Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Wars of
Independence
Learning Objective
Name
William
Wallace
Robert the
Bruce
Edward I
John Balliol
Key Points
How
important
5: Battle of Falkirk
Balliol Crowned
Battle of Falkirk
Execution of Wallace
Key Areas
When revising it is important to split your history
into manageable sections
There are five key ones in this topic
The succession crisis
The Reign of King John
William Wallace
The Scottish collapse
Robert the Bruce
What happened?
When did it happen?
What were the consequences?
William Wallace
Key information
Outline of his career
Battle of Stirling Bridge
Wallace as Guardian
The importance of Wallace - his strengths
and weaknesses
The Examination
Describe Question:
At least One or Two relevant pieces of accurate
and explained information from the source
At least One or two pieces of accurate and
explained information from your own
knowledge
Plus - two or three other pieces of information
from either the source or your own knowledge
Evaluation
This is a key skill
Look at the sheet you have been given
You will need to place these in order of
how important they are
You will have ten minutes to do this
Feedback
Individual Work
Peer Assessment
Swap your work with another student
Now, read through the paragraph that
you have been given
Find two things that are really good and
one thing that could be made even
better
Relative Evaluation
Even harder and possibly more important than ordinary evaluation
Take four of your choices (two pairs)
Explain why one is more important than the one below it. Make
reference to both of them
For example: Wallaces victory at Stirling Bridge is much more
important than the defeat of King John as it gave hope to the Scottish.
It also ushered in the age of Wallace and the things that he was able to
do made an enormous difference to Scotland. He introduced reforms to
the army and he began getting international recognition for his
regime. Perhaps most important was his appointment of Lamberton as
Bishop of St Andrews. John did have an important role. Had he not
been there, Scotland may not have been in so desperate a shape but
he actually had very little impact on the actual situation. Scotland was
in the same situation after King John as before.