You are on page 1of 3

HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

PARTICIPATION AND PROFESSIONALISM (P&P)


EVALUATION
INSTRUCTIONS:

1.
2.

Complete this self-evaluation objectively and honestly.


Indicate whether or not you think you met each objective by placing a
tick mark in the appropriate column.
Substantiate, in the Discussion section, your evaluation by providing
examples relative to your performance for each criterion.

3.

Although the instructor reserves the right to determine the final mark for P&P, your self-evaluation will serve
as a basis for instructor evaluation.
STUDENT: Julia Slade

COURSE: HIMP 2420


STUDENT EVALUATION

CRITERION

MET

USUALLY
MET

NOT
MET

INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION
MET

USUALLY
MET

NOT MET

1. TOOK RESPONSIBILITY FOR ONES OWN LEARNING:


Completed assignments, readings
and homework regularly.

Attendance and punctuality


standards met.

Participated in class discussions on


a weekly basis.

Used class time efficiently and


effectively.

Consistently prepared for class.

Other: Specify
Contributed to discussion
forum

Discussion on how you took responsibility for your own learning:


Outside of program- continued to make adjustments in work, health, family responsibilities and living arrangements to
facilitate being able to stay in program.
In program- continued to make alterations in study/work groups, set clear boundaries with non-participators and
continued to work on stress reduction.
Continued to acquire complimentary courses (Privacy and PIDP) to enhance HIM knowledge and in preparation for
practicum and graduation.
Continued to network in anticipation of practicum and graduation

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/311058313.doc November 14, 2008 mc

HIMP 2320 Participation and Professionalism (P & P) Evaluation cont


STUDENT EVALUATION
CRITERION
MET
USUALLY
NOT
MET

INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION
MET

USUALLY
MET

MET

NOT
MET

2. INTERACTS WITH OTHERS IN A RESPECTFUL, PROFESSIONAL, CONSTRUCTIVE AND SUPPORTIVE


MANNER:

Collaborated well and contributed x


to the group assignments and
discussions.
Constructively and objectively
X
handled conflict situations.
Discussion of your interaction with others (students and classmates):

Set clear boundaries with workload in group settings


Accepted lower group mark rather than accepting previous uneven contributions
Provided study and coaching support for numerous classmates

STUDENT EVALUATION
CRITERION
3.

MET

USUALLY
MET

NOT
MET

INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION
MET

USUALLY
MET

NOT MET

DEMONSTRATES AN INTEREST IN THE PROFESSION AND IS COMMITTED TO


PERSONAL GROWTH:

Discussed learning with


X
colleagues and others.
Asked relevant questions,
X
completed extra readings,
performed extra activities, shared
extra information.
Extrapolated and applied course
X
knowledge globally.
Contributed ideas in a
X
constructive manner.
Enjoyed and showed enthusiasm
X
about learning.
Demonstrated flexibility and
X
initiative in new or changing
situations.
Discussion on how you demonstrated an interest in the profession, etc:
Continued to participate in discussion forums, monitor official website, and related sources of HIM information.

TOTAL SCORE:

3/3

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/311058313.doc November 14, 2008 mc

/3

/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/311058313.doc November 14, 2008 mc