From: To: Subject: Date:

(b) (6) (b) (6)
Fw: Chain link fencing Thursday, January 17, 2008 6:42:59 PM

(b) (6) chainlink is in the footprint...always has been. This (b) (6) ----- Original Message ----From: (b) (6) To: (b) (6) Sent: Thu Jan 17 18:39:40 2008 Subject: RE: Chain link fencing (b) (6) Let me expand on the 14 miles. When we talked I said I was giving an approximate mileage. 14 miles is the approximate length of this entire span of chain link.
To clarify and make it simple the entire K-2A project area is currently lined with a section of this 14 mile span of chain-link. K-2A is listed as 8.96 miles so approximately 8.96 miles of this chain link will be replaced under PF-225. Our proposed alignment for K-2A is in the exact same footprint as the existing chain link. The chain-link at the POE is a completely separate issue as it is in Santa Teresa, New Mexico. K-2A runs through the El Paso and Ysleta AORs. I have never seen anything showing that fencing at the Santa Teresa POE was counted as primary fencing. If I wasn't able to clarify please give me a call. Take Care- (b) (6) -----Original Message----From: (b) (6) Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 4:15 PM To: (b) (6) Subject: Chain link fencing

(b) (6) more time...please. Is the 14 miles of chain link fencing 1)not part of this POE fence issue and 2)is One this 14 miles part of/within the PF225 laydown? By #2 I mean is it expected to be replaced by a PF225 project? Is so, what are the projects involved? I have heard it both ways and am confused. Please lay it out for me. Thanks. (b) (6)

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful