Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cox Cub News
Volume 8, Issue 7 Mrs. Tara Imboden, Principal imbodtr@nv.ccsd.net
Sept. 24-Oct. 5, 2018 Mrs. Erica Silas, Assistant Principal shawel@nv.ccsd.net
Cub Cheers: Congratulations to the students in Mrs. Ernst’s Class they did our Friday Announcements on the 27th and to
Mr. Orth’s Class, they did our Friday Announcements on the 5th and were fabulous! Congratulations to the following students
for receiving Cox Cub of the Week: Chloe Grenz, Deontae Layne, Dominick Wheaton, Melanie Pham, Hunter McKeegan,
Kaitlynn Bamber, Damion Mollinedo, Sienna Allen, Van Davis, Aubree Torres, Chandler Ostler, Audrey Cabanos, Rylan
Harry, Brian Gilgan, Anabelle Blea, Kalista Kozhin, Deisel Jones, DeAnthony Gallardo, Matthew Rojas, Zachary Camuso,
Siana Knox, Tanner Waterman, Alanna Weston, Ammon Hansen, Carmen Dian, Carl LoBue, Kayla Spencer, Kalani
Bookrum, Preston Michaelson, Ashley Hernandez, Yosseline Ortiz, Jace Pingul, Dai’jha Nolen, Tessa Barfield, Makenna
Nash, Chloe Church, Ella Creer, Anjaea Houston, and Connor Truman.
Specialist Class Winners for September: Congratulations to the following classes for having top behavior and participation
for the month of September in all our Specialist’s Classes: Mr. Shafran’s students, Mrs. Pisano’s students, Mr. Frank’s
students, Ms. Lopez’s students, Mrs. Anderson’s students, and Ms. Swinger’s students! Great job on the awesome behavior!
Shade Structure Update: Sadly, I was just informed last week that our shade structure is probably not getting put up until
after winter break! The district ordering from the replacement company is taking longer than expected and once it is in, they
get it up rather quickly. It’s the getting it in from the company that has been the long process.
PTA News: Congratulations to the following classes for having top PTA membership throughout the membership
drive: #1-Mr. Frank’s class, #2-Mrs. Anderson’s class, #3-Ms. Peter’s class, #4-Mrs. Blohm’s class,
#5-Ms. Davis’ class!
Awesome Cox Cub Students (2nd posting): Did you know we had 5 students in grades 3, 4, and 5 who scored PERFECT
scores on either their math or their ELA SBACS??? We even had one student, Henry Lindgren, who scored PERFECT on
both the ELA and math tests! WOW! Congratulations to the following students who will receive a Chromebook for their
outstanding scores: Henry Lindgren, Raymon Pham, Chase Crampton, Lucy Creer, and Jia Li! These students will be
recognized along with other students who passed their SBACS at a testing assembly in October! We are so proud of them!
Musical Performance for Third Grade on Friday: Parents of our third grade students, their musical performance is this
Friday, October 12th with two duplicate performances; one at 9:30 am and the other at 2:15 pm in the MP Room. There is
reserved “Family Seating” and we ask that you do not sit in those benches with reserved seating signs.
There are many factors which contribute to a school’s STAR Rating beyond just simply passing or not passing the
SBAC in grades 3, 4, and 5. Every student’s score impacts a school up to 7 different scoring categories.
The following are the scoring categories…
1. Proficient or Non-proficient
2. Growth vs. not meeting the student’s growth target
3. Ethnicity
4. Subgroup (IEP-special education/speech, ELL-second language listed, FRL-free/reduced lunch)
5. Attendance (all students missing 10 or more days are considered by the state to be chronically absent-which
our schools is penalized for)
6. Participation (simply taking the test vs. not taking the test regardless of achievement)
7. 5th Grade Only – Science, 3rd Grade Only – Read by Grade 3 Literacy score
Score’s within these categories are tracked over the years which also contribute to or penalize a school’s STAR
Rating.
Here is an example of how the above categories can affect a school’s rating…
Student A: Scores a proficiency score of “exceeding standards” (the highest ranked category). However, does not
make “adequate growth” by means from the state. “Growth points” are valued higher than “Achievement points” so
even though Student A had an excellent score, the school was penalized for Student A not meeting his/her “Growth
Targets.”
Student B: Scored below proficiency (did not pass the tests), thus the school lost “Achievement points” for Student
B. However, Student B showed improved growth from last year to this year, “Growth points” are weighted more
from the state, so the school received points for his/her score. However, Student B might also have had an IEP
(special education) and could have also been ELL (had a second language). Since Student B did not pass his/her
tests the school was also penalized within the ethnicity category and the IEP category. This meant that although the
student’s score earned points in one category the school was penalized points in 3 other categories.
We had a 9 point penalty assessed in the Academic Achievement category which took us from
a 23 out of 25 to a 14 out of 25.
*We had 8 students whose parents “opted out” of the test and 11 students who were not enrolled in our school
during testing but counted on our state rosters which cause the 9 point penalty assessment. By not just sitting and
taking the test, regardless of outcome score, we were penalized for non-participation.
School Rating Report: Attached you’ll find our “School Rating Report” which outlines what our school scored
along with what was earned in each category and subgroup. The report can be viewed on the NDE website under
“Data” and “School Rating Report.”
Our greatest category groups which are impacting our overall STAR Rating are:
1. Student Growth
2. Closing Opportunity Gaps
*Without the 9 point participation penalty we would have scored 23/25 in Academic Achievement.
*School score-rate drops when attendance is below 96% and a 2 point bonus was awarded for over 50% of parent’s turning in
surveys. David Cox’s chronic absenteeism went from 8% in 2017 to 12% in 2018.