This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
“uRus Charter Democracy Force ROP“
www.uRus.ca Presents the BLACK BOOK (Portfolio) Henceforth referred to as “the BB” Canadian Governments: Federal and Provincial Organized Crime
“the BB” documents the governments’ modus operandi to administer and enforce the laws of our country irrefutably proving that they are inconsistent with the Constitution 180 degrees adverse to every individual’s guaranteed Charter Democracy rights of equal protection and benefit.
In matters of law that governs the Canadian people sanity is presumed and prerequisite of all government personnel involved in the legal system and where laws are expected and required to be obeyed the laws must be attentive to clearness, unambiguous and consistent with
“The Spirit of the Law”
It is every person’s responsibility to obey the law and it is the responsibility of the government personnel financed to administer and enforce the law to ensure every person accepts their responsibility Obviously it is every person’s responsibility to have a good understanding of the law and obviously the professionals in these matters must have an excellent understanding.
We must all “Know the Law”
by Reverse Osmosis Psychosis
We will eradicate Government Organized Crime, corruption, inhumanities, poverty, and starvation
Governments are corrupt beyond belief
Believe it and poof ...they are gone
The unscrupulous federal government wrote the law precisely sane of moral thought and reason for us to trust and believe to ransack the people of the Lower Tier who have been seasoned Their Modus Operandi is that of Organized Crime as reality attests
Know "The Spirit of the Law" then Believe in it and we will do the rest URUS Charter Democracy Force ROP www.urus.ca January 1 2009
If you believe that you already know the law having observed the politicians and legal system in action quite competent of the reality that is "How it is" with persistent poverty, starvation, inhumanities, hopelessness and despair that begets crime in flourishing numbers that our tax dollars cannot keep the pace, so distanced from the Ideal defined and guaranteed in the Canadian Charter of rights....perhaps you are part of the problem and do not Know The Law. Perhaps you are an excellent witness as to how the shysters operate adverse to the law and the only way to determine that is to take 10 minutes to compare what you have come to know to see if your observed knowledge is consistent with the Constitution, the supreme law of Canada that recognizes the supremacy of God and the rule of law where all laws must be consistent with "The Spirit of the Law"
Know "The Spirit of the Law" in ten minutes and recognize the Devil's Disciples for the rest of your life
Excerpts from the Constitution Act, 1982: Document 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect. 3
Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms "Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of Law"
The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada - Lawyers Rules of Conduct 103) Interpretation (f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in the spirit as well as in the letter.
Principles: main beliefs, values, philosophy, ideology, morality, ethics, doctrine, principle Supremacy: pre-eminence, ascendancy, primacy, superiority, domination, incomparability, dominance
Charter: contract, licence, deed, agreement, bond, hire, rent, employ Democracy: social equality, equality, egalitarianism
Egalitarianism: parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality Spirit: strength, courage, character, guts, will, strength of mind, Force, fortitude Justice: fairness, impartiality, righteousness, even- handedness, fair dealing, honesty, integrity Consistency: constancy, steadiness, reliability, uniformity, evenness, stability, regularity
Osmosis: the gradual, often unconscious, absorption of knowledge or ideas through continual exposure
rather than deliberate learning
The Rule of Law (From the Wikipedia) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law
The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law. Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process.
The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.
According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly include a clear separation of powers, legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law. The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use"
publicly disclosed laws 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect. "The Letter of the Law" in the first statement of Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms clearly cedes to the supremacy of God, and Jesus of world renown summarized the aspirations attributed to God as "The Golden Rule" obviously "The Spirit of the Law". Where there is conflict between "The Spirit of the Law" and "The Letter of the Law" "The Spirit of the Law" has superiority clearly stated in "The Letter of the Law", where sane moral thought and reason is either stated or implied giving credence to that which is least apt to be mistaken by humankind whereas to be human is to err, there can be no mistaking the meaning and intention of The Golden Rule as words put to paper by people can be unintentionally ambiguous, adverse to "The Spirit of the Law" inconsistent with the Constitution, either erroneously or deliberately placed for nefarious intent or deliberately interpreted inconsistent with the Constitution, but of no force or effect 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
Consistency in "The Spirit of the Law"= The Golden Rule is obviously mandatory to meet the terms of the Charter, in particular s. 15.(1) and s.52.(1) To meet the terms of the "Letter of the Law" consistency is imperative where "The Letter of the Law" clearly recognizes the supremacy of God . "The Spirit of the Law" has priority over "The Letter of the Law" and where there is perceived to be conflict "The Spirit of the Law" must prevail throughout to maintain legal certainty of justice and equal protection and benefits of the law the legal system personnel , namely the members of the Law Societies, government and private sector must be competent, responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and conviction to the support of every individual's guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits. Clearly The Golden Rule is "The Spirit of the Law" consistent with democracy, justice, principles, and the rule of law and a sane person of moral legitimate thought and reason could not possibly find the Golden Rule any fairer or simpler to comprehend where credence must be to that, which is least apt to be mistaken by humankind where all persons in matters of law are presumed human and sane who should have no misunderstanding as to what is receptive and non receptive to each other. Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. 2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association. 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. 24. (1) Anyone whose rights or freedoms, as guaranteed by this Charter, have been infringed or denied may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to obtain such remedy as the court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances. 31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority. 32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province. 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect. It is irrelevant whether or not God exists or whether or not one believes he exists as obviously it does not matter what one believes as long as they are CONSISTENTLY in, of and with "The Spirit of the Law" 6
A person's safety and wellbeing is the most valuable possession every individual has and must be treated with the respect they are entitled to as equals guaranteed by law. It is every individual's responsibility to abide by the law that ultimately protects every individual and it is the responsibility of the federal and provincial governments who signed the Constitution to consistently demonstrate due diligence to every individual's guaranteed Charter rights ensuring every individual abides by the law. We are all human requiring the same necessities of life and would have to be insane not to know what is receptive and non-receptive of others Sanity must CONSISTENTLY prevail in "The Spirit of the Law" Confucius 551 BC - 479 BC born to poverty rose to dine with kings experiencing all walks of life gave us the Golden Rule "Do not impose on others what you would not wish for yourself" and "Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness" Jesus confirmed the Golden Rule in paraphrase as the summary of the aspirations attributed to God
"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"
The purpose of Law and Order is to define the law and enforce it. In the case of the Constitution priority one is to every individual's guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits It cannot be over emphasized that competent responsible irreproachable people of sane moral thought and reason in continuity with fortitude and conviction to every individual's guaranteed Charter rights is mandatory of the administers and enforcers of the laws to be consistent with the Constitution.
Police Services Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15
PoliceServicesAct.doc Declaration of principles 1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles: 1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario. 2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code. 3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they serve. 4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.
The law is particularly clear CONSISTENT with sane moral thought and reason and due punishment applies to every individual who strays from the law and in positions of trust where tremendous amounts of money are involved with extraordinary temptation and opportunity extreme measures must be taken to eradicate the temptation and opportunity by extreme punishment particularly attentive to deterrence, the only viable means of present knowledge to apply due diligence to the protection of every individual as guaranteed.. 7
In order to maintain equality of protection and benefits consistent with the Constitution justice must be the personification of "The Spirit of the Law" free to victims on the presentation of reasonable evidence that they have been victimized as defined in the provisions of the Charter in s.24 (1) are guaranteed the right to apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to be recompensed by the perpetrator in due course unobstructed. It is extortion to charge victims for their guaranteed Charter rights that only exasperates the already humongous burden on the taxpayers who are made to finance the entire legal system to deal with the amorally inclined. It is the amoral who should be made to finance the operating costs of the system with the taxpayer having already been deprived to pay for the infrastructure and to get the system up and running. It must be done in efficient and effective manner for the sole purpose to determine one's innocence or guilt, and when proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt made to recompense his or her victim to the status he or she was in prior to the act that brought the perpetrator before the courts. The convicted must also recompense the taxpayer for all court costs. The taxpayer is deprived every court case and every time a perpetrator is allowed to go free when a victim is deprived of his or her right to bring the perpetrator to justice, the safety and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Charter is compromised.. The government members of the Law Societies’ modus operandi has illegitimately created a flourishing and luxurious business for the members of the Law Society absolutely indifferent to the Constitution and every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights that they demonstrate every day for all to see as they illegally carry out business that is too costly for the majority of the people of the Lower Tier to access the court system and prominent judges and the Ontario Attorney General Chris Bentley admit it in the July 26 2008 Saturday edition of the Toronto Star as they set the stage to once again fill the Legal Aid system money trough readily available for the members of the Law Societies and Bar Association to ransack inconsistent with 15.(1) of the Charter 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. The ramifications of this upon society is humongously detrimental and every thing the government members of the Law Societies do is absolutely adverse to every individual’s Charter rights who depend on the government personnel that they elect and finance to protect every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of eual protection and benefits without the exercise of thought as they must be competent responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and conviction to an exemplary modus operandi adept to the support. The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” downloaded from the Ontario web site has many inconsistencies with the Constitution and the rule of law but ultimately he is responsible as “guardian of the public interest” and “the guardian of the legitimate rule of Law” as defined in the Wikipedia being consistent with the Constitution and every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights. The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” are outdated obviously authored and authorized prior to the 1982 enactment of the Constitution with no mention of the Charter. The “R & R of the Attorney General” is presumed to have been authored and authorized by the Parliament of Canada that defines that most elusive concept - the rule of law- a well established legal principle, but hard to easily define.
That does not make it hard to define the unscrupulous nature of the authors and authorizers of the “R & R of the Attorney General” as the Wikipedia puts it this way. The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use" So clearly we are dealing with the unscrupulous who hold every position of authority in the legal system with the office of Attorney General of Ontario playing a major role in the government organized crime as he is the chief legal advisor of the Executive Council who advises all Cabinet Ministers, the Legislature, government departments, agencies and the police. He administers the Law Society Act and is a bencher that appoints the Chair but is not accountable to the reprimands of the Law Society Act ultimately making him a puppet Dictator appointed by the Premier of Ontario who is sworn in by the Lieutenant Governor who is connected back to the federal government
I must check this for accuracy
So anyway in accordance with s.52 (1) the rule of law as defined in the “R & R of the AG” is inconsistent with the Constitution and therefore of no force or effect. His responsibility then remains solely as the “guardian of the public interest” and has every authority to protect every individual as guaranteed by the Charter as he is responsible for all constitutional matters, the legitimacy of all laws and the administration of the Ontario legal system that includes the courts. Clearly there is not a clear separation of powers or legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law. How can there be when he advises the entire system even the agencies like the Ombudsman the people’s last resort to file complaints against the improprieties of the government? He even advises the Legislature when they are handing out the limited authority mandates of such agencies including the mandate of the Law Society of Upper Canada that clearly demonstrated the pathetic ideology of their members who hold every position of authority in the absurd illegitimate legal system as they adamantly state or imply that their members are not required to give a damn about every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights stating their members only obligation is to vigorously advance the interests of their clients providing a humongous advantage to they who can afford their services absolutely inconsistent with the Constitution and every individual’s guaranteed rights of equal protection and benefits in s.15 (1). See the compiled correspondence in the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document where they also state that evidence is irrelevant to the Law Society when it is against their members and went on to demonstrate it in their addressing of my complaint that I filed against one of their members. So with that evidence and that most elusive concept-the rule of law-but hard to easily define in the “R & R of the AG” we can for certain state that there can be no legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law. According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly include a clear separation of powers, legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law. 9
The concept of “Law and Order” is to define the Law and enforcer it maintaining Order The Constitution: Document is the supreme Law of Canada that provides a guarantee to every individual of equal protection and benefit and the Constitution: Establishment is the guarantor representatives of the people financed and responsible to administer and enforce it.
The DOJ-Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada attempts to deceive me, consistent with all government correspondence, in the January 22 2007 letter informing that the Parliament of Canada enacts federal law and the provinces are responsible to administer them, being the Constitution the point of concern, with the provinces having autonomy and the federal government has no authority to intervene. It is prudent to note that the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada is also a member of the Law Society of Upper Canada as are former Ministers of Justice and Attorney Generals of Canada and Attorney Generals of Ontario. (See the following page for a copy of the DOJ letter dated January 22 2007
You will note that he refers to the issues as my responsibility to deal with them being a personal matter that they can not provide legal advice. Similarly, neither departmental officials nor members of his staff are in a position to help resolve personal issues. I had been consistently complaining about the various Ontario government personnel involved in the legal system who refused to deal with the criminal offences that occurred at the ORHT June 30 2005 that was obviously obstruction of Justice adverse to the Constitution and every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights as Deputy Chief of the York Regional Police Bruce Herridge stated in his January 10 2006 report that the evidence did not meet the “Threshold” required to proceed before the provincial courts and the issues I had raised are clearly connected to the legislative framework. (See page 12) My MPP Julia Munroe, (Lawyer File # 5) the Premier Dalton McGuinty (Lawyer File # 6) and the Attorney General Michael Bryant (Lawyer File # 7) and many others of the Ontario government refused to address these most serious issues inconsistent with the Constitution adverse to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights including the federal government as my MP Peter Van Loan and the RCMP refused to respond. 10
It is important to note that the evidence of the criminal actions committed at the ORHT by my former tenant Don Wilson is irrefutable although the YRP state it did not meet the “Threshold” to proceed before the courts and they have refused to respond to address the terminology of “Threshold” as to why the evidence did not chin the bar. (See pages 12 and 13) Clearly the evidence in “the BB” shows that the “Threshold” is an imaginary line introduced by the conspirators that separates the Upper and Lower Tier where the people of the Lower Tier, the majority supports the financing of the legal system but are not protected by it contrary to their equal rights of protection and benefits as guaranteed in s.15 (1) of the Charter. AS for the DOJ letter of January 22 2007 they state they had no authority to intervene in the province yet the RCMP obviously under their authority are stationed throughout Ontario and on November 8 2007 I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP for refusing to investigate government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy and they undertook the investigation that took 10 months being a clear sign that the federal government does have the authority to intervene in the province contrary to what the DOJ letter of January 22 2007 would have me believe. The RCMP Final Letter of Disposition found the RCMP not guilty of refusing to investigate government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy on September 3 2008 signed by Superintendent Robert Davis District Commander of the Greater Toronto area thereby irrefutably proving the RCMP refuse to investigate the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy as they demonstrate their consistency as charlatans of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration consistent with all the federal and Ontario government correspondence. They of course have no other option available to them than to maintain the façade of a legitimate legal system consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits while their every action is 180 degrees adverse having designed the entire legal system to protect the government members of the Law Societies from the victims who become lucidly aware of the conspiracy when they attempt to access the court system only to find that they cannot afford to pay the exorbitant costs for their GUARANTEED right under section 24.(1) Reality and the evidence in “the BB” clearly and consistently shows the illegitimate legal system designed and structured by the government members of the Law Societies is for their luxurious benefit using the taxpayer’s trust and money against the people of the Lower Tier, the majority while creating agencies such as the Ombudsman to protect them, consistent with that demonstrated by the Law Society of Upper Canada in the 2 part document absolutely inconsistent with democracy, the Constitution and every individual’s equal Charter rights being tantamount to treason and undoubtedly government organized crime in a “Puppet Dictatorship” with the appointed Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the provincial Attorney Generals the puppets and the Parliament of Canada at the helm with the cooperation of the provincial governments and the media. The government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy has been thoroughly investigated and documented in “the BB” that is irrefutable and they of course will due everything within their wherewithal provided them by the people to make it vanish. The BLACK BOOK (Portfolio) is available for download at http://www.scribd.com/people/documents/5652120?from_badge_documents_button=1 and www.uRus.ca under the Download tab where you will find this document “the BB”.
March 29, 2007 On several occasions I have requested Bruce Herridge inform me as to what efforts he has made to this promise with no response.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?