Professional Documents
Culture Documents
enabled to understand conflicts of differing perspectives. The use of visual and literary
techniques can unwittingly persuade audiences into taking a particular stance, as can be
seen in Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, Jason Reitman’s film, Thank You for Smoking
Conflicting perspectives in Julius Caesar develop over the assassination of Caesar. The
power to win over the Plebeians is found in Mark Antony’s funeral speech as opposed to
Brutus’ through his linguistic ability to manipulate their opinion. In Elizabethan times,
Julius Caesar the play was a form of entertainment, not a political statement against the
monarchy. Shakespeare would have been given the death sentence for depicting the
downfall of the Monarchy either way, so it was imperative that all Conspirators that acted
against it were punished. In Act one I, Shakespeare has represented the fickleness of the
commoners, as Flavius and Marullus see how easily they were swayed from first
to their impressionable nature for the forthcoming conflicts. A dichotomy between the
Conspirators’ covets for a republic, and Antony’s thrust for a Monarchy resulted in
conflict and the murder of Caesar. Brutus spoke first at the funeral, demanding the
inner conflict and instability. Speaking in prose, his planned, syllogistic speech lacks
exaltation and fails to connect with the people on an emotional level. By having the first
say, Brutus has given the commoners the chance to be won over by Antony. Contrasting
From the two greetings, the crowd distinguishes Antony as the speaker who cares more
for the needs of the Romans. Whereas Brutus tried to reason with the audience,
Shakespeare has represented Antony as sly and manipulative. Through the use of
praeteritio, Antony subtly convinces the audience that Brutus and the other conspirators
Antony makes it sound as though his words were mere truths, that he didn’t intend to lay
praise, capturing the hearts of the people further than if he admitted to his admirations.
When the crowds proceeded to hunt down the conspirators, it is made clear that the
successful speaker was Antony, and proof of his success is found when the mob
randomly attack and kill Cinna the Poet, thinking he was Cinna the Conspirator. Through
of rhetoric was what ultimately manipulated the audience to believing Mark’s opinions of
Caesar.
Similarly to the dichotomy formed between the republicans and the monarchs in Julius
Caesar, conflicting perspectives occur in Reitman’s Thank You for Smoking between the
tobacco companies and the non-smoking public and government. In present context,
when the movie is set, smoking is seen and advertised to the public as a poison, and it is
tobacco industry lobbyist Nick Naylor’s job to defend his company. Thank You for
Smoking aims to make more of a political statement than Julius Caesar; as a film, it can
reach the wider public and show the effects of smoking legislations from the perspective
becoming more evident. Naylor is successful in swaying his audiences to his own
opinions as the composer has represented him as a confident, intelligent ‘Sultan of Spin’
through various oratory and filmic editing techniques. The first scene opens as an ad-
break return on the Joan Lunden Show, where Naylor is a guest speaker, alongside a 15
year-old ex smoking cancer patient, and representatives from various health associations.
As Naylor is introduced, the frame freezes as the crowd boos. The scene remains still in
smoking related death figures, to emphasize his challenge to win over the non smoking
public. The camera returns to a clip of Naylor swooning the press, as his voiceover states
As his head swings from one side to the other, the composer has dubbed in the sound of a
machine gun firing, which symbolizes his speaking ability as being a powerful force,
possessing the ability to control people and leave a lasting impression. The scene then
reverts back to the Joan Lunden show, where Naylor proceeds to use techniques of spin
to manipulate the crowd’s opinions. Before the other panel members can drill him about
the effects of smoking on the ‘Cancer Kid’, Naylor begins conversation by flattering the
“fine audience” in their concern for the youth of America, winning them over with his 50
Naylor used sycophancy to precede his speech, just as Antony had in addressing the
“gentle Romans”. By using spin to influence the audience opinions, Naylor connects with
them on an emotional level, successfully diverting their attention from the issue of
smoking in general to the discouragement of teen smoking. Through the composer’s use
of techniques, Naylor has been represented as a self-assured orator who parallels the
rhetoric of Mark Antony, showing that both men were successful as they were able to
perspectives of Caesar formed between Antony and the Conspirators in Julius Caesar. In
Australia in the early 1800s, Marsden was seen as a sadist and a tyrant for his abuse of
power in torturing convicts, and his rejection of Aboriginal culture, whereas in New
Zealand he was seen as a savior, introducing the ways of Christianity to the islands, and
accepting and helping the Maoris. As an Australian, Kenneth Slessor has represented
Marsden as a wicked man with a twisted desire to make others suffer; drawing out his
darker traits through linguistic techniques and poetic structure in Vesper-Song of the
Marsden’s voice, where the responder is able to connect with his thoughts more
intimately and directly. The poem is structured as an Iambic Tetrameter, providing the
steady, flowing rhythm of a traditional prayer, whilst it also replicates the regularity and
continuity of his whips in motion. As the hand of God, the contradiction in this saintly
figure’s violent desires and nonchalance for the convicts makes Marsden seem pitiful in
his caricature of himself, enhancing the satire and emphasizing his inner conflict. The
metaphor “My cage of Brutes” creates an image of the indifference Marsden feels, in
viewing these men as animals and low-lives, suggesting his feelings of superiority and
suggests its importance, and represents God- Marsden is suggesting that God is
controlling his hand, and that he is performing God’s will by torturing these men for their
redemption. Both Brutus and Marsden feel the need to justify themselves and their
actions, making them both appear unstable in their inner conflicts. Slessor’s
inner conflict is seen in both protagonists, restricting their ability to be admired. Slessor’s
Samuel Marsden, he has been able to manipulate his audience; the New Zealand
his audience to his own perspective on the truth of Marsden. Such an effect also occurred
on Brutus- Caesar’s representation of Antony as a success left little room for Brutus to be
praised, showing that it is the successful people who are able to manipulate their
audiences.
Through analysis of Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Jason Reitman’s Thank You for
Smoking and Kenneth Slessor’s Vesper-Song of the Reverend Samuel Marsden, it can be
conflicting perspectives to occur, but in all texts, the successful person is the one who can
manipulate their audience’s opinions of truth to follow their own perspective- whether
that person be the composer himself or a character within the text. In all three texts,
various techniques have been able to distinguish that Antony, Naylor and Slessor have
been the successful people in winning over their audiences, whereas Brutus, The non-
smoking public and the New Zealand view of Marsden (respectively) have been
established as unsuccessful as they have lacked in the tools and techniques which equate