Arabs real time Astronomy

The 30 solutions of Mercury’s Perihelion
Real time physics = event time physics + time delay physics Quantum = classical + relativistic
joenahhas1958@yahoo.com

(I/O) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(I – O)/O] θ’0

I am Joe Nahhas greatest and only physicist alive since 1258 AD telling idiots like the two on my left Buzz off: Time travel based “modern Physics” is not physics but Einstein’s and Western “University” academia garbage imposed in classrooms and used wrong in scientific calculations to send 500,000 “physicists” to go work at Macdonald’s without loss of subject. My name is Professor Joe Nahhas founder of Arabs real time physics July 4th 1973. There is one and only one physics Arabs real time physics. Leonard Susskind is not only an idiot but this is the proof of his and Einstein’s stupidity This is me in October 2009 flashing my 1979 picture stapled to my thermo book congratulating myself and buzzing off 500 years of “western” stupidity of physics and buzzing off physicists and re - introducing real time physics that Arabs in 10th century started with 1001 new Arabs real time physics formulas to change physics and history Page 1

Confronting criminals in Alfred Nobel suit is my promise

Greetings: My name is Joe Nahhas and I was expelled from University of Michigan in 1991 and PHD wiped for exposing criminals in Alfred Nobel suit Headquartered in USA department of energy

Frederick Reines 1953 US physicists of US DOE and Einstein’s dumbest thought E = mc2 Modern physics which is based on space – to time - back to space travel fiction is not physics but Einstein’s and Alfred Nobel criminals’ stupidity imposed in classrooms and used in scientific calculation terrorizing students with University “Professors’” stupidity

I Joe Nahhas accuse Nobel Prize winner Dr Stephen Chu of the crime of fraud including scientific fraud money laundering in the amounts of billions of dollars

along with other Nobel Prize winners. Dr Stephen Chu is shelling billions in research money when he knows it is all fraud. Crime started with Lorentz and Einstein and the Alfred Nobel Prize Institution and USA department of energy is where the crimes happened and keep happening. In 1953 Frederick Reines rigged physics while he was working at USA department of energy to create the dark energy multi billion dollars scam and the dark energy scam have/had reached an unprecedented levels that criminals has to be confronted and Dr Stephen Chu is a criminal in Alfred Nobel suit and it is the subject of this article Western physicists after the 1932 two chemists discovery that the heavy metal of Uranium can split releasing heat they raced for a way to speed up the splitting process to make a heat bomb we call nuclear bomb. At this stage western physicists realized that they can tell the USA congress and get all the money they want and they used visual effects to claim new discovery fooling and blackmailing Congress the American people and humanity and the time has come to expose them and who can expose them? I can! There is no dark energy because it is based on modern physics and modern physics is made up physics and can be deleted in its entirety without loss of subject. I am that good and can show how modern physics is Garbage Dark energy Neutrino crime:

Frederick Reines Neutrino crime The Nobel Prize in Physics 1995 was awarded "for pioneering experimental contributions to lepton physics" jointly with one half to Martin L. Perl "for the discovery of the tau lepton" and with one half to Frederick Reines "for the detection of the neutrino". Frederick Reines and many others used visual effects to claim discovery when there is no discovery and he did it while working for America’s most wanted crime hub called US department of energy Einstein is fraud and E = mc2/2 and not E = mc2 Terrorist Einstein talk about is dark energy visual Illusion after 106 years till can never be found

I can show you using 5th grade math that he is fraud by showing that 5th grade math can solve the same problems Einstein solved and the problems Einstein cannot

solve. I can show you how USA department of energy used visual effect to verify Einstein’s theory when his theory and the experimental proofs are nothing but fraud and a crime Modern Physics is Garbage: I can use 5th grade math to beat Alfred Nobel physics and physicists A = A; add and subtract B to get A = B + (A – B); divide by B to get A/B = 1 + (A – B)/B; multiply by C to get (A/B) C = C + [(A – B)/B] C If a Car has a velocity C at a distance A and the Car is moving away; then, the car velocity would be measured as (A/B) C at a distance B and the difference between the two velocities measurements at A and B is (A/B) C – C = [(A – B)/B] C C = classical physics = event time measurement of C (A/B) C = real time measurements of C = quantum mechanics [(A – B)/B] C = time delay Illusion = relativistic Or Quantum = Classical + relativistic Meaning when light was discovered and used as measuring tool physicists started seeing Illusions confused for real thing and called it modern physics. Real time illusions only use was speeding up the information age called modern technology. Everything scientist said that it exist they have no proof because it is an Illusion (A/B) C = C + [(A – B)/B] C This equation ends 500 years of modern physics University of Michigan time travel bus drivers and criminals like these idiots who believe in dark energy when dark energy is all made up fraud

Chairs of Nuclear Engineering Department past 30 years

James J. Duderstadt

Glenn Knoll

Bill Martin

Ron Gilgenbach

Arabs real time particle motion:

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product S = m r; State = mass x location: P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment = change of location + change of mass = m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force = m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r = m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate In polar coordinates system r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1) r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r
(1)

= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ = 0 Light force law Proof: First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1) Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ] = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1) Define θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ; And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1) And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1)

(1)

Define γ = d [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t = r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1) With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = F (r) And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 If light mass m = constant, then With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1 And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2 With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1 And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2 From Eq-2: d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Then r²θ' = h = constant

Differentiate with respect to time

Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0 Divide by r²θ' Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0 And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t For a fixed orbit: λ r = 0 Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2ỉ ω t With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Let u = 1/r; r = 1/u; r²θ' = h = θ’ /u² And d r/d t = (d r/ d u) (d u /d θ) (d θ/ d t) = (- 1/u ²) (θ’) (d u/ d θ) = - h (d u/ d θ) And d² r/ d t² = - h (θ’) (d² u/ d θ ²) = [- h²/r²] (d² u/ d θ ²) = - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1 And - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) – (1/u) (h u²) ² = 0 Then (d² u/ d θ ²) + u = 0 Then u = A e - í θ Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t Or, r = r 0 e
í (θ + ω t)

This is real time particle motion Light is emitted and not an emitter and humans have no means of measuring light in motion and at best they can take a snap shot. In mathematical language Then r = r 0 e í θ at t = 0 And r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t) Then ∆ r = r 0 e í θ [1 - e í ω t] Or ∆ r = r [1 - e í ω t] = ∆ r (x) + í ∆ r (y) ∆ r (x) = r [1 – cosine ω t] = - 2r sine ² ω t/2 ∆ r (x) = - 2r sine ² ω t/2 Eq - 3 Page 5

Dark energy Neutrino crime:

Frederick Reines Neutrino crime The Nobel Prize in Physics 1995 was awarded "for pioneering experimental contributions to lepton physics" jointly with one half to Martin L. Perl "for the discovery of the tau lepton" and with one half to Frederick Reines "for the detection of the neutrino". Anti-neutrino + proton ---------> neutron + positron Positron + electron --------------> Gamma + Gamma Gamma caught by a sensor and amplified to a signal 1 --> signal 1 on Oscilloscope 1 Neutron + Cadmium --> [Cadmium eats neutron] --> coughs Gamma Gamma caught by a sensor and amplified to a signal 2 --> signal 2 on Oscilloscope 2

Reines and Cowan who claimed that if they install a tank of water close to a nuclear reactor building and shield it from cosmic radiation then the Neutrino can be found from seeing two γ- gamma signals. The first signal γ- gamma signal is an indication of an Antineutrino capture by a neutron and the second γ- gamma signal is an indication of a neutron capture by cadmium and excited cadmium spits another γgamma signal A Water Tank with 200 liters of water and 40 CdCl2 or a mixture of tri ethyl benzene

Page 6

* --------------------------------------------------------------------- *
signal 1 captured 25 μ seconds later signal 2 captures

Signal 1 and two differ by a small size captured on oscilloscope screens Water has a refractive index of 4/3 and try ethyl benzene has a refractive index of 1.44 There was a time window of 25 micro seconds shots were taken and when a # 1 signal appeared in this 25 micro-seconds window the second window showed another signal appearing within 0- 5 microseconds A signal moving inside a medium is expected to get delayed from 0-5 micro seconds in a 0-25 micro second window The diffraction slows the motion inside a medium with refractive index n: And r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t) With θ = 0 Then r = r 0 e í ω t Dividing by c Then T = T (0)

eỉωt ỉωt T = T (0) e ; ω t = arc tan (1/ n); n v = c; n = index of refraction; v = velocity

of light in medium; c = light speed in vacuum T = T (0) [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t] = T (0) [1 - 2sine² (ω t/2) + ỉ sine ω t] = T (x) + ỉ T (y) T (x) = T (0) [1 - 2sine² (ω t/2)] = T (0) {1 - 2sine² {[(arc tan (1/n)]/2}} Δ T = T (x) - T (0) = - 2 T (0) sine² {[arc tan (1 /n)]/2} Δ T = - 2 T (0) sine² {[arc tan (1 /n)]/2} T (x) = T (0) cosine arc tan [1 /n)] T (x) = T (0) cosine arc tan [3/4] = 0.8 T (0) T (x) - T (0) = 0.2 T (0) Δ T = 0.2 T (0) The assumption that the free neutrino is detected at the Savannah River nuclear power plant experiment in 1953 and published in nature 1956 by Reines and Cowan and advertised by United Nations in 1958 is not only wrong but dead wrong. The claim of a second signal detection delayed 5 micro second after the pair annihilation indicating a neutron capture by Cadmium and proving the existence of the neutrino to support Wolfgang Pauli Neutrino theory and relativity theory is not justified. Here is why Proof: The gate length is T (0) = 25 μ s (microseconds) The Container that had Cadmium is basically Tri ethyl benzene mixed with water. The refractive index of water at 25°C is 1.333 ~ 4/3 and the refractive index of tri ethyl benzene is 1.44 with 5 to 1 ratio water to tri ethyl benzene which is a minor distraction to water refractive index.

Δ T = - 2 x 25 sine² {[arc tan (~ 3/4)/2]} = 5 μ s time delays Δ T = 0.2 T (0) = 0.2 x 25 = 5 μ s time delays

The coincidence of Pair annihilation gammas and Neutron capture gammas is not justified If all the mixture was Tri ethyl benzene because the literature says it is a mixture and it say it is tri ethyl benzene Δ T = - 2 x 25 {[sine² arc tan (1/1.44)]/2} = 4.46575 μ s time delays The delayed signal within the 5 μ s intervals is not a sign of Neutrino capture but a flash of light caught traveled and caught delayed. Meaning it is the same gamma and not two different gammas. What Reines and Cowan did is measuring the same signal in a 25 micro second interval at the start they measured the signal and in that 25 micro seconds interval the signal had 5 micro seconds signal time delay that was measured as a second event. Reines and Cowan claimed two signals the first event was the signal of pair annihilation and the second event is the neutron capture and releasing a second gamma ray when in fact looking at the same signal. This is the basis of all dark energy fraud California institute of technology Ahmed Zewail Femto Chemistry historical mistake is the same repeated stupidity

Γ = t ℮ ỉ θ; θ = arc tan (v/c) The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1999
"for his studies of the transition states of chemical reactions using femto second spectroscopy"

Dr Ahmed Zewail Nobel Lecture
Femtochemistry: Atomic-Scale Dynamics of the Chemical Bond Using Ultrafast Lasers Or finding t
In his Nobel work Dr Zewail used Cyanogenic iodide with λ = 306 nanometer; 1 nanometer = 10 - 9 and watched it fluoresces at λ = 388.9; t = 200 femto seconds; 1 femto second = 10 15 second He shot a Laser beam to stir a solution that contained crystal of Cyanogenic iodide Then every 10 femto seconds he shot again to see what happens and after the last shot he concluded the stir is dead and Cyanogenic iodide broke ICN ----------------> CN + I
-

The index of refraction of Cyanogenic iodide is n = 1.64 [US Army articles on the net]

With λ = c T: T (1) = 306 x 10 - 9/3 x 10 8 = 102 x 10 - 15 With λ = c T: T (2) = 388.9 x 10 - 9/3 x 10 8 = 129.633 x 10 Δ Γ = T (1) - T (2) = - 27.6333 x 10 - 15 And Δ Γ = - 2 t sine ² arc tan (v/c) And Δ Γ = - 2 t sine ² arc tan (1/n) And -2 sine ² arc tan (v/c) = - 0.1455
And t = Δ Γ / - 2 t sine ² arc tan (1/n) = - 27.6333 x 10
- 15

- 15

/ - 0.1462 = 190 x 10

- 15

Or t = 190 x 10 - 15 The last shot is just a waste Dr Zewail number is 200 +/- 30 femotseconds Other Nobel Prize winner used the same visual trick at Micro scale Then Nano technology came and used the same trick at nano scale And then Pico technology came and used it at pico scale I am not saying Dr Ahmed Zewail is wrong what I am saying is Dr Zewail and all others are wrong and Dr Zewail is another Nobel and no Nobility.

But that is not all Einstein used the same crime Lord Eddington used the same crime So did Copernicus Galileo, Tyco Brahe, Kepler, Newton, Hooke, Le Verrier, Laplace Von Soldner, …………. The entire western civilization 500 years of physics The entire western civilization 500,000 scientists used the same crime
All rights reserved Page 9

Chapter one: What is Arabs real time astronomy?

Car size at distance 4

Car size at distance 3

Car size at distance 2

Car size at distance 1 Observer line: …………………Observer ……………… If we stand in the middle of the street and watch a car moving directly away from us we see as if the size of the car shrunk. If we take a picture of the car at different distances then we see that the pictures of the car look like as if the car contracted in size. The further the car away from us the smaller image of the car in the picture. The size of the car did not change but real time light data reflected from the car and ran through air and into our eyes changes the real time image of the car to indicate a different location of the car and not a different size of the car. Our eyes see real time images of a moving car. If the car stops, then the image of the car freezes. A picture or a snap shot of a moving car is a frozen image of the moving car. When a car moves its real time image change size but the car does not change size. The car as a moving object at different distances has a variable real time image that our eyes see in real time and depends on distance and motion as perceived by our eyes. In short statements Our eyes see objects in real time as different objects at different distances and different speeds. Or, our eyes see real time objects we call images that change when measured from different distances or when moving. Our eyes do not see actual objects but Images of actual objects and our eyes see different images of same actual objects when at different distances of moving In mathematical form: Page 2 1 = 1 self evident 2 = 2 is self evident Image = image = I is self evident

line - 1

Object = object = O = self evident line - 2 And, - Object = - objects = - O = self evident line - 3 I=I line - 1 O=O line - 2 And, - O = - O line - 3 Adding: line - 1 and line - 2 and line - 3 I + O – O = O + (I – O) line - 4 I = O + (I – O); O – O = 0 one left side (I/O) = (O/O) + (I – O)/O; dividing by on both sides line - 5 Or, (I/O) = 1 + (I – O)/O; O/O = 1 line - 6 (I/O) O = O + [(I – O)/O] O Line - 7 Real time object = event time Object + time delay object Real time astronomy = event time astronomy + time delay astronomy Car size at distance 4

Car size at distance 3

R1

R2

O2 Car size at distance 2

D R1

D O1 R1

D d Car size at distance 1

Observer line: …………………Observer ……………… The image of R1 is R2; or R2 in real time is R1 Page 3

Let us do R1 real time analysis R2 = R2 R2 = R1 + (R2 – R1)

Dividing by R1 (R2/R1) = (R1/R1) + (R2 – R1)/ R1 Visual measurement scale (R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] Distance R1 when measured using light source and not a measuring tape is not the same as R1 but is measured as R2. R2 is the visual distance of R1. Using an eye as an instrument visual distance R2 is smaller than actual distance R1. The percentage of visual distance R2 to actual distance R1 is equal to (R2/R1). (R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] = 1 + [(R2/ R1) – 1] Percentage = 1 + [percentage – 1] Multiplying by R1 (R2/R1) R1 = R1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] R1 Visual = actual + (Visual – actual) In clear words when we try to measure the distance R1 using light source reflected from the car we see a percentage of R1 which is (R2/R1) R1 and that percentage times R1 is the visual we measure R2 Real time distance = event time distance + delay time distance Visual distance = distance + visual effect Visual measurement scale using distance Real time astronomy scale using distance (R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] Visual measurement scale using Velocity Real time astronomy scale using distance (V2/V1) = 1 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1] Visual measurement scale using angle Real time astronomy scale using angle (θ 2/ θ 1) = 1 + [(θ 2 – θ 1)/ θ 1] Visual measurement scale using angular velocity Real time astronomy scale using angular velocity (θ’ 2/ θ’ 1) = 1 + [(θ’ 2 – θ’ 1)/ θ’ 1] Visual measurement scale using time Real time astronomy scale using time (t 2/ t 1) = 1 + [(t 2 – t 1)/ t 1] This formula is real time astronomical scale (V/A) = 1 + [(V – A)/ A] (Visual/Actual) = 1 + [(Visual – Actual)/ Actual] Page 4

Arabs real time astronomy application

(I/O) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(I – O)/O] θ’0

Real time physics = event time physics + time delay physics In old terms Quantum = classical + relativistic
(R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1]

(R2/R1) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] θ’0
This is Arabs real time astronomy distance scale to measure the angular velocity θ’0 (V2/V1) = 1 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1]

(V2/V1) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1] θ’0
This is Arabs real time astronomy Velocity Scale to measure the angular velocity θ’0 Planet Mercury angular velocity accumulation in arc second per hundred years

(V2/V1) δ θ’0 = δ θ’0 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1] δ θ’0 Planet Mercury Angular velocity θ’0 = 2 π/Tm = 2(3.1415)/88 x24x3600 Tm = Planet Mercury orbital period = 88 days = 88 x 24 x 3600 seconds Planet Mercury angular velocity accumulation in arc second per century is: δ θ’0 = (2 π/ Tm) (1 century/Tm) (180/ π) (3600)
Or, Or,

δ θ’0 = (2 π/ Tm) (1 century/Tm) (180/ π) (3600)

= (2x3.1415/88x24x3600) (36526days/88days) (180/3.1415) (3600) = 70.75

(R2/R1) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] θ’0 (R2/R1) δ θ’0 = δ θ’0 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] δ θ’0
What we see = what there is + visual illusion Modern astronomers see = 70.75 + 43 What there is = 70.75 The visual Illusion is = 43

[(R2 – R1)/ R1] δ θ’0 = 43
Page 5

As an example: when Astronomers look at planetary motion around the sun and they saw the angular velocity in arc second per century: Equal to δ θ’ m = (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600) = 70.75 arc second per century

Astronomers also saw the visual effect Of: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = [(r m - r0)/r0] (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600) And it is equal to [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43 Where r m = Mercury – Sun distance = 58.2 X 106km And v m = Mercury around the sun orbital speed Sun distance = 47.9 km/sec And r 0 = r e = Earth – Sun distance = 149.6 X 106km And T m = Mercury around the sun orbital period Planet Distance r Planet Orbit X 106km Orbit T speed v in km/sec Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 Mars 227.936 687 24.14 Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74 Less Spin Earth speed speed km/sec 18.1 5.7 .002 6.52 .46511 0.2411 12.6 9.87 2.59 2.68 Angular velocity; v/r arc sec/ century 70.75 10.86 4.1

When astronomers measure the angular velocity from two different distances they make the following error: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43 When astronomers measure Planet mercury angular speed around the Sun from Earth r0 and not from the sun r m they make the following error Error: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43 Arabs real time astronomy is: Real time astronomy = event time astronomy + time delay astronomy Visual = actual + Illusions Visual = actual + (visual – actual) Quantum = classical + relativistic

Real time classical = classical + relativistic illusions Quantum mechanics and relativity theory is 20th century Garbage for physics. Measurements = actual + errors Actual + errors = actual + errors Page 6

Chapter Two The confrontation between Arabs real time Astronomy and Western Nobel prize winner modern space time astronomy Arabs astronomers:

M

Mercury

S

0

Sun

That: 1All object classified as planets Suns Moons has a real time circular motion As: r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t) And not 1 – Kepler - Newton’s ellipse r= [a (1 - ε²)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)] Or Einstein’s rotating ellipse: r= a (1 - ε²)/ [1 + ε cosine (θ - Ψ)] 2- The difference between two real time circular motions is a visual rotating ellipse Or, the difference between r1 = r 10 e í [θ (1) + ω (1) t] and r2 = r 20 e í [θ (2) + ω (2) t] Is Arabs real time ellipse: r= [a (1 - ε²)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)] e í [θ + ω t] 3 - Suns moons planets do not rotate around each other That is: r= [a (1 - ε²)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)] e í [θ + ω t] Is a visual ellipse 4 – Gravity does not exist between planets moons and sun That Newton’s F = - G m M/r² is wrong That Einstein’s F = - G m M/r² + k/r4 is wrong 5 – Gravity is due to atmosphere density and spin period That G = G [Ρ, T°] = G [atmospheric density, spin period] In short: Arabs real time astronomy says

500 years ago Europeans took 10th century Arabs real time Astronomy and changed it to Space- time astronomy and in the process physics was changed from an Arabic science to European – western stupidity globalized through planet of the Apes Institution and best known as Alfred Nobel Prize winner Institution Page 7

Alfred Nobel Prize winner physics theory Ape  Man  Modern Physicist Nobel Prize winner physicist  Ape Ass.

Alfred Nobel: The Man behind the Nobel Prize; Joe Nahhas: The Man after Alfred Nobel Institution head Since 1901, the Nobel Prize has been honoring men and women from all corners of the globe for outstanding achievements in physics. The foundations for the prize were laid in 1895 when Alfred Nobel wrote his last will, leaving much of his wealth to the establishment of the Nobel Prize. But who was Alfred Nobel? Meet Alfred Nobel - scientist, inventor, entrepreneur, author and pacifist. What is modern physics? Did anyone hear the big bang? Did anyone saw a black hole? Did anyone find Einstein’s gravity waves? Did anyone hook up a hose to the sky and found dark energy to verify E = mc2? Does anyone have a proof of Newton’s action at a distance? Does anyone have a proof of Einstein time travel? Does anyone figure out why humans have to accept Alfred Nobel prize winners claim that the universe is made up of particles that dies and rebirth billion billion times a second? Hey dude I am a redneck one grandfather was a damn farmer and my other grandfather was a damn Carpenter and my father was a Carpenter by inheritance but I never knew what a dumb ass really is till I met my science teacher! What did Alfred Nobel honor? The difference between an Alfred Nobel Prize winner physicists and fortune tellers is a flip of a coin. Space - Time is not physics but Alfred Nobel physicists’ flip of a coin between a crime and stupidity. Alfred Nobel Institution honored criminals in Alfred Nobel suit for all of past century. Modern space – time physics changed physics from science to stupidity and physicists from researchers to criminals. In writing: Yes I am after Alfred Nobel Institution head on my plate and I accept nothing less. Space – time physics is stupidity itself. Ending Nobel Prize for stupidity from classrooms and scientific calculations is the only Nobel thing left to do. Alfred Nobel Prize became 1001 times more worth in cash value. Big Institutions backed wrong physics and physicists for all of past century for a prize and a billion dollars jack pot and garbage for physics. I am Joe Nahhas and I am

unknown to the world of physics but I have 1001 new physics formulas to cut Alfred Nobel Institution head and delete Alfred Nobel Prize winner physics and physicists without loss of subject. This book is just the beginning and it is prime time and it is Arabs real time astronomy Page 8

Chapter three: 10th century Arabs real time astronomy
Arab Physicists of Baghdad of 950 Ad had said: I: Measurements are made along the line of sight or line of measurement

Arabs in 950 AD said that light going vertical (blue) to the eye it will go through the eye to be seen. The Arabs added that light coming oblique (pink) to the line of sight (blue line) we would see the part of light (pink) that is equal to the amount of light of horizontal amount (blue) or its vertical projection. What the Arabs concluded is that human eye and machines are unidirectional that can only recognize the amount of light along the line of sight or line of measurements. The Arabs mean that any point on the oblique pink line will be measured as its vertical projection as the blue line. The Arabs added that the horizontal projection of the pink line is the amount that would be measured as Zero or not seen at all. A point location on the pink line would be measured as equal to its vertical projection on the blue line and that part would be seen detected and measured by the eyes and instruments and its horizontal projection would not be detected or measured by the eyes or instruments and would be completely missed.

r0 r0
ωt

sine ω t

r0

cosine ω t

The angle between the pink line and the blue line is called light aberration angle. The aberration angle between the line where an object is (pink) and an object projection is with the eye as center. Light aberrations angle equals to: ω t = arc tan (v/c) where v = relative velocity of the moving object and c is light velocity. The light coming from a distant object is seen along the line of sight and that meant we do not measure actual distance of an object which is

r0

(pink line) but we measure its image or vertical projection

r0

r0

cosine ω t (blue line) and we escape measuring the horizontal projection

sine ω t which is perpendicular to the line of sight (black line). Page 9

In Short, light coming from objects at distance r0 will be seen at r0 cosine ω t Using real time mathematics to explain what we can see and/or detect or/and measure is what the Arabs have/had said and that would mean that if we try to measure a distance r0 we would not find r0 but we would find: Arabs real time distance is seen in real time along the line of sight. Or, Or,

r = r0

cosine ω t + í
í ω (r) t

Or r = real (blue = along line of sight)

r = r0 e

+ í imaginary (black = perpendicular to line of sight) . The absolute value of r = the absolute value of r0

r0

cosine ω t =

r0 e

í ω (r) t

Eq - 1

This statement said that light coming from objects when measured it is measured along line of sight and that meant we see light projections of objects (blue line) of objects positioned at positions

r0 (pink). We do not see objects at r0 but see

images of objects light projections

r0 cosine ω t and images of object light projections perpendicular along the line of sight is r0 sine ω t (blue line).
and images of objects light projection along the line of sight is The Arabs said that we do not see or measure light reflected from objects but we measure light speed projections as constant or light speed projections is measured as constant.

c c c

r0 but we see their visual position r. What humans see is r0 measured along the line of sight and miss r0 perpendicular to the line of sight. In other words an object at a distance r0 humans are not aware that they do í ω (r) t not see r0 but they see a visual of r0 which is r = r0 e and projection of r0 along
The Arabs claim that we do not see objects position

the line of sight that humans eye see and instruments measure is projection of

r0

cosine ω t and the

r0

perpendicular to the line of sight is

r0

cosine ω t. The Arabs added that

when accounted for, the difference between an object image or visual position

r (quantum

mechanics) and object location or position r0 (classical mechanics) is equal to a time delay effect (relativistic mechanics) Page 10

Modern physics is based on 3 different mechanics classical quantum and relativistic mechanics and their combination known as strings Arabs said that there is one and only one mechanics

Quantum = classical + relativistic r = r0 e í ω (r) t Arabs real time independent mechanics (classical mechanics) is r = r0; t = 0 í ω (r) t The difference between r = r0 e ; and r = r0 í ω (r) t Or, r0 e - r0 = Arabs real time mechanics visual effects (relativistic mechanics)
Arabs real time dependent mechanics (quantum mechanics): Or r = r = visual distance and r0 = actual distance Or, r = r0 + (r - r0) Or visual distance = actual distance + (visual distance – actual distance) Dividing by r0 And r /r0 = r0/r0 +(r – r0)/r0 And r /r0 = 1+ (r– r0)/r0 What are wrong in all of modern physics are all wrong physics measurements What this law said is: If the car width is r0 moves away the visual of the car width is r. The quantity r/r0 is the percentage that humans eye see and instruments measure and it is equal to 1 and the percentage difference between the car width and what the human eye see of the car width or a time delay effect or a visual distance effect of (r– r0)/r0 If someone attempts to measure a quantity θ’0; then multiply by θ’0 And (r /r0) θ’0= θ’0 + [(r - r0)/r0] θ’0 What this formula said everything about modern astronomy is all wrong What is wrong with all of astronomy? If we to measure the angular velocity of moving planets around a star ,or, a star moving around another star in the skies θ’0, then we do not measure actual θ’0 but we measure θ’0 + [(r - r0)/r0] θ’0 Or we have antidote to western space – time stupidity [(r - r0)/r0] θ’0 This is the basis of correct measurements. The entire western civilization 500 years of physics and the world 500,000 “modern” western civilization educated

physicists made/make this mistake and globalize their stupidity and to correct this mistake is to delete western civilization physicists without loss of subject. There is nothing in “modern” physics that can be considered as correct because modern physics is based on wrong measurements. Modern physics is “wrong time physics” that can be deleted without loss of subject. Arabs real time physics is the past present and future of all of physics and it is the subject of this book. Page 11

Arabs real time astronomy: The Arabs Astronomers and Physicists said that: We can not see or/and detect or/and measure something in space that did not exist; we can not see or/and detect or/and measure something that had not happened. We can only see or/and detect or/and measure things and events in space that had happened. What we see or/and detect or/and measure is not necessarily what there is and not necessarily what happened. We see or/and detect or/and measure traces and images of objects of past event. We see or/and detect or/and measure in present time of images of object and events that happened in past time. That is we measure images and record data of objects of past events in present time. An event changes in time and when an event is measured it is measured after it happened. Present time = present time Present time = past time + (present time – past time) Present time = past time + time difference Present time = real time; past time = event time; (present time – past time) = time delay, or, Real time = event time + time delay Real time Astronomy = Event time Astronomy + time delays Astronomy In Modern Physics language the Arabs would have said Quantum = classical + relativistic What there is = classical What we see and measure and detect and partially record is = quantum What we see and measure and has no detection because it is an Illusion = relativistic Time dependent measurements = time independent measurements + (Time dependent measurements – time independent measurements) Measured = actual + (measured – actual) We do not see object in real time but we see images of objects in real time In common Terms: Image = object + (image – object) With Image = I; object = O I = O + (I – O) I/O = O/O + (I – O)/O I/O = 1 + (I – O)/O Arabs real time measurements equation:

Is: (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q; q measured quantity ------------- Eq – 1
That is a quantity q when measured in real time it would appear as q + [(I – O)/O] q 500 years of modern physics and 500,000 of modern physicists is all wrong because of this principle (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] ----------------------- Eq - 1 Or quantum = classical + relativistic If Eq – 1 is applied it would expose modern physics as stupidity itself and it would expose modern astronomy as astrology itself. The thing about this principle given by Eq – 1: (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q is that it is flawless physics law or truth itself Page 12

r0 (actual or classical distance) and when measured in í ω (r) t real time they appear as at a location r (quantum distance) = r 0 e
There are objects at location That is the distance in the Universe is a classical distance but when a distance measured in real time it appears as quantum distance and the difference between classical distance and quantum distance is relativistic distance Quantum (real time distance) = classical (event distance) + [Quantum – classical] Quantum distance = classical distance + relativistic distance Relativistic distance = quantum distance – classical distance We see detect and measure quantum distance classical distance

r = r0 e

í ω (r) t

of an actual or
íωt

r0 and the difference between quantum distance r = r0 e and actual or classical distance r0 is relativistic distance í ω (r) t Take r = r0 e
Quantum (real time) = classical (event time) + [Quantum – classical] Quantum time = classical time + relativistic time Relativistic time = quantum time – classical time We see detect and measure Arabs real time physics Or,

t = t0 e

í ω (t) t

of an actual or classical time

t0 ------------------ Eq - 3
and actual or classical time

And the difference between Arabs relativistic time

t = t0 e

í ω (t) t

t0 is

Quantum = classical + [Quantum – classical] Quantum = classical + relativistic time Relativistic = quantum – classical All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product

S = m r; State = mass x location is all of astronomy needed Equation -1 That is if mass of objects in space is known and if the location of object in space is know then the state S = m r = mass x location of any object in space can be known and that is all needed to be known to describe space motion of any object and that is what is called astronomy That is mass m location r and time t = Astronomy and from this we can conclude: Page 13

Quantum (mass) = classical (mass) + [Quantum – classical] Quantum mass = classical mass + relativistic mass Relativistic mass = quantum mass – classical mass We see detect and Arabs real time mass an actual or classical time

m = m0 e

í ω (m) t

------------- Eq- 4 of

= m0 e

í ω (m) t

Such a claim by the Arabs that Astronomical measurements are made along the line Is saying Quantum mass = classical mass + relativistic mass And saying (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q; q measured quantity Eq - 1

m0 and the difference between Arabs real time mass m and actual or classical time m0 is Arabs real time mass delay

real time distance r = r0 e í ω (r) t í ω (t) t And real time t = t0 e í ω (m) t And real time mass m = m0 e
And And S = m r, the state equation

Eq - 2 Eq - 3 Eq - 4 Eq - 5

That is Arabs see detect and measure quantum distance quantity r =

r0 e

í ω (r) t

When there is classical distance quantity r0 And the difference explains that the universe is seen in real time and not in silly Western ideas of wrong space time. That is the difference between an object location and an object measurement of its location is “relativistic” and that 500 years of “western” Modern physics can be deleted without loss of subject and 500,000 “Modern” physicists can be told idiots with no fear or regrets. That is Arabs detect and measure quantum time quantity t = When there is classical time quantity

t0 e

í ω (t) t

t0 m0

That is Arabs see detect and measure quantum mass quantity When there is classical mass quantity

m = m0 e

í ω (m) t

What is wrong in all of Modern physics is this experimental mistake:
[(I – O)/O] q in everything that western modern space – timers do from space science to nuclear structure and this mistake was made by every physicist. This painful mistake is the one mistake when corrected it deletes western civilization physics and physicists explain the universe correctly and matches experimental results with unprecedented accuracy to delete “modern” physics of past 500 years and delete 500,000 “modern” physicists without loss of subject. What I am going to do

1- Show how this one mistake was/is made daily by all western civilization educated “modern” physicists 2- How this one mistake won the majority of Nobel prizes and changed physics from 1258 Arabic science to 2010 western educated stupidity 3 – Show how correcting this mistake will solve any and all unsolved physical motion problems that is not solvable by space – time physics or any read or published physics Arabs real time physics and astronomy is the past present and future of all of physics Page 14

Chapter four

Car size at distance 4

Car size at distance 3

Car size at distance 2

Car size at distance 1

Observer line: …………………Observer ……………… Humans do not see detect or measure cars but humans see detect and measures image of the car. In other words humans see detect and measure images of objects in real time. Page 15

The size of the car object is the same but the size of the car image is dependent on car distance and transmitted signal. Meaning we see detect and measure an image of size I in real time (present time) of an object O seen detected and measured in event (past time). That is when images of cars are seen these images of the cars are seen in real time. And when these car objects move the car see itself the same size. That is we measure images of object in real time and not objects. The difference between images and objects are visual illusions Arabs knew about and described in 10th century Ad. Conclusion: Is that humans see detect and measure images of objects in real time

Why all Modern Physics and modern astronomy is all wrong?
With Image = I; object = O I = O + (I – O) I/O = O/O + (I – O)/O I/O = 1 + (I – O)/O And (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q; q measured quantity --------------------- Eq - 1

Modern physics is all wrong because Modern physics is wrong time physics based on wrong physics measurements that misses by a factor of [(I – O)/O] q and this quantity [(I – O)/O] q is taken as real experimental result and not as a relativistic illusion correction. In other words: Correct Physics is: (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q Modern Physics is wrong because (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q What we measure = what there is + visual effects Quantum = classical + relativistic Quantum = we see in real time = observer dependent = time dependent measurements Classical = object independent of observer = time independent measurements Relativity = illusions In mathematical terms: Relativity = time dependent measurements – time independent measurements Real time scale Real time = event time + (real time – event time) Real time = event time + time delay; time delay = (real time – event time) With real time = Γ; event time = t; time delay = (Γ – t)

Γ = t + (Γ – t) = t + ∆ Γ; ∆ Γ = (Γ – t) Γ/t = t/t + (Γ – t)/t Γ/t = 1 + (Γ – t)/t To measure orbital speed using time, then multiply by orbital speed to get the following equation: (Γ/t) θ’0= θ’0 + [(Γ – t)/t] θ’0 And θ’0 = orbital speed The quantity θ’0 measurement is independent of time The quantity (Γ/t) θ’0 measurement is time dependent The difference = [(Γ – t)/t] θ’0 = relativistic = Illusions Page 16

With (Γ/t) θ’0= θ’0 + [(Γ – t)/t] θ’0 Modern physics is wrong when: In general 1 - (Γ/t) θ’0= θ’0 Quantum = classical or when someone looks at the car from different distances and wonder why he/she does not see the same size car.

An observer sees a car passing by at close distance

An observer sees a car passing by at far distance Each observer will find the car size different 2 – Modern physics is wrong when (Γ/t) θ’0= [(Γ – t)/t] θ’0 When quantum = relativistic

3 – Modern physics is wrong when θ’0= [(Γ – t)/t] θ’0 When classical = relativistic Let us demonstrate the power of Arabs real time Physics and astronomy and see how Arabs real time astronomy works but first let us do some definitions. Page 17 Real time distance scale Measured distance = actual distance + [measured distance – actual distance] Or, r = r0 + (r x – r0) And r /r0 = r0/r0 +(r – r0)/r0 And r /r0 = 1+(r– r0)/r0 And (r /r0) θ’0= θ’0 [(r - r0)/r0] θ’0 Real time Velocity Scale v With r = r0 + (r – r0) Divide by t Then r/t = r0/t + (r/t – r0/t) And v = v0 + (v – v0); dividing by v0 And v/ v0 = 1 + (v – v0)/ v0 Multiplying by θ’0 And (v/ v0) θ’0= θ’0+ [(v – v0)/ v0] θ’0 Real time acceleration scale γ With r = r0 + (r – r0) Divide by t² Then r/ t² = r0/ t² + (r/ t² – r0/ t²) And γ = γ 0 + [(γ – γ 0)]; dividing by v0 And γ / γ 0 = 1 + [(γ – γ 0)/ γ 0] Multiplying by θ’0 And (γ / γ 0) θ’0= θ’0+ [(γ – γ 0)/ γ 0] θ’0 The angular speed is a 5th grade math that is measured wrong by Astronomers expose the stupidity of modern physics and the stupidity of modern astronomy The circumference of a planet circular motion is C = 2 π r m where r m is the radius. In 1969 I knew about circular speed v m = 2 π r m/ T m where Tm is the period of rotation. Also, in 1969 I knew about angular speed θ’ m = 2 π /Tm = (v m/ r m). Or C = 2 π r m; v m = 2 π r m/Tm; θ’ m = 2 π /Tm = (v m/ r m)

θ’

m

= 2 π /Tm= (v m/r m)

Page 18

Angular velocity is θ’ m = 2 π /Tm= (v m/r m) In arc second per century δ θ’ m = (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600) Arabs Real time Astronomy distance scale: Is: (r m /r0) θ’ m= θ’ m [(r m - r0)/r0] θ’ m Multiplying by δ θ’ m Then (r m /r0) δ θ’ m= δ θ’ m + [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m In arc second per century δ θ’ m = (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600) The distance Error is: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m The velocity Error is: [(v m - v0)/v0] δ θ’ m The acceleration error is: [(γ m – γ 0)/ γ 0] δ θ’ m The angular velocity real time distance scale Error: Is: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = [(r m - r0)/r0] (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600) The angular velocity real time velocity scale Error: Is: [(v m - v0)/v0] δ θ’ m = [(v m - v0)/v0] (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600) The angular velocity real time acceleration scale Error: Is: [(γ m – γ 0)/ γ 0] δ θ’ m = [(γ m – γ 0)/ γ 0] δ θ’0 (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600) As an example: when Astronomers look at planetary motion around the sun and they saw the angular velocity in arc second per century: Equal to δ θ’ m = (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600) = 70.75 arc second per century Astronomers also saw the visual effect Of: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = [(r m - r0)/r0] (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600) And it is equal to [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43 Where r m = Mercury – Sun distance = 58.2 X 106km And v m = Mercury around the sun orbital speed Sun distance = 47.9 km/sec And r 0 = r e = Earth – Sun distance = 149.6 X 106km And T m = Mercury around the sun orbital period

Planet

Distance r Planet Orbit X 106km Orbit T speed v in km/sec Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 Mars 227.936 687 24.14 Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74

Less Spin Earth speed speed km/sec 18.1 5.7 .002 6.52 .46511 0.2411 12.6 9.87 2.59 2.68

Angular velocity; v/r arc sec/ century 70.75 10.86 4.1

Page 19

This quantity of: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = [(r m - r0)/r0] (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600) And it is equal to [(r - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43 is taken as the proof of the existence of silly Modern Astronomy notion that the Universe is not made of three dimensional Space (x, y, z) = (length, width, height) but made of a more complex space – to imaginary time – back to space Universe (x, y, z, it) = (length, width, height, imaginary time) [(v m – v e)/v e] δ θ’0 = [(v m – v e)/v e] (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600) And it is equal to [(r - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43 [(γ m – γ e)/ γ e] δ θ’ m = [(γ m – γ e)/ γ e] (v m /r m) (180/ π) [36526/T m (days)] (3600) [(γ – γ 0)/ γ 0] δ θ’ m= 43 Space – time is Einstein’s crime against physics

I am the Greatest Nuclear Physicist of all time And I have 1001 all new physics formulas to prove it
My name is Joe Nahhas and I am the greatest Physicist and Astronomer of past present and the future because as a teenager I stood up to criminals with Nobel prizes and this book is how to expose criminals with Nobel prizes in physics and the fact that most criminals with Nobel prizes are a product of the big western institutions has nothing to do with science but has something to do with western capitalistic greed fraud and arrogance that changed physics from science to stupidity and the time has come to delete stupidity and that is to delete western physics and physicists without exception since the rise of western civilization 500 years ago starting with Copernicus. There is nothing correct in all western civilization physics that is taught in classrooms and used in scientific calculations. Yes, I am saying that all of physics is all wrong and this book is the proof of it and there is nothing better than to start with the grand master of stupidity, German – American moron of the 20th century, the one and only Albert Einstein. Page 20

Einstein greatest achievement in space said Planet Mercury travel in space at an angular speed of 70.75 arcs second per century And in time at angular speed of 43 arcs second per century The Advance of Planet Mercury’s Perihelion given by Euclid’s Geometry

[2 π/T] [180/π][36526/88][3600] = [2 π /88 x 24x3600] [180/π][36526/88][3600] = 70.75 planet Mercury

Einstein’s time travel space – time formula: ψ = - 6 π GM/a c² (1 - ε²) [180/ π] [36526/T][3600] = 43 angular velocity time travel of G = 6.673 x 10-11= gravitational acceleration constant M =2x1030 kilogram = mass of the Sun Eccentricity of Mercury’s orbit = ε = 0.206 T= 88 days = period of Planet mercury’s rotation around the Sun And c = 299792.458 kilometer/second =light speed in kilometers/second And a = 58.2 x 106 km/sec = semi major axis of planet Mercury orbit

The grand moron of the west said Planets travel in space and time
The Grand moron said planets travel in space around the Sun in an elliptical orbit
Planet

 Su n

r

The Grand moron said planets travel in time around the Sun rotating the elliptical orbit 21

Mercury

r θ

Sun

This is space travel And the motion of a planet m around the Sun M measured as a rotating ellipse

m

θ ψ M

This is time travel

Page 22

Unless this moron can prove time travel he can keep his German stupidity to himself and Alfred Nobel Institution because time travel is Einstein’s and Alfred Nobel Institution stupidity

I am not saying Einstein is a moron but what I am saying is all western physicists are morns to say the least and can be deleted without loss of subject to be exact. Practicing again If 1= 1 2=2 3=3 Then we can write anything that is equal to itself as equal to itself like: Visual = Visual Actual = actual - Actual = - actual ----------------------- Add Visual = Actual + (Visual – actual) Divide by actual Visual/actual = Actual/actual + (Visual – actual)/actual Or Visual/actual = 1 + (Visual – actual)/actual Image/object = 1 + (Image – object)/object I/O = 1+ (I – O)/O We do not see object O but we see Image I. If we to look at planet Mercury from Earth and not from the Sun, then we are not looking at θ’ m= 2 π /T m = (v m /r0) but we are looking: At θ’0 I/O = 1 θ’0+ [(I – O)/O] θ’0 Or θ’0 I/O = θ’0+ [(I – O)/O] θ’0 The visual illusion and Modern Physicists confusion is: [(I – O)/O] θ’0 Where I is Mercury – Sun distance = 58,200,000 kilometers = r m And O is Earth – Sun distance = 149,600,000 kilometers = r e The Visual Illusions and modern Physicists confusion of Planet Mercury is: [(I – O)/O] θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] θ’0 Page 23

Multiplying by (t/t) = 1 [(I – O)/O] θ’0 = [(r m/t – r e/t)/ r e/t] θ’0 Then [(I – O)/O] θ’0 = [(v m – v e)/ v e] θ’0 [(I – O)/O] θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] (v0/r0) [(I – O)/O] θ’0 = [(v m – v e)/ v e] θ’0 = [(v m – v e)/ v e] (v0/r0) With v0 = v m; and r0 = r m With r m = 58.2 x 109 m; r e = 149.6 x 109 m; v m = 47.9 km/s; T

m

= 88 days

With (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m) = 70.75 arc second per century Copernicus Distance Illusion
[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43 = [(58.2 x 109 - 149.6 x 109)/ 149.6 x 109] (70.75) = [(58.2 - 149.6)/ 149.6] (70.75) = 43 arc second per century
Nicklaus Copernicus Distance Illusion [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] (v
m

/r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43

M r Copernicus you are wrong and you are deleted
With [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] (v
m

/r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)]

Next Is Galileo Page 24

With r m = v
Or

m

T m; r e = v

e

T

e

Galileo’s linear motion visual Illusion
m

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v

T

m

– v e T e)/ v e T e] (v

m

/r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0= [(47.9x88 – 365.26x29.8)/ 365.26x29.8] (70.75) = 43

M r Galileo you are wrong and you are deleted
With [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v
m

T

m

– v e T e)/ v e T e] (v

m

/r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43

Page 25

Tyco Brahe Velocity Illusion: [(r m – r e)/ r e] = [(r m /t) – (r e/ t)]/ (r e /t) = (v [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v
m

m

– v e)/ v e

– v e)/ v e] (v

m

/r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(47.9– 29.8)/ 29.8] (70.75) = 43

M r Tyco Brahe you are wrong and you are deleted With
[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v
m

– v e)/ v e] (v

m

/r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43

Page 26

(I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q M r Lippershey you can even read the telescope and you are deleted Hans Lippershey the person who attempted to get a patent for the telescope in 1609 Modern Physics is wrong because Hans and the entire Western civilization still have no clue how to read the telescope (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q
Page 27

Rene Descartes Cartesian failures t = t0 e í ω (t) t
Γ

= te

í ω (t) t

Along the line of sight Γ Γ Γ Γ
x x x x

= = /t /t

t cosine ω t t + (Γ x – t) = t + ∆ Γ x; ∆ Γ = t/t + (Γ x – t)/t = 1 + (Γ x – t)/t
x

x

= (Γ

x

– t)

What is [(Γ

– t)/t]
rm

Then ∆ Γ x (seconds) = Γ x - t = - 2 t sine² {[arc tan (V And in arc ∆ Γ x (arc seconds) = Γ x - t = - 30 t sine² {[arc tan (V r m - V r e)/ (√ 2c)]/ 2} = 43 Where r’ = V r; and r θ’ = V θ; and V r ²= 2 γ r r; and V
θ

- V r e)/ (√ 2c)]/ 2} = 43

²=rγθ

The confusion is and was γ r = γ θ; V r ²= 2 V θ ²; and taking V r = (√ 2) V θ And taking V r = V r (Mercury) - V r (Earth) = V r m - V r e And V θ = V r / (√ 2 ∆ Γ x Arc second) = Γ x - t = - 30 t sine² {[arc tan (V r m - V r e)/ (√ 2c)]/ 2} = 43 arc second /century Page 28

Chapter 3: Arabs real time light motion
Car size at distance 4

Car size at distance 3

Car size at distance 2

Car size at distance 1

Observer line: …………………Observer ……………… Visual objects seen through emitted or reflected light follow this law Light measurement of visual motion of objects law: (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q The proof: Page 29

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product S = m r; State = mass x location: P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment = change of location + change of mass = m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force = m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r = m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate In polar coordinates system r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1) r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r
(1)

= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/m r) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1) = [-Gm M/r²] r (1) ------------------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law Proof: First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1) Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ] = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1) Define θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ; And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1) And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1) Define γ = d [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t = r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1) With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = F (r) And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 With m = constant, then With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1 And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2 With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1 And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2 Page 30

From Eq-2: d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Then r²θ' = h = constant Differentiate with respect to time Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0 Divide by r²θ' Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0 And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t For a fixed orbit: λ r = 0 Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2ỉ ω t With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Let u = 1/r; r = 1/u; r²θ' = h = θ’ /u² And d r/d t = (d r/ d u) (d u /d θ) (d θ/ d t) = (- 1/u ²) (θ’) (d u/ d θ) = - h (d u/ d θ) And d² r/ d t² = - h (θ’) (d² u/ d θ ²) = [- h²/r²] (d² u/ d θ ²) = - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1 And - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) – (1/u) (h u²) ² = 0 Then (d² u/ d θ ²) + u = 0 Then u = A e - í θ Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t Or, r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t) This is quantum mechanics Arabs real time astronomy is actually quantum mechanics

r = r0 e

í ω (r) t

Light is emitted and not an emitter and humans have no means of measuring light in motion and at best they can take a snap shot. In mathematical language Then r (θ, 0) = r 0 e í θ at t = 0 And r (θ, t) = r 0 e í (θ + ω t) = r 0 e í θ e í ω t = r (θ, 0) e í ω t And r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) [cosine ω t + í sine ω t] And r x (θ, t) = r x (θ, 0) cosine ω t And ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] 31

Then ∆ r = r x (θ, t) - r x (θ, 0) = r x (θ, 0) [(cosine ω t) – 1] And [r x (θ, t) - r x (θ, 0)]/ r x (θ, 0) = [(1 - 2 sine² ω t/2) – 1] = - 2 sine ² ω t/2; ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r Arabs real time astronomy: Image = Image = I Object = Object = O - Object = - Object = - O Image = object + (Image – Object) I = O + (I – O) (I/O) = O/O + [(I – O)/O] (I/O) = 1 + [(I – O)/O] (I/O) θ' 0 = θ' 0 + [(I – O)/O] θ' 0 Quantum = classical + relativistic Illusion I = r; O = r 0 Or, (r / r 0) θ' 0 = θ' 0 + [(r – r 0)/ r 0] θ' 0 And [(r – r 0)/ r 0] θ' 0 Or [- 2sine ² ω t/2] θ' 0; ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r For planet Mercury: The distance visual effect Error is: [(r
m

x

(θ, 0)]

x

(θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r/ r 0)

– re)/re] δ θ’

m

The quantity: δ θ’ m = (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600) = 70.75
With v
m

= 47.9 km/sec; r

m

= 58.2 x 106 km; Tm = 88 days

With r = 58.2 x 109 m = Sun – Mercury distance And r
e

= 149.6 x 109 m = Sun Earth distance

With [(r m – re)/re] = [- 2sine ² ω t/2] = 0.61 And ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r/ r 0) Or ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r m/ r e) And [(r m – re)/re] δ θ’ m = [- 2sine ² ω t/2] (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600) = [- 2sine ² {[cosine-1 (r m/ r e)]/2}] (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600) = 0.61 x 70.75 = 43 Page 32

Chapter five: Arabs real time light Astronomy Kepler’s force laws F = - ω² a and F = - GmM/a² Or, F = - ω² a = - GmM/a² And T²/a³ = 4 π GM
A-

Johannes Keplers: Kepler’s law: a³/T² = k = constant Isaac Newton space Inverse square law γ = k/r² Hooke’s time Inverse square law γ = r/t² or γ = r/T² Kepler’s Space – time Law: k/r² = r/ T²; or, a³/T² = k = constant Where this law came from? Acceleration = γ = r/t² = k/r² γ = time coordinates r/t² = space coordinates k/r²; r substituted for t γ = r/t² = k/r² γ = - k/r² Newton’s theft = Newton γ = - r/t² = - r/T² = - k r Hooke’s theft = Hooke’ law Of: a³/T² = k = constant Or, a1³/ T1² = a2³/ T2² Or, a1/ a2 = (T1/ T2)2/3 And (a1 - a2)/ a2 = (T1/ T2)2/3 – 1 Or (am – a e)/ a e = (Tm/ Te) 2/3 – 1
Nicklaus Copernicus Distance Illusion [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] (v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43 Become: Kepler’s vision of idiot Einstein: Nicklaus Copernicus Distance Illusion

Mr Kepler you are wrong and you are deleted

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(Tm/ Te)

2/3

– 1] (v

m

/r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43 Page 33

When Newton came with F = - GmM/r²
Physicists calculated: θ' c m = v
/r; Angular velocity with respect to center of mass
cm

And Astronomers observed: θ's = v s/r Angular velocity with to the sun And v And v
cm

= √ [GM²/ (m + M) a]

s

= √ (GM/a)
cm

And (θ'

- θ’s) /θ’ s = [(2 π/T c m) - (2 π/T s)]/ (2 π/T s) = (T c m/T s) – 1 = (v s/v c m) – 1 = [√ (GM/a)] x {√ [(m + M) a/ GM²]} - 1 = √ [(m + M)/M] - 1 = √ [1 + (m/M)] - 1 ≈ 1 + (m/2 M) – 1 ≈ m/2 M

And (θ' cm - θ’ s) /θ’ s ≈ (m/2 M) And (θ' cm - θ’ s) / θ' s = (2 π/T s) (m/2 M) And [(θ' cm - θ’ s)] T s = π (m/ M) Multiplying by [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = (π m/M) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43 T²/a³ = 4 π²/GM with respect to the sun To T²/a³ = 4 π²/G (M + m) with respect to the center of mass That is Kepler's measurements data are centered from the sun and Newton's data are centered at the center of mass and this would explain this mistake like this: T² (1)/a³ = 4 π²/GM and T² (2) /a³ = 4 π²/G (M + m) When Newton changed Kepler's equation he solved the advance of perihelion as shown: The advance of Mercury perihelion by Newton T (1) = T (2) √ [M/ (M + m)] And 2π/ T (1) = [2 π/ T (2)] √ (1 + m/M) And θ' (1) = θ' (2) √ (1 + m/M) And θ' (2) = θ' (1) /√ [1 + (m/M)] ≈ [1 - m/ (2M)] This approximation was not on the original work And θ' (2) - θ' (1) = θ' (1) [1 /√ [1 + (m/M)] - 1] And θ' (2) - θ' (1) ≈ - θ' (1) (m/2M) = - [2 π/T] [m/2M) = - π m/MT radians/T Page 34

W " (calculated) = [- π m/MT] (180/π degrees) (3600 seconds) (36526 century); T = days; with m = 0.32 x1024 kg; and M = 2.0 x1030 kg; T = 88 days [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = (-180 x 36526 x 3600/T) (π m/M) = 43.0" seconds of arc /100 years

Mr Newton you are wrong and you are deleted

Page 35

Hooke’s for law F = - ω²x; 3 – Newton’s law F = - GmM/x²
If Hooke’s law is taken the F = - k r in one dimension Then r’’ +ω²r = 0; then r (θ, 0) = r0 e ỉ ω t Then r = r0 e ỉ ω t; and r = r0 [1- 2 sine² ω t/2] And (r - r0)/ r0 = - 2 sine² ω t/2 The distance visual effect Error is: [(r m – re)/re] δ θ’

m

The quantity: δ θ’ m = (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600) = 70.75
With v
m

= 47.9 km/sec; r

m

= 58.2 x 106 km; Tm = 88 days

With r = 58.2 x 109 m = Sun – Mercury distance And r
e

= 149.6 x 109 m = Sun Earth distance

With [(r m – re)/re] = [- 2sine ² ω t/2] = 0.61 And ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r/ r 0) Or ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r m/ r e) And [(r m – re)/re] δ θ’ m = [- 2sine ² ω t/2] (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600) = [- 2sine ² {[cosine-1 (r m/ r e)]/2}] (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600) = 0.61 x 70.75 = 43

Mr Hooke I really like you but you can be deleted Page 36

Chapter Five: The all time wrong Astronomer

Then Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier came
The angular velocity of Mercury around the Sun is: θ m' = v m /r m And δ θ’0 = (v m /r m) (180/π) (3600) (26526/Tm); Tm = 88 days If it is measured for planet Mercury from the sun then Then it is θ m' = v m /r m If planet Mercury around the sun measured from earth then = Then θ m' (Earth) = (v m + v e)/r m

E

S

M

And θ m' (Earth) = v m /r m + v e /r m And not v m /r m Le Verrier [1] mistake is: v e /r m The angular speed delay is: v* e /r m Or, [(v e/v m) (v m /r m)] Taking into account Earth rotation vº e Le Verrier mistake: Then the angular speed delay: Is: v e /r m = [v* e /r m +/- vº e /r m] In arc second per century multiplying by [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T)] [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v* e +/- vº e) /r m] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T)] [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v* e +/- vº e) /v m) (v m /r m)] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T)] = 43 [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v* e +/- vº e) /v m) (v m /r m)] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/Tm)] Page 37

Idiot Le Verrier
[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] (v
m

/r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43
m

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v

m

T

m

– v e T e)/ v e T e] (v

/r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)]

Arabs real time Astronomy is 5 laws
And saying (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q; q measured quantity Eq - 1

real time distance r = r0 e í ω (r) t í ω (t) t And real time t = t0 e í ω (m) t And real time mass m = m0 e
And And S = m r, the state equation

Eq - 2 Eq - 3 Eq - 4 Eq - 5

Page 38

Chapter six

Newton equation is a solved wrong for 350 years
Newton’s unprecedented stupidity

Being a good mathematician is solving own equation wrong? Newton said there is gravity Force F = -GmM/r² whose solution is this
Planet r  Su n

Fig1. Newton’s gravitational law
And r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] Real time solution is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] ℮ (r) "Apparent advance of perihelion" [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1- ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x [(v°+ v*)/c] ² = 43 arc second per century Page 39

But you idiot this solution is wrong

+ ỉ ω (r)] t

All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location r = r (x, y, z) = r [length, width, height]. The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product S = m r; State = mass x location: P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment = change of location + change of mass = m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force = m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r = m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate In polar coordinates system Location = r = r r Velocity = v = r' r
(1) (1)

+ r θ' θ

(1) (1)

Acceleration = γ = (r" - rθ'²) r F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r

+ (2r'θ' + r θ") θ

(1)

F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + + (m" r) r (1) F = [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1) F = F1 + F2 F1 = [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r F2 = (1/m r) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ
(1)

(1)]

+

(1)

Newton's Gravitational Equation is: F = -GmM/r² With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² (1) And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 (2)

Page 40

The solution is not And r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)] But this solution

(r) Real time solution is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] ℮ (r) "Apparent advance of perihelion" [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1- ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x [(v°+ v*)/c] ² arc second per century Proof: All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location = r (x, y, z) = r [length, width, height]. The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product S = m r; State = mass x location: P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment = change of location + change of mass = m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force = m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r = m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate In polar coordinates system Location = r = r r (1) Velocity = v = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1) Acceleration = γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1) F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + + (m" r) r (1) F = [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1) F = F1 + F2 F1 = [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) F2 = (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)

+ỉω

]t

r

Newton’s force law is F1 = [-GmM/r²] r Kepler's force law is: F2 = (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ’)/d t] θ (1) = 0

(1)

If m is constant then d (m²r²θ’)/d t = 0; and d (r²θ’)/d t = 0 Or, r²θ’ = h = 2 π a b/T; a = mean distance from sun and is called semi major axis and b is the semi minor axis. Page 41

Mercury

r θ

Sun

And the motion of a planet m around the Sun M measured in real time is a rotating ellipse

m

θ ψ M

Tyco Brahe Logged observational Data of Planets P motion around the Sun S and then Kepler stated the areal velocity law: If Planet p observed from the sun then the trajectory of planet p will cut equal areas in equal times. Page 42

P A A A S A A A A

T T T T

T T

P

T S

Page 43

When the areas size A are sliced equally it was found that the times spent by planets orbiting around the Sun and making areas A each are equal also. Or, r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1) = r² (2) θ' (2) = r² (3) θ' (3) = -= location² x [angular speed] = constant = Areal velocity If r² θ' = h Then differentiating with respect to time Then d (r² θ')/ d t = d h/ d t And 2 r r’ θ’ + r² θ’’ = 0 Or 2 (r’ /r) = - (θ’’/θ’) The r = r0 e
íωt –2íωt

And θ’ = θ’0 e With r = r0 e

íωt

In real time r (n) = r (0) e í ω t With r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1) Then θ' (1) = [r² (0)/ r² (1)] θ' (0) And θ' (1) = {[e í 2 ω t] θ' (0) And θ’ (1) = {[cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] – 1} θ' (0) Δ θ’ (1) = Δ θ’ (x) + í Δ θ’ (y) = [cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] θ' (0) Δ θ’ (x) = [cosine 2 ω t] θ' (0) Δ θ’ (x) = [1 – 2 sine² ω t] θ' (0) Δ θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' (0) sine² ω t Δ W = Δ θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' (0) sine² ω t = -2(2π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t And θ' (0) = h/r² (0) = 2 π a b/T a² = 2π√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ² Δ W = - 4 π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, then With, v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity And v/c = (v* + v°)/c = tan ω t Δ W = -4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} radians Multiplication by 180/π to change to degrees Δ W ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years Approximations With v° << c and v* << c, Then sine Inverse tan [v°/c + v*/c] ≈ (v° + v*)/c Δ W ° (calculated) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years This is the equation for axial rotations rate of planetary and binary stars or any two body problem. The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4) Page 44

Finding orbital velocities From Newton's inverse square law of an ellipse motion applied to a circular orbit gives the following: m v²/ r (cm) = GmM/r² Planet --- r (cm) ----- Center of mass ------- r (CM) --------- Mother Sun Planet ------------------- r -------------------------------------- Mother Sun Center of mass law m r (cm) = M r (CM); m = planet mass; M = sun mass And r (cm) = distance of planet to the center of mass And r (CM) = distance of sun to center of mass And r (cm) + r (CM) = r = distance between sun and planet Solving to get: r (cm) = [M/ (m + M)] r And r (CM) = [m/ (m + M)] r Then v² = [GM r (cm)/ r²] = GM²/ (m + M) r And v = √ [GM²/ (m + M) r = a (1-ε²/4)] Planet orbital velocity or primary velocity: And v* = v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 48.14 km for planet Mercury Velocity of secondary or Mother Sun velocity And v* (M) = √ [Gm² / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] Applications: mercury ellipse and its axis rotation of 43 " /century 1- Planet Mercury axial "apparent" rotation rate Δ W’’ = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/ (1-ε) ²} (v* + v°/c) ² seconds of arc per century The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4) Where v* (p) =√ [G M² / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m<<M; Solar system data: G =6.673x10-11; M=2x1030kg; m=.32x10^24kg; ε = 0.206; T=88days; c = 299792.458 km/sec; a = 58.2km/sec; v° = 0.002km/sec Calculations yield: v* =48.14km/sec; [√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.552 Δ W = (-720x36526x3600/88) x (1.552) (48.14/299792)² =43.0”/century Δ W’’ = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v* + v°)/c] ² = 43 seconds of arc per century [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v*m + v° m)/c] ² seconds of arc per century Or, Newton is plain stupid? There is no proof of action at a distance? F = -GmM/r² is not a proof of gravitational pull between planetary objects but rather the interaction of earth with its atmosphere G = 1/ (2/5) (4π/3) p T² = √ (2π)/ (4π/3)p T²; ρ = air density =1.2045kg/m³; and T = Earth rotation period = 23.9333x3600; Then G = 6.6747 x 10-11 G = 1/ (radius of gyration) (sphere) (air density) (Earth spin) ² G = √ (2 π) / (4π/3) p T² = √ (2π)/ (4π/3)p T² Suggesting that gravity measured on Earth is local to earth surface caused by Earth spin motion Also a rotating Ellipse can be derived from many different solutions and not necessarily from an inverse square law Page 45

Chapter seven
Inverse Cube equations F = m γ = - k/r³ r (1), then in polar coordinates With m [d² r/dt² - θ'²r] = - k /r³ Inverse Cube Gravitational law (1) And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity Equation (2) These two equations give an axial rotation rate: One: φ = π (m/ M) (180) [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years = 43.0344 seconds of arc / century for Mercury Two: δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) √ (1 - ε²)/ T (1 - ε) ² (v/c) ² arc second/100 years = 43.0" seconds of arc /century for Mercury

Solution:
With m = constant Then d² r/dt² - θ'²r = - k/ r³ (1) And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 (2) From (2) d (r²θ')/d t = 0; r²θ' = h From (1), θ'² d² r/ dθ² - θ'²r = - k/ mr³ And θ'² [d² r/ dθ² - r] = - k/ mr³ And d² r/ dθ² - r = - (k/mh²) r And d² r/ dθ² - r [1 - (k/mh²)] = 0 And r (θ, 0) = r (0, 0) e ỉ {√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ From (2) d (r²θ')/d t = 0; r²θ' = h Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ'' = 0 Dividing by r²θ' We get 2 (r'/r) + (θ''/θ') = 0 And 2 (r'/r) = - θ''/θ' = 2ỉ ω t

And θ' = (θ' (0, 0) {cosine 2 [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t] - ỉ sine 2 [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t]} And θ' - θ' (0, 0) = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t] And δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t] If k = Gm M α (1 - ε²); h = 2π a b/T Then: k/mh² = Gm M a (1 - ε²)/m 4 π ² a² b²/T² And k/mh² = GM T² (1 - ε²)/4 π ² a b²; multiply by (a²/a²) Then [a² (1 - ε²)/ b²] [GM T²/4 π ² a³] = [GM T²/4 π ² a³] Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0)] sine² [{√ [1 - (GM T²/4 π ² a³)]} θ + ω t] Taking Kepler's: GM T²/4π²a³ = 1 Page 46

e ỉ {√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ e ỉ ω t And θ' = θ' (θ, 0) e - 2ỉ ω t Or r = r (0, 0) e ỉ {√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ỉ ω t And θ' = θ' (0, 0) e -2ỉ [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t] And θ' = θ' (0, 0) e -2ỉ [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t]
And r = r (0, 0)

Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² ω t And θ' (0, 0) = h/r² = 2πab/Ta² (1 - ε) ² = 2πa²√ (1 - ε²)/Ta² (1 - ε) ² = 2π√ (1 - ε²)/T (1 - ε) ² And δ θ' = - 4π√ (1 - ε²)/ T (1 - ε) ² sine² ω t With ω T = arc tan v/c << 1 Then δ θ' = - 4π/T√ (1 - ε²)/ (1 - ε) ² sine² arc tan (v/c) radians per T Or δ θ' = - 4π/T√ (1 - ε²)/ (1 - ε) ² (v/c) ² radians per T
And δ θ' = - 4π/T√ (1 - ε²)/ (1 - ε) ² (v/c) ² [180/π] [36526] [3600] arc second/100 years Or δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) [√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²] (v/c) ² arc second/100 years Or δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) (1.552) (48.2/c) ² = 43.11 " arc second/100 years

If k = Gm (M + m) α (1 - ε²); h = 2π a b/T If we take Newton’s G (M + m) T²/4π²a³ = 1 Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0)] sine² [{√ [1 – [G (M + m) T²/4 π ² a³)]} θ + ω t] And G (M + m) T²/4π²a³ = 1 And 1- G (M + m) T²/4π²a³ = 0 Then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² ω t Then δ θ' = - 2 2 π √ (1 - ε²)/T (1 - ε) ² sine² ω t = - 4 π √ (1 - ε²)/T (1 - ε) ² sine² ω t If k = mh²; then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² ω t

Or δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) [√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²] (v/c) ² arc second/100 years Or δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) [√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²] (v/c) ² arc second/100 years

If k = m²h²/M; then δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² [{√ [1 - (k/mh²)]} θ + ω t] Become δ θ' = - 2 θ' (0, 0) sine² [{√ [1 - (m/M)]} θ + ω t] And (m/ M) << 1; t = 0 Or r = r (0, 0)

e ỉ [1 - (m/ 2M)]} θ And r ≈ r (0, 0) e ỉ [(θ - φ)]
Then r ≈ r (0, 0)

e

ỉ {√ [1 - (m/M)]} θ

With φ = m/ 2M θ Taking θ = 2 π Then φ = π m/ M radians And φ = π m/ (M) [180/π] [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years If k = m²h²/ (M + m) Then φ = π m/ (M + m) radians And φ = π m/ (M + m) [180/π] [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years Or φ = π (m/ M) (180/ π) [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years = 43.0344"/100 years Or φ = π m/(M +m) (180/ π) [36526/T] [3600] arc second/100 years = 43.0344"/100 years Or δ θ' = - 720 [36526/T] (3600) √ (1 - ε²)/ (1 - ε) ²] (v/c) ² arc second/100 years = 43.0"/100 years Page 47

Chapter eight: Nuclear gravity
Or Yukawa’s: [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0: M r Yukawa travel is not physics but Alfred Nobel physicists’ stupidity

Nuclear Gravity F = (-GmM/r²) e

k/r

With d² (m r)/dt² – (m r) θ'² = [-GmM/r²] e k/ r Nuclear gravity Equation (1) And (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity (2) (2): d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Then m²r²θ' = constant; if m is taken as constant then r²θ' = h And (1): d² r/dt² - r θ'² = [-GmM/r²] Let m r =1/u Then d r/d t = -u'/u² = - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ = - h d u/d θ And d² r/dt² = -hθ'd²u/dθ² = - hu² [d²u/dθ²]

e

k/r

With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = [-GmM/r²]

e

k/r

Nuclear Gravity

(1)

With e k/r ≈ 1+ k/r; k/r <<1 And -hu² (d²u/dθ²) - (1/u) (hu²)² = -GMu² [1 + k u]; α m/M r << 1 And (d²u dθ²) + (1 – GMk/h²) u = GM/h² And u = [GM/ h²]/ {(1 – GMk/h²) + A cosine [√ (1 - GMk/h²)] θ} And r = 1/u = 1/ {[GM/ h²]/ {[1 – GMk/h²] + A cosine {√ [1 – GMk/h²]} θ} = [1 – GMk/h²]/ (M/ h²)]/ {1 + ε cosine {√ [1 - GMk/h²]} θ Where [1 – GMk/h²]/ (GM/h²) = a (1 – ε²) 48

And [1 – GMk/h²] = (GM/h²) a (1-ε²) And h² - GM k = G M a (1- ε²) Then h²/GM – a (1- ε²) = k And √ [1 – GMk/h²] =√ {[1 – (GM/h²) [(h²/GM) – a (1 - ε²)]} = √ {[1 – 1 + (GM/h²) a (1 - ε²)]} = √ [(GM/h²) a (1 - ε²)] = √ {[GMT²/4π²a4 (1 - ε²)] a (1 - ε²)]} = √ (GMT²/4π²a³) = 1; T²/ a³ = 4π²/ GM Kepler’s Then, r = 1/u = (GM/ h²) + A cosine θ If, T²/ a³ = 4π²/ G (M +m) Newton’s Then, √ [1 – GMk/h²] = √ (GMT²/4π²a³) = √ [M/ (M + m)] = 1/ √ [1 + (m/M)] ≈ 1/ [1 + (m/2M)] = 1 – (m/ 2M) And [1 – GMk/h²]/ (M/ h²)]/ {1 + ε cosine {√ [1 - GMk/h²]} θ = a (1- ε²)/ [1 + ε cosine {√ [1 – (GMk/h²)]} θ = a (1- ε²)/ {[1 + ε cosine [(1 – m/2M) θ]} = a (1- ε²)/ [1 + ε cosine (θ – Φ)] And 2 π Φ = 2 π (m/ 2M) = π (m/M) If Newton’s law were to be F = - Gm (M + m)/r² The 2 π Φ = 2 π [m/ 2(M + m)] = π [m/ (m + M)]

Nuclear Gravity (-GmM/r²) e

(m α/ M r)

Abstract: Yukawa Gravity (-GmM/r²) e (m α/ M r) or the nuclear gravity force is the crudely approximated Newtonian gravity force (-GmM/r²) explains planetary motion around the sun as a rotating ellipse with a rotation rate φ = [π m/(m + M)] (180/π)(36526/T)(3600) = 43.03 seconds of an arc per century for the most talked about planet of mercury; m = 3.2 x 1024 kg; M = 2x1030 kg; T = 88days With d² (m r)/dt² – (m r) θ'² = (-GmM/r²) e (m α/ M r) Gravity Force And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity Then m²r²θ' = constant; if m is taken as constant then r²θ' = h And (1): d² r/dt² - r θ'² = -GmM/r² + Gm²α/r³ Let m r =1/u Then d r/d t = -u'/u² = - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ = - h d u/d θ And d² r/dt² = -hθ'd²u/dθ² = - hu² [d²u/dθ²] -hu² [d²u/dθ²] - (1/u) (hu²)² = -G M u² [1 – (α m /M) u]; α m /M r << 1 Or (d²u/ dθ²) + (1 – Gmα/h²) u = GM/h² And u = [GM/ h²]/[1 – Gmα/h²] + A cosine {√ [1 - Gmα/h²]}θ Page 49 (1) (2)

And r = 1/u = 1/ {[GM/ h²]/ [1 – Gmα/h²] + A cosine {√ [1 – Gmα/h²]} θ}

= [1 – Gmα/h²]/M/ h²]/ {1 + ε cosine {√ [1 - Gmα/h²]} θ Where [1 – Gmα/h²]/GM/h² = a (1 – ε²) And [1 – Gmα/h²] = (GM/h²) a (1-ε²) If α = a (1 – ε²), the h² = G (m + M) a (1- ε²) Then Gmα/h² = G ma (1 - ε²) /G (m + M) a (1- ε²) = m/ (m + M) With r (θ, 0) = [1 – Gmα/h²]/M/ h²]/ {1 + ε cosine {√ [1 – Gmα/h²]} θ Then r (θ, 0) = a (1 – ε²)/ {1 + ε cosine {√ [1 – Gmα/h²]} θ And r (θ, 0) = a (1 – ε²)/ {1 + ε cosine {√ [1 – m/ (m + M)]} θ And m << M; √ [1 – m/ (m + M)] ≈ 1 - m/2(m + M) With {√ [1 – Gmα/h²]} θ ≈ [1 - m/ 2(m + M)] θ If θ = 2π, Then 2π [1- m/2(m + M)] = 2π - 2π [m/2(m + M)] With r (θ, 0) = a (1 – ε²)/ {1 + ε cosine [θ – mθ/2(m + M)]} Then r (θ, 0) = a (1 – ε²)/ [1 + ε cosine (θ – φ)] And φ = mθ/2(m + M) With θ = 2π, then φ = 2πm/2(m + M) = π m/ (m + M) radians/second Multiplication by 180/π, then φ = 180m/ (m + M) degrees/second Multiplication by degrees/century (36526/T), then φ = [m/ (m + M)] (180)(36526/T)

Multiplication by 3600, then φ = [m/ (m + M)] (180) (36526/T)(3600) seconds/century With Planet Mercury: m = 3.2x1024kg; M = 2x1030kg Then φ = [3.2x1024/ 2x 1030] (180) (36526/T)(3600) seconds of an arc per century And φ = 43.03426909''/century φ = 2 π m/2(m + M) = π m/ (m + M) And [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [π m/ (m + M)] (180/ π) (36526/T) (3600)] Page 50

Chapter Nine
What is the accumulated value of 2 π f per century for planet mercury seen from Earth? The angular frequency is ω = 2 π f How I would see ω of planet mercury turning around the sun from earth? The answer is there will be a frequency change of W = 2 π f [v* m - v*e]/v* e; radians per second Where v*e = Earth orbital velocity around the Sun = 29.8 km/sec And vº e = Earth spin speed = 0.465 km/sec And v* m = Mercury orbital velocity around the Sun = 47.9 km/sec With f = 1/T; f = frequency; T = Period = 88 days If W is wanted in degrees multiply by: 180/π If W is wanted in degree per century multiply by (180/π) x (36526 days/ T) If W is wanted in arc second per century multiply by (180/π) x (36526 days/ T) x 3600 W = [2 π f [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] x (180/π) x [36526 days/ (T days)] x 3600 With f = 1/T (seconds) W = [360 x 3600 x (36526/T (days)] [1/T (seconds)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] W = [360 x 3600 x (36526/T (days)] [1/ 24 x 3600 x T (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] W = 15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 =15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] For Mercury W = 15 x [36526/ (88)²] [(47.9 – 29.8)/29.8] = 43.0 arc second per century The conclusion is With ω = 2 π f = 2 π /T angular frequency in event time And ω (real time) = ω (event time) + Δ ω Δ ω = ω (real time) - ω (event time) = 2 π f [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] = 2 π f Z; Z = [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] = red shift And Δ ω = 2 π f (1 + Z) The Advance of Planet Mercury Perihelion is 2 π f Z = 2 π Z/ T Δ ω = (2 π/T) [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] In arc seconds per century: Multiply by: (180/π) [36526/T (days)] (3600) And Δ ω = [2 π / T (seconds)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] x (180/π) [36526/T (days)] (3600); T (seconds) = T days x 24x 3600 Δ ω = [2 π / T days x 24x 3600] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] x (180/π) [36526/T (days)] (3600) Δ ω = [15 x 36526 / T² (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] = 43 Page 51

Frequency Games

Chapter Ten: Space – time unlimited stupidity
Visual force: F = - Gm M/r² - Gm Mk/r³ With m [d² r/dt² - θ'²r] = - Gm M/r² - Gm Mk/r³ Visual Gravitational law And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity Equation (2) Gives an axial rotation rate of W = 15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(v* - v*e)/v* e] (1)

m

With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = - k/ r² Inverse square Gravitational And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's law At Perihelion: d² r/d t² - r θ'² = - GM/r² = - r θ'²; d² r/d t² = 0 Then r θ'² = GM/r² A quick answer by Newton would be: First θ' ² = [GM/r³] And ω² = [GM/r³] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] ²

Boundary value Law

(1) (2)

In arc sec / century Then ω = {[GM/r³]} 1/2 [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] [(180/π) (3600) (36526/Tm) = 43"/century [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = {[GM/r³]} 1/2 [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] [(180/π) (3600) (36526/Tm)

Or, r 1 /θ'² 1= r 2 /θ'²2 = constant Or, θ' 2= {√[r 2/ r 1]} θ' 1 And θ' 2 - θ' 1 = {[√ (r 2/ r 1)] - 1} θ' 1 Δ θ' = {[√ (r 2/ r 1)] - 1} θ' 1 This is the angular time delay and will be seen as angular visual Illusion The angular speed is θ' = v/r For Mercury: θ' = v/r = (47.9km/sec)/58,200,000 km = 0.000000843 radians/sec If you want the accumulation value in arc sec /century W", then And W" = (v/r) (180/π) (3600) (26526/T) = angular velocity in arc sec per century. If it is measured for planet Mercury then W" = (47.9/58,200,000) (180/π) (3600) (26526/88) W"= 70.75 arc second per century Or, Δ W" = {[√ (r 2/ r 1)] - 1} W" (1) What is the angular visual Illusion for planet Mercury that would be seen when measured from Earth with Earth location r (1) = Earth = 149.6 x 106 And r (2) = Mercury = 58.2 x 106 And W" (2) = - 70.75 arc sec /century Δ W" = {[√ (r 2/ r 1)] - 1} W" 1 Δ W" = {{√ [149.6/58.2]} - 1} [-70.29] = 43.0" arc per century [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = {{√[r e/ r m]} - 1} (v m /r m)] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T) Page 52

Constant acceleration law

Constant Areal velocity Law Or, r² Or, r
1 1

θ'1= r²
2

2

θ'2 = location x speed = constant = Areal velocity

v 1= r

v2
2

Or, θ' 1= (r 2/ r 1)² θ'

And θ' 1 - θ' 2 = [(r 2/ r 1)² - 1] θ'

2

Δ θ' = θ' 1 - θ' 2 = [(r 2/ r 1)² - 1] θ' Δ θ' = [(v 1/ v 2)² - 1] θ'
2

2

This is the angular time delay and will be seen as angular visual Illusion The angular speed is θ' = v/r For Mercury: θ' = v/r = (47.9km/sec)/58,200,000 km = 0.000000843 radians/sec If you want the accumulation value in arc sec /century W", then And W" = (v/r) (180/π) (3600) (26526/T) = angular velocity in arc sec per century. If it is measured for planet Mercury then W" = (47.9/58,200,000) (180/π) (3600) (26526/88) W"= 70.29 arc second per century Or, Δ W" = [(v 1/ v 2)² - 1] W" (2) What is the angular visual Illusion for planet Mercury that would be seen when measured from Earth with Earth location r (1) = Earth = 149.6 x 106 And r (2) = Mercury = 58.2 x 106 And W" (2) = - 70.29 arc sec /century Δ W" = [(v 1/ v 2)² - 1] W" (2) Δ W" = [(v 1/ v 2)² - 1] (v
m

/r m)] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T)

Δ W" = [(29.8/ 47.9)² - 1] [-70.75] = 43.0" arc per century [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [(v e/ v m) ² - 1] (v
m

/r m)] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T) Page 53

No Force solution

Newton said there is gravity Force F = -GmM/r² whose solution is this
Planet r  Su n

Fig 1. Newton’s gravitational law With m [d² r/dt² - θ'²r] = 0 Zero force law equation (1) And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity Equation (2) íωt Equation (2) r = r0 e ; θ' = θ'0 e - 2 í ω t Equation (1) - h² d² θ/ d u² - h² u³ = 0 Or d² θ/ d u² + u = 0 Then u = u0 e - í θ And r0 = r0 (0) e + í θ Or, r = r0 (0) e í (θ + ω t) [h/ θ'0]½ e í (θ + ω t) And θ' = θ'0 e - 2 í ω t Δ θ' = - 2 θ'0 sine² ω t = - 2[2π/T] x [180/ π] [38526/T] [3600] sine² ω t = - 2 [2π/88 x 24 x 3600] x [180/ π] [38526/T] [3600] sine² ω t = - 141.5 sine² ω t And ω t = arc tan [(r m - r e)/ (r m + r e)] ½ = arc tan [(149.6 – 58.2)/ (149.6 + 58.2)] ½ Δ θ' = - 141.5 sine² arc tan [(149.6 – 58.2)/ (149.6 + 58.2)] ½ = 43 arc seconds per century Planet Distance r Planet Orbit X 106km Orbit T speed v in km/sec Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 Mars 227.936 687 24.14 Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74 Less Spin Earth speed speed km/sec 18.1 5.7 .002 6.52 .46511 0.2411 12.6 9.87 2.59 2.68 Angular velocity; v/r arc sec/ century 70.75 10.86 4.1

Newton’s mathematically wrong [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = (-720x36526x3600/88) (1.552) (48.14/300,000) ² arc sec per century = 43

This particular equation structure is the basis of stars studying. Originally, I derived it from Arabic real time physics literature. A visual Illusion along the line of sight is constructed as follows: Instead of seeing r0 we see r0 cosine arc tan (v/c) and perpendicular to the line of sight we see r0 sine arc tan (v/c) Or r = r0 [cosine arc tan (v/c) + í sine arc tan (v/c)]

Or r = r0 e í arc tan (v/c) íωt Or r = r0 e

And areal velocity law gives the same results If r² θ' = h Then differentiating with respect to time Then d (r² θ')/ d t = d h/ d t And 2 r r’ θ’ + r² θ’’ = 0 Or 2 (r’ /r) = - (θ’’/θ’) The r = r0 e
íωt –2íωt

And θ’ = θ’0 e With r = r0 e

íωt

In real time r (n) = r (0) e í ω t With r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1) Then θ' (1) = [r² (0)/ r² (1)] θ' (0) And θ' (1) = {[e í 2 ω t] θ' (0) And θ’ (1) = {[cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] – 1} θ' (0) Δ θ’ (1) = Δ θ’ (x) + í Δ θ’ (y) = [cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] θ' (0) Δ θ’ (x) = [cosine 2 ω t] θ' (0) Δ θ’ (x) = [1 – 2 sine² ω t] θ' (0) Δ θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' (0) sine² ω t Δ W = Δ θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' (0) sine² ω t = -2(2π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t And θ' (0) = h/r² (0) = 2 π a b/T a² = 2π√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ² Δ W = - 4 π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, then

With, v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity And v/c = (v* + v°)/c = tan ω t Δ W = -4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} radians Multiplication by 180/π to change to degrees Δ W ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years Page 55 Abstract: light measurements are done along the line of sight and we measure light projections to our eye. Meaning, that we do not measure distance r but we measure r cosine arc tan (v/c) when light is used and as a consequence instead of measuring time T we measure T cosine arc tan (v/c) and here is the experimental proof of it. Your eyes

A000 0 0000 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 θ (2) 0 0 0 0 θ (1) 0 0 θ (3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 B------------------------- 0 --------------- 0 ------------- 0 1 2 3 The projections of light is what we measure and the projection of 1 and 2 and 3 is AB If the angle between ray 1 and AB is θ (1) If the angle between ray 1 and AB is θ (2) If the angle between ray 1 and AB is θ (3)
Then C (1) cosine θ (1) = C (2) cosine θ (2) = C (3) cosine θ (3) = c = AB

You want experimental proof? Here is my iron clad proof of my theory: This is using the light projections to be equal c then the advance of perihelion and stars to solve mercury Venus and DI Herculis binary stars better than all is
If an object at location A sends light signals in all directions at time at t = 0 where B1 is;

And B1 is moving to B2 then the projection of AB2 of AB1 is measured. AB1 is theorized and AB2 is measured; or AB2 = AB1 cosine θ And θ = arc tan (v/c) B1B2 /AB1 = sine θ; AB2/AB1 = cosine θ; B1B2/AB2 = tan θ Instead of measuring time t we theorize time t and we measure time Γ = t cosine θ Page 56

A

Light V O O O

E O

L O

O O

θ
O O O

C O C

I O

T O

Y O

B2 O O O O O O O O O O B1

V O O O O

Γ = t cosine arc tan (v/c) = t {1- 2 sine² {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}} Γ - t = - 2 t sine² {[arc tan (v/c)]/2} With r2θ’ = h and 1/T= θ’’/θ’ = - 2r’/r = 2/t Or T = t/2 or the time measurements changes are twice period changes Or (Γ – t)/2 = - t sine² {[arc tan (v/c)]/2} is the time delays for periods With t = 1 century and t in arc seconds is 15 times time seconds then (Γ – t)/2 = - 15 T sine² {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}; T = One century With v = 47.9 (mercury) – 29.8 (Earth) =18.1 km/sec (Γ – t)/2 = - 15 (36526) sine² {[arc tan (18.1/300,000)]/2] = 43
= 15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(r m – r e)/ r e] = 43 = 15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(v = 15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(v
m

T

m

– v e T e)/ v e T e] = 43

m

– v e)/ v e] = 43
2/3

= 15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(Tm/ Te)

– 1] = 43

Or, Center of mass gravity equation [(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = [π m/ (m + M)] (180/ π) (36526/ T m) (3600)] = 43

Page 57

Mr Laplace yes you are deleted The solution to F = -GmM/r² is not r = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] and it is time you get corrected Real time solution is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] "Apparent advance of perihelion" Or, Boundary value law

℮ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 = = {[GM/r³]} 1/2 [(r m – r e)/ r e] [(180/ π) (3600) (36526/ T m) = 43 = {[GM/r³]} = {[GM/r³]} = {[GM/r³]}
1/2

[(v m – v e)/ v e] [(180/ π) (3600) (36526/ T m) = 43 [(Tm/ Te) [(v
m 2/3

1/2

– 1] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43

1/2

T

m

– v e T e)/ v e T e] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m) = 43 Page 58

Chapter Eleven

Arabs real time physics in outer Space
Apparent Apsidal motion of binary (two) stars
This is the solution to the 150 years apsidal motion puzzle that is not solvable by space-time physics or any said or published physics including 500 years of Modern physics and 500,000 modern physicists. Binary stars apsidal motion or "Apparent" rate of orbital axial rotation is a visual effect along the line of sight of moving objects applied to the angular velocity at Apses. From the thousands of close binary stars astronomers picked a dozen sets of binary stars systems that would be a good test of relativity theory and modern physics collected data for all of past century and relativity theory failed every one of them. This rate of "apparent" axial rotation is given by this new equation W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} (v* + v°/c) ² degrees/100 years T = period; ε = eccentricity; v° = spin velocity effect; v*= orbital velocity effects The simplest problem in physics that all 500 years modern physics and 500,000 modern physicists could not solve by any physics: 1 – As Camelopardalis 2 – DI Herculis 3 – V1143 Cygni 4 – V 541 Cygni 5 - AI Hydra 6 - V 731 Cephei 7 - SW Canis Majoris 8 - NV Canis Majoris 9 - GG Orion 10- CM Draconis 11- VV PYX 12 – EW Oriomis 13- V1147 Sagittari 14 – PSR 1913 + 16 12 – PSR 0737 – 3039 Solution: Location r = r r (1) ; Velocity v = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1) Acceleration γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1) S = m r; State = mass x distance P = d S/ d t = d (m r)/d t = m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) r Velocity = v = (d r/d t); mass rate change = m' = (d m/d t) P = m v + m' r; Momentum = change of state = change in location or change in mass F = d P/d t = d² S/d t² = d [m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t)]/d t = m d² r/d t² + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d² m/d t) ² r Page 59

The problems Einstein and all others can not solve

F = m d² r/d t² + 2 (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d² m/d t) ² r Force = Change of momentum F = m a + 2 m ' v + m" r F = - GmM/r² Or, Newton's Kepler's equation: F = - GmM/r² Then With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² Newton's Gravitational Equation (1) And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2) With m = constant, then m can be taken out from both equations (1) and (2) With d² r/d t² - r θ'² = - GM/r² Newton's Gravitational Equation (1) And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2) From 2: With m = constant; then d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 And m² d (r²θ')/d t = 0 And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 And r²θ' = h With (1): d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² With m = constant Then m [d² r/ d t² - r θ'²] = - Gm M/ r² And [d² r/ d t² - r θ'²] = - G M/ r² Let r =1/u Then d r/d t = -u'/u² = - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ = - h d u/d θ And d² r /d t² = - h θ'd²u/dθ² = - h u² [d²u/dθ²] And - h u² [d²u/dθ²] - (1/u) (hu²)² = - G Mu² Or, [d²u/ dθ²] + u = G M/ h ² u = G M/ h² + A cosine θ And r = 1/u = 1/ [G M / h² + A cosine θ] = (h²/ G M)/ [1 + (Ah²/ GM) cosine θ] = (h²/GM)/ (1 + ε cosine θ) Then r (θ, 0) = a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ) This is Newton's Classical Equation solution of two body problem. We solved this equation and we got the motion equation: Is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] which is the equation of an ellipse with eccentricity ε and semi - major axis a, and a semi- minor axis whose value is b = a √ [1 - ε²] and two foci one equals to c = ε a, and the other foci location equals to c = - ε a. Or the motion of one ball around the other ball should be an ellipse with the other ball at one of the foci +/- ε a, of the ellipse with semi major axes (- a, a) on x-axis and semi minor axes (-b, b) on y- axis and foci (- c, c) on x- axis again with angle of rotation θ. If this law to work on two planets instead of two balls like planetary motion around the sun, then Astronomers should see this motion of a planet moving around the sun in an ellipse with the sun at one of its foci. Page 60

m

θ

M

What astronomers saw was not an ellipse but a rotating ellipse like the ellipse below wth rotating angle ψ

m

θ ψ

M

Page 61

When the areas size A are sliced equally it was found that the times spent by planets orbiting around the Sun and making areas A each are equal also. Or, r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1) = r² (2) θ' (2) = r² (3) θ' (3) = -= location² x [angular speed] = constant = Areal velocity If r² θ' = h Then differentiating with respect to time Then d (r² θ')/ d t = d h/ d t And 2 r r’ θ’ + r² θ’’ = 0 Or 2 (r’ /r) = - (θ’’/θ’) The r = r0 e
íωt –2íωt

And θ’ = θ’0 e With r = r0 e

íωt

In real time r (n) = r (0) e í ω t With r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1) Then θ' (1) = [r² (0)/ r² (1)] θ' (0) And θ' (1) = {[e í 2 ω t] θ' (0) And θ’ (1) = {[cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] – 1} θ' (0) Δ θ’ (1) = Δ θ’ (x) + í Δ θ’ (y) = [cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] θ' (0) Δ θ’ (x) = [cosine 2 ω t] θ' (0) Δ θ’ (x) = [1 – 2 sine² ω t] θ' (0) Δ θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' (0) sine² ω t Δ W = Δ θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' (0) sine² ω t = -2(2π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t And θ' (0) = h/r² (0) = 2 π a b/T a² = 2π√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ² Δ W = - 4 π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, then With, v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity And v/c = (v* + v°)/c = tan ω t Δ W = -4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} radians Multiplication by 180/π to change to degrees Δ W ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days Page 62

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years

Astronomy re - written
Primary → Secondary ↓ v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin results Orbit results Examples v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ Spin results Orbit results Examples v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ Spin results Orbit results Examples v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ Spin results Orbit results Examples v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑]=orbit v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) AS CAM [↑,↑][↑,↓] v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s) [↑,↓][↑,↑] v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) [↑,↓][↑,↓] v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s) v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ [↑,↑][↓,↑] v°(p) + v°(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) [↑,↑][↓,↓] v°(p) + v°(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) [↑,↓][↓,↑] v°(p) - v°(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) [↑,↓][↓,↓] v°(p) - v°(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ [↓,↑][↑,↑] - v°(p) + v°(s) v* (p) + v*(s) [↓,↑][↑,↓] -v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s) [↓,↓][↑,↑] -v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) [↓,↓][↑,↓] -v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s) v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓ [↓,↑][↓,↑] -v°(p) + v°(s) -v* (p) + v* (s) [↓,↑][↓,↓] -v°(p) + v°(s) -v* (p) - v* (s) [↓,↓][↓,↑] -v°(p) - v°(s) -v* (p) + v* (s) AS CAM [↓,↓][↓,↓] -v°(p) - v°(s) -v* (p) - v* (s) AS CAM

W° (calculated) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1- ε²)]/ (1- ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years 1- As Cameloppardalis: Binary stars System AS Cam Data T=3.431; r (m) =0.1499; m=3.3 M (0); M=2.5 M (0) R (m) =2.57 R (0); [v° (m), v° (M)] = [40, 30]; ε = 0.1695; 1- ε = 00.8305 R (M) = 2.5 R (0); r (M) =0.1111; m + M=5.8 M (0); G=6.673x10-11 M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg; R (0) = 0.696x109m; The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4) Finding orbital velocities From Newton's inverse square law of an ellipse motion applied to a circular orbit gives the following: m v²/ r (cm) = GmM/r² Planet --- r (cm) ----- Center of mass ------- r (CM) --------- Mother Sun Planet ------------------- r -------------------------------------- Mother Sun Center of mass law m r (cm) = M r (CM); m = planet mass; M = sun mass And r (cm) = distance of planet to the center of mass Page 63

And r (CM) = distance of sun to center of mass And r (cm) + r (CM) = r = distance between sun and planet Solving to get: r (cm) = [M/ (m + M)] r And r (CM) = [m/ (m + M)] r Then v² = [GM r (cm)/ r²] = GM²/ (m + M) r And v = √ [GM²/ (m + M) r = a (1-ε²/4)] Planet orbital velocity or primary velocity: And v* (m) = v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] R =a (1-ε²/4)

Calculations: (1- ε²/4) = 0.9928
[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 1.43 With a = [R (m)/r (m)] = (2.57/0.1499) (0.696x109) = 11.9327x109 And v* (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1- ε²/4)] = 110km/sec = √ [6.673x10-11 (2.5)² (2 x 1030) / (5.8) 11.932x109 (0.9928)] = 110.178km/sec And v* (M) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1- ε²/4)] = √ [6.673x10-11 (3.3)² (2 x 1030) / (5.8) 11.932x109 (0.9928)] = 145.435 km/sec Spin: v° = 40 + 30=70km/sec And v* (e) = v* Earth = 29.8 km/sec And vº (e) = 0.465 km/sec Then v* + v °= v* (m) + v* (M) + v* (e) + vº (m) + v° (M) + vº (e) = 110.178 + 145.435 + 70 + 29.8 – 0.465 = 355 m/sec [√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 1.43; T = 3.431days W°= (-720x36526/T) x {√ [(1-ε²)] (1-ε) ²} {[v* + v°]/c} ² W°= (-720x36526/3.431) x (1.43) (355/ 300,000) ² = 15.0°/century Dr Guinan and DR Maloney 1989: W°= 15°/century 1989 DR Khailullin and Dr Kozyreva: 1983 W º= 14.6 °/century Einstein: 44.3º/ century

2 - Binary stars System: DI Her Apsidal Motion Solution
DI Her Apsidal motion solution: Data: T=10.55days r(m) = 0.0621 [v°(m),v°(M)]=[45,45] And ε = 0.4882; r (M) = 0.0574 M=4.52 M L = 2000 +/- 200 Ly Page 64 m=5.15M(0)
(0)

R(m)=2.68R(0)
(0)

R

(M)

=2.48; m + M=9.67 M

Calculations 1- ε = 0.5118; (1-ε²/4) = 0.94; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 3.33181; 1 + ε = 1.4882; G=6.673x10-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x109m V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 99.88 km/sec V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 113.8km/sec A- Apsidal motion is given by this formula: W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years And v° = - 45 km/s - 45 km/sec = 90km/sec Now let us calculate v* (cm) = ∑m v/∑m = 106.38km/sec With v* = 2 v*(cm) = 212.76 km/sec And v° = -90 km/sec Then v* + v° = 212.76 - 90 = 122.76 km/sec and W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse 122.76/300,000] = (-720x36526/10.55) (3.33181) (122.76/300,000)² W° (cal) = 1.39°/century With σ = √ {∑ [v* - v* (cm)] ²/2} = √ {[106.36 - 99.88]²/2 + [106.36 - 113.8]²/2} = 6.975 km/sec Then W° (cal) = 1.39°/century +/- 0.16 Observed 2004: 1.39° +/- 0.3°/century; Relativity: 4.27°/century

tan

B - W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years With v° = - 45 km/s + 45 km/sec = 0 km/sec And v* = v* (cm) = ∑m v/∑m = 106.38km/sec W° (cal) = (-720x36526/10.55) (106.38.300, 000) ² degrees/100 years W° (cal) = 1.044 degrees/century C - V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 99.88 km/sec With v* x √ (1-ε²/4)/√ (1-ε) = 99.88 √ (.94)/√ (0.5118) = 135.36 And v* x √ (1-ε²/4)/√ (1+ ε) = 99.88 √ (.94)/√ (1.4882) = 79.38 K (A) = [(135.36 + 79.38)/2] = 107.37 km/sec V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 113.8 km/sec With v* x √ (1-ε²/4)/√ (1-ε) = 113.8 √ (.94)/√ (0.5118) = 154.2254 km/sec And v* x √ (1-ε²/4)/√ (1+ ε) = 113.8 √ (.94)/√ (1.4882) = 90.44312 km/sec K (B) = 122.3342 km/sec V* = [m K (A) + M K (B)]/ (m + M) = 114.3646 km/sec Or v* = [K (A) + K (B)]/2 = 114. 85 km/sec; with v* = 114.85 Page 65

W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse 114.85/300,000] = (-720x36526/10.55) (3.33181) (114.85/300,000)² = 1.22° degrees/ century Observed: 1.24° degree/century +/- 0.05°

tan

References: Go to Smithsonian/NASA website SAO/NASA and type: 1- Apsidal motion of DI Her: Dr Edward Guinan and Dr Frank Maloney; 1985. 2- New Apsidal Motion of DI Her: Dr Edward Guinan and Dr Frank Maloney; 1994. 3- D. YA. Martynov; and KH. F. Khaliulullin 1980 4- Petrie et al.1967 5- Petrova - Ovlav Apsidal motion catalogue 6- Riazi 2003 7- Maloney Guinan 2004

3 - V1143 Cgyni Apsidal Motion Solution
V1143 Cgyni data
T= 7.641days; r (m) = 0.059; m =1.391 M (0); R (1) =1.346R And [v ° (m), v° (M)] = [18, 28]; r (M) = 0.058; M=1.347 M (0) Distance [38 +/- 2 parsec] = 123.956 +/- 6.524 Ly
(0);

ε = 0.54

Calculations

We have 1- ε = 0.46 1- ε²/4=0.9721 R (0) = 0.696x109m With a = [R (1)/r (m)] R (0) = 15.87823729x10^9m; 1+ ε = 1.54 With v (p -perihelion) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1- ε)] = 110 km/sec And v (p- aphelion) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1+ε)] = 60 km/sec K (A) = (110 + 60)/2 = 170/2 = 85km/sec With v (s - perihelion) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε)] = 113.6 km/sec And v (s - aphelion) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1+ε)] = 62 km/sec K (B) = (113.6 + 62)/2 = 175.6/2 = 87.8km/sec With v (1) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a] = 74.632 km/sec And v (2) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a] = 77.0699 km/sec When spinning on opposite directions 1- With v° [21, 28] = 28 - 21 = 7 2- With v° [18, 28] = 28 - 18 = 10 3- Taking average 10 + 7/2 = 8.5 With v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 77.5126 km/s And v (M) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 80.00448 km/s Also, [√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 3.977622971 Page 66

Now: With 1- v° + v* = 157.51648km/sec - 10 km/sec = 147.51648km/sec And 2- v° + v* = 157.51648km/sec - 8.5 km/sec = 149.01648km/sec And 3- v° + v* = 157.51648km/sec - 7 km/sec = 150.51648km/sec W° (obo) = (-720x36526/T) x {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} {[v* + v°]/c} ² 1W°/century= (-720x36526/7.641) (3.977622951) (147.51648/300,000)²=3.31°/century 2W°/century= (-720x36526/7.641) (3.977622951) (149.01/300,000)²=3.3778°/century 3- W°/century= (-720x36526/7.641) (3.977622951) (150.51648/300,000)² = 3.44614561°/century With v* = 2 v* (cm) = 157.4770 km/sec And v ° = v° (p) - v° (s) = 21 - 28 = -7 km/sec Then v* + v ° (p) = 157.477 - 7 = 150.477 km/sec W° /century= (-720x36526/7.641) (3.977622951) (150.477/300,000)²=3.44°/century Observed values are: W° = 3.393987698°/century; W° = =3.489592985 Average observed: 3.44°/ century References: 1-Geminez and Margrave, 1985 [0.00071°/cycle] = [1 century = 36526days/7.641days] = 3.393987698°/century 2- Anderson and Nordstrom and Garcia and Geminez 1987: 0.00073°/cycle [0.00073°/cycle] = [1 century = 36526days/7.641days] = 3.489592985°/century Relativity theory: 4.254435283°/ century = 0.00089°/cycle

4- V541Solution: Apsidal motion catalogue
W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years T = 15.3379days; r (m) = 0.0440 m = 2.4 M (0) R (m) = 1.88 R (0) And [v°(m),v°(M)]= [24±2,24±2] And ε = 0.479 r (M) =0.0425 M=2.4 M (0) R (M) =1.79 R (0) With 1- ε = 0.521 1-ε²/4=0.94263975; [√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 3.2339 Page 67

And a = [R (m)/r (m)] R (0) = (1.88/0.0440)0.696x10^9m = 29.73818182x10^9m Then a (1-ε²/4) = 28.03x10^9m And v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 75.5883km/sec; v° (m) =24 And v (M) = √ [Gm²/a (m + M) (1-ε²/4)] = 75.883km/sec; v° (M) =24 With v°=24 + 24= 44km/sec And v* = 151.1766km/sec With v* + v°= 151.1766 - 48 = 103.1766km/sec W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} {[v* + v°]/c} ² W° (ob) = (- 720 x 365226/15.3379) (3.2339) (103.1766/300,000)² W° (ob) = 0.65° Notice: [v° (m), v° (M)] = [24 ± 2, 24 ± 2] If v° (m) = v° (M) = 24 + 2 = 26 Then v* + v°= 151.1766 - 52 = 99.1766km/sec And W° (ob) = (- 720 x 365226/15.3379) (3.2339) (99.1766/300,000)² W° (ob) = 0.60°/century Observed is W°= 0.60° +/ -0.1/century Lacy = [0.5°; 0.7°] Relativity: W° = 0.97°/century 1- Apsidal motion of V541Cgyni Lacy 1989

5 - AI Hydra apsidal motion puzzle solution
W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years AI Hydra Apsidal motion solution: Data: T=8.29days r(m) = 0.1418 m=2.15M(0) R(m)=3.92R(0) [v°(m),v°(M)]=[28,27]; and ε = 0.0.23; r (M) = 0.1002 M=1.98 M (0) R (M) =2.77(0); m + M=4.13 M (0); L = 575 +/- 15 Ly Calculations 1-ε = 0.77; (1-ε²/4) = 0.986775; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.6414 G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m Then a = [R (m) / r (m)] = 19.24062059 x 10 ^ 9 m V (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 81.11439578 km/sec V (M) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 88.11km/sec Apsidal motion is given by this formula: W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years Page 68

With v* = v (m) + v (M) = 81.11439578km/sec + 88.11km/sec = 169.2243958km/sec And v° = v° (m) + v° (M) = 28 + 27 = 55 km/sec Then (v* + v°) = 224.2243958 km/sec W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan 224.2243958/300,000] = (-720x36526/8.29) (1.6414) (224.2243958/300,000)² = 2.90°/ century W° (observed) = 2.90°/century as measured Observed is 2.90°/century Space-Time Relativity theory 6.8° / century Now let us calculate v* (cm) = ∑m v/∑m = 2.15 x 81.11439578 + 1.98 x88.11= 84.46822 km/sec With v* = 2 v*(cm) = 168.936411 km/sec; And v° = 55 km/sec Then v* + v° = 223.9364411 km/sec and W° (observed) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan 223. 936/300,000] = (-720x36526/10.55) (3.33181) (223.9364411/300,000)² W° (observed) = 2.9°0/century With σ = √ {∑ [v* - v* (cm)] ²/2} = √ {[88.11 -84.46822]²/2 + [81.11439578 - 84.46822]²/2} = √ {[3.64178]²/2 + [3.35382422]²/2} = 3.5 km/sec Then W° (ob) = 2.9°0/century; observed is W° = 2.9°/per century And Einstein's 100,000 space-timers 6.8° / century References: Go to Smithsonian/NASA website SAO/NASA and type: 1- Apsidal motion of AI Hydra Popper 1985 2- KH. F. Khaliulullin and V.S Kozyreva 1988 3- Petrova - Ovlav Apsidal motion catalogue 1999

6 - V731Cehpei Apsidal Motion Solution
Primary → Secondary ↓ v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin results Orbit results Examples v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ Spin results Orbit results Examples v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ Spin results Orbit results Examples v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ Spin results Orbit results v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑]=orbit v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ [↑,↑][↓,↑] v°(p) + v°(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) [↑,↑][↓,↓] v°(p) + v°(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) [↑,↓][↓,↑] v°(p) - v°(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) [↑,↓][↓,↓] v°(p) - v°(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ [↓,↑][↑,↑] - v°(p) + v°(s) v* (p) + v*(s) [↓,↑][↑,↓] -v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s) [↓,↓][↑,↑] -v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) [↓,↓][↑,↓] -v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s) v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓ [↓,↑][↓,↑] -v°(p) + v°(s) -v* (p) + v* (s) [↓,↑][↓,↓] -v°(p) + v°(s) -v* (p) - v* (s) [↓,↓][↓,↑] -v°(p) - v°(s) -v* (p) + v* (s) [↓,↓][↓,↓] -v°(p) - v°(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)

V731Cephei
[↑,↑][↑,↓] v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s) [↑,↓][↑,↑] v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) [↑,↓][↑,↓] v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s)

Examples

V731Cephei

Next the same equation will be used to find the advance of Periastron or "apparent" apsidal motion of V731 binary stars system.

V731Cehpei Apsidal Motion Solution
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) x {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years V731data [see below] T= 6.068567days; m= 2.577 M (0); M = 2.577 M (0) And [v° (m), v° (M)] = [19+/-3, 18+/-3] And ε = 0.0165 a = 23.27x R (0) Calculations M + m = 2.738; 1-ε=0.9835 1-ε²/4=0.9999 R (0) = .696x10^9m

With v° [21, 28] = [19 +/- 3] + [18 +/- 3] = 37 +/- 6 With v* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 85.6111965km/sec And v* (M) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 109.38km/sec Also, [√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 1.033694356 With v* (cm) = 2∑m v∑/m = 96.46688km/sec; 2 v* (cm) = 192.9337619 And σ = √ {∑ [v*-v* (cm)] ²/2} = √ {[96.46688 - 85.6] ²/2} + {[109.38 - 96.46688] ²/2} = 11.9288422 km/sec With v* (p) = 85.6111965km/sec +/- 11.9288422 km/sec And v* (s) = 109.38km/sec +/- 11.9288422 km/sec Then v* (p) + v* (s) = [192.9337619 +/-] x 2 = 23.8567844 km/sec Then v* + v° = 229.9288422km/sec +/- 29.8567844 km/sec Now: Taking the upper limit Then v* + v° = 229.9288422km/sec + 29.8567844 km/sec = 259.7856266 km/sec Page 70

W° (obo) = (-720x36526/T) x {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} {[v* + v°]/c} ² W°/century= (-720x36526/6.068567) (1.033694356) (259.7856266 /300,000)²=2.91°/century W°/century = 3.35914177°/century = 0.0335914177°/year U = 360/0.0335914177° = 10717 years Observed values are U = 10000 +/- 2500 References: 1- Absolute dimensional and apsidal motion of V731Cep V. Batkis; M.Zejda; I. Bulut; M.Wolf; S. Bilir; H. Bakis; O.Demircan: J.w.Lee: M.Slechta: B. Kucerova. 2008

7 - NV CMa Binary stars apsidal motion table

8 - NV CMa apsidal motion solution:
Data: T=1.885159 days; ε = 0; v* (p) = 128.55 km/sec; v* (s) = 130.87 km/sec [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 3.33181; v° (p) = 51.7 km/sec and v° (s) = 52.4 km/sec Apsidal motion is given by this formula: W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years With v* = v* (p) + v*(s) = 259.42 km/sec and v° = v° (p) + v° (s) = 104.1 And v* + v° = 363.52 km/sec W° (observed) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan 363.52/300,000] = (-720x36526/1.885159) (1) (363.52/300,000)² = 20.48333818°/century = 0.2048333818°/year U = 360°/0.2048333818°/year; U = 1757. 5 years References: Go to Smithsonian/NASA website SAO/NASA and type: Absolute dimensions NV CMa; Kaluzny, J; Pych, W; Rucinski, S. M; Thompson, I.B Page 71

Relativity theory coffin nail # 8 SW Canis Majoris
W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years T = period = 10.09 days; ε = eccentricity = 0.3179 And v° = spin velocity effect = v° (p) + v°(s) = 57km/sec And v*= orbital velocity effect = v*(p) + v* (s) = 80.5 + 87.8 = 168.3 km/sec For SW Canis Majoris: v* + v° = 225.3km/sec W° (observed) = 2.99565967°/century = 0.0299565967° U = 360/ 0.0299565967= 12017years U (observed) = 12,000 years Einstein and space-timers 14,000 years SW Canis Majoris Binary stars Primary → Secondary ↓ v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin results Orbit results Examples v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ Spin results Orbit results Examples v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ Spin results Orbit results Examples v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ Spin results Orbit results Examples v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑]=orbit v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ [↑,↑][↓,↑] v°(p) + v°(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) [↑,↑][↓,↓] v°(p) + v°(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) [↑,↓][↓,↑] v°(p) - v°(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) [↑,↓][↓,↓] v°(p) - v°(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ [↓,↑][↑,↑] - v°(p) + v°(s) v* (p) + v*(s) [↓,↑][↑,↓] -v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s) [↓,↓][↑,↑] -v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) [↓,↓][↑,↓] -v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s) v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓ [↓,↑][↓,↑] -v°(p) + v°(s) -v* (p) + v* (s) [↓,↑][↓,↓] -v°(p) + v°(s) -v* (p) - v* (s) [↓,↓][↓,↑] -v°(p) - v°(s) -v* (p) + v* (s) [↓,↓][↓,↓] -v°(p) - v°(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)

Sw Canis Majoris
[↑,↑][↑,↓] v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s) [↑,↓][↑,↑] v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) [↑,↓][↑,↓] v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s)

SW Canis majoris
Page 72

SW CMa apsidal motion solution: Data: T=10.09 days; r (m) = 0.0942; m = 2.22 M (0); R (m) = 3.01R (0); ε = 0.3179 And r (M) = N/A M = 2.03 M (0) R (M) =2.46 R (0); m + M = 4.25 M (0) And [v° (m), v° (M)] = [30+/-2, 27+/-3] K (1) = 80.5; K (2) = 87.8 Calculations 1-ε = 0.6821; (1-ε²/4) = 0.974734898 [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 2.037835646 G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m Then a = [R (m) / r (m)] = 22.23949045 x 10 ^ 9 m V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 77.26298km/sec V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 84.4944913km/sec And v* = v* (p) + v* (s) = 161.7574713 km/sec With v° = v° (p) + v° (s) = 30 + 27 = 57 km/sec And, v* + v° = 218.7574713km/sec Apsidal motion is given by this formula: W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse 218.7574713/300,000] = (-720x36526/10.09) (2.037835646) (218.7574713/300,000)² = 2.8242°/ century = 0.026242/yr U = 360/ 0.026242 = 12747 years Taking: v* + v° = 80.5 + 87.8 +57 = 225.3 km/sec W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} Sine² [Inverse tan 225.3 /300,000] = (-720x36526/10.09) (2.037835646) (218.7574713/300,000)² = 2.995659677°/ century = 0.0299565967°/yr U = 360/ 0.0299565967 = 12017 years Nahhas U (observed) = 12,000 years References: Go to Smithsonian/NASA website SAO/NASA and type: 1- Lacy Apsidal motion Canis Majoris 1997 73 tan

9 - GG Orion Apsidal motion puzzle solution
Primary → Secondary ↓ v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin results Orbit results Examples v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ Spin results Orbit results Examples v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ Spin results Orbit results Examples v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ Spin=[↑,↑][↑,↑]=orbit v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) GG Orion [↑,↑][↑,↓] v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s) [↑,↓][↑,↑] v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ [↑,↑][↓,↑] v°(p) + v°(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) [↑,↑][↓,↓] v°(p) + v°(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) [↑,↓][↓,↑] v°(p) - v°(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ [↓,↑][↑,↑] - v°(p) + v°(s) v* (p) + v*(s) [↓,↑][↑,↓] -v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s) [↓,↓][↑,↑] -v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓ [↓,↑][↓,↑] -v°(p) + v°(s) -v* (p) + v* (s) [↓,↑][↓,↓] -v°(p) + v°(s) -v* (p) - v* (s) [↓,↓][↓,↑] -v°(p) - v°(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)

v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓] Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s) Examples GG Orion Data: T=6.6314948; m = 2.342 M (0); M = 0.2338 M (0); R (1) = 1.852 R (0); R (2) =1.830 ε = 0.2218; 1 - ε = 0.7782; r (1) = 0.0746; r (2) =.988 r (1); m + M = 4.68 M (0) And [v° (p); v° (s)] = [16 +/- 1; 16 +/- 1]; [v° (p); v° (s)] = [25 +/- 3; 24 +/- 3]; U = 10700 +/- 4500 years Calculations (1-ε²/4) = 0.9877; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.57 G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m Calculations With v* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 95.6 km/sec And v* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 95.735 km/sec And v° (p) = 16 km/sec; v° (s) = 16 km/sec Then v* (p) + v* (s) + v° (p) + v° (s) = 223.335 km/sec W° (ob) = (-720x36526/6.6314948) (1.57) [223.335/300,000] ² degrees/100 years W° (ob) = 3.45°/century = 0.0345°/year U [years] = 360/[0.0345°/year] U = 10,432 years Nahhas U (observed) = 10700+/-4500years References: Absolute dimensions and apsidal motion of eclipsing binary GG Orion Dr Lacy; Dr Torres; Dr Claret; Dr Sabby: 2000 The time has come to send relativity theories and all four-dimensional space-time confusion of physics to the... Page 74

Chapter Twelve
Arabs real time physics in outer Space II
2009 total collapse of general relativity theory; CD Draconis Binary stars Primary → Secondary ↓ v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin results Orbit results Examples v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ Spin results Orbit results Examples v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ Spin results Orbit results Examples v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ Spin results Orbit results Examples v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑]=orbit v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ [↑,↑][↓,↑] v°(p) + v°(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) [↑,↑][↓,↓] v°(p) + v°(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) [↑,↓][↓,↑] v°(p) - v°(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) [↑,↓][↓,↓] v°(p) - v°(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ [↓,↑][↑,↑] - v°(p) + v°(s) v* (p) + v*(s) [↓,↑][↑,↓] -v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s) [↓,↓][↑,↑] -v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) [↓,↓][↑,↓] -v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s)

A- Arabs Binary stars and Binary Pulsar apsidal motion
v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓ [↓,↑][↓,↑] -v°(p) + v°(s) -v* (p) + v* (s) [↓,↑][↓,↓] -v°(p) + v°(s) -v* (p) - v* (s) [↓,↓][↓,↑] -v°(p) - v°(s) -v* (p) + v* (s) [↓,↓][↓,↓] -v°(p) - v°(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)

CD Draconis
[↑,↑][↑,↓] v°(p) + v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s) [↑,↓][↑,↑] v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) + v*(s) [↑,↓][↑,↓] v°(p) - v°(s) v*(p) - v*(s)

CD Draconis

10 – 2009 CD Draconis apsidal motion Table:

Data: T=1.268389985days; m = 0.231 M (0); M = 0.2141 M (0); a = 3.7634 R 0.0051 And [v° (p); v° (s)] = [9.5 +/- 1; 10.0 +/- 1] Einstein and space – timers: W° = 1.91x10-3/day Calculations m + M = 0.4451 M (0) 1-ε = 0.9949; (1-ε²/4) = 0.99993498; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.01 G=6.673x10-11; M (0) = 1.98892x1030kg; R (0) = 0.696x10 9m Calculations With v* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 72.436 km/sec And v* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 78.153 km/sec And v° (p) = 9.5 km/sec; v° (s) = 10 km/sec Then v* (p) + v* (s) + v° (p) + v° (s) = 170.117 km/sec Page 75

(0);

ε=

Apsidal motion is given by this formula: W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years W° (ob) = (-720x36526/1.238389985) (1.01) [170.09/300,000] ² degrees/100 years W° (ob) = 6.731598944°/century = 0.06731598944°/year U [years] = 360/[0.06731598944°/year] U = 5348 years Nahhas U (observed) = 5400+/-3200years Einstein's and space-timers U = 360/ [0.00191x365.26] = 516 years Can it get any better? It is not just about dumping relativity it is dumping relativity and Alfred Nobel institution with it. References: Absolute properties of the low-mass eclipsing binary CM Draconis; 2009 By : Juan Carlos Morales; Ignasi ribas; carme jordi; Guillermo Toress; Jose Gallardo; Edward F. Guinan; David Chardonneau; Marek wolf; David w.latham; Guillem Angalada Escude; David H.Bradstreet; Mark E.Everett; Francis T. O, Donavan; Georgi Mandushev; Robert D. Mathieu and other 15

11 - V 1147 Sagittari

V 1147 Sagittari: Data: U = 592.5 +/- 6 years With K (p) = 117.4 km/sec; K(s) = 130.8 km/sec Giving v* (p) = 117.4 + 29.8 - 0.465 = 146.735 km/sec And v* (s) = 130.8 + 29.8 – 0.465 =160.135 km/sec Orbital speed of earth = 29.8 km/sec; spin speed of earth is 0.465 km/sec And vº (p) = 80 + 29.88 – 0.465 km/sec = 109.335 km/sec And vº(s) =75 + 29.88 – 0.465 km/sec = 104.335 km/sec Then v* + vº = 146.735 + 160.135 + 109.335 + 104.335 = 520.54km/sec [√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 2.62 W (cal) = (-720x36526/3.28) x (2.62) (520.541/300,000)²= 63º/century U = [63/100]-1x 360 = 570 years. Observed values; 592.5 References Absolute dimensions of solar-type eclipsing binaries V 1147Sagittari
J. Anderson, A. Gimenez 1985

Page 76

12- EW Orionis EW Orionis: Data: U =16300 +/- 3900 With K (p) = 73.18km/sec; K(s) = 75.46 km/sec Giving v* (p) = 73.18 + 29.8 - 0.465 = 102.515 km/sec And v* (s) = 75.46 + 29.8 – 0.465 =104.795 km/sec And vº (p) = 9 + 29.8 - 0.465 = 102.515 km/sec And vº (s) = 73.18 - 29.8 + 0.465 = 102.515 km/sec Orbital speed of earth = 29.8 km/sec; spin speed of earth is 0.465 km/sec And vº (p) = 9km/sec; vº(s) =8.8km/sec Then v* + vº = 102.515 + 104.795 +9.0 + 8.8 =225.11km/sec [√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.167 W (cal) = (-720x36526/6.93) x (1.167) (225.11/300,000)²= 2.1367º/century U = [2.1367/100]-1x 360 = 16848 years.

13 - The Apsidal motion of VV PYX
Data: T = 4.596 days; m = 2.098 M (0); M = 2.098 M (0) With r (p) = 0.1156 and r (s) = 0.1156 and R (m) = 2.167 R (0) and R (M) = 2.167 R (0) And ε = 0.0956; 1 - ε = .9044; U = 3200 +/- 1000 And [v° (p); v° (s)] = [23; 23] V = 381.03095km/sec Calculations With m + M = 4.196 M (0) And (1-ε²/4) = 0.99771516; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.216984877 G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m And a = [R (m)/r (m)] = [2.06/ 0.097] R (0) = [2.167/ 0.1156] [0.696x109 m] Then a = 13.04698962 x 109 m And a (1-ε²/4) = [13.04698962 x10^9m] [0.99771516] = 13.01717934 x109m K (A) = {√ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1- ε)] + √ GM²/ (m + M) a (1+ ε)]}/2 K (A) = {√ [6.673x2.098²x2x10-19/ (4.196) 13.04698962x10^9x0.9044] + √ [6.673x2.098²x2x10-19/ (4.196) 13.04698962x10^9x1.0956]}/2 = [108.85 + 98.96511511]/2 = 103.9km/sec K (B) = {√ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1- ε)] + √ Gm²/ (m + M) a (1+ ε)]}/2 = 103.9km/sec Page 77

With v* (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 103.70 km/sec And v* (M) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 103.70 km/sec And v* (cm) = [m v* (p) + M v* (s)]/ (m + M) = 103.70 km/sec And v° (p) = 23vkm/sec; v° (s) = 23 km/sec W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} (v* + v°/c) ² degrees/100 years T = period; ε = eccentricity; v° = spin velocity effect; v*= orbital velocity effects With v* (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 103.70 km/sec Primary orbital speed contribution to apsidal motion Is v* (m) = 103.7 + 29.8 – 0.465 = 133 km/sec And v* (M) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 103.70 km/sec Secondary orbital speed contribution to apsidal motion Is v* (M) = 103.7 + 29.8 – 0.465 = 133 km/sec And v° (m) = 23 km/sec Primary spin speed contribution to apsidal motion Is vº (m) = 23 + 29.8 – 0.465 = 52.335 km/sec And v° (M) = 23 km/sec Secondary spin speed contribution to apsidal motion Is vº (m) = 23 + 29.8 – 0.465 = 52.335 km/sec Then v * + vº = 370.67 With ε = 0.17; T = 4.596 days [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.216984877 W° (cal) = (-720x36526/4.596) (1.216984877) [370.67/300,000] ² U = 3386 years Nahhas' U (observed) = 3200 +/- 1000years References Absolute dimensions of solar-type eclipsing binaries EW Orionis
J.V. Clausen, H. Bruntt, E.H. Olsen, B.E. Helt, and A. Claret 2009

Page 78

Chapter 13: Alfred Nobel prize winner for less than a $ 1993 Nobel Prize Winner Dr Joseph H. Taylor Binary Pulsar 1913 + 16
For PSR 1913 + 16 Data: Joseph Taylor and Joel M. Weisberg 2004 With a =2.3417725 R (0); R (0) = 0.696 x 10 9meters And ε = 0.6171338 T = 0.322997448930

And θ' = 4.226595 °/year With mass m = 1.4414 M (0) and M = 1.3867 M (0); M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a] = 235.9574664 km/sec V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a] = 245.2640841km/sec W° (cal) = (-720x365.26/Tdays) x sine² [Inverse tan (v/c)] degrees/100 years = (-720x365.26/0.329974489) x sine² [Inverse tan (481.22/300, 00)] deg/100 years

W = 4.2°/year
15-

PSR J0737 – 3039

Data: U =21.3 years With m = 1.34 M (0); M = 1.25 M (0); M (0) = 2 x 1030 And ε = 0.0878; [vº (p), vº (s)] = [22.7 km/sec, 2km/sec] With G = 6.673 x 10 – 11; T =2.4 hours; a = 1.145 x 0.069 x 109 With K (p) = v* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 303 km/sec And K(s) = v* (m) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 325 km/sec Giving v* (p) = 303 + 29.8 - 0.465 = 332.335 km/sec And v* (s) = 325+ 29.8 – 0.465 =354.335 km/sec And vº (p) = 22.7 + 29.8 - 0.465 km/sec And vº (s) = 2 - 29.8 + 0.465 km/sec Orbital speed of earth = 29.8 km/sec; spin speed of earth is 0.465 km/sec Then v* + vº = 332.335 + 354.335 +22.7 + 2 =711.37km/sec [√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.197 W (cal) = (-720x36526/6.93) x (1.197) (711/300,000)²= 1770º/century U = [1770/100]-1x 360 = 20.3389 years. References The Double pulsar PSR J0737 - 3039
Burgay, M; D’Amico,N.; A.Manchester,R.N; Lyne, A.G.; Kramer, M; Mclaughlin, M.A; Lorimer, D.R; Carmilo, F.; Stairs, I.H: Freire, P.C.C; Joshi,

Page 79

Chapter 14
B- Arabs Real time GPS or Real time Global positioning systems
B- Arabs real time Global Positioning System: GPS Abstract: The Global Positioning System or GPS 45 micro seconds per day time delays have nothing to do with Einstein's relativity theory time travels confusions of physics and they are a consequence of Satellite orbital speed and Earth rotational speed given by this formula below. Even if Einstein's formulas were correct for all practical purposes they are insignificant to the performance to the GPS system. Earth - Satellite distance is a variable that Engineers account for and the tiny "relativistic" effect has no significance whatsoever because distance adjustment is far more than any relativistic adjustment. For the president of the United States President to ask for Innovations like that in an AAAS meeting is a sign of a bankrupt scientific community and for those who knew the facts must have laughed to their teeth at the president. NASA's and AAAS laughing at the president requires a reply with laugh at AAAS and NASA and all other including the person who wrote the speech for the president GPS time delays of 45 micro seconds per day have nothing to do with relativity theory or Einstein or AAAS or NASA or silly time travel physics or any theory. This time delay is due to Earth rotation and satellite orbital speed that Scientists turn their heads away from because without Einstein's silly magic sock of time travel physics, Physicists will have less tricks that allows them to say anything publish anything based on nothing for jobs money prestige Nobel Prizes and silly physics. W" (ob) = (-720x3600x15) [(v° +/- v*)/c] ² arc sec /day T = period; ε = eccentricity; v° = spin velocity of earth; v*= orbital velocity of satellite And v* = 14000km/hr = 3.88888888889 km/s; ε = 0; T = 0.5 days and v° = 0.465km/s

U = W" x (24/360) = 45.016microsecond per day Nahhas'
Relativity theory silly professor of time travel accounted for 38 Micro seconds and blamed the other 7 Micro seconds on weather 1 – Arabs Global Positioning Systems in arc second per century: W" (calculated) = [-720x36526x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century Page 80

2 – Arabs Global Positioning Systems in arc degree /century W" (calculated) = [-720x36528/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century 3 – Arabs Global Positioning Systems in arc second per year: W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century 4- Arabs Global Positioning Systems in arc degree per year: W" (calculated) = [-720x365.26/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century 5 - Arabs Global Positioning Systems delays in arc degree per cycle: W" (calculated) = [-720/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century 6 Arabs Global Positioning Systems delays in arc second per cycle: W" (calculated) = [-720x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century 7- Arabs Global Positioning Systems delays in arc second per day: W" (calculated) = [-720x3600] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century 8- Arabs Global Positioning Systems delays in second per cycle: W" (calculated) = [24/360] [-720x3600/T] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² arc sec/ century 9 - Arabs Global Positioning Systems delays in second per day: U (seconds/day) = [-720x 3600/15] {[√ (1 - ε²)]/ (1 - ε) ²} (v/c) ² sec/day 10 - Arabs Global Positioning System Circular Satellite Orbits time delays in seconds/day U (seconds/day) = [-720x 3600/15] (v/c) ² sec/day Application of Arabs Global positioning system GPS Data: T = 0.5 days satellite orbital Period; ε = 0 And v° = 0.465km/sec Earth spin speed; And v* = 14,000 km/hr = 35/9 km/second Then v* +/- v° = 35/9 = 3.88888889km/sec - 0.465km/second We subtracted because satellite and motion and spin orientations are opposite GPS time delays are given by this formula per day in seconds of an arc W" (ob) = (-720x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° +/- v*)/c] ² seconds/day W" (ob) = (-720x36/0.5) (1) [3.423888889/300,000] ² seconds of arc /1 day W" (ob) = 0.000675246 arc seconds per day to get this answer in seconds divide by 24hours/360degress = 15 U [seconds] = 0.000675246 x [24/360] seconds/day U = 0.000045016 seconds/day = 45 micro seconds /day Page 81

Chapter 15 Arabs Real time Interplanetary Telecommunications systems C - Interplanetary telecommunications around the sun

Harvard Irwin Shapiro historical mistake Relativity stupidity of Harvard Physics department
Universal Constant Γ0 =16πGM/C³= 247.597μs
Abstract: Interplanetary time delays around the moving sun derived from three dimensional time-dependent Newton - Kepler's equations solution gives a solar round trip time delay rate of: ΔΓ= 16πGM/c³ [1 + (v°/v)] ² = ΔΓ0 [1 + (v°/v)] ² ΔΓ0 = 16πGM/c³= 247.597μs G = Gravitational constant; M=Sun mass; a=mean distance from Sun. And eccentricity; c = light speed; a = mean distance And v = Planet speed; v°= Sum/Difference in spin between Earth and planets. When applied to actual data it gives extremely accurate results better than Shapiro's Space-time-delay analysis and without space-time fictional forces or space-time fiction. Page 82

W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²- --.) ≈ 2πa (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4) Where v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] And v (M) = √ [Gm² / (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] Then W (ob) = -4π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ² sine² [ω (m) t + ω(r) t] Δ θ = T W (ob) = - 4π {[√ (1-ε) ²]/ (1-ε) ²} (v° + v*/c) ²} radians; and with ε = 0 Δ θ = - 4π (v° + v*/c) ² Sun-Photon; and with v° = 0 Δ θ = -4π (v*/c) ² Sun-Photon: 0 = ε [Sun - Photon] ≠ ε [Earth - Mars] = 0.2075 The circumference of an ellipse: 2πa (1 - ε²/4 + 3/16(ε²)²---) ≈ 2 π a (1-ε²/4); R =a (1-ε²/4) v=√ [Gm M/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] ≈ √ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)]; m<<M; Solar system ΔΓ = 2 arc length/c = 2[Δ θ] d/c = 2[- 4π (v/c) ²] 2R/c; ΔΓ = -16π/c (v/c) ²; ΔΓ = 8πd/c³ [GM/a (1-ε²/4)] =16πGM/c³ (1-ε²/4) = Γ0 (1 - ε²/4) ε = [a (planet 1) - a (planet 2)]/ [a (planet 1) + a (planet 2)] =0.2075 Mars-Earth Γ0 = 16 πGM/c³= 247.5974607μs=universal constant ΔΓ = 250μs Mars-Earth. x 1000 x 1000 x 1000

Planet

Distant

Mercury 57,910 Venus Earth Mars Jupiter Saturn 108,200 149,600 227,940 778,330

PlanetEarth 91,690 41,400 0 78,340 628,730 1,279,80 0 2,721,39 0 4,354,70 0 5,763,92 0

Planet+ Earth 207,510 257,800 299,200 377,540 927,930 1,579,00 0 3,020,59 0 4,653,90 0 6,063,12 0

Eccentricity 0.44185822 4 0.16058960 4 0 0.20750119 2 0.67756188 5 0.81051298 3 0.90094650 4 0.93570983 5 0.95065246 9 Page 83

1-ε²/4 0.95119032 8 0.99355274 5 1 0.98923581 4 0.88522747 3 0.83576717 6 0.79707384 9 0.78111177 6 0.77406497 1

ΔΓ0 247.597460 7 247.579460 7 247.579460 7 247.579460 7 247.579460 7 247.579460 7 247.579460 7 247.579460 7 247.597460 7

ΔΓ μs 260.3 249.2 247.597

250.273
279.6789 296.230 310.61 316.98 319.86650

1,429,40 0 Uranus 2,870,99 0 Neptune 4,504,30 0 Pluto 5,913,52 0

These data compared to Shapiro's time delay from NASA 1977 Vikings 6, 7 Earth Mars Telecommunications mission are more accurate because the actual value is 250μs and the value published by Doctor Irwin Shapiro of Harvard is 247.597μs Although this formula works the correct formula is Δ θ = -4π [(v° + v*)/c] ² Sun-Photon; and with v° ≠ 0 v = √ [GM/a] = 24.1 km/sec; vº = 0.46511 – 0.241 = 0.224 km/sec ΔΓ = 2 arc length/c = 2[Δ θ] d/c = 16πGM/c³ [1 + (vº/v)] ² = 247.597 x [1 + 0.224/24.1)]² Δ Γ = 250 µs For Mars; 0.4651 = Earth rotation; 0.241 = mars rotation; v = mars speed

Harvard physics department is where physics changed from science to stupidity Page 84

Physics in a capitalist country is a business and physics is not necessarily science or scientific and if it is a western invention it is to be at least 88.88 % fraud
After World War II and the emergence of USA as a global superpower and the shift of power from traditional old empires to the new world “superpower” American Universities rushed for gold and gold is “reputable” physics department that can say anything publish anything based on nothing and nothing is Robert Pound and Glen Rebka confusion of an experiment . Harvard strikes again with fraud Robert Pound and Glen Rebka (top)

22.5 meters apart

To start with gravity is a spin effect of a planet with atmosphere The gravitational and electric and magnetic constants all are derived from two constants p and T which are air density and Earth spin Page 85

If we took a look at the most famous physics fundamental constant G from Newton's 350 years old Equation F = - GmM/r², or, Coulomb electric force equation F = - Qq/4π ε 0, one can see that, for example, G’s value has unit dimension of [G] = [1/ρ T²]; ρ is density and T is time rotational period. If we can show that the gravitational constant G = G (ρ, T) is a variable air density and Earth rotational period dependent then we can say what Earth is saying that the most famous physics fundamental constants are not so universal constants because all three fundamental constant are air density and Earth spin dependent.

Proof: G = G (ρ, T) = 1/ [(2/5) (4 π/3) ρT²] = √ (2π)/ (4 π/3) ρT² Nothing that: 8 π /15 = (2/5) (4π/3); 4π/3 and 2/5 come from spherical aspect Where: ρ = air density; T = Earth rotation period The 2/5 is the ratio for radius of gyration of a sphere Taking T = 24 hours and ρ = 1.2045 kg/m³ G = 1/ (8 π/15) ρT² = 6.674 x 10 - 11

ε And μ
And

0

= 1/4πρT² = 8.85 x 10

-12

= 4πρT²/c² When Newton’s equation F = - mM/r² was solved it produced the angular velocity r’
0

= r’0 e í ω t Divide by c And r’/c = (r’0/c)

e íωt And f = f0 e - í ω t
T = T0

e íωt

And f = f x + f y = f 0[cosine ω t - í sine ω t] And f x = f 0 cosine ω t And f x - f 0 = f 0 [1 – 2 sine² (ω t/2)] - f 0 And δ f = f x - f 0 = – 2 f 0 sine² (ω t/2) And δ f/f 0 = - 2 sine² (ω t/2) Up And δ f/f 0 = 2 sine² (ω t/2) Down And δ f/f 0 (total) = [2 sine² (ω t/2) Down] – [- 2 sine² (ω t/2)] And δ f/f 0 (total) = 4 sine² (ω t/2) With ω t = arc tan (v/c) With v = δ f/f 0 (total) = 4 sine² [(arc tan √2gh) /2] With v << c Then δ f/f 0 (total) ≈ 2gh/c² = 2x9.81x22.5/ (299,792,458)² = 4.91 x 10-15 Page 86

Chapter 16 Handymen in white ropes

In Cleveland Ohio there were two handymen in white robes named

Michelson

Morley

Set up this round rotating table in 1887 with a lamb, two mirrors beam splitter, telescope Page 87

In Modern times an animation of the experiment would look like

Their reasoning was that if they rotate the table 90 degrees they would see the interference pattern should change looking through the telescope. When the interference pattern did not change they claim that physical quantities data would not change when rotated 90 degrees or 1 = 1 +i

A. Michelson and E. Morley Handymen in white ropes confusions of an Experiment
In General V = v = Velocity of Earth assuming that emitter - receiver line-up with earth line travel at start and during this whole experiment. That would be the x-x line X' ------Earth moving in this direction with velocity v -----------X And C = c at start What is turning is the table that has the lamb and the mirrors and the telescope on top of it. To turn a quantity you multiply by e î θ And that means light c and distance d C = c e î θ = velocity of light And d = d e î θ Then: V = v; C = c e î θ; d = d e î θ; e î θ = cosine θ + î sine θ For example: Page 88

1-Assume θ = 0° Arm A Then: V = v; C = c; d = d

Forward is C-V = c - v Backward C+V = c + v And t = d/ (c-v) + d/ (c + v) 2- Assume θ = 90° then e î 90 = î Arm B Then V = v; C = c î; d = d î Forward is C-V = -v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²) V is along the x-x and has no component on y-y axis and î means along the y-y axis Backward C+V = v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²) And comes to this is Position I Position 1: Right-Upper Right: t (1) = d/ (c -v) +d/ (c +v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)] Upper: t (2) = d/√ (c² + v²) + d√ (c² + v²) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)] Now Position II 3-Assume θ = 90° Arm A Then: V = v; C = ỉ c; d = d Forward is C-V = -v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²) MMX mistake √ (c² v²) Backward C+V = v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²) And t' (1) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)] 4- Assume θ = 90° + 90° =180 then e î 180 = -î Arm B Then V = v; C = -c; d = d Forward is C-V = -c - v; V is along the x-x and has no component on y-y axis and î means along the y-y axis Backward C+V = -c + v Then t = d/-c+ v forward and in absolute value t = d/ (c - v) And t = d/-c -v backward and in absolute value t = d/ (c + v) And t' (2) = d/ (c - v) + d/ (c + v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)] With t' (1) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)] Conclusions is turning the table 90° has no effect what so ever on time length difference In General If we twist the table by an angle θ then V = v; C = c e î θ; d = d e î θ; e î θ = cosine θ + î sine θ Now position I V = v; C = c cosine θ + î c sine θ; d = d cosine θ + î d sine θ Forward: C - V = c cosine θ -v + î c sine θ and its measure is √ [(c cosine θ -v) ² + c² sine ² θ] Backward: C + V = c cosine θ +v + î c sine θ and its measure is √ [(c cosine θ + v) ² + c² sine ² θ] Page 89

And t (1) = d / √ [(c cosine θ -v) ² + c² sine ² θ] + d / √ [(c cosine θ + v) ² + c² sine ² θ] And Position II

V = v; C = c cosine [θ + 90°] + î c sine [θ + 90°] = c sine θ - ỉ c cosine θ d = d cosine θ + î d sine θ Forward: C - V = c sine θ -v - î c cosine θ and its measure is √ [(c sine θ -v) ² + c² cosine ² θ] Backward: C + V = c sine θ + v - î c cosine θ and its measure is √ [(c sine θ + v) ² + c² cosine ² θ] And t (2) = d / √ [(c sine θ -v) ² + c² cosine ² θ] + d / √ [(c sine θ + v) ² + c² cosine ² θ] As General rule: And t (1) = d / √ [(c cosine θ -v) ² + c² sine ² θ] + d / √ [(c cosine θ + v) ² + c² sine ² θ] And t (2) = d / √ [(c sine θ -v) ² + c² cosine ² θ] + d / √ [(c sine θ + v) ² + c² cosine ² θ] If θ = 0 then, we get position I Right: t (1) = d/ (c -v) +d/ (c +v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)] Upper: t (2) = d/√ (c² + v²) + d√ (c² + v²) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)] If θ = 90°, then we get position II With t' (1) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)] And t' (2) = d/ (c - v) d/ (c + v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)] There is no Path difference change If θ = 45 degrees, then Upper: t (2 = d/ (c -v) +d/ (c +v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)] Right: t (1) = d/√ (c² + v²) + d√ (c² + v²) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)] And the difference is still the same Now Let us turn the Table 30° A- Assume θ = 30° then Exp [30° î] = √ 3/2 + 1/2î Then: V = v; C = c Exp [î 30°]; d = d Exp [î 30°]; Exp [î 30°] = cosine 30° + î sine 30° And t (1) = d / √ [(c cosine 30° -v) ² + c² sine ² 30°] + d / √ [(c cosine 30° + v) ² + c² sine ² 30°] And t (2) = d / √ [(c sine30° -v) ² + c² cosine ² 30°] + d / √ [(c sine 30° + v) ² + c² cosine ² 30°] And t (1) = d / √ [(c √ 3/2 -v) ² + c² /4] + d / √ [(c √ 3/2 + v) ² + c² /4] And t (2) = d / √ [(c/2 -v) ² + c² (√ 3/2) ²] + d / √ [(c /2 + v) ² + c² (√ 3/2) ²] Now let us use v = 30km/sec and c = 300,000km/sec If θ = 0 then, Page 90

Right: t (1) = d/ (c -v) +d/ (c +v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)] Upper: t (2) = d/√ (c² + v²) + d√ (c² + v²) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)]

If θ = 30° then, And t (1) = d / c √ [(√ 3/2 -v/c) ² + 1 /4] + d / c √ [(√ 3/2 + v/c) ² + 1 /4] And t (2) = d / c √ [(1/2 -v/c) ² + (√ 3/2) ²] + d / c √ [(1 /2 + v/c) ² + (√ 3/2) ²] We can take (d/c) Then Multiply that at the end If θ = 0 then, Right: t (1)/ (d/c) = 2 / (1- v²/c²)] = 2.00000002 Upper: t (2)/ (d/c) =2/√ (1 + v²/c²)] = 1.99999999 Then δ t = 3 x 10-8 (d/c) = 3 x 10-8 (d/300,000,000) = 10 -16 d Then δ t = 10 -16 d If θ = 30° then, And t (1)/ (d / c) = √ [(√ 3/2 -v/c) ² + 1 /4] + √ [(√ 3/2 + v/c) ² + 1 /4] = 0.99999134 + 1.00000866 = 2 And t (2)/ (d / c) = √ [(1/2 -v/c) ² + (√ 3/2) ²] + √ [(1 /2 + v/c) ² + (√ 3/2) ²] = 0.999995 + 1.000005 = 2 Then δ t' = 0 So the difference is ΔΓ = δ t - δ t' = 10 -16 d With fringe shift = c ΔΓ/ δ r = 3x10-8d/λ; λ = 5.9 x 10^-5 c m; d = 11m =1100c m With (d/λ) = 1100/ (5.9x 10-5) Then fringe shift = (3300x10-8)/ (5.9x 10-5) = .559322034 Well if fringe shift does not happen at angle 90° and fringe shift happens at 30° why no shift seen? The initial problem was and is the lineup of apparatus with earth velocity which is impossible because of the infinite numbers of possibilities of earth motion in space and if it happened it will be momentarily. MMX will never work and all similar experiments will not work unless it is designed as a 3-dimensional set-up and not a one-dimensional wish washy set-up An ideal setup is a spherical set-up but a more realistic setup will be discussed below how to find earth path in space The conclusion was 1 = 1 +i Or E = mc²/2 = (mc²/2).1 = (mc²/2) (1 + i) ² = 2i (mc²/2) = i mc² Or E = mc²; i in absolute value = 1 Page 91

Page 92

Chapter 17 Earth Path in real space in real time Earth path in space is possible and Einstein can keep his relativistic trash to himself: Self – referenced motion
There is a serious problem in all of physics and that is timing of experiments and physics experiments theory. Earth absolute motion is a circle that is going to tie spin to orbit motion and waiting experimental verifications Finding new sources of energy requires the elimination of bad physics and bad physics is E = mc² because it is based on space - time physics and space time physics is wrong because I can prove it wrong as follows. What is wrong with space - time is that it is a wrong idea and it is without proofs. Time is a human made scale and making it a dimension is scientifically stupid and the reasoning behind accepting time as a dimension and not as a scale is the assumption that it matches experiment. Time as a dimension allowing the exchange of time for space or squeezing space to expand time is not acceptable to me regardless what all Nobel prize winners have said about it and regardless what the 100, 000 living physicists are saying about it and regardless what all 100, 000 dead physicists had said about it because it is wrong and proving it wrong is what I can do and did the first time I read what started it and that would be the original dumb idea and experiment in Cleveland Ohio in 1887 by Michelson and Morley. What dumb Michelson and Morley experiment did is it started stupidity as accepted science. The stupidity of Michelson and Morley experiment is the following. We can not measure something that did not happen. We can only measure something that had happened. We can measure something in present time that had happened in past time. Michelson and Morley experiment is stupid because two handymen in white robes tried to measure something in real time and wondered why they did not see it in past time. Present time = present time Present time = past time + [present time - past time] Present time = past time + time delays Real time = event time + time delays What we measure = what happened + what changed till things are measured. Real time physics = event time physics + time delays physics What we see or measure is relativistic = Absolute event + relativistic time delays What happened is absolute = real time relativistic event - real time relativistic effects Michelson and Morley mistake is the attempt: Page 93

Real time = event time [this is the wrong idea that started space - time stupidity] What are missing are time delays [Known as quantum theory and relativity theory] Real time = event time + time delays This formula is my 1973 discovery that not only Nobel Prize winners are wrong but all of physics and physicists are wrong because physics solution is based on the idea that: Real time = event time In one dimension: How would I know if I am going to the right or the left? The problem is very simple, I would send a signal to 2 signals to two equidistant repeaters that send back the signal to me and the signal that comes first indicate a motion in opposite direction. Installing a multi opposite directional repeaters system and one signal and for each tow opposite direction have on timer will produce Earth path in absolute space and may produce the greatest formula in all of Physics and that would be mass motion and spin and better than that it will erase stupidity from classrooms know as space - time. Abstract: Finding new sources of energy require the elimination of bad physics and bad physics is Einstein's space-time (x, y, z, ict) confusion of physics that lead to energy fraud symbol E = mc² because energy spent is based on distance traveled and not relative distance and distance traveled is self referenced distance or absolute motion and finding this motion is waiting on funding for discovery since the beginning of time and experimentally is possible. Discovering Earth absolute motion in space could be one of the greatest discoveries in physics of all time because it will answer the trillion dollar question if mass m spin s and absolute motion r are related by a mathematical formula that expresses a physical law and if this law is to be found can it explains the structural design of the solar system and if so what applications of such a law is useful inside the nucleus to produce new sources of energy?

Page 94

The experimental set - up
Experimental set-up d <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<E >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d Sensor x' Emitter Ex Lead Sensor x Timer T x And d <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<E>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d Sensor y' Emitter E y Lead Sensor y E Timer T y And d <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<E>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d Sensor z' Emitter E z Lead Sensor z E Timer T z 1-Assume there is a pulse emitter E shooting pulses in six different directions of the Euclidean system of axes per unit time τ; x'-x and y'-y and z'-z axes at six equidistant receivers of distance d and has three wire leads Ex, E y, E z connected to three Timers Named T x , T y, and T z. 2 - The six equidistant receivers are named x', x, y', y, z', z. 3- Three timers are named timer T x with three wires one to receiver x' and one wire to receiver x and one wire to emitter wire lead E x and timer T y with three wires one to receiver y' and one wire to receiver y and one wire to emitter wire lead E y and timer T z with three wires one to receiver z' and one wire to receiver z and one wire to emitter wire lead E z are used 4- These six pulses has their directions grouped in three sets of pairs x'-x, y'-y, z'z. 5- Three timers T x; T y, and T z are associated with the three axes respectively a - Timer T x takes measurements from Emitter lead E x; receiver x' and receiver x b - Timer T y takes measurements from Emitter lead E y; receiver y' and receiver y c - Timer T z takes measurements from Emitter lead E z; receiver z' and receiver z Page 95

Now d <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<E>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d Sensor x' E x Lead Sensor x Emitter E Timer T x tx 1- Timer T x receives 3 signals a- From lead E x a signal departures from emitter E to T x register E [T x, n = 1, 2, 3,] b - From receiver x' a signal departures to timer T x [t x', n =1, 2, 3,] c - From receiver x a signal departures to timer T x [t x, n =1, 2, 3,] If t x' - T x is the travel time from emitter E to receiver x' And t x - T x is the travel time from emitter E to receiver x

t x'

RIGHT (C - V x'-x) = d/ t (x-direction) = V x = measurable quantity; t (x-direction) measured because d is known LEFT (C + V x'-x) = d/ t (x'-direction)/d = V x' = measurable quantity; t (x'-direction) measured because d in known Then C = (V x' + V x)/2 And V x'- x = (V x' - V x)/2 Equation X-1 Measurable quantity Similarly we can get V y'- y = (V y' - V y)/2 Equation Y-1 Measurable quantity V z'- z = (V z' - V z)/2 Equation Z-1 Measurable quantity V (earth) = √ [V² x'-x + V² y'-y + V² z'-z] If we take unit of times τ = period of a light source (or a high speed signal) Wave # 1 2 3 4 5 Page 96 V x'x Vx
1

If t x' < t x Then t x' - T x < t x - T x And motion Earth is in the x - direction Let C = average velocity of the pulses and v = velocity of earth in x'-x direction Then

V y'y Vy1 Vy2 Vy 3 Vy4

V z'z Vz
1

V = √ [V²x + V²y + V²z] V1=√ [V²x1 + V²z1] V2=√ [V²x2 + V²z2] V3=√ [V²x3 + V²z3] V4=√ [V²x4 + V²z4] V²y1 + V²y2 + V²y3 + V²y4 +

X= τVx X1 X2 X3 X4

Y= τVy Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4

Z= τV z
Z1

r=X+Y+Z r (1) = X1 + Y1 + Z1 r (2) = X2 + Y2 + Z2 r (1) = X3 + Y3 + Z3 r (4) = X4 + Y4 + Z4

Vx
2

Vz
2

Z2 Z3 Z4

Vx 3 Vx
4

Vz 3 Vz
4

Then Conclusion: The idea of this experiment is to find distance travel segments r (1); r (2); r (3); r (4); ...ETC; then join them together. With [r (1); τ] O -------------- O
[r

[r (4); τ] - O ------------------

(2);

τ]

-

[r (3); τ]

O

r r r r

= (2) = (1) = (4) =
(1)

X1 + Y1 + Z1 X2 + Y2 + Z2 X3 + Y3 + Z3 X4 + Y4 + Z4

The smaller the signal time interval or period τ then the more accurate the experiment. Such a set-up is not only capable of finding absolute motion but it will give clues to finding the relation between mass m spin s and its orbit r of planet Earth. If mass m motion r and spin s are found to be related it will the greatest formulas of all time because all there is in the Universe is mass m space r and spin s. Earth mass m and spin s are know but mass r is Earth absolute motion that had been waiting on funding for discovery since the beginning of time.

Page 97

Johann Georg Von Soldner 1801 light bending historical mistake

Chapter 18

Abstract: Newton proposed F = - GmM/r² as gravitational law In 1801 Johann Georg Van Soldner was the first person to calculate the gravitational bending of light using Newtonian Mechanics and he got: Johann Georg Van Soldner ς (Johann) = 2 {cosine -1 [v²/ (-c² + v²)} - π With v² = GM /R where G = gravitational constant = 6.673 x 10-11; C = 3 x108m/sec And M = Sun mass = 2 x 1030 kg; R = sun radius = 0.695 x 10 9 m; v = 437.89 Einstein said if make – believe time travel and new forces added: Then: ς (Einstein) = 4 (v/c) ²; ς (Johann) = 0.8789 arc sec; ς (Einstein) = 2(0.8789) Johann Georg Van Soldner derivation was incomplete and when completed and approximated it produces Einstein’s formula without Einstein’s space – time fiction and as light aberration and not light bending. Johann Georg Van Soldner wrong derivation of angle of light aberration around the Sun With d² r/d t² - r θ'² = -GM/r² And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Assuming mass m = constant Newton's Gravitational equation (1) Kepler's force law (2)

Proof:

Proof: With (2): d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Then r²θ' = constant = h Differentiate with respect to time Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0 Divide by r²θ' Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0 And 2(r'/r) = - (θ"/θ') = 2[λ (r) + ì ω (r)] And 2(r'/r) = 2[λ (r) + ì ω (r)] And (θ"/θ') = - 2[λ (r) + ì ω (r)] Solving for r = r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) r (0, t) = r (θ, 0)

℮ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t Then θ'(θ, t) = [h/ r² (θ, 0)] ℮
With r (0, t) = And, θ'(θ, t) = θ' (θ, 0) θ' (0, t) Page 98

℮ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

(r) (r) And θ' (0, t) = ℮ Also θ'(θ, 0) = [h/ r² (θ, 0)] And θ'(0, 0) = [h/ r² (0, 0)]

-2[λ

+ỉω

]t

With (1): d² r/d t² - r θ'² = - GM/r² Let r =1/u Then d r/d t = -u'/u² = - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ = - h d u/d θ And d² r/d t² = - hθ'd²u/dθ² = - h u² [d²u/dθ²] And - hu² [d²u/dθ²] - (1/u) (hu²)² = - G Mu² [d²u/ dθ²] + u = G M/ h² And u = G M/ h² + A cosine θ And du/ d θ = 0 = - A sine θ; θ = 0 Then u (0) = 1/ r (0) = GM/h² + A; h = RC C = light velocity of 300,000km/sec; And A = 1/R – GM/ (RC) ² And u = G M/ h² + A cosine θ = GM/ (RC) ² + [1/R – GM/ (RC) ²] cosine θ And r = 1/u = 1/ {GM/ (RC) ² + [1/R – GM/ (RC) ²] cosine θ} If r --- ∞; GM/ (RC) ² + [1/R – GM/ (RC) ²] cosine θ = 0 Divide by GM/ (RC) ² Then 1 + [R²C²/ GM R – 1] cosine θ = 0 And cosine θ = -1/ [C²/ (GM/ R) – 1] Or cosine θ = 1/ [1 – (C²/V²)]; GM/R = V² Or cosine θ = v²/ (v² - c²) And θ = cosine -1 [v²/ (v² - c²)] And ς (Johann) = 2 {cosine -1 [v²/ (-c² + v²)} - π ≈ 2 [π/2 + (v/c) ²] – π = 2 (v/c) ²; v/c <<1

Light Sun

Light

θ

ς

Einstein invented many things to come up with double the amounts: Or, ς (Einstein) = 4 (v/c) ² Here is Johann Georg Van Soldner 1801 Historical mistake We have u (θ) = G M/ h² + A cosine θ
(r) And r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) r (0, t) = r (θ, 0) ℮ (r) And r (θ, 0) = 1/ u (θ, 0) = 1/ [G M/ h² + A cosine θ] Or, r (θ, 0) = (h²/GM)/ [1 + (h²/GM) A cosine θ] Or, r (θ, 0) = (h²/GM)/ [1 + ε cosine θ]

+ỉω

]t

Real time orbit: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)]

℮ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

This equation is real time Universal mechanics solution [λ + ỉ ω (r)] t This: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] ℮ (r) --------------------------------- I It is the math formula that matches a physical experiment If time is frozen that is t = 0 Then r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] we get the classical or event time solution ----------- II Relativistic is the difference between I and II And it is the visual illusion between motion II and Visual motion I The difference between an event and its measurement in real time With θ’ (θ, t) = [h/ r² (θ, 0)] ℮ With (θ”/ θ’) = - 2[λ (r) + ì ω (r)]
-2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

Then θ” (θ, t) = - 2[λ (r) + ì ω (r)] [h/ r² (θ, 0)]

℮ -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t

With λ (r) = 0

(r) Then θ” (θ, t) = - 2 ì ω (r) [h/ r² (θ, 0)] ℮ Or, θ” (θ, t) = - 2 ì ω (r) [h/ r² (θ, 0)] [cosine 2 ω (r) t + ί sine 2 ω (r) t]

-2 ỉ ω

t

The real part or along the line of sight Is Real θ” (θ, t) = 2 ω (r) [h/ r² (θ, 0)] sine 2 ω (r) t] (t/t) Or, Real θ” (θ, t) = 2 t ω (r) [h/ t r² (θ, 0)] sine 2 (r) ω t] Or, Real θ” (θ, t) / [h/ t r² (θ, 0)] = 2 t ω (r) sine 2 ω (r) t At t = T; light aberration angle in real time is confused for light bending. With ω T = arc tan (v/c) Then ψ = visual illusion angle = θ” (θ, T) / [h/ T r² (θ, 0)] Or, ψ =2 T ω (r) sine 2 ω (r) T Johann Georg Van Soldner 1801 historical mistake Is: ψ = [2 arc tan (v/c)] sine [2 arc tan (v/c)] Page 100

With (v/c) << 1; 2 arc tan (v/c) ≈ 2 (v/c) And sine 2 arc tan (v/c) ≈ sine 2 (v/c) ≈ 2 (v/c) And ψ = [2 arc tan (v/c)] sine [2 arc tan (v/c)] ≈ [2 (v/c)] [2 (v/c)] Or ψ ≈ 4 (v/c) ² radians Or, ψ ≈ 4 (v/c) ² x (180/π) degrees Or, ψ ≈ 4 (v/c) ² x (180/π) x 3600 seconds With v² = GM/R Then ψ ≈ 4 GM/R c² x (180/π) x 3600 seconds Einstein with the help of others rigged eternity to come up with 4 (v/c) ² and not 2 (v/c) ² to justify experimental illusions or 2[2(v/c) ²] Ψ = 7200 [arc tan (437.89 / 300,000)] sine 2 [arc tan (437.89/300,000)] = 1.757855865 arc second

MR Eddington: keep the trash to England Royals
101 Chapter 19: 20th century greatest mistake is E = mc²

The difference between old physics and new physics is double That is one Einstein equal two Newton.

Newton energy definition is En = mc²/2 Einstein doubled that amount or E e = 2 En = 2[mc²/2] = mc² It is not just Einstein and Newton are wrong but physics is 500 years wrong Page 1 Abstract: The elimination of 500 years of Physics including relativity theory is a matter of time and not a matter of science and the time is 1900. E = mc² death certificate is now available Real time Physics: We can only measure past events. We can not measure something that did not happen. We can only measure things that had happened. What we measure is not what happened. We measure in present time an event that happened in past time. Present time = present time Present time = past time + [present time - past time] Present time = past time + real time delays Real time physics = event time physics + real time relativistic delays What one sees is relativistic = what happened in an absolute event + relativistic effects What happened in an event is absolute = real time physics - real time relativistic effects. Observer time = observed traveler time + time delays Real time = absolute time + time delays Real time = Event time + time delays Real time Physics = event time Physics + time delays Physics Page 102

Quantum = classical + relativistic Naming Γ as real time and t as event time Γ = t + (Γ - t) = t [1 + (Γ – t)/t] = t (Γ/t) Γ = t + Δ Γ; Δ Γ = Γ - t If an event happens on Planet Mercury and the event is seen from the Sun at event time t, then this same event would be seen from Earth in real time as time Γ = t + ΔΓ Γ = t + (Γ - t) Real time = Event time + time delays Γ = t + Δ Γ (x) + ỉ Γ (y) = t + Δ Γ Δ Γ = Δ Γ (x) + ỉ Γ (y) Δ Γ (x) is along the line of sight time delays Δ Γ (y) is perpendicular to the line of sight time delays

Γ = t (Γ/t)

Γ=te ; Γ/t = e ίωt Γ=te Multiplying by c, then r = c Γ = c t e Or r = r0 e
ίωt

ỉωt

ỉωt

ίωt

= r0 e

ίωt

; ω T = arc tan (v/c)

A – Light aberration ω T= arc tan (v 0/c) B – Michelson and Morley ω T = [π/2 + arc tan (v 0/c)]
Real time location is r = r 0

℮ ỉωt ℮ ỉωt

Real time velocity v = [v 0 + í ω r 0]

The definition of energy
E = m (V. V)/2 = (m/2) [v 0 + í ω² r 0]. [v 0 + í ω r 0] ℮ 2 ỉ = (m/2) [(v0² - ω² r 0²) + 2 í ω (r 0 v 0)] [cosine 2ω t + í sine 2ω t] = (m/2) {[(v0² - ω² r 0²) cosine 2ω t - 2 ω (r 0 v 0) sine 2ω t] + í [(v0² - ω r 0²) sine 2ω t + 2 ω (r 0 v 0) cosine 2ω t]} = Ex + i E y Ex = (m/2) [(v0² - ω² r 0²) cosine 2ω t - 2 ω (r 0 v 0) sine 2ω t] Page 103
ωt

Case I
Constant velocity of light principle: v 0 = ω r 0 = c Then Ex = (m/2) [(c² - c²) cosine 2ω t - 2 c² sine 2ω t] Ex = (m/2) [- 2 c² sine 2ω t] Ex = - m c² sine 2ω t A – Light aberration ω T= arc tan (v 0/c) Ex = - m c² sine 2ω t Ex = - m c² sine 2 [arc tan (v 0/c)] Ex = - m c² sine 2 [arc tan (c/c)] Ex = - m c² B – Michelson and Morley ω T = [π/2 + arc tan (v 0/c)] Ex = - m c² sine 2ω t Ex = - m c² sine 2[π/2 + arc tan (v 0/c)] Ex = - m c² sine 2[π/2 + arc tan (c/c)]

Ex = - m c² sine 2[π/2 + π/4] Ex = - m c² sine [3π/2] Ex = m c² Case II Rest Energy Principle: v 0 = 0; ω r 0 = c Then Ex = (m/2) [(0² - c²) cosine 2ω t - 2 c (0) sine 2ω t] Ex = (m/2) [- 2 c² cosine 2ω t] Ex = - m c² cosine 2ω t A – Light aberration ω T= arc tan (v 0/c) Ex = - m c² cosine ω T= arc tan (v 0/c) Ex = - m c² cosine 2 [arc tan (0/c)] Ex = - m c² cosine 2 (0) Ex = - m c² B – Michelson and Morley ω T = [π/2 + arc tan (v 0/c)] Ex = - m c² cosine 2ω t Ex = - m c² cosine 2[π/2 + arc tan (0/c)] Ex = - m c² cosine 2(π/2) Ex = - m c² cosine π Ex = - m c² (-1) Ex = m c² Page 104

Michelson Morley This 1907 Nobel Prize winner Dude along with this Dude put a Lamp two mirrors and a telescope on a round rotating table.

This was the set –up.

Page 105

Michelson and Morley looked at the virtual image from the two mirrors of light reflections through the telescope. They claim that if they to rotate the table then the image should change. When Michelson and Morley rotated the table in 1887 and the image did not change they claim that you can rotate data without change in results! Then conclusion of this wacky claim that won a Nobel Prize is that The number 1 can be replaced by 1 + i; i is the complex number Or; in Cartesian coordinates Page 106

i

1

If we take E = (mc²/2) (1)² And replace (1) with (1 + 1i) Then E = (mc²/2) (1)² = (mc²/2) (1 + 1i) ² E = (mc²/2) (1 + 1i) ² = (mc²/2) (1 – 1 + 2i) ² E = 2i (mc²/2) = imc² |E| = |imc²| = mc² Case III: Classical Energy Principle: v 0 = c; ω r 0 = 0: Then ω Ex = (m/2) [(c² - 0²) cosine 2 ω t - 2 c (0) sine 2ω t] Ex = (m/2) (c² cosine 2 ω t) Ex = (m/2) [c² cosine 2 (0) t] Ex = m c²/2

E = mc²/2 and not E = mc² but the visual illusion ∆ E = mc² The crooks of “University” are using visual effects to claim Dark energy or an expansion of 500 years of western stupidity and fraud in physics

Page 107

Chapter 20: special relativity stupidity
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product S = m r; State = mass x location: P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment = change of location + change of mass = m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force = m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r = m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate In polar coordinates system r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1) r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r
(1)

= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1) = [-GmM/r²] r (1) ------------------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law Proof: First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1) Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ] = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1) Define θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ; And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1) And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1) Define γ = d [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t = r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1) With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = F (r) And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 With m = constant, then With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1 And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2 With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = - ω²s r E q – 1 Hooke’s Law And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2 Page 108

From Eq-2: d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Then r²θ' = h = constant Differentiate with respect to time Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0 Divide by r²θ' Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0 And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t For a fixed orbit: λ r= 0 Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t An object of length r could be seen longer or shorter if it extended or shortened e λ t or twisted e í ω t making it in general r e [λ + í ω] t. If the length of an object is not extended or shortened then λ = 0 and it could be seen as a twisted visual effect. Then r -------------------------- Visual r = S = r e í ω t 1- The illusion of length contraction: Length contraction is just a visual effect of projected light aberration and it is an "apparent" visual effect and not real

Alfred Nobel Institution Idiot An object located at r ----- light sensing -----measured as S = r e arc tan (v/c); tan (v/c) = light aberrations angle = ω t S = r e í ω t caused by light aberrations visual effects as follows: If e í ω t = [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]; From S = r e í ω t Page 109

í ω t

with ω t =

It changes to: S = r {√ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)] - ỉ sine arc tan (v/c)} = r {√ [1- (v/c) ²] - ỉ (v/c)}; v/c <<< 1 =Sx+ỉSy Where S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = cosine arc tan (v/c) With v/c << 1 then; Where S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = cosine arc tan (v/c) In absolute value S = r Along the line of measurement: S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)] ≈ r √ [1-(v/c) ²]; v/c << 1 This the equation for length contraction of Lorentz's used in Einstein's theories But it is the light aberrations visual effects and it is "apparent and not real 2 - Constant velocity of light leading to Time Dilations Projected light aberrations S x = r cosine ω t Hypotenuse = S x = [c t x] = c t x √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)] S x ≈ c t √ [1-(v/c) ²]; from constant velocity of light and c is constant in all reference frames Where t = local self time; t x = time by observer t x = t √ [1-(v/c) ²]; and t = {1/√ [1-(v/c) ²]} t x absolute math These are time dilatation equations given by Einstein’s special relativity theory. t x' = t' √ [1-(v'/c) ²]; and t' = {1/√ [1-(v'/c) ²]} t x' absolute math Two observers observing the same thing the time dilations are Then, t x = t √ [1-(v/c) ²]; t = {1/√ [1-(v/c) ²]} t x absolute math; Lab purposes And, t x' = t √ [1-(v'/c) ²]; t' = {1/√ [1-(v'/c) ²]} t x' absolute math; Lab purposes However; two observers looking at each other S (A) = r exp [ỉ ω t] S (B) = r exp [- ỉ ω t] S x (A) = S x = c t x ≈ c t x' √ [1-(v/c) ²] S x (B) = S x = c t x' ≈ c t x √ [1-(v/c) ²] And t x ≈ t x' √ [1-(v/c) ²] And t x' ≈ t x √ [1-(v/c) ²] That is why there no twin Paradox except on science fictions books because it is all about aberrations and nothing real. Page 110

3 – Momentum S x = Visual location along the line of sight = r [√ [1-(v/c) ²] P x = v [√ [1-(v/c) ²]; v =constant; P x = d [S x]/d t And m P x = m v [√ [1-(v/c) ²] = m (0) v 4 – Mass Then m = m (0) / [√ [1-(v/c) ²] Also; m = m (0) / [1-1/2(v/c) ²] 5- Energy mc² = m (0) c² / [1-1/2(v/c) ²] E = m (0) c²; v = 0 Also m ≈ m (0) [1+ 1/2(v/c) ²] Hence m c² ≈ m (0) c² + m v ²/2

Page 111

Chapter 21 Quantum mechanics Copenhagen Cyclic Interpretation
Ape  Man  Modern Physicist  Nobel Prize  Ape Ass. Then came the Copenhagen Interpretation

The Copenhagen idiots with Nobel prizes That new physics is needed! This new physics is quantum mechanics! Quantum mechanics is a purely western stupidity: I - In 950 AD with Arabs visual location law is quantum mechanics: Is r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t) All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product S = m r; State = mass x location: P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment = change of location + change of mass = m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force = m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r = m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate In polar coordinates system r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1) r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r
(1)

= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1) = [-GmM/r²] r (1) ---------------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law Page 112

Proof: First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1) Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ] = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1) Define θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ; And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1) And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1) Define γ = d [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t = r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1) With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = F (r) And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 With m = constant, then With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1 And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2 With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1 And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2 From Eq-2: d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Then r²θ' = h = constant Differentiate with respect to time Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0 Divide by r²θ' Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0 And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t For a fixed orbit: λ r = 0 Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2ỉ ω t With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Let u = 1/r; r = 1/u; r²θ' = h = θ’ /u² And d r/d t = (d r/ d u) (d u /d θ) (d θ/ d t) = (- 1/u ²) (θ’) (d u/ d θ) = - h (d u/ d θ) And d² r/ d t² = - h (θ’) (d² u/ d θ ²) = [- h²/r²] (d² u/ d θ ²) = - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) Page 113

With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1 And - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) – (1/u) (h u²) ² = 0 Then (d² u/ d θ ²) + u = 0 Then u = A e - í θ Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t Or, r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t) This is quantum mechanics Arabs real time astronomy is actually quantum mechanics

r = r0 e

í ω (r) t

Light is emitted and not an emitter and humans have no means of measuring light in motion and at best they can take a snap shot. In mathematical language Then r (θ, 0) = r 0 e í θ at t = 0 And r (θ, t) = r 0 e í (θ + ω t) = r 0 e í θ e í ω t = r (θ, 0) e í ω t And r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) [cosine ω t + í sine ω t] And r x (θ, t) = r x (θ, 0) cosine ω t And ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] Then ∆ r = r x (θ, t) - r x (θ, 0) = r x (θ, 0) [(cosine ω t) – 1] And [r x (θ, t) - r x (θ, 0)]/ r x (θ, 0) = [(1 - 2 sine² ω t/2) – 1] = - 2 sine ² ω t/2; ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] rabs real time astronomy: Image = Image = I Object = Object = O - Object = - Object = - O Image = object + (Image – Object) I = O + (I – O) (I/O) = O/O + [(I – O)/O] (I/O) = 1 + [(I – O)/O] (I/O) θ' 0 = θ' 0 + [(I – O)/O] θ' 0 Quantum = classical + relativistic Illusion I = r; O = r 0 Or, (r / r 0) θ' 0 = θ' 0 + [(r – r 0)/ r 0] θ' 0 And [(r – r 0)/ r 0] θ' 0 Or [- 2sine ² ω t/2] θ' 0; ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r For planet Mercury: Page 114

x

(θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r/ r 0)

The distance visual effect Error is: [(r

m

– re)/re] δ θ’

m

The quantity: δ θ’ m = (v m/r m) (180/ π) [36526/Tm (days)] (3600) = 70.75
With v
m

= 47.9 km/sec; r

m

= 58.2 x 106 km; Tm = 88 days

With r = 58.2 x 109 m = Sun – Mercury distance And r
e

= 149.6 x 109 m = Sun Earth distance

With [(r m – re)/re] = [- 2sine ² ω t/2] = 0.61 And ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r/ r 0) Or ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)] = cosine-1 (r m/ r e) [(r m – re)/re] δ θ’ m = 0.61 x 70.75 = 43

All rights reserved Page 116

Chapter 22: Earth Absolute Motion is circular
Copernicus said that Planets move around the sun in an ellipse Galileo affirmed that planets move around the sun in an ellipse Tycho Brahe collected the astronomical data and confirmed that planets move around the Sun in an ellipse

Mercury

r θ

Sun

Figure - 1

Kepler wrote the acceleration law: a/T2 = k/a2 And deduced that planets move around the sun in an ellipse and that the sun is at the focus of the ellipse like in figure above Newton and Hooke reiterated the same thing as Kepler and wrote: r/ t2 = k/r2 Astronomers found that the motion is not an ellipse but a rotating ellipse Einstein wrote another acceleration law r/t2 = k/ r2 + k1/r4 to describe a rotating ellipse 7 billion people were told by Alfred Nobel prize winner physicists that Planets rotate around the Sun in a rotating ellipse What if I can prove all wrong? I am Joe Nahhas And I am better than good and I am after Alfred Nobel Institution head Page 117

Mercur y

θ ψ Sun

Newton gave the equation of the ellipse: As: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)]

Einstein said he corrected Newton and wrote the new equation: Is: r (θ, t) = a (1-ε²)/ [1+ε cosine (θ - Ψ)]
It is a fact that Astronomers see this axis tilt and Einstein got a formula for it: ψ = {6 π G

M/a c² (1 - ε²)} [180/ π] [36526/T (days)][3600]

G = 6.673 x 10-11= gravitational acceleration constant M =2x1030kg = mass of the Sun Eccentricity of Mercury’s orbit = ε = 0.206 T= 88 days = period of Planet mercury’s rotation around the Sun And c = 299792.458 km/sec =light speed/sec And a = 58.2 x 106 km/sec = semi major axis of planet Mercury orbit

ψ = {6 (π) 6.673 x 10-11 (2 x 1030)/58.2 x 106 (299792.458) ² [1– (0.206)²]} x [180/ π] [36526/88] [3600] = 43 seconds of an arc per century Page 118

Newton used magical powers or action at a distance force F = G m M/r2 Einstein said if Newton can add magical power then I can do magic powers of Newton and add Einstein’s own magical powers of time travel force and the force Is F = G m M/r2 (space force) + k/r4 (time force)

These two morons claim that what we see is due to magic where the Sun is pulling on the planets to keep them around? Did anyone see the Sun Pulling? Did anyone see a damn robe not the Sun hanging the planets to revolve around it but to hang these two idiots with Alfred Nobel physicists?!

There is nothing Nobel about Alfred Nobel institution that gave prizes for magical forces and time travel and garbage for physics.
Page 119

I am not saying that Alfred Nobel physicists are idiots to say the least but what I am saying is that Alfred Nobel prize winner physics is stupidity itself and Alfred Nobel prize winner physicists are crooks to be exact. Time is not a structure like space to allow Alfred Nobel Institution to dictate stupidity in classrooms on the rest of us and Alfred Nobel Physicists can keep stupidity to themselves. Alfred Nobel prize is worth 1001 times in money. Alfred Nobel prize is a 1 billion dollar business each. Big Institutions with massive funding needs backed bad physics and idiots for physicists for 1 billion dollars prize and the world stuck with garbage for physics.
What is modern physics? Did anyone hear the big bang? Did anyone saw a black hole? Did anyone find Einstein’s gravity waves? Did anyone hook up a hose to the sky and funnel dark energy to verify E = mc2? Does anyone have a proof of Newton’s action at a distance? Does anyone have a proof of Einstein time travel? Does anyone figure out why humans have to accept Alfred Nobel prize winners nuclear claims that the universe is made up of particles that dies and rebirth billion billion times a second? Hey dude I am a redneck one grandfather was a damn farmer and my other grandfather was a damn Carpenter and my father was a much damn redneck I sometimes feel reluctant to claim him but I never knew what a dumb ass really is till I met my science teacher talking about the greatest idiots of physics starting With the seven idiots in order Copernicus Galileo Newton and Einstein! What did Alfred Nobel honor? My answer to that is: “University” Crooks in Alfred Nobel Suit The difference between a crook and a Nobel Prize winner is a flip of a coin The difference between me and all others I can prove them crooks and I dare all to prove me wrong. Starting with Einstein and Newton to make Galileo irrelevant to the subject of planetary motion around the Sun because of now and now is July 4th 1973 there is no Galileo and there is No Einstein and there is no Newton because I can prove them all wrong including NASA and Europeans space agency and all others!

Newton’s space force: F = G m M/r2

Einstein’s – Newton space - time:

F = G m M/r2 (Newton’s space force) + k/r4 (Einstein’s time force) The force is with Joe Nahhas and in real time space F = 0
Nahhas said the only magic is an act of kindness of a human to all others! My act of kindness to humanity is to make humanity aware of the criminals with Nobel prizes and the idiots with Intelligent portfolios!

Page 120

What I am saying is that there is no Newton’s gravitational force and Einstein’s space – time force is silly to say the least and I can prove that there is no gravitational force between the Sun and the Planets force, or, F = o solution is a rotating ellipse Illusion. What I am saying dear Pope John Paul is that those with “knowledge” and sick intentions to be arrogant and claim magical forces and mocks the believers have absolutely no clue what they see in their telescopes and have nothing to offer beside stupidity that started with Newton and perfected with Alfred Nobel Institution’s dumbest Einstein. To start with let me solve this equation F = 0. The solution of F = 0 is the equation of a real time circle Is r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product S = m r; State = mass x location: P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment = change of location + change of mass = m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force = m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r = m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate In polar coordinates system

r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1) r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r
(1) (1)

+ (2r'θ' + r θ") θ

(1)]

+ 2m'[r' r

(1)

+ r θ' θ

(1)]

+ (m" r) r

= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/m r) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1) = [-G m M/r²] r (1) -------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law Page 121

Proof: First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1) Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ] = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1) Define θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ; And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1) And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1) Define γ = d [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t = r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1) With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = F (r) And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 With m = constant, then With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1 And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2 With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1 And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2 From Eq-2: d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Then r²θ' = h = constant Differentiate with respect to time Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0 Divide by r²θ' Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0 And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t For a fixed orbit: λ r = 0 Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t

And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2ỉ ω t With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Let u = 1/r; r = 1/u; r²θ' = h = θ’ /u² And d r/d t = (d r/ d u) (d u /d θ) (d θ/ d t) = (- 1/u ²) (θ’) (d u/ d θ) = - h (d u/ d θ) Page 122

And d² r/ d t² = - h (θ’) (d² u/ d θ ²) = [- h²/r²] (d² u/ d θ ²) = - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1 And - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) – (1/u) (h u²) ² = 0 Then (d² u/ d θ ²) + u = 0 Then u = A e - í θ Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t Or, r = r 0 e
í (θ + ω t)

What I am saying Dear Pope is this is the equation of motion of any planet! It is also the equation of motion of the smallest particle light! Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t] Sun
s í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

r

r Mercury r1 r0 r2 X2

r

m

X1

Earth

Page 123

In mathematical form: r1 = x1 + r And r2 = x2 + r m

s

Then r2 - r1 = x2 - x1 + r m – r s Or, r = r0 + (r m – r s) To find the extreme values of r, Then: d r/d t = d r0/d t+ (d r m/d t – d r s/ d t) = 0 And (d r m/d t – d r s/ d t) = 0; d r0/d t = 0 And d r m/d t = d r s/ d t Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t] And d r m/d t = r And d r s/ d t = r
m 0 s 0 í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

[θ’ (m) + ω (m)] e [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] e

í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

With r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] Cosine [θ (m) + ω (m) t] = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] Cosine [θ (s) + ω (s) t] And r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] sine [θ (m) + ω (m) t] = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] sine [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

Then dividing we get: tan [θ (n) + ω (n) t] = tan [θ (s) + ω (s) t] Or, [θ (m) + ω (m) t] = [θ (s) + ω (s) t] + [n π = 0; n =0]

And θ (m) - θ (s) + = [ω (s) - ω (m)] t This is the time delay Illusion And, r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)]

And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] = (r

m 0/

r

s 0)

[θ’ (m) + ω (m)]
m 0/

And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = [(r
In arc second per century:

r

s 0)

-1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]

Is: [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = [(r
m 0/

r

s 0)

-1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) Page 124

And, r
And

m 0

[θ’ (m) + ω (m)] =

r

s 0

[θ’ (s) + ω (s)]

r

m 0

[θ’ (m) + ω (m)] =

r

e 0

[θ’ (e) + ω (e)]
m 0/

And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] = [(r
In arc second per century:

r

e 0)

-1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]

Is: [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = [(r
m 0/

r

e 0)

-1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = 43

r
M

m 0

M

Mercury
0

r

s 0

S

Sun

r

m0

r

Is: r
Is: r

= r 0 + (r m 0 + r s 0) And r min = r 0 - (r m 0 + r s 0) And c = (r max - r min)/2 = r m 0 + r And a = (r max + r min)/2 = r 0
max

0

= distance between centers

s 0

With c = (r

max

-r

min

)/2 = r

m 0

+r

s 0

And a = (r max + r min)/2 = r 0 This establishes visual ellipse of semi major axis a and a semi minor axis b = √ (a² - c²) = a √ [1 – (c/a) ²] = a √ (1 – ε ²) And h = 2 π a b = 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²) Areal Velocity is: 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T Page 125

Mercury

r θ

Sun

Figure - 1

Page 126

And Farthest distance = r

max

= r 0 + (r

m 0

+r

s 0

)=a+c

And closest distance = r

min

= r 0 - (r

m 0

+r

s 0

)=a-c

At closest approach: h =2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T And dividing h / (a – c) ² = 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T a² (1 – ε) ² Or r²θ' = h will give θ' (a) = 2 π √ (1 – ε ²)/T (1 – ε) ²
And for any motion θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2ỉ ω t And θ’ = {[cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] – 1} θ' 0 (θ, 0) And θ’ = θ’ (x) + í θ’ (y) = [cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0) And θ’ (x) = [cosine 2 ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0)

= [1 – 2 sine² ω t] θ'

0

(θ, 0)

And θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' 0 (θ, 0) sine² ω t = -2(2π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t = - 4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t Page 127

If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, then

Mercur y

θ Ψ Sun

With, v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity And v/c = (v* + v°)/c = tan ω t = -4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} radians

Multiplication by 180/π to change to degrees Ψ ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days Ψ’’ (calculated) = (-720x36526/T days) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years

And in arc seconds per century:
Ψ’’ (calculated) = (-720x36526x3600/T days) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years = 43 Page 128

The confrontation between physics and physicists
By Professor Joe Nahhas 1978

Greetings: my name is Joe Nahhas and I am the greatest physicist of all time since July 4th 1973 I am unknown to the world of physics but I have 1001 new real time physics formulas to change physics and history to delete all physics and wipe out written history and this is a revolt!

Abstract: There is no solar system and Earth does not move around the Sun. I can say that there is no solar system and Earth does not move around the Sun because I can prove that there is no solar system and that Earth does not move around the Sun. There is a solar group of objects humans call one star few planets and few moons. Each object of the solar group has its own independent orbit (circle) and all are in the same neighborhood looking like a solar “system” where Earth is visually looking like it moves around the Sun in an ellipse and the Sun at the focus (not center) of that ellipse. Gravity is a spin effect found inside the atmosphere. There is no gravity outside the atmosphere. There is no gravity between Earth and Sun. Taking that there is no gravity between Earth and Sun leads to a circular motion for the Sun and a circular motion for Earth. The difference between two circular motions is visual motion and not an actual motion of an ellipse. An ellipse motion requires an inverse square law that is given by Newton’s equation that says the gravitational force F between Earth of mass m and the Sun of mass M is given by F = G m M/r² where r is the distance between Earth and sun and G is a constant number. A rotating ellipse requires Newton’s law of space motion - G m M/r² and Einstein’s time motion k/r4 to a total force of F = - G m M/r² + k/r4 in contradiction to Qur’an F = 0

In Short Planets Moons Sun all swim freely and no gravity restrictions. No gravity means the Force F = 0. The solution of F = 0 leads to a circular orbit for all .

r

Sun
s

r Mercury r1 r0 r2 X2 Earth

r

m

X1

M

M

M
m 0

Mercury

S

r

s 0

Sun

r

r

0

The Sun S moves in a circle and Planet mercury moves in a circle. And Farthest distance = r max = r 0 + (r m 0 + r s 0) = a + c

And closest distance = r

min

= r 0 - (r

m 0

+r

s 0

)=a-c

Gives a visual ellipse and visual (not actual gravity) meaning planets seems to move around the Sun and not actually moving around the Sun

Mercury

r θ

Sun

Figure - 1

If we took a look at the most famous physics fundamental constant G from Newton’s 350 years old Equation F = G m M/r² G’s value has unit dimension of [G] = [1/ρ T²]; ρ is atmospheric density and T is time rotational period. If we can show that the gravitational constant G = G (ρ, T) is a variable air density and Earth rotational period dependent then we can say what Earth is saying that the most famous physics fundamental constants are not so universal constants because all physics fundamental constant are air density and Earth spin dependent. For example: G = G (ρ, T) = 1/ [(2/5) (4 π/3) ρT²]; 5/2 ~ √ (2 π) Nothing that: 8 π /15 = (2/5) (4π/3); 4π/3 and 2/5 come from spherical aspect Where: ρ = air density; T = Earth rotation period; T = 23.9333 hours and ρ = 1.2045 kg/m³ G = 1/ (8 π/15) ρT² = 6.674 x 10 – 11 [G] = [1/ρ T²] ~ 0 if spin period is very long or atmospheric density is very high This fact applies to electromagnetic fundamental constants: Like ε (0) = 1/4πρT² = 8.85 x 10 -12; μ (0) = 4πρT²/c² There is no “gravity” between the “sun” and “planets” and that means: The force F = 0 And not F = - G m M/r²

Yes I am saying that astronomers have no clue what they see using their telescopes What I am saying is that there is no F = - G m M/r² and there is no solar system where the motion of a planet around the sun is an ellipse with the sun at the focus of the ellipse.

Mercury

r θ

Sun

Figure - 1

Kepler wrote the acceleration law: a/T2 = k/a2 And said that the motion of a planet around the sun is an ellipse like in figure - 1 And wrote the equation of motion law As: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] Newton and Hooke reiterated the same thing as Kepler and wrote: r/ t2 = k/r2 Astronomers found that the motion is not an ellipse but a rotating ellipse And wrote the equation of motion law As: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] Einstein wrote another acceleration law r/t2 = k/ r2 + k1/r4 to describe a rotating ellipse

Mercur y

θ ψ Sun

Newton gave the equation of the ellipse: As: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)]

Einstein said he corrected Newton and wrote the new equation: Is: r (θ, t) = a (1-ε²)/ [1+ε cosine (θ - Ψ)]
It is a fact that Astronomers see this axis tilt and Einstein got a formula for it: ψ = {6 π G

M/a c² (1 - ε²)} [180/ π] [36526/T (days)][3600]

G = 6.673 x 10-11= gravitational acceleration constant M =2x1030kg = mass of the Sun Eccentricity of Mercury’s orbit = ε = 0.206 T= 88 days = period of Planet mercury’s rotation around the Sun And c = 299792.458 km/sec =light speed/sec And a = 58.2 x 106 km/sec = semi major axis of planet Mercury orbit ψ = {6 (π) 6.673 x 10-11 (2 x 1030)/58.2 x 106 (299792.458) ² [1– (0.206)²]} x [180/ π] [36526/88] [3600] = 43 seconds of an arc per century

Newton used magical powers or action at a distance force F = G m M/r2 Einstein said if Newton can add magical power then I can do magic powers of Newton and add Einstein’s own magical powers of time travel force and the force Is F = G m M/r2 (space force) + k/r4 (time force)

These two morons claim that what we see is due to magic where the Sun is pulling on the planets to keep them around? Did anyone see the Sun Pulling? Did anyone see a damn robe not the Sun hanging the planets to revolve around it but to hang these two idiots with Alfred Nobel physicists?!

There is nothing Nobel about Alfred Nobel institution that gave prizes for magical forces and garbage for physics.
Page 6

I am not saying that Alfred Nobel physicists are idiots to say the least but what I am saying is that Alfred Nobel prize winner physics is stupidity itself and Alfred Nobel prize winner physicists are crooks to be exact. Time is not a structure like space to allow Alfred Nobel Institution to dictate stupidity on the rest of us and Alfred Nobel Physicists can keep stupidity to themselves. Alfred Nobel prize is worth 1001 times in money. Alfred Nobel prize is a 1 billion dollar business each. Big Institutions with massive funding needs backed bad physics and idiots for physicists for 1 billion dollars prize and the world stuck with garbage for physics.
What is modern physics? Did anyone hear the big bang? Did anyone saw a black hole? Did anyone find Einstein’s gravity waves? Did anyone hook up a hose to the sky and funnel dark energy to verify E = mc2? Does anyone have a

proof of Newton’s action at a distance? Does anyone have a proof of Einstein time travel? Does anyone figure out why humans have to accept Alfred Nobel prize winners nuclear claims that the universe is made up of particles that dies and rebirth billion billion times a second? Hey dude I am a redneck one grandfather was a damn farmer and my other grandfather was a damn Carpenter and my father was a much damn redneck I sometimes feel reluctant to claim my dad but I never knew what a dumb ass is really is till I met my science teacher talking about the greatest idiots of physics Newton and Einstein! What did Alfred Nobel honor? My answer to that is: “University” Crooks in Alfred Nobel Suit The difference between a crook and a Nobel Prize winner is a flip of a coin The difference between me and all others I can prove them crooks and I dare all to prove me wrong. Starting with Einstein and Newton to make Galileo irrelevant to the subject of planetary motion around the Sun because of now and now is July 4th 1973 there is no Galileo and there is No Einstein and there is no Newton because I can prove them all wrong including NASA and Europeans space agency and all others!

Newton’s space force: F = G m M/r2
Einstein’s – Newton space - time:

F = G m M/r2 (Newton’s space force) + k/r4 (Einstein’s time force)

The force is with Joe Nahhas and in real time space F = 0

Nahhas said the only magic is an act of kindness of a human to all others! My act of kindness to humanity is to make humanity aware of the criminals with Nobel prizes and the idiots with intelligent portfolios!

What I am saying is that there is no Newton’s gravitational force and Einstein’s space – time force is silly to say the least and I can prove that there is no gravitational force between the Sun and the Planets force, or, F = o solution is a rotating ellipse Illusion. What I am saying dear Pope John Paul is that those with “knowledge” and sick intentions to be arrogant and claim magical forces and mocks the believers have absolutely no clue what they see in their telescopes and have nothing to offer beside stupidity that started with Newton and perfected with Alfred Nobel Institution’s dumbest Einstein. To start with let me solve this equation F = 0. The solution of F = 0 is the equation of a real time circle Is r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product S = m r; State = mass x location: P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment

= change of location + change of mass = m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force = m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r = m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate In polar coordinates system r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1) r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r
(1) (1)

+ (2r'θ' + r θ") θ

(1)]

+ 2m'[r' r

(1)

+ r θ' θ

(1)]

+ (m" r) r

= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/m r) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1) = [-G m M/r²] r (1) -------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law Page 8

Proof: First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1) Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t = r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ] = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1) Define θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ; And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1) And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1) Define γ = d [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t = r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1) With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = F (r) And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 With m = constant, then With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1 And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2 With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1 And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2 From Eq-2: d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Then r²θ' = h = constant Differentiate with respect to time Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0 Divide by r²θ' Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0 And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]

Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t For a fixed orbit: λ r = 0 Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2ỉ ω t With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Let u = 1/r; r = 1/u; r²θ' = h = θ’ /u² And d r/d t = (d r/ d u) (d u /d θ) (d θ/ d t) = (- 1/u ²) (θ’) (d u/ d θ) = - h (d u/ d θ)

Page 9

And d² r/ d t² = - h (θ’) (d² u/ d θ ²) = [- h²/r²] (d² u/ d θ ²) = - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1 And - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) – (1/u) (h u²) ² = 0 Then (d² u/ d θ ²) + u = 0 Then u = A e - í θ Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t Or, r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)

What I am saying Dear Pope is this is the equation of motion of any planet! It is also the equation of motion of the smallest particle light! Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e í [θ (m) + ω (m) t] The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t] Sun
s

r

r Mercury r1 r0 r2

r

m

X1

X2 Earth

In mathematical form: r1 = x1 + r And r2 = x2 + r m Then r2 - r1 = x2 - x1 + r m – r s

s

Or, r = r0 + (r

m

– r s)
Page 10

To find the extreme values of r, Then: d r/d t = d r0/d t+ (d r m/d t – d r s/ d t) = 0 And (d r m/d t – d r s/ d t) = 0; d r0/d t = 0 And d r m/d t = d r s/ d t Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t] And d r m/d t = r And d r s/ d t = r
m 0 s 0 í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

[θ’ (m) + ω (m)] e [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] e

í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]

í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

With r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] Cosine [θ (m) + ω (m) t] = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] Cosine [θ (s) + ω (s) t] And r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] sine [θ (m) + ω (m) t] = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] sine [θ (s) + ω (s) t]

Then dividing we get: tan [θ (n) + ω (n) t] = tan [θ (s) + ω (s) t] Or, [θ (m) + ω (m) t] = [θ (s) + ω (s) t] + [n π = 0; n =0]

And θ (m) - θ (s) + = [ω (s) - ω (m)] t This is the time delay Illusion And, r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)]

And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] = (r

m 0/

r

s 0)

[θ’ (m) + ω (m)]
m 0/

And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = [(r
In arc second per century:

r

s 0)

-1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]

Is: [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = [(r
m 0/

r

s 0)

-1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)

And, r
And

m 0

[θ’ (m) + ω (m)] =

r

s 0

[θ’ (s) + ω (s)]

r

m 0

[θ’ (m) + ω (m)] =

r

e 0

[θ’ (e) + ω (e)] Page 12

And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] = [(r
In arc second per century:

m 0/

r

e 0)

-1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]

Is: [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = [(r
m 0/

r

e 0)

-1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = 43

r

m 0

M

M

M

Mercury

r

s 0

S

Sun

r

m 0

r

0

Is: r
Is: r

0

= distance between centers

max

= r 0 + (r = r 0 - (r

m 0

+r +r

s 0

) )

And r

min

m 0

s 0

And c = (r And a = (r

max

-r +r

min

)/2 = r )/2 = r

m 0

+r

s 0

max

min

0

With c = (r max - r min)/2 = r m And a = (r max + r min)/2 = r 0

0

+r

s 0

This establishes visual ellipse of semi major axis a, and a semi minor axis; b = √ (a² - c²) = a √ [1 – (c/a) ²] = a √ (1 – ε ²) And h = 2 π a b = 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²) Areal Velocity is: 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T

Mercury

r θ

Sun

Figure - 1

And Farthest distance = r

max

= r 0 + (r

m 0

+r

s 0

)=a+c

And closest distance = r

min

= r 0 - (r

m 0

+r

s 0

)=a-c

At closest approach: h =2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T And dividing h / (a – c) ² = 2 π a² √ (1 – ε ²)/T a² (1 – ε) ² Or r²θ' = h will give θ' (a) = 2 π √ (1 – ε ²)/T (1 – ε) ²
And for any motion θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2ỉ ω t And θ’ = {[cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] – 1} θ' 0 (θ, 0) And θ’ = θ’ (x) + í θ’ (y) = [cosine 2 ω t + í sine 2 ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0) And θ’ (x) = [cosine 2 ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0) = [1 – 2 sine² ω t] θ' 0 (θ, 0) And θ’ (x) - θ' (0) = - 2 θ' 0 (θ, 0) sine² ω t = -2(2π) [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t = - 4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² ω t Page 15

If this apsidal motion is to be found as visual effects, then

Mercur y

θ Ψ Sun

With, v ° = spin velocity; v* = orbital velocity And v/c = (v* + v°)/c = tan ω t = -4 π [√ (1-ε²)]/T (1-ε) ²] sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} radians Multiplication by 180/π to change to degrees Ψ ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days Ψ’’ (calculated) = (-720x36526/T days) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years

And in arc seconds per century:

Ψ’’ (calculated) = (-720x36526x3600/T days) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years = 43

Banger Georges Lemaitre and Time traveler Albert Einstein and Real Timer Joe Nahhas

Time Travel Bus Driver Einstein said that his proudest space – time travel achievement is the proof that planet Mercury travels with space angular velocity of 70.75 and time angular velocity of 43.0
Big Banger Georges Lemaitre said that The Universe came from a Big Bang Explosion Joe Nahhas said Buzz off: Einstein greatest achievement in space said Planet Mercury angular speed travel in space is 70.75 and in time 43 The Advance of Planet Mercury’s Perihelion given by space formula of:

G = 6.673 x 10-11= gravitational acceleration constant M =2x1030 kilogram = mass of the Sun Eccentricity of Mercury’s orbit = ε = 0.206 T= 88 days = period of Planet mercury’s rotation around the Sun And c = 299792.458 kilometer/second =light speed in kilometers/second And a = 58.2 x 106 km/sec = semi major axis of planet Mercury orbit In my 5th grade I did this: Angular velocity = θ’0 = θ’0 Visual angular velocity = θ’ = θ’ - Visual angular velocity = - θ’ = - θ’ Add line - 1 and Line – 2 and line - 3 Then θ’0 = θ’ + (θ’0 - θ’); Divide by θ’ And (θ’0/ θ’) = 1 + [(θ’0 – θ’)/ θ’]; multiply by θ’0 Then (θ’0/ θ’) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(θ’0 – θ’)/ θ’] θ’0 Quantum = classical + relativistic And [(θ’0 – θ’)/ θ’] θ’0 = [(2πR0 /T– 2πR/T)/ 2πR/T] θ’0 line - 1 line - 2 line - 3

[2 π/T] [180/π][36526/88][3600] = [2 π /88 x 24x3600] [180/π][36526/88][3600] = 70.75 And Einstein’s formula of: ψ = - 6 π GM/a c² (1 - ε²) [180/ π] [36526/T] [3600] = 43 angular velocity = angular speed of time travel of planet Mercury

Or, [(θ’0 – θ’)/ θ’] θ’0 = [(R0 - R)/R] θ’0 R0 = Mercury’s distance from the sun = 5.82 x 106 km R = Earth’s distance from the sun = 149.6 x 106 km And Mercury’s angular velocity; Is θ’0 = 2πR0/T = 2π x 5.82 x 106 /88x 24x3600 radians /period And Mercury’s angular velocity accumulation in arc seconds per century Is: δθ’0 = (2π x 5.82 x 106 /88x 24x3600) x (36526/88) (180/ π) (3600) = 70.75 [(R0 - R)/R] δθ’0 = [(5.82 x 106 - 149.6 x 106)/ 149.6 x 106] x (2π x 5.82 x 106 /88x 24x3600) x (36526/88) (180/ π) (3600) = 43.0 arc second per century Where this came from? It is called Arabs real time astronomy? Car size at distance 4

Car size at distance 3

Car size at distance 2

Car size at distance 1

Observer line: …………………Observer ……………… If we stand in the middle of the street and watch a car moving directly away from us we see as if the size of the car shrunk. If we take a picture of the car at different distances then we see that the pictures of the car look like as if the car contracted in size. The further the car away from us the smaller image of the car in the picture. The size of the

car did not change but real time light data reflected from the car and ran through air and into our eyes changes the real time image of the car to indicate a different location of the car and not a different size of the car. Our eyes see real time images of a moving car. If the car stops, then the image of the car freezes. A picture or a snap shot of a moving car is a frozen image of the moving car. When a car moves its real time image change size but the car does not change size. The car as a moving object at different distances has a variable real time image that our eyes see in real time and depends on distance and motion as perceived by our eyes. In short statements Our eyes see objects in real time as different objects at different distances and different speeds. Or, our eyes see real time objects we call images that change when measured from different distances or when moving. Our eyes do not see actual objects but Images of actual objects and our eyes see different images of same actual objects when at different distances of moving In mathematical form: 1 = 1 self evident 2 = 2 is self evident Image = image = I is self evident line - 1 Object = object = O = self evident line - 2 And, - Object = - objects = - O = self evident line - 3 I=I line - 1 O=O line - 2 And, - O = - O line - 3 Adding: line - 1 and line - 2 and line - 3 I + O – O = O + (I – O) line - 4 I = O + (I – O); O – O = 0 one left side (I/O) = (O/O) + (I – O)/O; dividing by on both sides line - 5 Or, (I/O) = 1 + (I – O)/O; O/O = 1 line - 6 (I/O) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(I – O)/O] θ’0 Line - 7 If we try to measure the angular velocity of planet Mercury around the sun θ’0 from planet Earth and not from the Sun a visual effect (error) of [(I – O)/O] θ’0 is measured that Einstein’s call time travel (I/O) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(I – O)/O] θ’0 Quantum = classical + relativistic What we see = what is + visual effects Real time object = event time Object + time delay object Real time astronomy = event time astronomy + time delay astronomy If we try to measure an object θ’0 we see it as (I/O) θ’0 and the difference accumulation: Is [(I – O)/O] θ’0 = visual effects And the accumulation is [(R0 - R)/R] δθ’0 And Planet Mercury angular velocity space travel Is δθ’0 = (2π x 5.82 x 106 /88x 24x3600) x (36526/88) (180/ π) (3600) = 70.75 And Arabs 10th century correction to idiot man of the 20th century Einstein

Is: [(R0 - R)/R] δθ’0 = [(5.82 x 106 - 149.6 x 106)/ 149.6 x 106] x (2π x 5.82 x 106 /88x 24x3600) x (36526/88) (180/ π) (3600) = 43.0 arc second per century Another method is the product method If two objects going in two different orbital paths around the Sun and one with speed v* m = planet Mercury Orbital speed around the Sun and one with speed v* e = Planet Earth orbital speed around the Sun; then the cross multiply is: (v* e - v° e/v m + v° m) δθ’0 = [(29.8 – 0.465)/47.9 + 0.465] (70.75) = 43 Buzz off Einstein Then came the big Banger The big Banger said that: r = r And r = r + 0 And r = r + (r0 - r0) And r = (r - r0) + r0; dividing by r0 Then: r/r0 = 1 +(r - r0)/r0 And: n λ /n λ 0= 1 + (n λ – n λ0)/ λ0 Or, λ/ λ0 = 1 + (λ – λ0)/ λ0 = 1 + Z This quantity [(λ - λ 0)/ λ 0] = Z = Red Shift is a measure of a different is an indication of a different location and not of an expanding Universe to claim big bang Distant r, λ

Lab r0, λ0 …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Lab λ0 will have a different value Lab λ0 when measured from a distant. That is: (r/r0) λ 0= λ 0 + [(r – r0)/ r0] λ0 Or, (λ / λ 0) r 0= r 0 + [(λ – λ 0)/ λ 0] r0 The conclusion is that if we use distance scale to measure wavelength λ0 We will measure it as λ and a wavelength distance Illusion delay by the quantity of [(r – r0)/ r0] λ0 will be added or subtracted to λ0 And if we use wavelength scale to measure distance r0; then a distance wavelength Illusion delay by the quantity of [(λ – λ 0)/ λ 0] r0 will be added or subtracted to distance r0 What Lemaitre confusion is distance Illusion expansion of [(λ – λ 0)/ λ 0] r0 when he tried to measure r0

Nahhas confession to these two: “I am real timer and I am a proud American redneck and yall Idiots; Big Bang and Time Travel is a purely western stupidity”

All rights reserved 156 All rights reserved

Sign up to vote on this title
UsefulNot useful