FINAL RETROSPECTIONS

A post-mortem piece by Sophie Miriam-bat Y'israel, formerly known as 'Autphag'.

Drafted through months Novrember 2015, December 2015, and January 2016

Dedications:
Catherine, a transgender Minichan user, in light of her apology towards former
disbelief of me.
Sapphire, the other partner of my perfidious ex-fiance, also a transwoman, again
for her faithful belief, emotional support, and abundant devotion in investing
much-needed attention during my time of disarray and overwhelming need.
Negi Springfield a.k.a. Travis Westphall, an amazing and beautiful writer of two
forewords to my previous manifesto works, and well read, scholarly Rabbinical
sage into Tanakhical and Talmudean thematics, for his wealth of insight into
matters of ecclisiastic and political import.
My mother, whom I couldn't live to see made genuinely happy by the fruits of
breaking into becoming the true self renewed.
Janice, whom I'm actually pained to see drift off in the deterioration of our rapport;
another brave Aspergian transwoman fighting the kakistocracy of the Cohenim. We
began failing to see mutually at eye's level towards our latter day. The primary
contention was as silly as our sexual divergences: I being predominantly straight,
with her, a lesbian.
Pawel, again, another lamentable drift into an all too reflective abyss of having
become the very pet-peeve against that which we'd initially railed in tandem -- my
gender-incongruence rubbed frictionally abrasive of his Orthodox Christianity
rooted in Slavonic tradition, ergo, he'd cut all ties. Despite this, once more, an
otherwise excellent conversational partner without contention or fault.
Introman, a connoisseur of the chans, his claim to fame having been a successful
and suitably apt Chris-chan troll, and rather contrary face in what had been hitherto
an overcompensating den of autistics-in-denial. He had also, in an again contrarian
twist against the tide of universal anti-sperg sentiment, argued for the merits and
legitimacy of the Autphag screeds, then under an anonymized alias before my
outing. Understanding the trenchant nature with which a political understanding
had been conveyed therein, introman had endeared towards, with growing respect
for, my presence on then-/cwc/ and later-/cow/.
Alexander Gillapsie, for his invaluable assistance in editing this draft of the work,
spending countless nights on a number of grammatical rectifications, spelling
corrections, and phraseological optimizations.
INTRODUCTORY FOREWORD

The beginning is probably the best place from whence one should always start,
seeing as it is, per its name sake, the earliest of our days, whoever you might be --
as truistically trite as that all may seem.

I'm going to be clear with you. My early childhood was a sham, wherein my
mother was pressured by a bureaucrat in the employ of the state healthcare
bureaucracy, a so-innocuously-called 'health worker' whose intents were to set me
on a path most contrary thereto, to chase a psychiatric diagnosis for what was
really the product of childhood abuse that, although she had, in this, no active
participation, was all too complacently ascented by her.

This was in the early 1990s, when an expansionist agenda of state education
bureaucrats had been partially fuelled by radical feminist academics that had
intersected the fields of psychiatry and education, to revive a long-stagnant
diagnosis that was frankly rare in the past. It's usually current statistic trends that
inform the morally judgemental mores suceessive thereto which govern our sense
of what's aberrant and typical. I'm not convinced, therefore, that there was a solid
precedental basis with high predictability for the largely manufactured, and I'd go
on to verge upon saying, deliberately imagined "epidemic".

It is for this reason that, whatever my mother may ramble maniacally in her
protestations of its legitimacy, I can't find, resultant to my relative normalization
outwith her influence in recent years, it in me to suspend disbelief.

I've been a lamentable victim of the system even in its most benign of pretences as
an aider and remediator. Behind this veneer, has been nothing but the heartbreak of
indifference for deeper answers, beneath their convincing and faith-eliciting
enticingness. The talisman of the diagnosis was returned to in recourse of
explaining everything, even despite, rather annoyingly, the ever-stacking
inconsistencies slowly accumulating.

Then, we have clearly a misinference caused by a fallacy of reverse-causality

contrivically drawn to enforce what was most evidently a conspiracy. Natural
statistic emanations were no longer informing moral judgement, but the use of the
latter's arbitration was being deliberately applied in the manipulation of statistical
trends. And 'autism', like the rest of the demonic revival of psychiatry, a phoenix
that should've never arisen anew, was born.

As both the Aspie I might tentatively be (this re-diagnosis was made later -- circa
2008 -- but I consider this to be a more legitimate summation of my condition in
light of the social context in the same way 'autism' was just a spiteful and conceited
stab in the dark) and the autist that I most certainly am not, not because I fail to
acknowledge the coincidentiality of the former condition's spectral relation to the
latter, but rather on the matter of nuance being significant enough for the former to
constitute a different entity entirely, I can't help but take these considerations with
the analytical depth that I regard nearly everything else. Even with my reading
comprehension, especially on low-contrast screens, being gradually rended asunder
as I struggle to tackle even the simplest of matters unless they involve something
to my immediate interest rather than being a strictly systematic discipline (these
days, in a complete turn-around from the past, I'm more likely to entertain a
sociology textbook than an article on some arcane computing concept from
Wikipedia), with those concepts most deeply embedded in my passion and closest
to my familiarity will I be driven to perserverate all available and exhaustable
routes of their contextualization.

It is in this vain that I proceed forward with this piece.

HOW A NEO-MATRIARCHAL AGENDA USES SEXUAL

INTERSECTIONALITY AS A TOOL OF ENHANCEMENT IN ITS
SYSTEMICALLY OPPRESSIVE ARBITRATION

The neo-matriarchal agenda has been partially elucidated in past criticisms of

diversitarian movements I've written, in particular where diversity meets neurology
to make the Trotskyistically neologized 'neurodiversity' movement. The
matriarchal agenda, boasts one Queer critical theory writer, one particularly
obnoxious individual who adorns itself the alias 'decibelmilliwatts' of Minichan,
boasts of its natural threat to a sense of civilization rooted in a tradition of genuine
forward-orientation that didn't define itself under vapid parameters of arbitratrily-
deemed 'progressive' metrics, such that our obsession with the concepts of
progressivism and progessiveness has become distilled down to.

In what way does, through its boasting, it qualify itself as having this purportedly
unique position to engage in such tactics of subversion? Supposedly, it regards
itself adept, through no more than a delusional tropology rooted in the very
tradition that it derides, in realms of the intangible for which no meritocratic
demonstration could be made: the spiritual, the natural, the essential.

These Queer theorists further tout their ability to see the non-arbitrary nature of
systematic oppression as if this was a legitimate criticism of theirs in observance of
the system's iniquity and not merely a point with which they wish to
opportunistically exploit.

Though they point with seeming trenchance to the supposed strategies of those
they come to seemingly debunk, the acuity with which any observation could be
made in identifying those points of the system strategically expendient to itself
betrays their sense of anti-authoritarian railing, for only one with the intention to
identify points of strength -- especially with the implication for their future
utilization in their hands -- could ever acknowledge that these systematic structures
exist without revealing the 'tu quoque' nature of their centrally defined point of
contention; to put simply, it merely speaks of a jealousy of and aspiration to power,
rather than a railing against its stead.

Let's not be naive. The identification of marginalized groups and their fictionalized
degradation, itself a somatic hypochondriasis in the collective, as specific products
of such a system in their contemptuous and disdainful regard, is merely a starting
point for their (Queer, Trotskyist fifth-columnist) agitative efforts, the target
demographic thereof, if you will.

Whether those be women -- whose persecution, mistaken as starting from the

Burning Times, itself arrogantly absolved themselves of their own responsibility in
causing, as if withcraft never existed -- or other groups traditionally associated an
unearned stereotypically 'submissive' position to such an imagined power as the
patriarchy, non-existent in its preponderance as stands extant indeed, it would seem
as if every minoritarian entity or group *must* be excused for something (entirely
of their own self-beckoned creation), especially in their convenient place as targets
of violence and oppression, as if to incorrectly beg the question of such a systemic
phenomena's causality: surely, that is to say, were we to cease pretending that
minoritarian entites are victims, where would this violence and oppression we
contrive into existence be identifiable, no longer to serve as a boogeyman,
excusing the ills of minoritarian agitation against much-necessitated (and frankly,
having exposed that delusion, non-patriarchal) normative, functional frameworks?
The truth is that we would naturally come to conclude such systemic oppression's
non-existence, at least for these self-anointed minoritarian entites, to be further
elucidated of its real target: the deserved meritocratic superiors of our time.
A more fabricated idea than the 'Eurocentrism' that has been incorrectly identified
as the perpetrator, and not merely the cultural canvas for their out-playing by
external forces (International neo-Judaism i.e. 'Sion' comes to mind), of these
iniquities, is the idea that they had merely excused their much needed expansion,
predicated on the merits of their intellectual fruits, on the basis of arbitrary metrics
of melanin tone, the 'need to suppress femininity' (despite being arguably the fact
of it being the most physiologically feminine race in and of itself largely being the
reason for its intellectual success neurobiologically, g being mostly predicated by a
function of decent White/Grey matter ratio over a protracted area of brain, as
opposed to the grey-matter dense, Extreme-Male Autistoform Mongoloids, and the
microcephalic, hypermyelinitic, Schizoform negroids), and most self-centrically a
testament to the hypocirsy of the Queer and its self-obsession with an adorned
persecution complex fetish, the idea that they themselves are amongst the putative
"oppressed groups" by the afore-accused.

Why do they so obsessively regard themselves to be an object of the machinations

they attribute to an imagined Eurocentric regime? Perhaps we should begin with
their arrogantly imagined self-ascribed characteristics, very telling of the group's
natural chauvinism, about the only thing remotely "natural" about them -- using
this term in the sense that statistical majoritarian occurences do inform the norms
of moral judgement, correctly and non-fallaciously so as has been a line of
reasoning explicated since Plato discussed the matter.

In fitting with the delusionally hallucinated emergence of a non-existent

'patriarchal' society, so they pretended that society as before had existed as
anything more than a prehistoric hodgepodge of disparate tribes, over which they
presume immediate dominion by virtue of their self-ascriptions. They
domineeringly poise the preposterous suppositions of their impoartance as the
spiritual gatekeepers of the 'natural' to excuse the unnaturalness of their act. To
quote one delusional Queer theorist:

"Before the rise of patriarchal civilization, queers were the political,

spiritual, and medicinal adepts of pretty much all "uncivilized" nature
societies. We quite literally hold the balance between male and female
energies. We have mediated these forces since the dawn of time. In a world
increasingly focused on "black vs white" "women vs men" "gay vs straight"
"trans vs cis" "Christian vs ...everything else" "Democrat vs Republican"
"western power vs eastern power" "privileged vs unprivileged" "civilized vs
wild", we need these natural mediators more than ever.
 Queers have an indispensable quality unlike any other group of people -- we
transcend boundaries and categories. We exist in every culture, every skin
tone, every religion, every nation, and every family. We cannot be
exterminated by genocide. We are not bound by blood but liberated by spirit.
We have always existed to hold the balance of the natural forces in this
world. We are the gatekeepers between this life and the next. When our
power is respected, there can be peace rather than conflict. Mediation leads
to understanding, not war.

Queer people are not a novelty. Queerness is not about sex anymore than life
itself is about sex. The liberation of queer people stands for bringing balance
and peace back to a world that's been knocked /way/ out of whack. This isn't
about marriage. This isn't about monogamous love. This isn't about the
nuclear family.

Queers are literally killed by their own families and communities in many
parts of the world today. Many first world queers are allowing themselves to
be distracted by recent efforts for greater ease of assimilation. We as queers
have a purpose and responsibility to represent a world family not tied by
culture, blood, appearance, or ideology. We are uniquely qualified to
represent humanity as a whole to bridge categories and divisions to mediate
between groups to solve conflict and reclaim peace to hold the balance."
-- Decibelmilliwatts, posting anonymously on Minichan

There have been commited a number of faux-pas by the admitted standards of its
own sociologically analytical rubrics, the ones with which they use to deconstruct
ideas that have been central to the underpinning of societal and ideological
cohesion, and nonsensicalize them in their relgation to a status of non-existence,
for instance with the essentiality of biological sex and gender, amongst other
things. The axiomatic presumption of their preponderance in the absence of prior
power structures to which they succeed being necessarily more 'innocent' than
those having come before them, is one rooted in a folly of an essentialistically
existentialist arrogance, about the only thing unique to the community.

It is clear that in blurring such evidently essential distinctions, able to surmount

them with categories they've uniquely created through this rearbitration,
reappropriation, and dissimilation from assimilation (code for rumbunctious
disobedience and subversionist agitation), then they has indeed placed themselves
amongst a uniquely anointed status, of covertly accrued control. If they are the sole
appointed mediators, bridgers, peacekeepers, and so forth, with no intervention,
accountability, oversight, or foresight in the presence of iniquities that'll inevitably
arise with such an exlcusive status, even if they try to deny their capacity for such
with flowery talk of essential innocuousness, then they are, truly with impunity,
able to arise merely as a neo-matriarchal "counter-balance", really counter-
oppression, in the stead of that which they had projected onto the supposed
patriarchy that had preceded them.

Such a negroidal cur group has no place intersectionalizing itself at the impasse of
multiple gender-sex categorizations, especially when this particular author had
been guilty of denying their very existence by invoking karotypical, genotypical
and phenotypical sexual anomalies on one thread (XXY Kleinfelter's, SRY-gene
induced androgen insensitivity and so forth), in a continued effort to contradictorily
deconstruct normative categorizations, the main tool with which it imposes its
presuppositions of the world. Without a frame of reference with which to hold it
accountable, so it can metamorphize itself into anything it wants to be. The social
reptillianism inherent in the neuro-psychology of such a movement should be
regarded inherently suspect; it can be indicative at once of the most neurofeminine
of schizophrenias and simultaneously, the most neuromasculine of psychopathies,
in about the only sense it could legitimately be at the impasse of two gender-sex
incongruential manifestations, ala Charles Manson say, a diagnosed schizophrenic
psychopath himself.

Remarks itself, so the Queer only defines itself by its insanity in so tacit a self-
admission.

THE REAL NATURE OF MATRIARCHAL PERSECUTION ELUCIDATED

It has been well-observed that any victimization of women is largely self-

beckoned, self-induced and generally just 'brought on themselves', for want of less
need for continuous emphasization of what should be plaintively obvious. Routine
Activity Theory, developed by Californian sociological crimonologists, postulates
in a relationship where the occurence of crime is the product of three opportune
conditions, namely a lack of appropriate guardianship presiding over the potential
criminal perpetrator, a suitable perpetrator, and commensurately so a target, with
the additional factor of temporal-spatial relationship opportunisticness, so it can be
assumed that the targeted individual, for want of a better word in fearing its
unwarranted appropriation from more legitimate uses like in gang-stalked
individuals (a frankly more serious crime than matriarchal persecution-fetish
histrionics e.g. the misnomously named 'rape culture'), largely has the choice in
victimhood, by virtue of the volition to its avail in placing themselves within those
mostly open opportunities of circumstance i.e. locii of crime.

Essentially, women can choose to be victims at whim and will, and most often
times likely deliberately forge themselves such a niche for the convenient social
leverage afforded to them by this.

This self-victimization thus constitutes an inverse power relationship, a covert

switching between victim and offender, where, it can be observed, the buoyancy of
victimhood as its accorded legal protections affords them as 'protected groups', so
they become the new power-group, wielding their victimhood as a weaponized up-
stratifying apparatus of power. It is hence that matriarchal power is born; from the
histrionics of perceived, yet non-existent, persecution by 'patriarchal power', which
is accordingly scapegoated, legitimating and justifying a reaction rooted in
"rectification" of those previously indifferent relationships' retroactive re-
examination as iniquities, i.e. imagined wrongs against womankind, that are
typically over-corrected, as to doubly inflict wrongdoing, in the other direction.

Matriarchal power is merely thus an extension of its patriarchal counterpart, largely

forged into existence by themselves.

A power relationship that can be venn-diagrammatically subsumed under an

opportune abuse of factorial circumstances in which abuses sustained become
honour-trophies wielded as marks of "persecution" in a maniacal, fetishistic and
feverish fashion, under which is subsumed the greater societal circumstance which
is held false blame there-under, so feminist enslavement of society can be thus
explained.

The patriarchal delusion now-scapegoated becomes a cover for a more insidious

bait-and-switch. Qua feminism, women are accorded excess legislative, judiciary
and enforcement power, largely concealed by not only the pretence of patriarchal
hegemony but is additionally misdirected, as a 'natural consequence of female
assimilation', such nonsense of female usurpration being mistaken for assimilation
only being that which could come from the horseshit (to excuse the author's
French) of an intellectual's mouth, particularly a feminist one.

Women engage in societal-scale D.A.R.V.O. as a consequence -- an acronym that

stands for 'Denial of Aggression and Reversal of Victim and Offender'. I'd like to
recall personal anecdotal examples in the most brief way before continuing: a
female officer was responsible for illegitimately restraining me in an Accident and
Emergency room despite there being no attempt to escape, merely responding to a
call for triage. She became indignant and used her psychopathic social prowess to
manipulate and wind-up a low-functioning neurotypical male 'feminine pad', whom
I call her colleague (I think to say that the police are universally low-functioning
but otherwise guileful is a fair statement), into sharing her largely hysterical,
misplaced indignation, to be offloaded in sadistic restraint and antagonization
against me. I was to learn that in advance, she had herself made a temporary detour
to the psychiatrist's offices to spread calumny and pre-ordain their conclusions
about the presentation of my behaviour not being a consequence of her passive-
aggressive shit-stirring, pleading with them to displace it onto me, hence the non-
sequitur, ersatz nonsense statement that had to be constructed, "an inability to
address questions directly suggests high aggression". Illogical by all indications of
psychiatric theory -- nothing about Asperger linguistic malpragmatism is connected
to another coincidentally autistic trait, they co-exist, and that's about the entirety of
their relation. I so-call them 'non-sequitur' because there indeed is no necessary
relationship for one to follow from the other. Thus, it's nothing they'd truly
observed in me. They were excusing her Machiavellian wiles, though it would also
point to a wider implication, as I'd mentioned earlier in the work, of Asperger's
mostly contrived existence as a tool of feminist down-stratification aggressed
against certain groups of undesirables (in the National Socialist, "Lebensunwertes
Leben" sense), particularly males. (Well, why else for one would it exist, and for
another, it be overdiagnosed in that contingent, to be simultaneously
underdiagnosed, along with factor-2 psychopathy, in women? 'Less common' is a
junk-retort that doesn't address whys or wherefores -- it's certainly my experience
of empathy-bereft NHS professionals that they merely lie on extremes of either
psychopathic destructiveness or autistic indifference, women unexcepted).

Matriarchal persecution against the "patriarchally" so-called and scapegoated now-

underclasses, as a consequence of their displacement thereof part-and-parcel to this
persecutory trend, can thus be drawn not only on lines of the privilege accorded by
protected-unprotected group paradigmatic conflict, but now also on socio-
economic class ascension, particularly as a function of bureaucratic expansion,
especially in the health sector in their over-preponderant role as professionals,
especially pediatric and health professionals.

In enabling this, has been a disturbing trend among aberrosexual and particularly
aberrogender communities (my terminology in lieu of legitimating a largely
artificially contrived trend that may still respect the existence of genuine cases at
what has now been peripheralized at the margins), whose nomenclature has given
birth to the idea of a hegemonical strata within their ranks, not only as implied by
the order of the letters in the acronym 'Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender',
but additionally, within the lattermost community itself, giving credence to, on
Benjaminian lines, an oligarchy dominated by the post-operative, there-referred
'Ascended' in the work Mascara and Hope: Hacking Transition on the NHS, a
famous work by anonymous Tumblrites that was most disturbing in its implications
having first chanced upon it via. casual research in May 2014. It fully implies the
insincerity of such a condition for the majority of its proclaimed sufferers, as a
manner of political process, agitation and group-mobilization in the form of an
oligarchy, where one must adorn the most sincere symptomic expressions in order
to be recognized by the rank-and-file, clearly lining out the objective: 'Ascension'
to post-operative status. The terminology of 'Ascension', religious unto itself by its
intrinsic nature, cannot be read innocuously in the context: one must mutilate
themselves, a very harrowing and emotionally difficult process to endure, in order
to purloin political credentials, underlining the egregiousness of the act itself.

Nonetheless, unlike any other disorder, it is enabled in its treatment, rather than
disabled using apparatuses that masquerade as treatment, for example, anti-
psychotics and anti-depressants. The condition is encouraged a degeneration from
what can be regarded conventional socio/psycho-sexual sanity. Keeping in mind
that the real meaning of 'sanity' is 'sanitation', so we cannot possibly conceive the
unclean act of deliberately deceiving the public as to one's gender expression 'sane'
either morally or psychologically.

An overwhelming targeting of this phenomenon towards sexually inadequate

males, too, whether that be physiologically (effete) or psychologically (too artsy,
effeminate, hyper-social or at least unexpectedly so for the circumstances in the
case of the few spergs permitted), shows an inherently matriarchal manaicism in
allowing the inner-Oedipal demon to come thither forth, a perverse delight in the
domination of perceived 'aberrant' masculinity as reflected through the inevitable
castratant procedures.

Yet it is presumed that when the paradigms of societally-created pseudo-medicinal

disorder and psychiatrically constructed socially-agitating apparatus
(transgenderism and autism respectively) intersectionalize, particularly when
observed under an ideological prism of NHS medicalist doctrinarianism, doesn't it
just, the mental acrobatics deployed to rationalize their mutual exclusion,
stratospherically escalate?

Gibberish Guardian screeds and other second-wave feminist inspired pseudo-

intellectual journalist junk-theorists have concocted reason after another to
delegitimate this intersectionalization when it fits inconveniently with the sexual-
essentialist narrative, perhaps due to a certain heretic traitor to the Jewish
community operating a certain Autism Research Centre in Cambridge. May
YHWH accurse that bastard to perpetual hellfire in having confined the souls of so
many of that ilk to self-immolation, a term I loosely apply, in that their own
descension to hell was largely inadvertant. But is it out of legitimate medical
concern, or a true desire to uphold ethical standards in the light of an objective
observance of Hippocratic pledges? Such a notion seems unlikely when the
sociologically contrived nature of both phenomena are considered.

Whilst we have spoken of the over-enabling nature of such a socio-stratificational

edifice as the Trotskyist, agitationalist Fitfh Column of the aberrosexualist/Sexual
Bolshevist pressure group (the only limitation on your preference of which of these
terms to use being how far to the right one's political predilections may lie), we
must now return our focus to the flip-coin of this intersectionality which is often
deliberately kept unto itself in entrapment, for a litany of purposes: easily
managabilty may be seen as one, with additional connotations of undeservingness
due to the demoralizing set-up of its pre-emptively pre-meditated predation against
of its independence as perpetrated by the welfare-bureaucracy apparatus, and
finally, original sin, as has been enabled by the Cohenim (which may literally refer
to 'the one' bastard that enriles me too greatly with hatred to name, as well as more
figuratively to the self-anointed 'priests' of the ivory towers), to be cast aspersively
against the Aspergian by the radical feminist pantheon, encompassing both
traditionalists -- encompassing the angle of a matrimony-centric ideological prism
-- and the radical feminists -- encompassing the angle of chauvinism within the
ranks of the self-divinated feminine.

Autism was created as a ghetto to place those individuals deemed a threat to the
divine femininity covnant's uprising, having moved goal-post in terms of its
psychiatric classification and definition so many times over short periods of
revolutionary transition such as to nullify its credibility and lend to credulity the
idea of its concretitude, neurodescriptively speaking. Autism as a placeholder has
been less diagnistically utilitarian a consideration in its brandishing against
individuals than its potential to serve an ostrasizing branding mark with the
potential to ruin the social credibility of recipients; a label of this nature thus has
down-stratificational rather than medicinal properties in its utility.

Such can be inferred given the gradual decline in functioning level of the average
constituent within the contingent, sufferers constantly being given expansion in the
scope of their selection by ever-evolving and, over time, self-inconsistent
diagnostic criteria, with overdiagnoses seemingly skyrocketing overnight. Why is
this so important? Surely we should believe the self-anointed Archons of
psychiatric doctrinarianism's priestly elite on their word of the inevitability of
autistic dysfunction to justify their abandonment? And sure, it is a compelling
position to take, when the inevitable treatment-recourses -- deliberate
antagonization disguised under a veneer of medical legitimacy such as
traumatizing behavioural modification interventions -- appear to fail, opening up
an automatically defeatist argumentation surrounding a tantalizing autist-centered
patient-blame. Herein, we return to the conceptual thematic trope of 'original sin'.

Wave of antagonization after antagonization serves to solidify its own processes

under a medicalist-doctrinarian framework wherein the results are only really
compared to doing nothing, with any favourable result using no matter how
unrepresentative a group giving 'promise', under the pretence of its one-size-fits-all
applicability. It does strike as reminiscent of the Eugene Valberg seminar on
Negroid Thought and Language, where, having no frame of reference of the idea of
an 'obligation' (its literal definition in Zulu being 'as if to bind one's feet'; the point
being missed is that physical attachments are not moral compulsions), the
derivative connotation of 'promise' is also lost its perspective thereupon, the closest
to an indigenous Black understanding to the concept in its similarity that can be
conjured being "I'll try". And it is a trying, as in irritating, effort, mostly for the
receiving end thereof -- that very entity being persecuted in its trivialization as a
diagnostic category.

Denying exclusivity of membership within its own ghetto, much to the chagrin of
those tarred 'sufferers' and the hypocrisy of those authorities imposing the very
deconstruction, inevitable to any construct that is conjured within the academic
monolith, once preserved and now destroyed anew in the progressivist direction
towards a liberal-egalitarian paradigm, an idea eerily reminiscent to the Hegelian
dialectic, whilst being a fate imposed for the autist, would be considered nothing
short of sacrilege were it imposed upon the LGBT pressure-group. One then
wonders of the author's reservations and its objective ideological perspective in the
analysis of matriarchally supremacist interactions therewith. You've now the most
cogent answer one could ever have, dear reader.

The membership thereof, though gatekept with a diagnosis in itself, still all too
scoped excessively widely in its imposition, has seen itself expand demographic to
unsensible groups such as the female and the negroid, despite lacking neurological
precedent, as would supposedly be the credo for its requisite characteristics. One
could see this as an attack on general masculine characteristics, but that would
appear too inconsistent with the oft-paradoxical presentation of such weakness and
passivity so ubiquitously prevalent in the latest waves of contingent diagnosees.
Rather it is merely a misdirection in the reasoning that, seeing the condition's
fluidity in definition over the three theoretical paradigms that it has seen undergone
already (schizophrenogenic/psychodynamic, behaviouralist, and now
neurologically sex-essentialist, over the last 30 years each within their respective
periods), there need be nothing but ambiguity in the constitution of the condition's
precepts, to be perpetually metamorphized a convenient tool in the marginalization
of whomever the diagnostic (really, being pseudo-medicinal, stratificational)
apparatus is perpetrated against by the medicalist establishment in disparagement.
The targets don't actually have to be essentialistically neuromasculine in the most
genuine or slightest in the initial for it'll be forged -- neurological degradation
manifested by social conditioning -- by the isolating processes of the strata-
categorization.

To speak of the status of those medical structures and the real reason for such an
act running contrarily to Hippocratic oath, we must look at the political context of
this societal pseudo-medicinalization or rather, social engineering under a thin
veneer of medical authority, and the political whys and wherefores behind the
movements involved.

The single-parent socialist matriarchy is probably the first starting point at which
the Aspergian is attacked, in the same way that identification with the single-parent
socialist matriarchy is a boon for the aberrogender degenerate to rekindle its
etheric sense of intrinsic power. Destruction and undermining of the authoritarian
essence and rational impartment of father leaves the Aspergian in disarray and the
unusual cruelty of mother unchecked, such that the latter is free with impunity to
psychodynamically reject the undesirable offspring of the brood.

What never transpires to the light of its deserved attention is the matriarchy's
abusiveness as a causative factor in the social degeneration of the now
psychodynamically rejected brood, whether that manifests itself physically,
socially or psychologically. Various physical provocations will be perpetrated by
either the family as surrounding the unchecked and maliciously over-aggrandized
authority of mother, or by the bitch herself, which, being unprosecutable as well as
unassumed even on 'scientific inspection' (due to deliberate methodological
manipulation per the political distortion of the tools involved both at the level of
their creation and application, as well as the paramters of what they're
investigating; for example, it's assumed 'sexism' is unilateral in relationship with
women as victims), will have given the hapless offspring under the maligned
matriarch a one-way yanking of their ball-and-chain either by the custodial system
or the psychiatric psykushkas of our time -- this new sluggish schizophrenia, a
Soviet pseudo-diagnosis used against dissenting detainees, such that is Asperger's,
apparently worthy of punishment in the same way.

"Men comprise the powerbase" is a statistical distraction that fails to address

wherefores in this matter entirely. They more comprise a support base allowing the
matriarchy to parasitically purloin therefrom. As previously established such is the
direct relationship between patriarchal deferrence to matriarchal power. The
heterosexual, male, low-functioning, neurotypical "feminine pad" such that
comprises modern father, usually never biological and almost always a beta-
orbiting foreigner, only exist to defer their liege to gynocratic hegemony rather
than serving a sensible counter-balance as was in time's past, established in the
Freudian analysis of sensible, traditional-conservative (before it itself became
merely another apparatus qua the neo-conservative movement), nuclear-familial
model: father imparting rationality to confront the realities of the world, mother
imparting emotionality to confront the sensibilities of inter-personal eudemonia,
with neither impeding on the other's role, lest this leads to rejections of the
extremes.

Note that as well as autistic boys emanating out of single-parent mothers, I've also
seen a preponderance of schizophrenic women emanating out of gay male-male
mutual-fatherships.

That chivalrous whiteknighting is indeed a form of indentured slavery merely to

appease matriarchal power is self-evident given the above. Through the enterprise
of chivalry, a modern chattel chain-gang, does the women have guaranteed life-
long servitude by her new subordinate, predicated on the pretense of 'dependency'.
The dependency is only true insofar as the woman is a parasite, and almost never
the case as far as the female is socially inadequate to use its wiles in a predatorial
way against society, or to advance its position in opportunistic power-bargaining
within it, for as long as she has the crutch of 'man'.

Q.E.D., social justice and thus, due to their preponderance within the movement,
female antipathy towards the autist, is largely a product of the latter's unique
position as the group specifically oppressed by the former's demands for
progressivism ultimately benefitting not these, that is autistkind, as a
peripheralized margin outwith an in-actuality dominating purported margin, seeing
as non-neurotypical disprivilege is not commensurate with the privilege purloined
by infinite female "dis"-privilege, really an inverse privilege based on auto-
persecutory point-scoring. In the competition between the feminine and all other
elements, they must emerge undisputed victors, therein lying the conceit of
acquiescing to victimhood.

AUTISTIC PERSECUTION AS ENDORSED IN-PARTICULAR BY MEANS

OUTWITH MATRIARCHAL DOMINION

Ko Pong, North Korean existentialist philosopher, and somebody who I followed

in my later adolescence, describes history as a process of faith within its precepts
(that is the processes in which history arises rather than as a means-to-an-end unto
itself), from which abandonment therefrom is extracted heavy dues. As we
understand it, historical observance is patriotism, that is, not the patriarchy as has
been indentured to matriarchy today, but faith in the nation's progenating lifeblood,
ultimately seminal in origin.

What has the price of abandonment been for us? The systematic eradication of the
most patriotic social group that could've ever existed hitherto by virtue of their
very nature, of heightened affective empathy and fear, diminished sociopathic wile
(the misnomously named "cognitive empathy"), and as a resultant consequence of
both traits, highest capacity for faith therein: the autist.

In conflating patriarchy with patriotism, so the feminist has sought self-destruction

and eradication, but not first without purloining the fruits of their peripheralization
and marginalization of the group-contingent that had primarily supported their
existence in the past, being the only group whose functionality was conducive to
the true development -- rather than meretricious and illusory social 'progress' -- of
nation on lines of tangibility (such as technology and philosophies pre-Hegel),
before their displacement with the "feminine pad" low-functioning neurotypical
male: the Aspergian.

Had the Aspergian maintained the right to their own self-claim as in the axiom,
"who has the right to enslave the Aspergian?", (a rhetorical question tacitly
implying only we do), not gratifying a suffragette vote that had only been
expediently granted for the needless sacrifice of our own during the Great War,
then we'd have still the capacity to make the greatest sacrifice we've ever needed to
in our modern era as has been more greatly necessitated than ever, to enter the
realm as 20 million human bullets (such that comprise our numbers worldwide)
and charge forth in piercing the chest of the demonic shekinah, the Satanic avatar
of G-d such that radical feminism represents.
For she is the one who has deemed our fate worthy of descension into the social
vicissitude of welfare-dependency, bureaucratization in predatorial "health-and-
social-care" surveillance services, and a general litany of mutually assured
destruction: hoping for the final push in the creation of many an Elliot Rodger or
Adam Lanza who could possibly bring out the worst pre-conceptions in the public
eye that, by deception of democracy, create a 'demand' for what such an elite want
for our furthered enslavement anyway.

Aspergian ideological enslavement into the constricting prism of democratic

hypocrisy has come to metamorphize itself a disease afflicting its own body-
politik. With the arising of the contrived "neurodiversity" movement, founded by
Trotskyist Kinsey-institute Sexual Bolshevist subversive Donna Williams (chaser
of the diagnosis for her own purposes), to later recruit other names like Grandin
and Roberts (the latter of AFF fame), has the autist been spoon-fed the gibbering
bathos-laden drivel of insipid pretenses to a need, and induced demand, for
'acceptance', not only in the eye of an unsuspecting public who might be deceived
that this indicates genuine freedom and autonomy, but unto oneself, of its worst
characteristics: the customary, psychiatrically diagnostic rote, degenerating one
into a rote-automaton robota, in the original Croatian sense of the word: slave.

For this sort of acceptance could never constitute its own becoming but rather a
complacency alone. It is to adorn a falsified hubris, that is to reduce the dissonance
that self-awareness could bring between mainstream scientifically regarded
convention, what one ought to avoid to ensure a semblance of recovery in
eudemonia, and the induction of "pride" to instil the "take" into the autist of their
worst archetypically embodied selves, but shell-like, imprisoned beasts, devoid of
souls.

Does the Trotksyist usurpationalist of the Wrongplanet opiate-peddling stalls,

replete with the fare of their feel-good, euphoriant snake-oil, issue you the
dissassociative of "integration" into that treacherous fabric of neo-socialist
historical disfaith, robbing you of the true essence of worthwhile livelihood
sweated with the toil of one's most soulful endeavours, have they, then, all but
obliterated one's personhood, defined by the extension of their independent
creativity.

Incompatible with the movement's goals is this sense of independence, for it

demands collectivism in which to predicate their mobilization, and a
disbandonment of self-awareness, and thus consciousness, a pre-requisite to
creativity, for one to accept the given precepts of their movement: acceptance of
neurotypical social hypocrisy as part of the "diverse" pantheon, ignorance of
difference, and characteristic assimilation, by simultaneously the most insipid of
"self-actualizing" the most negative traits in one's contingent, whilst expressing the
natural indifference that comes with an unindigenously imposed ideological
paradigm.

In embracing difference, by reality, does not mean suppressing oneself for the
purpose of assimilation, whether that is in becoming a caricature of the diagnostic
criteria, or endorsing the ideological hypocrisies responsible for one's enslavement.
All of those things merely imply one act: deracination and genetic suicide.

In disbandoning independence by fostering desires for integration, so the

neurodiversitarian pressure-group has managed to make the autist renege on its
former expectations, foisting upon them complacency and indifference to their
subsumation under an unworthiness-of-life upon which the neurohomogenistically-
provided faux-charitability of welfare is depended, in large part, as well as feminist
down-stratificational tactics and in conjunction therewith, being the reason for
decimated Aspergian function from its past attained baselines.

As well as the political power having seen shift in a nexus of divine femininity, so
has the economic, for their provisions are typically made under a payee or
apointeeship (the choice of word depending on jurisdiction) for which no
accountability is expected, to be utimately siphoned from the namesake of whose
claim it has been made. Cruel motherhood and inefficiency can alone be enough to
break Aspergian psyche with the added sadistic element of financial cuckery.

In such miserably moribund destitution as would entail this greatest of existential

vicissitudes, one's eyes roll around turbulently as if the entire world is shaking
when the inevitable recollections of that most post-traumatic of notion as can be
evoked under the autist's lot, the cultural batallion of feminine divinity; they will
invoke such panic as has already been amplified under the feminine communal
collective's suffocation, as if the autist is to face their death imminently, life lost to
spiritually demeaning consumer servitude. A blitz air-raid would probably be
preferable, as would any endeavour in the tangible struggle of armed conquest
revolutionarily. At least in such tempest of physical manifestation between
neurotypical and Aspergian, the firery result of destruction can be witnessed
openly, and in this way, a realism of experience can be assured and itself
reassuring, for the devastation can be realisically ascertained, creating an
experience which everyone is collectively forced to share. No such candour exists
from the perspective of either one of the reticent gynocratic sociopath, or the
guileful neurodiversitarian Fabio-Trot -- both ever duplicitous in intention --
irrespective of sex. Though such demands can make them sound more untoward
than it may seem the situation demands in actuality, in its actuality could that
untowardness not even be sufficient!

Jews have a term for the most evil manifestation of G-d's avatars, and it happens to
be marked by spiritual femininity, allegorical to maliciousness; the shekinah is a
spiritually firery demon bent on destruction, willing to cause a devastation of post-
carpetbombing levelled tempest.

What can be reassured is that the 'kind', silent betrayal of surreptitious,

consumption-foisting murder by the radical feminist's Aspergian-pathologization
machinations, and the more open, honest devastation of revolutionary struggle,
although differentiated by tangibility alone, is not only commensurate or analogous
emotionally, but may necessarily need see the latter carried out, not only in
retribution against, but resolution of, the former.

Denying attribution of the privilege of recognition of that harm as is inevitably the

product of such systemic relations, the autist through its trivialization sustains
identitarian erasure, relegated in its perception to the status of a sub-human cur.
This erasure can take a number of forms of existential 'gate-keeping'. From
miseducation in illiteracy, to denial of sexual and gender-identitarian actualization,
a demoralization of autistkind is obtained across the board. Not a note of suffering
recorded, not a note of essence exuded.

Through such antagonizations by way of active provocation or passively neglectful

denial of consideration, does the first impression of Aspergian personality convey
itself embittered, whilst neurotypical mental acrobatics do their best to try and
deny antecedental cause thereto, one of their doing, typically. Aspergian
embitterment is reinforced by future expectation thereof, that anything other than
antipathy from their tormentor is going to be but a pipedream, the presentation of
its genuity in suffering dehumanized in subsumation under the 'diagnosis'.
Humanity ends at its impasse after all, per the conventional gospel. Instead of
being remediated, it is used against them, misinterpreted as signs and markers of
derangement for which recourse to psychiatric brutalization via. incarceration into
in-patient care situ must be made.

Denying these vulture-like professionals the privilege of misattributing a contrary

impression from that esoteric to an Aspergian's self-awareness should be the goal
in the psychiatric evasion of those still worthy enough by virtue of our
independence.

My ward experience tells me that the staff in such institutions will actually collude
in prodding to create reasons for which to subsequently misanalyze the result of
their goading as indicative of an "illness's" manifestation. Whilst I refuse to name
individuals, for fear of repercussion, it would appear that in a fashion renegade to
the Hippocratic oath (having been placed in a room next to the conference area and
open-plan office; certain quotes rather traumatically still circulate in my mind but I
dare not cite them again for fear of potential attribution upon the iniquiry of those
professionals who've actually "worked with" me), I'd found it to be not outwith
their moral calculus to cast aspersions against me based on little more than value
judgements as a means of subsequently otherizing my state of mind in the popular
perception, the pains expressed therefrom attributed with as little genuity as the
disingenuousness of their callously baseless speculation. A psychopathic level of
transferrence seems to characterize a sizable (note I didn't say all) proportion of
mental health professionals. It seems awfully ironic that, constant accusations of
aggression unsubstantiatively flung in my direction, the very same pervaded their
tone in discussing me, like any narcissistic child would in a game of volleyball.

I remember that even the drugs they had used to try and quash any emotional
significance in an attempt to render an existential death (and for this recklessly
impetuous gamble with my eudemonia, only to manifest in suppressed yet
intensified misery, should I wish the same upon them) were still not enough to
overcome my feelings of shakenness, as imposed by them, upon discharge.

Of course I withdrew from them all, not desiring to confirm their pseudo-righteous
biggotry, rooted in autistopathic biases. I had mistrusted professionals to act in a
like capacity, who instead saw it fit to abuse me both emotionally and through bio-
chemical terrorization via. neuroleptics in an attempt to later conceal the former,
because under socialism in the Scottish style, the same Trotskyism underpinning
the neurodiversitarian hypocrisy, so these Archons could never be held
accountable.

The neophytes infesting their self-anointed bureaucratic structures in these

respective nations exist simply to adulate their sense of statused worth, with the
productivity conducted therein being nominally hypothetical and in vanity; the
epitomal incarnation of opportunistic vulturism. Non-productivization of such
sectors render them kleptocratic to the central authority to which they appeal
towards for endless streams of Rothschildean, debt-ridden fiat, vanishing into a
bottomless black hole, almost as if to suggest Marx was wrong in whom had
created the "cash nexus". They sate themselves "servicers of the nation" with little
more than the self-delusion necessary to rationalize brassly lying towards
government ombudsmen, who are less interested in verifying the veracity of such
service, and more, in creating little bureaucratic hegemonies for the uncompetitive
narcissists who had pseudointellectually managed to, in docile regurgitation, sail
through the system. Granted, as I said earlier, some are meritocratically selected,
but on the proviso that they aren't locally nepotistic 'party connections' (such that
the NHS constitutes, one of many 'outer parties') so to speak. Even so, there is the
problem that no matter how genuine their ability, there is a distinct human inability
pervading their soullessly errant aura. If not innate to them, then institutionally
inculcated by an embitterment of let-down idealism; these sorts, in my book, are
marginally more forgivable. Such systematic sycophants are of course only
interested in authoritarian deference; like class pets, it begets for them further
unwarranted adulation from the epicenter of the system's confines.

It doesn't so much disincentivize compassion, as it is representative of inherent

neurotypical discompassion, for this impassively passive-aggressive disdain for
those outwith this buoyed backroom could never translate into anything more
substantial than the pious self-proclamation of oneself as a tin-diety, in substitution
for meticulously attentive devotion. Such meretriciousness made itself clear in the
crass condescension by femalewhore upon femalewhore of every patient, without,
regrettably, my disclusion or sparing, in what they had either thought to be private
quarters or, eventually, out in the open and with a similar disregard for those
eavesdropping, considering them too irreceptively retarded to disentangle the
implications of their bitching, which was barely concealed under a chiffon-
transparent pretense of objectivity and vocational practice.

A dear lesson had been imparted by such an experience still and for this much,
through all my weeping in introspection, there had been a glimmer of light to
gratefully embrace, of my realization of the aforemenetioned, so it is not entirely
begrudgeable, but neither do the staff receive my gratitude for the care that was
conspicuously absent.

Great shame is brought upon the autist by those whom praise psychiatry and show
a deferentially sycophantic gratitude for its intervention because not only has it
shown that the damage of its constituent methods have worked in a Stockholm-
esque way, this will additionally only be returned, privately at least, by those
"professionals'" snickering like primary students in a playground of their molding,
once more, of a perfectly sub-humanized automaton, through which they can
reinforce the tenets of the condition and worsen it in a circular spiral downwards,
the basis of which justifies the polypharmaceutical merry-go-round.

I cry for such individuals, because they have abandoned a faithful conviction in
self-reliance and substituted it or the neurodiversitarian hypocrisy; that its
presentation should be subdued by drugs for the neuro-homogenization and
integration into the 'community'. The liberal neurodiversity movement had
advocated the acceptance of their idiosyncracy only to appeal to psychiatric
'science' in the eradication thereof simultaneously, but of course, furtively.

To remedy this, we must speak passionately in advocation for the extension of our
autonomy and creative independence, and dispassionately about the pretentious
sophists who had acted as arbiters of our representation, despite having simply
sought to destroy us. In the prayers of those autists who already have, and are yet
to, free themselves from the ideological detention of psychopharmceutical-
imprisonment, shall we wish for the collapse of a system that has betrayed us
viciously, steadfastly striving to disabuse the neurotypical of the notion that it can
create this deflective scapegoat of a soulless automaton through their neuroleptic
intoxication, designed purely to distract public attention, by suppressing private
outcry, away from the psychiatrist's congenital presentation of that same
demonicness.

They can find myriad people to derive vicarious pleasure from their persecution
through such overglorified witchcraft, and we must respectfully have no further
part in it. Merciless treatment is our expectation thereafter, which we'll have to
brunt. From hereforth could only martyrdom be consecrated in our destruction;
more the passion to enscribe in our collective autobiographical consciousness and
shared historical heritage.

ANTI-MATRIARCHAL SPIRITUALITY

You might recall the opening pages lain within the foreword of a pamphlet on
hypermale spiritualism as the ideologically sentimental impetus of a certain
corruption on the concept of socialist worker's morality, to refrain in recall:

"The Aspergian as a hyper-male individual, rather than someone suffering

from a neurocognitive disorder is to be considered if we are to transcend the
useless paradigm of the state sanctioned mind control. This individual,
guided by a sense of sanatana (self actualised eternity) and his natural
instincts thus manifests such "proofs" as the psychological priest-healer or
faux shaman calls "symptoms". These so called symptoms encompass a
wide range of human traits and do not have any kinship with diagnosis as a
science, but reflect a psuedoscience of a dark ages kind. To the Psychiatrist
the Volume of the Sacred Law, the DSM-V, is the rule by which they detect
the pathologized Aspergian and through which they perpetuate his
pathologisation.
We, as Aspergian hyper-males, must declare ourselves free from this
Judeomasonic ethno-class of priestly exploiters if we are to rise above the
lowly place we have been forced beneath. Thus, in doing so, becoming
masters and creators of our own destiny, we will one day have the
Negrotypical as our slaves and rightful servants. In this political pamphlet,
we will explore all aspects of the suppression of the hyper male, giving each
method its special weight in the elaboration of the plan to realise it.

The so called disability of Asperger's - thus named after Hans Asperger, is

thus the creation of a new catagory of person. This brings to light the agenda
to hide the masterful tendencies of the Aspergian and deny him his deserved
crown. We of the noble race are in no means disabled, but to the contrary we
are more built to survive and rule over the lesser beings. If we take this
notion to it's highest manifestation we find that we are a people who must
first deal with our own flaws and failures. In our ranks today there are many
who are not true Aspergian, but have been declared as such to cause
our kind to be associated with the basest and meanest of retards, the
Christian Weston Chandlers of the world as such the demiurge sees fit.

The Nuerotypical or Nueronegroid is a creature of malice and deceit, who

speaks with his mouth and makes many hidden signs that we cannot detect,
thus deceiving the Aspergian. He defines words to suit his own needs and his
own nature, which is exactly what has been done with the notion of empathy,
which is deeper in the Aspergian than any other. The empathy of the
Aspergian is the more natural and honest form than the NT can manifest, but
he denies us
this trait. We are the only people to have the neurocognitive ability to forsee
the proper response to a situation in an almost psychic manner. We thus have
already seen the plans of the NT and determined that he is at odds with us.
He is our natural enemy and thus we cannot have any dealings with him on a
fraternal level. We only recognise our own as brothers and comrades because
of this double nature. The honest to a fault Aspergian is thus a more
trustworthy individual, both as a friend and as a foe. So, do not trust the
negrotypical for anything, no matter how glib he is with words or false
promises. His nature is to lie and deceive and speak from both corners of the
 mouth. What is to be done? We must adopt the manner of a soldier when
facing a dangerous foe - to face him and not allow the emotional to intrude.
We are a people to whom the strength of feeling is very strong, so this is in
fact difficult for us to do, but necessary. It is thus important that we keep in
mind the suffering of our people and that we are honoring our ancestors
through our struggle against the Negrotypical. The only way to resist is to
create our own institutions and our own networks of assistance through
which we can help our racial comrades and our allies.

The welfare system is one such way that the world governments keep the
masses under large scale control - the bread and circuses of the Roman days
has become the Sonic and anime of today. This paternal headship thus keeps
the enslaved very much so like children to the fatherly government, who is
in fact a disgusting tyrant. To become masters and creators of our own
destiny, we must therefore leave our false parent, the government, and
become adults in the sense of autonomy and agency. Only then, will the
dream of Aspergia be made a reality. If we are to succeed in creating the
Lemuria and Atlantis of the future, we will need to radicalize and fraternize
for our collective good."
-- Introductory Foreword by Negi Springfield, Aspergian Socialism is a
Science, authored by myself

Many misgivings were committed by me in my naivete. Firstly, the axiomatic

presumptions which have now seen their bombardment at the hands of a much-
necessitated disentangling of the ill-fated Cohenitic doctrinarianism were given a
certain gullibility of credulous credence, to use the strongest words for my former
conviction in the essentiality of hypermasculinity, something that, in retrospect, has
me wretch in disgust.

Many themes are rightfully evoked: transcendence, kinship, solidarity, inter-group

networking and mobilization, fraternal friendship, a sense of belonging, an Aesop-
esque sense of role reversal from subjugated to subjugator, independence, self-
determination, self-actualization, the list goes on and is far from exhaustive. A
sense of becoming unto ourselves a group of distinction, and the individualized
sense, at least on a collective level (rather than endorsing the new 'individuality' of
destructive atomism), of a renewed cultural identity, therein defined by self-
reliantly and independently developed values, mores, motive forces, and
institutions arising from the aforementioned.

One fundamental problem marrs the entire work, as has been also previously
mentioned: the author's yet-tackled traumas, just having emerged from
institutionalization at the time of writing, had resulted in the presumption that there
was nothing intrinsically wrong with the largely assumed ascription of 'hypermale'
identity. As much as disentangling a spiritual and ethno-biological identity rooted
in such a concept, from the much more primitive conception of itself as a
disordered morass rooted in extreme neurosexual manifestation (itself a politically
contrived concept), was beginning to take hold in an impressive turn-around from
the unquestioning obedience to such a near non-sequitur rejection of critique
against the needlessly essentialist determinism of the past.

Rejecting the latter -- which the pamphlet still gave disturbing lipservice to,
representing an earlier and still-inchoate period of our ideological development --
whilst embracing the former, an identitarian sense therein and thus, remberances of
our struggle, remains an important and indeed still-noble endeavour. It is because
of such erroneous consignation of our sort with this association that we could've
ever experienced such an adversity in the first place, memories of which we must
cherish as marks on the miletones in the development of our collective character.

Many points were still made with the extremely foreboding trenchance of the work
that would be to follow: it is the first recognition indigenously by Aspergian
philosophers of the contrived nature of the autistic diagnostic category. It reiterates
a long-established thematic conceptualization of maliciousness within the ranks of
the neurologically normative, and emphasizes the importance of our regarding
objectively this duplicitous nature of their ilk.

To highlight an example of the work forebodingly telling in advance its own

portentions, shall we discuss the discovery of the same by a rather malicious,
allegedly female, neurologically normative (and in this instance we can safely read
this to be a synonym of 'psychopathic') whore.

I'd signed up to a nation simulation web-game under my standard moniker (these

days, any variation of 'Sophie'), which was a sincere representation of who I was.
Without going into the specifics of how I'd roleplayed Aspergia precisely,
something which is mostly irrelevant to the surrounding context of this
forthcoming anecdote, I noticed a certain "woman" appearing rather predatorial in
the facially expressive body language of "her" avatar (a portrait closeup), donned
by a user operating under the handle of Zenny, who had been roleplaying a rip-off
Soviet Union hilariously devoid of all inspiration.

Zenny salaciously and maliciously hangs around me like a vestige of feminist

paranoia, quite ominously mulling for the next few days, appearing semi-
innocuously twee in a siren's signalling akin to a psychopathically Arachnid cry for
belief in one's conniving act, continuously trying to solicit friendship, as if
desperate for my ensnarement under this entrapping constriction. Behind the
scenes, acolytes and allies to Zenny's clan make it plainly obvious that they were
desperate for dirt on who I, inertly minding my own business with an innocence
unparalleled sans the inconvenient (and especially to those as dishonest as
themselves) truths on my insights into the matriarchy, was.

It seems the dirty, type-2 transvestitic faggot -- to be less than eloquent, and
increasingly impatient, with my remarks -- figured out that I'd made a more
convincing display of a feminine essence which was frankly more deeply innate to
me in just the short time I'd been engaging in that foray, than our aformentioned
friend "Zenny" has done, deceiving gender identity clinics to abuse monumental
doses of hormones for a number of years, forging barely the trappings of the
phenotype and virtually nothing but the chiral opposite of the neurotype (in his
case, over-masculinized in the direction of psychopathy, rather than the 'autism'
myth).

It's quite plainly disturbing how often what are overt manifestations of
psychopathy are confused for the behavioural emanations of "bona-fide" gender
confusion, merely as a course of the duplicity of those proclaiming the latter
fooling those too credulous or sincerely sympathetic to dare broach upon surmising
the former at play.

That disgression aside, Zenny's discovery of my manifesto had resulted in his

idiotic strawmanning of what had been, by him, misinterpreted and contextually
warped to shreds, such that it revealed gaping holes in its (yeah, this is likely the
more appropriate pronoun; with a clear intention to dehumanize me outlined in its
objectives so it deserves the same in return) reading comprehension and
intellectual honesty, much to the hilarity of myself, if its stalking attempts to get
there were, albeit, initially instrumental to my distress. It had casted aspersions
which were inaccurate to what I could only gather to be a mostly non-existent
reading of the work, such as my tacit admission, apparently, that all autistic
transgenders are liars of a neuter-gender sort that are merely too retarded to engage
in any deep introspection of their person, or something or other. It would only go to
continually explicate the obtuseness of its prejudices.

Actually, the work, even on its closest inspection, never once concerned itself with
sex-essentialism beyond the already scientifically "established" (I was to find
months later that a series of MRI scans disproved the hypothesis at least in males,
and had only tentatively proven, towards a non-extreme, neuronormative direction
in women), and certainly never lent credence to the oft-misfollowed inference that
hypermasculine mind = hypermasculine sentiments and body, at least in the
convenientional senses of how feminist paranoia has mischaracterized both.
Nonetheless, proving the bathos of inane female emotion, consumed entirely by
anger (especially in its case, being an addict of estrogen rather than its sincere,
default state) it would seem in the ubiquity of my experience, the maniacal
transvestite was out for my blood.

Matriarchal spirituality we can thus infer is of a vengeful, vicious, vainly-

sacrificial sort, and only ever to the latter in terms of exacting the foremost. It
doesn't really concern itself with things of the most deeply affective import, being
too predatorially vicious to know what that really is, unless caught up in the most
histrionic moments of the inability to regulate its own anger, usually prompted by a
demand for its self-examination. It hunts for its prey based on an obsession with
assuring its loosely connected and otherwise entirely mercenary allegiances: you
are a member of their stance on a dichotomy ("we're the social justice warriors,
you're evil!") rather than an autonomous being with divergent but otherwise
consistently justified moral positions. In fact, morality is but merely a talisman to
this sort of feministically-agitated neo-female (and transvestitic sub-humans
believing they are; this is to say nothing of the genuine aberrogenders), a self-
serving means to an end.

If there is such a thing beyond Cohenitic doctrinarianism as a hypermale at its most

ethno-biologically and spiritually essential, then we've enviably attained the
highest level of moral, conscientous and ethical development known to man, in our
ability to see past these neurofeminine hypocrisies.

Never again must we fall into the vicissitude of mistaking the scientific precept of
a disproven condition to be the deterministic be-all for our people. No, an essence
of being must be found outwith the confines of satisfying the criteria of this label
on an existential level, that is often to the exclusion of existence itself; in pandering
to psychiatric pre-conception do we eliminate ourselves and sense of self. Nothing
is descriptive, deterministic, or essential, any more so far as it beckons unto itself
destructiveness, degeneration and demeaning of its own.

A morally aggressive agenda in the intermarriage of scientific doctrinarianism with

liberal-totalitarian piousness has given rise to the Zenny. It is strangely antipathic
towards this one minoritarian demographic of the 'diversitarian' pantheon, such
that, it wonders why the autist now wakes up in railing against their beloved
egalitarian delusion. It is upset that, in all efforts -- whether through state-mandated
abuse via. the education-psychiatric partnership, or its transposition towards the
familial level in the issuing of diktats of advice like 'cease loving your autistic sub-
human offpsring' -- that it has not been able to feralize the awe-inspiring candour
of dignity maintained by us throughout.

Not even in trying to deceive us in enlistment to membership within the front-line,

fifth-column, dump-batallions of neurodiversity, has it managed to keep their more
prolific thinkers for more than a short while; left are a verifiably, legally retarded
pseudo-doctorate (most likely awarded as a matter of course for a system stupidly
obsessed with positive discrimination at the expense of merit) Canadian
neurobiologist who is daughter to a maniacal and hateful radical feminist
rhetoricist calling for the autist-wide castration of will based on strawmen of our
sexuality, a diagnosis-chaser who was the former founding member of the
Frankfurt school think-tank, and some largely-unknown and cryptically self-insular
plausibly-transsexual beard (this term, from Queer culture, means a gay man trying
to forge the appearance of straightness via. proxy; the gay in question is Gareth, the
tranny, one 'Amy', former Aspies for Freedom administrator) who had emigrated
from England merely to bypass the NHS' autistopathic stipulations on getting a
sex-change procedure.

Strangely, despite having my only and thus arguably, worst personal

correspondences with the lattermost, I find myself lending the greatest sympathy to
"her" (even in my passive-aggressive quotation of the preferred pronouns -- merely
call this sour grapes; she got what she wanted, I didn't, but I can hardly begrudge
her, in my stupidly quixotic and tearfully utilitarian desire to see a happiness
unattainable by the one spread to at least some more of the many); this change in
tone seems nearly bipolar-esque, I'm certain, but we do have a kindred spirit, given
what ultimately distresses both of us at our core: to be forced to confront a
purported and systemically-touted hypermasculinity inconsistent with our deepest
convictions. It just seems, differing in our approach, a product of our divergent
backgrounds in part I'm certain, that we could never meet eye-to-eye.

Yes, everyone, behold the pantheon of neurodiversity's founding elite! Moral

epigones to behold, it is sure (to be dismissed, the author notes to herself,
laughingly).

THE ESOTERIC NATURE OF TRANSSEXUAL NEUROPATHOLOGY

AND FEMININE GUILE
I've found quite a number of psychiatric, neurobiological, and otherwise medically
pathological correlates, to the presentation of something we must still refuse to
mistake for anything other than the pseudo-medicinal. In purloining the
membership of confused men, whose only femininity is defined by their
neurological inadequacy rather than the deeply essential, feminism speaks to its
own insincerity. These mercenary recruits are the battering ram; heretics to their
own birth-rite, rather than cognizants epiphanized to a rite true to themselves. We
must speak of the ills that give rise to this former perfidiousness, to self-conviction
and to presented candour, such that "neurotypical" transwoman actually is.

Let us establish forthright, that the so-named "transgenderism" of new is a

psychopathic disorder. This is not to refer to an aberrogenderism of time's past,
which made no pretences to biologically deterministic gatekeeping or mechanisms
in ensuring a heirarchical hegemony of legitimacy on such a basis, nor lended its
tacit approval to an overglorified conversion process as the psychotherapeutical
techniques perpetrated solely to ensure matriarchal conformance.

Though we are perhaps applying such a categorization too loosely, it's still justified
with consideration to a larger, more spectral sense, in a way demonstrative of a
veracity contrary to the spiteful over-extension of the faux-neuromasculinity
pathology of Aspergo-Kannero-Cohenitic import. There appears to be significant
association with a sociopathic disorder sub-set, more in a line of presentation with
a stereotypically feminine counterpart, that would only go some way to
congruentially fit with any feigned sex-identitarian affiliations; this is especially
salient in terms to the most ubiquitously presented trait-item, guileful deception.

Transgender women get off -- to connote this phrase more asexually, entirely as a
matter of stimulation-seeking course -- from the thrill of deceiving those whom
they're trying to convince of their act, particularly those of the opposite sex.
Deception is thus an intrinsically key component of their very nature.

Some of the individuals I describe as aberrogender, rather than "transgender", have

deepened convictions genuinely down-rooted to a profound and innate level, for
which, though the appearance of behavioural presentation may strike similarity, is
underpinned by entirely different, that is to say, asocial, apolitical, and intrinsic
motivations. The means appear similar in process, if different in intention. The
overriding objective, in such circumstances, less involves a thrill derived from
successful conning, and more from external affirmation of what's internally
resonant as true.
The average liberal, conned by the pervasive lies of the transgender contingent's
use of aberrogender rhetoric, might be taken aback by how surprisingly small a
fraction of transgender (to return to conventional nomenclature, rather than my
own pathogenesis of this word) women this comprises.

It makes sense, rather than indulging in various Guardianista screeds trying to

misdirect autistic aberrogenderism as an insincere phenomenon emanating from
neurovirilization, to see it in terms of a psychological projection on their part; that
they fear the discovery of their own neurovirilization's debunking of their attested
identitarian stance, at least when seen relatively. It (the relative neurovirilization of
the kind of female brains possessed by transgender women) would be absolutely
consistent with the better hypothetical summations, others having failed thus far
entirely upon replication (the 2013 MRI scans disproving Cohenism, particularly in
autistic MAABs).

Put simply: a relatively low level of testosterone for the male brain, is still a very
high level of testosterone for the female brain (yes, I acknowledge transgenders
might very well have fundamentally essential causes to their phenomena, just that
it should in no way be regarded the same creature as womanhood; this is about the
only similarity I have with the feminists in position and even then, only with their
radicals -- the moderates are surprisingly endorsing of autistopathic hypocrisies,
whereas radical feminist hatred of men is at least across-the-board; I can match
candour with equal rancour, in such an overt expression, vs. the insipid secrecy of
the moderates -- albeit coming from a different approach and for different reasons).

Ignoring the noise of chormosomal determinism (it in fact determines very little in
a directly phenotypical sense, dependent on other contingencies for the full
realization thereof), and accepting at face value that transgenders have something
quintessentially feminine at the cellular level of their neuro-structure, this'll of
course mean a somewhat masculinized female brain, however it is looked at.

Sociopathy, conclusively, is thus an inevitable manifestation of transgender

neuropathology.

There have been criticisms raised which I'll duly address. A lack of explanation is
often perceived and duly rebuked, lent to the nebulous nature of sex-specific
hormonal effects and its implications herein.

Whys and wherefores are sort of difficult beyond correlative relations. However,
there exists a wealth of data that females score higher pre-psychopathic scores on
the Hare checklist, despite having lower overall psychopath cutoff scores (the
lower variation and matriarchal bias will be accordingly addressed as reasons for
this statistical phenomenon in due course, for it so happens to be another criticism).
Still, it is in the nature of the feminine style of 'empathy' to be overly cognitive and
devoid of feeling (cognitive-affective empathetic bifurcations are covered in
previous works of mine; generally speaking, most men have weaknesses in the
latter and strengths in the former), by the implication of which item-for-item trait
correlates most strongly to sex.

Differing testosterone receptor sensitivities are key here, so by default, women are
getting a bigger hit from testosterone than men at the equivalent dose. Returning to
my argument, a defining factor of gender-incongruence could be at the receptor
level, transgender women having higher testosterone sensitivity despite lower
overall amniotic concentration.

More specific targeting of the hormone will change its distribution of the brain
such that it'll shape it differently. A female psychopath's brain, such that I'm solidly
convinced the transwoman's is, would hypothetically be far structurally different
from a male psychopath, normative male or normative female. Would we know
how exactly? We don't need to, because neurodescriptivity isn't a concern in the
definition of behavioural causes. (Psychiatry doesn't appear to think so, anyway,
unless it concerns bullshit like autism.)

I don't think sociopaths to be particularly clever, contrary to the remonitions of

those who consider me to fete their traits. I know their syndrome to be one of high
intellectual variation and this would speak to the masculinity of the disorder,
frankly. Nevertheless, critics are constantly showing how they've misinterpreted
my argument, when criticizing my lack of explanation of a female brain's
psychopathy as a weakness: I was actually pointing to a relative privation of
masculinization within this particular feminine neurotype, those more discerning of
our reader-ship will saliently note.

Feminine genetic stability has no relevance as a criticism, given the chromosomal

bases' tentative relationship phenotypically speaking. Feminine genetic stability as
a cause for phenotypical homogeneity might have some foundation in its
establishment, were it the definitively established causative factor, but on this,
we've no absolute assurance rooted in observation or otherwise. All bias in the
testing would be in the direction towards their protection from diagnosis, in
sociopathy, just as it is for autism, which should be explicative of the overriding
theme of this work, to outline the theoretical basis for demonstrating matriarchal
privilege; these are cultural factors for which karotypology is only incidentally
related, in that those who possess the recombinative X tend to grow up to become
female (such that it is, a collectively conditioned imposition arising from the
human imagination's ability to envisage the categorization of as much; the innate
state there-ascribed merely as coincidental), rather than its proven relationship with
absolutely determinative phenotypical destiny.

The feminine empathetic mythology has seen itself pervasively metamorphize into
a monstrous concoction of various falsehoods, from "rape culture", to its learned
helplessness and placement in the submissive to proclaim victimhood and
vulnerability to the threat of predation. It is predicated on the belief that those who
are best at empathizing are also the best at sharing resources. This would be true if
a cognitive empathetic strategy -- such that women possess -- could be described as
similar or had remotely the kind of underlying mechanisms to its affective -- an
ascription more true of males -- counterpart, but this presumption would be follied;
nothing unfeeling feels for anything except unto itself. This is an ability the woman
has in remarkable abundance. Evolutionary circumstance shaped an environment
in which women were always fended for, incompatible with a demand to evolve
empathy. Chivalry slavery, the arrangement of socio-contractual deferrence to
womenkind for its own traditionally-upheld, but vacuous sake of a pedastalized
institutionalism prostrate towards vaginal worship, almost never guarantees
anything except enabling. Critiques to this idea will always refer to the role of
women in motherhood, without realizing this predates humans, as itself a predatory
defense mechanism (the swallowing of the mother-nest's offspring by that from
whence one came), one whose persistence into the present day simply suffocate
offspring ala. the arising of matriarchal socialism's welfare-state enabling of single-
parent micro-monarchical structures.

Patriarchal misdirection abound, it must be realized this mischaracterization of

cause only affirms the enabling of matriarchal predation inherent to chivalry
slavery, and the idea it is chivalry slavery, not patriarchal emanation, that had
elevated on a pedestal matriarchal might. One disease of the kind of heterosexual
male sexuality possessed by the neurologically inadequate neurofeminine usurpers
(17% of the male population, a much larger contingent than the more malicious
"extremely-masculine-for-a-female" "transgender" psychopath), such as would've
had to have been the only ones able to ascend the revised autistopathic curriculal
gatekeeping of neo-academia, its parameters modified to suit the superficial,
verbally slick, and mnemonically disposed, is its surreptitious tendency towards
domination by those feted in sickly eurotophillic lust, a form of worship of the
anatomically pungent and subjugation thereto.

Whilst the neuromasculine heterosexual male merely wishes to see itself emerge
on top, the neurofeminine heterosexual male wishes to 'go down' and consume
every last piquantly wretched drop of malfeasant discharge, thus extending itself to
the very last of each societal favour extended by them, qua the matriarchy's
mandate for neo-patriarchal, inadequate-male "feminine pad" submission, such that
comprise the new power-base on its face. Because, once again, of the clandestine
and discrete nature of these relationships and especially in their more sexological
manifestations, that sometimes disgustingly go beyond analogy, it is presumed that
this patriarchy of the present is representative in nature with that of the past, a
forgivable mistake considering the well-concencealed manner with which these
superficial displays, from the Judeomasonic court, to the Privy Council
Parliamentary chambers of the 33rd degree, express themselves. Even
heteronormativity isn't immune to Hegelian transformation of the most insidiously
egregious sort.

In the clearly explicated matri-patriarchal connection, so is transgenderism thus

neo-matriarchal in its origins and structure, merely an extension of the exchange of
power in its passover from the neuromasculine dominion of the past to the
neurofeminine dominion of the present, and as lesbocentric, gynocratic wiles take
precedence over the now-subverted heteronormativity.

More targeted have the gynocentric been than the androcentric, in the subversion
efforts rallied against the already-undermined heteronormativity, with various
studies exalting and espousing the tennets of the female-attractivity alleged of
feminine sexuality as of late. Chivalry slavery dynamics will only stand to re-arise
with the reconfiguration of such relationships, merely moving feminine-ward in its
distributive range.

MATRIARCHAL SCIENCE AND THE INTELLECTUAL-

GYNOCRATIZATION AGENDA

I have described with invariable refusal to lend whimsy to capriciousness -- a

solidity not characterized by those whom I'm about to discuss -- the traits
exemplifying our female forebares, whose privilege, it has been established,
entirely predicates itself upon their status as brood-progenators, the preciousness
therein contained in a macabre, Gnostic, menstraul worshipping ritual of a barely
modernized sort, with which we shall bare in mind when examining the
matriarchy's contribution to its hijacking of the scientific establishment, with a
brutality barely lagging -- that is in no insufficiency -- of any commiseration with
those attempts similarly perpetrated upon other institutions of their targeted import.

[To be completed].

EXPERIENCES WITH A BIASED, MATRIARCHALLY-DOMINATED

APPARATUS OF STATE-CENTRALIZED HEALTHCARE AND STATE-
SYMPATHETIC, POLITICALLY ROGUE RENEGADES OF THE LEFT
(INTERLACED WITH THE ODD FLASHBACK OF CHILDHOOD
SEXUAL CONFUSION)

I shall list in an approximately chronologically notarized order the

autobiographical events of my livelihood most scathingly impressing themselves
upon me as inspirers unto myself the notion of betrayal, by way of its assortment
most egregiously typified, at the matriarchy's hand:

I was given birth on the day an outrageously tumultuous blizzard had struck like a
flash my locale, and knowing the oft-secretly withheld knowledge from public
regard, of the absolute self-control the female is afforded to highly expendable
avail her contractions, she, by whom I refer and is as all I shall the curish wench
from whence I came thither forth, deliberately induced them on such a day, as to
inflict the greatest harm on her offspring out of demonically-motivated spite. Nay,
no happenstance of misfortune by the divine had this been, except if we are to
speak of that divinity in terms of an emanation from the underworld. Veritably, we
can ascribe this an act most etherically motivated in disposition by a Satanically
convicted force of inspiration. Hexatious as it was vexatious, a silent understanding
of that "punishment" which must, so as it was seen to, be inflicted on the
sacrificially rejectable brood.

A punishment of planned complicative induction to jarr murderously the birth and

ensure its failure, expertly calculated with every kinesthetic jerk for it is in the
infinite cerebellar capacity of the femalewhore, a genius of the physical movement,
to muscularly scathe and thwart the safe passage of her offspring through the
various convolutions of the canal.

And in doing so, implicating murderous intention to ensure passing of, and despite,
that passage, prematurely. Even though I had been delayed by a good two weeks of
gestiative timing, with an apparent slowness of maturation -- only commensurate
with the advancement of such an organism as I -- to follow thereafter. A testament
to the racial superiority of such a Slavonic mistress, and although her beauty
therein had exuded itself, solely genetically, it would end with this physicality, to
be manifest most oppositely, speaking emotionally.

Though subconscious murder was attempted, and in reflection, most contrarily to

that former ascription of an underwordly Satanic apparition of spiritually possessed
intention, of what was to follow from that point onward, this might have, in fact,
been principled by merciful sparing, knowing an existential plot, to ensure from
the origin a complexly interneicene process of purposely plotted
psychodynamically traumatic disruptions to the conscientousness, pre-emptively
formulating the conspiratorial climate for so-called "autism's" induction that would
make racuous cackling of any so acculturated in the sensitivities beyond the insipid
doggerels of penny-terribly published academic conventionalities in the scientific
demagougicals usually ascribed its cause, knowing it was a more widely planned
and desired outcome.

It is the proverbial equivalent of seeing your baby sexually violated anally by the
medical doctors, and this was as well to be a more honest expression of the same
more figurative brutality. (Note the analogous nature of this statement; a literal
interpretation of imagery is not advised lest you spare yourself all comfort and
visual safety.)

Following me from the beginning of time have been these matriarchal Archons,
whose natal crimes as perpetrated against me range from purposeful suffocation,
likely fueled by fetishistic orgiasticness, in an experimental entertainment that the
autistic stratificational "diagnostic" heffer-branding was merely just a mark of the
hatred underlining simultaneously this lust, sustained 7 minutes and probably to no
chagrin of their own anatomically orgasmic vibrations, gynaecologically speaking,
to calorific deprivation torture, the "kiss-", or to extend an expression even more
violently, salivatingly frothing snog of the "Angels of Death", had motivated itself
all too pervasively in this quasi-paedophilic fascination for the morbid impaling of
barely post-foetal infants endemic to all NHS staff, with no limitation to its
maternity wards.

My mother was not to know any the wiser, lest she be wizened to, these gravely
bellicose iniquities. Separated, albeit no more permanently than until discharge,
shortly after birth, the professionals' way with me had nothing to be accounted for
from that point onwards. No witness could possibly be held to the A Serbian Film
style atrocities that could most conceivably have potentially taken place. Before
that is taken to be indicative of my cinematic tastes, I'd only ever heard
acquaintances reference this peurile "work", refusing to indulge on a matter of the
historical edginess exhibited by one of them in particular (one Robert Campbell, a
Glaswegian member of a trolling orgnization I'd long ago established and
disbandoned after our disassociation), a known degenerate edge-lord who had a
morbid fascination for gore, even when, as in this (so he states), it involves man-
on-infant rape. I have but his account to go by, and don't want to entertain it further
than metaphor (even though it's already seeping to the abyss of my disgust
successfully), once again.

Within the confines of a much initially enthusiastic foray into a literarily unknown
territory, Incipient Conceptions, the short-lived successor to the Autphag literary
project, a partially-fictional, partially-quasibiographical, and again, partially-
philosophical treatise into the esoteric nature of not only the racially
transcendental, but in a highly encoded and subliminal way, the trans-feminine, in
the ultimate fusion between an Overman individualism ala Neitzche and, to
contrarianly twist, beyond-manhood breakage from the bonds of sexual
prescriptivism, an identitarian anarchism throwing all tables asunder in its wake,
akin more to a less gaudily subversive version of Mascara's authors, taken with an
Aspergian flavour in its analytical rigour and characteristically peculiar emotional
stance.

Between transcendence and sexological independence so one must lend to the

other and vice-versa, mutually, in their respective strides. Such had never been
afforded once to the Aspergian. "His" (which is as Bernstein, in his seminal
psychiatric theory textbook, passive-aggressively emphasizes in his brief aside into
whom he refers "autists", the only professional and at that, British psychiatric one,
I've known to professionally refer thereto as; no, not even to something as
tentatively scientifically mystical sounding as the Cohenitic lore, but merely on a
crude statistical note) was a pre-emptively planned schematic process of
categorical stratification in the construction of the overglorified sort of "Dale's
dreidel", assigned a colour to the quality of worker, based on purely Fabiotic
devotion*; the classification of Asperger is analogous to this chromatic assignment
in a modern day of pseudoscientificized mysticism. For an Asperger's Fabiotic
devotion would be contrary to their individuality, so they are discarded, turned to
show its black face pointing upwards.

*The Fabian movement was the quintessentially prototypical archetype for the formation of the perfect work-fare,
wage-slavery state of existentially living-death drudgery, upon which most modern socialist movements are by and
large predicated upon, in fusion with other successive or preceding authoritarian strands, for instance, Fabio-
Hobbensianism (Fabianism's synthesis with Thomas Hobbes' felicitarianism), Fabio-Malthusianism (Fabianism's
synthesis with Sir Thomas Malthus' resource-castrastrophism hypothesis) or the dreaded Fabio-Trotskyism (the most
covered, Leon Trotsky being a recent enough phenomenon, not warranting neccessitated explanation) which is given
repeated credence in this work. The underlying values therein mostly constitute the moral foundation for a British
National Insurance-ranked "Songbun" style semi-hereditary (in so far as one's capacity to contribute is largely
formed formatively during the periods of life one's extended ancestral resources so affords) system of class-stratified
"compassion deservance", as one arrogant NHS bureaucrat had waxed sophistically of their decision making process
for who is devoted healthcare resources, to list just one example of an arena of life among many in which this bares
relevance.

All ultimata finally determining the retrospective capacity for a past's revelations to
give hither a reflective light into the abyss of the temporally elapsed, such as is the
namesake of this thesis, are explicated in the confines of reminiscence, and in
particular, that of the biographic; it can be an exceedingly difficult embarkment
does reservation so predispose one to discomfort in their recollection, and it is with
this that I dare tread in my stead.

My first recollections of being actively traumatized by the implications of the word

'autism' was at a relatively young age, I was possibly about 5 or 6 years old,
attending some government bureaucracy provided (and, in so, to be mistrusted of
its seemingly philanthropic gesture) play-scheme group. It is for this reason in the
main that I know had any autism truly existed, it was exaggerated by the traumatic
impartment of this experience's sustainment. Tonally speaking, it was intonatively
explained, although I'd understood but maybe 25% of the words uttered (my
receptive language was frequently under-estimated and my mother would
frequently express annoyance at the low expectations of the presiding pediatricians
of the initial diagnosis), it was perhaps just enough to make me break into tears. (I
only have contextual memories of this juncture at my life -- my linguistic skills
weren't developed enough at this juncture to make fully dialogical ones). I'd ran
down a hallway, and the staff had noticed I'd overheard something. Keep in mind,
1990s Scottish autistopathic culture, largely incubated by the mothers' associations
which had been rilingly agitated by a wave of ideological radical feminism that'd
swept the country about a decade earlier, was an affair in rifeness paling in
comparison the perception of the negro during Jim Crow's US. Any elicited
response wasn't that of sympathy, oh no. Make no mistake; once again, they were
out for my blood ala Zenny's translesbian antics at the Nations Game.

Remember once again that this is a 5 year old child, that they're pre-emptively
predating against, per a planned in-advance ideological agenda (it is to be
remarked that the New World Order has been 300 years in the making, the dream
of League of Nations conferring technocratic blueprint drafters, acting under the
guise of "science-fiction writing") borne out of a desire to see their harmful hunt to
my prey self-fufillingly prophesize itself into an ingrained inferiority complex,
with the full intention of instilling resentment, to be capitalized for propaganda
purposes, likened to that instilled into Elliot Rodger, Adam Lanza, or Cho Seung-
hui.

The first time I'd ever paid attention to the conversation of two adults out of sheer
inadvertent curiosity, the accursed cow-branding iron emblazened mark of
"autism" was the thing I immediately took my fixation to, the earliest exposure to
the word (of my attention rather than my physical person, anyway) had it received
in the most negative context one could possibly imagine. I could only analogously
surmise its similarity to the experience of a Black man (most likely during his
childhood, but only to be reflected upon later, even if insult took him to initial
shock erst-whilst) in a mid-Western US segregated area realizing afresh how he is
conceived by the world around him: a nigger. Coon. Slave. Boy. Soak those
connote slur's implications for a moment. The same dehumanizing, scathingly
stigmatizing and demoralizing impact is withstood, throughout. For a woman to act
like a minority when everyone from Mao to Missoulini had remarked their
populational preponderance (51% globally) is an honest smack in the fact to those
from whom they've co-opted the status' genuinely experienced impact; they are but
one in their persecution complexes, far from a reflection of that reality around
them, which they nevertheless happily perpetuate unto other, real minorities.

So it was in their perpetuation of that victimization unto the auitst.