You are on page 1of 23

3

More

Next Blog

Create Blog

Sign In

Legal options....
Sunday , 3 February 2013

WHEN FALSE FIR IS REGISTERED


WHEN FALSE FIR IS REGISTERED; OR WHEN FALSE FIR IS
ANTICIPATED TO BE FILED BY ANY PERSON; AND WHERE
PURSUANT TO SAID FALSE FIR, ARREST IS ANTICIPATED THEN
DEPENDING UPON THE PECULIAR FACTS OF EACH CASE,
FOLLOWING STEPS MAY BE TAKEN
http://commonlaw-sandeep.blogspot.in/2013/10/offences-acts-and-omissionsevidences.html
(i) A letter1 may be recorded to the concerned Police station where the false FIR is
filed, with a copy to Superintendent of Police or Commissioner of Police, stating therein
that a false FIR is filed against me and advising the Police authority that in case the
Police intends to arrest the Person named in the allegedly false FIR, then they should
scrupulously / strictly follow the due process of law as contained u/ss 157(1),
41(1)(b)(i)(ii), 41(2) r/w section 60-A of CrPC, 1973; and also strictly adhere to the
guidelines framed by SC in the Joginder Kumar case. The said SC guidelines were thus
PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

issued by all DGP of each State to all the Police stations in the State, on the specific
directions of the Supreme Court in the said Joginder Kumar case in 1994. Rules in
respect of arrest of women are contained in section 46 of CrPC, 1973.
(ii) Obtaining Anticipatory Bail2 from Sessions court or High Court u/s 438 of CrPC,
1973; and it is advisable to seek alternative prayer in the Anticipatory Bail Application (in
case Anticipatory Bail is refused by the Sessions / High Court) that in case the Police
intends to arrest the person/s named in the FIR, the Police shall scrupulously / strictly
follow the due process of law as contained u/ss 157(1), 41(1)(b)(i)(ii), 41(2) r/w section
60-A of CrPC, 1973; and also strictly adhere to the guidelines framed by SC in the
Joginder Kumar case
(iii) In lieu of Application for Anticipatory Bail or where Anticipatory Bail is refused, a
Writ Petition3 in the respective High Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India
may be filed, seeking a Writ of Mandamus, that, in the light of Article 21 of the
Constitution of India, which guarantees that No person shall be deprived of his life and
personal liberty, except according to the procedure established by law, and thereby the
HC directing the Police authorities, not to mechanically arrest on mere filing of FIR and
Police to scrupulously follow the due process of law as contained in sections 157(1),
41(1)(b)(i)(ii), 41(2) r/w section 60-A of CrPC, 1973 and strictly adhere to the guidelines
framed by SC in the Joginder Kumar case, in case the Police intends to arrest the
Petitioner (the person named in the FIR).
(iv) An application u/s 156(3)4 or complaint u/s 2005, to Judicial Magistrate /
Metropolitan Magistrate, against those Police officers if they have knowingly
registered false FIR / or have falsely arrested / or if are falsely prosecuting the case,
alleging therein your complaint that said Police officer have committed the offence
defined u/ss 218 and 220 or 342 of IPC, 1860, as the case may be. Nevertheless, a
regular FIR6 can also be lodged against the said Police officers u/s 154.

PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(v) An Application u/s 4827 of CrPC, 1973 may be preferred, before respective High
Court, for High Court in the exercise of their inherent powers, to quash the said false
FIR.
(vi) Where, during the pendency of section 482 Application in the High court, if the
charge sheet is filed by the Police before the competent Magistrates court, the
concerned person, may either seek the quashing of charge sheet7, or, may file a
discharge Application8 (in warrant cases only) before the concerned Magistrates court
u/s 239 or 245 of CrPC, 1973. Where the case is committed to Sessions Court, then the
discharge Application can be filed before the Sessions Court u/s 227 of CrPC.
(vii) It is a criminal offence u/s 182 and 211 of IPC, 1860 to knowingly make a false
complaint / accusation and register a false complaint against any person. In such cases
the innocent person cannot register FIR or make complaint to Magistrates court against
those persons who have filed false Complaint.
In such cases, as far as offence u/s 182 is concerned, a complaint9 can be made to the
Police officer to whom false complaint has been made, or complaint may be made to an
authority higher to the concerned Police officer, and the concerned Police officer or the
higher authority, is empowered to file the case in the Magistrates Court against the
person who has made false complaint to the Police.
Where the offence is alleged to have committed u/s 211 of IPC, but the matter did not
reached the Court of law for trial and proceedings / investigation terminated, then, a
direct Complaint u/s 20010 or Application u/s 156(3)11 of CrPC, 1973, can be made
before the Magistrates court concerned against those persons who have made false
charge of offence.
Where, in pursuance to said false complaint, criminal proceedings before the Magistrates
Court / Sessions Court have been initiated, then, an Application12 u/s 340 read with
PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

section 195 of CrPC 1973, may be preferred before the said Magistrate / Sessions court,
against those persons, praying therein for Magistrates / Sessions court to refer the said
offence of false accusation to the appropriate / competent Magistrate Court of
jurisdiction. (IPC section 182: False information, with intent to cause public servant to
use his lawful power to the injury of another person. IPC section 211: False charge of
offence made with intent to injure)
However, aforesaid two section 182 and 211 preferably be invoked only after (a) where
the Police before / after registering FIR, has terminated the investigation on the
ground of falsity of complaint, or (b) where FIR is quashed by the HC, or (c) where if
the trial Court has discharged the Accused or has acquitted the Accused, and no Appeal
is preferred against the acquittal. However, Application invoking sections 182 and/or 211
should be invoked keeping in mind the limitation period provided u/ss 467 to 473 of CrPC,
1973.
(viii) where the Trial Court acquits the person against whom false FIR / Complaint is
made, Compensation may be sought u/s 250 of CrPC, 1973, from that Trial court, against
the persons who have knowingly filed false FIR / complaint.
(ix) A Complaint13 may be made to Commissioner of Police / Superintendent of Police
against the concerned Police Officer of the concerned Police Station,
seeking disciplinary proceedings for "Misconduct" / Malicious prosecution.
http://thepracticeoflawjalan.blogspot.in/2012/11/public-service-jurisprudence.html
(x) A Civil Suit14 for exemplary damages can be filed for the Malicious prosecution
against the complainant and / or against the Police officers concerned. (Pls see Article
74 of the Limitation Act, 1963).
(xi) Complaints against police officers of and up to the rank of Deputy Superintendent of
Police, may be made to Police Complaints Authority15. The said authority may be
PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

situated at the Office of the Superintendent of Police of the concerned district or


Commissioner of Police of the concerned metropolitan city. The said authority is
constituted pursuant to Order of the Supreme Court in the famous Prakash Singhs case,
in the year 2006.
(xii) Complaints against Superintendent of Police or Commissioner of Police may be
made to Police Complaints Authority16. The said authority may be situated at the
Office of the Director General of Police of the concerned State. The said authority is
constituted pursuant to Order of the Supreme Court in the famous Prakash Singhs case,
in the year 2006.
Note: In every case where Application u/s 156(3) or Criminal Complaint u/s 200 of
CrPC, 1973, may be preferred, the said Application or Complaint may also be preferred
Orally, instead of in writing, before the competent Magistrate Court. [Section 2(d) of
CrPC, 1973]

Related Links

Sr.
No.
1

Nature of Remedy

Anticipatory Bail u/s


438 of CrPC, 1973,
in the Sessions /
High Court
Writ Petition

3
PRO version

Link

Letter to concerned http://legaldraftsjalan.blogspot.in/2015/02/letter-toPolice station


police-stn-to-follow-due.html

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

7
8

9
10

11

12
PRO version

Application
u/s
156(3)
for
the
offences u/ss 218,
220 and 342 of IPC,
1860
Criminal Complaint
u/s 200 for the
offences u/ss 218,
220 and 342 of IPC,
1860.
FIR for the offences
u/ss 218, 220 and
342 of IPC, 1860
Application u/s 482
before High Court
Discharge
Application u/s 227 /
239 / 245 of CrPC,
1973
Complaint before for
the offence
Criminal Complaint
u/s 200 for the
offence u/s 211 of
IPC, 1860
Application
u/s
156(3)
for
the
offence u/s 211 of
IPC, 1860
Application u/s 340
r/w 195 of CrPC,

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

13

14
15

16

1973,
for
the
offences u/s 182 and
211 of IPC, 1860
Complaint
before
CP / SP against the
concerned
Police
officer
for
Misconduct
Civil
Suit
for
Malicious Prosection
Complaint
before
Police
Complaint
Authority against the
concerned
Police
officer
Complaint
before
Police
Complaint
Authority against the
CP / SP for their
alleged inaction

Legal Prescriptions (Index)


http://thepracticeoflawjalan.blogspot.in/2012/04/legal-options.html
Sentence of Caution
http://thepracticeoflawjalan.blogspot.in/2012/11/sentence-of-caution.html

PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

Posted by The Practice of Law at 06:15

No comments:

Recommend this on Google

Labels: Legal Options

WHEN POLICE NEGLECTS TO INVESTIGATING


THE CASE
WHEN POLICE NEGLECTS TO INVESTIGATING THE CASE
(i) Writ Petition1 under Article 226 of Constitution of India, may be made to the
respective High Court, thereby HC directing the Police to make thorough investigation,
or directing the State Govt. to refer the case to an independent agency like CBI or CID
for thorough investigation.
(ii) Where, the Police authorities are being duly furnished of all the evidences against the
accused persons, and yet they are not filing the Police Report u/s 173 of CrPC, 1973, a
Writ Petition2 under Article 226 of Constitution of India, may be preferred before
concerned High Court, for directing the Police to file Police Report.
(iii) An Application u/s 156(3)3 as aforesaid, before the Judicial Magistrate /
Metropolitan Magistrate, for directing the Police to carry out proper investigation and file
Report; or complaint4 u/s 200 before Judicial Magistrate / Metropolitan, for Honble
Magistrate to cause an Inquiry u/s 202 into the case himself or may direct an
Investigation by a particular Police officer as the Magistrate thinks fit.
PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(iv) An FIR5 u/s 154 or Application6 u/s 156(3) or complaint7 u/s 200 of CrPC, 1973,
can be made before Judicial Magistrate / Metropolitan Magistrate against those Police
officers u/s 213, 214, 217, 221 of IPC, 1860, who have deliberately and dishonestly
neglecting to investigate the case.
(v) A Writ Petition8 may be filed in respective High Court for seeking damages /
compensation, if the inaction of the Police in investigating the case has resulted in
frustration of life and liberty of a person, guaranteed under Article 21 of Constitution
of India.
(vi) A civil suit9 for seeking damages may be filed in the District Court / High court, if
the inaction of the Police has directly resulted in manifest loss of any property.
(vii) A Civil Suit10 for exemplary damages can also be filed for the Irregular exercise of
powers / acts and omissions of Public authorities / Public officials, allegedly in the
pretence / pretext / colour of provisions of an enactment. (Pls see Article 72 of the
Limitation Act, 1963)
http://thepracticeoflawjalan.blogspot.in/2012/04/kinds-of-suits-that-can-be-filed-list.html
(viii) A Complaint may be made to Commissioner of Police / Superintendent of Police11
against the concerned Police Officer of the concerned Police Station for dereliction of
duty, seeking disciplinary proceedings for "Misconduct".
http://thepracticeoflawjalan.blogspot.in/2012/11/public-service-jurisprudence.html
(ix) Complaints against police officers of and up to the rank of Deputy Superintendent of
Police, may be made to Police Complaints Authority12. The said authority may be
situated at the Office of the Superintendent of Police of the concerned district or
Commissioner of Police of the concerned metropolitan city. The said authority is
constituted pursuant to Order of the Supreme Court in the famous Prakash Singhs case,
PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

in the year 2006.


(x) Complaints against Superintendent of Police or Commissioner of Police may be made
to Police Complaints Authority13. The said authority may be situated at the Office of
the Director General of Police of the concerned State. The said authority is constituted
pursuant to Order of the Supreme Court in the famous Prakash Singhs case, in the year
2006.
(xi) Section 166A(b)14 now, expressly makes a punishable offence if the public servant
concerned knowingly disobeys, to the prejudice of any person, any other direction of the
law regulating the manner in which he shall conduct such investigation.
Note: In every case where Application u/s 156(3) or Criminal Complaint u/s 200 of
CrPC, 1973, may be preferred, the said Application or Complaint may also be preferred
Orally, instead of in writing, before the competent Magistrate Court. [Section 2(d) of
CrPC, 1973]

Related Links

Sr.
No.
1

PRO version

Nature of Remedy

Link

Writ
Petition
praying
for
Investigation
by
CBI / CID
Writ Petition for
directing Police to
file Police Report

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

8
9
10
PRO version

contemplated u/s
173 of CrPC, 1973
Application
u/s
156(3) for directing
the Police to carry
out
proper
Investigation and
file Report
Criminal Complaint
u/s 200 of CrPC,
1973
FIR against those
Police officers u/s
213, 214, 217, 221
of IPC, 1860
Application
u/s
156(3)
against
those
Police
officers u/s 213,
214, 217, 221 of
IPC, 1860
Criminal Complaint
against those Police
officers u/s 213,
214, 217, 221 of
IPC, 1860
Writ Petition for
damages
Civil
Suit
for
damages
Civil
Suit
for

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

11

12

damages
for
irregular exercise
of powers by the
concerned Police
officer
Complaint before
CP / SP against the
concerned Police
officer
for
dereliction of duty
Complaint before
Police Complaint
Authority against
the
concerned
Police officer

http://legaldraftsjalan.blogspot.in/2015/02/complaintbef-police-comp-auth-cp-sp_98.html

http://legaldraftsjalan.blogspot.in/2015/02/letter-to-cjito-take-su-moto-contempt_64.html
http://legaldraftsjalan.blogspot.in/2015/02/letter-to-cj-tohc-to-take-su-moto.html

13

14

PRO version

Complaint before http://legaldraftsjalan.blogspot.in/2015/02/complaintPolice Complaint bef-police-comp-auth-dgp_59.html


Authority against
CP /SP for their
inaction
FIR / Application
u/s
156(3)
/
Criminal Complaint
u/s 200 for the
offence of Section
166A(b) of IPC,
1860

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

Legal Prescriptions (Index)


http://thepracticeoflawjalan.blogspot.in/2012/04/legal-options.html
Sentence of Caution
http://thepracticeoflawjalan.blogspot.in/2012/11/sentence-of-caution.html
Posted by The Practice of Law at 06:13

No comments:

Recommend this on Google

Labels: Legal Options

WHEN POLICE ILLEGALLY ARREST


WHEN POLICE ILLEGALLY ARREST
First of all it must be stated that powers for effecting arrest are ordinarily conferred
upon Police officers only (except in exceptional cases, arrest may be effected by
Magistrate / Private persons), that is to say, Police officers who have powers to
investigate the case and powers to file the Police Report including Chargesheet u/s 173
of CrPC, 1973.
(i) The procedure for effecting arrest has been set out in section 41B of CrPC, 1973.
The said section is reproduced below.
Section 41B: Procedure of arrest and duties of officer making arrest:
PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

Every police officer while making an arrest shall


(a) bear an accurate, visible and clear identification of his name which will facilitate easy
identification;
(b) prepare a memorandum of arrest which shall be
(i) attested by at least one witness, who is a member of the family of the person arrested
or a respectable member of the locality where the arrest is made;
(ii) countersigned by the person arrested; and
(c) inform the person arrested, unless the memorandum is attested by a member of his
family, that he has a right to have a relative or a friend named by him to be informed of
his arrest.
(ii) Whenever Police intends to arrests any person, it is also obligatory upon police,
among other things (a) to clearly inform him about the offence he is alleged to have
committed section 50 of CrPC 1973; (b) the Police are obliged to immediately inform
to any of the friend or relative of the arrested person about the arrest of that person and
the place of his custody section 50-A (c) if the offence / offences alleged is/are
defined as bailable offences, then, Police must inform the accused person about his right
of immediate release on furnishing of Bail (Surety) (section 50-A) or by executing a
Bond (Section 441 of CrPC, 1973) in lieu of Bail. The Police may also release a person
on deposit of certain sum of money for accused person to arrange for the surety.
(iii) The arrested person or his relative / friend may record a Letter1 to the concerned
Police station, stating therein about the position of law as regards to restrictions in
powers of arrests, and that the Police officer effecting arrest is not following the
mandate of law as set out in sections 157(1), 41(1)(b)(i)(ii), 41(2) r/w section 60-A of
CrPC, 1973) and also knowingly disregarding the guidelines framed by SC in the case of
Joginder Kumar versus State of U.P., 1994, for effecting arrests, and thereby advising
the Police to release the arrested person forthwith. Also, it is within the powers of Police
u/s 169 r/w 59 or section 437(2) of CrPC, 1973, to release the person who is arrested, on
the execution of Bail Bond by the said person.
PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(iv) An oral / written complaint2 may be made before local Magistrates court within
whose jurisdiction the person is arrested, thereby requesting to take immediate
cognizance of the complaint, and alleging that the Police has wrongfully arrested the
person and the Police has thereby committed the offence of (a) contempt of the
Supreme Court in willful disobedience to guidelines framed in respect of effecting arrest;
(b) sections 220 and 342 of IPC, 1860; and praying the Magistrate to issue search
warrant for the arrested person and be produced before him immediately. Section 97 of
CrPC, 1973, empowers the Magistrates court to issue search warrant for persons
wrongfully confined.
(v) The SC binding guidelines, before making any arrest, is provided in the case of
Joginder Kumar versus State of U.P.1994 (4) SCC 260 : AIR 1994 SC 1349.
(vi) The relative / friend of the arrested person may file a Writ Petition of Habeas
Corpus3 before respective High Court for the alleged illegal arrest and seek immediate
release of the person illegally arrested.
(vii) Any person who is arrested must be produced before the nearest Judicial
Magistrates court within 24 hours of his arrest (Section 57 of CrPC, 1973). When the
arrested person is produced before the Judicial Magistrates, the arrested person or his
relative / friend may present a simple Bail Application4, before concerned Magistrates
Court and inform the Magistrate, among other things, that the said arrest is patently
illegal, for being effected without following the due process of law and in wilful disregard
/ defiance of guidelines framed by SC in the case of Joginder Kumar versus State of
U.P., 1994, and may pray for immediate release, on Bail on furnishing of Surety5 or
execution of Personal Release Bond; and where court insists for surety, then, some
reasonable time may be sought for furnishing of surety and release may be sought on
depositing of reasonable amount of cash in lieu of furnishing surety thereof.
(viii) Where it is alleged that Police has inflicted violence, beaten / tortured the accused
PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

person in the Police custody, than the same must be informed to the Magistrate before
whom the accused is produced and Magistrate should be requested to register offence
u/s 330, 331 of the IPC and section 29 of the Indian Police Act 1861 against the
respective Police officer for causing violence / beating / torture; and also requesting the
said Magistrate Court to make a reference to the High Court concerned that the said
Police officer must be hauled up for Contempt of the Court, i.e. Contempt of the SC
strictest guidelines given in DK Basu Vs State Of West Bengal case5.
Section 330 and 331 of IPC provide for punishment for voluntarily causing hurt and
section 29 of Indian Police Act 1861 provides for imprisonment for offences including
unwarranted personal violence to any person in his custody.
In the light of section 176 of CrPC 1973, Magistrate is bound to investigate every death
in Custody. Even it is mandatory for police to inform State Human Rights Commission or
National Human Rights Commission about every custodial death.
Failure to implement strictest of guidelines on law of arrests and on Tortures as laid
down by the SC in DK BasuVs State of West Bengal will render any Policeman to be
hauled for Contempt of Court in any High Court of the Country.
(ix) Where the Bail is refused by the Magistrate, thereby committing the accused to
either Police custody or to Judicial custody (Jail), then, immediately, a fresh Bail
Application6 may be filed before Sessions Court or before High Court u/s 439 of CrPC.
(x) However, where the arrested person is not produced before the Magistrates court
within 24 hours of his arrest, then such confinement becomes illegal beyond 24 hours,
and, an oral / written Application7 may be made u/s 97 of CrPC, before any magistrate
court and requesting / praying the Magistrate to issue search warrant for the said person
unlawfully confined, or Writ of Habeas Corpus may be preferred before the concerned
High Court.
PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(xi) If one cannot go to High Court for Writ Petition of Habeas Corpus, then, one can
(a) personally approach or make an Application to State Human Rights Commission, (b)
National Human Rights Commission8; (iii) make an Application to the Registry of the
Supreme Court9; (iv) to respective High Court10, stating therein about the said illegal
arrest effected, in willful disregard of the directions given by the SC in Joginder Kumar
case, seeking their intervention for the release; followed by an RTI Application11 to the
aforesaid four authorities, on steps taken by them in pursuance to said RTI Application.
Life and Liberty clause under RTI may be invoked to obtain information within 48 hours.
(xii) Writ of Mandamus12 may be preferred before respective High court seeking
exemplary Damages / Compensation from respective State Government, but only after
the High Court in the Writ of Habeas Corpus, or the concerned Magistrates Court had
released the accused, and recorded in its / his Order that the said arrests was illegal, or
the concerned Human Rights Commission comes to the conclusion that the said arrest
was illegal.
(xiii) A Contempt Petition (Civil)13 before respective High court can be filed alleging
therein that the Police illegally arrested the Petitioner in willful disobedience / defiance to
SC guidelines framed in aforesaid Joginder Kumar case.
(xiv) A Letter Petition may be recorded to the Chief Justice of the concerned High
Court10 / Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court9, requesting them to take Su Moto
Cognizance of the alleged contempt of the Court, and the copy of said letter may be sent
to the concerned Police officer. RTI application11 may be made to the said concerned
High Court / Supreme Court, to know if the said Court has taken Su Moto cognizance of
the said Letter Petition.
(xv) An FIR14 to Police, or complaint before Magistrates Court u/s 156(3)15 or u/s
PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

20016 of CrPC, 1973, may be preferred against the concerned Police officer who have
illegally arrested and has thereby have committed the offence defined u/ss 220 and 342
of IPC 1860.
(xvi) A Civil Suit17 for exemplary damages can be filed for the Irregular exercise of
powers / acts and omissions of Public authorities / Public officials, allegedly in the
pretence / pretext / colour of provisions of an enactment. (Pls see Article 72 of the
Limitation Act, 1963).
http://thepracticeoflawjalan.blogspot.in/2012/04/kinds-of-suits-that-can-be-filed-list.html
(xvii) A Complaint18 may be made to Commissioner of Police / Superintendent of Police
against the concerned Police Officer of the concerned Police Station,
seeking disciplinary proceedings for "Misconduct".
http://thepracticeoflawjalan.blogspot.in/2012/11/public-service-jurisprudence.html
(xviii) Arrests during Public protests Ordinarily, all the detainees are released on their
execution of Personal Release (PR) Bond in the Police station. No money is required to
be deposited while executing the saidPR Bond.
(xix) Police Raids at Parties: There could be indiscriminate / mindless arrests by Police
during such raids at parties. However, the procedure for arrests remains the same as
stated hereinbefore. The persons present at such Party should enforce the concerned
Police officer to adhere to laws of the land before effecting any arrest or detention.
(xx) Complaints against police officers of and up to the rank of Deputy Superintendent
of Police, may be made to Police Complaints Authority19. The said authority may be
situated at the Office of the Superintendent of Police of the concerned district or
Commissioner of Police of the concerned metropolitan city. The said authority is
constituted pursuant to Order of the Supreme Court in the famous Prakash Singhs case,
in the year 2006.
PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

(xxi) Complaints against Superintendent of Police or Commissioner of Police may be


made to Police Complaints Authority20. The said authority may be situated at the
Office of the Director General of Police of the concerned State. The said authority is
constituted pursuant to Order of the Supreme Court in the famous Prakash Singhs case,
in the year 2006.
Note: In every case where Application u/s 156(3) or Criminal Complaint u/s 200 of
CrPC, 1973, may be preferred, the said Application or Complaint may also be preferred
Orally, instead of in writing, before the competent Magistrate Court. [Section 2(d) of
CrPC, 1973]

Related Links

Sr.
No.
1

PRO version

Nature of Remedy

Link

Letter to concerned
Police station about
the factum of illegal
arrest being carried
out
Complaint
to
Magistrate, for him
to duly exercise his
powers u/s 97 of
CrPC, 1973
Writ Petition for
Habeas Corpus

http://legaldraftsjalan.blogspot.in/2015/02/letter-topolice-that-arrest-is-illegal.html

http://legaldraftsjalan.blogspot.in/2015/02/complaint-tojudicial-magistrate-us-97.html

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

5
6

7
8

10

11

12

13
PRO version

Bail
Application
before Magistrates
Court u/s 439 of
CrPC, 1973
Surety Application
Bail
Application
before Sessions /
High Court
Complaint before
Magistrates Court
Complaint before
State / National
Human
Rights
Commission
Letter Complaint to
Chief Justice of the
High Court
Letter Complaint to
Chief Justice of
India
of
the
Supreme Court
RTI
Application
before HC / SC to
know action taken
on representation
made to them
Writ Petition for
damages for illegal
arrest
Contempt Petition
(Civil Contempt)

http://legaldraftsjalan.blogspot.in/2015/02/letter-tonhrc-shrc-about-illegal-arrest.html

http://legaldraftsjalan.blogspot.in/2015/02/letter-to-cjof-hc-to-take-su-moto_28.html
http://legaldraftsjalan.blogspot.in/2015/02/letter-to-cjito-take-su-moto-contempt_53.html

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

PRO version

FIR
for
the
offences u/ss 220
and 342 of IPC,
1860
Application
u/s
156(3)
for
the
offences u/ss 220
and 342 of IPC,
1860
Criminal Complaint
u/s 200 for the
offences u/ss 220
and 342 of IPC,
1860
Civil
Suit
for
damages for illegal
arrest
Complaint before
CP / SP for alleged
Misconduct of the
concerned Police
officer
Complaint before
Police
Complaint
Authority against
the
concerned
Police officer
Complaint before
Police
Complaint
Authority against
the CP / SP for

http://legaldraftsjalan.blogspot.in/2015/02/complaintagainst-police-officer.html

http://legaldraftsjalan.blogspot.in/2015/02/complaintbef-police-comp-auth-cp-sp_23.html

http://legaldraftsjalan.blogspot.in/2015/02/complaintbef-police-comp-auth-dgp_76.html

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

the CP / SP for
their failure to take
action

Legal Prescriptions (Index)


http://thepracticeoflawjalan.blogspot.in/2012/04/legal-options.html
Sentence of Caution
http://thepracticeoflawjalan.blogspot.in/2012/11/sentence-of-caution.html

Posted by The Practice of Law at 06:11

No comments:

+1 Recommend this on Google

Labels: Legal Options

Newer Posts

Home

Older Posts

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Blog Archive

2015 (151)
2013 (87)
September (5)
PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

May (9)
April (17)
March (2)
February (4)
WHEN FALSE FIR IS REGISTERED
WHEN POLICE NEGLECTS TO INVESTIGATING ...
WHEN POLICE ILLEGALLY ARREST
WHEN POLICE UNLAWFULLY SUMMONS WITNESSES / ACCUSED...
January (50)
2012 (473)
About Me

The Practice of Law


View my complete profile

Simple template. Template images by luoman. Powered by Blogger.

PRO version

Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API

pdfcrowd.com

You might also like