Professional Documents
Culture Documents
II.
At this stage we, the training design team and I, will take the agreed
upon objectives of the program and design an evaluation method that
best fits your needs. Specifically, we will be using a four-level model
(Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2006) to develop material that assesses
employee satisfaction and attitude, employee learning, and employee
changed behavior. This step allows your team to create the form of
assessment based on the desired outcome.
III.
IV.
Lastly, we will compile the data in order to analyze it. Most data
coming back to us will be gathered through surveys and
questionnaires. There will also be behavioral long-term data they may
be collected over months and analyzed at specific breaks in the fiscal
year (quarterly, semester, bi-annually, etc.)
D. Evaluation Framework
The following section will organize the recommendations from above using
timeframes and more detail.
What to
evaluate
How to
evaluate
Who collects
data
When will
data be
taken
Success?
1.
Employee
attitude
Attitude
surveygauges
employees
baseline
attitude
toward
company
as well as
during and
after POL
course.
Built-in
questionnaire
throughout
course
modules.
HR conducts
initial survey
through digital
media. JetBlue
Uni. conducts
further surveys
in course.
Within two
weeks of hire,
mid-course and
end of course.
Target goal80% of
employees
attitudes
towards
company has
improved, 100%
is same or
better than
baseline.
JetBlue
University
through digital
media.
At the end of
each course
module.
3.
Employee
adoption
of
company
culture
Formal
evaluation
using
designed form,
measures
following of
policies and
procedures.
Supervisor of
employee,
submitted
digitally to
JetBlue Univ. for
further
review/analysis.
4.
Employee
leadership
skills
1. Formal
evaluation
using
designed form.
2. Employee
submits
evidence of
professional
growth and
development
using
designed
location on the
company
website.
1. Supervisor of
employee,
submitted
digitally to
JetBlue Univ. for
further
review/analysis.
2. Employee
submits
evidence online
in a leadership
portal.
Quarterly,
starting after
POL course
completion for
one year. Then
bi-annually if
target goal was
met each
quarter.
1. Bi-annually
for the first
year of
employment,
annually in
consecutive
years.
2. On an
annual basis,
all years of
employment.
Target goal100% of
employees are
satisfied with
training
program.
Target goal90% of
employee
ratings are
between
satisfactory (3)
and exemplary
(4-being the
highest).
Target goal- 1.
90% of
employee
ratings are
between
satisfactory (3)
and exemplary
(4-being the
highest).
2. 100% of
employees
submit
minimum 40
hours of
leadership
development
experiences.
2.
Employee
satisfactio
n
Rationales:
1. A positive attitude toward company training programs will increase
motivation to learn and encourage acceptance of company policies
and culture. A survey will quickly and accurately display how each
new employee is feeling.
2. Satisfaction within the work environment and trainings offered will
keep morale high. This will decrease employee turnover, and
encourage a strong and healthy body of employees to support the
continuing growth of JetBlue Airways. A simple questionnaire
administered throughout the course of trainings can frequently
illustrate the overall drive of the employees.
3. In order for the employees to perform at their highest level they
must understand and accept corporate policies and procedures. A
formal evaluation sends the message to employees that JetBlue
Airways demands excellence of its staff. It also always supervisors
to engage with their new hires on a quarterly basis regarding their
performance and growth.
4. An increase in involvement and leadership within the company
illustrates an employees desire to have a positive influence in their
position, no matter what that may be. A formal evaluation, again,
displays the high expectations JetBlue Airways has of its employees.
The online portal for submitting leadership hours gives the staff
freedom and opportunities to get involved. It also encourages
continued growth and development, which can only benefit the
company.
References:
Horton, W. (2001). Evaluating E-Learning. The American Society for Training
& Development. Pg. 2.
Kirkpatrick, D.L. & Kirkpatrick, J.D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs. San
Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.