Geert Masureel (geert.masureel@theartificialbrain.

com)

Preface................................................................................................................................................. 5 It’s all about linking and comparison................................................................................................ 7 Warming Up....................................................................................................................................7 Linking, comparison and decisions............................................................................................... 7 Neural Networks............................................................................................................................. 8 Procedural or not ?........................................................................................................................... 10 Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 10 Thanks time and space !...............................................................................................................10 Scripting is the answer !............................................................................................................... 11 Other advantages of scripting..................................................................................................... 11 The main protector............................................................................................................................ 13 Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 13 The amygdala................................................................................................................................ 13 Emotions and feelings....................................................................................................................... 15 Some free thoughts on emotions.................................................................................................. 15 Fear................................................................................................................................................ 15 Feelings, the derivatives of fear................................................................................................... 16 Disgust and surprise..................................................................................................................... 17 Curiosity and acceptance............................................................................................................. 18 Pain................................................................................................................................................ 19 Aggression..................................................................................................................................... 19 Believe, the driving force !................................................................................................................ 21 Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 21 Believe, always believe ….............................................................................................................21 The three states of believe and doubt......................................................................................... 22 The diverse forms of consciousness..................................................................................................24 Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 24 Consciousness................................................................................................................................ 24 Some free thoughts..................................................................................................................... 24 Another approach towards answers............................................................................................ 25 Conscious versus subconscious.................................................................................................... 25 Self-awareness (self-conscious).................................................................................................... 27
__________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www.theartificialbrain.com is always required. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type, style and height must be easy readable !
© Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel - Page 2 of 60

The ultimate A.I. Challenge – The artificial brain

Creativity, dreams, imagination and thinking........................................................................... 28 Impact on the digital brain.......................................................................................................... 29 Unexpected processes of the subconscious...................................................................................... 31 Intuition or following the own instincts...................................................................................... 31 Imitation and insight.................................................................................................................... 31 What about hormones ?.................................................................................................................... 33 Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 33 Hormones...................................................................................................................................... 33 An odd question : is puberty required ?..................................................................................... 33 The impact on the digital brain................................................................................................... 34 The hormone part....................................................................................................................... 34 The pre-juvenile phase............................................................................................................... 34 The juvenile phase...................................................................................................................... 36 Deeper thoughts.................................................................................................................................37 'I think, therefore I am ...'............................................................................................................37 The buzzword 'perception'.......................................................................................................... 37 Values and ego.................................................................................................................................. 39 Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 39 Relativity....................................................................................................................................... 39 Standard of values........................................................................................................................ 39 The world turns around you !..................................................................................................... 40 Self-interest, always !....................................................................................................................41 Altruism ….................................................................................................................................... 42 A number of important actors........................................................................................................... 43 Motivation..................................................................................................................................... 43 Appreciation versus punishment.................................................................................................43 Instincts......................................................................................................................................... 44 Memory.............................................................................................................................................. 45 Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 45 What about synapses ?................................................................................................................. 45 Storing information...................................................................................................................... 45 The inner voice.............................................................................................................................. 46 The principles behind belief and fear......................................................................................... 47 The ‘play-zone’............................................................................................................................. 48 The long-term memory................................................................................................................ 49
© Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert.masureel@theartificialbrain.com - Page 3 of 60

...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 56 Digidala (J)....................... 51 What types of memory are needed ?.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 54 Explanation.................................................................................................................................... 52 Appendix 1 : A sample diagram......................theartificialbrain..................................................................................... 56 Curiosity (G)...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Digi LTP (Long Term Potentiation) (N)................................................................58 Acceptance (I)...................................................................................................... 52 Concentration...................................................................................................................................................................................... style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel ................................................................................................................................ 59 Conscious versus subconscious...................................................................................................................................................................................... 54 The diagram.........................Visualization............................................... 57 Data Temp (M)............................................................................................................................Page 4 of 60 ................ 57 Main Data (O)........................................ 57 Labeling (L).........................com is always required............. 50 Fragmentation................... 58 Rewarding (K) and Punishment (D)..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 59 Epilog................................ 56 Attention (E)........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 55 Surprise (F)......................................................................................................................................................... 60 __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. 55 Pain (C)......................................................................................................................................................................................................................51 Mirror neurons..................51 Attention......................................... 52 Introduction.......................... 54 Introduction....................................... 58 Instincts (P).................................................................... This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type...................................................... 55 Digital Cerebellum (A) and the Play-zone (B)..............................

I needed to dig deeper and at that moment my actual search truly began.. But instead of overcomplicating things by imitating the brain to the letter.B. motivation and feelings © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert.Page 5 of 60 ...masureel@theartificialbrain.. and who am I to argue such wisdom ! This document is primary written as a theoretical guide in creating an A.I.I. appreciation. computer systems are not the best host for gigantic parallel multitasking as required for supercomplex neural networks like brain imitations where this capacity is the primary necessity.. First I started reading the classical psychology books. Forget for a moment all you've ever learned about the brain (psychological and physical) and follow me in this journey. How to implement this is not always covered since that is not the primary goal of this writing. better manageable and cheaper. but didn't find real answers. No. It covers most fundamentals needed in developing an artificial brain. How I came to the knowledge in this document ? At the age of 14. Challenge – The artificial brain Preface A lot of research has already been done in the field of A. Keep in mind that it is a summary of the path I had to follow for over more than 20 years. something is missing (as a matter of fact a lot is missing) to go from that one point to an actual self learning system capable of real thinking in 'new' fields (like we do). don't be discouraged if it takes several readings to get a total overview of the picture .The ultimate A. or C. wasn't it John Nash (Nobel prize winner in Economics in 1994) who once stated that existing information always leads you away from being creative in finding true answers . fear. you will find a fully explained input diagram in Appendix 1.. At a certain moment it became almost unbearable and I realized I needed to find a way to figure out how 'the others' were thinking.. but if developed in an experienced team it should be very well possible to have a fully functional artificial brain within a reasonable timeframe !!!! A side effect of my research is the fundamental wisdoms I discovered directly applicable in the field of human interest like psychology. and Mensa Belgium Member since then). It is quite heavy stuff and I would be surprised if anyone is capable to fully understand in-depth at the first reading. but there were so many necessary missing links like emotions. Some major companies invest heavily in artificial neurons or even build microchips by cutting tiny slices of both human and non-human brain-parts and measuring the electric charge present at that moment in the hope to achieve a major breakthrough in creating an artificial brain ! The key question remains if this is the road to success and personally I am not really convinced it is ! The available processing power of computer systems (even with multiple processors per system) these days is so immense and thanks to networks. but as some experts in neural networks have discovered by now. Also in this area I personally have the feeling a lot is known (and sometimes made extremely complicated) but the pieces not always fall together and that is a shame since most people could (in)directly benefit from this … What needed to be done was to find out how our thinking process works. but all main parts are described as well as why they are required to obtain a fully functional Artificial Brain.B. After all. .. Different fields of expertise are mixed constantly. this capacity can be adjusted till virtually unlimited ! Of course. I struggled with the fact that everybody else was so different in mindset than I was (at that moment I hadn't figured out that it was me who was the odd man out).) ! Why ? A wrong approach in the way of looking at this challenge is the answer ! Imitating brain functions (like neural networks or even some emotions) help us in a lot of domains where a simple form of intelligence is needed. I took a complete different approach and as you will discover in this document. but when looking closer no major breakthrough has yet been accomplished in creating an Artificial Brain (A. it is not only simpler.I.com . And although I try to explain everything in a simple way (with real life examples). a long time before I discovered being high gifted (in 1997. As bonus. At the age of 17 I discovered the personal computer and instantly I knew we would be best friends for life ! It didn't take long to see the similarities in the working of the brain and the way a computer operates and at the age of 22 I had a first (primitive) scheme how it could work. at the age of 27.

Page 6 of 60 .. Have fun and not only discover that an artificial brain is very well possible but learn as well how You and everyone else is thinking . This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . In every design I make.that I decided to make it my primary target to exactly figure out how our thinking process works.. It took almost another ten years to see full clarity and a couple of years afterwards to overcome the last obstacles. Geert Masureel geert.com __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. I use the elementary rule Einstein mentioned once : “You should make everything as simple as possible.theartificialbrain.masureel@theartificialbrain. but not simpler” ! So not a single item can be deleted out of this design if the target is a true working ánd autonomous digital brain.com is always required.

listening to some music or watching an exciting movie. make the sound of a cow or even when You smell a cow cake You just stepped in. the impact will be nearer and viceversa. but the thinking process is perfectly capable of interpreting other 'sensors'. lifting an arm. book. The decisions we took were the small corrections to obtain the balance. regenerate. But if we look at some processes running in the background. feeling.. Humans need to have the ability to reproduce. we are limited to our five senses (smell. Some behavior is partially or completely triggered or influenced by these needs and therefore it is crucial to eliminate these factors or even discover the necessity of such a 'need' to obtain a functioning 'brain'. for the thinking process it even doesn't matter where the base signal originates (smell. linking and thanks to both also taking decisions.. In this document I use human behavior as a starting point to discover the way the thinking process functions and it is of the utmost importance to keep in mind that the object 'human' is far more complicated than what I state here. there is no way of comparing. sense. That's why You think the same when I show a picture of a cow. when I use the sentence ‘everything in the brain is about comparison and linking’. If the sound is louder than the previous time. So this should not be a surprise for those familiar with the working of neurons or neural networks … Good to know ! Some believe that the differences in both hemispheres of the human brain are the result of limited neurons available in the brain and therefore specific tasks are dedicated to specific parts. like how the brain steers the ratio saliva (chemically a base) versus the amount of gastric juice (chemically an acid) via the taste.. Few people will doubt this. The moment 'our veteran'. This brings us to an essential issue. without being symmetrical or even logical … Because one of the main features of the thinking process is comparison. © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert.' when something new is on the market or happens to us. comparison and decisions Everything in the brain is about comparison. thanks to linking and comparison..I. It is also the reason why a person with a malfunction in one of the five senses will have no problem in optimizing one of the others to overcome this.The ultimate A. in fact I mean that in all these separate brain-parts the same principle of comparing and linking is applicable. The brain exists out of neurons and linking and comparison is basically what most neurons do. .Page 7 of 60 . A soldier at the front will weight out the impact place of an incoming grenade by the whistling. but not always.masureel@theartificialbrain. preferably but not necessarily to something we already know. that looks (a little) like . a decision will be taken to duck. seeing and hearing). . all of these processes are conducted by the brain. taste or even piece of art. as long as there is the possibility to compare and link.) as long as there is a possibility to compare and link. song. Keep this in mind ! Not all parts in the (human) brain communicate directly with each other and disconnections in the interconnected brainparts (lesions) mostly result in severe malfunctions. In most cases new experiences will change this point of reference.com .. If one does not know how long a meter is or how heavy one kilogram is. It could be a new perfume.. taste. As human. All organic brains (human and non-human) are pretty well defined and leave almost no room for error in the blueprint ! Therefore. we compare the visual information combined with the data provided by the organs of balance from previous times (falling) until we reach that point of true balance. When we learn to walk or bicycle. run away or to crouch lower. primal experiences are used as initial reference points. eat. Since none of us is born with a list of calibration.or reference points. Actually. Never wondered why we often say or think 'Hé. Challenge – The artificial brain It’s all about linking and comparison Warming Up Stretching your legs. there must be a point of reference or calibration. concludes the next incoming grenade could be very well right on top of him. Linking.and smell receptors is less common known.

But there is one little problem … … copying the human brain is simply too complex ! The number of axon-connections (we often talk about sky-scraping numbers. This could be described as a classical true/false statement. And even if we would be able to duplicate the brain.Neural Networks Neural networks imitate the way neurons actually work in our brain and are a good example of how the comparison part could be solved. compare this with the current available digital versions (neural networks) and optimize them for the use in a digital brain. Nevertheless. false (0). And this is exactly what needs to be done to optimize the neuron to function on a system with less parallel but more processing capabilities (like PC’s). In case the internal algorithm concludes that there are many reasons to give it a true. By just adding this one state we actually make from this single neuron a high performing piece of decision ! Of course it is very well possible to generate other output sequences like true (4).theartificialbrain. even 200 million in the case of the corpus callosum) is just a tiny too much to get control over. It’s very well possible to give extra values to the output of the axon since dendrites are capable of handling non true/false statements. the axon-value should be true or 1. In general. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . By combining some neurons it is possible to create a simple ‘if … then’ statement. The principle behind a neuron is that when the input (via dendrites) is near or equal to a predefined value (obtained through the learning process in the nucleus) it fires via the axon.Page 8 of 60 . the axon value should be false or 0. nothing __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. If on the other hand the algorithm concludes that the nearest table value is too far (too many errors). how would it be possible in short-term and with limited resources to adapt certain aspects without opening Pandora’s box ? Although I followed the road of neural networks for a small period of time. likely (3). as explained later. All sorts of output can be generated and might be useful in separate parts of the digital brain. preferable on a standard computing system like a PC and only there where really needed. Since many neurons are generally used simultaneously in ‘brain processing’. not everything about neural networks is bad ! So let’s look a little closer at neurons and where they might be useful in our digi-brain. rather a side effect of the amount of neurons present in the human brain. maybe (2). That is in most cases what they do. A balance therefore is necessary between the output values and the hardware available. processing power and availability ! Furthermore. If the input is ‘far away’ from the ‘predefined’ values. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. reliability. not likely (1). Another important advantage of the digital neuron is that we are not limited to a true/false state of the axon firing (it fires or not). But. These examples can easily be achieved by combining some neurons as well. but why overcomplicating things if simplification (more reliable and less neurons) is possible ! The basic conclusion here is that the more possible output we generate the larger the logical table of the connected neurons will be and the more processing power and memory space will be used. if no special (expensive) equipment is available (electronic imitations of physical neurons allowing parallel handling).com is always required. neurons are capable of pattern-recognition. It is better to understand the principles behind the organic neurons. the amount of parallel processing is limited to the number of processors and separate threats supported by the operating system and programming language on the ‘PC’. A good example is that if a certain input (dendrites) will be compared to the internal table (nucleus) and if the value is near or equal to an earlier correct line in the table. the PC has the benefit of low cost. A digital version is per definition digital and. I am no longer a believer that it is the right way to create a highly flexible intelligent digital brain. the axon does not fire. a PC is in the disadvantage at first glance. but grounds are present to doubt about this (more and further errors) a state of ‘maybe’ (value 2) should be present. a digital neuron must not be the exact equivalent of the organic one ! A physical neuron has evolved during million of years and fulfills the needs for animals and humans whereas the ability to learn theoretical and abstract matter in case of humans is. Organic neurons work in an analog way and have the advantage of parallel processing resulting in an extremely fast ‘process-execution’.

like attention. The system must remain flexible enough to adapt future ‘experiences’ to the existing data and expand the area of use. a neural network future is present for the digital cerebellum. Like the cerebellum in vertebrates the main focus of this digital cerebellum would be on sensory perception and motor output. Nature does not need physics to survive. A sort of universal interface if you prefer it in programmer’s words. always ! A mathematical equation is just a discovered pattern.I.com . but is rather limited in fields of use. Using math expressions to bounce a bal on a tennis racket is nice. As will be described later in this document. A very low level process such as attention deserves an own space outside the cerebellum ! The motor function of these features like moving lips. The out. Just the same way as neural networks are presently used in prediction software in the financial world. but via mathematical expressions we call physical laws we see patterns in nature and are even able of predicting certain events.The ultimate A. A checklist is nothing more than a pattern and someone recurrently using the same checklist will just need a glimpse of the checklist to see what is missing (in the executed pattern). etc would of course reside within the cerebellum. There is one big “BUT” in this equation : fifty percent of the neurons present in the human brain is situated in the cerebellum and that is a stunning 50 billion neurons and even a multiplicity of synapses ! Therefore I would split this in manageable units all with a single function and where feasible applying other techniques to overcome this. A clear and logical design leaving few room for errors and side-effects ! The focus of this chapter was on illustrating that other possibilities than only neurons would work better. It is also the reason why so many checklists exists and are frequently used.masureel@theartificialbrain. sense of hearing and even smell. but the outcome would be perfect input for the neural network of smelling ! Two conditions must be fulfilled in replacing the neural network structure and these are : • • Interaction must still be possible. Speech. Flexibility.or visual (OCR) recognition in current neural networks already make use of this capacity. In this last case better and more precise electronic techniques exist.Page 9 of 60 . but criticizing without offering solutions is cheap ! The next chapter therefore provides the answer … © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. It might even be best only to use neural networks for those parts where pattern recognition is the only real answer like sight. processing of language and music. Challenge – The artificial brain more or less. ear adjustments to optimize the hearing. It would take a complete other expression or set of expressions to let the same hand juggle ! So predefined expressions are to be avoided ! A typical example of why it is not good practice to copy the human brain structure as such is that not everything is always as logical as could be ! Dyslexia is one fine example of this ! Dyslexic children performing balancing exercises frequently helps enormously because the same brain environment is used for both ! That is why for instance I would extract some side functions from the human cerebellum. And pattern recognition is also what the brain does.and input of the neurons or other techniques must be able of ‘communicating’ with each other or whatever modus operandi would be used. this is what we refer to as intuition or following your instincts … Personally I would state that for the digi-brain. to more specific areas outside the digital cerebellum.

find a stable balance. End. This walking also is procedural and lets put all in a nice procedure to illustrate my point : (Step A) While not Table_Is_Reached do begin lift up leg A. Thanks time and space ! Quantum computers can simultaneously handle vast amounts of processes in literally no time. then step c.com is always required. (Step C) While not Glass_Is_Reached do Begin If (Hand is Lower then Glass) then Move_Hand_Up_A_Little. If the execution of the separate steps of the sequence is done in a parallel or serial way is actually of no importance as long as there is a sequence in the main steps. End. __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. However to have a procedural way of operating. repeat this complete procedure for leg B End. ….theartificialbrain. (Step B) While not Hand_Is_Open_Complete do Begin Open_Hand_A_Litlle_More. If I want to grab my glass of water I must first move my hand towards the glass no matter where my hand is ! This ‘moving towards’ can be done in different ways and can depend on external factors like ‘both arms in plaster’ (causing non standard ways of moving towards the glass). place it in front of leg B. balance on leg A. It can even be that my glass is on a table 5 meter away and I need to walk to the table first before I can even start reaching for the glass. First step a. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . If (Hand is Left of Glass) then Move_Hand_A_Little_To_The_Right. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. some sort of sequence is required.Page 10 of 60 .Procedural or not ? Introduction The way the human brain works is not serial but parallel based. but the human brain is not a quantum computer ! The human specie is optimized for living in its habitat (earth) and over here time and space do exist ! This explains why all physical actions are sequential by nature. If (Hand is Higher then Glass) then Move_Hand_Down_A_Little. then step z. That is the general idea behind procedural behavior. as discussed before. So instead of focusing on how the system functions let’s try to find out if the human thinking can be seen as procedural. If (Hand is Right of Glass) then Move_Hand_A_Little_To_The_Left. then step b.

End. …) to implement this in the ‘self thinking area’. to be more specific interactive procedural. fear. Conclusion : All in the human brain can be considered procedural.The ultimate A.com .masureel@theartificialbrain. In a lot of neuron and non neuron ‘thinking’. In the above example I could first open my hand even before I start walking towards the table and it is not impossible to even raise the hand towards ‘a good position’ also before starting to walk. Scripting is the answer ! The above demonstrates that all can be considered as (interactive) procedural and on computer systems we already have a technique capable of performing this : scripting ! Nonetheless. the standard behavior is pretty straight forward and easy definable but ‘the exceptions to the rule’ can often © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. Where is the procedure here ? The procedure can be considered as a list of thinks ‘to do’ before reaching the end point (in this case grabbing the glass) BUT the items in the list not necessary need execution in chronological way. but can be achieved by modern computers as well and is not exclusive for the human brain ! However. Whether it is canceling. you always will have a number of steps in any thinking process. engine. whether it is being creative (most likely messing around with procedures). Further in this document you will discover levels (like conscious and subconscious) and required parameters (like hormones. One procedure must be able of controlling another and influencing it in diverse ways. reading and understanding a book or … … Try to find one thought that is otherwise. adding information or modifying variables to mention a few options. it is advisable to allow simultaneously processing of diverse steps in a procedure to speed up and smoothen the execution. you won’t ! Of course some thoughts can happen simultaneously or even interact and that leads us to the final conclusion. one would just fall down ! However. technically not required. Other advantages of scripting Hereunder you can find some additional benefits of scripting : • Exceptions are handled better. I could start ‘Step B’ (the opening of the hand) a little before I reach the table and I even could start moving the hand towards the glass (Step C) at that same time. See it as a sort of checklist with steps to take in an interactive way and not necessary sequential. Although it is for an A.B. but understandable for all and I can get a lot of information out of it ! For instance we know the brain is capable of parallel processing but in ‘Step A’ in the example (the moving of the legs) it would be very unwise to parallel start this process for both legs A and B.I. Therefore it might be better to name this behavior “interactive procedural behavior” ! Also the way we ‘think’ is interactive procedural. It is a rather simplistic example. This requires parallel processing. the current way of scripting is not capable of processing all to obtain full interactive procedural level.Page 11 of 60 . Challenge – The artificial brain (Step D) While (Pressure_on_the_glass > This_Pressure_Would_Squeeze_the_glass) and (Pressure_on_the_glass <= At_This_Pressure_The_Glass_will_not_Slip_out_Of_The_Hand) do Begin Close_Hand_A_Little_More. belief. this ‘overlapping’ is also a reason to doubt whether the thinking process is procedural or not. it might be a good idea to overlap the separate processes in order to advance things. interpreter and the higher operational systems. preparing a speech in the head. It looks like the different steps as such are procedural but the execution of the diverse steps not always is. but this is rather a technical issue in how to design the scripting language.

so we have a better control over how the system ‘thinks’ and it is even possible to make changes to certain scripts if required. Extra information. Scripting has the advantage that all rules can be defined easily and even the exceptions fit in the picture. Scripts can easily be viewed and understood by us humans. The trick is to find a balance between enough commands to comprehend all needed and avoiding commands capable of overruling certain safety rules implemented. A script is easy to modify and it is uncomplicated to allow the system to alter or create new types of base scripts without extra hard coding new ‘types’ or ‘object’. Safety. This scripting of course implies a scripting language. Another tremendous advantage of scripting is that a simple pc is capable of running through scripts extremely fast (if there is an optimized interpreter).theartificialbrain. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. Since this scripting (combined with neural networks) will happen on a very low level of the digital brain and. lots of ‘illogical linking’ happens at diverse levels of brain processing I can not stress enough to avoid the possibility of commands overruling safety procedures ! This could and will lead towards serious threats for mankind ! What commands should be present and how exactly to implement depends on the requirements of the digital brain and needs to be digged out deeper when this challenge comes in a later stadium. These scripts can be written in the same language as all other scripts and no additional programming is required to implement these instincts. __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. Thanks to the scripting approach it is possible to make ‘objects’ a little stretchable and extra information regarding this ‘object’ can easily be added and used afterwards.com is always required. so multiple processes can be handled. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . which is of course necessary (remember : interactive procedural behavior !) and thanks to computer networks it is also possible to spread the load over diverse computers what will be unavoidable if visual and audio information need to be processed too. Some basic instincts are required in order to let the system survive or even live. allowing compacter “neurons”. Instincts. Easy modifiable.• • • • • • be hard to ‘include’.Page 12 of 60 . Safety versus flexibility versus complexity. as clarified later in this document. This means less parallel processing is required in comparison to neurons and the result essentially is the same or even better ! Most operating systems and programming languages support multithreading.

without burning and without hesitating ! The amygdala is our first line of defense and it works extremely fast. A lot of our so-called instincts originate there (see side frame for extra info). In the above example of the burning hand of the little child. it would simply take too long to process all the information in a normal way. A typical example is a small child who wants to place his hand on a hot surface like a burning stove. The same applies to the amygdala and that is a different story ! Let’s take again our example of our little child.com . Challenge – The artificial brain The main protector Introduction The last 25 years can be characterized as a sequence of innovations in the field of computer technology. will have the same effect as if the hand would have been burned effectively and an obvious link is added in the amygdala not to touch the stove. On what base will the system do one thing and the other not ? It is impossible to do everything at once and on the other hand.masureel@theartificialbrain. The blanching of this. something one (animal or human) is born with. This last part needs a little further explanation. … … both the absence of what they really are and especially how to implement them in a digital environment are the key factors in why. the hand will be pulled back automatically. it is absolutely of no importance for the thinking process where the input comes from as long as it can link (and compare). an almond shaped part in the brain near each ear). at this moment. isn't it ! Unfortunately the coin has two sides. but this time there is somebody near to prevent the burning of the hand. As mentioned in a previous part. The adult suddenly notices that the child is about to burn its hand and starts to shout at the child. cardiomuscular contractions. attention. The next time the child recognizes a source of heat with its little hand. © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. All predefined and necessary from the start of the organism to survive or to facilitate the social integration. If no one is in the neighborhood to prevent this from happening. If not all humans would laugh the same way or use sticking out the thong in case of a ‘bah’ experience. How can a system be self-adapting and self-learning ? That is the basic question and therefore it is imperative to look closer at concepts like fear or emotions as something we call motivation (explained later in this document) is dependent on this. yawn or even smiling.Page 13 of 60 . only the principle is. An instinct is a predefined type of action (in the broadest sense of the word). the hand would have been burned again. Although the amygdala exists out of several independent functional cores (connected to the central core).The ultimate A. as long as you keep in mind that instincts are never Pavlovian reflexes ! Fine examples of instincts or reflexes are the surviving.I. no artificial brain is yet available. Keep this in mind ! A Pavlovian-reflex (described further in this chapter) is not the same as an instinct. sweating. love. caused by this action. Nevertheless an artificial brain was impossible due to the lack of digital surrogates for typical ‘human’ properties like fear. it is not necessary to cover them in depth here. the burning of the hand (a clear negative experience which is even threatening) will be stored via the amygdala. jumps out of his chair en strongly pulls the hand of the little child away from the stove. it would limit the system enormously if all needs to be predefined and ‘hard coded’ ! On what base will the system conclude that something might be useful and another thing is not important or obsolete ? In other words why would a system prefer mathematics over literature or otherwise ? Motivation. Simply stated (but not entirely correct).and sucking (for babies) reflexes or breathing. Sometimes instincts are mixed with the term reflexes and that is alright. confusion would arise with possible (deadly) conflicts as a result. it is released to the other parts in the brain for further processing. Fantastic. This small part is our first line of defense and some name it the center of fear or emotional center and is an element of the limbic system. emotions. motivation and motivation … The amygdala In the brain of complex vertebrates resides the amygdala (in humans. Before the child would have 'understood' that the stove is too hot. every signal on its way to be processed in the brain passes first through the amygdala and if approved.

This displays the low level the amygdala is working on … No matter how old we are. What motivation exactly is for the brain is at this moment not relevant and will be covered in depth later on.. Some other amygdala related functions are aggression and most likely reproduction too. fantastic because this is what we wanted to achieve ! Indeed.. I can assure You that this kid will no longer play much with the building blocks in the future and that was not the purpose ! The previous example perfectly demonstrates that although there are two different ways of input sensory (the burning of the hand) and shock (yelling) the outcome is the same. less active and often even lazy. Now imagine there is no stove near but in this case the child is playing with its building blocks and the adult shouting and strongly pulling the kid away from his toys is his mother. Before. __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. it is quite predictable that all these innocent incidents will have a reflection in other aspects in the daily life and often where one would not expect it ! The amygdala is also of great significance in saving data in the long-term memory. How many sisters have not a panic fear for spiders because their lovely brother found it amusing to chase dear sister with a spider in the hand or simply throwing the spider in the hair. furiously leaves the home to move in again with her mother . As discussed later on. a decrease of 30 percent of the amygdala occurs. must have at least 99 percent of impact on storage of data ! If this was not the case.. .. After castration. a selection of what to process and what to drop is needed and this selection always originates from motivation. the amygdala keeps playing an important role in our life. who.com is always required. This is not a scientific fact as such and no complete clearance is present at this moment on this topic since this only applies to male species and not in all cases has this been observed. To avoid a complete overflow of the brain. life threatening situations wouldn’t be stored immediately and permanently and therefore the future of the species would be in great danger ! It is always good practice to keep in mind that not so long ago there where more threatening than non-threatening situations humans had to face. Fear. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. . the principle of an amygdala is mandatory and will be essential for a digital brain as well. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . For now the conclusion that motivation and the amygdala are apparently connected to each other is sufficient. after a domestic quarrel. only surviving and reproduction was important.theartificialbrain. in this case that's true.Once again. How many people aren't extremely afraid to drive again after a severe car crash. This indicates that sexuality could be an important motivator. and that is where the amygdala stands for. Which is as such not so surprisingly ! One may never forget that it is only recently in human history that theoretical matter is of such meaning. A lot of people are also familiar with the knowledge that castrated tomcats and he-dogs in a lot of cases become less aggressive.. Nature is hard and hostile territory and offers more hostility than friendliness.. The current situation of diverse tens of years of (almost) peace worldwide is unique and encouraging but absolutely not representative in the search of the brain functioning ! It is rather the result of economical principles and regions in conflict mostly are economically important or absolutely not (with the unfortunate result of no or very limited external interference of other nations). Since one of the basic functions of the brain is linking (conscious or subconscious). for the child both situations are identical and a link will be stored in the amygdala.Page 14 of 60 .

even professional ones. An important conclusion here is that not trust but caution (combination fear and trust) creates most chances in surviving. nothing more or less). It is also the reason why faith is so important and © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert.B. Simply because 100 percent trust is the same as the lack of fear (not-fear) ! Ask people who are credulous and have a little too much faith in other people. others can better react.B. That is the main reason why new things frighten us and after a while the fear most of the time weakens.com . A good parent will notice the small (or expressive) changes in a child’s face or voice and will be able to relieve the burden of the child. ‘A subjective expression of an emotion’ is not so well chosen therefore and furthermore it implies that feelings are the result of emotions and that is not the case … Another commonly used approach is the ABC method to define emotions. it is wise to keep in mind that emotions (remember : the physical expression of feelings) could come in handy to better understand the thoughts and feelings of the A. Challenge – The artificial brain Emotions and feelings Some free thoughts on emotions In order to see full clarity in the principles behind the amygdala (actually the complete limbic system). it is of utmost importance to exactly figure out what emotions. I would like to emphasize that everything in the brain is subjective (discussed later on). it is. etc. pet a lion in the zoo or even tell your boss what you really think of him or her ! Caution is also a form of fear. as earlier described. What is for sure is that there must be a feeling to have an emotion. someone with absolute fear (not-trust) will collapse and display unpredictable behavior.. Primarily. It is the balance between fear and its opponent trust. Time after time they get a smack in the face ! On the other hand. it will work confusing otherwise … Fear It would be simply impossible to talk about feelings without first touching 'fear'. technically to be correct. an emotion actually needs a physical expression and then forget it. Thanks to our capacity to physically display certain feelings (that is what emotions stand for.I.B. Someone full of trust is not cautious at all and will often do stupid things. Know that. The main question is why emotions (not feelings) are so important ? The answer is interaction. In conjunction to the A. in the future of this document I will often use the term ‘emotions’ to make things a little easier to understand and more readable. It is more and more accepted that emotions and feelings are different things and that feelings are the subjective experience of an emotion.Page 15 of 60 . mix the terms emotions and feelings constantly referring to feelings. can work perfectly without the existence of emotions ! Feelings on the other hand are obligated and the rest of this chapter is dedicated to this subject. our main protector ! Without fear you would cross roads without checking. it is of the utmost importance that fear exists. It helps social (non-verbal) communication and it comes in handy when raising children. dramatized feeling. Someone crying will need some comforting. I prefer the description of Robert Masters stating that emotion is psychosocially constructed.The ultimate A. Personally. Since most people. Whether emotions are the consequences of feelings or they arise simultaneously (axons can fire to many dendrites at once) is a discussion I am not willing to perform and it is not mandatory in the case of an A. In order to survive. but they are optional ! Yes. If we are unable to link something we get afraid. an A. Someone with an angry face will be recognized allover the world as someone to avoid.masureel@theartificialbrain.B. feelings and fear are. at that moment.

Trust in the own capacities. just the possibility to link it gives a comforting feeling. as we will cover later on. Self-confidence. Anger is often used as an easy way to avoid rejection or psychological pain too. and that is correct. This surprised me and after digging even deeper I discovered something of the greatest importance in the realization of an A. Due to historical and sociological reasons men try more to suppress these feelings or often even don't know how to handle them (everything is better than being called a woes). Fear to lose certain attainments or attainments others achieved are not preserved for oneself. Fear something is not 'good' enough. Sense of shame. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. Dissatisfaction. Notice that in this case a partner (person) can be an attainment for some people ! Greed.. both positive and negative feelings ! Let’s start with some 'negative' samples :        Sense of guilt. Autistic people display this even better than words can. Fear that one is done wrong.should be respected. When you look closer. Sadness and anger. surprise..Page 16 of 60 .. miserliness.theartificialbrain. sadness.com is always required. Self respect. curiosity and acceptance). something interesting comes to the surface. it is very well possible to modify or influence one’s character (both conscious and subconscious) as long as the person self is willing to cooperate in this process. The major fears and not-fears (feelings) in fact are the key modelers in one’s personality ! The good news here is that these fears can be changed. joy. Trust one is 'good' the way he/she is right now. no matter what gender. the derivatives of fear Every feeling is a derivative of fear. Trust that 'justice' is done for oneself. not remarkably. … Feelings. Fear that the own efforts (or the lack of) caused something that could have been avoided. Trust there is enough available. fear. Anger. Fear (or not-fear) remains fear. so yes. Trust one is better than another. One should be able to link experiences to something and whether that ‘something’ is correct or not is less important. Trust that things are the way they are 'supposed to be'. Satisfaction and joy. Notice that some feelings are actually combinations of fear or not-fear and the above list is only there for demonstrative purposes. . Envy or jealousy. you will even see that a man having less emotions (or feelings) than a woman is nothing more than a fable.. disgust. Fear that one actually is inferior to another person. derivatives of trust (or not-fear) :       Happiness. sadness and joy are essentially sub forms of fear ! Disgust and surprise are special and will be discussed later on and curiosity and acceptance are both ways of steering the fear-trust balance (also explained later). Fear of what other people will or would think about us. Try something new (out of the pattern) and they usually become hysteric ! When looking a little closer at the primary emotions (or feelings) like for example Plutchik lists (anger. Generosity. a man would have had a guilt sense during hunting __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www.B. Just imagine that a couple of thousand years ago. Superiority sense. A second remarkable thing we detect looking a little closer is that some feelings (like generosity) are traditionally taken as a part of the character and not looked at as feelings . Get them first before they get you ! The 'positive' feelings are. This explains why brainwashing will not work if someone is not willing to believe the ‘new information’ or this ‘new information’ is too much in conflict with other values. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . Sense of inferiority. Fear of deficit.

The ultimate A.I. Challenge – The artificial brain

every time he needed to kill 'that sweet and lovely little animal' in order to survive ! Women on the other hand (in that same period) were benefiting from having 'better developed' feelings (and emotions). This was necessary to raise the children and to obtain a better social contact with other 'moms'. What we describe as empathy is nothing more or less than a (conscious or even subconscious) simulation process of the feelings the other person is going through. That is the reason why someone with few empathic abilities is always someone having problems with the own emotions or feelings (as described earlier, typical for the male gender) ... … it is hard to link if no available information is there ! These empathy equations will certainty be one of the toughest nuts to crack for military application of a digital brain. If the focus is on suppressing the own feelings, few empathic capabilities will be present. This creates cold-blooded soldiers who are willing to do the dirty work but who become a possible threat at the same time with less control over. Not to mention the possible side effects in the long run on both the own mental state as well as possible destructive behavior towards the environment caused by suppressing feelings. On the other hand, if the empathic capabilities are too well defined, the robot or whatever carrier of the A.B. will not be capable of killing … … and that is something most military commanders wouldn’t appreciate ! Two workarounds are possible. The first one is creating multipersonalities, which is of course dangerous and hard to control what personality will become the more dominant. The second option is my favorite and is something human is incapable of : adding a third ‘conscious’ level, perfectly externally controllable. This would be comparable with a soldier temporarily under hypnosis, but without the capacity of waking up out of this hypnotic state and without being conscious of what it is doing at that particular moment ! The main advantage of this approach is that the system is not aware of anything and, in worst case, it will be experienced like a bad dream. The closer a feeling resides on the side of absolute fear (zero trust), the more we tend to call it a phobia and the more chance there is a link stored in the amygdala. And no, removing the amygdala (the center of fear) does not create 'fearless people' ! Around 1960, a lot of research was done in this field and the main conclusion was that people with a disconnected amygdala lived the life of a vegetable. This may seem strange at first, but in the chapter of motivation we will cover this in depth. For now it is enough to memorize that motivation is driven by feelings and, as mentioned above, feelings are derivatives of fear ...

Disgust and surprise
As mentioned before these two basic emotions/feelings are special. Disgust is an all or nothing feeling. Either you are disgusted by something or you are not ! Being a little disgusted is not possible. It is also the only basic feeling which is not needed in order to obtain a fully working A.B.. For humans it is fundamental a protection system. Food tasting or smelling ‘bad’ or a room smelling terribly (often indicating the presence of unhealthy bacteria) will be avoided. The throw-up reflex, characterizing disgust, will protect you from eating contaminated food. It sometimes happens one saying to the other ‘You disgust me !’, but this is more a way of expressing the degree of dissatisfaction than it has to do with the feeling of disgust. No specific reflexes, typical for disgust, will be present … Surprise on the other hand is special since it can be both a positive and negative feeling. Surprise as such can be best considered as a layer between unexpected input and fear. Surprise is necessary for an A.B. since it is the way the system will be able to react to unexpected changes. We live on pattern recognition (what else do neurons) and we always expect something to happen. Most of the time this expectation will be the continuation of what was happening at that moment (the pattern). Standing on a dance floor with the music up loud, one supposes (subconsciously) the next moment the music will still be loud. If something happens to the dj’s equipment and the music all at sudden stops, one is surprised ! If I whisper during a conversation and unexpectedly raise my voice, you will be near having a heart attack ! If you come back to your hometown after 20 years and see new buildings and roads, you will be surprised ! If you meet a friend in the afternoon, you did see in the morning, with a complete different haircut (short instead of long hair), you will be surprised. The same applies to fusion cooking, the latest
© Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert.masureel@theartificialbrain.com - Page 17 of 60

trend in haut-cuisine, if you are served a green ice-cream smelling and tasting like strawberries, you will be surprised ! The best humor is the one ending unforeseen. Surprise is one of the main ways the attention is focused on something specific (possibly threatening) ! This principle is the same for both humans and lots of animals and runs on a very low level in the brain. In the previous paragraph I stated that surprise could be both positive as negative, but this is not entirely correct. The outcome of surprise can be either condition but surprise as such is stateless. Surprise is also the driving element behind the well-known ‘fight-or-flight’ response. But what about confusion ? Is that not pretty much the same as surprise ? No ! Confusion is nothing more than opposite and conflicting information available for the brain. Nevertheless confusion is often indirectly the result of surprise. If you walk in a wood and all at the sudden a bear passes by, this will cause surprise. If two different people at that moment give conflicting information like “Drop on the ground and lay still” and “Run for your life”, there will be confusion (“which of both is accurate?”) ! So it is not truly the surprise causing the confusion but two or more conflicting data in how to react on the surprise. In the brain cause and consequence are not always easy to point out since many neurons can fire in a split second and most of the time the output becomes new input !

Curiosity and acceptance
Both “curiosity” and “acceptance” regulate fear. By nature one is afraid of new experiences and these are considered as threatening. The fear-slider will be positioned on the side of fear. If there was no mechanism to move this slider towards trust (not-fear), it would be impossible to overcome this and as a result life would be impossible ! Both humans and animals constantly are exposed to new experiences and fear alone would work contra-productive. Go near an animal not familiar with you and it will be afraid of approaching you. If you sit there long enough and are gentile to the animal, after a while it will make small moves towards you, slow and suspicious. The smallest move of your part will result in surprise and the animal will run away or at least take some steps back. Eventually the animal might overcome this first natural fear, thanks to curiosity, and see you as non-threatening. This last will especially be the case if a (food) reward is given. After a while the animal will be familiar with you (a pattern is established) and neither curiosity nor fear will still be necessary. “Acceptance” is also a fear regulator and is the main and fastest regulator towards trust. Someone accepting a certain situation will be without fear for that situation ! Religious people like Buddhists believe that there is a reason for everything. A situation causing an awful lot of fear for most people, like a violent hostage, will cause less fear for those accepting that this could be the end and especially if a positive image of an afterlife is present, like for our Buddhist friends. Forgiveness is nothing more or less than acceptance and it is the reason why victims of severe crimes able to forgive the criminal, finally are able to continue with their lives. Most feelings or emotions are, as seen before, derivatives of fear and if we take away the fear (acceptance), the emotion will no longer be a spoilsport since the emotion is simply eliminated ! “Acceptance” has another meaning as well, a more personal one ! Everybody wants to be accepted, the opposite of rejection. The reason I mention this here is because it is also important for the A.B.. This form of acceptance is a result of the punishment and rewarding system we all have. Not being accepted feels similar as doing something the wrong way (bad/punishment). A good description to make it even more understandable is that rejection (opposite of acceptance) is a sort of psychological slap in the face. Ignoring people during conversations is more or less rejecting people and can truly hurt ! The selfimage will suffer from it and anyone manipulating someone else will, consciously or subconsciously, uses this acceptance and rejection as powerful weapons, always ! Since it is impossible to have an A.B.
__________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www.theartificialbrain.com is always required. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type, style and height must be easy readable !
© Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel - Page 18 of 60

The ultimate A.I. Challenge – The artificial brain

without fear, rewarding- and punishment-system (motivation) the chances the A.B. will suffer from this drawback is extremely high ! It is important to understand that humans will for a long time not accept an A.B. (fear, religion, superiority feeling, …) and during the ‘education’ of the A.B. this topic must be addressed so the A.B. will be aware that they didn’t cause this ! The tutors also need to exceed this and accept and nourish the A.B. with this in mind ! I presume it is not the intention to create digital Hiltlers, Mussolinis or serial killers ! After reading this, it is obvious both regulators operate at a very low level and are mandatory in an A.B.

Pain
One surprising aspect in the list of basic emotions of Plutchik is the absence of pain. Physical pain has all ingredients to be considered as an emotion, even a basic emotion. But there is also something we refer to as emotional or psychological pain. Those reading this document are without doubt above average intelligence, it is not easy matter and my writing can hardly be compared with brilliant writers such as Shakespeare or Tom Clancy. So, if I would say, looking you straight in the eyes, that you are really stupid and have absolutely no idea of what you are reading, it will hurt you (possibly also make you angry or sad). This feeling is an emotional pain and for all clarity, it is not the result of anger or sadness as other processes raise those feelings. It would be fantastic if we could avoid these emotional pains in our A.B. since it is the cause of possible problems. The bad news is that an A.B. without these emotional pains would not be able to function in an intelligent way ! The reason for this latter conclusion is that pain is always a warning signal and results in avoiding something. If you hurt your foot, the pain will be the warning signal something is wrong and you will avoid walking on it as long as the pain remains. The same applies to emotional pain. The hurting of my fictive sentence of you being stupid will be considered as a warning signal that you may be doing something ‘wrong’ and you will avoid getting the same comments from me in the future ! Emotional pain is one of the most important motivators ! If I would keep on repeating my commentary, you would actually start avoiding me ! It will hardly surprise one that the way we handle physical and emotional pain in the brain is very similar and both make use of the same areas. This is one of the reasons self-mutilation exists. Some consider hurting and pain as ‘pleasant’ (Sado-Masochism, endorphin ‘addiction’ like in runners high) or even relieving (self-mutilation). Remember, in the brain it is all about linking and comparison ! Combine this with the ultimate goal of feeling ‘good’ and strange permutations like self-mutilation are in some cases the outcome … … this proofs once more that experiences are the most important factor in defining one’s life !

Aggression
Although aggression is not an emotion (anger is), it is wise to cover it here. If an intelligent system has no way of defending itself from external attacks, it will not live long ! One can argue with a bear but it is to be expected that the bear will not respond well on this ! In the well-known fight-or-flight reflex in either case the system will temporarily require more energy available than normal. For humans this will be a momentarily rise of adrenaline. In case the system concludes that ‘fight’ is the procedure to follow, aggression will be the result. Aggression causes the system to focus on a single thing and, dependent on the degree of aggression, it will block out the thinking system as a normal reaction since all attention is directed towards ‘the fight’. Real aggressive people often do things at that specific moment they regret later and insanity is a legal term for the point where aggression blocks out all ‘normal thinking’. Even though the first reflex might be not to implement a similar function in the A.B., it is not so wise ! Anger (as all emotions) is an important motivator. At certain moments the system must be angry at itself in order to deal with fear. It will be the anger that will lead to action and this action will allow new experiences and these can be the cause of overcoming the fear (gaining trust – believe). As explained
© Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert.masureel@theartificialbrain.com - Page 19 of 60

If your partner is cheating on you. The first one is that per certain time period. used for industrial purposes. without loosing the benefits of getting angry. The aggression factor will need to be high in order to do some ‘dirty work’ but it is the same amount of aggression required to damage the ‘own troops’. as described elsewhere in this document. Since all in the brain is linking and comparison this will occur automatically if the A. is designed on the fundamentals in this document. if the attention is drawn to something else the anger will stop. If you are having a quarrel and someone is ringing at the door. An A. it is best implemented in the A. without subconscious level and.B. the attention will (temporarily) be redrawn from the argue and the anger will decrease. ! This will turn out to be one of the main challenges if an A. also decreasing the value. which is limited in time as motivator). This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type.B.B. This will cause the system to deal with anger in a better way than humans do ! A second good trick is if the systems ‘aggression variable’ reaches a certain value for a certain amount of time.Page 20 of 60 . as a global variable.B. Attention and severity are the key players in this. Notice that if the point of real aggression is reached. will be used for military reasons. the doorbell will likely even enlarge the anger and could lead towards a snapping point. Is it possible to make the system better stress-resistant than animals and humans by not using a stack approach (placing one little annoyance on top of the other (increasing the var) until the point of outburst is reached and aggression is the result) ? The answer is yes and no ! Dependent on the requirements it is possible.B.elsewhere in this document. How long will the system be angry at the moment ? Sometimes we remain angry for a minute and other times it takes hours or days to calm down. How long will the system remain angry about a certain issue ? Two aspects are determinant in this : • The reference in the associated object in the brain will remain active until other experiences diminish the anger associated with the object. learning theoretical matter is also a sort of experience and if the system would not have the ability to become angry it would be fully dependent on external input in order to gain trust for overcoming new experiences (except for curiosity. If you reflect on a specific negative experience it will still make you angry nevertheless it might have happened several years ago. chances are higher that this will have your attention for a longer period than when a minor traffic incident caused some anger.B.B.theartificialbrain.B. Communication can play an important factor as well since it will (in most cases) create experiences decreasing the anger value. It is important to implement some dimming mechanisms since it is virtually impossible to create an A. In most cases although. the reflex could be to either start diminishing it automatically or forcing the system to focus on other things. Since aggression is hormone-driven. implemented in a robot used for peacekeeping missions in hostile territory will require a higher level of aggression in order to defend itself than for example an A.com is always required. • Some simple techniques can help in managing this for the A. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . the subconscious level will deal with the anger too ! This will happen in a rather uncontrolled way and therefore could lead to results one prefers not to have for an A. The time-factor will play an important role as well. something to be avoided ! __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. it might be wise to diminish the anger factor for the topic by a specific number.

On the other hand believe had something to do with it. Only at 'older' age they realize that the way they have been treated was not “right’ and the mental struggle begins. basis of most exact sciences.The ultimate A.Page 21 of 60 .masureel@theartificialbrain. but when one accepts (remember.. the no-fear creator) that the social system can not longer be of assistance. the fear will decrease and you will cross the road ! As mentioned earlier in this document. You are afraid of crossing a road blindfolded because you are afraid you will die ! So. Of course experiences help in this. always believe … I should have seen it sooner ! Many involved in unraveling emotions. With just a little imagination it would be correct to state that science functions as an extra sense thanks to the capacity of interpreting input that is not directly noticeable to the other senses … If believe would not be the driving force behind all thinking. Suicide attempts are often made to get attention in the hope (again believe) the disbelieve is not correct (a cry for help). But how could fear be steered and what about believe ? Two items I needed to fit into my scheme and no matter how I tried. calmer and even relaxed and looked in full control and happier … … no wonder since the fear-slider was more towards trust than fear. there was always something missing or there was a contradiction ! I simply didn't see it … Believe. Trust that suicide would be the outcome to all problems ! Even the ground rules of mathematics. This is the hypnotic phase we will discus later on. but those experiences are based on subjective matter as well and what else than believe is subjective matter … Molested or abused little children only at 'older' age have severe mental problems. the driving force ! Introduction It literally took me several years to overcome this one. Believe is the determinant factor in moving the slider of fear from 0 (non-fear or trust) up to 100 percent (max fear or phobia). then a serious suicide attempt with high potential of success will follow. but what ? Then. In these cases the surrounding often is surprised (something out of the pattern. believe. all at the sudden. is not longer capable of offering help and they somehow feel rejected by this system. faith (not-fear) and fear (not-faith) pretty much look the same ! In all my previous models of an A. Remember that for our calibration-system first experiences work as calibration-point and children are not only impressed by 'mature' people but they believe that what is done by these people is the 'right thing' (non-fear or trust). as seen before) and frequently say that the person was feeling a lot better recently. I ended up with fear as the absolute basic where all the rest was build-upon and everything seemed to work fine as you can see throughout this document so far. religions try to offer answers to 'difficult' questions and problems. believe that emotions express sorts of beliefs or appearances and I already knew that this was not entirely correct ! Emotions. or even better the underlying feelings. are derivates of fear. In this way believe provides faith (not-fear).com . At first glance. as explained earlier.B. all pieces of the puzzle fell together ! Believe and not fear is the absolute fundament in our thinking process ! Why are you afraid of something ? Because you believe it will harm you in some way. it would conflict with the statement that © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. Challenge – The artificial brain Believe. are axioms and this is nothing else than believe ! Nature does not need math to do what it does ! Science is our way of finding patterns for natural phenomenons and thereby sometimes being able of making predictions. People facing severe depression have the impression (believe) the social system (whatever that is).I. if I can make you believe the road is clear and will remain clear for at least 24 hours.

In order to make the ‘final’ decision what to believe. You believe something or you don’t or you have no opinion on that subject ! You cannot believe or disbelieve a little bit ! This neutral state can be : no opinion. All these mini-routes are actually believe and I must admit that sometimes they can be strange in nature and far-fetched ! Once you believe that a certain path will not lead towards answers. For instance if one source is a respected person (believe again) and the other is totally unknown. People living in the barest and worst conditions. exact science. regardless of what fields of expertise we are into (innovation. not interested. the path is dropped. the child almost certainly will end up indecisive ! Another factor is the amount of available information.theartificialbrain. Evidence was there but convictions too and it took an enormous effort to overcome those … … and what else than belief is a conviction ? Notice as well that lots of scientific proof originates from the belief of a single soul and the determination to prove his/her right … … whether we like it or not. I wanted to exclude the amount of external influence as much as possible. But more about this in that chapter. mathematics. But what about doubt ? I can believe or disbelieve something and have doubts at the same time ! Does this imply that believe is rather a slider as fear is ? No ! Doubting is a process were believe is a state ! If conflicting ‘reliable’ information is available one often is forced to choose between the two or more possibilities. as mentioned in the preface. and the question is whether this should be the default state. neutral state and disbelieve. Since believe is the fundament of all. belief and interpretation absolutely dominate our lives more than anything else. having hope. chances are high that the statement of the respected person will be taken as correct. If both father and mother argue and the child is forced to choose one opinion and no previous data is available of unreliability of either parent. Not knowing what to believe is actually ‘doubting’. philosophy. sometimes do amazing things ! And hope is nothing else than the belief that there is a possibility that the circumstances will change. The same also applies for two believable paths conflicting with each other ! Lots of scientists have the tendency of starting new ‘far-fetched’ paths with a state of unbelief and I am sure that if they had the initial reflex of belief-until-proven-otherwise they would advance faster … … __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. etc. no information available. sociology. Subjective because even respected people make mistakes ! Notice that the doubt will be more intense the higher the reliability of the diverse sources is. it is incorporated in everything we store and I will discus the storing-topic in the chapter “Memory”. The way we mainly interpret is indeed dependent of what we believe at that moment ! The following sample will demonstrate this perfectly : the discussion a few hundred years ago whether the earth was round or not. With a limited amount of information one must pick routes to follow and build further on these routes resulting in a network of possibilities.com is always required. we will check the credibility of the source and this is not done in an objective way. psychology. In the chapter “What about hormones ?”. I show the need of ‘trust’ for small children in order to learn and this indicates that during the pre-juvenal phase the best default state is ‘believe’. the old path will be immediately reopened. Suicidal people give up hope and therefore they give up the believe that their life might change for the good (whatever this may be) and are willing to unplug … The three states of believe and doubt Believe essentially exists out of three states : believe. Not because no information was available but because. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. theology. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . In that way I was forced of being both creative and skeptical at once. in most cases. During my 20 years’ search I often faced the problem of having non or very few information on specific topics.everything in the brain is an interpretation of facts (as discussed later).Page 22 of 60 . …) ! Hope is a crucial factor in the thinking process too. If future information suddenly arouses the belief that with the new information the old path could lead towards answers.

Page 23 of 60 .The ultimate A.com . Challenge – The artificial brain this is actually what we name being open-minded and creativity flouts on this.masureel@theartificialbrain.I. Doubting is also often used in sentences as a polite way of saying “I don’t believe it for a moment !” and has nothing to do with doubt as such ! © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert.

Once again perception. but during dreaming the consciousness is not existent (at least not in the dreaming part) ! In order to demonstrate my main objection in following this approach. This is very well possible since I can make the computer generate shapes automatically and can compare the network output with the input shape. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . every experience (P) is based upon decisions (A) and all decisions (A) are based upon experience (P). The last two are mostly ways of gathering or receiving 'external information' and their role is not so important to create a standalone artificial brain.Page 24 of 60 . it is not mandatory in this case. not to define it and secondly. not only is it confusing. Consciousness Some free thoughts Although it is a habitual wisdom that consciousness cannot be defined. but that is for later on … Traditionally the consciousness is divided in P.(Access) consciousness. it is really quite simple to define the boundaries wherein the consciousness ‘resides’. Whether there is an upper consciousness or not is also something I wish to leave in the middle. allow me to pick a last case.B. an endless loop is born ! And what about dreaming ? The information the dream is based upon and the processing (internal thoughts) are both Access and the experience of the dream (ask someone waking up in sweat after a nasty dream) is Phenomenal. upperand collective consciousness. I would like to break this tradition (and not from a philosophical point of view). First of all. Some consider the things preached by ‘respected people’ as holy and extremely sapient while others might find it very dumb. As mentioned before. Secondly let’s not forget that sapience is always subjective inherently. containing no wisdom at all. it is too important for an A. Only in further steps where more 'special communication' is required this comes into the picture. Running the network in executive mode. but also no progress can be made in the understanding of the brain. This last is especially correct when I would automate the learning process. For example. If I create a small neural network existing out of a few neurons to recognize simple shapes.The diverse forms of consciousness Introduction Traditionally there are four forms of consciousness : The consciousness.(Phenomenal) and A. Respectively they stand for experience (P) and (the A-part) accessibility and behavior-control. Therefore only the consciousness and subconsciousness are covered in detail in the following chapter. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. according to the definitions there is a consciousness ?!? In the learning phase of this small network the learning as such is Access while the storing of the information is sort of experience and is Phenomenal. Events out of these two areas are described as subconscious events.theartificialbrain. One of the typical qualities usually linked to the consciousness is subjectivity. subconsciousness. the experience is the input of the dendrites and is Phenomenal and the reflection if the input comes near a predefined value (error level is low) is taking a decision and is therefore Access ! __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. Later on in this document I demonstrate that every input results in perception and therefore is always subjective by nature ! In other parts I will also demonstrate that other classic qualia like sapience actually relay as much on the subconsciousness (or even more sometimes) than on the consciousness. If one holds on to these criteria.com is always required.

And there is. This indirectly indicates that concentration is energy consuming and as most species.masureel@theartificialbrain. A typical example of this is someone conducting a car. it works a lot better ! The main question in this equation is why a conscious and subconscious are required ? One may not forget that we are the result of millions of years of evolution and it is obvious that only improvements last (more chances in surviving for the specie). this will strengthen the link petit-a-petit or immediately in the brain and will often be used as input as well as in solving the ‘problem’. I took a different approach in defining both and remarkably. using the blinker and even brake a little from time to time. since much more of these processes need to be executed by the consciousness (maybe even how to switch gears).000 years ago had. Only when the vehicle right in front of 'our ace' suddenly brakes really hard. Both gather their information (mostly) from the same sources and process this in the exact same way. humans are energy saving creatures (more chances in surviving). both conscious and subconscious are actually identical but operate on another level. but the consciousness will possibly consider shifting back one or more gears to even attain a greater deceleration and basically give this command if needed. if considered important. only automated processes can run in the background (subconscious). the total number of performed tasks might even be tremendously higher. All these maneuvers are pretty complex as such (ask a rookie). The conscious’ level primary role is to maximize the surviving chances through fast detection and reacting on immediate danger. Since humans of 5. Someone studying hard for a couple of hours will be exhausted (almost all on conscious level) while working a complete day at work in familiar matter (routine and on subconscious level) will be less fatigued or maybe even bored. Is something important (for this person) or not ? This meaning once again is based upon chances of surviving. turning the wheel. In this case it is more likely that pure luck will be the cause if a crash is avoided. as described in the next chapter.and executive phase for the network. It is vital to look deeper into this.com . the consciousness will demand all attention and those processes that are not important at that moment (listening to the music en picking the noose) will be killed. Conscious versus subconscious People working with artificial neural networks always need a learning. If in the future similar events happen. All input is experience ! If we look a little closer at experience. appreciation. The base for potential storing in the brain is always “meaning”. punishment and pleasure. As we will see later on.I. The consciousness analyzes fast the possible options like : will hard braking be sufficient without the car following me bumping into me or do I have to swerve left or right to avoid an accident ? Some processes like how to shift gears will still be done by the subconscious. A rookie will miss the experience and reflexes causing a possible overflow of processes for the consciousness. it will be stored.Page 25 of 60 . all at the same time ! It's obvious that these processes run in the background (via the subconscious). In the case of a ‘normal’ day. As you will discover in a few minutes. Challenge – The artificial brain Another approach towards answers To facilitate this conscious-subconscious problem. More than fifty percent of the time this will be done on 'automatic pilot' and the driving itself just happens without real (conscious) thinking.The ultimate A. it is a good starting point. With just a little imagination one could state that the conscious is the learning input. the subconscious’ only purpose is to relieve the conscious. Simply stated. so this distinction between conscious and subconscious makes sense ! © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. the same brain as we do today. but the load is significantly lower. rewarding. globally taken. An important supposition is that the consciousness can handle fewer processes at the same time than the subconscious because conscious processes use a lot more resources in terms of memory usage and load. Changing gears. we notice that all input is actually experience because notwithstanding what sense or senses is or are the receptor(s) of the input. there must be a surviving function integrated. but a more experienced driver still has time left to listen to some music and even to pick the noose. Although this is not entirely correct (described later on). while the subconscious leans more towards the executive phase.

you will try a lot of links. only the outcome..theartificialbrain. in the brain we link and this linking is done in a creative way during the learning curve. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . Before you will have the insight in the matter. First all 10 digits (0. it will even be virtually impossible to memorize it. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. The digidala (digital amygdala) will be the key-factor in which step the numbering on a particular script should be increased. In the human brain this is often referred to as Long Term Potentiation (LTP). no other or new paths could be taken and the learning would remain very primitive without improvements or simplifications being possible since only the ‘highest’ path could be followed.Page 26 of 60 • . The principle I introduce here can be applied to all brain-storage.9) must be learned.com is always required. how absurd this might look at first. Understanding complex theoretical concepts (what we usually call education) is not different from the previous and can also be classified under the concept of experience. the chances in failure increase drastically (the reason why so many do not understand mathematics). will for sure use the same approach in the future and become unmanageable and a real pain in the ass. compare them and decide if the result is correct (again the tree basic functions of the brain). the lower the step has to be. If a certain neuron or chain of neurons is not used for a long period of time. The brain is result based ! The more this mininetwork will be used. In the play-area of the digital brain (a little like the frontal lobe) two things need to be done on neuron level : how many times is this neuron used in the learning process (a second counter) and the possibility to leave a certain path of neurons out of the chain. like real threatening experiences. The more neutral (less interesting) something is. Ever tried to teach someone something he or she is not interested in ? Only if the fear (yes amygdala interference) is present that not learning this ‘uninteresting’ stuff will lead to a ‘bad’ thing. it would be good practice to keep this in mind and preserve a space where ‘neurons’ or ‘scripts’ can ‘play’ (in the future of this document I will mix these terms neuron and script but actually referring to the same). the increase should even be maximal on first experience. The first one (counter) is needed to indicate the creative system (what else is creating new patterns) which is the preferred way or path to follow. If the neuron or chain of neurons is repeated frequently (high counter value) with success. Nevertheless. Step by step and if one of these steps is not stable.Experience. like failing for an exam. The internal connections in such a mini-network and how many neurons are used will differ for each individual and is not important. In some cases. the more stable the links in this network will become and after a while something called long term potentiation will occur and the mini-network will be stored for a real long time in the long term memory (as described later). Also adding a counter and last used date will be necessary. In the digital brain. and is not only limited to the ‘creativity center’. if no way would be present to deviate from the ‘existing’ path of high counter values. it can be safely deleted to preserve space and memory and keep the system fast. and only experience is capable of transferring a process from the conscious to the subconscious level ! This is the case because only experience gives the signal that it is save to do the transfer and that the full attention of the consciousness is no longer needed to operate this process. simple equations will be used with those same 10 digits as input and after a while these simple equations will even be used in other more complex equations. Just look at someone learning basic mathematics to understand this. Once this is done. Even the way emotions are handled operates mainly on experience. will be used again in the near future. Bad or good experiences will have a significant higher step than ‘neutral’ experiences. This is done using the wellknown method of 'trial and error' and is exactly the same as learning to ride the bike. A child experiencing that bad behavior leads to attention and getting new stuff. All these mini-networks (or call it procedures) can and will be used in future linking as well. __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. Why ? • Well. walk and blow the noose or any other 'physical' activity. the procedure is ready to be stored in the long-term memory. That is why I am a great advocate of teaching creatively. in the broadest sense of the word. The brain is capable of creating its own mini-neural networks and if the outcome of one of these mini-networks is considered positive. The higher the number of the diverse counters the more likely that it is the right path.

the link will be made that the other person in the mirror must be oneself ! As a result an “image” of oneself will be stored in the brain and will be used to compare with in the future. To make a dog slaver when it actually can notice on a conscious level via vision or smell that there is no meat. it is proof of the fact that the brain is capable of complex linking. rang every time a bell just before he gave his dog some meat. After a while. the slaver will stop. after a while.I. If one of these babies is hungry the crying will start. Once this link is established. but to evade the statement ‘how can one be selfish if there is no self-awareness ?’. number of neurons) seems to be the decisive factor to create self-awareness … If an adult. Challenge – The artificial brain with a vivid imagination. the topic on ego (selfishness) will be covered in depth. the meat and no slaver. That way more pupils will be interested in the matter and better results will follow automatically. Pavlov was a scientist who. comparison and decision. the person will discover that the reflection is not ‘real’ and that by moving the reflection moves exactly the same way. meat was there) was sufficient. this process must be running in the background (subconscious).masureel@theartificialbrain. In psychology the Pavlov-reflex is often used to demonstrate how many times we actually don’t use the consciousness but rather float on associations (links). The linking occurred at the moment the experience of the dog (every time the bell rang. A young child whose self-awareness is not yet present will touch the red dot of the ‘child’ in the mirror. The remarkable is that only the brain capacity (nl. An interesting side conclusion of this Pavlov test is that dogs obviously also use the system of consciousness and subconscious . Do you think one of the hungry babies will stop crying and spontaneously will say ‘I insist. nothing more or less ! Just look around and you will find very few people who actually are self-aware and even less who are self-conscious ! Selfish yes.Page 27 of 60 . Let’s retell the story for those who never heard it before. a long time ago. self-aware no … … two different things ! Later on. There simply was no link. there would be the spontaneous effect of looking at the reflection as it were a stranger (no information in the brain is yet available associated with the ‘image’ of this person). In psychology the red dot on the forehead of a child and a mirror are used to demonstrate the existence of the self-awareness (the mirror-test). which we could also describe as self-consciousness ? Although it is almost impossible to support this with enough evidence. Children with sufficient self-consciousness will touch the red spot on the own forehead while looking in the mirror. this person will touch it and not the one on the mirror … Personally I find the red dot test rather simplistic and not real proof of self-awareness and even less of self-consciousness ! Nevertheless. especially after touching oneself. you would actually observe the same thing ! First. © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. just think of a mother having a triplet or a maternity with multiple newborns.. And yes. Self-awareness (self-conscious) All well. personally I am a great advocate of the thought that this is a logical side effect of the human capacity to link. Only when the dog figures out that there actually is no meat (and this can take a while and is based on hope trough experience). but what about the self-awareness. please feed the crying baby to my left side first please !’? I don’t think either … … so “selfishness” is inherent from the bitter start. After a while. What Pavlov actually proved is that the above theorem of the experience transferred to the subconscious is indeed correct ! In the beginning there was the bell.com . Now let’s take the example that more than one of them is hungry and only one feeding bottle is available. selfawareness not (if we are willing to accept the concept of self-awareness).The ultimate A. compare and decide.. combined with the amount of neurons available. even when no meat was present. would be placed in the same situation. This test was performed on a number of animals as well and on some like dolphins and elephants it had the same outcome as on humans. never using a mirror (and not knowing what a mirror’s purpose is). if a red dot will be spotted on the forehead (a difference). the dog was slavering hearing the bell.

from malfunctions in the brain to extensive use of amphetamines or other drugs shortly before sleeping. this person had to drive over 20 kilometers by car to arrive at his mother-in-law’s house and to carry out his brutal action. To speed up the transfer routine and to preserve the conscious for 'urgent processes' (historically more chance to survive) the subconscious uses its own capability to simulate. It appears that the brain is perfectly capable of simulating processes. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel .K. you do not waste time in actually doing so but nevertheless it will feel like real. Although most 'sleepwalkers' make spastic and incoherent movements while dreaming. __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. link and decide. This is only partially correct as described below. This is without doubt the reason why someone can have a dream of only a few seconds while if in real life it would have taken hours of action. This is not a nice gadget. One must not forget that only very recently in the history of humans the brain has to cope with such large amounts of pure theoretical and abstract matter (education). Creativity. It looks pretty much like the well known 127 IP loop back address in computer networking. Our brain does absolutely make no difference between theoretical matter or standard daily experiences. it probably would make you shudder and maybe even raise goose bumps. This is what we refer to as dreaming.theartificialbrain.Page 28 of 60 . This particular switch immediately returns the signal one has arrived. But there is actually no spider ! One can hardly state that this is a Pavlovreflex since you probably have no real repetitive experience in walking around with spiders on your arms. Before that. such severe cases of sleepwalking are rather rare because in normal conditions a switch in the brain prevents physical actions (like walking or car driving) from happening. Although there are many reasons why people sleepwalk. in the U. it just does do ! Never had a dream or nightmare that felt pretty real when waking up ? This brings us to sleepwalkers or people with sleeping disorders. only two things were important : surviving and reproduction. more severe cases are known where it would be incorrect to state that all things done are essentially 'automated tasks'. in other words the brain’s capacity is limited. Enough existing studies reveal that while sleeping (actually dreaming) new study material is assimilated. In this specific case precise proof was provided that this person was. If you dream you are going to a place. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. a sleepwalker. there is one common thing. medically seen. For example. The consciousness is not active and the person is actually sleeping. as long as it can compare. When I would ask you to close your eyes and to imagine that a large fat and deadly spider is crawling on your arm. dreams. To commit the murder. but bitter necessity ! In a previous chapter we demonstrated that conscious processes are transferred to the subconscious part of the brain once a routine is established (experience). Let’s give an example to describe this.So self-awareness should not be taken in consideration in the blueprint of the artificial brain but should create itself if the digital brain is well designed and if the brain capacity is sufficient.com is always required. We also know that the brain is restricted in the amount of processes it can handle simultaneously. imagination and thinking A major and essential part of the working of the conscious and subconscious are without doubt the simulation processes. a man was acquitted of the charge of murder on his mother-in-law. Perhaps the best proof that consciousness and subconsciousness actually are the same (but on a different level) and use the same resources to operate. all while sleeping ! Fortunately.

The liar usually picks an existing experience (linking) and only makes small changes to it. as described earlier.. Challenge – The artificial brain As mentioned before. lies) or a subconscious (dreams. © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. The links for the pattern. the lie will be told (decision). in most cases. it could be wise to integrate the storage and retrieval of data exclusively for the subconscious level. Secondly. are exactly the same ! Driving the car is. but it might as well be new input for further 'thinking'. Don't confuse this with a blackout where fear is in most cases the main cause. a fast internal simulation of the lie is made to check the credibility of the lie (compare). Sleeping a night over it is in this latter case a wise decision . Try to wake up someone in the middle of a dream (REM) and it will take severe shaking to achieve this. One confuses one thing with another.. To accomplish this. and the short term memory is one of the only ways both 'meet' each other directly.. as seen before. idea or solution popping up in the middle of the night. the lie becomes a little more subtle and less 'outer space' and is in fact largely based on 'reality'. This is actually also the reason why students who love to party (a little too much) during the year and need to absorb gigantic amounts of study material the day before the exam. They are the result of successive abstract processes (via trial and error) and the outcome is 'something'. we are well aware what the dream was. the amount was simply too much and only partial or restricted links are stored. This demonstrates that the full attention of the brain during this phase is on the subconscious level ! Keep in mind that not all will be equal for both levels.Page 29 of 60 . The subconscious struggles with the same restricted capacity as the consciousness and although the subconscious did a fantastic job in linking and comparing this information (during sleep). but the differences are minor.. The same applies to a flash. This is the reason why in most lies there is a reflection of about ninety percent of reality.masureel@theartificialbrain. .. tend to wake up and confuse all 'new knowledge'. Both layers identical and capable of handling all brain functions even utilities like attention. An artist who throws some paint on a canvas to get rid of it is not creative. a flash) level and in exactly the same way ! Impact on the digital brain What is the impact of all of this on our digital brain ? Well. so why changing . Even lies fall under the category of the simulation process. All required actions to murder a mother-in-law. A lie is per definition not reality and most of the time contains truth for more than ninety percent. Creativity and thinking as such are the same (for the brain) and both work via simulation processes. a large cluster of neurons should be present in the foundation of the blueprint allowing simulating processes. In some cases the solution to a problem will still be available (long term memory) but only if it concerns a 'problem' you're struggling with for a 'long time' and you can make a direct link to it (for example by directly thinking on a particular matter). Every child goes through a phase of lying and it is remarkable how transparent and absurd these lies are in the beginning. this shows the correctness of the statement that the conscious and subconscious actually do the same and use the same resources. For us humans. imagination. right. If found acceptable.com . After a while. nightmares. the link is simply not stable enough. All the above indicates that simulation processes can be done in a conscious (creativity. His colleague who “figured out this concept” first is creative . conscious or subconscious. This outcome can be a theorem. but if we wake up during the dream.I. If we don't write it down immediately it's gone ! Why ? The answer is the short term memory ! Both states of consciousness use the same brain functions. this is situated in the (pre)frontal lobe. unless the consciousness and subconscious operate in exactly the same way ! Most of the time we tend to forget what we dreamt.The ultimate A. in most cases routine (subconscious) but the processing of the visual information of the road (turn left.) in order to stay on the road uses the complete visual cortex ! One would not expect this on the subconscious level.. two layers should be present : one for the conscious and one for the subconscious processes. As we will see later on. vision or image.. foundation or algorithm for lying are created in this typical lying phase of the child and the results are satisfying..

A possible exception might be real ‘threatening’ information. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. which needs to be stored immediately. In the chapter ‘Memory’ I discuss the storage topic and other relevant information like ‘the play-zone’ in detail.Page 30 of 60 .theartificialbrain.com is always required. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www.

The imitation behavior in a meeting room : A junior spontaneously adapts the behavior of a senior (if respected).. To illustrate the fact that this behavior is not only preserved for children. You are nevertheless pretty sure. the subconscious main function was to burden the consciousness and perform tasks delegated by the consciousness. Originally. No matter how hard you try.. If you feel your new design is missing something or is not entirely correct. . women know better how to cope with emotions (experience) than men. at home or at work.). In most cases this is true IF the input concerns emotions or feelings. Indeed a good cop (with lots of experience) just feels when something is not right ! Thousands of years ago this 'warning signal' offered more chances in surviving and avoiding danger.. Why ? Because he really would like to be the other person and by copying this behavior he moves into that direction ! © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. linking and comparing are the two main features of a thinking process. ambitious junior will follow within seconds . but can be triggered as the result of any simulation process (every possible form of processable input the brain can handle). Automated processes reside via the subconscious and such a feeling of “intuition” will only occur in areas in which there is not enough experience in ! In that case the subconscious is processing a simulation process and concludes something is missing (comparison). Every child imitates the behavior of the parents. This is not coincidental of course. If mister senior crosses his legs. the answer is quite simple. meditation. Actually. Now that we know that intuition is not exclusively meant for emotions. the short-term memory is used up fast. the only conclusion can be that neither women nor men are more or less intuitive than the other gender. Challenge – The artificial brain Unexpected processes of the subconscious Intuition or following the own instincts Everyone has had this experience.The ultimate A. it is advisable to have a look at some research results done in that field.I. but one of the few moments the subconscious can directly communicate with the consciousness (in this order) as seen before (shared use of short term memory during sleep). so in fully awake.masureel@theartificialbrain. Earlier in this document we have seen that. the subconscious is trying to make its point and this manifests itself through the feeling we call “intuition” or “following the own instinct”. is because a reference (link) can be made where one can compare to. the only way the subconscious can communicate directly with the consciousness is in a state of relaxation (sleeping. while sleeping. The main reason why imitation is so powerful. Imitation and insight In most cases we learn new stuff by imitation. There is no simple way for the subconscious to communicate directly with the consciousness (only viceversa). You just feel something is not right but you fail to point the exact reason. the answer usually won't pop up just like that. it is more complicated due to the more complex nature of our way of living. the basic need for intuition is to enough experience in the specific field. These days. but what ? This can be a certain feeling or a new design (technical) or the expression on the face of a potential customer.. agitated or excited state the consciousness demands all focus (interprets this as surviving) and pays no attention at subconscious data in the short-term memory. Hence the statement that women are more intuitive than men. but in most cases the nature of the intuition will reside in other areas. Although I will not cover this subject in-depth in this document (not really necessary for an artificial brain).com . as discussed earlier. And. Secondly.Page 31 of 60 . Once again. The result frequently doesn't show up until nighttime. every math exercise is an imitation and a tennis tutor showing a pupil how to do a backhand will result in an imitation of that backhand. as a result of historical and sociological reasons. hypnosis.

Page 32 of 60 . It is often assumed that the mirror neurons are heavily involved in this. after a while and thanks to the experience. Not always. remember those courses in school where a reproduction of the result was possible. the basic principles (algorithm) of the specific matter become clear and make it so much easier to progress in this material or even to discover new areas.theartificialbrain. __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. A special chapter is dedicated to “mirror neurons” in this document. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . but because of the lack of knowledge this wasn’t the case. In gaining insight.com is always required.It often happens that. an insight in this field is obtained.

If those kids have a little confidence in the (mature) person in front of them. Somehow humans with a faster developing brain-cycle did not gain from it. it always is the thinking process that both steers and receives input from these hormone changes. it would just © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. Just look at the impact of falling in love. An odd question : is puberty required ? For a long time I wondered why it takes 25 years before the human brain is fully developed. Pick almost any other mood swing. Without this capacity.I.B. depending on their specific function. but how would it handle this emotionally ? What about the fact that it is fully capable of having a complete personality. Pre-juvenile children (till the age of approximately 8-10 years old) absorb new matter like they are in a hypnotic state. When looking closer. Another example is the impact of menstruation on a woman.B. Personally I think this issue will remain unsolved … This brings up another surprising question. but the main conclusion is that it will not work well if it works at all ! Something else fascinated me for a long time and I believe the answer to this question is also the answer to this topic.Page 33 of 60 . they take every answer or piece of information as correct. even if it conflicts with other information ! This is absolutely necessary because the amount of information to be processed in those years is not only enormous.g. Challenge – The artificial brain What about hormones ? Introduction A crucial function of diverse parts of the brain is to steer hormone-balances like testosterone. both for male and female.-equation.B. These diverse parts react or interact on these changes in other ways or don’t react at all. The importance of hormones in the thinking process is imperative. I still don’t know the answer ! Partially it must have something to do with the slow pace we physically grow but at the age of 18 grow-pains are over and nevertheless it takes another 7 years before the brain reaches its ‘maturity’. assume for a moment we place an artificial brain with all capacities of a mature person but without any data (experience) into a robot. How important is this for the digital brain and how to implement this (if necessary) ? Hormones A number of our hormones are purely there for regenerative and practical (e. and for an A.com .The ultimate A. unless a genetic failure or malfunction is present. Of course there is the factor of brain-growth as for all organic creatures but 25 years is an awful long time ! Especially if one takes into account that the average lifespan of humans 5. Women on the other hand know that the more horny men are the less they can think clearly thanks to hormones.masureel@theartificialbrain. from stress to depression and you will see that hormone changes are the cause or at least present. Why and what would be the first thing this A. but no data is present to support this ? What would be the motive to learn a certain specific item ? Because we say so !?! I could go on popping up similar questions for a long time. ? To answer that question. estrogen and adrenaline. needs to learn ? Getting used to all sensory input.000 years ago must have been something between 25 and 30 years old ! No. this time hormone related : is puberty (or similar) required for the thinking process. But. that’s for sure. ghrelin and leptin for hungry and saturated feeling) reasons and can be left out of the A. but on what basis would this kid be able to decide what is important and what not ! Today a lot of this stuff is theoretical but only a few hundred years ago it was mainly basic information on how to survive and interact with others in the group. there must be an evolutionary reason behind this. one notices that hormones actually almost function as global variables and/or global events and therefore are able to influence all parts of the body (not only the brain as such). the better … To be honest. But why ? The more logical outcome would be that the sooner the brain is fully developed.

the number of internal connections would end up so high that there wouldn’t be room left for ‘normal’ neurons … … so. This latter combination deserves some extra explanation. hormones are the ideal solution to overcome this problem for us. the priority should be to get used to and optimize all sensory input and motor output.-)). This implies that the conscious level remains active but on a lower pace. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel .take an awful long time to obtain all crucial information upon which all later decisions will be based. It is for sure that some like adrenaline are imperative to even have a fully functional digital brain ! In the future. People familiar with hypnosis know that it is nothing more or less than creating a higher state of suggestibility (exactly what we need !). organic creatures ! The pre-juvenile phase Two important factors need to be considered : • How to create this required ‘hypnotic’ state ? Different approaches are possible. If no focus of attention is present towards the tutor(s).B. In idle moments (no tutor teaching). The second important factor in this combination is that the attention of the ‘pupil’ must be focused on what the tutor is teaching.Page 34 of 60 . where these ‘hormones’ reside both as variables and events (to notify changes). no special or mysterious tricks. bit by bit. The subconscious level on the other hand gains priority and stores the information __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. As a result of this intense learning period. without being less adequate ! All organic based creators suffer from the fact that if global vars would be present as such. Only at the final stage (approximately 25 years old) the concept of cause and consequences is fully mature as well. Unless otherwise instructed at the end of the session. It would be good practice as well to foresee a period of ‘sleep’ to help assimilate all conscious information via the subconscious (a digi-dream phase . Which digital hormones must be present in order to achieve real intelligence ? This needs some further investigation. Whatever these guys instruct or teach at that moment is considered as holy. just look at them as global variables or events and it will make things less complex. once the juvenile phase pops up. as it should be for most parents. but my favorite is a combination of hard coding a phase where the motivation of what to learn is fully dependant on the primal tutor(s). This last point explains why even 20 year old people sometimes still act so stupid ! This whole issue is one of the main reasons I have my doubts with copying and digitizing the human brain just like this. It would be good practice to foresee a central space in our A. What about hormones and how would the system start its learning phase !?! The impact on the digital brain The hormone part As discussed previously.theartificialbrain. every answer will be questioned ! At that time the individual will. when I refer to (digital) hormones. The approval or disapproval will function as correction. hormone changes operate like global vars or global events. one is and stays fully aware of what happened during the session. combined with a temporary raise of priority of the subconscious level during that phase. The temporary rising of the subconscious level is a little harder to explain.com is always required. the almost complete base for the future personality will be formed in that timeframe ! Ask any parent. create an own personality based on the earlier stages. whatever input at that moment could be handled as important or even an overflow of information could be the result.

the system can be programmed to compare speech with the existing patterns and if one fits. Once the system gets activated. have the reflex of being cautious for new things (more chances in surviving). even destructive behavior. So why not creating an extra space where the voice pattern of the primal tutors can be stored before first activation. Another disadvantage of this approach is that whatever first thing (human or not human) drawing the attention from the system. will be considered as the primal tutor. Otherwise a bypassing fly or a screensaver in action could be considered as primal tutors by the system and I assume that is not the objective … The fear-slider (as explained later) can be placed at no-fear (absolute trust) for a small period of time (a couple of days) at first activation of the system. • Who will the system accept as primal tutor(s) ? All animals. This approach looks a little like the system the gnu uses. Curiosity on the other hand is the force that allows us to make small steps towards these new things. no teaching possible). Once a non-threatening situation (pattern) is being recognized.com . consider all input as friendly and accept these tutors as equal.I. This indicates that somehow the amygdala is surpassed in storing this data. This approach of accepting primal tutors is not only relatively simple to implement. But more on this topic in the chapter about memory. temporarily. This means that the environmental conditions must be optimal to avoid distraction from the tutor. the best and most complete method ! • • • How to move the fear-slider towards trust in the pre-juvenal phase ? © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert.B. In the case of hypnosis no extreme emotions are usually present and the information is stored better and faster. but in my humble opinion. This is the way it works for ducks and gooses. humans included. It is simple to implement and works perfect. it could be wise not to end this or even restrict it and as such not allow others to be of influence (no voice pattern recognition.The ultimate A. Although several possibilities exist to make the system pick someone as the primal tutor(s) without having the normal time consuming drawbacks of lifting cautiousness. a two-day “isolation” period to allow the calf to become familiar with the mother. the fear-slider at that moment (and for that process only) should be near to no-fear and full attention should be provided to this tutor. The system will then. if not conflicting with other ‘rules’ (again the conscious level). We also know that it can take weeks before certain ‘neutral’ data gets actually stored in the long-term memory and this points out that it is the task of the subconscious to actually store the data and not the conscious level. The latter would probably be the rule in military concepts. I personally have three favorites : • The system can be programmed to see the first moving or speaking “person” after primary activation as the main tutor. The problem here is that the system must have time enough to establish a recognition pattern towards the tutors and at the same time will start learning all sensory input and motor output. The immense disadvantage of this approach is that during that period all sensory input will be considered friendly. In most cases there should be a time limitation for this since the system otherwise doesn’t has the capacity to learn from others than the initial tutors. The remark on the strict environmental conditions from the above paragraph is also applicable to this case. The drawback of this approach is that only one person will be accepted as tutor at first and it will take a while before the system will accept another as equal tutor (cautiousness of the system). Challenge – The artificial brain more efficient than otherwise.Page 35 of 60 . Depending on the application of the A. The third one is my absolute favorite one ! The advantage of a digital brain is that we are not restricted by capacity or available predefined space like is the case with an organic brain. one (animal or person) is trustier and accepts it better.masureel@theartificialbrain.

But personally I would seriously consider adding it anyway ! Why ? It is rather simple to implement and the outcome is far better predictable.B. to give this serious thought ! The main rule is simple : if you don’t know the outcome of something for sure. the same is valid for a fully functional A. is a serious matter that needs to be approached with wisdom and caution ! Control is everything ! Therefore I strongly advise everyone who attempts to create an A.theartificialbrain. the risk is present that the system could be too aggressive ! Since no data is available for a newborn baby of twenty years old. If we give the final default values as from the first activation.B. with no data present at first activation. An A.B. the trust-level at that moment will be maximal. a ‘digital puberty’ phase is not mandatory to obtain a working A. It is too complex to imagine what unexpected things (in the negative sense) might result out of that method.com is always required. Somehow the A. will need some simulation of certain hormones like testosterone and adrenaline (as explained earlier) to work.Page 36 of 60 . The same applies to tutors : if the object referring to this tutor is flagged as “trustworthy” (belief) there will be 100% trust and all new information will be considered as correct. This allows the system to learn without questioning at all. The juvenile phase Unlike the pre-juvenile phase. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel .If the default state of belief for new information is ‘belief. Is ‘belief’ and ‘fear’ both necessary ? Is it not easier to implement only one ? I will answer this in the chapter “Memory”.B.. try to find a way around of something you can predict the effect of for sure ! __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www.B.

Two boys and a girl are having a nice time in a club. Someone thinking he or she is a bungler. as long as linking and comparison is possible.Page 37 of 60 . but they are not the determinant factor. Although it is tempting to categorize this under feeling. the data can come from both external or internal information.I. You can feel the table via the nerve ends in the hand (external). smell. most of the time this will be external data like images. noise or a certain smell. at the age of puberty this person would probably find it more difficult than others to get in touch with the opposite sex. or you can feel pain in the stomach or knee (internal). one must first dig into the purpose of the senses. therefore I am . Although. Feelings or emotions are always internal and an exception because they are variable.com . Let’s now assume humans are evolved enough to understand that this person is also a person like any other. where another day we actually don't care at all about this. one of the boys says 'Yesterday I sat on the bed with my brother'. The other senses are more regular in the way they operate.masureel@theartificialbrain. The chances this will lead to a total solitary existence are much smaller since the experiences with the own gender were namely positive. The traditional five senses are human’s direct allies but I would like to add one to that list. Both environmental and genetic factors (the character) are important in what kind of experiences we will have. will reflect this in every possible way and act as such.. Only experience is ! A good example to illustrate this is someone who is born with a severely misshaped face who is constantly stared after by others (that's experience). The following example is probably one of the best ways to demonstrate how perception influences our thinking process. Emotions are a major input source for the brain (both cause and result) and therefore deserve the term 'sense'. Challenge – The artificial brain Deeper thoughts 'I think. Experience is the key feature in how we think in the long term about ourselves. In this. The girl on the other hand gets tears in her eyes thanks to a sexual abuse for many years on her brother’s bed. A situation can make us angry one day. After a while.' Who doesn't know this statement of Descartes ! But it reaches much further than the traditional conclusion of the self-awareness. The mutual thing they all have in common is that they provide input to the brain. Already in an early stage in his life this person will diagnose his 'being different' and being treated differently (by others) via the mirror and the being staring after (comparison). You won’t suddenly see. except for the misshaped face. The second boy spontaneously starts to smile because. At a certain moment during the conversation. feelings or emotions. In case of feeling.. there will be no staring after and as a result no solitary existence would have existed (no such experiences). one positive © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. the brain does not care what sort of input it has to process. How do we interpret something ? As tackled in the beginning of this article. sitting on the bed with his brother always ended in a hilarious pillow-fight. hear or taste better tomorrow and if you bump into a wall it will hurt as much as today. one sentence.. Tree persons. unfortunately purely hypothetic case. as child.The ultimate A. this person will feel more and more (psychological) pain because of being stared after constantly (linking) and will decide (the decision) that having contact with others is not a very pleasant experience and is to be avoided ! A lonely person is born . This will undoubtedly result in a number of negative links towards the opposite sex.. But the primary factor in this 'experiences experience' is ‘perception’. That is a fact ! Yesterday this one guy was indeed sitting on his brother’s bed. tree different interpretations and reactions : one neutral. The buzzword 'perception' The above example clearly shows the main impact of experiences in our personal growth.

but (at brain level) rather experience an interpretation of 'life' . but with interpretations of facts ! Someone with a little imagination could very well. and correctly.Page 38 of 60 .com is always required.. state that we do not really live our life. The probability that the second boy (good experience) will be more and more active involved in this conversation is great.. because of the 'positive feeling'. … which is accurate since everything is belief as seen before ! __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www.. This also shows that both consciousness and subconscious actually are only capable of processing simulation processes (what else would perception be ?) ! We do not live with facts. most likely the opposite will happen .and one negative. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type.theartificialbrain. With the girl.. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel .

Sometimes we all are a little selfish (as discussed in detail later) and the way we fine-tune our calibration system is based on this. would loose their job. The definition not only depends on the time spirit and education. the simplest way to add new information in the case of our cow is to link the new information to the object cow. you will most likely also think of 'the object cow' if you step into a cow cake. this would be in contradiction with the linking and comparison principles our thinking process is based upon. In most cases links between 'different objects' will be there as well. So. a legal system would even be obsolete ! If one would find a drug that cures all diseases. As mentioned earlier. profit or investment and most likely define this as 'bad' (at least in short terms). This flexible calibration system makes people unique ! Thanks to so many individual experiences. but also on how we tend to define it for ourselves. Somehow it is quite obvious.The ultimate A. This results in an explanation why physical pain (not pleasant) and psychical pain (also not pleasant) are treated the same way by the human brain. although a cake © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. Challenge – The artificial brain Values and ego Introduction Who hasn’t heard of these words. if I let you hear the sound of a cow or I show the picture of a cow. the moral question. it is relative. If everyone would define all terms the same way. most people would consider this as 'good' but those working for the pharmaceutical industry (directly or indirectly). Some will find thousand dollars a lot of money where others see one million dollars as pocket money. In our example. Remember the example at the start of this document when learning to ride the bike. but what do they stand for and how do they influence the thinkingprocess ? In psychology ego is often divided in four or even more parts. the brain does not care where the input comes from as long as it can link and compare. But the reality is different ! There is no standard at all ! To better understand this. As also seen before. It is in our own best interest to keep balanced during biking ! Falling hurts and is considered as not pleasant.I. you will first refer to the cow and thereafter pick the wanted specification (in this case the sound of a cow). So it is variable. since the brain always tries to compare and link and once the object 'cow' is present.masureel@theartificialbrain. the brain will refer to the same thing : a cow (whatever this might be in your brain). A poor guy winning the lottery will probably recalibrate his view on money. spread over time.com .Page 39 of 60 . it is very unlikely to find two people with exactly the same calibration settings ! Every experience (link) will play its role in future comparison for 'similar' information. Earlier in this document. Another typical example is the relativity of 'good' and 'bad'. it is imperative to dig deeper in how linking is being performed in the thinking process. Someone moving from the Arctic to the Sahara will adapt remarkably fast ! Standard of values Does one choose ‘friendship’ over ‘money’ or vice versa ? It is one of these typical examples that suggest there must be a standard of values present somewhere in the brain. I discussed the need of the (variable) calibration system to accomplish this. but personally I do not agree with this for the reasons explained beneath. Often it is extremely hard to see what cause and consequence are ! This way of relative interpretation is also the main reason why we have such a high adaptability. Relativity Nothing we interpret is absolute. If I ask you to make the noise of a cow.

you can feel something similar. The more memories (especially positive ones) the harder it will be to get over it. During lots of years. As also seen before. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . Notice that this often happens in these moments that someone has serious doubts about his religion ! It was faith that provided at the same time that safe feeling and comfort but also the explanation (linking). In some cases certain people refuse to accept the death and continue to make new links (although this person is no longer alive) (often the case with the loss of children) and this will cause a lifetime of emotional pain. the more important it will be (both positive and negative) simply because one will be confronted (at brain level) more with this object or subject. believe is the most important property in how we define and interpret fear. This illustrates that the memory storage is pointer-based and is pretty well comparable with placing a shortcut on the computer’s desktop to directly go to a certain document. These links cause a certain relationship. Last experiences (once again. The new __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. Because in these cases lots of links (direct and indirect) (memories) are present of the living related or acquainted. In the above-mentioned example. The interpretation (via linking and comparison) is that this is impossible (disbelieve) since the brain only has links to this person alive ! The brain actually doesn't know how to deal with this.com is always required. Remember the brain is unable to handle facts (everything is interpretation) and the brain has several vivid links to that person living. we can link. but it never will be the pain the other is going through ! That is also the reason the own pains are heavier and worse than the pains of somebody else. it is mostly very hard to accept. separated from the ‘old parent’. In best case. And that is exactly what will occur ! After a while the cow cake will be associated with a cow cake and will be directly accessible without deviations. You are unable to actually feel the exact pain somebody else is going through. Fear and believe is more correct and as we saw before. the more we are willing to 'defend' it and that's why it sometimes really appears as if there actually is a list. via emphatic ways (again simulation process). …). the brain is able to start making links towards the 'not being there anymore' of this individual and it will be less hard (the factor disbelieve is minor). If one of these links is dropped (for instance the passing-away of somebody). It simply is so in contradiction with all other brain information available. Some even love pain (SM). The more links. The more important something is. links to certain subjects or objects) have a huge weight in this algorithm (comparisons) ! The world turns around you ! The brain is only capable of processing the own signals (and not those of others) via simulation processes. depending on future experiences) from 'friends above all' to 'money above all'. As seen before. during which it is possible to see death arriving. the higher this value will be in our fictive list. it is confused. If someone working on a farm frequently has to deal with cow cakes (not stepping into them. it becomes more important to have a direct link towards cow cakes. Emotional pain (remember : emotions or feelings are derivatives of fear) ? Is fear then behind all of this? Yes and no.Page 40 of 60 . children and friends. but this would be incorrect (since this person no longer is) and this causes the fear. Notice that in case of a long term chronic illness. It is often presented as a treeview where the parent is the main object and the linked objects are ancestors. you will make much links to other individuals in the direct surrounding like parents. causing everyone to be little islands near each other. we tend to give labels as 'good' or 'bad' to certain 'objects' and this will have its reflection on the output ! That explains why someone having a 'bad' experience with friends at this moment might change the standard (temporarily or permanently. Time after time ! The more links (also indirect) refer to a certain object or subject.theartificialbrain.as such has nothing to do with the object cow ! The above principle is widely accepted by many people dealing with the way memory is stored into our brain. changes (or situations we are not familiar with) cause fear because no linking is possible. Always the same : linking and comparison. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. This would indeed be correct if it was not for the weight of the items. cleaning them up. But if we look a bit closer we will notice something special. brothers/sisters.

Challenge – The artificial brain 'facts' are in conflict with this and make people doubt … If the deceased is someone totally unknown. it could have been me !)). Semantics are more important than one would expect. To reach the 'higher purpose'. always ! This is without any doubt a daring statement. Even they way we act towards our children is more often driven by selfishness than one would expect ! Look a bit closer at why you behave the way you do towards your children and try to find the links with your own childhood. Only few people will say under such circumstances to a complete stranger : 'No. As a matter of fact.com . no ! I insist you go first'. Why are you member of a union or employers’ organization ? To protect your own interests or to gain (personally) from it.Page 41 of 60 . Not the values of your neighbor. strange but true ! You can only feel compassion if your situation is better in that particular field.. You can only sympathize in these fields you are familiar with and have similar experience... that is sad !'. if the brain is only capable of handling the own processes. but let’s look a bit closer at next examples before shooting the pianist ! If you look at a group photo and you know you are on it. one must walk between the borderlines of these values. Disbelievers are not obliged to follow these 'rules' and automatically fall back on the 'own' values. you’ll probably say 'Oh. as seen before. actor or musician.masureel@theartificialbrain. What happens in disastrous fires on ships or overcrowded places with few exits ? The individual will do anything to survive. Did you have few toys and do you want to overcompensate your child ? Couldn't you or was it not allowed (by the parents) to become a football player. So you are actually slapping yourself on the back and are probably insulting someone ! Sympathizing on the other hand is different from compassion. Compassion namely implies a certain superiority. I've been asking this question at hundreds of people over the last ten years and never had a different answer ! Why do you vote for a specific political group ? The 'values' they stand for will be the ones you deem important. who do you look first for ? Indeed. The hotter it gets or the more falling. Your world turns around you and depending on diverse factors the facts will be interpreted differently . Except if there are some mutual interests involved which will induce linking like : age or place of the accident (I passed there ten minutes before the accident. the more elementary courtesy will fade away ! It is not by coincidence that in countries where few people are religious that selfishness prevails to that extent ! Each religion helps in defining a number of standard values. are less dignifying than appear at sight ! A typical example is compassion. Self-interest. . that's too bad'.I. yourself. Why are religious people willing to obey to certain 'rules' which others (even from different religious groups) find odd ? Indeed. and are you pushing this dream (of yours) to become reality through your child (against its will) ? Also some of the noble feelings we have. At that moment You are confronted with the possibility that it could have been you or that it can happen to you which allows you to line and compare. but more likely 'You lucky bastard !'. burning pieces. Empathic simulation processes are possible through linking and comparison.. but ten minutes later you will have forgotten about it. you won’t vote at all or blanc (if voting is obligated) or you will simply issue a protest vote. how on earth would it ever be able not to be selfish (since it must somehow all be related to 'the self') !?! © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert.The ultimate A. Note that someone suicidal will not think of this deceased as 'Oh. boss or mother-in-law (unless you benefit from this) ! If in your opinion (and yours only) your vote won’t make any difference. to personally get into 'heaven' (the ultimate goal in most religions).

everything is self related (selfish) ?!? One could state that education and religion play an important role in this. this could explain why “guilt” is one of the most frequent emotions. when asking for directions). Most common reflection will be “next time you are on your own” ! Isn’t that in conflict with the definition of altruism … It is possible that mirror neurons have an important role in this. on conscious or subconscious level. as explained earlier. a good feeling (even compassion) or by having had a similar experience and knowing that it is hard to handle single. A small experiment I did with some adolescents displaying narcissistic behavior (thanks to over-rewarding (extreme ego) and no sort of punishment in case of ‘bad manners’). it is likely that ‘oneself’ could have done something to avoid this (that is the thought in the background) and that causes this guilt feeling … … it is hard to view other perspectives if one is only capable of handling the own information originating from the own perspective ! Merge this with the linking and comparison principles the brain is based upon and you understand the typical “if I had done this or that. This is especially important in socializing ! Just look at how people react to someone never being polite (or even being rude) when something is given or offered. sadistic people will have a good feeling when not helping … … same input. other motives. a link can and will be made that one can benefit from ‘helping’ someone else.com is always required.g. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. it is also likely that mirror neurons could be the cause of narcissism as well.Page 42 of 60 . However.theartificialbrain. If something happens and all is related to oneself. At a certain point. it is my opinion that experience (and rewarding) is the base for narcissism.Alll information is somehow related to one-self. In that way it could be that altruism is actually a myth … __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. but I have not seen a deep religious and well-educated chimp lately. This shows that there must always be a motivator in order to initiate action and that motivation always comes from within our thinking process. The empathic information can lead to offering help. I touch this subject of narcissism here because it is so in conflict with altruism that at least it should be reviewed thoroughly ! Some experiments demonstrated that good-looking people (both men and women) get easier help than others (e. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . This can be in the form of appreciation. I could have avoided it” ! Altruism … For a long time the assumption was made that altruism was one of the main differences that distinguished humans from other primates (originating 6 million years ago when a sub branch of the chimps was born (our pre-ancestors)). and they do. Recent research demonstrated that chimpanzees also have the altruism ability and therefore it can no longer be considered as exclusive for humans ! How is altruism possible if. other outcome ! On the other hand. But one of the main reasons one creature helps another ‘without rewarding’ is that at a later point the inverse might be necessary.

emotions. humans included. At first sight. In the human brain. but it also helps in bending certain fears (emotions or feeling) into trust and thereby facilitating the 'actionprocess'.com . It is not surprising that the punishment area is intensively interacting with the amygdala. Appreciation versus punishment 'Well done !' or 'I couldn't have done it without your help !'. the fear-slider can only be moved via ‘belief’. there would be a total overflow of the complete system ! The three main motivators for human beings are : surviving. will always be for a conscious or subconscious reason. What drives us to take a certain decision or not ? Everything you will do. This self-interest must be interpreted in a very open way and appreciation. if the intelligent system would not be able to set priorities or preferences and absorb all information as such. motivation is necessary to start new 'actions'. needs some sort of motivation to (be able to) perform new tasks. but reality showed a different outcome ! Someone (soldier or not) with a disconnected amygdala turned into a vegetable ! Why ? Since motivation is mainly based on fear (via values. Otherwise after one action or one series of actions the system would end-up in a passive state ! Why in heaven’s name would the system take new actions and even more important based upon what ?!? Humans’ main enemy. this should result in a fearless soldier. “fear”. The total of these factors is what we describe as 'motivation'. With autistic © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert.The ultimate A. Appreciation not only helps us in lifting the priority in our list of values. usually through positive experiences) ? . It would be incorrect to look at appreciation without talking about rewarding and punishment. nl. this indicates that appreciation (or rewarding) and punishment are ‘belief’-related and both pillars are the driving forces behind the complete ‘belief’-mechanism ! Appreciation (the strongest possible way of rewarding) determines how the remuneration system of the brain works ! Appreciation indirectly expresses that your life is not worthless ! Attention is a form of appreciation since it shows indirectly that someone is important (otherwise you wouldn't pay attention to that person). appreciation and punishment).Page 43 of 60 .. reproduction and acceptance (people would do literally everything to be part of the group). the disconnected amygdala only results in someone with no motivation at all ! Each intelligent system. Remember also that one of the functions of the amygdala is to help storing the information in the long term memory. Who doesn't like to get these compliments ! Why is appreciation so important for our way of thinking ? As mentioned above. People having problems with the amygdala functioning (like diverse forms of autism) need continues confirmation and appreciation. is actually its primary ally and it is the absolute fundament for its intelligence ! On the other hand. punishment and values on the one hand and emotions on the other hand are the main driving causes.. As seen before.masureel@theartificialbrain. directly or indirectly.I. Challenge – The artificial brain A number of important actors Motivation The brain takes decisions that are. In the sixties a lot of research was done in creating the 'Über-soldier' and one of the main researches concerned people with a disconnected amygdala (the center of fear). Why would you get out of your chair to get something to drink if you had no sense of thirst ? Why would you study day after day on study material you are absolutely not interested in (fear of not getting your degree) ? Why do you prefer mathematics over English or vice versa (appreciation via good results and the confidence (notfear) you can handle it. in one’s self-interest. both have a specific area.

B. no punishment will ever follow.theartificialbrain. needs to have is actually very limited. Since both rewarding and punishment are mandatory for a brain a low level implementation in the A. often resulting in under-performing. Since this is very similar with the way the human brain works. are conditioned in that way that whatever they do.B. it is never good enough). A “regeneration instinct” is best implemented as well. we do not have such a thing and it is not required for the A. will be required ! How ? By hard-coding that all the ‘negative’ (physical or emotional punishment) must be avoided and all the ‘positive’ (rewarding) must be embraced ! This is best done by implementing a pain and pleasure variable and the one with the highest value at that moment will determine if future similar experiences will be deliberately re-experienced. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . continuously searching for approval and appreciation … … something to keep in mind when raising an intelligent system. Some of the elements like surprise and curiosity could be considered as instincts and are mandatory. Children for whom only encouragement and approval and no punishment was used. In some cases they will grow into perfectionists. Notice too that children having had an optimal balance between approval and disproval are the ones when growing adults who will have the least problems in socializing. either ! This ‘surviving instinct’ is rather a group of individual mechanisms (like the above-mentioned instincts) mostly fear-based combined with the earlier declared ‘pain and pleasure’-system directly related to the amygdala or digidala ! __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www.com is always required. If the system is low on energy. the attention must be drawn to this (works best if this is accompanied with some sort of pain) until it is solved ! What about the surviving instinct ? Well. it is theoretically possible to obtain an A. They tend to be rather pessimistic and have a low self-image.B.people.B. Children who had to undergo continuous punishment and who were rarely encouraged and appreciated will suffer from a very low self-image and will often underperform (why bother.Page 44 of 60 . loving Sado Masochism (pleasure value higher than pain value) … Instincts The number of instincts the A. the ‘negative’ is better and faster stored than the ‘positive’.

Without. Both the pointer-table and the synapse can point to many other pointer-tables or synapses and behind the reference they are pointing to. in a digital brain the storage will obviously most likely be on hard disk.com . The main challenge is how to store the impressions (what else is sensory input) in an ‘ordered’ way and available for other sensory experiences. The lack of understanding gives us the opportunity to redefine the way things should be stored in an efficient and logical way for our A. Storing information The first step in memory handling is how to store the data.masureel@theartificialbrain. In other words how can I for instance make the link between the visual information. retain and (subsequently) recall information” and this is a good starting point. The principle behind pointer-tables is similar to synapses. scripts. While it will slow down the system a tiny. but that is pretty much it ! Thanks to some experiments and malfunctions we assume the existence of a sensory. More memory space for humans than first thought ? A bizarre phenomenon in the medical world is the one of changed preferences after heart transplantations. it is wise to store all (even processes in progress) on hard disk. That definitely is something to keep into account in the design of a digital brain ! The typical definition of memory is : “The ability to store. we know very little on how everything is stored in the brain. feelings. spare time or whatever. If there was not such an aspect.Page 45 of 60 . These changes can be in food. none of the others is possible ! Since. the possibility exists that for some reason the program might get terminated unexpectedly. the ‘evidence’ indicates that the neurons around the heart function as memory as well and this could be the explanation why some preferences of the (anonymous) donor are transferred via the transplant to the acceptant. A major advantage the brain has is that it is never switched off until death. we discovered a number of areas involved like the amygdala and the hippocampus. While not all doctors do accept this.I.. so the object must be universal in order to link everything to everything like we are capable of and is required to achieve real intelligence. Oh yes. Virtual because the information in the object can be anything ! If you hear the sound of a cow. sound and smell of a cow ? The answer is virtual objects.B. it © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. How can I justify this if you know that synapses form the absolute fundament in data storage in the human brain ? Well. as explained later in this chapter. any form of data can be present. short-term. this does not imply you will ever see or smell a cow in your life. This is best done in mirror (duplicate) to overcome file-errors caused by the interruption or hard disk failure. Years ago when databases where less standardized everybody in informatics used an own data-format and the better-written formats were binary and based on the principles of pointer-tables. critical problems with reboots as a result or fatal errors in the software. long-term and working memory and some models have been created according to this knowledge. etc. Challenge – The artificial brain Memory Introduction Although we know a lot of the human brain. A major key player in solving this is the need of a common factor. a necessity. the benefits by far supersede this disadvantage. as mentioned in the introduction.The ultimate A. The information can also be non-sensory such as procedures. For instance one might not like sweet pepper before the transplant and become a big fan afterwards or someone lazy becoming a disciplined cyclist. Both allow fragmentation of data. Multiple tables could exist to allow sorting the pointers in diverse ways. If this would turn out to be correct and one is aware of the large number of neurons near the intestines. the region of available memory could very well be larger than originally thought … What about synapses ? In this complete document I touched the term ‘synapse’ only a couple of times. Computer systems on the other hand need to store all on hard disk to overcome power failures.

com is always required. If I need to run over all available images to detect if this one is of a cow before being able to ‘recall my cow’. I would not advise the use of traditional databases to achieve this. audio and aromatic information of a cow for instance. something strange appears ! No information is by itself connected to other separate information unless insight or comprehension is present ! That is the reason why some people have trouble solving mathematical expressions slightly modified ! As long as the basic pattern is there no problems pop-up. A partial. Diverse input will point to the same object and the older meaningless labels will expire (number of times recently used and last access date). The ‘phonetic labeling’ solves the problem in linking to the same object and recalling information structured referring to the same but from multiple points of view and that was the target ! During this progression. but not only would it consume an awful lot more memory (diverse objects containing similar information). data storage is the base of every system … __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. multiple objects containing similar info originating from different sensory input will be present. the solution is rather easy. The outcome was an ultra-lightweight (both in memory use as overhead storage) and extreme fast ‘database’.053 (the common factor) to refer to the object ‘cow’. This theoretically would work. the system will be able of referring much of this sensory input to this label. random ‘labeling’ should be used and yes. This will not only reveal the solution for this topic but will also show the path to real intelligence ! Talking to yourself. non-connected object for the visual. I would remain busy for a dreadful lot of time and the complete system would run extremely slow. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . It incorporated the possibility to vary the size and type (numeric or alphanumeric) of the pointer-table and of course the option to sort (index) if required. A couple of years ago I did some serious experimenting on this topic and wrote a low level binary data-container based on the principles of optimized pointertables. it would also give trouble in internal communication. Once this vocabulary gets developed. it will be hard ! The same applies to images. After a while the system will create sort of a vocabulary (like babies do) and the phonetic meaning will become more and more similar to ours. most of the time without sound … … it is the best and most accurate description I have for this phenomenon ! Everybody does it but not all are aware of doing so. but if the same exercise is shaken a little.would be very well possible to have separate objects of the same without a link in between. the thinking process can begin and is basically creating combinations of existing information (linking and comparison). So the inner voice will build its vocabulary from meaningless to others towards a similar vocabulary most of us use. virtually unlimited in capacity and by nature allowing (any sort of) data to be fragmented over diverse files on diverse (network) drives. It surprises me how often I say (internally) ‘what if I try it this way’ in solving problems. So I need the ability to have access to information not directly related and if you look closer at this. some implementation problems pop up then.885. the ‘phonological loop’ is actually fragments (words) of this inner voice ! Question is how to create this inner voice when no data or lexicon is present ! Surprisingly.theartificialbrain. The inner voice Before continuing. however. it is wise to have a closer look at something we call the inner voice. a revised version will be the first code I will make available on the net. confusion occurs ! In the topic on synapses I touch the subject of pointer-tables and although the above ‘labeling’ best requires some way of indexing in order to sort the labels (for fast retrieval purposes). The results of this experiment can be considered as a good starting point on how to store data in the digibrain ! As a matter of fact.Page 46 of 60 . At start. After all. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. The same applies to the human brain. not in the way to store but in the way to retain or recall the information. So what should this common factor be ? Hypothetically it can be anything ! It can be a number or an image. If I need to think of the number 256.197. In the Baddeley and Hitch model of the working memory of the brain.

that path will be continued ! Although the subject of belief is covered already in several parts throughout this document some questions remained unanswered … The first question is if it is really necessary to have both belief and fear stored since.The ultimate A. as explained earlier. We already saw some mechanisms like acceptance and curiosity doing the job. disbelief will probably be the result. The scripting I mentioned before will therefore contain data such as certain feelings (fears) and the status of belief for that specific object. If someone is telling you that your partner is cheating on you. It is well possible that. experience is ! Experience is just another word for ‘content’ to be stored ! If a new ‘positive’ experience occurs. But if I show you something futuristic and very abstract and ask the same question. Only when you belief it is safe again (and this can be a while after the encounter) the fear will decrease. Seeing a bear all the sudden right in front of you will trigger the surprise mechanism (the belief something is dangerous) and this will cause fear. in other words a sort of belief ! This is actually what thinking is about and why the play-zone (described later this chapter) is required. But let’s go back to absolute basics to discover why belief is involved in everything concerning the brain. the answer will be most likely positive (and maybe you will be curious that it might be something else because I ask this rather stupid question). Dependent on the outcome the doubt will be : • • Confirmed. it looks as both depend on each other. fear not. If someone else tells you a month later the same.B.-puzzle ! If I point at a chair and ask you if you believe that it is a chair. it is actually the belief behind the fear that will steer the fear and this belief can steer the first mentioned belief. The opposite would happen if I point a finger at a table and ask if you believe it is a chair ! The concept of a chair is well defined in our brain and during our lives we encounter lots of chairs. So belief can have a direct impact on belief. Nevertheless this data will be stored and a pointer towards this will also be saved in the object ‘partner’. again with a pointer in the ‘partner’ object. after this second warning signal. it does not matter whether these are organic or digital in nature ! On what base does a neuron (axon) fire ? Yes. the outcome will be less predictable ! You will try and find similarities in the favor of the concept ‘chair’ and depending on the balance the outcome will be one of the three states : belief. chances are high a serious doubt will rise. you would do some research. The right question to ask in solving this riddle is if fear can steer belief ? The answer is no ! Although it sometimes looks that way. Both the elements against as in favor will have a reference as well. It is everywhere but can be so hard to indicate ! How does belief work ? That is the main question in solving the A.-riddle. This last can best be explained by an example. The second question is how this method of moving-the-fear-slider works. A good example to demonstrate this is the confrontation with a bear. but most of the time these are not the driving force. This will have serious impact since the belief in the partner will (at least temporarily) switch to disbelief ! But even more dramatic is that all other types of ‘belief’ related to the object partner would be questioned as well.Page 47 of 60 . disbelief or no opinion.masureel@theartificialbrain.I. Never forget that a single thought exists out of much different sorts of fragmented data. the fear will still be present. especially if no data is available indicating the opposite. Unconfirmed.B. it will be stored and the properties present at that moment will influence the complete bundle of information available at that moment. The research did not clear anything and the question remains if the partner is © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. This was already explained in the chapter on belief. This is because a second pointer with ‘negative’ information (the experience) will be stored. It is a speculation. dependent on the input and how many errors away from a ‘known’ reference. The answer is neurons. Challenge – The artificial brain The principles behind belief and fear Belief is the mysterious factor in the A. This zone allows the system to place forms of belief above information (the thinking process) and if the outcome is positive (belief it could be correct). If the bear just passes by without even looking at you. even after the bear is back in the bushes and no input of his presence is longer available.com .

B. the first reflex is to preserve a lot of space for this area in the A. always.B. you will probably believe this info and the fear slider will move quite fast towards fear. the fear slider will only move slightly at once. as well ! For humans. all information the brain processes is subjective and if there would be a way of playing with all these different kinds of information (linking).theartificialbrain. It will literally be hard to focus on other things ! Notice as well that this will happen on both conscious as subconscious level. but for all custom designed systems like an A. This not only applies to organic creatures. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . the ‘play-zone’ or digital (pre)frontal cortex is best kept small. the more the fear-slider will be moved in one or the other direction.com is always required.B.Page 48 of 60 . A vision is in fact a sort of fantasy and some visions are best avoided for an A. For the A. like humans and elephants or even aliens. If you have a best friend you consider (experience) as very reliable and he or she is the messenger of the cheating message.B. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. so it should be your partner worrying instead. the (pre)frontal cortex plays an important role in creativity and creativity is actually another word for playing with different sorts of information. The more similar (in the broadest sense of the word) links. Since this statement enfeebles all previous negative statements. A side-effect of this will be that the belief in the messengers of ‘the bad news’ will in future encounters be questioned more … Doubt is actually always a form of belief on top of the current belief and will be the cause of fear (in this case most likely jealousy and anger).B. although it might be a hoax. which we define as intelligence can occur. in our own interest ! The line between geniality and insanity is often very slim and this is the reason why ! To keep control over an A.B. The ‘play-zone’ If the target is a true intelligent A. imagination and similar all are side effects of this play-zone. The reliability of the information. this will be experienced as very reliable information and will cause the fear-slider to move faster towards fear. Since intelligence is mainly dependent of this play-zone. the previous is of major importance ! Memorizing information can be done by anybody and is basically the ‘labeling’ I discussed before. a similar region will be needed and I refer to this as ‘the play-zone’ for obvious reasons. The above example also demonstrates that it is likely to have a pointer in a centralized table in the digibrain with ‘important’ (unfinished) issues. a limitation is best considered. The belief will be that maybe the belief that your partner is exclusively for you is not (longer) correct. only then it may be __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. It is a hoax and the so-called new playmate turns out to be for the opposite sex. This possible cheating will be something constantly playing in the head and it will draw the attention to the internal thoughts the whole time. Once the results indicate it is safe or even required to enlarge this region. it will keep you awake ! A second question is how belief can influence the fear-slider ? Two parameters are important in this : • • The number of references (experiences) available for this specific topic.. Ask people of a child missing for five years how devastating this state is ! Enfeebled. Since all information is subjective and not all information combined results in realistic or wanted ‘thoughts’. but is this wise ? Fantasy. But self creating links is the path to intelligence ! As stated earlier. If you discover your partner in bed with a new playmate yourself. daydreaming.• trustworthy. During dreaming this will somehow be integrated in the dreams.. If the messenger has a history of being unreliable. then and only then new ideas and thoughts. the belief that the partner is trustworthy is correct and ‘belief’ will be restored. It will even be hard to get some sleep because the attention is always drawn towards this and as long as this happens on conscious level..

chances are small it will work well. unless you somehow believe that memorizing this poem could take away the threat or buy time ! It is also good to keep in mind that fear values closer to fear have a negative effect on recalling information because at such moments the consciousness claims all attention and the actual storing and recalling of information happens on subconscious level ! The A. Let’s label this as the neutral zone. The human brain does this in a similar way. If I would ask you to memorize a poem at such a time. This deserves some more explanation.I. meaningless and uninteresting information. It is mainly this information being processed during sleep as well on a subconscious level as described before in the topic on dreaming. It is the amygdala (or simplified : fear) indicating how fast data will be stored in the long-term memory ! Threatening situations need to be stored faster and better than neutral input. Have you ever tried to learn new matter you have absolutely no interest in and which you can’t link to existing information and for which no penalty is waiting if you fail the exam ? You will have to rehearsal an awful lot and will forget it after a short time ! Where is the motive ? It is also good to keep in mind that when the slider is to close to 100% fear. For the digital brain. the point of balance between fear and trust is reached and fear-values in that area are neutral. only the first impression will be stored and the fight-or-flight state will be triggered causing tunnel vision (lots of adrenaline running through the vanes). Diverse experiments in memorizing information reveal that the basic information of an unsolved riddle is better preserved than if solved. will suffer from this as well since fear and some hormones like adrenaline are required to obtain motivation ! An environment of trust on the other hand helps enormously in fast learning because only very few processes will run on the conscious level and the attention can be fully focused on the matter (if there is motivation) ! But what about movements for example ? We do not label these (no phonological store) and they are somehow stored very well in the long-term memory ! Well. then the information may be transferred to the subconscious level and it will at first (not much experience) be hard to recall it. Challenge – The artificial brain enlarged ! One of the typical properties for a play-zone is that the data will be stored consciously until a satisfying answer is present or the system no longer considers it as ‘interesting’. For diverse reasons solving ‘the problem’ might become obsolete. Neither fear nor trust is dominating and it could be described as boring. this is so and can be described as experience. the faster data will be stored. We now know that fear can reach from 0% fear (absolute trust) to 100% fear (phobia).masureel@theartificialbrain. If the result is satisfying. The long-term memory The same flag could also be used to indicate that the problem is satisfyingly solved and ready to be transferred to the subconscious level ! One of the criticisms on the multi-store model of Atkinson and Shiffrin is that they claimed that only rehearsal is capable of storing data in the long-term memory.Page 49 of 60 . it is necessary to keep the information until the problem is actually solved. but as I explained already in a previous chapter.com . The more the fear-slider is away from this neutral zone (either fear or trust). the amygdala plays an even more important role in storing information. In between. Since the play-zone is in control of solving problems and one may assume that ‘the problem’ is present in the play-zone because it is somehow important at that moment.The ultimate A.B. So the system must be capable of dropping this information and this is done automatically by no longer giving it attention. In a lot of cases. This results in a weak link and chances are high that relatively soon this will be overwritten with new data. for this kind of processes the multi-store © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. an extra flag indicating that the information is ready to be overwritten should do the job. As stated before it will be the experience (multiple use) giving it a higher priority and a stable link. Someone else for example could come up with a good solution or ‘the problem’ is considered too difficult and the motivation in trying to solve it is absent. at 50%.

most likely ‘camel’. Due to a malfunction in the brain this boy is capable of this and it is impressive ! But since not all is correct. the better and more accurate it will be stored and recalled. the more we repeat it. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. in most cases we are still capable of recognizing all. This indicates that instead of images we rather store scenario’s composed out of shapes ! This approach has several advantages and the main benefit is that it requires less storage ! That is also the reason why you probably wouldn’t remember half of the objects present in a room after leaving the room. the reflex will be to look at the back to determine the number of bumps. For diverse reasons this topic deserves a closer look ! According to some. Only people confronted regularly with these animals will notice other differences and probably be capable of storing both shapes as separate objects. Try it out (best done with the eyes shut) and imagine a cat on the back of a horse … … you see what I mean ! If I would ask you to imagine walking around in a shop you frequently visit. it would be a piece of cake to remember all ! And yes. once the object camel is detected. after flying over it for a short period.Page 50 of 60 . in detail. both will be treated as equal but once one knows the difference is in the number of humps on the back. is not the actual image and that is the case. Take the example of a camel and a dromedary. The combination of both results in what we see. At first. Besides the fact that this would be impossible if images as such were stored. the visual information the human brain has to process is in the neighborhood of 8 Megabits per second. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . A word as such has no __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. I could agree but since that is not the case I find it a daring statement.com is always required. but further specifications are stored there to make the distinction between both.theartificialbrain. We namely isolate shapes and like with everything in memory storage. it also shows that the compositions we make are often 3D. It is processed information and is one of the reasons why illusionists like David Copperfield can do their tricks ! It is also the reason why we are capable of visualization and that you most likely will not have a ‘real image’ during this visualization but rather a composition of shapes. If everything is subjective. it is rather hard to state that the brain processes 8 Megabits per second. This indicates that the shape of both a camel and dromedary point to the same object. this indicates that the image we think we see. in future encounters. I know the case of this young guy capable of drawing an almost perfect image of a city. how funny it might be. but from a 30° different angle. We also have the capacity to place these shapes in an environment. without you knowing. this also indicates that we do not use images as such in the visual processing ! So. The link to an Artificial Brain is the way we handle vision. combined with the fact that this cannot be done after a single look. the scene might be more detailed ! The above demonstrates that the ‘play-zone’ is best capable of ‘rendering’ fictive scenarios build out of shapes.model of Atkinson and Shiffrin as such works perfectly IF the input has also this ‘emergency-factor’ of the amygdala (pain-driven) ! Badly falling is to be avoided quickly without endless rehearsals ! Visualization So far we nearly touched the subject of visualization and it is well known that this helps much in better storing data. if we do not process images like a digital camera does. you would be surprised and have the reflex to focus your attention on the changes. If I would move a tree in your garden from the left to the right. If our eyes were CCD-camera’s. as I state several times throughout this document. it is comparing apples with oranges … Another argument in my defense is that when we look at a view. something I will not cover in this document. will be composed out of existing objects allowing the brain to do what it best does : linking ! That is the reason why visualization is working so well to remember lists of words. The two main principles our vision is based upon is the simultaneous processing of ‘shapes’ and ‘colors’. This allows a memory efficient way of visualization and a scenario. If a picture were stored.

a space frame where all fits in and often a ‘timetable’ in which order the scenario must be executed. I describe the imitation processes and pretty much of what is dedicated to mirror neurons falls under this. It is normal that diverse sorts of sensory memory will be present since the processing of the sensory input itself will need memory ! The main memory will be based on the above and whether the need will rise to have a central executive. One of the theories on autism is a lack of mirror neurons. -. will be dependent on the used techniques.I. © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. Therefore if the labeling system is not working properly and ‘easy linking’ like color-changes are not handled well. Challenge – The artificial brain meaning. For humans it is almost sure that somehow language is associated with mirror neurons but research also revealed that it is gender dependent. pointers and pointers. but placed in a scenario it comes alive ! The basic memory-usage to deal with this ‘virtual’ scenario is rather small since it exists mainly out of pointer values. * ! We store little bits of information for everything we learn and add meaning to it. and I believe it is not obligated ! In the chapter ‘The diverse forms of consciousness’. I prefer storage within binary files and optimize it for fragmentation ! A single file for every object or script would become unmanageable ! Mirror neurons A lot of theories exist on this topic but very few is known for sure.B. it is hard to link information (learn) and to recall associated information (bad linking). but we first learn al 10 digits (0. Another element indirectly indicates that the above-mentioned statement of the interconnection between labeling and mirror neurons could be correct ! Both have one thing in common for sure : language related ! Mirror neurons are linked to language and the phonological loop in the model of the working memory from Baddeley and Hitch is too ! This last is nothing more or less than labeling … What types of memory are needed ? The diverse types of memory required for the A. /.Page 51 of 60 . Remember that surprise is equal to something-out-of-the-pattern and has a factor of expectation as well (which is also sort of pattern on top). If the labeling does not work correct. they will be the foundation ! The labeling system I describe in this chapter is also somehow related to mirror neurons and this could also explain some autism symptoms.masureel@theartificialbrain.The ultimate A. Although it takes more than just the above mentioned ‘playzone’ and data available to create these imitation processes. This causes inferior learning possibilities and bad assessment since both require the need of linking information and data available. Females would have more mirror neurons than males and this is.com . episodic buffer or other ‘brain-related’ types of memory is to be considered at that moment. causing the typical symptoms. This is one of the main reasons I am such a fan of scripting ! The extra information can be stored (or removed) well in a script and the script as such (basically a text-stream) can be stored fragmented within a binary file allowing both fast storage as retrieval ! Since the amount of data will be substantial and in order to keep all running smoothly.B.9) and afterwards we use them in equations as pointers ! We do not need to learn every equation by heart ! The same applies to the basic operators like +. that is the fundament of a powerful thinking system ! I mentioned it before. The question is if these are required to obtain our A. Primates have them and what distinct these neurons from others is the ability to fire even if oneself is not performing ‘the task’. This meaning is actually added information somehow connected to other information and therefore the storage system should be capable of storing fragmented information in an optimized way ! For instance in a subtraction this extra info could be that if the second number is higher than the first one. according to some. this could very well be the reason why autistic people have the exaggerated surprise reflex (causing fear) when for instance a bus passes in another color than usual.. Game-creators are familiar with this principle … Fragmentation Pointers. the two numbers can be switched and a minus-sign must be added to the result indicating that this number is negative. the reason why women have better empathic skills then men.

Paranoia is therefore always a problem in concentration (amplification) often accompanied by exaggerated expectations … Suppression. If we are unable to find a way an A.com is always required. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. From all the areas. as illustrated earlier. could focus attention on something. external attention is best documented since it is the easiest to obtain (relatively) objective information for. This causes these senses to be amplified. sneaking on me successfully. chances are high that I will be within a split second in the top of a near standing tree ! Due to the amplified senses.Page 52 of 60 • .Attention Introduction Attention is in psychology and cognitive neuroscience a very well documented and researched topic. is one of these build in motivators and covers most of the passive and external dimensions (even part of covert attention). internal versus external and overt versus covert. I had an expectation pattern that unsuspected input probably originated from a bear nearby as well. attention is just a consequence of concentration ! Concentration is always a way of prioritizing processes and even deliberately suppressing parts of information within one process (listening to a single voice ignoring all other ‘noises’ for instance). there is just one single way of how concentration works : amplification and suppression : • Amplification. A widely accepted definition for attention is : “Attention is the cognitive process of selective concentration on one thing while ignoring the rest”. the colors become more intense and the shapes sharper thanks to amplification (covert attention) ! If I am out during the night somewhere in an unknown forest where a bear warning is recently launched. If everything would be amplified the problem would remain. it is just not possible to __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. When a friend. therefore a mechanism of suppression must be present as well. When I look at a specific topic. in this example. Surprise for example. I will be concentrated to notify any possible signs by a bear (ears. If no isolation of the individual ‘objects’ is present. most of the time combined with the appreciation/punishment system. others are based on the fear-trust part I earlier described in this document. touching the back of my shoulder just slightly with one single finger. In my humble opinion it would be better practice to focus research on concentration rather than on attention since. sight and touch).B. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . this slight touch feels more intense than when one is in a relaxed state of mind. I can just stare out the window not seeing much but a vague color and shape scene. as the definition indicates. What is out of the ‘normal’ pattern can be life-threatening and for most that is an important motivator ! Since all information is subjective and is handled similar by the brain. Diverse dimensions of attention have been discovered like : active versus passive. This leads us to the absolute necessity of different tracks per input (and this input can be both internal as external). it is clear to all that this would lead to a quick and unavoidable death of such a project ! Concentration In the above-mentioned definition of attention we notice ‘selective concentration’.theartificialbrain. Of course. So. the main question is what is the driving force behind concentration ? The answer is motivation ! Some of the motivators are hard coded.

If the other person al the sudden starts talking significantly louder without noticeable reason (not expected). At that moment if the above-mentioned balloon pops (something out of the normal pattern) the surprise mechanism would be triggered causing “attention” to pay full attention on this. for us humans. © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. Problem for this is that there is no way of telling in advance how many tracks will be needed and if this gets solved somehow. the frequency of both voices will be likely within the same range. one will be surprised as well. the concentration will be drawn towards ‘the surprise’. Another fact substantiating my call from different tracks is the need to remain aware of the other incoming information as well. but the track of attention as well as the other track must remain monitored by surprise ! ADHD for instance is pretty much concentration related and is something we need to avoid in the A. both monitored by the surprise mechanism. A system used for astronomic reasons focusing on one asteroid coming near the shuttle. One of the possibilities is to keep the complete incoming signal intact for the surprise mechanism and split it only afterwards. causing all the tracks to be monitored separately by the surprise mechanism. This last remark reveals something important ! Both the surprise and attention mechanism best operate on the same level instead of making surprise the conductor of attention.B. The hyperactive part could originate from this since the human body will produce adrenaline for every surprise ! The main conclusion for the A. If you tell a joke. If the system’s attention would be focused on a voice. Assume two women speaking to you simultaneously. As described before this mechanism is mainly based on detecting pattern changes and if somehow this mechanism sees changes in patterns that are normally not triggered. there is something we call expectation. The reason I mention this here is that we also need to determine at what level the splitting in tracks need to be done.B. but the theoretically potential is there. This expectation actually is nothing more than a pattern as well.The ultimate A. you expect others to laugh. whether it is vision. The first solution has the advantage that the splitting can be done in two channels : one channel for the focus and one for all the rest. Another solution could be to split all at the moment of incoming. but how would the system be able at that moment to react on other input in that range since all will be filtered out as if it was not there ! In other words the system’s focus could not be changed in the same input area as long as the current focus remains. a major factor in this is a dopamine deficiency. sound or even thoughts ! It could be if somehow filters were used but even then the problem would remain.com . therefore is that both the surprise as the concentration mechanism will need some experimenting before the right settings will be discovered and similar problems can be avoided. would be unable to spot another one maybe more threatening ! Although I did not touch this subject in the chapter on surprise.masureel@theartificialbrain. ! Even though it is believed that. even if they are not always correct ! It is not my favorite possibility. The surprise mechanism could also have a fundamental role in this. Surprise will trigger attention.I. otherwise you would be surprised (and likely embarrassed too). something to be avoided. the splitting itself takes much time and resources increasing the reaction time of the system.Page 53 of 60 . the noise of an exploding balloon (indicating a possible threat) would simply be ignored. If I do this. personally I consider two main system errors leading to similar behavior : • • A malfunction in the amplification mechanism causing the system to react on almost all stimuli. It is technically possible to filter out a single voice via complex filtering and just using one track. Challenge – The artificial brain amplify or suppress a single stream out of the complete stream. so filtering will offer no real solution and lead to fragmentized sound instead of isolating the complete conversation. that will happen.

com is always required. Too many sub-diagrams would be needed to cover the entire concept and the functioning of each component separately and this is not in first instance the purpose. The diagram N O 1 K Digi LTP M Main Data Rewarding Data Temp Via A Labeling L I 'Urgent' matter Acceptance P J Instincts H Aggression Digidala 1 G D Curiosity E F Punishment Attention 1 C Surprise Pain B A Play-Zone (Internal thoughts) Other internal thoughts Digital Cerebellum Motor output Sensory input __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www.Appendix 1 : A sample diagram Introduction Although different schemes can be created based upon the information in this document. The diagram is not UML or any other modeling language and therefore the shapes used in the diagram only have a pure visual purpose. On the next pages you will find the accompanying explanation. I took the freedom not to elaborate more than necessary. one of my favorites is displayed below : The Input Diagram. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type.theartificialbrain. Therefore. the complexity lies not within the amount of required components but rather in the interaction between all the components ! The diagram demonstrates all these required components and the inter-relations. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel .Page 54 of 60 . As you will discover.

Since internal thoughts can contain virtually anything and only the system holds control over this. It is not because an A.I. Pain (C) also will serve as new input for internal thoughts (Play-zone (B)) and most of the time for Instincts (P) as well allowing the system to react on it. a direct link to the Digidala (J) would work contra productive and is therefore best avoided. The handling of this information not only requires other components like ‘Attention’ (E) but it is also relatively slow processed. has a direct input in the amygdala allowing a super-fast handling of this incoming information. Pain can have both a physical and an emotional origin and plays an important role in motivation.masureel@theartificialbrain. A direct link of the outcome of the visual information for example would be impossible. Especially this last argument takes away the reason one would consider a sense having direct interaction with the Digidala (J) ! Nevertheless. artificial or not. The only rule in this is that the information (the sense) must have a fast result. I added a dashed line in the diagram from the Digital Cerebellum (A) to the Digidala (J) illustrating this possibility.com . instructs the Digital Cerebellum (A) to move to a certain point a couple of meters away that the system immediately arrives ! This will take time (lots of brain processes) and one or more senses will be used to determine if the system has reached the objective. Something I kept out of the diagram since it is not required as such. Therefore both the Play-zone (B) as well as the Digital Cerebellum (A) need direct access to the Pain (C) component.B. The Play-zone (B) also has the ability to give direct instructions to the Digital Cerebellum (A) as well. the main instruction is given on conscious level and the handling will be done on subconscious level. It is clear that the diverse subcomponents of the Digital Cerebellum (A) might require their own memory and even internal data space to obtain a functional system. • Pain (C) Although it is tempting to place Pain (C) in the Digital Cerebellum (A) it is not wise to do so as described in the main document. it is more correct to refer to this as the short-term memory. for example the instruction to move an arm up. The location for the short-term memory therefore is best located within the Play-zone (B).) might use the same principle. Keep in mind that this scheme is not an exact copy of how the human brain works but a universal diagram to obtain an intelligent Artificial Brain ! The arousal information. in the human brain for example. but other senses the Artificial Brain possesses (dependent on the use of the A. Since all input comes from either one and all output will be (part of) a new thought (Play-zone (B)) or motor output (Digital Cerebellum (A)) it is okay to take both as starting points. The Play-zone (B) itself is best viewed as (part of) the working memory.B. In other words. Although it might be tempting to see this as the ‘working memory’.The ultimate A. one must also keep in mind that the diverse conscious-levels have an impact as well since they also perform parallel ! Digital Cerebellum (A) and the Play-zone (B) The Digital Cerebellum (A) and the Play-zone (B) are the starting components. The Play-zone (B) is the component handling all internal thoughts as described in the main document. Most of the time. it is extremely hard to isolate a single event ! Everything is influencing one-another continuously (parallel processing and multiple input-sources) and sometimes extra input based upon the outcome of the original input in a single component arrives in another component in just a split second making the isolation even tougher ! As if that was not enough. all senses the system will have and the steering of all movements. Pain (C) also needs to increase the aggression factor (Aggression (H)) to give the system more chances in surviving. • The Digital Cerebellum (A) stands for all possible sensory input and motor output.Page 55 of 60 . Challenge – The artificial brain Explanation In every brain. Most of the time a single thought exists out of many parts of information and even other internal thoughts. This information needs to be stored temporarily to process the thought adequately. © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert.

Since both Surprise (F) and Pain (C) trigger Attention (E). Surprise (F) always triggers Attention (E). Curiosity (G) Curiosity (G) does not require a link to Attention (E) because Curiosity (G) is a way of diminishing fear to allow new experiences (as explained in the main document). Thanks to the fact that the Play-zone (B) is capable of deliberately focusing on other ‘thoughts’ (giving a higher priority of attention). Actually.theartificialbrain. Pain (C).com is always required. If I stick with a needle unexpected. a nuclear explosion). But to keep things simple I did not draw that link in the diagram … Attention (E) In the main document I cover this and lots of possibilities exist like active. Attention (E) can indirectly be triggered via Pain (C) or Surprise (F). A loud explosion automatically triggers Surprise (F) and if the complete sky all the sudden turns into another color or brightness (e. sticking with a needle causes full attention ! Surprise (F) As seen in the previous item (Pain (C)). style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . In the Digital Cerebellum (A) all sensory input is handled that way (even vision or sound). covert. The Play-zone (B) on the other hand requires a direct input in the Attention (E) component. some neurons will be activated in that region and the value will be much higher than the ‘normal’ level.Most people would connect the Pain (C) component to the Surprise (F) component as well and understandable : if I stick you with a needle in the butt. overt. something to be avoided in my humble opinion ! Nevertheless. only the Play-zone (B) and the Digital Cerebellum (A) can trigger the Surprise (F) mechanism. as mentioned before. As described in the main document. Otherwise Pain (C) would keep on triggering Attention (E) and all other incoming signals would be ignored or an overflow of the system would occur. Never woke up during a terrifying dream where al the sudden something extreme happened and triggered the Surprise (F) mechanism … It is also required that a link between Surprise (F) and (some sort of) short-term memory is present. Pain (C) can be suppressed as it is for humans. I can assure you that Surprise (F) will be triggered as well ! The same applies for the Play-zone (B) where an unexpected thought or outcome will result in Surprise (F). Keep in mind that during dreaming (pure subconscious level) one can have Surprise (F) too. This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. also triggers Attention (E). something to compare with is necessary. For the same reason no link between Surprise (F) and Curiosity (G) is present as well. In order to detect changes. external or internal as base for triggering Attention (E). you will be surprised ! The pitfall is that if we would do so. passive. the only reason Surprise (F) exists is to foresee a mechanism that can run in the background and activate Attention (E) ! This last remark could be interpreted as if Surprise (F) is only operating on the subconscious level but that is incorrect. The reason why is that only these both components can notify a change-in-the-pattern. Aggression (H) also requires a direct link to Attention for obvious reasons that the system would be unable to defend itself.g. the surprise mechanism would remain triggered as long as the pain is present and that is not what is wanted ! In the diagram you can see the connection of both the Play-zone (B) and the Digital Cerebellum (A) to Surprise (F) and either one needs to trigger Surprise (F) if something is out-ofthe-pattern (like (the first reaction on) sticking with a needle). In the diagram something surprisingly pops-up : the Digital Cerebellum (A) has no direct connection to Attention ! The reason for this is that in the Digital Cerebellum (A) the primary processing of the sensory input is handled and at that level an interconnection would trigger Attention (E) to all incoming information. It always is Attention (E) triggering Curiosity (G) and Curiosity (G) triggering the Digidala (J) where the fear can be diminished if no other warning signals are __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www.Page 56 of 60 . It is the Playzone in charge of defining what internal processes are important and should be focused on at that moment. It needs to run in the background for both conscious levels.

The Digidala (J) is also the center of data-transfer. Dependent on the characteristics of the information. A two-way connection between the Digidala (J) and Attention (E) exists since some information processed in the Digidala can be alerting and requiring the focus but this also will be more the case in retrieved data.The ultimate A. for simplicity reasons. “Last used date” and “Times used” will increase and if the area is full. like certain movements. both conscious and subconscious. it will be done ! As explained in the main document labeling is the way different sorts of information can be linked together regardless their origin. I deliberately did not include a link between these two components as it would requires a complete new diagram to explain the functioning of belief and the interaction of the diverse components on this. based upon a number of variables. Nevertheless Curiosity (G) can diminish fear. Since most data exists out of some information and a number of pointers towards other information. processed in the Digidala and this must be ventilated somehow and a good way is re-requesting Attention (E) this time with the ‘better’ values incorporated. In most input cases Attention (E) will pass the signal towards the Digidala (J) and dependent on a number of factors it will be classified as ‘Urgent’ (if the fear factor is far away from the neutral zone) and a direct link to the Digi LTP (Long Term Potentiation) (N) will be the result allowing the Digi LTP (N) to store this information immediately and forever. Labeling (L) If the incoming data somehow can be labeled.com . but later more on this. Although this is the input diagram. no immediate and definitive store of the information is required and it will be temporarily stored in this component. a number of components. This is handled in the Labeling component (L) and is well described in the main document. If the input is information from the Digital Cerebellum (A). Data Temp (M) If the accompanying values of the diverse variables are not high enough to instruct the Digidala (J) to consider it as ‘Urgent’. depending on the diverse values of the included variables. It is closely connected to belief as well but the Play-zone (B) plays an even more important factor in this. All matter to be possibly stored or retrieved needs to pass through the Digidala (J). The Digi LTP (N) is the component in the digital brain © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. Challenge – The artificial brain present indicating danger.Page 57 of 60 . Since it is the Digidala (J) and the Digi LTP (N) which are the main key-players in storing the data definitive in the Main Data (O). I also did not include the retrieval part of data either where retrieved information can and will function partially or complete as input. Therefore the link from the Digidala (J) towards Attention (E) must be included. It is wise to compare this component with the hippocampus. the smart reader will see that the Data Temp (M) component is the storage part of the working memory ! Digi LTP (Long Term Potentiation) (N) Long Term Potentiation (LTP) is the process in the human brain allowing information to be stored for a real long time (multiple years up to a lifespan). data which is the least important (long time no use or low number of uses) will be overwritten. it is very well possible that some of these pointers refer to overwritten information and an incomplete ‘thought’ can be the result. it will be fast overwritten allowing the Data Temp (M) to remain manageable or it will go to the Digi LTP (N) for possible definite storage in the Main Data (O). Remember that isolating a single event is hard and most data exists out of diverse parts of input as explained in the topic on ‘Fragmentation’ in the main document. This would overcomplicate the scheme and the number of interconnections would increase dramatically since the Digidala (J) then triggers. this data will go directly from the Digidala (J) to Data Temp (M) without Labeling (L).I. For reasons of clarity. as if it is for us humans. Digidala (J) The Digidala component (J) handles everything about fear.masureel@theartificialbrain.

Nevertheless. It is hard to prove. whereas Punishment (D) requires Pain (C) or Aggression (H) as intermediates. Since input from the Digital Cerebellum (A) is not completely processed yet.allowing the same to happen. as to be expected.theartificialbrain. The same principle of overwriting exists here as it does in the Data Temp module (M). A too small Data Temp (M) will cause the system to overwrite existing data too fast and a too small Main Data (O) will obviously lead towards a diminished learning capacity and might even cause safety and surviving problems. the last used parameter will be recent enough to keep it undeleted for a long time ! With this information in the back of the head it is wise to consider the temporarily character of the Data Temp with a large margin … The exact dimensions of both data containers is something that will depend on the use of the system and in order to find an optimal balance between both some experimenting will be required. but I wouldn’t be surprised that this is what is causing the typical rebellion behavior of teenagers … Rewarding (K) and Punishment (D) In the diagram you will see that Rewarding (K) has a direct link to the Digidala (J) and Attention (E).Page 58 of 60 . Acceptance (I) As explained in the main document Acceptance (I) has a similar purpose as Curiosity (G) : moving the fear-slider towards trust. Therefore the more logical choice is to provide only the Play-zone (B) a direct link to Acceptance (I). Main Data (O) The Main Data (O) module is. it would be unwise to give this a direct link towards Acceptance (I). A too large Data Temp (M) or Main Data (O) has no disadvantages as such except for space requirements and a possible slower access speed. no overwriting will occur as long as other (candidate) data is available with a lower “Times used” value. aggression. Punishment (D) will always result in (emotional or physical) Pain (C) and/or some sort of Aggression (H) (to react on the pain). This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type. If the “Times used” parameter is not the lowest in the Data Temp (M).com is always required. as explained earlier. The input for both comes via Attention (E) (the blue colored circle labeled ‘1’) and remember that this can happen on both conscious and subconscious level ! A variable for both will determine in which degree some input will be considered as ‘with rewarding’ or ‘with punishment’. Those variables are continuously changing dependent on a lot of actors like ambiance. etc and the one __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. the information can be considered as important enough to store definitively. If a number of variables reaches a certain point. Acceptance (I) has a link to the Digidala (J) in order to allow modifying the fear-slider. only then the Data Temp component (M) may be searched. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . Notice that minor important information used once a week for example may remain in the Data Temp (M) for many years without ever being transferred to Main Data (O) or being overwritten. The reason for the division in two data modules (Data Temp (M) and Main Data (O)) is to guarantee speed and safety. the place where all definite data is stored. This latter transitional stage is required because Punishment (D) causes not all Pain (C) and is not the only trigger-source for Aggression (H) either. pain. Since this data is used from time to time. The data in Main Data (O) must be searched first in retrieving data and if no data is found there. In this pre-juvenal phase everything is generally more accepted and once the system must start learning by itself (the juvenal phase) it is best not to accept all ‘just because’. Notice as well that the requirement of a pre-juvenal phase (as explained in the main document) can be achieved by making the Acceptance component (I) dependent of some digi-hormone.

I. overcoming some emotional scarves. which best happens centralized at subconscious level. All other important actors like Pain (C) and Aggression (H) have a direct link to the Digidala. In the diagram the dotted light gray rectangle therefore contains the required components best preserved only at subconscious level. the signal is passed over to the subconscious level. In the main document I mention the preferred use of scripting outside the Digital Cerebellum (A) (even partially within) and one of the advantages of this is that someone externally can (re)define new instincts after the system is up and running. The disadvantage of this is that ‘circumstances’ (a single brain-process is inexistent) help defining these two variables allowing strange combinations to occur like sadomasochism or loving punishment ! However for the digital brain one could consider to implement a time limit for acceptance of the Digital Cerebellum (A) input in that equation. Conscious versus subconscious The main target of the subconscious level is to assist the conscious level. as explained in the main document. Instincts (P) Since instincts are basically there to protect the system it is logical that the triggering component is the Digidala (J).com . Challenge – The artificial brain with the higher value wins at that moment.masureel@theartificialbrain. © Copyright 2005-2007 – Geert Masureel – geert. In reality once the conscious level reached the gray zone. as happens in the human brain in the amygdala. this would cause such a drawback in possible future (motor skill) learning that it is to be avoided ! A better solution is to incorporate a system that blocks out the signal once a certain pain value is reached. The disadvantages of the latter solution are identical to human problems related to this approach. This will allow the system to be appreciated. In that way rewarding pain can lead to expanding the limits. However. I also explain that both are identical with the exception of storing and retrieving data.The ultimate A. Some extreme emotional pains can and will be blocked out … … and the possibility of “loving punishment” remains ! It is good practice to foresee a way of externally triggering both directly as well. In our diagram this is the link from Pain (C) to the Digidala (J). punished and rewarded for physical movements required in learning the motor output but will no longer allow these signals once all motored skills are present.Page 59 of 60 . …) and physical (revalidating. top-sporting). both psychologically (difficult theoretical matter. It will be clear to all that interaction between the different processes of a single instinct might be mandatory and therefore the possibility of an “action trigger” should be included allowing fast response.

B. I had the opportunity to do it my way ! Special thanks go to my lovely wife and wonderful daughter who had and have to live with such a weirdo like myself ! It surely is not always easy for them … … but as weak defense. all of these are actually combinations of what is covered and often have a semantic or philosophical explanation. can be created ? The answer is YES! I will even state that any intelligent creature one will ever encounter will have these fundamentals ! Dependent on the specifics of the creature. I am not such a fan of writing and therefore everything is rather concentrated. other sensory input and motor output will be present but the same fundamentals will work in the background and yes. cats. I can officially state that it is not always easy to be me either ! I also thank the many dogs. requiring a certain amount of words or pages. It is best not to overcomplicate things and first learn to walk before trying to run a marathon … As you will have discovered by now. don’t you hate books with more paper than reasonable text ? I surely do and since I am not bound by any publisher. it might be possible that more levels than just the conscious and subconscious will be present (apart from the above and collective consciousness) … What about love.Epilog Is it really possible that based on these fundamentals a truly intelligent A. sheep and innocent people whom I observed during those twenty years of research to doublecheck things over and over and who gave me so much valuable input. respect and so many important actors I did not mention in this document ? Well.com is always required.theartificialbrain. my excuses for that. __________________________________________________ You may distribute this document or use parts out of it for free but a reference to http://www. However. style and height must be easy readable ! © Copyright 2005-2007 Geert Masureel . This reference must be within reasonable distance from a quote and the font type.Page 60 of 60 .