This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
ENGINEERING DATA TRANSMITTAL
1 . ~ 0 ~
4. Related ED7
Ooeration Eauioment . .
6 . Design Authority/ Design Agent/Cog. Engr.:
7. Purchase Drdar NO. :
TWRS Interim Stabilization Engineering
H. H. Ziada
9 . Eguip./Conponent NO.:
This EDT Transmits the Release o f the Supporting Document HNF-3286, Rev. 0
11. Receiver Remarks: 11A. Design Baseline Docunent?
12. Major Asam. Dug. No.:
13. Permit/Permit Application No.:
I1 DocumsntiDrawingNo. S
DATA TRANSMITTED I1 C ID) Sheet Re".
IEl M a or Dascdption 01 Data
Transmmsd Approval Di .p
Reason tor Tnnimittai
O+# nator DIspo-
Design Analysis o f 2.000 lb. Jib Crane
Appmval Oasignator I1 F
E. S, ( . D or NIA 1
Reaeon far T r . n ~ m ~ a l ~ Q l 4. Review 2 . Release 5 . Poat-Review 3. information 6. Diit. IRecdpt AEknow. Requiredl
1 . Approval
DIwadtbn (HI & (I1
1. Appmved 2. Appmvad wlmmmmt 3. Dhppravad w/Eommml 4. Reviewed noleomment 6. Reviewedwlsomrnsnt 6, Rscolpt afknowledged
Sionotura of EOT Originator
for Receiving Orgmlzatlon
HNF-3286, Rev. 0
Design Analysis of 2,000 Lb. Jib Crane for Chemical Lab
H. H. Ziada Numatec Hanford Corporation, Richland, WA 99352 U.S. Department o f Energy Contract DE-AC06-96RL13200
EDT/ECN: 625110 Org Code: 82600 B&R Code: EW3120071
uc: 2000 Charge Code: T o t a l Pages:
Key Words: J i b Crane, Chemical Lab, 200 East, Design Analysis, H o i s t i n g and Rigging, Tank Farms. A b s t r a c t : T h i s design a n a l y s i s provides a design ( M a t e r i a l s , s i z e s , and dimensions) o f a 2,000 l b . J i b Crane t o be i n s t a l l e d i n t h e 200 East Tank Farms Chemical Lab (MO-733) t o r e p l a c e an e x i s t i n g 1,0001b. J i b Crane.
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. Reference h e r e i n t o any s p e c i f i c c m r c i a l prcduct, process, o r s e r v i c e by t r a d e name, trademark, manufacturer, o r otherwise, does n o t n e c e s s a r i l y c o n s t i t u t e or imply i t s endorserent, recamendation, o r favoring by the United States G o v e r m n t o r any agency thereof o r i t s c o n t r a c t o r s o r subcontractors. P r i n t e d i n t h e United States of America. lo o b t a i n copies of t h i s docunent, contact: D o c M m t Control Services, P.O. Box 950, Mailstop H6-OB, Richland UA 99352, Phone (509) 372-2420; Fax (509) 376-4989.
Approved for Public Release
A-6400-073 (01197) GEF321
Author HNF-3286 H. J. 0 H. Code output consistent with input and with results reported in analysis documentation. Conclusions consistent with analytical results and applicable 1 imi ts. Safety margins consistent with good engineering practices. Julyk Reviewer .0001bf Jib Crane for Chemical Lab Document No. Data used in calculations explicitly stated in document. Acceptability limits on analytical results applicable and supported. Models appropriate and used within range of validity or use outside range of established validity justified w [ I [ I [ I fA [ I w pa [ I [ I 11 [ I . Limits checked against sources. Data checked for consistency with original source information as applicable. - Rev. DQ 1 1 [ I pa ga 1 1 [ I w JKl [ I [ I pl [ I [ I L . Results and conclusions address all points required in the problem statement. Mathematical derivations checked including dimensional consistency of results. Ziada Y e s m u Da [ I [ I MI 1 1 [ I [ I [ I ba Problem completely defined. p4 [ I [ I 11 [ I Hand calculations checked for errors. Necessary assumptions explicitly stated and supported. Code run streams correct and consistent with analysis documentation.CHECKLIST FOR INDEPENDENT REVIEW Document Reviewed Desiqn Analysis of 2. Computer codes and data files documented.
000 lb. Rev. 0 Design Analysis of 2. Jib Crane for Chemical Lab H. H. Ziada January 1999 .HNF-3286.
4 5.0 ANALYSIS 4 4 5 5.0 4.0 9 11 REFERENCES 12 .0 2 LOADING ALLOWABLE STRESSES AND LOADS 2 2 4. 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 .3 7 5.HNF-3286 Rev.1 5.O 2.0 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONFIGURATION AND MATERIAL LOADING AND CRITERIA 4.1 1 1 2 3.5 6.2 JIB CRANE BOOM HINGE BRACKETS HINGE PIN WELDS ANALYSIS RESULTS 5.2 5.
Numatec Hanford Corp. Sketches of the proposedjib crane assembly are shown in Figures 14.b Doc No.dimenslons.000 Ibf jib crane is needed to replace an edsting 1. -:LoamlK L. thick plate at the hole region. EVALUATIONANALYSIS a u k . Ifthe as-built assembly differs from the 2. or stronger. N F a R. sizes.000 Ibf jib crane to be replaced (about 5-R apart) shall be uwd In connecting the new jib crane to the wall.The pln of each hinge shall be a minimum of l-in. It was decided to construct the new jib crane fmm two perpedlcular I-beams (L-shape) without a supporting rod (see Figure I). This construction is to be similar to another exisling 1. . and a supporting rod is attached to the upper bracket. and conllguration. The supporting rod is attached to the boom at about 8 4 fmm the free end. After construction. Final drawings should be developed and approved.000 lbfjib crane to determine suitable hs sizes of members and configuration of the new jib crane assembly.The edsting lower two brackets of the 1. The boom is attached to the lower bracket.000 IMJIB CRANE FOR CHEMICAL LAB I INTRODUCTIONAND OBJECTIVE .structural materialsare recommended to be carbon steel A36 (ASTM 1097) and the pin material to be A325 steel. 5. ~ O ev: DESIGN ANALYSIS OF 2. After prellminatystudies and discussions.v*ion: 4 I d W O N o b N o .000 Ibf jib crane (L-shape) in the lab. a revision of this analysis needs to be performed to confirm the acceptability of the as-built assembly. The thickness of the upper and lower brackets of each support should be strengthened by a IR-in. for each bracket to satisfy the DOE (1993) stress allowable (see Figure 2) . 3.OOO Ibf jib crane (to be replaced) has a 1 7 4 boom (I-beam).The assembly of the L-shaped I-beams and hinge connectionsshall be similar to that of the other exlsting 1. All 2. I. 2.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommended materials. The purof t i document is to perform a deslgn analysis for the proposed 2.and dimensions are based on the deslgn factor of 5 spedtkd in DOE (1993). The vertical I-beam is to be attached to the lower two exisling brackets to support the jib crane to the wall. This will provides total thickness of l-in. diameter and made of A325 material. The boom is to be 20-R long cantilever (the horizontal Cbeam).O A 2. a revision of this analysis needs to be performed to confirm the acceptability of the as-built structure.The L-shaped jib crane is recommendedto be constructed from I-beam size W 12x40 (as minimum &e).000 Ibf jib crane (L-shape) or stiffer (see Figure 1) . If the final as-built assembly is different from the proposed sizes. I .000 Ibf jib crane as proposed In thk document. 6-All welds shall be fillet welds with the sizes shown in Fgures 14. crane is to be supported on the wall through the t o The w lower edsting brackets (about 5-R apart). and the guidelines provided in AlSC (1989). The recommended weld material is ETOXX. 4.000 Ibf jib crane in the Chemical Lab (Building -733). The crane is attached to the wall through The edsting I two brackets (about 8 ID-R apart).
1 LOADING The loadlng on the 20-R boom (cantilever) is the jib crane rated load of 2.5 4.8 the yield strength. The yield and ultimate strengths of the A325 material are 92.577 (thus 0.0001bf jib crane is illustrated in Fbure I. The brackets are welded to the wall by a 1IUn.9m. and gives allowable shear stress more conservative than the AlSC ratlo of 0. 4.0 LOADING AND CRITERIA The evaluation is based on the general construction and installation requirement8 of Hanford SIb Ho#ing end w i n g Manual (DOE 1893).2. The structural material of the new componenb is selected to be carbon steel A36. thick plate. Ratio of shear stress to tensile stress allowables = FvFt = 0.The crane l constructed of two perpendicular I-beams.88 (see below).vwon: 9- a The coniigurahn of the proposed L-shaped 2. The edrting h m e brackets are made of I M n . the allowable tensile stress (Ft) is 0.Numatec Hanford Corp.R in2 Fv = 6693 *-Ibf in2 Fp = 174OO. The yield strength of the A36 material is 38.2 ALLOWABLE STRESSES AND LOADS The allowable sr tand loads are based on the deslgn factor of 5 on the ultlmate tensile strength of the mstehl (DOE 1993). Allowable Sr D d g n (AISC tm 1989). 4.8 = I .000 lbfAnz. thick plate at the hole region on the outer upper and lower horlzontal surfaces.8 of the yield strength.000Ibflinz. thus. The shear strength is taken as 0.in2 F :=-Fu t 5 Ibf F =11600*t FV := 0. which are selected to be slze W 12x40 (stronger slzes can also be used but the beam weight should not exceed 70 Ibflft). all around Illletweld.000 lbfllnZand 120. 4.577 is used to obtain Fv).ting lower hinge brackets. and the pin material la to be A325 (ASTM 1997).1 Allowable Stresses for Structural Components (A38 Material) Ibf Fu :I SSOC0. which is condste~nt nrith ductile material behavior.Ibf in2 L Allowable bending stress @nslle end compredw.000 Ibf.the allowable &ear stress (Fv) la 0.0 CONFIGURATIONAND MATERIAL -- EVALUATIONANALYSIS R. and the boom (W 12x40 I-beam) distributed weight of 40 lbflft (3.577. Because the the jib crane is a steel structure.4/0. the ratios between the different stress allowables in AlSC (1889) can be applied to determine the shear and beating stress allowables in comparison to the tenslle stress allowable. The jib crane la attach4 to the two exk. Ratio of beating stress to tensile stress allowable3 = FpFt = 0. and the guidelines provided in the Manual of Steel Construction. and the mlnlmum ultimate tensile strength is 58.6 = 0. The boom (horkontal part) has a 20-R effecthre arm.333 Ibflin). A sketch of the modified bracket is illustrated in Fbure 2. Doc No.88 > 0. see nekl page) Allowable shear stress Allowable beating stress .577 of the tensile strength (Von-Msen Criteria). HNFJZas 3.4 the yield strength. From AlSC (1888). respecthrely.and the allowable bearing stress (Fp) is 0.000 Ibflln2. The boom weight is considered because It has dgniRcant contrlbullon t the o bending moment. The brackets are modified by the addition of a IR-in.
-M.: mm w ~ r HM. of 101. 0m L M . a w . ) I 989).14.in T _-112 ' T For flexural memberswith compact or noncompactsections.in (where Fy is 36 kips) Beam length. JiNF-3208 Revidom PageNo. 51oooo'cb The beam satisfies the following condition. FbcZ :=- C2. coefficient depends on end moments ratio.15< 119.02).mildim . the allowable compressive bending stress is determined as the larger value from the following two equations. and loaded in the plane of their web.b f in2 Yield strength " & L :=240. When the unbraced length L The AlSC ( is greater than a specified value (defined below). C1 :=2.23< 112. b f =&in Flange width Lc = 76x8/6 = 101.33-in. V.WGO laeuiML00 M .in2 1 CI=d/Af.nt: S Doc No. J . Section F I.) and I/rT (112. provides formulas for different cases of slenderness ratio. .33 in Ibf Fy =36WO- L =- 76.. the allowable compressive bending stress for the W 12x40 I-beam is calculated in accordance with the following formulas of AlSC (1989).3. ' :=2. ' T F Y When L (24041. Cb:=l For cantilever beams.) exceeds L.u b j a c t : p h l Lab 3d WON& No. (107. 9 /b ' Z A . I n Ibf c 2 := 12lxmxQ. in2 r : For any value of U. Ibf a := lS3LXCOCOO- Dummy units for a constant given in the following equation. from I-beam properties tables in AlSC (1989). Radius of gyration of compression flange plus 1/3 of compressionweb. r h ~ s *: : Ravh.c b L.600 Ibfhr? is used for allowable tension and compression bending stresses.(53.15) is between the above values.=17241*2 in lbf Second compressive bending stress allowable Both F k l and Fk2 values of the above two equations are greater than Ft.C1 -----(2) Fh. Ft of 11.. ratio of depth to flange area (AISC 1989). EVALUATION ANALYSIS cli.33-h. greater than L. and with unbraced lengths greater than Lc with an eds of symmetryin. Therefore. Dummy units for a constant given in the following equation.9. the allowable bending stress in compression (Fk) is shown below.d: By: The allowable compressive bending stress depends on the slenderness ratio ( r of the flexural member (I-beam).Numatec Hanford Cop.
000 Ibf/in2 Allowable shear stress for tension or compression parallel to axis of weld = same as base metal To be consistent with DOE (1993) and the derivation of the base metal allowables in the preceding sections.vi.in M :=P.Ftp ~ 5. Fvw :=Fv t Fvw = 6693 a - Ibf Allowable shear stress for weld :=0.2 Allowable Shear Stress for Fillet Weld Assume the weld electrode material is E70XX. the allowable shear stress for welds will be taken as the base metal allowables (consenrative). (from the wall).E (40 Ibf/fI of I-beam) L :=240.in F = 1 I83 in2 Ibf -Allowable shear stress (per linear inch) for 1/4-in.Sin3 M Ob :=S Bending stress is less than bending stress allowable of 11.333333.t w.600 Ibf/in2.5. ILCLE-328s R. end for the distributed weight of the boom (~3.lbf w . fillet weld. ia t : Suy. Shigley.000 Ibf at 240411. The AISC (1989). n n s i l Lab Loation: p c z * g e R e By: L. and Blodgett (1982). specifies the following shear stress allowables for fillet welds. - lbf Ultimate strength of pin material in2 Ftp :=-fuP 5 Ftp = 24000 lbf e - in2 in2 Allowable bending stress for pin Allowable shear stress for pin F v :=0.2.L2 2 in M =576oOo*in~lbf Modulus of section Moment at bed end S := 5 1 .33 Ibfhnfor the I-beam).707. Bruhn (965). Table J2.577. Allowable shear stress for shear on effective area = 0. 4 .0 ANALYSIS Ibf F~p=13848*- I The analysiswas performed by conventional hand calculations using formulas from Roark (1975).3 x Fu weld = 0.= 3.c. JilWGO 4 d /6 IW Jib C 733. WON& No.L+-w. EVALUATlONANALYSIS cl n.3 x 70. P =2000. Thk moment k consewalive for the boom and its weld connection to the box. in 4.2. 4.ct: Doc No.lon: PageNo.Numatec Hanford Cop. Ricker (Iggl).000 = 21. F :=0.1 JIB CRANE BOOM (W 12X 40 I-BEAM) The bending moment is calculated for the 2.Fvw .3 Allowable Stresses for Pin (A325 Material) fup := 1 2 ~ .25. 5.
5in. t thick. HtiF-3288 RdJon: PapNo. It is recommendedto strengthen the brackets by welding (0.Double shear failure. bearing. Ricker (1991). and tearing tension failures. Bruhn (1965). in order to satisfy the shear and bearing stress allowables.600 Ibfln2allowable stress. and the side distance from the hole to the edge is about 1. 4.n i The modified bracket is 1&.).Compliance with dishing failure. plate to the upper and lower outermost horizontal surfaces of each bracket at the hole region. The distance between the centerlines of the brackets is 5-R (60-in.Bearing failure. 5.1 Tension Failure .lbf) produces a couple that generates action and reaction forces (F) in the two brackets. fillet weld) a 0.0.5in.25in. 2. O h . and Shigiey (1983) have slightly different approaches in dealing with shear. The welded plates need to follow the contour of the brackets and to allow sufficientdistances from the outside edges to facilitate the welding on the outside of the added plate (no weld on the hole surface).F A Pt Force on bracket lbf f t =4800*- in2 Tensile stress is less than 11.Tension failure at sides of hole. The modified bracket configuration is presentedin Figure 2.Numatec Hanford Corp. = I. 5 .h Plate thickness Side length for tension stress Tension area Distance between brackets M F :=_ L1 F = 9600 -1bf f t :=. 5. The moment M (576.2. 1. 3.2 HINGE BRACKETS The results of a preliminaryanalysis indicatedthat the brackets (at the pin hole region) need to be thicker than the original thickness of 0.Tearing tension failure or hoop tension failure. (see mure below). The bracket at the hole region should be checked for the follohhg failure modes.000 in. e ~!LL&&- 5. EVALUATIONANALYSIS Da No.
h Pin diameter Apb :=D.in ' Shear distance to edge Shear area f =4800.693 Ibfln2.vkd: 5.5 x d = 1.:Subject Lmtiom -No.2.2 Double Shear Failure L S . D s =- t.e 1 2 6 s=o*in 3 MI =- F.O = I. 5.t Bearing area '=. .L d Bending moment M1 8 =960. The block performs as a fixed-ends beam (see sketch on previous page).2.4 Tearing Tension Failure This failure occurs when the pin diameter k smaller than the hole diameter. distance from the edge.=l. e =l. this k more than 1.5 x 1. Assume that a block of 0.3 Bearing Failure D := I. MF-3288 RevMn: e u i.5 in.O.0. Thus. in* 5.Numatec Hanford Corp. I b) Ricker (991) assumes that the tear resulted from a bending stress in section between the hole and the boundary.8xd in length.in Ld=l. Lab R.400 Ibfhn2 allowable bearing stress. JlW'GD 3 L s & m. Jib CRm & & d W& . EVALUATIONANALYSIS Doc No. WOlJob No.O. check the tearing tendon failure. a) Shigley (19830 states that this failure is avolded by spacing the hole at least I diameter from the margin (edge).k Height or distance to edge Beam length Modulus of section Ld ~ 0 .lbf 6 .in. and have the same plate thickness. 8 . e In height.Mn.2.- Ibf in2 Shear stress is less than allowable shear stress of 6.5 I.F P' A Pb fp=9600--Ibf f Bearing stress k less than 17. .
0 ?.WNO. diameter. Therefore.5Dishing Failure (Out-of-Plane Buckling) 0. 9 - . 5. Rniud: f = 5760.. EVALUATIONANALYSIS CIht -% buS + Doc No.3.- Ibf i n 2 Bending stress is less than allowable stress of 11.A f sp Ibf =6112*- in2 Double shear stress is not conservative. Besides.Nurnatec Hanford Corp. the pin diameter is restrictedto l i n .E 2. Ap . but never less than 0. Each pin is subjected to a force of 9.4 lbf Ft=11600-in2 Bearing area Shear bearing factor based on t/D4 .F 2.2.O.1 l.. and e/D=l. dishing is not a concern. Allowable tensile stress Pta:=Kb. because the load is not uniform.in2 i 7 Pin area fsp :=. Therefore.1 Shear Stress First assume the pin will fall under double shear.ApEFt P ta = 16240 .5in.. it is not easy to machinethe bracket hole because it is welded to the wall structure. The bracket does not have enough distance to the front edge to Increase the pin diameter. c) Bruhn (1965) states that failure due to shear out and bearing (tearing) are closely related and are covered by a single calculation based on empirical cwves. The allowable load ( P d may be expressed as a function of the allowable stress A pb = 1 .25 the diameter.600 Ibf.600 Ibf.1 1.Ibf Allowable load k greater than the acting load of 9. the pin material needs to be A325 or stronger.E l.b 7 o ( /6 WON& No.600 Ibfln2. Preliminarycalculations Indicatedthat the pin should be made out of material stronger than A36 carbon steel. Thus.5 (see curve) . The bracket satisfies this condition.3 HINGE PIN The existing pin has l-in. 5. J3NF-3286 uwirlon: P. ..L. 5. diameter.P U 4.0 r5 Ricker (1991) stated that dishing can be prevented by having the plate thickness equal or greater than 0. The pin is checked for shear and bending stresses (the bearing stress is enveloped by the bracket). W O O blEdwb Mcx33.in 2 K bv := 1.
Mp fbp:=II. a =0.000 Ibfhnz.a Reactionforce P' Mp=1173*in. EVALUATION ANALYSIS Doc No. in* 5. mF-3286 Rddom 9 H crtmt: . i k not known l exactly how the load k distributed to the pin nor the relative deformations of the pin and the members.600 Ibf load to act as a concentrated load on the pin.- Single shear stress k less than 13. ILS \\ in2 (cle.in L P =s. Subjct: m i a n Page NO. and the gap between the pin and the hinge on the left is not closed.2 Bending stress In general static tests of single bolt frttings will not show a failure due to bolt bending failure. Beddes.traMte) ket 6 t-ac 8 . Assume simply supported beam with concentrated load as shown in the sketch below.Ibf Bending stress k less than the allowable bending stress of 24. it is important that sufficient bending strength k provided to prevent permanent bending deformation so that bolts can be readily removed in maintenance operations. assume that the rotation of the crane (due to the bending moment) will cause the 9. This is a conservative representation for thii application.125in Distancefrom close support (Clearance) Dktance from far support Length of pin between supports (inside of the bracket) b =5.=R.3. see sketch below. the pin will be under single shear. with a maximum clearance of 0.s. L o a t h -s733 -til w: Second. However.lbf 32. N l W G O I Mm o .Numatec Hanford COT. Therefore.37S. & C I L% WOlJob No.848 Ibfhn2allowable shear stress.in R :. D3 Maximum bending moment at point of load fbp-11945'.125-in applied on one side. f spd = I2223 Ibf . b FLP R =9382*Ibf M .
15in A.4WELDS This section evaluatesthe welds of the crane assembly.000 Ibf plus the beam weight (see Section 5. . f.:=- Shear force. fillet weld (see Figure 2). 5.F fhw -422. Ibf in Shear stress (per linear length) for shear load f Ibf .4.375+6.ICI J ib -No.2 Welds Connecting Boom (I-Beam) to Box . fillet weld.375) fhw :=. = 132.25411. A. The two I-beams are connectedtogether through a box-shaped structure as shown In Fbure I The boom is welded to one side of the box-shape structure around b contour. fillet weld around the plate ddes (on the bottom).4.440-= in Resultant shear stress (per linear length) is less than 1.Ibf Shear stress (per linear length) for tension load in The shear load 01) on the weld is the 2. A 3/41n.183 lbflin allowable weld stress for 0. Bottom weld (at point "a") is the critical location. thick plateswith the web plate welded to the four dde plates by a 5/%n. The normal load on the weld is 9. The other welds are to be sized to support the crane loads. 2 1~24. Weld area per unit thickness (5+5+6. V:=P+wL V = 2800 4bf f. I Lab WolJDb No. MF-3286 urvh(on: .h Total weld area Polar moment of inerb'a 9 J \v = 945. EVALUATIONANALYSIS Clknt. The welds were evaluated according to formulas obtained from Blcdgett (1982) and the guidelines of AlSC (1989). The box-shape is constructed from 3/4-in. M H G D me: i w i m pJULLA ~ y : By: Location: avlldirn Mm LakJWE Area Hanfofd. The weld dimensions and section properties appear in Figure 3.1). A .i~~ . fillet weld.6. fillet welds on both sides. thick plate is welded to the top surface of the box and the I-beam by a 3/Bin. S u w Doc No.32.=22.1 Welds of Hinge Support This is an ehting l/din.Numatec Hanford Corp.600 Ibf (load per bracket to react the moment). The weld that joins the the hinge bracket to the wall is an existing 1/44n. assuming only one support carries the shear load V A. Washinaton o 5. 5.
C :=JW f . Assume the length of the welds on each internal side is 1OS-in. Ibf = 2028 *- Vertical torsional shear stress in f v l :=- 2 V Awl Vertical shear stress f v l -115'f. thick. The web plate is welded to the side plates by a 5/84. MF-32LIB Rwlsion: e Paw No.- f Ibf ~ in2 Shear stress on weld is less than the 6. long (see sketch below).in Vertical distance from point "a" to neutral axis Horizontal distance from point "a" to neutral axis M = 576. long.=9.693Ibf/in2allowable shear stress. 2 - Dos No.o. Subjct:0 m . WOlJob No.C JW lbf f & =5482*- Horizontaltorsional shear stress in* f. EVALUATION ANALYSIS Client: .000 in.in f & :=- M. All plates are 3/44n. s 10 . Ibf in2 :=JfSh2+ (f.lbf (Section 5. The length of each side is 12-in. M. Weld horizontal length Weld vertical length (cosetvative) Vh:=M dV Shear force in weld (V.LA% w: h cY' . NlWGD IW Jib C w d a G t t l Lab inaton 1 o /A 0f l#lwu50 -733.Numatec Hanford Cow.+fVI)2 = 5886.1) c :=3. 5 4 3Welds in Box-Shaped Connedon .33..=VJ Fillet weld size Ibf f h b x = 591 2 'in2 Shear stress in weld i less than 6. Loation: -Rw!J!J Mo-733 cs:m* RevIsd : * z. fillet weld.693Ibflin' allowable shear stress.
Figures 14 represent the main features and dimensions of the proposed jib crane.in2 Shear stress for tension load fvw2':. t a L e 0 . and the fillet weld size to be W n .1 above. a revised stress analysis needs to be performedto verify the changes. Area of weld Aw2 f = 4023 lbf . The hinge pins need to be made of steel A325 or stronger to satisfy the required allowable stresees that are based on a factor of 5 on the ultimate strength of the materlal. long to allow for the I B i n . L ! $- 7AeL w. The proposed sizes of I-beams and welds are minimum requirements. tab W W k b No. The condusions and recommendationsare presented in Section 2. madmum clearance between the hinge and the inside space of the support plates (5. 7 0 7 A w 2 = 2 . The exktlng wall support brackets should be modified by welding a IR-ln.V Aw2 f vw2 = 1 173 -Ibf in Shear stress for shear load 2 .5 ANALYSIS RESULTS The stress analysis results show that all proposed component sizes and dimensions (as shown In Fuures 14) are acceptable.375..0. The depth of the plate should not be lees than 5.Q : : 2 . thkk brackets can not satisfy the allowable shear and bearing stresses developed from the 2.4 WELD OF HINGE PLATE The loads are the same as those in Section 5..4. 11 ..hw2 +fvw2 lbf fw2=4191-in2 Shear stress kr less than 6. distance). thick plate on each of the top surfaceof the upper bracket and the bottom surface of the lower bracket at the pin hole region.000 Ibf and the wdght of the jib crane boom. Final drawings need to be developed.in Weld size Lw2 :=4.2541. M Q D d E W d J - ~~:~ InBuMhu Morn.693 Ibf/ln2allowable shear stress.in A. h2 fhw2:=. If the Rnal as built structure is different from the proposed design. 5.v*d: & u & . L c u t b m p C27 h2R. Any sizm larger than those proposed are acceptable (provided that the weight of the beam does not exceed 70 Ibfm) and will provide larger margins of safely beyond the factor of 5 on ultimate strength. EVALUATION ANALYSIS C . Take the plate thickness to be 3 U n ._ J 7 2 fw2 .5. q :=0. 5. (to be In proportion with other plates). I W Ibs No. The erdsting IR-in.F Length of vertical weld8 only (conwnrathm. t. M F J Z O R* -No.Numatec Hanford Cow. see sketch on previous page.37541.4. because ii neglects the effect of the horizontal plate).
" Hanford Site Hoisting and Rigging Manual. Illinois. Shigley. 12 . EVALUATIONANALYSIS Doc No. Edtion." American InstiMe of Steel Construction. 1991.0. ASTM." DOE-RL-92-36. 12 th." Manual of Steel Construction. R. New York. New York. F." ThState Offset Company." Journal of American Institute of Steel Construction.Numatec Hanford Corp. Inc.." Mechanical Engineering Design. 149-158. New York." Fiih Edtion.5 REFERENCES AISC. edib'on. 1993. W. Allowable Stress Design.." Analysis and Design of Fliiht Vehicle Structures." 4 th. McGrow-Hill Book Company. New York. p. 1975. McGrow-Hill Company." Formulas for Stress and Strain. Fourth Quarter. Bruhn. Chicago. 1965. 9 th. Section 12. Cincinnati. Pennsylvania. Richland." Philadelphia. 1997.. Ohio.. 1983." Design of Welded Structures. Washington. 0. 1982. J.." The James F.. Blodgett. E.vhkn: _e 5. 1989. David t. Ricker. NF-3286 u." American Society of Testing and Materials. Cleveland." Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Ohio. DOE. Lincoln Arc Welding Foundation. J." Design and Construction of Lifting Beams. E. Printing. Roark.
. . .4 .I-:. .. . .No.. . .. __ . Washinaton . . . -... . .. .. . .. ~ . . I SEE FIGURES 2-. . . zr-7 ~ ~ ~ I+ . . . .. ! ..I 0 4 I f --I= $ I .. .. ..- Pap. .. .q_ ..IX . WON& No. . . .. ~ ..~ . . . EVALUATION ANALYSIS CI*nt Doc No.000 Ibf Jib Crane. . /r . .Numatec Hanford Cop. JiNF-3286 RNIrlon: 9 13 d / L suyrt: P Loation: Hanford.. .~ . -&WGD ma: Chclud: R& m .. .-LA~ Bv: Figure 1: Configurationof the Proposed 2. . .. 13 .
.. . . . ... 14 . . .... . ~. . . .: . . ~~ . . .. . -. . ... .. A rea Hanford. ~.. ' 1 ..:. Z W ~ f f w Chakea? By: L.. 14 o /L f WWJob No. . . . . . . .. . ..033 Ibl Jib Cnne in Chemical Lab Client in Bulldim EVALUATIONANALYSIS MO-733. . -" . .2. ~. . .. .. . . .. i_ . . .. ... . . > . . . -1 ~ . . . .. . . . ... . . . . Gorp. ..-_ ..~ . . . . . .. .. . . .. . H . .... .. .. . . -1 . ... . : . ... ~ . .I I i ..Nurnatec Hanford Corp. . . > . . . . . . ... Washindon Location: E - D x No. . . .. . . . J jWGD j Date: loll I BV: H. . .--I . . . . . .. . . . ... . .\ : . . . .. . ... . . . HNF-3286 Re4rion: -0 . . . -No. (EXjST5). . ..i : ~_' ~ . .LL Figure 2: Modified Bracket Configuration.:::I :. . -1 . . .. . . ~ . Manin Hanfod. . . . . .. .. . . .~. . . . .. . . :I .. . .. ..-. .. . . . . . .. J u M Revid - w e H... ... ~. .. . . . . . . . .. Dssion Anabis d 2. J. Subjw. ..
Numatec Hanford Cop. 1. EVALLJATlONANALYSIS Doc NO.HNF-32e4 R.x I YY .*irion: Figure 3: Proprties of Weld Connecting Boom (I-Beam) to Box.
.. . _. .- . 16 ._ .Numatec Hanford Corp... HNF-3288 R d m : Figure 4: Configuration of Hinge and Box. . . . ... . . . ~ . . ... . . 12 ... . .. . .I_ .. . . .. . . .. . i . . . . . . . . ..... .. . 4 .. ..-. . EVALUATIONANALYSIS Doc No. -. .. . . .. ... .. . . ... . . 12%40 . .. . . . . 3/y -.. 3v '8 .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. W . . .. . .
C. Peoples 5 . M. Text Only Attach” Appendix Onlv EDT/ECN Only Name Lockheed Martin Hanford Corporation J. R. Tipps 57-34 ( w . J. R. Koch I 57-54 57-20 R1-56 R1-56 I x X I C. Elsen 0.000 lb. W.DISTRIBUTION SHEET To Distribution Project TitleMlork Order IDesign Analysis of 2. L. Julyk I M . Crane for Chemical Laboratory Page 1 of 1 Date August 25. Jaka MSlN 57-24 57-24 R1-56 X X X I I I X X X L . Schlosser M. € Rifaey I . Zuroff I I I I I I I I Numatec Hanford CorDoration I A-6000-1 35 (10/97) . 625110 1 ECN NO. J. G. N/A With All Text Attach. 1999 EDT No.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.