This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
JORG BUSSE, Plaintiffs, versus Case # 2:10-cv-00390-JES-AEP
CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL; JOHN EDWIN STEELE; JENNIFER WAUGH CORINIS; A. BRIAN ALBRITTON, Defendants. INDEPENDENT ACTION FOR RELIEF FROM GOVERNMENT CRIMES, CORRUPTION, AND FACIALLY FRAUDULENT WRIT OF EXECUTION ____________________________________________________________________________/ NOTICE OF SERVICE OF AFFIDAVIT UPON DEF. U.S. DEPUTY MARSHALS RICHARD, a.k.a. “RICK”, JESSUP, AND RYAN BARRY AND DEMAND “TO STAY PROCEEDINGS ON THE EXECUTION” PURSUANT TO CH. 56, § 56.15, FLORIDA STATUTES IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY MOTION FOR SUMMARY REMEDY AND TO STAY PRIMA FACIE ILLEGAL ‘EXECUTION’ AS A MATTER OF LAW EMERGENCY OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION, CRIMES, AND ALTERED RECORDS 1. The publicly recorded corruption, crimes, unlawful acts, and record alterations and falsifications of official documents in this Court have been an EMERGENCY under public policy.
EMERGENCY MOTION FOR SUMMARY REMEDY 2. The Plaintiffs made an Affidavit that the “execution” is illegal and stated as grounds, e.g., the lack of any supporting judgment on the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, the lack of any falsely alleged “Rule 38 motion” by Defendant K. M. Wilkinson on the record. DEMAND FOR INJUNCTION AND SUSPENSION OF ANY EXECUTION 3. Therefore under Florida law, here immediately the U.S. Marshal and/or Sheriff must suspend proceedings on the execution with corrupt intent to illegally obtain benefits. Plaintiffs move this Court to enjoin Defendants Ryan Barry and Richard Jessup from any proceedings on the fraudulent execution, because said Defendants knew and conspired to conceal that no factual and/or legal basis for any execution had ever existed and that no judge had ever authorized any authentic “writ”. Here, no judge had even been named. DEF. CROOKED HONEYWELL’S RECORD CONCEALMENT AND COVER-UP 4. Defendant Government Whore C. E. Honeywell fraudulently concealed and conspired with other Officials and Defendants to conceal: a. Publicly recorded forgeries of non-existent “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”; b. Lack of any recorded “5,048.60 judgment” and “writ of execution” on the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228; c. Public corruption in the Office of Crooked Judge Defendant Charlene Edwards Honeywell; d. That Honeywell could not locate the prima facie forged “parcels” on the 1912 “Cayo Costa” Subdivision Plat of Survey in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25. COERCION AND EXTORTION 5. For criminal and illegal purposes of coercing the Plaintiffs to “cease and desist” prosecuting her and other Government Defendants for organized Government crimes and corruption, Honeywell altered and/or falsified official records, and threatened “civil contempt” without any justification.
CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST DEF. HONEYWELL 6. Again on 07/19/2010, Plaintiff Government corruption victim Prescott complained to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. OBSTRUCTION OF COURT ACCESS AND FILING OF NOTICE OF APPEAL 7. Defendant Crooked Honeywell totally obstructed any and all court access in Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791. Plaintiffs were absolutely entitled to file their Notice of Appeal from fraudulent “order”, Doc. # 213, but were obstructed for criminal and illegal purposes of concealment and cover-up of public corruptoion. See Doc. # 214. EVER INCREASING THREATS AND “ARREST” THREATS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS 8. Staff members of Defendant Crooked Judge C. E. Honeywell unintelligently threatened the “arrest” of the Plaintiffs unless they cease and desist prosecuting and reporting the public corruption in the U.S. District Court. Said record threats followed “arrest” threats by Defendant U.S. Deputy Marshal Richard Jessup. In the record absence of any “judgment” and “writ of execution”, Defendant Jessup “posted” Plaintiffs’ property for criminal and illegal purposes of extorting property and fees without any legal basis and coercing the Plaintiffs to refrain from redressing Government grievances 9. Defendant U.S. Deputy Marshal “Rick” Jessup and his Supervisor, Defendant Ryan Barry, knew that bribed Def. U.S. Judges and Officials have been deliberately depriving the Plaintiff corruption whistleblowers of express fundamental rights and Florida and Federal Constitutional guarantees. PUBLISHED NOTICE OF ILLEGAL EXECUTION UNDER FLORIDA LAW 10. The purported “execution” issued illegally. See § 56.15, Fla. Stat.; Case No. 2:2007-cv00228.
NO $5,048.60 JUDGMENT WAS EVER RECORDED 11. “No execution or other final process shall issue until the judgment on which it is based has been recorded nor within the time for serving a motion for new trial or rehearing.… Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.550. Here, no “judgment in the amount of $5,048.60” was ever “recorded”, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. Here, no evidence of any such judgment ever existed or could have possibly existed as a matter of law. DEFENDANT CLERKS’ FALSIFICATIONS OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 12. On 07/16/2010, Defendant U.S. District Clerks Drew Heathcoat and Diane Nipper again falsified and altered official documents and records for criminal and unlawful purposes of obstructing justice and Plaintiffs’ court access. 13. In particular, the Clerk obstructed, and conspired with other Defendants to obstruct, electronic court access, court access, and the filing of Plaintiffs’ pleadings, Case No. 2:2007cv-00791; 2:2009-cv-00791. In particular, Defendants Nipper and Heathcoat deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of their express fundamental rights to redress Government grievances, and file their Motions for new trial and rehearing, and Notices of Appeal. DIRECT INDEPENDENT ATTACKS OF CRIMINAL & ILLEGAL “EXECUTION” 14. Here on the record, the Plaintiffs have been directly attacking the prima facie criminality, illegality, and nullity of the fraudulently procured “execution”, which issued illegally. See § 56.15, Fla. Stat.; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228; 2:2010-cv-00089; 2:2010-cv-00791. PRIMA FACIE LACK OF RECORD, FED.R.CIV.P. 44 15. On 07/16/2010, Defendant Corrupt U.S. District Clerk Drew Heathcoat obstructed to issue “a written statement that a diligent search of the designated records in Case No. 2:2007-cv-
00228 revealed no “writ of execution” and no “judgment” awarding “$5,048.60” to Defendant K. M. Wilkinson.” See Fed.R.Civ.P. 44. PRIMA FACIE ORGANIZED PUBLIC CORRUPTION 16. The fake “writ of execution”, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, is another publicly recorded element of organized Government and judicial corruption with corrupt intent to extort fess and property from the Plaintiff corruption whistleblowers. PRIMA FACIE GROUNDS TO STAY ILLEGAL “EXECUTION” OF RECORD 17. Repeatedly, the Plaintiff public corruption victims stated several grounds as good cause to stay the illegal execution. Grounds for the motion appeared on the face. Here, e.g., no judgment had existed. See Docket Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. The purported basis for the non-existent judgment had never existed, because Def. Forger Wilkinson had never filed any “Rule 38 motion”. See Docket for Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. RECORD EXTORTION AND FORGERIES BY DEF. APPRAISER WILKINSON 18. Because, e.g., Def. Forger Wilkinson had criminally and illegally forged “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-0000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, Plaintiffs’ Appellants’ Appeal had been highly meritorious, and no “frivolous appeal” could have possibly existed. RECORD FABRICATION OF “FRIVOLITY” AND “JUDGMENT” 19. No “frivolity” was ever determined in the “judgment”, Doc. # 365, Case ## 2:2007-cv-00228; 2008-13170-BB. Here, no monetary penalty had ever been awarded to Defendant Government Crook Wilkinson. PUBLICLY RECORDED FALSIFICATION OF RECORDS 20. For criminal and unlawful purposes of obstructing justice and court access and perpetrating fraud on the Courts, Defendants John E. Steele, Sheri Polster Chappell, Charlene E.
Honeywell, Mark A. Pizzo, and Richard A. Lazzara falsified and altered, and conspired to falsify and alter, public records. 21. Said judicial Crooks knew and fraudulently concealed that no “regulation”, “resolution”, “resolution 569/875”, “law”, “legislative act” had ever existed, and that as a matter of supreme Florida and Federal law, no “law” could have possibly divested the Plaintiffs’ of their unimpeachable record title to Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, PB 3, PG 25 (1912). 22. Doc. # 386-2, Case No. # 2:2007-cv-00228, evidenced an illegal “motion” filed on 08/20/2008 under fraudulent pretenses. Here, the deadline for any hypothetical “Rule 38 motion” had terminated on or around 08/08/2008, and Def. Wilkinson had never filed anything prior to said deadline to justify any judgment or monetary punishment. Therefore here, no lawful basis could have possibly existed, and the illegal “execution” has been fraudulent on its face. PRIMA FACIE ILLEGAL “writ of execution” - AFFIDAVIT 23. Here, no lawful writ of execution had ever been issued. Furthermore, the Plaintiffs made an Affidavit that the “execution” is illegal and stated as grounds, e.g., the lack of any supporting judgment, the lack of any falsely alleged “Rule 38 motion” by Defendant K. M. Wilkinson. PLAINTIFFS’ COMMUNICATIONS OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION AND FELONIES 24. Plaintiffs again contacted Defendant Crooked Attorney Jack N. Peterson for Def. Forger Kenneth M. Wilkinson and reported said publicly recorded public corruption, extortion, coercion, and fraud, Tel. 239-533-2236. 07/19/10 COMMUNICATIONS TO FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
25. On 07/19/2010, Plaintiff public corruption victim Jennifer Franklin Prescott updated the Federal Bureau of Investigation about the public corruption, extortion, fraud, and fraudulent “writ”. PRIMA FACIE FRAUD ON THE COURT AND EXTORTION 26. Furthermore, the Plaintiff corruption victims move this Court to “set aside“ the non-existent judgment and “writ” in accordance with, e.g., Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b), 1.500, and/or 1.540(a). 27. In the prima facie record absence of any recorded judgment, any writ of execution, and any “Rule 38 motion”, Defendants illegally and fraudulently procured an illegal “writ”. 28. Furthermore here, there were other pending actions affecting the subject matter and conclusively evidencing the prima facie illegality of the fake “writ”, direct attacks upon its criminality, as well as fraud, extortion, and corruption. See also Daytona Enterprises, Inc. v. Wagner, 91 So.2d 171 (Fla. 1956); Childs v. Boats, 112 Fla. 282, 152 So. 214 (1933); McGee v. Ancrum, 33 Fla. 499, 15 So. 231 (1894); Fair v. Tampa Electric Company, 158 Fla. 15, 27 So.2d 514 (1946); Viggio v. Wood, 101 So.2d 922 (3 D.C.A. 1958). WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand 1. An Order granting summary remedies to the Plaintiffs, because Defendants forged “land parcels”, coerced and threatened the Plaintiffs with “arrest” and “civil contempt”, and then extorted fees and property under fraudulent pretenses of a non-existent “writ” and unrecorded “judgment”; 2. An Order enjoining the publicly recorded illegal “execution”-scheme under Florida law; 3. An Order granting the Plaintiffs summary remedies against the record public corruption and non-existent “writ of execution”, and non-existent “Rule 38 motion”; 4. An Order staying the illegal and null & void “writ of execution” and any “execution”;
5. An Order enjoining any further public corruption and the record falsification of “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”; 6. An Order enjoining Defendant Forger K. M. Wilkinson from forging and falsifying official records and documents for criminal and unlawful purposes of, e.g., extorting unrecorded fees and property under facially false pretenses of a non-existent “5,048.60 judgment” and fictitious “writ of execution”; 7. An Order directing and/or compelling the Clerk of Court to authenticate and certify the lack of any “writ of execution” on the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228 pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 44. __________________________________ /S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff, pro se P.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295 ____________________________________ /S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M. Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff, pro se State Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.