2016/4/2

Lecture Slides

Chapter 9

Welding, Bonding, and the

Design of Permanent Joints

2015 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any manner. This document may not be
copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.

Chapter Outline

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

2016/4/2

Welding Symbols

Welding symbol standardized by American Welding Society

Specifies details of weld on machine drawings

Fig. 94

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Welding Symbols

Fig. 91

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

2016/4/2

Welding Symbols

Arrow side of a joint is the line, side, area, or near member to

which the arrow points
The side opposite the arrow side is the other side
Shape of weld is shown with the symbols below

Fig. 92

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Welding Symbol Examples

Weld leg size of 5 mm

Fillet weld
Both sides

Intermittent and
staggered 60 mm along
on 200 mm centers

Leg size of 5 mm
On one side only
(outside)
Circle indicates all the
way around

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

2016/4/2

Welding Symbol Examples

Fig. 95

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Welding Symbol Examples

Fig. 96

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

2016/4/2

Tensile Butt Joint

Simple butt joint loaded in tension or compression

Stress is normal stress

Throat h does not include extra reinforcement

Reinforcement adds some strength for static loaded joints
Reinforcement adds stress concentration and should be ground
off for fatigue loaded joints

Fig. 97a

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Shear Butt Joint

Simple butt joint loaded in shear

Average shear stress

Fig. 97b

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

2016/4/2

Transverse Fillet Weld

Joint loaded in tension

Weld loading is complex

Fig. 98

Fig. 99

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Transverse Fillet Weld

Summation of forces

Law of sines

Solving for throat thickness t

Fig. 99

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

2016/4/2

Transverse Fillet Weld

Nominal stresses at angle

Von Mises Stress at angle

Fig. 99

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Transverse Fillet Weld

Largest von Mises stress occurs at = 62.5 with value of

' = 2.16F/(hl)
Maximum shear stress occurs at = 67.5 with value of
max = 1.207F/(hl)

Fig. 99

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

2016/4/2

Experimental Stresses in Transverse Fillet Weld

Experimental results are more complex

Fig. 910

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Transverse Fillet Weld Simplified Model

No analytical approach accurately predicts the experimentally

measured stresses.
Standard practice is to use a simple and conservative model
Assume the external load is carried entirely by shear forces on
the minimum throat area.

By ignoring normal stress on throat, the shearing stresses are

inflated sufficiently to render the model conservative.
By comparison with previous maximum shear stress model, this
inflates estimated shear stress by factor of 1.414/1.207 = 1.17.
h

0.707h
45

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

2016/4/2

Parallel Fillet Welds

Same equation also applies for simpler case of simple shear

loading in fillet weld

Fig. 911

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Fillet Welds Loaded in Torsion

Fillet welds carrying both

direct shear V and moment M
Primary shear

Secondary shear

A is the throat area of all

welds
r is distance from centroid of
weld group to point of
interest
J is second polar moment of
area of weld group about
centroid of group

Fig. 912

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

2016/4/2

Example of Finding A and J

Rectangles represent
throat areas. t = 0.707 h

Fig. 913

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example of Finding A and J

Note that t3 terms will be

very small compared to
b3 and d3
Usually neglected
Leaves JG1 and JG2 linear
in weld width
Can normalize by
treating each weld as a
line with unit thickness t
Results in unit second
polar moment of area, Ju
Since t = 0.707h,
J = 0.707hJu

Fig. 913

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

10

2016/4/2

Common Torsional Properties of Fillet Welds (Table 91)

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Common Torsional Properties of Fillet Welds (Table 91)

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

11

2016/4/2

Example 91

Fig. 914

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 91

Fig. 915

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

12

2016/4/2

Example 91

Fig. 915

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 91

Fig. 915

Fig. 916

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

13

2016/4/2

Example 91

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 91

Fig. 916

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

14

2016/4/2

Example 91

Fig. 916

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Fillet Welds Loaded in Bending

Fillet welds carry both shear V and moment M

Fig. 917

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

15

2016/4/2

Bending Properties of Fillet Welds (Table 92)

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Bending Properties of Fillet Welds (Table 92)

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

16

2016/4/2

Strength of Welded Joints

Must check for failure in parent material and in weld

Weld strength is dependent on choice of electrode material
Weld material is often stronger than parent material
Parent material experiences heat treatment near weld
Cold drawn parent material may become more like hot rolled in
vicinity of weld
Often welded joints are designed by following codes rather than
designing by the conventional factor of safety method

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Minimum Weld-Metal Properties (Table 93)

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

17

2016/4/2

Stresses Permitted by the AISC Code for Weld Metal

Table 94

This code permits the same stress in the weld metal as in the
parent metal.

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Fatigue Stress-Concentration Factors

Kfs appropriate for application to shear stresses

Use for parent metal and for weld metal

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

18

2016/4/2

Allowable Load or Various Sizes of Fillet Welds (Table 96)

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Minimum Fillet Weld Size, h (Table 96)

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

19

2016/4/2

Example 92

Fig. 918

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 92

1025N/mm
102.5

1025l=1025(100)=102.5kN

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

20

2016/4/2

Example 92

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 93

Fig. 919

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

21

2016/4/2

Example 93

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 93

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

22

2016/4/2

Example 93

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 93

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

23

2016/4/2

Example 93

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 94

Fig. 920

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

24

2016/4/2

Example 94

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Minimum Weld-Metal Properties (Table 93)

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

25

2016/4/2

Bending Properties of Fillet Welds (Table 92)

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 94

3.55

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

26

2016/4/2

Example 94

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Allowable Load or Various Sizes of Fillet Welds (Table 96)

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

27

2016/4/2

Example 95

Fig. 921

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 95

surface factor ka always assumed as-forged for

weldments unless a superior finish is specified.

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

28

2016/4/2

Example 95

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 96

Fa

9000N)

Fig. 922

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

29

2016/4/2

Example 96

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 96

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

30

2016/4/2

Resistance Welding

Welding by passing an electric current through parts that are

pressed together
Common forms are spot welding and seam welding
Failure by shear of weld or tearing of member
Avoid loading joint in tension to avoid tearing

Fig. 923

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Adhesive Bonding

Adhesive bonding has unique advantages

Reduced weight, sealing capabilities, reduced part count, reduced
assembly time, improved fatigue and corrosion resistance, reduced
stress concentration associated with bolt holes

Fig. 924

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

31

2016/4/2

Types of Adhesives

May be classified by
Chemistry
Epoxies, polyurethanes, polyimides
Form
Paste, liquid, film, pellets, tape
Type
Hot melt, reactive hot melt, thermosetting, pressure sensitive,
contact
Load-carrying capability
Structural, semi-structural, non-structural

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Mechanical Performance of Various Types of Adhesives

Table 97

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

32

2016/4/2

Stress Distributions

Adhesive joints are much stronger

in shear loading than tensile loading
Lap-shear joints are important for
test specimens and for practical
designs
Simplest analysis assumes uniform
stress distribution over bonded area
Most joints actually experience
significant peaks of stress

Fig. 925

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Double-lap Joint

Classic analysis of double-lap joint known as shear-lag model

Double joint eliminates complication of bending from
eccentricity

Fig. 926

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

33

2016/4/2

Double-lap Joint

Shear-stress distribution is given by

Fig. 926b

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 97

Fig. 926

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

34

2016/4/2

Example 97

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 97

Fig. 927

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

35

2016/4/2

Example 9-7

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Example 9-7

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

36

2016/4/2

Single-lap Joint

Eccentricity introduces bending

Bending can as much as double the resulting shear stresses
Near ends of joint peel stresses can be large, causing joint failure

Fig. 928

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Single-lap Joint

Shear and peal stresses in single-lap joint, as calculated by Goland

and Reissner
Volkersen curve is for double-lap joint

Fig. 928

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

37

2016/4/2

Adhesive Joint Design Guidelines

Design to place bondline in shear, not peel.

Use adhesives with adequate ductility to reduce stress
concentrations and increase toughness to resist debond
propagation.
Recognize environmental limitations of adhesives and surface
preparation.
Design to facilitate inspection.
Allow sufficient bond area to tolerate some debonding before
becoming critical.
Attempt to bond to multiple surfaces to support loads in any
direction.
Consider using adhesives in conjunction with spot welds, rivets, or
bolts.

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Design Ideas for Improved Bonding

Fig. 929

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

38

2016/4/2

Design Ideas for Improved Bonding

Fig. 929

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

Design Ideas for Improved Bonding

Fig. 929

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

39

2016/4/2

9-5
9-17
9-21
9-25
9-30
9-47
4/18

Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design

40