Wellbore Calculations Multiphase Flow Definitions

© All Rights Reserved

53 views

Wellbore Calculations Multiphase Flow Definitions

© All Rights Reserved

- PHYSICS AND ANAESTHESIA
- Energy Loss in Pipes
- PSV Reation Force - Two Phase - Assumption Close Sytem
- Friction Loss
- Mass Transfer in Wetted Walls
- Reynolds Number Group2
- A Simplified Pipeline Calculations Program
- A Review of Water Hammer Theory and Practice
- ultra pro
- GSETB0006
- CH 10 gases
- 779.pdf
- MP0593-ICPS
- Chapter 6_Gas Well Performance
- STEAM TRACING engineering_guide.pdf
- Gas Looplinestpt
- 3- Pressure Drop Due to Friction
- Formal Report 2
- Flow Through Triangular Notch999000
- Research on Water Distribution Network

You are on page 1of 37

Wellbore Calculations

Multiphase Flow Definitions

Input Volume Fraction

The input volume fractions are defined as:

Where:

= gas formation volume factor

= input gas volume fraction

= input liquid volume fraction

= gas flow rate (at standard conditions)

= liquid flow rate (at prevailing pressure and temperature)

= superficial gas velocity

= superficial liquid velocity

= mixture velocity (

Note:

is the liquid rate at the prevailing pressure and temperature. Similarly,

the prevailing pressure and temperature.

and

, are known quantities, and are often used as correlating

variables in empirical multiphase correlations.

The in-situ volume fraction, (or ), is often the value that is estimated by multiphase correlations. Because

of "slip" between phases, the "holdup" (

). For example, a single-phase gas can percolate through a wellbore containing water. In this

situation = 0 (single-phase gas is being produced), but > 0 (the wellbore contains water). The in-situ

volume fraction is defined as follows:

Where:

= cross-sectional area occupied by the liquid phase

A = total cross-sectional area of the pipe

When two or more phases are present in a pipe, they tend to flow at different in-situ velocities. These insitu velocities depend on the density and viscosity of the phase. Usually the phase that is less dense will

flow faster than the other. This causes a "slip" or holdup effect, which means that the in-situ volume

fractions of each phase (under flowing conditions) will differ from the input volume fractions of the pipe.

Mixture Density

The mixture density is a measure of the in-situ density of the mixture, and is defined as follows:

Where:

= in-situ liquid volume fraction (liquid holdup)

= in-situ gas volume fraction

= mixture density

= liquid density

= gas density

Note: The mixture density is defined in terms of in-situ volume fractions (

density is defined in terms of input volume fractions (

).

Mixture Velocity

Mixture Velocity is another parameter often used in multiphase flow correlations. The mixture velocity is

given by:

Where:

= mixture velocity

= superficial liquid velocity

= superficial gas velocity

Mixture Viscosity

The mixture viscosity is a measure of the in-situ viscosity of the mixture and can be defined in several

different ways. In general, unless otherwise specified, m is defined as follows.

W here:

= in-situ liquid volume fraction (liquid holdup)

= in-situ gas volume fraction

= mixture viscosity

= liquid viscosity

= gas viscosity

Note: The mixture viscosity is defined in terms of in-situ volume fractions (

viscosity is defined in terms of input volume fractions (

).

No-Slip Density

The "no-slip" density is the density that is calculated with the assumption that both phases are moving at

the same in-situ velocity. The no-slip density is therefore defined as follows:

Where:

= input liquid volume fraction

= input gas volume fraction

= no-slip density

= liquid density

= gas density

Note: The no-slip density is defined in terms of input volume fractions (

is defined in terms of in-situ volume fractions (

).

No-Slip Viscosity

The "no-slip" viscosity is the viscosity that is calculated with the assumption that both phases are moving

at the same in-situ velocity. There are several definitions of "no-slip" viscosity. In general, unless

otherwise specified, is defined as follows.

Where:

= input liquid volume fraction

= input gas volume fraction

= no-slip viscosity

= liquid viscosity

= gas viscosity

Superficial Velocity

The superficial velocity of each phase is defined as the volumetric flow rate of the phase divided by the

cross-sectional area of the pipe (as though that phase alone was flowing through the pipe). Therefore:

and

Where:

= gas formation volume factor

D = inside diameter of pipe

= measured gas flow rate (at standard conditions)

= liquid flow rate (at prevailing pressure and temperature)

= superficial gas velocity

= superficial liquid velocity

Since the liquid phase accounts for both oil and water

phase accounts for the solution gas going in and out of the oil as a function of pressure(

), the superficial velocities can be rewritten as:

Where:

= water flow rate in (at stock tank conditions)

= gas flow rate (at standard conditions of 14.65psia and 60F)

= liquid flow rate (oil and water at prevailing pressure and temperature)

= oil formation volume factor

= water formation volume factor

= gas formation volume factor

= solution gas/oil ratio

WC = water of condensation (water content of natural gas, Bbl/MMscf)

The oil, water and gas formation volume factors (

,

and

) are used to convert the flow rates

from standard (or stock tank) conditions to the prevailing pressure and temperature conditions in the pipe.

Since the actual cross-sectional area occupied by each phase is less than the cross-sectional area of the

entire pipe the superficial velocity is always less than the true in-situ velocity of each phase.

Surface Tension

The surface tension (interfacial tension) between the gas and liquid phases has very little effect on twophase pressure drop calculations. However a value is required for use in calculating certain

dimensionless numbers used in some of the pressure drop correlations. Empirical relationships for

estimating the gas/oil interfacial tension and the gas/water interfacial tension were presented by Baker

and Swerdloff, Hough and by Beggs.

The dead oil interfacial tension at temperatures of 68 F and 100 F is given by:

Where:

= interfacial tension at 68 F (dynes/cm)

= interfacial tension at 100 F (dynes/cm)

API = gravity of stock tank oil (API)

If the temperature is greater than 100 F, the value at 100 F is used. If the temperature is less than 68 F,

the value at 68 F is used. For intermediate temperatures, linear interpolation is used.

As pressure is increased and gas goes into solution, the gas/oil interfacial tension is reduced. The dead

oil interfacial tension is corrected for this by multiplying by a correction factor.

Where:

P = pressure (psia)

The interfacial tension becomes zero at miscibility pressure, and for most systems this will be at any

pressure greater than about 5000 psia. Once the correction factor becomes zero (at about 3977 psia), 1

dyne/cm is used for calculations.

The gas/water interfacial tension at temperatures of 74 F and 280 F is given by:

Where:

= interfacial tension at 74 F (dynes/cm)

= interfacial tension at 280 F (dynes/cm)

P = pressure (psia)

If the temperature is greater than 280 F, the value at 280 F is used. If the temperature is less than 74 F,

the value at 74 F is used. For intermediate temperatures, linear interpolation is used.

Wellbore Correlations

Beggs and Brill Correlation

For multiphase flow, many of the published correlations are applicable for "vertical flow" only, while others

apply for "horizontal flow" only. Not many correlations apply to the whole spectrum of flow situations that

may be encountered in oil and gas operations, namely uphill, downhill, horizontal, inclined and vertical

flow. The Beggs and Brill (1973) correlation, is one of the few published correlations capable of handling

all these flow directions. It was developed using 1" and 1-1/2" sections of pipe that could be inclined at

any angle from the horizontal.

The Beggs and Brill multiphase correlation deals with both the friction pressure loss and the hydrostatic

pressure difference. First, the appropriate flow regime for the particular combination of gas and liquid

rates (Segregated, Intermittent or Distributed) is determined. The liquid holdup, and hence, the in-situ

density of the gas-liquid mixture is then calculated according to the appropriate flow regime, to obtain the

hydrostatic pressure difference. A two-phase friction factor is calculated based on the "input" gas-liquid

ratio and the Fanning friction factor. From this the frictional pressure loss is calculated using "input" gasliquid mixture properties.

The Beggs and Brill correlation requires that a flow pattern be determined. Since the original flow pattern

map was created, it has been modified. We have used this modified flow pattern map for our calculations.

The transition lines for the modified correlation are defined as follows:

Where:

= liquid input volume fraction

The flow type can then be readily determined either from a representative flow pattern map or according

to the following conditions, where

.

Where:

D = inside pipe diameter (ft)

= Froude Mixture Number (unitless)

g = acceleration of gravity (32.2 ft/s2)

= mixture velocity (ft/s)

SEGREGATED flow

if

and

or

and

INTERMITTENT flow

if

and

or

and

DISTRIBUTED flow

if

and

or

and

TRANSITION flow

if

and

Once the flow type has been determined then the liquid holdup can be calculated. Beggs and Brill divided

the liquid holdup calculation into two parts. First the liquid holdup for horizontal flow,

determined, and then this holdup is modified for inclined flow.

and therefore when

separate

is smaller than

, is

is assigned a value of

. There is a

SEGREGATED

INTERMITTENT

DISTRIBUTED

TRANSITION

Where:

Once the horizontal in situ liquid volume fraction is determined, the actual inclined liquid holdup,

,is obtained by multiplying

by an inclination factor,

Where:

= Inclination factor (unitless)

= horizontal liquid holdup (unitless)

= inclined liquid holdup (unitless)

= angle of inclination from the horizontal (degrees)

is a function of flow type, the direction of inclination of the pipe (uphill flow or downhill flow), the liquid

velocity number (

).

is defined as:

Where:

= superficial liquid velocity (ft/s)

= liquid velocity number (unitless)

= liquid density (lb/ft3)

= gas/liquid surface tension (dynes/cm)

SEGREGATED

INTERMITTENT

DISTRIBUTED

For DOWNHILL flow:

ALL flow types

Note:

assume

must always be greater than or equal to 0. Therefore, if a negative value is calculated for

= 0.

) is calculated, it is used to calculate the mixture density,

The mixture density is, in turn, used to calculate the pressure change due to the hydrostatic head (

) of the vertical component of the pipe or well.

Where:

gc = conversion factor

= pressure change due to hydrostatic head (psi)

= elevation change (ft)

= mixture density (lb/ft3)

The first step to calculating the pressure drop due to friction is to calculate the empirical parameter, S.

The value of S is governed by the following conditions:

otherwise,

Where:

S = Beggs and Brill coefficient (unitless)

(unitless)

Note: Severe instabilities have been observed when these equations are used as published. Our

implementation has modified them so that the instabilities have been eliminated.

A ratio of friction factors is then defined as follows:

Where:

= no-slip friction factor (unitless)

= two phase friction factor (unitless)

We use the Fanning friction factor, calculated using the Chen equation. The no-slip Reynolds Number,

, is also used, and it is defined as follows:

Where:

= no-slip Reynold's Number (unitless)

= no-slip viscosity (cp)

= no-slip density (lb/ft3)

Finally, the expression for the pressure loss due to friction,

is:

Where:

L = length of pipe section (ft)

= frictional pressure loss (psi)

Smith)

The Fanning Gas Correlation is the name used in this document to refer to the calculation of the

hydrostatic pressure difference (

) and the friction pressure loss (

) for single-phase gas flow,

using the following standard equations.

This formulation for pressure drop is applicable to pipes of all inclinations. When applied to a vertical

wellbore it is equivalent to the Cullender and Smith method. However, it is implemented as a multisegment procedure instead of a 2 segment calculation.

The Fanning equation is as follows:

Where:

D = inside diameter of pipe (in)

f = Fanning friction factor (function of Reynolds number)

g = acceleration of gravity (32.2 ft/s2)

L = length of pipe section (ft)

= pressure loss due to friction effects (psi)

= density (lb/ft3)

This correlation can be used either for single-phase gas (Fanning Gas) or for single-phase liquid (Fanning

Liquid).

The single-phase friction factor can be obtained from the Chen (1979) equation, which is representative of

the Fanning friction factor chart.

Where:

k = absolute roughness (in)

k/D = relative roughness (unitless)

Re = Reynolds number (unitless)

The single-phase friction factor clearly depends on the Reynolds number, which is a function of the fluid

density, viscosity, velocity and pipe diameter. The friction factor is valid for single-phase gas or liquid flow,

as their very different properties are taken into account in the definition of Reynolds number.

Where:

= viscosity (lb/fts)

Since viscosity is usually measured in "centipoise", and 1 cp = 1488 lb/fts, the Reynolds number can be

rewritten for viscosity in centipoise.

The calculation of hydrostatic head is different for a gas than for a liquid, because gas is compressible

and its density varies with pressure and temperature, whereas for a liquid a constant density can be

safely assumed. Either way the hydrostatic pressure difference is given by:

Where:

gc = conversion factor

= pressure change due to hydrostatic head (psi)

= gas density (lb/ft3)

Since

varies with pressure, the calculation must be done sequentially in small steps to allow the

density to vary with pressure.

The Fanning friction factor pressure loss (

(

) to give the total pressure loss. The Fanning Liquid Correlation is the name used in this program

The Fanning equation is widely thought to be the most generally applicable single-phase equation for

calculating frictional pressure loss. It utilizes friction factor charts (Knudsen and Katz, 1958), which are

functions of Reynolds number and relative pipe roughness. These charts are also often referred to as the

Moody charts. We use the equation form of the Fanning friction factor as published by Chen (1979).

Where:

k = absolute roughness (in)

k/D = relative roughness (unitless)

Re = Reynolds number (unitless)

The method for calculating the Fanning friction factor is the same for single-phase gas or single-phase

liquid.

The Fanning equation is as follows:

Where:

D = inside diameter of pipe (in)

f = Fanning friction factor (function of Reynolds number)

g = acceleration of gravity (32.2 ft/s2)

L = length of pipe section (ft)

= pressure loss due to friction effects (psi)

= density (lb/ft3)

This correlation can be used either for single-phase gas (Fanning Gas) or for single-phase liquid (Fanning

Liquid).

The calculation of hydrostatic head is different for a gas than for a liquid, because gas is compressible

and its density varies with pressure and temperature, whereas for a liquid a constant density can be

safely assumed. For liquid, the hydrostatic pressure difference is given by:

Where:

gc = conversion factor

= pressure change due to hydrostatic head (psi)

=elevation change (ft)

= liquid density (lb/ft3)

Since

does not vary with pressure, a constant value can be used for the entire length of the pipe.

Gray Correlation

The Gray correlation was developed by H.E. Gray (Gray, 1978), specifically for wet gas wells. Although

this correlation was developed for vertical flow, we have implemented it in both vertical, and inclined pipe

pressure drop calculations. To correct the pressure drop for situations with a horizontal component, the

hydrostatic head has only been applied to the vertical component of the pipe while friction is applied to the

entire length of pipe.

First, the in-situ liquid volume fraction is calculated. The in-situ liquid volume fraction is then used to

calculate the mixture density, which is in turn used to calculate the hydrostatic pressure difference. The

input gas liquid mixture properties are used to calculate an "effective" roughness of the pipe. This

effective roughness is then used in conjunction with a constant Reynolds Number of

to calculate the

Fanning friction factor. The pressure difference due to friction is calculated using the Fanning friction

pressure loss equation.

The Gray correlation uses three dimensionless numbers (shown below), in combination, to predict the in

situ liquid volume fraction. These three dimensionless numbers are:

And:

Where:

D = inside diameter of pipe (in)

g = gravitational acceleration (32.2 ft/s2)

= Ratio of superificial liquid velocity of superficial gas velocity (unitless)

= mixture velocity (ft/s)

= superficial gas velocity (ft/s)

= superficial liquid velocity (ft/s)

= gas density (lb/ft3)

= liquid density (lb/ft3)

= no-slip density (lb/ft3)

= gas / liquid surface tension (

They are then combined as follows:

Where:

= in-situ liquid volume fraction (liquid holdup) (unitless)

Once the liquid holdup (

) is calculated it is used to calculate the mixture density (

). The mixture

density is, in turn, used to calculate the pressure change due to the hydrostatic head of the vertical

component of the pipe or well.

Where:

gc = conversion factor

= pressure change due to hydrostatic head (psi)

= elevation change (ft)

= mixture density (lb/ft3)

Note: For the equations found in the Gray correlation,

is given in

. We have implemented

them using with units of dynes/cm and have converted the equations by multiplying

by 0.00220462.

(0.00220462dynes/cm = 1

The Gray Correlation assumes that the effective roughness of the pipe (

(defined previously). The conditions are as follows:

if

then

if

then

Where:

k = absolute roughness of the pipe

= effective roughness of the pipe (in)

The effective roughness (

The relative roughness of the pipe is then calculated by dividing the effective roughness by the diameter

of the pipe. The Fanning friction factor is obtained using the Chen equation and assuming a Reynolds

Number of

Where:

= two-phase friction factor

L = length of pipe (ft)

= pressure change due to friction (psi)

Note: The original publication contained a misprint (0.0007 instead of 0.007). Also, the surface tension (

) is given in units of

Experimental data obtained from a 1500ft deep, instrumented vertical well was used in the development

of the Hagedorn and Brown correlation. Pressures were measured for flow in tubing sizes that ranged

from 1 " to 1 " OD. A wide range of liquid rates and gas/liquid ratios were used. As with the Gray

correlation, our software will calculate pressure drops for horizontal and inclined flow using the Hagedorn

and Brown correlation, although the correlation was developed strictly for vertical wells. The software

uses only the vertical depth to calculate the pressure loss due to hydrostatic head, and the entire pipe

length to calculate friction.

The Hagedorn and Brown method has been modified for the Bubble Flow regime (Economides et al,

1994). If bubble flow exists the Griffith correlation is used to calculate the in-situ volume fraction. In this

case the Griffith correlation is also used to calculate the pressure drop due to friction. If bubble flow does

not exist then the original Hagedorn and Brown correlation is used to calculate the in-situ liquid volume

fraction. Once the in-situ volume fraction is determined, it is compared with the input volume fraction. If

the in-situ volume fraction is smaller than the input volume fraction, the in-situ fraction is set to equal the

input fraction (

=

). Next, the mixture density is calculated using the in-situ volume fraction and

used to calculate the hydrostatic pressure difference. The pressure difference due to friction is calculated

using a combination of "in-situ" and "input" gas-liquid mixture properties.

The Hagedorn and Brown correlation uses four dimensionless numbers to correlate liquid holdup. These

four numbers are:

Where:

D = inside pipe diameter (ft)

= superficial liquid velocity (ft/s)

= superficial gas velocity (ft/s)

= liquid viscosity (cp)

= liquid density (lb/ft3)

= gas / liquid surface tension (dynes/cm)

Various combinations of these parameters are then plotted against each other to determine the liquid

holdup(

).

For the purposes of programming, these curves were converted into equations. The first curve provides a

value for

. This

dimensionless group of numbers,

vs.

can then

vs. another

, is calculated by:

Where:

= in-situ liquid volume fraction (liquid holdup) (unitless)

The hydrostatic head is once again calculated by the standard equation:

And:

Where:

g = gravitational acceleration (32.2 ft/s2)

gc = conversion factor

= pressure change due to hydrostatic head (psi)

= elevation change (ft)

= gas density (lb/ft3)

= mixture density (lb/ft3)

The friction factor is calculated using the Chen equation and a Reynolds number equal to:

Note: In the Hagedorn and Brown correlation the mixture viscosity is given by:

Where:

= mixture velocity (ft/s)

= gas viscosity (cp)

= liquid viscosity (cp)

= mixture viscosity (cp)

= no-slip density (lb/ft3)

The pressure loss due to friction is then given by:

And:

Where:

f = Fanning friction factor

L = length of calculation segment (ft)

= pressure change due to friction (psi)

Modifications

We have implemented two modifications to the original Hagedorn and Brown Correlation. The first

modification is simply the replacement of the liquid holdup value with the "no-slip" (input) liquid volume

fraction if the calculated liquid holdup is less than the "no-slip" liquid volume fraction.

if

<

then

Where:

= input liquid volume fraction (no-slip liquid hold up)

The second modification involves the use of the Griffith correlation (1961) for the bubble flow regime.

Bubble flow exists if

<

where:

And:

= input gas volume fraction

= Parameter which defines boundary between bubble and slug flow (unitless)

If the calculated value of

is less than 0.13 then

is set to 0.13. If the flow regime is found to be

bubble flow then the Griffith correlation is applied, otherwise the original Hagedorn and Brown correlation

is used.

Brown Correlation)

In the Griffith correlation the liquid holdup is given by:

where:

= 0.8 ft/s

The in-situ liquid velocity is given by:

Where:

= in-situ liquid velocity (ft/s)

The hydrostatic head is then calculated the standard way.

The pressure drop due to friction is also affected by the use of the Griffith correlation because

into the calculation of the Reynolds Number via the in-situ liquid velocity (

calculated using the following format:

enters

The single phase liquid density, in-situ liquid velocity and liquid viscosity are used to calculate the

Reynolds Number. This is unlike the majority of multiphase correlations, which usually define the

Reynolds Number in terms of mixture properties not single phase liquid properties. The Reynolds number

is then used to calculate the friction factor using the Chen equation. Finally, the friction pressure loss is

calculated as follows:

The liquid density and the in-situ liquid velocity are used to calculate the pressure drop due to friction.

Determine Flow Pattern

To determine a flow pattern, we do the following:

Exists if

where

and if

Stratified Flow

Exists if flow is downward or horizontal ( 0)

Calculate

where

and

fG from standard methods where

fL from

where

fsL from standard methods where

fi from

where

where

where

Geometric Variables:

Stratified flow exists if

where

and

Stratified smooth versus Stratified Wavy

if

where

and

Calculate

where

and

(1)

from standard methods where

fi from

(2)

Use Lochhart-Martinelli Parameters

where

where

Geometric Variables:

Solve for

iteratively.

where

from

Bubble Flow

Bubble flow exists if

(3)

where:

C1 = 0.5

= 1.3

db = 7mm

(4)

In addition, transition to bubble flow from intermittent flow occurs when

where:

Intermittent Flow

Intermittent flow exists if

where:

If EL > 1, EL = CL

and:

where

for fm < 1, fm = 1

where

if

1. If

and

2. If

and

3. Froth Flow

If none of the transition criteria for intermittent flow are met, then the flow pattern is designated as Froth,

implying a transitional state between the other flow regimes.

Footnotes

1.

, where:

(dyn/cm)

(lb/ft3),

(cP),

2.

, where:

(dyn/cm)

3.

, where:

(lb/ft3),

, where:

(lb/ft3),

(lb/ft3), (dyn/cm)

4.

(lb/ft3),

(dyn/cm)

5.

,

where: D (ft),

(lb/ft3),

6.

(lb/ft3),

(dyn/cm)

, where:

(lb/ft3),

(dyn/cm)

Nomenclature

A = cross sectional area

C0 = velocity distribution coefficient

D = pipe internal diameter

E = in situ volume fraction

FE = liquid fraction entrained

g = acceleration due to gravity

hL = height of liquid (stratified flow)

L = length

P = pressure

Re = Reynolds number

S = contact perimeter

VSG = superficial gas velocity

VSL = superficial liquid velocity

(lb/ft3),

= pipe roughness

= pressure gradient weighting factor (intermittent flow)

= Angle of inclination

= viscosity

= density

= interfacial (surface) tension

= shear stress

= dimensionless quantity

Subscripts

b = relating to the gas bubble

c = relating to the gas core

F = relating to the liquid film

db = relating to dispersed bubbles

G = relating to gas phase

i = relating to interface

L = relating to liquid phase

m = relating to mixture

SG = based on superficial gas velocity

s = relating to liquid slug

SL = based on superficial liquid velocity

wL = relating to wall-liquid interface

wG = relating to wall-gas interface

C0 = velocity distribution coefficient

References

Petalas, N., Aziz, K.: "A Mechanistic Model for Multiphase Flow in Pipes," J. Pet. Tech. (June

2000), 43-55.

Petalas, N., Aziz, K.: "Development and Testing of a New Mechanistic Model for Multiphase Flow

in Pipes," ASME 1996 Fluids Engineering Division Conference (1996), FED-Vol 236, 153-159.

Gomez, L.E. et al.: "Unified Mechanistic Model for Steady-State Two-Phase Flow," Petalas, N.,

Aziz, K.: "A Mechanistic Model for Multiphase Flow in Pipes," SPE Journal (September 2000),

339-350.

Turner Correlation

The Turner correlation assumes free flowing liquid in the wellbore forms droplets suspended in the gas

stream. Two forces act on these droplets. The first is the force of gravity pulling the droplets down and the

second is drag force due to flowing gas pushing the droplets upward. If the velocity of the gas is sufficient,

the drops are carried to surface. If not, they fall and accumulate in the wellbore.

The correlation was developed from droplet theory. The theoretical calculations were then compared to

field data and a 20% fudge factor was built-in. The correlation is generally very accurate and was

formulated using easily obtained oil field data. Consequently, it has been widely accepted in the

petroleum industry. The model was verified to about 130 bbl/MMscf.

The Turner correlation was formulated for free water production and free condensate production in the

wellbore. The calculation of minimum gas velocity for each follows:

Where:

G = gas gravity (unitless)

k = calculation variable

= pressure (psia)A

T = temperature (R)

= minimum gas velocity required to lift liquids (ft/s)

Z = compressibility factor (unitless)

From the minimum gas velocity, the minimum gas flow rate required to lift free liquids can then be

calculated using:

where:

A = cross-sectional area of flow (

Important Notes

If both condensate and water are present, use the Turner correlation for water to judge behaviour

of a system.

Turner correlation utilizes the cross-sectional area of the flow path when calculating liquid lift

rates. For example, if the flow path is through the tubing, the minimum gas rate to lift water and

condensate will be calculated using the tubing inside diameter. When the tubing depth is higher in

the wellbore than the mid-point of perforations (MPP) in a vertical well, the Turner correlation

does not consider the rate required to lift liquids between the MPP and the end of the tubing.

Ultimately, the liquid lift rate calculations are based on the inside diameter (ID) of the tubing or the

area of the annulus and not on the casing ID unless flow is up the "casing only".

Given

and

).

)

)

).

).

Using MBE:

- PHYSICS AND ANAESTHESIAUploaded bySuresh Kumar
- Energy Loss in PipesUploaded byRo Win
- PSV Reation Force - Two Phase - Assumption Close SytemUploaded byNesrine Mhedhbi
- Friction LossUploaded bynmgcarmo
- Mass Transfer in Wetted WallsUploaded byRonald Ramirez Espinoza
- Reynolds Number Group2Uploaded byanonretee
- A Simplified Pipeline Calculations ProgramUploaded byRaakze Movi
- A Review of Water Hammer Theory and PracticeUploaded byjulio49
- ultra proUploaded byAleksandar Veliki
- GSETB0006Uploaded byMohit Tyagi
- CH 10 gasesUploaded byLuthfiyyahAzizah
- 779.pdfUploaded byjowar
- MP0593-ICPSUploaded byTheer Nguyen
- Chapter 6_Gas Well PerformanceUploaded byNur Syaffiqa Mohamad Ruzlan
- STEAM TRACING engineering_guide.pdfUploaded bykresimir.mikoc9765
- Gas LooplinestptUploaded byniyo7
- 3- Pressure Drop Due to FrictionUploaded bylancho97
- Formal Report 2Uploaded byFadi Ronaldo
- Flow Through Triangular Notch999000Uploaded byAbdul Razak Kaladgi
- Research on Water Distribution NetworkUploaded byVikas Pathak
- Wellbore Flow PerformanceUploaded byAhmad Kohar
- lecture.pdfUploaded byAbu Sayed Md. Rashed
- QL METHODUploaded byAbdul Rehazk
- Copy of CE365 Hydro, HW 1 SolutionUploaded bybrayan
- W1 D3 S3 turbulent teori.pptUploaded byNfatowil Boy Beliebt
- Knife ValveUploaded byCristhian Niño Martinez
- BEHAVIOUR OF REAL FLUIDS.pptxUploaded bychile
- BEHAVIOUR OF REAL FLUIDS.pptxUploaded bychile
- Sin título(2).en.esUploaded byGlin J
- BOYLE'S LAW LATEST.pdfUploaded byfarid

- Fea Radial Function Tubular Sealability 15Uploaded byRMolina65
- 5. Portland CementUploaded byChristine Factores
- xy+0.5y'+0.25y=0 Step by Step - Wolfram_Alpha.pdfUploaded byRMolina65
- 9781461492290-c1Uploaded byNitishKumar
- Brochure GAMSUploaded byRMolina65
- Chap6 SP LecturenotesUploaded byRMolina65
- 12 Rock Mass PropertiesUploaded byMilton Teran
- Soft Versus Stiff StringUploaded byRMolina65
- 281276Uploaded byRMolina65
- Abscissas and Weights of Gauss-Legendre IntegrationUploaded byRMolina65
- Runge KuttaUploaded bybarbaroj
- Casing-Design zxcvds.pdfUploaded bykirankirk
- Derby TimeSeriesForecasting Nov2009Uploaded byRMolina65
- formation evaluations.pdfUploaded byRizka
- Well DesignUploaded byTheezz
- Reverse-Circulation Cementing and Foamed Latex Cement Enable Drilling in Lost- Circulation ZonesUploaded byRMolina65
- Wellbore Integrity and Cement Failure at HPHT Conditions.pdfUploaded byRMolina65
- 12- Reverse Circulation CementingUploaded byJoan Corso
- Cement SqueezeUploaded byHadi Hendizadeh
- GasCutMudUploaded byRMolina65
- Influx Management Envelope Deployed During Planning Phase for 3 Sections of Deepwater MPD WellUploaded byRMolina65
- AOGR Pressure Prediction Helps Guide Drilling - Alan R Huffman - Sep 2011Uploaded byRMolina65
- Directional Design (Well Trajectory).pdfUploaded byHendra Jurbon
- Drillind Abo ElaUploaded byengye7ia
- Arima ModelUploaded byRaymond Smith
- part 11-14Uploaded byRMolina65
- Well Log Response Chart.pdfUploaded byRMolina65

- Slug PaperUploaded byGary Jones
- Determination of Flow Sub-regimes in StratifiedUploaded byAileen Vanessa Mejenes Garcia
- Two Phase Flow PresentationUploaded byAnant Joshi
- 2012 Karam Pros Jek tUploaded byayubkara
- FULLTEXT01[1]Uploaded byAldo Enrique Gasca Montaño
- 456Uploaded byDavid Lapaca
- (Exce) Pipe Flow 2-Multiphase Flow Assurance-Ove Bratland-2010Uploaded byHoang Nguyen Minh
- Proven-Methods-for-Design-and-Operation-of-Gas-Plant-Liquid-Slug-Catching-Equipment-Gpa-2001.pdfUploaded byace4200
- Choke Sizing & Propiedaes de Los FluidosUploaded byLuis Morales Canedo
- Pressure Loss CorrelationsUploaded byMed Samoud
- Air-in-Pipelines.pdfUploaded byJoelCristobal
- 1_Drag Reducing Agents in Multiphase FlowUploaded byMichael Medina
- Buoyancy Effects in Fluids by J.S. TurnerUploaded byAna Banana
- Mukherjee e Brill 1985 Empirical.pdfUploaded byFrancisco Opps
- What Two Phase Flow Regime Maps NarrateUploaded byrohl55
- Unified Model for Gas_Liquid Pipe Flow via Slug Dynamics_Part 1_Model DevelopmentUploaded byleofrazao
- 8006-4.pdfUploaded byalumnopitagoras
- Lecture notes - Two phase (G_V) - L fluid flow.pdfUploaded byMaría Alejandra Ballesteros
- Kokal e Stanislav 1987.pdfUploaded byFrancisco Opps
- SimulationUploaded byRohammed Castillo
- Flow CorrelationsUploaded byvajrahasta
- J. S. Turner - Buoyancy Effects in Fluids1.pdfUploaded byvladislav
- Xiaodong Zhao DissUploaded by3370_234234
- 3. Well PerformanceUploaded byعمر الفاروق صانع حضارة
- SPE 10923 Liquid Holdup Correlations for Inclined Two-phase Flow.pdfUploaded byDavid Hernandez
- Flow CorrelationsUploaded byAli
- Presentation 6-3 --- NAM --- Transient Multiphase Flow Modeling of Liquid LoadingUploaded byramihey
- 20210_Corrosion Inhibition of Downlhole Production Tubing Process Piping and Pipeline.pdfUploaded byĐiệnBiênNhâm
- Flow Control in Oil & Gas Wells and PipelinesUploaded byArsénio
- 1993 - Kelvin-Helmholtz stability criteria for stratfied flow- viscous versus non-viscous (inviscid) approaches.pdfUploaded byBonnie James

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.