Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment Details
Course Code:
Course Name:
Course Teacher:
Task Title:
Task Description:
Special
Instructions:
Weighting:
Duration/Word
Limit:
Due Date:
Grading/Marking
Criteria:
EPC3903
Practicum 3b
Garnel Desravins
Coursework - Practical Skills Assessment
(Outcomes: 1,2,3,4,5)
Combined Mentoring School (MST) and College
Teacher (MCT) Report with reference to 3 formal
MST and 2 MCT observations, Practicum 3b TP
competences and documentation illustrating wider
planning, including activities designed in core
courses.
This report is to be completed by the Mentoring
College Teacher (MCT) during the fi nal week of the
placement in consultation with the Mentoring School
Teacher (MST) and evaluates student progress with
reference to 3 MST and 2 MCT formal written
observations, EPC3903 Teaching Practice
competences and broader course content.
30%
N/A
Week 12
Grade will be determined using the relevant criteria
from the attached rubric.
(to be determined by
the teacher using the
attached criteria
matrix)
Late Penalty:
Academic Honesty:
SI/DWC/2015-16
2.
3.
4.
Technological Literacy
5.
6.
7.
Vocational Competencies
8.
Mathematical Literacy
SI/DWC/2015-16
EPC3903
Course
Name:
Practicum 3b
Course
Teacher:
Task Title:
Student
Name:
Garnel Desravins
Coursework - Practical Skills Assessment
Wafa
Student ID:
Final Grade/Mark
General
Comments
SI/DWC/2015-16
208/230=90%
90%
Practicum 3b
Course Code:
Instructor
Name:
Garnel Desravins
Task Title:
Due Date:
EPC3903
Date
Submitted:
Section:
Late Penalty:
Unless special circumstances are agreed with the course teacher regarding late
submission, work submitted 1 working day late will be deducted 10%, 2 days late
20%, 3 days late 30% and any work submitted more than 3 days late will get a
zero mark.
Academic Honesty:
Breaches of Academic Honesty will be treated with the utmost
seriousness. You are reminded the penalties for cheating or plagiarism
include dismissal from the HCT.
(for more information please refer to Academic and Student Regulations , HCT
Academic Honesty Policy , Student Handbook )
Student Declaration:
This assignment is entirely my own work except where I have duly acknowledged
other sources in the text and listed those sources at the end of the assignment. I
have not previously submitted this work to the HCT. I understand that I may be
orally examined on my submission.
SI/DWC/2015-16
GRADING/MARKING RUBRIC
ACHIEVEMENT INDICATORS
Achievement that does not meet
requirements
GRADING/MARKI
NG CRITERIA
Letter Grade
Percentage for
Gradebook
Clearly
does not
meet the
requiremen
ts
Below course
requirements
achievement
that narrowly
does not meet
the
requirements
F
0
30
50
Achievement that
minimally meets the
course requirements
Achievement that
satisfactorily meets
the course
requirements
Achievement that is
significantly above
the course
requirements
Achievement that is
outstanding relative
to the course
requirements
C+
B+
A-
64
69
74
79
84
89
100
SI/DWC/2015-16
Unable to evidence or
articulate basic principles
and knowledge related to the
subject. Information may be
irrelevant, incomplete and/or
inaccurate.
Limited
knowledge of
subject.
Information
may be
significantly
irrelevant,
incomplete
and/or
inaccurate
making
information
hard to follow
Some evidence of
understanding key
aspects of the subject,
but details are lacking.
Some irrelevancies and
inaccuracies
Generally accurate
understanding of key
aspects of the subject.
Some irrelevancies
and inaccuracies
Accurate extensive
understanding of
subject. Minor
irrelevancies and
inaccuracies
stakeholders. (25%)
7. Reflection
Management of
learning through
critical reflection.
Discusses learning
experiences and
appreciates the role of
critical friends, MST &
MCT in shaping
development.
logically.
Sporadic
evidence of
reflection not
followed
through
consistently.
Incomplete
awareness of
personal
strengths and
weaknesses
Adequate evidence of
insight and thoughtful
reflection. Generally,
has an awareness of
strengths and
weaknesses
Reflection is
comprehensive with
only a few lapses and
has led to noteworthy
insight. Has a good
awareness of
strengths and
weaknesses
Reflection is
complete and has
led to substantial
insight. Strengths
have been built on
and weaknesses
mitigated
8. Experimentation/
Exploration of ideas
Problem solving, risk
taking,
experimentation,
initiative and testing of
ideas and materials in
the planning and
implementation of
lessons and activities.
(10%)
Unable to
identify
problems;
does not
understand
the purpose of
risk taking or
exploration of
alternatives
Evidence of
exploration of
processes, media and
materials; may lead to
potential directions for
future work
Evidence of
conceptual risk taking
/ using own analysis
to inform further
cycles of inquiry and
potential future
directions
Unfamiliar
conceptual
territories may be
explored
9. Collaborative
professional
working
Collaborates
reluctantly
Productive and
positive but requires
some guidance from
the team.
Demonstrates
initiative and respects
team members.
Contributes ideas and
solutions to problems
or conflict.
Consistently
provides leadership
as well as support.
Compromises to
accommodate
common goal.
Contributes
positively and
productively. Takes
initiative and
responsibility.
(20%)
Demonstrates the
ability to work
effectively with others
in the setting.
(10%)
SI/DWC/2015-16
Unable to complete
talk.
Unable to complete
talk or has
memorized script
without engaging
audience. Major
problems with
enunciation,
portions of speech
unheard or
unintelligible.
Delivers adequately
paced and rehearsed
talk. Clear enunciation
and use of voice is
inconsistent. Engages
and maintains
audience some of the
time. Attempts repair
and recovery
strategies.
Delivers well-paced
and rehearsed talk.
Contains a few
mistakes. Clear
enunciation and
effectively uses voice
most of the time.
Engages and
maintains audience.
Occasional lapses in
repair and recovery
strategies.
Confidently delivers
well-paced and
extensively
rehearsed talk.
Contains few
mistakes.
Consistently uses
clear enunciation
and effectively uses
voice. Engages and
maintains audience
throughout. Fully
focused and skillfully
demonstrates repair
and recovery
strategies.
Usually maintains
fluency, but with some
correction, repetition or
slower speech.
Demonstrates the
ability to confidently
deliver effective and
engaging lessons
/activities in the
setting.
(25%)
18a. Spoken
language
Fluency and
coherence,
Lexical resources,
Grammatical range
and accuracy,
Pronunciation
(10%)
Only simplest
vocabulary and
sentence structures
attempted.
Inaccuracies cause
serious
misunderstanding.
Pronunciation
problems cause
speech to be often
unintelligible.
SI/DWC/2015-16
Vocabulary limited
to familiar topics
and rare
paraphrasing.
Sentence structures
very limited in range
and accuracy.
Errors and frequent
mispronunciation
cause difficulty for
the listener.
Sufficient vocabulary to
talk about topics but with
limited flexibility and only
occasional paraphrase.
Mostly accurate in simple
sentences.
Errors and
mispronunciation can
cause misunderstanding.
School:
Name of Student:
Name of MST:
Name of MCT:
/
Please tick the boxes using the scale with 5 indicating the best possible performance during this
lesson
PROFESSIONALISM
1 2 3 4 5
Comments or reasoning:
Explicitly linked to the rubric in 5. Subject
X
X
X
X
SI/DWC/2015-16
Comments or reasoning:
SI/DWC/2015-16
X
X
Comments or reasoning:
10
X
X
1 2
SI/DWC/2015-16
11
Comments or reasoning:
CRITICAL REFLECTION
SI/DWC/2015-16
12
Comments or reasoning:
SI/DWC/2015-16
13
Observed Strengths: /
SI/DWC/2015-16
14