You are on page 1of 1
5 Demers v Holer Christine... MR. DEMERS: Same. HER WORSHIP: ...Santos. Now, I have just given you a rough copy gleamed from the two informations that you provided to the Justices that are the subject of this mandamus and basically what I’ve indicated here is, it is alleged by you ~ and I don’t know what your occupation is, sir? MR. DEMERS: Right now I’m just a seasonal laborer ... (unintelligible)... HER WORSHIP: Okay, so if I put laborer... MR. DEMERS: Laborer, yeah. HER WORSHIP: ...is that acceptable? Okay. MR. DEMERS: It is. HER WORSHIP: It is - you're saying that you “have reasonable grounds to fear and do fear that John Holer, hereinafter called the defendant, will cause personal injury to himself or to his spouse, Christine Santos, or will damage his or her property on account of a threat made between January the 15, 2013 and December 29", 2013, at the City of Niagara Falls.” MR. DEMERS: A series of threats. HER WORSHIP: Yeah. In the words or to the affect... MR. DEMERS: Okay. HER WORSHIP: ...general affect, “that John Holer has an ongoing civil suit in Superior Court against the complainant”. That’s the, the parameters between the two. “Mr. Holer continually drives past the complainan

You might also like