3.0K views

Uploaded by Kenneth Llantos

- PHY101
- Experiment 103 Projectile Motion
- E104 Newton's Second Law of Motion
- PHY10 E102
- Experiment 101 RESOLUTION OF FORCES
- E305 Equipotential LInes
- E101 - Resolution of Vectors
- Conclusion E105
- PHY12L E302
- E206: Archimedes' Principle
- Conclusion E106
- E102-Kinematics
- Analysis
- E103 Projectile Motion
- PHY10 E101
- Questions Exp 106
- Experiment 202 Fe Anne
- e103 Projectile
- Experiment 105 - QUESTIONS
- PHY11L Experiment 1

You are on page 1of 3

1. A cannonball, can be launched an initial velocity of 100 m/s. A target, on the same

level as the muzzle of the cannon, is 1000 m away. (a) Can the cannonball reach the

target? (b) At what angle should the cannonball be launched to hit the target?

Given:

Required:

Solution:

Interpretation of Results

The motion of an object under the influence of gravity is determined completely by the

acceleration of gravity, its launch speed, and launch angle provided air friction is negligible. The

horizontal and vertical motions may be separated and described by the general motion

equations for constant acceleration. The initial vector components of the velocity are used in

the equations.

At certain instances, a golf ball and a basketball fired with the same angle and initial speed,

depending on the mass and diameter, might travel both on the same range, height and time of

travel under certain circumstances. Looking at the figures below, we can see they shows a

parabolic path. The cannonball launched at a 45-degree angle had the maximum range. Note

that the cannonball launched at a 60-degree angle had the highest peak height before falling.

The cannonball launched at the 30-degree angle reached the ground first. The 60 and

30 degree trajectories have almost the same range, as does any pair of launches

at complementary angles. This is base on the general ballistic trajectory.

Variation of the launch angle of a projectile will change the range. If the launch velocity is

known, the required angle of launch for a desired range can be calculated from the motion

College Physics Part 1

equations. Basing on the computed range on the experiment, the launch angle at 30 and 60

degrees are the same, both are 2.27 meters. Though base on the statement earlier, the 30

degrees will reach the target first before the 60 degrees. Base on theory, since the acceleration

along the x-axis is zero, the horizontal velocity is constant all throughout the motion.

Along the y-axis, the velocity changes because of the acceleration due to gravity. From the

results of the experiment, the maximum distance reached by the projectile launched at 60° is

higher with a value of 0.98 m along the y-axis, against the projectile launched at 30° with only

0.33 m high. This is shown in figure above. Basing on the equation , as the ө

reach 90°, so does the value of whereas will be divided by 2g which leads to a

higher value of .

With percentage errors obtained, it is apparent that the computed values and the experimental

values of range obtained have precise values. Such percentage errors may be caused by the

inaccurate measurement of the vertical distance, since the time of travel depends on this, or

maybe due to the inaccuracy in the measurement of the horizontal distance, where the initial

velocity depends. The time of travel is used in the calculation of the initial velocity, which in

turn will determine the computed value of the range. Or else, the inaccuracy of the

experimental values may also have yielded such discrepancies, since these are also manually

measured. Otherwise, these discrepancies may be due to the inconsistent launches, that is, the

release cord was not pulled at right angles to the launcher, or maybe also due to erroneous

measurement of the angles in the second part of the experiment. On the other hand, air

resistance, which is one of the factors that affect the projectile motion, is negligible in this case

because there are no strong winds while performing the experiment. Furthermore, air

resistance cannot easily affect the cannonball, since this is heavy.

http://www.physicsclassroom.com/mmedia/vectors/mr.cfm for the images.

- PHY101Uploaded byDaniel Catolico
- Experiment 103 Projectile MotionUploaded byAllen Madrazo
- E104 Newton's Second Law of MotionUploaded byKenneth Llantos
- PHY10 E102Uploaded byRisha Santiago
- Experiment 101 RESOLUTION OF FORCESUploaded byL.a. Ladores
- E305 Equipotential LInesUploaded byApril Saccuan
- E101 - Resolution of VectorsUploaded byJanssen Alejo
- Conclusion E105Uploaded byJan Ebenezer Moriones
- PHY12L E302Uploaded byJan Rafael Eusebio
- E206: Archimedes' PrincipleUploaded byPJ Bundalian
- Conclusion E106Uploaded byJan Ebenezer Moriones
- E102-KinematicsUploaded byKenneth Pera
- AnalysisUploaded bydannamay
- E103 Projectile MotionUploaded byJan Ebenezer Moriones
- PHY10 E101Uploaded byRisha Santiago
- Questions Exp 106Uploaded bymajetislove
- Experiment 202 Fe AnneUploaded byZairel Allen Austria Santander
- e103 ProjectileUploaded bySteven Ace Galedo
- Experiment 105 - QUESTIONSUploaded bymajetislove
- PHY11L Experiment 1Uploaded byRhon Antonio
- Exp 105 InterpretationUploaded bymajetislove
- PHY10L - E102Uploaded byIdate Patrick
- Exp 106 InterpretationUploaded bymajetislove
- Kinematics Lab ReportUploaded byNate Bocker
- e202Uploaded byGiaÜ ÜEntrolizo
- Experiment 105 GraphUploaded bymajetislove
- E105.docxUploaded byKenneth Pera
- PHY10L-E106Uploaded byIdate Patrick
- E 201- Work, Energy and PowerUploaded byEmpress Vanessa Tutica

- Welcome 2 Companion+Key.pdfUploaded bysweetface_f2900
- Wh-Movement In Persian, Russian, And English: A Cross-Linguistic ComparisonUploaded byVahid Nia
- NAM Brief in Wal-Mart CaseUploaded bySteve Quinlivan
- TRIAL STPM Mathematics M 2 (NSEMBILAN) SMK TgDurahSerembanUploaded bySK
- An Integrated and Quantitative Approach to Petrophysical HeterogeneityUploaded bysaifulislam9442
- 23661207 Dominos Pizza Human Resourse CopyUploaded byVandita Rannsingh
- Patrologia Latina Database Search TipsUploaded byCristian Ispir
- (744985916) sps23059Uploaded byvalentineseftiana
- Color Approval Procedure Manual.updated.02.19.15Uploaded bySaif Rahman
- LAW Pre Discovery User GuideUploaded byShanequa QueenofQueens Stevenson
- Wasteland [PC] ManualUploaded byJames Eagel
- Williams, Rebelión Siglo XVIIUploaded byNoelia Ibañez
- Staff PlanningUploaded byAde Roy Renaldo
- A Museum Studies Approach to HeritageUploaded byAmy Jane Barnes
- Types of Performance MeasurementUploaded byAsitha Rathnayake
- Silabus SAP Dasar Sistem Dan Kendali Cerdas v2Uploaded byRahmat Muttaqin
- Wacholder, Ben Zion. Nicolaus of Damascus, 1962Uploaded byomnisanctus_new
- ISO12207Uploaded bydana
- Psych 1 Chapter 4Uploaded byAmanda Flugstad-Clarke
- The World English Bible (WEB): Isaiah by AnonymousUploaded byGutenberg.org
- Assessing the Effects of Urbanization on Annual Runoff and Flood Events UsingUploaded byIsabelle Baranguta
- bulletin november 10 2018Uploaded byapi-242081048
- Vedic Forex ForecastingUploaded bypaparock34
- Laws of Moses CodeUploaded byMorisHaim
- PERCEPTIONS ON MANILA HOTELUploaded byKatrina De Ubago Yanga
- Speech Corporal Punishment DebateUploaded byleahscap
- 25.3.Shaw_Web.pdfUploaded byJournal of Law, Information & Science
- PP223 Course OutlineUploaded byBogdan Zadorozhny
- 304-Hw9 CI and HT With Rv4(1)Uploaded bySomrita Banerjee
- Navaneetha.N. 19.01Uploaded bySusmita Banerjee (HirePro)