Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Well, I want you to talk about the places that you've been recently and
the kind of challenges those local communities face on Interfaith
Alliances key issues.
[JM]: Thanks, yeah, have actually been doing a lot of traveling the last
couple of weeks. I've had an opportunity to meet with our folks in
Denver, Colorado - the Interfaith Alliance of Colorado. Jay Keller from
our office and I went up to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania for the tenth
anniversary of Interfaith Alliance of Pennsylvania. And now here I am
in Ocala, Florida - the Marion County Interface Alliance.
And what we're finding is that many of the same issues we're dealing
with nationally - religious freedom, Islamophobia, and just the bad
behavior of people with extreme religious views - are things that are
being dealt with on a local level, as well. But they have their own
issues, too. You know that our affiliates have a little more latitude in
defining their agenda than we seek to impose on them, which is the
right thing to do - religious freedom is a local issue.
And so to folks in Pennsylvania were working hard on making sure
that the right kinds of representation on the Supreme Court came to
pass, and indeed they have justices who will uphold a genuine
religious freedom agenda.
The folks in Denver are working on religious freedom legislation
they're hoping to prevent that hasn't reached the state house yet. It's
been blocked before, and they're hoping to do that again.
And here in Ocala, I have the privilege of speaking so far with a group
of students at at the College of Central Florida who were very very
concerned about understanding Shari'a law, and what its impact,
what its engagement is, in the American scene. Very, very intelligent
questions from this community college class.
[WG]: Are there aspects of what you have seen and what you've
heard that cause a light bulb to go off and you say, you know, that is
really information we need in the national office, and I think we can
benefit from giving some attention to this?
[JM]: So, I think it has reinforced what we hope to embark on very,
very soon, which is developing - for lack of a better term - metrics to
measure religious freedom in the United States generally, and stateby-state. That we are having a conversation about something that
everybody is defining for himself or herself, and we really need to
understand what religious freedom means, and how it's being
practiced in the individual states. And the very fact that I'm hearing
similar but not identical concerns in all these places I've been leads
me to believe that if we're ever going to get to the root of this, we in
Interface Alliance have an opportunity to create a conversation that
will sort of level the playing field and allow people to compare apples
to apples.
[WG]: And tell me, Jack, what are the apples? What are the items we
need to compare?
[JM]: We need to be able to look at all of these mini-RFRAs, these
mini-Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, and be able to say, These
provisions are applicable in a constitutionally defined society, and
these provisions are nothing more than an excuse for religious
discrimination. And rather than taking aim like we're a whack-a-mole
gallery, at fifty different versions of this legislation, if we least knew
what we were talking about, we would be able to say: There's a good
one in that state over there, and there's one that isn't so good in that
state on the other side.
[WG]: Interfaith Alliance provides five questions that voters and
people who are thinking about voting need to ask political candidates:
What role will your faith or values play in creating public policy or
making appointments? To the candidate: What are your views on the
boundaries between religion and government? What steps will you
take to protect the rights of your constituents regardless of faith or
belief? How will you speak about your beliefs without making them
just another political tool? How will you balance the principles of your
faith and your obligation to defend the Constitution - particularly if the
two come into conflict?
Every voter has a right to know what every candidate feels about
those five questions. Talk about, Jack, the initiative to get those
questions in front of the candidates campaigning in communities all
across the nation.
[JM]: So those are the five questions, and they're extraordinarily
important for individuals to ask candidates, because mostly what we
hear when people are asked about religious faith are ridiculous
questions about Bible verses and who's middle of the road and whos
side of the road and that sort of stuff. But the real issues are the
same issues, frankly, that we talked about when the pope made his
visit to Congress. And that is that legislators need to legislate on the
basis of the Constitution; on the basis of state and local law; and not
on the basis of religious faith.
Much of the conversation we have about these kinds of concerns are
more about whether the candidate who is campaigning is like me,
rather than whether the candidate is campaigning is going to be a
4
good legislator. And those five questions are designed to sort of ferret
out the role that religious faith plays in the individual candidates life,
and to make the point - subtly and, I think, politely - that our
expectation is that a legislator is going to legislate, and not
pontificate.
[WG]: Jack, have you, in listening to the debates of the respective
parties and just what you've heard on new shows, is there any
candidate that is getting it right - whether or not the questions have
come from Interfaith Alliance or from some other source?
[JM]: I'm discouraged by what I've heard from moderators - and not
just on this question of religious freedom; we haven't really heard any
of the moderators on the debates on either side of the aisle talk about
the issues that we're concerned about. In fact, we've sort of
bemoaned the fact that we haven't been able to tweet anything out
from these debates because there's really nothing said on the issues
that we're concerned about. So what I think will be right is if the model
of the moderator who is well prepared with the facts and asking
questions rather than provoking challenges will create a conversation
among candidates that will help people understand who's going to
lead and how they're going to lead.
And I would hope that, more importantly, the leadership in both
parties, Democrats and the Republicans both, would be ready to
repudiate within their own party inappropriate comments about faith,
about the role of faith in our civic life, and about the inappropriate
depiction of a particular kind of religious culture in America.
[WG]: We've always been concerned about whether a candidate has
sensitivity to the diverse communities of different religions that are in
our nation, and whether or not that sensitivity motivates them to say
5
invited to offer a blessing to the Obama and Biden families before the
2013 presidential inauguration.
Rabbi Moline has authored two books and has contributed to many
publications. He is a popular speaker and has offered commentary on
PBS, CNN, CBS, Fox News, the Washington Post, National Journal,
Huffington Post and other news outlets.
Rabbi Moline is a graduate of Northwestern University (School of
Communications, 1974). He studied to become a rabbi at the
University of Judaism (now the American Jewish University) in Los
Angeles and the Jewish Theological Seminarys (JTS) Jerusalem and
New York campuses. Ordained in 1982, he received an honorary
doctorate from JTS in 2012. He became full-time rabbi and part-time
Jewish chaplain at the Federal Correctional Institution in Danbury,
Connecticut upon ordination. In 1987, he became rabbi of Agudas
Achim Congregation of Northern Virginia, in Alexandria.
Rabbi Moline is a long-suffering supporter of the Chicago Cubs. He
lives in Alexandria, VA with his wife of 37 years. He is the father of
three grown children and the proud grandfather of one.
10
11
12
13