Professional Documents
Culture Documents
44
Hardenability Curves
A typical hardenability curve is represented in Figure 2.32. The quenched
end is cooled most rapidly and exhibits the maximum hardness; 100%
martensite is the product at this position for most steels. Cooling rate
decreases with distance from the quenched end, and the hardness also
decreases, as indicated in the figure. With diminishing cooling rate more
time is allowed for carbon diffusion and the formation of a greater
proportion of the softer pearlite, which may be mixed with martensite and
bainite. Thus, a steel that is highly hardenable will retain large hardness
values for relatively long distances; a low hardenable one will not. Also,
each steel alloy has its own unique hardenability curve.
45
46
The hardenability curves for five different steel alloys all having 0.40
wt% C, yet differing amounts of other alloying elements, are shown in
Figure 2.34. One specimen is a plain carbon steel (1040); the other four
(4140, 4340, 5140, and 8640) are alloy steels. The compositions of the
four alloy steels are included with the figure.
Several details are worth noting from this figure. First, all five alloys have
identical hardness at the quenched end (57 HRC); this hardness is a
function of carbon content only, which is the same for all these alloys.
47
48
Figure 2.34 Hardenability curves for five different steel alloys, each
containing 0.4 wt% C. Approximate alloy compositions (wt%) are as
follows: 43401.85 Ni, 0.80 Cr, and 0.25 Mo; 41401.0 Cr and 0.20 Mo;
86400.55 Ni, 0.50 Cr, and 0.20 Mo; 51400.85 Cr; and 1040 is an
unalloyed steel.
This disparity in hardenability behavior for the five alloys in Figure 2.34
is explained by the presence of nickel, chromium, and molybdenum in the
alloy steels. These alloying elements delay the austenite-to-pearlite and/or
bainite reactions, as explained above; this permits more martensite to
form for a particular cooling rate, yielding a greater hardness. The righthand axis of Figure 2.34 shows the approximate percentage of martensite
that is present at various hardness for these alloys.
The hardenability curves also depend on carbon content. This effect is
demonstrated in Figure 2.35 for a series of alloy steels in which only the
concentration of carbon is varied. The hardness at any Jominy position
increases with the concentration of carbon. Also, during the industrial
production of steel, there is always a slight, unavoidable variation in
composition and average grain size from one batch to another.
49
Figure 2.35 Hardenability curves for four 8600 series alloys of indicated
carbon content.
50
51
52
Solution:
From Figure 2.38, a hardness of HRC 40 in a 9310 steel corresponds to a
Jominy distance of 10/16 in. (10oC/s). If we assume the same Jominy
distance, the other steels shown in Figure 2.38 have the following
hardnesses at the critical location:
1050 HRC 28
1080 HRC 36
8640 HRC 52
4340 HRC 60
4320 HRC 31
In Table 2-1, we find that the 86xx steels contain less alloying elements
than the 43xx steels; thus the 8640 steel is probably less expensive than
the 4340 steel and might be our best choice. We must also consider other
factors such as durability.
53
54
Solution:
Several quenching media are listed in Table 2-2. We can find an
approximate H coefficient for each of the quenching media, then use
Figure 2.39 to estimate the Jominy distance in a 1.5-in. diameter bar for
each media. Finally, we can use the hardenability curve (Figure 2.38) to
find the hardness in the 4320 steel. The results are listed below.
The last three methods, based on brine or agitated water, are satisfactory.
Using an unagitated brine quenchant might be least expensive, since no
extra equipment is needed to agitate the quenching bath. However, H2O is
less corrosive than the brine quenchant.
55