P. 1
Was the New World Settled Twice

Was the New World Settled Twice

|Views: 2|Likes:
Published by grotius2

More info:

Published by: grotius2 on Sep 18, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Was the New World Settled Twice?

- ScienceNOW

10-08-03 7:47 PM





Daily News

Enter Search Term


News Home



Premium Content from Science

About Science News

Home > News > ScienceNOW > June 2010 > Was the New World Settled Twice?

Was the New World Settled Twice?
by Andrew Lawler on June 14, 2010 4:02 PM | Permanent Link | 5 Comments


Print |




Were the primary ancestors of today's Native Americans really the first people to set foot in the New World? Genetic evidence suggests so, but ancient skeletons tell a different story. Now, the most detailed analysis yet of ancient American skulls concludes that there were two distinct waves of colonizers from Asia, suggesting that another group got here first. A team of paloeanthropologists compared the skulls of several dozen Paleoamericans, which date back to the early days of migration 11,000 years ago, with those of more than 300 Amerindians, which date to 1000 years ago. The Paleoamerican remains came from four sites in South and Central America, and the researchers also compared them with more than 500 skulls from East Asia. In all, the team found clear differences in the shapes and sizes of the Paleoamerican and Amerindian samples. That suggests that more than one group of individuals migrated to the Americas from Asia, the team reports online today in PLoS ONE. And due to the age of the skeletons, the researchers say, this other group of individuals arrived before the primary ancestors of today's Native Americans. Team member Katerina Harvati of Germany's Tübingen University says that although the study does not rule out a single migration, it demonstrates "that the story of the peopling of the New World was most likely more complex than is commonly thought."



Facing the past. This 11,000-year-old Paleoamerican skull from Lagoa Santa, Brazil, may provide clues to separate migrations from Asia to the Americas. Credit: LEEH-IB-USP

The work is "solid" and "perhaps the most sophisticated analysis of craniofacial traits undertaken to date," says Theodore Schurr, a molecular anthropologist at the University of Pennsylvania. Schurr's own recent work on DNA in living people has led him to favor a single migration, but he says he is "willing to accept that there were pulses of migration into the Americas from Northeast Asia at different times." Nevertheless, Schurr warns that the lack of large numbers of Paleoamerican skulls makes progress difficult and that the small sample sizes may not show the true morphological and genetic diversity of early American populations. The field, he notes, continues to be hampered by the lack of ancient DNA data because of poor bone preservation. Genetic studies of modern populations, by contrast, can draw on large numbers of samples. Dennis Stanford, an archaeologist at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, D.C., adds that the authors could have benefited from additional samples from North America as well as more Asian skulls. He believes that there likely were three or four major migrations.


Page 1 of 2

sciencemag. 2010.ScienceNOW 10-08-03 7:47 PM Harvati hopes that further studies will include more samples and agrees that "ancient DNA would be extremely helpful.breeze As just an interested person with no knowledge of the subject. June 26. i am nevertheless intrigued by the size of the scull. 2:34:37 PM CDT – Flag – Like – Reply Liked by 2 Guests http://news. 9:59:08 PM CDT – Flag – Like – Reply r0n77 Exactly.Was the New World Settled Twice? .org/sciencenow/2010/06/was-the-new-world-settled-twice. Morphology. such studies have not had much success. Email Print | Share 374 16 retweet 23 More Posted in Anatomy. Is it? or is the photo or my imagination? July 21. 6:38:12 PM CDT – Flag – Like – Reply Edward Kaahui jr Very interesting in the finds I always knew there was different migration patterns of different groups that came to the american continents I beleive there were also polynesian contacts way before the time previously thought the DNA studys should be able to trace the groups of there ethnic background June 18. June 14. Biomechanics | Anthropology | Asia/Pacific | Genetics | Latin America | Paleontology Login Share What's on your mind. 2010. It looks a lot higher than normal to me. right? June 15.. 2010.html Page 2 of 2 . It sounds like the Amerindians stole the land from the Paleoindians? I guess they should pay restitution. Your name (required) This Page Add images Follow Cancel Post Echo 5 Items Admin joy. 7:15:41 PM CDT – Flag – Like – Reply olive oil Very interesting--don't tell some of the tribes in california--they won't be able to handle real information like this.." But so far. 2010. she notes. 2010. 8:37:18 AM CDT – Flag – Like – Reply warren webb The Olmecs were exiled Brahmins from India.

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->