P. 1
CA9Doc 268

CA9Doc 268

|Views: 53|Likes:
Published by Kathleen Perrin
Clerk Order – Plaintiffs' request for reallocation of time is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Order filed 11/26/2010
Clerk Order – Plaintiffs' request for reallocation of time is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Order filed 11/26/2010

More info:

Published by: Kathleen Perrin on Nov 26, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/29/2010

pdf

text

original

Case: 10-16696 11/26/2010 Page: 1 of 3

ID: 7558727 DktEntry: 268

FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOV 26 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

KRISTIN M. PERRY; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff - IntervenorAppellee, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; et al., Defendants, and DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; et al., Defendants -IntervenorsAppellants.

No. 10-16696 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW Northern District of California, San Francisco

ORDER

Case: 10-16696 11/26/2010 Page: 2 of 3

ID: 7558727 DktEntry: 268

KRISTIN M. PERRY; et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff-Intervenor Appellee, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; et al., Defendants, DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; et al., Defendants-Intervenor, and COUNTY OF IMPERIAL; et al., Movants - Appellants.

No. 10-16751 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW

ORDER

For purposes of clarification, these appeals are consolidated for oral argument. Treating plaintiffs’ counsel’s letter of November 17, 2010, as a motion to reconsider this Court’s Order of November 15, 2010, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

Case: 10-16696 11/26/2010 Page: 3 of 3

ID: 7558727 DktEntry: 268

The argument shall remain divided into two hour-long sessions as provided in this Court’s previously issued Order, and the allocation of time within the first hour remains the same. Time within the second hour, concerning the merits, is reallocated as follows: 30 minutes for the Proponents, 20 minutes for the Perry plaintiffs-appellees, and 10 minutes for the plaintiff-intervenor-appellee City and County of San Francisco. Until December 1, 2010, however, the Court will entertain any suggestion submitted jointly by counsel on plaintiffs’ side to reallocate the time between plaintiffs-appellees and plaintiff-intervenor-appellee, and similarly, any jointly submitted request relating to the time allocated to defendants-intervenorsappellants and movants-appellants.

FOR THE COURT: MOLLY DWYER CLERK OF COURT By: Kwok Wong Deputy Clerk

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->