Excellence is the gradual result of

always striving to do better.
Pat Riley

School District of
Cheltenham Township
Made

AYP
2009 - 2010

HITTING THE TARGET
13 / 13

CE

GE

25/25

EP
EP

CBK

ME

WE
16/17

CHS

Target #1 Attendance/Graduation
Attendance Threshold is 90%
Graduation Threshold is 85%

Cheltenham Elementary
Glenside Elementary
Myers Elementary
Wyncote Elementary
Elkins Park
Cedarbrook
Cheltenham High School

96.24%
96.19%
95.97%
96.20%
96.28%
96.19%
97.82%

Target #2

Participation

Participation Threshold is 95%
Math%

Cheltenham Elementary
Glenside Elementary
Myers Elementary
Wyncote Elementary
Elkins Park
Cedarbrook
Cheltenham High School

100%
100
100
100
99.6
99.7
98.4

Reading%

100%
99.3
100
98.6
99.7
99.9
98.2

Performance Targets
Targets 2008, 2009 and 2010
Reading
Math

63% Proficient/Advanced
56% Proficient/Advanced

Targets 2011
Reading
Math

72% Proficient/Advanced
67% Proficient/Advanced

Cheltenham School District 2010

Cheltenham Elementary
Glenside Elementary
Myers Elementary
Wyncote Elementary
Elkins Park
Cedarbrook
Cheltenham High School

Reading

Math

75.9
82.0
90.5
90.9
69.9
88.6
75.7

87.0
91.0
95.9
95.2
76.8
85.4
65.1

PSSA PROFICIENCY
Reading Threshold ~ 63%
Past Five Years ~ All Students
(IN PERCENTAGES)

Year
2006

3-5
76.8

6-8
78.7

9-12
71.4

2007

76.7

77.9

69.5

2008
2009
2010

75.6
79.9
76.2

82.7
80.7
82.7

60.4
80.6
74.9

PSSA PROFICIENCY
Reading Threshold ~ 63%
Past Five Years ~ African American Students
(IN PERCENTAGES)

Year
2006

3-5
64.7

6-8
59.3

9-12
49.7

2007

62.8

63.8

47.7

2008
2009
2010

59.5
65.4
63.7

70.5
70.2
70.8

35.0
66.4
60.9

PSSA PROFICIENCY
Reading Threshold ~ 63%
Past Five Years ~ Students with an IEP
(IN PERCENTAGES)

Year
2006

3-5
39.9

6-8
36.0

9-12
N<40

2007

39.9

43.3

26.7

2008

30.2

47.6

24.5

2009
2010

38.6
28.6

41.6
49.0

N<40
30.6

PSSA PROFICIENCY
Math Threshold ~ 56%
Past Five Years ~ All Students
(IN PERCENTAGES)

Year
2006

3-5
77.4

6-8
69.5

9-12
60.1

2007

83.6

71.5

61.5

2008

85.3

74.5

55.9

2009
2010

87.2
84.8

80.9
82.5

70.3
64.5

PSSA PROFICIENCY
Math Threshold ~ 56%
Past Five Years ~ African American Students
(IN PERCENTAGES)

Year
2006

3-5
66.9

6-8
46.2

9-12
34.1

2007

71.4

55.3

35.9

2008

75.4

57.5

34.2

2009
2010

77.9
75.3

70.7
71.6

53.1
41.4

PSSA PROFICIENCY
Math Threshold ~ 56%
Past Five Years ~ Students with an IEP
(IN PERCENTAGES)

Year
2006

3-5
42.5

6-8
33.3

9-12
N<40

2007

53.7

36.0

24.5

2008

44.4

35.4

14.3

2009
2010

53.2
50.0

38.8
45.8

N<40
24.5

CHELTENHAM ELEMENTARY
MATH

Performance Target =56%

YEAR

GRADE

% PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE

% IEP

2006
2007
2008

3
3
3

90
86
91

90
74
88

90
100
96

44
40
46

2009

3

96

94

100

50

2010
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010

3
4
4
4
4
4

85
83
67
90
80
88

73
74
57
79
72
79

93
94
82
100
97
97

13
44
35
54
44
25

CHELTENHAM ELEMENTARY
MATH
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006

2007

BLACK ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th

2008

2009

WHITE ~ 3rd
WHITE ~ 4th

2010

GLENSIDE ELEMENTARY
MATH
YEAR

2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010

Performance Target =56%

GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4

94
88
87
89
91
86
94
89
85
90

92
76
67
85
90
68
93
80
70
82

97
97
96
90
92
95
94
97
94
98

78
40
33
46
23
58
80
25
50
50

GLENSIDE ELEMENTARY
MATH
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006

2007

BLACK ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th

2008

2009

WHITE ~ 3rd
WHITE ~ 4th

2010

MYERS ELEMENTARY
MATH
YEAR

Performance Target =56%

GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006

3

87

74

92

67

2007

3

92

84

95

55

2008

3

89

79

97

55

2009

3

100

100

100

100

2010

3

93

88

100

83

2006

4

83

66

97

39

2007

4

83

61

98

70

2008

4

84

66

97

36

2009

4

89

77

100

63

2010

4

97

93

100

100

MYERS ELEMENTARY
MATH
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006

2007

BLACK ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th

2008

2009

WHITE ~ 3rd
WHITE ~ 4th

2010

WYNCOTE ELEMENTARY
MATH
YEAR

Performance Target =56%

GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006

3

84

74

94

53

2007

3

86

74

96

67

2008

3

75

53

97

25

2009

3

96

97

94

90

2010

3

91

81

100

71

2006

4

94

83

100

89

2007

4

88

82

93

50

2008

4

89

79

100

56

2009

4

93

88

100

75

2010

4

87

95

98

100

WYNCOTE ELEMENTARY
MATH
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006

2007

BLACK ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th

2008

2009

WHITE ~ 3rd
WHITE ~ 4th

2010

ELKINS PARK SCHOOL
MATH
YEAR

Performance Target =56%

GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006

5

69

54

81

35

2007

5

84

70

95

62

2008

5

85

80

91

53

2009

5

84

70

98

38

2010

5

75

59

92

29

2006

6

73

54

85

45

2007

6

70

54

83

41

2008

6

79

59

95

38

2009

6

82

74

89

42

2010

6

83

64

95

33

ELKINS PARK SCHOOL
MATH
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006

2007

BLACK ~ 5th
BLACK ~ 6th

2008

2009

WHITE ~ 5th
WHITE ~ 6th

2010

CEDARBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL
MATH
YEAR

Performance Target =56%

GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006

7

71

52

83

24

2007

7

71

53

85

36

2008

7

72

57

85

32

2009

7

81

65

84

38

2010

7

84

79

91

56

2006

8

70

44

90

33

2007

8

75

60

85

33

2008

8

76

59

87

34

2009

8

83

75

90

39

2010

8

87

76

96

50

CEDARBROOK MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MATH
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006

2007

BLACK ~ 7th
BLACK ~ 8th

2008

2009

WHITE ~ 7th
WHITE ~ 8th

2010

CHELTENHAM HIGH SCHOOL
MATH
YEAR

2006
2007
2008
2009
2010

Performance Target =56%

GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

11
11
11
11
11

60
63
57
71
65

34
38
34
54
42

76
80
72
82
87

17
29
16
21
27

CHELTENHAM HIGH SCHOOL
MATH
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006

2007

BLACK ~ 11th

2008

2009

WHITE ~ 11th

2010

CHELTENHAM ELEMENTARY
READING
YEAR

Performance Target =63%

GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006

3

77

70

90

33

2007

3

83

74

96

27

2008

3

78

73

83

31

2009

3

82

74

94

29

2010

3

74

61

82

0

2006

4

79

67

92

44

2007

4

70

52

87

24

2008

4

88

76

96

54

2009

4

76

69

89

31

2010

4

77

69

91

39

CHELTENHAM ELEMENTARY
READING
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006

2007

BLACK ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th

2008

2009

WHITE ~ 3rd
WHITE ~ 4th

2010

GLENSIDE ELEMENTARY
READING
YEAR

Performance Target =63%

GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006

3

81

69

88

56

2007

3

95

88

100

80

2008

3

82

57

92

42

2009

3

84

70

91

46

2010

3

85

76

94

20

2006

4

80

64

88

42

2007

4

85

74

91

60

2008

4

83

67

97

25

2009

4

74

50

90

21

2010

4

78

70

85

21

GLENSIDE ELEMENTARY
READING
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006

2007

BLACK ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th

2008

2009

WHITE ~ 3rd
WHITE ~ 4th

2010

MYERS ELEMENTARY
READING
YEAR

2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010

Performance Target =63%

GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4

75
87
87
87
83
81
80
77
85
91

48
72
71
79
77
60
61
53
79
83

88
92
100
89
97
94
96
97
97
96

44
36
27
40
50
31
50
18
38
73

MYERS ELEMENTARY
READING
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006

2007

BLACK ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th

2008

2009

WHITE ~ 3rd
WHITE ~ 4th

2010

WYNCOTE ELEMENTARY
READING
YEAR

Performance Target =63%

GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006

3

80

69

91

57

2007

3

80

61

92

33

2008

3

75

53

94

25

2009

3

92

85

100

90

2010

3

87

77

100

57

2006

4

83

71

92

68

2007

4

87

77

97

50

2008

4

74

52

93

11

2009

4

84

69

97

60

2010

4

93

86

95

63

WYNCOTE ELEMENTARY
READING
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006

2007

BLACK ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th

2008

2009

WHITE ~ 3rd
WHITE ~ 4th

2010

ELKINS PARK SCHOOL
READING
YEAR

Performance Target =63%

GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006

5

77

65

86

33

2007

5

67

49

82

35

2008

5

69

55

85

33

2009

5

75

54

97

32

2010
2006

5
6

64
78

43
62

85
89

12
53

2007

6

79

66

90

48

2008

6

80

62

93

31

2009

6

78

70

90

38

2010

6

72

50

96

31

ELKINS PARK SCHOOL
READING
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006

2007

BLACK ~ 5th
BLACK ~ 6th

2008

2009

WHITE ~ 5th
WHITE ~ 6th

2010

CEDARBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL
READING
YEAR

Performance Target =63%

GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006

7

81

72

87

37

2007

7

72

52

88

38

2008

7

83

73

92

51

2009

7

77

59

94

40

2010

7

86

78

95

52

2006

8

80

60

95

37

2007

8

83

74

90

47

2008

8

87

79

95

56

2009
2010

8
8

88
93

86
86

87
98

55
69

CEDARBROOK MIDDLE
SCHOOL
READING
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006

2007

BLACK ~ 7th
BLACK ~ 8th

2008

2009

WHITE ~ 7th
WHITE ~ 8th

2010

CHELTENHAM HIGH SCHOOL
READING
YEAR

Performance Target =63%

GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006

11

72

50

86

24

2007

11

69

49

83

29

2008

11

61

35

82

22

2009

11

81

67

93

29

2010

11

76

62

91

33

CHELTENHAM HIGH SCHOOL
READING
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006

2007

BLACK ~ 11th

2008

2009

WHITE ~ 11th

2010

Cheltenham High School Initiatives
• Principal meetings with Math and English Departments
– Increased focus and awareness of IFOM
– Math and English teacher meetings by course on monthly basis
to review curriculum and adjusting instruction
– Greater focus on Performance Tracker to review data for 9th,
10th and 11th grade curriculum
– Reading and Math Across the Curriculum
– Benchmark Assessments



Testing all students consistently for all 3 tests
Instructional adjustments made based on data - DI
Weekly teachers meeting to review data and adjust instruction
Improved testing in Algebra 1 and Geometry

– Teachers will meet monthly and/or during common planning
periods to review and adjust curriculum

CHS Initiatives Cont.
Math
• Problem of the Week
• Algebra II Scope & Sequence updated
English
• Increased use of Teen Biz with new reading
specialist
• Cross departmental activities

CHS Initiatives Cont.
Student Voices – Increased engagement activities
with 11th grade student groups

Early meetings beginning 2nd week in September
Meet with student leadership groups – October and
then throughout the year

Homeroom visits beginning in January
Exploring new incentives and motivation activities

Meetings with each individual 11th grade student
and team assistant / vice principal, guidance and
counselor
Student Leadership Conferences

CHS Initiatives Cont.
• Monday Meetings expanded to include
teachers and students
• Presentations at PTO Meetings
• Vertical team meetings between CBK and
CHS teachers

Elkins Park School Initiatives
5th Grade Schedule closer to 4th grade
experience
▪ Core Extension
▪ Reading Classes Restructured – Guided
Reading Focus
▪ Student Movement between classes
▪ Specialist attached to grades
▪ School Climate to Bridge K-4 to CBK
▪ “Upper Elementary”

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful

Master Your Semester with Scribd & The New York Times

Special offer for students: Only $4.99/month.

Master Your Semester with a Special Offer from Scribd & The New York Times

Cancel anytime.