You are on page 1of 3

][BilingualfilingEnglishfollowstheHebrew

Sentbyfaxto:026759648,onMay1,2016
______________

7939/10
"502/07

:'
HumanRightsAlertNGO
",33407"
"joseph.zernik@hrango.org:
0773179186:
:
(1
"
(2
"

(502/07)

(502/07),
,,:
.111,2016,
"][.
.2212016,,
"",,
.
)(.
.3
.,
1/3
)
(502/07.


.
.4:
.
.
.
21,2016,.
.,

,
.
,.

____________
',

01,,2016,

IntheSupremeCourtoftheStateofIsrael
7939/10

criminalappeal

ZadorovvStateofIsrael

Pertainingtothefollowingcourtfile:
StateofIsraelvZadorov(502/07)seriouscrimeNazarethDistrictCourt
Requester:JosephZernik,PhD
HumanRightsAlertNGO
POBox33407,TelAviv
Email:joseph.zernik@hrango.org

Fax:0773179186
Parties:
1)RomanZadorovAppellant
ByhisCounsel,AttorneyYaromHalevy
2)StateProsecutionRespondent
ByitsCounsel,AttorneyTammarBornstein
2/3
)
(502/07.

RequestforDueProcessinProfFormaRequesttoInspectDecisionRecords
inthePaperCourtFileStateofIsraelvZadorov(502/07)fromtheNazareth
DistrictCourt
Ihereinfilerequestfordueprocessintheprocessofproformarequesttoinspect
thedecisionrecordsinthepapercourtfileStateofIsraelvRomanZadorov
(502/07)fromtheNazarethDistrictCourt,inwhichtheappealininstantcourt
fileoriginated,andwhichissaidtobeheldbytheSupremeCourt:
1. OnApril11,2016,Ifiledtheproformarequesttoinspecttheabovereferenced
papercourtfile[hereinaftertheproformarequest].
2. TheApril21,2016MagistratedecisionandtheEventsdatainITsystemof
theCourtininstantcourtfileleadonetoconcludethatthepartiesfiledwith
theCourttheirresponsesonmyproformarequest.However,theirresponses
haveneverbeendeliveredtometothisdate(aswasthecaseinthepastin
instantcourtfileandinnumerousothercourtfiles).
3. FailuretoservetheresponsesbypartiesontheRequesterunderminesthe
fundamentalsofDueProcessintheancillaryprocessoftheproformarequest.
Also,failuretoservetheresponsesstandsdiametricallyoppositetostatements
inwrittenresponsesbytheAdministrationofCourts,regardingtothemanner
inwhichrequeststoinspectarelawfullyconductedinthecourtsoftheStateof
Israeltoday.
4. Therefore,Ihereinrequest:
a.ThattheCourtserveonmetheresponses,filedbythepartiestothisdatein
theproformarequestprocess.
b.ThattheCourtordertheStateProsecutiontolawfullyserveonmeits
responseontheApril21,2016Magistratedecision,ifandwhenfiled.
c.AlternativelyincasetheCourtfindsthatserviceofparties'responseson
theRequesterarenotdueininspectionrequestprocessesthattheCourt
permitmyinspectionoftheparties'responsesintheancillaryprocessofthe
proformarequest,sothatIcancopythemduringmynextvisittotheCourt.
Respectinglawandjustice,theCourtshouldgrantinstantrequest.

Today,May01,2016

______________
JosephZernik,PhD

3/3
)
.(502/07