You are on page 1of 1

Assessment Feedback

Summative Formative

Student Name Student ID

Programme BA (Hons) Design for Interaction Level 1


Project Title Project Value
Unit Title Personal and Professional Development 1 Unit Code PPD1/ACT107
Project Leader Unit Leader

Assessment Criteria Indicative Grading


Excellent V Good Good Satisfactory Basic Fail N/A
1 Thoroughly review their own strengths and weaknesses
(particularly as a learner) and relate these to relevant
models, such as learning styles; (LO1)
2 Develop and set out personal and professional goals,
particularly in relation to learning, that are informed by the
models covered within the unit; (LO2)
3 Evidence their learning and personal and professional
development by gathering relevant material and presenting
this in an appropriate form. (LO3)
Note 1 - Unless specified in the Project Brief it is assumed that all assessment criteria are equally weighted

Overall comment including strengths and areas for improvement

Grade Banding Brief Grade Descriptor


A+ 90-100 High Excellent all round work or outstanding
A 80-89 Medium performance Grade (where appropriate)
A- 70-79 Low
B+ 67-69 High High level achievement or very good level of
B 64-66 Medium performance
B- 60-63 Low
C+ 57-59 High Good level of achievement or proficient
C 54-56 Medium performance
C- 50-53 Low
D+ 47-49 High Satisfactory level of achievement or competent
D 44-46 Medium performance
D- 40-43 Low
E 35-39 Marginal Elementary achievement or basic level of Note 2 - All summative grades are subject to ratification by the Examination Board
Pass performance
F+ 30-34 Marginal Does not achieve the learning outcomes but
Fail may be some element of understanding or Please contact your Unit Leader about retrieval
competence arrangements (where appropriate)
Assessor(s)
F < 30 Name:
Fail No evidence of achievement or competence
F- > 10 Poor Fail
0 0 no submission or special circumstances

Student signature: Date sent to student: