Professional Documents
Culture Documents
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Avenida Centenario km 5.5 Apartado Postal 424 Chetumal, Quintana Roo C.P. 77000, Mexico
b
Marine Biology & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus,
Plymouth PL4 8AA UK
c
School of Geography, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
d
CINVESTAV-IPN, Antigua Carretera a Progreso km 2.5 Merida, Yucatan, C.P. 97310, Mexico
Received 24 May 2004; received in revised form 20 June 2005; accepted 27 June 2005
Available online 26 August 2005
Abstract
The present study describes the spatial and temporal patterns of surcial sediments within the transition zone of the
terrigenous and carbonate (CO) provinces in the Southern Gulf of Mexico after ood events during the rainy season of
1999. The sampling design consisted of two across-shelf (A, B) and two along-shelf (C, D) transects that followed depth
and sediment gradients. Twelve stations, approximately 78 km apart, were allocated to each transect. PVC cores of
10 cm in diameter were taken to a depth of 5 cm for organic matter (OM), CO content and grain-size analysis after
recording relevant information such as corer penetration, characteristics of the surcial layer of sediment and depth of
the soft liqueed layer if present. OM was determined by combustion and CO content was analysed by acid digestion
and titration. Size-frequency distributions (SFDs) were measured using a Malvern Mastersizer X laser particle sizer into
15 whole phi size intervals. A multivariate approach was chosen to look in detail at the derived sediment SFDs and pick
up depth-related sub-environments that would help to construct a conceptual model of sediment movement.
Additionally, OM and CO content were used to identify the relative inuences of river input and CO sediment, together
with the bulk sediment surface area/OM relationship to strengthen the interpretation of sediment sources. Three subenvironments were qualitatively identied within the Southern Gulf of Mexico and validated using a multivariate
approach, which reect the across-shelf topography and depth gradient. The spatial pattern was temporally maintained
in relation to sediment size distribution and CO content. OM and CO content showed an inverse association in response
to the effect of ne sediment of terrigenous origin carrying adsorbed OM. In contrast, CO content seems to be related to
coarser material with less surface area and organic content. A number of differences were found between the present
Corresponding author at: El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Avenida Centenario km 5.5 Apartado Postal 424 Chetumal, Quintana
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.A. Hernandez Arana et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 18361852
1837
and previous studies carried out on the transitional area of the southern Gulf in relation to sediment size and CO
content. It is considered that these differences are mainly the consequence of local hydrology, which makes transitional
environments highly variable. As in other COsiliclastic transitions, climate and hydrological setting are the main
controls of the dispersion and deposition of ne materials on the Southern Gulf of Mexico shelf.
r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Shelf sediments; Grain size; Mixed sediments; Multivariate analysis; Gulf of Mexico
1. Introduction
Two provinces constitute the Southern Gulf of
Mexico: Campeche Bank and Campeche Bay. The
former is an extensive CO shelf characterised by a
gentle slope and irregular bottom with sandbanks,
coral reefs and autochthonous biogenic and
authogenic sediments along most of the coast of
the Yucatan Peninsula (Antoine, 1972; Martin and
Bouma, 1978). Because of its karstic topography,
there is an absence of surcial runoff and the
presence of clastic sediments across the southwestern region is due to transport by currents from
Campeche Bay (Logan et al., 1969; Rezak and
Edwards, 1972). The physical properties of the
water column are considered vertically uniform,
with high salinity and density due to high
evaporation and the lack of surcial river runoff
(Monreal Gomez et al., 1992). Campeche Bay is
characterised by its narrow shelf with a steep
slope; sedimentary features change into a terrigenous shelf of very ne silt and clay bottom,
presumably with an area of persistently turbid
bottom water (Rezak et al., 1990) due to the
presence of the Grijalva-Usumacinta and San
Pedro-San Pablo rivers delta system. This coastal
plain is the largest deltaic uvial system in Mexico,
accounting for 35% of the total drainage of the
country. However, the sediment load is low
(o50 ton km2) and at present is undergoing
erosive processes related to coastal currents
(Aguayo Camargo et al., 1999).
The south-western region of the bank and the
continental area of the Campeche Bay have been
studied intensively due to the presence of salt
domes with oil-trapping characteristics (Bishop,
1980; Klemme, 1980). These two characteristic
provinces contain surcial sediments of different
origins, being relict marine autochthonous sedi-
ments on Campeche Bank and terrigenous unconsolidated sediments in Campeche Bay. The
dynamics of the area produce an extensive transition zone where the interaction of river discharges,
coastal currents and intruding oceanic water
occurs, generating an area of mixed surcial
sediments (Yanez-Arancibia and Sanchez-Gil,
1983). The criterion used to identify the transition
zone is the percentage of CO content in recent
sediments. Different authors have proposed varied
levels of CO content for this transition region,
ranging from 25% to 75%. The isoline of 75% CO
content has been proposed as the limit between the
terrigenous and CO provinces (Bello and Cano,
1991; Carranza Edwards et al., 1993). Gutierrez
Estrada and Galaviz Solis (1991) proposed a
classication system based on the amount of CO
content and mean grain size (MGS) (phi units) for
surcial sediments, providing a tool that allows the
degree of mixing of CO and terrigenous sediments
to be evaluate.
Extensive research exists on the characterisation
of the obvious, different depositional environments
(i.e. river beds, coastal dunes and beaches).
However, difculties arise when the aim is to
differentiate samples from a more or less homogeneous environment (Hartmann and Christiansen,
1992; Sutherland and Lee, 1994). An additional
difculty is present when human activities, such as
offshore oil production, contribute to a local
modication of the depositional environment. Oil
drilling activity is a prime issue of concern relating
to offshore oil production due to the use of oilbased mud (Gray and Darley, 1981). These factors
vary in extent and are focused in localised areas of
the Southern Gulf of Mexico, providing an
opportunity to explore the interactions between a
number of natural and non-natural variables that
putatively inuence surcial sediments. The present
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1838
2. Methods
2.1. Study area
The study area is located between latitude
191000 191400 N and longitude 911400 921300 W, in
Fig. 1. Study area indicating the location of stations along four transects AD. Stations sampled for surcial sediments in November
1999, after the rainy season, and April 2000, after the northers season.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.A. Hernandez Arana et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 18361852
1839
The sampling design consisted of two acrossshelf (A, B) and two along-shelf (C, D) transects
(Fig. 1). Across-shelf transects started 40 km NW
off the Terminos Lagoon system and extended to
approximately 80 km offshore. Consequently,
these transects followed a depth gradient of
12135 m and a sediment gradient of ne sand to
clay. Along-shelf transects followed a putative
sediment gradient from clay/silt to ne sand, and
CO content from 20% to 50%, whilst depth was
kept relatively constant, ranging from 30 to 50 m
(with the exception of stations D1 and D2 at 67 m
depth). These latter transects commenced
6070 km N-NE offshore from the rivers mouths
and extended for approximately 80 km along
shore. Twelve stations, approximately 78 km
apart, were allocated to each transect. By sampling
along putative gradients in depth and sediment
size/CO content at different times, the sampling
design effectively allows for an examination of the
inuence of river runoff, winter storms and the
presence of oil activities. The intersections were
sampled twice in November and only once in
April, making a total of 48 and 44 stations,
respectively.
2.3. Sampling methodology
Sampling was carried out from 11 to 13
November 1999 after the rainy season and from
14 to 16 April 2000 after the northers season.
Stations were located and positioned using the
satellite navigation system of the vessel, and
sampled (without replication) using a box corer.
The recovered core was sub-sampled for OM, CO
content and grain-size analysis after recording
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1840
Statgraphics plus 4.1v packages. Correlationbased PCA ordination and discriminant analysis
(DA) were run with two data sets from both
sampling dates: (1) Arc-sin transformed data of
the 92 SFDs plus bulk OM and CO content. (2)
Derived moment descriptive statistics (MGS,
sorting, skewness) from the 92 SFDs, SSAS, bulk
OM and CO content. The objective was to look at
particular sizes of sediment that could provide an
insight into any existing gradient or pattern of
depositional sub-environments and to compare
with the summarising statistics seeking to obtain a
better environmental ordination that allows validating a priori proposed classication. This type of
analysis has been used previously to identify
and differentiate sedimentary environments
(Fernandez et al., 2003; Barcelo et al., 1999;
Syvitsky, 1991). Histograms of SFD were employed to visualise our proposed conceptual model
of across-shelf sediment transport. In order to
further validate our proposed a priori classication of sub-environments two textural classication were employed. One was based on CO content
and sediment MGS (Gutierrez Estrada and
Galaviz Solis, 1991) and a further three component classication scheme was based on sand/silt/
clay ratios using ternary plots in order to
3. Results
Field observations provided insights for a
preliminary qualitative classication. Three subenvironments were distinguished by sediment
compaction (measured qualitatively as depth of
main core penetration), bivalve and gastropod
shell abundance and the occurrence of a top layer
of liquid dense mud: near-shore, inner and outer
shelf (Table 1). The sampling after the rainy season
coincided with conditions derived from a very
heavy rainy season with serious ooding along the
south and south-western Gulf coast of Mexico.
Therefore, an increased sediment load was discharged onto the continental shelf of the Campeche Bay and Bank. Samples taken after the
northers season will have been affected by pulses
of strong northerly winds up to 17 m s1, which
occurred during autumn and winter and are
Table 1
Preliminary classication of three sub-environments based on eld observations of sediment characteristics during the sampling
programs of November 1999 and April 2000 in the Southern Gulf of Mexico
Sub-environment
Shell content
Sediment rmness
Other observations
Near-shore, 1227 m
deep. Stations 15 of
transects A and B
2535
Abundant, particularly
oyster shells on transect
B
3560
A gradient of scarce to
abundant from the SW
to NE of transects C
and D
4055
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.A. Hernandez Arana et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 18361852
30
20
PC2
Table 2
Mean and extreme values of moment descriptive statistics for
three shelf sub-environments classied qualitatively based on
eld observations of sediment characteristics during the
sampling programs of November 1999 and April 2000 in the
Southern Gulf of Mexico
1841
10
0
2.56
1.45
1.97
1.69
0.14
0.76
6.75
3.12
4.30
Inner shelf
Maximum 7.39
Minimum 6.24
Average
7.15
2.47
1.56
1.72
0.67
0.63
0.35
4.86
2.62
3.54
Outer shelf
Maximum 7.55
Minimum 6.38
Average
7.36
3.28
1.55
1.89
0.38
1.1
0.28
6.5
3.21
4.66
April 2000
Near-shore
Maximum 6.07
Minimum 4.67
Average
5.49
3.43
1.82
2.16
1.30
0.26
0.69
4.85
2.04
3.85
Inner shelf
Maximum 7.43
Minimum 6.86
Average
7.17
2.38
1.59
1.77
0.66
1.13
0.25
5.79
3.14
3.78
Outer shelf
Maximum 7.60
Minimum 7.32
Average
7.44
2.24
1.62
1.78
0.42
1.26
0.07
6.61
2.97
4.21
-10
-15
-5
(a)
15
PC1
25
35
45
6.2
4.2
PC2
November 1999
Near-shore
Maximum 6.82
Minimum 4.79
Average
5.65
2.2
0.2
-1.8
-2.6
(b)
-0.6
1.4
3.4
5.4
PC1
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1842
Table 3
Percentage of variation explained by the rst two PCs and
coefcients in the linear combination of variables making up
the PCs
PC1
PC2
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.A. Hernandez Arana et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 18361852
45
40
40
35
35
30
30
25
1000
1000
1000
16
250
50
30
45
40
25
35
30
freq vol %
25
20
15
10
20
15
10
16
0.25
250
1000
microns
63
16
0.25
0.06
5
0.06
freq vol%
250
1000
250
63
16
10
5
0.25
15
10
0.25
20
15
5
0
25
0.06
20
250
30
25
63
35
30
63
40
35
63
45
40
freq vol %
45
0.06
50
16
1000
250
63
16
10
5
1
10
0.25
15
20
15
20
0.25
25
0.06
freq vol %
50
45
50
freq vol %
50
0.06
freq vol %
1843
microns
Fig. 3. Histograms of sediment-SFD compiled by pooling stations for the near-shore, inner and outer shelf showing the across-shelf
change in sediment grain size.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.A. Hernandez Arana et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 18361852
1844
NS
IS
OS
Centroids
5.3
Df 2
3.3
1.3
-0.7
-2.7
-4
-2
Df 1
Fig. 4. DA ordination plot for samples taken during the rainy
and northers seasons from the Southern Gulf of Mexico using
data of 92 SFDs, SSAS, bulk OM and CO content (, nearshore; n, inner shelf; E, outer shelf).
NS
IS
OS
30
40
50
7.6
MGS
7.1
6.6
6.1
5.6
5.1
4.6
20
60
70
80
CO %
Fig. 5. Scatter plot of bivariate classication of surcial
sediments from the Southern Gulf of Mexico (see text for
explanation) based on CO content and sediment MGS: o50%
CO content terrigenous sediments with carbonate inuence;
450% CO content carbonate sediments mixed with terrigenous material (&, near-shore; n, inner shelf; B, outer shelf).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.A. Hernandez Arana et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 18361852
1845
Fig. 6. Textural classication of surcial sediments from the Southern Gulf of Mexico using ternary plots based upon Flemmings
scheme of textural classes: (a) samples taken after the rainy season in November 1999 and (b) samples taken after the norther season in
April 2000 (J, near-shore; K, inner shelf; &, outer shelf).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.A. Hernandez Arana et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 18361852
1846
Table 4
Spearman correlation coefcients for the association between
specic surface area of sediment (SSAS), mean grain size
(MGS), organic matter (OM), carbonate content (CO) and
distance to oil elds on the along shelf transects sampled in
November 1999 and April 2000
SSAS m2/g
0.8
0.6
0.4
SSAS
0.2
OM
CO
0
20
30
40
(a)
50
60
70
80
CO %
18
15
12
OM %
MGS
0
20
30
(b)
40
50
60
70
80
CO %
18
15
OM %
12
9
6
3
0
0
(c)
0.2
0.4
0.6
SSAS m2/g
0.8
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.A. Hernandez Arana et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 18361852
4. Discussion
Both multivariate techniques allowed the proposed three sub-environments to be separated,
although DA resolved the group separation better.
This outcome supports the ability of multivariate
techniques to separate spatial and temporal
patterns when present (Syvitsky, 1991; Fernandez
et al., 2003). The clear separation of near-shore
stations from those on the inner and outer shelf
suggests that the 30 m isobath is a natural
boundary for differential depositional environments. The depth gradients observed in the multivariate ordinations can be interpreted in terms of
hydrodynamics affecting the deposited sediment
coming from river discharges, the CO shelf and in
situ production. A relatively high contribution of
coarse silt and sand fractions is observed at the
near-shore. Winnowing of the ne spectra of the
sediment grain-size distribution occurs, sizes
o32 mm being preferentially removed by the
hydrology regime occurring at the near-shore.
These ner sediments are then subsequently
deposited across the inner shelf, where the wind
generated currents and waves are less likely to
reach the bottom (Mooers, 1976). Temporal
differences were not observable, indicating that
the mechanisms involved in the sediment transport
and deposition are continuously present within the
sampling time span.
Sediment particle size distribution is thought to
reect the hydrodynamics of the depositional area,
and can be used to infer direction of transport
1847
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1848
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.A. Hernandez Arana et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 18361852
1849
Fig. 8. Conceptual model of sediment transport in relation to shelf topography, wind and wave stress and regional hydrology, and
location of the transitional area based on the criteria of 2550% carbonate content (shadowed areas) from data obtained in this and
previous studies. Current patterns were drawn from the various studies referenced in the text, with bottom currents as interpreted from
Rosales Hoz et al. (1999). Drawn isolines of 25% and 75% from Carranza Edwards et al. (1993) and isoline of 50% from Gutierrez
Estrada and Galaviz Solis (1991).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1850
5. Conclusions
Three sub-environments were identied within
the Southern Gulf of Mexico using a multivariate
approach, which reect the across-shelf topography and depth gradient. The spatial pattern was
temporally maintained in relation to sediment
grain-size distribution and CO content. OM and
CO content showed an inverse association in
response to the effect of ne sediment of terrigenous origin carrying adsorbed OM. On the
contrary, CO content seems to be related to
coarser material with less SSAS and organic
content.
Acknowledgements
The British Council and CONACyT (Mexico)
are thanked for providing nancial support
through a scholarship to H.A.H.A. Special thanks
are due to D. Salas de Leon and E. Escobar
Briones for providing logistic support within the
oceanographic research programs PROMEBIO 2
and 3 (ICMyL-UNAM Mexico). The authors
express their gratitude to the commander and
crew of the oceanographic vessel B./O. Justo
Sierra and the M.Sc. students that provided help
during the sampling program and onboard processing of samples. H. Weissenberger is thanked for
map editing. Two anonymous referees are thanked
for their comments which contributed to the
improvement of the nal manuscript.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
H.A. Hernandez Arana et al. / Continental Shelf Research 25 (2005) 18361852
References
Aguayo Camargo, J.E., Gutierrez Estrada, M.A., Araujo
Mendieta, J., Sandoval Ochoa, J.H., Vazquez Gutierrez,
F., 1999. Holocene and recent geodynamics of the uvialdeltaic Grijalva-Usumacinta system, Southwest Gulf of
Mexico. Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia
Natural 49, 2944.
Antoine, J.W., 1972. Structure of the Gulf of Mexico. In:
Rezak, R., Henry, V.J. (Eds.), Contributions on the
Geological and Geophysical Oceanography of the Gulf of
Mexico. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, pp. 134.
Barcelo, C., Pawlowsky, V., Bohling, G., 1999. Classication of
compositional data using mixture models: a case study using
granulometric data. In: Harff, J., Lemke, W., Statteger, K.
(Eds.), Computerized Modelling of Sedimentary Systems.
Springer, Berlin, pp. 389400.
Bello, A.A., Cano, R., 1991. Subsuelo marino en el area
de la Sonda de Campeche. In: Conference Proceedings of
the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 1.
Sociedad Chilena de Geotecnia, Vina del Mar, Chile,
pp. 183195.
Bishop, W.F., 1980. Petroleum geology of Northern Central
America. Journal of Petroleum Geology 3 (1), 359.
Boicourt, W.C., Wiseman, Jr., W.J., Valle-Levinson, A.,
Atkinson, L.P., 1998. Continental shelf of the southeastern
United States and the Gulf of Mexico: in the shadow of the
western boundary current. In: Robinson, A.R., Brink, K.H.
(Eds.), The Sea. The Global Coastal Ocean. Regional
Studies and Syntheses. Wiley, New York, pp. 135181.
Carranza Edwards, A., Rosales Hoz, L., Monreal Gomez, A.,
1993. Suspended sediments in the southeastern Gulf of
Mexico. Marine Geology 112, 257269.
Clarke, K.R., Gorley, R.N., 2001. PRIMER v5: User Manual/
Tutorial. PRIMER-E Ltd., Plymouth.
CNA, 2001. Compendio basico del agua en Mexico, 2001.
Comision Nacional del Agua. Online, Annual Report.
www.cna.gob.mx.
Czitrom, S.P.R., Ruiz, F., Alatorre, M.A., Padilla, A.R., 1986.
Preliminary study of a front in the Campeche Bay, Mexico.
In: Nihoul, J.C.J. (Ed.), Marine Interfaces Ecohydrodynamics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 301311.
Dean, Jr., W.E., 1974. Determination of carbonate and organic
matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by
loss on ignition: comparison with other methods. Journal of
Sedimentary Petrology 44 (1), 242248.
Drake, D.E., 1999. Temporal and spatial variability of the
sediment grain size distribution on the eel shelf: the ood
layer of 1995. Marine Geology 154, 169182.
Fernandez, M., Roux, A., Fernandez, E., Calo, J., Marcos, A.,
Aldacur, H., 2003. Grain-size analysis of surcial sediments
from Golfo San Jorge, Argentina. Journal of the Marine
Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83,
11931197.
Flemming, B.W., 2000. A revised textural classication of
gravel-free muddy sediments on the basis of ternary
diagrams. Continental Shelf Research 20, 11251137.
1851
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1852