You are on page 1of 2

15-2279 Summary

https://ecf.ca7.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=...

If you view the

Full Docket

you will be charged for 1 Pages $0.10

General Docket
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals Docket #: 15-2279
Nature of Suit: 4110 Insurance
Altom Transport, Inc. v. Westchester Fire Insurance Com, et al
Appeal From: Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division
Fee Status: Paid

Docketed: 06/15/2015

Case Type Information:


1) civil
2) private
3) Originating Court Information:
District: 0752-1 : 1:14-cv-09547
Trial Judge: Sharon Johnson Coleman, District Court Judge
Date Filed: 11/28/2014
Date Order/Judgment:
05/18/2015

1 of 2

Date NOA Filed:


06/15/2015

6/22/15, 10:43 AM

15-2279 Summary

2 of 2

https://ecf.ca7.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=...

06/15/2015

Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 06/29/2015.
Appellant's brief due on or before 07/27/2015 for Altom Transport, Inc. [1] [6670564] [15-2279] (CAG)

06/16/2015

A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different
counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief.
The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170
F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). DW [6670655] [2] [6670655]
[15-2279] (CAG)

06/16/2015

ORDER: Appellant Altom Transport, Inc. shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be
dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details)
[6670658] Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Altom Transport, Inc. by 06/30/2015. DW [3] [6670658]
[15-2279] (AD)

06/16/2015

ORDER: In the present case, plaintiff relies on diversity of citizenship for federal jurisdiction. However, appellants
Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement fails to identify the state of citizenship of defendant Michael Stampley. Appellant
must provide this information. It is insufficient, for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, to disclose the residency of
defendant Stampley; citizenship matters, not residency. See Meyerson v. Harrahs East Chicago Casino, 299 F.3d
616, 617 (7th Cir. 2002) (residency and citizenship are not synonyms). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that appellant
file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the omitted information. The statement is due on or before
06/23/2015. (See order for details). DW [4] [4] [6670680] [15-2279] (MM)

6/22/15, 10:43 AM

You might also like