Professional Documents
Culture Documents
science learning
By David Lloyd, Annastasia Vanderhout, Lisa Lloyd and David Atkins
In this article we describe our experiences in developing futures scenarios in two science
contexts, space science and atmospheric science/climate change. Futures scenario writing
can develop scientific literacy by connecting science learning to students lifeworlds past,
present and future. They also provide a synthesising mechanism for cognitive, affective and
ethical learning. This article describes how pre-service teachers who have undertaken two
general studies undergraduate courses went about constructing futures scenarios.
Background
While futures scenario writing is traditionally the province
of futurists, it has become more common in recent
times for scientists and other professionals to use this
approach as a way of exploring possible, probable and
preferable futures. For example, Tim Flannery, Ian Lowe,
and Barrie Pittock all value futures scenarios as a tool in
their work as scientists and science communicators. For
science educators who are interested in emphasising
meaning as well as understanding, futures scenario
writing is a valuable tool in the learning process.
Tytler (2007, p. 26) states,
[i]n a science education incorporating matters
of concern, the wider ethical, social and human
questions intrude naturally into science topics.
Roth and Dsautels (2002, p. 4) suggest that.
instead of making the focus on the teaching
and learning of disciplinary knowledge, the
empowerment of citizens to become critical
social actors is now conceived as the goal
towards which science should strive.
In our work in developing futures scenarios we
value integrative and transformative learning which
recognises the need for narratives in addition to facts,
stories in addition to theories so that the human drama
is usefully or adequately portrayed and understood
(Ogilvy, 2002, p. 26), and acted upon.
In this article we describe our experiences in developing
futures scenarios in two science contexts, Space
science and atmospheric science and climate change.
Firstly, we define futures scenarios, secondly, develop
a rationale for their use in science learning and, finally,
describe their construction and implementation. We
intersperse extracts from our own work and that of
colleagues to illustrate various aspects of the futures
scenario writing process.
18
teachingscience
Features
Lowe (2005), a need to provide learning in the science
classroom that includes the social and ecological
characteristics of place or region and promotes
social learning.
We identify here three interrelated reasons why futures
scenario writing is valuable in science learning:
1. It addresses students interests and concerns and
connects their science learning to their lifeworlds.
Most, if not all, current environmental and social
issues/interests, such as global warming and space
exploration, require scientific understanding as a
key element of their resolution and advancement.
These issues/interests are certain to be of concern
to students and influence their personal and
collective wellbeing and future lives (Eckersley,
2002; Hicks, 1996, 2002; Lloyd, 2002). OSullivan
(2002, p.5) suggests that,
without the development of a critical
understanding and creative vision, despair
has the capacity to overwhelm.
By developing normative futures scenarios, that
is scenarios about the way the world should
be (Ogilvy, 2002), or even developing dystopic
scenarios which students can actively work to avoid
(Slaughter, 1987) students shift from being passive
victims of the future to active actors in its creation.
2. D
eveloping futures thinking (foresight).
This is a necessary tool for the 21st century,
the capacity to make decisions in the present
by calling upon past experiences and future
expectations/desires. The latter aspect is relatively
more important in times of rapid change, when the
past does not necessarily offer indicators for solving
current and anticipated problems. In such times,
the development of foresight, such as skills in futures
scenario planning and implementation, becomes
a necessary aspect of deep learning and
responsible living (Laszlo, 2001; Raskin et al,
2002; Slaughter, 1995a).
3. Students develop high-order integrative thinking.
As futures scenarios elicit and communicate
speculative thoughts and imaginative ideas
about future developments, they require the skills
of synthesising data from a range of sources,
and generating discussion, critique, and shared
understandings. They develop higher-order
thinking skills (Blooms cognitive learning domains
of creating, knowing, understanding, analysing,
applying and evaluating) in an extended present,
and provide a context in which new understandings
can be usefully applied (Lloyd, 2009). Students skills
and abilities are brought to bear upon open-ended
issues that need resolution for futures worth living for,
and they must learn to construct knowledge as well
as use current knowledge.
Weather for Tuesday Sept 12, Fine and Sunny 12 High: 35 Low: 18
The Australian
www.theAustralian.com.au
The quality Australian owned and operated by the Australian people.
AUSTRALIA, 2000-2050
teachingscience
19
STEP
Population, economy,
environment, equity,
technology, conflict, resource
availability, tourism, business,
spirit of adventure, food
production, local and global
governance, globalisation,
energy, lifestyle.
Utopic, dystopic
Conventional worlds,
barbarization, transformation
Describing the
scenarios and bringing
them to life
20
teachingscience
Features
this second phase were too long-winded or disrupted
its flow. This approach provides the reader with the
opportunity to explore ideas further, and the assessor
with evidence of research.
teachingscience
21
22
teachingscience
References
By spiritual is meant zestfulness, enjoyment of life,
meaningful life, connection to cosmos, with the
associated values of goodness, truth, justice, virtue,
universal care, openness, being responsible (Maslow,
1964; Wilber, 2000).
Amara, R. (1981). The futures field: Searching for definitions and
boundaries. Futures, 15(2), 25-29.
Eckersley, R. (2002). Future visions, social realities, and private
lives: Young people and their personal wellbeing. In J. Gidley &
S. Inayatullah (Eds.), Youth futures: Comparative research and
transformative visions (pp. 31-41). Westport, CA: Praeger.
Fensham, P., J. (2003). What do the All need in science
education? In D. Fisher & T. Marsh (Eds.), Third Conference on
Science, Mathematics and Technology Education (pp. 1-20).
East London, South Africa. The National Key Centre for School
Science and Mathematics, Curtin University of Technology,
Perth, Western Australia.
Hicks, D. (1996). Retrieving the dream: How students envision their
preferable futures. Futures, 28(8), 741-749.
Volume 56 | Number 2 | June 2010
Features
Hicks, D. (2002). A lesson for the future: Young peoples concerns
for tomorrow. In Lessons for the future: The missing dimension in
education (pp. 26 - 39). London, Routledge.
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an
alternative future. International Journal of Science Education,
25(6), 645-670.
Laszlo, E. (2001). Macroshift: Navigating the transition to a
sustainable world. San Francisco, CA. Berrett-Koehler.
Lloyd, D. (2002). Futures imaging: Student views, mediation and
learning through science. Science and Mathematics Science
Centre Retrieved 13 June, 2006, from http://adt.curtin.edu.au/
theses/available/adt-WCU20031216.094405/
Lloyd, D. (2008). Exploring futures scenario writing in science
learning with undergraduate education students. In D. Fisher
& S. Wanpen (Eds.), Fifth International Conference on Science
Mathematics and Technology Education. Udon Thani, Thailand.
The National Key Centre for School Science and Mathematics,
Curtin University of Technology, Australia and UdonThani Rajabhat
University, Thailand.
Lloyd, D. (2009). Using futures scenario writing for developing deep
learning and foresight with pre-service science education students:
An evaluation. The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural,
Economic and Social Sustainability, 5(4), 109-123.
Lloyd, D., & Wallace, J. (2004). Imaging the future of science
education: The case for making futures studies explicit in student
learning. Studies in Science Education, 40, 139-178.
Lowe, I. (2005). A big fix: Radical solutions for Australias
environmental crisis. Melbourne, Australia, Black Inc.
Raskin, P., Banuri, T., Gallopin, G., Gutman, P., Hammond, A., Kates,
R., et al. (2002). Great transition: The promise and lure of the times
ahead. Boston, Stockholm Environmental Institute.
teachingscience
COLOUR 1X
colour
colour
colour
colour
colour
colour
mono/spot
mono/spot
mono/spot
mono/spot
2X
$2100
$1575
$1850
$1420
$1260
$1155
$980
$735
$580
$350
3X
$3360
$2520
$2960
$2270
$2020
$1850
$1565
$1175
$925
$555
$5250
$3940
$4620
$3545
$3150
$2829
$2495
$1840
$1445
$870
4X
$6510
$4885
$5735
$4395
$3910
$3580
$3095
$2280
$1785
$1070
$1575
$1260
STAs
$265
Inserts must be A4 size or smaller and weigh below 75g. Inserts should be delivered
to Canprint, 16 Nyrang Street, Fyshwick ACT 2609, clearly labelled For insertion into
Teaching Science. Contact ASTA for distribution figures.
Half page
130 x 185mm
Quarter Page
130 x 90mm
teachingscience
23
Copyright of Teaching Science - the Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association is the property of
Australian Science Teachers Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or
posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
download, or email articles for individual use.