The Tort of Negligence

Gary Lam 2009067958 Kelly Koh 2009536868

Duty of Care
‡ Special relationship between a defendant and a plaintiff ‡ Breach could be found to be at fault

Negligence arises when a duty of care based on the neighbor principle is breached. It is a tort in its own right. It is one of the basic principles established by the case of Donoghue versus Stevenson, 1932.

1 2 3 4

Duty Breach Causation Damages

‡ It must be established that the defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff ‡ There are various conditions that can help us establish whether the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff. ‡ Foreseeability

Nova Mi k v

ans Canada Ai lines

‡ A low flying airplane flew over a commercial mink farm ‡ The animals were frightened ‡ Result: Mink Cannibalism ‡ But this situation was not foreseeable, and the airline was held to owe no duty of care to the mink farm.

‡ Reasonable man ‡Breach: ‡Did something that a reasonable man should not do ‡Didn t do something that a reasonable man should do

What if«

Lack of intelligence

What if

Slow reaction

Personal characteristics

‡ Legal standards generally take no account of the personal characteristics of the Defendant ‡ Exceptions:
± Children:
‡ Mullin v Richards 1998 CA

± Professionals:
‡ Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee 1957

1. Did the Defendant owe a duty of care?

2. Was the Defendant in breach of his duty?

3. Did the Plaintiff suffer harm as a result of the breach? If YES causation

‡ If harm to the claimant would not have occurred but for the Defendant s negligence then that negligence is a cause of the harm ‡ if the loss would occur in any event, the defendant s conduct is not a cause

‡ Economic loss ‡ Other methods possible

1 2 3 4

Negligence case

Donoghue versus Stevenson

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful