You are on page 1of 8

InfluenceMap Scoring Tables:

Corporations and Influencers


Here are our ranking tables of corporations and influencers (trade associations etc.)
on their influence on climate change policy. Progressive organizations supporting
climate policy are at the top of the table with obstructive ones at the bottom in the F
band. The names of the companies and influencers are hyperlinked back to our site.
The full interactive version is available here
14th September 2015

Corporations
InfluenceMap
Performance Band

Organization

Engagement
Intensity

Sector

Region

Google

18

Information Technology

North America

Unilever

49

Consumer Staples

Europe

Cisco Systems

21

Information Technology

North America

B-

GlaxoSmithKline

21

Healthcare

Europe

B-

Deutsche Telekom

16

Telecommunications

Europe

B-

National Grid

34

Utilities

Europe

B-

Vodafone Group

13

Telecommunications

Europe

C+

Nestle

25

Consumer Staples

Europe

C+

Apple

19

Information Technology

North America

C+

Vinci

18

Commercial Services

Europe

C+

Telefonica

20

Telecommunications

Europe

Johnson & Johnson

11

Healthcare

North America

Orange

11

Telecommunications

Europe

ABB

30

Industrials

Europe

InfluenceMap
Performance Band

Organization

Engagement
Intensity

Sector

Region

Coca Cola

18

Consumer Staples

North America

Hewlett Packard

14

Information Technology

North America

Iberdrola

42

Utilities

Europe

Mondelez International

Consumer Staples

North America

L'Oreal

15

Consumer Staples

Europe

PepsiCo

18

Consumer Staples

North America

Walt Disney

Media

North America

C-

Deutsche Post

21

Airlines and Logistics

Europe

C-

Qualcomm

12

Information Technology

North America

C-

Softbank

17

Telecommunications

Asia

C-

Siemens

20

Industrials

Europe

C-

Samsung Electronics

Information Technology

Asia

C-

Honda Motor

17

Automotive

Asia

C-

Microsoft

Information Technology

North America

C-

Philip Morris International

Consumer Staples

North America

C-

Nippon Telegraph &


Telephone

Telecommunications

Asia

C-

EDF

56

Utilities

Europe

C-

Novartis

Healthcare

Europe

C-

United Technologies

14

Industrials

North America

C-

Anheuser Busch InBev

10

Consumer Staples

Europe

C-

Express Scripts Holding

Healthcare

North America

D+

Walmart Stores

Retailing

North America

D+

Oracle

14

Information Technology

North America

D+

Amgen

Healthcare

North America

InfluenceMap
Performance Band

Organization

Engagement
Intensity

Sector

Region

D+

E.ON

48

Utilities

Europe

D+

Enel

36

Utilities

Europe

D+

United Parcel Service

12

Airlines and Logistics

North America

D+

Honeywell International

24

Industrials

North America

D+

Walgreens Boots Alliance

Retailing

North America

D+

Nissan

21

Automotive

Asia

D+

General Motors

16

Automotive

North America

D+

Moller Maersk Group

11

Airlines and Logistics

Europe

Pfizer

Healthcare

North America

DuPont

20

Chemicals

North America

Verizon Communications

Telecommunications

North America

IBM

10

Information Technology

North America

Hitachi

21

Industrials

Asia

Toyota Motor

16

Automotive

Asia

Sanofi

10

Healthcare

Europe

Suncor Energy

28

Energy

North America

BHP Billiton

23

Materials

Oceania

Airbus Group

18

Industrials

Europe

BMW Group

22

Automotive

Europe

General Electric

34

Industrials

North America

ENI

30

Energy

Europe

D-

Volkswagen

20

Automotive

Europe

D-

Royal Dutch Shell

45

Energy

Europe

D-

British American Tobacco

Consumer Staples

Europe

InfluenceMap
Performance Band

Organization

Engagement
Intensity

Sector

Region

D-

Daimler

19

Automotive

Europe

D-

Roche Group

Healthcare

Europe

D-

Hyundai Motor

12

Automotive

Asia

D-

Delta Air Lines

Airlines and Logistics

North America

D-

Intel

19

Information Technology

North America

D-

Boeing

13

Industrials

North America

E+

Home Depot

Retailing

North America

E+

Ford Motor

16

Automotive

North America

E+

Total

40

Energy

Europe

E+

Time Warner

Media

North America

E+

America Movil

Telecommunications

North America

E+

Bayer

28

Healthcare

Europe

E+

Rio Tinto Group

27

Materials

Europe

E+

Lukoil

12

Energy

Europe

E+

Dow Chemical

28

Chemicals

North America

E+

Schlumberger

12

Energy

North America

E+

Mitsubishi Corporation

13

Commercial Services

Asia

E+

Merck

10

Healthcare

North America

CVS Health

Retailing

North America

Cargill

16

Materials

North America

BASF

35

Chemicals

Europe

Hutchison Whampoa

Telecommunications

Asia

UnitedHealth Group

Healthcare

North America

AT&T

10

Telecommunications

North America

InfluenceMap
Performance Band

Organization

Engagement
Intensity

Sector

Region

Exxon Mobil

32

Energy

North America

Caterpillar

19

Industrials

North America

21st Century Fox

17

Media

North America

BP

37

Energy

Europe

E-

Procter & Gamble

Consumer Staples

North America

E-

Mitsui & Co

10

Commercial Services

Asia

E-

Chevron

38

Energy

North America

E-

Hon Hai Precision Industry

Information Technology

Asia

E-

Occidental Petroleum

15

Energy

North America

E-

Berkshire Hathaway

15

Industrials

North America

E-

Comcast

Media

North America

Phillips 66

14

Energy

North America

Duke Energy

28

Utilities

North America

Reliance Industries

10

Energy

Asia

Koch Industries

35

Energy

North America

Influencers
InfluenceMap
Performance Band

Organization

Engagement
Intensity

Sector

Region

C-

International Council of
Chemical Associations (ICCA)

Chemicals

Europe

C-

Alliance of Automobile
Manufacturers

19

Automotive

North
America

C-

Confederation of British
Industry (CBI)

43

All Sectors

Europe

C-

Confederation of Indian
Industry (CII)

19

All Sectors

Asia

D+

International Chamber of
Commerce (ICC)

21

Chemicals

Europe

German Automotive
Association (VDA)

16

Automotive

Europe

Eurelectric

31

Utilities

Europe

D-

Federation of Korean
Industries (FKI)

19

All Sectors

Asia

D-

Japan Chemical Industry


Association (JCIA)

22

Chemicals

Asia

D-

European Roundtable of
Industrialists (ERT)

20

All Sectors

Europe

D-

National Confederation of
Industry Brazil (CNI)

18

All Sectors

South
America

D-

International Federation of
Industrial Energy Consumers
(IFIEC)

35

Chemicals

Europe

D-

German Industrial Federation


(BDI)

42

All Sectors

Europe

D-

American Chemistry Council


(ACC)

26

Chemicals

North
America

E+

The Business Council of


Australia

28

All Sectors

Oceania

E+

Japan Business Federation


(Keidanren)

30

All Sectors

Asia

Business Roundtable

27

All Sectors

North
America

Business Europe

39

All Sectors

Europe

European Automobile
Manufacturers Association
(ACEA)

25

Automotive

Europe

German Chemical Industry


Association (VCI)

32

Chemicals

Europe

E-

European Chemical Industry


Council (CEFIC)

39

Chemicals

Europe

E-

US Chamber of Commerce

36

All Sectors

North
America

InfluenceMap
Performance Band

Organization

Engagement
Intensity

Sector

Region

E-

Federation of French Industry


(MEDEF)

39

All Sectors

Europe

National Association of
Manufacturers (NAM)

45

All Sectors

North
America

International Air Transport


Association (IATA)

25

Airlines and
Logistics

North
America

Canadian Association of
Petroleum Producers

28

American Petroleum Institute


(API)

34

Energy

North
America

American Legislative Exchange


Council (ALEC)

40

All Sectors

North
America

Global

Notes on Our Scoring


The Organization Scores
To measure and score corporate influence on climate change policy, we have developed a
comprehensive process of examining a series of publicly available and reliable data sources
(e.g. legislative consultations, respected press, CDP responses) and querying them, for each
corporation, against a set of climate change policy and legislation related queries (e.g.
position on a carbon tax, energy efficiency standards). We score each data source/query
intersection (or cell) on a 5-point scale, with clearly consistent evidence and guidelines for our
scorers. There are 96 such scoring cells at present and the Organizational Score for each
corporation is computed over these, by our proprietary algorithm that accounts for weightings
and irrelevant data sources/queries. The Organizational Score is expressed as a % with
100% representing very supportive influence on climate policy. We note here that a
corporation and an influencer (e.g. a trade body, chamber of commerce, advocacy group) are
scored in exactly the same way to arrive at their respective Organizational Score.

The Relationship Scores


A corporation, as well as its Organizational Score will have a Relationship Score. It is
computed by aggregating the Organizational Scores of the Influencers (trade bodies etc.) it
has relationships with, weighted by both the strength of these relationships and the relative
importance of the Influencers towards climate change policy. A corporation will have a
number of relationships with Influencers mapped in our database. In turn these Influencers
will themselves have organizational scores as computed by exactly the same method as was
done for the corporations. Such relationships vary in nature and strength and we account for
this in our assessment by assigning Relationship Strengths. For example a trade association
may have 2000 member corporations with 10 of them on its executive committee. The 10
Executive Committee members would have strength of 8 compared to 3 for the regular
members, for example.

The Performance Bands


For Corporations, the Organizational Scores and Relationship Scores are combined to result
in an Overall Rating that places the Corporation in a Performance Band. There are 20
performance bands from A+ (representing a total score from 95-100%) through to E- (a score
of 25-30%), with scores below 25% falling in the red "F" band. So it is a relative scale. Most
companies fall within the 45-55% band that indicates they are neither actively obstructing nor
supporting the climate policy process. A score of 60% or more indicates the company is
actively supporting polices and regulations towards a low carbon future. Conversely lower
than a 40% band generally indicates obstructing behavior. As different sectors face differing
regulatory issues, it is most useful to compare the Performance Bands of corporations within
the same sector.

Engagement Intensity
The engagement intensity is a metric of the extent to which the company is engaging on
climate change policy matters, whether positively or negatively. It is a number from 0 (no
engagement at all) to 100 (full engagement on all queries/data points. Clearly energy and
energy intensive users more affected by climate regulations will have a higher engagement
intensity than, for example retailers. So an organizations score should be looked at in
conjunction with this metric to understand the amount of evidence we are using in each case
to base our score on.
Full details on our scoring can be found here.

You might also like