02/28/2011 62[RECAP] SUPPLEMENT to Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 43 , Response (non-motion), Response (non-motion), Response (non-motion) 59 filed by Defendants Appealing Dentistry, Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, Orly Taitz Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Order by a Federal judge to hold pro hac vice petition by Philip Berg in abeyance)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 02/28/2011)
Original Title
LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - 62 - SUPPLEMENT to Brief - Gov.uscourts.cacd.484804.62.0
02/28/2011 62[RECAP] SUPPLEMENT to Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 43 , Response (non-motion), Response (non-motion), Response (non-motion) 59 filed by Defendants Appealing Dentistry, Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, Orly Taitz Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Order by a Federal judge to hold pro hac vice petition by Philip Berg in abeyance)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 02/28/2011)
02/28/2011 62[RECAP] SUPPLEMENT to Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 43 , Response (non-motion), Response (non-motion), Response (non-motion) 59 filed by Defendants Appealing Dentistry, Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, Orly Taitz Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Order by a Federal judge to hold pro hac vice petition by Philip Berg in abeyance)(Taitz, Orly) (Entered: 02/28/2011)
Case 8:10-cv-01573-AG -PLA Document 62 Filed 02/28/11 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:1525
Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ SB#223433
29839 SANTA MARGARITA PKWY RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CA 92688, STE 100 PH 949-683-5411 FAX 949-766-7603 E-MAIL orly.taitz @gmail.com Attorney FOR DEFEND OUR FREEDOMS FOUNDATION, ORLY TAITZ INC, APPEALING DENTISTRY
) CASE NO.: 8:10-CV-01573-AG
CHARLES LINCOLN, ) DEFENDANTS’DEFEND OUR ) FREEDOMS FOUNDATION, ORLY PLAINTIFF, ) TAITZ INC AND APPEALING ) DENTISTRY VS. ) Request for judicial notice ) DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL,et al ) ) DEFENDANT )
TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, Orly Taitz, inc and Appealing Dentistry (collectively “Defendants) will be filing under Federal Rule 201 following Request for Judicial Notice of order by a federal judge to hold Pro Hac Vice request by Philip J. Berg in abeyance. Exhibit 1. Civil action 08- 2254 USDC DC Pro hac vice was never granted in this case to Philip Berg and the case was dismissed. This took place before the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania instituted disciplinary proceedings against Berg. This precedent shows that Federal court has wide latitude to deny pro hac vice applications and specifically shows one not being granted to Philip Berg. Defendants request this judicial notice to be treated as a supplemental brief Case 8:10-cv-01573-AG -PLA Document 62 Filed 02/28/11 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:1526
to the Opposition to pro hac vice requested by Philip
Berg and as a response to the question posed by Your Honor today at the hearing in this case, questioning if one (referring to Berg) can be in good standing with the court, if there are multiple sanctions against him by federal judges. /s/Orly Taitz Dr.Orly Taitz, ESQ 02.28.2011
FEDERAL COURT PROOF OF SERVICE
I certify under penalty of perjury and under the laws of CA that all the parties to this action were served on 02.28.2011 via ECF and/or mail
Dated this 02.28.2011
/s/Orly Taitz Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688