for Scientists & Engineers
Matrix Analysis
for Scientists & Engineers
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank
Matrix Analysis
for Scientists & Engineers
Alan J. Laub
University of California
Davis, California
slam.
Matrix Analysis
for Scientists & Engineers
Alan J. Laub
University of California
Davis, California
Copyright © 2005 by the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
1 0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book
may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any manner without the written permission
of the publisher. For information, write to the Society for Industrial and Applied
Mathematics, 3600 University City Science Center, Philadelphia, PA 191042688.
MATLAB® is a registered trademark of The MathWorks, Inc. For MATLAB product information,
please contact The MathWorks, Inc., 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 017602098 USA,
5086477000, Fax: 5086477101, info@mathworks.com, www.mathworks.com
Mathematica is a registered trademark of Wolfram Research, Inc.
Mathcad is a registered trademark of Mathsoft Engineering & Education, Inc.
Library of Congress CataloginginPublication Data
Laub, Alan J., 1948
Matrix analysis for scientists and engineers / Alan J. Laub.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0898715768 (pbk.)
1. Matrices. 2. Mathematical analysis. I. Title.
QA188138 2005
512.9'434—dc22
2004059962
About the cover: The original artwork featured on the cover was created by freelance
artist Aaron Tallon of Philadelphia, PA. Used by permission.
slam is a registered trademark.
Copyright © 2005 by the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
10987654321
All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book
may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any manner without the written permission
of the publisher. For information, write to the Society for Industrial and Applied
Mathematics, 3600 University City Science Center, Philadelphia, PA 191042688.
MATLAB® is a registered trademark of The MathWorks, Inc. For MATLAB product information,
please contact The MathWorks, Inc., 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 017602098 USA,
5086477000, Fax: 5086477101, info@mathworks.com, wwwmathworks.com
Mathematica is a registered trademark of Wolfram Research, Inc.
Mathcad is a registered trademark of Mathsoft Engineering & Education, Inc.
Library of Congress CataloginginPublication Data
Laub, Alan J., 1948
Matrix analysis for scientists and engineers / Alan J. Laub.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 0898715768 (pbk.)
1. Matrices. 2. Mathematical analysis. I. Title.
QA 188.L38 2005
512.9'434dc22
2004059962
About the cover: The original artwork featured on the cover was created by freelance
artist Aaron Tallon of Philadelphia, PA. Used by permission .
•
5.lam... is a registered trademark.
To my wife, Beverley
(who captivated me in the UBC math library
nearly forty years ago)
To my wife, Beverley
(who captivated me in the UBC math library
nearly forty years ago)
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank
Contents
Preface xi
1 Introduction and Review 1
1.1 Some Notation and Terminology 1
1.2 Matrix Arithmetic 3
1.3 Inner Products and Orthogonality 4
1.4 Determinants 4
2 Vector Spaces 7
2.1 Definitions and Examples 7
2.2 Subspaces 9
2.3 Linear Independence 10
2.4 Sums and Intersections of Subspaces 13
3 Linear Transformations 17
3.1 Definition and Examples 17
3.2 Matrix Representation of Linear Transformations 18
3.3 Composition of Transformations 19
3.4 Structure of Linear Transformations 20
3.5 Four Fundamental Subspaces 22
4 Introduction to the MoorePenrose Pseudoinverse 29
4.1 Definitions and Characterizations 29
4.2 Examples 30
4.3 Properties and Applications 31
5 Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition 35
5.1 The Fundamental Theorem 35
5.2 Some Basic Properties 38
5.3 Row and Column Compressions 40
6 Linear Equations 43
6.1 Vector Linear Equations 43
6.2 Matrix Linear Equations 44
6.3 A More General Matrix Linear Equation 47
6.4 Some Useful and Interesting Inverses 47
vii
Contents
Preface
1 Introduction and Review
1.1 Some Notation and Terminology
1.2 Matrix Arithmetic . . . . . . . .
1.3 Inner Products and Orthogonality .
1.4 Determinants
2 Vector Spaces
2.1 Definitions and Examples .
2.2 Subspaces.........
2.3 Linear Independence . . .
2.4 Sums and Intersections of Subspaces
3 Linear Transformations
3.1 Definition and Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2 Matrix Representation of Linear Transformations
3.3 Composition of Transformations . .
3.4 Structure of Linear Transformations
3.5 Four Fundamental Subspaces . . . .
4 Introduction to the MoorePenrose Pseudoinverse
4.1 Definitions and Characterizations.
4.2 Examples..........
4.3 Properties and Applications . . . .
5 Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition
5.1 The Fundamental Theorem . . .
5.2 Some Basic Properties .....
5.3 Rowand Column Compressions
6 Linear Equations
6.1 Vector Linear Equations . . . . . . . . .
6.2 Matrix Linear Equations ....... .
6.3 A More General Matrix Linear Equation
6.4 Some Useful and Interesting Inverses.
vii
xi
1
1
3
4
4
7
7
9
10
13
17
17
18
19
20
22
29
29
30
31
35
35
38
40
43
43
44
47
47
viii Contents
7 Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms 51
7.1 Projections 51
7.1.1 The four fundamental orthogonal projections 52
7.2 Inner Product Spaces 54
7.3 Vector Norms 57
7.4 Matrix Norms 59
8 Linear Least Squares Problems 65
8.1 The Linear Least Squares Problem 65
8.2 Geometric Solution 67
8.3 Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares Problems 67
8.3.1 Example: Linear regression 67
8.3.2 Other least squares problems 69
8.4 Least Squares and Singular Value Decomposition 70
8.5 Least Squares and QR Factorization 71
9 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors 75
9.1 Fundamental Definitions and Properties 75
9.2 Jordan Canonical Form 82
9.3 Determination of the JCF 85
9.3.1 Theoretical computation 86
9.3.2 On the +1's in JCF blocks 88
9.4 Geometric Aspects of the JCF 89
9.5 The Matrix Sign Function 91
10 Canonical Forms 95
10.1 Some Basic Canonical Forms 95
10.2 Definite Matrices 99
10.3 Equivalence Transformations and Congruence 102
10.3.1 Block matrices and definiteness 104
10.4 Rational Canonical Form 104
11 Linear Differential and Difference Equations 109
11.1 Differential Equations 109
11.1.1 Properties of the matrix exponential 109
11.1.2 Homogeneous linear differential equations 112
11.1.3 Inhomogeneous linear differential equations 112
11.1.4 Linear matrix differential equations 113
11.1.5 Modal decompositions 114
11.1.6 Computation of the matrix exponential 114
11.2 Difference Equations 118
11.2.1 Homogeneous linear difference equations 118
11.2.2 Inhomogeneous linear difference equations 118
11.2.3 Computation of matrix powers 119
11.3 HigherOrder Equations 120
viii
7 Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms
7.1 Projections ..................... .
7.1.1 The four fundamental orthogonal projections
7.2 Inner Product Spaces
7.3 Vector Norms
7.4 Matrix Norms ....
8 Linear Least Squares Problems
8.1 The Linear Least Squares Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.2 Geometric Solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.3 Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares Problems
8.3.1 Example: Linear regression ...... .
8.3.2 Other least squares problems ...... .
8.4 Least Squares and Singular Value Decomposition
8.5 Least Squares and QR Factorization . . . . . . .
9 Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
9.1 Fundamental Definitions and Properties
9.2 Jordan Canonical Form .... .
9.3 Determination of the JCF .... .
9.3.1 Theoretical computation .
9.3.2 On the + l's in JCF blocks
9.4 Geometric Aspects of the JCF
9.5 The Matrix Sign Function.
10 Canonical Forms
10.1 Some Basic Canonical Forms .
10.2 Definite Matrices . . . . . . .
10.3 Equivalence Transformations and Congruence
10.3.1 Block matrices and definiteness
10.4 Rational Canonical Form . . . . . . . . .
11 Linear Differential and Difference Equations
ILl Differential Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11.1.1 Properties ofthe matrix exponential . . . .
11.1.2 Homogeneous linear differential equations
11.1.3 Inhomogeneous linear differential equations
11.1.4 Linear matrix differential equations . .
11.1.5 Modal decompositions . . . . . . . . .
11.1.6 Computation of the matrix exponential
11.2 Difference Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11.2.1 Homogeneous linear difference equations
11.2.2 Inhomogeneous linear difference equations
11.2.3 Computation of matrix powers .
11.3 HigherOrder Equations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Contents
51
51
52
54
57
59
65
65
67
67
67
69
70
71
75
75
82
85
86
88
89
91
95
95
99
102
104
104
109
109
109
112
112
113
114
114
118
118
118
119
120
Contents ix
12 Generalized Eigenvalue Problems 125
12.1 The Generalized Eigenvalue/Eigenvector Problem 125
12.2 Canonical Forms 127
12.3 Application to the Computation of System Zeros 130
12.4 Symmetric Generalized Eigenvalue Problems 131
12.5 Simultaneous Diagonalization 133
12.5.1 Simultaneous diagonalization via SVD 133
12.6 HigherOrder Eigenvalue Problems 135
12.6.1 Conversion to firstorder form 135
13 Kronecker Products 139
13.1 Definition and Examples 139
13.2 Properties of the Kronecker Product 140
13.3 Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations 144
Bibliography 151
Index 153
Contents
12 Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
12.1 The Generalized EigenvaluelEigenvector Problem
12.2 Canonical Forms ................ .
12.3 Application to the Computation of System Zeros .
12.4 Symmetric Generalized Eigenvalue Problems .
12.5 Simultaneous Diagonalization ........ .
12.5.1 Simultaneous diagonalization via SVD
12.6 HigherOrder Eigenvalue Problems ..
12.6.1 Conversion to firstorder form
13 Kronecker Products
13.1 Definition and Examples ............ .
13.2 Properties of the Kronecker Product ...... .
13.3 Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations
Bibliography
Index
ix
125
125
127
130
131
133
133
135
135
139
139
140
144
151
153
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank
Preface
This book is intended to be used as a text for beginning graduatelevel (or even seniorlevel)
students in engineering, the sciences, mathematics, computer science, or computational
science who wish to be familar with enough matrix analysis that they are prepared to use its
tools and ideas comfortably in a variety of applications. By matrix analysis I mean linear
algebra and matrix theory together with their intrinsic interaction with and application to
linear dynamical systems (systems of linear differential or difference equations). The text
can be used in a onequarter or onesemester course to provide a compact overview of
much of the important and useful mathematics that, in many cases, students meant to learn
thoroughly as undergraduates, but somehow didn't quite manage to do. Certain topics
that may have been treated cursorily in undergraduate courses are treated in more depth
and more advanced material is introduced. I have tried throughout to emphasize only the
more important and "useful" tools, methods, and mathematical structures. Instructors are
encouraged to supplement the book with specific application examples from their own
particular subject area.
The choice of topics covered in linear algebra and matrix theory is motivated both by
applications and by computational utility and relevance. The concept of matrix factorization
is emphasized throughout to provide a foundation for a later course in numerical linear
algebra. Matrices are stressed more than abstract vector spaces, although Chapters 2 and 3
do cover some geometric (i.e., basisfree or subspace) aspects of many of the fundamental
notions. The books by Meyer [18], Noble and Daniel [20], Ortega [21], and Strang [24]
are excellent companion texts for this book. Upon completion of a course based on this
text, the student is then wellequipped to pursue, either via formal courses or through self
study, followon topics on the computational side (at the level of [7], [11], [23], or [25], for
example) or on the theoretical side (at the level of [12], [13], or [16], for example).
Prerequisites for using this text are quite modest: essentially just an understanding
of calculus and definitely some previous exposure to matrices and linear algebra. Basic
concepts such as determinants, singularity of matrices, eigenvalues and eigenvectors, and
positive definite matrices should have been covered at least once, even though their recollec
tion may occasionally be "hazy." However, requiring such material as prerequisite permits
the early (but "outoforder" by conventional standards) introduction of topics such as pseu
doinverses and the singular value decomposition (SVD). These powerful and versatile tools
can then be exploited to provide a unifying foundation upon which to base subsequent top
ics. Because tools such as the SVD are not generally amenable to "hand computation," this
approach necessarily presupposes the availability of appropriate mathematical software on
a digital computer. For this, I highly recommend MA TL A B® although other software such as
xi
Preface
This book is intended to be used as a text for beginning graduatelevel (or even seniorlevel)
students in engineering, the sciences, mathematics, computer science, or computational
science who wish to be familar with enough matrix analysis that they are prepared to use its
tools and ideas comfortably in a variety of applications. By matrix analysis I mean linear
algebra and matrix theory together with their intrinsic interaction with and application to
linear dynamical systems (systems of linear differential or difference equations). The text
can be used in a onequarter or onesemester course to provide a compact overview of
much of the important and useful mathematics that, in many cases, students meant to learn
thoroughly as undergraduates, but somehow didn't quite manage to do. Certain topics
that may have been treated cursorily in undergraduate courses are treated in more depth
and more advanced material is introduced. I have tried throughout to emphasize only the
more important and "useful" tools, methods, and mathematical structures. Instructors are
encouraged to supplement the book with specific application examples from their own
particular subject area.
The choice of topics covered in linear algebra and matrix theory is motivated both by
applications and by computational utility and relevance. The concept of matrix factorization
is emphasized throughout to provide a foundation for a later course in numerical linear
algebra. Matrices are stressed more than abstract vector spaces, although Chapters 2 and 3
do cover some geometric (i.e., basisfree or subspace) aspects of many of the fundamental
notions. The books by Meyer [18], Noble and Daniel [20], Ortega [21], and Strang [24]
are excellent companion texts for this book. Upon completion of a course based on this
text, the student is then wellequipped to pursue, either via formal courses or through self
study, followon topics on the computational side (at the level of [7], [II], [23], or [25], for
example) or on the theoretical side (at the level of [12], [13], or [16], for example).
Prerequisites for using this text are quite modest: essentially just an understanding
of calculus and definitely some previous exposure to matrices and linear algebra. Basic
concepts such as determinants, singularity of matrices, eigenvalues and eigenvectors, and
positive definite matrices should have been covered at least once, even though their recollec
tion may occasionally be "hazy." However, requiring such material as prerequisite permits
the early (but "outoforder" by conventional standards) introduction of topics such as pseu
doinverses and the singular value decomposition (SVD). These powerful and versatile tools
can then be exploited to provide a unifying foundation upon which to base subsequent top
ics. Because tools such as the SVD are not generally amenable to "hand computation," this
approach necessarily presupposes the availability of appropriate mathematical software on
a digital computer. For this, I highly recommend MAlLAB® although other software such as
xi
xii Preface
Mathematica® or Mathcad® is also excellent. Since this text is not intended for a course in
numerical linear algebra per se, the details of most of the numerical aspects of linear algebra
are deferred to such a course.
The presentation of the material in this book is strongly influenced by computa
tional issues for two principal reasons. First, "reallife" problems seldom yield to simple
closedform formulas or solutions. They must generally be solved computationally and
it is important to know which types of algorithms can be relied upon and which cannot.
Some of the key algorithms of numerical linear algebra, in particular, form the foundation
upon which rests virtually all of modern scientific and engineering computation. A second
motivation for a computational emphasis is that it provides many of the essential tools for
what I call "qualitative mathematics." For example, in an elementary linear algebra course,
a set of vectors is either linearly independent or it is not. This is an absolutely fundamental
concept. But in most engineering or scientific contexts we want to know more than that.
If a set of vectors is linearly independent, how "nearly dependent" are the vectors? If they
are linearly dependent, are there "best" linearly independent subsets? These turn out to
be much more difficult problems and frequently involve researchlevel questions when set
in the context of the finiteprecision, finiterange floatingpoint arithmetic environment of
most modern computing platforms.
Some of the applications of matrix analysis mentioned briefly in this book derive
from the modern statespace approach to dynamical systems. Statespace methods are
now standard in much of modern engineering where, for example, control systems with
large numbers of interacting inputs, outputs, and states often give rise to models of very
high order that must be analyzed, simulated, and evaluated. The "language" in which such
models are conveniently described involves vectors and matrices. It is thus crucial to acquire
a working knowledge of the vocabulary and grammar of this language. The tools of matrix
analysis are also applied on a daily basis to problems in biology, chemistry, econometrics,
physics, statistics, and a wide variety of other fields, and thus the text can serve a rather
diverse audience. Mastery of the material in this text should enable the student to read and
understand the modern language of matrices used throughout mathematics, science, and
engineering.
While prerequisites for this text are modest, and while most material is developed from
basic ideas in the book, the student does require a certain amount of what is conventionally
referred to as "mathematical maturity." Proofs are given for many theorems. When they are
not given explicitly, they are either obvious or easily found in the literature. This is ideal
material from which to learn a bit about mathematical proofs and the mathematical maturity
and insight gained thereby. It is my firm conviction that such maturity is neither encouraged
nor nurtured by relegating the mathematical aspects of applications (for example, linear
algebra for elementary statespace theory) to an appendix or introducing it "onthefly" when
necessary. Rather, one must lay a firm foundation upon which subsequent applications and
perspectives can be built in a logical, consistent, and coherent fashion.
I have taught this material for many years, many times at UCSB and twice at UC
Davis, and the course has proven to be remarkably successful at enabling students from
disparate backgrounds to acquire a quite acceptable level of mathematical maturity and
rigor for subsequent graduate studies in a variety of disciplines. Indeed, many students who
completed the course, especially the first few times it was offered, remarked afterward that
if only they had had this course before they took linear systems, or signal processing,
xii Preface
Mathematica® or Mathcad® is also excellent. Since this text is not intended for a course in
numerical linear algebra per se, the details of most of the numerical aspects of linear algebra
are deferred to such a course.
The presentation of the material in this book is strongly influenced by computa
tional issues for two principal reasons. First, "reallife" problems seldom yield to simple
closedform formulas or solutions. They must generally be solved computationally and
it is important to know which types of algorithms can be relied upon and which cannot.
Some of the key algorithms of numerical linear algebra, in particular, form the foundation
upon which rests virtually all of modem scientific and engineering computation. A second
motivation for a computational emphasis is that it provides many of the essential tools for
what I call "qualitative mathematics." For example, in an elementary linear algebra course,
a set of vectors is either linearly independent or it is not. This is an absolutely fundamental
concept. But in most engineering or scientific contexts we want to know more than that.
If a set of vectors is linearly independent, how "nearly dependent" are the vectors? If they
are linearly dependent, are there "best" linearly independent subsets? These tum out to
be much more difficult problems and frequently involve researchlevel questions when set
in the context of the finiteprecision, finiterange floatingpoint arithmetic environment of
most modem computing platforms.
Some of the applications of matrix analysis mentioned briefly in this book derive
from the modem statespace approach to dynamical systems. Statespace methods are
now standard in much of modem engineering where, for example, control systems with
large numbers of interacting inputs, outputs, and states often give rise to models of very
high order that must be analyzed, simulated, and evaluated. The "language" in which such
models are conveniently described involves vectors and matrices. It is thus crucial to acquire
a working knowledge of the vocabulary and grammar of this language. The tools of matrix
analysis are also applied on a daily basis to problems in biology, chemistry, econometrics,
physics, statistics, and a wide variety of other fields, and thus the text can serve a rather
diverse audience. Mastery of the material in this text should enable the student to read and
understand the modem language of matrices used throughout mathematics, science, and
engineering.
While prerequisites for this text are modest, and while most material is developed from
basic ideas in the book, the student does require a certain amount of what is conventionally
referred to as "mathematical maturity." Proofs are given for many theorems. When they are
not given explicitly, they are either obvious or easily found in the literature. This is ideal
material from which to learn a bit about mathematical proofs and the mathematical maturity
and insight gained thereby. It is my firm conviction that such maturity is neither encouraged
nor nurtured by relegating the mathematical aspects of applications (for example, linear
algebra for elementary statespace theory) to an appendix or introducing it "onthef1y" when
necessary. Rather, one must lay a firm foundation upon which subsequent applications and
perspectives can be built in a logical, consistent, and coherent fashion.
I have taught this material for many years, many times at UCSB and twice at UC
Davis, and the course has proven to be remarkably successful at enabling students from
disparate backgrounds to acquire a quite acceptable level of mathematical maturity and
rigor for subsequent graduate studies in a variety of disciplines. Indeed, many students who
completed the course, especially the first few times it was offered, remarked afterward that
if only they had had this course before they took linear systems, or signal processing.
Preface xiii
or estimation theory, etc., they would have been able to concentrate on the new ideas
they wanted to learn, rather than having to spend time making up for deficiencies in their
background in matrices and linear algebra. My fellow instructors, too, realized that by
requiring this course as a prerequisite, they no longer had to provide as much time for
"review" and could focus instead on the subject at hand. The concept seems to work.
— AJL, June 2004
Preface XIII
or estimation theory, etc., they would have been able to concentrate on the new ideas
they wanted to learn, rather than having to spend time making up for deficiencies in their
background in matrices and linear algebra. My fellow instructors, too, realized that by
requiring this course as a prerequisite, they no longer had to provide as much time for
"review" and could focus instead on the subject at hand. The concept seems to work.
AJL, June 2004
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank
Chapter 1
Introduction and Review
1.1 Some Notation and Terminology
We begin with a brief introduction to some standard notation and terminology to be used
throughout the text. This is followed by a review of some basic notions in matrix analysis
and linear algebra.
The following sets appear frequently throughout subsequent chapters:
1. R
n
= the set of ntuples of real numbers represented as column vectors. Thus, x e Rn
means
where xi e R for i e n.
Henceforth, the notation n denotes the set {1, . . . , n}.
Note: Vectors are always column vectors. A row vector is denoted by y
T
, where
y G Rn and the superscript T is the transpose operation. That a vector is always a
column vector rather than a row vector is entirely arbitrary, but this convention makes
it easy to recognize immediately throughout the text that, e.g., X
T
y is a scalar while
xy
T
is an n x n matrix.
2. Cn = the set of ntuples of complex numbers represented as column vectors.
3. R
mxn
= the set of real (or realvalued) m x n matrices.
4. R
mxnr
= the set of real m x n matrices of rank r. Thus, R
nxnn
denotes the set of real
nonsingular n x n matrices.
5. C
mxn
= the set of complex (or complexvalued) m x n matrices.
6. C
mxn
= the set of complex m x n matrices of rank r.
1
Chapter 1
Introduction and Review
1.1 Some Notation and Terminology
We begin with a brief introduction to some standard notation and terminology to be used
throughout the text. This is followed by a review of some basic notions in matrix analysis
and linear algebra.
The following sets appear frequently throughout subsequent chapters:
I. IR
n
= the set of ntuples of real numbers represented as column vectors. Thus, x E IR
n
means
where Xi E IR for i E !!.
Henceforth, the notation!! denotes the set {I, ... , n }.
Note: Vectors are always column vectors. A row vector is denoted by y ~ where
y E IR
n
and the superscript T is the transpose operation. That a vector is always a
column vector rather than a row vector is entirely arbitrary, but this convention makes
it easy to recognize immediately throughout the text that, e.g., x
T
y is a scalar while
xyT is an n x n matrix.
2. en = the set of ntuples of complex numbers represented as column vectors.
3. IR
rn
xn = the set of real (or realvalued) m x n matrices.
4. 1R;n xn = the set of real m x n matrices of rank r. Thus, I R ~ xn denotes the set of real
nonsingular n x n matrices.
5. e
rnxn
= the set of complex (or complexvalued) m x n matrices.
6. e;n xn = the set of complex m x n matrices of rank r.
Chapter 1. Introduction and Review
Each of the above also has a "block" analogue obtained by replacing scalar components in
the respective definitions by block submatrices. For example, if A e R
nxn
, B e R
mx n
, and
C e R
mxm
, then the (m+ n) x (m+ n) matrix [ A0 Bc ] is block upper triangular.
The transpose of a matrix A is denoted by A
T
and is the matrix whose (i, j)th entry
is the (7, Oth entry of A, that is, (A
7
),, = a,,. Note that if A e R
mx
", then A
7
" e E"
xm
.
If A e C
mx
", then its Hermitian transpose (or conjugate transpose) is denoted by A
H
(or
sometimes A*) and its (i, j)\h entry is (A
H
),
7
= («77), where the bar indicates complex
conjugation; i.e., if z = a + jf$ (j = i = v^T), then z = a — jfi. A matrix A is symmetric
if A = A
T
and Hermitian if A = A
H
. We henceforth adopt the convention that, unless
otherwise noted, an equation like A = A
T
implies that A is realvalued while a statement
like A = A
H
implies that A is complexvalued.
Remark 1.1. While \/—\ is most commonly denoted by i in mathematics texts, j is
the more common notation in electrical engineering and system theory. There is some
advantage to being conversant with both notations. The notation j is used throughout the
text but reminders are placed at strategic locations.
Example 1.2.
Transposes of block matrices can be defined in an obvious way. For example, it is
easy to see that if A,, are appropriately dimensioned subblocks, then
is symmetric (and Hermitian).
is complexvalued symmetric but not Hermitian.
is Hermitian (but not symmetric).
2
We now classify some of the more familiar "shaped" matrices. A matrix A e
(or A eC"
x
")i s
• diagonal if a,
7
= 0 for i ^ j.
• upper triangular if a,
;
= 0 for i > j.
• lower triangular if a,
7
= 0 for / < j.
• tridiagonal if a
(y
= 0 for z — j\ > 1.
• pentadiagonal if a
i;
= 0 for / — j\ > 2.
• upper Hessenberg if a
f
j = 0 for i — j > 1.
• lower Hessenberg if a,
;
= 0 for j — i > 1.
2 Chapter 1. Introduction and Review
We now classify some of the more familiar "shaped" matrices. A matrix A E IR
n
xn
(or A E e
nxn
) is
• diagonal if aij = 0 for i i= }.
• upper triangular if aij = 0 for i > }.
• lower triangular if aij = 0 for i < }.
• tridiagonal if aij = 0 for Ii  JI > 1.
• pentadiagonal if aij = 0 for Ii  J I > 2.
• upper Hessenberg if aij = 0 for i  j > 1.
• lower Hessenberg if aij = 0 for }  i > 1.
Each of the above also has a "block" analogue obtained by replacing scalar components in
the respective definitions by block submatrices. For example, if A E IR
nxn
, B E IR
nxm
, and
C E jRmxm, then the (m + n) x (m + n) matrix [ ~ ~ ] is block upper triangular.
The transpose of a matrix A is denoted by AT and is the matrix whose (i, j)th entry
is the (j, i)th entry of A, that is, (AT)ij = aji. Note that if A E jRmxn, then AT E jRnxm.
If A E em xn, then its Hermitian transpose (or conjugate transpose) is denoted by A H (or
sometimes A*) and its (i, j)th entry is (AH)ij = (aji), where the bar indicates complex
conjugation; i.e., if z = IX + jfJ (j = i = R), then z = IX  jfJ. A matrix A is symmetric
if A = A T and Hermitian if A = A H. We henceforth adopt the convention that, unless
otherwise noted, an equation like A = A T implies that A is realvalued while a statement
like A = AH implies that A is complexvalued.
Remark 1.1. While R is most commonly denoted by i in mathematics texts, } is
the more common notation in electrical engineering and system theory. There is some
advantage to being conversant with both notations. The notation j is used throughout the
text but reminders are placed at strategic locations.
Example 1.2.
1. A = [
; ~ ] is symmetric (and Hermitian).
2. A = [
5
7+}
7 + j ]
2 is complexvalued symmetric but not Hermitian.
[
5 7+} ]
3 A  2 is Hermitian (but not symmetric).
·  7  j
Transposes of block matrices can be defined in an obvious way. For example, it is
easy to see that if Aij are appropriately dimensioned subblocks, then
r = [
1.2. Matrix Arithmetic
1.2 Matrix Arithmetic
It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the fundamental notions of matrix addition,
multiplication of a matrix by a scalar, and multiplication of matrices.
A special case of matrix multiplication occurs when the second matrix is a column
vector x, i.e., the matrixvector product Ax. A very important way to view this product is
to interpret it as a weighted sum (linear combination) of the columns of A. That is, suppose
The importance of this interpretation cannot be overemphasized. As a numerical example,
take A = [96 85 74]x = 2 . Then we can quickly calculate dot products of the rows of A
with the column x to find Ax =[50 32]' but this matrixvector product can also be computed
v1a
For large arrays of numbers, there can be important computerarchitecturerelated advan
tages to preferring the latter calculation method.
For matrix multiplication, suppose A e R
mxn
and B = [bi,...,b
p
] e R
nxp
with
bi e W
1
. Then the matrix product A B can be thought of as above, applied p times:
There is also an alternative, but equivalent, formulation of matrix multiplication that appears
frequently in the text and is presented below as a theorem. Again, its importance cannot be
overemphasized. It is deceptively simple and its full understanding is well rewarded.
Theorem 1.3. Let U = [M I , . . . , u
n
] e R
mxn
with u
t
e R
m
and V = [v
{
,..., v
n
] e R
pxn
with v
t
e R
p
. Then
If matrices C and D are compatible for multiplication, recall that (CD)
T
= D
T
C
T
(or (CD}
H
— D
H
C
H
). This gives a dual to the matrixvector result above. Namely, if
C eR
mxn
has row vectors cj e E
lx
", and is premultiplied by a row vector y
T
e R
l xm
,
then the product can be written as a weighted linear sum of the rows of C as follows:
3
Theorem 1.3 can then also be generalized to its "row dual." The details are left to the readei
Then
1.2. Matrix Arithmetic 3
1 .2 Matrix Arithmetic
It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the fundamental notions of matrix addition,
multiplication of a matrix by a scalar, and multiplication of matrices.
A special case of matrix multiplication occurs when the second matrix is a column
vector x, i.e., the matrixvector product Ax. A very important way to view this product is
to interpret it as a weighted sum (linear combination) of the columns of A. That is, suppose
I ]
A = la' ....• a"1 E JR
m
" with a, E JRm and x = l
Then
Ax = Xjal + ... + Xnan E jRm.
The importance of this interpretation cannot be overemphasized. As a numerical example,
take A = ! x = Then we can quickly calculate dot products of the rows of A
with the column x to find Ax = but this matrixvector product can also be computed
via
3.[ J+2.[ J+l.[ l
For large arrays of numbers, there can be important computerarchitecturerelated advan
tages to preferring the latter calculation method.
For matrix multiplication, suppose A E jRmxn and B = [hI,.'" h
p
] E jRnxp with
hi E jRn. Then the matrix product AB can be thought of as above, applied p times:
There is also an alternative, but equivalent, formulation of matrix multiplication that appears
frequently in the text and is presented below as a theorem. Again, its importance cannot be
overemphasized. It is deceptively simple and its full understanding is well rewarded.
Theorem 1.3. Let U = [Uj, ... , un] E jRmxn with Ui E jRm and V = [VI, .•. , Vn] E lR
Pxn
with Vi E jRP. Then
n
UV
T
= LUiVr E jRmxp.
i=I
If matrices C and D are compatible for multiplication, recall that (C D)T = DT C
T
(or (C D)H = DH C
H
). This gives a dual to the matrixvector result above. Namely, if
C E jRmxn has row vectors cJ E jRlxn, and is premultiplied by a row vector yT E jRlxm,
then the product can be written as a weighted linear sum of the rows of C as follows:
yTC=YICf EjRlxn.
Theorem 1.3 can then also be generalized to its "row dual." The details are left to the reader.
Chapter 1. Introduction and Review
1.3 Inner Products and Orthogonality
For vectors x, y e R", the Euclidean inner product (or inner product, for short) of x and
y is given by
Note that the inner product is a scalar.
If x, y e C", we define their complex Euclidean inner product (or inner product,
for short) by
and we see that, indeed, (x, y)
c
= (y, x)
c
.
Note that x
T
x = 0 if and only if x = 0 when x e Rn but that this is not true if x e Cn.
What is true in the complex case is that X
H
x = 0 if and only if x = 0. To illustrate, consider
the nonzero vector x above. Then X
T
X = 0 but X
H
X = 2.
Two nonzero vectors x, y e R are said to be orthogonal if their inner product is
zero, i.e., x
T
y = 0. Nonzero complex vectors are orthogonal if X
H
y = 0. If x and y are
orthogonal and X
T
X = 1 and y
T
y = 1, then we say that x and y are orthonormal. A
matrix A e R
nxn
is an orthogonal matrix if A
T
A = AA
T
= /, where / is the n x n
identity matrix. The notation /„ is sometimes used to denote the identity matrix in R
nx
"
(orC"
x
"). Similarly, a matrix A e C
nxn
is said to be unitary if A
H
A = AA
H
= I. Clearly
an orthogonal or unitary matrix has orthonormal rows and orthonormal columns. There is
no special name attached to a nonsquare matrix A e R
mxn
(or € C
mxn
) with orthonormal
rows or columns.
1.4 Determinants
It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the basic theory of determinants. For A e R
nxn
(or A 6 C
nxn
) we use the notation det A for the determinant of A. We list below some of
Note that (x, y)
c
= (y, x)
c
, i.e., the order in which x and y appear in the complex inner
product is important. The more conventional definition of the complex inner product is
( x , y )
c
= y
H
x = Eni=1 xiyi but throughout the text we prefer the symmetry with the real
case.
Example 1.4. Let x = [ 1j ] and y = [ 1/ 2 ]. Then
while
44 Chapter 1. Introduction and Review
1.3 Inner Products and Orthogonality
For vectors x, y E IRn, the Euclidean inner product (or inner product, for short) of x and
y is given by
n
(x, y) := x
T
y = Lx;y;.
;=1
Note that the inner product is a scalar.
If x, y E <en, we define their complex Euclidean inner product (or inner product,
for short) by
n
(x'Y}c :=xHy = Lx;y;.
;=1
Note that (x, y)c = (y, x}c, i.e., the order in which x and y appear in the complex inner
product is important. The more conventional definition of the complex inner product is
(x, y)c = yH x = L:7=1 x;y; but throughout the text we prefer the symmetry with the real
case.
Example 1.4. Let x = [} ] and y = [ ~ ] . Then
(x, Y}c = [ } JH [ ~ ] = [I  j] [ ~ ] = 1  2j
while
and we see that, indeed, (x, Y}c = {y, x)c'
Note that x
T
x = 0 if and only if x = 0 when x E IR
n
but that this is not true if x E en.
What is true in the complex case is that x
H
x = 0 if and only if x = O. To illustrate, consider
the nonzero vector x above. Then x
T
x = 0 but x
H
X = 2.
Two nonzero vectors x, y E IR
n
are said to be orthogonal if their inner product is
zero, i.e., x
T
y = O. Nonzero complex vectors are orthogonal if x
H
y = O. If x and y are
orthogonal and x
T
x = 1 and yT y = 1, then we say that x and y are orthonormal. A
matrix A E IR
nxn
is an orthogonal matrix if AT A = AAT = I, where I is the n x n
identity matrix. The notation In is sometimes used to denote the identity matrix in IR
nxn
(or en xn). Similarly, a matrix A E en xn is said to be unitary if A H A = AA H = I. Clearly
an orthogonal or unitary matrix has orthonormal rows and orthonormal columns. There is
no special name attached to a nonsquare matrix A E ]Rrn"n (or E e
mxn
) with orthonormal
rows or columns.
1.4 Determinants
It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the basic theory of determinants. For A E IR
n
xn
(or A E en xn) we use the notation det A for the determinant of A. We list below some of
1.4. Determinants
the more useful properties of determinants. Note that this is not a minimal set, i.e., several
properties are consequences of one or more of the others.
1. If A has a zero row or if any two rows of A are equal, then det A = 0.
2. If A has a zero column or if any two columns of A are equal, then det A = 0.
3. Interchanging two rows of A changes only the sign of the determinant.
4. Interchanging two columns of A changes only the sign of the determinant.
5. Multiplying a row of A by a scalar a results in a new matrix whose determinant is
a det A.
6. Multiplying a column of A by a scalar a results in a new matrix whose determinant
is a det A.
7. Multiplying a row of A by a scalar and then adding it to another row does not change
the determinant.
8. Multiplying a column of A by a scalar and then adding it to another column does not
change the determinant.
9. det A
T
= det A (det A
H
= det A if A e C
nxn
).
10. If A is diagonal, then det A = a11a22 • • • a
nn
, i.e., det A is the product of its diagonal
elements.
11. If A is upper triangular, then det A = a11a22 • • • a
nn
.
12. If A is lower triangular, then det A = a11a22 • • • a
nn
.
13. If A is block diagonal (or block upper triangular or block lower triangular), with
square diagonal blocks A11, A22, • • •, A
nn
(of possibly different sizes), then det A =
det A11 det A22 • • • det A
nn
.
14. If A, B eR
nxn
,thendet(AB) = det A det 5.
15. If A € R
nxn
, then det(A
1
) = 1det A.
16. If A e R
nxn
and D e R
mxm
, then det [Ac
B
D
] = del A det ( D – CA–
l
B).
Proof: This follows easily from the block LU factorization
17. If A eR
nxn
and D e RM
mxm
, then det [Ac
B
D
] = det D det(A – BD–
1
C) .
Proof: This follows easily from the block UL factorization
5 1.4. Determinants 5
the more useful properties of determinants. Note that this is not a minimal set, i.e., several
properties are consequences of one or more of the others.
1. If A has a zero row or if any two rows of A are equal, then det A = o.
2. If A has a zero column or if any two columns of A are equal, then det A = O.
3. Interchanging two rows of A changes only the sign of the determinant.
4. Interchanging two columns of A changes only the sign of the determinant.
5. Multiplying a row of A by a scalar ex results in a new matrix whose determinant is
exdetA.
6. Multiplying a column of A by a scalar ex results in a new matrix whose determinant
is ex det A.
7. Multiplying a row of A by a scalar and then adding it to another row does not change
the determinant.
8. Multiplying a column of A by a scalar and then adding it to another column does not
change the determinant.
9. detAT = detA (detA
H
= detA if A E C"X").
10. If A is diagonal, then det A = alla22 ... ann, i.e., det A is the product of its diagonal
elements.
11. If A is upper triangular, then det A = all a22 ... a"n.
12. If A is lower triangUlar, then det A = alla22 ... ann.
13. If A is block diagonal (or block upper triangular or block lower triangular), with
square diagonal blocks A 11, A
22
, ... , An" (of possibly different sizes), then det A =
det A 11 det A22 ... det Ann.
14. If A, B E IR
nxn
, then det(AB) = det A det B.
15. If A E then det(A
1
) = de: A .
16. If A E and DE IR
mxm
, then det = detA det(D  CA
1
B).
Proof" This follows easily from the block LU factorization
] [
17. If A E IR
nxn
and D E then det = det D det(A  B D
1
C).
Proof" This follows easily from the block UL factorization
BD
1
I
] [
Chapter 1. Introduction and Review
Remark 1.5. The factorization of a matrix A into the product of a unit lower triangular
matrix L (i.e., lower triangular with all 1's on the diagonal) and an upper triangular matrix
U is called an LU factorization; see, for example, [24]. Another such factorization is UL
where U is unit upper triangular and L is lower triangular. The factorizations used above
are block analogues of these.
Remark 1.6. The matrix D — CA–
1
B is called the Schur complement of A in [AC BD].
Similarly, A – BD–
l
C is the Schur complement of D in [AC
B
D
].
EXERCISES
1. If A e R
nxn
and or is a scalar, what is det(aA)? What is det(–A)?
2. If A is orthogonal, what is det A? If A is unitary, what is det A?
3. Let x, y e Rn. Show that det(I – xy
T
) = 1 – y
T
x.
4. Let U1, U
2
, . . ., Uk € R
nxn
be orthogonal matrices. Show that the product U =
U1 U2 • • • Uk is an orthogonal matrix.
5. Let A e R
n x n
. The trace of A, denoted TrA, is defined as the sum of its diagonal
elements, i.e., TrA = Eni=1
aii.
(a) Show that the trace is a linear function; i.e., if A, B e R
nxn
and a, ft e R, then
Tr(aA + fiB)= aTrA + fiTrB.
(b) Show that Tr(Afl) = Tr(£A), even though in general AB ^ B A.
(c) Let S € R
nxn
be skewsymmetric, i.e., S
T
= S. Show that TrS = 0. Then
either prove the converse or provide a counterexample.
6. A matrix A e W
x
" is said to be idempotent if A
2
= A.
/ x ™ . , • , ! T 2cos
2
<9 sin 20 1 . . _ ,
(a) Show that the matrix A =  . _ .. _ .
2rt
is idempotent for all #.
2 _ sin 2^ 2sm
z
# J
r
(b) Suppose A e IR"
X
" is idempotent and A ^ I. Show that A must be singular.
66 Chapter 1. Introduction and Review
Remark 1.5. The factorization of a matrix A into the product of a unit lower triangular
matrix L (i.e., lower triangular with all l's on the diagonal) and an upper triangular matrix
V is called an LV factorization; see, for example, [24]. Another such factorization is VL
where V is unit upper triangular and L is lower triangular. The factorizations used above
are block analogues of these.
Remark 1.6. The matrix D  e A I B is called the Schur complement of A in [ ~ ~ ].
Similarly, A  BDIe is the Schur complement of Din [ ~ ~ l
EXERCISES
1. If A E jRnxn and a is a scalar, what is det(aA)? What is det(A)?
2. If A is orthogonal, what is det A? If A is unitary, what is det A?
3. Letx,y E jRn. Showthatdet(lxyT) = 1 yTx.
4. Let VI, V2, ... ,Vk E jRn xn be orthogonal matrices. Show that the product V =
VI V2 ... V
k
is an orthogonal matrix.
5. Let A E jRNxn. The trace of A, denoted Tr A, is defined as the sum of its diagonal
elements, i.e., TrA = L ~ = I au·
(a) Show that the trace is a linear function; i.e., if A, B E JRn xn and a, f3 E JR, then
Tr(aA + f3B) = aTrA + f3TrB.
(b) Show that Tr(AB) = Tr(BA), even though in general AB i= BA.
(c) Let S E jRnxn be skewsymmetric, i.e., ST = So Show that TrS = O. Then
either prove the converse or provide a counterexample.
6. A matrix A E jRnxn is said to be idempotent if A2 = A.
I [ 2cos
2
0
(a) Show that the matrix A =  . 2f)
2 sm 0
sin 20 J. . d .. II II
2sin
2
0 IS I empotent lor a o.
(b) Suppose A E jRn xn is idempotent and A i= I. Show that A must be singular.
Chapter 2
Vector Spaces
In this chapter we give a brief review of some of the basic concepts of vector spaces. The
emphasis is on finitedimensional vector spaces, including spaces formed by special classes
of matrices, but some infinitedimensional examples are also cited. An excellent reference
for this and the next chapter is [10], where some of the proofs that are not given here may
be found.
2.1 Definitions and Examples
Definition 2.1. A field is a set F together with two operations +, • : F x F — > F such that
Axioms (A1)(A3) state that (F, +) is a group and an abelian group if (A4) also holds.
Axioms (M1)(M4) state that (F \ {0}, •) is an abelian group.
Generally speaking, when no confusion can arise, the multiplication operator "•" is
not written explicitly.
7
(Al) a + (P + y ) = (a + p ) + y f o r all a, f t, y € F.
(A2) there exists an element 0 e F such that a + 0 = a. for all a e F.
(A3 ) for all a e F, there exists an element (—a) e F such that a + (— a) = 0.
(A4 ) a + p = ft + afar all a, ft e F.
(M l) a  ( p  y ) = ( a  p )  y f o r al l a, p, y e F.
(M 2) there exists an element 1 e F such that a • I = a for all a e F.
(M 3 ) for all a e ¥, a ^0, there exists an element a"
1
€ F such that a • a~
l
= 1.
(M 4 ) a • p = P • a for all a, p e F.
(D) a  ( p + y)=ci p+a y f or alia, p,ye¥.
Chapter 2
Vector Spaces
In this chapter we give a brief review of some of the basic concepts of vector spaces. The
emphasis is on finitedimensional vector spaces, including spaces formed by special classes
of matrices, but some infinitedimensional examples are also cited. An excellent reference
for this and the next chapter is [10], where some of the proofs that are not given here may
be found.
2.1 Definitions and Examples
Definition 2.1. A field is a set IF together with two operations +, . : IF x IF ~ IF such that
(Al) a + (,8 + y) = (a +,8) + y for all a,,8, y Elf.
(A2) there exists an element 0 E IF such that a + 0 = a for all a E IF.
(A3) for all a E IF, there exists an element (a) E IF such that a + (a) = O.
(A4) a + ,8 = ,8 + a for all a, ,8 Elf.
(Ml) a· (,8, y) = (a·,8)· y for all a,,8, y Elf.
(M2) there exists an element I E IF such that a . I = a for all a E IF.
(M3) for all a E IF, a f. 0, there exists an element aI E IF such that a . aI = 1.
(M4) a·,8 =,8 . afar all a, ,8 E IF.
(D) a· (,8 + y) = a·,8 +a· y for all a, ,8, y Elf.
Axioms (Al)(A3) state that (IF, +) is a group and an abelian group if (A4) also holds.
Axioms (MI)(M4) state that (IF \ to), .) is an abelian group.
Generally speaking, when no confusion can arise, the multiplication operator "." is
not written explicitly.
7
Chapter 2. Vector Spaces
Example 2.2.
1. R with ordinary addition and multiplication is a field.
2. C with ordinary complex addition and multiplication is a field.
3. Raf. r] = the field of rational functions in the indeterminate x
8
where Z+ = {0,1,2, . . . }, is a field.
4. RMr
mxn
= { m x n matrices of rank r with real coefficients) is clearly not a field since,
for example, (Ml) does not hold unless m = n. Moreover, R"
x
" is not a field either
since (M4) does not hold in general (although the other 8 axioms hold).
Definition 2.3. A vector space over a field F is a set V together with two operations
+ :V x V ^V and : F xV »• V such that
A vector space is denoted by (V, F) or, when there is no possibility of confusion as to the
underlying fie Id, simply by V.
Remark 2.4. Note that + and • in Definition 2.3 are different from the + and • in Definition
2.1 in the sense of operating on different objects in different sets. In practice, this causes
no confusion and the • operator is usually not even written explicitly.
Example 2.5.
1. (R", R) with addition defined by
and scalar multiplication defined by
is a vector space. Similar definitions hold for (C", C).
(VI) (V, +) is an abelian group.
(V2) ( a  p )  v = a  ( P ' V ) f o r all a, p e F and for all v e V.
(V3) (a + ft) • v = a • v + p • v for all a, p € F and for all v e V.
(V4) a(v + w)=av + a w for all a e F and for all v, w e V.
(V5) 1 • v = v for all v e V (1 e F).
8 Chapter 2. Vector Spaces
Example 2.2.
I. IR with ordinary addition and multiplication is a field.
2. e with ordinary complex addition and multiplication is a field.
3. Ra[x] = the field of rational functions in the indeterminate x
= {a
o
+ atX + ... + apxP +}
:aj,f3i EIR ;P,qEZ ,
f30 + f3t
X
+ ... + f3qX
q
where Z+ = {O,l,2, ... }, is a field.
4. I R ~ xn = { m x n matrices of rank r with real coefficients} is clearly not a field since,
for example, (MI) does not hold unless m = n. Moreover, l R ~ x n is not a field either
since (M4) does not hold in general (although the other 8 axioms hold).
Definition 2.3. A vector space over a field IF is a set V together with two operations
+ : V x V + V and· : IF x V + V such that
(VI) (V, +) is an abelian group.
(V2) (a· f3) . v = a . (f3 . v) for all a, f3 E IF andfor all v E V.
(V3) (a + f3). v = a· v + f3. v for all a, f3 Elf andforall v E V.
(V4) a· (v + w) = a . v + a . w for all a ElF andfor all v, w E V.
(V5) I· v = v for all v E V (1 Elf).
A vector space is denoted by (V, IF) or, when there is no possibility of confusion as to the
underlying field, simply by V.
Remark 2.4. Note that + and· in Definition 2.3 are different from the + and . in Definition
2.1 in the sense of operating on different objects in different sets. In practice, this causes
no confusion and the· operator is usually not even written explicitly.
Example 2.5.
I. (IRn, IR) with addition defined by
and scalar multiplication defined by
is a vector space. Similar definitions hold for (en, e).
2.2. Subspaces
3. Let (V, F) be an arbitrary vector space and V be an arbitrary set. Let O (X > , V) be the
set of functions / mapping D to V. Then O (D, V) is a vector space with addition
defined by
2.2 Subspaces
Definition 2.6. Let (V, F) be a vector space and let W c V, W = 0. Then (W, F) is a
subspace of (V, F) i f and only i f (W, F) is i tself a vector space or, equi valently, i f and only
i f ( a w 1 + ß W 2 ) e W for all a, ß e ¥ and for all w 1 , w
2
e W.
Remark 2.7. The latter characterization of a subspace is often the easiest way to check
or prove that something is indeed a subspace (or vector space); i.e., verify that the set in
question is closed under addition and scalar multiplication. Note, too, that since 0 e F, this
implies that the zero vector must be in any subspace.
Notation: When the underlying field is understood, we write W c V, and the symbol c,
when used with vector spaces, is henceforth understood to mean "is a subspace of." The
less restrictive meaning "is a subset of" is specifically flagged as such.
9
2. (E
mxn
, E) is a vector space with addition defined by
and scalar multiplication defined by
and scalar multiplication defined by
Special Cases:
(a) V = [to, t \ ] , (V, F) = (IR", E), and the functions are piecewise continuous
=: (PC[f
0
, t\ ] )
n
or continuous =: (C[?
0
, h] )
n
.
4. Let A € R"
x
". Then (x(t) : x ( t ) = Ax(t}} is a vector space (of dimension n) .
2.2. Subspaces 9
2.
(JRmxn, JR) is a vector space with addition defined by
[ ." + P"
al2 + fJI2 aln + fJln
l
a21 + fJ2I a22 + fJ22 a2n + fJ2n
A+B= .
amI + fJml am2 + fJm2 amn + fJmn
and scalar multiplication defined by
[ ya"
y
a
l2
ya," l
y
a
21 y
a
22 ya2n
yA = . . .
yaml ya
m
2
ya
mn
3. Let (V, IF) be an arbitrary vector space and '0 be an arbitrary set. Let cf>('O, V) be the
set of functions f mapping '0 to V. Then cf>('O, V) is a vector space with addition
defined by
(f + g)(d) = fed) + g(d) for all d E '0 and for all f, g E cf>
and scalar multiplication defined by
(af)(d) = af(d) for all a E IF, for all d ED, and for all f E cf>.
Special Cases:
(a) '0 = [to, td, (V, IF) = (JR
n
, JR), and the functions are piecewise continuous
=: (PC[to, td)n or continuous =: (C[to, td)n.
(b) '0 = [to, +00), (V, IF) = (JRn, JR), etc.
4. Let A E JR(nxn. Then {x(t) : x(t) = Ax(t)} is a vector space (of dimension n).
2.2 Subspaces
Definition 2.6. Let (V, IF) be a vector space and let W ~ V, W f= 0. Then (W, IF) is a
subspace of (V, IF) if and only if (W, IF) is itself a vector space or, equivalently, if and only
if(awl + fJw2) E W foral! a, fJ E IF andforall WI, W2 E W.
Remark 2.7. The latter characterization of a subspace is often the easiest way to check
or prove that something is indeed a subspace (or vector space); i.e., verify that the set in
question is closed under addition and scalar multiplication. Note, too, that since 0 E IF, this
implies that the zero vector must be in any subspace.
Notation: When the underlying field is understood, we write W ~ V, and the symbol ~ ,
when used with vector spaces, is henceforth understood to mean "is a subspace of." The
less restrictive meaning "is a subset of' is specifically flagged as such.
Then W
a
,ß is a subspace of V if and only if ß = 0. As an interesting exercise, sketch
W2,1, W2,o, W1/2,1, and W1/2,
0
. Note, too, that the vertical line through the origin (i.e.,
a = oo) is also a subspace.
All lines through the origin are subspaces. Shifted subspaces W
a
,ß with ß = 0 are
called linear varieties.
Henceforth, we drop the explicit dependence of a vector space on an underlying field.
Thus, V usually denotes a vector space with the underlying field generally being R unless
explicitly stated otherwise.
Definition 2.9. If 12, and S are vector spaces (or subspaces), then R = S if and only if
R C S and S C R.
Note: To prove two vector spaces are equal, one usually proves the two inclusions separately:
An arbitrary r e R is shown to be an element of S and then an arbitrary 5 € S is shown to
be an element of R.
2.3 Linear Independence
Let X = { v1 , v2, • • •} be a nonempty collection of vectors u, in some vector space V.
Definition 2.10. X is a linearly dependent set of vectors if and only if there exist k distinct
elements v1, . . . , vk e X and scalars a1, . . . , ak not all zero such that
10 Chapter 2. Vector Spaces
Example 2.8.
1. Consider (V, F) = (R"
X
",R) and let W = [A e R"
x
" : A is symmetric}. Then
We V.
Proof: Suppose A\, A
2
are symmetric. Then it is easily shown that ctA\ + fiAi is
symmetric for all a, ft e R.
2. Let W = { A € R"
x
" : A is orthogonal}. Then W is /wf a subspace of R"
x
".
3. Consider (V, F) = (R
2
, R) and for each v € R
2
of the form v = [v1v2 ] identify v1 with
the jccoordinate in the plane and u
2
with the ycoordinate. For a, ß e R, define
X is a linearly independent set of vectors if and only if for any collection of k distinct
elements v1, . . . ,Vk of X and for any scalars a1, . . . , ak,
10 Chapter 2. Vector Spaces
Example 2.S.
1. Consider (V,lF) = (JR.nxn,JR.) and let W = {A E JR.nxn : A is symmetric}. Then
Proof' Suppose AI, A2 are symmetric. Then it is easily shown that aAI + f3A2 is
symmetric for all a, f3 E R
2. Let W = {A E ]Rnxn : A is orthogonal}. Then W is not a subspace of JR.nxn.
3. Consider (V, IF) = (]R2, JR.) and for each v E ]R2 of the form v = ] identify VI with
the xcoordinate in the plane and V2 with the ycoordinate. For a, f3 E R define
W",/l = {V : v = [ ac f3 ] ; c E JR.} .
Then W",/l is a subspace of V if and only if f3 = O. As an interesting exercise, sketch
W2.I, W2,O, Wi,I' and Wi,o, Note, too, that the vertical line through the origin (i.e.,
a = 00) is also a subspace.
All lines through the origin are subspaces. Shifted subspaces W",/l with f3 =1= 0 are
called linear varieties.
Henceforth, we drop the explicit dependence of a vector space on an underlying field.
Thus, V usually denotes a vector space with the underlying field generally being JR. unless
explicitly stated otherwise.
Definition 2.9. ffR and S are vector spaces (or subspaces), then R = S if and only if
R R.
Note: To prove two vector spaces are equal, one usually proves the two inclusions separately:
An arbitrary r E R is shown to be an element of S and then an arbitrary s E S is shown to
be an element of R.
2.3 Linear Independence
Let X = {VI, V2, •.• } be a nonempty collection of vectors Vi in some vector space V.
Definition 2.10. X is a linearly dependent set of vectors if and only if there exist k distinct
elements VI, ... , Vk E X and scalars aI, ..• , (Xk not all zero such that
X is a linearly independent set of vectors if and only if for any collection of k distinct
elements VI, ... , Vk of X and for any scalars aI, ••• , ak,
al VI + ... + (XkVk = 0 implies al = 0, ... , ak = O.
2.3. Linear Independence 11
(since 2v\ — v
2
+ v3 = 0).
2. Let A e R
xn
and 5 e R"
xm
. Then consider the rows of e
tA
B as vectors in C
m
[t
0
, t1]
(recall that e
fA
denotes the matrix exponential, which is discussed in more detail in
Chapter 11). Independence of these vectors turns out to be equivalent to a concept
called controllability, to be studied further in what follows.
Let v
f
e R", i e k, and consider the matrix V = [ v1 , ... ,Vk] e R
nxk
. The linear
dependence of this set of vectors is equivalent to the existence of a nonzero vector a e R
k
such that Va = 0. An equivalent condition for linear dependence is that the k x k matrix
V
T
V is singular. If the set of vectors is independent, and there exists a e R* such that
Va = 0, then a = 0. An equivalent condition for linear independence is that the matrix
V
T
V is nonsingular.
Definition 2.12. Let X = [ v1 , v2, . . . } be a collection of vectors vi. e V. Then the span of
X is defined as
Example 2.13. Let V = R
n
and define
Then Sp{e1, e
2
, ...,e
n
} = Rn.
Definition 2.14. A set of vectors X is a basis for V if and only ij
1. X is a linearly independent set (of basis vectors), and
2. Sp(X) = V.
Example 2.11.
is a linearly independent set. Why?
s a linearly dependent set However,
1. LetV = R
3
. Then
where N = {1, 2, ...}.
2.3. Linear Independence 11
Example 2.11.
I. 1£t V = Then {[ H i Hi] } i" independent.. Why?
Howe,."I [ i 1 [ i 1 [ l ] } is a Iin=ly
(since 2vI  V2 + V3 = 0).
2. Let A E ]Rnxn and B E ]Rnxm. Then consider the rows of etA B as vectors in em [to, tIl
(recall that etA denotes the matrix exponential, which is discussed in more detail in
Chapter 11). Independence of these vectors turns out to be equivalent to a concept
called controllability, to be studied further in what follows.
Let Vi E ]Rn, i E If, and consider the matrix V = [VI, ... , Vk] E ]Rnxk. The linear
dependence of this set of vectors is equivalent to the existence of a nonzero vector a E ]Rk
such that Va = O. An equivalent condition for linear dependence is that the k x k matrix
VT V is singular. If the set of vectors is independent, and there exists a E ]Rk such that
Va = 0, then a = O. An equivalent condition for linear independence is that the matrix
V T V is nonsingular.
Definition 2.12. Let X = {VI, V2, ..• } be a collection of vectors Vi E V. Then the span of
X is defined as
Sp(X) = Sp{VI, V2, ... }
= {v : V = (Xl VI + ... + (XkVk ; (Xi ElF, Vi EX, kEN},
where N = {I, 2, ... }.
Example 2.13. Let V = ]Rn and define
0 0
0 1 0
el =
0
, e2 =
0
,'" ,en =
0
o o
Then SpIel, e2, ... , en} = ]Rn.
Definition 2.14. A set of vectors X is a basis for V if and only if
1. X is a linearly independent set (of basis vectors), and
2. Sp(X) = V.
12 Chapter 2. Vector Spaces
Example 2.15. [e\,..., e
n
} is a basis for IR" (sometimes called the natural basis).
Now let b1, ..., b
n
be a basis (with a specific order associated with the basis vectors)
for V. Then for all v e V there exists a unique ntuple {E1 , . . . , E n} such that
Definition 2.16. The scalars {Ei} are called the components (or sometimes the coordinates)
of v with respect to the basis (b1, ..., b
n
] and are unique. We say that the vector x of
components represents the vector v with respect to the basis B.
Example 2.17. In Rn,
we have
To see this, write
Then
Theorem 2.18. The number of elements in a basis of a vector space is independent of the
particular basis considered.
Definition 2.19. If a basis X for a vector space V= 0) has n elements, V is said to
be ndimensional or have dimension n and we write dim(V) = n or dim V — n. For
We can also determine components of v with respect to another basis. For example, while
with respect to the basis
where
12 Chapter 2. Vector Spaces
Example 2.15. {el, ... , en} is a basis for]Rn (sometimes called the natural basis).
Now let b
l
, ... , b
n
be a basis (with a specific order associated with the basis vectors)
for V. Then for all v E V there exists a unique ntuple ... , such that
v = + ... + = Bx,
where
B [b".,b.l. x D J
Definition 2.16. The scalars } are called the components (or sometimes the coordinates)
of v with respect to the basis {b
l
, ... , b
n
} and are unique. We say that the vector x of
components represents the vector v with respect to the basis B.
Example 2.17. In]Rn,
VI ]
: = vlel + V2e2 + ... + vne
n
·
Vn
We can also determine components of v with respect to another basis. For example, while
with respect to the basis
we have
To see this, write
Then
[ ] = I . el + 2 . e2,
[ ] = 3 . [ ] + 4· [ l
[ ] = XI • [  ] + X2 • [ _! ]
= [  ! ] [ l
[ ] = [ ; 1 r I [ ; ] = [ l
Theorem 2.18. The number of elements in a basis of a vector space is independent of the
particular basis considered.
Definition 2.19. If a basis X for a vector space V(Jf 0) has n elements, V is said to
be n.dimensional or have dimension n and we write dim (V) = n or dim V = n. For
2.4 Sums and Intersections of Subspaces
Definition 2.21. Let (V, F) be a vector space and let 71, S c V. The sum and intersection
of R, and S are defined respectively by:
The subspaces R, and S are said to be complements of each other in T.
Remark 2.23. The union of two subspaces, R C S, is not necessarily a subspace.
Definition 2.24. T = R 0 S is the direct sum of R and S if
Theorem 2.22.
2.4. Sums and Intersections of Subspaces 13
consistency, and because the 0 vector is in any vector space, we define dim(O) = 0. A
vector space V is finitedimensional if there exists a basis X with n < +00 elements;
otherwise, V is infinitedimensional.
Thus, Theorem 2.18 says that dim(V) = the number of elements in a basis.
Example 2.20.
1. d i m(Rn)=n.
2. dim(R
mxn
) = mn.
Note: Check that a basis for R
mxn
is given by the mn matrices Eij; i e m, j e n,
where E
f
j is a matrix all of whose elements are 0 except for a 1 in the (i, j)th location.
The collection of Eij matrices can be called the "natural basis matrices."
3. dim(C[to, t1])  +00.
4. dim{A € R
nxn
: A = A
T
} = {1/2(n + 1).
1
2
(To see why, determine 1/ 2n( n + 1) symmetric basis matrices.)
5. dim{A e R
nxn
: A is upper (lower) triangular} = 1/ 2n( n + 1).
1. n + S = {r + s : r e U, s e 5}.
2. ft H 5 = {v : v e 7^ and v e 5}.
K
1. K + S C V (in general, U\  \ h 7^ =: ]T ft/ C V, for finite k).
1=1
2. 72. D 5 C V (in general, f] * R,
a
C V/ or an arbitrary index set A).
a e A
1. n n S = 0, and
2. U + S = T (in general ft; n (^ ft,) = 0 am/ ]Pft, = T).
y>f «
2.4. Sums and Intersections of Subspaces 13
consistency, and because the 0 vector is in any vector space, we define dim(O) = O. A
vector space V is finitedimensional if there exists a basis X with n < +00 elements;
otherwise, V is infinitedimensional.
Thus, Theorem 2.18 says that dim (V) = the number of elements in a basis.
Example 2.20.
1. = n.
2. = mn.
Note: Check that a basis for is given by the mn matrices Eij; i E m, j E
where Eij is a matrix all of whose elements are 0 except for a 1 in the (i, J)th location.
The collection of E;j matrices can be called the "natural basis matrices."
3. dim(C[to, tJJ) = +00.
4. dim{A E : A = AT} = !n(n + 1).
(To see why, determine !n(n + 1) symmetric basis matrices.)
5. dim{A E : A is upper (lower) triangular} = !n(n + 1).
2.4 Sums and Intersections of Subspaces
Definition 2.21. Let (V, JF') be a vector space and let R, S S; V. The sum and intersection
ofR and S are defined respectively by:
1. R + S = {r + s : r E R, s E S}.
2. R n S = {v : v E R and v E S}.
Theorem 2.22.
k
1. R + S S; V (in general, RI + ... + Rk =: L R; S; V, for finite k).
;=1
2. R n S S; V (in general, n Ra S; V for an arbitrary index set A).
CiEA
Remark 2.23. The union of two subspaces, R U S, is not necessarily a subspace.
Definition 2.24. T = REB S is the direct sum ofR and S if
1. R n S = 0, and
2. R + S = T (in general, R; n (L R
j
) = 0 and L Ri = T).
H;
The subspaces Rand S are said to be complements of each other in T.
14 Chapter 2. Vector Spaces
Remark 2.25. The complement of ft (or S) is not unique. For example, consider V = R
2
and let ft be any line through the origin. Then any other distinct line through the origin is
a complement of ft. Among all the complements there is a unique one orthogonal to ft.
We discuss more about orthogonal complements elsewhere in the text.
Theorem 2.26. Suppose T =R O S. Then
1. every t € T can be written uniquely in the form t = r + s with r e R and s e S.
2. dim(T) = dim(ft) + dim(S).
Proof: To prove the first part, suppose an arbitrary vector t e T can be written in two ways
as t = r1 + s1 = r2 + S2, where r1, r2 e R. and s1, S2 e S. Then r1 — r2 = s2— s\. But
r1 –r2 £ ft and 52 — si e S. Since ft fl S = 0, we must have r\ = ri and s\ = si from
which uniqueness follows.
The statement of the second part is a special case of the next theorem. D
Theorem 2.27. For arbitrary subspaces ft, S of a vector space V,
EXERCISES
1. Suppose {vi,..., Vk} is a linearly dependent set. Then show that one of the vectors
must be a linear combination of the others.
2. Let x\, *2, . . . , x/c E R" be nonzero mutually orthogonal vectors. Show that [x\,...,
X k} must be a linearly independent set.
3. Let v\,... ,v
n
be orthonormal vectors in R". Show that Av\,..., Av
n
are also or
thonormal if and only if Ae R"
x
" is orthogonal.
4. Consider the vectors v\ — [2 l]
r
and 1*2 = [3 l]
r
. Prove that vi and V2 form a basis
for R
2
. Find the components of the vector v = [4 l]
r
with respect to this basis.
Example 2.28. Let U be the subspace of upper triangular matrices in E"
x
" and let £ be the
subspace of lower triangular matrices in R
nxn
. Then it may be checked that U + L = R
nxn
while U n £ is the set of diagonal matrices in R
nxn
. Using the fact that dim (diagonal
matrices} = n, together with Examples 2.20.2 and 2.20.5, one can easily verify the validity
of the formula given in Theorem 2.27.
Example 2.29. Let (V, F) = (R
nxn
, R), let ft be the set of skewsymmetric matrices in
R"
x
", and let S be the set of symmetric matrices in R"
x
". Then V = U 0 S.
Proof: This follows easily from the fact that any Ae R"
x
" can be written in the form
The first matrix on the righthand side above is in S while the second is in ft.
14 Chapter 2. Vector Spaces
Remark 2.25. The complement of R (or S) is not unique. For example, consider V = jR2
and let R be any line through the origin. Then any other distinct line through the origin is
a complement of R. Among all the complements there is a unique one orthogonal to R.
We discuss more about orthogonal complements elsewhere in the text.
Theorem 2.26. Suppose T = R EB S. Then
1. every t E T can be written uniquely in the form t = r + s with r E Rand s E S.
2. dim(T) = dim(R) + dim(S).
Proof: To prove the first part, suppose an arbitrary vector t E T can be written in two ways
as t = rl + Sl = r2 + S2, where rl, r2 E Rand SI, S2 E S. Then r,  r2 = S2  SI. But
rl  r2 E Rand S2  SI E S. Since R n S = 0, we must have rl = r2 and SI = S2 from
which uniqueness follows.
The statement of the second part is a special case of the next theorem. 0
Theorem 2.27. For arbitrary subspaces R, S of a vector space V,
dim(R + S) = dim(R) + dim(S)  dim(R n S).
Example 2.28. Let U be the subspace of upper triangular matrices in jRn xn and let .c be the
subspace of lower triangUlar matrices in jRn xn. Then it may be checked that U + .c = jRn xn
while un.c is the set of diagonal matrices in jRnxn. Using the fact that dim {diagonal
matrices} = n, together with Examples 2.20.2 and 2.20.5, one can easily verify the validity
of the formula given in Theorem 2.27.
Example 2.29. Let (V, IF) = (jRnxn, jR), let R be the set of skewsymmetric matrices in
jRnxn, and let S be the set of symmetric matrices in jRnxn. Then V = n $ S.
Proof: This follows easily from the fact that any A E jRnxn can be written in the form
1 TIT
A=2:(A+A )+2:(AA).
The first matrix on the righthand side above is in S while the second is in R.
EXERCISES
1. Suppose {VI, ... , vd is a linearly dependent set. Then show that one of the vectors
must be a linear combination of the others.
2. Let XI, X2, ... , Xk E jRn be nonzero mutually orthogonal vectors. Show that {XI, ... ,
Xk} must be a linearly independent set.
3. Let VI, ... , Vn be orthonormal vectors in jRn. Show that Av" •.. , AV
n
are also or
thonormal if and only if A E jRnxn is orthogonal.
4. Consider the vectors VI = [2 1 f and V2 = [3 1 f. Prove that VI and V2 form a basis
for jR2. Find the components of the vector v = [4 If with respect to this basis.
Exercises 15
5. Let P denote the set of polynomials of degree less than or equal to two of the form
Po + p\x + pix
2
, where po, p\, p2 e R. Show that P is a vector space over E. Show
that the polynomials 1, *, and 2x
2
— 1 are a basis for P. Find the components of the
polynomial 2 + 3x + 4x
2
with respect to this basis.
6. Prove Theorem 2.22 (for the case of two subspaces R and S only).
7. Let P
n
denote the vector space of polynomials of degree less than or equal to n, and of
the form p( x) = po + p\x + • • • + p
n
x
n
, where the coefficients /?, are all real. Let PE
denote the subspace of all even polynomials in P
n
, i.e., those that satisfy the property
p(—x} = p(x). Similarly, let PQ denote the subspace of all odd polynomials, i.e.,
those satisfying p(—x} = – p( x) . Show that P
n
= P
E
© PO
8. Repeat Example 2.28 using instead the two subspaces 7" of tridiagonal matrices and
U of upper triangular matrices.
Exercises 15
5. Let P denote the set of polynomials of degree less than or equal to two of the form
Po + PI X + P2x2, where Po, PI, P2 E R Show that P is a vector space over R Show
that the polynomials 1, x, and 2x2  1 are a basis for P. Find the components of the
polynomial 2 + 3x + 4x
2
with respect to this basis.
6. Prove Theorem 2.22 (for the case of two subspaces Rand S only).
7. Let P
n
denote the vector space of polynomials of degree less than or equal to n, and of
the form p(x) = Po + PIX + ... + Pnxn, where the coefficients Pi are all real. Let PE
denote the subspace of all even polynomials in P
n
, i.e., those that satisfy the property
p( x) = p(x). Similarly, let Po denote the subspace of all odd polynomials, i.e.,
those satisfying p(x) = p(x). Show that P
n
= PE EB Po·
8. Repeat Example 2.28 using instead the two subspaces T of tridiagonal matrices and
U of upper triangular matrices.
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank
Chapter 3
Linear Transformations
3.1 Definition and Examples
We begin with the basic definition of a linear transformation (or linear map, linear function,
or linear operator) between two vector spaces.
Definition 3.1. Let (V, F) and (W, F) be vector spaces. Then C : V > W is a linear
transformation if and only if
£(avi + pv
2
) = aCv\ + fi£v
2
far all a, £ e F and far all v
}
,v
2
e V.
The vector space V is called the domain of the transformation C while VV, the space into
which it maps, is called the codomain.
Example 3.2.
1. Let F = R and take V = W = PC[f
0
, +00).
Define £ : PC[t
0
, +00) > PC[t
0
, +00) by
2. Let F = R and take V = W = R
mx
". Fix M e R
mxm
.
Define £ : R
mx
" > M
mxn
by
3. Let F = R and take V = P" = (p(x) = a
0
+ ct
}
x H h a
n
x" : a, E R} and
w = p
n

1
.
Define C.: V —> W by Lp — p', where' denotes differentiation with respect to x.
17
Chapter 3
Linear Transformations
3.1 Definition and Examples
We begin with the basic definition of a linear transformation (or linear map, linear function,
or linear operator) between two vector spaces.
Definition 3.1. Let (V, IF) and (W, IF) be vector spaces. Then I: : V + W is a linear
transformation if and only if
I:(avi + {3V2) = al:vi + {3I:V2 for all a, {3 ElF and for all VI, V2 E V.
The vector space V is called the domain of the transformation I: while W, the space into
which it maps, is called the codomain.
Example 3.2.
1. Let IF = JR and take V = W = PC[to, +00).
Define I: : PC[to, +00) + PC[to, +00) by
vet) f+ wet) = (I:v)(t) = 11 e(tr)v(r) dr.
to
2. Let IF = JR and take V = W = JRmxn. Fix ME JRmxm.
Define I: : JRmxn + JRmxn by
X f+ Y = I:X = MX.
3. Let IF = JR and take V = pn = {p(x) = ao + alx + ... + anx
n
: ai E JR} and
W = pnl.
Define I: : V + W by I: p = p', where I denotes differentiation with respect to x.
17
18 Chapters. Li near Transformations
3.2 Matrix Representation of Linear Transformations
Linear transformations between vector spaces with specific bases can be represented con
veniently in matrix form. Specifically, suppose £ : (V, F) — > • (W, F) is linear and further
suppose that {u,, i e n} and {Wj, j e m] are bases for V and W, respectively. Then the
ith column of A = Mat £ (the matrix representation of £ with respect to the given bases
for V and W) is the representation of £i> , with respect to {w
}
•, j e raj. In other words,
represents £ since
where W = [w\,..., w
m
] and
is the z'th column of A. Note that A = Mat £ depends on the particular bases for V and W.
This could be reflected by subscripts, say, in the notation, but this is usually not done.
The action of £ on an arbitrary vector v e V is uniquely determined (by linearity)
by its action on a basis. Thus, if v = E1v1 + • • • + E
n
v
n
= Vx (where u, and hence jc, is
arbitrary), then
Thinking of A both as a matrix and as a linear transformation from Rn to R
m
usually causes no
confusion. Change of basis then corresponds naturally to appropriate matrix multiplication.
Thus, £V = WA since x was arbitrary.
When V = R", W = R
m
and [vi , i e n}, [wj , j e m} are the usual (natural) bases
the equation £V = WA becomes simply £ = A. We thus commonly identify A as a linea
transformation with its matrix representation, i.e.,
18 Chapter 3. Linear Transformations
3.2 Matrix Representation of Linear Transformations
Linear transformations between vector spaces with specific bases can be represented con
veniently in matrix form. Specifically, suppose L : (V, IF) (W, IF) is linear and further
suppose that {Vi, i E and {w j, j E !!!.} are bases for V and W, respectively. Then the
ith column of A = Mat L (the matrix representation of L with respect to the given bases
for V and W) is the representation of LVi with respect to {w j, j E m}. In other words,
represents L since
A=
al
n
]
: E JR.mxn
a
mn
LVi = aliwl + ... + amiWm
=Wai,
where W = [WI, ... , w
m
] and
is the ith column of A. Note that A = Mat L depends on the particular bases for V and W.
This could be reflected by subscripts, say, in the notation, but this is usually not done.
The action of L on an arbitrary vector V E V is uniquely determined (by linearity)
by its action on a basis. Thus, if V = VI + ... + Vn = V x (where v, and hence x, is
arbitrary), then
LVx = Lv = + ... +
= WAx.
Thus, LV = W A since x was arbitrary.
When V = JR.n, W = lR.
m
and {Vi, i E {W j' j E !!!.} are the usual (natural) bases,
the equation LV = W A becomes simply L = A. We thus commonly identify A as a linear
transformation with its matrix representation, i.e.,
Thinking of A both as a matrix and as a linear transformation from JR." to lR.
m
usually causes no
confusion. Change of basis then corresponds naturally to appropriate matrix multiplication.
3.3. Composition of Transformations 19
3.3 Composition of Transformations
Consider three vector spaces U, V, and W and transformations B from U to V and A from
V to W. Then we can define a new transformation C as follows:
formula
Two Special Cases:
Inner Product: Let x, y e Rn. Then their inner product is the scalar
Outer Product: Let x e R
m
, y e Rn. Then their outer product is the m x n
matrix
Note that any rankone matrix A e R
mxn
can be written in the form A = xy
T
above (or xy
H
if A e C
mxn
). A rankone symmetric matrix can be written in
the form XX
T
(or XX
H
).
The above diagram illustrates the composition of transformations C = AB. Note that in
most texts, the arrows above are reversed as follows:
However, it might be useful to prefer the former since the transformations A and B appear
in the same order in both the diagram and the equation. If dimZ// = p, dimV = n,
and dim W = m, and if we associate matrices with the transformations in the usual way,
then composition of transformations corresponds to standard matrix multiplication. That is,
we have C — A B . The above is sometimes expressed componentwise by the
3.3. Composition ofTransformations 19
3.3 Composition of Transformations
Consider three vector spaces U, V, and Wand transformations B from U to V and A from
V to W. Then we can define a new transformation C as follows:
C
The above diagram illustrates the composition of transformations C = AB. Note that in
most texts, the arrows above are reversed as follows:
C
However, it might be useful to prefer the former since the transformations A and B appear
in the same order in both the diagram and the equation. If dimU = p, dim V = n,
and dim W = m, and if we associate matrices with the transformations in the usual way,
then composition of transformations corresponds to standard matrix mUltiplication. That is,
we have CAB . The above is sometimes expressed componentwise by the
mxp
formula
Two Special Cases:
nxp
n
cij = L aikbkj.
k=1
Inner Product: Let x, y E ~ n . Then their inner product is the scalar
n
xTy = Lx;y;.
;=1
Outer Product: Let x E ~ m , y E ~ n . Then their outer product is the m x n
matrix
Note that any rankone matrix A E ~ m x n can be written in the form A = xyT
above (or xyH if A E c
mxn
). A rankone symmetric matrix can be written in
the form xx
T
(or xx
H
).
20 Chapter 3. Li near Transformations
3.4 Structure of Linear Transformations
Let A : V —> W be a linear transformation.
Definition 3.3. The range of A, denotedlZ( A), is the set {w e W : w = Av for some v e V}.
Equivalently, R(A) — {Av : v e V}. The range of A is also known as the image of A and
denoted Im(A).
The nullspace of A, denoted N(A), is the set {v e V : Av = 0}. The nullspace of
A is also known as the kernel of A and denoted Ker (A).
Theorem 3.4. Let A : V — >• W be a linear transformation. Then
1. R( A) C W.
2. N(A) c V.
Note that N(A) and R(A) are, in general, subspaces of different spaces.
Theorem 3.5. Let A e R
mxn
. If A is written in terms of its columns as A = [a\,... ,a
n
],
then
Proof: The proof of this theorem is easy, essentially following immediately from the defi
nition. D
Remark 3.6. Note that in Theorem 3.5 and throughout the text, the same symbol (A) is
used to denote both a linear transformation and its matrix representation with respect to the
usual (natural) bases. See also the last paragraph of Section 3.2.
Definition 3.7. Let {v1 , . . . , vk] be a set of nonzero vectors u, e Rn. The set is said to
be orthogonal if' vjvj = 0 for i ^ j and orthonormal if vf vj = 8
ij
, where 8
t
j is the
Kronecker delta defined by
Example 3.8.
is an orthogonal set.
is an orthonormal set.
3. If { t > i , . . . , Vk} with u, € M." is an orthogonal set, then I — /==,  ., — /===  is an
I ^/v, vi ^/v'
k
v
k
]
orthonormal set.
then
20 Chapter 3. LinearTransformations
3.4 Structure of Linear Transformations
Let A : V + W be a linear transformation.
Definition3.3. The range of A, denotedR(A), is the set {w E W : w = Av for some v E V}.
Equivalently, R(A) = {Av : v E V}. The range of A is also known as the image of A and
denoted Im(A).
The nullspace of A, denoted N(A), is the set {v E V : Av = O}. The nullspace of
A is also known as the kernel of A and denoted Ker (A).
Theorem 3.4. Let A : V + W be a linear transformation. Then
1. R(A) S; W.
2. N(A) S; V.
Note that N(A) and R(A) are, in general, subspaces of different spaces.
Theorem 3.5. Let A E If A is written in terms of its columns as A = [ai, ... , an],
then
R(A) = Sp{al, ... , an} .
Proof: The proof of this theorem is easy, essentially following immediately from the defi
nition. 0
Remark 3.6. Note that in Theorem 3.5 and throughout the text, the same symbol (A) is
used to denote both a linear transformation and its matrix representation with respect to the
usual (natural) bases. See also the last paragraph of Section 3.2.
Definition 3.7. Let {VI, ... , vd be a set of nonzero vectors Vi E The set is said to
be orthogonal if vr v j = 0 for i f= j and orthonormal if vr v j = 8ij' where 8ij is the
Kronecker delta defined by
8 {I ifi=j,
ij = 0 if i f= j.
Example 3.8.
1. {[ J. [ : J} is an orthogonal set.
2. {[ ] ,[ J} is an orthonormal set.
3 If { }
. h 1Tlln • h I th { .
. VI, •.• ,Vk Wit Vi E.IN,. IS an ort ogona set, en ... , IS an
VI
orthonormal set.
3.4. Structure of Linear Transformations 21
Definition 3.9. Let S c Rn. Then the orthogonal complement of S is defined as the set
S
1
 = {v e Rn : V
T
S = 0 for all s e S}.
Example 3.10. Let
Then it can be shown that
Working from the definition, the computation involved is simply to find all nontrivial (i.e.,
nonzero) solutions of the system of equations
Note that there is nothing special about the two vectors in the basis defining S being or
thogonal. Any set of vectors will do, including dependent spanning vectors (which would,
of course, then give rise to redundant equations).
Theorem 311 Let R S C R
n
The
Proof: We prove and discuss only item 2 here. The proofs of the other results are left as
exercises. Let { v1 , ..., v
k
} be an orthonormal basis for S and let x e Rn be an arbitrary
vector. Set
3.4. Structure of Li near Transformations 21
Definition 3.9. Let S <; ]Rn. Then the orthogonal complement of S is defined as the set
vTs=OforallsES}.
Example 3.10. Let
Then it can be shown that
Working from the definition, the computation involved is simply to find all nontrivial (i.e.,
nonzero) solutions of the system of equations
3xI + 5X2 + 7X3 = 0,
4xI + X2 + X3 = 0.
Note that there is nothing special about the two vectors in the basis defining S being or
thogonal. Any set of vectors will do, including dependent spanning vectors (which would,
of course, then give rise to redundant equations).
Theorem 3.11. Let n, S <; ]Rn. Then
2. S \B = ]Rn.
3. = S.
4. n <; S if and only if <;
5. (n + = nl. n
6. (n n = +
Proof: We prove and discuss only item 2 here. The proofs of the other results are left as
exercises. Let {VI, ... , Vk} be an orthonormal basis for S and let x E ]Rn be an arbitrary
vector. Set
k
XI = L (xT Vi)Vi,
;=1
X2 = X XI.
we see that x2 is orthogonal to v1, ..., Vk and hence to any linear combination of these
vectors. In other words, X2 is orthogonal to any vector in S. We have thus shown that
S + S
1
= Rn. We also have that S U S
1
=0 since the only vector s e S orthogonal to
everything in S (i.e., including itself) is 0.
It is also easy to see directly that, when we have such direct sum decompositions, we
can write vectors in a unique way with respect to the corresponding subspaces. Suppose,
for example, that x = x1 + x2. = x'1+ x'
2
, where x\, x 1 E S and x2, x'
2
e S
1
. Then
(x'1 — x1)
T
( x'
2
— x2) = 0 by definition of ST . But then (x'1 — x1)
T
( x' 1 – x1) = 0 since
x
2
— X2 = — (x'1 — x1) (which follows by rearranging the equation x1+x2 = x'1 + x'
2
) . Thus,
x1 — x'1 and x2 = x
2
. D
Theorem 3.12. Let A : Rn —> R
m
. Then
1. N(A)
1
" = 7£(A
r
). (Note: This holds only for finitedimensional vector spaces.)
2. 'R,(A)
1
~ — J\f(A
T
). (Note: This also holds for infinitedimensional vector spaces.)
Proof: To prove the first part, take an arbitrary x e A/ "(A). Then Ax = 0 and this is
equivalent to y
T
Ax = 0 for all v. But y
T
Ax = ( A
T
y ) x. Thus, Ax = 0 if and only if x
is orthogonal to all vectors of the form A
T
v, i.e., x e R(A
r
) . Since x was arbitrary, we
have established that N(A)
1
= U(A
T
}.
The proof of the second part is similar and is left as an exercise. D
Definition 3.13. Let A : R
n
> R
m
. Then {v e R" : Av = 0} is sometimes called the
right nullspace of A. Similarly, (w e R
m
: W
T
A = 0} is called the left nullspace of A.
Clearly, the right nullspace is A/"(A) while the left nullspace is J\f(A
T
).
Theorem 3.12 and part 2 of Theorem 3.11 can be combined to give two very fun
damental and useful decompositions of vectors in the domain and codomain of a linear
transformation A. See also Theorem 2.26.
Theorem 3.14 (Decomposition Theorem). Let A : R" > R
m
. Then
7. every vector v in the domain space R" can be written in a unique way as v = x + y,
where x € M(A) and y € J\f(A)
±
= ft(A
r
) (i.e., R" = M(A) 0 ft(A
r
)).
2. every vector w in the codomain space R
m
can be written in a unique way asw = x+y,
where x e U(A) and y e ft(A)
1
 = Af(A
T
) (i.e., R
m
= 7l(A) 0 M(A
T
)).
This key theorem becomes very easy to remember by carefully studying and under
standing Figure 3.1 in the next section.
3.5 Four Fundamental Subspaces
Consider a general matrix A € E^
x
". When thought of as a linear transformation from E"
to R
m
, many properties of A can be developed in terms of the four fundamental subspaces
22 Chapters. L i near Transformations
Then x\ e < S and, since
22 Chapter 3. Linear Transformations
Then XI E S and, since
T T T
x
2
V j = X V j  X I V j
=XTVjXTVj=O,
we see that X2 is orthogonal to VI, .•. , Vk and hence to any linear combination of these
vectors. In other words, X2 is orthogonal to any vector in S. We have thus shown that
S + S.l = IRn. We also have that S n S.l = 0 since the only vector s E S orthogonal to
everything in S (i.e., including itself) is O.
It is also easy to see directly that, when we have such direct sum decompositions, we
can write vectors in a unique way with respect to the corresponding subspaces. Suppose,
for example, that x = XI + X2 = x; + x ~ , where XI, x; E Sand X2, x ~ E S.l. Then
(x;  XI/ ( x ~  X2) = 0 by definition of S.l. But then (x;  XI)T (x;  xd = 0 since
x ~ X2 = (x; XI) (which follows by rearranging the equation XI +X2 = x; + x ~ ) . Thus,
XI = x; andx2 = x ~ . 0
Theorem 3.12. Let A : IR
n
+ IRm. Then
1. N(A).l = R(A
T
). (Note: This holds only for finitedimensional vector spaces.)
2. R(A).l = N(A
T
). (Note: This also holds for infinitedimensional vector spaces.)
Proof: To prove the first part, take an arbitrary x E N(A). Then Ax = 0 and this is
equivalent to yT Ax = 0 for all y. But yT Ax = (AT y{ x. Thus, Ax = 0 if and only if x
is orthogonal to all vectors of the form AT y, i.e., x E R(AT).l. Since x was arbitrary, we
have established thatN(A).l = R(A
T
).
The proof of the second part is similar and is left as an exercise. 0
Definition 3.13. Let A : IR
n
+ IRm. Then {v E IR
n
: A v = O} is sometimes called the
right nullspace of A. Similarly, {w E IR
m
: w
T
A = O} is called the left nullspace of A.
Clearly, the right nullspace is N(A) while the left nullspace is N(A
T
).
Theorem 3.12 and part 2 of Theorem 3.11 can be combined to give two very fun
damental and useful decompositions of vectors in the domain and codomain of a linear
transformation A. See also Theorem 2.26.
Theorem 3.14 (Decomposition Theorem). Let A : IR
n
+ IRm. Then
1. every vector v in the domain space IR
n
can be written in a unique way as v = x + y,
where x E N(A) and y E N(A).l = R(AT) (i.e., IR
n
= N(A) EB R(A
T
».
2. every vector w in the codomain space IR
m
can be written ina unique way as w = x+y,
where x E R(A) and y E R(A).l = N(A
T
) (i.e., IR
m
= R(A) EBN(A
T
».
This key theorem becomes very easy to remember by carefully studying and under
standing Figure 3.1 in the next section.
3.5 Four Fundamental Subspaces
Consider a general matrix A E lR;,xn. When thought of as a linear transformation from IR
n
to IRm, many properties of A can be developed in terms of the four fundamental subspaces
3.5. Four Fundamental Subspaces 23
Figure 3.1. Four fundamental subspaces.
7£(A), 'R.(A)^, Af ( A) , and N(A)T. Figure 3.1 makes many key properties seem almost
obvious and we return to this figure frequently both in the context of linear transformations
and in illustrating concepts such as controllability and observability.
Definition 3.15. Let V and W be vector spaces and let A : V
motion.
1. A is onto (also called epic or surjective) ifR,(A) = W.
W be a linear transfor
2. A is onetoone or 11 (also called monic or infective) ifJ\f(A) = 0. Two equivalent
characterizations of A being 11 that are often easier to verify in practice are the
following:
Definition 3.16. Let A : E" > R
m
. Then rank(A) = dimftCA). This is sometimes called
the column rank of A (maximum number of independent columns). The row rank of A is
3.5. Four Fundamental Subspaces 23
A
r
N(A)1
r
EB {OJ
X {O}Gl
nr m r
Figure 3.1. Four fundamental subspaces.
R(A), R(A)1, N(A), and N(A)1. Figure 3.1 makes many key properties seem almost
obvious and we return to this figure frequently both in the context of linear transformations
and in illustrating concepts such as controllability and observability.
Definition 3.15. Let V and W be vector spaces and let A : V + W be a linear transfor
mation.
1. A is onto (also called epic or surjective) ifR(A) = W.
2. A is onetoone or 11 (also called monic or injective) if N(A) = O. Two equivalent
characterizations of A being 11 that are often easier to verify in practice are the
following:
(a) AVI = AV2 ===} VI = V2 .
(b) VI t= V2 ===} AVI t= AV2 .
Definition 3.16. Let A : IR
n
+ IRm. Then rank(A) = dim R(A). This is sometimes called
the column rank of A (maximum number of independent columns). The row rank of A is
24 Chapter3. Linear Transformations
dim 7£(A
r
) (maximum number of independent rows). The dual notion to rank is the nullity
of A, sometimes denoted nullity(A) or corank(A), and is defined as dim A/"(A).
Theorem 3.17. Let A : R
n
> R
m
. Then dim K(A) = dimA/ '(A)
±
. (Note: Since
A/^A)
1
" = 7l(A
T
), this theorem is sometimes colloquially stated "row rank of A = column
rank of A.")
Proof: Define a linear transformation T : J\f(A)~
L
— >• 7£(A) by
Clearly T is 11 (since A/"(T) = 0). To see that T is also onto, take any w e 7£(A). Then
by definition there is a vector x e R" such that Ax — w. Write x = x\ + X2, where
x\ e A/^A)
1
 and jc
2
e A/"(A). Then Ajti = u; = r*i since *i e A/^A)
1
. The last equality
shows that T is onto. We thus have that dim7?.(A) = dimA/^A^ since it is easily shown
that if { ui , . . . , iv} is abasis forA/'CA)
1
, then {Tv\, . . . , Tv
r
] is abasis for 7?.(A). Finally, if
we apply this and several previous results, the following string of equalities follows easily:
"column rank of A" = rank(A) = dim7e(A) = dim A/^A)
1
= dim7l(A
T
) = rank(A
r
) =
"row rank of A." D
The following corollary is immediate. Like the theorem, it is a statement about equality
of dimensions; the subspaces themselves are not necessarily in the same vector space.
Corollary 3.18. Let A : R" > R
m
. Then dimA/"(A) + dimft(A) = n, where n is the
dimension of the domain of A.
Proof: From Theorems 3.11 and 3.17 we see immediately that
For completeness, we include here a few miscellaneous results about ranks of sums
and products of matrices.
Theorem 3.19. Let A, B e R"
xn
. Then
Part 4 of Theorem 3.19 suggests looking at the general problem of the four fundamental
subspaces of matrix products. The basic results are contained in the following easily proved
theorem.
24 Chapter 3. LinearTransformations
dim R(AT) (maximum number of independent rows). The dual notion to rank is the nullity
of A, sometimes denoted nullity(A) or corank(A), and is defined as dimN(A).
Theorem 3.17. Let A : ]Rn ~ ]Rm. Then dim R(A) = dimNCA)L. (Note: Since
N(A)L = R(A
T
), this theorem is sometimes colloquially stated "row rank of A = column
rank of A.")
Proof: Define a linear transformation T : N(A)L ~ R(A) by
Tv = Av for all v E N(A)L.
Clearly T is 11 (since N(T) = 0). To see that T is also onto, take any W E R(A). Then
by definition there is a vector x E ]Rn such that Ax = w. Write x = Xl + X2, where
Xl E N(A)L andx2 E N(A). Then AXI = W = TXI since Xl E N(A)L. The last equality
shows that T is onto. We thus have that dim R(A) = dimN(A)L since it is easily shown
that if {VI, ... , v
r
} is a basis for N(A)L, then {TVI, ... , Tv
r
} is a basis for R(A). Finally, if
we apply this and several previous results, the following string of equalities follows easily:
"column rank of A" = rank(A) = dim R(A) = dimN(A)L = dim R(AT) = rank(AT) =
"row rank of A." 0
The following corollary is immediate. Like the theorem, it is a statement about equality
of dimensions; the subspaces themselves are not necessarily in the same vector space.
Corollary 3.18. Let A : ]Rn ~ ]Rm. Then dimN(A) + dim R(A) = n, where n is the
dimension of the domain of A.
Proof: From Theorems 3.11 and 3.17 we see immediately that
n = dimN(A) + dimN(A)L
= dimN(A) + dim R(A) . 0
For completeness, we include here a few miscellaneous results about ranks of sums
and products of matrices.
Theorem 3.19. Let A, B E ]Rnxn. Then
1. O:s rank(A + B) :s rank(A) + rank(B).
2. rank(A) + rank(B)  n :s rank(AB) :s min{rank(A), rank(B)}.
3. nullity(B) :s nullity(AB) :s nullity(A) + nullity(B).
4. if B is nonsingular, rank(AB) = rank(BA) = rank(A) and N(BA) = N(A).
Part 4 of Theorem 3.19 suggests looking atthe general problem of the four fundamental
subspaces of matrix products. The basic results are contained in the following easily proved
theorem.
3.5. Four F u n d a me n t a l Subspaces 25
Theorem 3.20. Let A e R
mxn
, B e R
nxp
. Then
The next theorem is closely related to Theorem 3.20 and is also easily proved. It
is extremely useful in text that follows, especially when dealing with pseudoinverses and
linear least squares problems.
Theorem 3.21. Let A e R
mxn
. Then
We now characterize 11 and onto transformations and provide characterizations in
terms of rank and invertibility.
Theorem 3.22. Let A : R
n
» R
m
. Then
1. A is onto if and only //"rank(A) — m (A has linearly independent rows or is said to
have full row rank; equivalently, AA
T
is nonsingular).
2. A is 11 if and only z/r a nk(A) = n (A has linearly independent columns or is said
to have full column rank; equivalently, A
T
A is nonsingular).
Proof: Proof of part 1: If A is onto, dim7?,(A) — m — rank (A). Conversely, let y e R
m
be arbitrary. Let jc = A
T
(AA
T
)~
]
y e R
n
. Then y = Ax, i.e., y e 7?.(A), so A is onto.
Proof of part 2: If A is 11, then A/"(A) = 0, which implies that dim A/^A)
1
—n —
dim 7£(A
r
), and hence dim 7£(A) = n by Theorem 3.17. Conversely, suppose Ax\ = Ax^.
Then A
r
A;t i = A
T
Ax2, which implies x\ = x^. since A
r
A is invertible. Thus, A is
11. D
Definition 3.23. A : V —» W is invertible (or bijective) if and only if it is 11 and onto.
Note that if A is invertible, then dim V — dim W. Also, A : W
1
»• E" is invertible or
nonsingular if and only z/r ank(A) = n.
Note that in the special case when A € R"
x
", the transformations A, A
r
, and A"
1
are all 11 and onto between the two spaces M(A)
±
and 7£(A). The transformations A
T
and A~
!
have the same domain and range but are in general different maps unless A is
orthogonal. Similar remarks apply to A and A~
T
.
3.5. Four Fundamental Subspaces 25
Theorem 3.20. Let A E IRmxn, B E IRnxp. Then
1. RCAB) S; RCA).
2. N(AB) ;2 N(B).
3. R«AB)T) S; R(B
T
).
4. N«AB)T) ;2 N(A
T
).
The next theorem is closely related to Theorem 3.20 and is also easily proved. It
is extremely useful in text that follows, especially when dealing with pseudoinverses and
linear least squares problems.
Theorem 3.21. Let A E IRmxn. Then
1. R(A) = R(AA
T
).
2. R(AT) = R(A
T
A).
3. N(A) = N(A
T
A).
4. N(A
T
) = N(AA
T
).
We now characterize II and onto transformations and provide characterizations in
terms of rank and invertibility.
Theorem 3.22. Let A : IR
n
+ IRm. Then
1. A is onto if and only if rank (A) = m (A has linearly independent rows or is said to
have full row rank; equivalently, AA T is nonsingular).
2. A is 11 if and only ifrank(A) = n (A has linearly independent columns or is said
to have full column rank; equivalently, AT A is nonsingular).
Proof' Proof of part 1: If A is onto, dim R(A) = m = rank(A). Conversely, let y E IRm
be arbitrary. Let x = AT (AAT)I Y E IRn. Then y = Ax, i.e., y E R(A), so A is onto.
Proof of part 2: If A is 11, then N(A) = 0, which implies that dimN(A)1 = n =
dim R(A
T
), and hence dim R(A) = n by Theorem 3.17. Conversely, suppose AXI = AX2.
Then AT AXI = AT AX2, which implies XI = X2 since AT A is invertible. Thus, A is
11. D
Definition 3.23. A : V + W is invertible (or bijective) if and only if it is 11 and onto.
Note that if A is invertible, then dim V = dim W. Also, A : IRn + IR
n
is invertible or
nonsingular ifand only ifrank(A) = n.
Note that in the special case when A E I R ~ x n , the transformations A, AT, and AI
are all 11 and onto between the two spaces N(A)1 and R(A). The transformations AT
and A I have the same domain and range but are in general different maps unless A is
orthogonal. Similar remarks apply to A and A T.
26 Chapters. Li near Transformations
If a linear transformation is not invertible, it may still be right or left invertible. Defi
nitions of these concepts are followed by a theorem characterizing left and right invertible
transformations.
Definition 3.24. Let A : V > W. Then
1. A is said to be right invertible if there exists a right inverse transformation A~
R
:
W —> V such that AA~
R
= I
w
, where I
w
denotes the identity transformation on W.
2. A is said to be left invertible if there exists a left inverse transformation A~
L
: W —>
V such that A~
L
A = I
v
, where I
v
denotes the identity transformation on V.
Theorem 3.25. Let A : V > W. Then
1. A is right invertible if and only if it is onto.
2. A is left invertible if and only if it is 11.
Moreover, A is invertible if and only if it is both right and left invertible, i.e., both 11 and
onto, in which case A~
l
= A~
R
= A~
L
.
Note: From Theorem 3.22 we see that if A : E" >• E
m
is onto, then a right inverse
is given by A~
R
= A
T
(AA
T
) . Similarly, if A is 11, then a left inverse is given by
A~
L
= (A
T
A)~
1
A
T
.
Theorem 3.26. Let A : V » V.
1. If there exists a unique right inverse A~
R
such that AA~
R
= I, then A is invertible.
2. If there exists a unique left inverse A~
L
such that A~
L
A = I, then A is invertible.
Proof: We prove the first part and leave the proof of the second to the reader. Notice the
following:
Thus, (A
R
+ A
R
A — /) must be a right inverse and, therefore, by uniqueness it must be
the case that A~
R
+ A~
R
A — I = A~
R
. But this implies that A~
R
A = /, i.e., that A~
R
is
a left inverse. It then follows from Theorem 3.25 that A is invertible. D
Example 3.27.
1. Let A = [1 2] : E
2
»• E
1
. Then A is onto. (Proof: Take any a € E
1
; then one
can always find v e E
2
such that [1 2][^] = a). Obviously A has full row rank
(=1) and A~
R
= [ _j j is a right inverse. Also, it is clear that there are infinitely many
right inverses for A. In Chapter 6 we characterize all right inverses of a matrix by
characterizing all solutions of the linear matrix equation AR = I.
26 Chapter 3. linear Transformations
If a linear transformation is not invertible, it may still be right or left invertible. Defi
nitions of these concepts are followed by a theorem characterizing left and right invertible
transformations.
Definition 3.24. Let A : V + W. Then
1. A is said to be right invertible if there exists a right inverse transformation A
R
:
W + V such that AA R = I
w
, where Iw denotes the identity transfonnation on W.
2. A is said to be left invertible if there exists a left inverse transformation A L : W +
V such that A L A = Iv, where Iv denotes the identity transfonnation on V.
Theorem 3.25. Let A : V + W. Then
1. A is right invertible if and only if it is onto.
2. A is left invertible if and only ifit is 11.
Moreover, A is invertible if and only if it is both right and left invertible, i.e., both 11 and
onto, in which case A I = A R = A L.
Note: From Theorem 3.22 we see that if A : ]Rn + ]Rm is onto, then a right inverse
is given by A R = AT (AAT) I. Similarly, if A is 11, then a left inverse is given by
A
L
= (AT A)I AT.
Theorem 3.26. Let A : V + V.
1. If there exists a unique right inverse A  R such that A A  R = I, then A is invertible.
2. If there exists a unique left inverse A L such that A L A = I, then A is invertible.
Proof: We prove the first part and leave the proof of the second to the reader. Notice the
following:
A(A
R
+ ARA I) = AA
R
+ AARA  A
= I + I A  A since AA R = I
= I.
Thus, (A R + A R A  I) must be a right inverse and, therefore, by uniqueness it must be
the case that A R + A R A  I = A R. But this implies that A R A = I, i.e., that A R is
a left inverse. It then follows from Theorem 3.25 that A is invertible. 0
Example 3.27.
1. Let A = [1 2]:]R2 + ]R I. Then A is onto. (Proo!' Take any a E ]R I; then one
can always find v E ]R2 such that [1 2][ ~ ~ ] = a). Obviously A has full row rank
(= 1) and A  R = [ _ ~ ] is a right inverse. Also, it is clear that there are infinitely many
right inverses for A. In Chapter 6 we characterize all right inverses of a matrix by
characterizing all solutions of the linear matrix equation A R = I.
Exercises 27
2. Let A = [J] : E
1
> E
2
. ThenAis 11. (Proof: The only solution to 0 = Av = [
I
2
]v
is v = 0, whence A/"(A) = 0 so A is 11). It is now obvious that A has full column
rank (=1) and A~
L
= [3 — 1] is a left inverse. Again, it is clear that there are
infinitely many left inverses for A. In Chapter 6 we characterize all left inverses of a
matrix by characterizing all solutions of the linear matrix equation LA = I.
3. The matrix
when considered as a linear transformation on IE
below bases for its four fundamental subspaces.
\ is neither 11 nor onto. We give
EXERCISES
3 4
1. Let A = [
8 5
J and consider A as a linear transformation mapping E
3
to E
2
.
Find the matrix representation of A with respect to the bases
2. Consider the vector space R
nx
" over E, let S denote the subspace of symmetric
matrices, and let 7£ denote the subspace of skewsymmetric matrices. For matrices
X, Y e E
nx
" define their inner product by (X, Y) = Tr( X
r
F) . Show that, with
respect to this inner product, 'R, — S^.
3. Consider the differentiation operator C defined in Example 3.2.3. Is £ 11? Is£
onto?
4. Prove Theorem 3.4.
of R
3
and
of E
2
.
Exercises 27
2. LetA = [i]:]Rl ~ ]R2. Then A is 11. (Proof The only solution toO = Av = [i]v
is v = 0, whence N(A) = 0 so A is 11). It is now obvious that A has full column
rank (=1) and A L = [3  1] is a left inverse. Again, it is clear that there are
infinitely many left inverses for A. In Chapter 6 we characterize all left inverses of a
matrix by characterizing all solutions of the linear matrix equation LA = I.
3. The matrix
[
1 1
A = 2 1
3 1
when considered as a linear transformation on ]R3, is neither 11 nor onto. We give
below bases for its four fundamental subspaces.
EXERCISES
1. Let A = [ ~ ; i) and consider A as a linear transformation mapping ]R3 to ]R2.
Find the matrix representation of A with respect to the bases
{[lHHU]}
{ [ i l [ ~ J }
2. Consider the vector space ]Rnxn over ]R, let S denote the subspace of symmetric
matrices, and let R denote the subspace of skewsymmetric matrices. For matrices
X, Y E ]Rnxn define their inner product by (X, y) = Tr(X
T
Y). Show that, with
respect to this inner product, R = S J. .
3. Consider the differentiation operator £, defined in Example 3.2.3. Is £, II? Is £,
onto?
4. Prove Theorem 3.4.
28 Chapters. Linear Transformations
5. Prove Theorem 3.11.4.
6. Prove Theorem 3.12.2.
7. Determine bases for the four fundamental subspaces of the matrix
8. Suppose A e R
mxn
has a left inverse. Show that A
T
has a right inverse.
9. Let A = [ J o]. Determine A/"(A) and 7£(A). Are they equal? Is this true in general?
If this is true in general, prove it; if not, provide a counterexample.
10. Suppose A € Mg
9x48
. How many linearly independent solutions can be found to the
homogeneous linear system Ax = 0?
11. Modify Figure 3.1 to illustrate the four fundamental subspaces associated with A
T
e
R
nxm
thought of as a transformation from R
m
to R".
28 Chapter 3. Linear Transformations
5. Prove Theorem 3.Il.4.
6. Prove Theorem 3.12.2.
7. Detennine bases for the four fundamental subspaces of the matrix
2 5 5 3
8. Suppose A E IR
m
xn has a left inverse. Show that A T has a right inverse.
9. Let A = n DetennineN(A) and R(A). Are they equal? Is this true in general?
If this is true in general, prove it; if not, provide a counterexample.
10. Suppose A E How many linearly independent solutions can be found to the
homogeneous linear system Ax = O?
11. Modify Figure 3.1 to illustrate the four fundamental subspaces associated with ATE
IR
nxm
thought of as a transformation from IR
m
to IRn.
Chapter 4
Introduction to the
MoorePen rose
Pseudoinverse
In this chapter we give a brief introduction to the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse, a gener
alization of the inverse of a matrix. The MoorePenrose pseudoinverse is defined for any
matrix and, as is shown in the following text, brings great notational and conceptual clarity
to the study of solutions to arbitrary systems of linear equations and linear least squares
problems.
4.1 Definitions and Characterizations
Consider a linear transformation A : X —>• y, where X and y are arbitrary finite
dimensional vector spaces. Define a transformation T : Af(A)
1
 —>• Tl(A) by
Then, as noted in the proof of Theorem 3.17, T is bijective (11 and onto), and hence we
can define a unique inverse transformation T~
l
: 7£(A) —>• J\f(A}~
L
. This transformation
can be used to give our first definition of A
+
, the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse of A.
Unfortunately, the definition neither provides nor suggests a good computational strategy
for determining A
+
.
Definition 4.1. With A and T as defined above, define a transformation A
+
: y —» • X by
where y = y\ + j2 with y\ e 7£(A) and yi e Tl(A}
L
. Then A
+
is the MoorePenrose
pseudoinverse of A.
Although X and y were arbitrary vector spaces above, let us henceforth consider the
case X = W
1
and y = R
m
. We have thus defined A+ for all A e IR ™
X
" . A purely algebraic
characterization of A
+
is given in the next theorem, which was proved by Penrose in 1955;
see [22].
29
Chapter 4
Introduction to the
MoorePenrose
Pseudoinverse
In this chapter we give a brief introduction to the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse, a gener
alization of the inverse of a matrix. The MoorePenrose pseudoinverse is defined for any
matrix and, as is shown in the following text, brings great notational and conceptual clarity
to the study of solutions to arbitrary systems of linear equations and linear least squares
problems.
4.1 Definitions and Characterizations
Consider a linear transformation A : X + y, where X and Y are arbitrary finite
dimensional vector spaces. Define a transformation T : N(A).l + R(A) by
Tx = Ax for all x E NCA).l.
Then, as noted in the proof of Theorem 3.17, T is bijective Cll and onto), and hence we
can define a unique inverse transformation T
1
: RCA) + NCA).l. This transformation
can be used to give our first definition of A +, the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse of A.
Unfortunately, the definition neither provides nor suggests a good computational strategy
for determining A + .
Definition 4.1. With A and T as defined above, define a transformation A + : Y + X by
where Y = YI + Yz with Yl E RCA) and Yz E RCA).l. Then A+ is the MoorePenrose
pseudoinverse of A.
Although X and Y were arbitrary vector spaces above, let us henceforth consider the
case X = ~ n and Y = lP1.
m
. We have thus defined A + for all A E lP1.;" xn. A purely algebraic
characterization of A + is given in the next theorem, which was proved by Penrose in 1955;
see [22].
29
30 Chapter 4. Introduction to the MoorePenrose Pseudoinverse
Theorem 4.2. Let A e R?
xn
. Then G = A
+
i f and only i f
(PI) AGA = A.
(P2) GAG = G.
(P3) (AGf = AG.
(P4) (GA)
T
= GA.
Furthermore, A
+
always exi sts and i s uni que.
Note that the inverse of a nonsingular matrix satisfies all four Penrose properties. Also,
a right or left inverse satisfies no fewer than three of the four properties. Unfortunately, as
with Definition 4.1, neither the statement of Theorem 4.2 nor its proof suggests a computa
tional algorithm. However, the Penrose properties do offer the great virtue of providing a
checkable criterion in the following sense. Given a matrix G that is a candidate for being
the pseudoinverse of A, one need simply verify the four Penrose conditions (P1)(P4). If G
satisfies all four, then by uniqueness, it must be A
+
. Such a verification is often relatively
straightforward.
Example 4.3. Consider A = [' ]. Verify directly that A
+
= [ f ] satisfies (P1)(P4).
Note that other left inverses (for example, A~
L
= [3 — 1]) satisfy properties (PI), (P2),
and (P4) but not (P3).
Still another characterization of A
+
is given in the following theorem, whose proof
can be found in [1, p. 19]. While not generally suitable for computer implementation, this
characterization can be useful for hand calculation of small examples.
Theorem 4.4. Let A e R™
xn
. Then
4.2 Examples
Each of the following can be derived or verified by using the above definitions or charac
terizations.
Example 4.5. A
+
= A
T
(AA
T
)~ if A is onto (independent rows) (A is right invertible).
Example 4.6. A
+
= (A
T
A)~ A
T
i f A is 11 (independent columns) (A is left invertible).
Example 4.7. For any scalar a,
30 Chapter 4. Introduction to the MoorePenrose Pseudoinverse
Theorem 4.2. Let A E lR;" xn. Then G = A + if and only if
(Pl) AGA = A.
(P2) GAG = G.
(P3) (AG)T = AG.
(P4) (GA)T = GA.
Furthermore, A + always exists and is unique.
Note that the inverse of a nonsingular matrix satisfies all four Penrose properties. Also,
a right or left inverse satisfies no fewer than three of the four properties. Unfortunately, as
with Definition 4.1, neither the statement of Theorem 4.2 nor its proof suggests a computa
tional algorithm. However, the Penrose properties do offer the great virtue of providing a
checkable criterion in the following sense. Given a matrix G that is a candidate for being
the pseudoinverse of A, one need simply verify the four Penrose conditions (P1)(P4). If G
satisfies all four, then by uniqueness, it must be A +. Such a verification is often relatively
straightforward.
Example 4.3. Consider A = [a Verify directly that A+ = [! ~ ] satisfies (PI)(P4).
Note that other left inverses (for example, A L = [3  1]) satisfy properties (PI), (P2),
and (P4) but not (P3).
Still another characterization of A + is given in the following theorem, whose proof
can be found in [1, p. 19]. While not generally suitable for computer implementation, this
characterization can be useful for hand calculation of small examples.
Theorem 4.4. Let A E lR;" xn. Then
4.2 Examples
A + = lim (AT A + 8
2
1) I AT
6+0
= limAT(AAT +8
2
1)1.
6+0
(4.1)
(4.2)
Each of the following can be derived or verified by using the above definitions or charac
terizations.
Example 4.5. X
t
= AT (AA T) I if A is onto (independent rows) (A is right invertible).
Example 4.6. A+ = (AT A)I AT if A is 11 (independent columns) (A is left invertible).
Example 4.7. For any scalar a,
if a t= 0,
if a =0.
4.3. Properties and Appl ications 31
Example 4.8. For any vector v e M",
Example 4.9.
Example 4.10.
4.3 Properties and Applications
This section presents some miscellaneous useful results on pseudoinverses. Many of these
are used in the text that follows.
Theorem 4.11. Let A e R
mx
" and suppose U e R
mxm
, V e R
nx
" are orthogonal (M is
orthogonal if M
T
= M
1
). Then
Proof: For the proof, simply verify that the expression above does indeed satisfy each c
the four Penrose conditions. D
Theorem 4.12. Let S e R
nxn
be symmetric with U
T
SU = D, where U is orthogonal an
D is diagonal. Then S
+
= UD
+
U
T
, where D
+
is again a diagonal matrix whose diagonc
elements are determined according to Example 4.7.
Theorem 4.13. For all A e R
mxn
,
Proof: Both results can be proved using the limit characterization of Theorem 4.4. The
proof of the first result is not particularly easy and does not even have the virtue of being
especially illuminating. The interested reader can consult the proof in [1, p. 27]. The
proof of the second result (which can also be proved easily by verifying the four Penrose
conditions) is as follows:
4.3. Properties and Applications
Example 4.8. For any vector v E jRn,
Example 4.9.
[ ~ ~ r = [
0
~ l
[ ~ ~ r = [
I I
1
Example 4.10.
4 4
I I
4 4
4.3 Properties and Applications
if v i= 0,
if v = O.
31
This section presents some miscellaneous useful results on pseudoinverses. Many of these
are used in the text that follows.
Theorem 4.11. Let A E jRmxn and suppose U E jRmxm, V E jRnxn are orthogonal (M is
orthogonal if MT = M
1
). Then
Proof: For the proof, simply verify that the expression above does indeed satisfy each of
the four Penrose conditions. 0
Theorem 4.12. Let S E jRnxn be symmetric with U
T
SU = D, where U is orthogonal and
D is diagonal. Then S+ = U D+U
T
, where D+ is again a diagonal matrix whose diagonal
elements are determined according to Example 4.7.
Theorem 4.13. For all A E jRmxn,
1. A+ = (AT A)+ AT = AT (AA
T
)+.
2. (A
T
)+ = (A+{.
Proof: Both results can be proved using the limit characterization of Theorem 4.4. The
proof of the first result is not particularly easy and does not even have the virtue of being
especially illuminating. The interested reader can consult the proof in [1, p. 27]. The
proof of the second result (which can also be proved easily by verifying the four Penrose
conditions) is as follows:
(A
T
)+ = lim (AA
T
+ 8
2
l)IA
~   + O
= lim [AT(AAT + 8
2
l)1{
~   + O
= [limAT(AAT + 8
2
l)1{
~   + O
= (A+{. 0
32 Chapter 4. Introduction to the MoorePenrose Pseudoinverse
Note that by combining Theorems 4.12 and 4.13 we can, in theory at least, compute
the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse of any matrix (since A A
T
and A
T
A are symmetric). This
turns out to be a poor approach in finiteprecision arithmetic, however (see, e.g., [7], [11],
[23]), and better methods are suggested in text that follows.
Theorem 4.11 is suggestive of a "reverseorder" property for pseudoinverses of prod
nets of matrices such as exists for inverses of nroducts TTnfortnnatelv. in peneraK
As an example consider A = [0 1J and B = LI. Then
while
However, necessary and sufficient conditions under which the reverseorder property does
hold are known and we quote a couple of moderately useful results for reference.
Theorem 4.14. (AB)
+
= B
+
A
+
if and only if
Proof: For the proof, see [9]. D
Theorem 4.15. (AB)
+
= B?A+, where BI = A+AB and A) = AB\B+.
Proof: For the proof, see [5]. D
Theorem 4.16. If A e R
n
r
xr
, B e R
r
r
xm
, then (AB)
+
= B+A+.
Proof: Since A e R
n
r
xr
, then A
+
= (A
T
A)~
l
A
T
, whence A
+
A = I
r
. Similarly, since
B e W
r
xm
, we have B
+
= B
T
(BB
T
)~\ whence BB
+
= I
r
. The result then follows by
taking BI = B, A\ = A in Theorem 4.15. D
The following theorem gives some additional useful properties of pseudoinverses.
Theorem 4.17. For all A e R
mxn
,
32 Chapter 4. Introduction to the MoorePenrose Pseudo inverse
Note that by combining Theorems 4.12 and 4.13 we can, in theory at least, compute
the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse of any matrix (since AAT and AT A are symmetric). This
turns out to be a poor approach in finiteprecision arithmetic, however (see, e.g., [7], [II],
[23]), and better methods are suggested in text that follows.
Theorem 4.11 is suggestive of a "reverseorder" property for pseudoinverses of prod
ucts of matrices such as exists for inverses of products. Unfortunately, in general,
As an example consider A = [0 I] and B = [ : J. Then
(AB)+ = 1+ = I
while
B+ A+ = [ ] =
However, necessary and sufficient conditions under which the reverseorder property does
hold are known and we quote a couple of moderately useful results for reference.
Theorem 4.14. (AB)+ = B+ A + if and only if
1. n(BB
T
AT) n(AT)
and
2. n(A T AB) nCB) .
Proof: For the proof, see [9]. 0
Theorem 4.15. (AB)+ = B{ Ai, where BI = A+ AB and AI = ABIB{.
Proof: For the proof, see [5]. 0
Theorem 4.16. If A E B E then (AB)+ = B+ A+.
Proof' Since A E then A+ = (AT A)I AT, whence A+ A = f
r
• Similarly, since
B E lR;xm, we have B+ = BT(BBT)I, whence BB+ = f
r
. The result then follows by
takingB
t
= B,At = A in Theorem 4.15. 0
The following theorem gives some additional useful properties of pseudoinverses.
Theorem 4.17. For all A E lR
mxn
,
1. (A+)+ = A.
2. (AT A)+ = A+(A
T
)+, (AA
T
)+ = (A
T
)+ A+.
3. n(A+) = n(A
T
) = n(A+ A) = n(A
T
A).
4. N(A+) = N(AA+) = N«AA
T
)+) = N(AA
T
) = N(A
T
).
5. If A is normal, then AkA+ = A+ Ak and (Ak)+ = (A+)kforall integers k > O.
Exercises 33
Note: Recall that A e R"
xn
is normal if AA
T
= A
T
A. For example, if A is symmetric,
skewsymmetric, or orthogonal, then it is normal. However, a matrix can be none of the
preceding but still be normal, such as
for scalars a, b e E.
The next theorem is fundamental to facilitating a compact and unifying approach
to studying the existence of solutions of (matrix) linear equations and linear least squares
problems.
Theorem 4.18. Suppose A e R
nxp
, B e E
MX m
. Then K(B) c U(A) if and only if
AA+B = B.
Proof: Suppose K(B) c U(A) and take arbitrary jc e R
m
. Then Bx e H(B) c H(A), so
there exists a vector y e R
p
such that Ay = Bx. Then we have
where one of the Penrose properties is used above. Since x was arbitrary, we have shown
that B = AA+B.
To prove the converse, assume that AA
+
B = B and take arbitrary y e K(B). Then
there exists a vector x e R
m
such that Bx = y, whereupon
EXERCISES
1. Use Theorem 4.4 to compute the pseudoinverse of \
2 2
1 •
2. If jc, y e R", show that (xy
T
)
+
= (x
T
x)
+
(y
T
y)
+
yx
T
.
3. For A e R
mxn
, prove that 7£(A) = 7£(AA
r
) using only definitions and elementary
properties of the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse.
4. For A e R
mxn
, prove that ft(A+) = ft(A
r
).
5. For A e R
pxn
and 5 € R
mx
", show that JV(A) C A/"(S) if and only if fiA+A = B.
6. Let A G M"
xn
, 5 e E
nxm
, and D € E
mxm
and suppose further that D is nonsingular.
(a) Prove or disprove that
(b) Prove or disprove that
Exercises 33
Note: Recall that A E IRn xn is normal if A A T = A T A. For example, if A is symmetric,
skewsymmetric, or orthogonal, then it is normal. However, a matrix can be none of the
preceding but still be normal, such as
A=[ a b]
b a
for scalars a, b E R
The next theorem is fundamental to facilitating a compact and unifying approach
to studying the existence of solutions of (matrix) linear equations and linear least squares
problems.
Theorem 4.18. Suppose A E IRnxp, B E IRnxm. Then R(B) S; R(A) if and only if
AA+B = B.
Proof: Suppose R(B) S; R(A) and take arbitrary x E IRm. Then Bx E R(B) S; RCA), so
there exists a vector y E IRP such that Ay = Bx. Then we have
Bx = Ay = AA + Ay = AA + Bx,
where one of the Penrose properties is used above. Since x was arbitrary, we have shown
that B = AA+ B.
To prove the converse, assume that AA + B = B and take arbitrary y E R(B). Then
there exists a vector x E IR
m
such that Bx = y, whereupon
y = Bx = AA+Bx E R(A). 0
EXERCISES
1. Use Theorem 4.4 to compute the pseudoinverse of U ;].
2. If x, Y E IRn, show that (xyT)+ = (x
T
x)+(yT y)+ yx
T
.
3. For A E IRmxn, prove that RCA) = R(AAT) using only definitions and elementary
properties of the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse.
4. For A E IRmxn, prove that R(A+) = R(A
T
).
5. For A E IRPxn and BE IRmxn, show thatN(A) S; N(B) if and only if BA+ A = B.
6. Let A E IRn xn, B E JRn xm , and D E IRm xm and suppose further that D is nonsingular.
(a) Prove or disprove that
[ ~
AB
r = [
A+ A+ABD
i
].
D 0
D
i
(b) Prove or disprove that
[ ~
B
r =[
A+ A+BD
1
l
D 0
D
i
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank
Chapter 5
Introduction to the Singular
Value Decomposition
In this chapter we give a brief introduction to the singular value decomposition (SVD). We
show that every matrix has an SVD and describe some useful properties and applications
of this important matrix factorization. The SVD plays a key conceptual and computational
role throughout (numerical) linear algebra and its applications.
5.1 The Fundamental Theorem
Theorem 5.1. Let A e R™
xn
. Then there exist orthogonal matrices U e R
mxm
and
V € R
nxn
such that
where S = [J °
0
], S = diagfcri, ... , o>) e R
rxr
, and a\ > • • • > o
r
> 0. More
specifically, we have
The submatrix sizes are all determined by r (which must be < min{m, «}), i.e., U\ e W
nxr
,
U
2 e
^x(mr)
; Vi e R
«xr
j
y
2 €
Rnxfor^
and the
0
JM
^/ocJb in E are compatibly
dimensioned.
Proof: Since A
r
A> 0 ( A
r
Ai s symmetric and nonnegative definite; recall, for example,
[24, Ch. 6]), its eigenvalues are all real and nonnegative. (Note: The rest of the proof follows
analogously if we start with the observation that A A
T
> 0 and the details are left to the reader
as an exercise.) Denote the set of eigenvalues of A
T
A by {of , / e n} with a\ > • • • > a
r
>
0 = o>
+
i = • • • = a
n
. Let {u, , i e n} be a set of corresponding orthonormal eigenvectors
and let V\ = [v\, ..., v
r
] , Vi = [v
r+
\, . . . , v
n
]. Letting S — diag(cri, . . . , cf
r
), we can
write A
r
AVi = ViS
2
. Premultiplying by Vf gives Vf A
T
AVi = VfV^S
2
= S
2
, the latter
equality following from the orthonormality of the r;, vectors. Pre and postmultiplying by
S~
l
eives the emotion
35
Chapter 5
Introduction to the Singular
Value Decomposition
In this chapter we give a brief introduction to the singular value decomposition (SVD). We
show that every matrix has an SVD and describe some useful properties and applications
of this important matrix factorization. The SVD plays a key conceptual and computational
role throughout (numerical) linear algebra and its applications.
5.1 The Fundamental Theorem
Theorem 5.1. Let A E Then there exist orthogonal matrices U E IRmxm and
V E IR
nxn
such that
A =
(5.1)
where =
n
S diag(ul, ... , u
r
) E
IRrxr, and UI
> > U
r
> O. More
specifically, we have
U2) [
0
] [
V
T
]
A = [U
I
I
(5.2)
0
VT
2
= Ulsvt·
(5.3)
The submatrix sizes are all determined by r (which must be S min{m, n}), i.e., UI E IRmxr,
U2 E IRrnx(mrl, VI E IRnxr, V
2
E IRnx(nr), and the Osubblocks in are compatibly
dimensioned.
Proof: Since AT A ::::: 0 (AT A is symmetric and nonnegative definite; recall, for example,
[24, Ch. 6]), its eigenvalues are all real and nonnegative. (Note: The rest of the proof follows
analogously if we start with the observation that AAT ::::: 0 and the details are left to the reader
as an exercise.) Denote the set of eigenvalues of AT A by {U?, i E !!.} with UI ::::: ... ::::: U
r
>
0= Ur+1 = ... = Un. Let {Vi, i E !!.} be a set of corresponding orthonormal eigenvectors
and let VI = [VI, ... ,V
r
), V2 = [Vr+I, ... ,V
n
]. LettingS = diag(uI, ... ,u
r
), we can
write A T A VI = VI S2. Premultiplying by vt gives vt A T A VI = vt VI S2 = S2, the latter
equality following from the orthonormality of the Vi vectors. Pre and postmultiplying by
SI gives the equation
(5.4)
35
36 Chapter 5. Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition
Turning now to the eigenvalue equations corresponding to the eigenvalues o
r+
\, . . . , a
n
we
have that A
T
AV
2
= V
2
0 = 0, whence Vf A
T
AV
2
= 0. Thus, AV
2
= 0. Now define the
matrix Ui e M
mx/
" by U\ = AViS~
l
. Then from (5.4) we see that UfU\ = /; i.e., the
columns of U\ are orthonormal. Choose any matrix U
2
£ ^
7 7 I X(
™~
r)
such that [U\ U
2
] is
orthogonal. Then
since A V
2
=0. Referring to the equation U\ = A V\ S
l
defining U\, we see that U{ AV\ =
S and 1/2 AVi = U^UiS = 0. The latter equality follows from the orthogonality of the
columns of U\ andU
2
. Thus, we see that, in fact, U
T
AV = [Q Q], and defining this matrix
to be S completes the proof. D
Definition 5.2. Let A = t/E V
T
be an SVD of A as in Theorem 5.1.
1. The set [a\,..., a
r
} is called the set of (nonzero) singular values of the matrix A and
i
is denoted £(A). From the proof of Theorem 5.1 we see that cr,(A) = A
(
2
(A
T
A) =
A.? (AA
T
). Note that there are alsomin{m, n] — r zero singular values.
2. The columns ofU are called the left singular vectors of A (and are the orthonormal
eigenvectors of AA
T
).
3. The columns of V are called the right singular vectors of A (and are the orthonormal
eigenvectors of A
1
A).
Remark 5.3. The analogous complex case in which A e C™
x
" is quite straightforward.
The decomposition is A = t/E V
H
, where U and V are unitary and the proof is essentially
identical, except for Hermitian transposes replacing transposes.
Remark 5.4. Note that U and V can be interpreted as changes of basis in both the domain
and codomain spaces with respect to which A then has a diagonal matrix representation.
Specifically, let C, denote A thought of as a linear transformation mapping W to W. Then
rewriting A = U^V
T
as AV = U E we see that Mat £ is S with respect to the bases
[v\,..., v
n
} for R" and {u\,..., u
m
] for R
m
(see the discussion in Section 3.2). See also
Remark 5.16.
Remark 5.5. The singular value decomposition is not unique. For example, an examination
of the proof of Theorem 5.1 reveals that
• any orthonormal basis for jV(A) can be used for V
2
.
there may be nonuniqueness associated with the columns of V\ (and hence U\) cor
responding to multiple cr/' s.
36 Chapter 5. Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition
Turning now to the eigenvalue equations corresponding to the eigenvalues ar+l, ... , an we
have that A T A V
z
= VzO = 0, whence Vi A T A V
2
= O. Thus, A V
2
= O. Now define the
matrix VI E IRmxr by VI = AViSI. Then from (5.4) we see that VrVI = /; i.e., the
columns of VI are orthonormal. Choose any matrix V2 E IRmx(mr) such that [VI V2] is
orthogonal. Then
V
T
AV = [
VrAV
I
VIAV
I
=[
VrAV
I
vIA VI
Vr AV
z
]
vI AV
z
]
since A V
2
= O. Referring to the equation V I = A VI SI defining VI, we see that V r A VI =
S and vI A VI = vI VI S = O. The latter equality follows from the orthogonality of the
columns of VI and V
2
. Thus, we see that, in fact, VT A V = and defining this matrix
to be completes the proof. 0
Definition 5.2. Let A = V"i:. VT be an SVD of A as in Theorem 5.1.
1. The set {ai, ... , a
r
} is called the set of (nonzero) singular values of the matrix A and
I
is denoted From the proof of Theorem 5.1 we see that ai(A) = A;' (AT A) =
I
At (AA
T
). Note that there are also min{m, n}  r zero singular values.
2. The columns of V are called the left singular vectors of A (and are the orthonormal
eigenvectors of AA
T
).
3. The columns of V are called the right singular vectors of A (and are the orthonormal
eigenvectors of AT A).
Remark 5.3. The analogous complex case in which A E xn is quite straightforward.
The decomposition is A = V"i:. V H, where V and V are unitary and the proof is essentially
identical, except for Hermitian transposes replacing transposes.
Remark 5.4. Note that V and V can be interpreted as changes of basis in both the domain
and codomain spaces with respect to which A then has a diagonal matrix representation.
Specifically, let C denote A thought of as a linear transformation mapping IR
n
to IRm. Then
rewriting A = V"i:. VT as A V = V"i:. we see that Mat C is "i:. with respect to the bases
{VI, ... , v
n
} for IR
n
and {u I, •.. , u
m
} for IR
m
(see the discussion in Section 3.2). See also
Remark 5.16.
Remark 5.5. The !:ingular value decomposition is not unique. For example, an examination
of the proof of Theorem 5.1 reveals that
• £lny orthonormal basis for N(A) can be used for V2.
• there may be nonuniqueness associated with the columns of VI (and hence VI) cor
responding to multiple O'i'S.
5.1. The Fundamental Theorem 37
• any C/
2
can be used so long as [U\ Ui] is orthogonal.
• columns of U and V can be changed (in tandem) by sign (or multiplier of the form
e
je
in the complex case).
What is unique, however, is the matrix E and the span of the columns of U\, f/2, Vi, and
¥2 (see Theorem 5.11). Note, too, that a "full SVD" (5.2) can always be constructed from
a "compact SVD" (5.3).
Remark 5.6. Computing an SVD by working directly with the eigenproblem for A
T
A or
AA
T
is numerically poor in finiteprecision arithmetic. Better algorithms exist that work
directly on A via a sequence of orthogonal transformations; see, e.g., [7], [11], [25].
F/vamnlp 5.7.
Example 5.10. Let A e R
MX
" be symmetric and positive definite. Let V be an orthogonal
matrix of eigenvectors that diagonalizes A, i.e., V
T
AV = A > 0. Then A = VAV
T
is an
SVD of A.
A factorization t/SV
r
o f a n m x n matrix A qualifies as an SVD if U and V are
orthogonal and £ is an m x n "diagonal" matrix whose diagonal elements in the upper
left corner are positive (and ordered). For example, if A = f/E V
T
is an SVD of A, then
VS
r
C/
r
i sanSVDof A
T
.
where U is an arbitrary 2x2 orthogonal matrix, is an SVD.
Example 5.8.
where 0 is arbitrary, is an SVD.
Example 5.9.
is an SVD.
5.1. The Fundamental Theorem 37
• any U2 can be used so long as [U
I
U2] is orthogonal.
• columns of U and V can be changed (in tandem) by sign (or multiplier of the form
e
j8
in the complex case).
What is unique, however, is the matrix I: and the span of the columns of UI, U2, VI, and
V
2
(see Theorem 5.11). Note, too, that a "full SVD" (5.2) can always be constructed from
a "compact SVD" (5.3).
Remark 5.6. Computing an SVD by working directly with the eigenproblem for A T A or
AA T is numerically poor in finiteprecision arithmetic. Better algorithms exist that work
directly on A via a sequence of orthogonal transformations; see, e.g., [7], [11], [25],
Example 5.7.
A  [1 0 ]  U I U
T
 01 ,
where U is an arbitrary 2 x 2 orthogonal matrix, is an SVD.
Example 5.8.
A _ [ 1
 0  ~ ] = [
where e is arbitrary, is an SVD.
Example 5.9.
cose
 sine
sin e
cose J [ ~ ~ J [
cose
sine
A=U n=[
I 2y'5
2 ~ ][ 3 ~ 0][
3
5
2
y'5
4y'5 0 0
3 S 15
2
0
_y'5 0 0
3
3
[
I
]
3
3J2 [ ~
~ ]
=
2
3
2
3
is an SVD.
Sine]
cose '
v'2 v'2
]
T T
v'2 v'2
T
2
Example 5.10. Let A E IR
nxn
be symmetric and positive definite. Let V be an orthogonal
matrix of eigenvectors that diagonalizes A, i.e., VT A V = A > O. Then A = V A V
T
is an
SVDof A.
A factorization UI: VT of an m x n matrix A qualifies as an SVD if U and V are
orthogonal and I: is an m x n "diagonal" matrix whose diagonal elements in the upper
left comer are positive (and ordered). For example, if A = UI:V
T
is an SVD of A, then
VI:TU
T
is an SVD of AT.
38 Chapter 5. Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition
5.2 Some Basic Properties
Theorem 5.11. Let A e R
mxn
have a singular value decomposition A = VLV
T
. Using
the notation of Theorem 5.1, the following properties hold:
1. rank(A) = r = the number of nonzero singular values of A.
2. Let U =. [ H I , ..., u
m
] and V = [v\, ..., v
n
]. Then A has the dyadic (or outer
product) expansion
Remark 5.12. Part 4 of the above theorem provides a numerically superior method for
finding (orthonormal) bases for the four fundamental subspaces compared to methods based
on, for example, reduction to row or column echelon form. Note that each subspace requires
knowledge of the rank r. The relationship to the four fundamental subspaces is summarized
nicely in Figure 5.1.
Remark 5.13. The elegance of the dyadic decomposition (5.5) as a sum of outer products
and the key vector relations (5.6) and (5.7) explain why it is conventional to write the SVD
as A = UZV
T
rather than, say, A = UZV.
Theorem 5.14. Let A e E
mx
" have a singular value decomposition A = UHV
T
as in
TheoremS.]. Then
where
3. The singular vectors satisfy the relations
38 Chapter 5. Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition
5.2 Some Basic Properties
Theorem 5.11. Let A E jRrnxn have a singular value decomposition A = U'£ V
T
. Using
the notation of Theorem 5.1, the following properties hold:
1. rank(A) = r = the number of nonzero singular values of A.
2. Let V = [UI, ... , urn] and V = [VI, ... , v
n
]. Then A has the dyadic (or outer
product) expansion
r
A = Laiuiv;.
i=1
3. The singular vectors satisfy the relations
for i E r.
AVi = ajui,
AT Uj = aivi
(5.5)
(5.6)
(5.7)
4. LetUI = [UI, ... , u
r
], U2 = [Ur+I, ... , urn], VI = [VI, ... , v
r
], andV2 = [Vr+I, ... , V
n
].
Then
(a) R(VI) = R(A) = N(A
T
/.
(b) R(U
2
) = R(A)1 = N(A
T
).
(c) R(VI) = N(A)1 = R(A
T
).
(d) R(V2) = N(A) = R(AT)1.
Remark 5.12. Part 4 of the above theorem provides a numerically superior method for
finding (orthonormal) bases for the four fundamental subspaces compared to methods based
on, for example, reduction to row or column echelon form. Note that each subspace requires
knowledge of the rank r. The relationship to the four fundamental subspaces is summarized
nicely in Figure 5.1.
Remark 5.13. The elegance of the dyadic decomposition (5.5) as a sum of outer products
and the key vector relations (5.6) and (5.7) explain why it is conventional to write the SVD
as A = U'£V
T
rather than, say, A = U,£V.
Theorem 5.14. Let A E jRmxn have a singular value decomposition A = U,£V
T
as in
Theorem 5.1. Then
(5.8)
where
5.2. Some Basic Properties 39
Figure 5.1. SVD and the four fundamental subspaces.
with the Qsubblocks appropriately sized. Furthermore, if we let the columns of U and V
be as defined in Theorem 5.11, then
Proof: The proof follows easily by verifying the four Penrose conditions. D
Remark 5.15. Note that none of the expressions above quite qualifies as an SVD of A
+
if we insist that the singular values be ordered from largest to smallest. However, a simple
reordering accomplishes the task:
This can also be written in matrix terms by using the socalled reverseorder identity matrix
(or exchange matrix) P = \e
r
,e
r
^\, ..., e^, e\\, which is clearly orthogonal and symmetric.
5.2. Some Basic Properties 39
A
r r
E9 {O}
/ {O)<!l
nr mr
Figure 5.1. SVD and the four fundamental subspaces.
with the Osubblocks appropriately sized. Furthermore, if we let the columns of U and V
be as defined in Theorem 5.11, then
r 1
= L v;u;, (5.10)
;=1 U;
Proof' The proof follows easily by verifying the four Penrose conditions. 0
Remark 5.15. Note that none of the expressions above quite qualifies as an SVD of A +
if we insist that the singular values be ordered from largest to smallest. However, a simple
reordering accomplishes the task:
(5.11)
This can also be written in matrix terms by using the socalled reverseorder identity matrix
(or exchange matrix) P = [e
r
, erI, ... , e2, ed, which is clearly orthogonal and symmetric.
is the matrix version of (5.11). A "full SVD" can be similarly constructed.
Remark 5.16. Recall the linear transformation T used in the proof of Theorem 3.17 and
in Definition 4.1. Since T is determined by its action on a basis, and since ( v \ , . . . , v
r
} is a
basis forJ\f(A)
±
, then T can be defined by TV; = cr, w, , / e r. Similarly, since [u\, ... ,u
r
}
isabasisfor7£(.4), then T~
l
can be defined by T^' M, = ^u, , / e r. From Section 3.2, the
matrix representation for T with respect to the bases { v \ , ..., v
r
} and { MI , . . . , u
r
] is clearly
S, while the matrix representation for the inverse linear transformation T~
l
with respect to
the same bases is 5""
1
.
5.3 Row and Column Compressions
Row compression
Let A E R
mxn
have an SVD given by (5.1). Then
Notice that M(A)  M(U
T
A) = A/"(SV,
r
) and the matrix SVf e R
r x
" has full row
rank. I n other words, premultiplication of A by U
T
is an orthogonal transformation that
"compresses" A by row transformations. Such a row compression can also be accomplished
D _
by orthogonal row transformations performed directly on A to reduce it to the form
0
,
where R is upper triangular. Both compressions are analogous to the socalled rowreduced
echelon form which, when derived by a Gaussian elimination algorithm implemented in
finiteprecision arithmetic, is not generally as reliable a procedure.
Column compression
Again, let A e R
mxn
have an SVD given by (5.1). Then
This time, notice that H(A) = K(AV) = K(UiS) and the matrix UiS e R
mxr
has full
column rank. I n other words, postmultiplication of A by V is an orthogonal transformation
that "compresses" A by column transformations. Such a compression is analogous to the
40 Chapters. Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition
Then
40 Chapter 5. Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition
Then
A+ = (VI p)(PS1 p)(PVr)
is the matrix version of (5.11). A "full SVD" can be similarly constructed.
Remark 5.16. Recall the linear transformation T used in the proof of Theorem 3.17 and
in Definition 4.1. Since T is determined by its action on a basis, and since {VI, ... , v
r
} is a
basisforN(A).l, then T can be defined by TVj = OjUj , i E ~ . Similarly, since {UI, ... , u
r
}
is a basis forR(A), then T
I
canbedefinedbyTIu; = tv; ,i E ~ . From Section 3.2, the
matrix representation for T with respect to the bases {VI, ... , v
r
} and {u I, ... , u
r
} is clearly
S, while the matrix representation for the inverse linear transformation T
I
with respect to
the same bases is SI.
5.3 Rowand Column Compressions
Row compression
Let A E lR.
mxn
have an SVD given by (5.1). Then
VT A = :EVT
= [ ~ ~ ] [ ~ i ]
 [ SVr ] lR.
mxn
 0 E .
Notice that N(A) = N(V
T
A) = N(svr> and the matrix SVr E lR.
rxll
has full row
rank. In other words, premultiplication of A by VT is an orthogonal transformation that
"compresses" A by row transformations. Such a row compression can also be accomplished
by orthogonal row transformations performed directly on A to reduce it to the form [ ~ ] ,
where R is upper triangular. Both compressions are analogous to the socalled rowreduced
echelon form which, when derived by a Gaussian elimination algorithm implemented in
finiteprecision arithmetic, is not generally as reliable a procedure.
Column compression
Again, let A E lR.
mxn
have an SVD given by (5.1). Then
AV = V:E
= [VI U2] [ ~ ~ ]
=[VIS 0] ElR.mxn.
This time, notice that R(A) = R(A V) = R(UI S) and the matrix VI S E lR.
m
xr has full
column rank. In other words, postmultiplication of A by V is an orthogonal transformation
that "compresses" A by I;olumn transformations. Such a compression is analogous to the
Exercises 41
socalled columnreduced echelon form, which is not generally a reliable procedure when
performed by Gauss transformations in finiteprecision arithmetic. For details, see, for
example, [7], [11], [23], [25].
EXERCISES
1. Let X € M
mx
". If X
T
X = 0, show that X = 0.
2. Prove Theorem 5.1 starting from the observation that AA
T
> 0.
3. Let A e E"
xn
be symmetric but indefinite. Determine an SVD of A.
4. Let x e R
m
, y e R
n
be nonzero vectors. Determine an SVD of the matrix A e R™
defined by A = xy
T
.
6. Let A e R
mxn
and suppose W eR
mxm
and 7 e R
nxn
are orthogonal.
(a) Show that A and W A F have the same singular values (and hence the same rank).
(b) Suppose that W and Y are nonsingular but not necessarily orthogonal. Do A
and WAY have the same singular values? Do they have the same rank?
7. Let A € R"
XM
. Use the SVD to determine a polar factorization of A, i.e., A = QP
where Q is orthogonal and P = P
T
> 0. Note: this is analogous to the polar form
z = re
l&
ofa complex scalar z (where i = j = V^T).
5. Determine SVDs of the matrices
Exercises 41
socalled columnreduced echelon form, which is not generally a reliable procedure when
performed by Gauss transformations in finiteprecision arithmetic. For details, see, for
example, [7], [11], [23], [25].
EXERCISES
1. Let X E IRmxn. If XT X = 0, show that X = o.
2. Prove Theorem 5.1 starting from the observation that AAT ~ O.
3. Let A E IR
nxn
be symmetric but indefinite. Determine an SVD of A.
4. Let x E IRm, y E ~ n be nonzero vectors. Determine an SVD of the matrix A E ~ ~ xn
defined by A = xyT.
5. Determine SVDs of the matrices
(a)
[
1
]
0 1
(b)
[
~ l
6. Let A E ~ m x n and suppose W E IR
mxm
and Y E ~ n x n are orthogonal.
(a) Show that A and WAY have the same singular values (and hence the same rank).
(b) Suppose that Wand Yare nonsingular but not necessarily orthogonal. Do A
and WAY have the same singular values? Do they have the same rank?
7. Let A E ~ ~ x n . Use the SVD to determine a polar factorization of A, i.e., A = Q P
where Q is orthogonal and P = p
T
> O. Note: this is analogous to the polar form
z = re
iO
of a complex scalar z (where i = j = J=I).
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank
Chapter 6
Li near Equations
In this chapter we examine existence and uniqueness of solutions of systems of linear
equations. General linear systems of the form
are studied and include, as a special case, the familiar vector system
6.1 Vector Li near Equations
We begin with a review of some of the principal results associated with vector linear systems.
Theorem 6.1. Consider the system of linear equations
1. There exists a solution to (6.3) if and only ifbeH(A).
2. There exists a solution to (6.3} for all b e R
m
if and only ifU(A) = W", i.e., A is
onto; equivalently, there exists a solution if and only j/"rank([A, b]) = rank(A), and
this is possible only ifm < n (since m = dimT^(A) = rank(A) < min{m, n}).
3. A solution to (6.3) is unique if and only ifJ\f(A) = 0, i.e., A is 11.
4. There exists a unique solution to (6.3) for all b e W" if and only if A is nonsingular;
equivalently, A G M
mxm
and A has neither a 0 singular value nor a 0 eigenvalue.
5. There exists at most one solution to (6.3) for all b e W
1
if and only if the columns of
A are linearly independent, i.e., A/"(A) = 0, and this is possible only ifm > n.
6. There exists a nontrivial solution to the homogeneous system Ax = 0 if and only if
rank(A) < n.
43
Chapter 6
Linear Equations
In this chapter we examine existence and uniqueness of solutions of systems of linear
equations. General linear systems of the form
(6.1)
are studied and include, as a special case, the familiar vector system
Ax = b; A E ]Rn xn, b E ]Rn.
(6.2)
6.1 Vector Linear Equations
We begin with a review of some of the principal results associated with vector linear systems.
Theorem 6.1. Consider the system of linear equations
Ax = b; A E lR
m
xn, b E lRm.
(6.3)
1. There exists a solution to (6.3) if and only if b E R(A).
2. There exists a solution to (6.3) for all b E lR
m
if and only ifR(A) = lR
m
, i.e., A is
onto; equivalently, there exists a solution if and only ifrank([A, b]) = rank(A), and
this is possible only ifm :::: n (since m = dim R(A) = rank(A) :::: min{m, n n.
3. A solution to (6.3) is unique if and only if N(A) = 0, i.e., A is 11.
4. There exists a unique solution to (6.3) for all b E ]Rm if and only if A is nonsingular;
equivalently, A E lR
mxm
and A has neither a 0 singular value nor a 0 eigenvalue.
5. There exists at most one solution to (6.3) for all b E lR
m
if and only if the columns of
A are linearly independent, i.e., N(A) = 0, and this is possible only ifm ::: n.
6. There exists a nontrivial solution to the homogeneous system Ax = 0 if and only if
rank(A) < n.
43
44 Chapter 6. Linear Equations
Proof: The proofs are straightforward and can be consulted in standard texts on linear
algebra. Note that some parts of the theorem follow directly from others. For example, to
prove part 6, note that x = 0 is always a solution to the homogeneous system. Therefore, we
must have the case of a nonunique solution, i.e., A is not 11, which implies rank(A) < n
by part 3. D
6.2 Matrix Linear Equations
In this section we present some of the principal results concerning existence and uniqueness
of solutions to the general matrix linear system (6.1). Note that the results of Theorem
6.1 follow from those below for the special case k = 1, while results for (6.2) follow by
specializing even further to the case m = n.
Theorem 6.2 (Existence). The matrix linear equation
and this is clearly of the form (6.5).
has a solution if and only ifl^(B) C 7£(A); equivalently, a solution exists if and only if
AA
+
B = B.
Proof: The subspace inclusion criterion follows essentially from the definition of the range
of a matrix. The matrix criterion is Theorem 4.18.
Theorem 6.3. Let A e R
mxn
, B eR
mxk
and suppose that AA
+
B = B. Then any matrix
of the form
is a solution of
Furthermore, all solutions of (6.6) are of this form.
Proof: To verify that (6.5) is a solution, premultiply by A:
That all solutions arc of this form can be seen as follows. Let Z be an arbitrary solution of
(6.6), i.e., AZ — B. Then we can write
44 Chapter 6. Linear Equations
Proof: The proofs are straightforward and can be consulted in standard texts on linear
algebra. Note that some parts of the theorem follow directly from others. For example, to
prove part 6, note that x = 0 is always a solution to the homogeneous system. Therefore, we
must have the case of a nonunique solution, i.e., A is not II, which implies rank(A) < n
by part 3. 0
6.2 Matrix Linear Equations
In this section we present some of the principal results concerning existence and uniqueness
of solutions to the general matrix linear system (6.1). Note that the results of Theorem
6.1 follow from those below for the special case k = 1, while results for (6.2) follow by
specializing even further to the case m = n.
Theorem 6.2 (Existence). The matrix linear equation
AX = B; A E JR.
mxn
, BE JR.mxk, (6.4)
has a solution if and only ifR(B) S; R(A); equivalently, a solution exists if and only if
AA+B = B.
Proof: The subspace inclusion criterion follows essentially from the definition of the range
of a matrix. The matrix criterion is Theorem 4.18. 0
Theorem 6.3. Let A E JR.mxn, B E JR.mxk and suppose that AA + B = B. Then any matrix
of the form
X = A+ B + (/  A+ A)Y, where Y E JR.nxk is arbitrary, (6.5)
is a solution of
AX=B. (6.6)
Furthermore, all solutions of (6.6) are of this form.
Proof: To verify that (6.5) is a solution, premultiply by A:
AX = AA+ B + A(I  A+ A)Y
= B + (A  AA+ A)Y by hypothesis
= B since AA + A = A by the first Penrose condition.
That all solutions are of this form can be seen as follows. Let Z be an arbitrary solution of
(6.6). i.e .. AZ :::: B. Then we can write
Z=A+AZ+(IA+A)Z
=A+B+(IA+A)Z
and this is clearly of the form (6.5). 0
6.2. Matrix Linear Equations 45
Remark 6.4. When A is square and nonsingular, A
+
= A"
1
and so (/ — A
+
A) = 0. Thus,
there is no "arbitrary" component, leaving only the unique solution X• = A~
1
B.
Remark 6.5. It can be shown that the particular solution X = A
+
B is the solution of (6.6)
that minimizes TrX
7
X. (Tr() denotes the trace of a matrix; recall that TrX
r
X = £\ • jcj.)
Theorem 6.6 (Uniqueness). A solution of the matrix linear equation
is unique if and only if A
+
A = /; equivalently, (6.7) has a unique solution if and only if
M(A) = 0.
Proof: The first equivalence is immediate from Theorem 6.3. The second follows by noting
that A
+
A = / can occur only if r — n, where r = rank(A) (recall r < h). But rank(A) = n
if and only if A is 11 or _ /V(A) = 0. D
Example 6.7. Suppose A e E"
x
". Find all solutions of the homogeneous system Ax — 0.
Solution:
where y e R" is arbitrary. Hence, there exists a nonzero solution if and only if A
+
A /= I.
This is equivalent to either rank (A) = r < n or A being singular. Clearly, if there exists a
nonzero solution, it is not unique.
Computation: Since y is arbitrary, it is easy to see that all solutions are generated
from a basis for 7£(7 — A
+
A). But if A has an SVD given by A = f/E V
T
, then it is easily
checked that /  A+A = V
2
V
2
r
and U(V
2
V^) = K(V
2
) = N(A).
Example 6.8. Characterize all right inverses of a matrix A e ]R
mx
"; equivalently, find all
solutions R of the equation AR = I
m
. Here, we write I
m
to emphasize the m x m identity
matrix.
Solution: There exists a right inverse if and only if 7£(/
m
) c 7£(A) and this is
equivalent to AA
+
I
m
= I
m
. Clearly, this can occur if and only if rank(A) = r = m (since
r < m) and this is equivalent to A being onto (A
+
is then a right inverse). All right inverses
of A are then of the form
where Y e E"
xm
is arbitrary. There is a unique right inverse if and only if A
+
A = /
(AA(A) = 0), in which case A must be invertible and R = A"
1
.
Example 6.9. Consider the system of linear firstorder difference equations
6.2. Matrix Linear Equations 45
Remark 6.4. When A is square and nonsingular, A + = AI and so (I  A + A) = O. Thus,
there is no "arbitrary" component, leaving only the unique solution X = AI B.
Remark 6.5. It can be shown that the particular solution X = A + B is the solution of (6.6)
that minimizes TrXT X. (TrO denotes the trace of a matrix; recall that TrXT X = Li,j xlj.)
Theorem 6.6 (Uniqueness). A solution of the matrix linear equation
AX = B; A E lR,mxn, BE lR,mxk
(6,7)
is unique if and only if A + A = I; equivalently, (6.7) has a unique solution if and only if
N(A) = O.
Proof: The first equivalence is immediate from Theorem 6.3. The second follows by noting
thatA+ A = I can occur only ifr = n, wherer = rank(A) (recallr ::: n), Butrank(A) = n
if and only if A is Ilor N(A) = O. 0
Example 6.7. Suppose A E lR,nxn. Find all solutions of the homogeneous system Ax = 0,
Solution:
x=A+O+(IA+A)y
= (IA+A)y,
where y E lR,n is arbitrary. Hence, there exists a nonzero solution if and only if A + A t= I,
This is equivalent to either rank(A) = r < n or A being singular. Clearly, if there exists a
nonzero solution, it is not unique,
Computation: Since y is arbitrary, it is easy to see that all solutions are generated
from a basis for R(I  A + A). But if A has an SVD given by A = U h VT, then it is easily
checked that 1 A+ A = Vz V[ and R(Vz vD = R(Vz) = N(A),
Example 6.S. Characterize all right inverses of a matrix A E lR,mxn; equivalently, find all
solutions R of the equation AR = 1
m
, Here, we write 1m to emphasize the m x m identity
matrix,
Solution: There exists a right inverse if and only if R(Im) S; R(A) and this is
equivalent to AA + 1m = 1m. Clearly, this can occur if and only if rank(A) = r = m (since
r ::: m) and this is equivalent to A being onto (A + is then a right inverse). All right inverses
of A are then of the form
R = A+ 1m + (In  A+ A)Y
=A++(IA+A)Y,
where Y E lR,nxm is arbitrary, There is a unique right inverse if and only if A+ A I
(N(A) = 0), in which case A must be invertible and R = AI.
Example 6.9. Consider the system of linear firstorder difference equations
(6,8)
46 Chapter 6. Linear Equations
with A e R"
xn
and fieR"
xm
(rc>l,ra>l). The vector Jt* in linear system theory is
known as the state vector at time k while Uk is the input (control) vector. The general
solution of (6.8) is given by
for k > 1. We might now ask the question: Given X Q = 0, does there exist an input sequence
{uj } y~ Q such that x^ takes an arbitrary va
of reachability. Since m > 1, from the
see that (6.8) is reachable if and only if
[ Uj }
k
jj^ such that X k takes an arbitrary value in W ? In linear system theory, this is a question
of reachability. Since m > 1, from the fundamental Existence Theorem, Theorem 6.2, we
or, equivalently, if and only if
A related question is the following: Given an arbitrary initial vector X Q , does there ex
ist an input sequence {"y} "~ o such that x
n
= 0? In linear system theory, this is called
controllability. Again from Theorem 6.2, we see that (6.8) is controllable if and only if
Clearly, reachability always implies controllability and, if A is nonsingular, control
lability and reachability are equivalent. The matrices A = [ °
1
Q
1 and 5 = f ^ 1 provide an
example of a system that is controllable but not reachable.
The above are standard conditions with analogues for continuoustime models (i.e.,
linear differential equations). There are many other algebraically equivalent conditions.
Example 6.10. We now introduce an output vector y
k
to the system (6.8) of Example 6.9
by appending the equation
with C e R
pxn
and D € R
pxm
(p > 1). We can then pose some new questions about the
overall system that are dual in the systemtheoretic sense to reachability and controllability.
The answers are cast in terms that are dual in the linear algebra sense as well. The condition
dual to reachability is called observability: When does knowledge of {"
7
}"!Q and {y_ / } "~ o
suffice to determine (uniquely) Jt
0
? As a dual to controllability, we have the notion of
reconstructibility: When does knowledge of {w
y
} "~ Q and {;y/ } "Io suffice to determine
(uniquely) x
n
l The fundamental duality result from linear system theory is the following:
(A, B) is reachable [ controllable] if and only if (A
T
, B
T
] is observable [ reconstructive].
46 Chapter 6. Linear Equations
with A E IR
nx
" and B E IR
nxm
(n I, m I). The vector Xk in linear system theory is
known as the state vector at time k while Uk is the input (control) vector. The general
solution of (6.8) is given by
kJ
Xk = Akxo + LAkJj BUj
j=O
k kJ Uk2
[
UkJ ]
•...• A B]
(6.9)
(6.10)
for k 1. We might now ask the question: Given Xo = 0, does there exist an input sequence
{u j 1 such that Xk takes an arbitrary value in 1R"? In linear system theory, this is a question
of reacbability. Since m I, from the fundamental Existence Theorem, Theorem 6.2, we
see that (6.8) is reachable if and only if
R([ B, AB, ... , A
n

J
B]) = 1R"
or, equivalently, if and only if
rank [B, AB, ... , A
n

J
B] = n.
A related question is the following: Given an arbitrary initial vector Xo, does there ex
ist an input sequence {u j l'/:b such that Xn = O? In linear system theory, this is called
controllability. Again from Theorem 6.2, we see that (6.8) is controllable if and only if
Clearly, reachability always implies controllability and, if A is nonsingular, control
lability and reachability are equivalent. The matrices A = and B = provide an
example of a system that is controllable but not reachable.
The above are standard conditions with analogues for continuoustime models (i.e.,
linear differential equations). There are many other algebraically equivalent conditions.
Example 6.10. We now introduce an output vector Yk to the system (6.8) of Example 6.9
by appending the equation
(6.11)
with C E IR
Pxn
and D E IR
Pxm
(p 1). We can then pose some new questions about the
overall system that are dual in the systemtheoretic sense to reachability and controllability.
The answers are cast in terms that are dual in the linear algebra sense as well. The condition
dual to reachability is called observability: When does knowledge of {u j r/:b and {Yj l';:b
suffice to determine (uniquely) xo? As a dual to controllability, we have the notion of
reconstructibility: When does knowledge of {u j r/:b and {YJ lj:b suffice to determine
(uniquely) xn? The fundamental duality result from linear system theory is the following:
(A. B) iJ reachable [controllablcl if and only if (A T. B T) is observable [reconsrrucrible]
6.4 Some Us ef u l and I nt er es t i ng Inverses 47
To derive a condition for observability, notice that
Thus,
Let v denote the (known) vector on the lefthand side of (6.13) and let R denote the matrix on
the righthand side. Then, by definition, v e Tl(R), so a solution exists. By the fundamental
Uniqueness Theorem, Theorem 6.6, the solution is then unique if and only if N(R) = 0,
or, equivalently, if and only if
6.3 A More General Matrix Linear Equation
Theorem 6.11. Let A e R
mxn
, B e R
mxq
, and C e R
pxti
. Then the equation
has a solution if and only if AA
+
BC
+
C = B, in which case the general solution is of the
where Y € R
n
*
p
is arbitrary.
A compact matrix criterion for uniqueness of solutions to (6.14) requires the notion
of the Kronecker product of matrices for its statement. Such a criterion (CC
+
< g) A
+
A — I)
is stated and proved in Theorem 13.27.
6.4 Some Useful and Interesting Inverses
In many applications, the coefficient matrices of interest are square and nonsingular. Listed
below is a small collection of useful matrix identities, particularly for block matrices, as
sociated with matrix inverses. In these identities, A e R
nxn
, B E R
nxm
, C e R
mxn
,
and D € E
mxm
. Invertibility is assumed for any component or subblock whose inverse is
indicated. Verification of each identity is recommended as an exercise for the reader.
6.4 Some Useful and Interesting Inverses
Thus,
To derive a condition for observability, notice that
kl
Yk = CAkxo + L CAk1j BUj + DUk.
j=O
r
Yo  Duo
Yl  CBuo  Du]
Yn]  L j : ~ CA
n

2
j BUj  DUnl
47
(6.12)
(6.13)
Let v denote the (known) vector on the lefthand side of (6.13) and let R denote the matrix on
the righthand side. Then, by definition, v E R(R), so a solution exists. By the fundamental
Uniqueness Theorem, Theorem 6.6, the solution is then unique if and only if N(R) = 0,
or, equivalently, if and only if
6.3 A More General Matrix Linear Equation
Theorem 6.11. Let A E jRmxn, B E jRmx
q
, and C E jRpxq. Then the equation
AXC=B (6.14)
has a solution if and only if AA + BC+C = B, in which case the general solution is of the
form
(6.15)
where Y E jRnxp is arbitrary.
A compact matrix criterion for uniqueness of solutions to (6.14) requires the notion
of the Kronecker product of matrices for its statement. Such a criterion (C C+ ® A + A = I)
is stated and proved in Theorem 13.27.
6.4 Some Useful and Interesting Inverses
In many applications, the coefficient matrices of interest are square and nonsingular. Listed
below is a small collection of useful matrix identities, particularly for block matrices, as
sociated with matrix inverses. In these identities, A E jRnxn, B E jRnxm, C E jRmxn,
and D E jRm xm. Invertibility is assumed for any component or subblock whose inverse is
indicated. Verification of each identity is recommended as an exercise for the reader.
48 Chapter 6. Linear Equations
1. (A + BDCr
1
= A~
l
 A~
l
B(D~
l
+ CA~
l
B)~
[
CA~
l
.
This result is known as the ShermanMorrisonWoodbury formula. It has many
applications (and is frequently "rediscovered") including, for example, formulas for
the inverse of a sum of matrices such as (A + D)"
1
or (A"
1
+ D"
1
) . It also
yields very efficient "updating" or "downdating" formulas in expressions such as
T — 1
(A + JUT ) (with symmetric A e R"
x
" and ;c e E") that arise in optimization
theory.
EXERCISES
1. As in Example 6.8, characterize all left inverses of a matrix A e M
mx
".
2. Let A € E
mx
", B e R
mxk
and suppose A has an SVD as in Theorem 5.1. Assuming
7Z(B) c 7£(A), characterize all solutions of the matrix linear equation
Both of these matrices satisfy the matrix equation X^ = I from which it is obvious
that X~
l
= X. Note that the positions of the / and — / blocks may be exchanged.
where E = (D — CA B) (E is the inverse of the Schur complement of A). This
result follows easily from the block LU factorization in property 16 of Section 1.4.
where F = (A — ED C) . This result follows easily from the block UL factor
ization in property 17 of Section 1.4.
in terms of the SVD of A
48 Chapter 6. Linear Equations
1. (A + BDC)I = AI  AIB(D
I
+ CAIB)ICAI.
This result is known as the ShermanMorrisonWoodbury formula. It has many
applications (and is frequently "rediscovered") including, for example, formulas for
the inverse of a sum of matrices such as (A + D)lor (AI + DI)I. It also
yields very efficient "updating" or "downdating" formulas in expressions such as
(A + xx
T
) I (with symmetric A E lR
nxn
and x E lRn) that arise in optimization
theory.
2. r
l
= [
3. !/ r
l
= l r
l
= 1
Both of these matrices satisfy the matrix equation X2 = / from which it is obvious
that XI = X. Note that the positions of the / and  / blocks may be exchanged.
4. r
l
= [
AI BD
I
]
D I .
5. r
l
= 1
6. [ / +c
BC
r
l
= [!C / 1
7. r
l
= [ AI l
where E = (D  CA
I
B)I (E is the inverse of the Schur complement of A). This
result follows easily from the block LU factorization in property 16 of Section 1.4.
8. r
l
= D
I
l
where F = (A  B D
I
C) I. This result follows easily from the block UL factor
ization in property 17 of Section 1.4.
EXERCISES
1. As in Example 6.8, characterize all left inverses of a matrix A E lR
m
xn .
2. Let A E lRmxn, B E lR
fflxk
and suppose A has an SVD as in Theorem 5.1. Assuming
R(B) R(A), characterize all solutions of the matrix linear equation
AX=B
in terms of the SVD of A.
Exercises 49
3. Let jc, y e E" and suppose further that X
T
y ^ 1. Show that
4. Let x, y € E" and suppose further that X
T
y ^ 1. Show that
where c = 1/(1 — x
T
y).
5. Let A e R"
x
" and let A"
1
have columns c\, ..., c
n
and individual elements y
;y
.
Assume that x/
(
7^ 0 for some / and j. Show that the matrix B — A —
l
—ei e
T
: (i.e.,
A with — subtracted from its (zy)th element) is singular.
Hint: Show that c
t
< = M(B).
6. As in Example 6.10, check directly that the condition for reconstructibility takes the
form
Exercises 49
3. Let x, y E IR
n
and suppose further that x T y i= 1. Show that
T 1 1 T
(/  xy) = I  xy .
xTy 1
4. Let x, y E IR
n
and suppose further that x T y i= 1. Show that
cxJ
C '
where C = 1/(1  x
T
y).
5. Let A E 1 R ~ xn and let A 1 have columns Cl, ... ,C
n
and individual elements Yij.
Assume that Yji i= 0 for some i and j. Show that the matrix B = A  ~ i e;e; (i.e.,
A with yl subtracted from its (ij)th element) is singular.
l'
Hint: Show that Ci E N(B).
6. As in Example 6.10, check directly that the condition for reconstructibility takes the
form
N[
fA J ~ N(A
n
).
CA
n

1
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank
Chapter 7
Projections, Inner Product
Spaces, and Norms
7.1 Projections
Definition 7.1. Let V be a vector space with V = X 0 y. By Theorem 2.26, every v e V
has a unique decomposition v = x + y with x e X and y e y. Define PX y • V — > • X c V
by
Figure 7.1. Oblique projections.
Theorem 7.2. Px,y is linear and P# y — Px,y
Theorem 7.3. A linear transformation P is a projection if and only if it is idempotent, i.e.,
P
2
= P. Also, P is a projection if and only if I —P is a projection. Infact, Py,x — I — Px,y
Proof: Suppose P is a projection, say on X along y (using the notation of Definition 7.1).
51
Px,y is called the (oblique) projection on X along 3^.
Figure 7.1 displays the projection of v on both X and 3^ in the case V =
Chapter 7
Projections, Inner Product
Spaces, and Norms
7.1 Projections
Definition 7.1. Let V be a vector space with V = X EEl Y. By Theorem 2.26, every v E V
has a unique decomposition v = x + y with x E X and y E y. Define pX,y : V + X <; V
by
PX,yV = x for all v E V.
PX,y is called the (oblique) projection on X along y.
Figure 7.1 displays the projection of von both X and Y in the case V = ]R2.
y
x
Figure 7.1. Oblique projections.
Theorem 7.2. px.y is linear and pl.
y
= px.y.
Theorem 7.3. A linear transformation P is a projection if and only if it is idempotent, i.e.,
p2 = P. Also, P isaprojectionifandonlyifl P isaprojection. Infact, Py.x = I px.y.
Proof: Suppose P is a projection, say on X along Y (using the notation of Definition 7.1).
51
52 Chapter 7. Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms
Let u e V be arbitrary. Then Pv = P(x + y) = Px = x. Moreover, P
2
v = PPv —
Px = x = Pv. Thus, P
2
= P. Conversely, suppose P
2
= P. Let X = {v e V : Pv = v}
and y = {v € V : Pv = 0}. It is easy to check that X and 3^ are subspaces. We now prove
that V = X 0 y. First note that tfveX, then Pv = v. If v e y, then Pv = 0. Hence
i f v € X n y, then v = 0. Now let u e V be arbitrary. Then v = Pv + (I  P)v. Let
x = Pv, y = (I  P)v. Then Px = P
2
v = Pv = x so x e X, while Py = P(I  P}v =
Pv  P
2
v = 0 so y e y. Thus, V = X 0 y and the projection on X along y is P.
Essentially the same argument shows that / — P is the projection on y along X. D
Definition 7.4. In the speci al case where y = X^, PX.X
L
*
s
called an orthogonal projec
tion and we then use the notati on PX = PX,X
L

Theorem 7.5. P e E"
xn
i s the matri x of an orthogonal projecti on (onto K(P)} i f and only
i fP
2
= p = P
T
.
Proof: Let P be an orthogonal projection (on X, say, along X
L
} and let jc, y e R" be
arbitrary. Note that (/  P)x = (I  PX,X^X = P
x
±,
x
x by Theorem 7.3. Thus,
(/  P)x e X
L
. Since Py e X, we have ( P y f ( I  P)x = y
T
P
T
(I  P)x = 0.
Since x and y were arbitrary, we must have P
T
(I — P) = 0. Hence P
T
= P
T
P = P,
with the second equality following since P
T
P is symmetric. Conversely, suppose P is a
symmetric projection matrix and let x be arbitrary. Write x = Px + (I — P)x. Then
x
T
P
T
(I  P)x = x
T
P(I  P}x = 0. Thus, since Px e U(P), then (/  P)x 6 ft(P)
1
and P must be an orthogonal projection. D
7.1.1 The four fundamental orthogonal projections
Using the notation of Theorems 5.1 and 5.11, let A 6 R
mxn
with SVD A = UT,V
T
=
UtSVf. Then
are easily checked to be (unique) orthogonal projections onto the respective four funda
mental subspaces,
52 Chapter 7. Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms
Let v E V be arbitrary. Then Pv = P(x + y) = Px = x. Moreover, p
2
v = P Pv =
Px = x = Pv. Thus, p2 = P. Conversely, suppose p2 = P. Let X = {v E V : Pv = v}
and Y = {v E V : Pv = OJ. It is easy to check that X and Y are subspaces. We now prove
that V = X $ y. First note that if v E X, then Pv = v. If v E Y, then Pv = O. Hence
if v E X ny, then v = O. Now let v E V be arbitrary. Then v = Pv + (I  P)v. Let
x = Pv, y = (I  P)v. Then Px = p
2
v = Pv = x so x E X, while Py = P(l  P)v =
Pv  p
2
v = 0 so Y E y. Thus, V = X $ Y and the projection on X along Y is P.
Essentially the same argument shows that I  P is the projection on Y along X. 0
Definition 7.4. In the special case where Y = X1, px.xl. is called an orthogonal projec
tion and we then use the notation P
x
= PX.XL
Theorem 7.5. P E jRnxn is the matrix of an orthogonal projection (onto R(P)) if and only
if p2 = P = pT.
Proof: Let P be an orthogonal projection (on X, say, along X 1) and let x, y E jR" be
arbitrary. Note that (I  P)x = (I  px.xJ.)x = PXJ..xx by Theorem 7.3. Thus,
(I  P)x E X1. Since Py E X, we have (py)T (I  P)x = yT pT (I  P)x = O.
Since x and y were arbitrary, we must have pT (I  P) = O. Hence pT = pT P = P,
with the second equality following since pT P is symmetric. Conversely, suppose P is a
symmetric projection matrix and let x be arbitrary. Write x = P x + (I  P)x. Then
x
T
pT (I  P)x = x
T
P(l  P)x = O. Thus, since Px E R(P), then (I  P)x E R(P)1
and P must be an orthogonal projection. 0
7.1 .1 The four fundamental orthogonal projections
Using the notation of Theorems 5.1 and 5.11, let A E jRmxII with SVD A = U!:V
T
U\SVr Then
r
PR(A)
AA+
U\U[
Lu;uT,
;=1
m
PR(A).L
1 AA+
U2
U
! LUiUT,
i=r+l
11
PN(A)
1 A+A
V2V{
L ViVf,
i=r+l
r
PN(A)J.
A+A
VIV{
LViVT
i=l
are easily checked to be (unique) orthogonal projections onto the respective four funda
mental subspaces.
7.1. Projections 53
Example 7.6. Determine the orthogonal projection of a vector v e M" on another nonzero
vector w e R
n
.
Solution: Think of the vector w as an element of the onedimensional subspace IZ(w).
Then the desired projection is simply
(using Example 4.8)
Moreover, the vector z that is orthogonal to w and such that v = Pv + z is given by
z = PK(
W
)±V = (/ — PK(W))V = v — (^^ j w. See Figure 7.2. A direct calculation shows
that z and u; are, in fact, orthogonal:
Figure 7.2. Orthogonal projection on a "line."
Example 7.7. Recall the proof of Theorem 3.11. There, {v\ , ..., Vk} was an orthornormal
basis for a subset S of W
1
. An arbitrary vector x e R" was chosen and a formula for x\
appeared rather mysteriously. The expression for x\ is simply the orthogonal projection of
x on S. Specifically,
Example 7.8. Recall the diagram of the four fundamental subspaces. The indicated direct
sum decompositions of the domain E" and codomain R
m
are given easily as follows.
Let x e W
1
be an arbitrary vector. Then
7.1. Projections 53
Example 7.6. Determine the orthogonal projection of a vector v E IR
n
on another nonzero
vector w E IRn.
Solution: Think of the vector w as an element of the onedimensional subspace R( w).
Then the desired projection is simply
Pn(w)v = ww+v
wwTv
(using Example 4.8)
= (WTV)
T W.
W W
Moreover, the vector z that is orthogonal to wand such that v = P v + z is given by
z = Pn(w)"' v = (l  Pn(w»v = v  ( : ; ~ ) w. See Figure 7.2. A direct calculation shows
that z and ware, in fact, orthogonal:
v
z
Pv w
Figure 7.2. Orthogonal projection on a "line."
Example 7.7. Recall the proof of Theorem 3.11. There, {VI, ... , Vk} was an orthomormal
basis for a subset S of IRn. An arbitrary vector x E IR
n
was chosen and a formula for XI
appeared rather mysteriously. The expression for XI is simply the orthogonal projection of
X on S. Specifically,
Example 7.8. Recall the diagram of the four fundamental subspaces. The indicated direct
sum decompositions of the domain IR
n
and codomain IR
m
are given easily as follows.
Let X E IR
n
be an arbitrary vector. Then
X = PN(A)u + PN(A)X
= A+ Ax + (I  A+ A)x
= VI vt x + V
2
Vi x (recall VVT = I).
54 Chapter 7. Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms
Similarly, let y e ]R
m
be an arbitrary vector. Then
Example 7.9. Let
Then
and we can decompose the vector [2 3 4]
r
uniquely into the sum of a vector in A/' CA)
1
and a vector in J\f(A), respectively, as follows:
7.2 Inner Product Spaces
Definition 7.10. Let V be a vector space over R. Then { • , • ) : V x V
product if
is a real inner
1. (x, x) > Qfor all x 6V and ( x , x } =0 if and only ifx = 0.
2. (x, y) = (y,x)forallx,y e V.
3. { *, cryi + ^2) = a(x, y\) + / 3( j t, y^} for all jc, yi, j2 ^ V and for alia, ft e R.
Example 7.11. Let V = R". Then { ^, y} = X
T
y is the "usual" Euclidean inner product or
dot product.
Example 7.12. Let V = E". Then ( j c, y)
Q
= X
T
Qy, where Q = Q
T
> 0 is an arbitrary
n x n positive definite matrix, defines a "weighted" inner product.
Definition 7.13. If A e R
mx
", then A
T
e R
nxm
is the unique linear transformation or map
such that (x, Ay)  (A
T
x, y) for all x € R
m
and for all y e R".
54 Chapter 7. Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms
Similarly, let Y E IR
m
be an arbitrary vector. Then
Y = PR(A)Y +
= AA+y + (l AA+)y
= U1Ur y + U2U[ Y (recall UU
T
= I).
Example 7.9. Let
Then
1/4
1/4
o
1/4 ]
1/4
o
and we can decompose the vector [2 3 4V uniquely into the sum of a vector in N(A)L
and a vector in N(A), respectively, as follows:
[ ! ] A' Ax + (l  A' A)x
[
1/2 1/2 0] [ 2] [
= ! +
[
5/2] [1/2]
= + .
7.2 Inner Product Spaces
1/2
1/2
o
1/2
1/2
o
Definition 7.10. Let V be a vector space over IR. Then (', .) : V x V + IR is a real inner
product if
1. (x, x) ::: Of or aU x E V and (x, x) = 0 if and only ifx = O.
2. (x, y) = (y, x) for all x, y E V.
3. (x, aYI + PY2) = a(x, Yl) + f3(x, Y2) for all x, Yl, Y2 E V and/or all a, f3 E IR.
Example 7.11. Let V = IRn. Then (x, y) = x
T
Y is the "usual" Euclidean inner product or
dot product.
Example 7.12. Let V = IRn. Then (x, y) Q = X T Qy, where Q = Q T > 0 is an arbitrary
n x n positive definite matrix, defines a "weighted" inner product.
Definition 7.13. If A E IR
m
xn, then ATE IR
n
xm is the unique linear transformation or map
such that {x, Ay) = {AT x, y) for all x E IR
m
andfor all y e IRn.
7.2. Inner Product Spaces 55
It is easy to check that, with this more "abstract" definition of transpose, and if the
(/, y)th element of A is a
(;
, then the (i, y)t h element of A
T
is a/ , . It can also be checked
that all the usual properties of the transpose hold, such as (Afl) = B
T
A
T
. However, the
definition above allows us to extend the concept of transpose to the case of weighted inner
products in the following way. Suppose A e R
mxn
and let {, }g and (•, }
R
, with Q and
R positive definite, be weighted inner products on R
m
and W, respectively. Then we can
define the "weighted transpose" A
#
as the unique map that satisfies
(x, Ay)
Q
= (A
#
x, y)
R
for all x e R
m
and for all y e W
1
.
By Example 7.12 above, we must then have X
T
QAy = x
T
(A
#
) Ry for all x, y. Hence we
must have QA = (A
#
) R. Taking transposes (of the usual variety) gives A
T
Q = RA
#
.
Since R is nonsingular, we find
A* = /r'A' Q.
We can also generalize the notion of orthogonality (x
T
y = 0) to Q orthogonality (Q is
a positive definite matrix). Two vectors x, y e W are <2orthogonal (or conjugate with
respect to Q) if ( x, y}
Q
= X
T
Qy = 0. Q orthogonality is an important tool used in
studying conjugate direction methods in optimization theory.
Definition 7.14. Let V be a vector space over C. Then {, •} : V x V > C is a complex
inner product if
1. ( x, x) > Qfor all x e V and ( x, x) =0 if and only ifx = 0.
2. (x, y) = (y, x) for all x, y e V.
3. (x,ayi + fiy
2
) = a(x, y\) + fi(x, y
2
}forallx, y\, y
2
e V and for alia, ft 6 C.
Remark 7.15. We could use the notation {•, }
c
to denote a complex inner product, but
if the vectors involved are complexvalued, the complex inner product is to be understood.
Note, too, from part 2 of the definition, that ( x, x) must be real for all x.
Remark 7.16. Note from parts 2 and 3 of Definition 7.14 that we have
(ax\ + fix
2
, y) = a(x\, y) + P(x
2
, y}.
Remark 7.17. The Euclidean inner product of x, y e C" is given by
The conventional definition of the complex Euclidean inner product is (x, y} = y
H
x but we
use its complex conjugate x
H
y here for symmetry with the real case.
Remark 7.18. A weighted inner product can be defined as in the real case by (x, y}
Q
—
X
H
Qy, for arbitrary Q = Q
H
> 0. The notion of Q orthogonality can be similarly
generalized to the complex case.
7.2. Inner product Spaces 55
It is easy to check that, with this more "abstract" definition of transpose, and if the
(i, j)th element of A is aij, then the (i, j)th element of AT is ap. It can also be checked
that all the usual properties of the transpose hold, such as (AB) = BT AT. However, the
definition above allows us to extend the concept of transpose to the case of weighted inner
products in the following way. Suppose A E ]Rm xn and let (., .) Q and (., .) R, with Q and
R positive definite, be weighted inner products on IR
m
and IRn, respectively. Then we can
define the "weighted transpose" A # as the unique map that satisfies
(x, AY)Q = (A#x, Y)R for all x E IRm and for all Y E IRn.
By Example 7.l2 above, we must then have x
T
QAy = x
T
(A#{ Ry for all x, y. Hence we
must have QA = (A#{ R. Taking transposes (of the usual variety) gives AT Q = RA#.
Since R is nonsingular, we find
A# = R1A
T
Q.
We can also generalize the notion of orthogonality (x
T
y = 0) to Qorthogonality (Q is
a positive definite matrix). Two vectors x, y E IRn are Qorthogonal (or conjugate with
respect to Q) if (x, y) Q = X T Qy = O. Qorthogonality is an important tool used in
studying conjugate direction methods in optimization theory.
Definition 7.14. Let V be a vector space over <C. Then (., .) : V x V + C is a complex
inner product if
1. (x, x) :::: 0 for all x E V and (x, x) = 0 if and only if x = O.
2. (x, y) = (y, x) for all x, y E V.
3. (x, aYI + f3Y2) = a(x, yll + f3(x, Y2) for all x, YI, Y2 E V andfor all a, f3 E c.
Remark 7.15. We could use the notation (., ·)e to denote a complex inner product, but
if the vectors involved are complexvalued, the complex inner product is to be understood.
Note, too, from part 2 of the definition, that (x, x) must be real for all x.
Remark 7.16. Note from parts 2 and 3 of Definition 7.14 that we have
Remark 7.17. The Euclidean inner product of x, y E C
n
is given by
n
(x, y) = LXiYi = xHy.
i=1
The conventional definition of the complex Euclidean inner product is (x, y) = yH x but we
use its complex conjugate x
H
y here for symmetry with the real case.
Remark 7.1S. A weighted inner product can be defined as in the real case by (x, y)Q =
x
H
Qy, for arbitrary Q = QH > o. The notion of Qorthogonality can be similarly
generalized to the complex case.
56 Chapter 7. Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms
Definition 7.19. A vector space (V, F) endowed with a specific inner product is called an
inner product space. If F = C, we call V a complex inner product space. If F = R, we
call V a real inner product space.
Example 7.20.
1. Check that V = R"
x
" with the inner product (A, B) = Tr A
T
B is a real inner product
space. Note that other choices are possible since by properties of the trace function,
TrA
T
B = TrB
T
A = TrAB
T
= TrBA
T
.
2. Check that V = C
nx
" with the inner product (A, B) = Tr A
H
B is a complex inner
product space. Again, other choices are possible.
Definition 7.21. Let V be an inner product space. For v e V, we define the norm (or
length) ofv by \\v\\ = */(v, v). This is called the norm induced by (  ,  ) .
Example 7.22.
1. If V = E." with the usual inner product, the induced norm is given by   i>   =
xV—*« 9\ 7
( E , =i < Y )
2

2. If V = C" with the usual inner product, the induced norm is given by \\v\\ =
(£ ?
=
, l » ,  l
2
)* .
Theorem 7.23. Let P be an orthogonal projection on an inner product space V. Then
\\Pv\\ < \\v\\forallv e V.
Proof: Since P is an orthogonal projection, P
2
= P = P
#
. (Here, the notation P
#
denotes
the unique linear transformation that satisfies ( P u , v } = (u, P
#
v) for all u, v e V. If this
seems a little too abstract, consider V = R" (or C"), where P
#
is simply the usual P
T
(or
P
H
)). Hence ( P v , v) = (P
2
v, v) = (Pv, P
#
v) = ( P v , Pv) = \\Pv\\
2
> 0. Now /  P is
also a projection, so the above result applies and we get
from which the theorem follows.
Definition 7.24. The norm induced on an inner product space by the "usual" inner product
is called the natural norm.
In case V = C" or V = R", the natural norm is also called the Euclidean norm. In
the next section, other norms on these vector spaces are defined. A converse to the above
procedure is also available. That is, given a norm defined by \\x\\ — • > /(• * > x), an inner
product can be defined via the following.
56 Chapter 7. Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms
Definition 7.19. A vector space (V, IF) endowed with a specific inner product is called an
inner product space. If IF = e, we call V a complex inner product space. If IF = R we
call V a real inner product space.
Example 7.20.
1. Check that V = IR
n
xn with the inner product (A, B) = Tr AT B is a real inner product
space. Note that other choices are possible since by properties of the trace function,
Tr AT B = Tr B T A = Tr A B T = Tr BAT.
2. Check that V = e
nxn
with the inner product (A, B) = Tr AH B is a complex inner
product space. Again, other choices are possible.
Definition 7.21. Let V be an inner product space. For v E V, we define the norm (or
length) ofv by IIvll = J(V,V). This is called the norm induced by (', .).
Example 7.22.
1. If V = IR
n
with the usual inner product, the induced norm is given by II v II
n 2 1
(Li=l V
i
)2.
2. If V = en with the usual inner product, the induced norm is given by II v II =
"n 2 !
(L...i=l IVi I ) .
Theorem 7.23. Let P be an orthogonal projection on an inner product space V. Then
IIPvll ::::: Ilvll for all v E V.
Proof: Since P is an orthogonal projection, p2 = P = pH. (Here, the notation p# denotes
the unique linear transformation that satisfies (Pu, v) = (u, p#v) for all u, v E V. If this
seems a little too abstract, consider V = IR
n
(or en), where p# is simply the usual pT (or
pH)). Hence (Pv, v) = (P
2
v, v) = (Pv, p#v) = (Pv, Pv) = IIPvll
2
::: O. Now / P is
also a projection, so the above result applies and we get
0::::: ((I  P)v. v) = (v. v)  (Pv, v)
= IIvll2  IIPvll
2
from which the theorem follows. 0
Definition 7.24. The norm induced on an inner product space by the "usual" inner product
is called the natural norm.
In case V = en or V = IR
n
, the natural norm is also called the Euclidean norm. In
the next section, other norms on these vector spaces are defined. A converse to the above
procedure is also available. That is, given a norm defined by IIx II = .j(X,X}, an inner
product can be defined via the following.
7.3. Vector Norms 57
Theorem 7.25 (Polarization Identity).
1. For x, y € R", an inner product is defined by
7.3 Vector Norms
Definition 7.26. Let (V, F) be a vector space. Then \ \  \ \ : V >• R is a vector norm if it
satisfies the following three properties:
2. For x, y e C", an inner product is defined by
where j = i = \/—T.
(This is called the triangle inequality, as seen readily from the usual diagram illus
trating the sum of two vectors in R
2
.)
Remark 7.27. It is convenient in the remainder of this section to state results for complex
valued vectors. The specialization to the real case is obvious.
Definition 7.28. A vector space (V, F) is said to be a normed linear space if and only if
there exists a vector norm  •  : V > R satisfying the three conditions of Definition 7.26.
Example 7.29.
1. For x e C", the Holder norms, or pnorms, are defined by
Special cases:
(The second equality is a theorem that requires proof.)
7.3. Vector Norms
Theorem 7.25 (Polarization Identity).
1. For x, y E an inner product is defined by
(x,y)=xTy=
2. For x, y E en, an inner product is defined by
where j = i = .J=I.
7.3 Vector Norms
IIx + yll2 _ IIxll2 _ lIyll2
2
57
Definition 7.26. Let (V, IF) be a vector space. Then II . II : V + IR is a vector norm ifit
satisfies the following three properties:
1. Ilxll::: Of or all x E V and IIxll = 0 ifand only ifx = O.
2. Ilaxll = lalllxllforallx E Vandforalla E IF.
3. IIx + yll :::: IIxll + IIYliforall x, y E V.
(This is called the triangle inequality, as seen readily from the usual diagram illus
trating the sum of two vectors in ]R2 .)
Remark 7.27. It is convenient in the remainder of this section to state results for complex
valued vectors. The specialization to the real case is obvious.
Definition 7.28. A vector space (V, IF) is said to be a normed linear space if and only if
there exists a vector norm II . II : V + ]R satisfying the three conditions of Definition 7.26.
Example 7.29.
1. For x E en, the HOlder norms, or pnorms, are defined by
Special cases:
(a) Ilx III = L:7=1 IXi I (the "Manhattan" norm).
1 1
(b) Ilxllz = (L:7=1Ix;l2)2 = (X
H
X)2 (the Euclidean norm).
(c) Ilxlioo = maxlx;l = lim IIxllp
IE!! p++oo
(The second equality is a theorem that requires proof.)
58 Chapter 7. Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms
2. Some weighted pnorms:
(a)   JC  , .
D
= E^rf/l*/!, where 4 > 0.
(b) I k llz . g — (x
h
Q
X
Y > where Q = Q
H
> 0 (this norm is more commonly
denoted  • 
c
).
3. On the vector space (C[to, t \ ] , R), define the vector norm
On the vector space ((C[to, t\])
n
, R), define the vector norm
Fhcorem 7.30 (Holder Inequality). Let x, y e C". Ther,
A particular case of the Holder inequality is of special interest.
Theorem 7.31 (CauchyBunyakovskySchwarz Inequality). Let x, y e C". Then
with equality if and only if x and y are linearly dependent.
Proof: Consider the matrix [x y] e C"
x2
. Since
is a nonnegative definite matrix, its determinant must be nonnegative. In other words,
0 < ( x
H
x ) ( y
H
y ) — ( x
H
y ) ( y
H
x ) . Since y
H
x = x
H
y, we see immediately that \X
H
y\ <
\\X\\2\\y\\2
D
Note: This is not the classical algebraic proof of the CauchyBunyakovskySchwarz
(CBS) inequality (see, e.g., [20, p. 217]). However, it is particularly easy to remember.
Remark 7.32. The angle 0 between two nonzero vectors x, y e C" may be defined by
cos# = I, „ .^ , 0 < 0 < 5. The CBS inequality is thus equivalent to the statement
IlMmlylb — ^
COS 0 <1.
Remark 7.33. Theorem 7.31 and Remark 7.32 are true for general inner product spaces.
Remark 7.34. The norm  • 
2
is unitarily invariant, i.e., if U € C"
x
" is unitary, then
\\Ux\\
2
= \\x\\
2
(Proof. \\Ux\\l = x
H
U
H
Ux = X
H
X = \\x\\\). However,   , and   1^
58 Chapter 7. Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms
2. Some weighted pnorms:
(a) IIxll1.D = whered; > O.
1
(b) IIx IIz.Q = (x
H
Qx) 2, where Q = QH > 0 (this norm is more commonly
denoted II . IIQ)'
3. On the vector space (C[to, ttl, 1Ft), define the vector norm
11111 = max 1/(t)I·
On the vector space «e[to, ttlr, 1Ft), define the vector norm
1111100 = max II/(t) 11
00
,
Theorem 7.30 (HOlder Inequality). Let x, y E en. Then
I I
+=1.
p q
A particular case of the HOlder inequality is of special interest.
Theorem 7.31 (CauchyBunyakovskySchwarz Inequality). Let x, y E en. Then
with equality if and only if x and yare linearly dependent.
Proof' Consider the matrix [x y] E en
x2
. Since
is a nonnegative definite matrix, its determinant must be nonnegative. In other words,
o (x
H
x)(yH y)  (x
H
y)(yH x). Since yH x = x
H
y, we see immediately that IXH yl
IIxll2l1yllz. 0
Note: This is not the classical algebraic proof of the CauchyBunyakovskySchwarz
(CBS) inequality (see, e.g., [20, p. 217]). However, it is particularly easy to remember.
Remark 7.32. The angle e between two nonzero vectors x, y E en may be defined by
cos e = 0 e I' The CBS inequality is thus equivalent to the statement
1 cose 1 1.
Remark 7.33. Theorem 7.31 and Remark 7.32 are true for general inner product spaces.
Remark 7.34. The norm II . 112 is unitarily invariant, i.e., if U E e
nxn
is unitary, then
IIUxll2 = IIxll2 (Proof IIUxili = XHUHUx = xHx = IIxlli)· However, 11·111 and 1I·IIClO
7.4. Matrix Norms 59
are not unitarily invariant. Similar remarks apply to the unitary invariance of norms of real
vectors under orthogonal transformation.
Remark 7.35. If x, y € C" are orthogonal, then we have the Pythagorean Identity
7.4 Matrix Norms
In this section we introduce the concept of matrix norm. As with vectors, the motivation for
using matrix norms is to have a notion of either the size of or the nearness of matrices. The
former notion is useful for perturbation analysis, while the latter is needed to make sense of
"convergence" of matrices. Attention is confined to the vector space (W
nxn
, R) since that is
what arises in the majority of applications. Extension to the complex case is straightforward
and essentially obvious.
Definition 7.39.  •  : R
mx
" > E is a matrix norm if it satisfies the following three
properties:
2 _ _/ / .
the proof of which follows easily from z2 = z z.
Theorem 7.36. All norms on C" are equivalent; i.e., there exist constants c\, ci (possibly
depending onn) such that
Example 7.37. For x G C", the following inequalities are all tight bounds; i.e., there exist
vectors x for which equality holds:
Finally, we conclude this section with a theorem about convergence of vectors. Con
vergence of a sequence of vectors to some limit vector can be converted into a statement
about convergence of real numbers, i.e., convergence in terms of vector norms.
Theorem 7.38. Let \\ • \\ be a vector norm and suppose v, i»
( 1 )
, v
(2
\ ... e C". Then
7.4. Matrix Norms 59
are not unitarily invariant. Similar remarks apply to the unitary invariance of norms of real
vectors under orthogonal transformation.
Remark 7.35. If x, y E en are orthogonal, then we have the Pythagorean Identity
Ilx ± = +
the proof of which follows easily from liz = ZH z.
Theorem 7.36. All norms on en are equivalent; i.e., there exist constants CI, C2 (possibly
depending on n) such that
Example 7.37. For x E en, the following inequalities are all tight bounds; i.e., there exist
vectors x for which equality holds:
Ilxlll :::: Jn Ilxlb
Ilxll2:::: IIxll»
IIxlloo :::: IIxll»
Ilxlll :::: n IIxlloo;
IIxl12 :::: Jn Ilxll
oo
;
IIxlioo :::: IIxllz.
Finally, we conclude this section with a theorem about convergence of vectors. Con
vergence of a sequence of vectors to some limit vector can be converted into a statement
about convergence of real numbers, i.e., convergence in terms of vector norms.
Theorem 7.38. Let II· II be a vector norm and suppose v, v(l), v(2), ... E en. Then
lim V(k) = v if and only if lim II v(k)  v II = O.
k4+00
7.4 Matrix Norms
In this section we introduce the concept of matrix norm. As with vectors, the motivation for
using matrix norms is to have a notion of either the size of or the nearness of matrices. The
former notion is useful for perturbation analysis, while the latter is needed to make sense of
"convergence" of matrices. Attention is confined to the vector space (IRm xn , IR) since that is
what arises in the majority of applications. Extension to the complex case is straightforward
and essentially obvious.
Definition 7.39. II· II : IR
mxn
IR is a matrix norm if it satisfies the following three
properties:
1. IIAII Of or all A E IR
mxn
and IIAII = 0 if and only if A = O.
2. lIaAl1 = lalliAliforall A E IR
mxn
andfor all a E IR.
3. IIA + BII :::: IIAII + IIBII for all A, BE IRmxn.
(As with vectors, this is called the triangle inequality.)
60 Chapter 7. Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms
Example 7.40. Let A e R
mx
". Then the Frobenius norm (or matrix Euclidean norm) is
defined by
^wncic r = laiiK^/i;;.
Example 7.41. Let A e R
mxn
. Then the matrix pnorms are defined by
The following three special cases are important because they are "computable." Each is a
theorem and requires a proof.
1. The "maximum column sum" norm is
2. The "maximum row sum" norm is
3. The spectral norm is
Example 7.42. Let A E R
mxn
. The Schatten/7norms are defined by
Some special cases of Schatten /?norms are equal to norms defined previously. For example,
 . 
5 2
=  . \\
F
and  • 
5i00
=  • 
2
. The norm  • 
5>1
is often called the trace norm.
Example 7.43. Let A e K
mx
". Then "mixed" norms can also be defined by
Example 7.44. The "matrix analogue of the vector 1norm,"  A\\
s
= ^ j \a
i}
; , is a norm.
The concept of a matrix norm alone is not altogether useful since it does not allow us
to estimate the size of a matrix product A B in terms of the sizes of A and B individually.
60 Chapter 7. Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms
Example 7.40. Let A E lR,mxn. Then the Frobenius norm (or matrix Euclidean norm) is
defined by
IIAIIF ~ (t. t ai;) I ~ (t. altA)) 1 ~ (T, (A' A)) 1 ~ (T, (AA '));
(where r = rank(A)).
Example 7.41. Let A E lR,mxn. Then the matrix pnorms are defined by
IIAxll
IIAII = max _P = max IIAxll .
P Ilxllp;60 Ilxli
p
IIxllp=1 p
The following three special cases are important because they are "computable." Each is a
theorem and requires a proof.
I. The "maximum column sum" norm is
2. The "maximum row sum" norm is
IIAlioo = max
rE!!l. (
t laUI ).
J=1
3. The spectral norm is
tTL T
IIAII2 = Amax(A A) = A ~ a x ( A A ) = a1(A).
Note: IIA+llz = l/ar(A), where r = rank(A).
Example 7.42. Let A E lR,mxn. The Schattenpnorms are defined by
I
IIAlls.p = (at' + ... + a!)"".
Some special cases of Schatten pnorms are equal to norms defined previously. For example,
11·115.2 = II . IIF and 11'115,00 = II . 112' The norm II . 115.1 is often called the trace norm.
Example 7.43. Let A E lR,mxn _ Then "mixed" norms can also be defined by
IIAII = max IIAxil
p
p,q 11.<110#0 IIxllq
Example 7.44. The "matrix analogue of the vector Inorm," IIAlis = Li.j laij I, is a norm.
The concept of a matrix norm alone is not altogether useful since it does not allow us
to estimate the size of a matrix product AB in terms of the sizes of A and B individually.
7.4. Matrix Norms 61
Notice that this difficulty did not arise for vectors, although there are analogues for, e.g.,
inner products or outer products of vectors. We thus need the following definition.
Definition 7.45. Let A e R
mxn
, B e R
nxk
. Then the norms \\ • \\
a
, \\ • \\
p
, and \\ • \\
y
are
mutually consistent if \\ A B \\
a
< \\A\\p\\B\\
y
. A matrix norm\\ • \\ is said to be consistent
if \\AB\\ <  A   fi whenever the matrix product is defined.
Example 7.46.
1.  • /7 and  • 
p
for all p are consistent matrix norms.
2. The "mixed" norm
is a matrix norm but it is not consistent. For example, take A = B = \ \ J1. Then
  Af l  
l i 00
= 2whil e  A 
l i 00
  B 
1 >00
= l.
The p norms are examples of matrix norms that are subordinate to (or induced by)
a vector norm, i.e.,
11^ 4^ 11
(or, more generally, A = max^o ., . .
p
) . For such subordinate norms, also called oper
ator norms, we clearly have Aj c < A1jt. Since   Af ij c  <   A    f l j c  < Aflj t,
it follows that all subordinate norms are consistent.
Theorem 7.47. There exists a vector x* such that Ajt* = A jc* if the matrix normis
subordinate to the vector norm.
Theorem 7.48. If \\ • \\
m
is a consistent matrix norm, there exists a vector norm \\ • \\
v
consistent with it, i.e., H Aj c JI ^ < \\A\\
m
\\x\\
v
.
Not every consistent matrix norm is subordinate to a vector norm. For example,
consider  • \\
F
. Then  A^ 
2
< A
F
j c
2
, so  • 
2
is consistent with  • 
F
, but there does
not exist a vector norm  •  such that A
F
is given by max^o \^ •
Useful Results
The following miscellaneous results about matrix norms are collected for future reference.
The interested reader is invited to prove each of them as an exercise.
2. For A e R"
x
", the following inequalities are all tight, i.e., there exist matrices A for
which equality holds:
7.4. Matrix Norms 61
Notice that this difficulty did not arise for vectors, although there are analogues for, e.g.,
inner products or outer products of vectors. We thus need the following definition.
Definition 7.45. Let A E ]Rmxn, B E ]Rnxk. Then the norms II . II", II· Ilfl' and II . lIy are
mutuallyconsistentifIlABII,,::S IIAllfllIBlly. A matrix norm 11·11 is said to be consistent
if II A B II ::s II A 1111 B II whenever the matrix product is defined.
Example 7.46.
1. II· II F and II . II p for all p are consistent matrix norms.
2. The "mixed" norm
IIAxll1
II· 11
100
= max = max laijl
, x;60 Ilx 1100 i,j
is a matrix norm but it is not consistent. For example, take A = B = [: :]. Then
IIABIII,oo = 2 while IIAIII,ooIlBIII,oo = 1.
The pnorms are examples of matrix norms that are subordinate to (or induced by)
a vector norm, i.e.,
IIAxl1
IIAII = max  = max IIAxl1
x;60 IIx II Ilxll=1
IIAxll .
(or, more generally, IIAllp,q = maxx;60 IIxll
q
P
), For such subordmate norms, also caUedoper
atornorms, wec1earlyhave IIAxll ::s IIAllllxll· Since IIABxl1 ::s IIAlIllBxll ::s IIAIIIIBllllxll,
it follows that all subordinate norms are consistent.
Theorem 7.47. There exists a vector x* such that IIAx*11 = IIAllllx*11 if the matrix norm is
subordinate to the vector norm.
Theorem 7.48. If II . 11m is a consistent matrix norm, there exists a vector norm II . IIv
consistent with it, i.e., IIAxliv ::s IIAlim Ilxli
v
'
Not every consistent matrix norm is subordinate to a vector norm. For example,
consider II . II F' Then II Ax 112 ::s II A II Filx 112, so II . 112 is consistent with II . II F, but there does
not exist a vector norm II . II such that IIAIIF is given by max
x
;60 " , ~ ~ i ' .
Useful Results
The following miscellaneous results about matrix norms are collected for future reference.
The interested reader is invited to prove each of them as an exercise.
1. II In II p = 1 for all p, while IIIn II F = .jii.
2. For A E ]Rnxn, the following inequalities are all tight, i.e., there exist matrices A for
which equality holds:
IIAIII ::s .jii IIAlb
IIAII2 ::s.jii IIAII
I
,
II A 1100 ::s n IIAII
I
,
IIAIIF ::s.jii IIAII
I
,
IIAIII ::s n IIAlloo,
IIAII2 ::s .jii IIAlloo,
IIAlioo ::s .jii IIAII2,
IIAIIF ::s .jii IIAlb
IIAIII ::s .jii II
A
IIF;
IIAII2::S IIAIIF;
IIAlioo ::s .jii IIAIIF;
IIAIIF ::s .jii IIAlioo'
62 Chapter 7. Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms
3. For A eR
mxa
.
4. The norms  • \\
F
and  • 
2
(as well as all the Schatten /?norms, but not necessarily
other pnorms) are unitarily invariant; i.e., for all A e R
mx
" and for all orthogonal
matrices Q zR
mxm
and Z e M"
x
", (MZ
a
=   A 
a
fora = 2 or F.
Convergence
The following theorem uses matrix norms to convert a statement about convergence of a
sequence of matrices into a statement about the convergence of an associated sequence of
scalars.
Theorem 7.49. Let \\ \\bea matrix normand suppose A, A
( 1)
, A
(2)
, ... e R
mx
". Then
EXERCISES
1. If P is an orthogonal projection, prove that P
+
= P.
2. Suppose P and Q are orthogonal projections and P + Q = I. Prove that P — Q
must be an orthogonal matrix.
3. Prove that / — A
+
A is an orthogonal projection. Also, prove directly that V
2
V/ is an
orthogonal projection, where ¥2 is defined as in Theorem 5.1.
4. Suppose that a matrix A e W
nxn
has linearly independent columns. Prove that the
orthogonal projection onto the space spanned by these column vectors is given by the
matrix P = A(A
T
A)~
}
A
T
.
5. Find the (orthogonal) projection of the vector [2 3 4]
r
onto the subspace of R
3
spanned by the plane 3;c — v + 2z = 0.
6. Prove that E"
x
" with the inner product (A, B) = Tr A
T
B is a real inner product
space.
7. Show that the matrix norms  • 
2
and  • \\
F
are unitarily invariant.
8. Definition: Let A e R
nxn
and denote its set of eigenvalues (not necessarily distinct)
by { Ai , . . . , > . „ } . The spectral radius of A is the scalar
62 Chapter 7. Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms
3. For A E IR
mxn
,
max laijl :::: IIAII2 :::: ~ max laijl.
l.] l.]
4. The norms II . IIF and II . 112 (as well as all the Schatten pnorms, but not necessarily
other pnorms) are unitarily invariant; i.e., for all A E IR
mxn
and for all orthogonal
matrices Q E IR
mxm
and Z E IR
nxn
, IIQAZlia = IIAlla fora = 2 or F.
Convergence
The following theorem uses matrix norms to convert a statement about convergence of a
sequence of matrices into a statement about the convergence of an associated sequence of
scalars.
Theorem 7.49. Let II ·11 be a matrix norm and suppose A, A(I), A(2), ... E IRmxn. Then
lim A (k) = A if and only if lim IIA (k)  A II = o.
k ~ + o o k ~ + o o
EXERCISES
1. If P is an orthogonal projection, prove that p+ = P.
2. Suppose P and Q are orthogonal projections and P + Q = I. Prove that P  Q
must be an orthogonal matrix.
3. Prove that I  A + A is an orthogonal projection. Also, prove directly that V
2
Vl is an
orthogonal projection, where V2 is defined as in Theorem 5.1.
4. Suppose that a matrix A E IR
mxn
has linearly independent columns. Prove that the
orthogonal projection onto the space spanned by these column vectors is given by the
matrix P = A(AT A) 1 AT.
5. Find the (orthogonal) projection of the vector [2 3 4f onto the subspace of 1R
3
spanned by the plane 3x  y + 2z = O.
6. Prove that IR
n
xn with the inner product (A, B) = Tr AT B is a real inner product
space.
7. Show that the matrix norms II . 112 and II . IIF are unitarily invariant.
8. Definition: Let A E IR
nxn
and denote its set of eigenvalues (not necessarily distinct)
by P.l, ... , An}. The spectral radius of A is the scalar
p(A) = max IA;I.
i
Exercises 63
Determine A
F
, H AI d , A
2
, H AH ^ , and p(A). (An n x n matrix, all of whose
columns and rows as well as main d iagonal and antid iagonal sum to s = n(n
2
+ l)/2,
is called a "magic square" matrix. I f M is a magic square matrix, it can be proved
that  M U p = s for all/?.)
10. Let A = xy
T
, where both x, y e R" are nonzero. Determine A
F
, Aj, A
2
,
and Aoo in terms of \\x\\
a
and /or \\y\\p, where a and ft take the value 1, 2, or oo as
appropriate.
Let
9. Let
Determine A
F
, \\A\\
lt
A
2
, H A^ , and p(A).
Exercises 63
Let
A = [ ~ 0 ~ ] .
14 12 5
Determine IIAIIF' IIAII
I
, IIAlb IIAlloo, and peA).
9. Let
A = [ ~ ~ ~ ] .
492
Determine IIAIIF' IIAII
I
, IIAlb IIAlloo, and peA). (An n x n matrix, all of whose
columns and rows as well as main diagonal and antidiagonal sum to s = n (n
2
+ 1) /2,
is called a "magic square" matrix. If M is a magic square matrix, it can be proved
that IIMllp = s for all p.)
10. Let A = xyT, where both x, y E IR
n
are nonzero. Determine IIAIIF' IIAIII> IIAlb
and II A 1100 in terms of IIxlla and/or IlylljJ, where ex and {3 take the value 1,2, or (Xl as
appropriate.
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank
Chapter 8
Li near Least Squares
Problems
8.1 The Li near Least Squares Problem
Problem: Suppose A e R
mx
" with m > n and b <= R
m
is a given vector. The linear least
squares problem consists of finding an element of the set
Solution: The set X has a number of easily verified properties:
1. A vector x e X if and only if A
T
r = 0, where r = b — Ax is the residual associated
with x. The equations A
T
r — 0 can be rewritten in the form A
T
Ax = A
T
b and the
latter form is commonly known as the normal equations, i.e., x e X if and only if
x is a solution of the normal equations. For further details, see Section 8.2.
2. A vector x E X if and onlv if x is of the form
To see why this must be so, write the residual r in the form
Now, (Pn(A)b — AJ C ) is clearly in 7£(A) , while
so these two vectors are orthogonal. Hence,
from the Pythagorean identity (Remark 7.35). Thus, A.x — b\\\ (and hence p ( x ) =
\\Ax —b\\2) assumes its minimum value if and only if
65
Chapter 8
Linear Least Squares
Problems
8.1 The Linear Least Squares Problem
Problem: Suppose A E jRmxn with m 2: nand b E jRm is a given vector. The linear least
squares problem consists of finding an element of the set
x = {x E jRn : p(x) = IIAx  bll
2
is minimized}.
Solution: The set X has a number of easily verified properties:
1. A vector x E X if and only if AT r = 0, where r = b  Ax is the residual associated
with x. The equations AT r = 0 can be rewritten in the form A T Ax = AT b and the
latter form is commonly known as the normal equations, i.e., x E X if and only if
x is a solution of the normal equations. For further details, see Section 8.2.
2. A vector x E X if and only if x is of the form
x=A+b+(IA+A)y, whereyEjRnisarbitrary. (8.1)
To see why this must be so, write the residual r in the form
r = (b  PR(A)b) + (PR(A)b  Ax).
Now, (PR(A)b  Ax) is clearly in 'R(A), while
(b  PR(A)b) = (I  PR(A))b
= PR(A),,b E 'R(A)L
so these two vectors are orthogonal. Hence,
= lib 
= lib  + IIPR(A)b 
from the Pythagorean identity (Remark 7.35). Thus, IIAx  (and hence p(x) =
II Ax  b 112) assumes its minimum value if and only if
(8.2)
65
66 Chapter 8. Linear Least Squares Problems
and this equation always has a solution since AA
+
b e 7£(A). By Theorem 6.3, all
solutions of (8.2) are of the form
where y e W is arbitrary. The minimum value of p ( x ) is then clearly equal to
the last inequality following by Theorem 7.23.
3. X is convex. To see why, consider two arbitrary vectors jci = A
+
b + (I — A+A)y
and *2 = A+b + (I — A+A)z in X. Let 6 e [0, 1]. Then the convex combination
0*i + (1  #)*
2
= A+b + (I  A
+
A)(Oy + (1  0)z) is clearly in X.
4. X has a unique element x* of minimal 2norm. In fact, x* = A
+
b is the unique vector
that solves this "double minimization" problem, i.e., x * minimizes the residual p ( x )
and is the vector of minimum 2norm that does so. This follows immediately from
convexity or directly from the fact that all x e X are of the form (8.1) and
which follows since the two vectors are orthogonal.
5. There is a unique solution to the least squares problem, i.e., X = {x*} = {A+b}, if
and only if A
+
A = I or, equivalently, if and only if rank (A) = n.
Just as for the solution of linear equations, we can generalize the linear least squares
problem to the matrix case.
Theorem 8.1. Let A e E
mx
" and B € R
mxk
. The general solution to
is of the form
where Y € R"
xfc
is arbitrary. The unique solution of minimum 2norm or Fnorm is
X = A+B.
Remark 8.2. Notice that solutions of the linear least squares problem look exactly the
same as solutions of the linear system AX = B. The only difference is that in the case
of linear least squares solutions, there is no "existence condition" such as K(B) c 7£(A).
If the existence condition happens to be satisfied, then equality holds and the least squares
66 Chapter 8. Linear Least Squares Problems
and this equation always has a solution since AA+b E R(A). By Theorem 6.3, all
solutions of (8.2) are of the form
x = A+ AA+b + (I  A+ A)y
=A+b+(IA+A)y,
where y E ]R.n is arbitrary. The minimum value of p (x) is then clearly equal to
lib  PR(A)bll
z
= 11(1  AA+)bI1
2
~ Ilbll z,
the last inequality following by Theorem 7.23.
3. X is convex. To see why, consider two arbitrary vectors Xl = A + b + (I  A + A) y
and Xz = A+b + (I  A+ A)z in X. Let 8 E [0,1]. Then the convex combination
8x, + (1  8)xz = A+b + (I  A+ A)(8y + (1  8)z) is clearly in X.
4. X has a unique element x" of minimal2norm. In fact, x" = A + b is the unique vector
that solves this "double minimization" problem, i.e., x* minimizes the residual p(x)
and is the vector of minimum 2norm that does so. This follows immediately from
convexity or directly from the fact that all x E X are of the form (8.1) and
which follows since the two vectors are orthogonal.
5. There is a unique solution to the least squares problem, i.e., X = {x"} = {A+b}, if
and only if A + A = lor, equivalently, if and only if rank(A) = n.
Just as for the solution of linear equations, we can generalize the linear least squares
problem to the matrix case.
Theorem 8.1. Let A E ]R.mxn and BE ]R.mxk. The general solution to
min IIAX  Bib
XElR
Plxk
is of the form
X=A+B+(IA+A)Y,
where Y E ]R.nxk is arbitrary. The unique solution of minimum 2norm or Fnorm is
X = A+B.
Remark 8.2. Notice that solutions of the linear least squares problem look exactly the
same as solutions of the linear system AX = B. The only difference is that in the case
of linear least squares solutions, there is no "existence condition" such as R(B) S; R(A).
If the existence condition happens to be satisfied. then equality holds and the least squares
8.3 Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares Problems 67
residual is 0. Of all solutions that give a residual of 0, the unique solution X = A
+
B has
minimum 2norm or Fnorm.
Remark 8.3. If we take B = I
m
in Theorem 8.1, then X = A
+
can be interpreted as
saying that the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse of A is the best (in the matrix 2norm sense)
matrix such that AX approximates the identity.
Remark 8.4. Many other interesting and useful approximation results are available for the
matrix 2norm (and Fnorm). One such is the following. Let A e M™
x
" with SVD
8.2 Geometric Solution
Looking at the schematic provided in Figure 8.1, it is apparent that minimizing  Ax — b\\
2
is equivalent to finding the vector x e W
1
for which p — Ax is closest to b (in the Euclidean
norm sense). Clearly, r = b — Ax must be orthogonal to 7£(A). Thus, if Ay is an arbitrary
vector in 7£(A) (i.e., y is arbitrary), we must have
Then a best rank k approximation to A for l <f c <r , i . e . , a solution to
is given by
The special case in which m = n and k = n — 1 gives a nearest singular matrix to A e
Since y is arbitrary, we must have A
T
b — A
T
Ax = 0 or A
r
A;c = A
T
b.
Special case: If A is full (column) rank, then x = (A
T
A) A
T
b.
8.3 Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares
Problems
8.3.1 Example: Linear regression
Suppose we have m measurements (t\,y\), . . . , (t
m
,y
m
) for which we hypothesize a linear
(affine) relationship
8.3 Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares Problems 67
residual is O. Of all solutions that give a residual of 0, the unique solution X = A + B has
minimum 2norm or F norm.
Remark 8.3. If we take B = 1m in Theorem 8.1, then X = A+ can be interpreted as
saying that the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse of A is the best (in the matrix 2norm sense)
matrix such that AX approximates the identity.
Remark 8.4. Many other interesting and useful approximation results are available for the
matrix 2norm (and F norm). One such is the following. Let A E with SVD
A = = LOiUiV!.
i=l
Then a best rank k approximation to A for 1 :s k :s r, i.e., a solution to
min IIA  MIi2,
MEJRZ'xn
is given by
k
Mk = LOiUiV!.
i=1
The special case in which m = nand k = n  1 gives a nearest singular matrix to A E x n .
8.2 Geometric Solution
Looking at the schematic provided in Figure 8.1, it is apparent that minimizing IIAx  bll
2
is equivalent to finding the vector x E lR
n
for which p = Ax is closest to b (in the Euclidean
norm sense). Clearly, r = b  Ax must be orthogonal to R(A). Thus, if Ay is an arbitrary
vector in R(A) (i.e., y is arbitrary), we must have
0= (Ay)T (b  Ax)
=yTAT(bAx)
= yT (ATb _ AT Ax).
Since y is arbitrary, we must have AT b  AT Ax = 0 or AT Ax = AT b.
Special case: If A is full (column) rank, then x = (AT A)l ATb.
8.3 Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares
Problems
8.3.1 Example: Linear regression
Suppose we have m measurements (ll, YI), ... , (trn, Ym) for which we hypothesize a linear
(affine) relationship
y = at + f3
(8.3)
68 Chapter 8. Linear Least Squares Problems
Figure 8.1. Projection of b on K(A).
for certain constants a. and ft. One way to solve this problem is to find the line that best fits
the data in the least squares sense; i.e., with the model (8.3), we have
where &\,..., 8
m
are "errors" and we wish to minimize 8\ + • • • + 8^ Geometrically, we
are trying to find the best line that minimizes the (sum of squares of the) distances from the
given data points. See, for example, Figure 8.2.
Figure 8.2. Simple linear regression.
Note that distances are measured in the vertical sense from the points to the line (as
indicated, for example, for the point (t\, y\}}. However, other criteria arc possible. For ex
ample, one could measure the distances in the horizontal sense, or the perpendicular distance
from the points to the line could be used. The latter is called total least squares. Instead
of 2norms, one could also use 1norms or oonorms. The latter two are computationally
68 Chapter 8. Linear Least Squares Problems
b
r
p=Ax Ay E R(A)
Figure S.l. Projection of b on R(A).
for certain constants a and {3. One way to solve this problem is to find the line that best fits
the data in the least squares sense; i.e., with the model (8.3), we have
YI = all + {3 + 81,
Y2 = al2 + {3 + 82
where 8
1
, ... , 8
m
are "errors" and we wish to minimize 8? + ... + 8;. Geometrically, we
are trying to find the best line that minimizes the (sum of squares of the) distances from the
given data points. See, for example, Figure 8.2.
y
Figure 8.2. Simple linear regression.
Note that distances are measured in the venical sense from the point!; to [he line (a!;
indicated. for example. for the point (tl. YIn. However. other criteria nrc For cx
ample, one could measure the distances in the horizontal sense, or the perpendiculnr distance
from the points to the line could be used. The latter is called total least squares. Instead
of 2norms, one could also use Inorms or oonorms. The latter two are computationally
8.3. Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares Problems 69
much more difficult to handle, and thus we present only the more tractable 2norm case in
text that follows.
The ra "error equations" can be written in matrix form as
where
We then want to solve the problem
or, equivalently,
Solution: x — [^1 is a solution of the normal equations A
T
Ax = A
T
y where, for the
special form of the matrices above, we have
and
8.3.2 Other least squares problems
Suppose the hypothesized model is not the linear equation (8.3) but rather is of the form
y = f ( t ) =
Cl
0!(0+ • • • 4 c
n
<t>
n
(t). (8.5)
In (8.5) the < / > ,(0 are given (basis) functions and the c
;
are constants to be determined to
minimize the least squares error. The matrix problem is still (8.4), where we now have
An important special case of (8.5) is least squares polynomial approximation, which
corresponds to choosing 0,• (?) = t'~
l
, i
;
e n, although this choice can lead to computational
The solution for the parameters a and ft can then be written
8.3. Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares Problems 69
much more difficult to handle, and thus we present only the more tractable 2norm case in
text that follows.
The m "error equations" can be written in matrix form as
Y = Ax +0,
where
We then want to solve the problem
minoT 0 = min (Ax  y)T (Ax  y)
x
or, equivalently,
min = min II Ax 
x
Solution: x = is a solution of the normal equations AT Ax
special form of the matrices above, we have
and
AT Y = [ Li ti Yi J.
LiYi
The solution for the parameters a and f3 can then be written
8.3.2 Other least squares problems
(8.4)
AT y where, for the
Suppose the hypothesized model is not the linear equation (S.3) but rather is of the form
(8.5)
In (8.5) the ¢i(t) are given (basis) functions and the Ci are constants to be determined to
minimize the least squares error. The matrix problem is still (S.4), where we now have
An important special case of (8.5) is least squares polynomial approximation, which
corresponds to choosing ¢i (t) = t
i

1
, i E !!, although this choice can lead to computational
70 Chapter 8. Linear Least Squares Problems
difficulties because of numerical ill conditioning for large n. Numerically better approaches
are based on orthogonal polynomials, piecewise polynomial functions, splines, etc.
The key feature in (8.5) is that the coefficients c, appear linearly. The basis functions
< / > , can be arbitrarily nonlinear. Sometimes a problem in which the c, 's appear nonlinearly
can be converted into a linear problem. For example, if the fitting function is of the form
y = f ( t ) = c\e
C2i
, then taking logarithms yields the equation logy = logci + cjt. Then
defining y — logy, c\ = logci, and GI = cj_ results in a standard linear least squares
problem.
8.4 Least Squares and Singular Value Decomposition
In the numerical linear algebra literature (e.g., [4], [7], [11], [23]), it is shown that solution
of linear least squares problems via the normal equations can be a very poor numerical
method in finite precision arithmetic. Since the standard Kalman filter essentially amounts
to sequential updating of normal equations, it can be expected to exhibit such poor numerical
behavior in practice (and it does). Better numerical methods are based on algorithms that
work directly and solely on A itself rather than A
T
A. Two basic classes of algorithms are
based on S VD and QR (orthogonal upper triangular) factorization, respectively. The former
is much more expensive but is generally more reliable and offers considerable theoretical
insight.
In this section we investigate solution of the linear least squares problem
The last equality follows from the fact that if v = [£ ], then u^ =   i> i \\\ + \\vi\\\ (note
that orthogonality is not what is used here; the subvectors can have different lengths). This
explains why it is convenient to work above with the square of the norm rather than the
norm. As far as the minimization is concerned, the two are equivalent. In fact, the last
quantity above is clearly minimized by taking z\ = S~
l
c\. The subvector z
2
is arbitrary,
while the minimum value of \\Ax — b\\^ is l ^l l r
via the SVD. Specifically, we assume that A has an SVD given by A = UT, V
T
= U\SVf
as in Theorem 5.1. We now note that
70 Chapter 8. Linear Least Squares Problems
difficulties because of numerical ill conditioning for large n. Numerically better approaches
are based on orthogonal polynomials, piecewise polynomial functions, splines, etc.
The key feature in (8.5) is that the coefficients Ci appear linearly. The basis functions
¢i can be arbitrarily nonlinear. Sometimes a problem in which the Ci'S appear nonlinearly
can be converted into a linear problem. For example, if the fitting function is of the form
Y = f (t) = c, e
C2
/ , then taking logarithms yields the equation log y = log c, + c2f. Then
defining y = log y, c, = log c" and C2 = C2 results in a standard linear least squares
problem.
8.4 Least Squares and Singular Value Decomposition
In the numerical linear algebra literature (e.g., [4], [7], [11], [23]), it is shown that solution
of linear least squares problems via the normal equations can be a very poor numerical
method in finiteprecision arithmetic. Since the standard Kalman filter essentially amounts
to sequential updating of normal equations, it can be expected to exhibit such poor numerical
behavior in practice (and it does). Better numerical methods are based on algorithms that
work directly and solely on A itself rather than AT A. Two basic classes of algorithms are
based on SVD and QR (orthogonalupper triangular) factorization, respectively. The former
is much more expensive but is generally more reliable and offers considerable theoretical
insight.
In this section we investigate solution of the linear least squares problem
min II Ax  b11
2
, A E IR
mxn
, bE IR
m
, (8.6)
x
via the SVD. Specifically, we assume that A has an SVD given by A = = U,SVr
as in Theorem 5.1. We now note that
IIAx  = x 
= II VT X  U
T
bll; since II . Ib is unitarily invariant
wherez=VTx,c=UTb
= II [ ]  [ ] II:
= II [ c, ] II:
The last equality follows from the fact that if v = then II v II = II viii + II v211 (note
that orthogonality is not what is used here; the subvectors can have different lengths). This
explains why it is convenient to work above with the square of the norm rather than the
norm. As far as the minimization is concerned. the two are equivalent. In fact. the last
quantity above is clearly minimized by taking z, = S'c,. The subvector Z2 is arbitrary,
while the minimum value of II Ax  b II is II czll
8.5. Least Squares and QR Factorization 71
Now transform back to the original coordinates:
The last equality follows from
Note that since 12 is arbitrary, V
2
z
2
is an arbitrary vector in 7Z(V
2
) = A/"(A). Thus, x has
been written in the form x = A
+
b + (/ — A
+
A ) _ y, where y e R
m
is arbitrary. This agrees,
of course, with (8.1).
The minimum value of the least squares residual is
and we clearly have that
minimum least squares residual is 0 4=> b is orthogonal to all vectors in U
2
•<=^ b is orthogonal to all vectors in 7l(A}
L
Another expression for the minimum residual is  (/ — AA
+
) b 
2
. This follows easily since
(7  AA+)b\\
2
2
 \\U2Ufb\\l = b
T
U
2
U^U
2
UJb = b
T
U
2
U*b = \\U?b\\
2
2
.
Finally, an important special case of the linear least squares problem is the
socalled fullrank problem, i.e., A e 1R™
X
" . In this case the SVD of A is given by
A = UZV
T
= [U
{
t/ 2][o]^i
r
> and there is thus "no V
2
part" to the solution.
8.5 Least Squares and QR Factorization
In this section, we again look at the solution of the linear least squares problem (8.6) but this
time in terms of the QR factorization. This matrix factorization is much cheaper to compute
than an SVD and, with appropriate numerical enhancements, can be quite reliable.
To simplify the exposition, we add the simplifying assumption that A has full column
rank, i.e., A e R™
X M
. It is then possible, via a sequence of socalled Householder or Givens
transformations, to reduce A in the following way. A finite sequence of simple orthogonal
row transformations (of Householder or Givens type) can be performed on A to reduce it
to triangular form. If we label the product of such orthogonal row transformations as the
orthogonal matrix Q
T
€ R
mxm
, we have
B.S. Least Squares and QR Factorization 71
Now transform back to the original coordinates:
x = Vz
= [VI V
2
1 [ ]
= VIZI + V2Z2
= VISici + V2Z2
= vlsIufb + V
2
Z
2
.
The last equality follows from
c = U T b = [ f: ] = [ l
Note that since Z2 is arbitrary, V
2
Z
2
is an arbitrary vector in R(V
2
) = N(A). Thus, x has
been written in the form x = A + b + (I  A + A) y, where y E ffi.m is arbitrary. This agrees,
of course, with (8.1).
The minimum value of the least squares residual is
and we clearly have that
minimum least squares residual is 0 {::=:} b is orthogonal to all vectors in U2
{::=:} b is orthogonal to all vectors in R(A)l.
{::=:} b E R(A).
Another expression for the minimum residual is II (I  AA +)bllz. This follows easily since
11(1 = = b
T
U
Z
V!V
2
V!b = bTVZV!b =
Finally, an important special case of the linear least squares problem is the
socalled fullrank problem, i.e., A E In this case the SVD of A is given by
A = V:EV
T
= [VI Vzl[g]Vr, and there is thus "no V
2
part" to the solution.
8.5 Least Squares and QR Factorization
In this section, we again look at the solution of the linear least squares problem (8.6) but this
time in terms of the QR factorization. This matrix factorization is much cheaper to compute
than an SVD and, with appropriate numerical enhancements, can be quite reliable.
To simplify the exposition, we add the simplifying assumption that A has full column
rank, i.e., A E It is then possible, via a sequence of socalled Householder or Givens
transformations, to reduce A in the following way. A finite sequence of simple orthogonal
row transformations (of Householder or Givens type) can be performed on A to reduce it
to triangular form. If we label the product of such orthogonal row transformations as the
orthogonal matrix QT E ffi.mxm, we have
(8.7)
72 Chapter 8. Linear Least Squares Problems
where R e M£
x
" is upper triangular. Now write Q = [Q\ Q
2
], where Q\ e R
mx
" and
Q
2
€ K"
IX(m
~"
)
. Both Q\ and <2
2
have orthonormal columns. Multiplying through by Q
in (8.7), we see that
Any of (8.7), (8.8), or (8.9) are variously referred to as QR factorizations of A. Note that
(8.9) is essentially what is accomplished by the GramSchmidt process, i.e., by writing
AR~
l
= Q\ we see that a "triangular" linear combination (given by the coefficients of
R~
l
) of the columns of A yields the orthonormal columns of Q\.
Now note that
The last quantity above is clearly minimized by taking x = R
l
c\ and the minimum residual
is \\C 2\\2 Equivalently, we have x = R~
l
Q\b = A
+
b and the minimum residual is IIC?^!^
EXERCISES
1. For A € W
xn
, b e E
m
, and any y e R", check directly that (I  A
+
A)y and A
+
b
are orthogonal vectors.
2. Consider the following set of measurements (*,, y
t
):
(a) Find the best (in the 2norm sense) line of the form y = ax + ft that fits this
data.
(b) Find the best (in the 2norm sense) line of the form jc = ay + (3 that fits this
data.
3. Suppose qi and q
2
are two orthonormal vectors and b is a fixed vector, all in R".
(a) Find the optimal linear combination aq^ + fiq
2
that is closest to b (in the 2norm
sense).
(b) Let r denote the "error vector" b — ctq\ — flq
2
 Show that r is orthogonal to
both^i and q
2
.
72 Chapter 8. Linear Least Squares Problems
where R E is upper triangular. Now write Q = [QI Qz], where QI E ffi.mxn and
Qz E ffi.m x (mn). Both Q I and Qz have orthonormal columns. Multiplying through by Q
in (8.7), we see that
(8.8)
= [QI Qz] [ ]
= QIR.
(8.9)
Any of (8.7), (8.8), or (8.9) are variously referred to as QR factorizations of A. Note that
(8.9) is essentially what is accomplished by the GramSchmidt process, i.e., by writing
AR
1
= QI we see that a "triangular" linear combination (given by the coefficients of
R
I
) of the columns of A yields the orthonormal columns of Q I.
Now note that
IIAx  = IIQ
T
Ax  since II . 112 is unitarily invariant
= II [ ] x  [ ] If:,
The last quantity above is clearly minimized by taking x = R
I
Cl and the minimum residual
is Ilczllz. Equivalently, we have x = R
1
Qf b = A +b and the minimum residual is II Qr bllz'
EXERCISES
1. For A E ffi.
mxn
, b E ffi.
m
, and any y E ffi.
n
, check directly that (I  A + A)y and A +b
are orthogonal vectors.
2. Consider the following set of measurements (Xi, Yi):
(1,2), (2,1), (3,3).
(a) Find the best (in the 2norm sense) line of the form y = ax + fJ that fits this
data.
(b) Find the best (in the 2norm sense) line of the form x = ay + fJ that fits this
data.
3. Suppose q, and qz are two orthonormal vectors and b is a fixed vector, all in ffi.
n
•
(a) Find the optimallinear combination aql + (3q2 that is closest to b (in the 2norm
sense).
(b) Let r denote the "error vector" b  aql  {3qz. Show that r is orthogonal to
both ql and q2.
Exercises 73
4. Find all solutions of the linear least squares problem
5. Consider the problem of finding the minimum 2norm solution of the linear least
«rmarp« nrr»h1<=>m
(a) Consider a perturbation E\ = [
0
pi of A, where 8 is a small positive number.
Solve the perturbed version of the above problem,
where AI = A + E\. What happens to jt* — y 
2
as 8 approaches 0?
(b) Now consider the perturbation EI = \
0 s
~\ of A, where again 8 is a small
positive number. Solve the perturbed problem
where A
2
— A + E
2
. What happens to \\x* — z
2
as 8 approaches 0?
6. Use the four Penrose conditions and the fact that Q\ has orthonormal columns to
verify that if A e R™
x
" can be factored in the form (8.9), then A+ = R~
l
Q\.
1. Let A e R"
x
", not necessarily nonsingular, and suppose A = QR, where Q is
orthogonal. Prove that A
+
= R
+
Q
T
.
Exercises 73
4. Find all solutions of the linear least squares problem
min II Ax  bll
2
x
when A = [
5. Consider the problem of finding the minimum 2norm solution of the linear least
squares problem
min II Ax  bl1
2
x
when A = ] and b = [ ! 1 The solution is
(a) Consider a perturbation EI = of A, where 8 is a small positive number.
Solve the perturbed version of the above problem,
where AI = A + E
I
. What happens to IIx*  yII2 as 8 approaches O?
(b) Now consider the perturbation E2 = n of A, where again 8 is a small
positive number. Solve the perturbed problem
min II A
2
z  bib
z
where A2 = A + E
2
• What happens to IIx*  zll2 as 8 approaches O?
6. Use the four Penrose conditions and the fact that QI has orthonormal columns to
verify that if A E can be factored in the form (8.9), then A+ = R
I
Qf.
7. Let A E not necessarily nonsingular, and suppose A = QR, where Q is
orthogonal. Prove that A + = R+ QT .
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank
Chapter 9
Eigenvalues and
Eigenvectors
9.1 Fundamental Definitions and Properties
Definition 9.1. A nonzero vector x e C" is a right eigenvector of A e C
nxn
if there exists
a scalar A. e C, called an eigenvalue, such that
Similarly, a nonzero vector y e C" is a left eigenvector corresponding to an eigenvalue
a if
By taking Hermitian transposes in (9.1), we see immediately that X
H
is a left eigen
vector of A
H
associated with A . Note that if x [y] is a right [left] eigenvector of A, then
so is ax [ay] for any nonzero scalar a E C. One oftenused scaling for an eigenvector is
a — \j';t so that the scaled eigenvector has norm 1. The 2norm is the most common
norm used for such scaling.
Definition 9.2. The polynomial n (A.) = det(A —A ,/ ) is called the characteristic polynomial
of A. (Note that the characteristic polynomial can also be defined as det(A . / — A ). This
results in at most a change of sign and, as a matter of convenience, we use both forms
throughout the text.}
The following classical theorem can be very useful in hand calculation. It can be
proved easily from the Jordan canonical form to be discussed in the text to follow (see, for
example, [21]) or directly using elementary properties of inverses and determinants (see,
for example, [3]).
Theorem 9.3 (CayleyHamilton). For any A e C
nxn
, n(A) = 0.
Example 9.4. Let A = [~g ~g] . Then n(k) = X
2
+ 2A , — 3. It is an easy exercise to
verify that n(A) = A
2
+ 2A  31 = 0.
It can be proved from elementary properties of determinants that if A e C"
x
", then
7 t (X) is a polynomial of degree n. Thus, the Fundamental Theorem of A lgebra says that
75
Chapter 9
Eigenvalues and
Eigenvectors
9.1 Fundamental Definitions and Properties
Definition 9.1. A nonzero vector x E en is a right eigenvector of A E e
nxn
if there exists
a scalar A E e, called an eigenvalue, such that
Ax = AX. (9.1)
Similarly, a nonzero vector y E en is a left eigenvector corresponding to an eigenvalue
Mif
(9.2)
By taking Hennitian transposes in (9.1), we see immediately that x
H
is a left eigen
vector of A H associated with I. Note that if x [y] is a right [left] eigenvector of A, then
so is ax [ay] for any nonzero scalar a E C. One oftenused scaling for an eigenvector is
a = 1/ IIx II so that the scaled eigenvector has nonn 1. The 2nonn is the most common
nonn used for such scaling.
Definition 9.2. The polynomialn (A) = det (A  A l) is called the characteristic polynomial
of A. (Note that the characteristic polynomial can also be defined as det(Al  A). This
results in at most a change of sign and, as a matter of convenience, we use both forms
throughout the text.)
The following classical theorem can be very useful in hand calculation. It can be
proved easily from the Jordan canonical fonn to be discussed in the text to follow (see, for
example, [21D or directly using elementary properties of inverses and determinants (see,
for example, [3]).
Theorem 9.3 (CayleyHamilton). For any A E e
nxn
, n(A) = O.
Example 9.4. Let A = [  ~  ~ ] . Then n(A) = A2 + 2A  3. It is an easy exercise to
verify that n(A) = A2 + 2A  31 = O.
It can be proved from elementary properties of detenninants that if A E e
nxn
, then
n(A) is a polynomial of degree n. Thus, the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra says that
75
and set X = 0 in this identity, we get the interesting fact that del (A) = AI • A.2 • • • A
M
(see
also Theorem 9.25).
If A e W
xn
, then n(X) has real coefficients. Hence the roots of 7 r( A) , i.e., the
eigenvalues of A, must occur in complex conjugate pairs.
Example 9.6. Let a, ft e R and let A = [ _^ £ ]. Then jr( A. ) = A.
2
 2aA + a
2
+ ft
2
and
A has eigenvalues a ± fij (where j = i = •>/—!)•
If A € R"
x
", then there is an easily checked relationship between the left and right
eigenvectors of A and A
T
(take Hermitian transposes of both sides of (9.2)). Specifically, if
y is a left eigenvector of A corresponding to A e A( A) , then y is a right eigenvector of A
T
corresponding to A. € A ( A) . Note, too, that by elementary properties of the determinant,
we always have A ( A ) = A ( A
r
) , but that A ( A ) = A ( A ) only if A e R"
x
".
Definition 9.7. IfX is a root of multiplicity m ofjr(X), we say that X is an eigenvalue of A
of algebraic multiplicity m. The geometric multiplicity ofX is the number of associated
independent eigenvectors = n — rank( A — A/) = dim J \ f(A — XI).
If A € A ( A ) has algebraic multiplicity m, then 1 < di mA/ "(A — A/) < m. Thus, if
we denote the geometric multiplicity of A by g, then we must have 1 < g < m.
Definition 9.8. A matrix A e W
x
" is said to be defective if it has an eigenvalue whose
geometric multiplicity is not equal to (i.e., less than) its algebraic multiplicity. Equivalently,
A is said to be defective if it does not have n linearly independent (right or left) eigenvectors.
From the CayleyHamilton Theorem, we know that n(A) = 0. However, it is pos
sible for A to satisfy a lowerorder polynomial. For example, if A = \
1
Q
®], then A sat
isfies (1 — I)
2
= 0. But it also clearly satisfies the smaller degree polynomial equation
a  n = o.
Definition 5.5. The minimal polynomial of A G K""" is the polynomial o/ (X) of least
degree such that a (A) =0.
It can be shown that or(l) is essentially unique (unique if we force the coefficient
of the highest power of A to be +1, say; such a polynomial is said to be monic and we
generally write et (A) as a monic polynomial throughout the text). Moreover, it can also be
7 6 Chapt er 9. Ei g e n va l ue s and Ei genvect ors
7 r( A) has n roots, possibly repeated. These roots, as solutions of the determinant equation
are the eigenvalues of A and imply the singularity of the matrix A — XI, and hence further
guarantee the existence of corresponding nonzero eigenvectors.
Definition 9.5. The spectrum of A e C"
x
" is the set of all eigenvalues of A, i.e., the set of
all roots of its characteristic polynomial n(X). The spectrum of A is denoted A ( A) .
Let the eigenvalues of A e C"
x
" be denoted X\ ,..., X
n
. Then if we write (9.3) in the
form
76 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
n(A) has n roots, possibly repeated. These roots, as solutions of the determinant equation
n(A) = det(A  AI) = 0, (9.3)
are the eigenvalues of A and imply the singularity of the matrix A  AI, and hence further
guarantee the existence of corresponding nonzero eigenvectors.
Definition 9.5. The spectrum of A E c
nxn
is the set of all eigenvalues of A, i.e., the set of
all roots of its characteristic polynomialn(A). The spectrum of A is denoted A(A).
Let the eigenvalues of A E en xn be denoted A], ... , An. Then if we write (9.3) in the
form
n(A) = det(A  AI) = (A]  A) ... (An  A) (9.4)
and set A = 0 in this identity, we get the interesting fact that det(A) = A] . A2 ... An (see
also Theorem 9.25).
If A E 1Ftnxn, then n(A) has real coefficients. Hence the roots of n(A), i.e., the
eigenvalues of A, must occur in complex conjugate pairs.
Example 9.6. Let a, f3 E 1Ft and let A = [ ~ f 3 !]. Then n(A) = A
2
 2aA + a
2
+ f32 and
A has eigenvalues a ± f3j (where j = i = R).
If A E 1Ftnxn, then there is an easily checked relationship between the left and right
eigenvectors of A and AT (take Hermitian transposes of both sides of (9.2». Specifically, if
y is a left eigenvector of A corresponding to A E A(A), then y is a right eigenvector of AT
corresponding to I E A(A). Note, too, that by elementary properties of the determinant,
we always have A(A) = A(AT), but that A(A) = A(A) only if A E 1Ftnxn.
Definition 9.7. If A is a root of multiplicity m of n(A), we say that A is an eigenvalue of A
of algebraic multiplicity m. The geometric multiplicity of A is the number of associated
independent eigenvectors = n  rank(A  AI) = dimN(A  AI).
If A E A(A) has algebraic multiplicity m, then I :::: dimN(A  AI) :::: m. Thus, if
we denote the geometric multiplicity of A by g, then we must have I :::: g :::: m.
Definition 9.8. A matrix A E 1Ft
nxn
is said to be defective if it has an eigenvalue whose
geometric multiplicity is not equal to (i.e., less than) its algebraic multiplicity. Equivalently,
A is said to be defective if it does not have n linearly independent (right or left) eigenvectors.
From the CayleyHamilton Theorem, we know that n(A) = O. However, it is pos
sible for A to satisfy a lowerorder polynomial. For example, if A = [ ~ ~ ] , then A sat
isfies (Je  1)2 = O. But it also clearly satisfies the smaller degree polynomial equation
(it.  1) ;;;:; 0
neftnhion ~ . ~ . Thll minimal polynomial Of A l::: l!if.nxn ix (hI' polynomilll a(A) oJ IPll.ft
degree such that a(A) ~ O.
It can be shown that a(Je) is essentially unique (unique if we force the coefficient
of the highest power of A to be + 1. say; such a polynomial is said to be monic and we
generally write a(A) as a monic polynomial throughout the text). Moreover, it can also be
9.1. Fundamental Definitions and Properties 77
shown that a (A.) divides every nonzero polynomial fi(k} for which ft (A) = 0. In particular,
a(X) divides n(X).
There is an algorithm to determine or ( A . ) directly ( without knowing eigenvalues and as
sociated eigenvector structure). Unfortunately, this algorithm, called the Bezout algorithm,
is numerically unstable.
Example 9.10. The above definitions are illustrated below for a series of matrices, each
of which has an eigenvalue 2 of algebraic multiplicity 4, i. e. , 7r( A ) = ( A — 2)
4
. We denote
the geometric multiplicity by g.
A t this point, one might speculate that g plus the degree of a must always be five.
Unfortunately, such is not the case. The matrix
Theorem 9.11. Let A e C«
x
"
ana
[
e
t A ., be an eigenvalue of A with corresponding right
eigenvector j c,. Furthermore, let yj be a left eigenvector corresponding to any A
;
e A ( A )
such that Xj =£ A . ,. Then yfx{ = 0.
Proof: Since Ax
t
= A ,*,,
9.1. Fundamental Definitions and Properties 77
shown that a(A) divides every nonzero polynomial f3(A) for which f3(A) = O. In particular,
a(A) divides n(A).
There is an algorithm to determine a(A) directly (without knowing eigenvalues and as
sociated eigenvector structure). Unfortunately, this algorithm, called the Bezout algorithm,
is numerically unstable.
Example 9.10. The above definitions are illustrated below for a series of matrices, each
of which has an eigenvalue 2 of algebraic multiplicity 4, i.e., n(A) = (A  2)4. We denote
the geometric multiplicity by g.
A  [ ~
0
! ] ha,"(A) ~ (A  2)' ""d g ~ 1.
2 I
 0
0 2
0 0 0
A ~ [ ~
0
~ ] ha< a(A) ~ (A  2)' ""d g ~ 2.
2
0 2
0 0
A ~ U
I 0
~ ] h'" a(A) ~ (A  2)2 ""d g ~ 3.
2 0
0 2
0 0
A ~ U
0 0
~ ] ha<a(A) ~ (A  2) andg ~ 4.
2 0
0 2
0 0
At this point, one might speculate that g plus the degree of a must always be five.
Unfortunately, such is not the case. The matrix
A ~ U
I 0
!]
2 0
0 2
0 0
has a(A) = (A  2)2 and g = 2.
Theorem 9.11. Let A E cc
nxn
and let Ai be an eigenvalue of A with corresponding right
eigenvector Xi. Furthermore, let Yj be a left eigenvector corresponding to any Aj E l\(A)
such that Aj 1= Ai. Then YY Xi = O.
Proof' Since AXi = AiXi,
(9.5)
78 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Similarly, since y" A = Xjyf,
Subtracting (9.6) from (9.5), we find 0 = (A., — A
y
)j ^j c, . Since A,, — A.
7
 ^ 0, we must have
yfxt =0.
The proof of Theorem 9.11 is very similar to two other fundamental and important
results.
Theorem 9.12. Let A e C"
x
" be Hermitian, i.e., A = A
H
. Then all eigenvalues of A must
be real.
Proof: Suppose (A ., x) is an arbitrary eigenvalue/eigenvector pair such that Ax = A .J C. Then
Taking Hermitian transposes in (9.7) yields
Using the fact that A is Hermitian, we have that Xx
H
x = Xx
H
x. However, since x is an
eigenvector, we have X
H
X /= 0, from which we conclude A . = A , i.e., A . is real. D
Theorem 9.13. Let A e C"
x
" be Hermitian and suppose X and / J L are distinct eigenvalues
of A with corresponding right eigenvectors x and z, respectively. Then x and z must be
orthogonal.
Proof: Premultiply the equation Ax = A.J C by Z
H
to get Z
H
Ax = X z
H
x . Take the Hermitian
transpose of this equation and use the facts that A is Hermitian and A . is real to get X
H
Az =
Xx
H
z. Premultiply the equation Az = i^z by X
H
to get X
H
Az = / ^X
H
Z = Xx
H
z. Since
A, ^ /z, we must have that X
H
z = 0, i.e., the two vectors must be orthogonal. D
Let us now return to the general case.
Theorem 9.14. Let A €. C
nxn
have distinct eigenvalues A ,
1 ?
. . . , A .
n
with corresponding
right eigenvectors x\,... ,x
n
. Then [x\,..., x
n
} is a linearly independent set. The same
result holds for the corresponding left eigenvectors.
Proof: For the proof see, for example, [21, p. 118].
If A e C
nx
" has distinct eigenvalues, and if A ., e A (A ), then by Theorem 9.11, jc, is
orthogonal to all yj's for which j ^ i. However, it cannot be the case that yf*x
t
= 0 as
well, or else x
f
would be orthogonal to n linearly independent vectors (by Theorem 9.14)
and would thus have to be 0, contradicting the fact that it is an eigenvector. Since yf*Xi ^ 0
for each i, we can choose the normalization of the *, 's, or the y, 's, or both, so that y
t
H
x; = 1
f or / € n.
78 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Similarly, since YY A = A j yy,
(9.6)
Subtracting (9.6) from (9.5), we find 0 = (Ai  Aj)YY xi. Since Ai  Aj =1= 0, we must have
YyXi = O. 0
The proof of Theorem 9.11 is very similar to two other fundamental and important
results.
Theorem 9.12. Let A E c
nxn
be Hermitian, i.e., A = AH. Then all eigenvalues of A must
be real.
Proof: Suppose (A, x) is an arbitrary eigenvalue/eigenvector pair such that Ax = AX. Then
(9.7)
Taking Hermitian transposes in (9.7) yields
Using the fact that A is Hermitian, we have that IXH x = AXH x. However, since x is an
eigenvector, we have xH x =1= 0, from which we conclude I = A, i.e., A is real. 0
Theorem 9.13. Let A E c
nxn
be Hermitian and suppose A and iJ are distinct eigenvalues
of A with corresponding right eigenvectors x and z, respectively. Then x and z must be
orthogonal.
Proof: Premultiply the equation Ax = AX by ZH to get ZH Ax = AZ
H
x. Take the Hermitian
transpose of this equation and use the facts that A is Hermitian and A is real to get x H Az =
AxH z. Premultiply the equation Az = iJZ by x
H
to get x
H
Az = iJXH Z = AXH z. Since
A =1= iJ, we must have that x
H
z = 0, i.e., the two vectors must be orthogonal. 0
Let us now return to the general case.
Theorem 9.14. Let A E c
nxn
have distinct eigenvalues AI, ... , An with corresponding
right eigenvectors XI, ... , x
n
• Then {XI, ... , x
n
} is a linearly independent set. The same
result holds for the corresponding left eigenvectors.
Proof: For the proof see, for example, [21, p. 118]. 0
If A E c
nxn
has distinct eigenvalues, and if Ai E A(A), then by Theorem 9.11, Xi is
orthogonal to all y/s for which j =1= i. However, it cannot be the case that Yi
H
Xi = 0 as
well, or else Xi would be orthogonal to n linearly independent vectors (by Theorem 9.14)
and would thus have to be 0, contradicting the fact that it is an eigenvector. Since yr Xi =1= 0
for each i, we can choose the normalization of the Xi'S, or the Yi 's, or both, so that Yi
H
Xi = 1
for i E !1.
9.1. Fundament al Def i ni t i o ns and Properties 79
Theorem 9.15. Let A e C"
x
" have distinct eigenvalues A .I , ..., A .
n
and let the correspond
ing right eigenvectors form a matrix X = [x\, ..., x
n
]. Similarly, let Y — [y\, ..., y
n
]
be the matrix of corresponding left eigenvectors. Furthermore, suppose that the left and
right eigenvectors have been normalized so that yf
1
Xi = 1, / en. Finally, let A =
di ag ( A ,j , . . . , X
n
) e W
txn
. Then A J C, = A ., * /, / e n, can be written in matrix form as
Example 9.16. Let
Then n(X) = det( A  A ./) =  (A .
3
+ 4A .
2
+ 9 A . + 10) =  (A . + 2 )(A .
2
+ 2 A , + 5), from
which we find A ( A ) = { — 2 , — 1 ± 2 j } . We can now find the right and left eigenvectors
corresponding to these eigenvalues.
For A  i = — 2 , solve the 3 x 3 linear system (A — (—2 } I)x\ = 0 to get
while y^Xj = 5,
;
, / en, y' e n, is expressed by the equation
These matrix equations can be combined to yield the following matrix factorizations:
and
Note that one component of ;ci can be set arbitrarily, and this then determines the other two
(since di mA /XA — ( — 2 )7) = 1). To get the corresponding left eigenvector y\, solve the
linear system y\(A + 2 1) = 0 to get
This time we have chosen the arbitrary scale factor for y\ so that y f x \ = 1.
For A
2
= — 1 + 2 j , solve the linear system (A — (— 1 + 2 j )I)x
2
= 0 to get
9.1. Fundamental Definitions and Properties 79
Theorem 9.15. Let A E en xn have distinct eigenvalues A I, ... , An and let the correspond
ing right eigenvectors form a matrix X = [XI, ... , xn]. Similarly, let Y = [YI,"" Yn]
be the matrix of corresponding left eigenvectors. Furthermore, suppose that the left and
right eigenvectors have been normalized so that YiH Xi = 1, i E !!:: Finally, let A =
diag(AJ, ... , An) E ]Rnxn. Then AXi = AiXi, i E !!, can be written in matrixform as
AX=XA (9.8)
while YiH X j = oij, i E!!, j E !!, is expressed by the equation
yHX = I.
(9.9)
These matrix equations can be combined to yield the following matrix factorizations:
and
Example 9.16. Let
XlAX = A = yRAX
n
A = XAX
I
= XAyH = LAixiyr
2
5
3
3
2
i=1
~ ] .
4
(9.10)
(9.11)
Then rr(A) = det(A  AI) = (A
3
+ 4A2 + 9)" + 10) = ()" + 2)(),,2 + 2)" + 5), from
which we find A(A) = {2, 1 ± 2j}. We can now find the right and left eigenvectors
corresponding to these eigenvalues.
For Al = 2, solve the 3 x 3 linear system (A  (2)l)xI = 0 to get
Note that one component of XI can be set arbitrarily, and this then determines the other two
(since dimN(A  (2)1) = 1). To get the corresponding left eigenvector YI, solve the
linear system yi (A + 21) = 0 to get
This time we have chosen the arbitrary scale factor for YJ so that yi XI = 1.
For A2 = 1 + 2j, solve the linear system (A  (1 + 2j) I)x2 = 0 to get
[
3+ j ]
X2 = 3 ~ / .
80 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Solve the linear system y" (A — (1 + 27')/) = 0 and normalize y>
2
so that y"x
2
= 1 to get
For X T , = — 1 — 2 j, we could proceed to solve linear systems as for A.
2
. However, we
can also note that x$ =x
2
' and yi = jj. To see this, use the fact that A, 3 = A.2 and simply
conjugate the equation A;c
2
— ^.2 *2 to get Ax^ = ^2 X 2  A similar argument yields the result
for left eigenvectors.
Now define the matrix X of right eigenvectors:
It is then easy to verify that
Other results in Theorem 9.15 can also be verified. For example,
Finally, note that we could have solved directly only for *i and x
2
(and X T , = x
2
). Then,
instead of determining the j,'s directly, we could have found them instead by computing
X ~
l
and reading off its rows.
Example 9.17. Let
Then 7r(A.) = det(A  A./) = (A
3
+ 8A
2
+ 19X + 12) = (A. + 1)(A. + 3)(A, + 4),
from which we find A (A) = { —1, —3, —4}. Proceeding as in the previous example, it is
straightforward to compute
and
80 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Solve the linear system yf (A  ( I + 2 j) I) = 0 and nonnalize Y2 so that yf X2 = 1 to get
For A3 = I  2j, we could proceed to solve linear systems as for A2. However, we
can also note that X3 = X2 and Y3 = Y2. To see this, use the fact that A3 = A2 and simply
conjugate the equation AX2 = A2X2 to get AX2 = A2X2. A similar argument yields the result
for left eigenvectors.
Now define the matrix X of right eigenvectors:
3+j 3
j
]
3j 3+j .
2 2
It is then easy to verify that
.!.=.L
4
l+j
4
!.±1
4
.!.=.L
4
Other results in Theorem 9.15 can also be verified. For example,
[
2 0
XIAX=A= 0 1+2j
o 0
Finally, note that we could have solved directly only for XI and X2 (and X3 = X2). Then,
instead of detennining the Yi'S directly, we could have found them instead by computing
XI and reading off its rows.
Example 9.17. Let
A = .
o 3
Then Jl"(A) = det(A  AI) = _(A
3
+ 8A
2
+ 19A + 12) = (A + I)(A + 3)(A + 4),
from which we find A(A) = {I, 3, 4}. Proceeding as in the previous example, it is
gtruightforw!U"d to
I
i ]
0
I
and
1 2 1
] y'
3 0 3
2 2 2
9.1. Fundamental Definitions and Properties 81
We also have X~
l
AX = A = di ag( —1, —3, —4 ) , which is equivalent to the dyadic expan
sion
Theorem 9.18. Eigenvalues (but not eigenvectors) are invariant under a similarity trans
formation T.
Proof: Suppose (A, jc) is an eigenvalue/eigenvector pair such that Ax = Xx. Then, since T
is nonsingular, we have the equivalent statement (T~
l
AT)(T~
l
x) = X ( T ~
l
x ) , from which
the theorem statement follows. For left eigenvectors we have a similar statement, namely
y
H
A = Xy
H
ifandon\yif(T
H
y)
H
(T~
1
AT) =X(T
H
yf. D
Remark 9.19. If / is an analytic function (e.g., f ( x ) is a polynomial, or e
x
, or sin*,
or, in general, representable by a power series X^^o
fl
n*
n
)> then it is easy to show that
the eigenvalues of /( A) (defined as X^o^A") are /( A) , but /( A) does not necessarily
have all the same eigenvectors (unless, say, A is diagonalizable). For example, A = T
0 O
j
has only one right eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue 0, but A
2
= f
0 0
1 has two
independent right eigenvectors associated with the eigenvalue 0. What is true is that the
eigenvalue/eigenvector pair (A, x) maps to ( /( A) , x) but not conversely.
The following theorem is useful when solving systems of linear differential equations.
Details of how the matrix exponential e'
A
is used to solve the system x = Ax are the subject
of Chapter 11.
Theorem 9.20. Let A e R"
xn
and suppose X~~
1
AX — A, where A is diagonal. Then
9.1. Fundamental Definitions and Properties 81
We also have XI AX = A = diag( 1, 3, 4), which is equivalent to the dyadic expan
sion
3
A = LAixiyr
i=1
W j 0
+(4) [ ; ]
1
 
3
(I) [
I I I
J + (3) [
I
0
I
] + (4) [
I I I
l
(;
3
(;
2
2 3
3
3
I 2 I
0 0 0
I I I
3 3 3
3
3
3
I I I
I
0
I
I I I
(;
3
(;
2
2
3
3
3
Theorem 9.18. Eigenvalues (but not eigenvectors) are invariant under a similarity trans
formation T.
Proof: Suppose (A, X) is an eigenvalue/eigenvector pair such that Ax = AX. Then, since T
is nonsingular, we have the equivalent statement (T
I
AT)(T
I
x) = A(T
I
x), from which
the theorem statement follows. For left eigenvectors we have a similar statement, namely
yH A = AyH if and only if (T
H
y)H (T
1
AT) = A(T
H
y)H. D
Remark 9.19. If f is an analytic function (e.g., f(x) is a polynomial, or eX, or sinx,
or, in general, representable by a power series anxn), then it is easy to show that
the eigenvalues of f(A) (defined as are f(A), but f(A) does not necessarily
have all the same eigenvectors (unless, say, A is diagonalizable). For example, A = 6 ]
has only one right eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue 0, but A
2
= ] has two
independent right eigenvectors associated with the eigenvalue o. What is true is that the
eigenvalue/eigenvector pair (A, x) maps to (f(A), x) but not conversely.
The following theorem is useful when solving systems of linear differential equations.
Details of how the matrix exponential etA is used to solve the system i = Ax are the subject
of Chapter 11.
Theorem 9.20. Let A E jRnxn and suppose XI AX = A, where A is diagonal. Then
n
= LeA,txiYiH.
i=1
82 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Proof: Starting from the definition, we have
The following corollary is immediate from the theorem upon setting t = I.
Corollary 9.21. If A e R
nx
" is diagonalizable with eigenvalues A ., , /' en, and right
eigenvectors x
t
•, / € n_, then e
A
has eigenvalues e
X i
, i € n_, and the same eigenvectors.
There are extensions to Theorem 9.20 and Corollary 9.21 for any function that is
analytic on the spectrum of A , i.e., f ( A ) = X f ( A ) X ~
l
= Xdi ag ( / ( A . i ) , . . . , f ( X
t t
) ) X ~
l
.
It is desirable, of course, to have a version of Theorem 9.20 and its corollary in which
A is not necessarily diagonalizable. It is necessary first to consider the notion of Jordan
canonical form, from which such a result is then available and presented later in this chapter.
9.2 Jordan Canonical Form
Theorem 9.22.
1. Jordan Canonical Form (/CF): For all A e C"
x
" with eigenvalues X\,..., k
n
e C
(not necessarily distinct), there exists X € C^
x
" such that
where each of the Jordan block matrices / i , . . . , J
q
is of the form
82 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Proof' Starting from the definition, we have
n
= LeA;IXiYiH. 0
i=1
The following corollary is immediate from the theorem upon setting t = I.
Corollary 9.21. If A E ]Rn xn is diagonalizable with eigenvalues Ai, i E ~ , and right
eigenvectors Xi, i E ~ , then e
A
has eigenvalues e
A
" i E ~ , and the same eigenvectors.
There are extensions to Theorem 9.20 and Corollary 9.21 for any function that is
analytic on the spectrum of A, i.e., f(A) = Xf(A)X
I
= Xdiag(J(AI), ... , f(An))X
I
.
It is desirable, of course, to have a version of Theorem 9.20 and its corollary in which
A is not necessarily diagonalizable. It is necessary first to consider the notion of Jordan
canonical form, from which such a result is then available and presented later in this chapter.
9.2 Jordan Canonical Form
Theorem 9.22.
I. lordan Canonical Form (JCF): For all A E c
nxn
with eigenvalues AI, ... , An E C
(not necessarily distinct), there exists X E c ~ x n such that
XI AX = 1 = diag(ll, ... , 1q), (9.12)
where each of the lordan block matrices 1
1
, ••• , 1q is of the form
Ai
0 o
0
Ai
0
1i =
Ai
(9.13)
o
Ai
o o Ai
9.2. Jordan Canonical Form 83
2. Real Jordan Canonical Form: For all A € R
nx
" with eigenvalues Xi, . . . , X
n
(not
necessarily distinct), there exists X € R"
xn
such that
where each of the Jordan block matrices J\, ..., J
q
is of the form
in the case of real eigenvalues A., e A (A), and
where M
;
= [ _»' ^ 1 and I
2
= \
0
A in the case of complex conjugate eigenvalues
a
i
±jp
i
eA(A
>
).
Proof: For the proof see, for example, [21, pp. 120124]. D
Transformations like T = I " _, "•{ "] allow us to go back and forth between a real JCF
and its complex counterpart:
For nontrivial Jordan blocks, the situation is only a bit more complicated. With
9.2. Jordan Canonical Form 83
and L;=1 ki = n.
2. Real Jordan Canonical Form: For all A E jRnxn with eigenvalues AI, ... , An (not
necessarily distinct), there exists X E such that
(9.14)
where each of the Jordan block matrices 11, ... , 1q is of the form
where Mi = [ ] and h = [6 in the case of complex conjugate eigenvalues
(Xi ± jfJi E A(A).
Proof: For the proof see, for example, [21, pp. 120124]. 0
Transformations like T = [ _  { ] allow us to go back and forth between a real JCF
and its complex counterpart:
TI [ (X + jfJ O. ] T = [ (X fJ ] = M.
o (X  JfJ fJ (X
For nontrivial Jordan blocks, the situation is only a bit more complicated. With
1
o
j
o
j
o
1 o 0 '
o j 1
84 Chapter 9. Ei genval ues and Eigenvectors
it is easily checked that
Definition 9.23. The characteristic polynomials of the Jordan blocks defined in Theorem
9 . 2 2 are called the elementary divisors or invariant factors of A.
Theorem 9.24. The characteristic polynomial of a matrix is the product of its elementary
divisors. The minimal polynomial of a matrix is the product of the elementary divisors of
highest degree corresponding to distinct eigenvalues.
Theorem 9.25. Let A e C"
x
" with eigenvalues AI, . . . , X
n
. Then
Proof:
1. From Theorem 9.22 we have that A = X J X ~
l
. Thus,
det(A) = det(XJX
1
) = det(7) = ] ~ [ "
=l
A,  .
2. Again, from Theorem 9.22 we have that A = X J X ~
l
. Thus,
Tr(A) = Tr(XJX~
l
) = TrC/X"
1
*) = Tr(/) = £"
=1
A., . D
Example 9.26. Suppose A e E
7x7
is known to have 7r(A) = (A.  1)
4
(A  2)
3
and
a (A.) = (A. — I)
2
(A. — 2)
2
. Then A has two possible JCFs (not counting reorderings of the
diagonal blocks):
Note that 7
(1)
has elementary divisors (A  I )
2
, (A.  1), (A.  1), (A,  2)
2
, and (A  2),
while /(
2)
has elementary divisors (A  I )
2
, (A  I )
2
, (A  2)
2
, and (A  2).
84 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
it is easily checked that
[ "+ jfi
0 0
] T ~ [ ~
T
I
0
et + jf3 0 0
h
l
0 0 et  jf3 M
0 0 0 et  jf3
Definition 9.23. The characteristic polynomials of the Jordan blocks defined in Theorem
9.22 are called the elementary divisors or invariant factors of A.
Theorem 9.24. The characteristic polynomial of a matrix is the product of its elementary
divisors. The minimal polynomial of a matrix is the product of the elementary divisors of
highest degree corresponding to distinct eigenvalues.
Theorem 9.25. Let A E c
nxn
with eigenvalues AI, .. " An. Then
n
1. det(A) = nAi.
i=1
n
2. Tr(A) = 2,)i.
i=1
Proof:
1. From Theorem 9.22 we have that A = X J XI. Thus,
det(A) = det(X J XI) = det(J) = n7=1 Ai.
2. Again, from Theorem 9.22 we have that A = X J XI. Thus,
Tr(A) = Tr(X J XI) = Tr(JX
1
X) = Tr(J) = L7=1 Ai. 0
Example 9.26. Suppose A E lR.
7x7
is known to have :rr(A) = (A  1)4(A  2)3 and
et(A) = (A  1)2(A  2)2. Then A has two possible JCFs (not counting reorderings of the
diagonal blocks):
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I 0 0 0
J(l) =
0 0 0 1 0 0 0
and f2) =
0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Note that J(l) has elementary divisors (A  1)z, (A  1), (A  1), (A  2)2, and (A  2),
while J(2) has elementary divisors (A  1)2, (A  1)2, (A  2)2, and (A  2).
9.3. Determination of the JCF &5
Example 9.27. Knowing T T (A.), a ( A ) , and rank (A — A,,7) for distinct A., is not sufficient to
determine the JCF of A uniquely. T he matrices
both have 7r( A . ) = (A. — a) , a( A . ) = (A. — a) , and rank( A — al) = 4, i.e., three eigen
vectors.
9.3 Determination of the JCF
T he first critical item of information in determining the JCF of a matrix A e W
lxn
is its
number of eigenvectors. For each distinct eigenvalue A , , , the associated number of linearly
independent right (or left) eigenvectors is given by dim A^(A — A.,7) = n — rank( A — A.
(
7).
T he straightforward case is, of course, when X, is simple, i.e., of algebraic multiplicity 1; it
then has precisely one eigenvector. T he more interesting (and difficult) case occurs when
A, is of algebraic multiplicity greater than one. For example, suppose
T hen
has rank 1, so the eigenvalue 3 has two eigenvectors associated with it. If we let [^i £2 &]
T
denote a solution to the linear system (A — 3/) £ = 0, we find that 2£
2
+ £3=0. T hus, both
are eigenvectors (and are independent). T o get a third vector JC3 such that X = [x\ KJ_ XT,]
reduces A to JCF, we need the notion of principal vector.
Definition 9.28. Let A e C"
xn
(or R"
x
") . Then x is a right principal vector of degree k
associated with X e A (A) if and only if (A  XI)
k
x = 0 and (A  U}
k
~
l
x ^ 0.
Remark 9.29.
1. An analogous definition holds for a left principal vector of degree k.
9.3. Determination of the JCF 85
Example 9.27. Knowing rr(A), a(A), and rank(A  Ai l) for distinct Ai is not sufficient to
determine the JCF of A uniquely. The matrices
a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0
0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0
0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0
Al=
0 0 0 a 0 0
A2 =
0 0 0 a 0 0
0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0
0 0 0 0 0 a 1 0 0 0 0 0 a 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a
both have rr(A) = (A  a)7, a(A) = (A  a)\ and rank(A  al) = 4, i.e., three eigen
vectors.
9.3 Determination of the JCF
The first critical item of information in determining the JCF of a matrix A E ]R.nxn is its
number of eigenvectors. For each distinct eigenvalue Ai, the associated number of linearly
independent right (or left) eigenvectors is given by dimN(A  A;l) = n  rank(A  A;l).
The straightforward case is, of course, when Ai is simple, i.e., of algebraic multiplicity 1; it
then has precisely one eigenvector. The more interesting (and difficult) case occurs when
Ai is of algebraic multiplicity greater than one. For example, suppose
[3 2
n
A = 0 3
o 0
Then
A3I= U
2 I]
o 0
o 0
has rank 1, so the eigenvalue 3 has two eigenvectors associated with it. If we let
denote a solution to the linear system (A  = 0, we find that + = O. Thus, both
are eigenvectors (and are independent). To get a third vector X3 such that X = [Xl X2 X3]
reduces A to JCF, we need the notion of principal vector.
Definition 9.28. Let A E c
nxn
(or ]R.nxn). Then X is a right principal vector of degree k
associated with A E A(A) ifand only if(A  ulx = 0 and (A  AI)kl x i= o.
Remark 9.29.
1. An analogous definition holds for a left principal vector of degree k.
86 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
2. The phrase "of grade k" is often used synonymously with "of degree k."
3. Principal vectors are sometimes also called generalized eigenvectors, but the latter
term will be assigned a much different meaning in Chapter 12.
4. The case k = 1 corresponds to the "usual" eigenvector.
5. A right (or left) principal vector of degree k is associated with a Jordan block ji of
dimension k or larger.
9.3.1 Theoretical computation
To motivate the development of a procedure for determining principal vectors, consider a
2x2 Jordan block {h
0
h1. Denote by x
(1)
and x
(2)
the two columns of a matrix X e R
2
,x
2
that reduces a matrix A to this JCF. Then the equation AX = XJ can be written
The first column yields the equation Ax
(1)
= hx
(1)
which simply says that x
(1)
is a right
eigenvector. The second column yields the following equation for x
(2)
, the principal vector
of degree 2:
If we premultiply (9.17) by (A  XI), we find (A  XI )
z
x
( 2 )
= (A  XI)x
w
= 0. Thus,
the definition of principal vector is satisfied.
This suggests a "general" procedure. First, determine all eigenvalues of A e R"
x
"
(or C
nxn
). Then for each distinct X e A (A) perform the following:
1. Solve
This step finds all the eigenvectors (i.e., principal vectors of degree 1) associated with
X. The number of eigenvectors depends on the rank of A — XI. For example, if
rank(A — XI) = n — 1, there is only one eigenvector. If the algebraic multiplicity of
X is greater than its geometric multiplicity, principal vectors still need to be computed
from succeeding steps.
2. For each independent jc
(1)
, solve
The number of linearly independent solutions at this step depends on the rank of
(A — XI )
2
. If, for example, this rank is n — 2 , there are two linearly independent
solutions to the homogeneous equation (A — XI)
2
x^ = 0. One of these solutions
is, of course, x
(l)
(^ 0), since (A  XI )
2
x
( l )
= (A  XI)0 = 0. The other solution
is the desired principal vector of degree 2. (It may be necessary to take a linear
combination of jc
(1)
vectors to get a righthand side that is in 7£(A — XI). See, for
example, Exercise 7.)
86 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
2. The phrase "of grade k" is often used synonymously with "of degree k."
3. Principal vectors are sometimes also called generalized eigenvectors, but the latter
term will be assigned a much different meaning in Chapter 12.
4. The case k = 1 corresponds to the "usual" eigenvector.
S. A right (or left) principal vector of degree k is associated with a Jordan block J; of
dimension k or larger.
9.3.1 Theoretical computation
To motivate the development of a procedure for determining principal vectors, consider a
2 x 2 Jordan block [ ~ i]. Denote by x(l) and x(2) the two columns of a matrix X E l R ~ X 2
that reduces a matrix A to this JCF. Then the equation AX = X J can be written
A [x(l) x(2)] = [x(l) X(2)] [ ~ ~ J.
The first column yields the equation Ax(!) = AX(!), which simply says that x(!) is a right
eigenvector. The second column yields the following equation for x(2), the principal vector
of degree 2:
(A  A/)x(2) = x(l). (9.17)
If we premultiply (9.17) by (A  AI), we find (A  A1)2 x(2) = (A  A1)X(l) = O. Thus,
the definition of principal vector is satisfied.
This suggests a "general" procedure. First, determine all eigenvalues of A E lR
nxn
(or c
nxn
). Then for each distinct A E A(A) perform the following:
1. Solve
(A  A1)X(l) = O.
This step finds all the eigenvectors (i.e., principal vectors of degree I) associated with
A. The number of eigenvectors depends on the rank of A  AI. For example, if
rank(A  A/) = n  1, there is only one eigenvector. If the algebraic multiplicity of
A is greater than its geometric multiplicity, principal vectors still need to be computed
from succeeding steps.
2. For each independent x(l), solve
(A  A1)x(2) = x(l).
The number of linearly independent solutions at this step depends on the rank of
(A  uf. If, for example, this rank is n  2, there are two linearly independent
solutions to the homogeneous equation (A  AI)2x (2) = o. One of these solutions
is, of course, x(l) (1= 0), since (A  'A1)
2
x(l) = (A  AI)O = o. The other solution
is the desired principal vector of degree 2. (It may be necessary to take a linear
combination of x(l) vectors to get a righthand side that is in R(A  AI). See, for
example, Exercise 7.)
9. 3. Determination of the JCF 87
4. Continue in this way until the total number of independent eigenvectors and principal
vectors is equal to the algebraic multiplicity of A.
Unfortunately, this naturallooking procedure can fail to find all Jordan vectors. For
more extensive treatments, see, for example, [20] and [21]. Determination of eigenvectors
and principal vectors is obviously very tedious for anything beyond simple problems (n = 2
or 3, say). Attempts to do such calculations in finiteprecision floatingpoint arithmetic
generally prove unreliable. There are significant numerical difficulties inherent in attempting
to compute a JCF, and the interested student is strongly urged to consult the classical and very
readable [8] to learn why. Notice that highquality mathematical software such as MATLAB
does not offer a jcf command, although a jordan command is available in MATLAB'S
Symbolic Toolbox.
Theorem 9.30. Suppose A e C
kxk
has an eigenvalue A, of algebraic multiplicity k and
suppose further that rank(A — AI) = k — 1. Let X = [ x
( l )
, . . . , x
(k)
], where the chain of
vectors x(i) is constructed as above. Then
Theorem 9.31. (x
( 1)
, . . . , x
(k)
} is a linearly independent set.
Theorem 9.32. Principal vectors associated with different Jordan blocks are linearly inde
pendent.
Example 9.33. Let
The eigenvalues of A are A1 = 1, h2 = 1, and h
3
= 2. First, find the eigenvectors associated
with the distinct eigenvalues 1 and 2.
,(1)
(A  2/)x3(1) = 0 yields
3. For each independent x
(2)
from step 2, solve
9.3. Determination of the JCF 87
3. For each independent X(2) from step 2, solve
(A  AI)x(3) = x(2).
4. Continue in this way until the total number of independent eigenvectors and principal
vectors is equal to the algebraic multiplicity of A.
Unfortunately, this naturallooking procedure can fail to find all Jordan vectors. For
more extensive treatments, see, for example, [20] and [21]. Determination of eigenvectors
and principal vectors is obviously very tedious for anything beyond simple problems (n = 2
or 3, say). Attempts to do such calculations in finiteprecision floatingpoint arithmetic
generally prove unreliable. There are significant numerical difficulties inherent in attempting
to compute a JCF, and the interested student is strongly urged to consult the classical and very
readable [8] to learn why. Notice that highquality mathematical software such as MATLAB
does not offer a j cf command, although a j ardan command is available in MATLAB's
Symbolic Toolbox.
Theorem 9.30. Suppose A E C
kxk
has an eigenvalue A of algebraic multiplicity k and
suppose further that rank(A  AI) = k  1. Let X = [x(l), ... , X(k)], where the chain of
vectors x(i) is constructed as above. Then
Theorem 9.31. {x(l), ... , X(k)} is a linearly independent set.
Theorem 9.32. Principal vectors associated with different Jordan blocks are linearly inde
pendent.
Example 9.33. Let
1 ;].
002
The eigenvalues of A are AI = I, A2 = 1, and A3 = 2. First, find the eigenvectors associated
with the distinct eigenvalues 1 and 2.
(A  = 0 yields
88 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
(A l/)x,
(1)
=0 yields
Then it is easy to check that
9.3.2 On the +1 's in JCF blocks
In this subsection we show that the nonzero superdiagonal elements of a JCF need not be
1 's but can be arbitrary — so long as they are nonzero. For the sake of defmiteness, we
consider below the case of a single Jordan block, but the result clearly holds for any JCF.
Supposed A € R
nxn
and
Let D = d i a g ( d 1 , . . . , d
n
) be a nonsingular "scaling" matrix. Then
To find a principal vector of degree 2 associated with the multiple eigenvalue 1, solve
( A – l/)x,
(2)
= x,
(1)
toeet
Now let
88 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
(A  11)x?J = 0 yields
To find a principal vector of degree 2 associated with the multiple eigenvalue 1, solve
(A  1I)xl
2
) = xiI) to get
[ 0 ]
(2)
x, = ~ .
Now let
xl" xl"] ~ [ ~
0 5
l
X = [xiI) 1 3
0
Then it is easy to check that
X  ' ~ U
0
5 ] [ I
n
1
i and XlAX = ~
1
0 0
9.3.2 On the +1 's in JCF blocks
In this subsection we show that the nonzero superdiagonal elements of a JCF need not be
1 's but can be arbitrary  so long as they are nonzero. For the sake of definiteness, we
consider below the case of a single Jordan block, but the result clearly holds for any JCF.
Suppose A E jRnxn and
Let D = diag(d" ... , d
n
) be a nonsingular "scaling" matrix. Then
A
4l.
0 0
d,
0
)...
!b.
0
d,
D'(X' AX)D = D' J D = j =
A
d
n

I
0
d
n

2
A
d
n
d
n

I
0 0
)...
9.4. Geometric Aspects of the JCF 89
Appropriate choice of the di 's then yields any desired nonzero superdiagonal elements.
This result can also be interpreted in terms of the matrix X = [x\,..., x
n
] of eigenvectors
and principal vectors that reduces A to its JCF. Specifically, J is obtained from A via the
similarity transformation XD = \d\x\,..., d
n
x
n
}.
In a similar fashion, the reverseorder identity matrix (or exchange matrix)
9.4 Geometric Aspects of the JCF
Note that di mM( A — A.,/ )
w
= «,.
Definition 9.35. Let V be a vector space over F and suppose A : V —>• V is a linear
transformation. A subspace S c V is Ainvariant if AS c S, where AS is defined as the
set {As : s e S}.
can be used to put the superdiagonal elements in the subdiagonal instead if that is desired:
The matrix X that reduces a matrix A e IR"
X
" (or C
nxn
) to a JCF provides a change of basis
with respect to which the matrix is diagonal or block diagonal. It is thus natural to expect an
associated direct sum decomposition of R. Such a decomposition is given in the following
theorem.
Theorem 9.34. Suppose A e R"
x
" has characteristic polynomial
and minimal polynomial
with A i , . . . , A.
m
distinct. Then
9.4. Geometric Aspects of the JCF 89
Appropriate choice of the di's then yields any desired nonzero superdiagonal elements.
This result can also be interpreted in terms of the matrix X = [x[, ... ,x
n
] of eigenvectors
and principal vectors that reduces A to its lCF. Specifically, j is obtained from A via the
similarity transformation XD = [d[x[, ... , dnxn].
In a similar fashion, the reverseorder identity matrix (or exchange matrix)
0 0 I
0
p = pT = p[ =
(9.18)
0 1
I 0 0
can be used to put the superdiagonal elements in the subdiagonal instead if that is desired:
A I 0 0 A 0 0
0 A 0 A 0
p[
A
p=
0 1 A
0
A I A 0
0 0 A 0 0 A
9.4 Geometric Aspects of the JCF
The matrix X that reduces a matrix A E jH.nxn (or c
nxn
) to a lCF provides a change of basis
with respect to which the matrix is diagonal or block diagonal. It is thus natural to expect an
associated direct sum decomposition of jH.n. Such a decomposition is given in the following
theorem.
Theorem 9.34. Suppose A E jH.nxn has characteristic polynomial
n(A) = (A  A[)n) ... (A  Amt
m
and minimal polynomial
a(A) = (A  A[)V) '" (A  Am)V
m
with A I, ... , Am distinct. Then
jH.n = N(A  AlIt) E6 ... E6 N(A  AmItm
= N (A  A 1 I) v) E6 ... E6 N (A  Am I) Vm .
Note that dimN(A  AJ)Vi = ni.
Definition 9.35. Let V be a vector space over IF and suppose A : V + V is a linear
transformation. A subspace S ~ V is A invariant if AS ~ S, where AS is defined as the
set {As: s E S}.
90 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
If V is taken to be R" over R, and S e R"
x
* is a matrix whose columns s\,..., s/t
span a /^dimensional subspace <S, i.e., K(S) = <S, then <S is Ainvariant if and only if there
exists M eR
kxk
such that
This follows easily by comparing the /th columns of each side of (9.19):
Example 9.36. The equation Ax = A* = xA defining a right eigenvector x of an eigenvalue
X says that * spans an Ainvariant subspace (of dimension one).
Example 9.37. Suppose X block diagonalizes A, i.e.,
Rewriting in the form
we have that A A, = A", /,, / = 1, 2, so the columns of A, span an Amvanant subspace.
Theorem 9.38. Suppose A e E"
x
".
7. Let p(A) = «o/ + o?i A + • • • + <x
q
A
q
be a polynomial in A. Then N(p(A)) and
7£(p(A)) are Ainvariant.
2. S isAinvariant if and only ifS
1
 is A
T
invariant.
Theorem 9.39. If V isa vector space over F such that V = N\ ® • • • 0 N
m
, where each
A// isAinvariant, then a basisfor V can be chosen with respect to which A hasa block
diagonal representation.
The Jordan canonical form is a special case of the above theorem. If A has distinct
eigenvalues A,, as in Theorem 9.34, we could choose bases for N(A — A.,/)"' by SVD, for
example (note that the power n, could be replaced by v,). We would then get a block diagonal
representation for A with full blocks rather than the highly structured Jordan blocks. Other
such "canonical" forms are discussed in text that follows.
Suppose A" = [ X i , . . . , X
m
] e R"
n
xn
is such that X ^AX = diag(7i,. . . , J
m
), where
each Ji = diag(/,i,..., //*,.) and each /,* is a Jordan block corresponding to A, e A(A).
We could also use other block diagonal decompositions (e.g., via SVD), but we restrict our
attention here to only the Jordan block case. Note that A A", = A*, /,, so by (9.19) the columns
of A", (i.e., the eigenvectors and principal vectors associated with A.,) span an Ainvariant
subspace of W.
Finally, we return to the problem of developing a formula for e'
A
in the case that A
is not necessarily diagonalizable. Let 7, € C"
x
"' be a Jordan basis for N(A
T
— A.,/)"' .
Equivalently, partition
90 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
If V is taken to be ]Rn over Rand S E ]Rn xk is a matrix whose columns SI, ... , Sk
span a kdimensional subspace S, i.e., R(S) = S, then S is Ainvariant if and only if there
exists M E ]Rkxk such that
AS = SM. (9.19)
This follows easily by comparing the ith columns of each side of (9.19):
Example 9.36. The equation Ax = AX = x A defining a right eigenvector x of an eigenvalue
A says that x spans an Ainvariant subspace (of dimension one).
Example 9.37. Suppose X block diagonalizes A, i.e.,
XI AX = [ ~ J
2
].
Rewriting in the form
~ J,
we have that AX
i
= X;li, i = 1,2, so the columns of Xi span an Ainvariant subspace.
Theorem 9.38. Suppose A E ]Rnxn.
1. Let peA) = CloI + ClIA + '" + ClqAq be a polynomial in A. Then N(p(A)) and
R(p(A)) are Ainvariant.
2. S is A invariant if and only if S 1. is A T invariant.
Theorem 9.39. If V is a vector space over IF such that V = NI EB ... EB N
m
, where each
N; is Ainvariant, then a basis for V can be chosen with respect to which A has a block
diagonal representation.
The Jordan canonical form is a special case of the above theorem. If A has distinct
eigenvalues Ai as in Theorem 9.34, we could choose bases for N(A  Ai/)n, by SVD, for
example (note that the power ni could be replaced by Vi). We would then get a block diagonal
representation for A with full blocks rather than the highly structured Jordan blocks. Other
such "canonical" forms are discussed in text that follows.
Suppose X = [Xl ..... Xm] E ] R ~ x n is such that XI AX = diag(J1, ... , J
m
), where
each J
i
= diag(JiI,"" Jik,) and each Jik is a Jordan block corresponding to Ai E A(A).
We could also use other block diagonal decompositions (e.g., via SVD), but we restrict our
attention here to only the Jordan block case. Note that AXi = Xi J
i
, so by (9.19) the columns
of Xi (i.e., the eigenvectors and principal vectors associated with Ai) span an Ainvariant
subspace of]Rn.
Finally, we return to the problem of developing a formula for e
l
A in the case that A
is not necessarily diagonalizable. Let Yi E <e
nxn
, be a Jordan basis for N (AT  A;lt.
Equivalently, partition
9.5. The Matrix Sign Function 91
compatibly. Then
In a similar fashion we can compute
which is a useful formula when used in conjunction with the result
for a k x k Jordan block 7, associated with an eigenvalue A. = A.,.
9.5 The Matrix Sign Function
In this section we give a very brief introduction to an interesting and useful matrix function
called the matrix sign function. It is a generalization of the sign (or signum) of a scalar. A
survey of the matrix sign function and some of its applications can be found in [15].
Definition 9.40. Let z E C with Re(z) ^ 0. Then the sign of z is defined by
Definition 9.41. Suppose A e C"
x
" has no eigenvalues on the imaginary axis, and let
be a Jordan canonical form for A, with N containing all Jordan blocks corresponding to the
eigenvalues of A in the left halfplane and P containing all Jordan blocks corresponding to
eigenvalues in the right halfplane. Then the sign of A, denoted sgn(A), is given by
9.S. The Matrix Sign Function
compatibly. Then
A = XJX
I
= XJy
H
= [XI, ... , Xm] diag(JI, ... , J
m
) [Y
I
, ••• , Ym]H
m
= LX;JiYi
H
.
i=1
In a similar fashion we can compute
m
etA = LXietJ;YiH,
i=1
which is a useful formula when used in conjunction with the result
A 0 0
eAt teAt
.lt
2
e
At
2!
0 A
0
eAt teAt
exp t
A 0
0 0
eAt
1
0 0 A
0 0
for a k x k Jordan block J
i
associated with an eigenvalue A = Ai.
9.5 The Matrix Sign Function
91
In this section we give a very brief introduction to an interesting and useful matrix function
called the matrix sign function. It is a generalization of the sign (or signum) of a scalar. A
survey of the matrix sign function and some of its applications can be found in [15].
Definition 9.40. Let z E C with Re(z) f= O. Then the sign of z is defined by
Re(z) {+1
sgn(z) = IRe(z) I = 1
ifRe(z) > 0,
ifRe(z) < O.
Definition 9.41. Suppose A E cnxn has no eigenvalues on the imaginary axis, and let
be a Jordan canonical form for A, with N containing all Jordan blocks corresponding to the
eigenvalues of A in the left halfplane and P containing all Jordan blocks corresponding to
eigenvalues in the right halfplane. Then the sign of A, denoted sgn(A), is given by
[
/ 0] I
sgn(A) = X 0 / X ,
92 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
where the negative and positive identity matrices are of the same dimensions as N and P,
respectively.
There are other equivalent definitions of the matrix sign function, but the one given
here is especially useful in deriving many of its key properties. The JCF definition of the
matrix sign function does not generally lend itself to reliable computation on a finiteword
length digital computer. In fact, its reliable numerical calculation is an interesting topic in
its own right.
We state some of the more useful properties of the matrix sign function as theorems.
Their straightforward proofs are left to the exercises.
Theorem 9.42. Suppose A e C"
x
" has no eigenvalues on the imaginary axis, and let
S = sgn(A). Then the following hold:
1. S is diagonalizable with eigenvalues equal to del.
2. S
2
= I.
3. AS = SA.
4. sgn(A") = (sgn(A))".
5. sgn(T
l
AT) = T
l
sgn(A)TforallnonsingularT e C"
x
".
6. sgn(cA) = sgn(c) sgn(A)/or all nonzero real scalars c.
Theorem 9.43. Suppose A e C"
x
" has no eigenvalues on the imaginary axis, and let
S — sgn(A). Then the following hold:
1. 7l(S — /) is an Ainvariant subspace corresponding to the left halfplane eigenvalues
of A (the negative invariant subspace).
2. R(S+/) is an Ainvariant subspace corresponding to the right halfplane eigenvalues
of A (the positive invariant subspace).
3. negA = (/ — S)/2 is a projection onto the negative invariant subspace of A.
4. posA = (/ + S)/2 is a projection onto the positive invariant subspace of A.
EXERCISES
1. Let A e C
nxn
have distinct eigenvalues AI, ..., X
n
with corresponding right eigen
vectors Xi, ... ,x
n
and left eigenvectors y\, ..., y
n
, respectively. Let v e C" be an
arbitrary vector. Show that v can be expressed (uniquely) as a linear combination
of the right eigenvectors. Find the appropriate expression for v as a linear combination
of the left eigenvectors as well.
92 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
where the negative and positive identity matrices are of the same dimensions as N and p,
respectively.
There are other equivalent definitions of the matrix sign function, but the one given
here is especially useful in deriving many of its key properties. The JCF definition of the
matrix sign function does not generally lend itself to reliable computation on a finiteword
length digital computer. In fact, its reliable numerical calculation is an interesting topic in
its own right.
We state some of the more useful properties of the matrix sign function as theorems.
Their straightforward proofs are left to the exercises.
Theorem 9.42. Suppose A E e
nxn
has no eigenvalues on the imaginary axis, and let
S = sgn(A). Then the following hold:
1. S is diagonalizable with eigenvalues equal to ± 1.
2. S2 = I.
3. AS = SA.
4. sgn(AH) = (sgn(A»H.
5. sgn(T1AT) = T1sgn(A)T foralinonsingularT E e
nxn
.
6. sgn(cA) = sgn(c) sgn(A) for all nonzero real scalars c.
Theorem 9.43. Suppose A E e
nxn
has no eigenvalues on the imaginary axis, and let
S = sgn(A). Then the following hold:
I. R(S l) is an Ainvariant subspace corresponding to the left halfplane eigenvalues
of A (the negative invariant subspace).
2. R(S + l) is an A invariant subspace corresponding to the right halfplane eigenvalues
of A (the positive invariant subspace).
3. negA == (l  S) /2 is a projection onto the negative invariant subspace of A.
4. posA == (l + S)/2 is a projection onto the positive invariant subspace of A.
EXERCISES
1. Let A E e
nxn
have distinct eigenvalues ),.1> ••• , ),.n with corresponding right eigen
vectors Xl, ... , Xn and left eigenvectors Yl, ••. , Yn, respectively. Let v E en be an
arbitrary vector. Show that v can be expressed (uniquely) as a linear combination
of the right eigenvectors. Find the appropriate expression for v as a linear combination
of the left eigenvectors as well.
Exercises 93
2. Suppose A € C"
x
" is skewHermitian, i.e., A
H
= —A. Prove that all eigenvalues of
a skewHermitian matrix must be pure imaginary.
3. Suppose A e C"
x
" is Hermitian. Let A be an eigenvalue of A with corresponding
right eigenvector x. Show that x is also a left eigenvector for A. Prove the same result
if A is skewHermitian.
5. Determine the eigenvalues, right eigenvectors and right principal vectors if necessary,
and (real) JCFs of the following matrices:
6. Determine the JCFs of the following matrices:
Find a nonsingular matrix X such that X
1
AX = J, where J is the JCF
Hint: Use[ — 1 1 — l]
r
as an eigenvector. The vectors [0 1 — l]
r
and[ l 0 0]
r
are both eigenvectors, but then the equation (A — /)jc
(2)
= x
(1)
can't be solved.
8. Show that all right eigenvectors of the Jordan block matrix in Theorem 9.30 must be
multiples of e\ e R*. Characterize all left eigenvectors.
9. Let A e R"
x
" be of the form A = xy
T
, where x, y e R" are nonzero vectors with
x
T
y = 0. Determine the JCF of A.
10. Let A e R"
xn
be of the form A = / + xy
T
, where x, y e R" are nonzero vectors
with x
T
y = 0. Determine the JCF of A.
11. Suppose a matrix A e R
16x 16
has 16 eigenvalues at 0 and its JCF consists of a single
Jordan block of the form specified in Theorem 9.22. Suppose the small number 10~
16
is added to the (16,1) element of J. What are the eigenvalues of this slightly perturbed
matrix?
4. Suppose a matrix A € R
5x5
has eigenvalues {2, 2, 2, 2, 3}. Determine all possible
JCFs for A.
7. Let
Exercises 93
2. Suppose A E rc
nxn
is skewHermitian, i.e., AH = A. Prove that all eigenvalues of
a skewHermitian matrix must be pure imaginary.
3. Suppose A E rc
nxn
is Hermitian. Let A be an eigenvalue of A with corresponding
right eigenvector x. Show that x is also a left eigenvector for A. Prove the same result
if A is skewHermitian.
4. Suppose a matrix A E lR.
5x5
has eigenvalues {2, 2, 2, 2, 3}. Determine all possible
JCFs for A.
5. Determine the eigenvalues, right eigenvectors and right principal vectors if necessary,
and (real) JCFs of the following matrices:
[
2 1 ]
(a) 1 0 '
6. Determine the JCFs of the following matrices:
<a) U j n
2
1
2
=n
7. Let
A = [H 1]·
2 2"
Find a nonsingular matrix X such that XI AX = J, where J is the JCF
J = [ ~ ~ ~ ] .
001
Hint: Use[1 1  I]T as an eigenvector. The vectors [0 If and[1 0 of
are both eigenvectors, but then the equation (A  I)x(2) = x(1) can't be solved.
8. Show that all right eigenvectors of the Jordan block matrix in Theorem 9.30 must be
multiples of el E lR.
k
. Characterize all left eigenvectors.
9. Let A E lR.
nxn
be of the form A = xyT, where x, y E lR.
n
are nonzero vectors with
x
T
y = O. Determine the JCF of A.
10. Let A E lR.
nxn
be of the form A = 1+ xyT, where x, y E lR.
n
are nonzero vectors
with x
T
y = O. Determine the JCF of A.
11. Suppose a matrix A E lR.
16x
16 has 16 eigenvalues at 0 and its JCF consists of a single
Jordan block of the form specified in Theorem 9.22. Suppose the small number 10
16
is added to the (16,1) element of J. What are the eigenvalues of this slightly perturbed
matrix?
94 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
12. Show that every matrix A e R"
x
" can be factored in the form A = Si$2, where Si
and £2 are real symmetric matrices and one of them, say Si, is nonsingular.
Hint: Suppose A = X J X ~
l
is a reduction of A to JCF and suppose we can construct
the "symmetric factorization" of J . Then A = ( X S i X
T
) ( X ~
T
S
2
X ~
l
) would be the
required symmetric factorization of A. Thus, it suffices to prove the result for the
JCF. The transformation P in (9.18) is useful.
13. Prove that every matrix A e W
x
" is similar to its transpose and determine a similarity
transformation explicitly.
Hint: Use the factorization in the previous exercise.
14. Consider the block upper triangular matrix
where A e M"
xn
and A
n
e R
kxk
with 1 < k < n. Suppose A
u
^ 0 and that we
want to block diagonalize A via the similarity transformation
where X e R*
x
<«  *), i.e.,
Find a matrix equation that X must satisfy for this to be possible. If n = 2 and k = 1,
what can you say further, in terms of AU and A 22, about when the equation for X is
solvable?
15. Prove Theorem 9.42.
16. Prove Theorem 9.43.
17. Suppose A e C"
xn
has all its eigenvalues in the left half plane. Prove that
sgn(A) =  /.
94 Chapter 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
12. Show that every matrix A E jRnxn can be factored in the form A = SIS2, where SI
and S2 are real symmetric matrices and one of them, say S1, is nonsingular.
Hint: Suppose A = Xl XI is a reduction of A to JCF and suppose we can construct
the "symmetric factorization" of 1. Then A = (X SIXT)(X
T
S2XI) would be the
required symmetric factorization of A. Thus, it suffices to prove the result for the
JCF. The transformation P in (9.18) is useful.
13. Prove that every matrix A E jRn xn is similar to its transpose and determine a similarity
transformation explicitly.
Hint: Use the factorization in the previous exercise.
14. Consider the block upper triangular matrix
A _ [ All
 0
Al2 ]
A22 '
where A E jRnxn and All E jRkxk with 1 ::s: k ::s: n. Suppose Al2 =1= 0 and that we
want to block diagonalize A via the similarity transformation
where X E IRkx(nk), i.e.,
TIAT = [A 011 0 ]
A22 .
Find a matrix equation that X must satisfy for this to be possible. If n = 2 and k = 1,
what can you say further, in terms of All and A22, about when the equation for X is
solvable?
15. Prove Theorem 9.42.
16. Prove Theorem 9.43.
17. Suppose A E en xn has all its eigenvalues in the left halfplane. Prove that
sgn(A) = 1.
Chapter 10
Canonical Forms
10.1 Some Basic Canonical Forms
Problem: Let V and W be vector spaces and suppose A : V — > • W is a linear transformation.
Find bases in V and W with respect to which Mat A has a "simple form" or "canonical
form." In matrix terms, if A e R
mxn
, find P e R™
xm
and Q e R
n
n
xn
such that PAQ has a
"canonical form." The transformation A M» PAQ is called an equivalence; it is called an
orthogonal equivalence if P and Q are orthogonal matrices.
Remark 10.1. We can also consider the case A e C
m xn
and unitary equivalence if P and
< 2 are unitary.
Two special cases are of interest:
1. If W = V and < 2 = P"
1
, the transformation A H> PAP"
1
is called a similarity.
2 . If W = V and if Q = P
T
is orthogonal, the transformation A i» PAP
T
is called
an orthogonal similarity (or unitary similarity in the complex case).
The following results are typical of what can be achieved under a unitary similarity. If
A = A
H
6 C"
x
" has eigenvalues AI, . . . , A
n
, then there exists a unitary matrix £7 such that
U
H
AU — D, where D = di ag( A. j , . . . , A.
n
). This is proved in Theorem 10.2 . What other
matrices are "diagonalizable" under unitary similarity? The answer is given in Theorem
10.9, where it is proved that a general matrix A e C"
x
" is unitarily similar to a diagonal
matrix if and only if it is normal (i.e., AA
H
= A
H
A). Normal matrices include Hermitian,
skewHermitian, and unitary matrices (and their "real" counterparts: symmetric, skew
symmetric, and orthogonal, respectively), as well as other matrices that merely satisfy the
definition, such as A = [ _
a
b
^1 for real scalars a and b. If a matrix A is not normal, the
most "diagonal" we can get is the JCF described in Chapter 9.
Theorem 10.2. Let A = A
H
e C"
x
" have (real) eigenvalues A. I, . . . , X
n
. Then there
exists a unitary matrix X such that X
H
AX = D = diag(A.j , . . . , X
n
) (the columns ofX are
orthonormal eigenvectors for A).
95
Chapter 10
Canonical Forms
10.1 Some Basic Canonical Forms
Problem: Let V and W be vector spaces and suppose A : V + W is a linear transformation.
Find bases in V and W with respect to which Mat A has a "simple form" or "canonical
form." In matrix terms, if A E IR
mxn
, find P E lR;;:xm and Q E l R ~ x n such that P AQ has a
"canonical form." The transformation A f+ P AQ is called an equivalence; it is called an
orthogonal equivalence if P and Q are orthogonal matrices.
Remark 10.1. We can also consider the case A E e
mxn
and unitary equivalence if P and
Q are unitary.
Two special cases are of interest:
1. If W = V and Q = p
1
, the transformation A f+ PAPI is called a similarity.
2. If W = V and if Q = pT is orthogonal, the transformation A f+ P ApT is called
an orthogonal similarity (or unitary similarity in the complex case).
The following results are typical of what can be achieved under a unitary similarity. If
A = A H E en xn has eigenvalues AI, ... , An, then there exists a unitary matrix U such that
U
H
AU = D, where D = diag(AJ, ... , An). This is proved in Theorem 10.2. What other
matrices are "diagonalizable" under unitary similarity? The answer is given in Theorem
10.9, where it is proved that a general matrix A E e
nxn
is unitarily similar to a diagonal
matrix if and only if it is normal (i.e., AA H = AHA). Normal matrices include Hermitian,
skewHermitian, and unitary matrices (and their "real" counterparts: symmetric, skew
symmetric, and orthogonal, respectively), as well as other matrices that merely satisfy the
definition, such as A = [ _ ~ !] for real scalars a and h. If a matrix A is not normal, the
most "diagonal" we can get is the JCF described in Chapter 9.
Theorem 10.2. Let A = A H E en xn have (real) eigenvalues AI, ... ,An. Then there
exists a unitary matrix X such that X
H
AX = D = diag(Al, ... , An) (the columns of X are
orthonormal eigenvectors for A).
95
96 Chapter 10. Canonical Forms
Proof: Let x\ be a right eigenvector corresponding to X\, and normalize it such that xf*x\ =
1. Then there exist n — 1 additional vectors x
2
, ..., x
n
such that X = [x\,..., x
n
] =
[x\ X
2
] is unitary. Now
Then x^U
2
= 0 (/ € k) means that x
f
is orthogonal to each of the n — k columns of U
2
.
But the latter are orthonormal since they are the last n — k rows of the unitary matrix U.
Thus, [Xi f/2] is unitary. D
The construction called for in Theorem 10.2 is then a special case of Theorem 10.3
for k = 1. We illustrate the construction of the necessary Householder matrix for k — 1.
For simplicity, we consider the real case. Let the unit vector x\ be denoted by [£i, ..., %
n
]
T
.
In (10.1) we have used the fact that Ax\ = k\x\. When combined with the fact that
x"xi = 1, we get Ai remaining in the (l,l)block. We also get 0 in the (2,l)block by
noting that x\ is orthogonal to all vectors in X
2
. In (10.2), we get 0 in the (l,2)block by
noting that X
H
AX is Hermitian. The proof is completed easily by induction upon noting
that the (2,2)block must have eigenvalues X
2
,..., A.
n
. D
Given a unit vector x\ e E", the construction of X
2
e ]R"
X
("
1
) such that X —
[x\ X
2
] is orthogonal is frequently required. The construction can actually be performed
quite easily by means of Householder (or Givens) transformations as in the proof of the
following general result.
Theorem 10.3. Let X\ e C
nxk
have orthonormal columns and suppose U is a unitary
matrix such that UX\ = \
0
1, where R € C
kxk
is upper triangular. Write U
H
= [U\ U
2
]
with Ui € C
nxk
. Then [Xi U
2
] is unitary.
Proof: Let X\ = [x\,..., Xk]. Construct a sequence of Householder matrices (also known
as elementary reflectors) H\,..., H
k
in the usual way (see below) such that
where R is upper triangular (and nonsingular since x\, ..., Xk are orthonormal). Let U =
H
k
...H
v
. Then U
H
= / / , • • H
k
and
96 Chapter 10. Canonical Forms
Proof' Let XI be a right eigenvector corresponding to AI, and normalize it such that XI =
1. Then there exist n  1 additional vectors X2, ... , Xn such that X = (XI, ... , xn] =
[XI X
2
] is unitary. Now
XHAX = [
xH
] A [XI X2] = [
]
I
XH
XfAxl XfAX
2
2
=[
Al
]
(10.1)
0 XfAX
2
=[
Al 0
l
(10.2)
0
XfAX
z
In (l0.1) we have used the fact that AXI = AIXI. When combined with the fact that
XI = 1, we get Al remaining in the (l,I)block. We also get 0 in the (2, I)block by
noting that XI is orthogonal to all vectors in Xz. In (10.2), we get 0 in the (l,2)block by
noting that XH AX is Hermitian. The proof is completed easily by induction upon noting
that the (2,2)block must have eigenvalues A2, ... , An. 0
Given a unit vector XI E JRn, the construction of X
z
E JRnx(nl) such that X =
[XI X
2
] is orthogonal is frequently required. The construction can actually be performed
quite easily by means of Householder (or Givens) transformations as in the proof of the
following general result.
Theorem 10.3. Let XI E C
nxk
have orthonormal columns and suppose V is a unitary
matrix such that V X I = [ where R E C
kxk
is upper triangular. Write V H = [VI Vz]
with VI E C
nxk
. Then [XI V
2
] is unitary.
Proof: Let X I = [XI, ... ,xd. Construct a sequence of Householder matrices (also known
as elementary reflectors) HI, ... , Hk in the usual way (see below) such that
Hk ... HdxI, ... , xd = [ l
where R is upper triangular (and nonsingular since XI, ... , Xk are orthonormal). Let V =
Hk'" HI. Then VH = HI'" Hk and
Then X
i
H
U2 = 0 (i E means that Xi is orthogonal to each of the n  k columns of V2.
But the latter are orthonormal since they are the last n  k rows of the unitary matrix U.
Thus. [XI U2] is unitary. 0
The construction called for in Theorem 10.2 is then a special case of Theorem 10.3
for k = 1. We illustrate the construction of the necessary Householder matrix for k = 1.
For simplicity, we consider the real case. Let the unit vector XI be denoted by .. , ,
10.1. Some Basic Canonical Forms 97
Then the necessary Householder matrix needed for the construction of X^ is given by
U = I — 2uu
+
= I — ^UU
T
, where u = [t\ ± 1, £2, • • •» £«]
r
 It can easily be checked
that U is symmetric and U
T
U = U
2
= I, so U is orthogonal. To see that U effects the
necessary compression of j ci, it is easily verified that U
T
U = 2 ± 2£i and U
T
X\ = 1 ± £1.
Thus,
Further details on Householder matrices, including the choice of sign and the complex case,
can be consulted in standard numerical linear algebra texts such as [7], [11], [23], [25].
The real version of Theorem 10.2 is worth stating separately since it is applied fre
quently in applications.
Theorem 10.4. Let A = A
T
e E
nxn
have eigenvalues k\, ... ,X
n
. Then there exists an
orthogonal matrix X e W
lxn
(whose columns are orthonormal eigenvectors of A) such that
X
T
AX = D = diag(Xi, . . . , X
n
).
Note that Theorem 10.4 implies that a symmetric matrix A (with the obvious analogue
from Theorem 10.2 for Hermitian matrices) can be written
which is often called the spectral representation of A. In fact, A in (10.3) is actually a
weighted sum of orthogonal projections P, (onto the onedimensional eigenspaces corre
sponding to the A., 's), i.e.,
where P, = PUM —
x
i
x
f =
x
i
x
j since xj xi — 1.
The following pair of theorems form the theoretical foundation of the doubleFrancis
QR algorithm used to compute matrix eigenvalues in a numerically stable and reliable way.
10.1. Some Basic Canonical Forms 97
Then the necessary Householder matrix needed for the construction of X
2
is given by
U = I  2uu+ = I  +uu
T
, where u = [';1 ± 1, ';2, ... , ';nf. It can easily be checked
u u
that U is symmetric and U
T
U = U
2
= I, so U is orthogonal. To see that U effects the
necessary compression of Xl, it is easily verified that u
T
u = 2 ± 2';1 and u
T
Xl = 1 ± ';1.
Thus,
Further details on Householder matrices, including the choice of sign and the complex case,
can be consulted in standard numerical linear algebra texts such as [7], [11], [23], [25].
The real version of Theorem 10.2 is worth stating separately since it is applied fre
quently in applications.
Theorem 10.4. Let A = AT E jRnxn have eigenvalues AI, ... , An. Then there exists an
orthogonal matrix X E jRn xn (whose columns are orthonormal eigenvectors of A) such that
XT AX = D = diag(Al, ... , An).
Note that Theorem 10.4 implies that a symmetric matrix A (with the obvious analogue
from Theorem 10.2 for Hermitian matrices) can be written
n
A = XDX
T
= LAiXiXT,
(10.3)
i=1
which is often called the spectral representation of A. In fact, A in (10.3) is actually a
weighted sum of orthogonal projections Pi (onto the onedimensional eigenspaces corre
sponding to the Ai'S), i.e.,
n
A = LAiPi,
i=l
where Pi = PR(x;) = xiXt = xixT since xT Xi = 1.
The following pair of theorems form the theoretical foundation of the doubleFrancis
QR algorithm used to compute matrix eigenvalues in a numerically stable and reliable way.
98 Chapter 10. Canonical Forms
Theorem 10.5 (Schur). Let A e C"
x
". Then there exists a unitary matrix U such that
U
H
AU = T, where T is upper triangular.
Proof: The proof of this theorem is essentially the same as that of Theorem 10.2 except that
in this case (using the notation U rather than X) the (l,2)block wf AU2 is not 0. D
In the case of A e R"
x
", it is thus unitarily similar to an upper triangular matrix, but
if A has a complex conjugate pair of eigenvalues, then complex arithmetic is clearly needed
to place such eigenvalues on the diagonal of T. However, the next theorem shows that every
A e W
xn
is also orthogonally similar (i.e., real arithmetic) to a quasiuppertriangular
matrix. A quasiuppertriangular matrix is block upper triangular with 1 x 1 diagonal
blocks corresponding to its real eigenvalues and 2x2 diagonal blocks corresponding to its
complex conjugate pairs of eigenvalues.
Theorem 10.6 (MurnaghanWintner). Let A e R"
x
". Then there exists an orthogonal
matrix U such that U
T
AU = S, where S is quasiuppertriangular.
Definition 10.7. The triangular matrix T in Theorem 10.5 is called a Schur canonical
form or Schur form. The quasiuppertriangular matrix S in Theorem 10.6 is called a real
Schur canonical form or real Schur form (RSF). The columns of a unitary [orthogonal]
matrix U that reduces a matrix to [real] Schur form are called Schur vectors.
Example 10.8. The matrix
is in RSF. Its real JCF is
Note that only the first Schur vector (and then only if the corresponding first eigenvalue
is real if U is orthogonal) is an eigenvector. However, what is true, and sufficient for virtually
all applications (see, for example, [17]), is that the first k Schur vectors span the same A
invariant subspace as the eigenvectors corresponding to the first k eigenvalues along the
diagonal of T (or S).
While every matrix can be reduced to Schur form (or RSF), it is of interest to know
when we can go further and reduce a matrix via unitary similarity to diagonal form. The
following theorem answers this question.
Theorem 10.9. A matrix A e C"
x
" is unitarily similar to a diagonal matrix if and only if
A is normal (i.e., A
H
A = AA
H
).
Proof: Suppose U is a unitary matrix such that U
H
AU = D, where D is diagonal. Then
so A is normal.
98 Chapter 10. Canonical Forms
Theorem 10.5 (Schur). Let A E c
nxn
. Then there exists a unitary matrix U such that
U
H
AU = T, where T is upper triangular.
Proof: The proof of this theorem is essentially the same as that of Theorem lO.2 except that
in this case (using the notation U rather than X) the (l,2)block ur AU
2
is not O. 0
In the case of A E IR
n
xn , it is thus unitarily similar to an upper triangular matrix, but
if A has a complex conjugate pair of eigenvalues, then complex arithmetic is clearly needed
to place such eigenValues on the diagonal of T. However, the next theorem shows that every
A E IR
nxn
is also orthogonally similar (i.e., real arithmetic) to a quasiuppertriangular
matrix. A quasiuppertriangular matrix is block upper triangular with 1 x 1 diagonal
blocks corresponding to its real eigenvalues and 2 x 2 diagonal blocks corresponding to its
complex conjugate pairs of eigenvalues.
Theorem 10.6 (MurnaghanWintner). Let A E IR
n
xn. Then there exists an orthogonal
matrix U such that U
T
AU = S, where S is quasiuppertriangular.
Definition 10.7. The triangular matrix T in Theorem 10.5 is called a Schur canonical
form or Schur fonn. The quasiuppertriangular matrix S in Theorem 10.6 is called a real
Schur canonical form or real Schur fonn (RSF). The columns of a unitary [orthogonal}
matrix U that reduces a matrix to [real} Schur fonn are called Schur vectors.
Example 10.8. The matrix
s ~ [
2 5
n
2 4
0 0
is in RSF. Its real JCF is
h[
1
n
1 1
0 0
Note that only the first Schur vector (and then only if the corresponding first eigenvalue
is real if U is orthogonal) is an eigenvector. However, what is true, and sufficient for virtually
all applications (see, for example, [17]), is that the first k Schur vectors span the same A
invariant subspace as the eigenvectors corresponding to the first k eigenvalues along the
diagonal of T (or S).
While every matrix can be reduced to Schur form (or RSF), it is of interest to know
when we can go further and reduce a matrix via unitary similarity to diagonal form. The
following theorem answers this question.
Theorem 10.9. A matrix A E c
nxn
is unitarily similar to a diagonal matrix if and only if
A is normal (i.e., AH A = AA
H
).
Proof: Suppose U is a unitary matrix such that U
H
AU = D, where D is diagonal. Then
AAH = U VUHU VHU
H
= U DDHU
H
== U DH DU
H
== AH A
so A is normal.
10.2. Definite Matrices 99
Conversely, suppose A is normal and let U be a unitary matrix such that U
H
AU = T,
where T is an upper triangular matrix (Theorem 10.5). Then
It is then a routine exercise to show that T must, in fact, be diagonal. D
10.2 Definite Matrices
Definition 10.10. A symmetric matrix A e W
xn
is
1. positive definite if and only ifx
T
Ax > Qfor all nonzero x G W
1
. We write A > 0.
2. nonnegative definite (or positive semidefinite) if and only if X
T
Ax > 0 for all
nonzero x e W. We write A > 0.
3. negative definite if—A is positive definite. We write A < 0.
4. nonpositive definite (or negative semidefinite) if— A is nonnegative definite. We
write A < 0.
Also, if A and B are symmetric matrices, we write A > B if and only if A — B > 0 or
B — A < 0. Similarly, we write A > B if and only ifA — B>QorB — A < 0.
Remark 10.11. If A e C"
x
" is Hermitian, all the above definitions hold except that
superscript //s replace Ts. Indeed, this is generally true for all results in the remainder of
this section that may be stated in the real case for simplicity.
Remark 10.12. If a matrix is neither definite nor semidefinite, it is said to be indefinite.
Theorem 10.13. Let A = A
H
e C
nxn
with eigenvalues X
{
> A
2
> • • • > A
n
. Then for all
x eC",
Proof: Let U be a unitary matrix that diagonalizes A as in Theorem 10.2. Furthermore,
let v = U
H
x, where x is an arbitrary vector in C
M
, and denote the components of y by
j]i, i € n. Then
But clearly
10.2. Definite Matrices 99
Conversely, suppose A is normal and let U be a unitary matrix such that U H A U = T,
where T is an upper triangular matrix (Theorem 10.5). Then
It is then a routine exercise to show that T must, in fact, be diagonal. 0
10.2 Definite Matrices
Definition 10.10. A symmetric matrix A E lR.
nxn
is
1. positive definite if and only if x T Ax > 0 for all nonzero x E lR.
n
. We write A > O.
2. nonnegative definite (or positive semidefinite) if and only if x
T
Ax :::: 0 for all
nonzero x E lR.
n
• We write A :::: O.
3. negative definite if  A is positive definite. We write A < O.
4. nonpositive definite (or negative semidefinite) if A is nonnegative definite. We
write A ~ O.
Also, if A and B are symmetric matrices, we write A > B if and only if A  B > 0 or
B  A < O. Similarly, we write A :::: B if and only if A  B :::: 0 or B  A ~ O.
Remark 10.11. If A E e
nxn
is Hermitian, all the above definitions hold except that
superscript H s replace T s. Indeed, this is generally true for all results in the remainder of
this section that may be stated in the real case for simplicity.
Remark 10.12. If a matrix is neither definite nor semidefinite, it is said to be indefinite.
Theorem 10.13. Let A = AH E e
nxn
with eigenvalues AI :::: A2 :::: ... :::: An. Thenfor all
x E en,
Proof: Let U be a unitary matrix that diagonalizes A as in Theorem 10.2. Furthermore,
let y = U H x, where x is an arbitrary vector in en, and denote the components of y by
11;, i En. Then
But clearly
n
x
H
Ax = (U
H
X)H U
H
AU(U
H
x) = yH Dy = LA; 111;12.
n
LA; 11'/;12 ~ AlyH Y = AIX
H
X
;=1
;=1
100 Chapter 10. Canonical Forms
and
from which the theorem follows. D
Remark 10.14. The ratio ^^ for A = A
H
< = C
nxn
and nonzero jc e C" is called the
Rayleigh quotient of jc. Theorem 10.13 provides upper (AO and lower (A.
w
) bounds for
the Rayleigh quotient. If A = A
H
e C"
x
" is positive definite, X
H
Ax > 0 for all nonzero
x E C", soO < X
n
< • • • < A. I.
Corollary 10.15. Let A e C"
x
". Then \\A\\
2
= ^
m
(A
H
A}.
Proof: For all x € C" we have
Let jc be an eigenvector corresponding to X
max
(A
H
A). Then ^pjp
2
= ^^(A" A) , whence
Definition 10.16. A principal submatrix of an nxn matrix A is the (n — k)x(n — k) matrix
that remains by deleting k rows and the corresponding k columns. A leading principal
submatrix of order n — k is obtained by deleting the last k rows and columns.
Theorem 10.17. A symmetric matrix A e E"
x
" is positive definite if and only if any of the
following three equivalent conditions hold:
1. The determinants of all leading principal submatrices of A are positive.
2. All eigenvalues of A are positive.
3. A can be written in the formM
T
M, where M e R"
x
" is nonsingular.
Theorem 10.18. A symmetric matrix A € R"
x
" is nonnegative definite if and only if any
of the following three equivalent conditions hold:
1. The determinants of all principal submatrices of A are nonnegative.
2. All eigenvalues of A are nonnegative.
3. A can be written in the formM
T
M, where M 6 R
ix
" and k > rank(A) — rank(M) .
Remark 10.19. Note that the determinants of all principal eubmatrioes muet bQ nonnogativo
in Theorem 10.18.1, not just those of the leading principal submatrices. For example,
consider the matrix A — [
0
_
l
1. The determinant of the 1x1 leading submatrix is 0 and
the determinant of the 2x2 leading submatrix is also 0 (cf. Theorem 10.17). However, the
100 Chapter 10. Canonical Forms
and
n
LAillJilZ::: AnyHy = An
xHx
,
i=l
from which the theorem follows. 0
Remark 10.14. The ratio XHHAx for A = AH E e
nxn
and nonzero x E en is called the
x x
Rayleigh quotient of x. Theorem 1O.l3 provides upper (A 1) and lower (An) bounds for
the Rayleigh quotient. If A = AH E e
nxn
is positive definite, x
H
Ax > 0 for all nonzero
x E en, so 0 < An ::::: ... ::::: A I.
I
Corollary 10.15. Let A E e
nxn
. Then IIAII2 = Ar1ax(AH A).
Proof: For all x E en we have
I
Let x be an eigenvector corresponding to Amax (A H A). Then = Ar1ax (A H A), whence
IIAxll2 ! H
IIAliz = max = Amax{A A). 0
xfO IIxll2
Definition 10.16. A principal submatrixofan n x n matrix A is the (n k) x (n k) matrix
that remains by deleting k rows and the corresponding k columns. A leading principal
submatrix of order n  k is obtained by deleting the last k rows and columns.
Theorem 10.17. A symmetric matrix A E is positive definite if and only if any of the
following three equivalent conditions hold:
1. The determinants of all leading principal submatrices of A are positive.
2. All eigenvalues of A are positive.
3. A can be written in the form MT M, where M E xn is nonsingular.
Theorem 10.18. A symmetric matrix A E xn is nonnegative definite if and only if any
of the following three equivalent conditions hold:
1. The determinants of all principal submatrices of A are nonnegative.
2. All eigenvalues of A are nonnegaTive.
3. A can be wrirren in [he/orm MT M, where M E IRb<n and k ranlc(A) "" ranlc(M).
R.@mllrk 10.19. Not@th!ltthl!dl!termin!lntl:ofnllprincip!ll "ubm!ltriC[!!l mu"t bB nonnBgmivB
in Theorem 10.18.1, not just those of the leading principal submatrices. For example,
consider the matrix A = _ The determinant of the I x 1 leading submatrix is 0 and
the determinant of the 2 x 2 leading submatrix is also 0 (cf. Theorem 10.17). However, the
10.2. Definite Matrices 101
principal submatrix consisting of the (2,2) element is, in fact, negative and A is nonpositive
definite.
Remark 10.20. The factor M in Theorem 10.18.3 is not unique. For example, if
Recall that A > B if the matrix A — B is nonnegative definite. The following
theorem is useful in "comparing" symmetric matrices. Its proof is straightforward from
basic definitions.
Theorem 10.21. Let A, B e R
nxn
be symmetric.
1. If A >BandMe R
nxm
, then M
T
AM > M
T
BM.
2. If A >B and M e R
nxm
, then M
T
AM > M.
T
BM.
j m
The following standard theorem is stated without proof (see, for example, [16, p.
181]). It concerns the notion of the "square root" of a matrix. That is, if A € E"
xn
, we say
that S e R
nx
" is a square root of A if S
2
— A. In general, matrices (both symmetric and
nonsymmetric) have infinitely many square roots. For example, if A = /2, any matrix S of
the form [
c
s
°*
e
e
_
c
s
™
9
e
] is a square root.
Theorem 10.22. Let A e R"
x
" be nonnegative definite. Then A has a unique nonnegative
definite square root S. Moreover, SA = AS and rankS = rank A (and hence S is positive
definite if A is positive definite).
A stronger form of the third characterization in Theorem 10.17 is available and is
known as the Cholesky factorization. It is stated and proved below for the more general
Hermitian case.
Theorem 10.23. Let A e <C
nxn
be Hermitian and positive definite. Then there exists a
unique nonsingular lower triangular matrix L with positive diagonal elements such that
A = LL
H
.
Proof: The proof is by induction. The case n = 1 is trivially true. Write the matrix A in
the form
By our induction hypothesis, assume the result is true for matrices of order n — 1 so that B
may be written as B = L\L^, where L\ e C
1
""
1
^""^ is nonsingular and lower triangular
then M can be
10.2. Definite Matrices 101
principal submatrix consisting of the (2,2) element is, in fact, negative and A is nonpositive
definite.
Remark 10.20. The factor M in Theorem 10.18.3 is not unique. For example, if
then M can be
[1 0], [ fz
ti
o [ ~ 0]
o l ~ 0 , ...
v'3 0
Recall that A :::: B if the matrix A  B is nonnegative definite. The following
theorem is useful in "comparing" symmetric matrices. Its proof is straightforward from
basic definitions.
Theorem 10.21. Let A, B E jRnxn be symmetric.
1. 1f A :::: Band M E jRnxm, then MT AM :::: MT BM.
2. If A> Band M E j R ~ x m , then MT AM> MT BM.
The following standard theorem is stated without proof (see, for example, [16, p.
181]). It concerns the notion of the "square root" of a matrix. That is, if A E lR.
nxn
, we say
that S E jRn xn is a square root of A if S2 = A. In general, matrices (both symmetric and
nonsymmetric) have infinitely many square roots. For example, if A = lz, any matrix S of
h
" [COSO Sino] .
t e 10rm sinO _ cosO IS a square root.
Theorem 10.22. Let A E lR.
nxn
be nonnegative definite. Then A has a unique nonnegative
definite square root S. Moreover, SA = AS and rankS = rankA (and hence S is positive
definite if A is positive definite).
A stronger form of the third characterization in Theorem 10.17 is available and is
known as the Cholesky factorization. It is stated and proved below for the more general
Hermitian case.
Theorem 10.23. Let A E c
nxn
be Hermitian and positive definite. Then there exists a
unique nonsingular lower triangular matrix L with positive diagonal elements such that
A = LLH.
Proof: The proof is by induction. The case n = 1 is trivially true. Write the matrix A in
the form
By our induction hypothesis, assume the result is true for matrices of order n  1 so that B
may be written as B = L1Lf, where Ll E c(nl)x(nl) is nonsingular and lower triangular
102 Chapt er 10. Ca n o n i c a l Forms
with positive diagonal elements. It remains to prove that we can write the n x n matrix A
in the form
10.3 Equivalence Transformations and Congruence
Theorem 10.24. Let A € C™*
7 1
. Then there exist matrices P e C ™
xm
and Q e C"
n
x
" such
that
Proof: A classical proof can be consulted in, for example, [21, p. 131]. Alternatively,
suppose A has an SVD of the form (5.2) in its complex version. Then
Note that the greater freedom afforded by the equivalence transformation of Theorem
10.24, as opposed to the more restrictive situation of a similarity transformation, yields a
far "simpler" canonical form (10.4). However, numerical procedures for computing such
an equivalence directly via, say, Gaussian or elementary row and column operations, are
generally unreliable. The numerically preferred equivalence is, of course, the unitary equiv
alence known as the SVD. However, the SVD is relatively expensive to compute and other
canonical forms exist that are intermediate between (10.4) and the SVD; see, for example
[7, Ch. 5], [4, Ch. 2]. Two such forms are stated here. They are more stably computable
than (10.4) and more efficiently computable than a ful l SVD. Many similar results are also
available.
where a is positive. Performing the indicated matrix multiplication and equating the cor
responding submatrices, we see that we must have L\c = b and a
nn
= C
H
C + a
2
. Clearly
c is given simply by c = L^b. Substituting in the expression involving a, we find
a
2
= a
nn
— b
H
L\
H
L\
l
b = a
nn
— b
H
B~
l
b (= the Schur complement of B in A). But we
know that
Since det (fi ) > 0, we must have a
nn
—b
H
B
l
b > 0. Choosing a to be the positive square
root of «„„ — b
H
B~
l
b completes the proof. D
102 Chapter 10. Canonical Forms
with positive diagonal elements. It remains to prove that we can write the n x n matrix A
in the form
b ] = [L
J
0 ] [Lf c J,
ann c a 0 a
where a is positive. Performing the indicated matrix multiplication and equating the cor
responding submatrices, we see that we must have L I C = b and ann = c
H
c + a
2
• Clearly
c is given simply by c = C,lb. Substituting in the expression involving a, we find
a
2
= ann  b
H
LIH L11b = ann  b
H
B1b (= the Schur complement of B in A). But we
know that
o < det(A) = det [
b ] = det(B) det(a
nn
_ b
H
B1b).
ann
Since det(B) > 0, we must have ann  b
H
B1b > O. Choosing a to be the positive square
root of ann  b
H
B1b completes the proof. 0
10.3 Equivalence Transformations and Congruence
Theorem 10.24. Let A E c;,xn. Then there exist matrices P E C:
xm
and Q E such
that
(l0.4)
Proof: A classical proof can be consulted in, for example, [21, p. 131]. Alternatively,
suppose A has an SVD of the form (5.2) in its complex version. Then
[
Sl 0 ] [ U
H
] [I 0 ]
o I Uf AV = 0 0 .
Take P = [ 'f [I ] and Q = V to complete the proof. 0
Note that the greater freedom afforded by the equivalence transformation of Theorem
10.24, as opposed to the more restrictive situation of a similarity transformation, yields a
far "simpler" canonical form (10.4). However, numerical procedures for computing such
an equivalence directly via, say, Gaussian or elementary row and column operations, are
generally unreliable. The numerically preferred equivalence is, of course, the unitary equiv
alence known as the SVD. However, the SVD is relatively expensive to compute and other
canonical forms exist that are intermediate between (l0.4) and the SVD; see, for example
[7, Ch. 5], [4, Ch. 2]. Two such forms are stated here. They are more stably computable
than (lOA) and more efficiently computable than a full SVD. Many similar results are also
available.
10.3. Equivalence Transformations and Congruence 103
Theorem 10.25 (Complete Orthogonal Decomposition). Let A e C™
x
". Then there exist
unitary matrices U e C
mxm
and V e C
nxn
such that
where R e €,
r
r
xr
is upper (or lower) triangular with positive diagonal elements.
Proof: For the proof, see [4]. D
Theorem 10.26. Let A e C™
x
". Then there exists a unitary matrix Q e C
mxm
and a
permutation matrix Fl e C"
x
" such that
where R E C
r
r
xr
is upper triangular and S e C
r x(
"
r)
is arbitrary but in general nonzero.
Proof: For the proof, see [4]. D
Remark 10.27. When A has full column rank but is "near" a rank deficient matrix,
various rank revealing QR decompositions are available that can sometimes detect such
phenomena at a cost considerably less than a full SVD. Again, see [4] for details.
Definition 10.28. Let A e C
nxn
and X e C
n
n
xn
. The transformation A i> X
H
AX is called
a congruence. Note that a congruence is a similarity if and only ifX is unitary.
Note that congruence preserves the property of being Hermitian; i.e., if A is Hermitian,
then X
H
AX is also Hermitian. It is of interest to ask what other properties of a matrix are
preserved under congruence. It turns out that the principal property so preserved is the sign
of each eigenvalue.
Definition 10.29. Let A = A
H
e C"
x
" and let 7t, v, and £ denote the numbers of positive,
negative, and zero eigenvalues, respectively, of A. Then the inertia of A is the triple of
numbers In(A) = (n, v, £). The signature of A is given by sig(A) = n — v.
Example 10.30.
2. If A = A" eC
n x
" , t h enA > 0 if and only if In (A) = (n, 0, 0).
3. If In(A) = (TT, v, £), then rank(A) = n + v.
Theorem 10.31 (Sylvester's Law of Inertia). Let A = A
H
e C
nxn
and X e C
n
n
xn
. Then
In(A) = ln(X
H
AX).
Proof: For the proof, see, for example, [21, p. 134]. D
Theorem 10.31 guarantees that rank and signature of a matrix are preserved under
congruence. We then have the following.
10.3. Equivalence Transformations and Congruence 103
Theorem 10.25 (Complete Orthogonal Decomposition). Let A E e ~ x n . Then there exist
unitary matrices U E e
mxm
and V E e
nxn
such that
where R E e;xr is upper (or lower) triangular with positive diagonal elements.
Proof: For the proof, see [4]. 0
(10.5)
Theorem 10.26. Let A E e ~ x n . Then there exists a unitary matrix Q E e
mxm
and a
permutation matrix IT E en xn such that
QAIT = [ ~ ~ l
(10.6)
where R E e;xr is upper triangular and S E erx(nr) is arbitrary but in general nonzero.
Proof: For the proof, see [4]. 0
Remark 10.27. When A has full column rank but is "near" a rank deficient matrix,
various rank revealing QR decompositions are available that can sometimes detect such
phenomena at a cost considerably less than a full SVD. Again, see [4] for details.
Definition 10.28. Let A E e
nxn
and X E e ~ x n . The transformation A H XH AX is called
a congruence. Note that a congruence is a similarity if and only if X is unitary.
Note that congruence preserves the property of being Hermitian; i.e., if A is Hermitian,
then X H AX is also Hermitian. It is of interest to ask what other properties of a matrix are
preserved under congruence. It turns out that the principal property so preserved is the sign
of each eigenvalue.
Definition 10.29. Let A = AH E e
nxn
and let rr, v, and ~ denote the numbers of positive,
negative, and zero eigenvalues, respectively, of A. Then the inertia of A is the triple of
numbers In(A) = (rr, v, n The signature of A is given by sig(A) = rr  v.
Example 10.30.
l.In[! 1
o 0
00] o 0
10 =(2,1,1).
o 0
2. If A = AH E e
nxn
, then A> 0 if and only if In(A) = (n, 0, 0).
3. If In(A) = (rr, v, n, then rank(A) = rr + v.
Theorem 10.31 (Sylvester's Law of Inertia). Let A = A HE en xn and X E e ~ xn. Then
In(A) = In(X
H
AX).
Proof: For the proof, see, for example, [21, p. 134]. D
Theorem 10.31 guarantees that rank and signature of a matrix are preserved under
congruence. We then have the following.
104 Chapter 10. Canonical Forms
Theorem 10.32. Let A = A
H
e C"
xn
with In(A) = (jt, v, £). Then there exists a matrix
X e C"
n
xn
such that X
H
AX = diag(l, . . . , 1, 1,..., 1, 0, . . . , 0), where the number of
1 's is 7i, the number of — l's is v, and the number 0/0 's is (,.
Proof: Let AI , . . . , X
w
denote the eigenvalues of A and order them such that the first TT are
positive, the next v are negative, and the final £ are 0. By Theorem 10.2 there exists a unitary
matrix U such that U
H
AU = diag(Ai, . . . , A
w
). Define the n x n matrix
Then it is easy to check that X = U W yields the desired result. D
10.3.1 Block matrices and definiteness
Theorem 10.33. Suppose A = A
T
and D = D
T
. Then
if and only if either A > 0 and D  B
T
A~
l
B > 0, or D > 0 and A  BD^B
T
> 0.
Proof: The proof follows by considering, for example, the congruence
The details are straightforward and are left to the reader. D
Remark 10.34. Note the symmetric Schur complements of A (or D) in the theorem.
Theorem 10.35. Suppose A = A
T
and D = D
T
. Then
if and only ifA>0, AA
+
B = B, and D  B
T
A
+
B > 0.
Proof: Consider the congruence with
and proceed as in the proof of Theorem 10.33. D
10.4 Rational Canonical Form
One final canonical form to be mentioned is the rational canonical form.
104 Chapter 10. Canonical Forms
Theorem 10.32. Let A = AH E c
nxn
with In(A) = (Jr, v, O. Then there exists a matrix
X E such that XH AX = diag(1, ... , I, I, ... , 1,0, ... ,0), where the number of
1 's is Jr, the number of I 's is v, and the numberofO's
Proof: Let A I, ... , An denote the eigenvalues of A and order them such that the first Jr are
positive, the next v are negative, and the final are O. By Theorem 10.2 there exists a unitary
matrix V such that VH AV = diag(AI, ... , An). Define the n x n matrix
vv = ... , 1/.fArr+I' ... , I/.fArr+v, I, ... ,1).
Then it is easy to check that X = V VV yields the desired result. 0
10.3.1 Block matrices and definiteness
Theorem 10.33. Suppose A = AT and D = DT. Then
ifand only ifeither A> ° and D  BT AI B > 0, or D > 0 and A  BD
I
BT > O.
Proof: The proof follows by considering, for example, the congruence
B ] [I _AI B JT [ A
D 0 I BT
] [
The details are straightforward and are left to the reader. 0
Remark 10.34. Note the symmetric Schur complements of A (or D) in the theorem.
Theorem 10.35. Suppose A = AT and D = DT. Then
B ] > °
D 
if and only if A:::: 0, AA+B = B. and D  BT A+B:::: o.
Proof: Consider the congruence with
and proceed as in the proof of Theorem 10.33. 0
10.4 Rational Canonical Form
One final canonical form to be mentioned is the rational canonical form.
10.4. Rational Canonical Form 105
Definition 10.36. A matrix A e M"
x
" is said to be nonderogatory if its minimal polynomial
and characteristic polynomial are the same or, equivalently, if its Jordan canonical f orm
has only one block associated with each distinct eigenvalue.
Suppose A E W
xn
is a nonderogatory matrix and suppose its characteristic polyno
mial is 7 r( A ) = A " — ( a
0
+ «A +
is similar to a matrix of the form
+ a
n
_ i A
n
~ ' )  Then it can be shown (see [12]) that A
Definition 10.37. A matrix A e E
nx
" of the f orm (10.7) is called a companion matrix or
is said to be in companion form.
Companion matrices also appear in the literature in several equivalent forms. To
illustrate, consider the companion matrix
This matrix is a special case of a matrix in lower Hessenberg form. Using the reverseorder
identity similarity P given by (9.18), A is easily seen to be similar to the following matrix
in upper Hessenberg form:
Moreover, since a matrix is similar to its transpose (see exercise 13 in Chapter 9), the
following are also companion matrices similar to the above:
Notice that in all cases a companion matrix is nonsingular if and only if aO /= 0.
In fact, the inverse of a nonsingular companion matrix is again in companion form. For
£*Yamr\1j=»
10.4. Rational Canonical Form 105
Definition 10.36. A matrix A E lR
n
Xn is said to be nonderogatory ifits minimal polynomial
and characteristic polynomial are the same or; equivalently, if its Jordan canonical form
has only one block associated with each distinct eigenvalue.
Suppose A E lR
nxn
is a nonderogatory matrix and suppose its characteristic polyno
mial is n(A) = An  (ao + alA + ... + an_IAnI). Then it can be shown (see [12]) that A
is similar to a matrix of the form
o o o
o 0
o
(10.7)
o o
Definition 10.37. A matrix A E lR
nxn
of the form (10.7) is called a cornpanion rnatrix or
is said to be in cornpanion forrn.
Companion matrices also appear in the literature in several equivalent forms. To
illustrate, consider the companion matrix
(l0.8)
This matrix is a special case of a matrix in lower Hessenberg form. Using the reverseorder
identity similarity P given by (9.18), A is easily seen to be similar to the following matrix
in upper Hessenberg form:
a2 al
o 0
1 0
o 1
6]
o .
o
(10.9)
Moreover, since a matrix is similar to its transpose (see exercise 13 in Chapter 9), the
following are also companion matrices similar to the above:
l
:: ~ ! ~ 0 1 ] .
ao 0 0
(10.10)
Notice that in all cases a companion matrix is nonsingular if and only if ao i= O.
In fact, the inverse of a nonsingular companion matrix is again in companion form. For
example,
o
1
o
 ~
ao
1
o
o
 ~
ao
o
o
_!!l
o
o
(10.11)
106 Chapter 10. Canonical Forms
with a similar result for companion matrices of the form (10.10).
If a companion matrix of the form (10.7) is singular, i.e., if ao = 0, then its pseudo
inverse can still be computed. Let a e M""
1
denote the vector \a\, 02,..., a
n
i] and let
c =
l+
l
a
r
a
. Then it is easily verified that
Note that / — caa
T
= (I + aa
T
) , and hence the pseudoinverse of a singular companion
matrix is not a companion matrix unless a = 0.
Companion matrices have many other interesting properties, among which, and per
haps surprisingly, is the fact that their singular values can be found in closed form; see
[14].
Theorem 10.38. Let a\ > GI > • • • > a
n
be the singular values of the companion matrix
A in (10.7). Let a = a\ + a\ + • • • +a%_
{
and y = 1 + «.Q + a. Then
Remark 10.39. Explicit formulas for all the associated right and left singular vectors can
also be derived easily.
If A € R
nx
" is derogatory, i.e., has more than one Jordan block associated with
at least one eigenvalue, then it is not similar to a companion matrix of the form (10.7).
However, it can be shown that a derogatory matrix is similar to a block diagonal matrix,
each of whose diagonal blocks is a companion matrix. Such matrices are said to be in
rational canonical form (or Frobenius canonical form). For details, see, for example, [12].
Companion matrices appear frequently in the control and signal processing literature
but unfortunately they are often very difficult to work with numerically. Algorithms to reduce
an arbitrary matrix to companion form are numerically unstable. Moreover, companion
matrices are known to possess many undesirable numerical properties. For example, in
general and especially as n increases, their eigenstructure is extremely ill conditioned,
nonsingular ones are nearly singular, stable ones are nearly unstable, and so forth [14].
Ifao ^ 0, the largest and smallest singular values can also be written in the equivalent form
106 Chapter 10. Canonical Forms
with a similar result for companion matrices of the form (10.10).
If a companion matrix of the form (10.7) is singular, i.e., if ao = 0, then its pseudo
inverse can still be computed. Let a E JRn1 denote the vector [ai, a2, ... , anIf and let
c = I + ~ T a' Then it is easily verified that
o
o
o
o
o o
o
o
+
o
1 caa
T
o J.
ca
Note that I  caa T = (I + aa T) I , and hence the pseudoinverse of a singular companion
matrix is not a companion matrix unless a = O.
Companion matrices have many other interesting properties, among which, and per
haps surprisingly, is the fact that their singular values can be found in closed form; see
[14].
Theorem 10.38. Let al ~ a2 ~ ... ~ an be the singular values of the companion matrix
A in (10.7). Leta = ar + ai + ... + a;_1 and y = 1 + aJ + a. Then
2 _ 1 ( J 2 2)
a
l
 2 y + y  4a
o
'
a? = 1 for i = 2, 3, ... , n  1,
a; = ~ (y  J y2  4a
J
) .
If ao =1= 0, the largest and smallest singular values can also be written in the equivalent form
Remark 10.39. Explicit formulas for all the associated right and left singular vectors can
also be derived easily.
If A E JRnxn is derogatory, i.e., has more than one Jordan block associated with
at least one eigenvalue, then it is not similar to a companion matrix of the form (10.7).
However, it can be shown that a derogatory matrix is similar to a block diagonal matrix,
each of whose diagonal blocks is a companion matrix. Such matrices are said to be in
rational canonical form (or Frobenius canonical form). For details, see, for example, [12].
Companion matrices appear frequently in the control and signal processing literature
but unfortunately they are often very difficult to work with numerically. Algorithms to reduce
an arbitrary matrix to companion form are numerically unstable. Moreover, companion
matrices are known to possess many undesirable numerical properties. For example, in
general and especially as n increases, their eigenstructure is extremely ill conditioned,
nonsingular ones are nearly singular, stable ones are nearly unstable, and so forth [14].
Exercises 107
Companion matrices and rational canonical forms are generally to be avoided in floating
point computation.
Remark 10.40. Theorem 10.38 yields some understanding of why difficult numerical
behavior might be expected for companion matrices. For example, when solving linear
systems of equations of the form (6.2), one measure of numerical sensitivity is K
P
(A) =
I I ^ I I
p
I I A~
l
I I
p
>
m
e socalled condition number of A with respect to inversion and with respect
to the matrix Pnorm. I f this number is large, say 0(10*), one may lose up to k digits of
precision. I n the 2norm, this condition number is the ratio of largest to smallest singular
values which, by the theorem, can be determined explicitly as
I t is easy to show that y/2/ao < k2(A) < £,, and when GO is small or y is large (or both),
then K2(A) ^ T~I. I t is not unusual for y to be large for large n. Note that explicit formulas
for K\ (A) and K oo(A) can also be determined easily by using (10.11).
EXERCISES
1. Show that if a triangular matrix is normal, then it must be diagonal.
2. Prove that if A e M"
x
" is normal, then Af(A) = A/"(A
r
).
3. Let A G C
nx
" and define p(A) = maxx
€
A(A) I ' M Then p(A) is called the spectral
radius of A. Show that if A is normal, then p(A) = A
2
. Show that the converse
is true if n = 2.
4. Let A € C
nxn
be normal with eigenvalues y1 , ..., y
n
and singular values a\ > a
2
>
• • • > o
n
> 0. Show that a, (A) = A.,(A) for i e n.
5. Use the reverseorder identity matrix P introduced in (9.18) and the matrix U in
Theorem 10.5 to find a unitary matrix Q that reduces A e C"
x
" to lower triangular
form.
6. Let A = I J MeC
2x2
. Find a unitary matrix U such that
7. I f A e W
xn
is positive definite, show that A
[
must also be positive definite.
3. Suppose A e E"
x
" is positive definite. I s [ ^ /i 1 > 0?
}. Let R, S 6 E
nxn
be symmetric. Show that [ * J 1 > 0 if and only if S > 0 and
R> S
Exercises 107
Companion matrices and rational canonical forms are generally to be avoided in fioating
point computation.
Remark 10.40. Theorem 10.38 yields some understanding of why difficult numerical
behavior might be expected for companion matrices. For example, when solving linear
systems of equations of the form (6.2), one measure of numerical sensitivity is Kp(A) =
II A II p II A ] II p' the socalled condition number of A with respect to inversion and with respect
to the matrix pnorm. If this number is large, say O(lO
k
), one may lose up to k digits of
precision. In the 2norm, this condition number is the ratio of largest to smallest singular
values which, by the theorem, can be determined explicitly as
y+J
y
2 4
a5
21
a
ol
It is easy to show that :::: K2(A) :::: 1:01' and when ao is small or y is large (or both),
then K2(A) It is not unusualfor y to be large forlarge n. Note that explicit formulas
for K] (A) and Koo(A) can also be determined easily by using (l0.11).
EXERCISES
1. Show that if a triangular matrix is normal, then it must be diagonal.
2. Prove that if A E jRnxn is normal, then N(A) = N(A
T
).
3. Let A E cc
nxn
and define peA) = max)..EA(A) IAI. Then peA) is called the spectral
radius of A. Show that if A is normal, then peA) = IIAII2' Show that the converse
is true if n = 2.
4. Let A E en xn be normal with eigenvalues A], ... , An and singular values 0'1 0'2
... an O. Show that a; (A) = IA;(A)I for i E!l.
5. Use the reverseorder identity matrix P introduced in (9.18) and the matrix U in
Theorem 10.5 to find a unitary matrix Q that reduces A E cc
nxn
to lower triangular
form.
6. Let A = :] E CC
2x2
. Find a unitary matrix U such that
7. If A E jRn xn is positive definite, show that A I must also be positive definite.
8. Suppose A E jRnxn is positive definite. Is [1 O?
9. Let R, S E jRnxn be symmetric. Show that > 0 if and only if S > 0 and
R > SI.
108 Chapter 10. Canonical Forms
10. Find the inertia of the following matrices:
108
10. Find the inertia of the following matrices:
(a) [ ~ ~ l (b) [
(d) [1 1 + j ]
1  j 1 .
Chapter 10. Canonical Forms
2 1 + j ]
1  j 2 '
Chapter 11
Linear Differential and
Difference Equations
11.1 Differential Equations
In this section we study solutions of the linear homogeneous system of differential equations
for t > IQ. This is known as an initialvalue problem. We restrict our attention in this
chapter only to the socalled timeinvariant case, where the matrix A e R
nxn
is constant
and does not depend on t. The solution of (11.1) is then known always to exist and be
unique. It can be described conveniently in terms of the matrix exponential.
Definition 11.1. For all A e R
nxn
, the matrix exponential e
A
e R
nxn
is defined by the
power series
The series (11.2) can be shown to converge for all A (has radius of convergence equal
to +00). The solution of (11.1) involves the matrix
which thus also converges for all A and uniformly in t.
11.1.1 Properties of the matrix exponential
1. e° = I.
Proof: This follows immediately from Definition 11.1 by setting A = 0.
2. For all A G R"
XM
, (e
A
f  e^.
Proof: This follows immediately from Definition 11.1 and linearity of the transpose.
109
Chapter 11
Linear Differential and
Difference Equations
11.1 Differential Equations
In this section we study solutions of the linear homogeneous system of differential equations
x(t) = Ax(t); x(to) = Xo E JR.n (11.1)
for t 2: to. This is known as an initialvalue problem. We restrict our attention in this
chapter only to the socalled timeinvariant case, where the matrix A E JR.nxn is constant
and does not depend on t. The solution of (11.1) is then known always to exist and be
unique. It can be described conveniently in terms of the matrix exponential.
Definition 11.1. For all A E JR.nxn, the matrix exponential e
A
E JR.nxn is defined by the
power series
+00 1
e
A
= L ,Ak.
k=O k.
(11.2)
The series (11.2) can be shown to converge for all A (has radius of convergence equal
to +(0). The solution of (11.1) involves the matrix
(11.3)
which thus also converges for all A and uniformly in t.
11.1.1 Properties of the matrix exponential
1. eO = I.
Proof This follows immediately from Definition 11.1 by setting A = O.
T T
2. For all A E JR.nxn, (e
A
) = e
A
•
Proof This follows immediately from Definition 11.1 and linearity of the transpose.
109
110 Chapter 11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations
3. For all A e R"
x
" and for all t, r e R, e
(t
+
T)A
= e'
A
e
rA
= e
lA
e'
A
.
Proof: Note that
Compare like powers of A in the above two equations and use the binomial theorem
on (t + T)*.
4. For all A, B e R"
xn
and for all t e R, e
t(A+B)
=^e'
A
e'
B
= e'
B
e'
A
if and only if A
and B commute, i.e., AB = B A.
Proof: Note that
and
and
while
Compare like powers of t in the first equation and the second or third and use the
binomial theorem on (A + B)
k
and the commutativity of A and B.
5. For all A e R"
x
" and for all t e R, (e'
A
)~
l
= e~'
A
.
Proof: Simply take T = — t in property 3.
6. Let £ denote the Laplace transform and £~
!
the inverse Laplace transform. Then for
all A € R"
x
" and for all t € R,
(a) C{e
tA
} = (sIAr
l
.
(b) £
1
{(j/A)
1
} = «
M
.
Proof: We prove only (a). Part (b) follows similarly.
110 Chapter 11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations
3. For all A E JRnxn and for all t, T E JR, e(t+r)A = etA erA = erAe
tA
.
Proof" Note that
(t + T)2 2
e(t+r)A = I + (t + T)A + A + ...
2!
and
tA rA t 2 T 2
(
2 )( 2 )
e e = I + t A + 2! A +... I + T A + 2! A +... .
Compare like powers of A in the above two equations and use the binomial theorem
on(t+T)k.
4. For all A, B E JRnxn and for all t E JR, et(A+B) =etAe
tB
= etBe
tA
if and only if A
and B commute, i.e., AB = BA.
Proof' Note that
and
while
t
2
et(A+B) = I + teA + B) + (A + B)2 + ...
2!
tB tA t 2 t 2
(
2 )( 2 )
e e = 1+ tB + 2iB +... 1+ tA + 2!A +... .
Compare like powers of t in the first equation and the second or third and use the
binomial theorem on (A + B/ and the commutativity of A and B.
5. ForaH A E JRnxn and for all t E JR, (etA)1 = e
tA
.
Proof" Simply take T = t in property 3.
6. Let £ denote the Laplace transform and £1 the inverse Laplace transform. Then for
all A E JRnxn and for all t E lR,
(a) .l{e
tA
} = (sI  A)I.
(b) .lI{(sl A)I} = erA.
Proof" We prove only (a). Part (b) follows similarly.
{+oo
= io et(sl)e
tA
dt
(+oo
= io ef(Asl) dt since A and (sf) commute
11.1. Differential Equations 111
= (sl A)
1
.
The matrix (s I — A) ~' is called the resolvent of A and is defined for all s not in A (A).
Notice in the proof that we have assumed, for convenience, that A is diagonalizable.
If this is not the case, the scalar dyadic decomposition can be replaced by
using the JCF. All succeeding steps in the proof then follow in a straightforward way.
7. For all A e R"
x
" and for all t e R, £(e'
A
) = Ae
tA
= e'
A
A.
Proof: Since the series (11.3) is uniformly convergent, it can be differentiated termby
term from which the result follows immediately. Alternatively, the formal definition
can be employed as follows. For any consistent matrix norm,
11.1. Differential Equations 111
= {+oo t e(AiS)t x;y;H dt assuming A is diagonalizable
10 ;=1
= e(AiS)t dt]x;y;H
n 1
= '"' Xi y;H assuming Re s > Re Ai for i E !!
L..... s  A"
i=1 I
= (sI  A)I.
The matrix (s I  A) I is called the resolvent of A and is defined for all s not in A (A).
Notice in the proof that we have assumed, for convenience, that A is diagonalizable.
If this is not the case, the scalar dyadic decomposition can be replaced by
m
et(Asl) = L Xiet(Jisl)y;H
;=1
using the JCF. All succeeding steps in the proof then follow in a straightforward way.
7. For all A E JRnxn and for all t E JR, 1h(e
tA
) = Ae
tA
= etA A.
Proof: Since the series (11.3) is uniformly convergent, it can be differentiated termby
term from which the result follows immediately. Alternatively, the formal definition
d e(t+M)A _ etA
_(/A) = lim
d t L'lt
can be employed as follows. For any consistent matrix norm,
II
etA II III II
u.  Ae
tA
= L'lt  /A)  Ae
tA
= II  etA)  Ae
tA
II
= II  l)e
tA
 Ae
tA
II
II
I ( (M)2 2 ) tA tAil
= L'lt M A + A +... e  Ae
= II ( Ae
tA
+ A
2
e
tA
+ ... )  Ae
tA
II
= II ( A2 + A
3
+ .. , ) etA II
< MIIA21111e
tA
II _ + IIAII + IIAI12 + ...
(
1 L'lt (L'lt)2 )
 2! 3! 4!
< L'lt1lA21111e
tA
Il (1 + L'ltiIAIl + IIAII2 + ... )
= L'lt IIA 21111e
tA
112 Chapter 11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations
For fixed t, the righthand side above clearly goes to 0 as At goes to 0. Thus, the
limit exists and equals Ae'
A
. A similar proof yields the limit e'
A
A, or one can use the
fact that A commutes with any polynomial of A of finite degree and hence with e'
A
.
11.1.2 Homogeneous linear differential equations
Theorem 11.2. Let A e R
nxn
. The solution of the linear homogeneous initialvalue problem
Proof: Differentiate (11.5) and use property 7 of the matrix exponential to get x( t ) =
Ae
( t
~
to) A
xo = Ax( t) . Also, x( t
0
) — e
( fo
~
t
° '
) A
X Q — X Q so, by the fundamental existence and
uniqueness theorem for ordinary differential equations, (11.5) is the solution of (11.4). D
11.1.3 Inhomogeneous linear differential equations
Theorem 11.3. Let A e R
nxn
, B e W
xm
and let the vectorvalued function u be given
and, say, continuous. Then the solution of the linear inhomogeneous initialvalue problem
for t > IQ is given by the variation of parameters formula
Proof: Differentiate (11.7) and again use property 7 of the matrix exponential. The general
formula
is used to get x( t ) = Ae
{
'
to) A
x
0
+ f'
o
Ae
(
'
s) A
Bu( s) ds + Bu( t) = Ax( t) + Bu( t) . Also,
*('o)
=
< ?
(f
° ~
fo)/ 1
.¥ o + 0 = X Q so, by the fundamental existence and uniqueness theorem for
ordinary differential equations, (11.7) is the solution of (11.6). D
Remark 11.4. The proof above simply verifies the variation of parameters formula by
direct differentiation. The formula can be derived by means of an integrating factor "trick"
as follows. Premultiply the equation x — Ax = Bu by e~
tA
to get
112 Chapter 11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations
For fixed t, the righthand side above clearly goes to 0 as t:.t goes to O. Thus, the
limit exists and equals Ae
t
A • A similar proof yields the limit e
t
A A, or one can use the
fact that A commutes with any polynomial of A of finite degree and hence with etA.
11.1.2 Homogeneous linear differential equations
Theorem 11.2. Let A E IR
n
xn. The solution of the linear homogeneous initialvalue problem
x(t) = Ax(l); x(to) = Xo E IR
n
(11.4)
for t ::: to is given by
(11.5)
Proof: Differentiate (11.5) and use property 7 of the matrix exponential to get x (t) =
Ae(tto)A
xo
= Ax(t). Also, x(to) = e(toto)A Xo = Xo so, by the fundamental existence and
uniqueness theorem for ordinary differential equations, (11.5) is the solution of (11.4). 0
11.1.3 Inhomogeneous linear differential equations
Theorem 11.3. Let A E IR
nxn
, B E IR
nxm
and let the vectorvalued function u be given
and, say, continuous. Then the solution of the linear inhomogeneous initialvalue problem
x(t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t); x(to) = Xo E IR
n
for t ::: to is given by the variation of parameters formula
x(t) = e(tto)A
xo
+ t e(ts)A Bu(s) ds.
l t o
(11.6)
(11.7)
Proof: Differentiate (11.7) and again use property 7 of the matrix exponential. The general
formula
d l
q
(t) l
q
(t) af(x t) dq(t) dp(t)
 f(x, t) dx = ' dx + f(q(t), t)  f(p(t), t)
dt pet) pet) at dt dt
is used to get x(t) = Ae(tto)A Xo + Ir: Ae(ts)A Bu(s) ds + Bu(t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t). Also,
x(t
o
} = e(totolA Xo + 0 = Xo so, by the fundilm()ntill nnd uniqu()Oc:s:s theorem for
ordinary differential equations, (11.7) is the solution of (1l.6). 0
Remark 11.4. The proof above simply verifies the variation of parameters formula by
direct differentiation. The formula can be derived by means of an integrating factor "trick"
as follows. Premultiply the equation x  Ax = Bu by e
tA
to get
(11.8)
11.1. Differential Equations 113
Now integrate (11.8) over the interval [to, t]:
Thus,
and hence
11.1.4 Linear matrix differential equations
Matrixvalued initialvalue problems also occur frequently. The first is an obvious general
ization of Theorem 11.2, and the proof is essentially the same.
Theorem 11.5. Let A e W
lxn
. The solution of the matrix linear homogeneous initialvalue
nrohlcm
for t > to is given by
In the matrix case, we can have coefficient matrices on both the right and left. For
convenience, the following theorem is stated with initial time to = 0.
Theorem 11.6. Let A e Rn
xn
, B e R
mxm
, and C e Rn
xm
. Then the matrix initialvalue
problem
—
a
tA
ra
tB
has the solutionX ( t ) = e Ce
Proof: Differentiate e
tA
Ce
tB
with respect to t and use property 7 of the matrix exponential.
The fact that X ( t ) satisfies the initial condition is trivial. D
Corollary 11.7. Let A, C e IR"
X
". Then the matrix initialvalue problem
has the solution X(t} = e
tA
Ce
tAT
.
When C is symmetric in (11.12), X ( t ) is symmetric and (11.12) is known as a Lya
punov differential equation. The initialvalue problem (11.11) is known as a Sylvester
differential equation.
11.1. Differential Equations
Now integrate (11.8) over the interval [to, t]:
Thus,
and hence
esAx(s) ds = eSABu(s) ds.
1
t d 1t
to ds to
etAx(t)  etoAx(to) = t e
sA
Bu(s) ds
lto
x(t) = e(tt
olA
xo
+ t e(ts)A Bu(s) ds.
lto
11.1.4 Linear matrix differential equations
113
Matrixvalued initialvalue problems also occur frequently. The first is an obvious general
ization of Theorem 11.2, and the proof is essentially the same.
Theorem 11.5. Let A E jRnxn. The solution of the matrix linear homogeneous initialvalue
problem
X(t) = AX(t); X(to) = C E jRnxn (11.9)
for t ::: to is given by
X(t) = e(tto)Ac.
(11.10)
In the matrix case, we can have coefficient matrices on both the right and left. For
convenience, the following theorem is stated with initial time to = O.
Theorem 11.6. Let A E jRnxn, B E jRmxm, and C E ]R.nxm. Then the matrix initialvalue
problem
X(t) = AX(t) + X(t)B; X(O) = C (11.11)
has the solution X(t) = etACe
tB
.
Proof: Differentiate etACe
tB
with respect to t and use property 7 of the matrix exponential.
The fact that X (t) satisfies the initial condition is trivial. 0
Corollary 11.7. Let A, C E ]R.nxn. Then the matrix initialvalue problem
X(t) = AX(t) + X(t)AT; X(O) = C (11.12)
has the solution X(t) = etACetAT.
When C is symmetric in (11.12), X (t) is symmetric and (11.12) is known as a Lya
punov differential equation. The initialvalue problem (11.11) is known as a Sylvester
differential equation.
114 Chapter 11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations
11.1.5 Modal decompositions
Let A E W
xn
and suppose, for convenience, that it is diagonalizable (if A is not diagonaliz
able, the rest of this subsection is easily generalized by using the JCF and the decomposition
A — ^ X f Ji Y
t
H
as discussed in Chapter 9). Then the solution x(t) of (11.4) can be written
The ki s are called the modal velocities and the right eigenvectors *, are called the modal
directions. The decomposition above expresses the solution x(t) as a weighted sum of its
modal velocities and directions.
This modal decomposition can be expressed in a different looking but identical form
if we write the initial condition X Q as a weighted sum of the right eigenvectors
Then
In the last equality we have used the fact that y f * X j = S f j .
Similarly, in the inhomogeneous case we can write
11.1.6 Computation of the matrix exponential
JCF method
Let A e R"
x
" and suppose X e Rn
xn
is such that X"
1
AX = J, where J is a JCF for A.
Then
114 Chapter 11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations
11.1 .5 Modal decompositions
Let A E jRnxn and suppose, for convenience, that it is diagonalizable (if A is not diagonaliz
able, the rest of this subsection is easily generalized by using the JCF and the decomposition
A = L X;li y
i
H
as discussed in Chapter 9). Then the solution x(t) of (11.4) can be written
x(t) = e(tto)A Xo
= (ti.iUtO)Xiyr) Xo
1=1
n
= L(Yi
H
xoeAi(ttO»Xi.
i=1
The Ai s are called the modal velocities and the right eigenvectors Xi are called the modal
directions. The decomposition above expresses the solution x (t) as a weighted sum of its
modal velocities and directions.
This modal decomposition can be expressed in a different looking but identical form
n
if we write the initial condition Xo as a weighted sum of the right eigenvectors Xo = L ai Xi.
Then
n
= L(aieAiUtO»Xi.
i=1
In the last equality we have used the fact that Yi
H
X j = flij.
Similarly, in the inhomogeneous case we can write
i
t e(ts)A Bu(s) ds = t (it eAiUS)YiH Bu(s) dS) Xi.
~ i=1 ~
11.1.6 Computation of the matrix exponential
JCF method
i=1
Let A E jRnxn and suppose X E j R ~ x n is such that XI AX = J, where J is a JCF for A.
Then
etA = etXJX1
= XetJX
1
I
n
Le
A
•
,
X'Yi
H
if A is diagonalizable
1=1
~ t,x;e'J,y;H in geneml.
11.1. Differential Equations 115
If A is diagonalizable, it is then easy to compute e
tA
via the formula e
tA
= Xe
tJ
X '
since e
tj
is simply a diagonal matrix.
In the more general case, the problem clearly reduces simply to the computation of
the exponential of a Jordan block. To be specific, let .7, e <C
kxk
be a Jordan block of the form
Clearly A/ and N commute. Thus, e
tJi
= e'
u
e
tN
by property 4 of the matrix exponential.
The diagonal part is easy: e
tu
= diag(e
x
',..., e
xt
}. But e
tN
is almost as easy since N is
nilpotent of degree k.
Definition 11.8. A matrix M e M
nx
"
M
p
= 0, while M
p
~
l
^ 0.
is nilpotent of degree (or index, or grade) p if
For the matrix N defined above, it is easy to check that while N has 1's along only
its first superdiagonal (and O's elsewhere), N
2
has 1's along only its second superdiagonal,
and so forth. Finally, N
k
~
l
has a 1 in its (1, k) element and has O's everywhere else, and
N
k
= 0. Thus, the series expansion of e'
N
is finite, i.e.,
Thus,
In the case when A. is complex, a real version of the above can be worked out.
11.1. Differential Equations 115
If A is diagonalizable, it is then easy to compute etA via the formula etA = Xe
tl
XI
since e
t
I is simply a diagonal matrix.
In the more general case, the problem clearly reduces simply to the computation of
the exponential of a Jordan block. To be specific, let J
i
E C
kxk
be a Jordan block of the form
J
i
=
A 1
o A
o
o o
o =U+N.
o A
Clearly AI and N commute. Thus, e
t
I, = eO.! e
l
N by property 4 of the matrix exponential.
The diagonal part is easy: e
lH
= diag(e
At
, ••• ,eAt). But e
lN
is almost as easy since N is
nilpotent of degree k.
Definition 11.8. A matrix M E jRnxn is nilpotent of degree (or index, or grade) p if
MP = 0, while MPI t= O.
For the matrix N defined above, it is easy to check that while N has l's along only
its first superdiagonal (and O's elsewhere), N
2
has l's along only its second superdiagonal,
and so forth. Finally, N
k

I
has a 1 in its (1, k) element and has O's everywhere else, and
N
k
= O. Thus, the series expansion of e
lN
is finite, i.e.,
Thus,
t
2
t
k

I
e
IN
=I+tN+N
2
+ ... + N
k

I
2! (k  I)!
o
o o
eAt
teAt
12 At
2I
e
0
eAt teAl
ell; =
0 0
eAt
0 0
t
1
IkI At
(kI)! e
12 At
2I
e
teAl
eAt
In the case when A is complex, a real version of the above can be worked out.
116 Chapter 11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations
Example 11.9. Let A = [ ~ _ \ J]. Then A (A) = {2, 2} and
Interpolation method
This method is numerically unstable in finiteprecision arithmetic but is quite effective for
hand calculation in smallorder problems. The method is stated and illustrated for the
exponential function but applies equally well to other functions.
Given A € E.
nxn
and /(A) = e
tx
, compute f(A) = e'
A
, where t is a fixed scalar.
Suppose the characteristic polynomial of A can be written as n ( X ) = Yi?=i (^ ~~ ^ i)" ' »
where the A.,  s are distinct. Define
where O TQ , . . . , a
n
i are n constants that are to be determined. They are, in fact, the unique
solution of the n equations:
Here, the superscript (&) denotes the fcth derivative with respect to X. With the a, s then
known, the function g is known and /(A) = g(A). The motivation for this method is
the CayleyHamilton Theorem, Theorem 9.3, which says that all powers of A greater than
n — 1 can be expressed as linear combinations of A
k
for k = 0, 1, . . . , n — 1. Thus, all the
terms of order greater than n — 1 in the power series for e'
A
can be written in terms of these
lowerorder powers as well. The polynomial g gives the appropriate linear combination.
Example 11.10. Let
and /(A) = e
tK
. Then j r(A.) = (A. + I)
3
, so m = 1 and n
{
= 3.
Let g(X) — UQ + a\X + o^A.
2
. Then the three equations for the a, s are given by
116 Chapter 11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations
Example 11.9.
Let A = [=i
a Then A(A) = {2, 2} and
etA = Xe
tJ
xI
=[
2 1
] exp t [
2
 ~ ] [
1
]
0
1 2
=[
2
] [ e ~ 2 t
te
2t
] [
1
]
1
e
2t
1 2
Interpolation method
This method is numerically unstable in finiteprecision arithmetic but is quite effective for
hand calculation in smallorder problems. The method is stated and illustrated for the
exponential function but applies equally well to other functions.
Given A E jRnxn and f(A) = etA, compute f(A) = etA, where t is a fixed scalar.
Suppose the characteristic polynomial of A can be written as n(A) = nr=1 (A  Ai t',
where the Ai s are distinct. Define
where ao, ... , anl are n constants that are to be determined. They are, in fact, the unique
solution of the n equations:
g(k)(Ai) = f(k)(Ai); k = 0, I, ... , ni  I, i Em.
Here, the superscript (k) denotes the kth derivative with respect to A. With the aiS then
known, the function g is known and f(A) = g(A). The motivation for this method is
the CayleyHamilton Theorem, Theorem 9.3, which says that all powers of A greater than
n  1 can be expressed as linear combinations of A k for k = 0, I, ... , n  1. Thus, all the
terms of order greater than n  1 in the power series for e
t
A can be written in terms of these
lowerorder powers as well. The polynomial g gives the appropriate linear combination.
Example 11.10. Let
A = [  ~  ~ ~ ]
o 01
and f(A) = etA. Then n(A) = (A + 1)3, so m = 1 and nl = 3.
Let g(A) = ao + alA + a2A2. Then the three equations for the aiS are given by
g(I) = f(1) ==> ao al +a2 = e
t
,
g'(1) = f'(1) ==> at  2a2 = te
t
,
g"(I) = 1"(1) ==> 2a2 = t
2
e
t
•
11.1. Differential Equations 117
Solving for the a, s, we find
Thus,
~4 4i t f f > \ t k TU^^ _/"i\ f \ i o\ 2
Example 11.11. Let A = [ _* J] and /(A) = e
a
. Then 7 r(X ) = (A + 2)
2
so m = 1 and
«i = 2.
Let g(A.) = «o + ofiA.. Then the defining equations for the a,s are given by
Solving for the a,s, we find
Thus,
Other methods
1. Use e
tA
= £~
l
{(sl — A)^
1
} and techniques for inverse Laplace transforms. This
is quite effective for smallorder problems, but general nonsymbolic computational
techniques are numerically unstable since the problem is theoretically equivalent to
knowing precisely a JCF.
2. Use Pade approximation. There is an extensive literature on approximating cer
tain nonlinear functions by rational functions. The matrix analogue yields e
A
=
11 .1. Differential Equations
117
Solving for the ai s, we find
Thus,
Example 11.11. Let A = [ : : : : ~ 6] and f(A) = eO. Then rr(A) = (A + 2)2 so m = 1 and
nL = 2.
Let g(A) = ao + aLA. Then the defining equations for the aiS are given by
g(2) = f(2) ==> ao  2al = e
2t
,
g'(2) = f'(2) ==> al = te
2t
.
Solving for the aiS, we find
Thus,
ao = e
2t
+ 2te
2t
,
aL = te
2t
.
f(A) = etA = g(A) = aoI + al A
= (e
2t
+ 2te
2t
) [ ~
_ [ e
2t
_ 2te
2t
 te
2t
Other methods
o ] + te
2t
[4 4 ]
I I 0
1. Use etA = .cI{(sI  A)I} and techniques for inverse Laplace transforms. This
is quite effective for smallorder problems, but general nonsymbolic computational
techniques are numerically unstable since the problem is theoretically equivalent to
knowing precisely a JCE
2. Use Pade approximation. There is an extensive literature on approximating cer
tain nonlinear functions by rational functions. The matrix analogue yields e
A
~
118 Chapter 11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations
D~
l
(A)N(A), where D(A) = 8
0
I + Si A H h S
P
A
P
and N(A) = v
0
I + v
l
A +
• • • + v
q
A
q
. Explicit formulas are known for the coefficients of the numerator and
denominator polynomials of various orders. Unfortunately, a Fade approximation for
the exponential is accurate only in a neighborhood of the origin; in the matrix case
this means when  A is sufficiently small. This can be arranged by scaling A, say, by
/ * \
2
*
multiplying it by 1/2* for sufficiently large k and using the fact that e
A
= ( e
{ ] / 2 )A
j .
Numerical loss of accuracy can occur in this procedure from the successive squarings.
3. Reduce A to (real) Schur form S via the unitary similarity U and use e
A
= Ue
s
U
H
and successive recursions up the superdiagonals of the (quasi) upper triangular matrix
e
s
.
4. Many methods are outlined in, for example, [19]. Reliable and efficient computation
of matrix functions such as e
A
and log(A) remains a fertile area for research.
11.2 Difference Equations
In this section we outline solutions of discretetime analogues of the linear differential
equations of the previous section. Linear discretetime systems, modeled by systems of
difference equations, exhibit many parallels to the continuoustime differential equation
case, and this observation is exploited frequently.
11.2.1 Homogeneous linear difference equations
Theorem 11.12. Let A e Rn
xn
. The solution of the linear homogeneous system of difference
equations
11.2.2 Inhomogeneous linear difference equations
Theorem 11.14. Let A e R
nxn
, B e R
nxm
and suppose {«*}£§ « a given sequence of
mvectors. Then the solution of the inhomogeneous initialvalue problem
for k > 0 is given by
Proof: The proof is almost immediate upon substitution of (11.14) into (11.13). D
Remark 11.13. Again, we restrict our attention only to the socalled timeinvariant
case, where the matrix A in (11.13) is constant and does not depend on k. We could also
consider an arbitrary "initial time" ko, but since the system is timeinvariant, and since we
want to keep the formulas "clean" (i.e., no double subscripts), we have chosen ko = 0 for
convenience.
118 Chapter 11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations
DI(A)N(A), where D(A) = 001 + olA + ... + opAP and N(A) = vol + vIA +
... + Vq A q. Explicit formulas are known for the coefficients of the numerator and
denominator polynomials of various orders. Unfortunately, a Pad6 approximation for
the exponential is accurate only in a neighborhood of the origin; in the matrix case
this means when IIAII is sufficiently small. This can be arranged by scaling A, say, by
2'
multiplying it by 1/2k for sufficiently large k and using the fact that e
A
= (e( I /2')A )
Numerical loss of accuracy can occur in this procedure from the successive squarings.
3. Reduce A to (real) Schur form S via the unitary similarity U and use e
A
= U e
S
U H
and successive recursions up the superdiagonals of the (quasi) upper triangular matrix
e
S
.
4. Many methods are outlined in, for example, [19]. Reliable and efficient computation
of matrix functions such as e
A
and 10g(A) remains a fertile area for research.
11.2 Difference Equations
In this section we outline solutions of discretetime analogues of the linear differential
equations of the previous section. Linear discretetime systems, modeled by systems of
difference equations, exhibit many parallels to the continuoustime differential equation
case, and this observation is exploited frequently.
11.2.1 Homogeneous linear difference equations
Theorem 11.12. Let A E jRn xn. The solution of the linear homogeneous system of difference
equations
(11.13)
for k 2:: 0 is given by
Proof: The proof is almost immediate upon substitution of (11.14) into (11.13). 0
Remark 11.13. Again, we restrict our attention only to the socalled timeinvariant
case, where the matrix A in (11.13) is constant and does not depend on k. We could also
consider an arbitrary "initial time" ko, but since the system is timeinvariant, and since we
want to keep the formulas "clean" (i.e., no double subscripts), we have chosen ko = 0 for
convenience.
11.2.2 Inhomogeneous linear difference equations
Theorem 11.14. Let A E jRnxn, B E jRnxm and suppose { u d t ~ is a given sequence of
mvectors. Then the solution of the inhomogeneous initialvalue problem
(11.15)
11.2. Difference Equations 119
is given by
11.2.3 Computation of matrix powers
It is clear that solution of linear systems of difference equations involves computation of
A
k
. One solution method, which is numerically unstable but sometimes useful for hand
calculation, is to use ztransforms, by analogy with the use of Laplace transforms to compute
a matrix exponential. One definition of the ztransform of a sequence {gk} is
Assuming z > max A, the ztransform of the sequence {A
k
} is then given by
X€A(A)
Proof: The proof is again almost immediate upon substitution of (11.16) into (11.15). D
Methods based on the JCF are sometimes useful, again mostly for smallorder prob
lems. Assume that A e M"
xn
and let X e R^
n
be such that X~
1
AX = /, where J is a
JCF for A. Then
If A is diagonalizable, it is then easy to compute A
k
via the formula A
k
— XJ
k
X
l
since /* is simply a diagonal matrix.
11.2. Difference Equations
is given by
kI
xk=AkXO+LAkjIBUj, k:::.O.
j=O
119
(11.16)
Proof: The proof is again almost immediate upon substitution of (11.16) into (11.15). 0
11.2.3 Computation of matrix powers
It is clear that solution of linear systems of difference equations involves computation of
A k. One solution method, which is numerically unstable but sometimes useful for hand
calculation, is to use ztransforms, by analogy with the use of Laplace transforms to compute
a matrix exponential. One definition of the ztransform of a sequence {gk} is
+00
= LgkZ
k
.
k=O
Assuming Izl > max IAI, the ztransform of the sequence {Ak} is then given by
AEA(A)
+00
k "'kk 1 12
Z({A})=L...zA =I+A+"2A + ...
k=O z z
= (lzIA)I
= z(zI  A)I.
Methods based on the JCF are sometimes useful, again mostly for smallorder prob
lems. Assume that A E jRnxn and let X E be such that XI AX = J, where J is a
JCF for A. Then
Ak = (XJXI)k
= XJkX
1
_I
 m
LXi Jty
i
H
;=1
if A is diagonalizable,
in general.
If A is diagonalizable, it is then easy to compute Ak via the formula Ak = X Jk XI
since Jk is simply a diagonal matrix.
120 Chapter 11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations
In the general case, the problem again reduces to the computation of the power of a
Jordan block. To be specific, let 7, e C
pxp
be a Jordan block of the form
Writing /,• = XI + N and noting that XI and the nilpotent matrix N commute, it is
then straightforward to apply the binomial theorem to (XI + N)
k
and verify that
The symbol ( ) has the usual definition of ,
(
^ ., and is to be interpreted as 0 if k < q.
In the case when A. is complex, a real version of the above can be worked out.
4
Example 11.15. Let A = [_J J]. Then
Basic analogues of other methods such as those mentioned in Section 11.1.6 can also
be derived for the computation of matrix powers, but again no universally "best" method
exists. For an erudite discussion of the state of the art, see [11, Ch. 18].
11.3 HigherOrder Equations
It is well known that a higherorder (scalar) linear differential equation can be converted to
a firstorder linear system. Consider, for example, the initialvalue problem
with 4 > (t } a given function and n initial conditions
120 Chapter 11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations
In the general case, the problem again reduces to the computation of the power of a
Jordan block. To be specific, let J
i
E Cpxp be a Jordan block of the form
o ... 0 A
Writing J
i
= AI + N and noting that AI and the nilpotent matrix N commute, it is
then straightforward to apply the binomial theorem to (AI + N)k and verify that
Ak
kA kI
(;)A
k

2
(
k ) AkP+I
pl
0
Ak kA
k

1
J/ =
0 0
Ak
( ; ) A
k

2
kA
k

1
0 0
Ak
The symbol (: ) has the usual definition of q ! ( k k ~ q ) ! and is to be interpreted as 0 if k < q.
In the case when A is complex, a real version of the above can be worked out.
Example 11.15. Let A = [=i a Then
Ak = XJkX1 = [2 1 ] [(_2)k k(2)kk
1
] [ 1 2
1
]
1 1 0 (2) 1
_ [ (_2/
1
(2  2k) k( 2l+
1
]
 k( _2)k1 (2l
1
(2k  2) .
Basic analogues of other methods such as those mentioned in Section 11.1.6 can also
be derived for the computation of matrix powers, but again no universally "best" method
exists. For an erudite discussion of the state of the art, see [11, Ch. 18].
11.3 HigherOrder Equations
It is well known that a higherorder (scalar) linear differential equation can be converted to
a firstorder linear system. Consider, for example, the initialvalue problem
(11.17)
with ¢J(t) a given function and n initial conditions
y(O) = Co, y(O) = CI, ... , inI)(O) = CnI' (1l.l8)
Exercises 121
Here, v
(m)
denotes the mth derivative of y with respect to t. Define a vector x (?) e R" with
components *i(0 = y ( t ) , x
2
( t) = y ( t ) , . . . , x
n
( t) = y
{ n
~
l )
( t ) . Then
These equations can then be rewritten as the firstorder linear system
The initial conditions take the form ^(0) = c = [ C Q , c\, ..., C
M
_ I ] .
Note that det(X7 — A) = A." + a
n
\X
n
~
l
H h a\X + ao. However, the companion
matrix A in (11.19) possesses many nasty numerical properties for even moderately sized n
and, as mentioned before, is often well worth avoiding, at least for computational purposes.
A similar procedure holds for the conversion of a higherorder difference equation
EXERCISES
1. Let P € R
nxn
be a projection. Show that e
p
% / + 1.718P.
2. Suppose x, y € R" and let A = xy
T
. Further, let a = x
T
y. Show that e'
A
I + g ( t , a) xy
T
, where
3. Let
with n initial conditions, into a linear firstorder difference equation with (vector) initial
condition.
Exercises 121
Here, y(m) denotes the mth derivative of y with respect to t. Define a vector x (t) E ]Rn with
components Xl (t) = yet), X2(t) = yet), ... , Xn(t) = Inl)(t). Then
Xl (I) = X2(t) = y(t),
X2(t) = X3(t) = yet),
Xnl (t) = Xn(t) = y(nl)(t),
Xn(t) = y(n)(t) = aoy(t)  aly(t)  ...  an_llnl)(t) + ¢(t)
= aOx\ (t)  a\X2(t)  ...  anlXn(t) + ¢(t).
These equations can then be rewritten as the firstorder linear system
0 0 0
0 0 1
x(t)+ [ n ~ ( t )
x(t) =
0
0 0 1
ao a\ a
n
\
The initial conditions take the form X (0) = C = [co, Cl, •.. , C
n
\ r.
(11.19)
Note that det(A!  A) = An + an_1A
n

1
+ ... + alA + ao. However, the companion
matrix A in (11.19) possesses many nasty numerical properties for even moderately sized n
and, as mentioned before, is often well worth avoiding, at least for computational purposes.
A similar procedure holds for the conversion of a higherorder difference equation
with n initial conditions, into a linear firstorder difference equation with (vector) initial
condition.
EXERCISES
1. Let P E lR
nxn
be a projection. Show that e
P
~ ! + 1.718P.
2. Suppose x, y E lR
n
and let A = xyT. Further, let a = XT y. Show that etA
1+ get, a)xyT, where
{
!(eat  I)
g(t,a)= a t
3. Let
if a 1= 0,
if a = O.
122 Chapter 11. L i n ear Di f f eren ti al and Di f f erence Equati on s
where X e M'
nx
" is arbitrary. Show that
4. Let K denote the skewsymmetric matrix
where /„ denotes the n x n identity matrix. A matrix A e R
2n x2n
is said to be
Hamiltonian if K~
1
A
T
K = A and to be symplectic if K~
l
A
T
K  A
1
.
(a) Suppose E is Hamiltonian and let A, be an eigenvalue of H. Show that — A, must
also be an eigenvalue of H.
(b) Suppose S is symplectic and let A. be an eigenvalue of S. Show that 1 /A, must
also be an eigenvalue of S.
(c) Suppose that H is Hamiltonian and S is symplectic. Show that S~
1
HS must be
Hamiltonian.
(d) Suppose H is Hamiltonian. Show that e
H
must be symplectic.
5. Let a, ft € R and
Then show that
6. Find a general expression for
7. Find e
M
when A =
5. Let
(a) Solve the differential equation
122 Chapter 11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations
where X E jRmxn is arbitrary. Show that
e
A = [eo I sinh 1 X ]
~ I .
4. Let K denote the skewsymmetric matrix
[
0 In ]
In 0 '
where In denotes the n x n identity matrix. A matrix A E jR2nx2n is said to be
Hamiltonian if K I AT K =  A and to be symplectic if K I AT K = A I.
(a) Suppose H is Hamiltonian and let).. be an eigenvalue of H. Show that ).. must
also be an eigenvalue of H.
(b) Suppose S is symplectic and let).. be an eigenvalue of S. Show that 1/).. must
also be an eigenValue of S.
(c) Suppose that H is Hamiltonian and S is symplectic. Show that SI H S must be
Hamiltonian.
(d) Suppose H is Hamiltonian. Show that e
H
must be symplectic.
5. Let a, f3 E lR and
Then show that
6. Find a general expression for
7. Find etA when A =
8. Let
ectt cos f3t
_eut sin f3t
ectctrt sin ~ t J.
e cos/A
(a) Solve the differential equation
i = Ax ; x(O) = [ ~ J.
Exercises 123
Show that the eigenvalues of the solution X ( t ) of this problem are the same as those
of Cf or all?.
11. The year is 2004 and there are three large "free trade zones" in the world: Asia (A),
Europe (E), and the Americas (R). Suppose certain multinational companies have
total assets of $40 trillion of which $20 trillion is in E and $20 trillion is in R. Each
year half of the Americas' money stays home, a quarter goes to Europe, and a quarter
goes to Asia. For Europe and Asia, half stays home and half goes to the Americas.
(a) Find the matrix M that gives
(b) Find the eigenvalues and right eigenvectors of M.
(c) Find the distribution of the companies' assets at year k.
(d) Find the limiting distribution of the $40 trillion as the universe ends, i.e., as
k — » • +00 (i.e., around the time the Cubs win a World Series).
(Exercise adapted from Problem 5.3.11 in [24].)
(b) Solve the differential equation
9. Consider the initialvalue problem
for t > 0. Suppose that A e E"
x
" is skewsymmetric and let a = \\XQ\\
2
. Show that
*(OII
2
= af or al l f > 0.
10. Consider the n x n matrix initialvalue problem
12. (a) Find the solution of the initialvalue problem
(b) Consider the difference equation
If £
0
= 1 and z\ = 2, what is the value of Z IQ OO? What is the value of Zk in
general?
Exercises 123
(b) Solve the differential equation
i = Ax + b; x(O) = [ ~ l
9. Consider the initialvalue problem
i(t) = Ax(t); x(O) = Xo
for t ~ O. Suppose that A E ~ n x n is skewsymmetric and let ex = Ilxol12. Show that
I/X(t)1/2 = ex for all t > O.
10. Consider the n x n matrix initialvalue problem
X(t) = AX(t)  X(t)A; X(O) = c.
Show that the eigenvalues of the solution X (t) of this problem are the same as those
of C for all t.
11. The year is 2004 and there are three large "free trade zones" in the world: Asia (A),
Europe (E), and the Americas (R). Suppose certain multinational companies have
total assets of $40 trillion of which $20 trillion is in E and $20 trillion is in R. Each
year half of the Americas' money stays home, a quarter goes to Europe, and a quarter
goes to Asia. For Europe and Asia, half stays home and half goes to the Americas.
(a) Find the matrix M that gives
[
A] [A]
E =M E
R year k+1 R year k
(b) Find the eigenvalues and right eigenvectors of M.
(c) Find the distribution of the companies' assets at year k.
(d) Find the limiting distribution of the $40 trillion as the universe ends, i.e., as
k * +00 (i.e., around the time the Cubs win a World Series).
(Exercise adapted from Problem 5.3.11 in [24].)
12. (a) Find the solution of the initialvalue problem
.Yet) + 2y(t) + yet) = 0; yeO) = 1, .YeO) = O.
(b) Consider the difference equation
Zk+2 + 2Zk+1 + Zk = O.
If Zo = 1 and ZI = 2, what is the value of ZIOOO? What is the value of Zk in
general?
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank
Chapter 12
Generalized Eigenvalue
Problems
12.1 The Generalized Eigenvalue/Eigenvector Problem
In this chapter we consider the generalized eigenvalue problem
125
where A, B e C"
xn
. The standard eigenvalue problem considered in Chapter 9 obviously
corresponds to the special case that B = I.
Definition 12.1. A nonzero vector x e C" is a right generalized eigenvector of the pair
(A, B) with A, B e C
MX
" if there exists a scalar A. e C, called a generalized eigenvalue,
such that
Similarly, a nonzero vector y e C" is a left generalized eigenvector corresponding to an
eigenvalue X if
When the context is such that no confusion can arise, the adjective "generalized"
is usually dropped. As with the standard eigenvalue problem, if x [y] is a right [left]
eigenvector, then so is ax [ay] for any nonzero scalar a. e C.
Definition 12.2. The matrix A — X B is called a matrix pencil (or pencil of the matrices A
and B).
As with the standard eigenvalue problem, eigenvalues for the generalized eigenvalue
problem occur where the matrix pencil A — X B is singular.
Definition 12.3. The polynomial 7 r(A.) = det(A — A.5) is called the characteristic poly
nomial of the matrix pair (A, B) . The roots ofn(X .) are the eigenvalues of the associated
generalized eigenvalue problem.
Remark 12.4. When A, B e E"
xn
, the characteristic polynomial is obviously real, and
hence nonreal eigenvalues must occur in complex conjugate pairs.
Chapter 12
Generalized Eigenvalue
Problems
12.1 The Generalized Eigenvalue/Eigenvector Problem
In this chapter we consider the generalized eigenvalue problem
Ax = 'ABx,
where A, B E e
nxn
. The standard eigenvalue problem considered in Chapter 9 obviously
corresponds to the special case that B = I.
Definition 12.1. A nonzero vector x E en is a right generalized eigenvector of the pair
(A, B) with A, B E e
nxn
if there exists a scalar 'A E e, called a generalized eigenvalue,
such that
Ax = 'ABx. (12.1)
Similarly, a nonzero vector y E en is a left generalized eigenvector corresponding to an
eigenvalue 'A if
(12.2)
When the context is such that no confusion can arise, the adjective "generalized"
is usually dropped. As with the standard eigenvalue problem, if x [y] is a right [left]
eigenvector, then so is ax [ay] for any nonzero scalar a E <C.
Definition 12.2. The matrix A  'AB is called a matrix pencil (or pencil of the matrices A
and B).
As with the standard eigenvalue problem, eigenvalues for the generalized eigenvalue
problem occur where the matrix pencil A  'AB is singular.
Definition 12.3. The polynomial n('A) = det(A  'AB) is called the characteristic poly
nomial of the matrix pair (A, B). The roots ofn('A) are the eigenvalues of the associated
generalized eigenvalue problem.
Remark 12.4. When A, B E jRnxn, the characteristic polynomial is obviously real, and
hence nonreal eigenvalues must occur in complex conjugate pairs.
125
and there are again four cases to consider.
Case 1: a ^ 0, ft ^ 0. There are two eigenvalues, 1 and ^.
Case 2: a = 0, ft ^ 0. There is only one eigenvalue, 1 (of multiplicity 1).
Case 3: a ^ 0, f3 = 0. There are two eigenvalues, 1 and 0.
Case 4: a = 0, (3 = 0. All A 6 C are eigenvalues since det(B — uA) = 0.
At least for the case of regular pencils, it is apparent where the "missing" eigenvalues have
gone in Cases 2 and 3. That is to say, there is a second eigenvalue "at infinity" for Case 3 of
A — A.B, with its reciprocal eigenvalue being 0 in Case 3 of the reciprocal pencil B — nA.
A similar reciprocal symmetry holds for Case 2.
While there are applications in system theory and control where singular pencils
appear, only the case of regular pencils is considered in the remainder of this chapter. Note
that A and/or B may still be singular. If B is singular, the pencil A — KB always has
126 Chapter 12. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
Remark 12.5. If B = I (or in general when B is nonsingular), then n ( X ) is a polynomial
of degree n, and hence there are n eigenvalues associated with the pencil A — X B. However,
when B = I, in particular, when B is singular, there may be 0, k e n, or infinitely many
eigenvalues associated with the pencil A — X B. For example, suppose
where a and ft are scalars. Then the characteristic polynomial is
and there are several cases to consider.
Case 1: a ^ 0, ft ^ 0. There are two eigenvalues, 1 and .
Case 2: a = 0, f3 / 0. There are two eigenvalues, 1 and 0.
Case 3: a = 0, f3 = 0. There is only one eigenvalue, 1 (of multiplicity 1).
Case 4: a = 0, f3 = 0. All A e C are eigenvalues since det(A — A. B ) =0.
Definition 12.6. If del (A — X B) is not identically zero, the pencil A — X B is said to be
regular; otherwise, it is said to be singular.
Note that if AA(A) n J\f(B) ^ 0, the associated matrix pencil is singular (as in Case
4 above).
Associated with any matrix pencil A — X B is a reciprocal pencil B — n,A and cor
responding generalized eigenvalue problem. Clearly the reciprocal pencil has eigenvalues
(JL = £. It is instructive to consider the reciprocal pencil associated with the example in
Remark 12.5. With A and B as in (12.3), the characteristic polynomial is
126 Chapter 12. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
Remark 12.5. If B = I (or in general when B is nonsingular), then rr(A) is a polynomial
of degree n, and hence there are n eigenvalues associated with the pencil A  AB. However,
when B =I I, in particular, when B is singular, there may be 0, k E !!, or infinitely many
eigenvalues associated with the pencil A  AB. For example, suppose
where a and (3 are scalars. Then the characteristic polynomial is
det(A  AB) = (I  AHa  (3A)
and there are several cases to consider.
Case 1: a =I 0, {3 =I O. There are two eigenvalues, I and ~ .
Case 2: a = 0, {3 =I O. There are two eigenvalues, I and O.
Case 3: a =I 0, {3 = O. There is only one eigenvalue, I (of multiplicity 1).
Case 4: a = 0, (3 = O. All A E C are eigenvalues since det(A  AB) == O.
(12.3)
Definition 12.6. If det(A  AB) is not identically zero, the pencil A  AB is said to be
regular; otherwise, it is said to be singular.
Note that if N(A) n N(B) =I 0, the associated matrix pencil is singular (as in Case
4 above).
Associated with any matrix pencil A  AB is a reciprocal pencil B  /.LA and cor
responding generalized eigenvalue problem. Clearly the reciprocal pencil has eigenvalues
/.L = ±. It is instructive to consider the reciprocal pencil associated with the example in
Remark 12.5. With A and B as in (12.3), the characteristic polynomial is
det(B  /.LA) = (1  /.L)({3  a/.L)
and there are again four cases to consider.
Case 1: a =I 0, {3 =I O. There are two eigenvalues, I and ~ .
Case 2: a = 0, {3 =I O. There is only one eigenvalue, I (of multiplicity I).
Case 3: a =I 0, {3 = O. There are two eigenvalues, 1 and O.
Case 4: a = 0, (3 = O. All A E C are eigenvalues since det(B  /.LA) == O.
At least for the case of regular pencils, it is apparent where the "missing" eigenvalues have
gone in Cases 2 and 3. That is to say, there is a second eigenvalue "at infinity" for Case 3 of
A  AB, with its reciprocal eigenvalue being 0 in Case 3 of the reciprocal pencil B  /.LA.
A similar reciprocal symmetry holds for Case 2.
While there are applications in system theory and control where singular pencils
appear, only the case of regular pencils is considered in the remainder of this chapter. Note
that A and/or B may still be singular. If B is singular, the pencil A  AB always has
12. 2. Canonical Forms 127
fewer than n eigenvalues. If B is nonsingular, the pencil A A. f i always has precisely n
eigenvalues, since the generalized eigenvalue problem is then easily seen to be equivalent
to the standard eigenvalue problem B~
l
Ax = Xx (or AB~
l
w = Xw). However, this turns
out to be a very poor numerical procedure for handling the generalized eigenvalue problem
if B is even moderately ill conditioned with respect to inversion. Numerical methods that
work directly on A and B are discussed in standard textbooks on numerical linear algebra;
see, for example, [7, Sec. 7.7] or [25, Sec. 6.7].
12.2 Canonical Forms
Just as for the standard eigenvalue problem, canonical forms are available for the generalized
eigenvalue problem. Since the latter involves a pair of matrices, we now deal with equiva
lencies rather than similarities, and the first theorem deals with what happens to eigenvalues
and eigenvectors under equivalence.
Theorem 12.7. Let A, fl, Q, Z e C
nxn
with Q and Z nonsingular. Then
1. the eigenvalues of the problems A — XB and QAZ — XQBZ are the same (the two
problems are said to be equivalent).
2. ifx is a right eigenvector of A—XB, then Z~
l
x is a right eigenvector of QAZ—XQ B Z.
3. ify is a left eigenvector of A —KB, then Q~
H
y isa left eigenvector ofQAZ — XQBZ.
Proof:
1. det(QAZXQBZ) = det[0(A  XB)Z] = det gdet Zdet(A  XB). Since det 0
and det Z are nonzero, the result follows.
2. The result follows by noting that (A – yB)x  Oif andonly if Q(AXB)Z(Z~
l
x) =
0.
3. Again, the result follows easily by noting that y
H
(A — XB) — 0 if and only if
( Q~
H
y )
H
Q( A– XB ) Z = Q. D
where T
a
and Tp are upper triangular.
By Theorem 12.7, the eigenvalues of the pencil A — XB are then the ratios of the diag
onal elements of T
a
to the corresponding diagonal elements of Tp, with the understanding
that a zero diagonal element of Tp corresponds to an infinite generalized eigenvalue.
There is also an analogue of the MurnaghanWintner Theorem for real matrices.
The first canonical form is an analogue of Schur's Theorem and forms, in fact, the
theoretical foundation for the QZ algorithm, which is the generally preferred method for
solving the generalized eigenvalue problem; see, for example, [7, Sec. 7.7] or [25, Sec. 6.7].
Theorem 12.8. Let A, B e Cn
xn
. Then there exist unitary matrices Q, Z e Cn
xn
such that
12.2. Canonical Forms 127
fewer than n eigenvalues. If B is nonsingular, the pencil A  AB always has precisely n
eigenvalues, since the generalized eigenvalue problem is then easily seen to be equivalent
to the standard eigenvalue problem B
1
Ax = Ax (or AB
1
W = AW). However, this turns
out to be a very poor numerical procedure for handling the generalized eigenvalue problem
if B is even moderately ill conditioned with respect to inversion. Numerical methods that
work directly on A and B are discussed in standard textbooks on numerical linear algebra;
see, for example, [7, Sec. 7.7] or [25, Sec. 6.7].
12.2 Canonical Forms
Just as for the standard eigenvalue problem, canonical forms are available for the generalized
eigenvalue problem. Since the latter involves a pair of matrices, we now deal with equiva
lencies rather than similarities, and the first theorem deals with what happens to eigenvalues
and eigenvectors under equivalence.
Theorem 12.7. Let A, B, Q, Z E c
nxn
with Q and Z nonsingular. Then
1. the eigenvalues of the problems A  AB and QAZ  AQBZ are the same (the two
problems are said to be equivalent).
2. ifx isa right eigenvector of AAB, then Zl x isa righteigenvectorofQAZAQB Z.
3. ify isa left eigenvector of A AB, then QH y isa lefteigenvectorofQAZ AQBZ.
Proof:
1. det(QAZ  AQBZ) = det[Q(A  AB)Z] = det Q det Z det(A  AB). Since det Q
and det Z are nonzero, the result follows.
2. The result follows by noting that (A AB)x = 0 if and only if Q(A AB)Z(Zl x) =
o.
3. Again, the result follows easily by noting that yH (A  AB) o if and only if
(QH y)H Q(A _ AB)Z = O. 0
The first canonical form is an analogue of Schur's Theorem and forms, in fact, the
theoretical foundation for the QZ algorithm, which is the generally preferred method for
solving the generalized eigenvalue problem; see, for example, [7, Sec. 7.7] or [25, Sec. 6.7].
Theorem 12.8. Let A, B E c
nxn
. Then there exist unitary matrices Q, Z E c
nxn
such that
QAZ = T
a
, QBZ = T
fJ
,
where Ta and TfJ are upper triangular.
By Theorem 12.7, the eigenvalues ofthe pencil A  AB are then the ratios of the diag
onal elements of Ta to the corresponding diagonal elements of T
fJ
, with the understanding
that a zero diagonal element of TfJ corresponds to an infinite generalized eigenvalue.
There is also an analogue of the MurnaghanWintner Theorem for real matrices.
128 Chapter 12. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
Theorem 12.9. Let A, B e R
nxn
. Then there exist orthogonal matrices Q, Z e R"
xn
such
thnt
where T is upper triangular and S is quasiuppertriangular.
When S has a 2 x 2 diagonal block, the 2 x 2 subpencil formed with the corresponding
2x2 diagonal subblock of T has a pair of complex conjugate eigenvalues. Otherwise, real
eigenvalues are given as above by the ratios of diagonal elements of S to corresponding
elements of T.
There is also an analogue of the Jordan canonical form called the Kronecker canonical
form (KCF). A full description of the KCF, including analogues of principal vectors and
so forth, is beyond the scope of this book. In this chapter, we present only statements of
the basic theorems and some examples. The first theorem pertains only to "square" regular
pencils, while the full KCF in all its generality applies also to "rectangular" and singular
pencils.
Theorem 12.10. Let A, B e C
nxn
and suppose the pencil A — XB is regular. Then there
exist nonsingular matrices P, Q € C"
x
" such that
where J is a Jordan canonical form corresponding to the finite eigenvalues of A A.fi and
N is a nilpotent matrix of Jordan blocks associated with 0 and corresponding to the infinite
eigenvalues of A — XB.
Example 12.11. The matrix pencil
with characteristic polynomial (X — 2)
2
has a finite eigenvalue 2 of multiplicty 2 and three
infinite eigenvalues.
Theorem 12.12 (Kronecker Canonical Form). Let A, B e C
mxn
. Then there exist
nonsingular matrices P e C
mxm
and Q e C
nxn
such that
128 Chapter 12. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
Theorem 12.9. Let A, B E jRnxn. Then there exist orthogonal matrices Q, Z E jRnxn such
that
QAZ = S, QBZ = T,
where T is upper triangular and S is quasiuppertriangular.
When S has a 2 x 2 diagonal block, the 2 x 2 subpencil fonned with the corresponding
2 x 2 diagonal subblock of T has a pair of complex conjugate eigenvalues. Otherwise, real
eigenvalues are given as above by the ratios of diagonal elements of S to corresponding
elements of T.
There is also an analogue of the Jordan canonical fonn called the Kronecker canonical
form (KeF). A full description of the KeF, including analogues of principal vectors and
so forth, is beyond the scope of this book. In this chapter, we present only statements of
the basic theorems and some examples. The first theorem pertains only to "square" regular
pencils, while the full KeF in all its generality applies also to "rectangular" and singular
pencils.
Theorem 12.10. Let A, B E c
nxn
and suppose the pencil A  AB is regular. Then there
exist nonsingular matrices P, Q E c
nxn
such that
peA  AB)Q = [ ~ ~ ]  A [ ~ ~ l
where J is a Jordan canonical form corresponding to the finite eigenvalues of A  AB and
N is a nilpotent matrix of Jordan blocks associated with 0 and corresponding to the infinite
eigenvalues of A  AB.
Example 12.11. The matrix pencil
[2 I
0 0
~ ]> [ ~
0 0
o 0] o 2 0 0 I 0 o 0
o 0 1 0 0 0 I 0
o 0 0 1 0 0 o 0
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
with characteristic polynomial (A  2)2 has a finite eigenvalue 2 of multiplicty 2 and three
infinite eigenvalues.
Theorem 12.12 (Kronecker Canonical Form). Let A, B E c
mxn
• Then there exist
nonsingular matrices P E c
mxm
and Q E c
nxn
such that
peA  AB)Q = diag(LII' ... , L
l
" L ~ , ...• L;'. J  A.I, I  )"N),
12.2. Canonical Forms 129
where N is nilpotent, both N and J are in Jordan canonical form, and L^ is the (k + 1) x k
bidiagonal pencil
The /( are called the left minimal indices while the r, are called the right minimal indices.
Left or right minimal indices can take the value 0.
Such a matrix is in KCF. The first block of zeros actually corresponds to LQ, LQ, LQ, LQ ,
LQ, where each LQ has "zero columns" and one row, while each LQ has "zero rows" and
one column. The second block is L\ while the third block is L\. The next two blocks
correspond to
Just as sets of eigenvectors span Ainvariant subspaces in the case of the standard
eigenproblem (recall Definition 9.35), there is an analogous geometric concept for the
generalized eigenproblem.
Definition 12.14. Let A, B e W
lxn
and suppose the pencil A — XB is regular. Then V is a
deflating subspace if
Just as in the standard eigenvalue case, there is a matrix characterization of deflating
subspace. Specifically, suppose S e R n*
xk
is a matrix whose columns span a ^dimensional
subspace S of R
n
, i.e., R ( S) = <S. Then S is a deflating subspace for the pencil A — XB if
and only if there exists M e R
kxk
such that
while the nilpotent matrix N in this example is
12.2. Canonical Forms 129
where N is nilpotent, both Nand J are in Jordan canonical form, and Lk is the (k + I) x k
bidiagonal pencil
A 0 0
A
Lk =
0 0
A
0 0 I
The Ii are called the left minimal indices while the ri are called the right minimal indices.
Left or right minimal indices can take the value O.
Example 12.13. Consider a 13 x 12 block diagonal matrix whose diagonal blocks are
A 0]
I A .
o I
Such a matrix is in KCF. The first block of zeros actually corresponds to Lo, Lo, Lo, L6,
L6, where each Lo has "zero columns" and one row, while each L6 has "zero rows" and
one column. The second block is L\ while the third block is LI The next two blocks
correspond to
[
21
J = 0 2
o 0
while the nilpotent matrix N in this example is
000
Just as sets of eigenvectors span Ainvariant subspaces in the case of the standard
eigenproblem (recall Definition 9.35), there is an analogous geometric concept for the
generalized eigenproblem.
Definition 12.14. Let A, B E and suppose the pencil A  AB is regular. Then V is a
deflating subspace if
dim(AV + BV) = dimV. (12.4)
Just as in the standard eigenvalue case, there is a matrix characterization of deflating
subspace. Specifically, suppose S E is a matrix whose columns span a kdimensional
subspace S of i.e., n(S) = S. Then S is a deflating subspace for the pencil A  AB if
and only if there exists M E such that
AS = BSM. (12.5)
130 Chapter 12. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
If B = /, then (12.4) becomes dim(AV + V) = dimV, which is clearly equivalent to
AV c V. Similarly, (12.5) becomes AS = SM as before. If the pencil is not regular, there
is a concept analogous to deflating subspace called a reducing subspace.
12.3 Application to the Computation of System Zeros
Consider the linear svstem
which has a root at —2.8 .
The method of finding system zeros via a generalized eigenvalue problem also works
well for general multiinput, multioutput systems. Numerically, however, one must be
careful first to "deflate out" the infinite zeros (infinite eigenvalues of (12.6)). This is accom
plished by computing a certain unitary equivalence on the system pencil that then yields a
smaller generalized eigenvalue problem with only finite generalized eigenvalues (the finite
zeros).
The connection between system zeros and the corresponding system pencil is non
trivial. However, we offer some insight below into the special case of a singleinput,
with A € M
n x n
, B € R"
x m
, C e R
pxn
, and D € R
pxm
. This linear timeinvariant state
space model is often used in multivariable control theory, where x(= x(t)) is called the state
vector, u is the vector of inputs or controls, and y is the vector of outputs or observables.
For details, see, for example, [26].
In general, the (finite) zeros of this system are given by the (finite) complex numbers
z, where the "system pencil"
drops rank. In the special case p = m, these values are the generalized eigenvalues of the
(n + m) x (n + m) pencil.
Example 12.15. Let
Then the transfer matrix (see [26]) of this system is
which clearly has a zero at —2.8 . Checking the finite eigenvalues of the pencil (12.6), we
find the characteristic polynomial to be
130 Chapter 12. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
If B = I, then (12.4) becomes dim (A V + V) = dim V, which is clearly equivalent to
AV ~ V. Similarly, (12.5) becomes AS = SM as before. lEthe pencil is not regular, there
is a concept analogous to deflating subspace called a reducing subspace.
12.3 Application to the Computation of System Zeros
Consider the linear system
i = Ax + Bu,
y = Cx + Du
with A E jRnxn, B E jRnxm, C E jRPxn, and D E jRPxm. This linear timeinvariant state
space model is often used in multivariable control theory, where x(= x(t)) is called the state
vector, u is the vector of inputs or controls, and y is the vector of outputs or observables.
For details, see, for example, [26].
In general, the (finite) zeros of this system are given by the (finite) complex numbers
z, where the "system pencil"
(12.6)
drops rank. In the special case p = m, these values are the generalized eigenvalues of the
(n + m) x (n + m) pencil.
Example 12.15. Let
A=[
4
2
Then the transfer matrix (see [26)) of this system is
C = [I 2],
55 + 14
g(5)=C(sIA)'B+D= 2 '
5 + 3s + 2
D=O.
which clearly has a zero at 2.8. Checking the finite eigenvalues of the pencil (12.6), we
find the characteristic polynomial to be
det
[
A c
M
B]
D "'" 5A + 14,
which has a root at 2.8.
The method of finding system zeros via a generalized eigenvalue problem also works
well for general mUltiinput, multioutput systems. Numerically, however, one must be
careful first to "deflate out" the infinite zeros (infinite eigenvalues of (12.6». This is accom
plished by computing a certain unitary equivalence on the system pencil that then yields a
smaller generalized eigenvalue problem with only finite generalized eigenvalues (the finite
zeros).
The connection between system zeros and the corresponding system pencil is non
trivial. However, we offer some insight below into the special case of a singleinput.
12.4. Symmetric Generalized Eigenvalue Problems 131
singleoutput system. Specifically, let B = b e Rn, C = c
1
e R
l xn
, and D = d e R.
Furthermore, let g(.s) = c
r
(s7 — A )~
!
Z ? + d denote the system transfer function (matrix),
and assume that g ( s ) can be written in the form
where T T (S ) is the characteristic polynomial of A, and v(s) and T T (S ) are relatively prime
(i.e., there are no "pole/zero cancellations").
Suppose z € C is such that
is singular. Then there exists a nonzero solution to
or
Assuming z is not an eigenvalue of A (i.e., no pole/zero cancellations), then from (12.7) we
get
Substituting this in (12.8), we have
or g ( z ) y = 0 by the definition of g . Now _ y ^ 0 (else x = 0 from (12.9)). Hence g(z) = 0,
i.e., z is a zero of g.
12.4 Symmetric Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
A very important special case of the generalized eigenvalue problem
for A, B e R
nxn
arises when A = A and B = B
1
> 0. For example, the secondorder
system of differential equations
where M is a symmetric positive definite "mass matrix" and K is a symmetric "stiffness
matrix," is a frequently employed model of structures or vibrating systems and yields a
generalized eigenvalue problem of the form (12.10).
Since B is positive definite it is nonsingular. Thus, the problem (12.10) is equivalent
to the standard eigenvalue problem B~
l
Ax = A J C. However, B~
1
A is not necessarily
symmetric.
12.4. Symmetric Generalized Eigenvalue Problems 131
singleoutput system. Specifically, let B = b E ffi.n, C = c
T
E ffi.l xn, and D = d E R
Furthermore, let g(s) = c
T
(s I  A) 1 b + d denote the system transfer function (matrix),
and assume that g(s) can be written in the form
v(s)
g(s) = n(s)'
where n(s) is the characteristic polynomial of A, and v(s) and n(s) are relatively prime
(i.e., there are no "pole/zero cancellations").
Suppose Z E C is such that
[
A  zI b ]
c
T
d
is singular. Then there exists a nonzero solution to
or
(A  zl)x + by = 0,
c
T
x +dy = O.
(12.7)
(12.8)
Assuming z is not an eigenvalue of A (i.e., no pole/zero cancellations), then from (12.7) we
get
x = (A  zl)lby.
(12.9)
Substituting this in (12.8), we have
_c
T
(A  zl)lby + dy = 0,
or g(z)y = 0 by the definition of g. Now y 1= 0 (else x = 0 from (12.9». Hence g(z) = 0,
i.e., z is a zero of g.
12.4 Symmetric Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
A very important special case of the generalized eigenvalue problem
Ax = ABx (12.10)
for A, B E ffi.nxn arises when A = AT and B = BT > O. For example, the secondorder
system of differential equations
Mx+Kx=O,
where M is a symmetric positive definite "mass matrix" and K is a symmetric "stiffness
matrix," is a frequently employed model of structures or vibrating systems and yields a
generalized eigenvalue problem ofthe form (12.10).
Since B is positive definite it is nonsingular. Thus, the problem (12.10) is equivalent
to the standard eigenvalue problem B
1
Ax = AX. However, B
1
A is not necessarily
symmetric.
Nevertheless, the eigenvalues of B
l
A are always real (and are approximately 2.1926
and 3.1926 in Example 12.16).
Theorem 12.17. Let A, B e R
nxn
with A = A
T
and B = B
T
> 0. Then the generalized
eigenvalue problem
whose eigenvalues are approximately 2.1926 and —3.1926 as expected.
The material of this section can, of course, be generalized easily to the case where A
and B are Hermitian, but since realvalued matrices are commonly used in most applications,
we have restricted our attention to that case only.
has n real eigenvalues, and the n corresponding right eigenvectors can be chosen to be
orthogonal with respect to the inner product (x, y)
B
= X
T
By. Moreover, if A > 0, then
the eigenvalues are also all positive.
Proof: Since B > 0, it has a Cholesky factorization B = LL
T
, where L is nonsingular
(Theorem 10.23). Then the eigenvalue problem
can be rewritten as the equivalent problem
Letting C = L
1
AL
J
and z = L
1
x, (12.11) can then be rewritten as
Since C = C
T
, the eigenproblem (12.12) has n real eigenvalues, with corresponding eigen
vectors zi,..., z
n
satisfying
Then x, = L
T
zi, i € n, are eigenvectors of the original generalized eigenvalue problem
and satisfy
Finally, if A = A
T
> 0, then C = C
T
> 0, so the eigenvalues are positive. D
Example 12.18. The Cholesky factor for the matrix B in Example 12.16 is
Then it is easily checked thai
132 Chapter 12. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
Example 12.16. Let A ThenB~
l
A
132 Chapter 12. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
Example 12.16. Let A = ; l B = [i J Then A = J
Nevertheless, the eigenvalues of A are always real (and are approximately 2.1926
and 3.1926 in Example 12.16).
Theorem 12.17. Let A, B E jRnxn with A = AT and B = BT > O. Then the generalized
eigenvalue problem
Ax = ABx
has n real eigenvalues, and the n corresponding right eigenvectors can be chosen to be
orthogonal with respect to the inner product (x, y) B = x
T
By. Moreover, if A > 0, then
the eigenvalues are also all positive.
Proof: Since B > 0, it has a Cholesky factorization B = LL T, where L is nonsingular
(Theorem 10.23). Then the eigenvalue problem
Ax = ABx = ALL T x
can be rewritten as the equivalent problem
(12.11)
Letting C = L AL and Z = LT x, (12.11) can then be rewritten as
Cz = AZ. (12.12)
Since C = C
T
, the eigenproblem (12.12) has n real eigenvalues, with corresponding eigen
vectors Z I, •.. , Zn satisfying
zi Zj = Dij.
Then Xi = L Zi, i E !!., are eigenvectors of the original generalized eigenvalue problem
and satisfy
(Xi, Xj)B = xr BXj = (zi L Zj) = Dij.
Finally, if A = AT> 0, then C = C
T
> 0, so the eigenvalues are positive. 0
Example 12.18. The Cholesky factor for the matrix B in Example 12.16 is
1] .
.,fi .,fi
Then it is easily checked that
c = = [ 0 . .5
2.5
2 . .5 ]
1.5 '
whose eigenvalues are approximately 2.1926 and 3.1926 as expected.
The material of this section can, of course, be generalized easily to the case where A
and B are Hermitian, but since realvalued matrices are commonly used in most applications,
we have restricted our attention to that case only.
12.5. Simultaneous Diagonalization 133
12.5 Simultaneous Diagonalization
Recall that many matrices can be diagonalized by a similarity. In particular, normal ma
trices can be diagonalized by a unitary similarity. It turns out that in some cases a pair of
matrices (A, B) can be simultaneously diagonalized by the same matrix. There are many
such results and we present only a representative (but important and useful) theorem here.
Again, we restrict our attention only to the real case, with the complex case following in a
straightforward way.
Theorem 12.19 (Simultaneous Reduction to Diagonal Form). Let A, B e E"
x
" with
A = A
T
and B = B
T
> 0. Then there exists a nonsingular matrix Q such that
\ 2.5.1 Simultaneous diagonalization via SVD
There are situations in which forming C = L~
1
AL~
T
as in the proof of Theorem 12.19 is
numerically problematic, e.g., when L is highly ill conditioned with respect to inversion. In
such cases, simultaneous reduction can also be accomplished via an SVD. To illustrate, let
where D is diagonal. In fact, the diagonal elements of D are the eigenvalues of B
1
A.
Proof: Let B = LL
T
be the Cholesky factorization of B and setC = L~
1
AL~
T
. Since
C is symmetric, there exists an orthogonal matrix P such that P
T
CP = D, where D is
diagonal. Let Q = L~
T
P. Then
and
Finally, since QDQ~
l
= QQ
T
AQQ~
l
= L
T
PP
T
L~
1
A = L~
T
L~
1
A = B~
1
A, we
haveA(D) = A(B~
1
A). D
Note that Q is not in general orthogonal, so it does not preserve eigenvalues of A and B
individually. However, it does preserve the eigenvalues of A — XB. This can be seen directly.
LetA = Q
T
AQandB = Q
T
BQ. Then/HA = Q~
l
B~
l
Q~
T
Q
T
AQ = Q~
1
B~
1
AQ.
Theorem 12.19 is very useful for reducing many statements about pairs of symmetric
matrices to "the diagonal case." The following is typical.
Theorem 12.20. Let A, B e M"
xn
be positive definite. Then A > B if and only if B~
l
>
A
1
.
Proof: By Theorem 12.19, there exists Q e E"
x
" such that Q
T
AQ = D and Q
T
BQ = I,
where D is diagonal. Now D > 0 by Theorem 10.31. Also, since A > B, by Theorem
10.21 we have that Q
T
AQ > Q
T
BQ, i.e., D > I. But then D"
1
< / (this is trivially true
since the two matrices are diagonal). Thus, QD~
l
Q
T
< QQ
T
, i.e., A~
l
< B~
l
. D
12.5. Simultaneous Diagonalization 133
12.5 Simultaneous Diagonalization
Recall that many matrices can be diagonalized by a similarity. In particular, normal ma
trices can be diagonalized by a unitary similarity. It turns out that in some cases a pair of
matrices (A, B) can be simultaneously diagonalized by the same matrix. There are many
such results and we present only a representative (but important and useful) theorem here.
Again, we restrict our attention only to the real case, with the complex case following in a
straightforward way.
Theorem 12.19 (Simultaneous Reduction to Diagonal Form). Let A, B E ] [ ~ n x n with
A = AT and B = BT > O. Then there exists a nonsingular matrix Q such that
where D is diagonal. Infact, the diagonal elements of D are the eigenvalues of B
1
A.
Proof: Let B = LLT be the Cholesky factorization of B and set C = L I AL T. Since
C is symmetric, there exists an orthogonal matrix P such that pTe p = D, where D is
diagonal. Let Q = L  T P. Then
and
QT BQ = pT L I(LLT)L T P = pT P = [.
Finally, since QDQI = QQT AQQI = L T P pT L I A = L T L I A
B
1
A, we
have A(D) = A(B
1
A). 0
Note that Q is not in general orthogonal, so it does not preserve eigenvalues of A and B
individually. However, it does preserve the eigenvalues of A  'AB. This can be seen directly.
Let A = QT AQ and B = QT BQ. Then B
1
A = Q1 B
1
QT QT AQ = Q1 B
1
AQ.
Theorem 12.19 is very useful for reducing many statements about pairs of symmetric
matrices to "the diagonal case." The following is typical.
Theorem 12.20. Let A, B E lR
nxn
be positive definite. Then A 2: B if and only if B
1
2:
AI.
Proof: By Theorem 12.19, there exists Q E l R ~ x n such that QT AQ = D and QT BQ = [,
where D is diagonal. Now D > 0 by Theorem 10.31. Also, since A 2: B, by Theorem
10.21 we have that QT AQ 2: QT BQ, i.e., D 2: [. But then D
I
:::: [(this is trivially true
since the two matrices are diagonal). Thus, Q D
I
QT :::: Q QT, i.e., A I :::: B
1
. 0
12.5.1 Simultaneous diagonalization via SVD
There are situations in which forming C = L I AL T as in the proof of Theorem 12.19 is
numerically problematic, e.g., when L is highly iII conditioned with respect to inversion. In
such cases, simultaneous reduction can also be accomplished via an SVD. To illustrate. let
The problem (12.15) is called a generalized singular value problem and algorithms exist to
solve it (and hence equivalently (12.13)) via arithmetic operations performed only on LA
and LB separately, i.e., without forming the products L
A
L
T
A
or L
B
L
T
B
explicitly; see, for
example, [7, Sec. 8.7.3]. This is analogous to finding the singular values of a matrix M by
operations performed directly on M rather than by forming the matrix M
T
M and solving
the eigenproblem M
T
MX = Xx.
Remark 12.22. Various generalizations of the results in Remark 12.21 are possible, for
example, when A = A
T
> 0. The case when A is symmetric but indefinite is not so
straightforward, at least in real arithmetic. For example, A can be written as A = PDP
T
,
~ ~ ~ ~ T
where D is diagonal and P is orthogonal, but in writing A — PDDP = PD(PD) with
D diagonal, D may have pure imaginary elements.
134 Chapter 12. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
us assume that both A and B are positive definite. Further, let A = L
A
L
T
A
and B — LsL
T
B
be Cholesky factorizations of A and B, respectively. Compute the SVD
where E e R£
x
" is diagonal. Then the matrix Q = L
B
T
U performs the simultaneous
diagonalization. To check this, note that
while
Remark 12.21. The SVD in (12.13) can be computed without explicitly forming the
indicated matrix product or the inverse by using the socalled generalized singular value
decomposition (GSVD). Note that
and thus the singular values of L
B
L
A
can be found from the eigenvalue problem
Letting x = L
B
z we see that (12.14) can be rewritten in the form L
A
L
A
x = XL
B
z =
ALgL^Lg
7
z, which is thus equivalent to the generalized eigenvalue problem
134 Chapter 12. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
us assume that both A and B are positive definite. Further, let A = and B =
be Cholesky factorizations of A and B, respectively. Compute the SVD
(12.13)
where L E xn is diagonal. Then the matrix Q = L i/ u performs the simultaneous
diagonalization. To check this, note that
while
QT AQ = U
T
= UTULVTVLTUTU
= L2
QT BQ = U
T
= UTU
= I.
Remark 12.21. The SVD in (12.13) can be computed without explicitly forming the
indicated matrix product or the inverse by using the socalled generalized singular value
decomposition (GSVD). Note that
and thus the singular values of L B 1 L A can be found from the eigenvalue problem
02.14)
Letting x = LBT Z we see that 02.14) can be rewritten in the form = ALBz =
z, which is thus equivalent to the generalized eigenvalue problem
02.15)
The problem (12.15) is called a generalized singular value problem and algorithms exist to
solve it (and hence equivalently (12.13» via arithmetic operations performed only on LA
and L B separately, i.e., without forming the products LA L or L B L explicitly; see, for
example, [7, Sec. 8.7.3]. This is analogous to finding the singular values of a matrix M by
operations performed directly on M rather than by forming the matrix MT M and solving
the eigenproblem MT M x = AX.
Remark 12.22. Various generalizations of the results in Remark 12.21 are possible, for
example, when A = AT::: O. The case when A is symmetric but indefinite is not so
straightforward, at least in real arithmetic. For example, A can be written as A = PDP T,
where Disdiagonaland P is orthogonal,butin writing A = PDDp
T
= PD(PD{ with
D diagonal, b may have pure imaginary elements.
12.6. HigherOrder Eigenvalue Problems 135
12.6 HigherOrder Eigenvalue Problems
Consider the secondorder system of differential equations
where q(t} e W
1
and M, C, K e Rn
xn
. Assume for simplicity that M is nonsingular.
Suppose, by analogy with the firstorder case, that we try to find a solution of (12.16) of the
form q(t) = e
xt
p, where the nvector p and scalar A. are to be determined. Substituting in
(12.16) we get
To get a nonzero solution /?, we thus seek values of A. for which the matrix A.
2
M + A.C + K
is singular. Since the determinantal equation
yields a polynomial of degree 2rc, there are 2n eigenvalues for the secondorder (or
quadratic) eigenvalue problem A.
2
M + A.C + K.
A special case of (12.16) arises frequently in applications: M = I, C = 0, and
K = K
T
. Suppose K has eigenvalues
Let a > k =  f j i k 1
2
• Then the 2n eigenvalues of the secondorder eigenvalue problem A.
2
/ + K
are
If r = n (i.e., K = K
T
> 0), then all solutions of q + Kq = 0 are oscillatory.
12.6.1 Conversion to firstorder form
Let x\ = q and \i = q. Then (12.16) can be written as a firstorder system (with block
companion matrix)
where x(t) €. E
2
". If M is singular, or if it is desired to avoid the calculation of M
l
because
M is too ill conditioned with respect to inversion, the secondorder problem (12.16) can still
be converted to the firstorder generalized linear system
or, since
12.6. HigherOrder Eigenvalue Problems 135
12.6 HigherOrder Eigenvalue Problems
Consider the secondorder system of differential equations
Mq+Cq+Kq=O, (12.16)
where q(t) E ~ n and M, C, K E ~ n x n . Assume for simplicity that M is nonsingular.
Suppose, by analogy with the firstorder case, that we try to find a solution of (12.16) of the
form q(t) = eAt p, where the nvector p and scalar A are to be determined. Substituting in
(12.16) we get
or, since eAt :F 0,
(A
2
M + AC + K) p = O.
To get a nonzero solution p, we thus seek values of A for which the matrix A
2
M + AC + K
is singular. Since the determinantal equation
o = det(A
2
M + AC + K) = A 2n + ...
yields a polynomial of degree 2n, there are 2n eigenvalues for the secondorder (or
quadratic) eigenvalue problem A
2
M + AC + K.
A special case of (12.16) arises frequently in applications: M = I, C = 0, and
K = KT. Suppose K has eigenvalues
IL I ::: ... ::: ILr ::: 0 > ILr+ I ::: ... ::: ILn·
Let Wk = I ILk I !. Then the 2n eigenvalues of the secondorder eigenvalue problem A
2
I + K
are
± jWk; k = 1, ... , r,
± Wk; k = r + 1, ... , n.
If r = n (i.e., K = KT ::: 0), then all solutions of q + K q = 0 are oscillatory.
12.6.1 Conversion to firstorder form
Let XI = q and X2 = q. Then (12.16) can be written as a firstorder system (with block
companion matrix)
. [ 0
X = M1K
where x (t) E ~ 2 n . If M is singular, or if it is desired to avoid the calculation of M
I
because
M is too ill conditioned with respect to inversion, the secondorder problem (12.16) can still
be converted to the firstorder generalized linear system
[
I OJ' [0 I J
o M x = K C x.
136 Chapter 12. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
Many other firstorder realizations are possible. Some can be useful when M, C, and/or K
have special symmetry or skewsymmetry properties that can exploited.
Higherorder analogues of (12.16) involving, say, the kth derivative of q, lead naturally
to higherorder eigenvalue problems that can be converted to firstorder form using aknxkn
block companion matrix analogue of (11.19). Similar procedures hold for the general k\h
order difference equation
EXERCISES
are the eigenvalues of the matrix A — BD
1
C.
2. Let F, G € C
MX
". Show that the nonzero eigenvalues of FG and GF are the same.
Hint: An easy "trick proof is to verify that the matrices
are similar via the similarity transformation
are identical for all F 6 E"
1
*" and all G G R"
xm
.
Hint: Consider the equivalence
(A similar result is also true for "nonsquare" pencils. In the parlance of control theory,
such results show that zeros are invariant under state feedback or output injection.)
which can be converted to various firstorder systems of dimension kn.
1. Suppose A e R
nx
" and D e R™
xm
. Show that the finite generalized eigenvalues of
the pencil
3. Let F e C
nxm
, G e C
mx
". Are the nonzero singular values of FG and GF the
same?
4. Suppose A € R
nxn
, B e R
n
*
m
, and C e E
wx
". Show that the generalized eigenval
ues of the pencils
and
136 Chapter 12. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems
Many other firstorder realizations are possible. Some can be useful when M, C, andlor K
have special symmetry or skewsymmetry properties that can exploited.
Higherorder analogues of (12.16) involving, say, the kth derivative of q, lead naturally
to higherorder eigenvalue problems that can be converted to firstorder form using a kn x kn
block companion matrix analogue of (11.19). Similar procedures hold for the general kth
order difference equation
which can be converted to various firstorder systems of dimension kn.
EXERCISES
1. Suppose A E lR
n
xn and D E lR::! xm. Show that the finite generalized eigenvalues of
the pencil
[ ~ ~ J  A [ ~ ~ J
are the eigenvalues of the matrix A  B D
1
C.
2. Let F, G E e
nxn
• Show that the nonzero eigenvalues of FG and G F are the same.
Hint: An easy "trick proof' is to verify that the matrices
[Fg ~ ] and [ ~ GOF ]
are similar via the similarity transformation
3. Let F E e
nxm
, G E e
mxn
• Are the nonzero singular values of FG and GF the
same?
4. Suppose A E ]Rnxn, B E lR
nxm
, and C E lRmxn. Show that the generalized eigenval
ues of the pencils
[ ~ ~ J  A [ ~ ~ J
and
[ A + B ~ + GC ~ ] _ A [ ~ ~ ]
are identical for all F E Rm xn and all G E R" xm .
Hint: Consider the equivalence
[
I G][AU B][I 0]
01 CO Fl'
(A similar result is also true for "nonsquare" pencils. In the parlance of control theory,
such results show that zeros are invariant under state feedback or output injection.)
Exercises 137
5. Another family of simultaneous diagonalization problems arises when it is desired
that the simultaneous diagonalizing transformation Q operates on matrices A, B e
]R
nx
" in such a way that Q~
l
AQ~
T
and Q
T
BQ are simultaneously diagonal. Such
a transformation is called contragredient. Consider the case where both A and
B are positive definite with Cholesky factorizations A = L&L
T
A
and B = L#Lg,
respectively, and let UW
T
be an SVD of L
T
B
L
A
.
(a) Show that Q = LA V£~
5
is a contragredient transformation that reduces both
A and B to the same diagonal matrix.
(b) Show that Q~
l
= ^~^U
T
L
T
B
.
(c) Show that the eigenvalues of A B are the same as those of E
2
and hence are
positive.
Exercises 137
5. Another family of simultaneous diagonalization problems arises when it is desired
that the simultaneous diagonalizing transformation Q operates on matrices A, B E
jRnxn in such a way that Ql AQT and QT BQ are simultaneously diagonal. Such
a transformation is called contragredient. Consider the case where both A and
B are positive definite with Cholesky factorizations A = LA L and B = L B L
respectively, and let be an SVD of
(a) Show that Q = LA is a contragredient transformation that reduces both
A and B to the same diagonal matrix.
(b) Show that Ql =
(c) Show that the eigenvalues of AB are the same as those of 1;2 and hence are
positive.
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank
Chapter 13
Kronecker Products
13.1 Definition and Examples
Definition 13.1. Let A e R
mx
", B e R
pxq
. Then the Kronecker product (or tensor
product) of A and B is defined as the matrix
Obviously, the same definition holds if A and B are complexvalued matrices. We
restrict our attention in this chapter primarily to realvalued matrices, pointing out the
extension to the complex case only where it is not obvious.
Example 13.2.
Note that B < g> A / A < g> B.
2. Foranyfl e!F
X(
7, /
2
< 8 > f l = [o l\
Replacing I
2
by /„ yields a block diagonal matrix with n copies of B along the
diagonal.
3. Let B be an arbitrary 2x2 matrix. Then
139
Chapter 13
Kronecker Products
13.1 Definition and Examples
Definition 13.1. Let A E lR
mxn
, B E lR
pxq
. Then the Kronecker product (or tensor
product) of A and B is defined as the matrix
[
allB
A@B= :
amlB
alnB ]
: E lRmpxnq.
amnB
(13.1)
Obviously, the same definition holds if A and B are complexvalued matrices. We
restrict our attention in this chapter primarily to realvalued matrices, pointing out the
extension to the complex case only where it is not obvious.
Example 13.2.
1. Let A =
2
nand B = [; Then
2
4 2 6
n
A@B = [
2B 3 4 6 6
2B 3 4 2 2
9 4 6 2
Note that B @ A i A @ B.
2. Forany B E lR
pxq
, /z @ B = J.
Replacing 12 by In yields a block diagonal matrix with n copies of B along the
diagonal.
3. Let B be an arbitrary 2 x 2 matrix. Then
l b"
0
b12
0
l
B @/z =
b
ll
0 b12
0
b
2
2
0
b
21
0 b
22
139
140 Chapter 13. Kronecker Products
The extension to arbitrary B and /„ is obvious.
4. Let Jt € R
m
, y e R". Then
5. Let* eR
m
, y eR". Then
13.2 Properties of the Kronecker Product
Theorem 13.3. Let A e R
mx
", 5 e R
rxi
, C e R"
x
^ and D e R
sxt
. Then
Proof: Simply verify that
Theorem 13.4. For all A and B,
Proof: For the proof, simply verify using the definitions of transpose and Kronecker
product. D
Corollary 13.5. If A e R"
xn
and B e R
mxm
are symmetric, then A® B is symmetric.
Theorem 13.6. If A and B are nonsingular,
Proof: Using Theorem 13.3, simply note that
140 Chapter 13. Kronecker Products
The extension to arbitrary B and In is obvious.
4. Let x E y E !R.n. Then
[
T T]T
X ® Y = XIY , ... , XmY
= [XIYJ, ... , XIYn, X2Yl, ... , xmYnf E !R.
mn
.
13.2 Properties of the Kronecker Product
Theorem 13.3. Let A E B E C E and D E Then
(A 0 B)(C 0 D) = AC 0 BD (E
Proof; Simply verify that
=AC0BD. 0
Theorem 13.4. Foral! A and B, (A ® Bl = AT ® BT.
al;kCkPBD ]
amkckpBD
(13.2)
Proof' For the proof, simply verify using the definitions of transpose and Kronecker
product. 0
Corollary 13.5. If A E ]Rn xn and B E !R.
m
xm are symmetric, then A ® B is symmetric.
Theorem 13.6. If A and Bare nonsingular, (A ® B)I = AI ® B
1
.
Proof: Using Theorem 13.3, simply note that (A ® B)(A 1 ® B
1
) = 1 ® 1 = I. 0
Corollary 13.8. If A € E"
xn
is orthogonal and B e M
mxm
15 orthogonal, then A < g > B is
orthogonal.
13.2. Properties of the Kronecker Product 141
Theorem 13.7. If A e IR"
xn
am/ B eR
mxm
are normal, then A® B is normal.
Proof:
yields a singular value decomposition of A < 8 > B (after a simple reordering of the diagonal
elements O/£A < 8 > £5 and the corresponding right and left singular vectors).
Corollary 13.11. Let A e R™
x
" have singular values a\ > • • • > a
r
> 0 and let B e
have singular values T\ > • • • > T
S
> 0. Then A < g ) B (or B < 8 > A) has rs singular values
^iT\ > • • • > ff
r
T
s
> Qand
Theorem 13.12. Let A e R
nx
" have eigenvalues A.,  , / e n, and let B e R
mxw
/zave
eigenvalues jJij, 7 € m. TTzen ?/ze mn eigenvalues of A® B are
Moreover, if x\, ..., x
p
are linearly independent right eigenvectors of A corresponding
to A  i , . . . , A.
p
(p < n), and zi, • • •, z
q
are linearly independent right eigenvectors of B
corresponding to JJL\ , ..., \Ju
q
(q < m), then ;c, < 8 > Zj € ffi.
m
" are linearly independent right
eigenvectors of A® B corresponding to A., /u ,
7
, i e /?, 7 e q.
Proof: The basic idea of the proof is as follows:
If A and B are diag onalizable in Theorem 13.12, we can take p = n and q —mand
thu s g et the complete eig enstru ctu re of A < 8 > B. In g eneral, if A and fi have Jordan form
Example 13.9. Let A and B  Then it is easily seen that
A i s orthog onal wi th eig envalu es e
±j9
and B i s orthog onal wi th eig envalu es e
±j(i>
. T he 4x4
matrix A ® 5 is then also orthog onal with eig envalu es e^'^+'W and e
±
^
( 6>
~^
>
\
Theorem 13.10. Lg f A G E
mx
" have a singular value decomposition l/^E^Vj an^ /ef
fi e ^
pxq
have a singular value decomposition UB^B^B Then
13.2. Properties of the Kronecker Product
Theorem 13.7. If A E IR
nxn
and B E IR
mxm
are normal, then A 0 B is normal.
Proof:
(A 0 B{ (A 0 B) = (AT 0 BT)(A 0 B) by Theorem 13.4
= AT A 0 BT B by Theorem 13.3
= AAT 0 B BT since A and B are normal
= (A 0 B)(A 0 B)T by Theorem 13.3. 0
141
Corollary 13.8. If A E IR
nxn
is orthogonal and B E IR
mxm
is orthogonal, then A 0 B is
orthogonal.
E I 139 L A
[
eose Sine] dB [Cos</> Sin</>] Th ., '1 h
xamp e .• et = _ sin e cose an = _ sin</> cos</>O en It IS easl y seen t at
A is orthogonal with eigenvalues e±jO and B is orthogonal with eigenvalues e±j</J. The 4 x 4
matrix A 0 B is then also orthogonal with eigenvalues e±jeH</» and e±je
fJ
</».
Theorem 13.10. Let A E IR
mxn
have a singular value decomposition VA ~ A vI and let
B E IR
pxq
have a singular value decomposition V B ~ B VI. Then
yields a singular value decomposition of A 0 B (after a simple reordering of the diagonal
elements of ~ A 0 ~ B and the corresponding right and left singular vectors).
Corollary 13.11. Let A E lR;"xn have singular values UI :::: ... :::: U
r
> 0 and let B E IRfx
q
have singular values <I :::: ... :::: <s > O. Then A 0 B (or B 0 A) has rs singular values
U, <I :::: ... :::: U
r
<s > 0 and
rank(A 0 B) = (rankA)(rankB) = rank(B 0 A) .
Theorem 13.12. Let A E IR
n
xn have eigenvalues Ai, i E !!, and let B E IR
m
xm have
eigenvalues JL j, j E m. Then the mn eigenvalues of A 0 Bare
Moreover, if Xl, ••. , xp are linearly independent right eigenvectors of A corresponding
to AI, ... , A p (p ::::: n), and Z I, ... ,Zq are linearly independent right eigenvectors of B
corresponding to JLI, ... ,JLq (q ::::: m), then Xi 0 Zj E IR
mn
are linearly independent right
eigenvectors of A 0 B corresponding to Ai JL j, i E l!! j E 1·
Proof: The basic idea of the proof is as follows:
(A 0 B)(x 0 z) = Ax 0 Bz
= AX 0 JLZ
= AJL(X 0 z). 0
If A and Bare diagonalizable in Theorem 13.12, we can take p = nand q = m and
thus get the complete eigenstructure of A 0 B. In general, if A and B have Jordan form
142 Chapter 13. Kronecker Products
decompositions given by P~
l
AP = JA and Q~
]
BQ = JB, respectively, then we get the
following Jordanlike structure:
Note that JA® JB, while upper triangular, is generally not quite in Jordan form and needs
further reduction (to an ultimate Jordan form that also depends on whether or not certain
eigenvalues are zero or nonzero).
A Schur form for A ® B can be derived similarly. For example, suppose P and
Q are unitary matrices that reduce A and 5, respectively, to Schur (triangular) form, i.e.,
P
H
AP = T
A
and Q
H
BQ = T
B
(and similarly if P and Q are orthogonal similarities
reducing A and B to real Schur form). Then
Corollary 13.13. Let A e R
nxn
and B e R
mxm
. Then
Definition 13.14. Let A e R
nxn
and B e R
mxm
. Then the Kronecker sum (or tensor sum)
of A and B, denoted A © B, is the mn x mn matrix (I
m
< g> A) + (B ® /„). Note that, in
general, A ® B ^ B © A.
Example 13.15.
Then
The reader is invited to compute B 0 A = (/3 ® B) + (A < g> /2) and note the difference
with A © B.
1. Let
142 Chapter 1 3. Kronecker Products
decompositions given by p
I
AP = J
A
and Ql BQ = J
B
, respectively, then we get the
following Jordanlike structure:
(P ® Q)I(A ® B)(P ® Q) = (P
I
® Ql)(A ® B)(P ® Q)
= (P
1
AP) ® (Ql BQ)
= J
A
® J
B ·
Note that h ® JR, while upper triangular, is generally not quite in Jordan form and needs
further reduction (to an ultimate Jordan form that also depends on whether or not certain
eigenvalues are zero or nonzero).
A Schur form for A ® B can be derived similarly. For example, suppose P and
Q are unitary matrices that reduce A and B, respectively, to Schur (triangular) form, i.e.,
pH AP = TA and QH BQ = TB (and similarly if P and Q are orthogonal similarities
reducing A and B to real Schur form). Then
(P ® Q)H (A ® B)(P ® Q) = (pH ® QH)(A ® B)(P ® Q)
= (pH AP) ® (QH BQ)
= TA ® T
R
.
Corollary 13.13. Let A E IR
n
xn and B E IR
rn
xm. Then
1. Tr(A ® B) = (TrA)(TrB) = Tr(B ® A).
2. det(A ® B) = (det A)m(det Bt = det(B ® A).
Definition 13.14. Let A E IR
n
Xn and B E IR
m
xrn. Then the Kronecker sum (or tensor sum)
of A and B, denoted A EEl B, is the mn x mn matrix Urn ® A) + (B ® In). Note that, in
general, A EEl B i= B EEl A.
Example 13.15.
1. Let
2
;
2
Then
2 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
3 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0
AfflB = (h®A)+(B®h) =
1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
0 0 0 2 3
+
2 0 0 3 0 0
0 0 0 3 2 0 2 0 0 3 0
0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 3
The reader is invited to compute B EEl A = (h ® B) + (A 0 h) and note the difference
with A EEl B.
13.2. Properties of the Kronecker Product 143
If A and B are diagonalizable in Theorem 13.16, we can take p = n and q = m and
thus get the complete eigenstructure of A 0 B. In general, if A and B have Jordan form
decompositions given by P~
1
AP = JA and Q"
1
BQ = JB, respectively, then
is a Jordanlike structure for A © B.
Then J can be written in the very compact form J = (4 < 8 > M) + (E^®l2) = M 0 Ek.
Theorem 13.16. Let A e E"
x
" have eigenvalues A,  , i e n, and let B e R
mx
'" have
eigenvalues /z
;
, 7 e ra. TTzen r/ze Kronecker sum A® B = (I
m
(g> A) + (B < g> /„) /za^ ran
e/genva/wes
Moreover, if x\,... ,x
p
are linearly independent right eigenvectors of A corresponding
to AI, . . . , X
p
(p < n), and z\, ..., z
q
are linearly independent right eigenvectors of B
corresponding to f j i \ , . . . , f^
q
(q < ra), then Zj < 8 > Xi € W
1
" are linearly independent right
eigenvectors of A® B corresponding to A., + [ij , i € p, j e q.
Proof: The basic idea of the proof is as follows:
2. Recall the real JCF
where M =
13.2. Properties of the Kronecker Product
2. Recall the real JCF
1=
where M = [
a
f3
M I 0 0
f3
a
o M I 0
M
0
J. Define
0 0
0 0
Ek =
0
I 0
M I
o M
o
o
o
143
E jR2kx2k,
Then 1 can be written in the very compact form 1 = (I} ® M) + (Ek ® h) = M $ E
k
.
Theorem 13.16. Let A E jRnxn have eigenvalues Ai, i E !!. and let B E jRmxm have
eigenvalues fJj, j E I!!. Then the Kronecker sum A $ B = (1m ® A) + (B ® In) has mn
eigenvalues
Al + fJt, ... , AI + fJm, A2 + fJt,···, A2 + fJm, ... , An + fJm'
Moreover, if XI, .•• , xp are linearly independent right eigenvectors of A corresponding
to AI, ... , Ap (p ::s: n), and ZI, ... , Zq are linearly independent right eigenvectors of B
corresponding to fJt, ... , fJq (q ::s: m), then Z j ® Xi E jRmn are linearly independent right
eigenvectors of A $ B corresponding to Ai + fJj' i E E, j E fl·
Proof: The basic idea of the proof is as follows:
[(1m ® A) + (B ® In)](Z ® X) = (Z ® Ax) + (Bz ® X)
= (Z ® Ax) + (fJZ ® X)
= (A + fJ)(Z ® X). 0
If A and Bare diagonalizable in Theorem 13.16, we can take p = nand q = m and
thus get the complete eigenstructure of A $ B. In general, if A and B have Jordan form
decompositions given by pI AP = lA and Qt BQ = l
B
, respectively, then
[(Q ® In)(lm ® p)rt[(lm ® A) + (B ® In)][CQ ® In)(lm ® P)]
= [(1m ® p)I(Q ® In)I][(lm ® A) + (B ® In)][(Q ® In)(/m ® P)]
= [(1m ® pI)(QI ® In)][(lm ® A) + (B ® In)][CQ ® In)(/m <:9 P)]
= (1m ® lA) + (JB ® In)
is a Jordanlike structure for A $ B.
144 Chapter 13. Kronecker Products
A Schur form for A © B can be derived similarly. Again, suppose P and Q are unitary
matrices that reduce A and B, respectively, to Schur (triangular) form, i.e., P
H
AP = T
A
and Q
H
BQ = T
B
(and similarly if P and Q are orthogonal similarities reducing A and B
to real Schur form). Then
((Q ® /„)(/« ® P)]"[(/m < 8 > A) + (B ® /
B
)][(e (g) /„)(/„, ® P)] = (/
m
< 8 > r
A
) + (7* (g) /„),
where [(Q < 8 > /„)(/« ® P)] = (< 2 ® P) is unitary by Theorem 13.3 and Corollary 13.8 .
13.3 Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations
In this section we study the linear matrix equation
A special case of (13.3) is the symmetric equation
obtained by taking B = A
T
. When C is symmetric, the solution X e W
x
" is easily shown
also to be symmetric and (13.4) is known as a Lyapunov equation. Lyapunov equations
arise naturally in stability theory.
The first important question to ask regarding (13.3) is, When does a solution exist?
By writing the matrices in (13.3) in terms of their columns, it is easily seen by equating the
z'th columns that
The coefficient matrix in (13.5) clearly can be written as the Kronecker sum (I
m
* A) +
(B
T
® /„). The following definition is very helpful in completing the writing of (13.5) as
an "ordinary" linear system.
where A e R"
x
", B e R
mxm
, and C e M"
xm
. This equation is now often called a Sylvester
equation in honor of J.J. Sylvester who studied general linear matrix equations of the form
These equations can then be rewritten as the mn x mn linear system
144 Chapter 13. Kronecker Products
A Schur fonn for A EB B can be derived similarly. Again, suppose P and Q are unitary
matrices that reduce A and B, respectively, to Schur (triangular) fonn, i.e., pH AP = TA
and QH BQ = TB (and similarly if P and Q are orthogonal similarities reducing A and B
to real Schur fonn). Then
where [(Q ® In)(lm ® P)] = (Q ® P) is unitary by Theorem 13.3 and Corollary 13.8.
13.3 Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations
In this section we study the linear matrix equation
AX+XB=C, (13.3)
where A E IR
nxn
, B E IR
mxm
, and C E IRnxm. This equation is now often called a Sylvester
equation in honor of 1.1. Sylvester who studied general linear matrix equations of the fonn
k
LA;XB; =C.
;=1
A special case of (13.3) is the symmetric equation
AX +XAT = C (13.4)
obtained by taking B = AT. When C is symmetric, the solution X E IR
n
xn is easily shown
also to be symmetric and (13.4) is known as a Lyapunov equation. Lyapunovequations
arise naturally in stability theory.
The first important question to ask regarding (13.3) is, When does a solution exist?
By writing the matrices in (13.3) in tenns of their columns, it is easily seen by equating the
ith columns that
m
AXi + Xb; = C; = AXi +
j=1
These equations can then be rewritten as the mn x mn linear system
[
A+blll b
21
1
bl21 A + b
2Z
1
blml b2ml
(13.5)
The coefficient matrix in (13.5) clearly can be written as the Kronecker sum (1m 0 A) +
(B
T
0 In). The following definition is very helpful in completing the writing of (13.5) as
an "ordinary" linear system.
13.3. Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations 145
Definition 13.17. Let c
(
€ E.
n
denote the columns ofC e R
nxm
so that C = [n,..., c
m
}.
Then vec(C) is defined to be the mnvector formed by stacking the columns ofC on top of
one another, i.e., vec(C) =
Using Definition 13.17, the linear system (13.5) can be rewritten in the form
There exists a unique solution to (13.6) if and only if [(I
m
® A) + (B
T
® /„)] is nonsingular.
But [(I
m
< 8 > A) + (B
T
(g) /„)] is nonsingular if and only if it has no zero eigenvalues.
From Theorem 13.16, the eigenvalues of [(/
m
<g> A) + (B
T
<8> /„)] are A., + IJ LJ , where
A,, e A (A), i e n_, and ^j e A(fi), j e m. We thus have the following theorem.
Theorem 13.18. Let A e R
nxn
, B G R
mxm
, and C e R"
xm
. 77ie/i the Sylvester equation
has a unique solution if and only if A and —B have no eigenvalues in common.
Sylvester equations of the form (13.3) (or symmetric Lyapunov equations of the form
(13.4)) are generally not solved using the mn x mn "vec" formulation (13.6). The most
commonly preferred numerical algorithm is described in [2]. First A and B are reduced to
(real) Schur form. An equivalent linear system is then solved in which the triangular form
of the reduced A and B can be exploited to solve successively for the columns of a suitably
transformed solution matrix X. Assuming that, say, n > m, this algorithm takes only O(n
3
)
operations rather than the O(n
6
) that would be required by solving (13.6) directly with
Gaussian elimination. A further enhancement to this algorithm is available in [6] whereby
the larger of A or B is initially reduced only to upper Hessenberg rather than triangular
Schur form.
The next few theorems are classical. They culminate in Theorem 13.24, one of many
elegant connections between matrix theory and stability theory for differential equations.
Theorem 13.19. Let A e Rn
xn
, B e R
mxm
, and C e R
nxm
. Suppose further that A and B
are asymptotically stable (a matrix is asymptotically stable if all its eigenvalues have real
parts in the open left halfplane). Then the (unique) solution of the Sylvester equation
can be written as
Proof: Since A and B are stable, A., (A) + A
;
 (B) ^ 0 for all i, j so there exists a unique
solution to(13.8 )by Theorem 13.18. Now integrate the differential equation X = AX + XB
(with X(0) = C) on [0, +00):
13.3. Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations 145
Definition 13.17. Let Ci E jRn denote the columns ofC E jRnxm so that C = [CI, ... , C
m
].
: : ~ ~ : : ~ : : : d ~ ~ : : : O :[]::::fonned by "ocking the colunuu of C on top of
Using Definition 13.17, the linear system (13.5) can be rewritten in the form
[(1m ® A) + (B
T
® In)]vec(X) = vec(C). (13.6)
There exists a unique solution to (13.6) if and only if [(1m ® A) + (B
T
® In)] is nonsingular.
But [(1m ® A) + (B
T
® In)] is nonsingular if and only if it has no zero eigenvalues.
From Theorem 13.16, the eigenvalues of [(1m ® A) + (BT ® In)] are Ai + Mj, where
Ai E A(A), i E!!, and Mj E A(B), j E!!!.. We thus have the following theorem.
Theorem 13.1S. Let A E lR
nxn
, B E jRmxm, and C E jRnxm. Then the Sylvester equation
AX+XB=C
(13.7)
has a unique solution if and only if A and  B have no eigenvalues in common.
Sylvester equations of the form (13.3) (or symmetric Lyapunov equations of the form
(13.4» are generally not solved using the mn x mn "vee" formulation (13.6). The most
commonly preferred numerical algorithm is described in [2]. First A and B are reduced to
(real) Schur form. An equivalent linear system is then solved in which the triangular form
of the reduced A and B can be exploited to solve successively for the columns of a suitably
transformed solution matrix X. Assuming that, say, n :::: m, this algorithm takes only 0 (n
3
)
operations rather than the O(n
6
) that would be required by solving (13.6) directly with
Gaussian elimination. A further enhancement to this algorithm is available in [6] whereby
the larger of A or B is initially reduced only to upper Hessenberg rather than triangular
Schur form.
The next few theorems are classical. They culminate in Theorem 13.24, one of many
elegant connections between matrix theory and stability theory for differential equations.
Theorem 13.19. Let A E jRnxn, B E jRmxm, and C E jRnxm. Suppose further that A and B
are asymptotically stable (a matrix is asymptotically stable if all its eigenvalues have real
parts in the open left halfplane). Then the (unique) solution of the Sylvester equation
AX+XB=C (13.8)
can be written as
(13.9)
Proof: Since A and B are stable, Aj(A) + Aj(B) =I 0 for all i, j so there exists a unique
solution to (13.8) by Theorem 13.18. Now integrate the differential equation X = AX + X B
(with X(O) = C) on [0, +00):
lim XU)  X(O) = A roo X(t)dt + ([+00 X(t)dt) B.
IHoo 10 10
(13.10)
146 Chapter 13. Kronecker Products
Using the results of Section 11.1.6, it can be shown easily that lim e = lim e = 0.
r—> + oo t—v+oo
Hence, using the solution X ( t ) = e
tA
Ce
tB
from Theorem 11.6, we have that lim X ( t ) — 0.
/—<+3C
Substituting in (13.10) we have
Remark 13.20. An equivalent condition for the existence of a unique solution to AX +
XB = C is that [ J _
c
fi
] be similar to [ J _°
B
] (via the similarity [ J _* ]).
Theorem 13.21. Lef A, C e R"
x
". TTzen r/z e Lyapunov equation
has a unique solution if and only if A and —A
T
have no eigenvalues in common. If C is
symmetric and (13.11) has a unique solution, then that solution is symmetric.
Remark 13.22. If the matrix A e W
xn
has eigenvalues A.I ,...,!„, then — A
T
has eigen
values —A.], . . . , —k
n
. Thus, a sufficient condition that guarantees that A and — A
T
have
no common eigenvalues is that A be asymptotically stable. Many useful results exist con
cerning the relationship between stability and Lyapunov equations. Two basic results due
to Lyapunov are the following, the first of which follows immediately from Theorem 13.19.
Theorem 13.23. Let A,C e R"
x
" and suppose further that A is asymptotically stable.
Then the (unique) solution of the Lyapunov equation
can be written as
Theorem 13.24. A matrix A e R"
x
" is asymptotically stable if and only if there exists a
positive definite solution to the Lyapunov equation
Proof: Suppose A is asymptotically stable. By Theorems 13.21 and 13.23 a solution to
(13.13) exists and takes the form (13.12). Now let v be an arbitrary nonz ero vector in E".
Then
and so X
where C 
146 Chapter 13. Kronecker Products
Using the results of Section 11.1.6, it can be shown easily that lim e
lA
= lim e
lB
= O.
1>+00 1 .... +00
Hence, using the solution X (t) = elACe
lB
from Theorem 11.6, we have that lim X (t) = O.
t ~ + x
Substituting in (13.10) we have
C = A (1+
00
elACe
lB
dt) + (1+
00
elACe
lB
dt) B
{+oo
and so X = 1o elACe
lB
dt satisfies (13.8). o
Remark 13.20. An equivalent condition for the existence of a unique solution to AX +
X B = C is that [ ~ _C
B
] be similar to [ ~ _OB] (via the similarity [ ~ _ ~ ]).
Theorem 13.21. Let A, C E jRnxn. Then the Lyapunov equation
AX+XAT = C (13.11)
has a unique solution if and only if A and  A T have no eigenvalues in common. If C is
symmetric and ( 13.11) has a unique solution, then that solution is symmetric.
Remark 13.22. If the matrix A E jRn xn has eigenvalues )"" ... , An, then  AT has eigen
values AI, ... ,  An. Thus, a sufficient condition that guarantees that A and  A T have
no common eigenvalues is that A be asymptotically stable. Many useful results exist con
cerning the relationship between stability and Lyapunov equations. Two basic results due
to Lyapunov are the following, the first of which follows immediately from Theorem 13.19.
Theorem 13.23. Let A, C E jRnxn and suppose further that A is asymptotically stable.
Then the (unique) solution o/the Lyapunov equation
AX+XAT=C
can be written as
(13.12)
Theorem 13.24. A matrix A E jRnxn is asymptotically stable if and only if there exists a
positive definite solution to the Lyapunov equation
AX +XAT = C, (13.13)
where C = C
T
< O.
Proof: Suppose A is asymptotically stable. By Theorems l3.21 and l3.23 a solution to
(13.13) exists and takes the form (13.12). Now let v be an arbitrary nonzero vector in jRn.
Then
13.3. Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations 147
Since — C > 0 and e
tA
is nonsingular for all t, the integrand above is positive. Hence
v
T
Xv > 0 and thus X is positive definite.
Conversely, suppose X = X
T
> 0 and let A. e A (A) with corresponding left eigen
vector y. Then
Since y
H
Xy > 0, we must have A + A = 2 Re A < 0 . Since A was arbitrary, A must be
asymptotically stable. D
Remark 13.25. The Lyapunov equation AX + XA
T
= C can also be written using the
vec notation in the equivalent form
A subtle point arises when dealing with the "dual" Lyapunov equation A
T
X + XA = C.
The equivalent "vec form" of this equation is
However, the complexvalued equation A
H
X + XA = C is equivalent to
The vec operator has many useful properties, most of which derive from one key
result.
Theorem 13.26. For any three matrices A, B, and C for which the matrix product ABC is
defined,
Proof: The proof follows in a fairly straightforward fashion either directly from the defini
tions or from the fact that vec(;t;y
r
) = y <8 > x. D
An immediate application is to the derivation of existence and uniqueness conditions
for the solution of the simple Sylvesterlike equation introduced in Theorem 6.11.
Theorem 13.27. Let A e R
mxn
, B e R
px(}
, and C e R
mxq
. Then the equation
has a solution X e R.
nxp
if and only ifAA
+
CB
+
B = C, in which case the general solution
is of the form
where Y e R
nxp
is arbitrary. The solution of (13.14) is unique if BB
+
® A
+
A = I.
Proof: Write (13.14) as
13.3. Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations 147
Since C > 0 and etA is nonsingular for all t, the integrand above is positive. Hence
v
T
Xv > 0 and thus X is positive definite.
Conversely, suppose X = XT > 0 and let A E A(A) with corresponding left eigen
vector y. Then
0> yHCy = yH AXy + yHXAT Y
= (A + I)yH Xy.
Since yH Xy > 0, we must have A + I = 2 Re A < O. Since A was arbitrary, A must be
asymptotically stable. D
Remark 13.25. The Lyapunov equation AX + X A T = C can also be written using the
vec notation in the equivalent form
[(/ ® A) + (A ® l)]vec(X) = vec(C).
A subtle point arises when dealing with the "dual" Lyapunov equation A T X + X A = C.
The equivalent "vec form" of this equation is
[(/ ® AT) + (AT ® l)]vec(X) = vec(C).
However, the complexvalued equation A H X + X A = C is equivalent to
[(/ ® AH) + (AT ® l)]vec(X) = vec(C).
The vec operator has many useful properties, most of which derive from one key
result.
Theorem 13.26. For any three matrices A, B, and C for which the matrix product ABC is
defined,
vec(ABC) = (C
T
® A)vec(B).
Proof: The proof follows in a fairly straightforward fashion either directly from the defini
tions or from the fact that vec(xyT) = y ® x. D
An immediate application is to the derivation of existence and uniqueness conditions
for the solution of the simple Sylvesterlike equation introduced in Theorem 6.11.
Theorem 13.27. Let A E jRrnxn, B E jRPxq, and C E jRrnxq. Then the equation
AXB =C (13.14)
has a solution X E jRn x p if and only if A A + C B+ B = C, in which case the general solution
is of the form
(13.15)
where Y E jRnxp is arbitrary. The solution of (13. 14) is unique if BB+ ® A+ A = [.
Proof: Write (13.14) as
(B
T
® A)vec(X) = vec(C) (13.16)
148 Chapter 13. Kronecker Products
by Theorem 13.26. This "vector equation" has a solution if and only if
It is a straightforward exercise to show that (M ® N)
+
= M
+
< 8> N
+
. Thus, (13.16) has a
solution if and only if
and hence if and only if AA
+
CB
+
B = C.
The general solution of (13.16) is then given by
where Y is arbitrary. This equation can then be rewritten in the form
or, using Theorem 13.26,
The solution is clearly unique if BB
+
< 8> A
+
A = I. D
EXERCISES
1. For any two matrices A and B for which the indicated matrix product is defined,
show that (vec(A))
r
(vec(fl)) = Tr(A
r
£). In particular, if B e Rn
xn
, then Tr(fl) =
vec(/J
r
vec(fl).
2. Prove that for all matrices A and B, (A ® B)
+
= A
+
® B
+
.
3. Show that the equation AX B = C has a solution for all C if A has full row rank and
B has full column rank. Also, show that a solution, if it exists, is unique if A has full
column rank and B has full row rank. What is the solution in this case?
4. Show that the general linear equation
can be written in the form
148 Chapter 1 3. Kronecker Products
by Theorem 13.26. This "vector equation" has a solution if and only if
(B
T
® A)(B
T
® A)+ vec(C) = vec(C).
It is a straightforward exercise to show that (M ® N) + = M+ ® N+. Thus, (13.16) has a
solution if and only if
vec(C) = (B
T
® A)«B+{ ® A+)vec(C)
= [(B+ B{ ® AA+]vec(C)
= vec(AA +C B+ B)
and hence if and only if AA + C B+ B = C.
The general solution of (13 .16) is then given by
vec(X) = (B
T
® A) + vec(C) + [I  (B
T
® A) + (B
T
® A)]vec(Y),
where Y is arbitrary. This equation can then be rewritten in the form
vec(X) = «B+{ ® A+)vec(C) + [I  (BB+{ ® A+ A]vec(y)
or, using Theorem 13.26,
The solution is clearly unique if B B+ ® A + A = I. 0
EXERCISES
I. For any two matrices A and B for which the indicated matrix product is defined,
show that (vec(A»T (vec(B» = Tr(A
T
B). In particular, if B E lR
nxn
, then Tr(B) =
vec(Inl vec(B).
2. Prove that for all matrices A and B, (A ® B)+ = A+ ® B+.
3. Show that the equation AX B = C has a solution for all C if A has full row rank and
B has full column rank. Also, show that a solution, if it exists, is unique if A has full
column rank and B has full row rank. What is the solution in this case?
4. Show that the general linear equation
k
LAiXB
i
=C
i=1
can be written in the form
[BT ® AI + ... + B[ ® Ak]vec(X) = vec(C).
Exercises 149
5. Let x € M
m
and y e E". Show that *
r
< 8 > y = yx
T
.
6. Let A e R"
xn
and £ e M
mxm
.
(a) Show that A < 8 > B
2
= A
2
£
2
.
(b) What is A ® B\\
F
in terms of the Frobenius norms of A and B? Justify your
answer carefully.
(c) What is the spectral radius of A < 8 > B in terms of the spectral radii of A and B?
Justify your answer carefully.
7. Let A, 5 eR"
x
".
(a) Show that (/ ® A)* = / < 8 > A* and (fl < g > /)* = B
fc
® / for all integ ers &.
(b) Show that e
l
®
A
= I < g ) e
A
and e
5
®
7
= e
B
(g ) /.
(c) Show that the matrices / (8 ) A and B ® / commute.
(d) Show that
(Note: This result would look a little "nicer" had we defined our Kronecker
sum the other way around. However, Definition 13.14 is conventional in the
literature.)
8 . Consider the Lyapunov matrix equation (13.11) with
and C the symmetric matrix
Clearly
is a symmetric solution of the equation. Verify that
is also a solution and is nonsymmetric. Explain in lig ht of Theorem 13.21.
9. Block Triangularization: Let
where A e Rn
xn
and D e R
mxm
. It is desired to find a similarity transformation
of the form
such that T
l
ST is block upper triang ular.
Exercises 149
5. Let x E ]Rm and y E ]Rn. Show that x T ® y = y X T •
(a) Show that IIA ® BII2 = IIAII2I1Blb.
(b) What is II A ® B II F in terms of the Frobenius norms of A and B? Justify your
answer carefully.
(c) What is the spectral radius of A ® B in terms of the spectral radii of A and B?
Justify your answer carefully.
7. Let A, B E ]Rnxn.
(a) Show that (l ® A)k = I ® Ak and (B ® Il = Bk ® I for all integers k.
(b) Show that el®A = I ® e
A
and eB®1 = e
B
® I.
(c) Show that the matrices I ® A and B ® I commute.
(d) Show that
e
AEIlB
= eU®A)+(B®l) = e
B
® e
A
.
(Note: This result would look a little "nicer" had we defined our Kronecker
sum the other way around. However, Definition 13.14 is conventional in the
literature.)
8. Consider the Lyapunov matrix equation (13.11) with
A = [ ~ _ ~ ]
and C the symmetric matrix
[ ~
Clearly
Xs = [ ~ ~ ]
is a symmetric solution of the equation. Verify that
Xns = [ _ ~ ~ ]
is also a solution and is nonsymmetric. Explain in light of Theorem 13.21.
9. Block Triangularization: Let
where A E ]Rn xn and D E ]Rm xm. It is desired to find a similarity transformation
of the form
T = [ ~ ~ J
such that T
1
ST is block upper triangular.
150 Chapter 13. Kronecker Products
(a) Show that S is similar to
if X satisfies the socalled matrix Riccati equation
(b) Formulate a similar result for block lower triangularization of S.
10. Block Diagonalization: Let
where A e Rn
xn
and D E R
mxm
. It is desired to find a similarity transformation of
the form
such that T
l
ST is block diagonal,
(a) Show that S is similar to
if Y satisfies the Sylvester equation
(b) Formulate a similar result for block diagonalization of
150 Chapter 13. Kronecker Products
(a) Show that S is similar to
[
A +OBX B ]
DXB
if X satisfies the socalled matrix Riccati equation
CXA+DXXBX=O.
(b) Fonnulate a similar result for block lower triangularization of S.
to. Block Diagonalization: Let
S= [ ~ ~ l
where A E jRnxn and D E jRmxm. It is desired to find a similarity transfonnation of
the fonn
T = [ ~ ~ ]
such that T
1
ST is block diagonal.
(a) Show that S is similar to
if Y satisfies the Sylvester equation
AY  YD = B.
(b) Fonnulate a similar result for block diagonalization of
Bibliography
[1] Albert, A., Regression and the MoorePenrose Pseudoinverse, Academic Press, New
York, NY, 1972.
[2] Bartels, R.H., and G.W. Stewart, "Algorithm 432. Solution of the Matrix Equation
AX + XB = C," Cornm. ACM, 15(1972), 820826.
[3] Bellman, R., Introduction to Matrix Analysis, Second Edition, McGrawHill, New
York, NY, 1970.
[4] Bjorck, A., Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA,
1996.
[5] Cline, R.E., "Note on the Generalized Inverse of the Product of Matrices," SIAM Rev.,
6(1964), 57–58.
[6] Golub, G.H., S. Nash, and C. Van Loan, "A HessenbergSchur Method for the Problem
AX + XB = C," IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, AC24(1979), 909913.
[7] Golub, G.H., and C.F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations, Third Edition, Johns Hopkins
Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD, 1996.
[8] Golub, G.H., and J.H. Wilkinson, "IllConditioned Eigensystems and the Computation
of the Jordan Canonical Form," SIAM Rev., 18(1976), 578619.
[9] Greville, T.N.E., "Note on the Generalized Inverse of a Matrix Product," SIAM Rev.,
8(1966), 518–521 [Erratum, SIAM Rev., 9(1967), 249].
[10] Halmos, PR., FiniteDimensional Vector Spaces, Second Edition, Van Nostrand,
Princeton, NJ, 1958.
[11] Higham, N.J., Accuracy and Stability of'Numerical Algorithms, Second Edition, SIAM,
Philadelphia, PA, 2002.
[12] Horn, R.A., and C.R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge,
UK, 1985.
[13] Horn, R.A., and C.R. Johnson, Topics in Matrix Analysis, Cambridge Univ. Press,
Cambridge, UK, 1991.
151
Bibliography
[1] Albert, A., Regression and the MoorePenrose Pseudoinverse, Academic Press, New
York, NY, 1972.
[2] Bartels, RH., and G.w. Stewart, "Algorithm 432. Solution of the Matrix Equation
AX + X B = C," Comm. ACM, 15(1972),820826.
[3] Bellman, R, Introduction to Matrix Analysis, Second Edition, McGrawHill, New
York, NY, 1970.
[4] Bjorck, A., Numerical Methodsfor Least Squares Problems, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA,
1996.
[5] Cline, R.E., "Note on the Generalized Inverse of the Product of Matrices," SIAM Rev.,
6(1964),5758.
[6] Golub, G.H., S. Nash, and C. Van Loan, "A HessenbergSchur Method for the Problem
AX + X B = C," IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, AC24(1979), 909913.
[7] Golub, G.H., and c.F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations, Third Edition, Johns Hopkins
Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD, 1996.
[8] Golub, G.H., and lH. Wilkinson, "IllConditioned Eigensystems and the Computation
ofthe Jordan Canonical Form," SIAM Rev., 18(1976),578619.
[9] Greville, T.N.E., "Note on the Generalized Inverse of a Matrix Product," SIAM Rev.,
8(1966),518521 [Erratum, SIAM Rev., 9(1967), 249].
[10] Halmos, P.R, FiniteDimensional Vector Spaces, Second Edition, Van Nostrand,
Princeton, NJ, 1958.
[11] Higham, N.1., Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms, Second Edition, SIAM,
Philadelphia, PA, 2002.
[12] Hom, RA., and C.R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge,
UK, 1985.
[13] Hom, RA., and C.R. Johnson, Topics in Matrix Analysis, Cambridge Univ. Press,
Cambridge, UK, 1991.
151
152 Bibliography
[14] Kenney, C, and A.J. Laub, "Controllability and Stability Radii for Companion Form
Systems," Math, of Control, Signals, and Systems, 1(1988), 361390.
[15] Kenney, C.S., and A.J. Laub, "The Matrix Sign Function," IEEE Trans. Autom. Control,
40(1995), 1330–1348.
[16] Lancaster, P., and M. Tismenetsky, The Theory of Matrices, Second Edition with
Applications, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1985.
[17] Laub, A.J., "A Schur Method for Solving Algebraic Riccati Equations," IEEE Trans..
Autom. Control, AC24( 1979), 913–921.
[18] Meyer, C.D., Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA,
2000.
[19] Moler, C.B., and C.F. Van Loan, "Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential
of a Matrix," SIAM Rev., 20(1978), 801836.
[20] Noble, B., and J.W. Daniel, Applied Linear Algebra, Third Edition, PrenticeHall,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.
[21] Ortega, J., Matrix Theory. A Second Course, Plenum, New York, NY, 1987.
[22] Penrose, R., "A Generalized Inverse for Matrices," Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.,
51(1955), 406–413.
[23] Stewart, G. W., Introduction to Matrix Computations, Academic Press, New York, NY,
1973.
[24] Strang, G., Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Third Edition, Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich, San Diego, CA, 1988.
[25] Watkins, D.S., Fundamentals of Matrix Computations, Second Edition, Wiley
Interscience, New York, 2002.
[26] Wonham, W.M., Linear Multivariable Control. A Geometric Approach, Third Edition,
SpringerVerlag, New York, NY, 1985.
152 Bibliography
[14] Kenney, C., and AJ. Laub, "Controllability and Stability Radii for Companion Fonn
Systems," Math. of Control, Signals, and Systems, 1(1988),361390.
[15] Kenney, C.S., andAJ. Laub, "The Matrix Sign Function," IEEE Trans. Autom. Control,
40(1995),13301348.
[16] Lancaster, P., and M. Tismenetsky, The Theory of Matrices, Second Edition with
Applications, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1985.
[17] Laub, AJ., "A Schur Method for Solving Algebraic Riccati Equations," IEEE Trans ..
Autom. Control, AC24( 1979), 913921.
[18] Meyer, C.D., Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA,
2000.
[19] Moler, c.B., and c.P. Van Loan, "Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential
of a Matrix," SIAM Rev., 20(1978),801836.
[20] Noble, B., and J.w. Daniel, Applied Linear Algebra, Third Edition, PrenticeHall,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988.
[21] Ortega, J., Matrix Theory. A Second Course, Plenum, New York, NY, 1987.
[22] Pemose, R., "A Generalized Inverse for Matrices," Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.,
51(1955),406413.
[23] Stewart, G.W., Introduction to Matrix Computations, Academic Press, New York, NY,
1973.
[24] Strang, G., Linear Algebra and Its Applications, Third Edition, Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich, San Diego, CA, 1988.
[25] Watkins, D.S., Fundamentals of Matrix Computations, Second Edition, Wiley
Interscience, New York, 2002.
[26] Wonham, W.M., Linear Multivariable Control. A Geometric Approach, Third Edition,
SpringerVerlag, New York, NY, 1985.
Index
A–invariant subspace, 89
matrix characterization of, 90
algebraic multiplicity, 76
angle between vectors, 58
basis, 11
natural, 12
block matrix, 2
definiteness of, 104
diagonalization, 150
inverse of, 48
LU factorization, 5
triangularization, 149
C", 1
(pmxn i
(p/nxn 1
Cauchy–Bunyakovsky–Schwarz Inequal
ity, 58
Cayley–Hamilton Theorem, 75
chain
of eigenvectors, 87
characteristic polynomial
of a matrix, 75
of a matrix pencil, 125
Cholesky factorization, 101
co–domain, 17
column
rank, 23
vector, 1
companion matrix
inverse of, 105
pseudoinverse of, 106
singular values of, 106
singular vectors of, 106
complement
of a subspace, 13
orthogonal, 21
congruence, 103
conjugate transpose, 2
contragredient transformation, 137
controllability, 46
defective, 76
degree
of a principal vector, 85
determinant, 4
of a block matrix, 5
properties of, 4–6
dimension, 12
direct sum
of subspaces, 13
domain, 17
eigenvalue, 75
invariance under similarity transfor
mation, 81
elementary divisors, 84
equivalence transformation, 95
orthogonal, 95
unitary, 95
equivalent generalized eigenvalue prob
lems, 127
equivalent matrix pencils, 127
exchange matrix, 39, 89
exponential of a Jordan block, 91, 115
exponential of a matrix, 81, 109
computation of, 114–118
inverse of, 110
properties of, 109–112
field, 7
four fundamental subspaces, 23
function of a matrix, 81
generalized eigenvalue, 125
generalized real Schur form, 128
153
Index
Ainvariant subspace, 89
matrix characterization of, 90
algebraic multiplicity, 76
angle between vectors, 58
basis, 11
natural, 12
block matrix, 2
definiteness of, 104
diagonalization, 150
inverse of, 48
LV factorization, 5
triangularization, 149
en, 1
e
mxn
, 1
e ~ x n , 1
CauchyBunyakovskySchwarz Inequal
ity,58
CayleyHamilton Theorem, 75
chain
of eigenvectors, 87
characteristic polynomial
of a matrix, 75
of a matrix pencil, 125
Cholesky factorization, 101
codomain, 17
column
rank, 23
vector, 1
companion matrix
inverse of, 105
pseudoinverse of, 106
singular values of, 106
singular vectors of, 106
complement
of a subspace, 13
orthogonal, 21
153
congruence, 103
conjugate transpose, 2
contragredient transformation, 137
controllability, 46
defective, 76
degree
of a principal vector, 85
determinant, 4
of a block matrix, 5
properties of, 46
dimension, 12
direct sum
of subspaces, 13
domain, 17
eigenvalue, 75
invariance under similarity transfor
mation,81
elementary divisors, 84
equivalence transformation, 95
orthogonal, 95
unitary, 95
equivalent generalized eigenvalue prob
lems, 127
equivalent matrix pencils, 127
exchange matrix, 39, 89
exponential of a Jordan block, 91, 115
exponential of a matrix, 81, 109
computation of, 114118
inverse of, 110
properties of, 109112
field, 7
four fundamental subspaces, 23
function of a matrix, 81
generalized eigenvalue, 125
generalized real Schur form, 128
154 Index
generalized Schur form, 127
generalized singular value decomposition,
134
geometric multiplicity, 76
Holder Inequality, 58
Hermitian transpose, 2
higher–order difference equations
conversion to first–order form, 121
higher–order differential equations
conversion to first–order form, 120
higher–order eigenvalue problems
conversion to first–order form, 136
i, 2
idempotent, 6, 51
identity matrix, 4
inertia, 103
initial–value problem, 109
for higher–order equations, 120
for homogeneous linear difference
equations, 118
for homogeneous linear differential
equations, 112
for inhomogeneous linear difference
equations, 119
for inhomogeneous linear differen
tial equations, 112
inner product
complex, 55
complex Euclidean, 4
Euclidean, 4, 54
real, 54
usual, 54
weighted, 54
invariant factors, 84
inverses
of block matrices, 47
7, 2
Jordan block, 82
Jordan canonical form (JCF), 82
Kronecker canonical form (KCF), 129
Kronecker delta, 20
Kronecker product, 139
determinant of, 142
eigenvalues of, 141
eigenvectors of, 141
products of, 140
pseudoinverse of, 148
singular values of, 141
trace of, 142
transpose of, 140
Kronecker sum, 142
eigenvalues of, 143
eigenvectors of, 143
exponential of, 149
leading principal submatrix, 100
left eigenvector, 75
left generalized eigenvector, 125
left invertible, 26
left nullspace, 22
left principal vector, 85
linear dependence, 10
linear equations
characterization of all solutions, 44
existence of solutions, 44
uniqueness of solutions, 45
linear independence, 10
linear least squares problem, 65
general solution of, 66
geometric solution of, 67
residual of, 65
solution via QR factorization, 71
solution via singular value decom
position, 70
statement of, 65
uniqueness of solution, 66
linear regression, 67
linear transformation, 17
co–domain of, 17
composition of, 19
domain of, 17
invertible, 25
left invertible, 26
matrix representation of, 18
nonsingular, 25
nullspace of, 20
154
generalized Schur form, 127
generalized singular value decomposition,
134
geometric multiplicity, 76
Holder Inequality, 58
Hermitian transpose, 2
higherorder difference equations
conversion to firstorder form, 121
higherorder differential equations
conversion to firstorder form, 120
higherorder eigenvalue problems
conversion to firstorder form, 136
i,2
idempotent, 6, 51
identity matrix, 4
inertia, 103
initialvalue problem, 109
for higherorder equations, 120
for homogeneous linear difference
equations, 118
for homogeneous linear differential
equations, 112
for inhomogeneous linear difference
equations, 119
for inhomogeneous linear differen
tial equations, 112
inner product
complex, 55
complex Euclidean, 4
Euclidean, 4, 54
real, 54
usual, 54
weighted, 54
invariant factors, 84
inverses
of block matrices, 47
j,2
Jordan block, 82
Jordan canonical form (JCF), 82
Kronecker canonical form (KCF), 129
Kronecker delta, 20
Kronecker product, 139
determinant of, 142
eigenvalues of, 141
eigenvectors of, 141
products of, 140
pseudoinverse of, 148
singUlar values of, 141
trace of, 142
transpose of, 140
Kronecker sum, 142
eigenvalues of, 143
eigenvectors of, 143
exponential of, 149
leading principal submatrix, 100
left eigenvector, 75
left generalized eigenvector, 125
left invertible. 26
left nullspace, 22
left principal vector, 85
linear dependence, 10
linear equations
Index
characterization of all solutions, 44
existence of solutions, 44
uniqueness of solutions, 45
linear independence, 10
linear least squares problem, 65
general solution of, 66
geometric solution of, 67
residual of, 65
solution via QR factorization, 71
solution via singular value decom
position, 70
statement of, 65
uniqueness of solution, 66
linear regression, 67
linear transformation, 17
codomain of, 17
composition of, 19
domain of, 17
invertible, 25
left invertible. 26
matrix representation of, 18
nonsingular, 25
nulls pace of, 20
Index 155
range of, 20
right invertible, 26
LU factorization, 6
block, 5
Lyapunov differential equation, 113
Lyapunov equation, 144
and asymptotic stability, 146
integral form of solution, 146
symmetry of solution, 146
uniqueness of solution, 146
matrix
asymptotically stable, 145
best rank k approximation to, 67
companion, 105
defective, 76
definite, 99
derogatory, 106
diagonal, 2
exponential, 109
Hamiltonian, 122
Hermitian, 2
Householder, 97
indefinite, 99
lower Hessenberg, 2
lower triangular, 2
nearest singular matrix to, 67
nilpotent, 115
nonderogatory, 105
normal, 33, 95
orthogonal, 4
pentadiagonal, 2
quasi–upper–triangular, 98
sign of a, 91
square root of a, 101
symmetric, 2
symplectic, 122
tridiagonal, 2
unitary, 4
upper Hessenberg, 2
upper triangular, 2
matrix exponential, 81, 91, 109
matrix norm, 59
1–.60
2–, 60
oo–, 60
/?–, 60
consistent, 61
Frobenius, 60
induced by a vector norm, 61
mixed, 60
mutually consistent, 61
relations among, 61
Schatten, 60
spectral, 60
subordinate to a vector norm, 61
unitarily invariant, 62
matrix pencil, 125
equivalent, 127
reciprocal, 126
regular, 126
singular, 126
matrix sign function, 91
minimal polynomial, 76
monic polynomial, 76
Moore–Penrose pseudoinverse, 29
multiplication
matrix–matrix, 3
matrix–vector, 3
Murnaghan–Wintner Theorem, 98
negative definite, 99
negative invariant subspace, 92
nonnegative definite, 99
criteria for, 100
nonpositive definite, 99
norm
induced, 56
natural, 56
normal equations, 65
normed linear space, 57
nullity, 24
nullspace, 20
left, 22
right, 22
observability, 46
one–to–one (1–1), 23
conditions for, 25
onto, 23
conditions for, 25
Index
range of, 20
right invertible, 26
LV factorization, 6
block,5
Lyapunov differential equation, 113
Lyapunov equation, 144
and asymptotic stability, 146
integral form of solution, 146
symmetry of solution, 146
uniqueness of solution, 146
matrix
asymptotically stable, 145
best rank k approximation to, 67
companion, 105
defective, 76
definite, 99
derogatory, 106
diagonal,2
exponential, 109
Hamiltonian, 122
Hermitian, 2
Householder, 97
indefinite, 99
lower Hessenberg, 2
lower triangular, 2
nearest singular matrix to, 67
nilpotent, 115
nonderogatory, 105
normal, 33, 95
orthogonal, 4
pentadiagonal, 2
quasiuppertriangular, 98
sign of a, 91
square root of a, 10 1
symmetric, 2
symplectic, 122
tridiagonal, 2
unitary, 4
upper Hessenberg, 2
upper triangular, 2
matrix exponential, 81, 91, 109
matrix norm, 59
1,60
2,60
00,60
p,60
consistent, 61
Frobenius, 60
induced by a vector norm, 61
mixed,60
mutually consistent, 61
relations among, 61
Schatten,60
spectral, 60
155
subordinate to a vector norm, 61
unitarily invariant, 62
matrix pencil, 125
equivalent, 127
reciprocal, 126
regular, 126
singUlar, 126
matrix sign function, 91
minimal polynomial, 76
monic polynomial, 76
MoorePenrose pseudoinverse, 29
multiplication
matrixmatrix, 3
matrixvector, 3
MumaghanWintner Theorem, 98
negative definite, 99
negative invariant subspace, 92
nonnegative definite, 99
criteria for, 100
nonpositive definite, 99
norm
induced,56
natural,56
normal equations, 65
normed linear space, 57
nullity, 24
nullspace,20
left, 22
right, 22
observability, 46
onetoone (11), 23
conditions for, 25
onto, 23
conditions for, 25
156 Index
orthogonal
complement, 21
matrix, 4
projection, 52
subspaces, 14
vectors, 4, 20
orthonormal
vectors, 4, 20
outer product, 19
and Kronecker product, 140
exponential of, 121
pseudoinverse of, 33
singular value decomposition of, 41
various matrix norms of, 63
pencil
equivalent, 127
of matrices, 125
reciprocal, 126
regular, 126
singular, 126
Penrose theorem, 30
polar factorization, 41
polarization identity, 57
positive definite, 99
criteria for, 100
positive invariant subspace, 92
power (Kth) of a Jordan block, 120
powers of a matrix
computation of, 119–120
principal submatrix, 100
projection
oblique, 51
on four fundamental subspaces, 52
orthogonal, 52
pseudoinverse, 29
four Penrose conditions for, 30
of a full–column–rank matrix, 30
of a full–row–rank matrix, 30
of a matrix product, 32
of a scalar, 31
of a vector, 31
uniqueness, 30
via singular value decomposition, 38
Pythagorean Identity, 59
Q –orthogonality, 55
QR factorization, 72
T O " 1
IK , 1
M
mxn i
, 1
M
mxn 1
r '
M nxn 1
n ' '
range, 20
range inclusion
characterized by pseudoinverses, 33
rank, 23
column, 23
row, 23
rank–one matrix, 19
rational canonical form, 104
Rayleigh quotient, 100
reachability, 46
real Schur canonical form, 98
real Schur form, 98
reciprocal matrix pencil, 126
reconstructibility, 46
regular matrix pencil, 126
residual, 65
resolvent, 111
reverse–order identity matrix, 39, 89
right eigenvector, 75
right generalized eigenvector, 125
right invertible, 26
right nullspace, 22
right principal vector, 85
row
rank, 23
vector, 1
Schur canonical form, 98
generalized, 127
Schur complement, 6, 48, 102, 104
Schur T heorem, 98
Schur vectors, 98
second–order eigenvalue problem, 135
conversion to first–order form, 135
Sherman–Morrison–Woodbury formula,
48
signature, 103
similarity transformation, 95
and invariance of eigenvalues, h
156
orthogonal
complement, 21
matrix, 4
projection, 52
subspaces, 14
vectors, 4, 20
orthonormal
vectors, 4, 20
outer product, 19
and Kronecker product, 140
exponential of, 121
pseudoinverse of, 33
singular value decomposition of, 41
various matrix norms of, 63
pencil
equivalent, 127
of matrices, 125
reciprocal, 126
regular, 126
singular, 126
Penrose theorem, 30
polar factorization, 41
polarization identity, 57
positive definite, 99
criteria for, 100
positive invariant subspace, 92
power (kth) of a Jordan block, 120
powers of a matrix
computation of, 119120
principal submatrix, 100
projection
oblique, 51
on four fundamental subspaces, 52
orthogonal, 52
pseudoinverse, 29
four Penrose conditions for, 30
of a fullcolumnrank matrix, 30
of a fullrowrank matrix, 30
of a matrix product, 32
of a scalar, 31
of a vector, 31
uniqueness, 30
via singular value decomposition, 38
Pythagorean Identity, 59
Qorthogonality, 55
QR factorization, 72
JR.n, I
JR.mxn,1
1
I
range, 20
range inclusion
Index
characterized by pseudoinverses, 33
rank, 23
column, 23
row, 23
rankone matrix, 19
rational canonical form, 104
Rayleigh quotient, 100
reachability, 46
real Schur canonical form, 98
real Schur form, 98
reciprocal matrix pencil, 126
reconstructibility, 46
regular matrix pencil, 126
residual, 65
resolvent, III
reverseorder identity matrix, 39, 89
right eigenvector, 75
right generalized eigenvector, 125
right invertible, 26
right nullspace, 22
right principal vector, 85
row
rank, 23
vector, I
Schur canonical form, 98
generalized, 127
Schur complement, 6, 48, 102, 104
Schur Theorem, 98
Schur vectors, 98
secondorder eigenvalue problem, 135
conversion to firstorder form, 135
ShermanMorrisonWoodbury formula,
48
signature, 103
similarity transformation, 95
and invariance of eigenvalues, 81
Index 157
orthogonal, 95
unitary, 95
simple eigenvalue, 85
simultaneous diagonalization, 133
via singular value decomposition, 134
singular matrix pencil, 126
singular value decomposition (SVD), 35
and bases for four fundamental
subspaces, 38
and pseudoinverse, 38
and rank, 38
characterization of a matrix factor
ization as, 37
dyadic expansion, 38
examples, 37
full vs. compact, 37
fundamental theorem, 35
nonuniqueness, 36
singular values, 36
singular vectors
left, 36
right, 36
span, 11
spectral radius, 62, 107
spectral representation, 97
spectrum, 76
subordinate norm, 61
subspace, 9
A–invariant, 89
deflating, 129
reducing, 130
subspaces
complements of, 13
direct sum of, 13
equality of, 10
four fundamental, 23
intersection of, 13
orthogonal, 14
sum of, 13
Sylvester differential equation, 113
Sylvester equation, 144
integral form of solution, 145
uniqueness of solution, 145
Sylvester's Law of Inertia, 103
symmetric generalized eigenvalue prob
lem, 131
total least squares, 68
trace, 6
transpose, 2
characterization by inner product, 54
of a block matrix, 2
triangle inequality
for matrix norms, 59
for vector norms, 57
unitarily invariant
matrix norm, 62
vector norm, 58
variation of parameters, 112
vec
of a matrix, 145
of a matrix product, 147
vector norm, 57
l–, 57
2–, 57
oo–, 57
P–, 51
equivalent, 59
Euclidean, 57
Manhattan, 57
relations among, 59
unitarily invariant, 58
weighted, 58
weighted p–, 58
vector space, 8
dimension of, 12
vectors, 1
column, 1
linearly dependent, 10
linearly independent, 10
orthogonal, 4, 20
orthonormal, 4, 20
row, 1
span of a set of, 11
zeros
of a linear dynamical system, 130
Index
orthogonal, 95
unitary, 95
simple eigenvalue, 85
simultaneous diagonalization, 133
via singular value decomposition, 134
singular matrix pencil, 126
singular value decomposition (SVD), 35
and bases for four fundamental
subspaces, 38
and pseudoinverse, 38
and rank, 38
characterization of a matrix factor
ization as, 37
dyadic expansion, 38
examples, 37
full vs. compact, 37
fundamental theorem, 35
nonuniqueness, 36
singular values, 36
singular vectors
left, 36
right, 36
span, 11
spectral radius, 62, 107
spectral representation, 97
spectrum, 76
subordinate norm, 61
subspace, 9
Ainvariant, 89
deflating, 129
reducing, 130
subspaces
complements of, 13
direct sum of, 13
equality of, 10
four fundamental, 23
intersection of, 13
orthogonal, 14
sum of, 13
Sylvester differential equation, 113
Sylvester equation, 144
integral form of solution, 145
uniqueness of solution, 145
157
Sylvester's Law of Inertia, 103
symmetric generalized eigenvalue prob
lem,131
total least squares, 68
trace, 6
transpose, 2
characterization by inner product, 54
of a block matrix, 2
triangle inequality
for matrix norms, 59
for vector norms, 57
unitarily invariant
matrix norm, 62
vector norm, 58
variation of parameters, 112
vec
of a matrix, 145
of a matrix product, 147
vector norm, 57
1,57
2,57
00,57
p,57
equivalent, 59
Euclidean, 57
Manhattan, 57
relations among, 59
unitarily invariant, 58
weighted, 58
weighted p, 58
vector space, 8
dimension of, 12
vectors, 1
column, 1
linearly dependent, 10
linearly independent, 10
orthogonal, 4, 20
orthonormal, 4, 20
row, 1
span of a set of, 11
zeros
of a linear dynamical system, 130
Matrix Analysis Matrix Analysis
for Scientists & Engineers for Scientists & Engineers
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank
Laub University of California Davis. . Laub Alan J.Matrix Analysis Matrix Analysis for Scientists & Engineers for Scientists & Engineers Alan J. California slam.
L38 2005 512. Natick. Matrices. is a registered trademark.com 5086477000. Inc. 1948Laub. Title. For MATLAB product information. Title. please contact The MathWorks. stored. ISBN 0898715768 (pbk. PA 191042688. 2. Alan J. Laub. I. or transmitted in any manner without the written permission of the publisher. info@mathworks. Includes bibliographical references and index. QA188138 2005 QA 188. Mathematics. . MATLAB® is a registered trademark of The MathWorks. PA 191042688. MATLAB® is a registered trademark of The MathWorks. PA. 3600 University City Science Center. p. PA. Alan J. 3 Apple Hill Drive. 1. Mathematica is a registered trademark of Wolfram Research.. Inc.lam. I.. write to the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. For information. No part of this book All rights reserved. stored. Used by permission. 2. Matrix analysis for scientists and engineers / Alan J. Used by permission 5. Fax: 5086477101. Mathematical analysis.. Philadelphia. 10987654321 10987654321 All rights reserved. Mathematical analysis. Printed in the United States of America. Includes bibliographical references and index.) 1. No part of this book may be reproduced.9'434dc22 2004059962 2004059962 About the cover: The original artwork featured on the cover was created by freelance About the cover: The original artwork featured on the cover was created by freelance artist Aaron Tallon of Philadelphia. wwwmathworks. www. cm. or transmitted in any manner without the written permission may be reproduced. For MATLAB product information. Inc. Laub. Matrices. Inc. info@mathworks. Inc. artist Aaron Tallon of Philadelphia. Natick. Library of Congress CataloginginPublication Data Library of Congress CataloginginPublication Data Laub. please contact The MathWorks. cm. p. • slam is a registered trademark.) ISBN 0898715768 (pbk.. Inc.Copyright Copyright © 2005 by the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.mathworks. Fax: 5086477101. For information. Printed in the United States of America. Mathcad is a registered trademark of Mathsoft Engineering & Education. Philadelphia. write to the Society for Industrial and Applied of the publisher. 2005 by the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. 3600 University City Science Center. Inc. 5086477000.com....com. 3 Apple Hill Drive. Inc. MA 017602098 USA.com Mathematica is a registered trademark of Wolfram Research. MA 017602098 USA. Mathcad is a registered trademark of Mathsoft Engineering & Education.9'434—dc22 512. 1948Matrix analysis for scientists and engineers / Alan J.
Beverley To my wife. Beverley (who captivated me in the UBC math library captivated UBC nearly forty years ago) nearly forty .To my wife.
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank .
4.2 Matrix Arithmetic .2 Subspaces.3 Properties and Applications Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition 5.2 Some Basic Properties . .2 Matrix Linear Equations 6. 1. 4. 3. .2 Matrix Representation of Linear Transformations 3. .Contents Contents Preface Preface 1 1 Introduction and Review Introduction and Review 1. 5. . .. . .3 Linear Independence . 2. Definitions and Examples 2.4 Some Useful and Interesting Inverses. ..3 Composition of Transformations . .. . .4 Structure of Linear Transformations 3. .. 6.. . . ... . . .5 Four Fundamental Subspaces Introduction to the MoorePenrose Pseudoinverse Introduction to the MoorePenrose Pseudoinverse 4. . .. .1 Vector Linear Equations . 5. .1 Definition and Examples . .. .4 Some Useful and Interesting Inverses vii xi xi 1 1 1 1 3 3 4 4 4 7 7 7 7 9 9 10 10 13 13 17 17 17 17 18 18 19 19 20 20 22 22 2 2 3 3 4 4 29 29 30 30 31 31 35 35 35 35 38 40 5 5 6 6 43 43 43 43 44 47 47 47 47 . .5 Four Fundamental Subspaces . 6. . .1 Some Notation and Terminology 1.1 Some Notation and Terminology 1.4 Determinants 1. .3 Rowand Column Compressions 5.2 Examples 4. . .2 Matrix Representation of Linear Transformations 3. 1.2 Some Basic Properties 5.4 Structure of Linear Transformations 3.3 Inner Products and Orthogonality .3 Inner Products and Orthogonality 1. .1 Vector Linear Equations 6.3 Composition of Transformations 3.3 A More General Matrix Linear Equation 6.3 Properties and Applications . 3. . .1 Definitions and Examples ..3 A More General Matrix Linear Equation 6. .4 Sums and Intersections of Subspaces Linear Transformations Linear Transformations 3. ..3 Linear Independence 2.1 The Fundamental Theorem .1 4.. .3 Row and Column Compressions Linear Equations Linear Equations 6. . ..1 2. 3.1 Definitions and Characterizations Definitions and Characterizations.4 Determinants Vector Spaces Vector Spaces 2. .. . 4..4 Sums and Intersections of Subspaces 2.2 Matrix Arithmetic 1. . . . .2 Subspaces 2. 6.2 Examples.. ..1 Definition and Examples 3.2 Matrix Linear Equations . . 2.1 The Fundamental Theorem 5. . . .
.2 Other least squares problems 8. .3.3.2 Difference Equations 11.4 Linear matrix differential equations . . . . .2. . 7. .3 Inhomogeneous linear differential equations 11.3 Inhomogeneous linear differential equations 11.1 Some Basic Canonical Forms 10. . .2 Geometric Solution 8.1. .3 Computation of matrix powers . .1 9. . . .3. . . .2 On the +1's in JCF blocks 9.3.1 Theoretical computation .1 Fundamental Definitions and Properties 9.5 The Matrix Sign Function 51 51 51 51 52 52 54 54 57 57 59 59 8 65 65 65 65 67 67 67 67 67 67 69 70 70 71 71 9 75 75 75 82 82 85 85 86 86 88 88 89 89 91 91 95 95 10 Canonical Forms 10.1. .3 Vector Norms 7. .2.2 On the + l's in JCF blocks 9. . Example: Linear regression 8.1. . . 8.3 Equivalence Transformations and Congruence 10. .2.1. . .6 Computation of the matrix exponential 11. 8. 10. . . .1.5 The Matrix Sign Function. . and Norms 7. .4 Geometric Aspects of the JCF 9. . . .1 The four fundamental orthogonal projections The four fundamental orthogonal projections 7.3. . .1 Differential Equations ILl Differential Equations . . . .2 Homogeneous linear differential equations 11. . 95 95 99 102 102 104 104 104 104 109 109 109 109 109 109 112 112 112 112 113 113 114 114 114 114 118 118 118 118 118 118 119 119 120 120 . . . .3.1 Properties of the matrix exponential 11. . .1 7. 9.2 Inhomogeneous linear difference equations 11.1 Block matrices and definiteness 10. . . .3 HigherOrder Equations. .2 Jordan Canonical Form 9.3 Equivalence Transformations and Congruence 10. . 9.1 8.1.3 Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares Problems 8. .3 Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares Problems 8. Theoretical computation 9. 11. 11.1. . .3 Computation of matrix powers 11. . . . .2 Difference Equations .2. .4 Rational Canonical Form 11 Linear Differential and Difference Equations 11 Linear Differential and Difference Equations 11.4 Linear matrix differential equations 11.2 Homogeneous linear differential equations 11. .1 Homogeneous linear difference equations 11. .1 Example: Linear regression .1.1. . . . . .3 Determination of the JCF 9.2. 11.2 Inhomogeneous linear difference equations 11. . . . .2 Geometric Solution . . . . . .3.4 Least Squares and Singular Value Decomposition 8. . .4 Rational Canonical Form .1. .1 The Linear Least Squares Problem 8. . . . 11. . .1 Fundamental Definitions and Properties 9. . .5 Modal decompositions 11. .1. . . 10.1 Projections . . .5 Least Squares and QR Factorization . .2 Other least squares problems .1. . . . . . . .2 Definite Matrices 10. . .1 Some Basic Canonical Forms .4 Least Squares and Singular Value Decomposition 8. Inner Product Spaces.2 Inner Product Spaces 7.1 Projections 7. .1 Properties ofthe matrix exponential . . 9.1 Block matrices and definiteness 10. . . .3 HigherOrder Equations . . . .1 The Linear Least Squares Problem . 7. . .2. . . . Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors 9. . . . .5 Modal decompositions .3. . . . . . .2 Definite Matrices . . . . . .3 Vector Norms 7.4 Matrix Norms . . . 11. . . . . 8.1 Homogeneous linear difference equations 11. . . . .3.3 Determination of the JCF .viii viii Contents Contents 7 Projections.2 Inner Product Spaces 7. . .4 Matrix Norms Linear Least Squares Problems 8.6 Computation of the matrix exponential 11.1. .1. . .3. . . 10. .4 Geometric Aspects of the JCF 9. 11. .2 Jordan Canonical Form . . 11. .5 Least Squares and QR Factorization 8. . . .
. .1 The Generalized Eigenvalue/Eigenvector Problem 12.1 The Generalized EigenvaluelEigenvector Problem 12. . .Contents Contents ix ix 12 Generalized Eigenvalue Problems 12 Generalized Eigenvalue Problems 12. .6. . . . . . . .5 Simultaneous Diagonalization .4 Symmetric Generalized Eigenvalue Problems .2 Canonical Forms 12. . . . .2 Properties of the Kronecker Product .5. 13. . 12.3 Application to the Computation of System Zeros 12. .4 Symmetric Generalized Eigenvalue Problems 12. .6.5 Simultaneous Diagonalization 12.6 HigherOrder Eigenvalue Problems . .3 Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations Bibliography Bibliography Index Index .1 Conversion to firstorder form 125 125 125 127 127 130 131 131 133 133 133 135 135 135 139 139 139 139 140 144 144 151 153 13 Kronecker Products 13 Kronecker Products 13. 12. . .1 Simultaneous diagonalization via SVD 12. 12. 13. . .1 Conversion to firstorder form 12.3 Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations 13. .2 Properties of the Kronecker Product 13. 12. . . .1 Definition and Examples . .3 Application to the Computation of System Zeros . . . 12. .1 Definition and Examples 13. . .1 Simultaneous diagonalization via SVD 12.. .2 Canonical Forms . . . . .6 HigherOrder Eigenvalue Problems 12. . . .5.
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank .
For this. eigenvalues and eigenvectors. By matrix analysis I mean linear tools and ideas comfortably in a variety of applications. Matrices are stressed more than abstract vector spaces. although Chapters 2 and 3 do cover some geometric (i. Basic concepts such as determinants. computer science. Certain topics that may have been treated cursorily in undergraduate courses are treated in more depth that may have been treated cursorily in undergraduate courses are treated in more depth and more advanced material is introduced. Noble and Daniel [20].e. although Chapters 2 and 3 algebra. in many cases.e. I have tried throughout to emphasize only the and more advanced material is introduced. The concept of matrix factorization is emphasized throughout to provide a foundation for a later course in numerical linear is emphasized throughout to provide a foundation for a later course in numerical linear algebra. requiring such material as prerequisite permits tion may occasionally be "hazy. even though their recollecmatrices least tion may occasionally be "hazy. Instructors are encouraged to supplement the book with specific application examples from their own encouraged to supplement the book with specific application examples from their own particular subject area. but somehow didn't quite manage to do. Upon completion of a course based on this text. [13]. the student is then wellequipped to pursue. and mathematical structures. I highly recommend MAlLAB® although other software such as a digital computer. Ortega [21]." However. students meant to learn much of the important and useful mathematics that. The books by Meyer [18]. Matrices are stressed more than abstract vector spaces. I highly recommend MATLAB® although other software such as xi xi . [23]. followon topics on the computational side (at the level of [7]. or [16]. singularity of matrices. methods. or computational science science who wish to be familar with enough matrix analysis that they are prepared to use its enough analysis they are prepared to tools and ideas comfortably in a variety of applications. mathematics. either via formal courses or through selftext." this ics. Certain topics thoroughly as undergraduates. Because tools such as the SVD are not generally amenable to "hand computation. The choice of topics covered in linear algebra and matrix theory is motivated both by The choice of topics covered in linear algebra and matrix theory is motivated both by applications and by computational utility and relevance. in many cases. or [25]. basisfree or subspace) aspects of many of the fundamental do cover some geometric (i.Preface Preface This book is intended to be used as a text for beginning graduatelevel (or even seniorlevel) This book is intended to be used as a text for beginning graduatelevel (or even seniorlevel) students in engineering. These powerful and versatile tools can then be exploited to provide a unifying foundation upon which to base subsequent topcan exploited to foundation subsequent topics. [II]. For this. The text linear dynamical systems (systems of linear differential or difference equations). The concept of matrix factorization applications and by computational utility and relevance. and positive definite matrices should have been covered at least once. [13]." this approach necessarily presupposes the availability of appropriate mathematical software on approach necessarily presupposes the availability of appropriate mathematical software on a digital computer. requiring such material as prerequisite permits the early (but "outoforder" by conventional standards) introduction of topics such as pseuthe early (but "outoforder" by conventional standards) introduction of topics such as pseudoinverses and the singular value decomposition (SVD). example) or on the theoretical side (at the level of [12]. or [16]. particular subject area. These powerful and versatile tools doinverses and the singular value decomposition (SVD). and concepts such as determinants. example) or on the theoretical side (at the level of [12]. or computational students in engineering. mathematics. for [11]." However. essentially Prerequisites for using this text are quite modest: essentially just an understanding for this understanding of calculus and definitely some previous exposure to matrices and linear algebra. the student is then wellequipped to pursue. the sciences. the sciences. eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Because tools such as the SVD are not generally amenable to "hand computation. and Strang [24] Ortega are excellent companion texts for this book. students meant to learn thoroughly as undergraduates. Upon completion of a course based on this are excellent companion texts for this book. I have tried throughout to emphasize only the more important and "useful" tools. By matrix analysis I mean linear algebra and matrix theory together with their intrinsic interaction with and application to algebra and matrix theory together with their intrinsic interaction with and application to linear dynamical systems (systems of linear differential or difference equations).. but somehow didn't quite manage to do. Basic of calculus and definitely some previous exposure to matrices and linear algebra. singularity of matrices. basisfree or subspace) aspects of many of the fundamental notions.. either via formal courses or through selfstudy. for example). computer science. The text can be used in a onequarter or onesemester course to provide a compact overview of can be used in a onequarter or onesemester course to provide a compact overview of much of the important and useful mathematics that. for example).
Statespace methods are Statespace modem now standard in much of modern engineering where. and modem engineering. This is an absolutely fundamental fundamental concept. remarked afterward that if processing. are deferred to such a course. in particular. many students who completed especially offered. and states often give rise to models of very numbers models high order that must be analyzed. form the foundation virtually modem upon which rests virtually all of modern scientific and engineering computation. they are either obvious or easily found in the literature. science. But in most engineering or scientific contexts we want to know more than that. First. modern Some of the applications of matrix analysis mentioned briefly in this book derive of the applications of matrix analysis mentioned briefly in this book modem statespace from the modern statespace approach to dynamical systems. econometrics. especially the first few times it was offered. control systems with standard large numbers of interacting inputs. diverse audience. for example. and the course has proven to be remarkably successful at enabling students from disparate backgrounds to acquire a quite acceptable level of mathematical maturity and acceptable graduate rigor for subsequent graduate studies in a variety of disciplines. This is ideal not given explicitly.xii xii Preface Preface Mathcad® Mathematica® or Mathcad® is also excellent. I have taught this material for many years. consistent. and a wide variety of other fields. in an elementary linear algebra course. one must lay a firm foundation upon which subsequent applications and Rather. . "reallife" problems seldom yield to simple "reallife" closedform formulas or solutions." For example. how "nearly dependent" are the vectors? If they linearly independent. This is ideal material from which to learn a bit about mathematical proofs and the mathematical maturity and insight gained thereby. A second motivation for a computational emphasis is that it provides many of the essential tools for what I call "qualitative mathematics. are there "best" linearly independent subsets? These tum out to turn be much more difficult problems and frequently involve researchlevel questions when set be much more difficult problems and frequently involve researchlevel questions when set in the context of the finiteprecision. It is thus crucial to acquire knowledge vocabulary a working knowledge of the vocabulary and grammar of this language. If If are linearly dependent. are deferred to such a course. mathematics. applied physics. if only they had had this course before they took linear systems. outputs. When they are not given explicitly. statistics. Some of the key algorithms of numerical linear algebra. the student does require a certain amount of what is conventionally referred Proofs referred to as "mathematical maturity. prerequisites developed While prerequisites for this text are modest. in particular. Mastery of the material in this text should enable the student to read and understand the modern language of matrices used throughout mathematics. If a set of vectors is linearly independent. must lay firm foundation upon which and perspectives perspectives can be built in a logical. They must generally be solved computationally and closedform it is important to know which types of algorithms can be relied upon and which cannot. and while most material is developed from basic ideas in the book. Rather. form the foundation Some of the key algorithms of numerical linear algebra. linear algebra introducing "onthefly" algebra for elementary statespace theory) to an appendix or introducing it "onthef1y" when to necessary. finiterange floatingpoint arithmetic environment of of of most modem computing platforms. and the course has proven to be remarkably successful at enabling students from Davis. and coherent fashion. The tools of matrix analysis are also applied on a daily basis to problems in biology. completed the course." a set of vectors is either linearly independent or it is not. simulated. or signal processing." Proofs are given for many theorems. It is my firm conviction that such maturity is neither encouraged conviction neither nor nurtured by relegating the mathematical aspects of applications (for example. The presentation of the material in this book is strongly influenced by computais influenced by computational issues for two principal reasons. the details of most of the numerical aspects of linear algebra per se. Since this text is not intended for a course in numerical linear algebra per se. The "language" in which such described models are conveniently described involves vectors and matrices. Indeed. chemistry. they are either obvious or easily found in the literature. and evaluated. many times at UCSB and twice at UC Davis. and thus the text can serve a rather diverse audience.
Preface Preface xiii XIII or estimation theory. they no longer had to provide as much time for "review" and could focus instead on the subject at hand. The concept seems to work. AJL. My fellow instructors. too. etc. they would have been able to concentrate on the new ideas deficiencies they wanted to learn.. rather than having to spend time making up for deficiencies in their background background in matrices and linear algebra. realized that by requiring this course as a prerequisite. June 2004 — AJL. .
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank .
R mxn = the set of real (or realvalued) m x n matrices. This is followed by a review of some basic notions in matrix analysis throughout the text.. . Henceforth. Cn = the set of ntuples of complex numbers represented as column vectors. A row vector is denoted by y~. and linear algebra. where Xi E R for ii E !!. mxn = the set of complex (or complexvalued) x n matrices. en 4. . the set of ntuples of complex numbers represented as column vectors. A row vector is denoted by yT where Note: Vectors are always column vectors. XTy is a scalar while it easy to recognize immediately throughout the text that. e.1 Some Notation and Terminology Some Notation and Terminology We begin with a brief introduction to some standard notation and terminology to be used We begin with a brief introduction to some standard notation and terminology to be used throughout the text.Chapter 1 Chapter 1 Introduction and Review Introduction and Review 1. Henceforth. 1 . 5. 2.. 1R. n }. xyT is an n x n matrix. 3. 5. e 6.. n}.. Crnxn = the set of complex (or complexvalued) m x n matrices. That a vector is always a y E IR n and the superscript T is the transpose operation. Note: Vectors are always column vectors. Rn = the set of ntuples of real numbers represented as column vectors. 2. Thus.n xn Cmxn = the set of complex m x n matrices of rank r.. . x E Rn I. Thus. x T y is a scalar while xyT is an n x n matrix. nonsingular n x n matrices.g. but this convention makes it easy to recognize immediately throughout the text that.. IR~ xn denotes the set of real = set of real of rank Thus. but this convention makes column vector rather than a row vector is entirely arbitrary. IR rn xn = the set of real (or realvalued) m x n matrices. This is followed by a review of some basic notions in matrix analysis and linear algebra. IR n = the set of ntuples of real numbers represented as column vectors. where y G Rn and the superscript T is the transpose operation. the notation!! denotes the set {I. Thus.g. e. The following sets appear frequently throughout subsequent chapters: The following sets appear frequently throughout subsequent chapters: 1.1 1.n xn Rmxnr = the set of real m x n matrices of rank r. e. = the set of complex m x n matrices of rank r. the notation n denotes the set {1. That a vector is always a column vector rather than a row vector is entirely arbitrary. Rnxnn denotes the set of real nonsingular n x n matrices.. x e IR n means means where xi e IR for e n.
Example 1. where the bar indicates complex sometimes A*) and its = IX jfJ (j = = v^T). For example. j)th entry of a matrix A is denoted by AT and is the matrix whose j)th entry A. A if A = AT and Hermitian if A = AH. • lower Hessenberg if aij = 0 for } . Oth (A 7 ). j is Remark the more common notation in electrical engineering and system theory. j)\h entry is (AH)ij = (aji).. if z = a + jf$ (j = ii = R).. • lower Hessenberg if a. = 0 for j — > 1. A = [ 7+} 5 3· A . 1. AT E E" xm is the (j. ~ 5 is symmetric (and Hermitian).2 2 Chapter 1.JI > 1. = 0 for i > }.1. For example. • tridiagonal if a(y = 0 for z — j\ > 1..J I > 2. is Hermitian (but not symmetric). then the (m + n) x (m + n) matrix [~ Bc] is block upper triangular.2.ii > 1. • upper triangular if aij. Introduction and Review Chapter 1.. • lower triangular if aij7 = 0 for i/ < }. } is While R is most commonly denoted by i in mathematics texts. ] is symmetric (and Hermitian). z Remark 1. • upper triangular if a. i. For example. it is Transposes of block matrices can be defined in an obvious way. C E jRmxm. 7 = («77). = 0 for < j. • lower triangular if a.[ 7 . We henceforth that..jj > 1. Note that if A E R mx ". A matrix A is symmetric i. unless if A = A T Hermitian A = A H. • upper Hessenberg if afj = 0 for — > 1. The notation j is used throughout the text but reminders are placed at strategic locations.. Example 1. = 0 for / — j\ > 2. • tridiagonal if aij = 0 for Ii . = 0 for i > j. • pentadiagonal if ai. 2 Transposes of block matrices can be defined in an obvious way. B E IR nxm . otherwise noted. The The transpose of a matrix A is denoted by AT and is the matrix whose (i. (7. a. There is some advantage to being conversant with both notations.e. There is some the more common notation in electrical engineering and system theory. then easy to see that if A. and definitions block submatrices. an equation like A = A T implies that A is realvalued while a statement like A = AH implies that A is complexvalued. A = [ . A = AH A complexvalued. • upper Hessenberg if aij = 0 for ii .j  7+} ] is Hermitian (but not symmetric).. 7 + j ] is complexvalued symmetric but not Hermitian. A e jRmxn. = a jfJ.. if e Rnxn e Rmxn C e Rmxm then the (m n) x (m n) matrix [A0 ~] is block upper triangular. i)th entry of A. is complexvalued symmetric but not Hermitian.. A is conjugation. it is easy to see that if Aij are appropriately dimensioned subblocks. If A E em xn. A matrix A E IRn xn e (or A E enxn ) is A eC" x ")is • diagonal if a. where the bar indicates complex j)th entry is (A H ).2. For example. text but reminders are placed at strategic locations. then its Hermitian transpose (or conjugate transpose) is denoted by AH (or H If A e C mx ". then r = [ . (AT)ij = aji. then A7" e jRnxm. Each of the above also has a "block" analogue obtained by replacing scalar components in the respective definitions by block submatrices. then z = IX — jfi. if A E IRnxn. Hermitian conjugate sometimes A*) and its (i. 2 2. We henceforth adopt the convention that.. While \/—\ is most commonly denoted by i in mathematics texts. Introduction and Review We now classify some of the more familiar "shaped" matrices. = 0 for i ^ j. are appropriately dimensioned subblocks. that is. • pentadiagonal if aij = 0 for Ii . • diagonal if aij7 = 0 for i i= }.e. an equation like A = A T implies that A is realvalued while a statement otherwise noted. .
[ ~ J+2.. Theorem 1. vn Rpxn p with Vit e R .1. The importance of this interpretation cannot be overemphasized.• a"1 E m JR " with a. if (C D)H — D C ). applied p times: There is also an alternative.3 can then also be generalized to its "row dual.e. i=I If matrices C and D are compatible for multiplication. n UV T = LUiVr E jRmxp. . Then we can quickly calculate dot products of the rows of A column Ax = [...[ ~ l For large arrays of numbers. As a numerical example. importance interpretation take A = [96 85 74]x = take A = [~ ~]. formulation of matrix multiplication that appears frequently in the text and is presented below as a theorem. Namely. suppose A e Rmxn and B = [bi.. Matrix Arithmetic 3 1.... That is. Then v E jRP.3. vector x. multiplication. It is deceptively simple and its full understanding is well rewarded.. un Rmxn with u Rm and V = [v .. E JRm and x = l I. the matrixvector product Ax.. . Vn] ]Ee lR Pxn U [Uj. i." The details are left to the readei "row left . suppose A E jRmxn and [hI.2. . It Theorem 1.. Then the matrix product A B can be thought of as above. . multiplication of a matrix by a scalar.2 Arithmetic It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the fundamental notions of matrix addition. un]]Ee jRmxn with Ui t Ee jRm and V = [VI... AB bi E W1.•. matrixvector product with the column x to find Ax = [50 32]' but this matrixvector product can also be computed computed via v1a 3. matrixvector if C E jRmxn has row vectors cJ E jRlxn. recall that (CD)T = DT C T (C D)T = DT T If H H H (or (CD} = DHC H ). A very important way to view this product is interpret weighted to interpret it as a weighted sum (linear combination) of the columns of A. Let U = [MI. {.2 Matrix Arithmetic 1.. its importance cannot be overemphasized. Theorem reader. + Xnan E jRm. suppose (linear combination) suppose A = la' . A special case of matrix multiplication occurs when the second matrix is a column multiplication second i.. . and is premultiplied by a row yT E R l x m then the product can be written as a weighted linear sum of the rows of C as follows: follows: yTC=YICf +"'+Ymc~ EjRlxn.bhp ] e Rnxp with hi e jRn. Theorem 1. eRmxn has row cj e E l x ".. Again. and multiplication of matrices. This gives a dual to the matrixvector result above. x = ! 2 Then we can quickly calculate dot products of the rows of A [~]...'" p] E jRnxp For matrix multiplication. Ax..3. ..~].xn~ ] Then Ax = Xjal + .[ ~ J+l. and is premultiplied by a row vector yTe jRlxm. there can be important computerarchitecturerelated advancomputerarchitecturerelated tages to preferring the latter calculation method.. but equivalent.e.
Example 1. (or A E Cnxn) we use the notation det A for the determinant of A. y)c = (y. E R are said to be orthogonal if their inner product is Two nonzero vectors x. the Euclidean inner product (or inner product. the order in which x and y appear in the complex inner (x. the Euclidean inner product inner for short) y is given by y is given by n T (x. Introduction and Review Chapter 1. If x and y are zero. Nonzero complex vectors are orthogonal if x H y = 0. Similarly. 1.=1 y appear in Note that (x.. x)c and we see that. We list below some of (or A 6 en xn) we use the notation det A for the determinant of A. i.=1 Note that the inner product is a scalar. x)c. We list below some of . for short) of x and For vectors y e IRn. x}c. we define their complex Euclidean inner product (or inner product. y E <en. order in which x product is important.. Clearly said = an orthogonal or unitary matrix has orthonormal rows and orthonormal columns. i. A EC = (orC" xn). Then XTX = 0 but XHX = 2.4 Determinants Determinants It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the basic theory of determinants. The notation /„ is sometimes used to denote the identity matrix in IR nxn in Rnx" x nxn H H (or en "). There is no special name attached to a nonsquare matrix A E R mxn (or E Cmxn with orthonormal no special name attached to a nonsquare matrix A e ]Rrn"n (or € e mxn ))with orthonormal rows or columns.2j while while and we see that. To illustrate. we define their complex Euclidean inner product (or inner product. i.j] [ ~ ] = 1 . xTyy = 0. Note that x Tx = 0 if and only if x = 0 when x e Rn but that this is not true if x e Cn. y E R". consider the nonzero vector x above. y e IRn are said to be orthogonal if their inner product is zero. a matrix A e en xn is said to be unitary if A H A = AA H = I. (x. but throughout the text we prefer the symmetry with the real (x. where / is the n x n identity matrix. . rows or columns. the nonzero vector x above. y) := x y = Lx.4.4 1..4 4 Chapter 1. A nxn matrix E R is an orthogonal matrix if AT A = AAT = I. Introduction and Review 1. y ) c = yHxx = L:7=1 x.. Let x = [} ]] and y = [~]. y)c = (y. . (x. If x. Let x = [1j and y = [1/2].e.y. Note that the inner product is a scalar.e. A orthogonal and XTX = 1 and yTyy = 1.y. x and y are orthogonal and x Tx = 1 and yT = 1. for short) by for short) by n (x'Y}c :=xHy = Lx. i. case.. If e C". y)c = (y. Nonzero complex vectors are orthogonal if XHy = O.e. What is true in the complex case is that XH x = 0 if and only if x = 0. The more conventional definition of the complex inner product is product is important.4. then we say that x and y are orthonormal.. In sometimes used denote identity matrix. Two nonzero vectors x. consider What is true in the complex case is that x H 0 if and only if O. indeed. where I is the n x n matrix A e IRnxn is an orthogonal matrix if ATA = AAT = /. x)c'. For A E R nnxn A e IR xn It assumed of determinants. Note that x T x = 0 if and only if x = 0 when x E IRn but that this is not true if x E en. Then (x. There is an orthogonal or unitary matrix has orthonormal rows and orthonormal columns.e.3 Inner Products and Orthogonality Inner Products and Orthogonality For vectors x. Then Example 1. x T = O.y. then we say that x and y are orthonormal. The more conventional definition of the complex inner product is H ( x . To illustrate. Similarly. indeed. y)c = y = Eni=1 xiyi but throughout the text we prefer the symmetry with the real case. Y}c = [ } JH [ ~ ] = [I .3 1. Y}c = {y. Then x T x = 0 but x H X = 2.
• det Ann. If A is upper triangular. then det A = 0. 2.1 ) = de: A.. are consequences of one or more of the others. 3. exdetA.• ann.. Proof: This follows easily from the block LU factorization Proof" This follows easily from the block LU factorization [~ ~J=[ ~ ][ ~ 17.CA. 15. B eR n x n .• a"n. Interchanging two rows of A changes only the sign of the determinant. det AT = det A (detA H = detA if A e C nxn ). Multiplying a row of A by a scalar and then adding it to another row does not change 7. Proof" Proof: This follows easily from the block UL factorization BD. then det A = O. = alla22 • • ann i. Ann (of possibly different sizes). If A € lR~xn. If A is diagonal.. 14. If A e R n x n and D e R m x m . with A block diagonal (or block 13. If A has a zero row or if any two rows of A are equal. then det A = a11a22 . 8. If A has a zero column or if any two columns of A are equal. then det [~ BD] = del A det(D – CA– l 1 B). If A E lR~xn and DE IR mxm det [Ac ~] detA det(D . If A E R n x n and D e RMmxm.• ann. 11.. If A has a zero column or if any two columns of A are equal.. Multiplying a column of A by a scalar and then adding it to another column does not a column of scalar column does change the determinant. several more is a properties are consequences of one or more of the others. B E IRnxn . 15. then det A = all a22 .4. 17.. 16. 13.. of 5. 8.e. 10. then det [Ac ~] det D det(A B D. If det = a11a22 • • ann 12. det A 11 det A22 • • det Ann 14. det A is the product of its diagonal 10. then det(A.•. If A A A = o.e. properties 1. then det(AB) = det A det B.1 I ][ . If A is block diagonal (or block upper triangular or block lower triangular). If A e IRnxn and D E lR~xm. . then det A = 0. If A. Note that this is not a minimal set.e..4. Multiplying a row of A by a scalar ex results in a new matrix whose determinant is a det A. then det A = alla22 • • ann 12. Interchanging two rows of A changes only the sign of the determinant. If A is lower triangular. then det [~ BD] = det D det(A – B D – 11C ) . then det A = different det A11 det A22 . A 11.. Determinants 5 properties the more useful properties of determinants. Determinants 1. i. A 22 . then det(A1) = 1detA .. then det A = a11a22 .thendet(AB) = det A det 5. If A E Rnxn. det A is the product of its diagonal diagonal. Interchanging two columns of A changes only the sign of the determinant.B)...C). the determinant.... 11. i.1. is a det A. change the determinant. Multiplying A 6. 7. Multiplying a row of A by a scalar and then adding it to another row does not change the determinant. 4. detAT = detA (det A H = det A A E C"X").. 9. Multiplying a row of A by a scalar a results in a new matrix whose determinant is 5.. 16. If A. 3.A22.. If A is lower triangUlar. If elements. • • An" (of A = square diagonal blocks A11.. Multiplying a column of A by a scalar ex results in a new matrix whose determinant scalar a determinant is ex det A.
U2 . U1 U2 • • Uk is an 5.6.• V k is an orthogonal matrix.e. Then E jRnxn skewsymmetric. Suppose A E jRn xn is idempotent and A ^ I. • ... . i. what is det A? If A 3.e. Let x. AB ^ BA. see. 6. TrA = Eni=1 aii.. B e JRn xn and a. elements. V2.B D – l C is the Schur complement of D in [~ BD ].. 2sin20 J is idempotent for all #. ..yTx. TrS O. A matrix A e Wx" is said to be idempotent if A2 = A. Uk E Rnxn U = VI V2 . TrA = L~=I au· elements.6 6 Chapter 1.e A – 1 B is called the Schur complement of A in[ACBD]. Show that det(I – xyT) = 1. [24]. ST = So Show that TrS = 0. are block analogues of these. example. The factorization of a matrix A into the product of a unit lower triangular matrix L (i. (b) Suppose A e IR" X "is idempotent and A i= I. A . Tr(aA + f3B) = aTrA + fiTrB. y e Rn. Another such factorization is VL U is an LU factorization. either prove the converse or provide a counterexample. A E jRnxn A2 / x™ . even though in general AB i= B A. nxn linear E R f3 E JR. If A is orthogonal.e.. A =. for example. then Tr(aA fiB)= aTrA + f3TrB. . II _ .5. Show that A must be singular.Vk € jRn xn be orthogonal matrices. i. . Remark — C I B – BDIe Similarly. The factorizations used above U triangular. of denoted Tr A. aII o. The trace of A.. ft e R. of Din [AC ~ l EXERCISES EXERCISES nxn 1. see. 2 0 IS I dempotent . Show that the product V = VI. what is det A? If A is unitary. ST = S. [24]. The matrix D . Introduction and Review Chapter 1. Letx. Let U1.y E jRn. Remark 1.. .e.e. is defined as the sum of its diagonal A e Rnxn... (b) Show that Tr(AB) = Tr(BA). Another such factorization is UL where V is unit upper triangular and L is lower triangular. [~ ~ ].. (c) Let S € Rnxn be skewsymmetric.5.. The factorization of a matrix A into the product of a unit lower triangular Remark 1. denoted TrA. Introduction and Review Remark 1. what is det(aA)? What is det(–A)? E R a det(A)? A? If A unitary. Showthatdet(lxyT) 1 – yTx. Tr(Afl) = Tr(£A). (a) Show that the trace is a linear function. i. lor z r 2sm2rt # J.. 2f) 2 _ sm 2^ sin 0 sin sin 20 1 . i. Show that A must be singular.. 4. if A. _. Let A E jRNxn. A? 2. ! [ 2cos2<9 I T 2cos2 0 (a) Show that the matrix A = _. If A e jRnxn and or is a scalar. .. lower triangular with all l's on the diagonal) and an upper triangular matrix L 1's an V is called an LV factorization.
8 e F.8 + y) = a·. a f.ye¥. An excellent reference for this and the next chapter is [10]. afar all a.) is an abelian group. Axioms (M1)(M4) state that (F \ to). 0.((. .8 . A field is a set IF together with two operations +.) ( a . y Elf. but some infinitedimensional examples are also cited. ft. aI = 1. .8 + y) = (a +. where some of the proofs that are not given here may for this and the next chapter is [10]. (D) (D) a· p a . +) is a group and an abelian group if (A4) also holds. y e F. y)=cip+a.Chapter 2 Vector Spaces Vector Spaces In this chapter we give a brief review of some of the basic concepts of vector spaces.8. y € F. An excellent reference of matrices. (Al) a + (.8 +a· y for all a. The emphasis is on finitedimensional vector spaces. (M3) e IF. (M2) there exists an element I E F such that a . (A2) there exists an element 0 E F such that a + 0 = a for all a E F. p. there exists an element (—a) E IF such that a (—a) O. including spaces formed by special classes emphasis is on finitedimensional vector spaces. where some of the proofs that are not given here may be found. 2. (A2) there exists an element 0 e IF such that a 0 = a.1. 7 . for all a e IF.y for alia. • F x IF ~ F such that (Al) a (P y ) = (a + p ) y o r all a. (M4) a • p =. (Ml) a· p . (A4) a + . A field is a set F together with two operations +. (A4) a + p = . the multiplication operator "•" is Generally speaking. (A3) for all a E IF. : IF x F —> IF such that Definition 2. Axioms (A1)(A3) state that (F. when no confusion can arise.1 Definitions and Examples Definition 2. there exists an element (a) e F such that a + (a) = 0.8)· yyf for all a. the multiplication operator ". but some infinitedimensional examples are also cited. y Elf. Axioms (MI)(M4) state that (IF \ {0}. .((.8.8 = P • a for all a. (A3) for all a e F. p. . The In this chapter we give a brief review of some of the basic concepts of vector spaces. +) is a group and an abelian group if (A4) also holds. (M3) for all a E ¥.. y Elf.8. there exists an element aI E F such that a . ft Elf.8) + y ffor all a. ^ 0. including spaces formed by special classes of matrices. (M2) 1 e IF • I = for a e IF. •) is an abelian group. . Axioms (Al)(A3) state that (IF. yy) = (a·. I = a for all a E F.8 = ft + afar all a. (Ml) a .1..8. a"1 € IF • a~l = 1.8 E IF. be found. when no confusion can arise. Generally speaking. p e F. not written explicitly.8 a for all a.p ) . (M4) a·." is not written explicitly.o r all a.
2. Example 2. Remark 2. p E IF andfor all v e V. IR~ xn = m x n matrices of rank r with real coefficients) is clearly not a field since. (V4) a· (v + w) = a .• v = a·• v + p • v for all a. R) with addition defined by I. this causes 2. }. w e V. when there is no possibility of confusion as to the A vector space is denoted by (V. simply by V.1. Note that + and • in Definition 2.1 in the sense of operating on different objects in different sets. w for all a e F and for all v. is a field. A vector space over a field IF is a set V together with two operations + ::V x V + V and· :: IF x V + V such that V x V ^V and. 3..F xV »• V such that (VI) (V. ) f for all a.l..p ) .2. v for all a. RMrmxn= {m x n matrices of rank r with real coefficients} is clearly not a field since. (R". e with ordinary complex addition and multiplication is a field. Similar definitions hold for (C". when there is no possibility of confusion as to the underlying fie Id. 4. C with ordinary complex addition and multiplication is a field.}.3 are different from the + and . f3 Elf andforall v E V. (IRn. . Note that + and· in Definition 2. Moreover. Example 2. this causes no confusion and the·• operator is usually not even written explicitly. 2. where Z+ = {O.( (f3' V v) o r all a. no confusion and the operator is usually not even written explicitly. . p € F and for all v e V.2. A vector space over a field F is a set V together with two operations Definition 2. Moreover. Example 2. Ra[x] = the field of rational functions in the indeterminate x 3. (V2) (a·. + f3qXq :aj. (Ml) does not hold unless m = n. (VI) (V. lR~xn is not a field either since (M4) does not hold in general (although the other 8 axioms hold). Vector Spaces Example 2. underlying field. +) is an abelian group.5. Definition 2. IR) with addition defined by and scalar multiplication defined by and scalar multiplication defined by is a vector space. (MI) does not hold unless m = n. w E V.5.2. 1. v = a . is a vector space. simply by V... where Z+ = {0. (V2) ( a f3) v = a P . in Definition Remark 2. (V5) I·• v = v for all v E V (1 e F). e). (V3) (a (V4) a(v w)=av a w for all a ElF andfor all v. 4. C). is a field. F) or.4.. v + a..3 are different from the + and • in Definition 2. for example. In practice.3. R"x" is not a field either for example. In practice. (V5) 1 v = v for all v e V (1 Elf). IR with ordinary addition and multiplication is a field.4. +) is an abelian group.3. Raf.. I.r] = the field of rational functions in the indeterminate x = {ao + f30 + atX f3t X + . 1.. + apxP + ..1 in the sense of operating on different objects in different sets. since (M4) does not hold in general (although the other 8 axioms hold). ft) v = a v + f3.qEZ +} .f3i EIR . 2.P. . IF) or. Similar definitions hold for (en.8 Chapter 2. A vector space is denoted by (V. f3 e F and for all v E V. (V3) (a + f3). R with ordinary addition and multiplication is a field.
and the symbol c. and the symbol ~.. + fJmn l yaml yamn 3. IF) be an arbitrary vector space and '0 be an arbitrary set. W f= 0. Let (V. Subspaces 2. Then (x(t) : x ( t ) = Ax(t)} is a vector space (of dimension n).2. Let A E JR(nxn.. Subspaces 2. w2 e Remark 2. we write W ~ V. The latter characterization of a subspace is often the easiest way to check Remark 2. V) be the set of functions / mapping D to V. equivalently. 2. JR). Note. that since 0 E IF. that since 0 e F. too. Note. Notation: When the underlying field is understood. F) if and only if (W. when used with vector spaces. F) is a Definition 2. +00). 4." ya2n . (V. (JRmxn. W = 0. td)n or continuous =: (C[?0. g E cf> and scalar multiplication defined by and scalar multiplication defined by (af)(d) = af(d) for all a E IF. we write W c V. implies that the zero vector must be in any subspace. verify that the set in question is closed under addition and scalar multiplication. ß E ¥ and for all w1.7. too. Notation: When the underlying field is understood. etc. IF) if and only if (W.e. F) be an arbitrary vector space and V be an arbitrary set. equivalently. IF) is itself a vector space or. IF) is a subspace of (V. verify that the set in or prove that something is indeed a subspace (or vector space).7. W2 E W. fJ e IF andforall WI.6. less restrictive meaning "is a subset of' is specifically flagged as such. td)n. Then O(D. F) = (IR". =: (PC[f0." + fJ2I a21 + P" . E). l . Then cf>('O. if and only subspace of (V. (E mxn JR) is a vector space with addition defined by 2. this question is closed under addition and scalar multiplication. Let A € R"x". Let (V. i.e." The less restrictive meaning "is a subset of" is specifically flagged as such.2. Let cf>('O. JR).. is henceforth understood to mean "is a subspace of.2 Subspaces Subspaces Definition 2. amI al2 a22 + fJI2 + fJ22 aln + fJln a2n + fJ2n a mn + fJml am2 + fJm2 and scalar multiplication defined by and scalar multiplication defined by [ ya" y a 21 yA = . and the functions are piecewise continuous (a) '0 = [to. this implies that the zero vector must be in any subspace. foral! a. Then (W. Then {x(t) : x(t) = Ax(t}} is a vector space (of dimension n). 4.2. y a l2 y a 22 yam 2 ya. IF) be a vector space and let W c V. IF) = (JR n . Special Cases: Special Cases: (a) V = [to. V) be the 3. is henceforth understood to mean "is a subspace of. E) is a vector space with addition defined by 9 9 A+B= [ . V) is a vector space with addition defined by defined by (f + g)(d) = fed) + g(d) for all d E '0 and for all f. for all d ED. F) be a vector space and let W ~ V. if and only if(aw1 ßW2) E if(awl + fJw2) e W for all a. t\]. h])n (b) '0 = [to. t\])n continuous =: (C[to. Let O(X>. The latter characterization of a subspace is often the easiest way to check or prove that something is indeed a subspace (or vector space). Let (V. F) is itself a vector space or.2 2. and for all f E cf>." The when used with vector spaces. td. (V.6. IF) = (JRn.. Let (V. Then (W. V) is a vector space with addition set of functions f mapping '0 to V. i. (V. and the functions are piecewise continuous =: (PC[to. .
e. R) and for each v € R2 of the form v = [v1v2 ] identify v1 with 3.. For ß E R define the jccoordinate in the plane and V2 with the ycoordinate. As an interesting exercise. . one usually proves the two inclusions separately: Note: To prove two vector spaces are equal.S.O. Henceforth. W1/2. A2 are symmetric. Wi. . that the vertical line through the origin (i. W~V..9. Let X {VI. (Xk not all zero such that X is a linearly independent set of vectors if and only if for any collection of k distinct X is a linearly independent set of vectors if and only if for any collection of k distinct elements v1. V2. If 12.I. c E JR. ak not all zero such that elements VI.0. ffR and S are vector spaces (or subspaces).. To prove two vector spaces are equal..lF) = (R" X ". Consider (V. . As an interesting exercise. Definition 2. W2. ak. Thus...8.. Vector Spaces Example 2. vk E X and scalars a1. one usually proves the two inclusions separately: An arbitrary r e R is shown to be an element of S and then an arbitrary s E S is shown to is shown to be an element of and then an arbitrary 5 € is shown to An arbitrary r E be an element of R.ß with ß =1= 0 are called linear varieties. Vk e X and scalars aI. JR.. . . a = 00) is also a subspace. Henceforth. elements VI. Consider (V.} . . = {A E JR. in some vector space V.10 Chapter 2. that the vertical line through the origin (i. . too. V usually denotes a vector space with the underlying field generally being R unless Thus.I' and Wi./l = {V : v = [ ac ~ f3 ] . then R = S if and only if Definition 2. be an element of R. Proof: Suppose A\. v2. . . • • •} be a nonempty collection of vectors u. •. unless explicitly stated otherwise. too. Let W = {A € R"x" : A is orthogonal}. Consider (V. Definition 2. a = oo) is also a subspace. F) = (JR.10. ../l with f3 = 0 are All lines through the origin are subspaces.) and let W = [A e R"x" : A is symmetric}.nxn. •••.and W1/2. 2.3 Linear Independence Linear Independence Let X = {v1. V usually denotes a vector space with the underlying field generally being JR. we drop the explicit dependence of a vector space on an underlying field. IF) = (]R2. explicitly stated otherwise. Then W is /wf a subspace of JR. .. sketch W2.• } be a nonempty collection of vectors Vi in some vector space V. Then it is easily shown that ctA\ + f3A2 is Proof' Suppose AI.JR. 1. ak. f3 e R. called linear varieties. . A2 are symmetric. . sketch Then Wa.nxn. X linearly set of Definition 2. we drop the explicit dependence of a vector space on an underlying field. f3 e R. define W". X is a linearly dependent set of vectors ifand only if there exist k distinct if and only if exist distinct elements v1. . E ]Rnxn : not 2.R) and 1. 3. Note. then R = S if and only if R C S and S C R.3 2.o. Vk of X and for any scalars aI. Then W".ß is a subspace of V if and only if ß = O.) and for each v E ]R2 of the form v = [~~ ] identify VI with the xcoordinate in the plane and u2 with the ycoordinate. Note.e. R"x". Shifted subspaces Wa.10./l is a subspace of V if and only if f3 = 0.•. W2..1.. al VI + . Then it is easily shown that aAI + fiAi is symmetric for all a. For a. ft E R symmetric for all a.1. . + (XkVk = 0 implies al = 0. .. Shifted subspaces W". and S are vector spaces (or subspaces). Example 2. Then (V. W2. ~SandS ~ R. . ak = O. F) = (R2..9.nxn : A We V.Vk of X and for any scalars a1. .. All lines through the origin are subspaces.o. ..
}. A set of vectors X is a basis for V if and only ij Definition 2. Let X = {VI. 2. ii E If. (since 2vI .. Example 2. called consider Let Vif e R". kEN}. linear dependence x such that Va = 0. Sp(X) = V. Sp(X) = V. then = O..11.Vk] e ]Rnxk. Let A E ]Rnxn and 5 e R"xm. }. and X (of and 2... The dependence of this set of vectors is equivalent to the existence of a nonzero vector E Rk dependence of this set of vectors is equivalent to the existence of a nonzero vector a e ]Rk O. e2 = 0 1 0 . Vi e span of Definition 2.. Definition 2. (Xi ElF.14."I [ i1i1l ]} [[ s a linearly is a Iin=ly dependent set de~ndent ~t (since 2v\ — V2 + v3 = 0).. Linear Independence Example 2. Then {[ Then I.. The linear v E ]Rn. . e k. Independence of these vectors turns out to be equivalent to a concept called controllability. . = [ v 1 .'" . + (XkVk .2. Then Sp{e1.14. Let V = Rn and define = ]Rn and el = 0 0 . Example 2.. LetV = 11 11 ~. 2.. e2. en} = Rn.. ~ HHi] } Ime~ly i is a i" linearly independent set. t1] (recall that etA denotes the matrix exponential.13. 1£t V = R3.12.11..3. } = (Xl VI + .. Vi EX. .. and there exists a e R* such that Va = 0.. Linear Independence 2. tIl 2.. 2.en = 0 0 0 o SpIel.... Then consider the rows of etA B as vectors in em [to. to be studied further in what follows. Then consider the rows of etA B as vectors in Cm [t0. . {1.. and there exists a E ]Rk such that VT V is singular. An equivalent condition for linear independence is that the matrix Va = 0. which is discussed in more detail in efA Chapter 11). to be studied further in what follows.•}} be a collection of vectors vi. then a = 0. . If the set of vectors is independent. and consider the matrix V = [VI.v2 + V3 = 0).. X = [v1 v2 .13. . Why? However.en} = ]Rn. T V is nonsingular. Why? independent. An equivalent condition for linear dependence is that the k x k matrix condition VT V is singular. 1. Then the span of of X is defined as X is defined as Sp(X) = Sp{VI. V2. V V2. Vk] E Rnxk. .. o Definition 2. An equivalent condition for linear independence is that the matrix V TV is nonsingular. A e R xn B E ]Rnxm. Independence of these vectors turns out to be equivalent to a concept Chapter 11).. . . . If the set of vectors is independent. E V.. . X is a linearly independent set (of basis vectors). = {v : where N = {I. . e2 . A set of vectors X is a basis for V if and only if 1.3.12.. Howe.
{el. For . Example 2.16. Definition 2.E~n} such that v= where ~Ibl + . n unique. while We can also determine components of v with respect to another basis.. Then for all v E V there exists a unique ntuple {~I'. V is said to X for be ndimensional or have dimension n and we write dim(V) n or dim V n. .16.. The number of elements in a basis of a vector space is independent of the Theorem 2. + ~nbn = Bx.. el + 2 . The number of elements in a basis of a vector space is independent of the particular basis considered. In]Rn. VI ] : = vlel + V2e2 + ..18. n } such that for V. with respect to the basis with respect to the basis {[~l[!J} we have we have [ ~ ~ ] = 3. x ~ D J Definition 2. We represents B..12 12 Chapter 2. For example. In Rn... n for Then for all e there exists a unique ntuple {E1 . We say that the vector x of of of (b1... particular basis considered. . components represents the vector v with respect to the basis B. write [ ] = XI • [ ~ + ] X2 • [ _! ] =[ ~ = [ ~ Then Then ! ][ ~~ l 1 [ ~~ ] = [ .dimensional or have dimension n and we write dim (V) = n or dim V — n. For be n... + vne n · Vn We can also determine components of v with respect to another basis..15. For example. B ~ [b"...19. . . for]Rn [e\... en} natural Now let b l ... {~i } of v with respect to the basis {b l . . . bn]} and are unique. .17. Vector Spaces Example 2. while [ ~ ] = I . bn be a basis (with a specific order associated with the basis vectors) b1. .... en} is a basis for IR" (sometimes called the natural basis). .. . . If a basis X for a vector space V(Jf 0) has n elements. .19.b.. The scalars {Ei}are called the components (or sometimes the coordinates) components coordinates) Definition 2.. ] l = = Theorem 2.[ ~  ] + 4· [ ~ l To see this. e2. If V= 0) V is Definition 2.l. r I [ .18.
5. Sums and Intersections of Subspaces 2.= T). Let (V. t1]) . 2. we define dim(O) = O. dim{A E ~nxn :: A = AT} = !n(n + 1). A consistency. where Efj is a matrix all of whose elements are 0 except for a 1 in the (i. determine !n(n 1) symmetric basis matrices. n (^ ft. JF') be a vector space and let 71. Example 2.18 says that dim(V) = the number of elements in a basis. Note: Check that a basis for ~mxn is given by the mn matrices Eij.) 2 5. V for an arbitrary index set A). Theorem 2. otherwise. dim{A E ~nxn :: A is upper (lower) triangular} = 1/2n(n+ 1).20. Theorem 2. and S are said to be complements of each other in T.22.18 says that dim (V) the number of elements in a basis. 1.) = 0 and ]P ft. Ra C V/or an arbitrary index set A). and S are defined respectively by: 1. K + S S.4. R H S = {v : v e R and v e S}. 1. 1." 3. and because the 0 vector is in any vector space. s e S}. i e m. dim(C[to. The subspaces Rand S are said to be complements of each other in T. R = 0. F) be a vector space and let R. for finite k). The union of two subspaces. V is infinitedimensional. j E ~. T = R 0 S is the direct sum of R and S if = REB S is the direct sum ofR and S if Definition 2. for finite k). is not necessarily a subspace.23. Let (V. dim(~mXn) = mn. determine 1/2n(n + 1) symmetric basis matrices. j e n. S. n 5 S. 4. Note: Check that a basis for Rmxn is given by the mn matrices Eij.20. dim(R mxn ) mn. V is infinitedimensional. R S C V (in general. we define dim(O) = 0. 72.4. tJJ) = +00.22. dim{A € Rnxn A AT} = {1/2(n 1 (To see why. Sums and Intersections of Subspaces 13 13 consistency. and 1. 2. « The subspaces R. U\ + 1. n n S = 0. U + S = T (in general ft. The sum and intersection Definition 2. otherwise.4 2. j)th location.=1 K k 1=1 2.21. A vector space V is finitedimensional if there exists a basis X with n < +00 elements. R + S = {r + s : r e R. R S = (in general. RI \ h Rk =: ]T ft/ C V. dim(Rn)=n. V (in general.24. The sum and intersection ofR and S are defined respectively by: of R. where Eij is a matrix all of whose elements are 0 except for a 1 in the (i. ft n 5 = {v : v E 7^ and v E 5}." The collection of E.. The collection of Eij matrices can be called the "natural basis matrices. Thus.24. Remark 2. J)th location.21. n S {r s : r E U. R j ) = 0 am/ Ri = T). V.a S. i E m. R.. 2. + 7^ =: L R.2. a eA CiEA f] n *R. Thus. vector space V is finitedimensional if there exists a basis X with n < +00 elements. S c V. dim(~n) = n.23. Example 2. s E 5}. dim{A e Rnxn A is upper (lower) triangular} = !n(n 1). V (in general. Definition 2. and 2.) (To see why. R D S C V (in general. 2.. Theorem 2. H.j matrices can be called the "natural basis matrices. 2. S S. The union of two subspaces.+00. 1. V. Theorem 2. 2. and because the 0 vector is in any vector space. Remark 2. y>f (L L . R C S. is not necessarily a subspace. .4 Sums and Intersections of Subspaces Subspaces Definition 2. . U S.
Find the components of the vector v = [4 If with respect to this basis. Let x\.. Example 2. For example. S2 e rl Sl r2 Then r.. Let U be the subspace of upper triangular matrices in E" x" and let £ be the subspace of lower triangUlar matrices in Rnxn.20. IF) = (jRnxn. suppose an arbitrary vector t E T can be written in two ways t e as t S2. r2 e R. X2.26. 3. Vector Spaces Chapter 2. . R).28. AVn are orv\. Then Theorem 2.27. jRn xn . For arbitrary subspaces R. Since ft fl 0. XI.27. dim(T) = dim(R) + dim(S)... 0 S.vn be orthonormal vectors in R".14 14 Chapter 2.. . ..5. EXERCISES EXERCISES 1. every t € can be written uniquely in the form r s with r e R and s e S. which uniqueness follows. . x/c E R" be nonzero mutually orthogonal vectors. = dim(ft) + Proof: To Proof: To prove the first part. For arbitrary subspaces ft.c = jRnnxn jRn xn. ft.29. S2 E S. .. Vector Spaces Remark 2. 0 The statement of the second part is a special case of the next theorem. consider V = R2 unique. Xk} must be a linearly independent set. ft S) = jR2 and let ft be any line through the origin. every t E T can be written uniquely in the form tt = r + s with r E Rand s E S. dim(R + S) = dim(R) + dim(S)  dim(R n S). F) (R n x n .. Example 2.s\. Then r1 — r2 = s2— SI.. 2.. Let VI. one can easily verify the validity = n. ft..c jRnxn. .26. . Example 2. and let S Let (V.. Then it may be checked that U + . Then show that one of the vectors 1..r2 S2 .2 and 2.. Suppose =R EB Then 1. r2 E Rand s1. Av" •..20. . while U n £ is the set of diagonal matrices in Rnxn... 1 TIT The first matrix on the righthand side above is in S while the second is in R. Xk} must be a linearly independent set.. But r1 –r2 E ft and S2 — SI E S. Then any other distinct line through the origin is and let R be any line through the origin. Suppose {VI. Vn thonormal if and only if A E R"x" is orthogonal. let R be the set of skewsymmetric matrices in (V. we must have rl = r2 and s\ = si from S2 from which uniqueness follows. Among all the complements there is a unique one orthogonal to R. *2. Avn are also orjRn. Consider the vectors VI — [2 1f and V2 = [3 1f. ft be the set of symmetric matrices in R" x ". unique ft. Suppose T = R O S. and SI. Theorem 2.27.28.si e S. Show that Av\.r2 £ Rand 52 . Then V = U $ S. Vk} is a linearly dependent set.25. . vd must be a linear combination of the others. and let R"x".c the Example 2. Then any other distinct line through the origin is a complement of R. jRnxn...25. Prove that viand V2 form a a basis Consider v\ = [2 l]r 1*2 = [3 l] Prove that VI and V2 form basis 2 for R . e jRnxn 4. 2. v = [4 l]r jR2.. . together with Examples 2. we must have r\ ri and SI rl . mutually [x\.r .27. Show that {XI. S of a vector space V.. . where rl.. . But as t = r1 + s1 = r2 + S2. D Theorem 2. of the formula given in Theorem 2.. We discuss more about orthogonal complements elsewhere in the text. jR). where r1. the set in jRnxn. Since R n S = 0. . Using the fact that dim {diagonal (diagonal matrices} = n.29. S of a vector space V.. 2. The complement of R (or S) is not unique. Xk E jRn 2.. triangular + L = R xn un. . validity of the formula given in Theorem 2. n Proof: A e jRnxn written Proof: This follows easily from the fact that any A E R"x" can be written in the form A=2:(A+A )+2:(AA). Theorem 2. {vi.
Exercises Exercises
15
5. Let denote the set of polynomials of degree less than or equal to two of the form 5. Let P denote the set of polynomials of degree less than or equal to two of the form Po + PI X + pix2, where Po, PI, p2 E R. Show that P is a vector space over R Show Po p\x P2x2, where po, p\, P2 e R Show that is a vector space over E. Show Find the components of the that the polynomials 1, *, and 2x2 — 1 are a basis for P. Find the components of the that the polynomials 1, x, and 2x2  1 are a basis for 2 2 with respect to this basis. polynomial 2 + 3x 4x polynomial 2 + 3x + 4x with respect to this basis.
6. Prove Theorem 2.22 (for the case of two subspaces Rand S only). 6. Prove Theorem 2.22 (for the case of two subspaces R and only).
7. Let n denote the vector space of polynomials of degree less than or equal to n, and of 7. Let Pn denote the vector space of polynomials of degree less than or equal to n, and of the form p ( x ) = Po + PIX + ...•+ Pnxn,, where the coefficients Pi are all real. Let PE po + p\x + • • + pnxn where the coefficients /?, are all real. Let PE the form p(x) denote the subspace of all even polynomials in Pn,, i.e., those that satisfy the property denote the subspace of all even polynomials in n i.e., those that satisfy the property p(—x} = p(x). Similarly, let PQ denote the subspace of all odd polynomials, i.e., p( x) = p(x). Similarly, let Po denote the subspace of all odd polynomials, i.e., those satisfying p(—x} = p(x). Show that Pn = PE EB Po· those satisfying p(x) = – p ( x ) . Show that n = PE © PO8. Repeat Example 2.28 using instead the two subspaces 7" of tridiagonal matrices and 8. Repeat Example 2.28 using instead the two subspaces T of tridiagonal matrices and U of upper triangular matrices. U of upper triangular matrices.
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank
Chapter 3 Chapter 3
Linear Transformations Linear Transformations
3.1 3.1
Definition and Examples Definition and Examples
definition of a linear (or function, We begin with the basic definition of a linear transformation (or linear map, linear function, or linear operator) between two vector spaces. or linear operator) between two vector spaces.
Let IF) and (W, IF) be vector spaces. Then I: : > a Definition 3.1. Let (V, F) and (W, F) be vector spaces. Then C : V + W is a linear transformation if and only if transformation if and only if I:(avi £(avi + {3V2) = aCv\ + {3I:V2 far all a, {3 e F andfor all v},v2e V. pv2) = al:vi fi£v2 for all a, £ ElF and far all VI, V2 E V. The vector space V is called the domain of the transformation C while VV, the space into called the of the transformation I: while W, the space into The vector space which it maps, is called the which it maps, is called the codomain.
Example 3.2. Example 3.2.
1. Let F = R and take V = W = PC[f0, +00). 1. Let IF JR and take V W PC[to, +00). Define I: : PC[to, +00) > PC[to, +00) by Define £ : PC[t0, +00) + PC[t0, +00) by
vet)
f+
wet) = (I:v)(t) =
11
to
e(tr)v(r) dr.
2. Let F = R and take V = W = JRmxn. Fix M e R m x m . Let IF JR and V W R mx ". Fix ME JRmxm. Define £ : JRmxn + M mxn by I: : R mx " > JRmxn by
X
f+
Y
= I:X = MX.
3. Let F = R and take V = P" = {p(x) = a0 + ct}x H ... + anx"n : a, E R} and ao alx + ai E JR} and 3. Let IF = JR and take V = pn (p(x) h anx W = pnl. w = pn1. I: : —> Define C.: V + W by I: p = p', where'I denotes differentiation with respect to x. Lp — p', where denotes differentiation x.
17
W = R m and [ v i . + .. j E raj..18 Chapter 3. if v = ~I VI + • • + ~n v = Vx (where v. [ w . and hence jc... i. but this is usually not done. Thus. i e n} and {Wj. IF) veniently in matrix form.. is by its action on a basis.. Thinking of both as a matrix and as a linear transformation from JR. LV WA since x was arbitrary. Li near Transformations Chapters. W = lR... say.mxn a mn represents L since represents £ since LVi = aliwl =Wai.. usually L The action of £ on an arbitrary vector V e V is uniquely determined (by linearity) v E V uniquely determined by its action on a basis. and hence x.e.. L IF) ~ (W. j E !!!. . respectively. + ~nLvn =~IWal+"'+~nWan = WAx. with respect to {w }•. {u. Note that A = Mat £ depends on the particular bases for V and W. We identify A the equation £V = W A becomes simply £ = A. We thus commonly identify A as a linear transformation with its matrix representation. Thus.. for V and W) is the representation of £i>.. in the notation. In other words. Specifically.• + E nVnn = V x (where u. w m] and where W = [WI.. Thus. j E m} are the usual (natural) bases WA linea LV L = A. + amiWm where W = [w\. i. F) is linear and further suppose that {Vi. w ] and L is the ith column of A.m usually causes no naturally confusion. then LVx = Lv = ~ILvI + ." to Rm usually causes no Thinking of A both as a matrix and as a linear transformation from Rn to lR.2 Matrix Representation of Linear Transformations Matrix Representation of Linear Transformations Linear transformations between vector spaces with specific bases can be represented conLinear transformations between vector spaces with specific bases can be represented conSpecifically. then arbitrary).} are the usual (natural) bases. £V = W A since x was arbitrary. F) —>• (W. j e m}. i E n}. .. Thus.m and {Vi.e.. if V = E1v1 + . is arbitrary). i e ~}. E ~} e m] V ith column of A = Mat £ (the matrix representation of £ with respect to the given bases = L L for V and W) is the representation of LVi with respect to {w j. {W jj' j e !!!. In other words. Then the {w j. Linear Transformations 3.2 3. When V = R". When V = JR.} are bases for V and W. transformation with its matrix representation.. Change of basis then corresponds naturally to appropriate matrix multiplication. n A= al : ] E JR. suppose £ : (V.n. z'th V This could be reflected by subscripts.
it might be useful to prefer the former since the transformations A and B appear in the same order in both the diagram and the equation. The above is sometimes expressed componentwise by the C — A B . y e ~n. Inner Product: n xTy = Lx. and if we associate matrices with the transformations in the usual way. then composition of transformations corresponds to standard matrix multiplication. and dim W m. then composition of transformations corresponds to standard matrix mUltiplication.3. If dimZ// = p. If dimU = p. the arrows above are reversed as follows: C However. A rankone symmetric matrix can be written in above (or xy if A E C xyH e c ). V.y. Composition of Transformations 19 19 3. dimV = n.. Two Special Cases: Two Special Inner Product: Let x. . Composition ofTransformations 3.3. expressed mxp nxp formula cij = L k=1 n aikbkj. y e Rn. in the same order in both the diagram and the equation. Note that in The above diagram illustrates the composition of transformations C = AB. That is. xx T XX ).3 Composition of Transformations Composition Consider three vector spaces U. That is. we have C A B . and if we associate matrices with the transformations in the usual way. y E Rn. Then we can define a new transformation C as follows: C The above diagram illustrates the composition of transformations C = AB.3. Then we can define a new transformation C as follows: to W. and W and transformations B from U to V and A from Wand V to W. Note that in most texts. the form XXT (or xx HH).=1 Outer Product: Let x e Rm. Outer Product: matrix matrix mxn E R Note that any rankone matrix A e ~mxn can be written in the form A = xyT = xyT H mxn mxn). . Then their outer product is the m x n E ~m. dim V = n. and dim W = m. Then their inner product is the scalar E ~n.
. W. usual (natural) bases. R(A) C W. See also the last paragraph of Section 3.5 and throughout the text.. is an orthogonal set. in general.. The nullspace of kernel of and A is also known as the kernel of A and denoted Ker (A). 1. I ~VI VI ^/v. Li near Transformations 3.. The nullspace of A. The range of A. subspaces of different spaces. . vk] be a set of nonzero vectors Vi E ~n. Definition 3. is an orthonormal set. is the set {v E V : Av = O}. Note that N(A) and R(A) are.. {v1. Example 3.7. Vk} with u... denotedR(A). ~. the same symbol (A) is used to denote both a linear transformation and its matrix representation with respect to the used to denote both a linear transformation and its matrix representation with respect to the usual (natural) bases. Definition 3. 3.. Equivalently.. 2. The set is said to 3.. IS an orthogonaI set. { t > .. then ~ .i •.. e ~mxn. vd of u. See also the of Section 3. essentially following immediately from the defiProof: The proof of this theorem is easy. The range of A is also known as the image of A and — {Av e V}. e Rn. Let A : V + be a linear transformation.7. then then R(A) = Sp{al.. is an orthonormal set. . [: J} is an orthogonal set. N(A) S. Then Let A : V —>• be a linear transformation. is the set {w E W : w = Av for some v E V}. R ( A ) S. Then 1. Note that N(A) and R(A) are.. Note that in Theorem 3. denoted N(A). 1. 2. {[ ~ J. vi ^/v'k vk ~~~ ] . .. if i f= j. {[ ~~i ].3.4 3. The nullspace of The of denoted N(A). If {VI.[ :~~ J} . in general." • orthonormal set. be orthogonal if' vjvj 0 for i ^ j and orthonormal if vf vj 8ij' where 8tj is the be orthogonal if vr v j = 0 for i f= j and orthonormal if vr v j = 8ij. The range of A.2.•. an} . then {I —/==.8. orthonormal set. .. Let {VI. where 8ij is the Kronecker delta defined by Kronecker delta defined by 8 = {I0 ij ifi=j. ~ 3 .2. . an M.4.Vk } With Vi E. D Remark 3. N(A) c V.8. If A is written in terms of its columns as A = [ai. is the set {w e w = Av for some v e V}. then Proof: The proof of this theorem is easy. R(A) = {Av : v E V}.5.IN. € 1Tlln is an orthogonal set. . Theorem 3.6. .. —/=== . . essentially following immediately from the definition. of of denoted Im(A). denotedlZ( A).3. denoted Im(A).4 Structure of Linear Transformations Structure of Linear Transformations Let A : V —> W be a linear transformation. LinearTransformations Chapter 3. V. is the {v e V Av = 0}. Definition3.. If in of = [a\. the same symbol (A) is Note that in Theorem and throughout the text. subspaces of different spaces. an]. 0 nition. ~}  ISisan 3. ..an].. Theorem 3. (A). .. Let A E Rmxn.20 20 Chapter 3. 2. Let A : V + W be a linear transformation.
(S~)l. nonzero) solutions of the system of equations 3xI 4xI + 5X2 + 7X3 = 0. Theorem 311 Let Theorem 3. . n <. Set XI X2 = L (xT Vi)Vi.10. Then the orthogonal complement of S is defined as the set c ]Rn. 2. Let {VI.10.. = S. . n~. including dependent spanning vectors (which would. k =X . Rn. 3.e. Any set of vectors will do. The proofs of the other results are left as Proof: left exercises. of course. Note that there is nothing special about the two vectors in the basis defining S being orthogonal. Then it can be shown that Working from the definition.. Example 3. + X2 + X3 = 0.9. Proof: We prove and discuss only item 2 here. S 5.4. Then the of defined T S~={VE]Rn: V S = 0 for all s e S}. vk} e ]Rn vector.. S1. . (n + S)~ = nl. Structure of Linear Transformations 21 21 Definition 3.=1 XI. Let R S C Rn The S <. n S~. if and only if S~ <. the computation involved is simply to find all nontrivial (i. Let S <. 6.. Then n.4. ]Rn. Let 3.11.. then give rise to redundant equations). Set vector. 4. Vk} be an orthonormal basis for S and let x E Rn be an arbitrary {v1. Structure of Li near Transformations 3.3.. . S \B S~ = ]Rn. (n n S)~ = n~ + S~.= {v e Rn : vTs=OforallsES}.
since Then XI e S and.e.14 (Decomposition Theorem). every vector v in the domain space R" can be written in a unique way as v = x + y. Since x was arbitrary.l.l = 0 since the only vector s E S orthogonal to S1 = IRn. that x = XI for example. It can write vectors in a unique way with respect to the corresponding subspaces. + x~.14 (Decomposition Theorem). Then {v e IRn : A v = O} is sometimes called the Definition 3. x'2 E S1. Ax = 0 if and only if x equivalent to yT Ax = 0 for all y. – x1) = 0 since 0 by definition of S. 0 x1 — x'1 andx2 = x2. Let A : IRn > Rm. x. Linear Transformations Then x\ E <S and. Suppose. Thus.e. {w E IR m : WT A = O} is called the left nullspace of A. when we have such direct sum decompositions.e.12.1 in the next section. Thus. . Let A : IRn —> Rm. Theorem 3. But then (x..l. Vk and hence to any linear combination of these vectors.= Af(AT) ) (i. But then (x'1 —XI)TT (x.5 Four Fundamental Subspaces Four Fundamental Subspaces Consider a general matrix A E lR..13. Clearly.12 and part 2 of Theorem 3. We S n S1 =0 the e orthogonal everything in (i. Ax = 0 if and only if x orthogonal is orthogonal to all vectors of the form AT y. . Li near Transformations Chapters. (Note: This for finitedimensional 1.. XI = x. established that N(A) U(AT ). including itself) is 0. . and x2 = x~.12.e.x1) (x'1 xd x2 — X2 = — (x'1 — x1) (which follows by rearranging the equation x1+x2 = x'1 + x'2). x~ X2 = (x. 2..l = N(A ).. IRm = R(A) EBN(A T». every vector w in the codomain space IRm can be written in a unique way as w = x+y. D Definition 3. IRn = M(A) EB R(A T)).l.22 22 Chapter 3.) N(A)1" spaces. can write vectors in a unique way with respect to the corresponding subspaces. See also Theorem 2.l N(A T (i. XI) (which follows by rearranging the equation XI +X2 = x. Clearly.. We have thus shown that vectors. 'R. +x~). standing Figure 3..e.•. y. (Note: This also holds for infinitedimensional vector spaces. . E N(A) and E N(A). x~ e S.XITVj =XTVjXTVj=O. transformation A. E S and X2. Similarly. When thought of as a linear transformation from E" Consider a general matrix A € E^ x ". E R(A) and E R(A).. the right nullspace is A/"(A) while the left nullspace is N(A T ).l = Rn. Theorem 3.13. Then R(A r ). Then T (x.. Then X2 = x. X2 is orthogonal to any vector in S. Vk and hence to any linear combination of these we see that X2 is orthogonal to VI. N(A).xn. x E R(A r ) Since x 1 have established thatN(A).. Thus. the right nullspace is N(A) while the left nullspace is J\f(AT).XI/ (x~ . Rm = 7l(A) 0 M(AT)).) 2. Then 1. many properties of A can be developed in terms of the four fundamental subspaces .e. Then Ax = 0 and this is an and equivalent to yT Ax = 0 for all v. . we decompositions. Then {v E R" : Av = 0} is sometimes called the right nullspace of A. Suppose. for example. See also Theorem 2. When thought of as a linear transformation from IR n to Rm.11 can be combined to give two very fundamental decompositions damental and useful decompositions of vectors in the domain and codomain of a linear and transformation A.l = R(A T}. We also have that S U S. It is also easy to see directly that. everything in S (i. where x e U(A) and y e ft(A)1. This key theorem becomes very easy to remember by carefully studying and underThis key theorem becomes very easy to remember by carefully studying and understanding Figure 3.. (Note: This holds only for finitedimensional vector spaces. But yT Ax = (ATyy{ x. we see that x2 is orthogonal to v1. 0 The proof of the second part is similar and is left as an exercise.5 3. In other words.12 and part 2 of Theorem 3.l = 7£(AT). The proof of the second part is similar and is left as an exercise.26. since T x 2 Vj = XTVj . But yT Ax = ( A T ) x. We have thus shown that S + S. i. = x'1+ x'2.X2) 0 since (x'1 — x1) (x' 2 — x2) = 0 by definition of ST. where x\. Let A : Rn + IRm. including itself) is O. D Theorem 3. x e R(AT). X2 is orthogonal to any vector in S. every vector in the codomain space R m can be written ina unique way asw = x+y. Let A : Rn + Rm. Let A : R" + IRm.) 2. Ax = Proof: To prove the first part. (w e Rm : w T A = 0} is called the left nullspace of A.11 can be combined to give two very funTheorem 3. Thus. i. (Note: This also holds for infinitedimensional vector spaces. R(A). where XI. that x = x1 + x2. right nullspace of A. x 1 E Sand x2. Then Theorem 3. ft(Ar) (i. many properties of A can be developed in terms of the four fundamental subspaces to IRm.) Proof: To x E N(A).. Let A : IRn > IRm. R" N(A) 0 ft(Ar ».e.26. Then Theorem 3.e. Similarly.1 in the next section. every vector v in the domain space IRn can be written in a unique way as v = x 7. take an arbitrary x e A/"(A).. In other words.l where x € M(A) and y € J\f(A)± = R(AT) (i. we form AT v.(A)1~ — J\f(ATT ). 3.
Figure 3. R(A). IR n > IRm. and in illustrating concepts such as controllability and observability. Definition 3.1 obvious and we return to this figure frequently both in the context of linear transformations obvious and we return to this figure frequently both in the context of linear transformations and in illustrating concepts such as controllability and observability. A is onetoone or 11 (also called monic or injective) if N(A) = O. Four Fundamental Subspaces 3. Let A : E" + Rm. Two equivalent 2. 1. N(A).(A)^. Two equivalent characterizations of A being 11 that are often easier to verify in practice are the characterizations of A being 11 that are often easier to verify in practice are the following: following: (a) AVI = AV2 (b) VI ===} VI = V2 . A is onto (also called epic or surjective) ifR(A) = W. The row rank of A is column rank of of independent row rank of . 3. A is onto (also called epic or surjective) ifR.16. 2. A f ( A ) . be a linear transforDefinition 3. Let and W be vector spaces and let A : motion. Four fundamental subspaces. 1. the column rank of A (maximum number of independent columns). fundamental subspaces.15.16. This is sometimes called 3.(A) = W. rank(A) dimftCA).1 makes many key properties seem almost N(A)T. t= V2 ===} AVI t= AV2 . and N(A)1.1.15.5. properties 7£(A). R(A)1.5. Let V and W be vector spaces and let A : V + W be a linear transforDefinition 3. A is onetoone or 11 (also called monic or infective) ifJ\f(A) = 0. Figure 3.3.1. Then rank(A) = dim R(A). Four Fundamental Subspaces 23 23 A r N(A)1 r EB {OJ X {O}Gl nr m r Figure 3. mation. 'R.
1 1 Xl E A/^A) . rank(AB) = rank(BA) = rank(A) and N(BA) = N(A). We thus have that dim R(A) = dimN(A)L since it is easily shown T dim7?. {Tv\. of A. r*i *i E N(A)L. Then dimN(A) + dim R(A) = n. colloquially of = rank of A. x x e R" x\ X2. and is defined as dim A/"(A). following follows we apply this and several previous results. denoted nullity(A) or corank(A). Let A : R" ~ Rm. The last equality AXI x\ e N(A)L and jc E N(A). dimA/"(A) + dimft(A) = dimension of the domain of A. u. if {ui. rank(A) + B) :s rank(A) + rank(B). where n is the ]Rn > ]Rm.17. iv} abasis forA/'CA) .19 suggests looking at the general problem of the four fundamental Part 4 of Theorem 3. . (Note: Since 3.(A) = dimA/^A^ 1 if that if {VI. Theorem 3.11 and 3. .. if B is nonsingular.19 suggests looking atthe general problem of the four fundamental subspaces of matrix products. . it is a statement about equality of dimensions. Then Ajti = W = TXI since Xl e A/^A). and is defined as dimN(A). Theorem 3. the following string of equalities follows easily: "column rank of A" = rank(A) = dim R(A) = dimN(A)L1 = dim R(AT) = rank(AT)) = A" rank(A) = dim7e(A) = dim A/^A) = dim7l(AT) = rank(A r = "column "row rank of A. rank(B)}.24 24 Chapter 3. dimension of the domain of A.andx22 e A/"(A). B E R" xn . v r } is a basis for N(A)L. Let A.17 we see immediately that n = dimN(A) = dimN(A) + dimN(A)L + dim R(A) .. then {TVI.19. + rank(B)  n :s rank(AB) :s min{rank(A). 3. To see that T is also onto. Then N(T) = To w E 7£(A).18. Proof: From Theorems 3. LinearTransformations Chapter3. shows that T is onto. take any W e R(A).") of A. the subspaces themselves are not necessarily in the same vector space. Part 4 of Theorem 3.18. 0 For completeness. of Corollary 3. . The dual notion to rank is the nullity R(AT) of independent rows). 3. + nullity(B). where Ax — w. Let A : Rn > Rm..(A). Then 3. Like the theorem.. Then dim K(A) = dimNCA)L..") Proof: Proof: Define a linear transformation T : N(A)L ~ R(A) by J\f(A)~L —>• 7£(A) by Tv = Av for all v E N(A)L.19. . nullity(B) :s nullity(AB) :s nullity(A) 4. . . Write x = Xl + X2. 1. Finally.11 and 3. e ]Rnxn. . we include here a few miscellaneous results about ranks of sums completeness. R(A) : ]Rn ~ ]Rm. Tv abasis 7?. the subspaces themselves are not necessarily in the same vector space.17.. this theorem is sometimes colloquially stated "row rank of A = column N(A)L = R(A A/^A) " = 7l(A ). O:s rank(A 2. of A. Tvrr]} is a basis for R(A). .. Clearly T is 11 (since A/"(T) = 0).17 we see immediately that Proof: From Theorems 3. dimA/'(A) ± (Note: 1 T T ). Linear Transformations dim 7£(A r ) (maximum number of independent rows). sometimes denoted nullity(A) or corank(A). . The basic results are contained in the following easily proved following theorem. and products of matrices." 0 of D The following corollary is immediate.. . by definition there is a vector x E ]Rn such that Ax = w. dimensions.
Definition 3. D D 11. 1. AT A is nonsingular). A is AT AXI AT AX2. . 4. A Proof of part 2: If A is 11. 2.23. 1.2 N(A T ). to have full column rank. the transformations A.17. and hence dim R(A) n by Theorem 3. Note that if A is invertible. then A/"(A) = 0. : R n » Rm. which implies that dim A/^A). equivalently. Also. It is extremely useful in text that follows. Four Fundamental Subspaces Theorem 3. Definition 3.22. Thus.22. Theorem 3. nonsingular ifand only ifrank(A) = n. The transformations AT and A I have the same domain and range but are in general different maps unless A is and A~! have the same domain and range but are in general different maps unless A is orthogonal. AATT is nonsingular).—n = dim 7£(A r ). R(AT) 3. R(B T ). equivalently. A is onto if and only if rank (A) = m (A has linearly independent rows or is said to have full row rank. Then 3. let y e Rm Proof: Proof of part 1: If A is onto. e IRmxn. Theorem 3. Let jc = AT(AAT)~]y Y E Rn.ti = AT Ax2. Conversely.21. e IRnxp.20.20 and is also easily proved. RCA). x AT (AAT)I e IRn. linear least squares problems. i. 2. A is onto if and only //"rank(A) — m (A has linearly independent rows or is said to 1.(A) — m — rank (A). so A is onto. = R(A T A). and AI A. Then y = Ax. R«AB)T) S. Ar. Then Theorem 3.21. N(A T ) = N(AA T ).20. dim7?. Four Fundamental Subspaces 3.5. Let e IRmxn.and R(A). 25 25 The next theorem is closely related to Theorem 3. suppose AXI = Ax^. A is 11 if and only z/rank(A) = n (A has linearly independent columns or is said to have full column rank. which implies x\ = x^. since ArA is invertible. which implies that dimN(A)11 = n — Proof of part 2: If A is 11.20 and is also easily proved. A : W1 + E" is invertible or nonsingular if and only z/rank(A) = n. dim R(A) = m = rank(A). have full row rank. Let A E Rmxn. Then A r A. R(A) = R(AA T ). RCAB) S. Conversely. A € IR~xn. equivalently. AX2. 4. 1. e 7?. N(A) = N(A T A). N«AB)T) .5. Similar remarks apply to A and A~T. then N(A) = 0.3.23. B E Rnxp. Then 3. suppose Ax\ dim R(A T). Conversely. terms of rank and invertibility.. A"1 ± are all 11 and onto between the two spaces M(A) and 7£(A). Proof' Proof of part 1: If A is onto. then dim V — dim W. We now characterize 11 and onto transformations and provide characterizations in We now characterize II and onto transformations and provide characterizations in terms of rank and invertibility.2 N(B). A : IRn »• IR n is invertible or Note that if A is invertible. AA is nonsingular). Let A : IRn + IRm.17.e. then dim V = dim W. It The next theorem is closely related to Theorem 3. 3. Note that in the special case when A E R"x". A : V —» W is invertible (or bijective) if and only if it is 11 and onto. XI = X2 AT A A 11. 2. The transformations AT are all 11 and onto between the two spaces N(A)1. A is 11 if and only ifrank(A) = n (A has linearly independent columns or is said 2. A A T. equivalently. A : V + W is invertible (or bijective) if and only if it is 11 and onto. Also. and hence dim 7£(A) = n by Theorem 3. Let A E Rmxn. let y E IRm be arbitrary. AT A nonsingular).(A). especially when dealing with pseudoinverses and is extremely useful in text that follows. Conversely. N(AB) . especially when dealing with pseudoinverses and linear least squares problems. y E R(A). AT.
26 Chapter 3.both 11 and is if and if onto. A R the case that A~R + A~RA . (A R + A R A — /) must be a right inverse and.25 that A is invertible. by uniqueness it must be A R + A R A — = A R. by uniqueness it must be Thus. Theorem 3. Let A = [1 2] : E2 »• E1I. Similarly. Then A is onto. But this implies that A~RA = /. i. if A is 11.26.. can always find v e E2 such that [1 2][^] = a).I = A~R. A is said to be left invertible if there exists a left inverse transformation A~L : W —> to transformation A L : V such that A L A = Iv. Let A : V + W. 2. Also. in which case A~l = A~R = A~L. A is right invertible if and only if it is onto.e. that A~R is a left inverse. A is left invertible if and only ifit is 11. Obviously A has full row rank can always find v E ]R2 such that [1 2][ ~~] = a). If there exists a unique right inverse A~R such that AA~R = I. right inverses for A. . D Example 3.e. Let + V. then A is invertible. In Chapter 6 we characterize all right inverses of a matrix by Chapter characterize characterizing all solutions of the linear matrix equation A R = I. It then follows from Theorem 3. linear Transformations If a linear transformation is not invertible.27. Obviously A has full row rank (= 1) and A . it is clear that there are infinitely many right inverse. € ]R .22 we see that if A : E" + Em is onto.24. A is said to be right invertible if there exists a right inverse transformation A~RR : if A. where Iv denotes the identity transfonnation on V.. Let A : V » V. A~ (A A)~ A . Defileft If linear concepts left nitions of these concepts are followed by a theorem characterizing left and right invertible transformations. therefore. i. in A I = A R = A L.R + ARA I) = AA. it may still be right or left invertible.R = _~] (=1) and A~R = [ _j j is a right inverse. Li near Transformations Chapters. then one (Proo!' = [1 2]:]R2 + ]R .26. —> transformation if left + 2. then a left inverse is given by A R = AT (AAT) left T L = A.: AA R = w Iw W + V such that AA~R = Iw.. (A R + A RA . Let A : V + Then 1. It then follows from Theorem 3. such that A~LA = Iv where Iv denotes the identity transformation on V. A R A = I..R AA. (Proof: Take any a E E1I. 1.25. then a right inverse is given by A~R = AT(AAT) I.e..L = (ATTA)I1AT.24. are infinitely A. If there exists a unique left inverse A~L such that A~LA = I. A right invertible if and only if it onto.. Then Definition 3. is left invertible if and if it and left invertible.R + AARA = I A +IA  A since AA R = I = I. therefore. 3.R = If left A L A L A = 2. characterizing all solutions of the linear matrix equation AR = I. A is invertible if and only if it is both right and left invertible. where Iw denotes the identity transfonnation on W. Let A : V > W. Notice the and leave the following: following: A(A.I) must be a right inverse and.25 that A is invertible. Theorem 3. then A is invertible. If Proof: proof of second Proof: We prove the first part and leave the proof of the second to the reader. Let Theorem 3.e. i. Definition 3. 1. both 11 and Moreover.. 1. i.22 ]Rn >• ]Rm Note: From Theorem 3. A. 0 a left inverse. Then > 1.
and let 7£ denote the subspace of skewsymmetric matrices. whence N(A) = 0 so A is 11). respect to this inner product. Then A is 11. 4. is neither 11 nor onto. J E2. matrix characterizing all solutions of the linear matrix equation LA = I. below bases for its four fundamental subspaces. Is £. respect to this inner product. II? Is £. it is clear that there are A L = [3 — 1] infinitely many left inverses for A.1] is a left inverse. It is now obvious that A has full column is v 0.Exercises 27 2. Consider differentiation £ 11? Is£ onto? onto? 4. . EXERCISES EXERCISES 3 4 1.4. (Proof Theonly solution toO = Av = [i]v 2. let denote the subspace of symmetric 2. 2 . (Proof: The only solution to 0 = Av = [I2]v is v = 0. — S^. Let A = [~ . Prove Theorem 3. Consider the differentiation operator C defined in Example 3. The matrix A = 1 1 2 1 [ 3 1 when considered as a linear transformation onIE \ is neither 11 nor onto. Consider the vector space R nx " over E. In Chapter 6 we characterize all left inverses of a matrix by characterizing all solutions of the linear matrix equation LA = I. Let A = [8 5 i) and consider A as a linear transformation mapping E3 to ]R2. 3. and let R denote the subspace of skewsymmetric matrices. Y) = Tr(X Tr F). 3. Y E Enx" define their inner product by (X. For matrices matrices. Find the matrix representation of A with respect to the bases Find the matrix representation of A to bases {[lHHU]} of R3 and {[il[~J} of E . 2. Prove Theorem 3. with Y e ]Rnxn (X. y) = Tr(X Y). consider A linear transformation ]R3 1.2. £. whence A/"(A) = 0 so A is 11). In Chapter 6 we characterize all left inverses of a infinitely many left inverses for A.3. Let A = [i]:]Rl > ]R2. R = S J. We give when considered as a linear on ]R3. Consider the vector space ]Rnxn over ]R. 'R. Show that. For matrices X. let S denote the subspace of symmetric matrices. The matrix 3. Again. LetA [J] : E1 ~ E2. We give below bases for its four fundamental subspaces. ThenAis 11. It is now obvious that A has full column rank (=1) and A~L = [3 .4.
Show that AT has a right inverse. linearly independent solutions 10.4. Determine A/"(A) and 7£(A). Determine bases for the four fundamental subspaces of the matrix Detennine fundamental A=[~2 5 5 ~]. homogeneous linear system Ax = 0? homogeneous linear system Ax = O? n 3. Prove Theorem 3. 3. Let = [~ 9.1 to illustrate the four fundamental subspaces associated with AT e associated ATE nxm IR from IR m R".2.4.Il. How many linearly independent solutions can be found to the 10. Linear Transformations 7.11. Are they equal? Is this true in general? DetennineN(A) and R(A). Chapter 3. Let A = [ J o].1 11. prove it. . Linear Transformations Chapters. Suppose A € Mg 9x48 . Theorem 6. Modify Figure 3. ~ ~ 3 8. Rnxm thought of as a transformation from Rm to IRn. if not. Are they equal? Is this true in general? If this is true in general. Prove Theorem 3. Suppose A E IR m xn has a left inverse.12. left T Suppose e Rmxn 9.28 5. provide a counterexample. If E 1R~9X48.
characterization of A is given in the next theorem. for determining A+ .. With A and T as defined above. as noted in the proof of Theorem 3.1 Definitions and Characterizations Definitions and Characterizations Consider a linear transformation A : X —>• y. Then A+ is the MoorePenrose j2 with y\ E RCA) and yi E RCA). define a transformation A+ : Y —»• X by Definition 4. With A and T as defined above.1 4. T is bijective (11 and onto). which was proved by Penrose in 1955. as is shown in the following text. let us henceforth consider the X ~n lP1. This transformation T~ + can be used to give our first definition of A+. A purely algebraic y + characterization of A+ is given in the next theorem. can be used to give our first definition of A .l.+ R(A) by dimensional Define transformation T : N(A).17. as noted in the proof of Theorem 3. Then. a generalization of the inverse of a matrix. case X = W1 and Y = Rm.Chapter 4 Chapter 4 Introduction to the Introduction to the MoorePenrose MoorePen rose Pseudoinverse Pseudoinverse In this chapter we give a brief introduction to the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse. where X Xand Y y are arbitrary finitedimensional vector spaces..m We A+ A e lP1. a generIn this chapter we give a brief introduction to the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse. the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse of A. as is shown in the following text. Define a transformation T : Af(A)1. brings great notational and conceptual clarity matrix and. The MoorePenrose pseudoinverse is defined for any matrix and. 4. Then A+ is the MoorePenrose where y = y\ pseudoinverse of A. let us henceforth consider the Although X and Y were arbitrary vector spaces above. Definition 4.l —>• Tl(A) by Tx = Ax for all x E NCA). brings great notational and conceptual clarity to the study of solutions to arbitrary systems of linear equations and linear least squares to the study of solutions to arbitrary systems of linear equations and linear least squares problems. the definition neither provides nor suggests a good computational strategy good computational strategy for determining A +. and hence we Then. T is bijective Cll and onto). which was proved by Penrose in 1955. and hence we can RCA) —>• J\f(A}~L This transformation can define a unique inverse transformation Tl 1 :: 7£(A) + NCA). where and are arbitrary finiteConsider a linear transformation A : X + y..1.17. problems. see [22].1. neither provides Unfortunately." X ". see [22].l. the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse of A. define a transformation A + y + X by where Y = YI + Yz with Yl e 7£(A) and Yz e Tl(A}L.l. We have thus defined A+ for all A E IR™xn. Although X and y were arbitrary vector spaces above. pseudoinverse of A. 29 .
2) 4. Also.5. AG.1]) satisfy properties (PI). then by uniqueness. (4. Example 4.5. Given a matrix G that is a candidate for being the pseudoinverse of A. terizations. and (P4) but not (P3)." xn. Furthermore. Theorem 4. If G satisfies all four. Unfortunately.4. L Note that other left inverses (for example. if a t= 0. as a right or left inverse satisfies no fewer than three of the four properties. However. Such a verification is often relatively satisfies all four. Example 4. Introduction to the MoorePenrose Pseudoinverse Chapter 4. Note that other left inverses (for example. (P4) (GA)T = GA.30 Chapter 4. the Penrose properties do offer the great virtue of providing a checkable criterion in the following sense. characterization can be useful for hand calculation of small examples. Unfortunately.3. it must be A +.. A+ = (AT A)~ AT if A is 11 (independent columns) (A is left invertible). Then G = A+ if and only if Theorem 4. and (P4) but not (P3). Such a verification is often relatively straightforward. Then Theorem 4.1. Consider A = f ] satisfies (P1)(P4).2 Examples Examples Each of the following can be derived or verified by using the above definitions or characEach of the following can be derived or verified by using the above definitions or characterizations. this characterization can be useful for hand calculation of small examples.3. Then A+ [a [! = lim (AT A + 82 1) I AT 6+0 6+0 (4. A+ always exists and is unique. 19]. Example 4." xn. Example 4.2. (P4) (GA)T = GA. Note that the inverse of a nonsingular matrix satisfies all four Penrose properties. (P2) GAG G. one need simply verify the four Penrose conditions (P1)(P4).6. For any scalar a.2.1) = limAT(AAT +8 2 1)1. . Example 4. neither the statement of Theorem 4. Given a matrix G that is a candidate for being checkable criterion in the following sense. A t = AT (AA )~ if A is onto (independent rows) (A is Example 4. p. A~ = [3 . neither the statement of Theorem 4. it must be A+. For any scalar a. A L = [3 — 1]) satisfy properties (PI). (P2) GAG = G. whose proof Still another characterization of A + is given in the following theorem. Verify directly that A+ = [ ~] satisfies (PI)(P4). Let A e R™xn. Introduction to the MoorePenrose Pseudoinverse Theorem 4.1.7. (P2). one need simply verify the four Penrose conditions (P1)(P4).2 4.7. Let A e R?xn Then G = A + if and only if (Pl) AGA = A. Example 4. Let A E lR. = Furthermore.6. However. If G the pseudoinverse of A. p. (PI) AGA = A. the Penrose properties do offer the great virtue of providing a tional algorithm. a right or left inverse satisfies no fewer than three of the four properties. Verify directly that A+ = Example 4. Let A E lR. While not generally suitable for computer implementation. this can be found in [1. then by uniqueness. 19]. Note that the inverse of a nonsingular matrix satisfies all four Penrose properties. A+ = (AT A)I AT if A is 11 (independent columns) (A is left invertible). straightforward. A + always exists and is unique. if a =0.4. X+ = AT(AATT) I if A is onto (independent rows) (A is right invertible). Consider A = [']. While not generally suitable for computer implementation.2 nor its proof suggests a computational algorithm. as with Definition 4.2 nor its proof suggests a computawith Definition 4. whose proof can be found in [1. Still another characterization of A+ is given in the following theorem. Also. (P2). (P3) (AGf (P3) (AG)T = AG.
The interested reader can consult the proof in [1. Properties and Applications 4.9.9. Example 4. Proof: Both results can be proved using the limit characterization of Theorem 4. 31 31 Example 4.VVEejRnxnx " are orthogonal (M is 4.11. [~ ~ r ~ =[ 0 Example 4.7.4. Then Proof: For the proof.11.. Let A E R m x "and suppose UUEejRmxm. Then S+ = U D+UT.3 Properties and Applications Properties and Applications This section presents some miscellaneous useful results on pseudoinverses. 27].8. For A e Rmxn 1. elements are determined according to Example 4. Theorem 4. The interested reader can consult the proof in [1. . . A+ = (AT A)+ AT = AT (AA T)+. Many of these This section presents some miscellaneous useful results on pseudoinverses. D Theorem 4. Then S+ UD+U T where D+ is again a diagonal matrix whose diagonal elements are determined according to Example 4. For any vector v E M". Let S E Rnxn be symmetric with U TSU = D. e jRmxn and suppose Rmxm R n are orthogonal (M is T 1 1 orthogonal if M M ). The Proof: Both results can be proved using the limit characterization of Theorem 4.4. 4. p.13.3 4.4. .).8. (A T )+ = (A+{.3. The especially illuminating.10. are used in the text that follows. simply verify that the expression above does indeed satisfy each c the four Penrose conditions.7. if v i= 0. For all A E jRmxn. Many of these are used in the text that follows. The proof of the first result is not particularly easy and does not even have the virtue of being proof of the first result is not particularly easy and does not even have the virtue of being especially illuminating. [~ r 1 =[ 4 4 I I ~l 4 I I 4 4. Let S e jRnxn be symmetric with UT SU = D.13. The proof of the second result (which can also be proved easily by verifying the four Penrose proof of the second result (which can also be proved easily by verifying the four Penrose conditions) is as follows: conditions) is as follows: (A T )+ = lim (AA T ~+O + 82 l)IA = lim [AT(AAT ~+O + 82 l)1{ + 82 l)1{ 0 = [limAT(AAT ~+O = (A+{. where D+ is again a diagonal matrix whose diagonc D is diagonal. 2. simply verify that the expression above does indeed satisfy each of Proof: For the proof. Example 4. 27]. where U is orthogonal and D is diagonal. p. Theorem 4. 0 the four Penrose conditions. if v = O.12.12. Properties and Applications Example 4. For any vector e jRn.3. Example 4.10. Then orthogonal if MT = M. where U is orthogonal an Theorem 4.
n(A T AB) ~ nCB) . necessary and sufficient conditions under which the reverseorder property does hold are known and we quote a couple of moderately useful results for reference.14. Then As an example consider A = [0 I] and B = LI. (AB)+ = B+ A + if and only if 1.15. 2. (AB)+ = B{ Ai. in theory at least. and better methods are suggested in text that follows. [7].12 Note that by combining Theorems 4. Introduction to the MoorePenrose Pseudoinverse Chapter 4. (AA T )+ = (A T)+ A+.• Similarly. This A AT AT turns out to be a poor approach in finiteprecision arithmetic. Theorem 4. compute 4. since e lR~xr.. (AB)+ = B?A+. see [5]. where BI = A+AB and A) = ABIB{. Proof: Proof: For the proof.11 nets of matrices such as exists for inverses of nroducts Unfortunately.15.14. A+ = (AT A)I AT. 3. where BI = A+ AB and AI = AB\B+. 4. in peneraK ucts of matrices such as exists for inverses of products. A\ = A in Theorem 4. however (see. n(BB T AT) ~ n(AT) and 2. Proof: Proof: For the proof. For e Rmxn . xm + T B e Wr . Proof' A+ A Proof: Since A E Rnrxr. [] sufficient reverseorder However. see [9]. BB+ f r The by taking BI = B.16.. [11]. 4. [23]). Theorem 4. . (AB)+ = B+A+ if and only if 4. Ir Similarly. Theorem 4. For all A E lR mxn . in general. 0 D Theorem 4. 1. then A+ = (ATA)~lAT. N(A+) 5. B E Rrrxm. If A e Rnrxr. Introduction to the MoorePenrose Pseudo inverse 4. [9]. 0 D E lR~xr.15. whence A+A = f r. e.16. Then (AB)+ = 1+ = I while while B+ A+ = [~ ~J ~ = ~.32 Chapter 4. (AT A)+ = A+(A T)+. If A is normal.12 and 4. e.15. 0 The following theorem gives some additional useful properties of pseudoinverses. poor (see.13 we can.17. = N(AA+) = N«AA T)+) = N(AA T) = N(A T). properties Theorem 4. If e lR~xm. we B+ BT(BBT)I. = n(A T) = n(A+ A) = n(A TA). we have B = B (BBT)~\ whence BB+ = Ir.At = A in Theorem 4. TTnfortnnatelv. [7]. [5]. (AB)+ = B+A+. then (AB)+ = B+ A+.17. (A+)+ = A. As an example consider A = [0 1J and B = [ : J.xm. [II].g.13 can.11 is suggestive of a "reverseorder" property for pseudoinverses of prodTheorem 4. the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse of any matrix (since AAT and AT A are symmetric). D takingB t = B. The result then follows by E lR.g. n(A+) 4.. 4. then AkA+ = A+ Ak and (Ak)+ = (A+)kforall integers k > O.
4 to compute the pseudoinverse of U . 4. Then Bx E H(B) S. or orthogonal. and D E E mxm and suppose further that D is nonsingular. R(A) and take arbitrary x e IRm. properties of the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse. such as preceding but still be normal. problems. 2. B E E M X m . Then we have there exists a vector y e IRP such that Ay = Bx. Then we have Bx = Ay = AA + Ay = AA + Bx. we have shown that B = AA+B.18. show that (xyT)+ = (x Tx)+(yT y)++yxT. so Proof: Suppose R(B) c U(A) and take arbitrary jc E Rm. Let A G M"xn. (xyT)+ = (xTx)+(yTy) yx T 3. N(B) and 5 € IRmxn. whereupon y = Bx = AA+Bx E R(A). 0 EXERCISES EXERCISES 1. Use Theorem 4. ft(A+) ft(Ar 5. For A e Rmxn. so there exists a vector y E Rp such that Ay = Bx. fiA+A B.]. U(A) if and only if AA+B = B. Then there exists a vector x E Rm such that Bx = y. where one of the Penrose properties is used above. whereupon there exists a vector x e IR m such that Bx = y.• 1 2 x. Note: Recall that A e R" xn is normal if AATT = AT A. Then B and take arbitrary y E R(B). then it is normal.1 D. assume that AA+B = B and take arbitrary y e K(B). if A is symmetric. Y e R".. such as A=[ b a a b] for scalars a. The next theorem is fundamental to facilitating a compact and unifying approach The next theorem is fundamental to facilitating a compact and unifying approach to studying the existence of solutions of (matrix) linear equations and linear least squares to studying the existence of solutions of (matrix) linear equations and linear least squares problems. e IRnxm. If jc. Since x was arbitrary.Exercises 33 Note: Recall that A E IRn xn is normal if A A = A T A. Then R(B) c R(A) if and only if Suppose e IRnxp. a matrix can be none of the preceding but still be normal. assume that AA + B To prove the converse. However. However. a matrix can be none of the skewsymmetric. Then Bx e R(B) c H(A). or orthogonal. Suppose A E Rnxp. A E IRn xn B E E n xm 6. For example. y E IRn. To prove the converse. Theorem 4.4 to compute the pseudoinverse of \ 2 1. A E IRmxn.i D. RCA). show that JV(A) C A/"(S) if and only if BA+ A = B. € IRm xm D 6. Since x was arbitrary. A+ 0 A+BD. For A E Rpxn and BE R mx ". b E E. skewsymmetric. For example. For A e R m x n . prove that RCA) = R(AAT) using only definitions and elementary 3. Use Theorem 4. we have shown where one of the Penrose properties is used above. 5 e JRn x m . b e R for scalars a. (a) Prove or disprove that Prove or disprove that [~ (b) Prove or disprove that (b) Prove or disprove that AB D [~ B D r r=[ =[ A+ 0 A+ABD. For A E IRmxn. = B. A e IRPxn thatN(A) S. Proof: Suppose K(B) S.i ]. that B = AA+ B. prove that 7£(A) = 7£(AA r ) using only definitions and elementary properties of the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse. if A is symmetric. then it is normal. prove that R(A+) = R(A T). Then K(B) S.i l .
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank .
VI «xr j V U2 e ^x(mr) . i.. and the Osubblocks in are compatibly dimensioned..) Denote the set of eigenvalues of AT A by {U?..} with UI ::::: ..e.. Let A e R™ x n . Ch.\. U2 E IRrnx(mrl. Theorem 5. Preand postmultiplying by SI gives the emotion S~l eives the equation (5. and a\ > • • • > Ur > 0. (Note: The rest of the proof follows [24. . The SVD plays a key conceptual and computational of this important matrix factorization. [24. y22 €E Rnxfor^ and the 0JM^/ocJb in E~are compatibly IRnx(nr).. e IRmxm and V E IR nxn such that V € Rnxn such that UI > diag(ul. < min{m. . Vi eE RIRnxr. S = diagfcri.. dimensioned.. n}). r write A r A VI = ViS2. for example. Let {Vi. Pre. rcfr).. i e !!. 6]). we can and let V\ [VI. We show that every matrix has an SVD and describe some useful properties and applications show that every matrix has an SVD and describe some useful properties and applications of this important matrix factorization. u r ) e R .Chapter 5 Chapter 5 Introduction to the Singular Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition Value Decomposition In this chapter we give a brief introduction to the singular value decomposition (SVD). the latter equality following from the orthonormality of the Vi vectors. role throughout (numerical) linear algebra and its applications..LettingSS = diag(uI. Proof: Since A r A > 00 A r A i is symmetric and nonnegative definite. (5. vectors.. specifically. We In this chapter we give a brief introduction to the singular value decomposition (SVD). .4) 35 ..• = Un. e n} be a set of corresponding orthonormal eigenvectors 0= Ur+1 = .2) (5. V2 = [Vr+I. . . ..1. for example. «}). Premultiplying by Vf gives Vf A T A VI write ATAVi = VI S2.. Letting — diag(cri. Then there exist orthogonal matrices U E Rmxm and E IR~xn... (Note: The rest of the proof follows analogously if we start with the observation that AAT > 0 and the details are left to the reader analogously if we start with the observation that A A T ::::: 0 and the details are left to the reader as an exercise.• ::::: Urr > as an exercise. .. .u ).e. . vn].o>) E IRrxr.Vn ]. . i. . ..} be a set of corresponding orthonormal eigenvectors and let VI = [v\. its eigenvalues are all real and nonnegative.. U\ E IRmxr. Let {u. recall. More where ~ = [~ specifically. 6]).. where S = [J °0]. .and postmultiplying by equality following from the orthonormality of the r.. its eigenvalues are all real and nonnegative.. ii E !!. we have n = U~VT. The SVD plays a key conceptual and computational role throughout (numerical) linear algebra and its applications. recall. More S > o r > O. Premultiplying by vt gives vt ATAVi = vt VI S2 = S2.) Denote the set of eigenvalues of AT A by {of / E n} with a\ > • • > a > 0 = o>+i = • • an. 5. . Proof: Since AT A ::::: ( (AT A s symmetric and nonnegative definite.1. UI e Wnxr.] . the latter VfV^S2 = S2. Ch.3) = Ulsvt· The submatrix sizes are all determined by r (which must be S min{m. ..1) rxr A = [U I U2) [ ~ 0 0 ][ ] 2 T VI VT (5. .we can Vi = [vr+ .Vv r)..1 The Fundamental Theorem Theorem A Theorem 5.
VT as AV = V"i:.5. 1. we see that V r A VI = since A V2 = O.16.4) we see that VrVI = /.'. responding to multiple cr/'s. VT be an SVD of A as in Theorem 5. U V identical. Choose any matrix V2 E ^ 77IX( ™~ r) such that [VI V2] is VI columns orthonormal. . Now V20 Vf A T A V 0. .e.1 reveals that proof Theorem any orthonormal basis for jV(A) can be used for V2 • £lny orthonormal basis for N(A) can be used for V2.5.2).denote A thought of as aalinear transformation mapping IR n to IRm.. •. Remark 5. and codomain spaces with respect to which A then has a diagonal matrix representation. vn } for IR and {u\. .. The columns of V are called the left singular vectors of A (and are the orthonormal called orthonormal columns ofU left singular vectors of eigenvectors of AA ). whence Vi ATAV22 = O.. Then T V AV =[ =[ VrAVI VIAVI VrAVI vIA VI Vr AVz vI AVz ] ~] since A V2 =0. VTAV = [~ Q]. ar}} is called the set of (nonzero) singular values of the matrix A and called [a\.. the IRmxr VI AViSI. Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition Chapter 5... Referring to the equation U\ = A V\ S l defining VI. an examination decomposition Remark 5. of A A). . 0 Definition 5.. The columns of V are called the right singular vectors of A (and are the orthonormal right singular vectors of of called orthonormal eigenvectors of AT1A). and defining this matrix U\ andU UT A V [Q ~]. . V H.. Referring to the equation V I = A VI SI defining U\. Then from (5. From the proof of Theorem 5. The decomposition is A = V"i:. . let C. Definition 5. singular unique.2)... The analogous complex case in which A E C™ x " is quite straightforward. Thus. we see that Mat C is "i:.. n] — Note that there are also min{m.1. Note that V and V can be interpreted as changes of basis in both the domain Remark 5. Remark 5.4) see UfU\ = columns of U\ are orthonormal.(AT A) = is denoted ~(A). Then T rewriting A = V"i:.1 we see that ai(A) = A(2 (ATA) = £(A).16.). See also m [v\.. AV2 = 0. singular 2.. C denote A thought of as linear transformation mapping W to W. u ]} for Rm (see the discussion in Section 3. Choose U2 £ IRmx(mr) [U\ U2] orthogonal. Now define the ATA V AV O. } for R" {VI. .3. The !:ingular value decomposition is not unique. an we have that ATAV2z = VzO = 0. matrix VI E M mx/ " by U\ = AViS~l. The latter equality follows from the orthogonality of the S and vI AVi = vI VI S = O.1.2.. m for IR (see the discussion in Section 3.. . A. in fact. analogous complex e IC~ xn straightforward. For example. Thus. Remark 5.(A) At. we see that U{ AV\ = S and 1/2 A VI = U^UiS = 0. to be ~ completes the proof. 3.? (AA I min{m.36 36 Chapter 5. A = t/E VT SVD of A 5... D to be S completes the proof. n} . Specifically.. . Remark 5.r zero singular values...4. U be interpreted changes domain and codomain spaces with respect to which A then has a diagonal matrix representation... cr. eigenvectors of AA TT).2. . i. Ui e (5. . an we Turning now to the eigenvalue equations corresponding to the eigenvalues ar+l. Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition Turning now to the eigenvalue equations corresponding to the eigenvalues or+\. Remark 5.(AATT). The latter equality follows from the orthogonality of the columns of VI and V 2. of values of i I proof of A. with respect to the bases A = U^V as A V Mat £ is S the U E we see respect n and {u I. we see that.4. except for Hermitian transposes replacing transposes. Let A = V"i:. of the proof of Theorem 5. where V and V are unitary and the proof is essentially proof decomposition A = t/E V H. there may be nonuniqueness associated with the columns of V\ (and hence U\) cor• there may be nonuniqueness associated with the columns of VI (and hence VI) corresponding to multiple O'i'S. See also m Remark 5. The set {ai..3. Then Specifically.
. i.10. [25].2) can always be constructed from a "compact SVD" (5. F/vamnlp 5. A=U is an SVD.6. Let V be an orthogonal 5. U arbitrary 2 x orthogonal 5. f/2. too. C/ [U\ Ui] orthogonal. Let A e IRnxn" be symmetric and positive definite.. corner f/E V T r r T Ti isaanS V D o f AT. AT A Remark 5.e. U V form • columns of U and V can be changed (in tandem) by sign (or multiplier of the form e je in the complex case).. Computing an SVD by working directly with the eigenproblem for AT A or 5. Then A = V A VTT is an A.10.2) can always be constructed from ¥2 Theorem too. is an SVD. [11]. then A A. A _ [ 1  0 ~ ] cose = [ .7.8.e. see. however.g. Example A . SVD" (5. VI. Example 5. [11].3).g.1.[1 0 ] . i.11). The Fundamental Theorem 37 37 • any U22can be used so long as [U I U2] is orthogonal. e. Note. 01  where U is an arbitrary 2x2 2 orthogonal matrix. e j8 the case). if A = UI:VT is an SVD of A.U I U T . For example. The Fundamental Theorem 5.. Computing AA AATT is numerically poor in finiteprecision arithmetic. Vi. VI:TU/ s n SVD of A VS C . is the matrix I: and the span of the columns of UI. U2. that aa"full SVD" (5. V2 (see Theorem 5. SVD of A.3). 0 Example 5.9.8. symmetric V orthogonal matrix of eigenvectors that diagonalizes A. orthogonal transformations. A factorization UI: VT of a n m x n matrix A qualifies as an SVD if U and V are A t/SV r o f an m n U orthogonal and I: is an m x n "diagonal" matrix whose diagonal elements in the upper £ left comer are positive (and ordered). [7].. VT AV = A > O. is an SVD.sine sin e cose J[~ ~J[ cose sine Sine] cose ' where e is arbitrary. VT A V = A = VAV eigenvectors > 0. e.1. SVDof A. [7]. see.9.5. that "full SVD" (5. and E U\. Better algorithms exist that work directly on A via a sequence of orthogonal transformations. Example 5. What is unique. [25].6. n=[ [] 3 2 I 3 2 I 5 2y'5 y'5 S 4y'5 15 2~ ][ 3~ 0 0 0][ 0 0 3 0 _y'5 3 v'2 T v'2 T v'2 T v'2 2 ] 3 2 2 = 3 3 3J2 [~ ~] A E R MX Example 5.
The relationship to the four fundamental subspaces is summarized knowledge of the rank r.11. Then TheoremS.. vn].13. U2 = [Ur+I. (c) R(VI) = N(A)1. A = U.. for example. Then A has the dyadic (or outer 2. .5) as a sum of outer products and the key vector relations (5. . .7) explain why it is conventional to write the SVD and the key vector relations (5. as A = UZV rather than. [HI. The singular vectors satisfy the relations 3. the following properties hold: 1. Remark 5.. nicely in Figure 5.= R(A T ). Let U =. Let A e jRrnxn have a singular value decomposition A = VLV T Using Theorem 5. .38 38 Chapter 5.£VTT as in Let A e jRmxn have a singular value decomposition A = UHV as in Theorem Theorem 5. vr ]. . .1..14. rank(A) = r = the number of nonzero singular values of A. . . Then A has the dyadic (or outer product) expansion product) expansion r A = Laiuiv.1... Part 4 of the above theorem provides a numerically superior method for finding (orthonormal) bases for the four fundamental subspaces compared to methods based finding (orthonormal) bases for the four fundamental subspaces compared to methods based on. (5. . for example.1. . Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition 5. reduction to row or column echelon form..6) and (5.8) where where . A = UZV. Theorem 5.].£V..12. . (b) R(U2) = R(A)1. reduction to row or column echelon form. Let A E E mx " have a singular value decomposition A = U.. rank(A) = r = the number of nonzero singular values of A. urn].7) AT Uj = aivi for i E r.. Note that each subspace requires on.2 Some Basic Properties Some Basic Properties Theorem 5. The elegance of the dyadic decomposition (5.1.6) (5. Then (a) R(VI) = R(A) = N(A T / . u r ]. VI = [VI.. andV2 = [Vr+I. 4. urn] and V = [v\. LetUI = [UI.. The relationship to the four fundamental subspaces is summarized nicely in Figure 5. um] and V = [VI.5) 3. say. Let V = [UI.2 5. the following properties hold: the notation of Theorem 5. Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition Chapter 5.11..= N(A T ).. 2. Then (5. .. Remark 5. 1. The singular vectors satisfy the relations AVi = ajui. say.1.7) explain why it is conventional to write the SVD as A = U'£VTT rather than.12. The elegance of the dyadic decomposition (5. Note that each subspace requires knowledge of the rank r.5) as a sum of outer products Remark 5. i=1 (5. vn]. Using the notation of Theorem 5. Let A E Rmxn have a singular value decomposition A = U'£ VT. .13.. .6) and (5. Vn]. Part 4 of the above theorem provides a numerically superior method for Remark 5. . .. (d) R(V2) = N(A) = R(AT)1. .
11. Some Basic Properties 5. (or exchange matrix) P = [e erI. Proof' The proof follows easily by verifying the four Penrose conditions. Note that none of the expressions above quite qualifies as an SVD of A + Remark 5. 0 D (5. with the Osubblocks appropriately sized..10) . e2. Furthermore.u. a simple reordering accomplishes the task: reordering accomplishes the task: (5. SVD and the four fundamental subspaces. .11.2.=1 U.1. which is clearly orthogonal and symmetric. ed. then = L r 1 v. then be as defined in Theorem 5.11) This can also be written in matrix terms by using the socalled reverseorder identity matrix This can also be written in matrix terms by using the socalled reverseorder identity matrix (or exchange matrix) P = \err. if we let the columns of U and V be as defined in Theorem 5. e^. Some Basic Properties 39 39 A r r E9 {O} / {O)<!l nr mr Figure 5. Figure 5. a simple if we insist that the singular values be ordered from largest to smallest.er^\. Proof: The proof follows easily by verifying the four Penrose conditions.. Furthermore. Note that none of the expressions above quite qualifies as an SVD of A+ if we insist that the singular values be ordered from largest to smallest.15.1. which is clearly orthogonal and symmetric. However. e\\.. However. . Remark 5. .15. if we let the columns of U and V with the Qsubblocks appropriately sized. SVD and the four fundamental subspaces. ....2..5.
17 and in Definition 4. A "full SVD" can be similarly constructed.. Then VT A = :EVT = [~ ~ ] [ ~i ] D _ . In other words.. let A e Rmxn have an SVD given by (5. urr]} is clearly S.. notice that R(A) R(A V) This time.mxn..urr}} e r.3 5.. From Section 3. = tv. Such a compression is analogous to the . when derived by a Gaussian elimination algorithm implemented in finiteprecision arithmetic.. Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition Chapter 5. . premultiplication of A by VT is an orthogonal transformation that "compresses" A by row transformations. .1). . Then Let A E lR. postmultiplication of A by V is an orthogonal transformation that "compresses" A by column transformations..16. v } and {MI . Then Again. postmultiplication of A by V is an orthogonal transformation column rank.2.. Such a compression is analogous to the "compresses" A by I. u is a basis forR(A). Similarly. = cr.[ SVr ] 0 mxn E lR. premultiplication of A by UT is an orthogonal transformation that rank.vvr}}is aa is r basisforN(A). . Column compression Column compression Again.40 40 Then Then Chapters.1). since {UI.. This time.. Recall the linear transformation T used in the proof of Theorem 3. . Then AV = V:E = [VI U2] [~ ~ ] =[VIS 0] ElR. Both compressions are analogous to the socalled rowreduced where R is upper triangular.l. Since T is determined by its action on a basis. have an SVD given by (5. . / E~. . In other words. while the matrix representation for the inverse linear transformation TlI with respect to S. then TlI can be defined by T^'M.11). .. is the matrix version of (5. .17 and Remark 5.1)..M(UT Notice that M(A) = N(V T A) = N(svr> and the matrix SVf E Rrxll" has full row A/"(SV. basis forJ\f(A)±. mxr has full column rank.. since [u\. . where R is upper triangular.16. Such a row compression can also be accomplished by orthogonal row transformations performed directly on A to reduce it to the form 0 . notice that H(A) = K(AV) = R(UI S) and the matrix UiS e Rm xr has full K(UiS) and the matrix VI S E lR. Both compressions are analogous to the socalled rowreduced echelon form which.. Notice that N(A) . is not generally as reliable a procedure. .2. In other words. Such a row compression can also be accomplished "compresses" A by row transformations. and since ( v \ . = ^u. A "full SVD" can be similarly constructed.. r x has full row rank. u is clearly matrix representation for T with respect to the bases { v \ .. Similarly. 5.olumn transformations. the same bases is 5""1. Introduction to the Singular Value Decomposition A+ = (VI p)(PS1 p)(PVr) is the matrix version of (5.i / E~. w.1)..1.11).i e r. in Definition 4. . the isabasisfor7£(.3 Rowand Column Compressions Row and Column Compressions Row compression Let A E R have an SVD given by (5. .4).mxn have an SVD given by (5. In other words. Remark 5. then T can be defined by TVj = OjUj . finiteprecision arithmetic. when derived by a Gaussian elimination algorithm implemented in echelon form which. and since {VI. then T~ canbedefinedbyTIu. From Section 3.. .1.. is not generally as reliable a procedure. Since T is determined by its action on a basis. vrr} and {u I. while the matrix representation for the inverse linear transformation T~ with respect to the same bases is SI. let A E lR. . Recall the linear transformation T used in the proof of Theorem 3. then T can be defined by TV. . the matrix representation for T with respect to the bases {VI. by orthogonal row transformations performed directly on A to reduce it to the form [~].r) and the matrix SVr e lR. .
(b) Suppose that W and Y are nonsingular but not necessarily orthogonal. an SVD A. For details. [25]. 4.. Determine SVDs of the matrices (a) (b) [ ] [ ~l 1 0 1 6. show that X = 0. of defined by A defined by A = xyT. 3. € IRmxn. If XT X = 2. (a) Show that and W A F have the same singular values (and hence the same rank). y e Rn be nonzero vectors. Let x e Rm. Let A e E"xn be symmetric but indefinite. [23]. A = Q P 7. Prove Theorem 5. i.. If XTX = 0. Use the SVD to determine a where Q is orthogonal and P p T > O. For details.1 starting from the observation that AAT > 0. see. Determine an SVD of A. Prove Theorem 5. EXERCISES EXERCISES 1.[11]. . A = QP 7. [25]. y E ~n Determine A e ~~ 4.Exercises Exercises 41 41 socalled columnreduced echelon form.. for performed by Gauss transformations in finiteprecision arithmetic. z of complex scalar z (where i j J=I). [7]. Determine an SVD of the matrix A E R™ xn E IRm. for example. Determine SVDs of the matrices 5. which is not generally a reliable procedure when performed by Gauss transformations in finiteprecision arithmetic. 2. [7].1 starting from the observation that AAT ~ O. = o. see. Let X E M mx ". Let A e Rmxn and suppose W eRmxm and Y e Rnxn are orthogonal. [23]. Let E ~~xn. which is not generally a reliable procedure when socalled columnreduced echelon form.e. Let A € R" X M . Note: this is analogous to the polar form where Q is orthogonal and P = PT > 0. Do A Wand Yare A and WAY have the same singular values? Do they have the same rank? and WAY have the same singular values? Do they have the same rank? factorization of i.e. xyT 5. A E IRnxn indefinite. [11]. Use the SVD to determine a polar factorization of A. Let A E ~mxn and W E IR mxm and 7 E ~nxn are (a) Show that A and WAY have the same singular values (and hence the same rank). Note: this is analogous to the polar form iO z = rel&ofaa complex scalar z (where i = j = V^T).
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank .
A solution to (6. as a special case. and this is possible only ifm :::: n (since m = dim R(A) = rank(A) :::: min{m. i.3) for all b E lRm if and only ifR(A) = lRm. the familiar vector system are studied and include. A/"(A) = 0. There exists at most one solution to (6. There exists a solution to (6. the familiar vector system Ax = b. as a special case.1. A E ]Rn xn.e. A G M m x m and A has neither a singular value nor a eigenvalue. b]) = rank(A). There exists at most one solution to (6. i. i. Consider the system of linear equations Theorem 6.e. 3.1 6..1) are studied and include. equivalently. n. (6. There exists a unique to (6..1 Vector Linear Equations Vector Linear Equations We begin with a review of some of the principal results associated with vector linear systems.3) for all b E lRm if and only if the columns of 5. n this is possible only ifm < n (since m dimT^(A) = rank(A) < min{m. and onto.1. equivalently.3) if and only b E R(A). There exists a unique solution to (6.e. General linear systems of the form equations.e. b E lRm. and this is possible only ifm > n. 1. A is 11. there exists a solution if and only ifrank([A. (6. there exists a solution if and only j/"rank([A.e. i. b]) = rank(A).. There exists a solution to (6. equivalently. There exists a nontrivial solution to the homogeneous system Ax = 0 if and only if Ax = 0 if 6.3) if and only ififbeH(A). 2.Chapter 6 Chapter 6 Linear Equations Linear Equations In this chapter we examine existence and uniqueness of solutions of systems of linear In this chapter we examine existence and uniqueness of solutions of systems of linear equations.3) is unique if and only ifJ\f(A) = 0. A is 2. and this is possible only ifm ::: n. equivalently.3) for all b e W1 if and only if the columns of A are linearly independent. b E ]Rn. rank(A) < n. A E lRmxn. A E lR mxm and A has neither a 0 singular value nor a 0 eigenvalue. Consider the system of linear equations Ax = b. Theorem 6. i. A solution to (6. General linear systems of the form (6. There exists a solution to (6. 5. n}).3) for all b E ]Rm if and only if A is nonsingular. (6. 4. 6. onto. We begin with a review of some of the principal results associated with vector linear systems. 43 ..2) 6. A are linearly independent. A is 11. 4.3} for e R m if only ifU(A) = W".e..3) is unique if and only if N(A) = 0. only if rank(A) < n.. N(A) 0. 3. i.3) 1.3) for all b e W" if and only if is nonsingular.
Note that the results of Theorem of solutions to the general matrix linear system (6. Therefore. That all solutions are of this form can be seen as follows. a solution exists if and only if AA+B = B.mxk and suppose that AA+B = B. Let Z be an arbitrary solution of (6. Let Z be an arbitrary solution of That all solutions arc of this form can be seen as follows. A is not 11. The matrix linear equation AX = B. For example.4) has a solution if and only ifl^(B) C 7£(A).A+ A)Y. Furthermore. note that x = 0 is always a solution to the homogeneous system. which implies rank(A) < n by part 0 by part 3.. The matrix linear equation Theorem 6. i. i. Linear Equations Proof: The proofs are straightforward and can be consulted in standard texts on linear Proof: The proofs are straightforward and can be consulted in standard texts on linear algebra. Then any matrix eRmxk of the form of the form X = A+ B + (/ . a solution exists if and only if has a solution if and only ifR(B) S. AZ — B.1 follow from those below for the special case = 1. we prove part 6.e. BE JR. A E JR.18. The matrix criterion is Theorem 4.44 Chapter 6. all solutions of (6. premultiply by A: AX = AA+ B + A(I = B A+ A)Y + (A  AA+ A)Y by hypothesis = B since AA + A = A by the first Penrose condition. while results for (6. which implies rank(A) < n must have the case of a nonunique solution. Note that some parts of the theorem follow directly from others. Proof: To verify that (6.1).1). E JR. AZ :::: B. (6.mxn.mxk. note that x 0 is always a solution to the homogeneous system. +B = Theorem 6.5).5). to algebra. A is not II. where Y E JR.2) follow by specializing even further to the case m = n.6). R(A). (6. D 6. B E JR.5) is a solution of is a solution of AX=B.e. 0 .2 (Existence).1 follow from those below for the special case k = 1. equivalently. Proof: The subspace inclusion criterion follows essentially from the definition of the range Proof: The subspace inclusion criterion follows essentially from the definition of the range of a matrix. Therefore.e. Theorem 6.5) is a solution.6) are of this form. Then we can write (6. all solutions of (6.. of a matrix. specializing even further to the case m = n.e . i. The matrix criterion is Theorem 4. Then we can write Z=A+AZ+(IA+A)Z =A+B+(IA+A)Z and this is clearly of the form (6. equivalently. 0 Theorem 6.6) are of this form. Note that the results of Theorem 6.18. we must have the case of a nonunique solution.nxk is arbitrary.6) Furthermore.3. mxn .3.2 Matrix Linear Equations In this section we present some of the principal results concerning existence and uniqueness In this section we present some of the principal results concerning existence and uniqueness of solutions to the general matrix linear system (6.2 (Existence). Let A e Rmxn.2 6. premultiply by A: Proof: To verify that (6. For example. i. (6.. to prove part 6.5) is a solution.2)follow by 6. Linear Equations Chapter 6. AA+B B. while results for (6.. Note that some parts of the theorem follow directly from others. and this is clearly of the form (6.6).
wherer = rank(A) (recallr ::: h).mxn. this can occur if and only if rank(A) = r m (since equivalent to AA+Im = 1m.7. A R (AA(A) = A"1. Thus.9. Solution: There exists a right inverse if and only if R(Im) S. (TrO denotes the trace of a matrix. we write 1m to emphasize the m x m identity Im matrix. Clearly. Characterize all right inverses of a matrix A E lR.5. r checked that 1. in which case A must be invertible and R = AI. where y e lR. Ax — 0. (6. Solution: x=A+O+(IA+A)y = (IA+A)y. Matrix Linear Equations 45 Remark 6. A A = f/E VT. Clearly.6) that minimizes TrX7 (Tr() denotes the trace of a matrix. D 0 Example 6.8) . Remark 6. Matrix Linear Equations 6.7) is unique if and only if A+A = /. where r rank(A) (recall r < n).4. A solution of the matrix linear equation Theorem 6.A+A). Computation: Since y is arbitrary.6 (Uniqueness).j jcj.A+A = Vz V2 and R(Vz2V^) = R(Vz) = N(A).5. A A+ AI Remark (/ — A + A) 0. recall that TrXT X = £\ •xlj. (6. Characterize AR = Im solutions R of the equation AR = 1m. BE lR. it is easy to see that all solutions are generated y from a basis for 7£(7 .7) has a unique solution if and only if M(A) = 0. and (N(A) = 0). there exists a nonzero solution if and only if A+A /= I. A+ = A"1 and so (I .nxm is arbitrary. if and only if A is Ilor _/V(A) = O. it is not unique. if there exists a unique. Butrank(A) = n if and only if A is 11 or N(A) = 0.2.) that minimizes TrXT X.n is arbitrary. N(A) = O. y E R" A + A t= I. But rank(A) = n that A+ A = / if r — n. equivalently.A+ A V2 V[ and U(V = K(V2) = N(A).mxn.3.6. It particular (6. recall that TrX r = Li. there is no "arbitrary" component. But if A has an SVD given by A = U h VT.2. The second follows by noting thatA+A = I can occur only ifr = n. equivalently. find all A e ]Rmx". All right inverses r < m) A (A+ of A are then of the form of A R = A+ 1m + (In . equivalently. leaving only the unique solution X = AI1B. Hence. then it is easily R(I — A + A).8.A+A) = O. Consider Example 6. rank(A) = < A This is equivalent to either rank (A) = r < n or A being singular. Clearly.7) has a unique solution if and only if unique if and only if A + A = I. matrix.) Theorem 6.9. When A is square and nonsingular.mxk (6. Example 6. X• = A~ B. / . It can be shown that the particular solution X = A+B is the solution of (6.6) +B Remark 6. A solution of the matrix linear equation AX = B. Proof: Proof: The first equivalence is immediate from Theorem 6. this can occur if and only if rank(A) = r = m (since r ::: m) and this is equivalent to A being onto (A + is then a right inverse). Example 6. vD Example 6. A E lR.A+ A)Y =A++(IA+A)Y. There is a unique right inverse if and only if A+A = I/ e E"xm arbitrary. Here. Example 6.S. Find all solutions of the homogeneous system Ax = 0. A+ A where Y E lR. nonzero solution. A e E"x". 7£(A) and this is 7£(/m) c R(A) equivalent to AA + 1m Im.6 (Uniqueness). Suppose A E lR..nxn. Consider the system of linear firstorder difference equations (6.7.
We might now ask the question: Given XQ = 0. does there exist an input sequence for k > 1.e... linear differential equations). does there exist an input sequence {u j an input sequence {"y}"~o such that xn = O? In linear system theory. Theorem 6. A n . A related question is the following: Given an arbitrary initial vector Xo. we have the notion of suffice to determine (uniquely) xo? As a dual to controllability. standard conditions with analogues for continuoustime models (i. m known as the state vector at time while Uk is the input (control) vector. see that (6. AB. Again from Theorem 6. (A. We can then pose some new questions about the with C and (p > 1). Since m ~ I. this is a question {u }y~Q Xk of reacbability.~ I).y/}"Io suffice to determine reconstructibility: When does knowledge of {w r/:b and {YJ lj:b suffice to determine (uniquely) xn? The fundamental duality result from linear system theory is the following: (uniquely) xnl The fundamental duality result from linear system theory is the following: E RPxn e IR pxn E RPxm € IR pxm (A. we of reachability. if and only if or.11) with and D (p ~ 1). The answers are cast in terms that are dual in the linear algebra sense as well.e. The matrices A = [~ ~]1and B5 == [~] 1 providean example of a system that is controllable but not reachable. Theorem l'/:b Clearly.2. this is called such that Xn = 0? linear system theory. this is a question va [Uj }k~:b such that x^ takes an arbitrary value in W ? In linear system theory.46 46 Equations Chapter 6.J B] = n. There are many other algebraically equivalent conditions. The general solution of (6. Example 6. A n .8) is given by solution of (6.8) of Example 6.ra>l).J B]) = 1R" or.8) is reachable if and only if if R([ B.:b dual to reachability is called observability: When does knowledge of {" j }"!Q and {y_/}"~o suffice to determine (uniquely) Jt0? As a dual to controllability. We might now ask the question: Given Xo 0. does there exA related question is the following: Given an arbitrary initial vector XQ. controlA 1 lability and reachability are equivalent.. The vector Jt* in linear system theory is e IR nx " fieR" (n ~ I. B) is if(AT . B T] is observable [reconsrrucrible] [controllablcl if and T) observable [reconstructive]. .. We now introduce an output vector Yk to the system (6. .8) is given by kJ Xk = Akxo + LAkJj BUj j=O UkJ ] Uk2 (6.. reachability always implies controllability and. overall system that are dual in the systemtheoretic sense to reachability and controllability. AB. this is called controllability.9 by appending the equation by appending the equation (6.9) ~Axo+[B. does there exist an input sequence {ujj 1jj^ such that Xk takes an arbitrary value in 1R"? In linear system theory. We can then pose some new questions about the overall system that are dual in the systemtheoretic sense to reachability and controllability. from the fundamental Existence Theorem.AB •. There are many other algebraically equivalent conditions.8) is controllable if and only if if controllability. we have the notion of reconstructibility: When does knowledge of {u jy }"~Q and {..8) of Example 6. The above are standard conditions with analogues for continuoustime models (i.10) for k ~ 1. example of a system that is controllable but not reachable. The condition dual to reachability is called observability: When does knowledge of {u 7 r/:b and {Yj l'. equivalently. The linear differential equations).• A k kJ B] [ ~o (6. if A is nonsingular.10..9 Example 6. Since > 1. ..2. The general known as the state vector at time k while Uk is the input (control) vector.10. equivalently. Linear Equations Xk with A E R"xn and B E IR nxmxm(rc>l. . we see that (6. if and only if rank [B. from the fundamental Existence Theorem. The matrices A = [ ° Q and f ^ provide an lability and reachability are equivalent. We now introduce an output vector yk to the system (6.T. The condition The answers are cast in terms that are dual in the linear algebra sense as well. B) iJ reachable [controllable] ifand only if (A .
the coefficient matrices of interest are square and nonsingular. (6. Then. Then the equation e jRmxn. Then. asbelow is a small collection of useful matrix identities. arbitrary.6. Such a criterion (C C+ ® A +A = I) of the Kronecker product of matrices for its statement. equivalently. Theorem 6. 0. B E Rnxm.12) j=O Yo . notice that Yk = CAkxo Thus. Invertibility is assumed for any component or subblock whose inverse is indicated.DUnl 6. B e jRmx q . Thus. associated with matrix inverses. . v E R(R).6. particularly for block matrices. the solution is then unique if and only if N(R) Uniqueness Theorem. in which case the general solution is of the form (6.4 Some Useful and Interesting Inverses 47 To derive a condition for observability.27.13) and let denote the matrix on the righthand side..4 Some Useful and Interesting Inverses 6. so a solution exists. +L kl CAk1j BUj + DUk.14) requires the notion of the Kronecker product of matrices for its statement. e Rmxn. A compact matrix criterion for uniqueness of solutions to (6. sociated e jRnxn.4 Some Useful and Interesting Inverses Some Useful and Interesting Inverses In many applications.15) E jRnxp where Y € Rn*p is arbitrary. Verification of each identity is recommended as an exercise for the reader. and C e jRpxq. A E Rnxn. Listed In many applications.3 A More General Matrix Linear Equation A More General Matrix Linear Equation AXC=B (6. Let A E Rmxn.14) requires the notion A compact matrix criterion for uniqueness of solutions to (6.Duo Yl . C E jRmxn. the has a solution if and only if AA+BC+C = B. by definition. Such a criterion (CC+ <g) A+ A — I) is stated and proved in Theorem 13. particularly for block matrices. By the fundamental the righthand side.Du] (6. if and only if or.4 6. By the fundamental Uniqueness Theorem. B E Rmxq.CBuo .2 j BUj .11.6. E jRnxm. by definition. and C E Rpxti. the solution is then unique if and only if N(R) ==0.27. equivalently.3 6. so a solution exists. Theorem 6. indicated. in which case the general solution is of the has a solution if and only if AA + BC+C = B. if and only if r Yn]  Lj:~ CA n . or. the coefficient matrices of interest are square and nonsingular.13) and let R denote the matrix on Let denote the (known) vector on the lefthand side of (6. In these identities. notice that To derive a condition for observability. is stated and proved in Theorem 13. Verification of each identity is recommended as an exercise for the reader.13) Let v denote the (known) vector on the lefthand side of (6. Listed below is a small collection of useful matrix identities. e Tl(R).14) Theorem 6. 6. mxm and D E jRm Invertibility is assumed for any component or subblock whose inverse is and D € E xm.
8. l = l = [!C / [~ ~ l = [ AI +_~~!~CAI A~BE = D. This where E = (D — CA B) (E is the inverse of the Schur complement of A). characterize all left inverses of a matrix A E Mm xn .CA.A~lB(D~ CA~lB)~[CA~l This result is known as the ShermanMorrisonWoodbury formula. formulas for the inverse of a sum of matrices such as (A + D)lor (AI1 + DI)I.4.BDI l = [ AI BD. that X~l [~ !/ [~ ~ r [~ ~ l [~ ~/ r [~ ~ 1 l l l = [ ~ 4. = = Both of these matrices satisfy the matrix equation X2 = / from which it is obvious these matrices satisfy the matrix equation X^ = I from which it is obvious Both of that XI = X. BB EelR fflxk and suppose AAhas an SVD as in Theorem 5. 1. characterize all left inverses of a matrix A e lR ".. r A~I [~ ~ r [D~I~AI D~I 1 ~r ~~B 1 r l [~ ~ r [D~CF +~~I~. 2. Note that the positions of the / and — / blocks may be exchanged. 1.. X. Assuming R(B) ~ R(A). Linear Equations 1./ blocks may be exchanged. l 8. for example.1. [~ ~ r l 3.1. result follows easily from the block LU factorization in property 16 of Section 1.. Note that the positions of the / and . Let A € E mx ". formulas for applications (and is frequently "rediscovered") including. where F = (A . Assuming 2.48 Chapter 6. It also the inverse of a sum of matrices such as (A + D)"1 or (A" + D"1) It also yields very efficient "updating" or "downdating" formulas in expressions such as yields very efficient "updating" or "downdating" formulas in expressions such as T (A + JUT ) I1 (with symmetric A E R"x" and .4. It has many applications (and is frequently "rediscovered") including.B D. This result follows easily from the block UL factorwhere F = (A — ED C) This result follows easily from the block UL factorization in property 17 of Section 1. mx . where E = (D . characterize all solutions of the matrix linear equation AX=B in terms of the SVD of A in terms of the SVD of A. for example. It has many This result is known as the ShermanMorrisonWoodbury formula. (A + BDC)I = A~l .AIB(DlI + CAIB)ICAI. [ / +c 7.I ] D. Linear Equations Chapter 6. theory.4.I C) I. 5. This result follows easily from the block LU factorization in property 16 of Section 1. BC 6. As in Example 6. 2. ization in property 17 of Section 1. As in Example 6. characterize all solutions of the matrix linear equation 7Z(B) c 7£(A).I B)I (E is the inverse of the Schur complement of A).I .4.8. Rmxk and suppose has an SVD as in Theorem 5. Let A E lRmxn. (A BDCr1 = AI .c E E") that arise in optimization (A + xx T ) — (with symmetric A e lRnxn and x e lRn) that arise in optimization theory.I EXERCISES EXERCISES 1.
Show that the matrix B — A — —eie T : (i. check directly condition for reconstructibility the form form N[ fA J CA n 1 ~ N(A n ).xy) T 1 49 = I  1 xTy 1 xy . check directly that the condition for reconstructibility takes the 6. l' Hint: Show that Ci E N(B). Hint: Show that ct <= M(B). Let jc. A with yl subtracted from its (ij)th element) is singular. where C = 1/(1 ..l ~i e.e. . T 4. A with — subtracted from its (zy)th element) is singular. Show that 4. c and individual elements y. y e IRn and suppose further that x T y ^ 1. Assume that x/( 7^ 0 for some and j. (i. Show that the matrix B = A ...... Let x. Show that (/ . Show that cxJ C ' where c 1/(1 — T y).Exercises Exercises 3. in Example 6. Let A e R"xxn and let A"1 have columns c\.10. y E E" and suppose further that XTy ^ 1.e.x xTy). As in Example 6. 5. Let x. ..Cn and individual elements Yij.e.. y E E" and suppose further that XTy i= 1. Let A E 1R~ " and let A 1 have columns Cl.y Assume that Yji i= 0 for some i/ and j. € IRn and suppose that x T y i= 1. . Show that 3.10. . 6.
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank .
1. By Theorem 2.3. V by by PX. y x Figure 7.y. Also. P isaprojectionifandonlyifl P isaprojection. Figure 7.yp2 = P. i. every v E V Definition 7.y is linear and P# y — px. Py.y is called the (oblique) projection on X along y.1.1 displays the projection of v on both X and Y in the case V = ]R2. Let V be a vector space with V = X EEl Y.1 displays the projection of von both and 3^ in the case = Figure 7. and Norms 7.y is linear and pl.Chapter 7 Chapter 7 Projections.yV = x for all v E V. every v e V has a unique decomposition v x y with x E and y e y.1 Projections Definition 7. Let V be a vector space with V X 0 y. Also. Inner Product Spaces.26.y. y = Px..x = I px.y Theorem 7. Oblique projections. px. Theorem 7. say on X along y (using the notation of Definition 7.26. Theorem 7.1. Oblique projections. P2 = P.y is called the (oblique) projection on X along 3^. say on X along Y (using the notation of Definition 7. Define PX y : V + X <.1). Inner Product Projections.1 7. Px. P is a projection if and only if I —P is a projection. A linear transformation P is a projection if and only if it is idempotent.1).2. Theorem 7. Proof: Suppose P is a projection.2. Proof: Suppose P is a projection.3. Figure 7. and Norms Spaces. Define pX. Infact.1. Px.x — I — Px.y • V —>• c V has a unique decomposition v = x + y with x e X and y E y. A linear transformation P is a projection if and only if it is idempotent. PX. 51 51 .e.. Infact. i. Py.e. By Theorem 2.
P)x E ft(P)1 xTPT(I . Conversely.p 2 v 0 so y e Thus. Thus.11.xx by Theorem 7. Inner Product Spaces. T Since x and y were arbitrary. Hence if v E X ny. P2v = P Pv — 2 2 Px = x = Pv.P)v.1 7. and P must be an orthogonal projection. then Pv = 0. Let X n y. with the second equality following since PTP is symmetric. (I .AA+ U2 U ! LUiUT.P)x e X1. (I .P)x = xTP(I .1 The four fundamental orthogonal projections The four fundamental orthogonal projections Using the notation of Theorems 5.P) = 0. suppose P = P. Write x = Px (I — P)x. Then x T pT (I . R" be Proof: Let P be an orthogonal projection (on X. p 2v = PPv = Let u E V be arbitrary. Moreover. we must have pT (I . Projections.P is the projection on Y along X.P)x = (I . Thus. Note that (/ .1 and 5. Inner Product Spaces. let A E Rmxn with SVD A = U!:VTT = A = UT. Note that (I . Moreover. while Py = P(l . say. mental subspaces..=1 m PR(A). Then v = Pv + (I . P = P.XLtion and we then use the notation P x = PX.P)v. Projections.P)v.. We now prove and Y = {v E V : Pv = OJ.P)x 6 R(P)1and P must be an orthogonal projection. P Proof: Let P be an orthogonal projection (on X. Then v if v € Pv (I . Thus.3. Since x and y were arbitrary. i=r+l PN(A) 1. Thus. then v = O. PX.4. Then U\SVr Then r PR(A) AA+ U\U[ Lu. p2 = P.P)v.P)x = (I .uT. then Pv v. * called an orthogonal projecDefinition 7.XL Theorem 7. Thus. and Norms Chapter 7. A 6 jRmxII UtSVf. Since Py E X. X 0 y and the projection on X along y is P. suppose symmetric projection matrix and let x be arbitrary. then Pv = v. D 0 7. A+A VIV{ r LViVT are easily checked to be (unique) orthogonal projections onto the respective four fundaare easily checked to be (unique) orthogonal projections onto the respective four fundamental subspaces. and Norms Let v e V be arbitrary. First note that v E X.1.5. since Px e U(P).P}x = 0.P)x = yTTpT (I . Let X = {v e V : Pv = v} and y {v € V : Pv 0}.P)v = = Pv. We now prove that V = X $ y.52 52 Chapter 7. y = (I .1 . Essentially the same argument shows that / . First note that iftfveX. Now let v E V be arbitrary.3. Then Px = p 2v = Pv = x so x e X. along 1) and let jc.X^X = Px±. then (/ . Py e X. Thus.V Theorems 5. Write x = P x + (I .xJ. along XXL} and let x. yy Ee jR" be arbitrary. V Pv .P)x = O. 0 Definition 7.L 1. Then Pv = P(x + y) = Px = x.)x = PXJ.A+A V2V{ L i=r+l i=l 11 ViVf. In the special case where Y = X^. Conversely. then Pv = O. P e jRnxn is the matrix of an orthogonal projection (onto R(P)) if and only ifP2 PT if p2 = p = pT. It is easy to check that X and Y are subspaces. Conversely. If v E Y.4.5.. In the special case where y X1.PX.P)x E XL.P2v = 0 so Y E y. Hence PT = PTP = P. suppose P is a is a with the second equality following since pT P is symmetric. V = X $ Y and the projection on X along Y is P.P)x = O..P)x = x T P(l . Conversely. suppose p2 = P. It is easy to check that X and 3^ are subspaces.xx by Theorem 7. D Essentially the same argument shows that I — P is the projection on y along X. Then symmetric projection matrix and let x be arbitrary.XL iss called an orthogonal projection and we then use the notation PX = PX. P)x = y PT(I P)x = 0. Then Px = P2v = Pv = x so x E X. Let X = {v E V : Pv = v} Px = x = Pv.xl. Then Pv = P(x + y) = Px = x. px. Hence that V X 0 y. arbitrary. y = (I . If v e y. Px E R(P). while Py = P(I P}v = x Pv . we must have P (I — P) = O. Now let u e V be arbitrary. then v = 0.1 5. P E E"xn is the matrix of an orthogonal projection (onto K(P)} if and only 7. we have (py)T ((I .P)x. Let x = Pv. . .11. PN(A)J. say.px. Hence pT = pT P = P. we have ( P y f I (/ .
A direct calculation shows that and ware. e Rn Solution: Think of the vector w as an element of the onedimensional subspace IZ(w)..7. the vector z that is orthogonal to wand such that v = P v + z is given by z is given by z = PK(W)±Vv = (/ — PK(W))V = v — (^^ j w.8) = (WTV) W. There. See Figure 7. Recall the proof of Theorem 3. Determine the orthogonal projection of a vector v E IR n on another nonzero vector w E IRn." Example 7.2. Vk} was an orthornormal Example 7. Vk} was an orthomormal basis for a subset S of W1. Example 7. X on Specifically. . . Then the desired projection is simply Then the desired projection is simply Pn(w)v = ww+v wwTv (using Example 4.1.6. The indicated direct sum decompositions of the domain E" and codomain IRm are given easily as follows. {VI. Determine the orthogonal projection of a vector e M" on another nonzero Example 7. An arbitrary vector x e IRn was chosen and a formula for x\ appeared rather mysteriously. Specifically. Projections 53 Example 7. Orthogonal projection on a "line.7. Solution: Think of the vector w as an element of the onedimensional subspace R( w). A direct calculation shows z = Pn(w)"' = (l . Recall the diagram of the four fundamental subspaces. . in fact. Then Let x e W be an arbitrary vector. . orthogonal: v z Pv w Figure 7. orthogonal: that z and u. Then X = PN(A)u + PN(A)X . T W W Moreover. Recall the proof of Theorem 3.Pn(w»v = v . in fact. See Figure 7. An arbitrary vector x E R" was chosen and a formula for XI basis for a subset of IRn.11..8. The expression for x\ is simply the orthogonal projection of XI projection of rather x on S.8) (using Example 4. { v \ . Orthogonal projection on a "line.7. are.. The indicated direct Example 7. Projections 7.2. IR n Rm 1 n Let X E IR be an arbitrary vector.11.~) w. the vector z that is orthogonal to w and such that Pv Moreover.6.2.8. There.1.(:.A+ A)x 2 = A+ Ax + (I = VI vt x + V Vi x (recall VVT = I).2." Figure 7.. Recall the diagram of the four fundamental subspaces...
11. Then {^.y E V.10.x)forallx. f3ftE IR. Then Similarly.13.AA+)y = U1Ur y + U2U[ Y (recall UU T = I). y^} for all jc. (x. j2 ^ V and for alia. definite defines Definition 7. Yl. .10. x) ::: Qfor aU x 6V and (x. Yl) + f3(x. (x.12. y} = XTy is the "usual" Euclidean inner product or dot product. Let V be a vector space over R. yi. and Norms Chapter 7. y) x T Y is the "usual" Euclidean inner product or Example 7. Let V = R". and Norms Similarly. Then Y = PR(A)Y + PR(A)~Y = AA+y + ( l . > Ofor all E V ( x x) =0 if 2. Projections. (x. y e V. If e IR mx ". let y e IR m be an arbitrary vector. x) for all x. 2. Y2 E V and/or all a. . Then (x. y\) + /3(jt. (x. x } = 0 if and only ifx = 0. (x. respectively. cryi + ^2) = a(x. aYI + PY2) = a(x. {*. Projections. Let V be a vector space over IR. y) for all x € Rm and for all y e R". 3. Example 7. n x n positive definite matrix. Then (x. Then ('. y)Q = XT Qy. e R.9.2 Inner Product Inner Product Spaces Definition 7.13. ATE IR nxm transformation Definition 7. only ifx = O. y) = (y.) ) :: V x V + IR is a real inner is a real inner Definition 7. Ay) = {AT x. (jc.(A . such that {x. If A E Rm xn.9. Let Then Then and we can decompose the vector [2 3 and we can decompose the vector [2 3 and a vector in N(A). where Q = QT > 0 is an arbitrary Q = Q T > is an Example 7.11. then AT e Rn xm is the unique linear transformation or map T E IRm andfor IRn. Y2) for all x.54 Chapter 7. y) = (y.. V = IRn. as follows: o o 4] uniquely into the sum of a vector in N(A)L 4V uniquely into the sum of a vector in A/'CA)1 r 1/4 1/4 ] 1/4 1/4 [!]~ = = A' Ax + (l  A' A)x 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 0] [ 2] [ 1/2 1/2 + [ 1~2 1~2 ~ o o ! 5/2] [1/2] 1~2 . Example 7. let Y E ]Rm be an arbitrary vector. respectively. Inner Product Spaces. Let Example 7. defines a "weighted" inner product. Let V = E". [ 5~2 + 7.12. Let V = IRn. as follows: and a vector in J\f(A). 3. y) Q = X T Qy. Then { • • V x V if product if 1. Example 7. . Inner Product Spaces.
7.2. Inner product Spaces 7.2. Inner Product Spaces
55 55
It is easy to check that, with this more "abstract" definition of transpose, and if the It is easy to check that, with this more "abstract" definition of transpose, and if the (i, j)th element of A is aij, then the (i, j)th element of AT is ap. It can also be checked (/, y)th element of A is a(;, then the (i, y)th element of AT is a/,. It can also be checked that all the usual properties of the transpose hold, such as (Afl) = BT AT. However, the that all the usual properties of the transpose hold, such as (AB) = BT AT. However, the
definition above allows us to extend the concept of transpose to the case of weighted inner definition above allows us to extend the concept of transpose to the case of weighted inner products in the following way. Suppose A e Rmxn and let (., .) Q and (•, .) R, , with Q and A E ]Rm xn (., }R with Q and {, }g R positive definite, be weighted inner products on Rm and W, respectively. Then we can positive definite, be weighted inner products on IR m and IRn, respectively. Then we can define the "weighted transpose" A # as the unique map that satisfies define the "weighted transpose" A# as the unique map that satisfies
(x, AY)Q = (A#x, y)R all x e IRm (x, Ay)Q = (A#x, Y)R for all x E Rm and for all Y E W1. y e IRn.
By Example 7.l2 above, we must then have x T QAy x T (A#{ Ry for all x, y. Hence we By Example 7.12 above, we must then have XT QAy = xT(A#) Ry for all x, y. Hence we transposes (of AT Q = RA#. must have QA = (A#{ R. Taking transposes (of the usual variety) gives AT Q = RA#. QA = (A#) R. Since R is nonsingular, we find Since R is nonsingular, we find
A# = R1A Q. A* = /r'A' TQ.
We can also generalize the notion of orthogonality (x T = 0) to Q orthogonality (Q is We can also generalize the notion of orthogonality (xTyy = 0) to Qorthogonality (Q is a positive definite matrix). Two vectors x, y E IRn are Qorthogonal (or conjugate with a positive definite matrix). Two vectors x, y e W are <2orthogonal (or conjugate with T X Qy O. Qorthogonality is an important tool used in respect to Q) if ( x y) Q respect to Q) if (x,, y } Q = XT Qy = 0. Q orthogonality is an important tool used in studying conjugate direction methods in optimization theory. studying conjugate direction methods in optimization theory. Definition 7.14. Let V be a vector space over C. Then (., •} : V V > Definition 7.14. Let V be a vector space over <C. Then {, .) : V x V + C is a complex is a complex inner product if inner product if
1. (x,, x ) :::: Qfor all x e V and ( x , x ) = 0 if and only if x = 0. 1. ( x x) > 0 for all x E V and (x, x) =0 if and only ifx = O.
2. (x, y) = (y, x) for all x, y E V. (y, x) for all x, y e V. 2. (x, y)
3. (x, aYI + fiy2) = a(x, y\) + fi(x, Y2) for all x, YI, y2 E V and for alia, f3 6 C. 3. (x,ayi f3Y2) = a(x, yll f3(x, y2}forallx, y\, Y2 e V andfor all a, ft E c. Remark 7.15. We could use the notation (., ·)e to denote a complex inner product, but Remark 7.15. We could use the notation {•, }c to denote a complex inner product, but if the vectors involved are complexvalued, the complex inner product is to be understood. if the vectors involved are complexvalued, the complex inner product is to be understood. Note, too, from part 2 of the definition, that (x, x) must be real for all x. Note, too, from part 2 of the definition, that ( x , x ) must be real for all x.
Remark 7.16. Note from parts 2 and 3 of Definition 7.14 that we have Remark 7.16. Note from parts 2 and 3 of Definition 7.14 that we have
(ax\ + fix2, y) = a(x\, y) + P(x2, y}.
Remark 7.17. The Euclidean inner product of x, e C" is given by Remark 7.17. The Euclidean inner product of x, y E C n is given by
n
(x, y)
= LXiYi = xHy.
i=1
The conventional definition of the complex Euclidean inner product is (x, y) yH but we The conventional definition of the complex Euclidean inner product is (x, y} = yHxx but we use its complex conjugate H here for symmetry with the real case. use its complex conjugate xHyy here for symmetry with the real case.
Remark 7.18. A weighted inner product can be defined as in the real case by (x, y)Q = Remark 7.1S. A weighted inner product can be defined as in the real case by (x, y}Q — x H Qy, arbitrary Q QH > o. notion Qorthogonality can be similarly XH Qy, for arbitrary Q = QH > 0. The notion of Q orthogonality can be similarly generalized to the complex case. generalized to the complex case.
56 56
Chapter 7. Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms Chapter 7. Projections, Inner Product Spaces, and Norms
Definition 7.19. A vector space (V, F) endowed with a specific inner product is called an Definition 7.19. A vector space (V, IF) endowed with a specific inner product is called an inner product space. If F = C, we call V a complex inner product space. If F = R, we inner product space. If IF = e, we call V a complex inner product space. If IF = R we call V a real inner product space. call V a real inner product space.
Example 7.20. Example 7.20. 1. Check that V = IRn x" with the inner product (A, B) = Tr AT B is a real inner product 1. Check that = R" xn with the inner product (A, B) = Tr AT B is a real inner product space. Note that other choices are possible since by properties of the trace function, space. Note that other choices are possible since by properties of the trace function, Tr AT B = TrB TA = Tr A B = TrBAT TrATB = Tr BTA = TrABTT = Tr BAT..
2. Check that V = e nxn with the inner product (A, B) = Tr AHB is a complex inner Tr AH B is a complex inner 2. Check that V = Cnx" with the inner product (A, B) product space. Again, other choices are possible. product space. Again, other choices are possible. Definition 7.21. Let V be an inner product space. For v e V, we define the norm (or Definition 7.21. Let V be an inner product space. For v E V, we define the norm (or length) ofv by IIvll = */(v, v). This is called the norm induced by (',, .).. length) ofv by \\v\\ = J(V,V). This is called the norm induced by (  ) Example 7.22. Example 7.22. 1. If V = E." with the usual inner product, the induced norm is given by i> 1. If V = IRn with the usual inner product, the induced norm is given by II v II = n 2 2 1
(Li=l V i (E,=i<Y))2.xV—*« 9\ 7
2. If V = en with the usual inner product, the induced norm is given by II v II = 2. If V = C" with the usual inner product, the induced norm is given by \\v\\ "n (L...i=l IVi ) ! (£? = ,l»,lI22)*.. Theorem 7.23. Let P be an orthogonal projection on an inner product space V. Then Then Theorem 7.23. Let P be an orthogonal projection on an inner product space \\Pv\\ ::::: Ilvll for all v e V. IIPvll < \\v\\forallv E V.
Proof: Since P is an orthogonal projection, p2 = P = pH. (Here, the notation p# denotes Proof: Since P is an orthogonal projection, P2 = P = P#. (Here, the notation P# denotes the unique linear transformation that satisfies ( P u , } = (u, p#v) for all u, v E If this the unique linear transformation that satisfies (Pu, vv) = (u, P#v) for all u, v e V. If this seems a little too abstract, consider V = R" (or en), where P# is simply the usual PT (or seems a little too abstract, consider = IRn (or C"), where p# is simply the usual pT (or pH)). Hence (Pv, v) = (P 2v, v) = (Pv, p#v) = (Pv, Pv) = IIPvll 2 > O. Now /  P is PH)). Hence ( P v , v) = (P2v, v) = (Pv, P#v) = ( P v , Pv) = \\Pv\\2 ::: 0. Now /  P is also a projection, so the above result applies and we get also a projection, so the above result applies and we get
0::::: ((I  P)v. v) = (v. v)  (Pv, v)
=
IIvll2  IIPvll 2
from which the theorem follows. from which the theorem follows.
0
Definition 7.24. The norm induced on an inner product space by the "usual" inner product Definition 7.24. The norm induced on an inner product space by the "usual" inner product is called the natural norm. is called the natural norm.
In case V = C" or V = R",, the natural norm is also called the Euclidean norm. In In case = en or = IR n the natural norm is also called the Euclidean norm. In the next section, other norms on these vector spaces are defined. A converse to the above the next section, other norms on these vector spaces are defined. A converse to the above procedure is also available. That is, given a norm defined by IIx II = •>/(•*> x), an inner procedure is also available. That is, given a norm defined by \\x\\ — .j(X,X}, an inner product can be defined via the following. product can be defined via the following.
7.3. Vector Norms 7.3. Vector Norms Theorem 7.25 (Polarization Identity). Theorem 7.25 (Polarization Identity).
1. For x, y E m~n, an inner product is defined by 1. For x, y € R", an inner product is defined by (x,y)=xTy=
57 57
IIx+YIl2~IIX_YI12_
IIx + yll2 _ IIxll2 _ lIyll2 2
2. For x, y E en, an inner product is defined by 2. For x, y e C", an inner product is defined by
where j = i = \/—T. where j = i = .J=I.
7.3 7.3
Vector Norms Vector Norms
Definition 7.26. Let (V, F) be a vector space. Then \ Definition 7.26. Let (V, IF) be a vector space. Then II \ . \ II\ : V + R is a vector norm ifit V >• IR is a vector norm if it satisfies the following three properties: satisfies the following three properties:
1. Ilxll::: Ofor all x E V and IIxll = 0 ifand only ifx
= O.
2. Ilaxll = lalllxllforallx
E
Vandforalla
E
IF.
3. IIx + yll :::: IIxll + IIYliforall x, y E V. (This is called the triangle inequality, as seen readily from the usual diagram illus (This is called the triangle inequality, as seen readily from the usual diagram illustrating the sum of two vectors in ]R2 .) trating the sum of two vectors in R2 .) Remark 7.27. It is convenient in the remainder of this section to state results for complexRemark 7.27. It is convenient in the remainder of this section to state results for complexvalued vectors. The specialization to the real case is obvious. valued vectors. The specialization to the real case is obvious. Definition 7.28. A vector space (V, F) is said to be a normed linear space if and only if Definition 7.28. A vector space (V, IF) is said to be a normed linear space if and only if there exists a vector norm  •  : V > R satisfying the three conditions of Definition 7.26. there exists a vector norm II . II : V + ]R satisfying the three conditions of Definition 7.26. Example 7.29. Example 7.29.
1. For x E en, the Holder norms, or pnorms, are defined by 1. For e C", the HOlder norms, or pnorms, are defined by
Special cases: Special cases: (a) Ilx III = L:7=1
IXi
I (the "Manhattan" norm).
1
(b) Ilxllz = (L:7=1Ix;l2)2 = (c) Ilxlioo
(X
H
1
X)2
(the Euclidean norm).
= maxlx;l
IE!!
=
(The second equality is a theorem that requires proof.) (The second equality is a theorem that requires proof.)
p++oo
lim IIxllp
R). Projections. is a nonnegative definite matrix.D = L~=ld.1^ IIUxll2 = IIxll2 (Proof IIUxili = x U Ux = xHx = IIxlli)· However. we see immediately that IXH y\ ~ 0 < ( x H ) ( y H y ) — ( x H ) ( y H x ) .32 are true for general inner product spaces. 1Ft). 11·111 and 1I·IIClO XHUHUx .32. p.32. it is particularly easy to remember. we see immediately that \XH yl < IIxll2l1yllz.. Theorem 7. y e en. if U E enxn is unitary. with equality if and only if x and y are linearly dependent. p q I I A particular case of the HOlder inequality is of special interest.^ cos e = IlMmlylb 0 ~ 0 < I' The CBS inequality is thus equivalent to the statement ~ ^  COS 0 < 1. y e C" may be defined by Remark 7. Some weighted pnorms: (a) IIxll1. tO~t:5. 1cose 1~ 1. and Norms 2. y E en may be defined by cos# = 1I. Remark 7. Some weighted pnorms: 2. y e C". JC. its determinant must be nonnegative. In other words.31 and Remark 7. (b) IIx IIz. ttl. The angle 0 between two nonzero vectors x.33.~~1~1112'. then H H \\Ux\\2 \\x\\2 (Proof. where 4 > O. ttlr. Then Fhcorem 7. Since is a nonnegative definite matrix. 217]).34. „ . it is particularly easy to remember. Let x.t~JI On the vector space ((C[to. \\Ux\\l XHX = \\x\\\). Theorem 7.Q — (xhH Qx) 2. Inner Product Spaces..58 58 Chapter 7.lx. The norm II .e. define the vector norm 11111 = max 1/(t)I· to:::.l. However. IIQ)' 1 3. its determinant must be nonnegative.g = (x QXY denoted  • c). > 0. Let x.. Theorem 7.g.e.> where Q = QH > 0 (this norm is more commonly = QH > Ikllz. The CBS inequality is thus equivalent to the statement I. Since Proof: Consider the matrix [x y] e en x2 . Projections. (CBS) inequality (see. Let x. define the vector norm 3.30 (Holder Inequality). However..31 (CauchyBunyakovskySchwarz Inequality). Inner Product Spaces. 112 is unitarily invariant. On the vector space (C[to.. denoted II . Remark 7. e. define the vector norm On the vector space «e[to. The angle e between two nonzero vectors x. 217]). then Remark 7.31 and Remark 7. whered.32 are true for general inner product spaces. Proof' Consider the matrix [x y] E C" x2 . Remark 7. Let x. i. On the vector space (C[to. Since yH = x H y. t \ ] R). However.. o ~ (x Hxx)(yH y) .34.g. 1Ft). A particular case of the Holder inequality is of special interest.30 (HOlder Inequality). The norm  • 2 is unitarily invariant. if U € C"x" is unitary. and  . D 0 \\X\\2\\y\\2Note: This is not the classical algebraic proof of the CauchyBunyakovskySchwarz Note: This is not the classical algebraic proof of the CauchyBunyakovskySchwarz (CBS) inequality (see. +=1.D = E^rf/l*/!. Ther. define the vector norm 1111100 = max II/(t) 11 00 .tl Theorem 7. y E en.33. Remark 7. and Norms Chapter 7. Then with equality if and only if x and yare linearly dependent. 0 < e — 5. Then Theorem 7. [20.. p. Since yHxx = x Hy.  .(x Hyy)(yH x). t\])n.31 (CauchyBunyakovskySchwarz Inequality). In other words. e. y E C". i. [20.
Similar remarks apply to the unitary invariance of norms of real vectors under orthogonal transformation..35. Remark 7.. then we have the Pythagorean Identity Ilx ± YII~ = IIxll~ + IIYII~. Attention is confined to the vector space (IRmnxn.. Attention is confined to the vector space (W xn R) since that is what arises in the majority of applications. Let \\ \\ be a vector norm and suppose v. E en. 2. The using matrix norms is to have a notion of either the size of or the nearness of matrices. we conclude this section with a theorem about convergence of vectors..e. v(l). there exist constants CI. The former notion is useful for perturbation analysis. ConFinally.   R mx " ~ E is a matrix norm if it satisfies the following three Definition 7. vectors under orthogonal transformation. y E en are orthogonal. there exist constants c\.36.) .4. Matrix Norms 59 59 are not unitarily invariant. Theorem 7. IIA + BII :::: IIAII + IIBII for all A. For x E en. the following inequalities are all tight bounds. 2 the proof of which follows easily from z2 _ z_//. the motivation for using matrix norms is to have a notion of either the size of or the nearness of matrices.. we conclude this section with a theorem about convergence of vectors.e. the motivation for In this section we introduce the concept of matrix norm.39.. Similar remarks apply to the unitary invariance of norms of real are not unitarily invariant. As with vectors. e C".4 7.. Extension to the complex case is straightforward what arises in the majority of applications.. All norms on C" are equivalent. 3. IR) since that is "convergence" of matrices. there exist vectors x for which equality holds: vectors x for which equality holds: Ilxlll :::: Jn Ilxlb Ilxll2:::: IIxll» IIxlloo :::: IIxll» Ilxlll :::: n IIxlloo. while the latter is needed to make sense of "convergence" of matrices. 7.. II·• II : IR mxn > IR is a matrix norm if it satisfies the following three properties: properties: 1.e.4 Matrix Norms Matrix Norms In this section we introduce the concept of matrix norm.37. i. Theorem 7. i. and essentially obvious. i. then we have the Pythagorean Identity Remark 7. If x. while the latter is needed to make sense of former notion is useful for perturbation analysis. the following inequalities are all tight bounds.37. lIaAl1 = lalliAliforall A E mxn andfor all a E IR.38.36.7. For x G C". Extension to the complex case is straightforward and essentially obvious. . BE IRmxn. convergence in terms of vector norms. All norms on en are equivalent. i» (1) v(2\ . about convergence of real numbers. Then 7.e. (As with vectors. Then lim k4+00 V(k) = v if and only if lim k~+oo II v(k)  v II = O. As with vectors.39. IIxlioo :::: IIxllz. the proof of which follows easily from liz II~ = ZH z.35. Finally.e.e. C2 (possibly 7.38. IIxl12 :::: Jn Ilxll oo . this is called the triangle inequality. If y € C" are orthogonal.. ci (possibly depending onn) such that depending on n) such that Example 7. i. IIAII ~ Ofor all A E IR mxn and IR IIAII = 0 if and only if A = O. there exist Example 7. Definition 7. i. v(2). convergence in terms of vector norms.. i. Matrix Norms 7. Let II·• II be a vector norm and suppose v. Convergence of a sequence of vectors to some limit vector can be converted into a statement vergence of a sequence of vectors to some limit vector can be converted into a statement about convergence of real numbers..4.
mxn IIAII p.. IIAII P t altA)) 1 ~ (T."  A\\ = ^ \ai} . to estimate the size of a matrix product A B in terms of the sizes of A and B individually. IIAII2 = Amax(A A) = A~ax(AA ) = a1(A). The "matrix analogue of the vector 1norm.  . Let A E lR. 11·115. I. J=1 3. defined by IIAIIF ~ (t. I. Schatten/7norms IIAlls. and Norms Example 7. Example 7.jj laij. e R mx ". is a norm. Projections. pnorms previously. The concept of a matrix norm alone is not altogether useful since it does not allow us to estimate the size of a matrix product AB in terms of the sizes of A and B individually.." IIAliss = Li.  5 2 = II IIF and  • 5i00 = II .60 Chapter 7.p = (at' + . Example 7. (AA ')).mxn.44. ai. The norm  . and Norms Chapter 7. Let A E R . 5>1 is often called the trace norm.<110#0 IIxllq Example 7. + a!)"". The Schattenpnorms are defined by E lR. Example 7." theorem and requires a proof. Example 7.41..43.40.43. Let A E lR.42. matrix = Ilxllp..2 =  . The "maximum row sum" norm is 2. IIAlioo = max rE!!l.1 is often called the trace norm.) I ~ (t. \\F and 11'115. (t laUI)._ Then "mixed" norms can also be defined by e lR. I Some special cases of Schatten /?norms are equal to norms defined previously.44.60 max _P IIAxll = max Ilxli p IIxllp=1 IIAxll p .q = max IIAxil p 11.42. Projections. Inner Product Spaces." Each is a "computable. Example 7. tTL T Note: IIA+llz = l/ar(A). Let A E K m x ". 112' The norm II • 115. (where r = laiiK^/i.40. is a norm. Then the Frobenius norm (or matrix Euclidean norm) is 7. Example 7. . The "matrix analogue of the vector Inorm.00 =  • 2. The spectral norm is 3. 1. Then the matrix pnorms are defined by A e Rmxn. For example. The "maximum column sum" norm is 2. Inner Product Spaces. The following three special cases are important because they are "computable. (A' A)) 1 ~ (T. where r mxn = rank(A). ^wncic = rank(A)).mxn.mxn.
so II . For example.j is a matrix norm but it is not consistent.g.47. i. \\ • \\p. Since IIABxl1 ::s Afljc ::s IIAIIIIBllllxll.47.= max IIAxl1 x. there exists a vector norm \\ . IIAxll1 = max .e. II". B e Rnxk.jii. The following miscellaneous results about matrix norms are collected for future reference. II· II F and 1. which equality holds: which equality holds: IIAIII ::s . consistent with it..q = maxx.g.but there does  is consistent with F. Example 7.. \\ are Definition 7. IIABIII. 1. II such that AF is given by max^o ".. take A = B = [: is a matrix norm but it is not consistent.46. while E ]Rnxn.e. II A 1100 ::s n IIAII I . IIAlioo ::s . . e. e....e.jii IIAlioo' . Definition 7. IIAIIF ::s. If II . Theorem 7. i. )). II In II p = 1 for all p. more generally.jii IIAII I .. There exists a vector x* such that IIAx*11 = IIAllllx*11 if the matrix norm is subordinate to the vector norm. IIAII2 ::s .4. there exists a vector norm II • IIv Theorem 7. wec1earlyhave IIAxll < IIAllllxll· Since Afijc < IIAlIllBxll < Afljt. A A 2.e.60 . For such subordinate norms. We thus need the following definition. l. \\m is a consistent matrix norm.jii II A IIF.45. although there are analogues for.  • /7and II . Let A e Rmxn. there exist matrices A for i. .and II \\ •lIy y are mutually consistent if \\ A B \\ a < IIAllfllIBlly. i. exercise. it follows that all subordinate norms are consistent.jii IIAlloo. IIAxl1 IIAII = max . For example. Matrix Norms 61 61 Notice that this difficulty did not arise for vectors.jii IIAII2. There exists a vector x* such that Ajt* = A jc* if the matrix norm is Theorem 7. A = max^o IIxll.46. but there does consider II . For example. q For such subordmate norms. Notice that this difficulty did not arise for vectors. •II F. IIAII2::S IIAIIF. subordinate to the vector norm.jii IIAlb IIAIII ::s n IIAlloo. if II A B II < II A 1111 fi whenever the matrix product is defined. Theorem 7. inner products or outer products of vectors. 2.oo J1.jii IIAlb IIAIIF ::s .Then II Ax 1122 ::s II AFjc2. take A = B = \ \ Afl li00 = 2whileA li00 B 1>00 = 1.e. i.oo 2 while IIAIII.45.::S \\A\\p\\B\\y A matrix norm \\ • is said to be consistent if \\AB\\ ::s  A   B II whenever the matrix product is defined. although there are analogues for. 2.4. Then :].e. a vector norm. Let A E ]Rmxn. atornorms. i. \\v consistent with it. 11^4^11 P (or.48. e R" x ". Example 7. The "mixed" norm "mixed" norm II· 11 100 . •II p for all p are consistent matrix norms.. A matrix norm 11·11\\is said to be consistent mutuallyconsistentifIlABII. IIAlioo ::s .jii IIAII I. p for all p are consistent matrix norms.60 Ilx i. not exist a vector norm II •  such that IIAIIF is given by max x . Not every consistent matrix norm is subordinate to a vector norm. HAjcJI^ ::s \\A\\m Ilxli v.60 \^ • Useful Results The following miscellaneous results about matrix norms are collected for future reference. Then the norms II • \\a II· Ilfl' and .. If \\ • 11m is a consistent matrix norm. IIAxliv < IIAlim \\x\\v' Not every consistent matrix norm is subordinate to a vector norm. IIAII2 ::s. Matrix Norms 7. also caUedoperator norms.jii IIAIIF. We thus need the following definition. IIAllp. more generally.ooIlBIII. •1122is consistent with II .. IIAIIF ::s . we clearly have Ajc ::s A1jt. For example. 2. B E ]Rnxk. Then the norms \\ . it follows that all subordinate norms are consistent.. also called oper(or.48.~~i'. IIAIII ::s .. the IIIn II F = . 1. consider  • \\F. reader The interested reader is invited to prove each of them as an exercise. II F' ThenA^ < A II Filx 112. so not exist a vector norm  ..7. inner products or outer products of vectors.60 IIx II Ilxll=1 IIAxll p .1100 = max laijl x. Then The p norms are examples of matrix norms that are subordinate to (or induced by) The pnorms are examples of matrix norms that are subordinate to (or induced by) a vector norm. For A following inequalities are all tight.
. Definition: Let A e Rnxn and denote its set of eigenvalues (not necessarily distinct) 8. A (1) .Q — Q must be an orthogonal matrix.. but not necessarily The norms  • \\F and  • 2 (as well as all the Schatten pnorms. must be an orthogonal matrix. i. Inner Product Spaces.I.c — v + = 0. 4. IIQAZlia = A fora = 2 or F. Find the (orthogonal) projection of the vector [2 3 4f onto the subspace of 1R3 5. A (2) . but not necessarily other pnorms) are unitarily invariant. Prove that E"xn with the inner product (A.] 4. If P projection. 3. l.62 62 3. Chapter 7.49. and Norms Chapter 7. Definition: Let A E IRnxn and denote its set of eigenvalues (not necessarily distinct) by P. The spectral radius of A is the scalar by {Ai ...1. [2 3 4]r R3 spanned by the plane 3.A+A is an orthogonal projection. For A E IR mxn . A(A A) 1 AT 5. Also. > . and Norms max laijl :::: IIAII2 :::: ~ max laijl. Prove that P . (MZa or F. Prove that the A e Wnxn orthogonal projection onto the space spanned by these column vectors is given by the P matrix P = A(ATTA)~}AT. 7.1. . scalars. 2.] l. 6. Projections.An}. space. IIAllaa fora matrices Q E IR Convergence Convergence The following theorem uses matrix norms to convert a statement about convergence of a sequence of matrices into a statement about the convergence of an associated sequence of of scalars. Projections. spanned by the plane 3x . Let II ·11 be a matrix norm and suppose A..l. ... B) = space. EeIRmxn. IIF and II . Suppose P and Q are orthogonal projections and P + Q = I. Then 7.. The norms II . Show that the matrix norms II .. . for all A E IRmxn and for all orthogonal unitarily invariant. prove directly that V22Vl is an I — +A V V/ is an orthogonal projection. matrices Q zR and e M" ".y + 2z = O.e.e. IIF are unitarily invariant. Suppose that a matrix A E IR mxn has linearly independent columns. . Inner Product Spaces. EXERCISES EXERCISES 1. Theorem 7. Then k~+oo lim A (k) = A if and only if k~+oo lim IIA (k)  A II = o.. e Rmx" mxm x mxm and Z E IRnxn . Prove that / .49. A(2). A(I).. where ¥2 is defined as in Theorem 5. 112 and II . prove that P+ = P... \\ \\bea Rmx". i. „ } The spectral radius of A is the scalar p(A) = max IA. . If P is an orthogonal projection.  • 2 and  • \\F 8. orthogonal projection. where V2 is defined as in Theorem 5. 3. p+ = P. 1. B) = Tr ATB is a real inner product IR n x" AT B (A. i . For A eRmxa . 112 (as well as all the Schatten /?norms.
all of whose columns and rows as well as main diagonal and antidiagonal sum to s = n(n2 + 1) /2. Let A=[~4 9 2 ~ ~]. IIAlb IIAlloo. Let A = xy . \\A\\ A2. Let 9.Exercises Exercises 63 63 Let Let A=[~ 14 0 12 5 ~]. appropriate. HA^. 2. columns and rows as well as main diagonal and antidiagonal sum to s = n (n 2 l)/2. Determine IIAIIF' IIAIII> IIAlb and Aoo in terms of \\x\\a and/or \\y\\p..2. IIAlb IIAlloo. and peA). If M is a magic square matrix. y E IR n are nonzero. Determine AF. where both x. H A I I A2. A2. Determine AF.) T 10. y e R" are nonzero. it can be proved that IIMllp = ss for all p. and p(A). where ex and {3 take the value 1. H A H ^ and peA).) that  M Up = for all/?.. 9. Determine IIAIIF' IIAII d . Aj. Let A = xyT. 10. . all of whose Determine AF. where both x. and p(A). (An n x n matrix. or oo as and II A 1100 in terms of IIxlla and/or IlylljJ. where a and ft take the value 1. Determine IIAIIF' IIAII Ilt. is called a "magic square" matrix. (An n x n matrix. or (Xl as appropriate.
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank .
PR(A))b = PR(A). Thus. Solution: The set X has a number of easily verified properties: The set X has a number of easily verified properties: 1.Ax is the residual associated 1. (Pn(A)b — AJC) is clearly in 7£(A).b E 'R(A)L so these two vectors are orthogonal. i. so these two vectors are orthogonal. 2.Axll~ = lib . x e X if and only if latter form is commonly known as the normal equations. whereyEjRnisarbitrary. The linear least squares problem consists of finding an element of the set squares problem consists of finding an element of the set x = {x E jRn : p(x) = IIAx .bll~ (and hence p(x) = \\Ax . Now. see Section 8.. vector x e X if and only if AT where b — Ax is the residual associated with x.PR(A)b) + (PR(A)b  Ax). Thus.e. AT — A T Ax = AT b latter form is commonly known as the normal equations. while Now. i. A vector x E X if and only if ATrr = 0.1 The Linear Least Squares Problem The Linear Least Squares Problem Problem: Suppose A E Rmx" with m 2: nand b E jRm is aagiven vector. write the residual r in the form To see why this must be so. The linear least Problem: Suppose A e jRmxn with > n and b <= Rm is given vector. Hence. A vector x X if and onlv if x is of the x=A+b+(IA+A)y. while (b . is a solution of the normal equations.1) To see why this must be so..35).e. For further details.b 112) assumes its minimum value if and only if II Ax —b\\2) assumes its minimum value if and only if (8. The equations ATrr = 0 can be rewritten in the form A TAx = ATb and the x.bll 2 is minimized}. IIrll~ = lib . For further details.x — b\\\ (and hence p ( x ) = from the Pythagorean identity (Remark 7. x E X if and only if x is a solution of the normal equations.2) 65 .1 8.PR(A)bll~ + IIPR(A)b  Axll~ from the Pythagorean identity (Remark 7.. see Section 8. A. IIAx .Ax) is clearly in 'R(A). (PR(A)b . A vector x E X if and only if x is of the form 2.35).2. Hence.PR(A)b) = (I . (8. write the residual in the form r = (b . where r = b .2.Chapter 8 Chapter 8 Linear Least Squares Linear Least Squares Problems Problems 8.
2. X = {x*} = {A+b}. In fact.mxn XElR Plxk min IIAX  Bib is of the form is of the form X=A+B+(IA+A)Y. all and this equation always has a solution since AA+b E R(A).A+A)y and *2 = A+b + (I — A+A)z in X. The unique solution of minimum 2norm or Fnorm is X = A+B. of linear least squares solutions. i. Let A E E mx " and B € Rmxk. By Theorem 6. where y e W is arbitrary. there is no "existence condition" such as K(B) c R(A).. Let 6 E [0.8)xz2 = A+b ++ (I A+ A)(8y ++ (1 8)z) is clearly in X. which follows since the two vectors are orthogonal.mxk. the last inequality following by Theorem 7. x" = + b is the unique vector 4. Then the convex combination and Xz = A+b (I .. equivalently. if and only if rank(A) n. The minimum value of p x ) is then clearly equal to lib . Linear Least Squares Problems and this equation always has a solution since AA+b e 7£(A). X is convex. This follows immediately from and is the vector of minimum 2norm that does so. x* minimizes the residual p ( x ) and is the vector of minimum 2norm that does so. has a unique element x" of minimal2norm.1) and convexity or directly from the fact that all x E X are of the form (8.e. 5.23. where Y E R" xfc is arbitrary. BE ]R. 1]. X. The Theorem 8. By Theorem 6.2) are of the form solutions of (8. + (1 . This follows immediately from convexity or directly from the fact that all x e X are of the form (8.. and only if A+A = I or. equivalently.e.nxk is arbitrary.23. There is a unique solution to the least squares problem.. all solutions of (8. The minimum value of p ((x) is then clearly equal to where y E ]R. we can generalize the linear least squares Just as for the solution of linear equations. Notice that solutions of the linear least squares problem look exactly the same as solutions of the linear system AX = B.3.. X = A+B. we can generalize the linear least squares problem to the matrix case. if and only if rank (A) = n. To see why. Just as for the solution of linear equations. x* = A+b is the unique vector that solves this "double minimization" problem. then equality holds and the least squares . Remark 8. problem to the matrix case. The only difference is that in the case of linear least squares solutions.. x* minimizes the residual p(x) that solves this "double minimization" problem. consider two arbitrary vectors jci = A+b + (I — A + A) y (I . if and only if A + A lor. i. Let 8 e [0. If the existence condition happens to be satisfied. there is no "existence condition" such as R(B) S. In fact.66 Chapter 8. The only difference is that in the case same as solutions of the linear system AX = B. 3.n is arbitrary. i.e.1. To see why.e. AA+)bI1 2 the last inequality following by Theorem 7. then equality holds and the least squares If the existence condition happens to be satisfied. The unique solution of minimum 2norm or Fnorm is where Y € ]R. X has a unique element x* of minimal 2norm.2. The general solution to e ]R.A+ A)z in X. if 5. 0*i (1 #)* = A+b (I . X = {x"} = {A+b}.2) are of the form x = A+ AA+b + (I  A+ A)y =A+b+(IA+A)y.1]. Then the convex combination 8x. X is convex.PR(A)bll z = ~ 11(1 Ilbll z. Notice that solutions of the linear least squares problem look exactly the Remark 8. There is a unique solution to the least squares problem. i.3. 7£(A).A+A)(Oy (1 . consider two arbitrary vectors Xl = A + b 3. Linear Least Squares Problems Chapter 8.0)z) is clearly in 4.1) and which follows since the two vectors are orthogonal.
8.3 Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares Problems 8.3 Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares Problems
67
O. X = +B residual is 0. Of all solutions that give a residual of 0, the unique solution X = A+B has minimum 2norm or F norm. Fnorm. Remark 8.3. If we take B = 1m in Theorem 8.1, then X = A+ can be interpreted as Im in Theorem 8.1, then Remark 8.3. If we take B A+ can be interpreted as saying that the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse of A is the best (in the matrix 2norm sense) A AX matrix such that AX approximates the identity. Remark 8.4. Many other interesting and useful approximation results are available for the F norm). matrix 2norm (and Fnorm). One such is the following. Let A E M™ x " with SVD following. e lR~xn
A
= U~VT = LOiUiV!.
i=l
Then a best rank k approximation to A for 1< f c < r r,i . e . , a solution to A k l :s k :s , i.e., a
MEJRZ'xn
min IIA  MIi2,
is given by is given by
k
Mk =
LOiUiV!.
i=1
The special case in which m = n and k = n  1 gives a nearest singular matrix to A E A e = nand = —
lR~ xn .
8.2 8.2
Geometric Solution Geometric Solution
Looking at the schematic provided in Figure 8.1, it is apparent that minimizing IIAx —bll 2 2  Ax b\\ x e W1 p — Ax is equivalent to finding the vector x E lRn for which p = Ax is closest to b (in the Euclidean b Ay norm sense). Clearly, r = b  Ax must be orthogonal to R(A). Thus, if Ay is an arbitrary r b — Ax 7£(A). R(A) vector in 7£(A) (i.e., y is arbitrary), we must have y
0= (Ay)T (b  Ax) =yTAT(bAx) = yT (ATb _ AT Ax).
Since y is arbitrary, we must have ATb — ATAx = 0 or A r A;c = AT b. AT b  AT Ax AT Ax = ATb. T Special case: If A is full (column) rank, then x = (AT A) ATb. A = (A A)l ATb.
8.3 8.3
8.3.1 8.3.1
Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares Problems Problems
Example: Linear regression
Suppose we have m measurements (ll, YI), ... ,, (trn,,ym) for which we hypothesize a linear (t\,y\), . . . (tm Ym) (affine) relationship (8.3) y = at + f3
68
Chapter 8. Linear Least Squares Problems Chapter 8. Linear Least Squares Problems
b
r
p=Ax
Ay E R(A)
Figure S.l. Projection of b on K(A). Figure 8.1. Projection of b on R(A).
for certain constants a. and {3. One way to solve this problem is to find the line that best fits for certain constants a and ft. One way to solve this problem is to find the line that best fits the data in the least squares sense; i.e., with the model (8.3), we have the data in the least squares sense; i.e., with the model (8.3), we have
YI
Y2
= all + {3 + 81 ,
= al2 + {3 + 82
where &\,..., 8m are "errors" and we wish to minimize 8\ + • • 8;. Geometrically, we where 81 , ... , 8m are "errors" and we wish to minimize 8? + ...• + 8^ Geometrically, we are trying to find the best line that minimizes the (sum of squares of the) distances from the are trying to find the best line that minimizes the (sum of squares of the) distances from the given data points. See, for example, Figure 8.2. given data points. See, for example, Figure 8.2.
y
Figure 8.2. Simple linear regression. Figure 8.2. Simple linear regression.
Note that distances are measured in the vertical sense from the points to [he line (as Note that distances are measured in the venical sense from the point!; to the line (a!; indicated, for example, for the point (t\, y\}}. However, other criteria arc possible. For exindicated. for example. for the point (tl. YIn. However. other criteria nrc po~~iblc. For cxample, one could measure the distances in the horizontal sense, or the perpendicular distance ample, one could measure the distances in the horizontal sense, or the perpendiculnr distance from the points to the line could be used. The latter is called from the points to the line could be used. The latter is called total least squares. Instead squares. Instead of 2norms, one could also use 1norms or oonorms. The latter two are computationally of 2norms, one could also use Inorms or oonorms. The latter two are computationally
8.3. Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares Problems 8.3. Linear Regression and Other Linear Least Squares Problems
69
much more difficult to handle, and thus we present only the more tractable 2norm case in difficult text that follows. follows. The m "error equations" can be written in matrix form as ra
Y = Ax +0,
where
We then want to solve the problem
minoT 0 = min (Ax  y)T (Ax  y)
x
or, equivalently, min lIoll~ = min II Ax  YII~.
x
(8.4)
AT Solution: x = [~] is a solution of the normal equations AT Ax Solution: x — [^1 is a solution of the normal equations ATAx = ATyy where, for the special form of the matrices above, we have special form of the matrices above, we have
and and
AT Y = [ Li ti Yi
LiYi
J.
The solution for the parameters a and f3 can then be written ft
8.3.2
Other least squares problems
y = f(t) =
Cl0!(0
(8.3) of the form Suppose the hypothesized model is not the linear equation (S.3) but rather is of the form + • • • 4 cn<t>n(t). (8.5) (8.5)
In (8.5) the ¢i(t) are given (basis) functions and the Ci; are constants to be determined to </>,(0 functions c minimize the least squares error. The matrix problem is still (S.4), where we now have minimize the least squares error. The matrix problem is still (8.4), where we now have
An important special case of (8.5) is least squares polynomial approximation, which corresponds to choosing ¢i (t) = t t'~1,, i i;Ee!!, although this choice can lead to computational 0,• (?) = i  l n, although this choice can lead to computational
the subvectors can have different lengths). This that orthogonality is not what is used here. the two are equivalent. are based on orthogonal polynomials. S~lc\.4 8. [23]). respectively. e C2 / then taking logarithms yields the equation log y = log c. The former based on SVD and QR (orthogonalupper triangular) factorization. norm. then taking logarithms yields the equation logy = logci + cjt. Numerically better approaches ill difficulties n. if the fitting function is of the form can be converted into a linear problem.6) via the SVD. Specifically. etc. .can be arbitrarily nonlinear. insight. problem. c. [4]. The basis functions coefficients c.b\\^ is II czll ~. c\ logci. Better numerical methods are based on algorithms that AT work directly and solely on A itself rather than AT A.. if the fitting function is of the form y t) Y = ff( (t) = c\eC2i. In this section we investigate solution of the linear least squares problem min II Ax x b11 2 . For example. it can be expected to exhibit such poor numerical behavior in practice (and it does). The former is much more expensive but is generally more reliable and offers considerable theoretical offers insight. since II .c=UTb = II [~ ~] [ ~~ ] . A E IRmxn . ] II: = II [ The last equality follows from the fact that if v [~~]. C2 problem. we assume that A has an SVD given by A = UT. Then GI defining y = logy.1. [11]. etc. we assume that A has an SVD given by A U\SVf via the SVD. Then c. the last equivalent.[ ~~ ] II: sz~~ c. We now note that IIAx  bll~ = IIU~VT x =  bll~ II ~ VT X  U T bll. of linear least squares problems via the normal equations can be a very poor numerical method in finiteprecision arithmetic. Two basic classes of algorithms are A itself S VD and QR (orthogonalupper triangular) factorization. Sometimes a problem in which the Ci'S appear nonlinearly nonlinearly can be converted into a linear problem. Ib is unitarily invariant =11~zcll~ wherez=VTx. As far as the minimization is concerned. Better numerical methods are based on algorithms that behavior in practice (and it does). Since the standard Kalman filter essentially amounts method in finiteprecision arithmetic.g. (8. Linear Least Squares Problems Chapter 8.. 's ¢i. piecewise polynomial functions. = log c" and C2 = cj_ results in a standard linear least squares y — log y. respectively. For example. then II v II ~ = II viii ~ + II v211 ~ (note that orthogonality is not what is used here. [7]. z. quantity above is clearly minimized by taking z\ = S'c. as in Theorem 5. c. Specifically.SVr U~VT Theorem 5. 8.4 Least Squares and Singular Value Decomposition Least Squares and Singular Value Decomposition In the numerical linear algebra literature (e..1. arbitrary. The key feature in (8. Z2 while the minimum value of \\Ax — b II ~ is l^llr while the minimum value of II Ax . the subvectors can have different lengths). Since the standard Kalman filter essentially amounts to sequential updating of normal equations. + c2f. In fact.70 70 Chapter 8. fact. The subvector z2 is arbitrary. [7]. appear functions </>. splines. VT = U. it is shown that solution [4]. then u^ = i>i \\\ \\vi\\\ (note The last equality follows from the fact that if v = [£ ]. This explains why it is convenient to work above with the square of the norm rather than the concerned. Linear Least Squares Problems difficulties because of numerical ill conditioning for large n.5) is that the coefficients Ci appear linearly. bE IR m .
an important special case of the linear least squares problem is the Finally.. A e 1R™ X ". with (8. where y e ffi.5 Least Squares and QR Factorization Least Squares and QR Factorization In this section.m is arbitrary. we again look at the solution of the linear least squares problem (8. can be quite reliable. via a sequence of socalled Householder or Givens transformations. x has Note that since 12 is arbitrary.5 8. UZV = [U t/2][o]^i r > and there is thus "no V2 part" to the solution. 8. Z VISici The last equality follows from The last equality follows from c = UTb = [ ~ f: ]= [ ~~ l Note that since Z2 is arbitrary. i. This agrees. This agrees. V2z is an arbitrary vector in R(V2 = N(A). It is then possible. via a sequence of socalled Householder or Givens rank.S. Least Squares and QR Factorization Now transform back to the original coordinates: Now transform back to the original coordinates: x = Vz 71 71 = [VI V2 1[ ~~ ] = VIZ I + V2Z2 = = + V2Z2 vlsIufb + V2 2. If we label the product of such orthogonal row transformations as the to triangular form. (8. If we label the product of such orthogonal row transformations as the orthogonal matrix QT E R m x m . i. where y E Rm is arbitrary. It is then possible. of course. The minimum value of the least squares residual is The minimum value of the least squares residual is and we clearly have that and we clearly have that minimum least squares residual is 0 4=> b is orthogonal to all vectors in U2 minimum least squares residual is 0 {::=:} b is orthogonal to all vectors in U2 {::=:} •<=^ {::=:} b is orthogonal to all vectors in R(A)l. = +b + (/ — A + A) y.AA+)b\\22 = \\U2Ufb\\l = bTU2U^U22V!b = bTU2U*b = \\U?b\\22. To simplify the exposition.e. can be quite reliable.AA+)bll~ . and there is thus "no V2 part" to the solution. an important special case of the linear least squares problem is the socalled fullrank problem.e.7) . This follows easily since (7 . we have QT € ffi. i.mxm. A finite sequence of simple orthogonal row transformations (of Householder or Givens type) can be performed on A to reduce it row transformations (of Householder or Givens type) can be performed on A to reduce it to triangular form. Finally. Another expression for the minimum residual is  (/ — AA + )b 2 .5. we again look at the solution of the linear least squares problem (8. This follows easily since Another expression for the minimum residual is II (I . In this case the SVD of A is given by A A = V:EVTT = [VI{ Vzl[g]Vr. This matrix factorization is much cheaper to compute time in terms of the QR factorization.1). we add the simplifying assumption that A has full column To simplify the exposition. A E ffi.A + A)_y. we add the simplifying assumption that A has full column rank.~xn. with (8..1).. A finite sequence of simple orthogonal transformations.e. is orthogonal to all vectors in 7l(A}L b E R(A). This matrix factorization is much cheaper to compute than an SVD and. A E ffi. to reduce A in the following way. Thus.11U2U!b"~ = bTUZV!V UJb = bTVZV!b = IIV!bll~.e. In this case the SVD of A is given by socalled fullrank problem.. with appropriate numerical enhancements. with appropriate numerical enhancements. x has been written in the form x = A+b + (I .6) but this time in terms of the QR factorization. A e R™ X M . of course.AA+)bllz. i. Thus.6) but this In this section. than an SVD and. 11(1. Least Squares and QR Factorization B. to reduce A in the following way.8. V2 Z 2 is an arbitrary vector in 7Z(V2)) = A/"(A).~xn.
7). b E Em. are orthogonal vectors. Suppose qi and q2 are two orthonormal vectors and b is a fixed vector. data.7).9) Any of (8. we see that in (8. n .mxn and where R e M£ x " is upper triangular.e. yt): (1. Now write Q = [QI Q2].Show that r is orthogonal to both^i and q2.A+A)y and A +b 1. Now write Q = [Q\ Qz]. we have x = R. check directly that (I . Qz] [ (8. Linear Least Squares Problems where E ffi.7). by writing AR~l1 = Q\ we see that a "triangular" linear combination (given by the coefficients of ARQI we see that a "triangular" linear combination (given by the coefficients of R.Cl and the minimum residual The last quantity above is clearly minimized by taking x = R lIc\ and the minimum residual is Ilczllz..8).9) are variously referred to as QR factorizations of A. i.8).m IX(m ~" ) . data. Linear Least Squares Problems Chapter 8. The last quantity above is clearly minimized by taking x = R. For A E Wmxn . Equivalently. sense). m and any e ffi. Multiplying through by Q Q2 E ffi. Consider the following set of measurements (*. (b) Let r denote the "error vector" b . (a) Find the best (in the 2norm sense) line of the form y = ax + fJ that fits this (a) Find the best (in the 2norm sense) line of the form y = ax + ft that fits this data. R~l) ) of the columns of A yields the orthonormal columns of QI.72 Chapter 8. (8.8) ~ ] (8.9) is essentially what is accomplished by the GramSchmidt process. 3.7). Consider the following set of measurements (Xi.1Q\b = A+b and the minimum residual is II Qr bllz' is \\C2\\2.3)...[ ~~ ] If:. where QI E ffi. b e ffi.aql . Both Q I and Qz2 have orthonormal columns. (2. all in ffi.~xn is upper triangular. and any y E R". Note that (8.flq2 Show that r is orthogonal to (b) Let r denote the "error vector" b — ctq\ — {3qz. where Q\ e R mx " and Qz € K" x(mn)..e.+ A)y and A+b are orthogonal vectors. (3. 3. Multiplying through by Q in (8. Note that Any of (8. xn. 2. 112 is unitarily invariant ~ ] x .2). or (8.Equivalently.9) is essentially what is accomplished by the GramSchmidt process. Both Q\ and <2 have orthonormal columns. Yi): 2. we have = R~l Qf b = +b and the minimum residual is IIC?^!^ EXERCISES EXERCISES 1. For € ffi. Suppose q. by writing (8. i.1). Now note that Now note that IIAx  bll~ = IIQ T Ax = II [ QTbll~ since II .. and qz are two orthonormal vectors and b is a fixed vector.I of the columns of yields the orthonormal columns of Q\. or (8. both ql and q2 . check directly that (I . n • (a) Find the optimal linear combination aq^ + (3q2 that is closest to b (in the 2norm (a) Find the optimallinear combination aql + fiq2 that is closest to b (in the 2norm sense). we see that A=Q[~J = [QI = QIR.9) are variously referred to as QR factorizations of A. (b) Find the best (in the 2norm sense) line of the form jc = ay + (3 that fits this (b) Find the best (in the 2norm sense) line of the form x = ay fJ that fits this data.. all in R". (8.
and suppose A where is 1.9).bll 2 x when A = [ ~ 5. What happens to IIx* — y 2 as 8 approaches 0? where AI = A + E\. A+ R+QT .Exercises Exercises 73 4. and suppose A = QR. where 8 is a small positive number.bib z n where A2 = A + E2. 7. verify that if A E ~. Solve the perturbed version of the above problem.bl1 2 when A = [~ ~ ] and b = [ !1 x The solution is (a) Consider a perturbation EI = [~ pi of A. Use the four Penrose conditions and the fact that Q\ has orthonormal columns to 6. Find all solutions of the linear least squares problem 4. Solve the perturbed problem min II A 2 z . not necessarily nonsingular. where again 8 is a small of A.IlQf. where AI = A + E I . of 2norm solution of least «rmarp« problem squares nrr»h1<=>m min II Ax . (a) Consider a perturbation E\ = [0 ~] of A.9). Let A E ~nxn.• What happens to IIx* . where Q is orthogonal. Find all solutions of the linear least squares problem min II Ax . Use the four Penrose conditions and the fact that QI has orthonormal columns to verify that if A e R™ x "can be factored in the form (8.xn can be factored in the form (8. where again 8 is a small positive number.yII2 as 8 approaches O? (b) Now consider the perturbation E2 = [~ (b) Now consider the perturbation EI = \0 s~\ of A. What happens to jt* . then A+ R~ Q\. then A+ == R. Let A e R"x". Consider the problem of finding the minimum 2norm solution of the linear least 5. Solve the perturbed version of the above problem. where 8 is a small positive number. not necessarily nonsingular. Solve the perturbed problem positive number.:.z2 as 8 approaches O? where A2 — A E 2 What happens to \\x* — zll2 as 8 approaches 0? 6. Prove that A+ = R+ QT.
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank .
2) By taking Hennitian transposes in (9. n(A) = 0.3 (CayleyHamilton). for example.— 3.2.) throughout the text. for example. This of A. then It can be proved from elementary properties of detenninants that if A e enxn .A). Note that if x [y] is a right [left] eigenvector of A. (Note that the characteristic polynomial can also be defined as det(A. Let A = [~g ~g].1).1.3 (CayleyHamilton).4. (Note that the characteristic polynomial can also be defined as det(Al . Let A [~ ~]. for example. The polynomialn (A. The 2norm is the most common nonn used for such scaling. The polynomial n (A) = det(A—A. we see immediately that x H is a left eigenBy taking Hermitian transposes in (9. for proved easily from the Jordan canonical fonn to be discussed in the text to follow (see.2. the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra says that 7t (X) is a polynomial of degree n. This results in at most a change of sign and. Definition 9.1) Similarly. Theorem 9. [3]). verify that n(A) = A2 2A .} The following classical theorem can be very useful in hand calculation. Then n(A) A2 + 2A 3. One oftenused scaling for an eigenvector is One oftenused scaling for an eigenvector is so is ax [ay] for any nonzero scalar a E a = 1/ IIx II so that the scaled eigenvector has nonn 1.1. then vector of AH associated with I. we use both forms throughout the text. the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra says that x 75 . norm used for such scaling. It can be proved easily from the Jordan canonical form to be discussed in the text to follow (see. n(A) = O.. Theorem 9. It is an easy exercise to Example 9. such that a scalar A E e. as a matter of convenience. [21D or directly using elementary properties of inverses and determinants (see. Thus. [3]). The 2nonn is the most common a — \j'.31 = 0.Al) is called the characteristic polynomial Definition 9./ — A).Chapter 9 Chapter 9 Eigenvalues and Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Eigenvectors 9. called an eigenvalue.4. we see immediately that XH is a left eigenvector of A H associated with A. then so is ax [ay] for any nonzero scalar a E C. called an eigenvalue.1 9. [21]) or directly using elementary properties of inverses and determinants (see.t so that the scaled eigenvector has norm 1./) is called the characteristic polynomial of A.1). A nonzero vector x e C" is a right eigenvector of A e Cnxn if there exists a scalar A. (9. Then n(k) = X2 + 2A. Thus.) = det (A .31 O. Note that if x [y] is a right [left] eigenvector of A. example. then n(A) is a polynomial of degree n. For any A e Cnxn . a nonzero vector y E en is a left eigenvector corresponding to an eigenvalue Similarly. It can be The following classical theorem can be very useful in hand calculation. as a matter of convenience. Example 9. It can be proved from elementary properties of determinants that if A E C" ". a nonzero vector y e C" is a left eigenvector corresponding to an eigenvalue a if Mif (9. For any A E e nxn . such that Ax = AX.1 Fundamental Definitions and Properties Fundamental Definitions and Properties Definition 9. It is an easy exercise to 2 verify that n(A) = A + 2A . we use both forms results in at most a change of sign and. e C. A nonzero vector x E en is a right eigenvector of A E e nxn if there exists Definition 9.
For example.5. it can also be .AI). f3 e R and let A = [~f3 £ ].3) are the eigenvalues of A and imply the singularity of the matrix A . The spectrum of A is denoted A (A). if If A € A(A) has algebraic multiplicity m. But it also clearly satisfies the smaller degree polynomial equation isfies (1 . the set of all roots of its characteristic polynomial n(X).. Xn. The spectrum of A E C"x" is the set of all eigenvalues of A. possibly repeated. A matrix A e 1Ft x" is said to be defective if it has an eigenvalue whose geometric multiplicity is not equal to (i. degree such that a (A) =0.e. eigenvalues of A.~. as solutions of the determinant equation 7r(A) has n roots.. then we must have I < g < m. n(A).6. must occur in complex conjugate pairs. we denote the geometric multiplicity of A by g.. if left of A A E A(A).. we say that A is an eigenvalue of A Definition 9. then A satsible for A to satisfy a lowerorder polynomial... then A satisfies (Je — I)2 = 0. A is said to be defective if it does not have n linearly independent (right or left) eigenvectors. Moreover. we get the interesting fact that del (A) = A] • A2 • • An (see also Theorem 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors n(A) has n roots.e. such a polynomial is said to be monic and we generally write et (A) as a monic polynomial throughout the text). Equivalently.7. if A = \1Q ®]. y of AT y is a left eigenvector of A corresponding to A e A(A). but that A(A) = A(A) only if A E 1Ftnxn.AI) = (A] .25). ft E 1Ft and let A = [ _^ !]. if we denote the geometric multiplicity of A by g. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Chapter 9. c form form A e C" " A]..8.AI) :::: m.. . A matrix A E Wnxn is said to be defective if it has an eigenvalue whose Definition 9. For example. Thus.. the set of Definition 9. say.2.:. all roots of its characteristic polynomialn(A).3) in the n(A) = det(A . i.7. • AM(see and set X = 0 in this identity. too. A. independent eigenvectors = n ..1)2 = O..e. Then n(A) = A22. Definition 9. and hence further are the eigenvalues of A and imply the singularity of the matrix A — AI.AI) = dimN(A .1) . neftnhion ~.76 Chapter 9. It can be shown that or(l) is essentially unique (unique if we force the coefficient It can be shown that a(Je) is essentially unique (unique if we force the coefficient of the highest power of A to be + 1. If A E A(A) has algebraic multiplicity m. i. An.n =0o. less than) its algebraic multiplicity. eigenvalues of A. then n(X) has real coefficients. A. Let the eigenvalues of A E en xxn be denoted X\. IfXA is a root of multiplicity m ofjr(X). we get the interesting fact that det(A) = AI .rank(A . checked eigenvectors of A and AT (take Hermitian transposes of both sides of (9. but that A(A) = A(A) only if A e R"x". possibly repeated.. Then if we write (9. 2aA + 2 + ft and Example 9. The minimal polynomial Of A l::: K""" ix (hI' polynomilll a(A) of least degree such that a(A) ~ O. Theorem If A E 1Ftnxn.A) (9. From the CayleyHamilton Theorem. Then jr(A. guarantee the existence of corresponding nonzero eigenvectors. it can also be generally write a(A) as a monic polynomial throughout the text). A is said to be defective if it does not have n linearly independent (right or left) eigenvectors. E A(A). must occur in complex conjugate pairs.4) and set A = 0 in this identity. it is posn(A) = O. The spectrum of A e nxn is the set of all eigenvalues of A. i •>/—!)• If A E 1Ftnxn.5. that by elementary properties of the determinant. then I < dimA/"(A — A/) < m.8. we always have A(A) = A(AT). Example 9. and hence further guarantee the existence of corresponding nonzero eigenvectors. Definition 9. The geometric multiplicity of A is the number of associated independent eigenvectors = n — rank(A — A/) = dim J\f(A — XI). Thll minimal polynomial of A G l!if.e. i. sible for A to satisfy a lowerorder polynomial. Thus.. less than) its algebraic multiplicity. the n(A) coefficients. Hence the roots of 7r(A).nxn is the polynomial o/(X) oJ IPll. geometric multiplicity is not equal to (i. say. Definition 9. Specifically.. If is a root of multiplicity m of n(A). These roots. But it also clearly satisfies the smaller degree polynomial equation (it. if A = [~ ~]. Note.6. we know that n(A) = 0. The spectrum of A is denoted A(A). if eigenvectors of A and AT (take Hermitian transposes of both sides of (9.5. then we must have 1 :::: g :::: m. a . Equivalently. Let a. as solutions of the determinant equation n(A) = det(A  AI) = 0. then there is an easily checked relationship between the left and right If A € R"x".. The geometric multiplicity ofX is the number of associated of algebraic multiplicity m. .e.. Specifically. then 1 :::: dimN(A .A) . (9. If e Wxn. of we always have A(A) = A(A r ). Moreover. However.XI. However. we say that X is an eigenvalue of A of algebraic multiplicity m. Let a. These roots. such a polynomial is said to be monic and we of the highest power of A to be +1. then y is a right eigenvector of AT corresponding to I € A (A). (An ..ft Definition 5.2)).) A.2».2aA + aa2+ f322 and A has eigenvalues a f3j (where A has eigenvalues a ± fij (where j = i = R)...
Then Xi = 0.. a(A) directly (without knowing eigenvalues and asThere is an algorithm to determine or (A. shown that a (A.e. left Aj E A (A) such that Xj 1= A. Furthermore. one might speculate that g plus the degree of a must always be five. each 4. be an eigenvalue of A with corresponding right Theorem 9. sociated eigenvector structure). this algorithm. Unfortunately.) divides every nonzero polynomial fi(k} for which ft (A) = 0.10. n(A) = (A — 2)4.1. eigenvector is numerically unstable. such is not the case. 0 0 0 2 A~U 0 0 ] ha<a(A) (A . 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 ] h'" a(A) (A .2)' ""d g ~ ~ ~ 1. such that Aj =£ Ai. g."(A) ~ ~ ~ ~ (A . 0 g At this point. Let A e C« x " ana [et A. Bezout algorithm. a(X) n(X).. .9.. algorithm.2)' ""d g 2. Example 9. the geometric multiplicity by g.1.2) andg ~ 4.2)4.5) = (A  2)2 and g = 2. Example 9. called the Bezout algorithm. Then yfx{ = O.11. A~[~ A~U 2 0 0 I 2 2 ] ha< a(A) (A .. Fundamental Definitions and Properties 77 77 a(A) f3(A) O. Let A E cc nxn and let Ai be an eigenvalue of A with corresponding right eigenvector jc. A[~  2 0 I 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 !] ~ ~ ~ ha. Unfortunately.11. Fundamental Definitions and Properties 9. e l\(A) yj Xi. a(A) divides n(A).. every nonzero polynomial f3(A) particular. Proof' Since AXi AiXi. In particular. let Yj be a left eigenvector corresponding to any A. We denote 7r(A) (A . Theorem 9. The above definitions are illustrated below for a series of matrices. of which has an eigenvalue 2 of algebraic multiplicity 4. YY Proof: Since Axt = A.10..*.2)2 ""d g 3. The matrix A~U has a(A) I 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 !] (9.) directly (without knowing eigenvalues and as Unfortunately. i.
6) Subtracting (9. XH x /= 0.. D A =1= iJ.12. 0 D Theorem 9. i. A.. However. we can choose the normalization of the Xi'S..Aj)YY xi.. contradicting the fact that it is an eigenvector. result holds for the corresponding left eigenvectors. Since A. and if Ai E A(A). Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Chapter 9. [21. Chapter 9.. is If A e C nxn has distinct eigenvalues. from which conclude A. we must have that x H = 0.. . Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors yy. we find 0 = (A. Let us now return to the general case. Take the Hermitian A transpose of this equation and use the facts that A is Hermitian and A is real to get xXHAz == of equation facts A.11.. xn}} is a linearly independent set. then by Theorem 9. we can choose the normalization of the *. . ^ /z. 0 Let us now return to the general case. Then [x\. yr . from which we conclude I = A. Since equation Az i^z XH get X H Az = iJXH A. the two vectors must be orthogonal. .JC. p. is real to get H Az AxH z...7) Taking Hermitian transposes in (9. . An with corresponding Theorem 9.13. Since XxHz. jc. YyXi =0. = A.. so that y H Xi = 1 for each i. eigenvector. or the Yi 's. e A(A)..e.11. However. or the y.. x is a linearly independent set. p. c Proof: Suppose (A.. c Proof: Premultiply the equation Ax = A. Since Ai . respectively. However.5).78 Similarly.are distinct eigenvalues of A with corresponding right eigenvectors x and z. However.e.11 is very similar to two other fundamental and important The proof of Theorem 9. it cannot be the case that YiH Xi = 0 as well. 118]. Premultiply the equation Az = iJZ by x H to get x HAz = /^XHZZ = XxHz.14.n with corresponding right eigenvectors x\. since YY A = AjXjyf. Then and z must be orthogonal. we have that XxH = AXH x. Since yf*Xi =1= 0 for each i. A = AH.12.14) and would thus have to be 0. Then all eigenvalues of A must be real.e. A is real. we must have that XHzz = 0. .. Take the Hermitian Proof: Premultiply the equation Ax = AX by ZH to get ZH Ax = AZ H x..Aj ^ 0.. Then Proof: Suppose (A.14) well. Xi is orthogonal to all y/s for which j =1= i. 's. results. = 1 for/ E n. 's... for i € !1. i.5). the proof see. Let A E cnxn have distinct eigenvalues A .. 0 If A E cnx " has distinct eigenvalues. i. since y" A = Similarly. i. x) is an arbitrary eigenvalue/eigenvector pair such that Ax = A.6) from (9.7.e.is real. since x is an eigenvector. Let A E nxn be Hermitian and suppose X and iJ. Since Xi ^ 0 and would thus have to be 0. for [21. The same right eigenvectors XI.=1= 0. we must have Subtracting (9. or else Xi would be orthogonal to n linearly independent vectors (by Theorem 9..xnn • Then {XI. Then x and z must be of A with corresponding right eigenvectors and respectively.. or both.JC by ZH to get ZH Ax = X z Hx .e. we must have yfxt = O. or else xf would be orthogonal to n linearly independent vectors (by Theorem 9.14. and if A.7) yields Taking Hermitian transposes in (9. or both. the two vectors must be orthogonal.— A..— A y )j^jc.. 1 ?. Let A €. A. for example. Theorem 9. Let A e nxn be Hermitian. we find 0 = (Ai . Then (9. so that YitH x.6) from (9. Theorem 9. Cnxn have distinct eigenvalues AI.11 is very similar to two other fundamental and important results. Let A e C"x" be Hermitian and suppose A and /JL are distinct eigenvalues Theorem 9. x . i. A = AH. . Then all eigenvalues of A must Theorem 9. . we have xHX =1= 0. be real... i. orthogonal. since x is an Using the fact that A is Hermitian.7) yields Using the fact that A is Hermitian.. contradicting the fact that it is an eigenvector. we have that IXHxx = XxHx. Let A E C"x" be Hermitian. it cannot be the case that yf*xt = 0 as orthogonal to all yj's for which j ^ i. then by Theorem 9. Proof: Proof: For the proof see..13.e. 118]. 0 The proof of Theorem 9. AXH z. The same result holds for the corresponding left eigenvectors... (9. x) is an arbitrary eigenvalue/eigenvector pair such that Ax = AX.
y' E !!. i E !!.. let Y = [YI.(2)l)xI = 0 to get Note that one component of . Let A e en xn have distinct eigenvalues AI. . Fundamental Definitions and 79 Theorem 9.. Fundamental Definitions and Properties 9. .15. solve the 3 x 3 linear system (A ...3 4A2 9 A. suppose that the left and right eigenvectors have been normalized so that yf1 Xi = 1.1.8) while y^Xj = 5. An and let the corresponding right eigenvectors form a matrix X [x\. + 5). An) e ]Rnxn. Let Example 9.. Similarly. 2)(A... let Y — [y\. 2A. can be written in matrixform as diag(A. solve the (since dimN(A . .I . and this then determines the other two Note that one component of XI can be set arbitrarily. solve the linear system (A .I = = LAixiyr i=1 (9.. .(1 + 2j) I)x2 = 0 to get For A2 — 1 + 2j. Let 2 5 3 3 2 4 ~ ] .16. Then AJC.. For A2 = 1 + 2j. let A = diag(AJ. / e n.*/...15. This time we have chosen the arbitrary scale factor for y\ so that \ = 1./) = (A 3 + 4A.9) =A = XAyH yRAX n (9. Xn) E Wtxn. / en... i E !!:: Finally..(2)1) = 1). — 1 2 j } .. Then AXi = AiXi. = A. i E!!. We can now find the right and left eigenvectors which we find A (A) = {2.. . can be written in matrix form as AX=XA (9. A.9.1.A.2 + 9)" + 10) = ()" + 2)(). solve the linear system (A 21) = 0 to get linear system y\(A + 21) = 0 to get yi This time we have chosen the arbitrary scale factor for YJ so that y f xXI = 1. Furthermore. To get the corresponding left eigenvector YI. 10) (A. is expressed by the equation yHX = I. . We can now find the right and left eigenvectors corresponding to these eigenvalues. . Finally. j e n. from Then n(X) det(A . .. solve the 3 x 3 linear system (A — (—2}I)x\ = 0 to get For Ai = 2. from which we find A(A) = {—2. These matrix equations can be combined to yield the following matrix factorizations: These matrix equations can be combined to yield the following matrix factorizations: XlAX and and A (9. and this then determines the other two (since dimA/XA — (—2)7) = 1). To get the corresponding left eigenvector y\. For Al = —2. / en.ci can be set arbitrarily.nand let the correspondTheorem 9. solve the linear system (A — (—1 + 2j)I)x2 = 0 to get yi X2 =[ 3+ j ] 3 ~/ .22 + 2)" + 5).10) = XAX. .16. Then rr(A) = det(A . .j. xn].. 1 ± 2j}.AI) (A.11) Example 9. corresponding to these eigenvalues. Similarly. suppose that the left and be the matrix of corresponding left eigenvectors.. Yn] ing right eigenvectors form a matrix X = [XI. . Furthermore."" yn] be the matrix of corresponding left eigenvectors. let A = right eigenvectors have been normalized so that YiH Xi = 1. Let A E C"x" have distinct eigenvalues A. is expressed by the equation while YiH Xj = oij. xn]. .. .
2j. For example.j ] 3+j . we can also note that X3 =x2' and yi jj.80 Chapter 9. Then. Other results in Theorem 9. 4}.. + 4). A. Proceeding as in the previous example. is from which we find A (A) = {I. Let A = [~ ~ ~] .) 19X + 12) = (A.c2 = ^. —3. use the fact that A33 = A2 and simply conjugate the equation A.17.=./) _(A + 8A from which we find A(A) = {—1.L Other results in Theorem 9.A.=. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Solve the linear system yf (A — (1 + 27')/) = 0 and normalize y> so that yf 2 1 to get Solve the linear system y" (A .2 and simply can also note that x$ = X2 and Y3 = Y2. To see this. itit is gtruightforw!U"d to compute straightforward to comput~ X~[~ and and I 0 I i ] 1 x.17.~q 1 3 2 2 0 2 3 ] 2 ~ y' .±1 4 4 4 l+j .2*2 to get Ax^ = ^2X2.'s directly.15 can also be verified. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Chapter 9. + 1)(A. we could have found them instead by computing instead of detennining the Yi'S directly. instead of determining the j. o 3 Then 7r(A. = x2). we For XT. XIAX=A= [ 2 0 0 1+2j o 0 Finally. use the fact that A. However.L 4 !. 2 It is then easy to verify that It is then easy to verify that 2 . To see this. Proceeding as in the previous example.( I + 2 j) I) = 0 and nonnalize Y22 so that y"xX2 = 1 to get For A3 = — 1 — 2j. note that we could have solved directly only for XI and X2 (and X3 = X2).AI) = (A33 + 8A 22+ 19A + 12) = (A + I)(A + 3)(A + 4).2 However. X~l Example 9. Then Jl"(A) = det(A . —4}. we could proceed to solve linear systems as for A2. + 3)(A. for left eigenvectors. = I . Then.!. 3. note that we could have solved directly only for *i and x2 (and XT. Now define the matrix X of right eigenvectors: Now define the matrix of right eigenvectors: 3+j 3j 3. we could proceed to solve linear systems as for A.15 can also be verified. det(A .!. similar argument yields the result for left eigenvectors. Finally.A similar argument yields the result conjugate the equation AX2 — A2X2 to get AX2 A2X2. For example. we could have found them instead by computing XI and reading off its rows. Let Example 9.
but A2 = f0 0~1]has two has only one right eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue 0. Then. I I ~J I 2 0 0 0 3 3 3 I I (. x) but not conversely. Fundamental Definitions and Properties 9. Remark 9. from which equivalent statement (T~ AT)(T. For example. namely yH A AyH if and only if Hy)H(T~1AT) = A(T Hy)H.g. x) maps to (f(A).. or.3 0 ~l +(4) [ . which is equivalent to the dyadic expansion sion 3 A = LAixiyr i=1 ~(I)[ ~ W~l+(3)[ j ][~ ~ 1 .txiYiH. formation T. since T is nonsingular. A = T0 6 2 has only one right eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue 0. For left eigenvectors we have a similar statement. Remark 9. A is diagonalizable). Then. in general. Then suppose XI AX = A.18.18. Proof: Suppose (A. e jRnxn n = LeA. Fundamental Definitions and Properties 81 81 We also have XI AX = A = diag(—1. I 3 I (. or eX. which is equivalent to the dyadic expanWe also have X~l AX = A = diag( 1. Theorem 9.20. X) is an eigenvalue/eigenvector pair such that Ax = AX. A Theorem 9. 4). representable by a power series X^^o fln*n)> then it is easy to show that representable L~:O anxn). jc) is an eigenvalue/eigenvector pair such that Ax = Xx. ] [~ ~ (I) [ I (.) . but /(A) does not necessarily the eigenvalues of /(A) (defined as X^o^A") are /(A). but A = [~ has two independent right eigenvectors associated with the eigenvalue o.1.lIAT)(T~lx)x) = X ( T ~ lIxx).20. or sinx. x) maps to (/(A). x) but not conversely. A is diagonalizable).1 AT) =X(THyf. 3. A = [~ Oj ] have all the same eigenvectors (unless. D D yHA = XyH ifandon\yif(T(T Hy)H (T. Let A E R" xn and suppose X~~1AX — A. What is true is that the independent right eigenvectors associated with the eigenvalue 0. i=1 . of Chapter 11. from the theorem statement follows. where A is diagonal. Eigenvalues (but not eigenvectors) are invariant under a similarity transTheorem 9. or sin*.9. Eigenvalues (but not eigenvectors) are invariant under a similarity transformation T. ( x ) is a polynomial. namely the theorem statement follows.19. For example. say. —4). The following theorem is useful when solving systems of linear differential equations. say. The following theorem is useful when solving systems of linear differential equations.I = A(T. or ex. If / is an analytic function (e. —3. then easy to show that the eigenvalues of f(A) (defined as L~:OanAn) are f(A). What is true is that the eigenvalue/eigenvector pair (A. since T Proof: Suppose (A. we have the equivalent statement (T. For left eigenvectors we have a similar statement. 2 3 I (. eigenvalue/eigenvector pair (A.1.but f(A) does not necessarily have all the same eigenvectors (unless.19.. etA Ax are Details of how the matrix exponential e'A is used to solve the system x = Ax are the subject solve system i of Chapter 11.g. ff(x) is a polynomial. J+ (3) [ 2 0 2 I I I 2 I ]+ 3 3 I I 3 I I I 3 3 I (4) [ 3 3 I I 0 3 3 l Theorem 9. If f is an analytic function (e.
to have a version of Theorem 9. An e C 1. 0 (9... we have Proof' Starting from the definition.21 for any function that isis There are extensions to Theorem 9.22. and the same eigenvectors.20 and Corollary 9. and right eigenvectors xt•.i).2 9.12) where each of the lordan block matrices 1i . i. .. If A E Rnx" is diagonalizable with eigenvalues A. we have Chapter 9.. then eA has eigenvalues e X"i .= Xdiag(/(A.82 Proof: Starting from the definition..e. eigenvectors Xi. ff(A) = X f ( A ) X ~ l I = Xdiag(J(AI).22. If A e ]Rn xn is diagonalizable with eigenvalues Ai.20 and its corollary in which It is desirable. 9...IXiYiH. 1q). The following corollary is immediate from the theorem upon setting t = I.. 1q is of the form where each of the Jordan block matrices / 1 ••• Jq is of the form Ai 0 Ai Ai o 0 (9. and right Corollary 9. i E ~.2 Jordan Canonical Form Jordan Canonical Form Theorem 9. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Chapter 9. Theorem 9. I.... of course... Corollary 9. Jordan Canonical Form (/CF): For all A e c nxn with eigenvalues AI. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors n = LeA.. i=1 0 The following corollary is immediate from the theorem upon setting t = I. from which such a result is then available and presented later in this chapter. /' en. . . there exists X E C^x" such that XI AX = 1 = diag(ll.. ( A ) = Xf(A)X. ..21 for any function that analytic on the spectrum of A. / € n_. . canonical form.21. € n_. there exists X € c~xn such that (not necessarily distinct). analytic on the spectrum of A.20 and its corollary in which A is not necessarily diagonalizable. kn E C (not necessarily distinct).. It is necessary first to consider the notion of Jordan canonical form. from which such a result is then available and presented later in this chapter. It is necessary first to consider the notion of Jordan A is not necessarily diagonalizable. . and the same eigenvectors..Il . . then e A has eigenvalues e A There are extensions to Theorem 9. . i E ~..e. . f ( X t t ) ) X ~ It is desirable. of course.... i. lordan Canonical Form (JCF): For all A E C"x" with eigenvalues X\.20 and Corollary 9. ii E ~.21.13) 1i = o o Ai o Ai . to have a version of Theorem 9. f(An))X.
.. Real Jordan Canonical Form: For all A E R n x " with eigenvalues AI. complicated. Proof: proof D 0 Transformations like T = [ _~ "•{"]allow us to go back and forth between aareal JCF Transformations like T = I" _. . the situation is only a bit more complicated. ~: ] and I = \0 A in the case of complex conjugate eigenvalues a ± jfJi E A(A).. (Xii±jpieA(A>). = [ _»' ^ 1 and h2 = [6 ~] in the case of complex conjugate eigenvalues where Mi = [ _~. With 1 j o j o 1 o o o j ~ ~] 0 1 ' . For nontrivial Jordan blocks. Proof: For the proof see.. pp. . [21.. 83 83 Form: 2. for example. 120124]. 1q is of form where each of the Jordan block matrices 11.JfJ =[ (X fJ fJ ] (X = M.. . ] T (X .An n (not € jRnxn Xi. { ] allow us to go back and forth between real JCF and its complex counterpart: TI [ (X + jfJ o O....2. Jordan Canonical Form 9... .14) J\. e A (A). .=1 ki = n. Jordan Canonical Form and L.2. there exists X € R" xn such that (9. . X (not necessarily X E lR.~xn necessarily distinct).9. Jq is of the form of in the case of real eigenvalues A. and where M.
J(2) has elementary divisors (A while /( 2) haselementary divisors (A . Let A e C" " with eigenvalues AI. and 2).I [ "+ jfi 0 0 0 et + jf3 0 0 0 0 et .25. The minimal polynomial of a matrix is the product of the elementary divisors of divisors. The minimal polynomial of a matrix is the product of the elementary divisors of highest degree corresponding to distinct eigenvalues. Then has two possible JCFs (not counting reorderings of the diagonal blocks): diagonal blocks): 1 J(l) = 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 and f2) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 J(l) has elementary divisors (A Note that 7(1) haselementary divisors (A . 2(A(A. The characteristic polynomials of the Jordan blocks defined in Theorem Definition 9.2). highest degree corresponding to distinct eigenvalues.22 are called the elementary divisors or invariant factors of A. from Theorem 9.1)2. D 0 Example 9.2).(A 1).. 1)4(A 2) and 2 2 et(A) = (A . 1.— I) (A. From Theorem 9..jf3 0 0 et . — 2) . x Theorem 9.26. .23.2)2. det(A) = nAi. Tr(A) = 2.. An. Suppose A E E (A. Then c n 1.26. The characteristic polynomial of a matrix is the product of its elementary divisors.22 are called the elementary divisors or invariant factors of A. The characteristic polynomials of the Jordan blocks defined in Theorem 9.22 we have that A = X J X ~ .. i=1 n 2.2). 1). I) .(A.84 it is easily checked that it is easily checked that Chapter 9. .2(A(A . Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors T. and (A . 2. .. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Chapter 9. Thus.. Again. 9. .jf3 0 ]T~[~ l h M Definition 9.22 we have that A = X JJX ~ l . 2 .2)2... Thus.24.1)z.23. From Theorem 9. " Xn.2)3 3and is known to have :rr(A) Example 9. Suppose A e lR. Then Theorem 9.1*) = Tr(J) = L7=1 Ai.2)2.) = det(7) = ]~["=l A. Then AAhas two possible JCFs (not counting reorderings of the a (A. det(A) = det(XJX. i=1 l Proof: Proof: 1. and (A . .I)(A (A2)2. from Theorem 9. Thus. I) . X XI.25. The characteristic polynomial of a matrix is the product of its elementary Theorem 9.1)2. .22 l Tr(A) = Tr(X J XI) Tr(JX. .)i. Let A E nxn with eigenvalues AI. 2)2.(A.22 we have that A X J XI.. (A1). 1)2(A . 1).24.1)4(A . Tr(A) = Tr(XJX~ ) = TrC/X"1 X) = Tr(/) = £"=1 A. 1 det(A) = det(X J XI) det(J) = n7=1 Ai. Theorem 9... .7x7 is known to have 7r(A) = (A . and (A (A .) = (A..
e.e. Definition 9. determine the JCF of A uniquely.29.— a) and rank(A . so the eigenvalue 3 has two eigenvectors associated with it. The more interesting (and difficult) case occurs when Ai multiplicity A. three eigenboth have rr(A) = (A . For example.3. 9. of algebraic multiplicity 1. 1. a)\ . and rank (A A. determine a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 Al= 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 a A2 = a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 4.9.) = (A. is not sufficient to Example 9.e.. To get a third vector X3 such that X = [Xl KJ_ X3] reduces A to JCF. Then x is a right principal vector of degree k degree associated with A E A (A) ifand only if(A .3.3 Determination of the JCF Determination of the JCF The first critical item of information in determining the JCF of a matrix A E Wlxn is its A e ]R..27.).. and rank(A al) vectors.. a(A). we find that 2£2 + ~3 = O. An analogous definition holds for a left principal vector of degree k. left k. Knowing TT (A. eigenvectors dimN(A — A. i. three eigen7r(A.AI)klx i= o.rank(A . is of algebraic multiplicity greater than one.] are eigenvectors (and are independent).. The matrices A uniquely. both are eigenvectors (and are independent). i. a(A. For each distinct eigenvalue Ai. both denote a solution to the linear system (A .. we find that 2~2 + £ 3= 0 .nxn). associated independent right (or left) eigenvectors is given by dim A^(A . a (A).) = (A.— a) . To get a third vector JC3 such that X [x\ X2 XT.nxn number of eigenvectors. it The straightforward case is.l) independent right — — A. it then has precisely one eigenvector. Determination of the JCF 85 &5 Example 9..A.a(A) = (A .is simple.e. of course. Let A E C"xn (or R"x").A..l). Thus..27.. and rank(A —Ai l) for distinct Ai is not sufficient to rr(A). when X.7) for distinct A.29. X principal Definition 9. X e A(A) if and only if (A XI)kx = 0 and (A U}k~l x ^ 0. we need the notion of principal vector.(7). suppose suppose A = [3 2 0 o Then Then 3 0 A3I= U2 I] o o 0 0 n has rank 1. the associated number of linearly A. of algebraic multiplicity 1. A e nxn ]R. Thus. Remark 9.28.3/)£ = 0. Remark 9.— al) == 4. a)7.28. when Ai is simple. If we let [~l ~2 ~3]T associated If [^i £2 &]T denote a solution to the linear system (A — 3l)~ = 0. c . i. i. Determination of the JCF 9.ulx = 0 and (A . of course.7) = n . The straightforward case is.
ji of dimension k or larger. which simply says that x(!) is a right Ax(1) = hx(1) x (1) (2) x(2). of — AI. by (A . x(l) (^ 0).1. of k 5.AI). determine all eigenvalues of A e R" x " nxn ). See. If. Exercise 7.x2 A JCF.17) The first column yields the equation Ax(!) = AX(!). For each independent jc (1) . Then for each distinct X e A (A) perform the following: z (2) w c 1.A/)x(2) = x(l).XI)2x^ = 0. A right (or left) principal vector of degree k is associated with a Jordan block J. The case k = 1 corresponds to the "usual" eigenvector.3. I) associated This step finds all the eigenvectors (i. wefind(A. Denote by x(1) and x(2) the two columns of a matrix X e R2. different term will be assigned a much different meaning in Chapter 12. solve (A . this rank is n . of The number of linearly independent solutions at this step depends on the rank of 2 (A . 4. The other solution necessary is the desired principal vector of degree 2. for example. combination of jc(1) vectors to get a righthand side that is in 7£(A — XI). Theother solution (A . the definition of principal vector is satisfied. E lR nxn This suggests a "general" procedure. for get righthand example." "of often 3. Solve (A . if X. For example. 2. is. If we premultiply (9. principal vectors of degree 1) associated with A.A1)X(l) = O.A1)x(2) = x(l).) . x(l).AI). Thus.A1)X(l) = O. principal vectors still need to be computed from succeeding steps.3. there are two linearly independent n — o.A1)2 x(2) = (A . Thus.1 Theoretical computation Theoretical computation To motivate the development of a procedure for determining principal vectors.. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors synonymously "of 2. of course. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Chapter 9. Denote by x(l) and x(2) the two columns of a matrix X E lR~X2 2x2 2 Jordan block{h0 h1. (A — uf. (It may be necessary to take a linear of x(l) R(A .2. eigenvector.1 9. we find (A If we premultiply XI) x = (A XI)x = 0. Then the equation AX = X J can be written A [x(l) x(2)] = [x(l) X(2)] [~ ~ J. If the algebraic multiplicity of If A principal need X is greater than its geometric multiplicity. if of . the principal vector second of degree 2: of degree (A .A/) = — multiplicity of rank(A — XI) = n .'A1)22xx(l) = (A . solutions solutions to the homogeneous equation (A .XI. but the latter generalized eigenvectors. The number of eigenvectors depends on the rank of A . Principal vectors are sometimes also called generalized eigenvectors.X I ) ( l ) = (A AI)O o. since (A .XI).XI)0 = 0. k = eigenvector. A E A(A) following: (or C ). S.86 Chapter 9. (9. 9. Then the equation AX = XJ can be written that reduces a matrix A to this JCF.X I ) . See. The second column yields the following equation for x . consider a determining 2 x Jordan [~ i]. One of these solutions (A — AI)2 x (2) x(l) (1= 0).17) by (A .e. The phrase "of grade k" is often used synonymously with "of degree k. there is only one eigenvector. First.
. Let X = [[x(l). Unfortunately. X(k)} is a linearly independent set. find the eigenvectors associated The eigenvalues of A are A1 = I.AI) = k . There are significant numerical difficulties inherent in attempting generally prove unreliable. x (k) } is a linearly independent set. 1 . First.9.31. [20] and [21]. {x(l).. Determination of eigenvectors more extensive treatments. . Then Theorem 9. solve (A AI)x(3) 87 = x(2). Principal vectors associated with different Jordan blocks are linearly indeTheorem 9. Then vectors x(i) is constructed as above. Theorem 9. see. and the interested student is strongly urged to consult the classical and very to compute a JCF. . solve 3. Suppose A E C kxk has an eigenvalue A of algebraic multiplicity kkand suppose further that rank(A — AI) = k — 1.. Determination of eigenvectors and principal vectors is obviously very tedious for anything beyond simple problems (n = 2 and principal vectors is obviously very tedious for anything beyond simple problems (n = 2 or 3.32. where the chain of vectors x(i) is constructed as above. Theorem 9. Notice that highquality mathematical software such as MATLAB readable [8] to learn why. of algebraic multiplicity and Theorem 9. . say). Notice that highquality mathematical software such as MATLAB does not offer a j cf command.3. although a j ardan command is available in MATLAB'S does not offer a jcf command. Determination of the JCF 3. Attempts to do such calculations in finiteprecision floatingpoint arithmetic or 3. Theorem 9.. . with the distinct eigenvalues 1 and 2..30.. Example 9.(1) (A . pendent. see. . vectors is equal to the algebraic multiplicity of A. Continue in this way until the total number of independent eigenvectors and principal vectors is equal to the algebraic multiplicity of A. Suppose A e Ckxk has an eigenvalue A.1. Continue in this way until the total number of independent eigenvectors and principal 4. and A3 = 2. (x (1) . . Attempts to do such calculations in finiteprecision floatingpoint arithmetic generally prove unreliable. . 4. and h3 = 2. [20] and [21]. and the interested student is strongly urged to consult the classical and very readable [8] to learn why. Let X = x ( l ) . for example.33. this naturallooking procedure can fail to find all Jordan vectors. For each independent x(2) from step 2. For each independent X(2) from step 2. For more extensive treatments.2/)x3(1)= 0 yields (A .. although a jordan command is available in MATLAB's Symbolic Toolbox. There are significant numerical difficulties inherent in attempting to compute a JCF. .2I)x~1) = 0 yields . 0 The eigenvalues of A are AI = 1. A2 = 1.30. Symbolic Toolbox. Let Example 9. h2 = 1. say). For Unfortunately.33.3. for example. find the eigenvectors associated with the distinct eigenvalues 1 and 2. where the chain of suppose further that rank(A . Principal vectors associated with different Jordan blocks are linearly independent. . x(k)]. First. X(k)]. Determination of the JCF 9. this naturallooking procedure can fail to find all Jordan vectors.31.. Let A=[~ 0 2 ] .32.
d.88 (A .. .1I)xl ) = xiI) to get (A – l/)x.11)x?J = 0 yields (A.2 9. 0 = 0 A dn dn I 2 0 dn dn I A 0 ). d. d n)) be a nonsingular "scaling" matrix. Then A 4l. Then Let D = diag(d" . For the sake of defmiteness. we consider below the case of a single Jordan block.. For the sake of definiteness.. 0 0 D'(X' AX)D = D' J D = j ).l/)x. solve To find a principal vector of degree 2 associated with the multiple eigenvalue 1. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors To find a principal vector of degree 2 associated with the multiple eigenvalue 1. solve 2 (A . . dn be a nonsingular "scaling" matrix. (1) toeet x.3.so long as they are nonzero. Now let Now let X (2) =[ 0 ] ~ . but the result clearly holds for any JCF... but the result clearly holds for any JCF.2 On the +1 's in JCF blocks 's JCF In this subsection we show that the nonzero superdiagonal elements of a JCF need not be In this subsection we show that the nonzero superdiagonal elements of a JCF need not be 1's but can be arbitrary .. 0 !b. .. . =0 yields (1) Chapter 9. . we 1 's but can be arbitrary — so long as they are nonzero. consider below the case of a single Jordan block.3. 0 1 = [xiI) 0 xl" xl"] ~ [ ~ 5 ] and XlAX 5 3 0 Then it is easy to check that Then it is easy to check that l 1 X'~U i 1 =[ ~ I 0 0 n 9. Suppose A € Rnxn and SupposedA E jRnxn and Let D diag(d1.(2) = x.
4 9...9. Then AI.AmItm .18) 0 I 1 0 0 can be used to put the superdiagonal elements in the subdiagonal instead if that is desired: to superdiagonal elements in instead desired: A I 0 0 A 0 A 0 A 0 0 A 0 p[ A p= 0 1 0 0 A 0 I A A 0 0 0 A 9.n = N(A = N (A ....n.35. Such a decomposition is given in the following associated direct sum decomposition of jH. Geometric Aspects of the JCF 89 di's Appropriate choice of the di 's then yields any desired nonzero superdiagonal elements.Am I) Vm .. where AS is defined as the transformation. Note that dimM(A .4 Geometric Aspects of the JCF Geometric Aspects of the JCF The matrix X that reduces a matrix A E IR"X"(or C nxn)) to aalCF provides aachange of basis X e jH. Definition 9...A. Such a decomposition is given in the following theorem.4.34. . A subspace S ~ V is Ainvariant if AS ~ S.. In a similar fashion. where AS is defined as the set {As:: s e S}. dimN(A — AJ)Vi = ni. Let IF and suppose + transformation. Geometric Aspects of the JCF 9.. similarity transformation XD [d[x[... Then jH.A1I) v) E6 . interpreted This result can also be interpreted in terms of the matrix X = [x\. dnxn]. .35.34.A[)V) '" (A . Suppose e jH. E6 N (A . . x n eigenvectors and principal vectors that reduces A to its lCF. mdistinct... Am distinct. A. dnxn}. set {As s E S}. . E6 N(A .nxn (or nxn to JCF provides change of basis with respect to which the matrix is diagonal or block diagonal.nxn n(A) = (A ... the reverseorder identity matrix (or exchange matrix) In a similar fashion. J is obtained from A via the similarity transformation XD = \d\x\.A[)n) . j is obtained from A via the and principal vectors that reduces A to its JCF.. . Let V be a vector space over F and suppose A : V —>• V is a linear Definition 9..Amtm c and minimal polynomial a(A) = (A . Theorem 9.xn]] of eigenvectors = [x[. . Suppose A E R"x" has characteristic polynomial 9. A subspace S c V is A invariant if AS c S. It is thus natural to expect an associated direct sum decomposition of R...AlIt) E6 . (A .Am)Vm with Ai..4. It is thus natural to expect an with respect to which the matrix is diagonal or block diagonal. Specifically./) w = «. .. Specifically. the reverseorder identity matrix (or exchange matrix) 0 p = pT = p[ = 0 I 0 (9. ....
.i. e E"x".• EB Nm.e. Let 7. Equivalently. .. Jm).38.e. Other such "canonical" forms are discussed in text that follows. The equation Ax Example 9... The equation Ax = A* = x A defining a right eigenvector x of an eigenvalue AX = x A defining a right eigenvector x of an eigenvalue A x X says that * spans an Ainvariant subspace (of dimension one). . 2. A invariant if only ifS1 1... .e.span an Ainvariant subspace. = 1.. A". the eigenvectors and principal vectors associated with A. (i.).. AT Theorem 9. i. S is Ainvariant if and only if S ."" Jik. If A has distinct eigenvalues A.) and each /..34. Finally. /.37./)"' by SVD.* is a Jordan block corresponding to Ai E A(A). then a basis for V can be chosen with respect to which A has a block diagonal representation. such "canonical" forms are discussed in text that follows. we have that A A.19) the columns attention here to only the Jordan block case. Xm R"n such that XI AX diag(7i. then is Ainvariant if and only if there span a kdimensional subspace S.. 9.. is Ainvariant. Let p(A) = CloI + ClIA + '"• •+ ClqAqq be a polynomial in A. e A(A). Let Yi E <enxn .lt.. We could also use other block diagonal decompositions (e.. each Ji = diag(JiI.) and each Jik is a Jordan block corresponding to A..Xm] ] Ee]R~xnxnisis such that X^AX ==diag(J1. Jm)... This follows easily by comparing the ith columns of each side of (9. Example 9.e.as in Theorem 9. i.2. Suppose X block diagonalizes A. = Xi.. eigenvalues Ai 9.A.19) AS = SM.. where each Theorem 9... . Suppose A E ]Rnxn. for N(A . then S <S is Ainvariant if and only if there exists M E ]Rkxk such that eRkxk (9. so the columns of Xi span an Amvanant subspace. .39. Let peA) = «o/ + o?i A + • + <xqA be a polynomial in A.36. is not necessarily diagonalizable. we could choose bases for N(A — A. .li. K(S) <S.. of W.38. s/t span a /^dimensional subspace <S. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Chapter 9. so by (9. i /= 1. be a Jordan basis for N (AT . The Jordan canonical form is a special case of the above theorem. . we have that AXi Theorem 9.. but we restrict our attention here to only the Jordan block case. Suppose A"== [Xl . Rewriting in the form ~ J.. Then N(p(A)) and 1. We would then get a block diagonal representation for A with full blocks rather than the highly structured Jordan blocks. could be replaced by v. where each Ji = diag(/.. .Ai/)n... Then N(p(A)) and R(p(A)) 7£(p(A)) are Ainvariant. diagonal representation. and S e R" xk s\. we return to the problem of developing a formula for e l A in the case that A A formula e' A is not necessarily diagonalizable. Note that A A". /. //*.19) the columns of Xi (i. € C"x"' be a Jordan basis for N(AT — A. If F = NI ® • • 0 m A// is Ainvariant.39. Note that AXi = A*... example (note that the power n.e. then a basis for V can be chosen with respect to which A has a block N. .Ji . where X [ X i . Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors If V is taken to be ]Rn over Rand S E ]Rn x* is a matrix whose columns SI. so by (9. 7. Ainvariant. 9.37. via SVD). = X.34..36. R(S) == S. If A has distinct The Jordan canonical form is a special case of the above theorem. the eigenvectors and principal vectors associated with Ai) span an Ainvariant subspace of]Rn. Sk If R" R.g..is A T invariant. partition . If V is a vector space over IF such that V = N\ EB ./)"'. Other representation for A with full blocks rather than the highly structured Jordan blocks.) span an Ainvariant of A"..90 Chapter 9. We would then get a block diagonal example (note that the power ni could be replaced by Vi).19): /th Example 9. so the columns of A. XI AX = [~ J 2 ]...2. partition Equivalently... i..
Jm) [YI . Then compatibly. The Matrix Sign Function 9.5. E f= 0.9. Definition 9. A survey of the matrix sign function and some of its applications can be found in [15].= Ai..41. A called the matrix sign function.5 The Matrix Sign Function The Matrix Sign Function section brief interesting useful In this section we give a very brief introduction to an interesting and useful matrix function function called the matrix sign function.I = XJy H = [XI. is given by sgn(A) = X [ / 0] 0 / X I . It is a generalization of the sign (or signum) of a scalar. It is a generalization of the sign (or signum) of a scalar.5 9. ifRe(z) < O.S. . denoted sgn(A). Definition 9.40.. Then the sign of z is defined by Re(z) {+1 sgn(z) = IRe(z) I = 1 ifRe(z) > 0. 9. Then the sign of A. Suppose A E C"x" has no eigenvalues on the imaginary axis.40. and let e cnxn be a Jordan canonical form for A. associated with an eigenvalue A..YiH. for a k x k Jordan block 7. Definition 9. denoted sgn(A). . . Then A = XJX. Ym]H = LX. The Matrix Sign Function 91 91 compatibly.JiYi . is given by eigenvalues in the right halfplane. i=1 which is a useful formula when used in conjunction with the result which is a useful formula when used in conjunction with the result A 0 A A 0 eAt teAt eAt .. m ••• . of defined Definition 9. .. . i=1 H In a similar fashion we can compute m etA = LXietJ. Let z E C with Re(z) ^ O. Xm] diag(JI.lt 2 e At 2! 0 exp t 0 0 0 1 A teAt eAt 0 0 0 0 0 block Ji associated A = A.41.. Then the sign of A. with N containing all Jordan blocks corresponding to the be a Jordan canonical form for with N containing all Jordan blocks corresponding to the eigenvalues of in the left halfplane and P containing all Jordan blocks corresponding to eigenvalues of A in the left halfplane and P containing all Jordan blocks corresponding to eigenvalues in the right halfplane.
e nxn Theorem 9. distinct right eigenvectors Xi. Yn. Their left exercises. sgn(AH) = (sgn(A))". In fact. ••• .. ••.. e C"x" Theorem 9. Theorem 9. ). The JCF definition of the matrix sign function does not generally lend itself to reliable computation on a finitewordgenerally itself length digital computer. R(S+/) is an Ainvariant subspace corresponding to the right halfplane eigenvalues R(S + l) A invariant halfplane of (the positive invariant of A (the positive invariant subspace).. . 2.1> . yn. S2 = I. ± 1. EXERCISES EXERCISES 1. 2. The JCF definition of the here is especially useful in deriving many of its key properties. AS = SA. Then the following hold: following 1. Let v E en be an vectors Xl.n 1. 4. . projection subspace of 4. respectively. but the one given There are other equivalent definitions of the matrix sign function. Xn and left eigenvectors y\. We state some of the more useful properties of the matrix sign function as theorems. . Xn with corresponding right eigenA e nxn ). 5..42. Their straightforward proofs are left to the exercises. of A (the negative invariant subspace). sgn(T1AT) Tlsgn(A)TforallnonsingularT e enxn 6. sgn(TlAT) = T1sgn(A)T foralinonsingularT E C"x". We state some of the more useful properties of the matrix sign function as theorems. Then the following hold: following e 1.xn and left eigenvectors Yl. positive = (/ + of A. sgn(cA) = sgn(c) sgn(A)/or c. S2 = I.. negA == (l . There are other equivalent definitions of the matrix sign function. and let — sgn(A). Let e C" be an arbitrary vector..42.. AS = SA. 7l(S l) is an Ainvariant subspace corresponding to the left halfplane eigenvalues left halfplane I. Theorem 9.. Suppose A E C"x" has no eigenvalues on the imaginary axis. R(S — /) Ainvariant of (the negative invariant subspace). 3. 3. posA == (l + S)/2 is a projection onto the positive invariant subspace of A. S = sgn(A). positive of P.43. 4. Show that v can be expressed (uniquely) as a linear combination e of the right eigenvectors. S is diagonalizable with eigenvalues equal to del. .. 6. S = sgn(A).. 5..92 92 Chapter 9.. its reliable numerical calculation is an interesting topic in calculation its own right. Show that v can be expressed (uniquely) as a linear combination arbitrary vector. 2. Suppose A E enxn has no eigenvalues on the imaginary axis. . sgn(A") = (sgn(A»H. Find the appropriate expression for v as a linear combination expression of the left eigenvectors as well. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Chapter 9. 3. negA = (/ — S)/2 3. respectively.. and let = sgn(A). . Let A E Cnxn have distinct eigenvalues AI. but the one given here is especially useful in deriving many of its key properties. respectively. sgn(cA) = sgn(c) sgn(A) for all nonzero real scalars c.43.S) /2 is a projection onto the negative invariant subspace of A.. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors where the negative and positive identity matrices are of the same dimensions as N and p.
16x 16 has eigenvalues at 0 its JCF consists of single Jordan block of the form specified in Theorem 9. Let A = [H 1]· 2 2" Find a nonsingular matrix X such that XI AX = J. right eigenvectors and right principal vectors if necessary. Let A E lR.l]r as an eigenvector. x O. 10. Suppose a matrix A E R 16x 16 has 16 eigenvalues at 0 and its JCF consists of a single A e lR.. Characterize all left eigenvectors. Suppose a matrix A E lR. AH = A. = O.16 Jordan form specified 9.1) element of J. eigenvectors and if and (real) JCFs of the following matrices: (a) 2 1 ] 0 ' [ 1 6. Suppose A E C"x" is skewHermitian. k . Determine the JCF of A. i. Let A be an eigenvalue of A with corresponding 3.22. Let A e R"x" be of the form A = xyT. 5. 5. Show that all right eigenvectors of the Jordan block matrix in Theorem 9. Prove that all eigenvalues of 2. Prove the same result if A is skewHermitian. eigenvalues. 11. Determine the JCFs of the following matrices: 6. 2. JCFs for A. Prove that all eigenvalues of a skewHermitian matrix must be pure imaginary. What are the eigenvalues of this slightly perturbed is added to the (16. ~ 0 Hint: Use[1 1 — I]T an Hint: Use[— 1 1 .nxn A = xyT. Determine the JCF of A. where x. What are the eigenvalues of this slightly perturbed matrix? matrix? . but then the equation (A . Suppose A E C"x" is Hermitian. AH = —A. Determine all possible € R 5x5 {2. Suppose A e rc nxn is Hermitian. multiples of e\ E lR.1) element of J.30 must be 8. i. where x. x. JCFs for A. y E lR. 3}. (A — I)x(2) x(1) 8. 3. Let A be an eigenvalue of A with corresponding right eigenvector x. Determine the JCF of A. y E lR. 2. Show that x is also a left eigenvector for A. Let A e R" xn be of the form A = 1+ xyT. Suppose the small number 10. y e R" are nonzero vectors with A E lR. where x. nxn be of the form A = / + xyT. Prove the same result right eigenvector x. 3}. 9. Determine the JCFs of the following matrices: <a) Uj n 2 1 2 =n 7.e. where J is the JCF Find a nonsingular matrix X such that X AX = J. where J is the JCF 1 J=[~ 0 1~]. Determine the JCF of A..e. 2. Suppose 10~16 is added to the (16. y e R" are nonzero vectors 10.Exercises 93 93 2.n T T x yy = 0. Characterize all left eigenvectors.30 must be multiples of el e R*. Let 7./)jc = x can't be solved.22. The vectors [0 1 Ifand[l 0 of [0 — l] r and[1 0]r (2) (1) are both eigenvectors. n are nonzero vectors with with xTTyy = 0. Show that x is also a left eigenvector for A. Show that all right eigenvectors of the Jordan block matrix in Theorem 9.5x5 has eigenvalues {2. Determine the eigenvalues. a skewHermitian matrix must be pure imaginary. if A is skewHermitian. 4. Suppose A € rc nxn is skewHermitian.
is nonsingular. sgn(A) = /. 16. Show that every matrix A e jRnxn can be factored in the form A Si$2. what can you say further. Thus. Then A = (XS i X T ) ( X ~ T T S2XI) would be the the "symmetric factorization" of J. say Si. in terms of AU and A 22. If n = 2 and k = 1. Find a matrix equation that X must satisfy for this to be possible. transformation explicitly. 13. TIAT = [A011 A22 0 ] . Hint: Use the factorization in the previous exercise. Prove Theorem 9.94 Chapter 9. Find a matrix equation that X must satisfy for this to be possible.43.. Then = ( X SIXT)(X. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors Chapter 9. Suppose Al2 ^ and want to block diagonalize A via the similarity transformation want to block diagonalize A via the similarity transformation where X E IRkx(nk). Prove Theorem 9. If n = 2 and k = 1. Thus. Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors 12.42. Show that every matrix A E R"x" can be factored in the form A = SIS2. where SI and £2 are real symmetric matrices and one of them. xn has all its eigenvalues in the left halfplane. about when the equation for X is what can you say further. where Si 12. Consider the block upper triangular matrix A _ [ All  0 Al2 ] A22 ' where A E M"xn and An E Rkxk with 1 ::s: k < n. en . Hint: Use the factorization in the previous exercise. it suffices to prove the result for the JCF. about when the equation for is solvable? solvable? 15. i. 15. Prove Theorem 9. Prove Theorem 9. say S1. 16. in terms of All and A22. Prove that every matrix e jRn xn is similar to its transpose and determine a similarity transformation explicitly.42. JCF. Suppose A E C"xn has all its eigenvalues in the left halfplane. Suppose Au =1= 0 and that we we e jRnxn and All e jRkxk 1 < ::s: n. and S2 are real symmetric matrices and one of them. The transformation P in (9. Consider the block upper triangular matrix 14. Hint: Suppose A = Xl XI is a reduction of A to JCF and suppose we can construct Hint: Suppose A = X J X ~ l is a reduction of A to JCF and suppose we can construct the "symmetric factorization" of 1. is nonsingular.18) is useful. Prove that 17. Prove that 17.e. it suffices to prove the result for the required symmetric factorization of A.S2X~l) would required symmetric factorization of A. X e R*x <«*). The transformation P in (9.18) is useful. Prove that every matrix A E W x" is similar to its transpose and determine a similarity 13. Suppose A e sgn(A) = 1. 14.43.
2. V and Q 1... then there exists a unitary matrix U such that UH AU — D.. if A e Rmxn . .. Let A = AH e C"x" have (real) eigenvalues A. . such as A = [ _ab ^1 for real scalars a and b. This is proved in Theorem 10. . the transformation A f+ P ApT is called 2. skewsymmetric.1 Some Basic Canonical Forms Some Basic Canonical Forms Problem: Let V and W be vector spaces and suppose A : V + W is a linear transformation. . = V and if pT is orthogonal. . respectively)." The transformation A f+ P AQ is called an equivalence.. the transformation A H> PAP" 1 is called similarity. An. Then there AI. If W = V and <2== p. the transformation A f+ PAPI is called aasimilarity.e. it is called an orthogonal equivalence if P and Q are orthogonal matrices. most "diagonal" we can get is the JCF described in Chapter 9. If a matrix A is not normal. Two special cases are of interest: Two special cases are of interest: 1. What other U HAU = D.2.. Q are unitary. An. and unitary matrices (and their "real" counterparts: symmetric.1." The transformation A M» PAQ is called an equivalence. If The following results are typical of what can be achieved under a unitary similarity. the definition.Chapter 10 Chapter 10 Canonical Forms Canonical Forms 10. Normal matrices include Hermitian. !] Theorem 10. and unitary matrices (and their "real" counterparts: symmetric.j... . matrix if and only if it is normal (i. A.1. . Normal matrices include Hermitian. an orthogonal similarity (or unitary similarity in the complex case). the transformation A i» PAPT is called If an orthogonal similarity (or unitary similarity in the complex case). If a matrix A is not normal. . We can also consider the case A E emxn and unitary equivalence if P and <2 are unitary. respectively).9. Find bases in V and W with respect to which Mat A has a "simple form" or "canonical Find bases in V and W with respect to which Mat A has a "simple form" or "canonical xm form. as well as other matrices that merely satisfy the definition. If P"1 ." In matrix terms. . where D = diag(A..j. The following results are typical of what can be achieved under a unitary similarity. the for real scalars a and h..I. . orthogonal equivalence if P and are orthogonal matrices. AAHH = AH A). What other matrices are "diagonalizable" under unitary similarity? The answer is given in Theorem matrices are "diagonalizable" under unitary similarity? The answer is given in Theorem 10... where it is proved that a general matrix A E C"x" is unitarily similar to a diagonal 10.. orthonormal eigenvectors for A). An). ..1 10.2. skewskewHermitian. We can also consider the case A e Cm xn and unitary equivalence if P and Remark 10... and orthogonal..2. If W = V and if Q = PT is orthogonal. An) (the columns of X are exists a unitary matrix X such that XHAX = D = diag(A.9. if A E IR mxn find E R™ and Q E lR~xn such that P AQ has a form.. where D = diag(AJ. find P e lR. it is called an "canonical form. 95 95 . If A = A H 6 C" " has eigenvalues AI.. AA = AHA).:xm and Q e Rnnxn such that PAQ has a "canonical form." In matrix terms. .e. Xn) (the columns ofX are orthonormal eigenvectors for A). such as A = [_~ most "diagonal" we can get is the JCF described in Chapter 9. . where it is proved that a general matrix A e enxn is unitarily similar to a diagonal matrix if and only if it is normal (i. n ). . = H E en xn exists a unitary matrix X such that X H AX = D = diag(Al. then there exists a unitary matrix £7 such that A = AH E en xxn has eigenvalues AI. . . Remark 10. This is proved in Theorem 10. . as well as other matrices that merely satisfy the symmetric.1. and orthogonal.. Xn Theorem 10.An. skewHermitian. Problem: Let V and W be vector spaces and suppose A : V —>• W is a linear transformation.
1) we have used the fact that AXI = k\x\.• • Hk and Hk'" HI. the construction of X2 E JRnx(nl) such that X — z e ]R" (". . . where R E kxk is upper triangular.. . k 1... where R € Ckxk is upper triangular.. k = For simplicity. .Hv. %n] XI .. we get Ai remaining in the (l. VI € Cnxk [Xi U ] Proof: Let X\I = [x\. [XI U2] is unitary.. . An.. . [Xi f/2] unitary. . Then U = HI'" Hk and H Then x^U2 = 0 (i E ~) means that xf is orthogonal to each of the n — k columns of V2.3.. We illustrate the construction of the necessary Householder matrix for k — 1. D 0 (2.. When combined with the fact that x~ XI = 1.. Write V H matrix such that V X I = [ ~]...xd. Now XHAX =[ xH I XH ] A [XI 2 X 2] =[ =[ =[ x~Axl XfAxl X~AX2 XfAX 2 ] (10. Construct a sequence of Householder matrices (also known HI.. [£i.I)block. Xk]. When combined with the fact that In (l0. In (10.l)block.. Let V = XI. ..3 called Theorem 10.. xf*x\ = Proof' Let x\ be a right eigenvector corresponding to X\.l)block by Al (2.2).....) [XI X2]] is orthogonal is frequently required. .. Then there exist n . . Construct a sequence of Householder matrices (also known Proof: Let X [XI. .T.. and normalize it such that x~ XI = XI 1. We also get 0 in the (2.2)block X2 . following general result. X = Given a unit vector x\ E JRn. . 10. Xn such that [x\. Canonical Forms Proof: eigenvector corresponding AI. . simplicity. ....96 96 Chapter 10. XH AX induction noting that XH AX is Hermitian.. we consider the real case.2) Al X~AX2 XfAX 2 0 Al ] 0 XfAX z 0 l In (10. . Write UH = [U\ U ] [VI Vz] 0 2 with Ui E Cnxk . A. . ~nf..... xn] = [x\ ] [XI X22] is unitary. xn such that X = (XI. Canonical Forms Chapter 10. Let X\ e Cnxk have orthonormal columns and suppose U is a unitary Theorem 10.2 is then a special case of Theorem 10. Let XI E Cnxk have orthonormal columns and suppose V is a unitary matrix such that UX\ = \ 1. The proof is completed easily by induction upon noting proof that the (2. xn] = 1.. . orthogonal (l.2)block by XI Xz. .. Hk in the usual way (see below) such that Hk . D The construction called for in Theorem 10.2)block must have eigenvalues A2.1) we have used the fact that Ax\ = AIXI. Then there exist n — 1 additional vectors X2..k But the latter are orthonormal since they are the last n ..1 additional vectors x2.. Xk are orthonormal). (l. I)block x"xi = 1. Hk as elementary reflectors) H\. Then [XI V 2] is unitary. Then VH = / / . (/ € k) U2 X i U2 = Xi .3 for k = 1. n ..2)block noting that x\ is orthogonal to all vectors in X2. 0 Thus... . xd = [ ~ l U = where R is upper triangular (and nonsingular since x\.. . —k U. The construction can actually be performed orthogonal frequently [x\ 2 quite easily by means of Householder (or Givens) transformations as in the proof of the Householder transformations proof following general result.1) (10.. . Thus.. . Let the unit vector x\ be denoted by [~I. HdxI.. we get 0 in the (l.k rows of the unitary matrix U. Xk H Hk.3. . . X 1 XI e E".
. . . • • .1 and UT X\ = 1 ± £1. .e. i.1. quently in applications. An). necessary compression of Xl. [25].1 ± 1.i. X n ). Let A E jRn xn (whose orthogonal matrix X e Wlxn (whose columns are orthonormal eigenvectors of A) such that of XT AX = D = diag(Al. Thus.3) spectral which is often called the spectral representation of A.3) is actually a often weighted sum of orthogonal projections P. where u ^UU [t\ 1.4. x where P.1. Further details on Householder matrices..) — xiXt = i j since xT Xi = 1.. To see that U effects the U symmetric U U = U = I. = PUM = xixf = xxixT since xj xi — 1. Theorem 10. U effects necessary compression of jci. . consulted standard numerical linear algebra can be consulted in standard numerical linear algebra texts such as [7]. [23].4 implies that a symmetric matrix A (with the obvious analogue from Theorem 10. Then there exists an AT E jRnxn have eigenvalues AI.1.nf.It can easily be checked — 2uu+ — u u T .. [23]. Let A = AT e E nxn have eigenvalues k\. so U is orthogonal. . . (onto the onedimensional eigenspaces correPi onedimensional eigenspaces sponding to the A..10. where u = ['. The real version of Theorem 10.Xn. [7].2uu+ = I . . £«] r It can checked T 2 that U is symmetric and U TU = U 2 = I. Then there exists an 10.2 for Hermitian matrices) can be written n A = XDX T = LAiXiXT. In fact.2 for Hermitian matrices) can be written from Theorem 10. 's). i=l theoretical The following pair of theorems form the theoretical foundation of the doubleFrancisdoubleFrancisQR algorithm used to compute matrix eigenvalues in a numerically stable and reliable way. Some Basic Canonical Forms 10. . An.. i=1 (10. [11].2. A in (10. A Note that Theorem 10. it is easily verified that u T u = ± 2£i and u T Xl = 1 ± '. '.+uu T .2 is worth stating separately since it is applied frequently in applications.. Some Basic Canonical Forms 97 Then the necessary Householder matrix needed for the construction of X 2 is given by Then the necessary Householder matrix needed for the construction of X^ is given by U = I . U orthogonal. where Pi = PR(x. [11].e.. £2. . XTAX = D = diag(Xi. sponding to the Ai'S).. . n A = LAiPi.2 is worth stating separately since it is applied fre10. [25]. . including the choice of sign and the complex case..4. it is easily verified that UT U = 2 ± 2'...•» '.
Let A e C"x". but if A has a complex conjugate pair of eigenvalues. where S is quasiuppertriangular. D ur In the case of A e IRn ". Theorem 10. A is normal (i. and sufficient for virtually is real if U is orthogonal) is an eigenvector. real arithmetic) to a quasiuppertriangular matrix.5 (Schur). Proof: The proof of this theorem is essentially the same as that of Theorem lO. matrix U that reduces a matrix to [real] Schur form are called Schur vectors. However. [17]). A quasiuppertriangular matrix is block upper triangular with 1 x 1 diagonal matrix. where D is diagonal. However. Its real JCF is is in RSF.6 (MurnaghanWintner).2)block AU2 is not O. The columns of a unitary [orthogonal} Schur canonical form or real Schur fonn (RSF). Canonical Forms Chapter 10.6 is called a real Schur canonical form or real Schur form (RSF). is that the first k Schur vectors span the same Ainvariant subspace as the eigenvectors corresponding to the first eigenvalues along the invariant subspace as the eigenvectors corresponding to the first k eigenvalues along the diagonal of T (or S).2 except that Proof: The proof of this theorem is essentially the same as that of Theorem 10. then complex arithmetic is clearly needed if A has a complex conjugate pair of eigenvalues. [17]). The triangular matrix T in Theorem 10. the next theorem shows that every A E IR xn is also orthogonally similar (i. so A is normal. 0 in this case (using the notation U rather than X) the (l. Proof: Suppose U is a unitary matrix such that U H AU = D. Its real JCF is h[ 1 1 1 0 0 n n Note that only the first Schur vector (and then only if the corresponding first eigenvalue Note that only the first Schur vector (and then only if the corresponding first eigenvalue is real if U is orthogonal) is an eigenvector.5 is called a Schur canonical Definition 10.2 except that in this case (using the notation U rather than X) the (l. Then there exists an orthogonal 10..9. . Let A E cnxn Then there exists a unitary matrix U such that Theorem 10. it is of interest to know when we can go further and reduce a matrix via unitary similarity to diagonal form. where T is upper triangular. complex conjugate pairs of eigenvalues. but In the case of A E R"xxn . A matrix A e c nxn is unitarily similar to a diagonal matrix if and only if A is normal (i. where S is quasiuppertriangular.7. what is true. .e. it is thus unitarily similar to an upper triangular matrix. UH AU = T. and sufficient for virtually all applications (see. Then Proof: Suppose U is a unitary matrix such that U H AU = D. it is thus unitarily similar to an upper triangular matrix. diagonal of T (or S). Then AAH = U VUHU VHU H = U DDHU H == U DH DU H == AH A so A is normal. is that the first Schur vectors span the same all applications (see. following theorem answers this question. Canonical Forms Theorem 10. then complex arithmetic is clearly needed to place such eigenValues on the diagonal of T. However.7.2)block wf AU2 is not 0.. The triangular matrix T in Theorem 10.. it is of interest to know While every matrix can be reduced to Schur form (or RSF)..5 is called a Schur canonical form or Schur form. what is true. AHA = AA H).e. the next theorem shows that every to place such eigenvalues on the diagonal of T. AH A = AAH ). for example. for example. Theorem 10. A quasiuppertriangular matrix is block upper triangular with 1 x 1 diagonal blocks corresponding to its real eigenvalues and 2x2 2 diagonal blocks corresponding to its blocks corresponding to its real eigenvalues and 2 x diagonal blocks corresponding to its complex conjugate pairs of eigenvalues. where D is diagonal. The quasiuppertriangular matrix S in Theorem 10.98 98 Chapter 10.5 (Schur).8. The columns of a unitary [orthogonal] matrix U that reduces a matrix to [real} Schur fonn are called Schur vectors. A matrix A E C"x" is unitarily similar to a diagonal matrix if and only if Theorem 10.9. The matrix s~ [ 2 0 2 5 4 0 is in RSF. The when we can go further and reduce a matrix via unitary similarity to diagonal form. real arithmetic) to a quasiuppertriangular A e Wnxn is also orthogonally similar (i. Let A E R"xxn.e. where T is upper triangular.8. The matrix 10. Then there exists a unitary matrix U such that U H AU = T.6 is called a real form or Schur fonn. The following theorem answers this question. Then there exists an orthogonal Let A e IR n ". Definition 10. While every matrix can be reduced to Schur form (or RSF).e. The quasiuppertriangular matrix S in Theorem 10. matrix U such that U AU = S.6 T T matrix U such that U AU = S. Example 10. However.
=1 But clearly n LA... Proof: Proof: Let U be a unitary matrix that diagonalizes A as in Theorem 10.n • We write A :::: 0.2.. Then T (Theorem It is then a routine exercise to show that T must. we write A > B if and only if A — B > B .5). Then 11.. negative definite if . CM j]i. U diagonalizes A 10.12. indefinite. where T is an upper triangular matrix (Theorem 10. Similarly. nonnegative definite (or positive semidefinite) if and only if XT Ax :::: 0 for all (or positive if and only if x T Ax > for all nonzero x e W.10. We write A ~ 0.A < O. 111.2. be diagonal. Furthermore. we write A :::: B if and only ifA — B>QorB — A < 0. e Theorem 10. we write A > B if and only if A . Definite Matrices 99 Conversely. A U U HA U T. Indeed. if A and B are symmetric matrices. i € n.nxn is Definition 10. We write A > 0.. where x is an arbitrary vector in en. suppose A is normal and let U be a unitary matrix such that U H AU = T.10. Similarly. Furthermore.n.A ~ O.• :::: An.12 ~ AlyH Y = AIX HX . if A and B are symmetric matrices.10. all the above definitions hold except that A e nxn Remark 10. Definite Matrices 10. Let A = AH e enxn with eigenvalues X{ :::: A2 :::: . x eC". A symmetric matrix A e Wxn 1.11.B > 0 or or Also. We write A > O. if—A 4. positive definite if and only if xTT Ax > 0 for all nonzero x G lR. this section that may be stated in the real case for simplicity. We (or negative if— A nonnegative definite. . We write A < O. Also.11. If a matrix is neither definite nor semidefinite. Then for all E en. it is said to be indefinite. positive definite if and only ifx Ax > Qfor all nonzero x E W1 We write A > O. We write A < 0. If A E C"x" is Hermitian.2. It T 0 D 10.2 10. Remark 10. B — A < 0. i En. negative positive definite. 3.B :::: 0 or B . nonzero x E lR. Then n x HAx = (U HX)H U H AU(U Hx) = yH Dy = LA. nonpositive definite (or negative semidefinite) if A is nonnegative definite.A is positive definite. this is generally true for all results in the remainder of of superscript //s Ts. let y = U H x.12. 11'/. in fact. A symmetric matrix A E lR.13. Thenfor all Let A = AH E Cnxn with eigenvalues AI > A2 > • • > An. If neither semidefinite. superscript H s replace T s. Remark 10. write A < O.=1 . and denote the components of y by v UHx. we write A > B if and only if A .2. 2.2 Definite Matrices Definite Matrices Definition 10.
A leading principal submatrix of order n — k is obtained by deleting the last k rows and columns. where M E IRb<n and k ~ ranlc(A) — ranlc(M). Theorem 10.18. Canonical Forms Chapter 10. whence Ar1ax (A A). of positive. A can be wrirren in [he/orm MT M. .. Then 111~~1~2 Let jc be an eigenvector corresponding to Xmax(AHA). 3. A principal submatrix of an nxn n matrix A is the (n — k)x(n(n — k) matrix that remains by deleting k rows and the corresponding k columns. For example. Corollary Corollary 10.100 100 Chapter 10. A can be written in the form MT M.19. so 0 An ::::: . Theorem 1O. All eigenvalues of A are positive. XHAx > 0 for all nonzero = AH E enxn E en.17).18. of all principal submatrices of 2. Let A e C"x". I Proof: E C" Proof: For all x € en we have Let x be an eigenvector corresponding to Amax (A HA). 2. Theorem 10.19.14. xfO IIxll2 I 0 Definition submatrixofan n x k) x k) Definition 10. Let A E enxn Then \\A\\2 = Ar1ax(AH A). from which the theorem follows. 3. Then ^pjp2 = ^^(A" HA).l3 provides upper (AO and lower (An) bounds for (A.17).17. The ratio ^^ x for A = AH <=enxn and nonzero x jc een isis calledthe = AH E Cnxn and nonzero E C" called the x of x. form MT E ~n xn E ~n xn definite if and only if Theorem 10. Theorem 10. determinant the determinant of the 2x2 2 leading submatrix is also 0 (cf. The determinant of the 1x1 1 leading submatrix is 0 and 1. ::::: AI.16. consider the matrix A — [0 _l~]. Not@th!ltthl!dl!termin!lntl:ofnllprincip!ll eubmatrioes muet bQ nonnogativo in Theorem 10. where M 6 R ix " and k > rank(A) "" rank(M).. not just those of the leading principal submatrices.. The determinants of all leading principal submatrices of A are positive. The determinants of all principal submatrices of A are nonnegative.w) x HAx > the Rayleigh quotient. Note that the determinants of all principal "ubm!ltriC[!!l mu"t bB nonnBgmivB R. All eigenvalues of A are positive. 0 D Remark XHHAx Remark 10.15. the . where M e R"x" is nonsingular. All eigenvalues of A are nonnegative. A can be written in the form MT M.1. If A = AH e C"x" is positive definite. 2. Canonical Forms and and n LAillJilZ::: i=l AnyHy = An xHx . The determinant of the I x leading submatrix is 0 and consider the matrix A = [~ 2x 0 (cf. However.18. Theorem 10. Then IIAII2 = ^m(AH A}.I. A symmetric matrix A € R"x" is nonnegative definite if and only if any of following equivalent of the following three equivalent conditions hold: 1.13 provides (A 1) Rayleigh quotient of jc. 3. x E C".1. All eigenvalues of A are nonnegaTive. of obtained and E ~nxn positive definite if and only if any of the Theorem 10.@mllrk 10.soO < X n < ••• < A. whence IIAxll2 ! H IIAliz = max . A symmetric matrix A e E" x" is positive definite if and only if any of the following equivalent following three equivalent conditions hold: determinants of principal 1.= Amax{A A). Remark 10.
[16. for example. Then A has unique nonnegative Theorem 10.18. Definite Matrices 101 101 principal submatrix consisting of the (2. 1f A :::: Band M E Rnxm.20. That is. then MT AM > MT TBM. . nxn Theorem 10. matrices (both symmetric and nonsymmetric) have infinitely many square roots.3 is not unique. with positive diagonal elements such that positive Proof: The proof is by induction. negative and is nonpositive definite.20. In general.23. Its proof is straightforward from basic definitions.3 is not unique.17 is available and is known as the Cholesky factorization. if A E lR. E <C Theorem 10. 0 Recall that A :::: B if the matrix A . p.17 is available and is A stronger form of the third characterization in Theorem 10. if then M can be then M can be [1 0].22.2.10. It is stated and proved below for the more general Hermitian case. assume the result is true for matrices of order n . p. A e R"x be nonnegative definite. Remark 10. in fact. in fact. Theorem 10. For example. The factor M in Theorem 10. SA = AS and rankS = rank A (and hence S is positive = AS S S. Ll E C1""1^""^ and . Definite Matrices 10. BM.. The case = is trivially true.22. If >BandMe jRnxm. = LLH. [16. Hermitian case. concerns the notion of the "square root" of a matrix. B e Rnxn be symmetric. Its proof is straightforward from theorem is useful in "comparing" symmetric matrices.is a square root.23. The following Recall that A > B if the matrix A — B is nonnegative definite. Let A E lR..nxn"be nonnegative definite. 2. rankS = rankA definite definite if positive definite). 10rm [COSO _ Sino] . MT AM> M. For example. basic definitions. A stronger form of the third characterization in Theorem 10. For example. Then A has aaunique nonnegative definite square root S. Moreover.1 so that B By our induction hypothesis. In general. [ fz ti o o l [~ 0] ~ 0 v'3 .B is nonnegative definite.. It concerns the notion of the "square root" of a matrix.21. if Remark 10. If A > B and M e Rm . if € E" xn we say that e jRn x that S E R nxn"isisa asquare root of AA ifS2 2 =— A. any matrix S of c e s 9 the " °* ™ the form [ ssinOe _ ccosOe ] IS a square root. It is stated and proved below for the more general known as the Cholesky factorization. 1. Let A e c nxn be Hermitian unique nonsingular lower triangular matrix L nonsingular A = LLH. and positive definite. for example.18. Let A. The case n = 1 is trivially true.2. if A = lz. Write the matrix A in Proof: The proof is by induction. The following standard theorem is stated without proof (see. The factor M in Theorem 10. Theorem 10. then MT AM :::: MTTBM.2) element is. assume the result is true for matrices of order — 1 so that B may be written as B = L\L^.nxn . If A> Band E jR~xm. definite if A is positive definite). j proof (see. That is. E jRnxn MT AM > M BM. Then there exists a positive definite.2) element is. matrices (both symmetric and square root of if S A. The following theorem is useful in "comparing" symmetric matrices. For example. negative and A is nonpositive principal submatrix consisting of the (2. Write the matrix A in the form the form By our induction hypothesis. if = /2. nxm 2. where L\ e c(nl)x(nl) is nonsingular and lower triangular as = L1Lf. standard theorem stated 181]).we say 181]). any matrix of nonsymmetric) have infinitely many square roots.
However. Substituting in the involving we find 2 a2 = ann . suppose A has an SVD of the form (5.xn. multiplication where a is positive. ann Since det(B) > 0. It remains to prove that we can write the n x n matrix A It in the form in the form ann b ] = [LJ c a 0 ] [Lf 0 c a J. .24. the SVD is relatively expensive to compute and other canonical forms exist that are intermediate between (l0. Substituting in the expression involving a.4) [7. Ch. Alternatively. for example (10.2) in its complex version. 131]. 0 Note that the greater freedom afforded by the equivalence transformation of Theorem afforded 10. p. the unitary equivunitary alence known as the SVD.4) Proof: proof Proof: A classical proof can be consulted in. of course.3 10. numerical procedures for computing such procedures an equivalence directly via. Performing the indicated matrix multiplication and equating the corresponding submatrices. see. Then E c~xn such exist e C™ x m that that PAQ=[~ ~l (l0. 2]..4) efficiently available.b H B1b (= the Schur complement of B in A). available. for example. we find by L^b.b B1b completes D 10.• Clearly we see we L I C = b and ann = c HC a 2 c is given simply by c = C. [21. of ann — b 0 root of «„„ .4) and the SVD. Choosing a be det(fi) > HB~lb completes the proof. Canonical Forms Chapter 10. Then there exist matrices P E C: xm and Q e C"nx" such E c. Let A € C™*71.24.3 Equivalence Transformations and Congruence Equivalence Transformations and Congruence Theorem 10. yields a far "simpler" canonical form (10. 5]. Two such forms are stated here. are generally unreliable. Choosing a to be the positive square ann . [4.b H B1b > O. as opposed to the more restrictive situation of a similarity transformation. Gaussian or elementary row and column operations. Then [ Sl o 0 ] [ I Uf U H ] AV = [I 0 0 ] 0 .4). However.102 102 Chapter 10. Many similar results are also (10. Canonical Forms with positive diagonal elements.lb. we see that we must have L\c = b and ann = CHc + a 2. Alternatively. [21.b HL\H L11b = ann . They are more stably computable than (lOA) and more efficiently computable than a full SVD. But know that o < det(A) = det [ ~ b ] = det(B) det(a nn _ b H B1b). we must have ann —bHB lb > 0. The numerically preferred equivalence is.131]. say.p. Ch. But we = ann — b LIH L\lb = ann — bH B~lb B A). Take P =[ S~ 'f [I ] and Q = V to complete the proof.
i. negative. Theorem 10. If In(A) = (rr. then XH AX is also Hermitian.25 (Complete Orthogonal Decomposition). 0 D x Theorem 10.27. then rank(A) = n + v.1. see. where R e €. n The signature of A is given by sig(A) = n . nxn E e X E e~xn. and zero eigenvalues.25 (Complete Orthogonal Decomposition). sig(A) = rr — v.10. Theorem 10.29.31 guarantees that rank and signature of matrix are preserved under congruence. Let A e Cnxn and X e Cnnxn. phenomena at a cost considerably less than a full SVD. If A AH e e x " then A> 0 if and only if In(A) = (n. then rank(A) rr v. Proof: For the proof.In[! 1o o o 0 0 00] 10 =(2. respectively. Then is the numbers In(A) = (rr. v. congruence. Then there exist unitary matrices U e Cmxm and V E Cnxn such that unitary matrices U E e mxm and V e e nxn such that (10. We then have the following. v. Definition 10.0). Again. if A is Hermitian.. We then have the following.30. (TT. It is of interest to ask what other properties of a matrix are preserved under congruence. where R E Crrxr is upper triangular and S e C rx( " r) is arbitrary but in general nonzero. and ~ denote the numbers of positive.31 (Sylvester's Law of Inertia). Then the inertia of A is the triple of inertia of of negative.29. When A has full column rank but is "near" a rank deficient matrix.e. .6) E e. 2. see [4] for details. Let A = AH E e nxn and let rr.27.v. and eigenvalues. v. £).1).28. It turns out that the principal property so preserved is the sign of each eigenvalue. Let A = A He ennxn and X e Cnnxn. D Theorem 10. n. Equivalence Transformations and Congruence 103 103 Theorem 10. see [4] for details. see [4]. . p.t h e n A > 0 if and only if In (A) = (n. D 0 Remark 10. It turns out that the principal property so preserved is the sign preserved under congruence. Then there exists a unitary matrix Q e e mxm and a Theorem 10.31 guarantees that rank and signature of a a matrixare preserved under Theorem 10. numbers In(A) (n. of each eigenvalue.xr is upper (or lower) triangular with positive diagonal elements. Example 10. 134]. The H.0. It is of interest to ask what other properties of a matrix are then X H AX is also Hermitian. see [4]. upper Proof: For the proof. if A is Hermitian. p. [21. Let A e C™ ". HE C xn E e~ xn. £). 0).XH AX Definition 10. The signature of is Example 10. Then there exist Theorem 10. The transformation A i> XH AX is called a congruence. i. Note that a congruence is a similarity if and only ifX is unitary. Note that congruence preserves the property of being Hermitian. Definition 10. 134].rrxr is upper (or lower) triangular with positive diagonal elements. of A. If A = A" E C nnxn.. Proof: For the proof.30. Again.26. Then H HAX). In(A) = In(X AX). v. Let A = AH e C"x" and let 7t. D Proof: For the proof. of A. [21. see [4].31 (Sylvester's Law of Inertia).28. Equivalence Transformations and Congruence 10. for example.e.3. Let A E e~xn. respectively. see.5) where R E e.26. various rank revealing QR decompositions are available that can sometimes detect such various rank revealing QR decompositions are available that can sometimes detect such phenomena at a cost considerably less than a full SVD. Note that a congruence is a similarity if and only if X is unitary. v. l. and £ denote the numbers of positive. Then there exists a unitary matrix Q E Cmxm and a permutation permutation matrix IT e en xn" such that Fl E C"x QAIT = [~ ~ l (10. When A has full column rank but is "near" a rank deficient matrix. see [4]. a congruence. Note that congruence preserves the property of being Hermitian. 0.3. v.xr E erx(nr) arbitrary general nonzero. Definition 10. Let A E C™ x ". In(A) = ln(X Proof: For the proof. for example. Let A e e~xn. Proof: For the proof. Remark 10. 0 2. In(A) 3.
Then Remark Remark 10. 1/...4 10. . 0 D Then it is easy to check that X = V VV yields the desired result.. Theorem positive.0). . 1. the number 0/0 's is (. AA+B = B. and the numberofO's is~. Define the x n matrix vv = diag(I/~. .. £). 0.33. Canonical Forms Theorem 10.32.BT A+B > 0. .. v.1 Block matrices and definiteness Theorem 10.. .BT A+B:::: o. I/. . ifand only ifeither A > 0 and D .1). .4 Rational Canonical Form Rational Canonical Form rational One final canonical form to be mentioned is the rational canonical form. An)..104 104 Chapter 10. ... I..35. the number of — 's is v. v. and D .3. 's is 7i. . Then = AT D = DT. . Xw denote the eigenvalues of A and order them such that the first TTare ~ O. . 0). where the number of X 1's is Jr. Suppose A = AT and D = DT. 1. if ifA>0.BD.BD^BT > 0.. . D > and . the number of Il's is v. . O.. for example. Suppose A = AT and D = DT. .. Proof: AI. Proof: Consider the congruence with Proof: Consider proof Theorem and proceed as in the proof of Theorem 10. and the final £ are 0.0. X e C"nxn such that XHAX = diag(l. . .fArr+I' . . 1.34... . .fArr+v. 1. . An of Jr Proof: Let AI . . where the number of E c~xn XH AX = diag(1. .. if and if either A> and D .3. Let A = AHeE cnxn with In(A) = (jt. Canonical Forms Chapter 10.. X UW desired 10... left AT D DT.BT A~l B > 0. Note the symmetric Schur complements of A (or D) in the theorem.. . I. AA+B = B.. and D ..I BT > O. I. Define the nn x n matrix U UH AV = diag(Ai. Proof: proof Proof: The proof follows by considering.2 there exists a unitary matrix V such that VHAU = diag(AI. .. or D > 0 and A . B D ] >  ° if and only if A:::: 0. By Theorem 10.. the next v are negative.33. Then there exists a matrix AH C"xn In(A) = (Jr. .1 10. .BT AI > 0.. Theorem 10.. the congruence B ] [I D ~ 0 _AI B I ° JT [ A BT ~ ][ ~ 0 D The details are straightforward and are left to the reader. . I/~. A w ). 0 D 10.
consider the companion matrix (l0. o (10.18). if its Jordan canonical form has only one block associated with each distinct eigenvalue. A matrix A e E nx " of the form (10. A is easily seen to be similar to the following matrix in upper Hessenberg form: in upper Hessenberg form: a2 al o 0 0 1 o 1 6] ao o .Then it can be shown (see [12]) that A mial is 7r(A) = A" . : ~ ! ~01]. Rational Canonical Form 105 105 Definition A matrix A e M"x" is said to be Definition 10. consider the companion matrix illustrate. the inverse of a nonsingular companion matrix is again in companion form.7) Definition 10.36. To Companion matrices also appear in the literature in several equivalent forms. Using the reverseorder This matrix is a special case of a matrix in lower Hessenberg form. Then it can be shown (see [12]) that A is similar to a matrix of the form is similar to a matrix of the form o o o o 0 o o o (10. equivalently.. To illustrate.18). is said to be in cornpanion form. A matrix A E lRnxn of the form (10. A matrix A E lRn Xn is said to be nonderogatory ifits minimal polynomial if its minimal polynomial and characteristic polynomial are the same or. Using the reverseorder identity similarity P given by (9.8) This matrix is a special case of a matrix in lower Hessenberg form.37. For In fact.. Suppose A E lRnxn is a nonderogatory matrix and suppose its characteristic polynoSuppose A E Wxn is a nonderogatory matrix and suppose its characteristic polynon(A) An — (a0 + alA + a n _iA n ~'). l 0 0 ~ ao ~ ao _!!l (10. In fact. since a matrix is similar to its transpose (see exercise 13 in Chapter 9). Rational Canonical Form 10.4.(ao + «A + .9) Moreover. if its Jordan canonical form and characteristic polynomial are the same or.10) o 1 o 1 o o o o o o (10. + an_IAnI). the following are also companion matrices similar to the above: following are also companion matrices similar to the above: Notice that in all cases a companion matrix is nonsingular if and only if ao /= 0. Companion matrices also appear in the literature in several equivalent forms. the Moreover. the inverse of a nonsingular companion matrix is again in companion form.7) is called a companion matrix or is said to be in companion forrn. equivalently. Notice that in all cases a companion matrix is nonsingular if and only if aO i= O.10.7) is called a cornpanion rnatrix or Definition 10.37. has only one block associated with each distinct eigenvalue.11) . A is easily seen to be similar to the following matrix identity similarity P given by (9.4. since a matrix is similar to its transpose (see exercise 13 in Chapter 9). For £*Yamr\1j=» example.
form). in n general and especially as n increases. with a similar result for companion matrices of the form (10. . in matrices are known to possess many undesirable numerical properties. among which. each of whose diagonal blocks is a companion matrix. the largest and smallest singular values can also be written in the equivalent form If ao =1= 0.4aJ) .38. .caa T ca o J. it can be shown that a derogatory matrix is similar to a block diagonal matrix.10). and perhaps surprisingly. Moreover._1 and y = 1 + + a. If A E R nx " is derogatory.39. Then it is easily verified that c = l+ ara' Then it is easily verified that o o o + o o o o o o 1. then it is not similar to a companion matrix of the form (10. If a companion matrix of the form (10. Let a = a\ + a\ + • • • + a%_{ and y = 1 + «. Algorithms to reduce but unfortunately they are often very difficult to work with numerically. and perCompanion matrices have many other interesting properties. Theorem 10.. Then A in (10. see haps surprisingly. . Ifao ^ 0.4ao ' 1 2)  a? = 1 for i = 2.. Canonical Forms Chapter 10.. [12]. stable ones are nearly unstable.7).caa T = (I + aaT) I . For details. at least one eigenvalue. anIf and let e M"" \a\. a n i] and l c I+~T a. For example. and hence the pseudoinverse of a singular companion + matrix is not a companion matrix unless a = 0. a2. .1.. stable ones are nearly unstable.Q + a. if ao = 0.7).. companion matrices are known to possess many undesirable numerical properties.e. Such matrices are said to be in rational canonical form Frobenius rational canonical form (or Frobenius canonical form).. companion an arbitrary matrix to companion form are numerically unstable. associated at least one eigenvalue. i. Algorithms to reduce an arbitrary matrix to companion form are numerically unstable. However. Let a\ > a2 > ... Companion matrices appear frequently in the control and signal processing literature Companion matrices appear frequently in the control and signal processing literature but unfortunately they are often very difficult to work with numerically. Explicit formulas for all the associated right and left singular vectors can Remark 10.10). 02. Let a E JRn1 denote the vector [ai. Canonical Forms with a similar result for companion matrices of the form (10..39. + a. Then + ai + . the largest and smallest singular values can also be written in the equivalent form Remark 10. then its pseudoIf singular. Explicit formulas for all the associated right and left singular vectors can also be derived easily.Jy2 . for example. also be derived easily. Moreover. is the fact that their singular values can be found in closed form.7) is singular. 3.. Leta = ar aJ al 2_ 2 ( y + Jy 2.106 Chapter 10. a.. Let al ~ GI ~ • • ~ an be the singular values of the companion matrix Theorem 10. is the fact that their singular values can be found in closed form.38. Companion matrices have many other interesting properties. their eigenstructure is extremely ill conditioned.. I — T = T) Note that / . if ao = 1 inverse can still be computed. see [14]. among which... and so forth [14]. For example. = ~ (y .7). . matrix is not a companion matrix unless a = O. and so forth [14]. n . nonsingular ones are nearly singular. especially nonsingular ones are nearly singular. i. see.e.7). then it is not similar to a companion matrix of the form (10. has more than one Jordan block associated with If A € JRnxn derogatory.• > an be the singular values of the companion matrix A in (10. Such matrices are said to be in each of whose diagonal blocks is a companion matrix..
and when GO is small or y is large (or both). 2. Theorem 10. show that AI must also be positive definite. If this number is large.18) and the matrix U in identity in (9.18) U A E cc nxn Theorem 10. Let A = I J : ]eEC 22x2. 9. Suppose A e E"x" is positive definite. . For example. can be determined explicitly as determined explicitly y+J y 2 . say 0(10*). In the 2norm.EA(A) I'MpeA) 3. is true if n = 2.. K\ (A) (10. R> S [1 A~I] ~ O? /i 1 > 0? ~] > 0 if and only if > 0 and J 1 > 0 if and only if S > 0 and . by the theorem.(A)I for ii E!l. 6. 1. yn and singular values a\ ~ a2 > . Then p(A) is called the spectral radius of A. Prove that if A e M"x" is normal. Show that if a triangular matrix is normal.. A E en x n eigenvalues A].. . Let A € C n xn be normal with eigenvalues y1 ... Let A 7.. when solving linear equations numerical sensitivity Kp(A) = systems of equations of the form (6. then peA) = A2. EXERCISES EXERCISES 1.. For example. then Af(A) = N(A Tr ). 5. If A e jRn xn 8. Show that [ * }. Show that if A is normal. S 6 E nxn be symmetric. Show that a. Find a unitary matrix U such that [~ M CC x 2 Find a unitary matrix U such that 6. Let A G Cnx" and define p(A) = maxx€A(A) IAI.• ~ an ~ O. Let R. A E cc nxn peA) = max).38 yields some understanding of why difficult numerical Remark 10. If A E Wxn is positive definite. In the 2norm. Remark 10. Note that explicit formulas then K2(A) ~ I~I' It is not unusualfor y to be large forlarge Note that explicit formulas Koo(A) for K] (A) and Koo(A) can also be determined easily by using (l0. then K2(A) ^ T~I. Theorem 10.(A) for e n.. Show that if A is normal. If this number is large.2)..Exercises Exercises 107 Companion matrices and rational canonical forms are generally to be avoided in floatingCompanion matrices and rational canonical forms are generally to be avoided in fioatingpoint computation. then p(A) = IIAII2' Show that the converse is true if n = 2. this condition number is the ratio of largest to smallest singular values which..11). then it must be diagonal. (A) A.40. E jRnxn be symmetric.5 to find a unitary matrix Q that reduces A e C"x" to lower triangular form. Use the reverseorder identity matrix P introduced in (9. . A [ must also be positive 7. Show that a. Let R. It is easy to show that y/2/ao < K2(A) < £.40. this condition number is the ratio of largest to smallest singular precision. A E jRnxn N(A) = A/"(A ).. one measure of numerical sensitivity is KP(A) = A A ] > the socalled condition number of A with respect to inversion and with respect II ^ IIpp II A~l IIpp'me socalled condition number of A with respect to inversion and with respect to the matrix pnorm.4a5 21 a ol It is easy to show that 21~01 :::: k2(A) :::: 1:01' and when ao is small or y is large (or both).11). say O(lO k ). 3. Show that the converse radius of A. one may lose up to k digits of to the matrix Pnorm. Show that [~ R > SI. • • > on > 0. when solving linear behavior might be expected for companion matrices. (A) = IA.38 yields some understanding of why difficult numerical behavior might be expected for companion matrices. An and singular 0'1 > 0'2 ~ 4. It is not unusual for y to be large for large n. Is [ ^ A E jRnxn is definite. one may lose up to k digits of precision.
1 1. Canonical Forms [~ ~ l (b) [ 2 1. Find the inertia of the following matrices: following 10. Canonical Forms Chapter 10.j 1+ j ] 1 .108 108 10. .j 1+ j ] 2 ' (d) [ . (a) Chapter 10.
1 by setting AA =O.3) which thus also converges for all A and uniformly in t. The solution of (11.1 11.nxn is constant and does not depend on t. This is known as an initialvalue problem.n (11. The solution of (11.nxn is defined by Definition 11. which thus also converges for all A and uniformly in t.nxn. Forall A EG R" XM .Chapter 11 Chapter 11 Linear Differential and Linear Differential and Difference Equations Difference Equations 11.2) can be shown to converge for all A (has radius of convergence equal The series (11. Proof This follows immediately from Definition 11. = Xo In this section we study solutions of the linear homogeneous system of differential equations In this section we study solutions of the linear homogeneous system of differential equations x(t) x(to) E JR. We restrict our attention in this chapter only to the socalled timeinvariant case. The solution of (11.1. This is known as an initialvalue problem.1. It can be described conveniently in terms of the matrix exponential. 11. unique.1 Properties of the matrix exponential Properties of the matrix exponential 1.1) for t 2: to.1 11. e° = I.1.2) k=O The series (11. For all A JR. T T 109 109 . Proof: This follows immediately from Definition 11. the matrix exponential e A E Rnxn is defined by the power series power series e = A L +00 1 .1) involves the matrix (11. (e(eAf = e A e^. Definition 11. For all A e Rnxn.1) is then known always to exist and be and does not depend on t. For all A E JR. We restrict our attention in this for t > IQ.1 and linearity of the transpose. (11. Proof This follows immediately from Definition 11. the matrix exponential e A e JR.Ak. It can be described conveniently in terms of the matrix exponential.1. A) • 2.nxn. Proof: This follows immediately from Definition 11.1 Differential Equations Differential Equations = Ax(t).1) is then known always to exist and be unique.1 by setting = 0.2) can be shown to converge for all A (has radius of convergence equal to +00). k.1 and linearity of the transpose. The solution of (11. eO = I. where the matrix A E Rnxn is constant chapter only to the socalled timeinvariant case.1) involves the matrix to +(0). where the matrix A e JR.
Proof" We prove only (a). 2 2! and and while while e e tB tA = ( 1+ tB t2 2 + 2iB 2 +.e. 6.. et(A+B) =^e'Ae'B = e'Be'A and and B commute. i. = I + (t + T)A + (t + T)2 A 2 + . For all e R"x" and for all t.. Then for 6. on (t + T)*. i. For all A E JRnxn and for all t. (etA)1 = e. Then for E JRnxn t E R.A)I} = «M. all A € R"x" and for all t € lR.. Proof: We prove only (a).tA . T E JR. ForaH A E R" x " and for all t e JR.. (e'A)~l e~'A. (b) . For all A. 2! and and e e tA rA 2 = ( I + t A + t2! A 2 +.. Part (b) follows similarly.. Linear Differential and Difference Equations e(t+r)A e(t+T)A 3.A)I. (b) £. 5. Compare like powers of A in the above two equations and use the binomial theorem Compare like powers of A in the above two equations and use the binomial theorem on(t+T)k..1 } = erA. r e R. AB = B A. Proof" Note that Proof: Note that e(t+r)A = etA erA = erAe tA . ) . = e'A erA = elAe'A .110 110 Chapter 11. 4. and B commute. ) ( 1+ tA + t2!A 2 +. Part (b) follows similarly.l{e tA}} = (sI . Proof' Note that Proof: Note that et(A+B) = I t + teA + B) + (A + B)2 + .lI{(sl... Let denote the Laplace transform and £~! the inverse Laplace transform. ) ( I + T A + T2!2 A 2 +... (a) C{etA = (sIArl.e. For all e JRnxn and for all E R. Let £ denote the Laplace transform and £1 the inverse Laplace transform. {+oo = io et(sl)e tA dt since A and (sf) commute =io (+oo ef(Asl) dt .. Proof: Simply take T = t in property 3. B E R" xn and for all t E JR. ) . binomial theorem on (A B) and the commutativity of A and B. Compare like powers of t in the first equation and the second or third and use the Compare like powers of t in the first equation and the second or third and use the k binomial theorem on (A + B/ and the commutativity of A and B. Linear Differential and Difference Equations Chapter 11. Proof" Simply take T = — t in property 3. et(A+B) =etAe tB = etBe tA if and only if A all e JRnxn and all e R. (a) . AB = BA.1 {(j/A)...
Alternatively.A"I i=1 .etA . 1h(e tA ) = AetA = etA A.X i y.A)I. Notice in the proof that we have assumed. ) 3! 4! L'ltiIAIl < L'lt1lA21111e (1 + + (~t IIAII2 + . ) etA I < MIIA21111e  L'lt (L'lt)2 + IIAII + IIAI12 + . If this is not the case. .H using the JCF. for convenience.H dt assuming A is diagonalizable ..A) ~' is called the resolvent of A and is defined for all s not in A (A)...Ae II = I L'lt (M)2 + ~ A 2 +... Differential Equations 111 111 = {+oo 10 n t 1 e(AiS)t x. Differential Equations 11.=1 m Xiet(Jisl)y. the formal definition d dt _(/A) = lim ~t+O e(t+M)A _ etA L'lt can be employed as follows.. it can be differentiated termbyterm from which the result follows immediately.Ae tA tA tA I I e tA .y.H = '"' assuming Re s > Re Ai for i E !! = (sI . A 2etA + .. e'A Proof: Since the series (11.Ae tA etA) ..y. = (sl A).. The matrix (s I .AetAil Ae tA I ~t (e~tAetA I (M A I ~t (e~tA . All succeeding steps in the proof then follow in straightforward way. s . Notice in the proof that we have assumed.u .l)e . that A is diagonalizable. ) = L'lt IIA 21111e tA IIe~tIIAII.=1 = ~[fo+oo e(AiS)t dt]x. that A is diagonalizable. A2 + (~~)2 A tA II tA Il 1 (_ 2! + .1.3) is uniformly convergent.. ) = I ( Ae + = tA ~. . For all A E JRnxn and for all E JR.. the scalar dyadic decomposition can be replaced by If this is not the case. For any consistent matrix norm.. £(e'A) 7. using the JCF.. the scalar dyadic decomposition can be replaced by et(Asl) =L . .H L.. for convenience. it can be differentiated termbyProof: Since the series (11.Ae tA I = III (etAe~tA L'lt = = /A) . ) 3 II I ( ~. employed I e(t+~t)AAt.1 The matrix (s I — A) I is called the resolvent of A and is defined for all s not in A (A)..All succeeding steps in the proof then follow in aastraightforward way.11...1.3) is uniformly convergent. For all A e R"x" and for all t e R....
B E Wnxm and let the vectorvalued function u be given Let A e IR nxn .4.6). A similar proof yields the limit e'A A. x(to) = Xo E IR n (11. The solution ofthe linear homogeneous initialvalue problem Let A e Rnxn. D 11.i~t()Oc() nnd uniqu()Oc:s:s theorem for *('o)} = <?(f°~fo)/1.4). t) dx = l af(x t) ' dx pet) at (t) q + dq(t) dp(t) f(q(t). Thus.7) Proof: Differentiate (11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations Chapter 11. x(to) = Xo E IRn (11.t goes to O. (11. Also. Also. The proof above simply verifies the variation of parameters formula by direct differentiation. Then the solution of the linear inhomogeneous initialvalue problem and. by the fundamental existence and uniqueness theorem for ordinary differential equations. D Ir: Remark 11. 11. (11.5) is the solution of (11.1.4.5) Proof: Differentiate (11. (11.2 Homogeneous linear differential equations Homogeneous equations x(t) Theorem 11. (11. fact that A commutes with any polynomial of A of finite degree and hence with etA.. 0 ordinary differential equations.7) is the solution of (11. say.7) and again use property 7 of the matrix exponential. Thus. or one can use the limit exists and equals Ae t A A similar proof yields the limit et A A.6) for t ::: to is given by the variation of parameters formula for t > IQ is given by the variation of parameters formula x(t) = e(tto)A xo + t e(ts)A Bu(s) ds.tA to get as follows. The proof above simply verifies the variation of parameters formula by Remark 11. Then the solution of the linear inhomogeneous initialvalue problem x(t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t). continuous. the righthand side above clearly goes to 0 as t:. say. lo t (11.5) and use property 7 of the matrix exponential to get x t ) = Ae(tto)A xo fundamental Ae(t~to)Axo = Ax(t).8) .Ax = Bu by e. Let A E IR n xn.f(p(t).3. Ae(ts)A Bu(s) to get x(t) = Ae{'to)A Xo + Bu(t) = Ax(t) = x(to e(totolA Xo + = Xo fundilm()ntill ()lI. Let A E Rnxn . x(to) = e(toto)A Xo = XQ so. 0 uniqueness theorem for ordinary differential equations. The formula can be derived by means of an integrating factor "trick" as follows. the righthand side above clearly goes to 0 as At goes to 0.5) and use property 7 of the matrix exponential to get x ((t) = Proof: Differentiate (11.5) is the solution of (11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations For fixed t. B e IR xm and let the vectorvalued function u be given Theorem and.¥o + 0 = XQ so.3 Inhomogeneous linear differential equations Inhomogeneous equations Theorem 11. t ) . the For fixed t.7) and again use property 7 of the matrix exponential. or one can use the fact that A commutes with any polynomial of A of finite degree and hence with e'A. the limit exists and equals Ae'A •. The general Proof: Differentiate (11. The formula can be derived by means of an integrating factor "trick" direct differentiation. Premultiply the equation x .6). t ) .4).7) is the solution of (1l.112 112 Chapter 11.dt dt is used to get x ( t ) = Ae(tto)Ax0 + f'o Ae('s)ABu(s) ds + Bu(t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t). The solution of the linear homogeneous initialvalue problem = Ax(l). Premultiply the equation x — Ax = Bu by e~ to get (11. by the fundamental existence and x(t0) — e(fo~t°')AXQ — Xo uniqueness theorem for ordinary differential equations.1.4) for t ::: to is given by (11. The general formula formula d dt l q (t) pet) f(x. continuous.2..
Let A. t exponential.1. The initialvalue problem (11.nxn. t]: Now integrate (11. punov differential equation. B e R m x m . problem problem X(t) = AX(t) + X(t)B. and the proof is essentially the same. The of nrohlcm problem X(t) = AX(t). etAx(t) .11) is known as a Sylvester Sylvester differential equation.7. Then the matrix initialvalue E jRmxm. C e IR" ".12). X(O) =C (11. and hence t d esAx(s) ds = to ds 1t to eSABu(s) ds.4 Linear matrix differential equations Linear matrix differential equations Matrixvalued initialvalue problems also occur frequently.1. the Theorem 11. The fact that X((t) satisfies the initial condition is trivial. E ]R.sA Bu(s) ds x(t) = e(ttolA xo + lto t e(ts)A Bu(s) ds. Then the matrix initialvalue problem X(t) = AX(t) + X(t)AT.6.11) X(t) = etACe = e ratB has the solution X ( t ) — atACe tB .9) for t ::: to is given by for t > to is given by X(t) = e(tto)Ac. we can have coefficient matrices on both the right and left. X(O) = C (11. e jRnxn.etoAx(to) = lto t e.1. the following theorem is stated with initial time to = 0. 11. Corollary 11.10) coefficient In the matrix case.. Theorem 11. Theorem 11. Differential Equations [to. For convenience. (11.2. following to = O.7.12) X(t) = etACetAT has the solution X(t} = etACetAT. t]: 113 1 Thus. The first is an obvious generalization of Theorem 11.1. . differential equation. and C e Rnxm. X(to) =C E jRnxn (11.4 11. Differential Equations 11. The solution of the matrix linear homogeneous initialvalue e jRnxn. E ]R. the When C is symmetric in (11. X t) X 0 D Corollary 11.6.nxm. and the proof is essentially the same.11. Theorem 11. Let A E Wlxn. X((t) is symmetric and (11. Let A E Rnxn. the Proof: Differentiate etACe tB property Proof: Differentiate etACetB with respect to t and use property 7 of the matrix exponential.8) over the interval [to.2.12) is known as a LyaX t) punov differential equation.5.
e'J. are called the modal directions. Then the solution x(t) of (11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations Chapter 11. ~ 1=1 I t. The decomposition above expresses the solution x (t) as a weighted sum of its directions. Linear Differential and Difference Equations 11.1 . the rest of this subsection is easily generalized by using the JCF and the decomposition H A — ^ Xf Ji YiH as discussed in Chapter 9). for convenience. for convenience.li y t as discussed in Chapter 9). if A is diagonalizable in geneml.y.iUtO)Xiyr) Xo 1=1 n = L(YiHxoeAi(ttO»Xi.1. ~ 11.4) can be written x(t) = e(tto)A Xo E jRnxn E Wxn = (ti.5 11. Then the solution x(t) of (11. Then Then etA = etXJX1 = XetJX. in the inhomogeneous case we can write t e(ts)A Bu(s) ds i~ = t i=1 (it eAiUS)YiH Bu(s) dS) Xi.1.4) can be written A = L X. the rest of this subsection is easily generalized by using the JCF and the decomposition able.5 Modal decompositions Let A and suppose. where J is a JCF for A. where J is a JCF for A. Let A E jRnxn and suppose X e jR~xn is such that XI AX = J. Similarly. Then Then i=1 n = L(aieAiUtO»Xi. that it is diagonalizable (if A is not diagonalizLet A and suppose.114 114 Chapter 11.6 Computation of the matrix exponential Computation exponential JCF method JCF method Let A e R"x" and suppose X E Rnxn is such that X"1 AX = J. This modal decomposition can be expressed in a different looking but identical form This modal decomposition can be expressed in a different looking but identical form n if we write the initial condition Xo as a weighted sum of the right eigenvectors if we write the initial condition XQ as a weighted sum of the right eigenvectors Xo = L ai Xi.1 n Le A• X'YiH . i=1 The ki s are called the modal velocities and the right eigenvectors Xi are called the modal The Ai s are called the modal velocities and the right eigenvectors *.x. In the last equality we have used the fact that YiHXj = flij. The decomposition above expresses the solution x(t) as a weighted sum of its modal velocities and directions. modal velocities and directions. in the inhomogeneous case we can write Similarly. that it is diagonalizable (if A is not diagonalizable. i=1 In the last equality we have used the fact that yf*Xj = Sfj.H .
or grade) p if if matrix M e jRnxn is nilpotent of degree (or index. ext}.8. of In the more general case. (1. real version of the above can be worked out. AI e I. the problem clearly reduces simply to the computation of problem clearly reduces the exponential of a Jordan block. . O. and N kforth. Differential Equations 115 If A is diagonalizable. let .. is complex. Finally. eAt teAt eAt o 2I e 12 At IkI At e (kI)! 0 ell.0.eAt). degree k. But e tN is almost as easy since N The diagonal part is easy: e e = diag(e '.11. elN is is nilpotent of degree k.. k) element and has O's everywhere else. the series expansion of e'N is finite... i. ••• . and so forth. aareal version of the above can be worked out. or grade) MP = 0. t2 t k. l's For the matrix N defined above. e'u e l N tu x lH = diag(e At . Nk~lI has a 1 in its (1. teAl eAt = 0 0 0 2I e 12 At teAl 0 eAt In the case when A is complex. nilpotent Definition 11. e lN finite. Thus.e. its first superdiagonal (and O's elsewhere). while MPI t=. A matrix M E M nx " is nilpotent of degree (or index. e ttJi = eO.!etN by property 4 of the matrix exponential. Thus. o A o o A Clearly A/ and N commute.7. it is then easy to compute etA via the formula etA = XetJ XI' Xe tl X If is etA etA tj since et I is simply a diagonal matrix.. A. + N k2! (k . To be specific. it is easy to check that while N has 1's along only its first superdiagonal (and O's elsewhere). Differential Equations 11. N has 1's along only its second superdiagonal.1... k) O's k k N = 0.1.I)! I o t 1 o Thus.I e IN =I+tN+N 2 + .EeCkxk be aaJordan block of the form Ji <Ckxk be Jordan block of the form A Ji = 1 o o o =U+N. Mp~l ^ O. Mp = 0. N22 has l's along only its second superdiagonal.
2a2 = te. (A. Define the Ai nr=1 n where ao.a l +a2 = e==> at . in fact. k = 0. where t is a fixed scalar.116 Chapter 11. They are. the superscript (k) denotes the fcth derivative with respect to A.nxn and /(A) = etx.t . Let A = [~ o ~01~ ] t .10. compute f(A) = etA.s known.. Then jr(A.t • g'(1) = f'(1) g"(I) = 1"(1) ..2t e.. The motivation for this method is the CayleyHamilton Theorem. so m = 1 and n{ = 3. .1.Ai t'. ==> 2a2 = t 2 e. . Theorem 9..2.9. all the Ak — expressed k 1.I. lowerorder g Example 11. .10. . ani solution of the n equations: g(k)(Ai) = f(k)(Ai). I. The polynomial g gives the appropriate linear combination. which says that all powers of A greater than A n .. g(I) = f(1) ==> ao . the unique OTQ. I.1 in the power series for et A can be written in terms of these greater n— e' A lowerorder powers as well. Let A = [ ~_\ J].9. Then A(A) = {2. The motivation for this method is known.s are given by g(A) — ao aiS a\X o^A. functions.s are distinct. i Em. n . anl are n constants that are to be determined. Thus. Suppose the characteristic polynomial of A can be written as n(A)) = Yi?=i (A . f(A) n(A) etK. ni . terms of order greater than n . . . . t fixed Given A € E. the function g is known and /(A) = g(A). . + I) 3 . so m = 1 and nl Let g(X) = UQ + alA + a2A2.) = (A + 1)3. a. the function g is known and f(A) = g(A). . 2} and Example 11. Linear Differential and Difference Equations Chapter 11. Let A Then A (A) = {2. Given A E jRnxn and f(A) = etA. The method is stated and illustrated for the hand calculation in smallorder problems. 2} and etA Xe tJ =[=i a = xI =[ =[ 2 1 ] exp t ] [ [ 2 0 ~ ] [ 1 1 2 1 2 ] 2 1 e~2t te. The method is stated and illustrated for the exponential function but applies equally well to other functions. . With the aiS then kth superscript (&) X.1 can be expressed as linear combinations of Ak for k = 0... — 1. . .3. and /(A) = etA. characteristic of n(X (^ ~~ ^i)"'» where the A. Here. Then the three equations for the a..2t ][ 1 ] Interpolation method Interpolation method This method is numerically unstable in finiteprecision arithmetic but is quite effective for effective hand calculation in smallorder problems. Linear Differential and Difference Equations Example 11.. compute f(A) = e'A. Let Example 11..
2t I [4 4] I 0 _ [  e.11.2t .2t .A)^ 1 } and techniques for inverse Laplace transforms.2t ) 2te. Differential Equations 11 .2t aL = + 2te. 2. Let A _* Example 11. The matrix analogue yields e A ~ functions rational eA = . 2t . Let g(A. There is an extensive literature on approximating certain nonlinear functions by rational functions. Let A = [ ~4 J] and /(A) = eO.2t _ Other methods Other methods 1.1.2t + 2te. we find ao = e. s. 1.s are given by Let g(A) ao + aLA.2t . 2.1.) = «o + ofiA. Then the defining equations for the aiS are given by 6] g(2) = f(2) ==> ao ==> al 2al = e.11. we find 117 Thus. Thus. but general nonsymbolic computational effective smallorder techniques numerically problem equivalent techniques are numerically unstable since the problem is theoretically equivalent to knowing precisely a JCE JCF. Then rr(A) = f\ + o\2 so m = and (A i 2) «i nL = 2.. Use etA = £~l{(sl .2t [ ~ o ] + te. Differential Equations Solving for the ai s. Then the defining equations for the a. f(A) = etA = g(A) = aoI + al A = (e. te.cI{(sI — A)I} is quite effective for smallorder problems. Use Pade approximation. Then 7r(X) = (A+ 2)22 so m = 11and [::::~ 4i and f(A) = ea.s. This etA = .11. we find Solving for the aiS.2t te. g'(2) = f'(2) = te Solving for the a. we find Solving for the a. t ff>\ tk TU^^ _/"i\ Example 11.
convenience.• + Vq A q. Again. Many methods are outlined in. Let A E Rnxn. This can be arranged by scaling A. Proof: The proof is almost immediate upon substitution of (11. 4. and this observation is exploited frequently.1 11. where D(A) 80I Si A H h SPA and N(A) v0I + vlA + q Explicit formulas are known for the coefficients of the numerator and Explicit formulas are known for the coefficients of the numerator and denominator polynomials of various orders.118 118 l Chapter 11. e (e( 3.13. Numerical loss of accuracy can occur in this procedure from the successive squarings. a Pad6 approximation for denominator the exponential is accurate only in a neighborhood of the origin. say..e. in the matrix case this means when  A is sufficiently small.15) . This can be arranged by scaling A.. we restrict our attention only to the socalled timeinvariant Remark 11. Then the solution of the inhomogeneous initialvalue problem (11. •• vq A . E jRnxm {udt~ is of Theorem 11. no double subscripts). [19]. where the matrix A in (11. Unfortunately.. say. and since we want to keep the formulas "clean" (i.e. The solution ofthe linear homogeneous system of difference equations equations (11. and since we consider an arbitrary "initial time" ko. Linear discretetime systems. by 22' 2* )A A multiplying it by 1/2k for sufficiently large k and using the fact that A = / { ]I //2')A )\ * . Reliable and efficient computation 4. where D(A) = 001 + olA + . modeled by systems of equations of the previous section. a Fade approximation for polynomials of various orders. Unfortunately.2.2 11.2 Difference Equations Difference Equations In this section we outline solutions of discretetime analogues of the linear differential In this section we outline solutions of discretetime analogues of the linear differential equations of the previous section. in the matrix case the exponential is accurate only in a neighborhood of the origin.14) into (11. + opAP and N(A) = vol + vIA + D~ (A)N(A). for example.. We could also consider an arbitrary "initial time" ko.14.12. [19]. Again. we have chosen ko = 0 for convenience. Many methods are outlined in.13). but since the system is timeinvariant. B e Rnxm and suppose {«*}£§ « a given sequence of mvectors. no double subscripts). where the matrix A in (11. exhibit many parallels to the continuoustime differential equation difference equations. by this means when IIAII is sufficiently small.13) for k > 0 is given by for k 2:: 0 is given by Proof: The proof is almost immediate upon substitution of (11. Then the solution of the inhomogeneous initialvalue problem mvectors.13. 11. Let A e Rnxn. we have chosen ko = 0 for want to keep the formulas "clean" (i. 0 D Remark 11.13). We could also case. of matrix functions such as e A and 10g(A) remains a fertile area for research. exhibit many parallels to the continuoustime differential equation case.13) is constant and does not depend on k. Reduce A to (real) Schur form S via the unitary similarity U and use e A 3. = P = multiplying it by 1/2* for sufficiently large k and using the fact that e = ( e j . Linear Differential and Difference Equations Chapter 11. for example.2 Inhomogeneous linear difference equations Inhomogeneous linear difference equations E jRnxn.2. Linear discretetime systems. and this observation is exploited frequently. Linear Differential and Difference Equations DI(A)N(A). modeled by systems of difference equations.. but since the system is timeinvariant.14) into (11. 11. we restrict our attention only to the socalled timeinvariant case. case. Reliable and efficient computation of matrix functions such as e A and log(A) remains a fertile area for research. The solution of the linear homogeneous system ofdifference Let A e jRn xn.1 Homogeneous linear difference equations Homogeneous linear difference equations Theorem 11.2. eS .13) is constant and does not depend on k. Reduce A to (real) Schur form S via the unitary similarity U and use eA = U e SsUH Ue U H and successive recursions up the superdiagonals of the (quasi) upper triangular matrix and successive recursions up the superdiagonals of the (quasi) upper triangular matrix e s. Numerical loss of accuracy can occur in this procedure from the successive squarings.. 11.
15). Then Ak = (XJXI)k = XJkX. sometimes useful Ak. One solution method.=1 H l If A is diagonalizable. j=O (11. +00 k=O z z = (lzIA)I = z(zI . Jk . a matrix exponential. Difference Equations 11.1 _I tA~X. the ztransform of the sequence {Ak is then given by Assuming z > max IAI.y.2.O. again mostly for smallorder probsmallorder lems.H m if A is diagonalizable.A)I. is to use ztransforms.16) Proof: The proof is again almost immediate Proof: The proof is again almost immediate upon substitution of (11. which is numerically unstable but sometimes useful for hand calculation. it is then easy to compute Ak via the formula Ak = XJkXXI Ak Ak — X Jk If diagonalizable. in general. Assume that A e M" xn and let X e jR~xn be such that XI AX = /. X~1 AX JCF for A.. by analogy with the use of Laplace transforms to compute ztransforms. 0 D 11.16) into (11.2. k:::. where J is a E jRnxn and X E R^n J. substitution of (11..2. Then JCF for A. k=O Assuming Izl > max A.3 11.16) into (11. One definition of the ztransform of a sequence is +00 Z({gk}t~) = LgkZk. the ztransform of the sequence {Ak}} is then given by AEA(A) X€A(A) k "'kk 1 12 Z({A})=L. One definition of the ztransform of a sequence {gk} is a matrix exponential.. based Methods based on the JCF are sometimes useful.3 Computation of matrix powers Computation of matrix powers It is clear that solution of linear systems of difference equations involves computation of It is clear that solution of linear systems of difference equations involves computation of k. LXi Jtyi .zA =I+A+"2 A + .15).11. Difference Equations 119 119 is given by kI xk=AkXO+LAkjIBUj.2.. since /* is simply a diagonal matrix.
2k) k( _2)k1 ] k( 2l+ (2l. let 7.• = AI and noting that AI and the nilpotent matrix Writing Ji = XI + N and noting that XI and the nilpotent matrix N commute.1(2k .2 0 0 0 0 kA k .120 Chapter 11. Let A Ak = XJkX1 = [=i 4 a [2 1 J].6 can also methods 11. y(O) = CI. real version of the above can be worked out. 1 1 1 2 1 ] Basic analogues of other methods such as those mentioned in Section 11. Then Then 1 ] [(_2)k 1 0 k(2)kk(2) 1 ] [ _ [ (_2/.6 be derived for the computation of matrix powers. it is commute. aareal version of the above can be worked out. inI)(O) = CnI' (1l. 11. see [11. A is complex. Linear Differential and Difference Equations In the general case. ) Ak. it is then straightforward to apply the binomial theorem to (AI + N)k and verify that straightforward N)k (XI verify Ak kA kI Ak k 2 (. e Cpxp be a Jordan block of the form o .15. Let A = [_J Example 11. [11. For an erudite discussion of the state of the art.1 (2 . the initialvalue problem initialvalue (11.is complex.. the problem again reduces to the computation of the power of a In the general case. Ch. . and is to be interpreted as 0 if k < q. but again no universally "best" method exists.1. the problem again reduces to the computation of the power of a To Ji E Cpxp Jordan block.)A  ( k ) AkP+I pl 0 J/ = kA k. Linear Differential and Difference Equations Chapter 11.1 Ak The symbol (: ) has the usual definition of q!(kk~q)! and is to be interpreted as 0 if k < q.15. Consider. 18]. To be specific. In the case when A.l8) . . Example 11...2) ..1.3 HigherOrder Equations HigherOrder Equations differential It is well known that a higherorder (scalar) linear differential equation can be converted to higherorder a firstorder linear system.17) with ¢J(t) a given function and n initial conditions 4>(t} y(O) = Co. The symbol ( ) has the usual definition of . for example.. but again no universally "best" method be derived for the computation of matrix powers. 0 A Writing /.3 11.(^ .1 Ak ( .
. at least for computational purposes. Xn(t) y { n ~ l ) ( t ) . = O. . C M _I] The initial conditions take the form X (0) = C = [co. a)xyT. xn(t) = Inl)(t). = Xn(t) = y(nl)(t). and. . EXERCISES EXERCISES 1..I) g(t..718P. y E lRn and let A = xyT.A) = A. v (m) denotes the mth derivative of y with respect to t.a\X2(t) . Further. be a projection. Further. Let . Then Xl (I) X2(t) = X2(t) = y(t). y € R" and let A = xyT.. Define a vector x (t) E ]Rn with Here.. .. into a linear firstorder difference equation with (vector) initial condition... Note that det(X7 — A) = An + an\Xn 1l H alA + ao. A similar procedure holds for the conversion of a higherorder difference equation A similar procedure holds for the conversion of a higherorder difference equation with n initial conditions.a)= { a t nxn p if a if a 1= 0. (11.. Let 3.. Show that etA 2. Cn \ . Show that e P ~ ! + 1. Let P E lR nxn be a projection. the companion Note that det(A! . as mentioned before. x2(t) = y ( t ) . . Then components Xl (t) yet). is often well worth avoiding. let a = xTy. let a = XT y. Suppose x.an_llnl)(t) Xnl (t) Xn(t) = y(n)(t) = aoy(t)  + ¢(t) = aOx\ (t) .. . •. aly(t) . as mentioned before. where I + get.718P. Show that e'A 1+ g ( t . Let P € R 1. However. These equations can then be rewritten as the firstorder linear system These equations can then be rewritten as the firstorder linear system 0 0 x(t) = 0 0 1 0 0 0 ao a\ x(t)+ [ 0 1 a n\ n ~(t) r. X2(t) yet). c\. 2. y(m) denotes the mth derivative of y with respect to t. .19) The initial conditions take the form ^(0) = c [CQ. where !(eat . into a linear firstorder difference equation with (vector) initial with n initial conditions."+ an_1A n~ + .. . Cl..anlXn(t) + ¢(t). Define a vector x (?) e R" with components *i(0 = y ( t ) . = X3(t) = yet). is often well worth avoiding. 3. Show that e % / + 1. Suppose x. However...19) possesses many nasty numerical properties for even moderately sized n and.Exercises 121 121 Here. a)xyT.. the companion matrix A in (11. +h a\X+ ao. .19) possesses many nasty numerical properties for even moderately sized n matrix A in (11. condition. at least for computational purposes.
must (a) Suppose E is Hamiltonian and let A. x(O) =[ ~ J. (a) Suppose H is Hamiltonian and let).. A matrix A e R 2nx2n is said to be K I AT K = . Show that ). must also be an eigenvalue of H. Let a. Let K denote the skewsymmetric matrix 0 [ In In ] 0 ' In A E jR2nx2n where /„ denotes the n x n identity matrix. Let denote the skewsymmetric matrix 4.A and to be symplectic K~l AT K .. Show that 1 /A.be an eigenvalue of S. Hamiltonian if K~1ATK = A and to be symplectic if K I ATK = A I. H (d) Suppose H is Hamiltonian. (d) Suppose 5. Find eM when A = Find etA = 8.be an eigenvalue of H. Show that E jRmxn e = [eoI A sinh 1 X ] ~I . Hamiltonian.. Show that —A. Let (a) Solve the differential equation (a) Solve the differential equation i = Ax . (b) Suppose S is symplectic and let A. Show that SI HS must be Suppose and symplectic. ft € lR and Let a.A 1 . 4. Linear Differential and Difference Equations Chapter 11. be an eigenvalue of S. also be an eigenvalue of H. Show that eH must be symplectic. must (b) Suppose S is symplectic and let). Show S~1 H S Hamiltonian.. also eigenvalue of (c) Suppose that H is Hamiltonian and S is symplectic. .122 122 Chapter 11. f3 E R and Then show that Then show that ectt _eut cos f3t sin f3t ectctrt e sin ~t cos/A J. Let 5. Show that 1/). Linear Differential and Difference where X e M'nx" is arbitrary. be an eigenvalue of H. 6. Find a general expression for Find a general expression for 7. must also be an eigenValue of S.
.e. 11. Suppose certain multinational companies have Europe (E).e.Exercises Exercises (b) Solve the differential equation (b) Solve the differential equation i 123 = Ax + b. what is the value of ZIOOO? What is the value of Zk in 2. x(O) =[ ~ l 9.e. 12. Consider the initialvalue problem i(t) = Ax(t). Consider the initialvalue problem 9. Suppose that e E"x" is skewsymmetric and let a = \\XQ\\2. and the Americas (R). 10. i.3. (b) Consider the difference equation (b) Consider the difference equation Zk+2 + 2Zk+1 + Zk = O.Yet) + 2y(t) + yet) = 0. Consider the n x n matrix initialvalue problem X(t) = AX(t) . Suppose that A E ~nxn is skewsymmetric and let ex = Ilxol12. For Europe and Asia. yeO) = 1. Each total assets of $40 trillion of which $20 trillion is in E and $20 trillion is in R. Europe (E). and a quarter goes to Asia. (a) Find the matrix M that gives (a) Find the matrix M that gives [ A] E R =M year k+1 [A] E R year k (b) Find the eigenvalues and right eigenvectors of M..e. x(O) = Xo for t ~ O. i. of Cf or all t. Show that *(OII2 = aforallf > O. The year is 2004 and there are three large "free trade zones" in the world: Asia (A). goes to Asia.11 in [24].. what is the value of ZIQOO? What is the value of Zk in general? general? .) (Exercise adapted from Problem 5. half stays home and half goes to the Americas. and a quarter year half of the Americas' money stays home. a quarter goes to Europe. and the Americas (R). Consider the n x n matrix initialvalue problem 10. Suppose certain multinational companies have total assets of $40 trillion of which $20 trillion is in E and $20 trillion is in R. . as k —»• +00 (i. (a) Find the solution of the initialvalue problem (a) Find the solution of the initialvalue problem . (c) Find the distribution of the companies' assets at year k. a quarter goes to Europe. (c) Find the distribution of the companies' assets at year k. around the time the Cubs win a World Series). (b) Find the eigenvalues and right eigenvectors of M. half stays home and half goes to the Americas. I/X(t)1/2 = ex for all t > 0. Show that the eigenvalues of the solution X t ) of this problem are the same as those Show that the eigenvalues of the solution X ((t) of this problem are the same as those of C for all?.) 12. Each year half of the Americas' money stays home. X(O) = c. The year is 2004 and there are three large "free trade zones" in the world: Asia (A). (d) Find the limiting distribution of the $40 trillion as the universe ends.YeO) = O. Show that for t > 0.3. as (d) Find the limiting distribution of the $40 trillion as the universe ends. If £0 = 1 and z\ If Zo = 1 and ZI = 2. For Europe and Asia. 11.X(t)A. k * +00 (i. around the time the Cubs win a World Series). (Exercise adapted from Problem 5..11 in [24].
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank .
characteristic hence nonreal eigenvalues must occur in complex conjugate pairs. B) with A.5) is called the characteristic polynomial of the matrix pair (A.1 The Generalized Eigenvalue/Eigenvector Problem The Generalized Eigenvalue/Eigenvector Problem Ax = 'ABx.1.) are the eigenvalues of the associated generalized eigenvalue problem. generalized eigenvalue problem. B). B). The roots ofn('A) are the eigenvalues of the associated nomial of the matrix pair (A. if x [y] is a right [left] ax [ay] for any eigenvector. e C.1 12. The standard eigenvalue problem considered in Chapter 9 obviously where A. (A. a nonzero vector y e C" is a left generalized eigenvector corresponding to an E en generalized eigenvector eigenvalue 'X if eigenvalue A if (12. such that that (12. eigenvector. Definition 12. B E enxn. B). a. A E en Definition 12. B e jRnxn. and Remark 12.'AB is singular.3.2. B e C" xn The standard eigenvalue problem considered in Chapter 9 obviously corresponds to the special case that B = I. In this chapter we consider the generalized eigenvalue problem In we the generalized eigenvalue problem where A. As with the standard eigenvalue problem. Definition 12. The polynomial 7r(A. B) with A. hence nonreal eigenvalues must occur in complex conjugate pairs. Remark 12.XB is called a matrix pencil (or pencil of the matrices A and B).1. B e enxn" if there exists a scalar 'A. . called a generalized eigenvalue. The matrix A .Chapter 12 Chapter 12 Generalized Eigenvalue Generalized Eigenvalue Problems 12. eigenvalues for the generalized eigenvalue problem occur pencil — XB problem occur where the matrix pencil A . Similarly.4. The polynomial n('A) = det(A — A.3. e e. When A. The matrix A — 'AB is called a matrix pencil (or pencil of the matrices A Definition 12. The roots ofn(X. corresponds to the special case that B = I. As with the standard eigenvalue problem.) = det(A . the characteristic polynomial is obviously real. A nonzero vector x e C" is a right generalized eigenvector of the pair generalized eigenvector of (A. B E C MX if there exists a scalar A E C. B E E" xn .2. the adjective "generalized" "generalized" standard eigenvalue [y] is usually dropped. then so is ax [ay] for any nonzero scalar a E <C.4. called a generalized eigenvalue.2) When the context is such that no confusion can arise.1) Ax = 'ABx. Definition 12.'AB) is called the characteristic polyDefinition 12. and A. 125 125 .
(3A) ±.XB) is not identically zero. It is instructive to consider the reciprocal pencil associated with the example in It reciprocal Remark 12. If det(A — AB) not regular. {3 =I. {3 =I. Associated with any matrix pencil A .XB.6. Case 4: a = 0. or infinitely many B = I. There are two eigenvalues. Case 2: a = 0.O. Note appear. f3 / 0.A. Case = ft ^ 0.O. All A E C are eigenvalues since det(A . 1 (of multiplicity 1). There are two eigenvalues.0.L = (JL = £. and ~. there may be 0.AB) and there are several cases to consider.0.LA and corresponding generalized eigenvalue problem. Case 2: = 0.a/.0.X B is a reciprocal pencil B — n././. only the case of regular pencils is considered in the remainder of this chapter. While While there are applications in system theory and control where singular pencils appear. it is said to be singular. However.LA. I). There are two eigenvalues. I and ^. {3 =I. regular. If B is singular. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems Chapter 12. (12. (3 = O. when B =I. 1 and 0.AHa . reciprocal Case of reciprocal . At least for the case of regular pencils. All A e C are eigenvalues since det(A — AB) =0.126 126 Chapter 12. pencil . f3 = O.L)({3 .L) and there are again four cases to consider. in particular. All A E C are eigenvalues since det(B . only the case of regular pencils is considered in the remainder of this chapter. with its reciprocal eigenvalue being 0 in Case 3 of the reciprocal pencil B — /.3). ft ^ O.B) == O. Case 3: Case 4: = 0. All A 6 C are eigenvalues since det(B — uA) = O.LA) == 0. 1 and O.5. then rr(A) is a polynomial nonsingular). Case 4: a = 0. If = of degree n. I and O.3) where a and (3 are scalars. Case 4: a = 0.5. n(X) Remark 12. (3 = 0./. it is apparent where the "missing" eigenvalues have "missing" gone in Cases 2 and 3. there is a second eigenvalue "at infinity" for Case 3 of of .0.XB. zero. That is to say. {3 ^ 0. For example. There are two eigenvalues. I (of multiplicity 1). Then the characteristic polynomial is ft det(A .6. and hence there are n eigenvalues associated with the pencil A . If B = I (or in general when B is nonsingular).A and corAssociated with any matrix pencil — AB is a reciprocal pencil ./. However. If del (A . B k e n. Case 1: ^ 0. eigenvalues — AB. Case Case 3: a = 0. Case 1: a =I. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems Remark 12. {3 = 0. A similar reciprocal symmetry holds for Case 2.KB always has pencil — AB .B. (3 = O.nA. Case 1: a ^ 0. There are two eigenvalues. 1 Case 3: a =I.AB. f3 = O.AB Definition 12.5. the pencil A . I multiplicity 1). ^ 0. when B is singular.LA) = (1 . 1 and 0. the pencil A — XB is said to be 12. f3 = 0. There are two eigenvalues. k E !!. A — A. Case 1: a =I. =I. There is only one eigenvalue. is singular. With A and B as in (12. det(B . Clearly the reciprocal pencil has eigenvalues responding generalized /. Note that if AA(A) n J\f(B) ^ 0. ft =I. 1 and ~. the characteristic polynomial is = (I . I1 and . suppose associated — AB. There are two eigenvalues.I. Case 2: a = 0. Note that A and/or B may still be singular. otherwise. A similar reciprocal symmetry holds for Case 2.{3 = 0. There is only one eigenvalue. the associated matrix pencil is singular (as in Case N(A) n N(B) =Isingular 4 above). There are two eigenvalues. eigenvalues associated with the pencil A .O.
ify is a left of AB. then Z~lx isa right eigenvector of QAZ—XQ B Z. Then 1.7] or [25. Since det 0 and det Z are nonzero. [7. 6. Then there exist unitary matrices Q.7]. the result follows.8. Since the latter involves a pair of matrices. E nxn with Q and nonsingular.2 Canonical Forms Canonical Forms Just as for the standard eigenvalue problem. 12. Sec. fewer than n eigenvalues. [7. Sec.AB) o if and only if (QH y ) H Q ( A –_ B ) Z = Q. which is the generally preferred method for theoretical foundation for the QZ algorithm. for example. see.AB and QAZ . the pencil A fewer than eigenvalues. where Ta and TfJ are upper triangular. the eigenvalues ofthe pencil A — XB are then the ratios of the diagonal elements of Ta to the corresponding diagonal elements of TfJ . see. There is also an analogue of the MurnaghanWintner Theorem for real matrices. the result follows easily by noting that yH(A — XB) — 0 if and only if yH (A .AQBZ) = det[Q(A . and eigenvectors under equivalence. . Sec. in fact.7. see. then QHy isa left eigenvector ofQAZ AQBZ. for example. we now deal with equivaa matrices. the result follows. with the understanding onal elements of Ta to the corresponding diagonal elements of Tp.7]. ify isa left eigenvector of A —KB. Let A. 7. see.AB). Let A. Let A. for example. However. and the first theorem deals with what happens to eigenvalues lencies rather than similarities. 7. Then 12. ifx isa right eigenvector of A—XB. this turns to the standard eigenvalue problem B~1Ax = Xx (or AB~1w = Xw).2. Again. Since det Q XB). for example.8. 2.AQBZ are the same (the two problems problems are said to be equivalent). The result follows by noting that (A AB)x = 0 if and only if Q(A AB)Z(Zl x) = The result follows by noting that (A –yB)x . Theorem 12. By Theorem 12. the The first canonical form is an analogue of Schur's Theorem and forms. B. Numerical methods that work directly on A and are discussed in standard textbooks on numerical linear algebra. Z e Cnxn such that 12. the theoretical foundation for the QZ algorithm. o. B E Cnxn Then there exist unitary matrices Q. E c nxn such that QAZ = Ta . Theorem 12. Q. There is also an analogue of the MurnaghanWintner Theorem for real matrices. However.2 12. Canonical Forms 12.7] or [25. canonical forms are available for the generalized eigenvalue problem. and det Z are nonzero. Q~H y isa lefteigenvectorofQAZ — XQBZ. [7. Canonical Forms 127 B is nonsingular. Let A. lencies rather than similarities. 3. and the first theorem deals with what happens to eigenvalues and eigenvectors under equivalence. f i always has precisely eigenvalues. Numerical methods that if B is even moderately ill conditioned with respect to inversion. canonical forms are available for the generalized Just as for the standard eigenvalue problem. c 3.7. to ifx is a Zl x is a righteigenvectorofQAZAQB Z.7. work directly on A and B are discussed in standard textbooks on numerical linear algebra. B e cnxn . where Ta and Tp are upper triangular. fl. that a zero diagonal element of TfJ corresponds to an infinite generalized eigenvalue.7]. since the generalized eigenvalue problem is then easily seen to be equivalent to the standard eigenvalue problem B. Z e Cnxn with Q and Z nonsingular. det(QAZ .AB are then the ratios of the diagBy Theorem 12. Sec. which is the generally preferred method for solving the generalized eigenvalue problem. 7. Sec.7]. this turns out to be a very poor numerical procedure for handling the generalized eigenvalue problem out to be a very poor numerical procedure for handling the generalized eigenvalue problem if is even moderately ill conditioned with respect to inversion. Sec.Oif andonly if Q(AXB)Z(Z~lx) = 0. QBZ = TfJ .12. Q. 7.l W AW). 6. If B is nonsingular. det(QAZXQBZ) = det[0(A ..7] or [25. 6.7. since the generalized eigenvalue problem is then easily seen to be equivalent eigenvalues. with the understanding that a zero diagonal element of Tp corresponds to an infinite generalized eigenvalue.AB)Z] = det gdet Zdet(A 1. 0 ( Q ~ H y)H Q(A X AB)Z = O. D The first canonical form is an analogue of Schur's Theorem and forms.7] [25. the eigenvalues of the pencil A . Sec. in fact. 6. 2. solving the generalized eigenvalue problem.l Ax Ax (or AB. the eigenvalues of the problems A — XB and QAZ — XQBZ are the same (the two 1. Proof: Proof: 1. the pencil A AAB always has precisely n . the eigenvalues of the problems A . of AAB. [7.2.XB)Z] = detQ det Z det(A .
'....AB)Q = [~ ~ ] . Z e R"xn such B E jRnxn. Then there x exist nonsingular matrices P. .XB is regular. of — XB. In this chapter. form (KCF).11. Let A. Let A. [2o I o o o 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 ~ ]> [~ 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 I 0] 0 0 0 0 (X . the 2 x 2 subpencil formed with the corresponding fonned 2 x diagonal subblock 2x2 2 diagonal subblock of T has a pair of complex conjugate eigenvalues. Then there exist orthogonal matrices Q. Let A. Q € c nxn"such that nonsingular E C" such that peA . while the full KeF in all its generality applies also to "rectangular" and singular KCF "rectangular" pencils.A. thnt that QAZ = S. mxn E C • Theorem 12. B e Rnxn.fi and canonical form nilpotent matrix of associated and N is a nilpotent matrix of Jordan blocks associated with 0 and corresponding to the infinite infinite eigenvalues of A .I. real eigenvalues. J . quasiuppertriangular. B E c nxn pencil — AB Theorem 12. QBZ = T.10.128 Chapter 12. where T is upper triangular and S is quasiuppertriangular. B e c mxn . The matrix pencil 12. L l" L~. Then there exist 12. Example 12. The first theorem pertains only to "square" regular pencils. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems Chapter 12. of eigenvalues are given as above by the ratios of diagonal elements of S to corresponding elements of T. B e Cnxn and suppose the pencil A . .9. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems Theorem 12. T. I .AB.2)2 with characteristic polynomial (A — 2)2 has a finite eigenvalue 2 of multiplicty 2 and three 2 2 infinite eigenvalues.11.12 mxm nxn mxm nxn E C nonsingular nonsingular matrices P e c and Q e c QE C such that peA . When S has a 2 x 2 diagonal block.9. . is beyond the scope of this book. A full description of the KeF.12 (Kronecker Canonical Form).. we present only statements of the basic theorems and some examples.A [~ ~ l of . E jRnxn 12.• L. Otherwise.AB)Q = diag(LII' .)"N). including analogues of principal vectors and description of of so forth. There is also an analogue of the Jordan canonical form called the Kronecker canonical fonn Kronecker form (KeF). KCF.AB where J is a Jordan canonical form corresponding to the finite eigenvalues of A A.
The second block is L\ while the third block is LI. LQ. i.— XBif S Rn.XB is regular. 0. Canonical Forms 12. are called the right minimal indices. next two correspond to correspond J = 21 0 2 [ o 0 while the nilpotent matrix N in this example is N [ ~6~]. Specifically. there is an analogous geometric concept for the eigenproblem generalized eigenproblem. The /( are called the left minimal indices while the r. both Nand J are in Jordan canonical form. Then is deflating subspace for the pencil A AB if and only if there exists M E Rkxk such that e ~kxk AS = BSM. Such a matrix is in KCF. Lo.2.5) .The next two blocks second block L\ one the block is L\. and Lk is the (k + 1) x k bidiagonal pencil bidiagonal pencil A 0 0 A Lk = 0 0 0 0 A I The Ii are called the left minimal indices while the ri are called the right minimal indices. (12. generalized eigenproblem. Lo.14. R ( S <S. n(S)) = S. while each LQ has "zero rows" and L6. Definition 12. Canonical Forms 129 where N is nilpotent. B e Wlxn and suppose the pencil A . there is a matrix characterization of deflating subspace. Then SS is aadeflating subspace for the pencil A . L6. i.12. suppose S e Rn* xk is a matrix whose columns span a kdimensional E ~nxk ^dimensional subspace S of ~n.35). Then V is a E ~nxn suppose pencil — AB deflating subspace if deflating subspace if dim(AV + BV) = dimV. and L^ is the (k + I) x k where N is nilpotent. Example 12.13. LQ . The first block of zeros actually corresponds to LQ. Lo L6 one column. 000 Just as sets of eigenvectors span Ainvariant subspaces in the case of the standard eigenvectors eigenproblem (recall Definition 9..4) eigenvalue characterization Just as in the standard eigenvalue case.e.. Consider a 13 x 12 block diagonal matrix whose diagonal blocks are A 0] I o A I .e. Let A. (12. Left Left or right minimal indices can take the value O. Lo. both N and J are in Jordan canonical form. LQ. corresponds LQ. where each LQ has "zero columns" and one row.2.
Let A=[ 4 2 C = [I 2]. The connection between system zeros and the corresponding system pencil is nonThe connection between system zeros and the corresponding system pencil is nontrivial. we which clearly has a zero at 2.15. which is clearly equivalent to If B = I.3 12. E jRnxm. If the pencil is not regular. and D € Rpxm. This is accomplished by computing a certain unitary equivalence on the system pencil that then yields a plished by computing a certain unitary equivalence on the system pencil that then yields a smaller generalized eigenvalue problem with only finite generalized eigenvalues (the finite smaller generalized eigenvalue problem with only finite generalized eigenvalues (the finite zeros).4) becomes dim(AV + V) = dimV.130 Chapter 12. see.5) becomes AS = SM as before.8. the (finite) zeros of this system are given by the (finite) complex numbers In general. D=O. Then the transfer matrix (see [26]) of this system is Then the transfer matrix (see [26)) of this system is g(5)=C(sIA)'B+D= 5 55 2 + 14 ' + 3s + 2 which clearly has a zero at —2.15. However. B] . [26]. however. This linear timeinvariant statespace model is often used in multivariable control theory. for example. and y is the vector of outputs or observables.3 Application to the Computation of System Zeros Application to the Computation of System Zeros i y Consider the linear system Consider the linear svstem = Ax + Bu. C e Rpxn.8. multioutput systems. these values are the generalized eigenvalues of the drops rank.6». (n + m) x (n + m) pencil. there AV ~ V. then (12. Ac M D "'" 5A + 14. we find the characteristic polynomial to be find the characteristic polynomial to be det [ which has a root at 2. lEthe pencil is not regular. where x(= x(t)) is called the state space model is often used in multivariable control theory. Checking the finite eigenvalues of the pencil (12.6) drops rank. see. In general. In the special case p = m. there is a concept analogous to deflating subspace called a reducing subspace. where x(= x(t)) is called the state vector. = Cx + Du E jRnxn. and E jRPxm. vector. For details. However. which has a root at —2.5) becomes AS = SM as before. the (finite) zeros of this system are given by the (finite) complex numbers where the "system pencil" z. Let Example 12. which is clearly equivalent to AV c V. Numerically. one must be well for general mUltiinput. Example 12. (12. and y is the vector of outputs or observables. where the "system pencil" (12. zeros). then (12. [26]. trivial.4) becomes dim (A V + V) = dim V.6).8. The method of finding system zeros via a generalized eigenvalue problem also works The method of finding system zeros via a generalized eigenvalue problem also works well for general multiinput. This linear with A € M n x n . is a concept analogous to deflating subspace called a reducing subspace. B € R" xm . For details. for example. (12. u is the vector of inputs or controls. we offer some insight below into the special case of a singleinput. In the special case p = m. 12. we offer some insight below into the special case of a singleinput. Numerically. Similarly. E jRPxn. u is the vector of inputs or controls. these values are the generalized eigenvalues of the (n + m) x (n m) pencil. multioutput systems.6)). however. Checking the finite eigenvalues of the pencil (12.6). Generalized Eigenvalue Problems If B = /. one must be careful first to "deflate out" the infinite zeros (infinite eigenvalues of (12. This is accomcareful first to "deflate out" the infinite zeros (infinite eigenvalues of (12. Similarly.8.
10) is equivalent Since B is positive definite it is nonsingular.9) Substituting this in (12.8) c T x +dy = O. no pole/zero cancellations). there are no "pole/zero cancellations"). b e ffi. However.9».4. of the Since B is positive definite it is nonsingular.e. we have Substituting this in (12. we have _c T (A ." is a frequently employed model of structures or vibrating systems and yields a frequently generalized eigenvalue problem ofthe form (12.10). or g ( z ) y = 0 by the definition of g. system of differential equations differential Mx+Kx=O. the problem (12.4 Symmetric Generalized Eigenvalue Problems Symmetric Generalized Eigenvalue Problems Ax = ABx A very important special case of the generalized eigenvalue problem (12.10) for A.7) (12.A)~ ! Z? + d denote the system transfer function (matrix).. Thus.10) is equivalent B.9)).zl)lby + dy = 0. B~11A is not necessarily B~ Ax = AX. .A to the standard eigenvalue problem Bl1Ax = AJC. z is a zero of g. Then there exists a nonzero solution to or or (A . Hence g(z) = 0. symmetric. C = c T E R l x n .zl)lby.l xn. A pole/zero Assuming z is not an eigenvalue of A (i. Specifically. (12. let g(.s) = c (s I — A) 1 b + d c function and assume that g(s) can be written in the form and assume that g ( s ) can be written in the form v(s) g(s) = n(s)' polynomial A.12. 12. and D = d E R. Thus. For example. relatively where n(s) is the characteristic polynomial of A.4.nxn A AT and B the B1 0. g(s) Furthermore.e. and v(s) and n(s) are relatively prime TT(S) v(s) TT(S) (i. and D e R r T(s7 . or g(z)y 0 by the definition of g. "pole/zero cancellations"). Suppose z € is such that Suppose Z E C is such that [ A . let B = b E Rn. Symmetric Generalized Eigenvalue Problems 131 131 1 singleoutput system.zI cT b ] d is singular.8). M K where M is a symmetric positive definite "mass matrix" and K is a symmetric "stiffness definite "stiffness matrix.n.8). then from (12. g.zl)x + by = 0. Now _y 1= 0 (else x = 0 from (12.4 12. 0 from (12. e ffi. Hence g(z) 0. the secondorder A..e. Symmetric Generalized Eigenvalue Problems 12. B e ffi. Now y ^ 0 (else x z i.7) we get get x = (A . B E Rnxn arises when A = A and B = BT > O. (12.. the problem (12.
1926 and 3.1926 as expected..132 132 Chapter 12. = L ~Tzi.16 is D 0 L=[~ . if A > 0.5 ] 1. of course.17. the eigenvalues of B l A are always real (and are approximately 2. generalized case A and B are Hermitian. where L is nonsingular Proof: Since B > 0.fi 1] .18. Proof: Since B > 0. B E Rnxn with A = AT and B = BT > 0.23).. are eigenvectors of the original generalized eigenvalue problem and satisfy and satisfy (Xi. (12. Then the eigenvalue problem (Theorem 10. it has a Cholesky factorization B = LLT. •. (12.. Let A = [~ .16. if A = A > 0. it has a Cholesky factorization B = LL T. The material of this section can. so the eigenvalues are positive.16.16 is Example 12. the eigenvalue problem eigenvalue problem Ax = ABx has n real eigenvalues. positive. but since realvalued matrices are commonly used in most applications. then = C T > 0. l = [i ~ J B ThenB~ A Then A B~Il = [~ ~ J B~I A approximately Nevertheless...11) can be rewritten as the equivalent problem 1 Letting C = L ~I AL ~T and z = L1 x.fi Then it is easily checked that Then it is easily checked thai c = L~lAL~T = [ 0. with corresponding eigenvectors zi.. Zn Zj = Dij. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems Example 12. with corresponding eigenSince C = C T. .5 2.12) has n real eigenvalues. Moreover. and the n corresponding right eigenvectors can be chosen to be orthogonal with respect to the inner product (x.12) has n real eigenvalues. y)BB = XT By.1926 and —3. ii € n.18. zi Then x. we have restricted our attention to that case only.11) can then be rewritten as AL J and Z = LT x.1926 whose eigenvalues are approximately 2. if orthogonal > 0. then product y) x T By.1926 in Example 12. Finally.11) can then be rewritten as = Cz = AZ.. B e jRnxn A AT and B BT > O. . where L is nonsingular (Theorem 10. Finally... so the eigenvalues are positive. Moreover. but since realvalued matrices are commonly used in most applications. Let A.12) Since C = C T the eigenproblem (12.16). then C = C T > 0. the eigenvalues are also all positive. Then the generalized A. Xj)B T T = xr BXj = (zi L ~l)(LLT)(L ~T Zj) = Dij.23). Let A Example 12. (12. be generalized easily to the case where A material of can. are eigenvectors of the original generalized eigenvalue problem Xi Zi.5 2. The Cholesky factor for the matrix B in Example 12. Then the eigenvalue problem Ax = ABx = ALL Tx (12. E !!. Example 12. if A = AT> 0. .. zn satisfying vectors Z I. and are Hermitian.5 ' 3. we have restricted our attention to that case only. the eigenproblem (12. The Cholesky factor for the matrix B in Example 12. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems Chapter 12.. Theorem 12.
e. with the complex case following in a Again.19 is very useful for reducing many statements about pairs of symmetric Theorem 12. i. B) can be simultaneously diagonalized by the same matrix. Let Q = L . there exists Q e E"x" such that QT AQ = D and QT BQ = I.e. simultaneous reduction can also be accomplished via an SVD. It turns out that in some cases a pair of matrices (A. In numerically problematic. But then D"1I :::: [(this is trivially true 10. Then diagonal.19. \ 2. This can be seen directly.5.l Q~T QT Q~ B~ AQ. so it does not preserve eigenvalues of and B Note that Q is not in general orthogonal. B E E"x" with 12. Let A = QT AQandB = QT BQ. let . Then there exists a nonsingular matrix Q such that where D is diagonal.. Also. Q D. However.12.20. Since Proof: Let T C is symmetric. Again. In fact. A1. by Theorem where D is diagonal. B e M" xn be positive definite. Then A 2: B if and only if B~ 2: AI." The following is typical.31.5. the diagonal elements of D are the eigenvalues of B 1A. To illustrate. Simultaneous Diagonalization 133 12. D > I. There are many matrices (A.. Thus. normal maRecall that many matrices can be diagonalized by a similarity.T P.1A. Let A.1AQ. A~l :::: Bl1.1 Simultaneous diagonalization via SVD Simultaneous diagonalization via SVD There are situations in which forming C L I AL T as in the proof of Theorem 12.< / (this is trivially true 0 since the two matrices are diagonal). since A > B. In particular.19 is very useful for reducing many statements about pairs of symmetric matrices to "the diagonal case. B) can be simultaneously diagonalized by the same matrix.5 Simultaneous Diagonalization Simultaneous Diagonalization Recall that many matrices can be diagonalized by a similarity. straightforward way.19 e ][~nxn A AT and B BT > O. LetA QT AQ and B QT Then/HA Q~ B. Theorem 12. when L is highly ill conditioned with respect to inversion.. i.. let such cases. Theorem 12. Then A > B if and only if Bl1 > Theorem 12." The following is typical. In particular. D since the two matrices are diagonal). e. QD~ QT < QQT. normal matrices can be diagonalized by a unitary similarity. This can be seen directly.1A). we B~ 1 A. there exists Q E lR~xn such that QT AQ = D and QT BQ = [. haveA(D) = A(B.5. Let Q = L~T P. such results and we present only a representative (but important and useful) theorem here. so it does not preserve eigenvalues of A and B individually. But then D. Let A. where D is diagonal.20. Simultaneous Diagonalization 12.e.1A = Q1l B~1QT QT AQ = Q11B. Theorem 12. Thus. Then B. B E lRnxn be positive definite. Proof: By Theorem 12.21 we have that QT AQ 2: QT BQ. i. the diagonal elements of D are the eigenvalues of B.5. Infact. Since LLT be the Cholesky factorization of and setC L I AL~T. with the complex case following in a straightforward way. Proof: Let B = LLT be the Cholesky factorization of B and set C = L~1AL T. D 2: [.19 (Simultaneous Reduction to Diagonal Form). It turns out that in some cases a pair of trices can be diagonalized by a unitary similarity. Then and and QT BQ Finally.19 is numerically problematic. we restrict our attention only to the real case.e.g. However. There are many such results and we present only a representative (but important and useful) theorem here. where D is diagonal. matrices to "the diagonal case. A I < B~ . Then there exists a nonsingular matrix Q such that A = AT and B = BT > 0. Now D > 0 by Theorem 10.. where D is diagonal. since QDQI Finally.19.21 we have that QT AQ > QT BQ. by Theorem 10. when L is highly iII conditioned with respect to inversion. individually. it does preserve the eigenvalues of A . we restrict our attention only to the real case. simultaneous reduction can also be accomplished via an SVD. since A 2: B.g.. it does preserve the eigenvalues of A — XB. In such cases. there exists an orthogonal matrix P such that P CP = D. Now D > 0 by Theorem 10. Let A. i.1 12. Also.5 12. there exists an orthogonal matrix P such that pTe p = D. we Note that Q is not in general orthogonal.31. = QQT AQQ~l = LTPPTL~IA = L~TL~1A L T P pT L 1 A L T L I A QQT AQQI 0 D = B1A. To illustrate. since QDQ~l have A(D) = A(B~1A). = pT L I(LLT)L T P = pT P = [. where D is C is symmetric.lI QT :::: Q QT.19 is There are situations in which forming C = L~1AL~T as in the proof of Theorem 12.'AB. Proof: By Theorem 12. e.
15) is called a generalized singular value problem and algorithms exist to problem generalized solve it (and hence equivalently (12. Then the matrix Q U performs the simultaneous L e 1R~ xn diagonalization. which is thus equivalent to the generalized eigenvalue problem ALBL~LBT z. products LA L ~ LBL~ see.14) can be rewritten in the form LALAx = XLBz = Letting x = LBT Z we see 02. Sec.14) rewritten the LAL~x = ALBz = A L g L ^ L g 7 z . For example. at least in real arithmetic. The SVD in (12. respectively. Further. which is thus to the generalized eigenvalue problem 02. [7. let A = LALTA and B — LBL~ us assume that both A and B are positive definite. Further. Various generalizations of the results in Remark 12. Remark 12.21 example. note that T QT AQ = U Li/(LAL~)Li/U = UTULVTVLTUTU i/ = while L2 QT BQ = U T LB1(LBL~)Li/U = UTU = I.e.13» via arithmetic operations performed only on LA LA (12.13) can be computed without explicitly forming the without Remark product indicated matrix product or the inverse by using the socalled generalized singular value decomposition (GSVD). without forming the products LALTA or LBLTB explicitly.21. The case when A is symmetric but indefinite is not so A = AT::: O.15) The problem (12. A can be written as A = PDP T. To check this. 8.13)) and LB separately. (12.. see.14) Letting x = LB z we see that (12.22.e. Then the matrix Q == LLBTu performs the simultaneous diagonal. Remark 12. for LB i. let A = LAL~ and B = LsLTB be Cholesky factorizations of A and B.3]. i. but in writing = PDDp D diagonal. Note that LB A and thus the singular values of L B 1 LA can be found from the eigenvalue problem 02. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems us assume that both A and B are positive definite.21 are possible.7. D b . example.13) where E E R£ x " isisdiagonal. This is analogous to finding the singular values of a matrix M by Sec. A straightforward. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems Chapter 12. eigenproblem MT M x Xx. respectively. operations performed directly on M rather than by forming the matrix MT M and solving performed MT forming the eigenproblem MT MX = AX. PDPT ~ ~ ~ ~ T PD(PD{ with where Disdiagonaland P is orthogonal. Compute the SVD Cholesky factorizations A B. D may have pure imaginary elements.134 134 Chapter 12... for generalizations results 12.butin writing A — PDDP T = PD(PD) with D is diagonal and P orthogonal. when A = AT > 0.
r. C. there are 2n eigenvalues for the secondorder (or A2 M + AC + K. .16) can be written as a firstorder system (with block Let XI q and X2 Then (12. If r = n (i. ::: ILr ::: 0 > ILr+ I ::: .1 12. ::: ILn· Let a>k = IILk I!. yields a polynomial of degree 2rc.16) or. seek A A2 M + AC + To get a nonzero solution /?.. are to be determined.16) Consider the secondorder system of differential equations Consider the secondorder system of differential equations q(t) E ~n E ~nxn... Suppose K = KT. for which the matrix A..e. where the nvector p and scalar A.. quadratic) eigenvalue problem A. HigherOrder Eigenvalue Problems 12. E2". we thus seek values of A.2 K are are ± jWk. by analogy with the firstorder case. p.6. where q(t} e W1 and M. Since the determinantal equation o = det(A 2 M + AC + K) = A2n + . and A special case of (12.6. (A 2 M + AC + K) p = O. KT > 0). Suppose.. C = 0.1 Conversion to firstorder form Conversion to firstorder form Let x\ = q and \i = q..6. Substituting in form q(t) = ext p. If r n (i.2M + A.6 HigherOrder Eigenvalue Problems HigherOrder Eigenvalue Problems Mq+Cq+Kq=O. . A special case of (12.2M + A.16) can be written as a firstorder system (with block companion matrix) X . 12.16) can still M secondorder generalized linear be converted to the firstorder generalized linear system converted I [ o M OJ'x = [0 K I C Jx. or if it is desired to avoid the calculation of M lI because M is too ill conditioned with respect to inversion...6 12.C + K is singular.C + K.. Suppose K has eigenvalues eigenvalues IL I ::: . K = KT ::: 0). Since the determinantal equation is singular. . .• Then the 2n eigenvalues of the secondorder eigenvalue problem A2 I /+ K Let Wk =  fjik 12 Then the 2n eigenvalues of the secondorder eigenvalue problem A. then all solutions of q + Kq = 0 are oscillatory. polynomial 2n. (12. that we try to find a solution of (12. Then (12.16) arises frequently in applications: 0. k = r + 1. the secondorder problem (12. Substituting in q(t) = eAt p. If M is singular. n. then all solutions of q K q 0 are oscillatory..16) we get (12. k = 1. since eAt :F 0. Assume for simplicity that M is nonsingular.12. = [ M1K 0 x (t) E ~2n.6. (12. ± Wk.. K e Rnxn.16) arises frequently in applications: M = I. M Mwhere x(t) €. . and = = KT. HigherOrder Eigenvalue Problems 135 12.e.16) of the p A are to be determined.
B D. Show that the generalized eigenval". (A similar result is also true for "nonsquare" pencils. F 6 Rm *" G R" x . . Let F. which can be converted to various firstorder systems of dimension kn. Suppose A € Rnxn. Let € C M X • Show that the nonzero eigenvalues of and G F are the same. G E enxn". Hint: Consider the equivalence I G][AUO F0]' B][I l [01 C (A similar result is also true for "nonsquare" pencils.) . derivative q. Some can be useful when M. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems Chapter 12. EXERCISES EXERCISES nx 1. verify Hint: An easy "trick proof is to verify that the matrices "trick proof' [Fg ~] and [~ GOF ] are similar via the similarity transformation are similar via the similarity transformation Let F E nxm G E mx ". C. C. Are the FG and GF the 3. In the parlance of control theory. the kth derivative of q.19). G e Cmxn • Are the nonzero singular values of FG and GF the same? same? wx E ]Rnxn. Some can be useful when M.. Show that the generalized eigenvalues of the pencils ues of the pencils e e [~ ~JA[~ ~J and and [ A + B~ + GC ~] _ A [~ ~] are identical for all F E E"1xn and all G E R" xmm . Similar procedures hold for the general k\horder difference equation order difference equation which can be converted to various firstorder systems of dimension kn.16) involving. properties Higherorder analogues of (12. Similar procedures hold for the general kthblock companion matrix analogue of (11. lead naturally naturally involving. to higherorder eigenvalue problems that can be converted to firstorder form using a kn x kn to higherorder eigenvalue problems that can be converted to firstorder form using aknxkn block companion matrix analogue of (11. B e lRn*m. Suppose A e Rnxn and D E lR::! xm. say.. Show that the nonzero eigenvalues of FG and GF are the same. and C e lRmxn.19). and/or K have special symmetry or skewsymmetry properties that can exploited. In the parlance of control theory.136 136 Chapter 12. andlor K Many other firstorder realizations are possible. Generalized Eigenvalue Problems Many other firstorder realizations are possible.1 2. Let F e Cnxm . such results show that zeros are invariant under state feedback or output injection. Show that the finite generalized eigenvalues of E lR " finite eigenvalues of e R™ x m the pencil [~ ~JA[~ ~J are the eigenvalues of the matrix A — BD 1 C. E Rnxm and E E 4.
Another family of simultaneous diagonalization problems arises when it is desired Another simultaneous diagonalization problems operates that the simultaneous diagonalizing transformation Q operates on matrices A. Ql = ~!UTL~. . B E e jRnxn Ql AQT ]Rnx" in such a way that Q~l AQ~T and QT BQ are simultaneously diagonal. A and B to the same diagonal matrix. A B B are positive definite with Cholesky factorizations A = L<A and B = L#Lg.2 and hence are AB E2 positive. Such QT BQ a transformation is called contragredient. (c) Show that the eigenvalues of A B are the same as those of 1. respectively. Consider the case where both A and transformation contragredient. positive. respectively. positive Cholesky = LA L ~ = L B L ~. and let U~VT be an SVD of LTBLA (a) Show that Q = LA V £ ~ 5 is a contragredient transformation that reduces both contragredient = LA V~! A and B to the same diagonal matrix.Exercises Exercises 137 137 desired 5. (b) Show that Q~l = ^~^UT LTB. and let UWT be an SVD of L~LA'.
This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank .
1) amnB Obviously. Then the Kronecker product (or tensor Then the Kronecker product (or tensor product) of A and B is defined as the matrix product) of A and B is defined as the matrix allB A@B= [ : amlB alnB ] : E lRmpxnq. Then 0 b ll b12 B @/z = l b" b~l 139 0 b2 2 0 b21 0 0 b12 0 b 22 l .A @ B.1. Let A E lRmxn B E R Definition 13. Then A@B =[ 3~ ~]~U J.Chapter 13 Chapter 13 Kronecker Products Kronecker Products 13. We restrict our attention in this chapter primarily to realvalued matrices.1 13. Let B be an arbitrary 2x2 matrix. Example 13. (13. Example 13.. Foranyfl E lRX(7. B e lR pxq.2. Let A e R mx ".. the same definition holds if A and B are complexvalued matrices. 4 3 4 3 4 9 4 2 6 2 6 6 6 2 2 Note that B @ A i. 2B 2B ~J. extension to the complex case only where it is not obvious.1. Forany B e!F pxq /z @ B = [~ In Replacing 12 by /„ yields a block diagonal matrix with n copies of B along the I2 diagonal with n copies of along the diagonal. Then 3.1 Definition and Examples Definition and Examples Definition 13.. pointing out the restrict our attention in this chapter primarily to realvalued matrices.2. We Obviously. / 2 <8>fl = [o ~ l\ 2. n 2. Note that B <g> A / A <g> B. 1. the same definition holds if A and B are complexvalued matrices. Let A = [~ 2 2 nand B = [. Let B be an arbitrary 2 x 2 matrix. pointing out the extension to the complex case only where it is not obvious.
n.5. E R". XIYn. Proof: Proof: Using Theorem 13.2 13. simply verify using the definitions of transpose and Kronecker verify transpose Kronecker 0 product. xmYnf E !R.. A® 13. Then 13. (13. Kronecker Products Kronecker Products The extension to arbitrary B and /„ is obvious.. Let Jt € Rm. 5.140 Chapter 13.2 Properties of the Kronecker Product Properties of the Kronecker Product (A 0 B)(C 0 D) = AC 0 BD (E ~mrxpt). X2Yl..1 ) Theorem 13. y e !R. Let E ~mxn. 4..5. D Corollary 13. 0 . If A and B are nonsingular. = 1 ® 1 = I. then A® B is symmetric. Theorem 13. simply note that (A ® B)(A 1 ® B. .2) Proof: Simply verify that Proof. Simply verify that ~[ =AC0BD. y eR". . 5 E R r x i . B e ~rxs. C E R" x ^ and D E ~sxt. mn .4.kCkPBD L~=1 amkckpBD ] 0 Theorem 13.3. If AI ® B. and D e Rsxt. Then X ® Y = [ XIY T .. B In x E ~m.3. (A ® Bl = AT ® BT. If A e R"xn and B E !R. (A ® B)I = Bare 13. XmY T]T = [XIYJ. If E ]Rn xn e Rmxm are Theorem 13. . Let A e R mx ". . Let* eR m . C e ~nxp.6. Foral! Proof' Proof: For the proof.6.3. L~=l al..m xm are symmetric. Then 13.1. For all A and B. . .3.
Theorem 13.and let BB E e IRR mxwhave e IR nxn have eigenvalues A. then A® B is normal. xp are linearly independent right eigenvectors of A corresponding AI..2. \Ju (q ::::: m).... Then A <g)B (or B 0<8> A) has rs singular values U.c. i E l!! 7 E 1· Proof: proof Proof: The basic idea of the proof is as follows: follows: (A 0 B)(x 0 z) = Ax 0 Bz =AX 0 JLZ = AJL(X 0 z). we can take p thus get the complete eigenstructure of A 0 B. q Corollary 13. . 0 Zj E€ IR mn "are linearly independent right eigenvectors of A 0 B corresponding to Ai JL 7 i e /?. xp are linearly independent right eigenvectors of A corresponding Moreover.3 since A and B are normal by Theorem 13.JLqq (q < m)...p (p < n).... Then A 0 B (or B A) has rs singular values have singular values <I :::: . elements of ~A 0 ~B and the corresponding right and left singular vectors). j e q. Lgf A E E mxn have a singular value decomposition VA ~A Theorem 13.. The 4 x 4 orthogonal e±j9 orthogonal eigenvalues e±j(i>.8. . If A E IR"xn and B eRmxm are normal.Zq are linearly independent right eigenvectors of B corresponding to JLI.j. i / E e!!. . In general. Let A G IR mx " have a singular value decomposition l/^E^Vj an^ let and /ef singular decomposition UB^B^BB e IR pxq fi E ^pxq have a singular value decomposition V B ~B VI. Ap (p ::::: and ZI. If A e IR nxn am/ B E IR mxm are normal.• :::: U rr > 0 and let B E IRfx Corollary e R™x" singular a\ > • • > a > e have singular values T\ > • • > <s > 0. A.• sin e = _ sin</> Sin</>] Then it is easily seen that A is orthogonal with eigenvalues e±jO and B is orthogonal with eigenvalues e±j</J... A0 B e±jeH</» e±jefJ </». Let A E lR.i . and let eigenvalues jJij. and zi. then . if A and fi have Jordan form .8. 0 If A and Bare diagonalizable in Theorem 13. mxm /zave Theorem 13. .3. . then Xi <8> Zj ffi. Then the mn eigenvalues of A® B are eigenvalues JL j.12. .9.. we can take p = nand q = m and n and q —m and If A and B are diagonalizable in Theorem 13... matrix A ® 5 is then also orthogonal with eigenvalues e^'^+'W and e ± ^ (6> ~^ > \ Theorem 13. if A and B have Jordan form thus get the complete eigenstructure of A <8> B. j € m."xn have singular values UI :::: .7. if x\. then A 0 B is normal. Then vI yields a singular value decomposition of A <8>B (after aasimple reordering of the diagonal yields a singular value decomposition of A 0 B (after simple reordering of the diagonal elements O/£A <8> £5 and the corresponding right and left singular vectors). :::: U rTs > 0 and ^iT\ > • • • > ffr <s Qand rank(A 0 B) = (rankA)(rankB) = rank(B 0 A) . 7 E m. TTzen ?/ze mn eigenvalues of A 0 Bare Moreover. then A <g> B is € IR nxn orthogonal and e IR m x m 15 then 0 is orthogonal.11.. . Example 13.. ••.n. 141 141 Proof: Proof: (A 0 B{ (A 0 B) = (AT 0 BT)(A 0 B) = AT A 0 BT B = AAT 0 B BT by Theorem 13. Sine] and B . L et A E xamp Ie 139 Let A = [ _eose cose andB . <I :::: ..7./u.4 by Theorem 13.. eigenvectors of A® B corresponding to A. ..• :::: TS > O. If Corollary 13.•.13.. In general. . if Xl. Properties of the Kronecker Product Theorem 13... = (A 0 B)(A 0 B)T 0 Corollary 13.12. Properties of the Kronecker Product 13.12.[Cos</> cos</>O Then It IS easl'1y seen that .2. Let A E R nx "have eigenvalues Ai.. . • • zq independent of to A .10.10.m are linearly independent right corresponding to JJL\ ... If A E E"xn is orthogonal and B E Mmxm is orthogonal.
1.. with A EEl B. E IR nxn E IR mxm. while upper triangular.13. respectively. . Let 1. Let A e Rn Xn and B e Rm xrn. A EEl B ^ B EEl A. A Schur form for A ® B can be derived similarly. denoted A © B.e. Note that. Note that. det(A ® B) = (det A)m(det Bt = det(B ® A). Then reducing A and B to real Schur form).14. is generally not quite in Jordan form and needs Note that JA® JB. eigenvalues are zero or nonzero). nxn mxm Definition 13. Example 13.I ® Ql)(A ® B)(P ® Q) = (P.e. Example 13. Kronecker Products Chapter 13. E IR E IR Kronecker Definition 13. then we get the JA and Q~] BQ following Jordanlike structure: following Jordanlike structure: (P ® Q)I(A ® B)(P ® Q) = (P. are unitary matrices that reduce A and 5. 1. to Schur (triangular) form. ~l 2 2 1 3 AfflB = (h®A)+(B®h) = 1 3 0 1 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 3 4 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 + 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 The reader is invited to compute B 0 A = (/3 ® B) + (A 0 h) and note the difference The reader is invited to compute B EEl A = (h ® B) (A <g> /2) and note the difference with A © B. pH AP = TA and QH BQ = TB (and similarly if and are orthogonal similarities PHAP = TA and QHBQ = TB (and similarly if P and Q are orthogonal similarities reducing A and B to real Schur form).142 142 Chapter 13. For example. Let A e Rn xn and B e Rrn xm.13. to Schur (triangular) form. general. Kronecker Products decompositions given by p. Let A~U Then Then 2 2 !]andB~[ . while upper triangular. in of A and B. denoted A EEl B. Then 13. Then (P ® Q)H (A ® B)(P ® Q) = (pH ® QH)(A ® B)(P ® Q) = (pH AP) ® (QH BQ) = TA ® TR .AP J B . then we get the decompositions given by P~lI AP = J A and Ql BQ = JB. is the mn mn matrix (Im ® A) + (B ® /„).14. of A and B.. Then the Kronecker sum (or tensor sum) . in general. i. 2. suppose P and Q are unitary matrices that reduce A and B. A ® B i= B © A. respectively. Tr(A ® B) = (TrA)(TrB) = Tr(B ® A).15. suppose P and Schur form for A ® B can be derived similarly. For example. respectively.1 AP) ® (Ql BQ) = JA ® JB · Note that h ® JR. Corollary 13.15. is generally not quite in Jordan form and needs further reduction (to an ultimate Jordan form that also depends on whether or not certain further reduction (to an ultimate Jordan form that also depends on whether or not certain eigenvalues are zero or nonzero). is the mn x mn matrix Urn <g> A) + (B ® In). respectively. i.
TTzen r/ze Kronecker sum A $ B eigenvalues e/genva/wes Al + fJt.. . . 0 If A and Bare diagonalizable in Theorem 13. if XI... .16. AI + fJm. ii E E. .. Define 0 0 0 0 o o Ek = 0 o Then 1 can be written in the very compact form 1 = (4 <8>M) + (Ek ® h) = M $ E k . j e q.13.\ . eigenvectors of A® B corresponding to Ai + [ij. A2 + fJm. . respectively. . and let B E Rmx'" have e jRnxn eigenvalues A. Ap (p < and ZI. .. if A and B have Jordan form pI l B . Properties of the Kronecker Product 2.. (I} ® M) + (E^®l2) = M 0 Ek. Then J can be written in the very compact form J Theorem 13. fJq (q < m).xp are linearly independent right eigenvectors of A corresponding Moreover. if A and have Jordan form thus get the complete eigenstructure of A 0 B. . e jRmxm eigenvalues /z. zq are linearly independent eigenvectors of corresponding to fJt. Recall the real JCF M I M 143 143 0 I M I 0 o 1= 0 E jR2kx2k. . j E ra. . 0 I M 0 where M = [ where M = o M a f3 f3 a J. Properties of the Kronecker Product 13..i e n. Recall the real JCF 2. In general.16. then Zj ® Xi E€ jRmn" are linearly independent right Zj <8> Xi W1 are linearly independent right corresponding f j i ..... then decompositions given by P~1AP = lA and Q"1 BQ = JB. . we can take p = n and q = m and thus get the complete eigenstructure of A $ In general. we can take p nand q and If A and B are diagonalizable in Theorem 13.···. .. + fJj' € p. i E !!. . 7 e I!!. f^q (q ::s: ra). . Let A E E"x" have eigenvalues Ai.. . Proof: The basic idea of the proof is as follows: Proof: The basic idea of the proof is as follows: [(1m ® A) + (B ® In)](Z ® X) = (Z ® Ax) = (Z + (Bz ® X) ® Ax) + (fJZ ® X) = (A + fJ)(Z ® X).... An + fJm' Moreover. .•• .. Xp (p ::s: n).2.. .16.. if x\.2. respectively. A2 + fJt.. Zq are linearly independent right eigenvectors of B AI.. . then decompositions given JA and Qt BQ [(Q ® In)(lm ® p)rt[(lm ® A) = [(1m ® p)I(Q ® In)I][(lm ® A) = (1m ® lA) + (B ® In)][CQ ® In)(lm ® P)] + (B ® In)][(Q ® In)(/m ® + (B ® P)] = [(1m ® pI)(QI ® In)][(lm ® A) In)][CQ ® In)(/m <:9 P)] + (JB ® In) is a Jordanlike structure for A $ B. xp are linearly independent right eigenvectors of A corresponding to AI. . Then the Kronecker sum A® B = (1m (g>A) + (B ® In) has mn (Im ® A) + (B <g> /„) /za^ ran eigenvalues fJj. is a Jordanlike structure for A © B. j E fl· eigenvectors of A $ B corresponding to A. and z\.
Sylvester who studied general linear matrix equations of the form equation in honor of J.8. Lyapunov equations also to be symmetric and (13. (13. PHAP = TA that reduce to Schur and QH BQ = TB (and similarly if P and Q are orthogonal similarities reducing A and B and QHBQ = TB (and similarly if P and Q are orthogonal similarities reducing A and B to real Schur form). Then ((Q ® /„)(/« ® P)]"[(/m <8> A) + (B ® /B)][(e (g) /„)(/„. Kronecker Products Chapter 13. suppose P and are unitary A Schur form for A © B can be derived similarly. Then to real Schur fonn). it is easily seen by equating the writing (13. and C e M" xm ..3) in terms of their easily seen z'th columns that ith columns that m AXi + Xb.3 and Corollary 13. j=1 These equations can then be rewritten as the These equations can then be rewritten as the mn x mn linear system x linear system A+blll bl21 A + b 2Z 1 b2ml b 21 1 (13. The following definition is very helpful in completing the writing of (13.J..5) [ blml The coefficient matrix in (13. Again.5) as (B T 0 /„).XB.=1 A special case of (13. When C is symmetric. When does a solution exist? By writing the matrices in (13. i.4) obtained by taking B = AT. suppose P and Q are unitary fonn. arise naturally in stability theory. The first important question to ask regarding (13.144 Chapter 13.3 and Corollary 13.3) is. When does a solution exist? The first important question to ask regarding (13. [(Q ® /„)(/« ® P)] = (<2 ® P) is unitary by Theorem 13. The following definition is very helpful in completing the writing of (13.1. When symmetric. .3 13.3) is the symmetric equation AX +XAT = C (13. solution e IR xn also to be symmetric and (13.4) is known as a Lyapunov equation. respectively. .. ® P)] = (/m <8> rA) + (7* (g) /„). =C. Sylvester who studied general linear matrix equations of the fonn k LA. an "ordinary" linear system.5) clearly can be written as the Kronecker sum (Im * A) + (BT ® In).e. . the solution X E Wnx" is easily shown taking B = AT.3) is. i. pH AP = TA matrices that reduce A and B.4) is known as a Lyapunov equation.Xj. Kronecker Products A Schur fonn for A EB B can be derived similarly.3 Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations In this section we study the linear matrix equation In this section we study the linear matrix equation AX+XB=C. Again. B e Rmxm .8. This equation is now often called a Sylvester equation is now often equation in honor of 1.3) in tenns of their columns. 13.5) as an "ordinary" linear system. where [(Q <8>In)(lm ® P)] = (Q ® P) is unitary by Theorem 13.3) mxm E IRnxn E IR E IRnxm. = C. Lyapunovequations arise naturally in stability theory.5) clearly can be written as the Kronecker sum (1m 0 A) + The coefficient matrix in (13. to Schur (triangular) form. Sylvester where A e R"x".e. = AXi + l:~>j.
AX+XB=C (13.. The most (13.18. Definition 13. + IJLJ.24.8) by Theorem 13. Now integrate the differential equation X AX XB (with X(O) C) on [0. We thus have the following theorem. .. But [(Im <8>A) + (B TT ® In)] isisnonsingular ififand only ififitithas no zero eigenvalues. There exists a unique solution to (13.6) if and only if [(Im ® A) + (BT ® /„)] is nonsingular.9) Proof: Since A and B are stable. so there exists unique Proof: Since A and B are stable. +00): IHoo lim XU) .17.19..16.. and C e Rnxm. say. vec(C) = Using Definition 13.18. Assuming that. Then the (unique) solution of the Sylvester equation parts in the open left halfplane). Sylvester equations of the form (13. (real) Schur form.16.17.5) can be rewritten in the form [(1m ® A) + (B T ® In)]vec(X) = vec(C). But [(1m ® A) + (B (g) /„)] nonsingular and only has no zero eigenvalues.8)by Theorem 13. say. and ^j Theorem 13. A further enhancement to this algorithm is available in [6] whereby Gaussian elimination.17. E jRmxm. Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations 145 145 Definition 13. B E Rmxm. First A and B are reduced to commonly preferred numerical algorithm is described in [2]. (13.17.6). First A and B are reduced to (real) Schur form. A further enhancement to this algorithm is available in [6] whereby the larger of A or B is initially reduced only to upper Hessenberg rather than triangular the larger of A or B is initially reduced only to upper Hessenberg rather than triangular Schur form. They culminate in Theorem 13. From Theorem 13. Suppose further are asymptotically stable (a matrix is asymptotically stable if all its eigenvalues have real are asymptotically stable (a matrix is asymptotically stable if all its eigenvalues have real parts in the open left halfplane). Suppose further that A and B E Rn .13. Now integrate the differential equation X = AX + X B solution to (13. i.6) if and only if [(1m ® A) + (B T ® In)] is nonsingular. n :::: m. They culminate in Theorem 13. Aj(A) + A.B have no eigenvalues in common.6) directly with operations rather than the O(n 6 that would be required by solving (13. the eigenvalues of [(1m ® A) + (BT <8> /„)] are + Mj. Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations 13. Let Ci( € E.e A (A). the linear system (13. An equivalent linear system is then solved in which the triangular form equivalent linear system is then solved in which the triangular form of the reduced and can be exploited to solve successively for the columns of a suitably of the reduced A and B can be exploited to solve successively for the columns of a suitably transformed solution matrix X. Schur form. e m.X(O) = A 10 roo X(t)dt + ([+00 X(t)dt) 10 B.6).e. .10) . B e Rmxm. j j so there exists aaunique for all i. the eigenvalues of [(/m <g> A) + (BT ® In)] are Ai A.(B) ^ solution to(13. xn Theorem 13.3.1S..3) (or symmetric Lyapunov equations of the form (13.n denote the columns ofC E Rnxm so that C = [ n . and C e R" xm . . Then the (unique) solution of the Sylvester equation AX+XB=C (13.. 77ie/i Theorem 13. Theorem C E jRnxm. The next few theorems are classical. one of many elegant connections between matrix theory and stability theory for differential equations. Assuming that..3) (or symmetric Lyapunov equations of the form Sylvester equations of the form (13.3.. ofC e jRnxm [CI.4» are generally not solved using the mn x mn "vec" formulation (13. A(fi).. Let A e jRnxn. E R E jRnxm. (13. Ai E A(A). . c ]. (A)+ Aj(B) =I 00 for all i.7) has a unique solution if and only if A and . n > m. this algorithm takes only 0 (n 3) transformed solution matrix X. elegant connections between matrix theory and stability theory for differential equations. has a unique solution if and only if A and —B have no eigenvalues in common. the linear system (13. Then the Sylvester equation G jRmxm.18.and Mj Ee A(B). this algorithm takes only O(n3 ) operations rather than the O(n6)) that would be required by solving (13. The most commonly preferred numerical algorithm is described in [2].24. where From Theorem 13. where A. Cm}. c E jRn the Then vec(C) is defined to be the mnvector formed by stacking the columns ofC on top of by C ::~~::~: ::d~~:::O:[]::::fonned "ocking the colunuu of on top of one another.4)) are generally not solved using the mn x mn "vee" formulation (13. +00): (with X(0) = C) on [0. . We thus have the following theorem. j j E!!!.6) There exists a unique solution to (13. Let A e lRnxn..6) directly with Gaussian elimination.8) can be written as can be written as (13. A.5) can be rewritten in the form Using Definition 13. one of many The next few theorems are classical. E!!. ii e n_.
then . Then the (unique) solution o/the Lyapunov equation of the AX+XAT=C can be written as can be written as (13.24. Then Then ..146 146 Chapter 13.10) we have C t~+x /—<+3C = A (1+ 00 elACe lB dt) + (1+ o 00 elACe lB dt) B and so X and so X = 1o {+oo elACe lB dt satisfies (13. C E R"x". Two basic results due to Lyapunov are the following.19.13) where C = C T < O.1.. A.13) exists and takes the form (13. +00 r—>+oo t—v+oo X t ) = etACelB X t ) — O.. Kronecker Products Chapter 13.!„. Hence.. A matrix A E R"x" is asymptotically stable if and only if there exists a only if e jRnxn asymptotically if positive definite solution to the Lyapunov equation positive definite solution to the Lyapunov equation AX +XAT = C. Many useful results exist concerning the relationship between stability and Lyapunov equations. Now let v be an arbitrary nonzero vector in jRn. results = 0. Theorem Substituting in (13. Let A. An. then that solution is symmetric. Thus. X B = is that [ J _Cfi ] be similar to [~ _OB] (via the similarity [ Let Theorem 13.. By Theorems 13. symmetric and ( 13..C E R"x" and suppose further that A is asymptotically stable. . Remark 13.ATT have A —A. the first of which follows immediately from Theorem 13.23.19.8).6.AT has eigen— AT eigenvalues AI. . sufficient —A common eigenvalues A asymptotically no common eigenvalues is that A be asymptotically stable. If symmetric and (13.22.6. it can be shown easily that lim elA = lim elB = O.21 l3. using the solution X ((t) = elACe tB from Theorem 11. Theorem 13.23 a solution to (13..12) Theorem 13.An. If the matrix A E Wxn has eigenvalues A. (13. . .11) has a unique solution if and only if A and . Lef A. —kn.. v E". C e jRnxn further asymptotically stable. 1>+00 1 . . . we have that lim X ((t) = 0. where C Proof: asymptotically l3. then that solution is symmetric. .21 and 13. If C is has unique if and only if and —A T eigenvalues in common.12).. Then the Lyapunov equation e jRnxn.11) has a unique solution. TTzen r/ze AX+XAT =C (13.].A T have no eigenvalues in common.I .11) has a unique solution.. _* ]).21.23 solution Proof: Suppose A is asymptotically stable. Remark 13. If matrix A e jRn xn eigenvalues )"" . Theorem 13. An equivalent condition for the existence of a unique solution to AX + AX + Remark XB = C is that [~ _cB ] be similar to [ J _°B ](via the similarity [~J _~ ]). Kronecker Products Using the results of Section 11. a sufficient condition that guarantees that A and ...20.
Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations 13. defined. Proof: The proof follows in a fairly straightforward fashion either directly from the definiProof: The proof follows in a fairly straightforward fashion either directly from the definitions or from the fact that vec(. Since A was arbitrary. For any three matrices A. and C for which the matrix product ABC is Theorem 13. v TXv > 0 and thus X is positive definite. B. C. in which case the general solution has a if only ifAA + C B+ C. we must have A + I = 2 Re A < 0 . where Y e Rnxp is arbitrary. Application to Sylvester and Lyapunov Equations 147 147 Since — C > 0 and etA is nonsingular for all the integrand above is positive. A must be asymptotically stable. for the solution of the simple Sylvesterlike equation introduced in Theorem 6. However. the integrand above is positive. The solution of (13. most of which derive from one key result.t. e A(A) with corresponding left eigenvector y.13. and C for which the matrix product ABC is defined. suppose X = XT > 0 and let A. Conversely. in which the solution is of the form is of the form (13.14) as (B T ® A)vec(X) = vec(C) (13. the complexvalued equation H X X A = C is equivalent to However. where Y E jRnxp is arbitrary.26. e jRrnxq.yr) = <8> x. The Lyapunov equation AX X A = C can also be written using the Remark 13.14) xp E jRn has a solution X e R. Since yH Xy > 0.3. Theorem 13. Since A was arbitrary. D Remark 13.14) is unique if BB+ ® A+ A = I. vec(ABC) = (C T ® A)vec(B).27. result.14) as Proof: Write (13. Then vector y. The vec operator has many useful properties. we must have A + A = 2 R e A < O. The equivalent "vec form" of this equation is The equivalent "vec form" of this equation is [(/ ® AT) + (AT ® l)]vec(X) = + (AT ® l)]vec(X) = vec(C). most of which derive from one key The vec operator has many useful properties.15) of (13. D An immediate application is to the derivation of existence and uniqueness conditions An immediate application is to the derivation of existence and uniqueness conditions for the solution of the simple Sylvesterlike equation introduced in Theorem 6. Then the equation 13. D tions or from the fact that vec(xyT) = y ® x.3.11. For any three matrices A. B e jRPxq. 14) is unique if BB+ ® A+A = [. B E Rpx(}. B.27. e jRrnxn. D asymptotically stable. the AXB =C (13.11. The Lyapunov equation AX + XATT = C can also be written using the vec notation in the equivalent form vec notation in the equivalent form [(/ ® A) + (A ® l)]vec(X) = vec(C).26. A subtle point arises when dealing with the "dual" Lyapunov equation A T X X A A subtle point arises when dealing with the "dual" Lyapunov equation ATX + XA = C.16) . A must be Since yHXy > 0. the complexvalued equation AHX + XA = C is equivalent to [(/ ® AH) vec(C).25. and C E Rmxq. Let A E Rmxn. suppose X = XT > 0 and let A E A (A) with corresponding left eigenConversely. Hence vT Xv > 0 and thus X is positive definite.25. The Proof: Write (13. nx p if and only if A A+CB+BB = C. Hence Since C > 0 and etA is nonsingular for all t. Theorem 13. Then 0> yHCy = yH AXy + yHXAT Y = (A + I)yH Xy.
148 148
Chapter 1 3. Kronecker Products Chapter 13. Kronecker Products
by Theorem 13.26. This "vector equation" has a solution if and only if by Theorem 13.26. This "vector equation" has a solution if and only if
(B T ® A)(B T ® A)+ vec(C)
+
= vec(C).
+ +
It is a straightforward exercise to show that (M ® N) + = M+ ® N+.. Thus, (13.16) has aa It is a straightforward exercise to show that (M ® N) = M <8> N Thus, (13.16) has
solution if and only if solution if and only if vec(C)
=
(B T ® A)«B+{ ® A+)vec(C)
= [(B+ B{ ® AA+]vec(C)
= vec(AA +C B+ B)
and hence if and only if AA +CB+B = C. and hence if and only if AA+ C B+ B C. The general solution of (13 .16) is then given by The general solution of (13.16) is then given by vec(X) = (B T ® A) + vec(C)
+ [I 
(B T ® A) + (B T ® A)]vec(Y),
where Y is arbitrary. This equation can then be rewritten in the form where Y is arbitrary. This equation can then be rewritten in the form vec(X)
= «B+{
® A+)vec(C)
+ [I
 (BB+{ ® A+ A]vec(y)
or, using Theorem 13.26, or, using Theorem 13.26,
The solution is clearly unique if B B+ ® A + A ==I. The solution is clearly unique if BB+ <8> A+A I.
0 D
EXERCISES EXERCISES
I. For any two matrices A and B for which the indicated matrix product is defined, 1. For any two matrices A and B for which the indicated matrix product is defined, show that (vec(A»T(vec(fl)) = Tr(A T B). In particular, if B E Rn x n ,, then Tr(B) = show that (vec(A)) r (vec(B» = Tr(A r £). In particular, if B e lR nxn then Tr(fl) = vec(/J r vec(fl). vec(Inl vec(B). 2. Prove that for all matrices A and B, (A ® B)+ = A+ ® B+.. 2. Prove that for all matrices A and B, (A ® B)+ = A+ ® B+
3. Show that the equation AX B = C has a solution for all C if A has full row rank and 3. Show that the equation AX B = C has a solution for all C if A has full row rank and B has full column rank. Also, show that a solution, if it exists, is unique if A has full B has full column rank. Also, show that a solution, if it exists, is unique if A has full column rank and B has full row rank. What is the solution in this case? column rank and B has full row rank. What is the solution in this case? 4. Show that the general linear equation 4. Show that the general linear equation
k
LAiXBi =C
i=1
can be written in the form can be written in the form
[BT ® AI
+ ... + B[ ® Ak]vec(X) =
vec(C).
Exercises Exercises
149 149
5. Let x E ]Rm and y E E". Show that *rT ® yy==y X T T. x <8> € Mm e ]Rn. yx •
6. Let A e R" xn and £ e M m x m . (a) Show that IIA ® BII22 = IIAII2I1Blb. (a) Show that A <8> B = A2£2. (b) What is II A ® B II F in terms of the Frobenius norms of A and B? Justify your (b) What is A ® B\\F in terms of the Frobenius norms of A and B? Justify your answer carefully. answer carefully.
(c) What is the spectral radius of A ® B in terms of the spectral radii of A and B? of A <8> B in terms of the spectral radii of A and B? Justify your answer carefully. Justify your answer carefully. 7. Let A, 5 eR" x ". 7. Let A, B E ]Rnxn.
A)k = / <8> A* and (fl <g> l = B® I for all integers k. (a) Show that (l ® A)* = I ® Ak and (B ® I /)* =Bk fc ® / for all integers &. (/ l A (b) Show that el®A = I ® eeA and eB®1 7= eeB ® I./. e® <g) A and e5® = B (g)
(c) Show that the matrices I ® and (c) Show that the matrices / (8)AA andBB® I /commute. ® commute. (d) Show that (d) Show that
e AEIlB
= eU®A)+(B®l) = e B ® e A .
(Note: This result would look a little "nicer" had we defined our Kronecker (Note: This result would look a little "nicer" had we defined our Kronecker sum the other way around. However, Definition 13.14 is conventional in the 13.14 literature.)
8. Consider the Lyapunov matrix equation (13.11) with
A =
and C the symmetric matrix and C the symmetric matrix
[~ _~ ]
[~
Xs
Clearly Clearly
=
[~ ~ ]
[_~ ~
]
is a symmetric solution of the equation. Verify that is a symmetric solution of the equation. Verify that
Xns =
is also a solution and is nonsymmetric. Explain in light of Theorem 13.21. is also a solution and is nonsymmetric. Explain in light of Theorem 13.21. 9. Block Triangularization: Let 9. Block Triangularization: Let
A E ]Rn xn find similarity where A e Rnxn and D E ]Rm xm. It is desired to find a similarity transformation e Rmxm. of the form of the form
T=[~ ~J
such that T l1ST is block upper triangular. such that T ST is block upper triangular.
150 150 (a) Show that S is similar to
Chapter 13. Kronecker Products Chapter 13. Kronecker Products
[
A +OBX
B ] DXB
if X satisfies the socalled matrix Riccati equation if X satisfies the socalled matrix Riccati equation
CXA+DXXBX=O.
(b) Fonnulate a similar result for block lower triangularization of S. Formulate S.
to. Block 10. Block Diagonalization: Let
S=
[~ ~
l
where A E Rnxn and D E R m x m . It is desired to find a similarity transfonnation of e jRnxn E jRmxm. transformation of the fonn form
T=[~ ~]
such that T l1ST is block diagonal, T ST block diagonal. (a) Show that S is similar to
if Y satisfies the Sylvester equation Y
AY  YD = B.
(b) Formulate a similar result for block diagonalization of Fonnulate of
1. Press. Horn." SIAM Rev. P. and C. Analysis. Accuracy and Stability ofNumerical Algorithms. [2] Bartels.. Accuracy of'Numerical Algorithms. Solution of the Matrix Equation [2] Bartels. 1972. Cambridge Univ. Matrix Analysis.. and J. and C.F. Cambridge." Cornm.Bibliography [1] Albert. Second Edition. Princeton. Princeton. 820826.H.. [9] Greville. "Algorithm 432. 15(1972).. Van Loan. and C. AX + XB = C. Press. [11] Higham. NJ. Academic Press. [6] Golub. Van Nostrand. York. 249]. S.R. Cambridge. S. R.. UK. Cambridge. and G.. R.W. Philadelphia. [12] Hom. PA. Solution Equation AX + X B = C. Van Loan. N. New [1] York.. Second Edition." IEEE Trans.. NY. 578619... AC24(1979). and c. Johns Hopkins Univ. A. UK. Cambridge. New York. 1972. Cambridge Univ. 518–521 [Erratum. McGrawHill. Autom. Univ. SIAM.w. AX X B = C. and G. Stewart. Matrix Computations.. Second Edition. Nash. T.. Second Edition. Cambridge Univ. "IllConditioned Eigensystems and Computation ofthe Jordan Canonical Form. G. 2002. 1958. 15(1972). A. "Algorithm 432... 18(1976). Stewart. [13] Hom.R. 57–58. Press. 1970.. Control. "Note on the Generalized Inverse of the Product of Matrices. Baltimore. Regression and the MoorePenrose Pseudoinverse. SIAM 9(1967). Johns Hopkins [7] Golub... "Note on the Generalized Inverse of a Matrix Product. PA.R.578619. to Second Edition. New [3] Bellman.. UK. Matrix Computations. Johnson. NY. Wilkinson.R. NY. 249]..H. R." SIAM Rev.. Third Edition. G. [10] Halmos. PR. 909913." SIAM Rev. Univ. T. G. RA. PA. ACM. McGrawHill. York.N. Second Edition. Baltimore. [3] Bellman. Wilkinson. 6(1964). 1996. Third Edition. [4] Bjorck. Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems.5758. G. 1985. 151 151 . Philadelphia. SIAM Rev. R. Van Loan. MD. "Note on the Generalized Inverse of the Product of Matrices. Johnson.R. N.A. of the SIAM 18(1976). [9] Greville. 1996.E. Philadelphia. 9(1967).. and C.F.H. Press. G. "Note on the Generalized Inverse of a Matrix Product.820826. MD. 1991. Johnson.H. SIAM. Topics in Matrix Analysis.518521 [Erratum.E. [10] Halmos.H. R. "IllConditioned Eigensystems and the Computation [8] Golub. Introduction to Matrix Analysis. 1958. [11] Higham.J. FiniteDimensional Vector Spaces... [5] Cline. [8] Golub. Numerical Methodsfor Least Squares Problems.A. Philadelphia. Nash. [4] Bjorck. R.N. "A HessenbergSchur Method for the Problem AX + XB = C.. NY. R. Matrix Analysis. RA. SIAM. 1996. Van Loan.. 8(1966). UK. Horn.. Press." SIAM Rev. 8(1966). G." IEEE [7] Golub.H. C." Comm. NJ.. "A HessenbergSchur Method for the Problem [6] Golub.E. FiniteDimensional Vector Spaces. 2002. and C. 1991." SIAM Rev.E.H. and lH. RH.. 1996. 1970. 1985. SIAM. Van Nostrand. 6(1964). and C.H. [5] Cline. AC24(1979).
2002..B.w. W. 1(1988). NY. Second Edition. and A. Laub. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Laub. 1987. Wiley[25] D. 2000. 1973. Applications.152 152 Bibliography Bibliography [14] Kenney. 1979). Third Edition. and Systems.. G.. NJ.P. "A Schur Method for Solving Algebraic Riccati Equations. C. Tismenetsky. Van Loan. NY.. [15] Kenney. SIAM. and J.. 51(1955). New York. 1988.. Linear Algebra and Its Applications." Proc. G. P. [18] Meyer.. 361390. 1985. PA.801836. Plenum. and J. Third Edition. PrenticeHall." Math. C.. B. Control.M. and C. Autom.D.. New York.S.. [17] Laub. 1985. Theory of Second Edition with Applications. A Geometric Approach. 1988..J. PrenticeHall.. [19] Moler. Academic Press. 40(1995).W. Van Loan. G. New York. P." Proc. Systems. R. New York. [26] Wonham. [20] Noble.406413. and M.. Third Edition. Analysis Applied Linear [18] Meyer. Signals." SIAM Rev. SIAM. Linear Multivariable Control." Math. The Theory of Matrices. and AJ.S. 20(1978). Daniel. Applied Linear Englewood Cliffs.. "Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential [19] Moler. of Control. Third Edition. 406–413.361390. Second Edition. Linear Algebra and Its Applications.S. of [25] Watkins." IEEE Trans. Control. Laub. Matrix Theory. Introduction to Matrix Computations. andAJ. [22] Penrose. A Second Course. W. SpringerVerlag. Third Edition. 1(1988).." IEEE Trans. and M. New York.S. [21] Ortega. Philadelphia. CA. [15] Kenney.. .F. and c. "A Generalized Inverse for Matrices.." IEEE Trans . 2002. C. C. "The Matrix Sign Function. Third Edition.. 801836. of a Matrix. 1985.B. NY.. New York. [21] Ortega.. Soc. Control. NY. [17] Laub. AJ..D.J. W. Englewood Cliffs. Academic Press. Fundamentals of Matrix Computations.. 1985. "A Generalized Inverse for Matrices. [24] Strang.W." IEEE Trans. FL.M. NJ. NY. [16] Lancaster. Autom. Applied Linear Algebra. FL.. R. Interscience. D. C. Control. 913921. A. Tismenetsky. "The Matrix Sign Function. Philadelphia. "Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential of a Matrix. 1973. C. Academic Press. Soc.. 1330–1348. 40(1995). J.. NY.. PA.J. c. Orlando. to Academic Press. New York. 913–921. Cambridge Philos. 51(1955). 2000. [22] Pemose. Daniel. Harcourt Brace [24] Strang. AC24( 1979). "Controllability and Stability Radii for Companion Fonn [14] Kenney. and A. SpringerVerlag. Autom. 1987.. San Diego. [23] Stewart. San Diego. CA. [20] Noble. Second Edition with [16] Lancaster. [26] Wonham. 1988. Laub. "A Schur Method for Solving Algebraic Riccati Equations. C. "Controllability and Stability Radii for Companion Form Systems. Plenum. of Control. [23] Stewart.. G. Orlando. Interscience. 1988. Jovanovich.13301348." SIAM 20(1978). Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra.
75 Cayley–Hamilton Theorem. 91. 2 contragredient transformation. 11 natural. 105 inverse of. 76 algebraic multiplicity. 85 of a principal vector. 85 determinant. 76 degree degree of a principal vector. 104 diagonalization. 84 elementary divisors. 101 Cholesky factorization. 106 pseudoinverse of. 125 generalized real Schur form. 75 of a matrix pencil. 17 co–domain. 21 153 . 101 codomain. 125 of a matrix pencil. 109 computation of. four fundamental subspaces. 75 chain chain of eigenvectors. 104 definiteness of. C". 21 orthogonal. 2 block matrix. 13 orthogonal. 128 generalized real Schur form. 39. 137 contragredient transformation. 58 basis. 81. equivalent matrix pencils. 127 lems. 5 triangularization. 125 generalized eigenvalue. 23 four fundamental subspaces. 12 direct sum direct sum of subspaces. 91. 75 invariance under similarity transforinvariance under similarity transformation. 13 of a subspace. 103 congruence. 46 defective. 127 equivalent matrix pencils. 13 of subspaces. 109–112 properties of. 13 domain. 2 conjugate transpose. 4–6 dimension. 23 rank. 2 definiteness of.58 ity. 127 exchange matrix. 48 inverse of. 1 CauchyBunyakovskySchwarz InequalCauchy–Bunyakovsky–Schwarz Inequality. 149 congruence. 75 eigenvalue. 106 singular vectors of. 81. 1 . 58 angle between vectors. 89 matrix characterization of. 23 vector. 114118 inverse of. 17 eigenvalue. 89 exponential of a Jordan block.81 elementary divisors. 89 A–invariant subspace. 109112 field. 12 natural. 90 matrix characterization of. 76 defective. 76 angle between vectors.Index Index Ainvariant subspace. 128 e (pmxn mxn en. 95 orthogonal. 95 unitary. 106 singular values of. 110 properties of. 12 block matrix. 115 exponential of a Jordan block. 106 singular vectors of. 1 vector. 5 properties of. 137 controllability. 75 of a matrix. 110 inverse of. 89 exchange matrix. 39. 12 dimension. 11 basis. 17 column column rank. 1 companion matrix companion matrix inverse of. 81 generalized eigenvalue. 106 complement complement of a subspace. 46 controllability. 17 domain. 4 determinant. 81 function of a matrix. 150 diagonalization. 7 field. 150 inverse of. 95 unitary. 5 LU factorization. 84 equivalence transformation. 109 exponential of a matrix. 114–118 computation of. 58 CayleyHamilton Theorem. 95 equivalent generalized eigenvalue probequivalent generalized eigenvalue problems. 87 of eigenvectors. 105 pseudoinverse of. i 1 (p/nxn 1 e~xn. 106 singular values of. 4 of a block matrix. 90 algebraic multiplicity. 125 Cholesky factorization. 5 of a block matrix. 81 mation. 48 LV factorization. 23 function of a matrix. 95 equivalence transformation. 46 properties of. 115 exponential of a matrix. 87 characteristic polynomial characteristic polynomial of a matrix. 103 conjugate transpose.
4. 143 eigenvectors of. 85 linear dependence. 6. 10 linear equations linear equations characterization of all solutions. 143 eigenvectors of. 54 invariant factors. 4 Euclidean. 141 eigenvectors products of. 17 invertible. 82 Kronecker canonical form (KCF). 45 uniqueness of solutions. 70 statement of. 17 composition of. 119 for inhomogeneous linear differeninhomogeneous differential equations. 54 weighted. 125 left invertible. 120 higher–order for homogeneous linear difference homogeneous equations. 141 singular trace of. 2 transpose.2 7. 76 Holder Inequality. 142 eigenvalues of. 10 linear least squares problem. 148 singUlar values of. 65 uniqueness of solution. 54 real. 65 problem. generalized decomposition. 17 co–domain codomain of. 143 exponential of. 25 nulls pace of. 112 for inhomogeneous linear difference for inhomogeneous linear difference equations. 139 determinant of. 54 usual. 66 geometric solution of. 2 Jordan block. 26 invertible. 129 Kronecker canonical Kronecker delta. 67 linear transformation. 149 leading principal submatrix. 58 Hermitian transpose. 19 domain of. 142 transpose of. 4 complex Euclidean. 4 inertia. 10 linear independence. 2 idempotent. 71 71 decomsolution via singular value decomposition. 118 for homogeneous linear differential homogeneous equations. 26 invertible. 109 initial–value for higherorder equations. 75 left generalized eigenvector. 66 linear regression. 44 existence of solutions. 103 initialvalue problem. 51 identity matrix.2 i. 65 solution via QR factorization. 140 pseudoinverse of. left nullspace. 45 linear independence. 121 conversion firstorder higher–order differential equations higherorder conversion to first–order form. 112 equations. general solution of. 47 Index Index Kronecker product. 141 eigenvectors of. 142 determinant eigenvalues of. 136 firstorder i.154 generalized Schur form. 25 left invertible. 44 existence of solutions. 44 uniqueness of solutions. 20 Kronecker . 51 idempotent. 134 134 geometric geometric multiplicity. matrix representation of. 55 complex Euclidean. inner product inner product complex. 100 left eigenvector. 67 residual of. 120 firstorder higherorder eigenvalue problems higher–order problems conversion to first–order form. higherorder higher–order difference equations conversion to first–order form. 127 generalized generalized singular value decomposition. 44 characterization of all solutions. 84 inverses of block matrices. 20 nullspace j. 22 left left principal vector. 140 Kronecker sum. 18 nonsingular. 82 Jordan canonical form (JCF).
59 1. 33. 29 multiplication multiplication matrixmatrix. 60 spectral. 115 nonderogatory.60 2. 113 Lyapunov equation. 126 regular. 2 unitary. subordinate to a vector norm. 57 normed linear space. 60 00. 5 Lyapunov differential equation. 62 unitarily invariant. one–to–one (1–1). 60 induced by a vector norm.60 1–. 109 matrix norm. 65 normed linear space.60 2–.60 oo–. 60 p. 99 derogatory. 127 reciprocal. 67 nilpotent. 3 MumaghanWintner Murnaghan–Wintner Theorem. 105 normal. 98 negative definite. 60 61 consistent. 20 right invertible. 60 mixed. 81. 2 matrix exponential. 4 unitary. 46 observability. 98 sign of a.60 Schatten. 67 companion. 22 obser