FINAL RETROSPECTIONS

A post-mortem piece by Sophie Miriam-bat Y'israel, formerly known as'Autphag'.Drafted through months o!rember "#$%, December "#$%, and &anuary"#$

Dedications:

(atherine, a transgender Minichan user, in light of her apology towardsformer disbelief of me.Sapphire, the other partner of my perfidious e)-fiance, also a transwoman,again for her faithful belief, emotional support, and abundant de!otion inin!esting much-needed attention during my time of disarray ando!erwhelming need. egi Springfield a.k.a. *ra!is +estphall, an amaing and beautiful writer of two forewords to my pre!ious manifesto works, and well read, scholarlyabbinical sage into *anakhical and *almudean thematics, for his wealth of insight into matters of ecclisiastic and political import.My mother, whom  couldn't li!e to see made genuinely happy by the fruitsof breaking into becoming the true self renewed.&anice, whom 'm actually pained to see drift off in the deterioration of our rapport/ another bra!e Aspergian transwoman fighting the kakistocracy of the (ohenim. +e began failing to see mutually at eye's le!el towards our latter day. *he primary contention was as silly as our se)ual di!ergences0  being predominantly straight, with her, a lesbian.1awel, again, another lamentable drift into an all too reflecti!e abyss of ha!ing become the !ery pet-pee!e against that which we'd initially railed intandem -- my gender-incongruence rubbed frictionally abrasi!e of his2rthodo) (hristianity rooted in Sla!onic tradition, ergo, he'd cut all ties.Despite this, once more, an otherwise e)cellent con!ersational partner without contention or fault.ntroman, a connoisseur of the chans, his claim to fame ha!ing been asuccessful and suitably apt (hris-chan troll, and rather contrary face in whathad been hitherto an o!ercompensating den of autistics-in-denial. 3e hadalso, in an again contrarian twist against the tide of uni!ersal anti-spergsentiment, argued for the merits and legitimacy of the Autphag screeds, thenunder an anonymied alias before my outing. 4nderstanding the trenchantnature with which a political understanding had been con!eyed therein,introman had endeared towards, with growing respect for, my presence onthen-5cwc5 and later-5cow5.

 

Ale)ander 6illapsie, for his in!aluable assistance in editing this draft of thework, spending countless nights on a number of grammatical rectifications,spelling corrections, and phraseological optimiations.

INTRODUCTORY FOREWORD

*he beginning is probably the best place from whence one should alwaysstart, seeing as it is, per its name sake, the earliest of our days, whoe!er youmight be -- as truistically trite as that all may seem. 'm going to be clear with you. My early childhood was a sham, wherein mymother was pressured by a bureaucrat in the employ of the state healthcare bureaucracy, a so-innocuously-called 'health worker' whose intents were toset me on a path most contrary thereto, to chase a psychiatric diagnosis for what was really the product of childhood abuse that, although she had, inthis, no acti!e participation, was all too complacently ascented by her. *his was in the early $77#s, when an e)pansionist agenda of state education bureaucrats had been partially fuelled by radical feminist academics that hadintersected the fields of psychiatry and education, to re!i!e a long-stagnantdiagnosis that was frankly rare in the past. t's usually current statistic trendsthat inform the morally 8udgemental mores suceessi!e thereto which go!ernour sense of what's aberrant and typical. 'm not con!inced, therefore, thatthere was a solid precedental basis with high predictability for the largelymanufactured, and 'd go on to !erge upon saying, deliberately imagined9epidemic9. t is for this reason that, whate!er my mother may ramble maniacally in her  protestations of its legitimacy,  can't find, resultant to my relati!enormaliation outwith her influence in recent years, it in me to suspenddisbelief.'!e been a lamentable !ictim of the system e!en in its most benign of  pretences as an aider and remediator. :ehind this !eneer, has been nothing but the heartbreak of indifference for deeper answers, beneath their 

 

con!incing and faith-eliciting enticingness. *he talisman of the diagnosiswas returned to in recourse of e)plaining e!erything, e!en despite, rather annoyingly, the e!er-stacking inconsistencies slowly accumulating.*hen, we ha!e clearly a misinference caused by a fallacy of re!erse-causality contri!ically drawn to enforce what was most e!idently aconspiracy. atural statistic emanations were no longer informing moral 8udgement, but the use of the latter's arbitration was being deliberatelyapplied in the manipulation of statistical trends. And 'autism', like the rest of the demonic re!i!al of psychiatry, a phoeni) that should'!e ne!er arisenanew, was born.As both the Aspie  might tentati!ely be ;this re-diagnosis was made later --circa "##< -- but  consider this to be a more legitimate summation of mycondition in light of the social conte)t in the same way 'autism' was 8ust aspiteful and conceited stab in the dark= and the autist that  most certainly amnot, not because  fail to acknowledge the coincidentiality of the former condition's spectral relation to the latter, but rather on the matter of nuance being significant enough for the former to constitute a different entityentirely,  can't help but take these considerations with the analytical depththat  regard nearly e!erything else. >!en with my reading comprehension,especially on low-contrast screens, being gradually rended asunder as struggle to tackle e!en the simplest of matters unless they in!ol!e somethingto my immediate interest rather than being a strictly systematic discipline;these days, in a complete turn-around from the past, 'm more likely toentertain a sociology te)tbook than an article on some arcane computingconcept from +ikipedia=, with those concepts most deeply embedded in my passion and closest to my familiarity will  be dri!en to perser!erate alla!ailable and e)haustable routes of their conte)tualiation.t is in this !ain that  proceed forward with this piece.

HOW A NEO-MATRIARCHAL AGENDA USES SEXUALINTERSECTIONALITY AS A TOOL OF ENHANCEMENT IN ITSSYSTEMICALLY ORESSI!E AR"ITRATION

*he neo-matriarchal agenda has been partially elucidated in past criticismsof di!ersitarian mo!ements '!e written, in particular where di!ersity meetsneurology to make the *rotskyistically neologied 'neurodi!ersity'mo!ement. *he matriarchal agenda, boasts one ?ueer critical theory writer,