You are on page 1of 3

________

No. 14- 9396


_________
IN THE

Supreme Court of the United States


___________
Cody Robert Judy,
Petitioner,
v.
Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et.al.,
Respondent(s)
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Supreme Court
For the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals
________

Petition for Full Review


________
Comes now the Petitioner before the Court, pro se, and respectfully submits,
pursuant to Rule 44, 43 (c) and Rule 29s Special Notifications -of the Rules of the
Supreme Court, this PETITION FOR FULL REVIEW and details the argument for this
Review to be granted as follows.
1- APPLICATION FOR STAY ON DENIAL PENDING FULL REVIEW ON THE RECUSAL OF
JUSTICE
SOTOMAYOR FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT AND KAGAN FROM PROCEEDINGS submitted
July 15th, 2015 has not been docketed or taken place. Petitioner has been denied
that Review and believes he is entitled to such a Review of the Motion Application.
Rule 43 provides For good cause in compelling circumstances the Court may take
testimony and (c) EVIDENCE

ON A

MOTION. When a motion relies on facts outside the

record, the court may hear the matter on affidavits or may hear it wholly or partly on
oral testimony or on depositions.

2- Petitioner should reasonably be assured that a Denial of his Motion to Proceed in


forma pauperis has not been dismissed by a Justice that has a conflict with the
proceeding in the first place.
3- Petitioner has been the subject of a Denial of Certiorari owing to his poverty and
Justice Sotomayors decision to deny such. Moreover, Petitioner has been denied the
Reconsideration of that Motion by the same which is wholly arbitrary and contrast
reasonably both the District Courts Decision as well as the 10 th Circuits Permission
to proceed in Forma Pauperis within the same calendar year.
The U.S. Supreme Court is then in opposition to the lower Courts Decisions
without any Reason. The Reconsideration has not been dismissed based on Rule
39.8.
4- The Petitioners Reconsideration to Proceed in forma pauperis was docketed as
denied October 5th 2015.
5- Petitioners Reconsideration was not subject to a Review of the Full Court, but was
rather simply dismissed by the same Justice that denied his original Motion and is
charged with the duties of the 10th Circuit Court.
6- Without a Review by the Full Court, the poor of the Nation are subject to a
#WarOnPoor and an indiscretion of Justice, and by the Justices that is in dispute with
[Justice For All].
7- Petitioner provides the Motion to Recuse Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan and
prays that his Application for a Stay on Denial Pending a Full Review on the Recusal
of Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan submitted July 25 th, 2015 which the Court
has ignored and not docketed will be considered as unfinished business constituting
a reprieve of the closure of the Case under Special Notifications set apart in Rule
29 in this Request for a Full Review.
Signed and Submitted this ___th Day of October, 2015.
Cody Robert Judy Pro Se. _________________

DECLARATION of MAILING CERTIFICATE AFFADAVIT


In compliance with 28 U.S. C. 1746, reciting the facts and circumstances of
service in accordance with U.S. Supreme Cr. Rule 29 (c) I do hereby declare under
penalty of law that I mailed, via 1st class U.S. Mail and Email, a true and correct copy
of the forgoing:
1 PETITION FOR FULL REVIEW
Postage pre-paid, to the RESPONDENT(s), by and through Counsel(s) of
Record at:

And also: The Court & Solicitor General of the United States at:
Solicitor General of the United States
Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. ,
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Barack Hussein Obama aka Barry Soetoro et. al, Case No. 14-9396
U.S. Supreme Court
1 First Street N. E.
Washington DC 20543 meritsbriefs@supremecourt.gov

On this

th Day of October, 2015.

Signature of Mailer /s/Cody Robert Judy

Judy v. Obama et. al.,