This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
“CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF ITC”
SUBMITTED IN THE PARTIAL FULFILLMENT TOWARDS THE AWARD OF MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION 2008-2010
UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF:
G.L.A Institute of Business Management Mathura (U.P.)
(Affiliated to U.P. Technical University, (LUCKNOW)
It is well evident that work experience is an indispensable part of every professional course. In the same manner practical training in any organization is must for each and every individual, who is undergoing management course. Without the practical exposure one cannot consider himself as a qualified capable manager. Hence to fulfill this requirement of research report was completed at under guidance Mr. Utkal khandelwal. At first everything seems strange and unheard but as the time passes one understands the concept and working of the organization and thereby develop professional relationship. Initially it is felt as if classroom study was irrelevant and it is unless in any concern working. But gradually it is realized that all basic fundamental concepts studied are linked in one or other ways to the organization. But how and what can be done with fundamentals depends upon the intellectual and applicability of the individual
I hereby declare that the Research project: “Analysis of Corporate Governance Practice in Banking Sector “submitted for the degree of master in business administration Research project done by me under guidenance of Mr. Utkal khandelwal under, towards fulfillment of requirement for the MBA course of G.L.A Institute of Business Management Mathura (U.P) 2008-10;
I further declare that this study or any part thereof has not been submitted for any other degree.
Utkal khandelwal (Faculty of MBA) whose endeavor for perfection. under fatigable zeal. ideas. directly or indirectly made this project possible. I would like to thank Mr. innovation and dynamism contributed in a big way in completing this project. .ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to take this opportunity to express my deep sense of gratitude to all those who. I have got considerable help and support in making this project report a reality from many people. concept and above all his modest effort. This work is the reflection of his thought.
TO FIND OUT THE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN BANKING SECTOR • • • Introduction to the topic Review of Literature Need / Rational of study (Expected Contribution of the research work) • • Objectives of Research Research Methodology * Research design * Sample design • • • Proposed Plan of Study (Chapter Outline) Limitations of Study References/ Bibliography .
Through the survey study. The reason of assigning such a project to a management student is to get frank feedbacks from the bank employees about the exact picture of the corporate . Hence to make the working easy and transparent the banks accepted corporate governance. we try to reach the bank employees/managers and ask them about corporate governance. With the introduction of corporate governance in banking sector the banking is made much easier and transparent. With increasing competition the banks have to pay entire attention on their working. The banking industry is also not spread from this competition. we try to find out the problems of the corporate governance and with the help of questionnaire. Now the bank employees need not to wait to get the introduction from the top position to take decision.Introduction to the topic INTRODUCTION CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK In today’s world there is a end throat competition in each industry.
customers. such as the stakeholder view and the corporate governance models around the world (see section 9 below). Corporate governance is a multi-faceted subject. firms such as Enron Corporation and WorldCom. customs. banks and other lenders. Corporate governance also includes the relationships among the many stakeholders involved and the goals for which the corporation is governed.governance. The non-employed officials (such as students) are totally unbiased for their preference. with a strong emphasis on shareholders welfare. regulators. management and the board of directors. the US federal . particularly due to the high-profile collapses of a number of large U. In 2002. the environment and the community at large. suppliers.S. The principal stakeholders are the shareholders. A related but separate thread of discussions focus on the impact of a corporate governance system in economic efficiency. Other stakeholders include employees. There are yet other aspects to the corporate governance subject. An important theme of corporate governance is to ensure the accountability of certain individuals in an organization through mechanisms that try to reduce or eliminate the principal-agent problem. laws and institutions affecting the way a corporation is directed. administered or controlled. There has been renewed interest in the corporate governance practices of modern corporations since 2001. policies. MEANING OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Corporate governance is the set of processes.
"Corporate governance is a field in economics that investigates how to secure/motivate efficient management of corporations by the use of incentive mechanisms. organizational designs and legislation. OECD April 1999. how the corporate owners can secure/motivate that the corporate managers will deliver a competitive rate of return". page 15]. for example. This is often limited to the question of improving financial performance. Definitions 1. such as. The Journal of Finance. 2. and spells out the rules and procedures for making decisions on corporate affairs. "Corporate governance is the system by which business corporations are directed and controlled.government passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. such as contracts. 3. managers. it also provides the structure through which the company objectives are set. OECD's definition is consistent with the one presented by Cadbury [1992. the board. By doing this. intending to restore public confidence in corporate governance. . “Corporate governance deals with the ways in which suppliers of finance to corporations assure themselves of getting a return on their investment”. shareholders and other stakeholders. The corporate governance structure specifies the distribution of rights and responsibilities among different participants in the corporation. and the means of attaining those objectives and monitoring performance". .
". as its relationship to society -…. "Corporate governance . from an article financial Times An Organisational Framework for Corporate Governance Shareholders ← boards of directors (Principals) ← ← ← ← Use and role of share stake ↓ Delegates authority market for corporate control CEO and Executive debt structure of the firm Management (Agents) product market competition ↓ Agent actions implicit incentives and constraints HISTORY The subject of corporate governance leapt to global business limelight from Relative obscurity after a string of collapses of high profile companies. the . Enron.which can be defined narrowly as the relationship of a company to its shareholders or.4. more broadly.
shocked the business world with both the scale and age of their unethical and illegal operations. it appeared that the problem was far More widespread. Researchers in finance have actively investigated the topic for at least a quarter century1 and the father of modern economics. revealed significant and deep-rooted Problems in their corporate governance. Large and trusted companies from Parma at in Italy to the Multinational newspaper group Hollinger Inc.. Even the prestigious New York Stock Exchange had to remove its director. himself had recognized the problem over two centuries ago. they seemed to indicate only the tip of a dangerous iceberg.Houston.model of corporate governance is better than the bank based Models of Germany and Japan. It was clear that something was amiss in the area of corporate governance all over the world. However. the telecom behemoth. While corporate Practices in the US companies came under attack. Indeed . Adam Smith. of course. been an important field of query within the Finance discipline for decades. the differences in the quality of corporate Governance in these developed countries fade in comparison to the chasm that exists Starting from the seminal “agency problem” paper of Jensen and Macklin (1976). Corporate governance has. 2. Texas based energy giant. Worse. Between corporate governance standards and practices in these countries as a group and those in the developing world. There have been debates about whether the Anglo-Saxon market. Dick Grasso. and WorldCom. amidst public outcry over excessive Compensation. Corporate governance has been a central issue in developing countries long before the recent spate of corporate scandals in advanced economies made headlines.
leading to greater investment. The proportion of private credit to GDP in countries in the highest quartile of creditor right enactment and enforcement is more than double that in the countries in the lowest quartile. 3. have an unmistakably positive effect on economic growth and poverty reduction. 5. There are several channels through which the causality works.corporate governance and economic development are intrinsically linked. As for equity financing. Effective corporate Governance enhances access to external financing by firms. Good corporate governance also lowers of the cost of capital by reducing risk and creates higher firm valuation once again boosting real investments. There is a variation of a factor of 8 in the “control premium” (transaction price of shares in block transfers Signifying control transfer less the ordinary share price) between countries with the highest level of equity rights protection and those with the lowest. the ratio of stock market capitalization to GDP in the countries in the highest quartile of shareholder right enactment and enforcement is about four times as large as that for countries in the lowest quartile. in turn. The return on assets (ROA) is about twice as High in the countries with the highest level of equity rights protection as in countries with The lowest protection. 6. Effective corporate governance mechanisms ensure better resource allocation and Management raising the return to capital. as well as higher growth and employment. . Effective corporate governance systems promote the development of strong financial systems – irrespective of whether they are largely bank-based or market-based – which. 4. Poor corporate governance also hinders the creation and development of new firms.
There is a strong inverse relationship between the quality of corporate governance and currency depreciation. good corporate governance can remove mistrust between different stakeholders. a history of managing agency system. Such financial crises have massive economic and social costs and can set a country several years back in its path to development. Finally. reduce legal costs and improve social and labor relationships and external economies like environmental protection. the Indian financial sector is marked with a relatively unsophisticated equity market vulnerable to manipulation and with rudimentary analyst activity. . a dominance of family firms. Making sure that the managers actually act on behalf of the owners of the company – the stockholders – and pass on the profits to them are the key issues in corporate governance. Limited liability and dispersed ownership – essential features that the jointstock company form of organization thrives on – inevitably lead to a distance and inefficient monitoring of management by the actual owners of the business. 8 Indeed poor transparency and corporate governance norms are believed to be the key reasons behind the Asian Crisis of 1997. These potential problems of corporate governance are universal.7 Good corporate governance can significantly reduce the risk of nation-wide financial crises. In addition. Managers enjoy actual control of business and may not serve in the best interests of the shareholders. All these features make corporate governance a particularly important issue in India. and a generally high level of corruption.
The Board. The numerous shareholders who contribute to the capital of the company are the actual owners of business. Because of this “incomplete contracts” situation. some “residual powers” over the funds of the . Even if this power pattern held in reality. in turn. no contract can be written between representatives of shareholders and the management that specifies the right course of action in every situation. 9 The list of possible situations is infinitely long. It is not possible for the Board to fully instruct management on the desired course of action under every possible business situation.2. appoints a team of managers who actually handle the day-to-day functioning of the company and report periodically to the Board. in principle. The central issue is the nature of the contract between shareholder representatives and managers telling the latter what to do with the funds contributed by the former. The main challenge comes from the fact that such contracts are necessarily “incomplete”. it would still be a challenge for the Board to effectively monitor management. Thus mangers are the agents of shareholders and function with the objective of maximizing shareholders’ wealth. They elect a Board of Directors to monitor the running of the company on their behalf. Consequently. Central issues in Corporate Governance The basic power structure of the joint-stock company form of business. so that the management can be held for violation of such a contract in the event it does something else under the circumstances. is as follows.
Consequently the supervisory role of the Board is often severely compromised and the management. In companies with highly dispersed ownership.company must be vested with either the financiers or the management. In real life. can potentially use corporate resources to further their own self.interests rather than the interests of the shareholders. who really has the keys to the business. Most shareholders do not care to attend the General Meetings to elect or change the Board of Directors and often grant their “proxies” to the management. Often the CEO himself is the Chairman of the Board of Directors as well. Clearly the former does not have the expertise or the inclination to run the business in the situations unspecified in the contract. The underlying premise is that shareholders dissatisfied with a particular management would simply dispose of their shares in the . On his part the CEO frequently packs the board with his friends and allies who rarely differ with him. the Managing Director in British-style organizations ) functions with negligible accountability. The inefficacy of the Board of Directors in monitoring the activities of management is particularly marked in the Anglo-Saxon corporate structure where real monitoring is expected to come from financial markets. managers wield an enormous amount of power in joint-stock companies and the common shareholder has very little say in the way his or her money is used in the company. Even those that attend the meeting find it difficult to have a say in the selection of directors as only the management gets to propose a slate of directors for voting. The reality is even more complicated and biased in favor of management. The efficient limits to these powers constitute much of the subject of corporate governance. the manager (the CEO in the American setting. so these residual powers must go to management.
If and when the acquisition actually happens. presupposes the existence of a deep and liquid stock market with considerable informational efficiency as well as a legal and financial system conducive to M&A activity. . the company would become takeover target. It is thus the fear of a takeover rather than shareholder action that is supposed to keep the management honest and on its toes. An alternative corporate governance model is that provided by the bank-based economies like Germany where the main bank(“House bank” in Germany) lending to the company exerts considerable influence and carries out continuous project-level supervision of the management and the supervisory board has representatives of multiple stakeholders of the firm. these features do not exist in developing countries like India. More often than not. the acquiring company would get rid of the existing management. Box 1 gives a brief comparison of the two systems. however. As this would drive down the share price.company. This mechanism.
ownership patterns and Corporate Governance The legal system of a country plays a crucial role in creating an effective corporate governed mechanism in a country and protecting the rights of investors and creditors. The legal environment encompasses two important aspects – the protection offered in the laws (de jure protection) and to what extent the laws are enforced in real life (de facto protection). Both these aspects play important roles in determining the nature of corporate governance in the country in question.3. Recent research has forcefully connected the origins of the legal system of a country to the very structure of its financial and economic architecture arguing that the . Legal environment.
English-origin legal systems provide the best protection to shareholder lder rights. Germany. French civil law. The Indian legal system is obviously built on the English common law system. highest in the sample examined – equal to that of the USA. The first index captures the extent to which the written law protected shareholders while the latter reflects to what extent the law is enforced in reality. Hong Kong. The English common law countries lead the four systems in the shareholder rights index with an average of 4 (out of a maximum possible 6) followed by Scandinavian origin countries with an average score of 3 with the French-origin and German-origin countries coming last with average scores of 2. Canada. Thus. India. Researchers have used two indices for all these countries – a shareholder rights index ranging from 0 (lowest) to 6 (highest) and a rule of law index ranging 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) – to measure the effective protection of shareholder rights provided in the different countries studied.68).11 Legal systems in most countries have their roots in one of the four distinct legal systems – the English common law.05). English-origin countries (6.46) and French-origin countries (6.connection works through the protection given to external financiers of companies – creditors and shareholders. UK. for instance has a shareholder rights index of 5.law countries) and better than all the other 42 countries in the study including countries like France. The Rule of law index is another story. Japan and Switzerland. German civil law and Scandinavian civil law. Here the Scandinavian-origin countries have an average score of 10 – the maximum possible – followed by the German-origin countries (8.33 each. Most advanced countries have very high scores on this index while developing countries . Pakistan and South Africa (all English-origin.
shareholders other than the three largest shareholders in each company) to the GNP of a country averages a remarkable 0. The ratio of the stock market capitalization held by minority shareholders (i. They are also the best performers in mobilizing external finance. This difference in protection of shareholders’ rights has led to completely different trajectories of financial and economic developments in the different countries. The English-origin systems spawn the highest number of firms per capita (on average 35.46.60 for the English-origin countries.in books.31 which puts it in the upper half of the sample. Sri Lanka.21 respectively. Peru and Philippines. 0.30 and 0.17 on this index – ranking 41st out of 49 countries studied – ahead only of Nigeria. India. The primary difference between the legal systems in advanced countries and those in developing countries lies in enforce me rather than in the nature of laws. As for the ratio of external capital to GNP.79 companies per million citizens. for instance has a score of 4. Thus it appears that Indian laws provide great protection of shareholders’ rights on paper while the application and enforcement of those laws are lamentable. one of the lowest for English-origin countries but higher than many French-origin countries and Germany. Enforcement of laws play a much more important role than the quality of the laws . Colombia.e. Indonesia.79 and 10.45 companies per million citizens as compared to 27. Scandinavian and French-origin countries of 0. India has 7.00 for German and French-origin countries respectively). substantially higher than the average ratio for German. India has a score of 0.26 for Scandinavian-origin countries and 16. Zimbabwe. Pakistan.typically have low scores.
In spite of their substantial variation in economic conditions and politicolegal backgrounds. Corporate governance issues have been of critical importance in Asian countries particularly since the Asian crisis which is believed to have been partly caused by lack of transparency and poor corporate governance in East Asian countries 13 Research has established the evidence of pyramiding and family control of businesses in Asian countries. proxy fights and executive compensation – lose their effectiveness. particularly East Asia. the average shareholding of promoters in all Indian . In an environment marked by weak enforcement of property rights and contracts. Asian economies as a group share certain common features that affect the nature of corporate governance in the region. This particularly hurts the development of new firms and the small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Large block-holding emerges as the most important corporate governance mechanism with some potential roles for bank monitoring. leading to limited external financing and 12 See Bergdorf and Classes (2004) ownership concentration. In such a situation many of the standard methods of corporate governance – market for corporate controls. 12. Even in 2002. employee monitoring and social control. Apart from the universal features of corporate governance. board activity. though this feature is prevalent in India as well. most Asian countries are marked with concentrated stock ownership and a preponderance of family-controlled businesses while state-controlled enterprises form an important segment of the corporate sector in many of these countries. shareholder activism.on books in determining events like CEO turnover and developing security markets by eliminating insider trading. entrepreneurs and managers find it difficult to signal their commitment to the potential investors.
Empirical analyses of the effects of ownership by other (non. Recent research has also investigated the nature and extent of “tunneling” of funds within business groups in India. Similar to the effects for US companies.1%. 14.family) groups in Asia are relatively scarce. organizational forms that reduce transaction costs and asymmetric information problems. The corporate governance mechanism and efficiency in state controlled companies are generally deemed to inferior. The effect of this concentrated ownership by management in Asian countries is not straightforward. firm value rises with largest owner’s stake but declines as the excess of the largest owner’s management control over his equity stake increases. in several East Asian countries. Poor development of external financial markets also contributes to these ownership patterns.companies was as high as 48. family run companies with lower control by the family perform better than those with higher control. The state is an important party in some countries in Asia. Concentrated ownership and family control are important in countries where legal protection of property rights is relatively weak.17 During the 90’s Indian business groups evidently tunneled considerable amount of funds up the ownership pyramid thereby depriving the minority shareholders of companies at lower levels of the pyramid of their rightful gains. Weak property rights are also behind the prevalence of family-owned businesses – 13 See Claessens and Fan (2003) for a survey the literature on corporate governance in Asia. Several studies show that accounting performance is lower for state-owned enterprises in . It is believed that this is a result of the ineffectiveness of the legal system in protecting property rights. 15 In Taiwan. notably India and China.
4. appear to improve performance. Nevertheless. four functioning stock markets (predating the Tokyo Stock Exchange) with clearly defined rules governing listing. foreign ownership helps performance only if the foreigners constitute the majority shareholders.20 Hostile takeovers are all but absent in Asian countries. including India. on the other hand. At independence. but there is little evidence of their effectiveness in corporate governance in Asia. In many Asian countries. In post-liberalization India.18 Institutional investors fulfill an important certification role in emerging markets.19 Ownership by other groups like directors.N External and minority representation in boards as well as participation by professionals are rare though increasing in Asian companies. corporate governance is not entirely ineffective in Asia. Equity ownership by institutional investors like mutual funds has limited impact of performance in India.China. foreigners and lending institutions. and a banking system replete with well-developed . . CEOs are more likely to lose their jobs when corporate performance is poorer. The premium for control is significant in most Asian countries and as high as 10% of the share price in Korea21.22 See Box 2 for a discussion of a few typical features of Asian companies and their implications for corporate governance. a well-developed equity culture if only among the urban rich. India inherited one of the world’s poorest economies but one which had a factory sector accounting for a tenth of the national product. The non. Corporate Governance in India – a background The history of the development of Indian corporate laws has been marked by interesting contrasts. trading and settlements.linear effects of entrenchment are also present with state ownership.
the Unit Trust of India.24 In terms of corporate laws and financial system. The turn towards socialism in the decades after independence marked by the 1951 Industries (Development and Regulation) Act as well as the 1956 Induction Policy Resolution put in place a regime and culture of licensing. The situation grew from bad to worse in the following decades and corruption. the three all-India development Finance institutions (DFIs)– the Industrial Finance Corporation of India. India emerged far better endowed than most other colonies. the Industrial Development Bank of India and the Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India – together with the state financial corporations became the main providers of longterm credit to companies. the corporate governance system resembled the bank-based German model where these institutions could have . This section draws heavily from the history of Indian corporate governance in the beginning of corporate developments in India were marked by the managing agency system that contributed to the birth of dispersed equity ownership but also gave rise to the practice of management enjoying control rights disproportionately greater than their stock ownership. therefore. protection and widespread red-tape that bred corruption and stilted the growth of the corporate sector.lending norms and recovery procedures. Along with the government owned mutual fund. Exorbitant tax rates encouraged creative accounting practices and complicated emolument structures to beat In the absence of a developed stock market. Companies Act as well as other laws governing the functioning of joint-stock companies and protecting the investors’ rights built on this foundation. nepotism And inefficiency became the hallmarks of the Indian corporate sector. In this respect. they also held large blocks of sha res in the companies they lent to and invariably had representations in their boards.
Frequently they bled the company with impunity. promoters of businesses in India could actually enjoy managerial control with very little equity investment of their own. they were themselves evaluated on the quantity rather than quality of their lending and thus had little incentive for either proper credit appraisal or effective follow-up and monitoring. Very few companies have emerged successfully from the BIFR and even for those that needed to be liquidated. it is hardly surprising that banks. With their support. siphoning off funds with the DFI nominee directors mute spectators in their boards. by which time the assets of the company are practically worthless. Borrowers therefore routinely recouped their investment in a short period and then had little incentive to either repay the loans or run the business. flush with depositors’ funds routinely decide . This stage would come after the company has defaulted on its loan obligations for a while. Given this situation. Protection of creditors’ rights has therefore existed only on paper in India. but this would be the stage where India’s bankruptcy reorganization system driven by the 1985 Sick Industrial Companies Act (SICA) would consider it “sick” and refer it to the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR). the legal process takes over 10 years on average. This sordid but increasingly familiar process usually continued till the company’s net worth was completely eroded. after which period the delay has roughly doubled. Their nominee directors routinely served as rubber-stamps of the management of the day. Unfortunately. As soon as a company is registered with the BIFR it wins immediate protection from the creditors’ claims for at least four years.played a big role in keeping their clients on the right track. Between 1987 and 1992 BIFR took well over two years on an average to reach a decision.
Minority shareholders have sometimes been defrauded by the management undertaking clandestine side deals with the acquirers in the relatively scarce event of corporate takeovers and mergers. Boards of directors have been largely ineffective in India in monitoring the actions of management. Sometimes non-voting preferential shares have been used by promoters to channel funds and deprive minority shareholders of their dues. in flagrant violation of the spirit of corporate law. Financial disclosure norms in India have traditionally been superior to most Asian countries though fell short of those in the USA and other advanced countries. in reality minority shareholders have often suffered from irregularities in share transfers and registrations – deliberate or unintentional. They are routinely packed with friends and allies of the promoters and managers. While the Companies Act provides clear instructions for maintaining and updating share registers. For most of the post-Independence era the Indian equity markets were not liquid or sophisticated enough to exert effective control over the companies. Consequently.to lend only to blue chip companies and park their funds in government securities. who could and should have played a particularly important role. Noncompliance with disclosure norms and even the failure of auditor’s reports to conform to the law attract nominal fines with hardly any punitive action. The Institute of Chartered Accountants in India has not been known to take action against erring auditors. have usually been incompetent or unwilling to step up to the act. the boards of directors have largely functioned as rubber stamps of the management. Listing . The nominee directors from the DFIs.
it has played a crucial role in establishing the basic minimum ground rules of corporate conduct in the country.requirements of exchanges enforced some transparency. Concerns about corporate governance in India were. Established primarily to regulate and monitor stock trading. largely triggered by a spate of crises in the early 90’s – the Hashed Mehta stock market scam of 1992 followed by incidents of companies allotting preferential shares to their promoters at deeply discounted prices as well as those of companies simply disappearing with investors’ money. however. The committee was . One of the first among such endeavors was the CII Code for Desirable Corporate Governance developed by a committee chaired by Rahul Bajaj. but non-compliance was neither rare nor acted upon. minority shareholders and creditors in India remained effectively unprotected in spite of a plethora of laws in the books. These concerns about corporate governance stemming from the corporate scandals as well as opening up to the forces of competition and globalization gave rise to several investigations into the ways to fix the corporate governance situation in India. Perhaps the single most important development in the field of corporate governance and investor protection in India has been the establishment of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in 1992 and its gradual empowerment since then. 5 Changes since liberalization The years since liberalization have witnessed wide-ranging changes in both laws and regulations driving corporate governance as well as general consciousness about it. All in all therefore.
25 crore at any time in the past five years. 10 crore or with a net worth of Rs. A comparison of the three sets of recommendations in Table 1 reveals the progress in the thinking on the subject of corporate governance in India over the years. paid much-needed attention to the . The Birla Committee. to other listed companies with a paid up capital of over Rs. and all newly listed companies. on March 31. The SEBI committee recommendations have had the maximum impact on changing the corporate governance situation in India. 3 crore on March 31. An outline Provided by the CII was given concrete shape in the Birla Committee report of SEBI.formed in 1996 and submitted its code in April 1998. 2002. to companies with a paid up capital of Rs. The recommendations also show that much of the thrust in Indian corporate governance reform has been on the role and composition of the board of directors and the disclosure laws. The Advisory Group on Corporate Governance of RBI’s Standing 25 Go swami (2002) Committee on International Financial Standards and Codes also submitted its own Recommendations in 2001. however. SEBI implemented the recommendations of the Birla Committee through the enactment of Clause 49 of the Listing Agreements. The Narayana Murthy committee worked on further refining the rules. 2001. as of March 31. They were applied to companies in the BSE 200 and S&P C&X Nifty indices. 2003. Later SEBI constituted two committees to look into the issue of corporate governance – the first chaired by Kumar Mangle Birla that submitted its report in early 2000 and the second by Narayana Murthy three years later. Table 1 provides a comparative view of the recommendations of these important efforts at improving corporate governance in India.
The very nature of the business makes it extremely easy and tempting for management to alter the risk profile of banks as well as siphon off funds. much more difficult for the owners to effectively monitor . The opaqueness in banking creates considerable information asymmetries between the “insiders” – management – and “outsiders” – owners and creditors. Corporate Governance of Banks the topic Nowhere is proper corporate governance more crucial than for banks and financial institutions.subject of share transfers which is the Achilles’ heel of shareholders’ right in India. bank failure owing to unethical or incompetent management action poses a threat not just to the shareholders but to the depositing public and the economy at large. Given the pivotal role that banks play in the financial and economic system of a developing country. the spirit of the laws and principles is much more important than the letter. Corporate governance norms should not become just another 6. Two main features set banks apart from other business – the level of opaqueness in their functioning and the relatively greater role of government and regulatory agencies in their activities. developing a positive culture and atmosphere of corporate governance is essential is obtaining the desired goals. Besides in the area of corporate governance. Consequently. therefore. It is. Clearly much more needs to be accomplished in the area of compliance. Figure 1 shows the frequency of compliance of companies to the different aspects of the corporate governance regulation.
The RBI has moved to a model of governance by prudential norms rather from that of direct interference. the possibility of corruption and diversion of credit of Political purposes which may. Earnings. The reforms have marked a shift from hands-on government control interference to market forces as the dominant paradigm of corporate governance in Indian banks. It is partly for these reasons that prudential norms of banking and close monitoring by the central bank of commercial bank activities are essential for smooth functioning of the banking sector. Existence of explicit or implicit deposit insurance also reduces the interest of depositors in monitoring bank management activities. Liquidity and Systems and controls) approach. This market orientation of governance disciplining in banking has been accompanied by a stronger disclosure norms and stress on periodic RBI surveillance. Competition has been encouraged with the issue of licenses to new private banks and more power and flexibility have been granted to the bank management both in directing credit as well as in setting prices. in the long run. on the Levine (2003) Other hand. Management. the Board for Financial Supervision (BFS) inspects and monitors banks using the “CAMELS” (Capital adequacy. market institutions have been strengthened by government with attempts to infuse greater transparency and liquidity in markets for government securities and other asset markets. Government control or monitoring of banks. Along with these changes. jeopardize the financial health of the bank as well as the economy itself.the funk toiling of bank management. From 1994. Asset quality. Audit committees in banks have been stipulated . brings in its wake. even allowing debate about appropriateness of specific regulations among banks.
Nominee directors – from government as well as RBIs – are being gradually phased off with a stress on Boards being more often elected than “appointed from above”. thus allowing for “related party” transactions for banks. limiting the possibilities of professional l excellence and opening the possibility of misdirecting credit. The need for professional advice in the election of executive directors is increasingly realized. Rules like no lending to companies who have one or more of a bank’s directors on their boards are being softened or removed altogether. However. concentrated ownership remains a widespread characteristic. Rural co-operative banks are frequently run by politically powerful families as their personal fiefdoms with little professional involvement and considerable channeling of credit to family businesses.since 1995. It is generally believed that the “new” private banks have better and more professional corporate governance systems in place. Greater independence of public sector banks has also been a key feature of the reforms. . properly manage the banks within the broad prudential norms set by RBI. There is increasing emphasis on greater professional representation on bank boards with the expectation that the boards will have the authority and competence to Reddy (2002) summarizes the reforms -era policies for corporate governance in Indian banks. As for old private banks. Corporate governance in co-operative banks and NBFCs perhaps need the greatest attention from regulators. the recent collapse of the Global Trust Bank has seriously challenged that view and spurred serious thinking on.
act as trustees of the depositors. accountability. fairness and responsibility are universal in their application. To sum up. The foundation of any structure of corporate governance is disclosure. have been regulating banks more tightly than other corporate. therefore. All other considerations would fall in place once these two are achieved. Openness is the basis of public confidence in the corporate system and funds will flow to those centers of economic activity. The governance framework is there to encourage the efficient use of resources and equally to require accountability for the stewardship of those resources. Corporate governance is concerned with holding the balance between economic and social goals and between individual and community goals. Why Corporate Governance in Banks ? . The aim is to align as nearly as possible the interests of individuals. Regulators the world over have recognized the vulnerability of depositors to the whims of managerial misadventures in banks and. focuses on the principles on which it is based. therefore. These principles such as transparency. corporations and society. therefore.Corporate Governance and the World Bank The World Bank Report on Corporate Governance recognizes the complexity of the very concept of corporate governance and. which inspire trust. Banks deal in people’s funds and should. the objective of governance in banks should first be protection of depositors’ interests and then be to “optimize” the shareholders’ interests.
therefore.“Banks exist because they are willing to take on and manage risks”. Risk taking and management in a less regulated competitive market will have to be done in such a way that investor’s confidence is not eroded. the objective of governance in banks should first be protection of depositors’ interests and then be to “optimize” the shareholders’ interests. some big banks in the public sector and a few in the private sector had incurred substantial losses. Regulators the world over have recognized the vulnerability of depositors to the whims of managerial misadventures in banks and. Moreover. this is not and need not be so for two reasons: (i) The depositors collectively entrust a very large sum of their hard-earned money to the care of banks.5 times the shareholders’ stake in banks as early as in March. the depositor’s contribution was well over 15. protecting the interests of depositors becomes a matter of paramount importance to banks. 2001. To sum up. It is found that in India. therefore. (ii) The depositors are very large in number and are scattered and have little say in the administration of bank. (ii) Even in a regulated set-up as it was in India prior to 1991. have been regulating banks more tightly than other corporate. Banks deal in people’s funds and should. All other considerations would fall in place once these two are achieved. “With the rapid pace of financial innovation and globalization. Banking business is becoming more complex and diversified. In other corporate. the face of banking business is undergoing a sea-change.4 Besides. act as trustees of the depositors. BASEL COMMITTEE ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE .
almost all countries adopted these regulations for their banks. particularly following the East Asian crisis and the collapse of certain hedge funds in New York which threatened to bring down banking systems of the US and the developed world. The crux of the Basel I requirements is the assignment of risk weights for different assets in a bank’s book and aggregating the risk-weighted assets of which 8 percent was recommended as the capital of the bank. but the world's central banks speeded up the process of compliance. The Committee's recommendations were not mandatory. . Although these essentially intended internationally operating banks. Run the day-to-day operations of business. the Bank for International Settlement (BIS)-based Basel Committee on Banking Supervision or came out with regulations were regarding the capital for requirements banks. in due course. In 1988. India adopted Basel I norms in 1992 closely following the inception of economic reforms. From a banking industry perspective. corporate governance involves the manner in which the business and affairs of individual institutions are governed by their boards of directors and senior management affecting how banks Set corporate objectives (including generating economic returns to owners).
which in turn would lead to effective and more meaningful supervision. and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Sound corporate governance could also contribute to a collaborative working relationship between bank managements and bank supervisors. The Committee felt that it was the responsibility of the banking supervisors to ensure that there was effective corporate governance in the banking industry. corporate governance also includes in its ambit the manner in which their boards of directors govern the business and affairs of individual institutions and their functional relationship with senior management. From the perspective of banking industry. it would be difficult for stakeholders to make management accountable. Basel Committee published a paper on Corporate Governance for Banking Organizations in September. Basel Committee insisted banks to establish accountability for executing these strategies. and Protect the interests of depositors. Consider the interests of recognized stakeholders. Supervisory experience underscores the need for having appropriate accountability and checks and balances within each bank to ensure sound corporate governance. 19998. . Align corporate activities and behavior with the expectation that banks will operate in a safe and sound manner. Unless there is transparency of information related to decisions and actions.
codes of conduct and other standards of appropriate behavior and the system used to ensure compliance with them.g. independent of business lines. These papers have highlighted the fact that strategies and techniques that are basic to sound corporate governance include: The corporate values. senior management and the auditors. . traders). senior management. including internal and external audit functions. large shareholders. A well-articulated corporate strategy against which the success of the overall enterprise and the contribution of individuals can be measured. incorporating a hierarchy of required approvals from individuals to the board of directors. and other checks and balances Special monitoring of risk exposures where conflicts of interest are likely to be particularly great. The clear assignment of responsibilities and decision-making authorities.The Basel Committee has also issued several papers on specific topics. or key decision-makers within the firm (e. risk management functions. including business relationships with borrowers affiliated with the bank. Strong internal control systems. where the importance of corporate governance has been emphasized. Establishment of a mechanism for the interaction and cooperation among the board of directors.
business line management and employees in the form of compensation. and are extremely important engines of growth. and Independent risk management and audit and functions. corporate governance issues and practices by Indian banks has received only a scanty notice. First. There are four important forms of oversight that should be included in the organizational structure of any bank in order to ensure appropriate checks and balances: Oversight by the board of directors or supervisory board. and Appropriate information flows internally and to the public. Second. Direct line supervision of different business areas. For several reasons. as the country’s financial . Corporate Governance in Indian Banks Although the subject of corporate governance has received a lot of attention in recent times in India. The financial and managerial incentives to act in an appropriate manner offered to senior management. dayto-day running of the Oversight by individuals not involved in the various business areas. promotion and other recognition. banks have an overwhelmingly dominant position in developing the economy’s financial system.
experience and track record. Composition of Boards . banks are also the channels through which the country’s savings are collected and used for investments. verification reports from market. companies could call upon the candidates for Directorship to furnish necessary information by way of self-declaration. To ensure this. will be of interest. banks in India are the most significant source of finance for a majority of firms in Indian industry. Corporate governance in banks has assumed importance in India post-1991 reforms because competition compelled banks to improve their performance Directors should fulfill certain “fit and proper” norms. Third. India has recently liberalized its banking system through privatization. formal qualification. Ganguly Committee’s Recommendations To introduce corporate governance practices in the banking sector the recommendations of the Working Group of Directors of Banks Financial Institutions.. Fourth.. disinvestment and has reduced the role of economic regulation and consequently obtained greater autonomy and freedom with regard to managers of banks have running of banks. etc.markets are underdeveloped. known as the Ganguly Group. viz.
formal qualification. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) also might compile a list of eligible candidates. • . • Certain criteria adopted for public sector banks such as the age of Director being between 35 and 65. • Need-based training should be imparted to the Directors to equip them govern the banks properly. companies could call upon the candidates for Directorship to furnish necessary information by way of selfdeclaration..• Boards should be more contemporarily professional by inducting technical and specially qualified personnel. etc. • The banks may enter into a “Deed of Covenant” with every non-Executive Director. strategic planning. There should be a blend of “historical skill” set and “new skill” set. risk management. i. . credit recovery etc. technology and systems.. experience and track record. verification reports from market. viz. delineating his/her responsibilities and making him/her abide by them. may be adopted for private sector banks also. treasury operations... that he / she should not be a member of Parliament / State Legislatures etc. To ensure this.e. skills such as marketing.Directors should fulfill certain “fit and proper” norms. • Selection of Directors could be done by a nomination committee of the Board.
and the service providers themselves. that some directors are highly educated in terms of holding masters or doctorate degrees. their qualifications. This paper explores the boards of Directors behind the 12 listed Banks on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. this paper finds that overall listed Banks in Hong Kong exhibit good corporate governance. that there is a mixture of independent and executive directors. type of directors in terms of independence. in particular of its popularity within the Banking industry for the range of services it provides. and that most directors hold other director positions. . The three year comparison demonstrates that the high level of corporate governance exhibited by the 12 listed banks in Hong Kong from 2004 to 2006 provides a possible explanation to the success of the region in terms of being a significant international financial centre. Through the use of archival data over a three year period. outside directorships held and the auditors of the financial statements. All listed Banks were audited by Big Four audit firms.Review of Literature Hong Kong is known for its financial sector significance. That generally the CEO is not the chairman. It researches the number of directors on the boards.
a doctor is giving prescription to the patient or a professor is giving lecture in the classroom. – an accountant is preparing accounts for company. explanatory models of corporate culture and employee behavior. The study is an attempt to analyze the corporate governance in banking sector. In the same way . a researcher conduct a research in order to dig out some kind of specific knowledge which can help in the advancement of normal life. they all have the need of monetary and non – monetary perks. . If anybody is engaged in providing physical or mental service e.g. By this research we tried to provide the basis to the retailers so that they can design their functionality and services in that way so that the customer of the retail organization will be loyal and become the permanent customer to the organization. The review on Corporate governance shown that marketing researchers must first come to terms with the meaning of Corporate governance before they can begin to understand its role in more comprehensive.Need / Rationale of the Study There is always a need behind to perform the things.
OBJECTIVES 1. 6. Presenting overall picture of corporate governance in banking sector. To find out the systematic problems of corporate governance. 2. Studying the norms & regulatory framework regarding corporate governance. To find out whether banks really follows the corporate governance. 3. . To know the dependence of the corporate governance. 5. 4. To find out the mechanism & control of corporate governance.
ICICI. It is blue print that is followed in completing a research study”.HDFC. This is because the sample size is taken large and techniques adopted were for mass data. which would enable the company to take rational decisions regarding further process. Sampling Design Population: All the Bank employees of Gwalior region. 2.B. Sampling Frame: All the Employees S. PNB. Sampling Technique: Convenient sampling technique . The data observation is tabled and the results are in the form of percentage. Hence this framework for research is known as the research design. The Study The study was exploratory in nature with survey had been used as method for collecting data to complete the study 2. “A research design is simply the frame work or plan for a study that is used as a guide in collecting and analyzing the data. The research process designs the way of conducting research in conclusive and statistical manner.I.Research Methodology RESEARCH DESIGN: A Research project always is framed in a specific framework or blueprint of research for the problem. Sampling Element: Individual respondent was the sampling element.
2.Sampling Size: 150 Respondents was the sample size. . Item to total correlation: To check the internal consistency of the questionnaires. Reliability test: To check the reliability of the questionnaires Factor Analysis: To find out the underlying factors in the questionnaires. 2. Tools Used for Data Collection Self-designed questionnaire was used to collect the data with the Likert type scale Which consist nominal ranking of 1-5 where 1 represented minimum agreement and 5 represented the maximum agreement with the statement.4 Tools Used for Data analysis.
. Results & Discussions 3. Consistency Measure
Consistency Measure (Public banks)
Consistency of all the factors in the questionnaires was checked through item to total co-relation. Under this co-relation of every item with total was measured and the computed value was compared with standard value (0.15915 for 150 respondents). The factors having item to total correlation lower than the critical value were declared as inconsistent and dropped from the questionnaire.
Table 3.1 Showing Item to Total Correlations for the Measure Evaluating
S. No. 1
Bank follow corporate governance the
Computed correlation value
Accepted/ dropped Accepted
Are you satisfy with the corporate governance culture in your bank
Is the performance of bank is depend upon the corporate? 0.59803
The bank follows the corporate governance provisions & Recommendations according to Reserve Bank of India?
Find yourself comfortable with the corporate governance concept?
it quite helpful in profit maximization
it helpful in customer satisfaction?
it helpful in business expansion?
434474 Consistent Accepted 17 satisfied with the organization culture in your bank 0.501642 Consistent Accepted 11 0.464085 Consistent Accepted .430434 Consistent Accepted 12 0.532415 Consistent Accepted 15 your bank? Effect of corporate governance on customer loyalty satisfied with the pay scale given by the bank 0.520626 Consistent Accepted 14 show-case thing? Favor of the separate customer relationship management wing in 0.476715 Consistent Accepted 13 Competition should be healthy is this only a 0.influenced by the top management? 10 employees aware or follow the guidelines given by top management satisfied with the work of your recovery agent organization follow the RBI norms regarding recover 0.460875 Consistent Accepted 16 0.
working hour 0. Does the organization have any kind of mechanism for rotating board members? Does the organization undertake a review to ensure that actions decided at meetings have been taken? Does the company disclose the remuneration policy in the annual report? 0.494835 Consistent Accepted 23. 0.489912 Consistent Accepted 24.18.458466 Consistent 20. Reward system 0.50712 Consistent Accepted 21.472226 Consistent Accepted 25.44 Consistent Accepted 19. Organization Climate of the bank 3414 0.516428 Consistent Accepted . 0. promotion policy Accepted 0.472471 Consistent Accepted 22. transfer policy 0.
46276 Consistency Accepted/droppe d Accepted 1 Bank follow the corporate governance Consistent 2 Are you satisfy with the corporate governance culture in your bank Consistent 0.Consistency Measure (Private Banks) Firstly consistency of all the factors in the questionnaires was checked through item to total co-relation.478819 Consistent Accepted . If the computed value is found less. Under this co-relation of every item with total is measured and the computed value is compared with standard value 0. Table 3. Items Computed correlation value 0.15915 for 150 respondents. then whole factor/statement is dropped and will be termed as inconsistent.No.395201 Accepted 3 Is the performance of bank is depend upon the corporate? Consistent 0.2 Showing Item to Total Correlations for the Measure Evaluating S.521474 Accepted 5 0.447773 Accepted governance 4 The bank follows the corporate governance provisions & Recommendations according to Reserve Bank of India Find yourself comfortable Consistent 0.
with the corporate governance concept 6 it quite helpful in profit maximization It helpful in customer satisfaction? 0. Competition should be healthy is this only a showcase thing Favor of the separate customer relationship management wing in your bank Effect of governance on loyalty corporate customer 0.548319 Consistent Accepted 9 Routine decisions influenced by the top management 0. 0.58327 Consistent Accepted 14.487409 Consistent Accepted 12 organization follow the RBI norms regarding recover 0.567516 Consistent Accepted 7 0.594799 Consistent Accepted 10 employees aware or follow the guidelines given by top management satisfied with the work of your recovery agent 0.585401 Consistent Accepted 15. 0.701421 Consistent Accepted 11 0.515125 Consistent Accepted 13.548319 Consistent Accepted .365733 Consistent Accepted 8 it helpful expansion in business 0.
567516 Consistent Accepted 25. Reward system 0.16.52781 Consistent Accepted 20.594799 Consistent Accepted 18. Does the organization have any kind of mechanism for rotating board members? Does the organization undertake a review to ensure that actions decided at meetings have been taken? 0.515125 Consistent Accepted 21. working hour 0. satisfied with the organization culture in your bank 0. transfer policy 0. promotion policy 0.585401 Consistent Accepted Reliability Measure .58327 Consistent Accepted 22.701421 Consistent Accepted 19.447773 Consistent Accepted 23. 0. satisfied with the pay scale given by the bank 0.521474 Consistent Accepted 24. Does the company disclose the remuneration policy in the annual report? 0.
reliability value is quite higher than the standard value. Factor Analysis (public banks) .3 Showing Alpha Reliability Statistics for Public banks Reliability Statistics Re liability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha .900 N of Items 25 It is considered that the reliability value more than 0. so all the items in the questionnaire are highly reliable.Cranach alpha methods have been applied to calculate reliability of all items in the questionnaire.858 N of Items 25 Table 3.7 is good and it can be seen that in both statistics.4 Showing Alpha Reliability Statistics for private banks Reliability Statistics Re liability Statistics Cronbach's Alpha . Reliability test using SPSS software and the reliability test measures are given below: Table 3.
After factor analysis 8 factors were identified.3 1 Bank follow the corporate governance 2 Are you satisfy with the governance culture in your bank? corporate .21.owing Factor Analysis for public bank Factor na me Variables converged Loading 1.591.Factor Analysis for public hospital The raw scores of 25 items were subjected to factor analysis to find out the factors that contribute towards ‘public Bank’.5 Sh.2.643 .780 .20.680 3 Is the performance of bank is depending upon the corporate governance? . Table 3.775 20 how are promotion policy? .724 21 how are transfer policy? .
Does the organization have any kind of mechanism for rotating board members? .709 24 Does the organization undertake a review to ensure that actions decided at meetings have been taken? .699 9 .23.9.627 7. How is Reward system? . 22.779 .808 8 .14 12 Does your organization follow the RBI norms regarding recovery? 13 Competition should be healthy is this only a show-case thing? .12.22.627 .598 14 Are you in favor of the separate .543 23.593 customer relationship management wing in your bank? Effect of corporate governance on 15 customer loyalty? .15.8 7 Is it helpful in customer satisfaction? Is it helpful in business expansion? Are your routine decisions influenced by .13.746 the top management? 24.
25 5 Do you find yourself comfortable with the .17.10 4 How much the bank follows the corporate .11.736 18 .502 How much you satisfied with the pay .505 corporate governance concept? 25 Does the company disclose the remuneration policy in the annual report? 4.430 governance provisions & Recommendations according to Reserve Bank of India? 10 Are your employees aware or follow the guidelines given by top management? 11 Are you satisfied with the work of your recovery agents? 16.427 .816 .18 16 .745 scale given by the bank? Organization Climate of the bank? .741 working hours? .19 How much you satisfied organization culture in your bank? 17 19 with the .718 5.
After factor analysis 9 factors were identified. Table 3.Factor Analysis for private banks The raw scores of 25 items were subjected to factor analysis to find out the factors that contribute towards ‘private bank’.6 Showing Factor Analysis for Private bank .
Table 3. If the value of Z less then than the standard value.Test 16.482 9 Are your routine decisions influenced by the top management? .96 at 5 % level of significance the null hypothesis is accepted.594 10 Are your employees aware or follow the guidelines given by top management? .22 3 Is the performance of bank is depending upon the corporate governance? .15 8 Is it helpful in business expansion? .Factor na me Variables converged Loading 10.18.7 7 Is it helpful in customer satisfaction? .8.918 15 Effect of corporate governance on customer loyalty? .875 Z Test was applied for evaluate the differences between individual cell of research.951 22 how are Reward system? 951 .918 18 Organization Climate of the bank? .594 17 How much you satisfied with the organization culture in your bank? . 1.9.875 16 How much you satisfied with the pay scale given by the bank? .918 Z.8 Showing summary of ZTest 3.17.
Z Test Value of Z Public / Private Banks 0. Therefore we can say that there is difference between the services of public & private banks .573498) is below the cut off value (1. .96 at 5% level of significance). The null hypothesis has been rejected because the Z test value (1.321512 Insignificant Ho1: There is a significant difference between the services of public & private Banks.
Inspire of the above care has been taken the results are available and are true to facts. As the project was very vast and there was paucity of time. hence time was a crucial factor. 2. Banks were busy with their closing statements. . 4.LIMITATIONS The project encountered many limitations. 1. Time was a major constraint in completing the project. Policy matters are such that banker do not give the thrust data. All information collected is the first hand collection and hence may have some limiting factors. 3.
4.Research Methodology. 3. Scope of the study Aims and objectives Chapter No. Chapter No. ii. 1 – Introduction to the topic. 6. 5. . This is a concept based project.5. 2 – Introduction to the Organization and Implementing bodies.Review of Literature. so it is very difficult to do the comparative study. Chapter No. Conceptual Framework for analysis. Chapter No.7 – Conclusion. Recommendation. Proposed Plan of Study Chapter No. Chapter No.Data analysis and Results/ Findings. Suggestions and Scope for further research. Chapter No. iii.Use and importance of the study. i.
Berry and Joel r Evans (Oct-1997)Retail Management: A strategic approach 8th edition Englewood cliffs NJ Printicehall 3) Art kleiner George Roth. Aashish Nanda .References / Bibliography BOOKS: 1) Philip kotler & hiller (2008) marketing management 8th edition: person 2) Berman.” How to Make experience your company’s best teacher” Harward business review.and Nitin Nuhria ( may2004) “the risky business of hiring stars “. 4) Boris Groysberg. 5) Country analysis 1997 “A framework to identify and evaluate the national business environment “ Harward business review. Harward business review . .
http://www. svioula .com . 2004 7) Derrel k. D) INTERNET : http://www. Philip schefter. July Aug. 2008) C) 4P’S OF BUSINESS AND MARKETING (28TH MARCH. john J.com . (Aug. Rigby. 2008) B) BUSINESS STANDART (18TH FEB.6) Benson P Shapiro V Kasturi Rangan .2002) “avoid the four perils of CRM” Harward business review. MAGAZINES A) OUTLOOK BUSINESS (9TH FEB.(Feb .scribd. 2004 ) “ staple your self to an order “ Harward” business unit review .ssrn. Fredrick f reichheld.
4 How much the bank follows the corporate governance provisions & Recommendations according to Reserve Bank of India?      Q.1 Are your bank follow the corporate governance?      Q.QUESTIONNAIRE Q.2 Are you satisfied with the corporate governance culture in your bank?      Q.5 Do you find yourself comfortable with the corporate governance concept? .3 Is the performance of bank is depend upon the corporate governance?      Q.
10 Are your employees aware or follow the guidelines given by top management?      Q.9 Are your routine decisions influenced by the top management?      Q.11 Are you satisfied with the work of your recovery agents?      Q.     Q.12 Does your organization follow the RBI norms regarding recovery?      Q.13 Competition should be healthy is this only a show-case thing? .7 Is it helpful in customer satisfaction?      Q. its helpful in profit maximization?      Q.8 Is it helpful in business expansion?      Q.
19 working hours?      ]Q.20 how are Promotion policy? .18 Organization Climate of the bank?      Q.16 How much you satisfied with the pay scale given by the bank?      Q.14 Are you in favor of the separate customer relationship management wing in your bank?      Q.15 Effect of corporate governance on customer loyalty?      Q.     Q.17 How much you satisfied with the organization culture in your bank?      Q.
25 Does the company disclose the remuneration policy in the annual report?      .22 how are Reward system?      Q.24 does the organization undertake a review to ensure that actions decided at meetings have been taken?      Q.     Q.23 does the organization have any kind of mechanism for rotating board members?      Q.21 how are transfer policy?      Q.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?