'4th article' added by the catholic bishop Jean Baptist Pompallier is interesting. Article one describes the queen's responsibility to maintain order and peace. Article two states that full possessions of land, fisheries and things held dare are still owned by Maori.
'4th article' added by the catholic bishop Jean Baptist Pompallier is interesting. Article one describes the queen's responsibility to maintain order and peace. Article two states that full possessions of land, fisheries and things held dare are still owned by Maori.
'4th article' added by the catholic bishop Jean Baptist Pompallier is interesting. Article one describes the queen's responsibility to maintain order and peace. Article two states that full possessions of land, fisheries and things held dare are still owned by Maori.
From this reading I made the following observations and recognized them to be significant. I find the 4th article added by the catholic bishop Jean Baptist Pompallier to be interesting. The governor says that the several faiths or beliefs of England, of the Wesleyans, of Rome and also of Maori custom shall alike be protected by him. In summery this states the freedom to practice religion and beliefs under the protection of the law. A bi-cultural country where native and non-native beliefs are equally accepted. This section is not officially recognized as part of the treaty and there is mixed information around whether it should be. Most information found online acknowledging the 4th article tend to be from organizations and people who follow the Catholic faith and often it is referred to as a verbal agreement. However if in fact is was part of the signing my personal reflection of this is that it has not been upheld. There are many aspects of culture and belief within Maori that have been oppressed and are not recognized as being correct or are against the common law in todays society. Partnership: Article one In this article of the treaty it describes the queens responsibility to maintain order and peace and that she has sovereignty over the country, however in the Maori translation there is no word for this and it is translated to mean otherwise. I cannot comprehend how this transliteration is still bound as our countrys founding article and holds up in a court of law as true and transparent when there is so many language misinterpretations. Many English words had no Maori equivalent at the time of the signing and this has now resulted in the many wars and settlements claims we face today. It is apparent that article one and four are the most controversial due to the hearsay, misinterpretations and lack of substantial evidence on the fourth articles existence.
Crystal Walker MAOR5050 Understanding Te Ao Maori
Participation: Article two
States that full possessions of land, fisheries and things held dare are still owned by Maori. However Maori have to offer land titles to the crown first if ever the land is to be sold. Due to the increasing populations and colonization of New Zealand a large amount of pressure was being forced upon Maori and in some cases it was a necessity to sell their land in order to survive. By these terms they were forced into the sale of land and in some situations under very unfair circumstances, resulting in a loss of land and a huge change in social structure. Protection: Article 3 Explains that the same rights and protection is shared for British settlers and Maori. The queen protects all of New Zealand and the laws apply to all equally. Through the trade industry many Maori had travelled to other parts of the world, in particular Australia. The Aborigines refused this protection from the queen and as a result were oppressed and extradited from their lands. In my personal reflection of this article I wonder if this was an offer of protection or a threat should Maori not adhere to the terms of the crown.
Reference: Moorfield, T. M., Moorfield, J. C., Reilly, M. P., & Mosley, S. (2004). Ki te Whaiao : An Introduction to Maori Culture & Society.
(Advances in Political Science) David M. Olson, Michael L. Mezey - Legislatures in The Policy Process - The Dilemmas of Economic Policy - Cambridge University Press (1991)