Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dear Sir(s)/Madam(s),
In continuation of our letter of even number dated 18th October 2010, enclosed please find a copy
of the Agenda for ninth meeting of Solid Mineral Fuels Sectional Committee, PCD 7 along with
its subcommittees scheduled to be held at 1030h on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 at Dr. Lal C.
Verman Conference Hall, Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah
Zafar Marg, New Delhi – 110 002.
Prior to this meeting, meetings of all Subcommittees of PCD 7 shall be held on Monday, 29
November 2010 at 1100h at the same venue.
Kindly keep these dates free from your other engagements and make it convenient to attend the
meeting of which you are a member and participate in the deliberations.
You are once again requested to kindly update the nominations from your organization, if not already
done for better communications. Kindly provide E-mail, Fax, Phone etc.
Thanking you,
Yours faithfully,
Nisha Bura
Scientist ‘B’
Member Secretary, PCD 7
Encl: as above
NB: Kindly bring your copy of the AGENDA and other important documents for discussion. Kindly
note, it may not be possible for BIS Directorate General to supply additional copies of the Agenda during
the meeting.
AGENDA
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS
_____________________________________________________________________________
_
1.1 The Minutes of the 8th meeting of Solid Mineral Fuels Sectional Committee, PCD 7 held on
15 March 2007 were circulated vide letter No PCD 7/A-2.8 dated 2007-04-27. Comments
received from members are given in Annex I, page____.
2.1 In accordance with the BIS bye-laws, the composition of the Solid Mineral Fuels
Sectional Committee, PCD 7 was reviewed by the Petroleum, Coal and Related Products
Division Council in its 13th meeting held on 02 August 2010at BIS HQs, New Delhi.
The present title, scope and the composition of the Solid Mineral Fuels Sectional
Committee, PCD 7 and its Subcommittees are given in Annex II, page ______.
2.2 At the last meeting, new structure of subcommittees was constituted. Recently fresh
nominations have been sought from PCD7 and its Subcommittees. The organizations,
which are yet to send their fresh/revised nominations on PCD 7 and its subcommittees,
are requested to provide the updated information at the earliest for our computerized
record and reference. E-mail addresses of representatives may also be provided for faster
communication.
2.3 Dr. Hazra, Convener (PCD 7:2) has retired from CIMFR on 28th February 2009.
2.4 Request has been received from Dr. H. K. Mishra, CMPDIL to constitute a new
subcommittee on Coal Petrography.
2.5 The following Requests have been received for Representation on the Sectional
Committee/Sub-Committees:
4 ELICO Ltd., B-90, A.P.I.E. Sanathnagar, Solid Mineral Fuels Sectional Committee,
. Hyderabad-500018 PCD 7
As per BIS Rules 1987, all Indian Standards shall be reviewed once in five years after
their publication/reaffirmation with the following guidelines:
The review of Indian Standards may involve the following steps wherever applicable:
The Indian Standards, which fall in the above category, are given in Annex V, page
______.
Through our letter dated 18th October 2010, members / experts were requested to review
the standards given in Annex V, page ______, taking into account the information given
in other overseas standards, if any, and latest technological developments that might have
taken place in this interim period since their publication with a view to update the same
and make their implementation more effective. No comments have been received.
3.3.1 IS 436(Pt I/Sec 1):1964 Methods for sampling of coal and coke: Part I Sampling of
coal: Section 1 Manual sampling (first revision)
IS 436(Part 1/Sec 1):1964 was reaffirmed in the 8th meeting of PCD 7 and the
Committee requested Shri Sunil Nath, Convener of PCD 7:3, to review ISO 18283:2006
Hard coal and coke – Manual sampling and furnish comments whether it is possible to
adopt it under dual numbering of IS 436 (Pt I/Sec 1):1964. The copy of International
Standard was handed over to him during the meeting. Reply from Shri Sunil Nath is
awaited.
However, in the meantime, comments from Senior Chief Chemist, MPPGCL, Sarni on IS
436 (Pt I /Sec 1):1964 have been received which are reproduced below:
“It is very difficult to adopt the above standard for collection and preparation of coal
samples from coal rakes and trucks as the power station has been receiving/handling
approximately 20,000 M.T. of coal on daily basis. During the early sixties the procedure
prescribed in this Indian Standard was quite practical, when the number of thermal
stations was limited and coal consumption and movement of coal rake was minimum.
Looking at the present conditions, when the quantity of coal has increased and the time
duration of unloading the rakes is reduced to 7 hours by the railways. Also, now a days
multiple grades of coal are being received by different modes of transportations such as
rail, belt & road. Hence the Indian Standard may be reviewed so that the representative
samples of consignments/stocks could be made without any dispute between the buyer
and supplier.”
In the mean time, ISO 18283 has been closed by ISO/TC 27 for review and also a
corrigendum to this standard has been published as ISO 18283:2006/Cor 1:2009.
The Committee may consider adoption of this International Standard provided, the
practices followed in our country are compatible with this International Standard.
3.3.2
• IS 436(Pt I/Sec 2):1976 Methods for sampling of coal and coke: Part I Sampling of
coal: Section 2 Mechanical sampling
• IS 436(Pt II):1965 Methods for sampling of coal and coke: Part II Sampling
of coke(first revision)
However, comments received from A. K. Dey, CMPDIL on ISO 13909-3:2001 are given
under Annex VI, page____ .
In the mean time these International Standards have been confirmed by ISO. The
committee may now consider printing of these finalized documents under dual
numbering system.
3.3.3 IS 437:1979 Size analysis of coal and coke for marketing (third revision) and
In the 7th meeting, the Committee discussed IS 437:1979 and decided to prepare its draft
revision in the light of International Standard ISO 728: 1995 ‘Coke (nominal top size
greater than 20 mm)-Size analysis by Sieving’.
In the last meeting, the Committee requested Dr Sreenivasarao to furnish his comments
on the printed standard in writing to BIS which were to be sent to the Dr S.K. Hazra,
Convener PCD7:2 for his study and suitable modification/revision of IS 437. Comments
from Dr Sreenivasarao are still awaited. On scrutiny of published International Standards
it is found that the following four standards have been published by ISO/TC 27 on the
above subject:
1. ISO 728:1995 Coke (nominal top size greater than 20 mm) -- Size analysis by sieving
2. ISO 1953:1994 Hard coal -- Size analysis by sieving
3. ISO 2325:1986 Coke -- Size analysis (Nominal top size 20 mm or less)
4. ISO 14180:1998 Solid mineral fuels -- Guidance on the sampling of coal seams
However the Foreword of IS 437:1979 refers only to ISO 1953 having taken assistance
during formulation of this Indian Standard.
In the view of above the committee may like to align IS 437 with the latest ISO 1953 or
may like to base the draft revision on all above ISO Standards as deemed fit.
Because of shortening of 8th meeting by one day, IS 439:1989 could not be discussed in
the meeting. The Committee may now discuss the standard in light of the Table of
requirements prepared by Dr. Sarkar, comments received from A. K. Paul, CMD, BCCL
and from Shri H. C. Chakrabarti, Retired GM, Coal India Ltd. given under Annex VII,
page____of the Agenda so that draft revision can be prepared afresh.
3.3.5 IS 1350(Part 5): 1975 Methods of test for coal and coke Part 5: Special impurities
(first revision)
In the last meeting, the Committee requested Shri T.B. Das, Convener (PCD 7:4), to
review IS 1350(Part 5) in the light of ISO/FDIS 8983 Solid Mineral Fuels –
Determination of nine trace elements – Acid digestion and flame atomic absorption
method and furnish his comments as to whether this can be adopted as Indian Standard
under dual numbering system. Alternately, a revision of IS 1350 (Part 5) may be taken up
if adoption of International document does not serve the complete purpose. Reply from
Shri T.B. Das is awaited.
3.3.6 IS 1353:1993 Methods of Test for Coal Carbonization – Caking Index, Swelling
Number and (LT) Grey-King Assay (first revision)
This Indian Standard covers three methods of test for coal carbonization, namely
agglutinating or caking index, swelling number and low temperature (LT) Gray King
assay.
a) Sand method
b) Crucible Swelling Number test
c) Gray-King Assay (LT) Coke Type.
While the sand method of determining stickiness or agglutinating power is being used in
India, the other two alternative methods listed at sl. no. b) and c) have International
acceptance. The two methods based on following ISO specifications were finalized by
the Committee for printing at its last meeting.
i) ISO 501:2003 Coal – Hard Coal- Determination of the crucible swelling number
[Doc: PCD 7(1967)]
ii) ISO 502:1982 Coal – Coal-Determination of caking power – Gray-King coke test
[Doc: PCD 7(1968)]
However, ISO 501:2003 has already been taken up for revision by ISO/TC27, therefore,
the Committee may like to consider whether only sl. No. ii) be printed at this moment or
all the methods be published simultaneously. It may also be noted that IS 1353:1993 was
to be revised to cover only sand method and the new title of the standard agreed was
Methods of Test for Coal Carbonization – Caking Index - Sand Method. Shri T.B.
Das, Convener (PCD 7:4) was requested to prepare the proposed draft for IS 1353
covering remaining ‘Sand method’ as well as ‘Roga index method’ and submit the same
to BIS for circulation to the Committee members in two month’s time. The draft revision
from Shri T.B. Das is still awaited.
3.3.7 IS 3746:1984 Graphical symbols for coal preparation plant (first revision)
In the last meeting, after detailed discussions, it was agreed that Dr D.D Haldar, CIMFR
would prepare revised draft document for IS 3746 consulting ISO 561:1989 and
comments of Shri Biswas as given in Annex VIII, page____.
The draft revision of IS 3746:1984 has not been prepared by Dr D.D Haldar as he
mentioned in his reply to BIS that the above document is very big and needs to be
discussed in the Coal preparation: Terminology and performance Subcommittee, PCD
7:1 for taking suitable decision.
3.3.8 IS 4311:1967 vis-à-vis ISO 602:1983 Method for the determination of mineral
matter in coal
In the last meeting, the Committee after detailed discussions, agreed with the suggestions
of M/s Neyveli Lignite Corporation to publish IS 4311 / ISO 602:1983 under dual
numbering procedure.
However, from recording of the minutes, it is not clear whether the wide circulation of
the document has been waived off or it has to be first circulated for seeking views of the
experts.
3.3.9 IS 4433:1979 vis-à-vis ISO 5074: 1994 Method for determination of hardgrove
grindability index of coal (first revision)
In the last meeting, the Committee NOTED that ISO 5074:1994 is currently under
revision, hence, may not be considered for adoption till the revised version is available.
However as per latest status of ISO/TC 27, this International Standard has been
confirmed by ISO and ISO 5074:1994 version is valid.
Comments received from BHEL, Trichy in the last meeting, state that to avoid
complicity, ISO 5074:1994 Hard Coal – Determination of Hard Grove Grindability Index
may be accepted as Indian Standard adding the following portion after 9.1 of ISO
5074:1994(E) “Alternatively for quick reference, the HGI can be calculated from the
formula HGI=13 + 6.93M, where M = mass of that sample passing through 75 micron
sieve after grinding. In practice M is obtained by deducing from 50gm the mass of
ground sample retained on 75 micron sieve.”
3.3.10 IS 9949:1986 vis-a-vis ISO 12900:1997 Methods of test for abrasive properties of
coal and associated minerals (first revision)
In the last meeting, the Committee after detailed discussions, agreed to publish IS 9949 /
ISO 12900:1997 under dual numbering procedure.
However, from recording of the minutes, it is not clear whether the wide circulation of
the document has been waived off or it has to be first circulated for seeking views of the
experts. In the meantime, ISO/TC 27/ SC 5 has taken this International Standard under
periodical review.
3.3.11 IS 13810:1993 Code of practice for float and sink analysis of coal
In the last meeting, the Committee requested Dr Haldar to review IS 13810 in the light of
International Standards namely:
i) ISO 923:2000 Coal cleaning tests – Expression and presentation of results and
ii) ISO 7936:1992 Hard coal – Determination of float and sink characteristics –
General directions for apparatus and procedures
and forward the revised document to BIS for issue into wide circulation.
3.4.1 Doc: PCD7 (2547)P Methods of test for the Determination of Crossing Point and
Ignition Temperature of Coal
In the last meeting, Dr A. Sarkar, Scientist, CFRI, Dhanbad had submitted the working
draft on the subject which was to be circulated as proposed draft. BIS could not find the
P- Draft prepared by Dr A. Sarkar from the records instead an older P-Draft on same
subject by Shri S.C. Banerjee is available. All efforts to contact Dr Sarkar have failed.
The document available with BIS on subject is enclosed in Annex IX, page____.
The Panel for finalization of Doc: PCD 7(2275) in its meeting held on 15-03- 2007
decided to bring out Classification System for Imported Coke separately. As per this
decision a draft document was received from Dr. Sreenivasarao which is enclosed in
Annex X, page____. On examination of the above document it was observed that it is a
product standard for imported coke.
A written request from Dr T.K. Roy, Director (Revenue Laboratories), Central Board of
Excise & Customs for the formulation of Indian Standard for imported coking coal has
also been received.
However, CIL, BCCL and Shri H. C. Chakrabarti (Individual capacity) have suggested
that there is no need to have a separate standard for imported coal since the basic
parameters remain the same for any coal.
The Committee may re-consider the new subjects above.
4.1 The comments received from Dr S. Santhanam, Nayveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, Nayveli
on the following printed Indian Standard are given below:
ISO 7404-2, ISO 7404-3 and ISO 7404-5 have been revised by ISO and their 2009
version is already published. The above Indian Standards printed under dual numbering
of these ISO standards may also be revised for updation.
The following comments have been received from Shri A.K. Prasad, M/s. Amisha Fincap
Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi:
“IS 12770:1989 for cement plants is very old and it needs revision because now
Anthracite, Semi-anthracite, Pet-coke with low Volatile Matter (VM) like 6-9% is being
blended with non coking coal of VM 24-30%. The average VM of the blended coal is
not 24% as mentioned in above Indian Standard. Also cement plants have undertaken lots
of modification in their technology, due to which the plants are running with efficiency
using coal of much lower VM. Hence there is need for revision of IS 12770:1989.”
4.3 IS 1350(Part 4/Sec 1) Methods of test for coal and coke: Part IV Ultimate analysis
Section 1 - Determination of carbon and hydrogen (first revision)
In this standard following three methods of determination of carbon and hydrogen have
been prescribed:
Besides, International Standard ISO 609 Determination of carbon and hydrogen in coal
and coke by the high-temperature combustion method may be considered by the
Committee for reviewing the existing IS 1350(Part 4/Sec 1) and also the utility of method
at Sl.No. i) above.
5.1 Doc:PCD 7(2275) Classification and Codification of Indian coals, lignites and
Pseudo/semi-anthracite (third revision of IS 770:1977)
Revision of IS 770 is pending since last several years. At the 7th meeting, Committee had
considered the draft revision in the light of several comments received on this document
and constituted a small Panel under the leadership of Dr (Mrs.) Nandita Chaudhury, the
then CFRI, co-opting Dr T.A. Sreenivasarao of Customs Department, Vishakhapatnam
besides 6 other members to discuss and resolve all the comments received. Dr Chaudhury
conducted a meeting at CFRI along with CMPDI representative and prepared a second
draft revision on the subject which was again circulated to this Panel members for their
study and comments. Somehow, the comments received from the Customs Department
were not resolved even in this draft revision prepared, therefore, a large number of
comments were again received on the said document.
Decision of the Committee on this subject at the 8th meeting is reproduced in Annex XI,
page____. Brief history of the subject and observations received from the Customs are
given in same Annex.
6.1 IS 1354:1992 Methods of test for coke special test (second revision)
In the sixth meeting, Committee had finalized ISO 616:1995 for printing under dual
numbering of IS 1354:1992. However, in the last meeting after detailed deliberations, the
adoption of this ISO Standard was deferred and the Committee requested Dr Hazra of
CIMFR to prepare the draft revision of IS 1354 in three months time, taking assistance
from ISO 616:1995 in case the adoption of International Standard as such was not
feasible. Draft revision from Dr Hazra, CIMFR is still awaited.
The committee may note that the Foreword of IS 1354:1992 refers to ISO 556:1980, ISO
616:1977 and ISO 1014:1985 for taking assistance during formulation of this Indian
Standard.
6.2 IS 5062 (Part 1):1969 Methods of test for brown coals and lignites: Part 1
Determination of moisture content by the direct volumetric method
In the sixth meeting, Committee had finalized printing of IS 5062 (Part 1)/ISO 1015:1992
under dual numbering. However ISO/TC 27 has withdrawn this International Standard,
therefore in the last meeting, it was agreed that adoption of this International Standard as
Indian Standard is not possible. Shri T.B. Das, however, was assigned to review IS 5062
(Part 1) to upgrade the present standard on determination of moisture content using direct
volumetric method. . Draft revision from Shri T. B. Das is still awaited.
6.3 IS 1350(Pt 3):1969 – Methods of test for coal and coke: Part III Determination of
Sulphur (first revision); and Doc: PCD 7(1843)C/ ISO 157:1996 - Hard coal -
Determination of forms of sulphur
IS 1350(Pt 3):1969 covers the methods of test for coal and coke relating to the
determination of total Sulphur and forms of Sulphur both. The Foreword of this Indian
Standard refers to ISO 157 and ISO 334 having taken assistance during formulation of
this Indian Standard.
7.1 Doc: PCD7(2462)P Low Ash Metallurgical Coke - Specification was circulated vide letter
No. PCD 7/T dated 25-06-2009. The comments received from Shri A.K. Paul, BCCL,
Dhanbad are ‘Since Low Ash Metallurgical Coke is covered in IS 439:1989 Industrial
coke – Specification (third revision), no separate standard is required’. Similar comments
have earlier been received from Sh Chakrabarty.
iii) Methods of Test for evaluation of rate of disintegration, crossing point and
ignition point of lignite.
iv) Methods of Test for determination of marcasite (FeS2) as sporadic impurity in lignite.
8.2 Declaration of separate grade for middlings as new subject for standard formulation is
proposed by Amisha Fincap Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
“Middlings of 17% ash and non-coking coal of 17% give different useful heat value.
Therefore, unless experiments are carried out on samples of middlings, the formula for
deciding UHV of coal can not be applied for middling, even for commercial purpose.
The middlings always give higher heat value as compared to any non-coking coal of
same IM and ash%. Also middlings carry about 10-12% misplaced clean-coal due to poor
equipments of the washing vessels”.
The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) Certification Marks Scheme consists of a series of
activities aimed at ensuring the quality of the products under Certification at the various
stages at the manufacturer’s premises and providing a third party certification. The
presence of the BIS Standard Mark on a product indicates that it has been produced and
inspected in accordance with an approved Scheme of Testing and Inspection which
incorporates means to ascertain conformance of products with requirements stipulated in
the relevant Indian standards. BIS organizes frequent surveillance activities to maintain a
check on the quality of goods certified on a continued basis.
9.4 BIS Certification Schemes for Foreign manufacturers and Indian Importers
Rajiv Gandhi National Quality Awards was instituted by Bureau of Indian Standards,
with the approval of Government of India in 1991, with a view to encourage Indian
companies to strive for excellence and giving special recognition to those who are
considered to be the leaders of quality movement in India. The Award is intended to
generate interest and involvement of Indian industry in quality programmes, drive our
products and services to higher levels of quality, and equip them to meet the challenges
of domestic and international markets. This award is an annual feature. It has been
designed in line with similar awards in other developed countries like Malcolm Baldridge
Quality Award in USA, Deming Prize in Japan and European Quality Award. The
assessment criteria for these awards are based on TQM and are at par with the criteria for
other similar overseas awards. Application form and the brochure for this award is
available at BIS web-site: http://www.bis.org.in
11.1 World Trade Organization (WTO) is the international organization dealing with global
rules of trade between nations. The Technical Barrier to Trade Agreement (TBT) tries to
ensure that Regulations, Standards, Conformity Assessment Procedures do not create
unnecessary obstacles to trade. Manufacturers and exporters of each country need to
know about the latest standards and technical regulations in their prospective markets.
To help ensure that this information is made available conveniently, all WTO member
Governments are required to establish National Enquiry Point. India is a signatory to the
WTO TBT Agreement. Under this Agreement, India has to fulfill certain obligations
such as establishing an enquiry point and transparency of its standards and its regulations.
BIS functions as the enquiry point as nominated by Ministry of Commerce, the dealing
Ministry with WTO.
11.2 As the WTO TBT Enquiry Point, BIS answers all the reasonable enquiries pertaining to
Technical Regulation, Standards and Conformity Assessments procedures addressed to it
from the Enquiry Points of other countries. It also serves as the information centre within
the country. Additionally, BIS also disseminates the TBT Notifications of other member
bodies to the National Stakeholders.
11.3 The awareness regarding TBT notifications is lacking among various stakeholders in
India and as a result India is not sending its comments on draft notifications by other
countries, which may be of trade interest to India. As signatory of WTO-TBT
Agreement, there is a greater need for us to be aware of the TBT notifications issued by
different countries in order to protect our interest.
11.4 BIS has outsourced the activity of WTO-TBT Inquiry Point Services. The outsourced
agency, CERPA (Centre for Research Planning and Action) disseminates the TBT
Notifications of other countries to the Indian Stakeholders with a view to seek their
comments and taking up the same at appropriate forum. The stakeholders are expected to
examine the notifications on the following aspects:
11.5 The BIS Technical Committees have also been identified as stakeholders for the TBT
Notifications and relevant notifications are being disseminated to them. The Committee
Members should examine the TBT Notifications with a view to protect Indian trade
interest.
11.6 The E-mail address of CERPA and BIS Enquiry Point are as follows:
Bureau has recently started on-line sale of Indian Standards. Soft copies can be from BIS
Sales Portal http://www.standardsbis.in. Printed copy can also be procured by making
payment on-line on BIS e-sale portal www.standardsbis.in.
a) Technical Committee should be sensitized for Eco requirements and Standards should be
formulated considering the environmental aspects.
b) The Committee felt that BIS should be proactively involved so as to have greater impact
in International. For this purpose, the key areas are to be identified for formulating
standards for new products.
It has been recently agreed to outsource translation of Indian Standards in Hindi in order
to help consumer get standards in Hindi/Bilingual. BIS would pay Rs. 250 per page of
A4 Size (approx. 850 words) of translated typed text of Indian Standard of direct
consumer interest. The work can be allotted once a trial translated page is submitted for
approval.
The Committee may decide about the date and venue for the next meeting.
i) There is no need to prepare a different standard for Low Ash Metallurgical Coke because
this aspect has already been covered in IS 439:1989 Industrial coke – Specification. Any
body can produce any type of low ash metallurgical coke based on the input of low ash coals
depending on the need and for each type, general standards can not be formulated. However,
coke up to 18% ash content may be declared as low ash metallurgical coke if necessary.
ii) Regarding Coking Coal he has opined that the high volatile caking coals with high CSN and
high LTGK and also ddpm over 1000 are also imported at a lower price for blending with
L.V. coking coals to produce better coke. The high volatile plastic coals for import duty
purpose should be considered as coking coals because these coals are used in blend for hard
coke making. Customs duty, however on the import of such coals may be liberalized in
specific usage other than hard coke making. In the case of import of non caking coal there
should not be any problem. In the case of import of low ash metallurgical coke there are
Government tariffs. So far duties are concerned, even high Sulphur content and high
Phosphorus content in coke do not stand in the way for iron marking. Thus no tax relief
should be allowed.
NOTE: BIS has not role on tax tariff of customs or excise, hence his comments on tax relief
should be addressed to the right person.
iii) His comments on IS 439:1989 ‘Industrial coke – Specification’ are covered under item 3.3.4.
2. Dr. S. Santhanam, Dy. GM, Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Neyveli ,Tamil Nadu
In the Annex III (p-20) of Minutes of 8th Meeting of PCD 7, the distribution of the following
Indian Standards under Coke Subcommittee, PCD 7:2 maybe examined:
Sl No. IS No./Doc:No. Title Reaffirmed
last
9 5062(Pt 3):1969 Methods of test for brown coals and lignites: Part III
Determination of the yields of tar, water, gas and coke
by low temperature distillation
10 5062(Pt Methods of test for brown coals and lignites: Part IV Mar 07
4):2004 /ISO Determination of the yield of benzene - soluble
975: 2000 extract
11 5062(Pt Methods of test for brown coals and lignites: Part V Mar 07
5):2004 /ISO Determination of acetone - soluble material (resinous
1017:1985 substances) in the benzene extract from brown coals
and lignites
NOTE: The above three Indian Standards may rightly be placed under Methods of analysis
Subcommittee, PCD 7:4.
ANNEX II
(Item 2.1)
SCOPE
a) To formulate Indian Standards for terminology; methods of sampling and test; codes of
practice; classification by size and type; petrographic analysis; and specification for solid mineral
fuels; and
b) To co-ordinate with the work of ISO/TC 27 - Solid Mineral fuels
LIAISON
a) ISO/TC27 Solid Mineral Fuels
b) Sponge Iron Sectional Committee, MTD 30
c) Foundry Sectional Committee, MTD 14
14. Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd. (BHEL), Shri G. Viswanathan Shri K. Sivaramakrishnan
Tiruchirapalli visu@bheltry.co.in ksrk@bheltry.co.in
15. The Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd., Shri D.S. Sastry Shri B. Prasada Rao
Kothagudem, (A.P.)
16. Research & Develop Centre for Iron Shri N.K. Ghosh Shri A.K.Gupta
and Steel (R&DCIS), SAIL, Ranchi
17. Ministry of Mines and Minerals, Shri M.K. Thapar
Department of Coal, New Delhi
18. National Council for Cement & Shri A. Pahuja Shri Y.P. Sethi
Building Materials, New Delhi
19. Tata Energy Research Institute Shri S.K. Chand Smt. Arpita Khanna
(TERI), New Delhi
20. Ministry of Industry, Department Shri Mahender Kumar Shri R.K. Sharma
of Industrial Policy & Promotion
Tariff Commission, New Delhi
21. The Fertilizer Association of India Shri H.S. Mann Shri J. Mohali
(FAI), New Delhi
22. Development Consultants Ltd., Shri T.K.Das Shri S.K.Dey
Kolkata
23. Videocon Power Limited Shri S.K. Grover
24. NTPC, New Delhi Shri B.P. Singh
25. Cement Manufacturer’s Association Shri M.C. Gupta Shri S.M. Sharma
(CMA), New Delhi
26. Durgapur Projects Ltd. (DPL), Dr H.S. Sarkar
Durgapur, (Distt. Burdwan)
27. Individual Capacity Dr Kalyan Sen
6. NTPC Ltd, NTPC Bhawan, Core-7, SCOPE Complex- Shri Arun Kapoor
7, Institutional Area, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – 110003 Sr. Manager (Coal Mining &
Washeries)
We have the pleasure of informing you that we are member of the Ferro Alloys, Sectional
Committee, MTD 5 of BIS. We actively participate in this Sectional Committee meetings as
well as, are involved in developing various methods for chemical analysis of Ferro alloys and
revision of various BIS Standards pertaining to Ferro Alloys required thereof.
We are a regular importer of coal and coke in large quantity every year, and therefore, we are
interested to participate in your Solid Mineral Fuels Sectional Committee, PCD 7.
We, therefore, request to give us your kind consent for becoming a member of this Sectional
Committee (PCD 7) and inform us the formalities required for the same.
2. Representation by Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, Centre for Applied Research and
Development (CARD), Neyveli
Centre for Applied Research and Development (CARD) is an in-house R&D Centre of Neyveli
Lignite Corporation Ltd., Neyveli. It is engaged in various research activities apart from testing
of various materials. Members from CARD/NLC participate in BIS committees Bitumen, Tar
and Their Products, PCD 6 and Solid Mineral Fuels, PCD 7 for discussions.
In view of above, we request you to kindly consider our requests for representation on
Classification and Codification of Indian Coals and Lignites, PCD7/WG1.
For last two decades, we are catering the needs of sampling equipment for core industries like
thermal power plant, cement, coal and steel plant etc. involving bulk material handling like coal,
lime stone and Iron ores. Our market share in the field of sampling system is quite substantial in
the back drop of Indian scenario and we enjoy much confidence of our clients.
Our organization, playing its role in the field of sampling of bulk material handling, is keenly
interest to get involved in organizing the sampling standard particularly for coal handling system.
As such, we are interested to get membership in the sub-section for mechanical sampling.
We request your goodself to give due attention regarding the participation so that a
representative of our company can be enrolled as a member, thereby our experiences and views
can get due weightage in BIS.
ELICO started its venture in year 1960 with design, development and manufacturing of
Analytical instruments like pH meters for the first time in India and kept on adding several firsts
in the areas of Spectrophotometry, Electrochemistry, Flame Photometry, Water Quality Analysis
etc.
To keep pace with technology the company established its own R&D Wing since 1973 inception,
which is recognized by the Department of Science &Industry Research (DSIR), Govt. of India.
ELICO is the first Analytical Instrumentation Company in India to be certified for ISO 9001,
ISO 14001 and ISO 27001 standards.
ELICO to provide high end analytical instruments combined with service and support to suit
customer requirements. We strongly believe in the importance of forming partnerships and
working together towards our common goal with employees, customers, partners, stakeholders
and suppliers participation.
Coal based power has become a key element of India’s energy sector. As the country’s energy
and power needs continue to grow, the role will remain undiminished for coal at least the next
few decades while we are in search of understanding the “standards and methods of test for coal
and coke”. We can contribute our domain knowledge developed over 5 decades related to
indigenous laboratory instruments and explore possibilities to address the tasks related to
indigenous technology development of coal analysis instruments that needs through
understanding on the standards and test methods.
In view of accomplishing these goals, we request you to kindly consider our requests for
representation on the PCD 7 Sectional Committee on Coal and Coke.
ANNEX IV
(Item 3.1)
1 5062(Pt 3):1969 Methods of test for brown coals and lignites: Part III Apr 05
4 Determination of the yields of tar, water, gas and coke by
. low temperature distillation
9
1 5062(Pt 4):2004 Methods of test for brown coals and lignites: Part IV
5 /ISO 975: 2000 Determination of the yield of benzene - soluble extract
. extract - Semi automatic method (first revision)
1 5062(Pt 5):2004 Methods of test for brown coals and lignites: Part 5
6 /ISO 1017:1985 Determination of acetone-soluble material (resinous
. substances) in the toluene- soluble extract (first revision)
2 1350(Pt 2):1970 Methods of test for coal and coke Part II Determination of Apr 05
5 calorific value (first revision)
.
2 1350(Pt 3):1969 Methods of test for coal and coke Part III Determination Apr 05
6 of sulphur (first revision)
.
2 1350(Pt 4/Sec 1): Methods of test for coal and coke Part IV Ultimate Apr 05
7 1974 analysis, Section I Determination of carbon and hydrogen
. (first revision) [Superseding IS 1351:1959]
2 1350(Pt 4/Sec 2): Methods of test for coal and coke Part IV Ultimate Apr 05
8 1975 analysis Section 2 - Determination of nitrogen
. (first revision)
2 1350(Pt 5):1979 Methods of test for coal and coke Part V Special Mar 07
9 impurities (first revision)
.
3 5062(Pt 1):1969 Methods of test for brown coals and lignites: Part I Apr 05
4 Determination of moisture content by the direct
volumetric method
3 5062(Pt 2):1969 Methods of test for brown coals and lignites : Part II Apr 05
5 Determination of ash
.
17 IS 5062 Methods of test for brown coals and lignites : Part 1 April 2005
. (Part 1):1969 Determination of moisture content by the direct UR
volumetric method
18 IS 5062 Methods of test for brown coals and lignites: Part II April 2005
. (Part 2):1969 Determination of ash
19 IS 5062 Methods of test for brown coals and lignites: Part III
. (Part 3):1969 Determination of the yields of tar, water, gas and
coke by low temperature distillation
20 IS 5062 Methods of test for brown coals and lignites: Part IV
. (Part 4):2004 Determination of yield of benzene-soluble extract -
Note: UR - UNDER REVISION
ANNEX VI
(Item 3.3.2)
ISO 13909-3:2001 Hard Coal and Coke – Mechanical Sampling – Part 3: Coal – Sampling from
stationary lots
Symbols for certain equipment are given in BIS but not in ISO. Therefore, these may be retained
in BIS. There are given below:
Symbols for rest of the equipment are given in both BIS and ISO. Therefore, no change is
required for such equipment.
The crossing point and ignition temperature of coal has been recognized by the Directorate
General of Mines Safety as an index for determining the relative susceptibility of coals to
spontaneous combustion. The Committee, therefore, felt that there should be a standard
procedure for determining the same throughout the country.
Crossing point and ignition temperature determination is simply an empirical method, but if the
experimental conditions are kept constant, they give a fairly good idea about the susceptibility of
a coal to spontaneous heating. The importance of such an index for coal categorization is all the
more essential in the case of newly mined collieries, as their spontaneous heating characteristics
ate not known. Of course, for the coals that are mined since long, some idea of such
characteristics might be there with the experience gained. This index may, therefore, be used to
compare the relative susceptibility of the coals, provided the tests carried out under similar
conditions.
Central Mining Research Institute (CMRI), Dhanbad determined the crossing point and ignition
temperature of a good number of coal samples from different coalfields in India. This standard is
based on the method followed by CMRI, Dhanbad. Since it is an empirical method to compare
spontaneous heating susceptibility of different coals, the experimental conditions should be
rigorously adhered to, otherwise, the repeatability of the results may be impaired.
In reporting the result of test or analysis made in accordance with this standard, if the final value,
observed or calculated, is to be rounded off, it shall be done in accordance with IS 2: 1960 ‘
Rules for rounding off numerical values (Revised)’.
1. SCOPE
This standard prescribed the method of test for the determination of crossing point and ignition
temperature of coal.
2. TERMINOLOGY
For the purpose of this standard the following definitions shall apply.
If a definite amount of powdered coal sample is heated in a bath at a steady rate and a definite
flow of air or oxygen is maintained through the coal bed, the particular temperature at which coal
bed temperature crosses the bath temperature, due to oxidative heating, is termed as the crossing
point temperature of the sample concerned under the particular conditions. In fact, it is from this
temperature that the oxidative heating of the particular coal under that particular condition
becomes self-sustaining.
2.2 Ignition Temperature
This is the temperature when the actual ignition of the coal sample would start. It can be
obtained, if the powdered coal sample is heated even beyond the crossing point temperature
when the rate rise of coal bed temperature goes on increasing at a faster rate. Ultimately, a stage
comes when the coal bed temperature starts shooting up very fast, which may be considered as
the onset of ignition, termed as ignition temperature.
3. APPARATUS
3.1.1 Liquid Bath – A 30 cm x 25 cm x 20 cm bath with covering lid, made out of suitable
material, sufficient to hold the sample holder (reaction tube), immersion coil heater – one regular
and one booster heater and a stirrer. The outside wall of the bath shall be properly insulated to
minimize heat loss.
3.2 Heater (for liquid bath) – Two 1000 watt (immersion coil type) heaters-one regular heating
and the other for maintaining the temperature.
3.3 Stirrer (for liquid bath) – An electric stirrer to keep the temperature uniform thought the
bath.
3.4 Thermocouples – Two thermocouples ranging 0 – 300 degree Celsius for recording
temperatures of coal bed and the bath. The casing shall be made of steel and the thermocouple
bad must be tough. The outer diameter of the steel casing not be more than five.
3.5 Sample Holder – The sample holder shall be made of Pyrex glass tube of 18-20 mm (1.8 –
2.0 cm) diameter, which shall be slightly tampered at the mouth where a standard glass joint of
25 mm diameter shall be fitted. The mouth shall be closed with rubber bung of suitable size,
through which thermocouple and the oxygen / air exit pipe shall pass. The total length of the tube
shall be 200 mm (20 cm). The other end of the same tube shall meet a 5-6 mm spiral glass tube,
which is wound round the sample holder. This spiral glass tube shall ensure attainment of bath
temperature to the incoming oxygen / air being introduced in the coal sample by giving large
flow time.
3.6 Manometer – A differential manometer shall be used to ensure that a steady flow of
oxygen /air is maintained throughout the experiment. Adequate arrangement shall be made to
control oxygen/air flow using stop cock/valve.
3.7 Oxygen/Air Input – Oxygen cylinder with regulator for supplying oxygen or a suitable
suction pump for supplying air shall be used. The suction pump shall be fitted at the exit point of
the sample holder for drawing in air through the reaction tube/sample holder.
3.8 Voltage Stabiliser – A suitable voltage stabilizer shall be used for getting a steady current
needed for the heaters (required to be heated at a definitely programmed rate).
3.9 Auto Transformer – An autotransformer or, variac shall be used for varying the voltage for
liquid /air batch (required to heat it up at a definitely programmed rate).
4.0 PROCEDURE
NOTE 1- A heating rate of 0.5 degree Celsius has been found to be optimum but in certain
instances 1 degree Celsius/min may also be used to save the experiment time.
NOTE 3 – If air is used, then flow rate shall be 80 ml/min, being passed through water trap for
achieving nearly 100 percent humidity. But with air, it is difficult to obtain ignition temperature.
4.2 Procedure
The test sample is suggested to be equilibrated at 60% at 40 degree Celsius before determination
of crossing point & ignition point temperature.
Take 20 gm of coal sample –212 (m IS Sieve size in the sample holder over a glass wool
packing. Glass wool is used to avoid channeling effect and ensure uniform distribution of oxygen
throughout the coal bed. Some gentle tapping should be given over the sample holder for
uniform packing. The glass wool should be packed always up to a definite height.
Cover the coal sample with further quantity of glass wool packing. Close the sample holder
tightly with rubber bung through which the thermocouple and the outlet tube are allowed to pass.
Care is to be taken so that the thermocouple tip reaches up to the same depth of the coal bed in
all the experiments ( is nearly 5 mm above the bottom most point of the coal bed). Introduce the
tube up to a definitely marked depth of the liquid bath (or the air bath as the case may be) for all
experiments. The packing of reference coal bed as well as glass wool shall also be nearly the
same in every experiment.
Adjust the flow of oxygen /air so that same flow is maintained throughout the experiment.
Start raising the temperature of the liquid/air bath at a heating rate of 0.5 degree Celsius/min.
Start noting the temperature of the bath and cool sample at regular intervals of time. Manipulate
the voltage input to heaters in such a way that similar rate rise of bath temperature is maintained
throughout. At the beginning of the experiment, the rate of rise of coal bed temperature is less
than that of the moisture from coal. After sometime, the coal bed temperature starts rising at a
faster rate with simultaneous increase in auto oxidation rate. Then a time comes, when coal bed
temperature crosses the bath temperature. The crossing temperature can be obtained either by
directly noting the temperature of the two thermocouples or, more precisely by plotting the
graphs of the thermal profile of the coal bed as well as that of the bath, with time coordinate as
the abscissa.
If the experiment is continued for some more time, then it can be observed that the coal bed
temperatures goes on rising very sharply. Sharp inflation point may be noted as ignition
temperature.
The gas supply should then be cut off and hating of the bath be discontinued, otherwise the coal
may catch fire with a possibility of breakage of the sample holder.
Time – Temperature curves of both, the coal bed and liquid/air bath are drawn on the same graph
paper, using time coordinate as the abscissa. The point of intersection of the two curves, give the
crossing point of the coal sample under the particular conditions of the experiment.
The minimum temperature from which coal bed temperature, after attaining crossing point, starts
shooting up at a faster rate may be noted as the ignition temperature of the coal. The
experimental set up of crossing point and ignition temperature is shown in Fig.1 and typical
graphical representation of these is shown in Fig.2.
NOTE – The apparatus can be made more sophisticated by incorporating a programmable bath
and a reactor. The automatic programmable bath may be used in place of manually operated bath
and the thermocouple terminals can easily be connected with a two-pen recorder to get the graph
directly. This set up will not require constant attention so the operator can save lot of time for
some other work.
ANNEX X
(Item 3.4.2)
FOREWORD
(Formal clauses will be added later)
ICS No. 73.040
This draft standard gives requirements for coking coal (Non Indigenous). Coking coal is an
important raw material for steel industries in preparation of low ash metallurgical coke.
Indian coals and lignites classification and codification are specified in Indian standard IS
770:1977. This standard applies to coking coal (Non Indigenous) imported.
Coking coal is a bituminous coal with specific characteristic of coke formation .Coking coal
deposits in India are rare because of the high ash content in Indian bituminous coals. Steel
industry is importing coking coal from independence. Increased Steel production over years has
increased the coking coal imports. Now coking coal is mainly an imported from Australia,
NewZeland, South Africa and Indonesia. As this is obtained in bulk quantity involving foreign
currency payments , Indian customs and steel industry is in need of this standard.
Coking coal quality in a single mine varies with the parameters mentioned in the standard. Based
on these parameters the coal classified in to hard coking coal and semi/soft coking coal. The use
of these types of coal is mentioned in the standard. Coal with Crucible swelling number less than
3 are used as PCI (Pulverized coal injection) coal for energy purposes in blast furnace to reduce
the operational cost. PCI coals are used for heating purposes are not given as coking coals. They
have to be classified as Steam coals.
As Coking coal is a natural product with varied compositions crucible swelling number is taken
as prime criteria for classification purposes.
For the purposes of deciding whether a particular requirement of this standard is complied with,
the final values ,observed or calculated , expressing the results of a test or analysis ,shall be
rounded of in accordance with IS 2-1960. The number of significant places retained in the round
of values should be same as that of specified values in this standard
1 SCOPE
This standard prescribes the requirements and methods of sampling and test for coking coal
imported in country.
2 REFERENCES
The following Indian Standards contain provisions which, through reference in this text,
constitute the provisions of this standard. At the time of publication, the editions indicated are
valid. All standards are subject to revision, and parties to agreement based on the standard are
encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent editions of the standards
indicated below:
IS No Title
IS 436(Part 2):1965 Methods of sampling of coal and coke Part II: sampling of coke
(Revised)
IS 1350(Part 1):1984 Methods of test for coal and coke: Part 1 Proximate analysis
(second revision)
IS 1350(Part 3):1969 Methods of test for coal and coke: Part 3 Determination of
sulphur (first revision)
IS 1350(Part 5):1979 Methods of test for coal and coke: Part 5 Special impurities
(first revision)
IS 1353:1993 Methods of test for coal carbonization- caking index, swelling
number and (LT) grey king assay (first revision)
IS 3810(Part 3):1977 Glossary of terms relating to solid mineral fuels; Part III Coke
3 TERMINOLOGY
Coking coals are referred to coals with a quality that allows the production suitable to support
blast furnace charge. Soft/semi soft coking coals are referred to coking coals that can be blended
with a hard coking coal to produce an acceptable coke to support blast furnace charges. For the
purpose of this standard the definitions given in IS 3810: Part 3 shall apply.
4 TYPES
5 REQUIREMENTS
Coking coal shall also conform to the requirements laid down in Table 1, when tested in
accordance with the methods referred to in col.6 of the Table. In some cases where %Volatile
matter .%Ash crosses the limit prescribed in the table and still crucible swelling number is more
than or equal to 5 or more than or equal to 3 , the sample will be classified as hard , semi soft
/soft coking coal respectively for classification purposes .
Table 1 Requirements for Coking Coal (Non Indigenous)
6 SIZE CLASSIFICATION
The size shall be in the range 0-50 mm and fraction below 0.50 mm is 25% Max.
6.1 Sampling
Doc: PCD 7(2275) Classification and Codification of Indian coals, lignites and Pseudo/semi-
anthracite (third revision of IS 770:1977)
History
• This standard was first published in 1955 as a tentative standard. It was then firmed in
1960 as a regular standard. The title of the standard was ‘General Classification of Coal’.
The revised version was published as IS 770:1964.
• The objective of the classification was to show the path of metamorphosis from brown
coals to anthracites and was not to be used to grade Indian coal.
• The standard covered the terminology and characteristics used in the classification along
with typical compositions for anthracites; bituminous coals; sub-bituminous coals and
lignites or brown coals.
• Second revision of this standard was published in 1977 by merging IS 770:1964 General
Classification of coals and IS 5018:1968 – ‘Classification of hard coals by type’. The
title of the standard was changed to ‘Classification and Codification of Indian Coals and
Lignites’. This standard covers Indian Coals ranging from lignites to anthracites
covering information on general characteristics and utilization of coal and lignites with
relation to their code numbers.
• First attempt to prepare revision of this standard was made in 1990 (Doc: PCD 7(879)C
July 1990) followed by another attempt in August 2004 (Doc: PCD 7(2275)C). The later
version was prepared by Ms Nandita Chaudhury, Convener PCD7:3 in consultation with
CFRI Scientists and Dr H.K. Mishra of CMPDIL. On wide circulation, large number of
comments was received on this draft which has been discussed in 7th Meeting held on 21
April 2005 in New Delhi and 8th Meeting held on 15 March 2007 in Kolkata.
• Though the document was finalized for printing for which formal approval of Chairman,
Sectional Committee as well as Chairman, Division Council was taken but it could not be
sent for printing as Ms. Nandita Chaudhary, the convener had not carried out changes
agreed for the “scope” of the document during the meeting and there was strong
resistance from the customs against publication of the standard as such.
“Dr T.A. Srenivasa Rao presented the case of customs and had argued that the coal
classification can not be done both on basis of rank and end use both. Rank based
classification like ASTM and ISO Standards should be followed. The mixing of end use
based terms like coking coal creates a problem. It was also presented that the MMR %
can not be a sole parameter to call it as a coking coal. As from international standards
Volatile Matter % is directly related to MMR % and it can be a coking or non coking
coal. CIMFR presented an internal study to say it was valid but finally agreed it was not
possible to correlate the same. It was argued by Customs that CSN is for hard coal and it
comprises of both coking and non coking coal. It was also said that the formation of
mere button or caking is not synonymous with coking. It was wrong to interpret the
caking as coking. It was also pointed out that the draft gives the percent
Ash percent has to be washed below the 19 % level to do secondary parameters like CSN.
It was asked to explain by showing the documents of BHEL & CMPDI studies, it was
given in Indian coal it was not possible to wash Ash % below 25 percent level, then how
it was possible to interpret the coking property of coal. It was also shown to them as
percent inert cross certain level due to the inherent property of Indian coal it was not
possible to form a coke of required stability to call it as a coking coal. CIMFR tried to
explain it is for Indian coal and not for imported coal. It was asked by chairman what is
the problem faced by customs. It was
1. CIMFR issued reports saying used directly in arc furnace also as coking coal. This
was not correct.
2. CIMFR is also written letters to Customs saying they have to follow the IS 770 for
coking coal classification.
3. When asked to give coking coal specification it was said they do not have one.
In this scenario it was becoming difficult for customs to certify which coal is coking coal.
It was replied by CIMFR that by showing a document signed by 5 top scientists that it
was already a replied to Customs that weak coking coals used for blending purposes to
produce a metallurgical coke were not coking coals.
It was contested by Customs if it was true then all semi soft coking coals will be
eliminated from classification of coking coals. It was also shown that it was written in IS
770 from CSN 1 as coking coals (Weak coking coal). This is a contradiction and will
create a problem for customs in certifying the coking coals. CIMFR argued that IS 770 is
for Indian coals only and should not be compared with imported coals. Customs refused
to accept the standard in present form till coking coal term is removed. According to
them weak coking coals are non coking coals”.