You are on page 1of 1
Sea raaueon ul 13 4 15 16 17 18 19 20 my 22 23 25 26 27 28 — pee et — -— pr wig UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.) CASE NO. C 04-0807 VRW ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ; PROPOSED ORDER PRECLUDING v. ) DEFENDANT FROM DISCUSSING RDB ) DATABASE PURSUANT TO RULE 37(¢)(1) ) ORACLE CORPORATION ) ) Defendant. ) ) ean ne cn ee) PROPOSED ORDER AND NOW, this day of June, 2004, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Preclude Defendant from Discussing Rdb Database During Trial (filed on May 26, 2004), and Oracle Corporation's Response, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion is GRANTED. Oracle Corporation is PRECLUDED offering any evidence, testimony, or argument “at trial, at a hearing, or on any motion” relating to Rdb Database. IT IS SO ORDERED Date: 6/ _/2004 VAUGHN R. WALKER United States District Judge