how is

AFFORDABLE

HOUSING

THREATENED
in your
NEIGHBORHOOD?

P
(P erce
ro n
ra t o
te f A
d M
by I
Ho , 20
Un
us 14
eh
em
old
plo
Siz
ym
e)
en
tR
at
Pe
e,
Bu rce
2
rd nt
01
en w
4
, 2 ith
01 R
4 en
t
P
Re erce
nt nt
Bu Se
rd nio
en rs
,2 w
P
01 ith
Cr erce
4
ow nt
din of
g, Se
20 ver
14 e
S
lat erio
ion us
s, Ho
pe us
r 1 in
00 g C
N
0 od
un e
Lit um
its Vio
iga be
20 tio r of
15
ns H
, 2 ou
01 sin
4- g
Fa
20
fo mi
15
r S lie
he s A
lte pp
r F ly
Y ing
P
Pr ct. C 201 &
ice h
2 El
pe ang -201 igib
rS e
5 le
q in R
Ft e
, 2 si
01 de
N
0- nti
Ap um
2
ar ber
01 al S
tm o
5 al e
en f R
s
ts, en
t
2
01 Sta
L
4 bi
W IHTC
liz
ith U
e
in ni
d
5 Y ts
ea Elig
rs ib
A
(2 le
01 to
Un t-Ri
6- Ex
its sk
20 pi
,2 M
21 re
01 itc
)
5 he
llLa
At
m
a
Un Ri
its sk
, 2 HU
01 D
5 Su
bs
idi
%
ze
Ho Ch
d
m an
eP g
ur e: L
Lo ow
an /M
s, od
Sh
HM .
Ho are
DA Inc
m o
20 om
eP f1
11 e
ur -4
-1
ch U
4
as nit
P
e
Pr erce Loa Non
-C
>_ op nt
n
s
, 2 RA
1 ert of
ye ie R
0
14
ar, s T es
20 ax ide
P 13 Del ntia
inq l
P erc
ue
De rope ent
nt
lin rt of
qu ies 4+
en w F
i a
N cie th m
20 otic s, 20 Tax ily
an 15 es 13
d (p of
Co er Fo
nd 1, re
o 00 clo
Pr 0 su
op 1- re
N
er 4 F R
(5 otic
tie a at
+ es
s) mi e,
Un o
ly
it f F
Bu o r
ild ecl
ing os
s) ure
Th
,2
01
Pr rea
es ts
5
en to
t
Af
fo
rd
ab
le
Ho
us
ing

2016

BRONX

BRONX
BX1 MOT T H AVE N/ MELRO SE

28% AMI

5.2%

59.0%

64.4%

3.6%

85

340

2,517

74%

10,325

1,251

577

1,021

211.1%

58%

3.3%

8.3%

19.3

4.7

18

MOT T HAVEN /MELROSE

BX2

HU NTS POIN T / LON G WOO D

28% AMI

5.2%

59.0%

64.4%

3.6%

58

333

1,409

61%

8,487

460

111

202

211.1%

58%

4.8%

9.1%

29.3

2.3

15

HUNTS POINT/LONG WOO D

BX3

MOR R ISANI A/CROTO NA

30% AMI

7.5%

64.1%

66.1%

2.3%

197

428

2,399

10,962

553

320

168

-7.0%

62%

4.2%

9.8%

41.6

22

MORR ISA NIA/CROTO NA

BX4

HIG H BRI DG E/ S. CON CO UR SE

36% AMI

6.1%

62.3%

64.3%

7.0%

339

1,092

3,108

77%

33,579

1,213

2,110

2,079

-68.0%

36%

7.4%

7.4%

44.7

0.0

26

HIGHBR IDGE/S. CO NCO URSE

BX5

UN IV E RSI T Y HTS/ F ORD H AM

28% AMI

7.0%

67.3%

61.4%

7.4%

125

1,035

3,014

125%

28,698

1,159

2,522

453

67%

7.7%

10.1%

40.9

4.6

28

U NIVE RSIT Y H TS/F O RD HAM

BX6

BE LM O NT/ EA ST T REMO NT

30% AMI

7.5%

64.1%

66.1%

2.3%

91

600

2,317

49%

13,256

618

1,543

1,960

-7.0%

62%

5.8%

11.9%

41.6

5.3

23

BE LMON T/EAST TREMON T

73.6%

36,086

892

K INGSB RID GE HTS/B EDF O RD

30%

6.8

BX7

KI NG SBRI DG E HTS/ BED F ORD

48% AMI

8.7%

61.5%

5.3%

218

906

2,103

83%

385

354

27.4%

24%

5.9%

8.3%

21.6

2.8

24

BX8

RIV E RDAL E/ FI ELDSTON

77% AMI

6.0%

54.9%

56.3%

3.9%

206

245

431

62%

15,169

1,570

123

40.4%

18%

2.7%

3.2%

9.2

0.0

BX9

PAR KCH ESTER/ SOU NDV I E W

48% AMI

8.5%

57.8%

65.6%

3.9%

158

554

2,602

59%

14,791

1,022

2,391

1,692

35.7%

54%

3.0%

2.8%

15.4

14.1

20

PARKC HE STER /SO U NDV IE W

BX10 TH ROG S NE CK / CO - OP CI TY

77% AMI

4.4%

40.2%

44.3%

0.6%

75

124

575

15%

4,923

15,635

424

-32.3%

51%

1.8%

2.7%

17.0

12.3

THROGS NEC K/CO - OP C ITY

BX11 MOR RIS PARK/ B RON X DALE

64% AMI

6.7%

53.7%

59.1%

5.1%

98

278

1,000

34%

13,213

1,036

258

-53.5%

49%

2.2%

4.2%

17.7

9.8

MORRIS PAR K/BRONX DALE

60% AMI

8.7%

62.7%

57.0%

2.7%

118

584

2,338

36%

10,877

122

367

514

-34.7%

70%

4.6%

7.8%

31.7

9.0

17

W IL L IAM SBRIDG E/BAYCHE STER

BX12 WILL IAMS B RI DG E/ BAYC HESTER

B R O O K LY N

RIV ERDAL E/F IELDSTON

B R O O K LY N

BK1

GRE E N PO IN T / WI LLI AMSBURG

82% AMI

4.7%

52.1%

57.1%

3.6%

85

232

518

170%

16,465

71

2,957

1,071

-63.1%

21%

1.9%

1.9%

3.8

4.8

G REE NPOIN T/WIL LIA MSBURG

BK2

BROO KLYN HTS/ FT. G REENE

122% AMI

5.9%

36.9%

49.4%

2.9%

58

145

507

109%

10,854

579

748

-41.2%

15%

1.9%

1.5%

4.8

7.6

BROOKLYN HTS/FT. GREENE

BK3

BE DFORD STUY VESANT

48% AMI

7.8%

53.9%

57.0%

4.6%

197

813

2,878

139%

8,924

348

736

370.5%

27%

5.4%

5.3%

22.8

10.6

19

BE DFO RD STUY V ESANT

BK4

BUS H WICK

55% AMI

9.4%

58.4%

61.9%

3.6%

339

725

1,325

103%

9,020

542

-30.1%

52%

4.1%

5.4%

20.7

5.2

15

BUS HWIC K

BK5

E. N E W YO RK /STARRE T T CI TY

45% AMI

4.6%

55.2%

54.0%

4.4%

125

709

3,511

30%

6,270

288

5,986

846

-52.2%

65%

3.7%

5.1%

36.0

14.7

18

E. NE W YO RK /STARR E T T C ITY

BK6

PAR K SLOP E /C ARROL L GD N /G OW

159% AMI

5.1%

35.1%

45.4%

1.4%

91

140

339

64%

6,314

-83.5%

9%

1.3%

1.1%

2.9

4.9

PAR K SLOPE /C ARRO LL G ARDEN S

BK7

SU N SE T PARK

62% AMI

4.3%

60.4%

58.5%

7.9%

218

177

309

89%

7,735

110

674

-41.1%

19%

1.2%

1.8%

5.3

0.8

SUNSE T PARK

BK8

CROWN HEIG HTS

63% AMI

5.3%

50.0%

55.9%

3.8%

206

561

1,290

161%

14,152

608

142

1,262

51.9%

25%

3.9%

4.6%

21.9

5.2

15

C ROWN HEI GHTS

BK9

S. C ROWN H TS/P RO SPEC T HTS

58% AMI

6.9%

59.3%

72.5%

3.6%

158

493

780

115%

20,305

1,214

697

238

-63.1%

33%

4.9%

5.1%

17.4

13.9

16

S. CROW N HTS/PROSPEC T HTS

BK10 BAY RIDGE

78% AMI

4.7%

50.8%

67.0%

6.8%

75

87

109

39%

12,456

811

559

-11.8%

17%

1.1%

2.3%

4.8

4.5

BAY RIDGE

BK11 BE NS ONH URST

63% AMI

5.4%

55.8%

71.2%

4.5%

98

148

180

37%

15,412

167

-20.8%

16%

0.7%

1.3%

3.7

1.1

BE NSO NHU RST

BK12 BORO UG H PARK

53% AMI

3.0%

61.5%

63.8%

7.6%

118

203

149

81%

13,704

182

218

-39.3%

30%

2.6%

2.4%

11.6

3.6

BO ROUG H PA RK

BK13 CON EY ISL AN D

42% AMI

4.6%

58.1%

57.9%

3.2%

37

205

498

8%

8,790

321

4,047

192

-4.3%

16%

1.6%

1.6%

9.0

21.5

CO NEY ISL AN D

BK14 FL AT BUSH/ MIDWO O D

67% AMI

5.5%

53.6%

65.6%

5.4%

129

588

815

83%

31,276

103

-2.2%

25%

2.0%

3.7%

11.9

5.2

10

F L ATBU SH/MIDWOOD

No shading does not mean the threat is absent for

a particular area, but rather that it is out of the
Top 20.

BK15 SH E E PSHEAD BAY

73% AMI

4.2%

56.5%

71.2%

3.9%

45

132

213

30%

13,365

74

51

1.1%

28%

1.3%

1.0%

9.4

7.3

SHEEPSHEAD BAY

BK16 BROWN S VI LLE

35% AMI

5.6%

61.6%

56.9%

2.3%

102

404

2,321

53%

4,999

1,461

1,388

931

-27.4%

53%

4.8%

6.8%

37.4

3.2

18

BROWNSVILL E

Threats to Affordable Housing (far right column)

reflects the total number of weighted threats to
a given neighborhoods affordable housing.

BK17 E AST FLAT BUS H

58% AMI

5.4%

57.5%

65.4%

1.8%

207

652

1,721

34%

18,764

136

-33.9%

55%

3.1%

7.4%

29.6

10.4

16

BK18 FL AT L AN DS/ C AN ARSIE

82% AMI

5.5%

53.4%

57.0%

1.9%

39

209

870

-2%

2,876

438

-23.2%

55%

1.5%

2.9%

21.2

10.6

ASSOCIATION FOR
NEIGHBORHOOD
AND HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT, INC.

KE Y
Area that ranked in the Top 10 for the particular indicator. Area that ranged in the Top 15 for
overall Threats indicator.
Area that ranked in the Top 20 for the particular indicator. Area that ranked in the Top 30 for
overall Threats Indicator.

NOTES

694

M1

FIN A NCI AL D IST RIC T

183% AMI

3.3%

M2

GRE E N WI CH V IL L AGE/SO HO

183% AMI

M3

LE S /C HI NATOW N

62% AMI

M4

CL INTO N /CH ELS EA

M5

39.8%

63.5%

3.1%

14

3.3%

39.8%

63.5%

3.1%

47

4.0%

44.2%

48.7%

2.1%

67

152% AMI

3.9%

38.8%

50.4%

1.8%

MI DTOW N

152% AMI

3.9%

38.8%

50.4%

M6

ST UY TOW N /T URT LE BAY

163% AMI

3.0%

42.5%

M7

UPPE R WEST SI DE

159% AMI

3.1%

M8

UPPE R EAS T SI DE

174% AMI

2.2%

M9

MOR N I NGS IDE /HAM ILTO N

59% AMI

4.4%

M10 CE N T R A L HARLEM

58% AMI

M11 E AST HARLEM

44% AMI

This is just a small sample of possible indicators of threats

to neighborhood affordable housing and is not meant to
rank which neighborhoods are most at risk of losing affordable housing. Neighborhood scores should not be used in
comparison to previous years' scores because the indicators
included in each years chart vary slightly. Data was
compiled using the U.S Census Bureaus 2014 Housing
Vacancy Survey and the 2014 American Community Survey
1-Year Estimates, NYCOpenData, NYC Depart of Finance
Data, the NYU Furman Centers "Data Research Tool,"
the University Neighborhood Houing Programs (UNHP)
Building Indicator Project (BIP) database, the FFIEC
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data, and data from The
Institute for Children, Poverty, and Homelessness (ICPH).
Most data is for Community Districts, but some data is for
Sub-Borough Areas or Public Use Microdata Areas (PUMA)
both of which are defined by the U.S. Census Bureau and
so we are able to use the two interchangeably. Sub-borough
Areas are geographic units created by the Census Bureau
for the administration of the New York City Housing and
Vacancy Survey. Public Use Microdata Areas are designed for
decennial census Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) data,
American Community Survey (ACS) PUMS data and ACS
period estimates. They approximate New Yorks Community Districts. However, because they are constructed from
census tracts, their boundaries do not coincide precisely
with Community District boundaries. There are 59 Community Districts in New York but only 55 Sub-Borough Areas/
PUMAs because the areas of four pairs of community
districts were combined by the Census Bureau in creating
the Sub-Borough Areas/PUMAs to improve sampling and
protect the confidentiality of respondents. These pairs are
Mott Haven/Melrose (CD 101) and Hunts Point/Longwood
(CD 102) in the Bronx, Morrisania/Crotona (CD 103) and
Belmont/East Tremont (CD 106) in the Bronx, the Financial
District (CD 301) and Greenwich Village/Soho (CD 302) in
Manhattan, and Clinton/Chelsea (CD 304) and Midtown
(CD 305) in Manhattan.

QUEENS

M12 WASH ING TO N HTS / IN WOOD

EAST FLATB USH

FL AT L AN DS/C ANARSIE

M A N H AT T A N

M A N H A T TA N
41

273%

108

31

54%

11,879

175

262

196

732

74%

18,728

1,910

2,337

1,392

-20.3%

54

172

236

139%

28,149

621

4,509

866

1.8%

23

51

88

333%

10,609

214

60.6%

1.4%

18

69

92

-7%

25,296

852

41.9%

53.4%

0.9%

39

210

435

132%

30,297

2,709

36.4%

48.7%

1.1%

27

165

112

52%

23,311

593

49.1%

61.5%

2.9%

192

583

872

208%

17,285

8.4%

47.6%

55.5%

1.2%

171

504

1,798

201%

5.7%

49.6%

50.0%

2.6%

85

286

1,704

5.7%

180

993

60% AMI

7.5%

53.2%

68.5%

7%

0.0%

0.9%

7%

0.4%

8%

1.3%

81.9%

8%

81.9%

174

1,330
1,886

281

385

21,994

2,741

158%

12,845

1,096

3.8

0.0

F IN A NCIAL DISTRIC T

1.6%

1.2

0.8

G REE NW ICH V ILL AG E/SOHO

2.3%

3.0

0.9

LES/C HINATOWN

1.1%

1.4%

3.1

0.8

10

C LIN TON /CH ELSEA

8%

0.0%

1.7%

1.6

0.0

MIDTOWN

-27.2%

12%

0.8%

1.5%

3.3

1.1

STUY TOWN /TURTL E BAY

700

-46.4%

8%

0.3%

1.0%

1.5

0.4

U PPER W EST S IDE

1,891

-60.4%

8%

0.9%

1.3%

1.6

2.3

U PPER E AST SI DE

795

-21.0%

10%

3.8%

4.2%

6.1

2.6

10

MORNING SIDE/HAMILTON

346

1,436

-54.7%

11%

2.3%

3.3%

9.0

2.2

13

C EN TR AL HARL EM

852

1,072

1,965

12%

1.7%

3.3%

2.4

0.9

10

EAST HAR LEM

96%

48,251

287

1,001

486

-43.4%

19%

5.4%

3.9%

5.5

1.3

15

WASHING TON HTS/IN WOOD

6,975

251

1,741

339

QUEENS

Q1

ASTOR IA

80% AMI

6.4%

48.7%

52.9%

2.1%

59

156

495

76%

24,910

379

510

-17.3%

26%

1.2%

1.7%

5.8

1.2

ASTORIA

Q2

SU N NYS ID E/ WOO D SI DE

77% AMI

3.7%

57.0%

59.3%

4.5%

49

154

85

77%

16,186

80

-32.3%

20%

1.3%

0.9%

5.6

1.8

SU NNYSIDE/WOOD SI DE

Q3

J AC K S ON H EIG HTS

64% AMI

4.6%

60.4%

66.0%

7.0%

50

201

317

34%

11,923

62

104.2%

33%

2.3%

1.9%

20.1

11.1

JACK SO N HEIGH TS

Q4

E LM HU RST/ CORO N A

58% AMI

3.5%

62.0%

66.9%

11.8%

43

153

243

27%

15,849

296

295

-9.2%

31%

1.2%

1.8%

10.8

6.9

ELM HU RST/ CO RO N A

Q5

RIDG E WOO D/ MASP E TH

86% AMI

4.5%

44.4%

56.6%

1.0%

136

179

337

39%

8,729

-21.5%

50%

1.4%

1.7%

7.7

0.6

RIDG E WOOD /MAS PE TH

Q6

RE GO PA RK/F O REST HIL LS

90% AMI

4.0%

47.6%

64.6%

3.2%

16

41

37

43%

13,041

9.6%

18%

1.0%

1.3%

3.6

0.0

RE GO PAR K/F O REST HILL S

Q7

FLU S H IN G/ WHI TES TONE

70% AMI

3.3%

57.8%

69.3%

3.7%

27

98

163

21%

15,922

135

-32.6%

22%

0.9%

1.3%

6.6

2.0

F LUSHING/W HIT ESTON E

Q8

HIL LCRES T/ FRESH MEAD OWS

75% AMI

5.5%

55.2%

67.3%

2.7%

28

137

215

35%

13,721

256

77

12.6%

36%

1.2%

1.8%

8.3

4.5

HILLCR ES T/F RE SH MEADOWS

68.6%

78% AMI

5.0%

55.4%

1.4%

65

210

485

32%

5,878

-31.0%

46%

2.3%

3.1%

21.4

27.3

OZO NE PARK/WOO DHAVEN

Q10 S. O ZONE PK/ HOWA RD B EACH

76% AMI

5.9%

58.4%

63.4%

2.5%

49

142

363

15%

699

54.4%

51%

1.8%

2.5%

18.7

14.8

S. O ZON E PK /H OWARD B EACH

Q11 BAYS I DE/ L ITT LE N E CK

110% AMI

3.5%

43.2%

42.0%

0.5%

10

26

23

22%

2,707

78.2%

23%

0.9%

0.8%

5.9

0.0

BAYS IDE/LITTL E NE CK

Q12 JA MAIC A /H OLL IS

67% AMI

8.3%

59.7%

66.5%

2.3%

56

567

2,154

25%

8,772

5,860

607

-11.9%

68%

3.8%

6.6%

37.8

18.5

16

JAMAIC A/HOL LIS

Thanks to ANHD intern, Alex Spatz, for his contribution.

Q13 QU E E NS V IL L AGE

98% AMI

4.9%

53.0%

48.6%

0.6%

17

187

668

10%

1,912

-20.1%

56%

2.1%

5.4%

24.3

36.4

Q UEENS VIL L AGE

ASSOCIATION FOR NEIGHBORHOOD

AND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, INC.

Q14 RO CK AWAY/ B ROAD CH AN N EL

61% AMI

4.2%

54.3%

59.1%

2.1%

30

235

1,173

26%

6,716

1,435

5,259

1,654

-10.0%

49%

2.7%

2.5%

27.9

8.1

11

RO CK AWAY /BROAD CHA NN EL

50 Broad Street, Suite 1402

New York, NY 10004-2699
www.anhd.org

SI1

STAP L E TON /ST. G EO RG E

78% AMI

4.0%

52.5%

64.6%

2.4%

46

250

1,181

4%

4,775

989

989

664

-9.5%

42%

2.1%

7.2%

19.7

9.3

STAPL E TON/ ST. GEO RGE

SI2

S. B EACH/ W IL LOW BROOK

98% AMI

3.4%

54.3%

50.3%

0.5%

17

20

112

26%

719

808

24.6%

39%

1.0%

1.0%

9.7

0.0

S. BEACH /WI LLOWBROOK

t 212.747.1117 f 212.747.1114
e info@anhd.org twitter @ANHDNYC

SI3

TOT T E NV ILL E/G REAT KI LLS

110% AMI

3.3%

50.3%

57.1%

0.5%

14

25

67

8%

1,374

83.0%

44%

1.2%

2.2%

10.2

0.0

TOT TE NV ILL E /G REAT KIL LS

Q9

OZO NE PARK /WOOD HAVEN

S TAT E N I S L A N D

S TAT E N I S L A N D