This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Case No. 403868V
NATIONAL BLOGGERS CLUB, ET AL.,
DEFENDANT WALKER’S SUPPLEMENT TO HIS OPPOSITION TO THE
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STAY THIS COURT’S DECISION
OF JANUARY 12, 2016 (DKT. NO. 155)
NOW COMES Defendant Aaron J. Walker, Esq., and files this Supplement to his
Opposition to the Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay this Court’s Decision of January 12, 2016 (Dkt. No.
155)1 and states the following:
1. On January 19, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a motion to stay this Court’s January 12, 2016, granting a
dismissal and partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 155).
2. In that motion, the Plaintiff asked this Court to stay the partial summary judgment until the Court
of Special Appeals had a chance to rule on his appeal of Kimberlin v. Walker, et al., No. 380966V
(Md. Mont. Co. Cir. Ct. 2013).2 For instance, in his conclusion, the Plaintiff makes the following
request for relief: “Wherefore, Plaintiff moves this Court to stay its January 12, 2016 Order [sic]
until the Court of Special Appeals rules on Kimberlin v. Walker, supra.”
3. As of February 2, 2016, that request is now moot. Attached as Exhibit A is a copy of the
unreported opinion in the Court of Special Appeals affirming this Court’s decision in Kimberlin
1 Mr. Walker has simultaneously filed a motion for leave to file this supplement.
2 The appeal is styled as Kimberlin v. Walker, et al., Sept. Term 2014 Nos. 1553 and 2099, Sept.
Term 2015 No. 365 (Md. App. 2016).
v. Walker, et al. in its entirety, cited solely because it is “relevant under the doctrine of... res
judicata,” Md. Rule 1-104(b), and not as precedent or persuasive authority. This Court can
determine it is authentic by examining the unreported opinions listed the Court of Special
Appeals website. The unreported opinions page can be found here: http://www.courts.state.md
.us/appellate/unreportedopinions/201602unreported.html. Further, the specific opinion can be
unreportedopinions/2016/1553s14.pdf. However, the print out of the opinion is given to this
Court for its convenience.
4. Therefore, with the Court of Special Appeals having ruled in Mr. Walker’s favor, the Plaintiff’s
motion for a stay is now moot, providing an additional reason to deny that motion for a stay.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff's motion to stay or reconsider this Court’s January 12, 2016, order
should be denied on its merits or because it is moot, and this Court should grant any other relief
that is just and equitable.
Wednesday, February 03, 2016
Aaron J. Walker, Esq.
Va Bar# 48882
Manassas, Virginia 20109
I, Aaron Walker, solemnly affirm under the penalties of perjury that the contents of the
foregoing paper are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief and that all
attached exhibits are true and correct copies of the originals.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on the
, 2016, I served copies of this
document on Brett Kimberlin at [redacted], Bethesda, Maryland 20817, via U. S. Mail and on the
following co-Defendants via email: William Hoge via Patrick Ostronic; DB Capital Strategies,
Dan Backer, Esq. via Dan Backer, Esq.; and Lee Stranahan, pro se.