P. 1
USDC - Fine v State Bar IIa (1)

USDC - Fine v State Bar IIa (1)

|Views: 33|Likes:
Published by Leslie Dutton
Richard I Fine's filing against State Bar of California for "Fraud Upon the Court"
Richard I Fine's filing against State Bar of California for "Fraud Upon the Court"

More info:

Published by: Leslie Dutton on May 23, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

10/26/2011

pdf

text

original

the Shinkle case. The Shinkle case was one of the cases in the NDC. Fine

brought the case against the City of Los Angeles to reduce the sewer service

charges and to obtain damages for the residents who had been overcharged by the

City of Los Angeles. After the suit was brought, the LA City Council voted to

reduce the sewer service charges as set forth in the suit. However, due to the

unlawful action of Mitchell in denying class certification, and a later granting of

summary judgment in the individual case, only the injunctive relief was obtained

by the City Council vote. Laura Chick had an interest in the counts in the NDC

relating to the Shinkle case as such reflected on the conduct of the City of Los

Angeles while she was a councilperson.

-26-

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->