/V,,+e: Mc.(~ r.

~ filE

United States p:r 51 «! C1 Co o R r t{')l{ i}tt_District of New Jersey

NICHOLAS E. PURPURA, DONALD R. LASTER JR. et al.,

-----------------------------------------------------------)(

I

I f l

I

Plaintiffs,

t

I Civil Docket No.3:10-CV-04814-GEB-DEA

,

tJ rot t:.., t-t/ 'v ,; f1"t

~

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS et al.;

Motion Date February 22, 2011

Defendants.

------------------------------------------------------------~~

~(>1~ )

.fLAINTIFF~ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS "MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION .

TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION DEFAULT SUMMARY JUDGMENT and IN SUPPORT ru:J>EFENDANTS" MOTION to DISMISS for LACK of

. -

JURISDICTION"

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

e f - Abington School v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 ~ (1963)

- . __

".J"I.'.f ~rf1'/.oriJa,I= v. Miami-Dade County Schsel Bd. .• 55"F.3d 1171;c

A",,_ (; .. ;1 ___.5J~j~lp:~~d~ is i~/P9~:J,fe c IIfJ, C;,. 'l..c?6'l) cu_!1eeticd , ..

!.." ,+;t-;rJ-II14;t ,

• e Am~ Bank & 7J.ust Co. v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co., 251 La. 455,~o.

.280§-;-4{+, - c/o,lf)

Anastasotfv United States., ~F.3d 898 C 5+ h (;,.%1116') ~o"" ~ Dt t'~pJ •• _

'f'c.t .. lle I Babbitt v. United Farm Workers Nat" Union, 442 U.S. 289, 298, ~~S. Et

C ~+es - ~, 66 L.Erl.2d 895 (1979) Babbitt, StJptZl 4=4=2 U.S. at 298

\A .. Vluer,t;of1 C I qcU)

Bell v. Hood, 327 U.s. 678, g(;i S, gt. 773 ~O L.Ed. 939

BridgestonelFirestone Researcf)Inc. v. Autombile Club De L 'Quest De La France. 245~~59~1~~ir. 2001);

~v. Connecticut., ~Gt::78Q, 4tH, U8 (l9TZ) "fo I o s. 171 C [ti 11)

"'1.-41 ."\

Cary v. Piphus, 435 U.S. ~ c 1ft? 6../

V Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. (2 DaB.) 419 (1793) \/' e:'IlJ· f/ecH" .... C.Q,,"M)tfi~

Citizens United 130 S. Ct 876 (2010r~ 00 ~ I.

, ~f~

c 0 l'it I ,::til

.f1eJntinentaJ..Airlines. Inc. v. Intra Brokersa Inc ... , 24 F 3d 1 099~ ~ Cir. 1994 ~

CG wLte.(f')

Cohens v. Virginia., 19 U.S1f64 (1821)

V :"~;"'.t>I tt.r-eI.Cuccinelli v. Sebelius,0702 F. Supp. 2d 598; ~ (E.D. Va. 2010)D

c s:'J.AI. y. I~, 11 Dean Tarry Corp. v. Friedlander, 650 F. Supp. 1544~A'ff8. g;U~ F.28 ~l~

Co..-aP'l; <JS;'·e,1I" ::"\

Droz v. CeRUIt. }R9:,~48 F.3d 1120 (9~hCir) \Ci q I))

Note: Ot"3~~

.... \EJizabeth Teachers Union, AFT Local 733(Elizabeth Bd. OfEduc) Civ.A.

c~lt~I''1 wJ 1.20-3343, 1990WL 174654, *5(DNJ.N<.!y. 1990) .

",./ef"" \ /

du:'&iO,,~; V Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421 (1962)

111

Keff +1/1I'I4r (O"S;jft,.,f

Page~

i

361

I III

t6( 'l--~

261

(

231 13)24 I

3 I

48 '

29 \

21;30 (

3 J

I

9, fO •

\ 1) ofe r 110

481 ~"'fv'C;';f~"V' , CirC",;+ flf) ~

10 I

44,/48

I

34 \

38 J

J

7

36

C lott) 'b

Ex parte \= Young, 209<0 U.S. 123 47

. ('/f· J 1/~1")

Farmers Bank of State ofDel~ v. Bell Mortgrgge ~, 452 F.Supp. 1278, CO.1)e • 48

Farrell v. Pike, 342 F.SuPR . .2d 433;~I (M.D.N.C.2004)

-~ft~Ct. - ... '6'tiael.

Fe~l Election Comr/t~v. Akinsl. 524 U.S. 11 ~ (1998)

t

.. ; CI"6Z) Flast v. Cohen, ti-B S.CL at 19'5'!t, 392 u.s. ~2

2,27,43

9

9,46

/loU: e.te

htJl"'\tb;...... Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107 .. ~ (1911)

'Vrs 0.)' '.

17

F. T C. v. N at'mrmt Bus. Consltants._luc:u., 376 F.3 d 317....J22 (511, Cir. 2004) 1. ,,, C. ,1f:J 1(})

Goldberzv. Kelly, 397 U.S."'24§., ~l 299-

48

49

Gonnzalez-Gonzalez v. United States., 257 F.3d 31 CIttCir. 2001) )t

Gracedale Sports & Ent:::lJimmml Inc. v. Ticket Inlet, LLC, 199,WL 618991 (N.D. Ill. 1999) lJ}l9.~f'~iZ'J~9

48

27,43

c 10,1S)

Graham v. Asbury, 112 Ariz. 184, Me P.2d 656, Ei§.8.

16

Granite State Outdoor Adver~ Inc. v. City of Clearwater, 351" F 3d t112..., H+6 (11,ff,Cir.,'2-90'))

11

'1'fi CI'~60)

Harris v. McRea, +ee S. et. 267't, m U.S. 297,·M L~el '784 rehearil!l§ 101 8. et,

.w, 448 U s; 917 L,EQ,6Q 11 SQ. !\

t Acu:Lec.M ~S~ v.$". :;1~tt"163)

Herman ~ l+JeCkem v. Huddleston, l-Q 3 S. et. 68-2 48

1: ... c. ~i=.t;,. ,\ 't..J,. I. /1'."'.

Hirsch v. Enright Mfg., 577 F.Supp. 339 (D.N.1.) f~ t?J o.f.p 0'1 fh1eIlllC/rltMeqf-e~ i "(4" 48

J I

1<0( ".,t.)', 'Z., .., •

Hutchinson v. lfientt:y, G,C.A ]:)J,Q. F2d 254~ C q.Jl, C.,. IOJ 2. r)

• cJ 5" 2-2. t <.1'1 ~6) Japan Whaling Ass 'no v. Am~ Cetacean Soc.JIo.J ..., 1 "

v, )/,.,..ll ~fl. (' ... t~t"'5>''''' ('uf-) S" n· ".S. 1/.14 C Ie, "tS)

Lebron uwra~. 961, go-I.. e4. 2:4 902 Ql~te~ V. Esconditlo, 11

SQJ...U~1-9-;-534, 11;6 8. Ct. 1522, 118, b. gel. :;26 15~-fi 92) "" I>e f ... re.J.4, CB.,.sf: h .... ·q ... ! )

- 1'1 0-. A p. 10,66

Lake Dev~1JJle;nt Enterprises. Inc. v. KOjetinsky. 'Mel. A:J::t!r.', 410 S.W. 2d 361~. c "-'16 f

40

16

9

Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U'S, 555, 560 ... J 12, So Ot 2136, 119 t.13d. 2d 35~ (1992)

~ u.s, 131

Marbury v. Madison, 6 Cranc~ ~ (1803)

11

3,6,49

IV

"al~ f lid C , OJ ")

Mqthf/Ps v. Eldridge, 424 US. 319 ~ .\

(1,f)1) 7./

Massachusetts v. ERA .. 549 U.S. 497,@8. Ct.1438 14zt7'"'(20m).

("0,. Ct. Af,. IO,1})

Mitchell v. McIntee, ts, 15 Gp. App. 85514 P.2d 1357 ~. .

VNew Yorkv. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992)

30

9

16

44

Neitzke v. Williams. 490 U.S. 319,-324, 1"~. et. 1827, 1831, 104 L.Ed.2d 3'9ti (1989) 27,43 V .... • .. ,.J. S .... fe>.s"

Parker v. e« 110 F.3J678..k82 (~ir. 1997) 16

S-c\ ) ~L( . ~

Y f __ Pierce v. Socjefy of Sisters, 26~ U.S. 510~"5 S.Ci. 571 69 L.Ed.td 16'fe (1925) 2, 13

S;)hf''''' rIof.,

1.).(111/1",,..,11) Ponce v. Sheahan, 1997 WL 798784 (N.D. Il1./1997j) 27,43

Je ~~~ t 11""1 .f.t ;" .. : ..

Regents UIl:tCaL v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 2651'(1978) 41

Ricci..G#. ifk.; v. DeStefano, 129 S. Ct. 2658, 26'i'1, P4 L. Ed. 2d '*'0 (2009) 41

, vSaldana v. Riddle, 1998 WL 373413 (N.D. Il1.l998) Ab: ... ,ft,..,1'wf ..... "~l.elltPf., - ''_,,,,re.

SCh~Dist~of~.~74 U.s.20y_o.s (1963)

e x . ~ o~.,: .... .,

ate of Florida v. Us. Dept. Health and Human Services, ~~, ... ';" .,

3:10-cv-91-RV?EMT13See, Document 79: pages 157, page 20 I

~United States v.Butler, 297 US. 1 (1936)

--S'p"ec OJ" L)

United States v. Kenny;, 462 E2...d 1205 (3~<!kirt ooa. Q@Ried 4851 US 91-4, 9-J".~, Ct. 234 34 c.ed. 2d 1-%

u )((1 f. {"'Pf. b 1,

United States v. Local 560. Int~8tifmril Brotheshoed of Teamsters, No. 82..Q.89, 48

~ (D.NJ),-I ,,91)

United States v. Lopez, 51YU.S. 549.Jj 5 ~. Ct. 1624, 131 LEd.2t1' (1995)

... 0 b~ltl

United States v. Morrison, 5-I-4~549, 568, 571 5)Z.g.. &1."1 u.S. ,.,'Cl&Od)

United States v. Provenzano, 334 F.2d 678 (3rd Cir;[ i!t~ deAiea 379 U.S. 2: t2,

Sf:Hl~:-Zi11;"+~;L,Zg_~51.:l <,

5.- f. '.... \

United States v. g,fJf:trh ~ Underwriters Ass~ 322 U.S. 533 (1944)

q,'J, (,bCf

United States SC1tAffl., *W. U.S. "&t4..(1973) I

V. S+t._JIMts Chq 1Ie;; .. , ~f.§ ... '~f-f A..,en'y' (Jro cej~, e s CSCR,4-'P)

v

27,43

36

17,32,32

20,31,46

30

20

20

30

18

9

United States v. Sweeney, 262 F.2d 272 (3:1Cir. 1959)

~o;r1 )

United States v. Wrightwood MY Co., -s r d. S. "' C' ,,,2.

21,30

19

.. &'J Valley Forge Christian Colltff:t! v. Americans United tor Separation of Church & State/til 9

454 U.S. 464 (1982)

Village of Bensenville v. EM, 376 F.3dl! 14 (D.C. Cir. 2004)

Walz v. Tax Comm 'n ofthe City of New York, 397 U.S. 664.H)9 (1970)

13,24

36

Wooded Shores Property Owners Ass'n, Inc, v. Mathews,'37 Ill. App. 34el :W, 345 N.E. 2d 186~. eIIl. Ar" Cr. IOJ16)

16

Constitutional, Amendments Statutes. and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:

US. Const. Art. 1, Section 7

3

U.S. Const. Art. 1, Section 7 clause 1

3,17,34

U.S. Const. Art. 1, Section 8 clause 3,

3

U.S. Const. Art. 1, Section 8 clause 7,

21

U.s. Const. Art. 1, Section 8 clause 8,

21

U.S. Const. Art. 1, Section 8 clause 9

6,21

U.S. Const. Art. 1, Section 8 clause 12,

3,25

U.S. Const. Art. 1, Section 8 clause 14,

3,6,2

U.S. Const. Art. 1, Section 8 clause 15,

3,45

US. Const. Art. 1, Section 9 clause 3,

3,24,27

US. Const. Art. 1, Section 9 clause 4 ~5,

3,23,24

U.S. Const. Art. 2, Section 1, clause 5

3, 10 3

U.S. Const. Art. 3, Section 1,

U.S. Const. Art. 3, Section 2,

3,4,6,8

VI