This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Welcome to Scribd! Start your free trial and access books, documents and more.Find out more

Perimeter Greater than Area?

Why does our present title then not make any sense? Firstly we are comparing unequal things, like apples and oranges, or like comparing distance and speed. Obviously you cannot say anything if you are asked which is greater: distance 100 km or the speed value 200 km per hour?

But nevertheless sometimes interesting information can be gained by pursuing useless things. We are also doing so to show how elementary questions can be asked and explored at the elementary school level (well, it helps if children should know graphs).

Okay here is the problem: when is perimeter greater than area for a rectangle (PM being measured say in cm units and area in sq.cm units)? When we say greater we mean numerically greater.

[Well, if you want to make “sense” of this kind of question, you may reformulate the problem thus: we have two number crunching machines, the perimeter machine and the area machine. You feed positive numbers a and b – into both – then at what point the output from the one will exceed the other? ]

Let us take s and t be the sides of the rectangle and PM as its perimeter and A as its area.

1) When s = 1: PM = 2 (length + breadth) = 2 (1 + t). Area is length x breadth = 1x t = t. Now 2 + 2t is always greater than t. Therefore here PM > A, when s =1.

This means whenever you have one of the sides as 1, perimeter will be always (numerically) greater than area.

2) When s = 2: again here PM > area as always 2 (2+t) = 4 + 2t > 2t. This means whenever you have s =2, perimeter will be always (numerically) greater than area, irrespective of whatever value t takes.

3) When s = 3: Here it is bit more curious. PM > A till the other side t is less than 6, and when t > 6, A > PM, that is area is greater than perimeter. When t is exactly equal to 6, that is when t =6, area and perimeter are equal (numerically only, mind you). Here A = PM = 18. This is the first instance when area is equal to perimeter for integer values of the sides (s, t = 3,6). For a given value of s, we will call

the t-value equipoint when area becomes equal to perimeter. Or the point when the relation PM > A, becomes the other way around, that is A >PM. Again numerically please let us remember.

When s = 4: Till t reaches the value 4, PM > Area. At t = 4, PM = Area. When t > 4, A > PM. When t = 4, Area = PM =16. Now this is the second instance when area is equal to perimeter for integer values of the sides (s, t = 4,4). As far as we know (s,t) = (3,6) or (6,3) and (4,4) are the only instances when A = PM for integer values of the sides. Note the equipoint is t = 4 for s =4. The other integer solutions are,

s= 1, t = -2; s =0, t =0; s = -2, t = 1.

4) When s =5: the equipoint is t = 10/3 =3.333…, that is area = perimeter = 15 in this case. When t >10/3, A > PM. When t < 10/3, Area < PM.

If you wondered, how we got 10/3, all we did was solve the equation when PM = Area, or: 2 (5 +t) = 5t which leads to 3t =10 or t =10/3.

5) When s = 6: we know from (3) above there is an integer equipoint at t = 3. And also therefore when t <3, A < PM and when t > 3, A >PM.

6) When s =7: equipoint is t = 14/5 =2.80.

7) When s = 8: equipoint is t = 2.66.

8) When s =9: equipoint is t = 2.57.

9) When s= 10: equipoint is t = 2.50.

You can see the trend: as s increases, the equipoint t (or the point when the relation PM > A, becomes the other way around, that is A >PM) decreases. Does it indefinitely decrease? Or approaches a limit beyond which it does not go?

No t does not decrease beyond a point. It approaches a limit: when s increases, the equipoint t decreases to (or approaches) 2.

How do we know this? We write when PM =A,

2 (s+t) =st

or 2s + 2t = st; or 2s = st –2t = t(s-2). From which we can write t = 2s/(s-2) or

t = 2/(1-2/s). From this it is clear when s increases towards infinity, 2/s tends to zero, or 2/s Therefore, t 2.

0.

We show this in the graphs below, t is on the vertical axis and s is on the horizontal axis. We have plotted t = 2s/(s-2). In the graphs (produced by Wolfram Alpha), x is our s.

The graph clearly shows as s increases towards positive infinity, it approaches 2 and as s decreases and goes towards 2 (say from 2.5) then the equipoint t approaches infinity. The latter can be understood when we calculate t for s = 3, 2.5, 2.2, 2.1, 2.001, 2.0001, etc. The equipoint t values are respectively 6, 10, 22, 42, 4002, 40,002, etc.

If you are further interested in this kind of ‘exciting’ stuff, as s approaches 2 from zero to 1.5, 1.75, 1.90, the corresponding equipoint, t, approaches minus infinity, etc. Also when s takes values between 0 and less than 2, the corresponding equipoints t are negative. But when s is negative, that is less than zero; the corresponding equipoints are always negative.

You may also like to interpret by using your imagination like Alice in Wonderland what do the following mean or is it pure nonsense:

For example, s = ½, t =-1, A = -½, PM = -1; or s = 3, t =-1, A = -3, PM = 2; or s= -4, t =-5, A = 20, PM = 18.

That is, area and perimeter both negative with one parameter positive; area negative and perimeter positive with one parameter positive; or area positive and perimeter negative when both parameters t and s are negative.

This author cannot think of any meaningful explanation physically. But welcomes suggestions.

- Nuclear Power and Its Consequences by Jashbhai Patel
- Chapter 2 Anarchy in Retail Prices
- Contents and List of Drug Profiles in the book Lay Person's Guide to Medicines
- Section 2 of Lay Person's Guide to Medicines
- Section 3, Lay Person's Guide to Medicines
- Book Reviews_ Volume 18 Number 3 of the NMJI
- Epilogue
- Documents 1-4
- Chapter 9 Price Comparison DPCO vs MRP-Sep 04
- Chapter 12 Prevention is Better Than Cure
- Chapter 11 Anomalies in Drug Pricing
- Chapter 10 Costing and Pricing of a Drug Formulation
- Chapter 8 Drugs Likely to go out of Price Control after PP 2002 and the ones remaining
- Chapter 7 Revised DPCO 1995 and Irrelevance
- Chapter 4 Pharma Pricing in India
- Chapter 3 Drug Price Control in India
- Chapter 0 Drug Pricing Title Page and Introduction
- Chapter 6 Pharmaceutical Policy (PP) 2002 and National Health Policy (NHP) 2002
- Chapter 5 Drug Costs in Treatment of Common and Important Illnesses and Affordability of Treatment Costs
- Chapter 1 Missing the Wood for the Trees
- Perimeters and Areas
- Increasing Public Availability of Medicines
- Paving the Way for RCH - Part1
- Increasing Men's Involvement in Reproductive Health

Explores tentatively the relationship between area and perimeter for a rectangle ignoring the units. Author S.Srinivasan email: sahajbrc@gmail.com

Explores tentatively the relationship between area and perimeter for a rectangle ignoring the units. Author S.Srinivasan email: sahajbrc@gmail.com

- On Writing
- The Shell Collector
- I Am Having So Much Fun Here Without You
- The Rosie Project
- The Blazing World
- Hyperbole and a Half
- Quiet Dell
- After Visiting Friends
- Missing
- Birds in Fall
- The Great Bridge
- Who Owns the Future?
- The Wife
- On Looking
- Catch-22
- A Farewell to Arms
- Goat Song
- Birth of the Cool
- Girl Reading
- Galveston
- Telex from Cuba
- Rin Tin Tin
- The White Tiger
- The Serialist
- No One Belongs Here More Than You
- Love Today
- Sail of Stone
- All My Puny Sorrows
- Fourth of July Creek
- The Walls Around Us

Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

We've moved you to where you read on your other device.

Get the full title to continue

Get the full title to continue listening from where you left off, or restart the preview.

scribd