48K views

Uploaded by EliezerYudkowsky

Löb's Theorem shows that Peano Arithmetic can never assert its own soundness. I prove this amazing theorem using the standard mathematical technique of cartooning.

save

- From Financial Crisis to Global Catastrophe
- teachingphilosophystatement
- edn550 eportfolio 2b reflection fan li 22 02 15 v1
- singularityinstitute
- The Cartoon Guide to Statistics
- Toc 1
- List of cognitive biases affecting judgments of global risks
- soyouwanttobeaseedaiprogrammer
- 04 Indonesian Scholars Journal Template Final 1 a4
- The Hard-Hexagon Model and Rogers--Ramanujan Type Identities
- Modul Mpkt b
- The Cartoon Guide to Chemistry (0060936770)B
- Guide to Good Adjudication
- Singularity
- The Moral Status of Turing AIs
- slides1f
- zwicky
- Mathematical Induction 20110723
- Aristotle.ppt
- The Rise of Axiomatic Method
- logic stubs links.pdf
- Power Point (Formal Logical Argumentation)
- chapter 1 and 2
- Metalogic Review
- SWDM.pdf
- Identity in modal logic theorem proving
- 0404
- Euclid Geometry
- The Product of Partial Theta Functions. Accepted, Adv. Appl
- Presentasi Seminar Proposal
- The Innovators: How a Group of Hackers, Geniuses, and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution
- Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future
- Dispatches from Pluto: Lost and Found in the Mississippi Delta
- Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind
- Yes Please
- The Unwinding: An Inner History of the New America
- The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & Power
- Grand Pursuit: The Story of Economic Genius
- This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate
- A Heartbreaking Work Of Staggering Genius: A Memoir Based on a True Story
- The Emperor of All Maladies: A Biography of Cancer
- John Adams
- Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America
- Rise of ISIS: A Threat We Can't Ignore
- The Hard Thing About Hard Things: Building a Business When There Are No Easy Answers
- Smart People Should Build Things: How to Restore Our Culture of Achievement, Build a Path for Entrepreneurs, and Create New Jobs in America
- The World Is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century
- Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln
- The New Confessions of an Economic Hit Man
- Bad Feminist: Essays
- How To Win Friends and Influence People
- Angela's Ashes: A Memoir
- Steve Jobs
- The Incarnations: A Novel
- You Too Can Have a Body Like Mine: A Novel
- The Silver Linings Playbook: A Novel
- Leaving Berlin: A Novel
- Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close: A Novel
- The Sympathizer: A Novel (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction)
- The Light Between Oceans: A Novel
- The Blazing World: A Novel
- The Rosie Project: A Novel
- The First Bad Man: A Novel
- We Are Not Ourselves: A Novel
- Brooklyn: A Novel
- The Flamethrowers: A Novel
- A Man Called Ove: A Novel
- The Master
- Bel Canto
- Life of Pi
- The Love Affairs of Nathaniel P.: A Novel
- A Prayer for Owen Meany: A Novel
- The Cider House Rules
- Lovers at the Chameleon Club, Paris 1932: A Novel
- The Bonfire of the Vanities: A Novel
- The Perks of Being a Wallflower
- Interpreter of Maladies
- The Kitchen House: A Novel
- Beautiful Ruins: A Novel
- The Art of Racing in the Rain: A Novel
- Wolf Hall: A Novel
- The Wallcreeper
- My Sister's Keeper: A Novel

)

Löb's Theorem

by Eliezer Yudkowsky (http://yudkowsky.net) with thanks to Torkel Franzén and Marcello Herreshoff

This is our friend PA. His full name is "Peano Arithmetic."

2+2=4

PA makes statements about mysterious mathematical objects called "numbers".

We all trust our PA. When PA tells us something, we call it a proof.

In our experience so far, PA is sound - if PA says something, it always turns out to be true. So we generalize the rule "PA is always right", by scientific induction. A clever fellow named Gödel figured out how to ask PA questions about PA.

Does PA claim to be sound? Then we could trust PA even more - since, in our experience so far, scientific induction is sometimes wrong, but PA is always right.

But that darned Gödel proved this impossible - if PA asserted its own soundness (in general), PA would become inconsistent.

?

Maybe we could prove soundness (in PA) for some special cases? But if so, which statements could we prove sound?

Martin Hugo Löb proved a surprising theorem: If PA proves "If PA proves 'X', then X", then PA proves X! That is: PA can prove that a proof of 'X' implies X, only if PA can prove X. So if we found a proof (within PA) that "If Peano Arithmetic proves Goldbach's Conjecture, it is correct", we could use this fact to prove Goldbach's Conjecture! Alas, this means we can't prove PA sound with respect to any important class of statements. For example, we want to prove "If PA proves 'X + Y = Z', then X + Y = Z". "If PA proves '1 + 2 = 5', then 1 + 2 = 5" is a statement in that class. The hope would be to show that if 1 + 2 ≠ 5, PA does not prove "1 + 2 = 5". Unfortunately, Löb's Theorem demonstrates that if we could prove the above within PA, then PA would prove 1 + 2 = 5.

Löb's Sentence:

The key to Löb's Theorem is the Löb sentence L. L states: "If a proof of L exists, then C". C is some arbitrary statement like "1 + 2 = 5". We don't start with a proof of L - we just construct the sentence.

A paradoxical analogue of L is the Santa Claus sentence: "If this sentence is true, then Santa Claus exists." (Clearly, if that sentence were really true, Santa Claus would have to exist. But this is just what the sentence asserts, so it is true, and Santa Claus does exist.) L itself is not paradoxical, because it talks about proof within a system, not truth.

Direct self-reference is not permitted in Peano Arithmetic. Yet the Löb sentence L apparently refers to L itself.

For a sentence to refer to itself, it must contain a self-replicating recipe - when the recipe is executed, it produces a copy of the complete sentence, including the recipe itself. Likewise, Peano Arithmetic does not contain any direct method of referring to "provability". For an arithmetical sentence to talk about "proof", it must contain a (huge) recipe for the formal system of Peano Arithmetic - a numerical encoding of PA's axioms and inference rules. A non-paradoxical version of L in English:

If the result of substituting "If the result of substituting x for 'x' in x is provable in PA, then C" for 'x' in "If the result of substituting x for 'x' in x is provable in PA, then C" is provable in PA, then C.

Our Plan:

Step 1: Unpack the box.

We first prove (within PA) that "PA proves L if and only if PA proves that a proof of L implies C." Easy: this follows trivially from the construction of L.

Note that we have not proved L itself, just that PA proves L (the box) if and only if PA proves "Proving L implies C" (the content of the box). We can always construct the sentence L, but that doesn't mean we can prove it.

Step 2: The Löb hypothesis.

The Löb hypothesis is that PA proves "A proof of C implies C." For example, C could be "1 + 2 = 5", in which case Löb's hypothesis is that PA proves "If PA proves '1 + 2 = 5', then 1 + 2 = 5." Observe how the Löb hypothesis differs from the Löb sentence.

Step 3: Profit.

Starting from these two steps, we will prove C within PA.

Ingredients:

The formal proof uses a few more ingredients. These are not additional hypotheses; they are universal properties of Peano Arithmetic, and provable within PA itself.

A1: If PA proves

X, PA proves that "PA proves X".

A2: PA can

prove A1.

**A3: PA proves that PA
**

obeys Modus Ponens.

MP:

Modus Ponens

B1:

(A->B) + (B->C) => (A->C)

B2:

(A->B) + A->(B->C) => (A->C)

The Proof:

1. Unpack the box.

2. Löb's hypothesis.

3.

(A3)

4.

(1, 3, B1)

5.

(A2)

6.

(5, 4, B2)

7.

(6, 2, B1)

8.

(7, A1)

9.

(1, 8, MP)

10.

(9, 7, MP)

Q.E.D.

- From Financial Crisis to Global CatastropheUploaded byTurchin Alexei
- teachingphilosophystatementUploaded byapi-281891598
- edn550 eportfolio 2b reflection fan li 22 02 15 v1Uploaded byapi-280114661
- singularityinstituteUploaded byDanteA
- The Cartoon Guide to StatisticsUploaded byvemuriraja
- Toc 1Uploaded byapi-3696125
- List of cognitive biases affecting judgments of global risksUploaded byTurchin Alexei
- soyouwanttobeaseedaiprogrammerUploaded byDanteA
- 04 Indonesian Scholars Journal Template Final 1 a4Uploaded byMohammad Sholehuddin Hambali
- The Hard-Hexagon Model and Rogers--Ramanujan Type IdentitiesUploaded byapi-26401608
- Modul Mpkt bUploaded byEszy Celina Asmi
- The Cartoon Guide to Chemistry (0060936770)BUploaded byBernardo Arevalo
- Guide to Good AdjudicationUploaded byHarman Partap Singh
- SingularityUploaded by2501motoko
- The Moral Status of Turing AIsUploaded byAndrew Dun
- slides1fUploaded byAstrid Andrea Saragih
- zwickyUploaded byLaura Morales
- Mathematical Induction 20110723Uploaded byLiezel Lopega
- Aristotle.pptUploaded byjinx dale
- The Rise of Axiomatic MethodUploaded byQueen Mikael
- logic stubs links.pdfUploaded byDavid
- Power Point (Formal Logical Argumentation)Uploaded byZulaiha Abdul Rahman
- chapter 1 and 2Uploaded byapi-385932886
- Metalogic ReviewUploaded byFred_Mayweather
- SWDM.pdfUploaded byHector
- Identity in modal logic theorem provingUploaded byprooftheory
- 0404Uploaded byAshish Sharma
- Euclid GeometryUploaded byKawthar Ali
- The Product of Partial Theta Functions. Accepted, Adv. ApplUploaded byapi-26401608
- Presentasi Seminar ProposalUploaded byAbu Ubaidah