UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT MYERS DIVISION
[“TRANSFERRED” FROM: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION]

JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, DR. JORG BUSSE,

Plaintiffs,

versus Reassigned Case # 2:09-CV-00791-CEH-SPC

ROGER ALEJO; KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JACK N. PETERSON; ROGER

DESJARLAIS; LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LEE COUNTY VALUE
ADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L. RUTLAND; STATE OF FLORIDA, BOARD
OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND; STATE
OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; CHAD
LACH; CHARLES “BARRY” STEVENS; REAGAN KATHLEEN RUSSELL;
KAREN B. HAWES; ROGER DESJARLAIS; CHARLIE GREEN; BOB JANES;
BRIAN BIGELOW; RAY JUDAH; TAMMY HALL; FRANK MANN; UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY(S); SEAN P. FLYNN; E. KENNETH STEGEBY; DAVID P.
RHODES; A. BRIAN ALBRITTON; CYNTHIA A. PIVACEK; JOHNSON
ENGINEERING, INC.; STEVEN CARTA; MIKE SCOTT; HUGH D. HAYES;
GERALD D. SIEBENS; STATE OF FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL;
WILLIAM M. MARTIN; PETERSON BERNARD; SKIP QUILLEN; TOM
GILBERTSON, RYAN LENGERICH, NEWS PRESS,
Defendants.

EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENJOIN

RECORD EXTORTION, CORRUPTION & FRAUD

____________________________________________________________________________/

EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENJOIN PRIMA FACIE EXTORTION, CORRUPTION,

BRIBERY, AND FACIALLY IDIOTIC FRAUDULENT CLAIMS, DOC. ## 213, 214, 210,
BY DEF. CROOKED JUDGE CHARLENE E. HONEYWELL, AND IN PARTICULAR,
‘PUBLIC LAND CLAIM’ OF PLAINTIFFS’ LOT 15A CAYO COSTA, PB 3 PG 25 (1912)

PUBLISHED DEMAND FOR RELIEF FROM EXTORTION, CORRUPTION, BRIBERY

& FROM CONCEALMENT OF RECORD PROOF OF PLAINTIFFS’ RECORD TITLE
TO RIPARIAN GULF-FRONT LOT 15A, AS LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN REF. TO
CAYO COSTA PLAT IN LEE COUNTY PB 3, PG 25 [STRAP # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A]
 EXTORTION ON THE PUBLIC RECORD:

PUNISHMENTS, SANCTIONS, THREATS, INTIMIDATION & INJUNCTIONS

1. EXTORTION has been defined as

"the obtaining of property from another induced by wrongful use of actual or

threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right."

See Black's Law Dictionary.

"the unlawful exaction of money or property through intimidation."

See Encyclopedia Britannica.

2. Here, Defendants and Defendant Government Officials conspired to fraudulently interact,

defraud, deliberately deprive, bribe Officials, and extort property from the Plaintiffs under

color of, e.g., authority, office, and official right. Here, Defendants intimidated, punished,

and threatened the Plaintiffs with facially frivolous and deceptive sanctions on the public

record [see Defendants’ idiotic false pretenses of, e.g., ”frivolity”, “vexatiousness”, …],

because the Plaintiffs rightfully defended against said conclusively proven EXTORTION,

CORRUPTION, and FRAUD under color of prima facie fraud scheme “O.R. 569/875”.

3. Here under color of prima facie fake “law” and/or fictitious “resolution 569/875”,

Government Officials deliberately deprived and defrauded the Plaintiffs. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983,

1985; 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242.

DEFENDANTS’ & GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS’ CONTEMPT OF LAW

4. As a matter of law, no “law”, whatsoever, could have possibly involuntarily divested

record landowners of their title to private property. Here, the purported “public land

claim”, Doc. # 213, was the facially idiotic fabrication of multiple Defendant Judges in

2
 the U.S. Courts who agreed with other Defendants to accept bribes, defraud, and

deliberately deprive the Plaintiff unimpeachable record landowners.

5. Here, Defendants fraudulently interfered with public officials and bribed Defendant Judges.

Here, Judges unlawfully demanded real property under color of illegal scam “O.R. 569/875”

and non-existent authority to punish and sanction the Plaintiffs for rightfully defending their

real property ownership of public record against Government CORRUPTION, BRIBERY,

and EXTORTION.

FRIVOLITY & VEXATIOUSNESS SCAMS & SCANDALS

6. Here, the record Government CORRUPTION was a well-proven aspect of record

EXTORTION and BRIBERY. Here, Defendants unlawfully demanded Plaintiffs’ record

lands under facially fraudulent pretenses of, e.g., “O.R. 569/875”, “record Lee County

ownership”, “frivolity”, and “vexatiousness”, even though Defendants and Government

Officials knew that no property or money was legally due, or could have possibly been

legally due, to them. See, e.g., fraudulent Doc. # 432; 2:2007-cv-00228.

PLAINTIFFS’ ABSOLUTE OBJECTION TO ANY MAGISTRATE

7. Expressly, the Defendants stated and again reiterate their absolute objection to and refusal of

any exercise of jurisdiction by any Magistrate judge.

DEFENDANT K. M. WILKINSON’S FORGERIES & COVER-UP OF CRIMES

8. Under pretense of duty, Defendant Kenneth M. Wilkinson had forged “land parcels” “12-44-

20-01-00000.00A0”, and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, which all Defendants knew had never

existed. See PB 3 PG 25 (1912).

9. Here, requesting “fees” in excess of those allowed, through wrongful use of fear, force,

and/or authority of office, threatening arrest, all with CORRUPT motives, and unlawfully

3
 demanding money and property were CRIMES on the public record. Agreeing to obtain

Plaintiffs’ money and property by fraudulently coercing Plaintiffs’ consent to Defendants’

fraudulent “inverse condemnation” hoax, “ripeness requirement” scam, concealment of State

Court proceedings were illegal acts for criminal purposes of defrauding and depriving the

Plaintiffs of their right to own their riparian Gulf-front lands and exclude Governments.

RECORD RETALIATION ON THE PUBLIC RECORD

10. Here, Government Officials retaliated because Plaintiffs demanded their rights to own and

exclude Governments.

HONEYWELL’S EMBARASSINGLY IDIOTIC “PUBLIC LAND” “CLAIM”,

AND CASE FIXING FOR BRIBES, DOC. ## 213, 214

11. Here Honeywell knew that the law did not recognize Honeywell’s facially “criminal fable”

of a “public land” “claim” of Lot 15A. See Ch. 95, Fla. Stat., ADVERSE POSSESSION;

Chapters 73, 74, EMINENT DOMAIN, Fla. Stat.; Ch. 712, Fla. Stat., Florida’s self-enforcing

MARKETABLE RECORD TITLE ACT.

HONEYWELL’S “INCOMPREHENSIBLE” “RAMBLING” JUDICIAL TRASH

12. Here, Honeywell “rambled” “incomprehensibly” and idiotically about a “public land”

“claim” by unknown and unidentified “commissioners”. See Doc. # 213, p. 5.

13. Even if there had ever been [merely hypothetically] a valid Government “claim”, title could

have never involuntarily transferred to Government in the well-proven record absence of any

judicial proceedings. Any and all involuntary title transfers would have been strictly and

exclusively a judicial function. See also Florida Attorney General Opinion, AGO 78-125.

Here, Honeywell acted criminally and just like a clueless idiot, who perverted the

FUNDAMENTAL separation-of-powers-doctrine. Here, no ripeness was required to defend

4
 against said Governmental insanity and crimes in U.S. Courts. Here, record idiots like

Defendant Honeywell were objectively partial and incapable of “comprehending” the legal

issues, complaints, and claims for relief presented and mostly un-filed by the Courts.

HONEYWELL’S INSANITY AND INCOMPETENCE ON THE RECORD

14. Here insanely, Honeywell fabricated a “claim” of “land” by un-named unknown

“lawmaker(s)” of unknown and uncertain non-existent “raid lands”. See different versions of

Government forgeries “O.R. 569/875”.

HONEYWELL’S ILLEGAL REPETITION OF JUDICIAL TRASH

15. Just because other Judges had concocted said judicial trash of a “law” and/or facially non-

existent “resolution 569/875”, Honeywell had no authority to repeat the same judicial trash

over and over again under illegal pretenses of “frivolity” and “vexatiousness” and under color

of law, authority, and/or office. Here, Honeywell obstructed de novo review & justice.

HONEYWELL’S FRAUDULENT PRETENSES ON THE RECORD, DOC. # 213

16. Unintelligently and corruptly, Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell fraudulently pretended

that Plaintiffs’ real property of record, Lot 15A, as legally described in reference to the 1912

“Cayo Costa” Subdivision Plat of Survey in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 “was claimed

as public land”, Doc. # 213, p. 5:

Lot 15A, among other property, was claimed as public land (“Resolution 569/875")
(Dkt 5, Ex. 3, p. 9).”

HONEYWELL’S EMBARRASSINGLY IDIOTIC CASE FIXING RECORD

17. Here, Honeywell’s facially idiotic and fraudulent pretenses of “public land”, Doc. 213, had

no legal and factual basis, but were for the prima facie criminal purposes of obstructing

justice and deliberately depriving the Plaintiff record owners of said Lot 15A, subject Parcel

# 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, PB 3, PG 25 (1912). In particular, Honeywell recklessly

5
 contradicted the public record of Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable ownership of said Lot 15A as

also affirmed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. See Prescott, et al., v. State of

Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009): Here, Honeywell

fraudulently concealed the dispositive public record evidence that the Plaintiffs were the

unimpeachable “owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa subdivision in Lee County, Florida”:

“I. BACKGROUND
A. Current Action
The Appellants are owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa subdivision in
Lee County, Florida. On May 5, 2008, the Appellants filed the present pro se
complaint against numerous state and county officials n1 alleging that they had
violated the Appellants' constitutional rights with respect to their Cayo Costa
property. Most of the allegations in the complaint concern the 1969 Lee
County Resolution 569/875, which claimed the undesignated areas on the east
and west side of the Cayo Costa subdivision plat and all accretions thereto as
public land to be used for public purposes. The Appellants' Lot 15A is on the
west side of the Cayo Costa subdivision on the Gulf of Mexico and is
adjacent to land that was claimed through Resolution 569/875 to create
the Cayo Costa State Park.”

HONEYWELL’S OBJECTIVE LACK OF QUALIFICATION ON THE RECORD

18. Defendant judicial Crook Honeywell affirmed, Doc. # 213, p. 5, that the Plaintiff record

owners of “Lot 15A”, riparian Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, “appeared for a “quasi-

judicial proceeding”, because the Plaintiffs were the record owners of “Lot 15A”. See public

records on file admittedly affirming Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable ownership of Lot 15A.

6
19. Here, the Plaintiffs “appeared for” said “proceeding”, because they were the affirmed record

owners of Lot 15A and entitled to appear. Therefore here, crooked Judge Honeywell knew

that the Plaintiffs held unimpeachable marketable record title to said Lot 15A. Here,

Honeywell’s fraudulent pretenses and deprivations were deliberate and premeditated, Doc. #

213, p. 5:

“In a resolution adopted in December 1969 by the Board of Commissioners of Lee

County, Florida, Lot 15A, among other property, was claimed as public land
(“Resolution 569/875") (Dkt 5, Ex. 3, p. 9).”

PUBLIC TAX RECORDS EVIDENCED HONEYWELL’S RECORD FRAUD SCHEME

20. In particular, Honeywell knew that the Plaintiff unimpeachable record property owners had

paid real property taxes for said subject Parcel. See attached public records of Lee County

Tax Collector; Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A:

HONEYWELL’S BRAZEN RECORD FRAUD ON THE COURT & CRIMES

21. Here, crooked Honeywell knew and fraudulently concealed that

a. The Plaintiffs were the unimpeachable record owners of said “Lot 15A”;

7
 b. No “resolution” had ever existed;

c. No “resolution 569/875” had ever existed;

d. No “resolution” had ever been “adopted”;

e. No “resolution” had ever “claimed” Plaintiffs’ “Lot 15A”;

f. No “resolution” could have possibly involuntarily divested the Plaintiff record

property owners and record property tax payers of their riparian Gulf-front Lot

15A.

NOTICE OF APPEAL & EMERGENCY DEMAND FOR RELIEF FROM FRAUD

22. Here, the Plaintiffs appealed from Defendant crooked U.S. District Judge Honeywell’s

“order”, Doc. # 210, “filed 06/22/10”. Here, said judicial Defendant evaded and obstructed

mandatory disqualification in this Case, because Honeywell had “disqualified herself” in

related and/or associated Case 2:2010-cv-00390 on the very same day, 06/22/2010. See

publication:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/33659698/PUBLISHED-NOTICE-OF-APPEAL-FROM-
ORDER-Doc-210

EMERGENCY OF HONEYWELL’S CRIMES ON THE RECORD

23. Here, Honeywell’s fraud, fraud on the Court, and corrupt & criminal acts were an

EMERGENCY. Here, the prima facie criminality, idiocy and irrationality of Honeywell’s

acts were an EMERGENCY.

EMERGENCY OF LIEN & SIMULATANEOUS GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP CLAIM

24. While Defendant Honeywell fraudulently pretended Lot 15A to be “public land”, Defendant

Polster Chappell affirmed Plaintiffs’ record ownership just like said U.S. Appellate Court.

See Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr.

8
 21, 2009). Here, bungling Judges fatally conflicted with each other on the record at

Plaintiffs’ expense and injury, which created chaos and lawlessness.

25. Here, Honeywell knew that her co-conspirator and fellow judicial Defendant Sheri Polster

Chappell had fraudulently made an order for the illegal Governmental seizure of said “Lot

15A”. See fraudulent “writ of execution”; fraudulent “lien”; fraudulent Doc. ## 432, 432-3:

DEMAND FOR RELIEF FROM DEF. CORRUPT JUDGE HONEYWELL’S CRIMES

ON THE PUBLIC RECORD, E.G., DOC. ## 210, 213, UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 60

9
10
 EMERGENCY DEMAND TO ENJOIN PERVERSION OF PUBLIC RECORD

26. The Plaintiff record owners of said riparian Gulf-front Lot 15A, PB 3, PG 25 (1912), who

paid real property taxes, demand EMERGENCY relief from Honeywell’s material

misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment of the truth and public record evidence of

Plaintiffs’ record title and ownership of said Lot 15A, STRAP # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A;

see also Appeal # 08-13170, BUSSE, et al., v. LEE COUNTY, et al., Appellate Brief by

Defendants Lee County, 11th Circuit:

PUBLIC RECORD EVIDENCE OF HONEYWELL’S FRAUD & CORRUPTION

27. Here, ‘public records confirmed’ that the Plaintiffs paid property taxes and unimpeachably

owned said riparian Lot 15A as platted and subdivided in 1912, PB 3, PG 25. Here, public

records confirmed that Honeywell was a crooked U.S. Official and liar of record.

28. Here, on Plaintiffs’ Motion and just terms of record, the Court shall relieve the

Plaintiffs from the fraudulent judgment, orders, and proceedings of record such as, e.g.,

Doc. ## 210, 212, 213, 214. for the following reasons:

11
 HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO FALSELY PRETEND RIPENESS REQUIREMENTS

29. Idiotically and corruptly, Honeywell fraudulently pretended “ripeness requirements” for,

e.g., claims of record 4th, 1st, 14th, and 7th U.S. Const. Amendment violations, fraud, and

CORRUPTION. See Doc. # 213. Here, Plaintiffs could directly assert, and rightfully

asserted, their claims for relief from, e.g., Government CORRUPTION and fraud in

Federal Court. Honeywell knew that no ripeness requirements had ever existed.

30. Here, the Plaintiffs rightfully defended against Honeywell’s NAZI-style terror and

CORRUPTION and demanded EMERGENCY relief from Honeywell’s well-proven fraud

upon the Court and legally “incomprehensible” bogus contentions of “frivolity” and “public

land”. Here, Honeywell concealed that no condemnation had ever occurred nor could have

possibly occurred. Had there [hypothetically] been any condemnation, title would have

involuntarily transferred to Lee County, which Honeywell knew never happened. Only then

could there have possibly been any “compensation”, because here Plaintiffs rightfully

defended their record title against fraud and Government CORRUPTION:

12
31. Here, the Plaintiffs had rightfully pleaded, e.g., fraud and fraudulent concealment in both

State and Federal Courts. See State Case # 2006-CA-003185; www.LeeClerk.org:

32. Here, Honeywell fraudulently concealed that Plaintiffs paid property taxes and held perfected

marketable title to said “Lot 15A”. Here, Honeywell’s “order”, Doc. # 213, constituted prima

facie premeditated & deliberate deprivations under color of office and authority. Here,

Honeywell had no authority to pervert the public record & obstruct justice. Prescott v. State

of Florida, supra. Here, Honeywell knew that the Lee County Attorney had categorically

ruled out any possibility of Lee County ownership of Lot 15A, 12/29/2000 Memorandum:

13
14
 HONEYWELL’S COVER-UP FOR FELLOW JUDICIAL GANG MEMBERS

33. Here like a brainless parrot, Honeywell merely repeated the null and void orders by the

named judicial Defendants. Because the Plaintiffs had demanded relief from said null and

void orders by judicial Defendants such as, e.g., Steele, Polster Chappell, Pizzo, Lazzara,

which were based on facially fraudulent and legally impossible “Government ownership”

“claims”, Honeywell was obligated to review de novo and use a brain. However here, she

never reviewed anything, but repeated the same old judicial record trash and continued to

pervert the public record just like said fellow judicial Defendants had. Here more than one

hundred (100) pages of Plaintiffs’ Complaint had never even been filed, Doc. # 1:

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand

1. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining said EXTORTION and CORRUPTION under color of

authority and prima facie scam “O.R. 569/875”;

2. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining said record EXTORTION and CORRUPTION under

color of “O.R. 569/875”, because as a matter of law, no “law” or “resolution”, whatsoever,

could have possibly alienated Plaintiffs’ record property against their will;

3. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining said record EXTORTION and CORRUPTION and

embarrassingly idiotic Governmental and judicial hoax of a “public land claim” [see, e.g.,

Doc. ## 213; 214; 212];

4. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining objectively partial/crooked Judge Honeywell from

perverting the record & concealing Plaintiffs’ record ownership of Lot 15A, PB 3, PG 25.

15
5. An EMERGENCY order relieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent judgment, orders, and

proceedings of record such as, e.g., Doc. ## 210, 212, 213, 214. for said well-proven reasons;

6. An EMERGENCY order relieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent concealment of their

State action, 2006-CA-003185, Lee County Circuit Court, BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA;

7. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did

not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs’ record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel # 12-44-20-01-

00015.015A as evidenced in Plaintiffs’ Complaint and pleadings;

8. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did

not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel

# 12-44-20-01-00015.015A as affirmed by the public record;

9. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did

not maliciously pervert the dispositive affirmation of Plaintiffs’ record ownership by the U.S.

Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed.

Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009);

10. An Order compelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did

not capriciously conceal Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel

# 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, which the Defendants Lee County had asserted before the 11th

Circuit U.S. Appellate Court, Appeal # 08-13170, BUSSE v. LEE COUNTY;

11. An Order compelling Defendant Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why her “rulings” were not

NULL AND VOID and procured through the criminal scheme of false “frivolity” and

“vexatiousness” pretenses and the concealment of said fake “legal descriptions”, fake “land”

“parcels”, and fake “Government ownership” “claims” and contentions;

16
12. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell, because she

disrespected the law, disrupted the proceedings in favor of the Defendants, perverted the

facts of record, and could not possibly be trusted to be impartial and fair, 28 U.S.C. § 455;

/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT

Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff, pro se
P.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295
____________________________________
/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.
Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff, pro se
State Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor;
JRBU@aol.com

17
 Def. Crooked Honeywell’s Real Estate Fraud:

• Fake “lot” and “block” numbers such as, e.g.:

o “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”;
o “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;
Neither fake “lot” “00A0” nor “block”
“00001”ever existed.
• Fake “Government ownership” claims;
• Fake “transaction(s)” such as, e.g., “O.R.
569/875”;
• Fake “resolution” and “law” “claims”;
• Fake “land” “parcels”;
• Fake “frivolity” “defenses”;
• Fake “vexatiousness” contentions;
• Fake “legal descriptions”:

18
19
20
Crooked Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell

http://www.scribd.com/Judicial%20Fraud
Case 2:09-cv-00791-CEH-SPC Document 212 Filed 06/22/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:09-cv-00791-CEH-SPC Document 212 Filed 06/22/10 Page 3 of 3