Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Overview
Job Analysis is a process to identify and determine in detail the particular job duties and requirements and
the relative importance of these duties for a given job. Job Analysis is a process where judgements are
made about data collected on a job.
The Job; not the person
An important concept of Job Analysis is that the analysis is conducted of the Job, not the person. While
Job Analysis data may be collected from incumbents through interviews or questionnaires, the product of
the analysis is a description or specifications of the job, not a description of the person.
Purpose of Job Analysis
The purpose of Job Analysis is to establish and document the 'job relatedness' of employment procedures
such as training, selection, compensation, and performance appraisal.
Determining Training Needs
Job Analysis can be used in training/"needs assessment" to identify or develop:
training content
assessment tests to measure effectiveness of training
equipment to be used in delivering the training
methods of training (i.e., small group, computer-based, video, classroom...)
COMPENSATION
Job Analysis can be used in compensation to identify or determine:
skill levels
compensable job factors
work environment (e.g., hazards; attention; physical effort)
responsibilities (e.g., fiscal; supervisory)
required level of education (indirectly related to salary level)
SELECTION PROCEDURES
Job Analysis can be used in selection procedures to identify or develop:
job duties that should be included in advertisements of vacant positions;
appropriate salary level for the position to help determine what salary should be offered to a candidate;
minimum requirements (education and/or experience) for screening applicants;
interview questions;
selection tests/instruments (e.g., written tests; oral tests; job simulations);
applicant appraisal/evaluation forms;
orientation materials for applicants/new hires
Performance Review
Job Analysis can be used in performance review to identify or develop:
goals and objectives
performance standards
evaluation criteria
length of probationary periods
duties to be evaluated
==========================================
Job Analysis is a process to identify and determine in detail the particular job duties and requirements and
the relative importance of these duties for a given job. Job Analysis is a process where judgements are
made about data collected on a job.
There are two key elements of a job analysis:
1. Identification of major job requirements (MJRs) which are the most important duties and responsibilities
of the position to be filled. They are the main purpose or primary reasons the position exists. The primary
source of MJRs is the most current, official position description.
2. Identification of knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) required to accomplish each MJR and the quality
level and amount of the KSAs needed. Most job analyses deal with KSAs that are measurable, that can
be documented, and produce meaningful differences between candidates. Typically, possession of KSAs
is demonstrated by experience, education, or training. The goal of KSAs is to identify those candidates
who are potentially best qualified to perform the position to be filled; they are most useful when they
provide meaningful distinctions among qualified candidates. Source documents for KSAs may be the
position description, HRM standard qualifications and job classification standards.
==========================================
FIRST STEP --CLASSIFY THE JOB
Interview Outcomes
Interviewing is a flexible method for all levels and types of job. An interview may focus on what a
hypothetical job might involve.
Interviews generate descriptive data and enable job-holders to interpret their activities. A good interviewer
can probe sensitive areas in more depth. Structured questionnaires cannot easily do this. Jobholders can
give overviews of their work and offer their perceptions and feelings about their job and the environment.
Rigid questionnaires tend to be less effective where the more affective aspects of work are concerned.
However information from different interviews can be
hard to bring together
there is potential for interviewer bias
certain areas of the work may fail to be picked up
an interview may stress one area and neglect others.
there are problems in interpretation and analysis with the possibility of distorted impressions
the subjectivity of the data captured needs to be considered
Interviewing as the sole method of job analysis in any particular project has disadvantages. Interviews are
time consuming and training is needed. Co-counselling may remove the analyst and enable jobholders to
discuss work between themselves. Through inexperience however they may miss items and there is the
natural problem of people not establishing and maintaining rapport with each other during an interview.
Methods of Job Analysis
Several methods exist that may be used individually or in combination. These include:
review of job classification systems
incumbent interview
supervisor/direct boss interviews
expert panels [ direct boss/HRM/ others]
structured questionnaires
task inventories
check lists
open-ended questionnaires
job observations
incumbent work logs
A typical method of Job Analysis would be to give the incumbent a simple questionnaire to identify job
duties, responsibilities, equipment used, work relationships, and work environment. The completed
questionnaire would then be used to assist the Job Analyst who would then conduct an interview of the
incumbent(s). A draft of the identified job duties, responsibilities, equipment, relationships, and work
environment would be reviewed with the supervisor for accuracy. The Job Analyst would then prepare a
job description and/or job specifications.
The method that you may use in Job Analysis will depend on practical concerns such as type of job,
number of jobs, number of incumbents, and location of jobs.
===============================================
THIRD STEP ---ANALYSIS OF THE JOB.
What Aspects of a Job Are Analyzed?
Job Analysis should collect information on the following areas:
Duties and Tasks The basic unit of a job is the performance of specific tasks and duties. Information to be
collected about these items may include: frequency, duration, effort, skill, complexity, equipment,
standards, etc.
Environment This may have a significant impact on the physical requirements to be able to perform a job.
The work environment may include unpleasant conditions such as offensive odors and temperature
extremes. There may also be definite risks to the incumbent such as noxious fumes, radioactive
substances, hostile and aggressive people, and dangerous explosives.
Tools and Equipment Some duties and tasks are performed using specific equipment and tools.
Equipment may include protective clothing. These items need to be specified in a Job Analysis.
Relationships Supervision given and received. Relationships with internal or external people.
Requirements The knowledges, skills, and abilities (KSA's) required to perform the job. While an
incumbent may have higher KSA's than those required for the job, a Job Analysis typically only states the
minimum requirements to perform the job.
What does or should the person do?
What knowledge, skill, and abilities does it take to perform this job?
What is the result of the person performing the job?
How does this job fit in with other jobs in the organization?
What is the job’s contribution toward the organization’s goals?
Worker Functions. The relationship of the worker to data, people, and things.
Work Fields. The techniques used to complete the tasks of the job. Over 100 such fields have been
identified. This descriptor also includes the machines, tools, equipment, and work aids that are used in
the job.
Materials, Products, Subject Matter, and/or Services. The outcomes of the job or the purpose of
performing the job.
Worker Traits. The aptitudes, educational and vocational training, and personal traits required of the
worker.
Physical Demands. Job requirements such as strength, observation, and talking. This descriptor also
includes the physical environment of the work.
skills
abilities
knowledge
tasks
work activities
work context
experience levels required
job interests
work values/needs
==========================================
FIFTH STEP -- DEVELOPING JOB DESCRIPTIONS/JOB SPECIFICATIONS
There are as many different formats for job descriptions as there are jobs, but there are some basic
pieces of information that most job descriptions have. Include them in yours, if you feel they are
appropriate.
Job Scope . This section should contain a brief summary of the information found in more detail
elsewhere in the description. A summary shouldn't be more than a few sentences long and should explain
the main purposes and functions of the job.
Detailed duties and responsibilities. This is a more detailed description of the duties involved and
separates the essential functions of the job from the incidental job functions for purposes of the ADA.
Accountabilities. A list of outcomes, the position is responsible for.
Skills required to perform the job. This can include compensable factors such as education, experience,
and abilities.
Importance of job duties and tasks. Ranking the duties from most important to least important is a good
way to convey this information since the task that consumes the most time is not necessarily the most
important task. You can rank on a scale of one to 10, for example.
When and how often the tasks are performed. You might want to mention that certain tasks are only done
once a month, quarter, year etc.
Job environment. Job environments can impact significantly on workers' motivation and job satisfaction.
For example, it's a good idea to include in job descriptions factors like the fact that the work is done off-
premises, or mention the existence of hazards, noises, physical proximity of other employees, and
opportunities to communicate with other employees. Including these factors in the job description helps
job applicants better understand the requirements of the job and helps you select the best candidate for
the position.
Working Relationship. should include 1] direct reporting 2] dotted line communication 3]others.
Competencies.
KRA [ Key responsible areas]
KPA [ Key performance areas]
KPI [ Key performance indicators]
KPC [ Key performance criteria]
================================================================================
====
Job Specification Information
The first step in the program of job specification is to prepare a list of all jobs in the company and where
they are located. The second step is to secure and write up information about each of the jobs in a
company. Usually, this information includes:
1.Physical specifications
2.Mental specifications,
3.Emotional and social specifications
4.Behavioral specifications
Physical Specifications: Physical specifications include the physical qualifications or physical capacities
which vary from job to job. Physical qualifications or capacities include physical features like height,
weight, chest, vision, hearing, ability, to lift weight, ability to carry weight, health, age, capacity to use or
operate machines, tools, equipment etc.
Mental Specifications: Mental specifications include ability to perform, arithmetical calculation, to interpret
data, information blue prints, to read electrical circuits, ability to plan, reading abilities, scientific abilities,
judgment, ability to concentrate, ability to handle variable factors, general intelligence, memory etc.
Emotional and Social Specifications: Emotional and social specifications are more important for the post
of managers, supervisors, foremen etc. They include emotional stability, flexibility, and social adaptability
in human relationship, personal appearance including dress, posture, poise, features and voice required
by the job.
Behavioral Specifications: Behavioral specifications play an important role in selecting the candidates for
higher level jobs in the organizational hierarchy. This specification seeks to describe the acts of managers
rather than the traits that cause the acts. These specifications include judgments, research, creativity,
teaching, ability, maturity (capable of accepting responsibility) trial of conciliation, self-reliance (self-starter
sticks to own decisions), dominance (giving orders in a personal way) etc.
Employee Specifications
Job specifications information must be converted into employee specification information in order to know
what king of person is needed to fill a job. Employee specification is like a brand name which spells that
the candidate with a particular employee specification generally possesses the qualities specified under
job specification, for example, the employee with the educational qualification of MBA generally knows the
concepts, managerial skills like decision-making, inter-personal, leadership etc. However, the validity of
this assumption can be tested through selection procedure. Employee specification is useful to find out
the suitability of particular class of candidates to a particular job. Thus, employee specification is useful to
find out prospective employees (target group) whereas job specification is useful to select the right
candidate for a job. Employee specification information includes the following
1.Job Grade: Middle Management
2.Job Title: Credit Manager
3.Physical and Health: Normal health, able to visit factories, fields—able to walk extensively.
4.Energy Level and Temperature: High ability to adjust to increasing temperature
5.Appearance, Dress: Neat—suitable to traveling
6.Mental Abilities: Alertness, ability to read and perceive accurately.
7.Special Abilities: Flexibility, adaptability.
8.Special knowledge or Skills: Must know local language skills of conciliation, appreciation.
9.Skill in Operating Special Equipment: Driving two wheelers and light vehicles
10.Degree of Personal Traits.
11.Maturity: Must be capable of accepting responsibility to recover.
12.Self Reliance: Stick to own appraising decisions.
13.Dominance: Must dominate the field officers and branch managers.
14.Creativeness: Creative thinking in developing new schemes of advances and recovery.
15.Particular Skills: Calculating, analytical, interpretation, appraising etc.
16.Others.
Age
Sex
Educational Qualifications
Experience
Physical specifications: Height, weight etc
Social background
Family background
Extra-curricular activities
Hobbies
Some items of employee specification information are target for criticism. It is criticized that the privacy of
the employee may be affected if the information like social background and family background is asked
and taken into consideration to judge whether a candidate possess certain traits, behavioral specifications
and social specifications. However, the organization may adapt the counseling technique to solicit such
information rather than using application blank. And the organizations should give the benefit of doubt to
the candidate in judging the behavioral and social specifications basing on sex, family and social
background of the candidate. However, job analysis once applied is of great use of performing various
functions of HRM.
JOB EVALUATION
The aim of job evaluation is to provide a systematic and consistent approach to defining the relative worth
of jobs within a workplace, single plant or multiple site organisation. It is a process whereby jobs are
placed in a rank order according to overall demands placed upon the job holder. It therefore provides a
basis for a fair and orderly grading structure.
Job evaluation does not determine actual pay. That is a separate operation, normally the subject of
negotiation between management and employees or their trade union representatives. Only the job is
evaluated, not the person doing it. It is a technique of job analysis, assessment and comparison and it is
concerned with the demands of the job, such as the experience and the responsibility required to carry
out the job. It is not concerned with the total volume of work, the number of people required to do it, the
scheduling of work, or the ability of the job holder.
Several techniques of job evaluation have developed, varying in approach. Some involve an examination
of jobs according to criteria such as skill, responsibility and working conditions. Others are less complex.
Key Points: -
* It can help establish or maintain the credibility and acceptability of a grading system
* Job evaluation facilitates the accommodation of new or revised jobs into the grading structure
* It can be used by organisations as a basis for job matching and external pay comparisons
Job evaluation is used for all types of jobs both blue collar as well white collar . The concern for unit
labour costs makes it vitally important for organisations, operating in highly competitive markets, to
ensure that the grading level of their employees accurately reflects the relative importance of their jobs to
the organisation.
Properly introduced and maintained, job evaluation can help lay the foundation of fair and orderly pay
structures and thus improve relationships. Job evaluation may therefore be appropriate in the
circumstances.
Anomalies in the pay system/need for a pay structure
Job evaluation can help remove any anomalies or inequities in an organisation's payment system where
the existing grading structure is thought to place jobs in an arbitrary order with no justifiable or logical
reason. Job evaluation would help remedy this by providing a more structured basis for deciding grading
levels. However, job evaluation should not be introduced if the main reason is unrelated to the basic
grading structure, for example because a bonus and incentive scheme has fallen into disrepute.
Work restructuring within organisations may result in companies having fewer manual employees often
with a greater range of duties. In addition, new 'high tech' machinery may have altered traditional roles
and blurred the differences between 'operating' and 'craft' skills. All this may have the following effects on
existing grading systems:
• they may not be able to cope with the introduction of new jobs or new skills, with a likely increase in the
number of grievances about grading
• they may not be able to cope with any 'grade drift', with lower grades having less to do, while other jobs
may have drifted upwards, and
• there may be leap-frogging to catch up with pay rates elsewhere in the company, or outside.
Grading grievances
Frequent grievances or disputes over grading or pay may indicate that the existing grading structure is no
longer appropriate. If unresolved, such dissatisfaction could result in consequential pay claims, the
gradual erosion of differentials between grades, increased costs and deteriorating morale and
employment relations. A job evaluation scheme, properly designed and installed with an appeals
procedure, can help maintain the credibility and acceptability of a grading structure.
It is important to ensure that the grading system is appropriate to the needs of an organisation particularly
following technological and organisational change. Changes arising from new technology may affect jobs
in the following ways:
• employees may no longer have control over the quality and quantity of their output where the machine
dictates the pace
• mental effort may replace physical effort as an important factor for improving output
• employees may be required to do a number of activities previously carried out by others, and
• innovative and creative skills may be required which hitherto were not within the culture of the
organisation.
The introduction of flexibility, multi-skilling, team working and new operational methods also have
important consequences for job design and the way jobs are organised, and will clearly affect traditional
work groupings and pay structures. A further, important advantage of some job evaluation schemes is
that new jobs can be more easily fitted into the existing structure.
Discrimination
The Equal Pay Act and the Equal Pay (Amendment) Regulations, make it especially important to
maintain a fair and orderly grading structure. Job evaluation may be helpful as a means of ensuring that a
grading structure is fair and equitable.
Other benefits
Some job evaluation techniques require the analysis and description of jobs leading to a more detailed
and accurate knowledge of their content. This in turn may prompt:
• improved Human Resource Management through a greater understanding of the skills and training
needed for particular jobs, and
• a review of the organisation's structure and working methods, better designed jobs and the identification
of poor working conditions and job hazards.
Furthermore, when both employer, employees and their representatives have been jointly involved in a
job evaluation exercise, this usually leads to improved understanding, greater trust and better industrial
relations.
====================================
A more comprehensive approach is provided by the use of assessment centres. These incorporate a
range of assessment techniques and typically have the following features:
• Exercises are used to capture and simulate the key dimensions of the job. These include one–to–one
role–plays and group exercises. It is assumed that performance in these simulations predicts behaviour
on the job.
• Performance is measured in several dimensions in terms of the competencies required to achieve the
target level of performance in a particular job or at a particular level in the organization.
• Several candidates or participants are assessed together to allow interaction and to make the
experience more open and participative.
• Several assessors or observers are used in order to increase the objectivity of assessments. Involving
senior managers is desirable to ensure that they 'own' the process. Assessors must be carefully trained.
Assessment centres provide good opportunities for indicating the extent to which candidates match the
culture of the organization. This will be established by observation of their behaviour in different but
typical situations, and by the range of the tests and structured interviews that are part of the proceedings.
Assessment centres also give candidates a better feel for the organization and its values so that they can
decide for themselves whether or not they are likely to fit.
THESE CAN CONDUCTED IN-HOUSE OR OUTSOURCED.
===========================================================
The Approach
Starting from Scratch
5.Develop interim competency model–analyze data for themes and patterns and
look for differences between exceptional and standard performers.
EXPERTS have explored a wide variety of methods to describe leadership attributes. It has been found
that it takes four types of information to develop a solid understanding of executive candidates' strengths
and weaknesses:
1. Job Challenges
Job challenges are descriptions of the kinds of situations that an individual entering top management
should have experienced or at least had some exposure to. Examples include:
• Manage or become heavily involved with a merger, acquisition, strategic alliance, or partnership
opportunity.
• Complete an assignment with tight time and resource constraints (e.g., be first to market).
• Assume responsibility for growing, downsizing, reorganizing, or shutting down a unit or operation.
• Identify/Select talent.
• Without position power, lead a team or group through personal influence (e.g., project team, task force).
• Face a situation outside the individual's area of technical expertise, relying heavily on leadership skills.
• Deal with people from different disciplines, cultures, or countries who have diverse perspectives.
• Work with people outside the organization, such as government bureau representatives or special
interest groups.
• Develop others.
• Lead a formal meeting where attendees compose different functions within the organization.
• Manage a product.
Organizational knowledge refers to the understanding that managers have about how the various parts of
the organization operate. There are four components of organizational knowledge: functions; processes;
systems; and products, services, and technologies. Using this breakdown helps ensure that no important
knowledge areas are left out. (There is some overlap in the areas.)
Functions
To perform effectively, an executive must have at least a working knowledge of the company's functions
as well as how they interrelate. Examples of organizational functions include:
– International Operations
-Product Management or
Brand Marketing
-SALES
Processes
– Distribution
– Finance& Accounting
– Human Resources
Information Technology
(e.g., MIS)
– Engineering
Core Business Process–Activities that physically create a product or service that is of value to external
customers. A key source of competitive advantage, core business processes interact with internal or
external customers at the beginning and end of the process. For instance, the auto industry's core
process might be new car design, manufacturing, distribution, sales, and service.
Enabling Business Process–Produces outputs that act as the inputs to core processes. In other words,
the enabling process gives the core process the materials needed to operate. Examples of the enabling
business process include selection/recruitment (employee acquisition is the input to the core processes),
financial reporting (provides "feedback" input to the
core processes), sales training (sales representatives must obtain training to
do their jobs well ' ), and marketing (magazine and newspaper
advertisements, television commercials, corporate sponsorships of events).
Support Process–A pool of resources that is assigned to and shared by core and enabling processes.
Examples of support processes include information technology management, financial management,
employee orientation, and staff development.
Leaders need a thorough understanding of company processes to improve the efficiency, accuracy,
productivity, and quality of products and services. Many leaders lack the process orientation or knowledge
to be able to differentiate between process or system problems and people issues, Understanding these
processes will help in that assessment.
Systems
The third component of organizational knowledge is systems knowledge–the degree to which a manager
understands how the organization's internal systems–work. Organizational systems include:
The fourth component of organizational knowledge is familiarity with core products, services, and
technologies. Because senior managers often must deal with issues that cut across the total organization,
they need a working knowledge of these areas of the company.
Executive Competencies
Competencies (also known as dimensions) define clusters of behavior, knowledge, technical skills, and
motivations that are important to job success. Here are some executive–level competencies , along with
their definitions:
• Business Acumen–Understanding and utilizing economic, financial, and industry data to accurately
diagnose business strengths and weaknesses; identifying key issues and developing strategies and
plans.
• Change Leadership–Continuously seeking (or encouraging others to seek) opportunities for different
and innovative approaches to addressing organizational problems and opportunities.
• Coaching/Teaching–Providing timely coaching, guidance, and feedback to help others excel on the job
and meet key accountabih ties.
Communicating with Impact–Expressing thoughts, feelings, and ideas in a clear, succinct, and compelling
manner in both individual and group situations; adjusting language to capture the attention of the
audience.
Customer Orientation–Cultivating strategic customer relationships and ensuring that the customer
perspective is the driving force behind all value–added business activities.
Driving for Results–Setting high goals for personal and group accomplishment; using measurement
methods to monitor progress toward goal attainment; tenaciously working to meet or exceed those goals
while deriving satisfaction from the process of goal achievement and continuous improvement.
Energy–Demonstrating the physical and mental stamina necessary to meet the challenges of
organizational demands.
Entrepreneurship–Advancing own understanding and sharing insight regarding key market drivers;
actively using that knowledge to create/seize business and customer focus opportunities and/or expand
into new markets, products, or services.
Influencing Others–Using appropriate interpersonal styles and techniques to gain acceptance of ideas or
plans; modifying one's own behavior to accommodate tasks, situations, and individuals involved.
Learning Orientation–Demonstrating and encouraging in others a zeal for new knowledge, experiences,
and challenges; regularly creating and capitalizing on learning opportunities.
Managing the job–Effectively controlling one's job by planning time on priority goals, requirements, and
areas of opportunities.
Mobilizing Resources–Managing staff and resources consistent with organizational goals; proactively
negotiating and accessing resources outside of one's immediate domain when necessary.
Operational Decision Making–Relating and comparing; securing relevant information and identifying key
issues; committing to an action after developing alternative courses of action that take into consideration
resources, constraints, and organizational values.
Selling the Vision–Passionately selling an organizational strategy; creating a clear view of the future state
by helping others understand and feel how things will be different when the future vision is achieved.
Team Development–Using appropriate methods and interpersonal style to develop, motivate, and guide a
team toward successful outcomes and attainment of business objectives.
Valuing Diversity–Creates and maintains an environment that naturally enables all participants to
contribute to their full potential in pursuit of organizational objectives.
Executive Derailers
Executive derailers are personal attributes that can cause executives to fad even when they have all the
other necessary descriptors..
Approval Dependent
This derailer applies to executives who seek and need praise or reassurance from others, particularly
from people higher in the organization.
Argumentative (Defensive)
Executives with this derailer are skeptical, tense, and, perhaps, paranoid or suspicious. They are focused
on protecting their own interests and are likely to resist coaching and feedback.
Arrogant
This derailer applies to executives who are overly self–assured and confident. As a result, they tend to be
poor listeners, often dismissing ideas or feedback from others.
Executives with this derailer tend to be gregarious, charming, and persuasiveperhaps excessively so.
This can lead them to become melodramatic and selfpromoting.
Avoidant
While seeming pleasant and cooperative, these executives tend to be preoccupied with their own
agendas and might prefer to address issues covertly (avoiding more direct solutions). Thus, they can be
perceived as procrastinators or manipulative.
Eccentric
Executives with this derailer often are described as creative and, accordingly, different from others,
perhaps to the point of being unorthodox or even odd.
Imperceptive
This derailer describes executives who are not naturally inclined to read others' behavior, intent, and
motivations. They might not understand others'reaction to their own behavior.
Impulsive
This derailer applies to executives who are impatient, unpredictable, and inclined to act before
considering the consequences of their actions.
Perfectionistic (Micromanager)
These executives tend to micromanage. They are controlling and demanding of others.
Risk Averse
Executives with this derailer are described as indecisive, too deliberate, or reluctant to take unusual or
unconventional actions. They overemphasize the prospects of failure.
Volatile
These executives have difficulty controlling their emotions. They are often moody and quick to erupt in
anger.
A. Interpersonal
Skills
1.Communicating
with Impact
2.Cultural
Interpersonal
Effectiveness
3.Customer
Orientation
4.Developing
Strategic
Relationships
5.Persuasiveness
B. Leadership skills
6. Building organizational
Talents
7.Change Leadership
8.Coaching / Teaching
9.Empowerment / Delegation
10.Influencing Others
13.Business Acumen
14.Entrepreneurship
16.Global acumen
18.Mobilizing Resources
D. Personal Attributes
21.Adaptability
23.Energy
24.Executive Disposition
25.Learning Orientation
26.Positive Disposition.
5 Excels in all key actions; full mastery of all aspects of this competency.
4 Excels in some but not all key actions; has no significant development needs in any key actions.
3 Performs well in the more important/critical key actions; needs development in at least one or more
subtle or complex key actions.
2 Performs well in some key actions but has significant development needs in at least one key action.
1 Performs adequately in basic key actions but has significant development needs in several areas.