Professional Documents
Culture Documents
77
COURSE NOTES
Laboratory diagnosis of acute leukemia
Diagnosticul de laborator al leucemiilor acute
Selicean I. Elena-Cristina*, Paiu Mariana
Institute of Oncology Prof. dr. I. Chiricu Cluj-Napoca,
Medical Laboratory Hematology
Abstract
Acute leukemias are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic malignancies, characterized by uncontrolled growth of a leukemic clone, which is blocked in the maturation process. First classifications of acute leukemias were based solely on morphologic criteria, but the actual trend is to take into account biological and
pathogenetic aspects. This review's purpose is to cover this complex subject, according to the latest WHO classification, in respect with examination requirements and from the perspective of laboratory physicians.
Keywords: acute leukemia, morphology, immunophenotyping, cytogenetics, molecular biology
Rezumat
Leucemiile acute reprezint un grup heterogen de mbolnviri acute ale sistemului hematopoietic, caracterizate prin proliferarea necontrolatra a unei clone de celule leucemice blocat in maturaie. Dac primele
clasificri ale LA se bazau exclusiv pe criterii morfologice, tendina actual de abordare vizeaz aspecte biologice si patogenetice. Lucrarea i propune abordarea acestui subiect complex, respectnd cerinele tematicilor de
examen pentru medici rezideni si specialiti, innd cont de clasificarea actual a OMS i abordnd diagnosticul
LA din perspectiva medicului de laborator.
Cuvinte cheie: leucemie acut, morfologie, imunofenotipare, citogenetic, biologie molecular
78
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
FAB classification of AL
Clasificarea FAB a LA
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
79
Blasts in BM
Granulocytic
component
Monocytic
component
Other
M1
M2
M3
20% from NEC
(including
myeloblasts)
M4
Typical morphology
M5a
M5b
Monoblasts<=80% from
the monocytic series
M5
M6
M7
M0
<3% MPO+
Myeloid immunophenotype
80
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
Cytoplasm
L1
small
scant
L2
medium
L3
large
moderate,
week basophilic
Abundant,
intense basophilic,
sometimes vacuolated
Nucleus
Rather coarse chromatin,
Nucleoli - indistinct or absent
Finely dispersed, evident nucleoli
condensed
variable visible nucleoli
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
81
Chromatin
Cytoplasm
Other
Monoblast
Round/ oval
delicate/ lacy
evident nucleolus
large, 20-30m
Promonocyte
Convoluted/
indented
delicate/ lacy
evident nucleolus
Immature
monocyt e
Convoluted/
indented
condensed,
sometimes
nucleolated
Monocyte
Lobulated/
indented
Dysplastic promyelocytes display features belonging to the maturation stage, in addition to abnormal patterns: uneven cytoplasmic
basophilia, poorly represented Golgi zone,
hipergranularity or hipogranularity, irregular distribution of granules.
The morphological identification of
these forms is important for:
MDS-differential diagnosis - where the percentage of blasts is crucial
differential diagnosis of AML - agranulocytosismorphological aspects can be critical in certain
stages
further laboratory investigation for a possible
t(8,21).
In AML-M3 malignant promyelocytes
are counted as blasts. In the classical form, they
are hypergranular and may have multiple Auer
rods. The morphologic microgranular/ hypogranular variant requires cytogenetic confirmation (the presence of t(15, 17)). Prompt diagnosis of APL is followed by establishment of specific therapy and DIC prevention.
Other situations in which morphological
assessment of blasts is crucial for diagnosis are
proliferations of the monocytic compartment. In
these cases the percentage of blasts results by
adding the following: myeloid blasts, monoblasts and promonocytes. Differential diagnosis
of chronic versus acute myelomonocytic leukemia depends on the morphological differentiation of monoblasts and promonocytes from
more mature monocytes (Table 3).
82
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
Other important morphological characters for the diagnosis and classification of AML
are dysplastic changes of hematopoiesis. Thus,
the identification of more than 50% dysplastic
elements in at least two myeloid lineages allows
categorization, according to recent WHO criteria, in the category of dysplasia related AML.
Observation of abnormal eosinophils with large,
basophilic granules guides investigations towards identification of inv(16) or t(16,16).
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
Subsequently, the classification proposed by MIC Cooperative Study Group (morphology, immunology, cytogenetics) paved the
way for the recognition of the significance of
cytogenetics and immunophenotype in AL.
The next classification proposed and
widely accepted was the WHO classification of
2001, revised in 2008. The principles underlying
this classification are:
the percentage of blasts required for diagnosis
according to WHO criteria is 20%
the percentage of blasts is not a diagnostic criterion
for AL, when there is evidence of recurrent cytogenetic mutations in a significant hematologic context
includes two provisional entities characterized
by mutations in NPM1 and CEBPA
introduces MDS- related AML, diagnosis based
on MDS history, cytogenetic abnormalities associated with MDS, multilineage dysplasia
introduces the post-chemotherapy AML class
maintains FAB terminology for morphological
classification of AML in the category "not otherwise specified"
83
I.2
I.3
I.4
I.5
.
(RUNX1;RUNX1T1)
(FBMYH11)
(PML-RARA)
(MLLT3-MLL)
(DEK-NUP214)
(RNP1-EVI1)
(promyelocytic)
(RMB15-MKL1)
(megakaryoblastic)
84
I.6
II.
III.
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
classifies
menine
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
85
logice (imunocitochimie) sau histologice (imunohistochimie), dar n practic s-a impus imunofenotiparea prin citometrie n flux continuu, datorit multiplelor avantaje pe care le prezint.
Metodele aplicate n prezent n scop
diagnostic permit citirea concomitent la 3-4
lungimi de und i efectueaz o analiz multiparametric, sensibil i rapid a unui numr mare
de celule, oferind posibilitatea de a delimita i
caracteriza din punct de vedere al expresiei antigenelor de suprafa i intracelulare, populaiile
celulare din eantionul analizat.
Tehnica se poate aplica pe probe de snge
periferic, mduv osoas, iar atunci cnd este justificat, lichid cefalorahidian, alte lichide (pleural,
pericardic sau peritoneal) sau mase tumorale.
nainte de a fi analizat, proba primar se
supune unui procedeu de separare a mononucleatelor n gradient de concentraie sau unui procedeu de
liz a hematiilor. Multe laboratoare prefer metoda
cu liz, deoarece metodele de separare sunt mai laborioase i exist riscul de a pierde celule pe parcursul procesului de prelucrare. Pentru analiza antigenelor intracelulare, metoda presupune i o etap de
permeabilizare a membranei celulare.
Strategia actual pentru delimitarea populaiilor de celule din proba de analizat (strategia de
gating), pentru leucemiile acute, este CD45 versus
SSC (side scatter- dispersia laterala sub unghiuri mari
90o a fasciculului laser). Blatii au un grad redus de
dispersie laterala a fascicului (deoarece sunt slab granulari) i exprim CD45 dim+. Aceasta permite diferenierea lor de celelalte celule nucleate din proba
analizat: limfocite CD45 +++, eritroblati CD45-,
precursori neutrofilici i eozinofilici intensitate
mare a fasciculului laser dispersat lateral.
Alegerea panelului de anticorpi
n practic se urmrete utilizarea unor
paneluri minimale de anticorpi, care s permit
obinerea unor date cu valoare diagnostic mare
i reproductibile n laboratoare cu dotri diferite.
Panelul trebuie s permit deosebirea LAM
de LAL, stabilirea apartenenei la o linie (mieloid,
monocitar, megakariocitar, eritrocitar, respectiv B
sau T), evidenierea expresiei aberante de anticorpi,
86
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
Interpretation
For practical reasons, it was established
that the positivity limit is 20% for surface antigens, and 10% for cytoplasmic markers.
Differentiation of ALL AML
AML blasts express immature neutrophilic and monocytic antigens: CD13, CD15,
CD33, CD64, CD117, MPO.
The most sensitive and specific marker
for B lymphoblasts is CD19, followed by
CD22c. In T lineage lymphoblasts the highest
sensitivity is provided by CD3c.
Immunological characterization of
POX-negative AML
Immunophenotyping is essential for differential diagnosis of POX- negative ALs.
Expression of CD13, CD33 and MPO,
together with the lack of expression of CD19,
CD79a, TdT and CD3c demonstrates an AML
phenotype.
AML-M0 is defined as having less than
3% MPO-positive blasts in classic cytochemistry. The presence of MPO in turn can be better
demonstrated by immunophenotyping and electron microscopy. In these conditions, at least one
positive myeloid marker (CD113, CD33, or
MPO), in the absence of lymphoid markers
(CD3, CD22a, Cd79a) and megakaryocytic
markers (CD41 and CD61), allows the diagnosis
of AML-M0. HLA-DR, CD34, CD117, CD65,
CD14 and CD15 may be positive and sometimes
lymphoid markers (CD2, CD4, CD7, CD19) are
aberrantly expressed by myeloid cells.
Blasts of AML-M7 express megakaryocytic markers: CD41, CD42, CD61.
In erythroleukemia blasts express
CD235 or the characteristic phenotype CD36 + /
CD64-/MPO-.
Immunological characterization of AML morphological classes
AML-M1 and AML-M2 are characterized by the expression of CD13, CD33, MPO,
CD34, and CD117, without expression of
CD79a, CD14, CD64.
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
87
88
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
surface
Pro-B
Pre-T
Pre-T transitional
+ (dim)
CD2
cCD3
sCD3
CD4
CD5
CD7
CD8
CD34
Pre-T
+/-
+/-
Cortical
+/-
Medular
+/-
+/-
+/-
Pro-T
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
89
myeloid
CD79
c
CD3
TCR
MPO(lysozime)
CD 2
CD19
CD10
CD20
CD2
CD5
CD8
CD10
CD13
CD33
CDw65
CD117
0.5
TdT
CD24
TdT
CD17
CD1a
CD24
CD25
CD64
Rolul citogeneticii n LA
Anomalii citogenetice clonale, att numerice ct i structurale, se ntlnesc la 60-80%
90
classification
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
into prognostic classes- cytogenetic changes were found to be significant independent prognostic factor, with different recommendations regarding the usefulness and
right moment for bone marrow transplantation;
a better understanding of the leukemogenesis
with achievements and promises regarding
drug therapy.
In practice, standard cytogenetic analysis of chromosome G banding is still the most
used method to detect many rearrangements in
the leukemic clone. It is a laborious method, performed by trained personnel, requires the presence of dividing cells in the analysis sample, examines a small number of metaphases and leaves
no evidence of submicroscopic mutations.
Molecular biology techniques currently
used in the diagnosis and classification of LA are
fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) used for:
clonality demonstration (e.g. TCR - T cell receptor rearrangements);
identification of cryptic mutations in classic cytogenetics, i.e. mutations involving small fragments;
explaining complex caryotypes.
These investigations are guided by clinical,
morphological and cytogenetic aspects. Molecular
biology finds its practical application in AL, when
contributing to diagnosis (see AL with recurrent
cytogenetic abnormalities), or documents a significant abnormality in terms of prognosis.
PCR technique also tends to find its
place in the definition of complete remission and
minimal residual disease for many types of rearrangements, provided the methods used are
standardized.
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization) combines the advantages of standard cytogenetic analysis with
molecular techniques. It allows identification of
clonal rearrangements in metaphase and interphase nuclei and analyzes more cells than
conventional cytogenetics.
Recommended PCR techniques use
RNA as target and synthesize by reverse-transcription a DNA copy subsequently amplified
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
91
Intermediate
Unfavorable
Tehnicile preferate de PCR sunt cele care utilizeaz ARN-ul ca int i sintetizeaz sub aciunea revers-transcriptazei (RT) o copie de ADN, care ulterior
se amplific (RT-PCR). ADN este recomandat ca int
doar pentru situaiile n care punctele de ruptur sunt
situate n apropiere, pe un fragment scurt de ADN.
92
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
AML with 11q23 abnormalities involving the MLL gene: the most common is
t(9;11)(q23;q23) (MLL-AF9), often with
monoblastic morphology and unfavorable prognosis. Mutations are cryptic for classical cytogenetics and are identified by RT-PCR or FISH.
Other common cytogenetic abnormalities
in AML are trisomy 8, monosomy 5, 7, del(5q),
del (7q); there are also AML with normal karyotype and AML with complex karyotype.
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
93
94
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
LAM M1
LAM M1 peroxidaza
Corpi Auer
LAM M2 peroxidaza
LAM M3
LAM M3 varianta
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
LAM M4
LAM M4 cu eozinofile
LAM M55
LAM M6
LAL 1/ LAL 2
LAL 3
95
96
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
Abbreviations:
Abrevieri:
Revista Romn de Medicin de Laborator Vol. 18, Nr. 2/4, Iunie 2010
97
References
References
1. Paiu M. Examenul citologic al frotiului sangvin. Editura Alma Mater, Cluj-Napoca 2009
2. Cucuianu A. Leucemiile acute. In Hematologie cliniceditor coordonator Petrov L. Casa Crii de tiin. ClujNapoca 2009
3. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD,
Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, Harris NL, Le Beau MM, Hellstrm-Lindberg E, Tefferi A, Bloomfield CD. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale
and important changes. Blood 2009 114: 937-951
4. Amy Heerema-McKenney, Arber DA. Acute Myeloid
Leukemia. Hematol Oncol Clin N Am 23 2009: 633654
5. Onciu M. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Hematol
Oncol Clin N Am 2009 114: 937-951
6. Dhner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR,
Bchner T, Burnett AK, Dombret H, et al; European LeukemiaNet. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid
leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international
expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet.
Blood 2010 115(3):453-74
7. Fiona E. Craig, Foon KA. Flow cytometric immunophenotyping for hematologic neoplasm. Blood 2008 111:
3941-3967
8. Marie C. Bn. Biphenotypic, bilineal, ambiguous or
mixed lineage: strange leukemias! Haematologica 2009
94(7): 891-893
9. Frattini MG, Maslak PG. Strategy for Incorporating
Molecular and Cytogenetic Markers into Acute Myeloid
Leukemia Therapy. J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 2008
6(10):995-1002