This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Economic Analytical Unit
©Commonwealth of Australia 2007 This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth available through the Attorney-General’s Department. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Copyright Law Branch, Attorney-General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Canberra ACT 2600 or by email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Australia. Dept. of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Economic Analytical Unit. India’s services sector: unlocking opportunity. Bibliography. ISBN 9781921244056. 1. Service industries - India. 2. India - Commerce. 3. India - Economic conditions. 4. India - Economic policy. I. Title. 338.470954 Editing by Peter Judge. Typesetting by Lyn Lalor. Production by Jean Penny, Pirion Print and Design. Cover photo by Adrian Westwood, Firefly Creative.
with India running out of hard currency. the health of the international economy. most recently. If so. initiated by the then Finance Minister Dr Manmohan Singh in 1991. a degree of deregulation. These figures call to mind the performance of the economic success stories of East Asia – Japan. India’s entrepreneurial spirit was unleashed. provided the momentum for a major reduction of the role of the public sector in the economy. what factors need to be taken into account along the way as Australian companies consider whether they should be seeking to participate directly in India’s growth? 1 1 While some contend that growth picked up in the 1980s. studies by a number of prominent analytical organisations have projected that India could even outperform these dynamic economies over the next fifty years. Chief Mentor. Confederation of Indian Industries]. Between 1991 and 2005 the economy expanded at an annual average of around six per cent. In the past three years growth has been higher still. but this was largely a reflection of the liberalisation and deregulation measures under Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi as well as expansionary policies that ended in the economic crisis of June 1991.2 per cent in the third quarter of 2006. Growth was strong over 1988–89 to 1990–91. Panagariya (2005) points out that growth was patchy. Well it might. Manmohan Singh…decided that India had to open its economy. The result has been a shift from India’s traditional annual GDP growth rates of around 3. The World is Flat) Optimism abounds in India. It was the more systematic and deeper reforms commencing in 1991 that helped sustain India’s economic growth. and the shape of the international trading system. Growth for 2006–07 may be even higher. at around eight per cent. Keynote reforms. new developments in technology. Too much is dependent on factors which cannot be plausibly predicted. Any such attempt would be futile. This study does not seek either to substantiate or to disprove these rosy projections. Taiwan. such as the ongoing willingness and ability of Indian governments to sustain a reform program over long periods. these studies claim. P A G E iii . by 2050 India could be the third-largest economy in the world (in market exchange rate terms) by a significant margin. Such developments would profoundly shift the world’s economic centre of gravity. the high-growth ASEAN economies and. behind only China and the United States. China. and greater integration of India’s economy into international markets.’ (Thomas Friedman. Instead we ask: How might it happen? Is there a plausible path from today’s India to the projected giant economy of 2050? What opportunities might successful pursuit of that path generate for Australian services providers? And finally. Extrapolating from macro factors – such as demographics and potential for technological ‘catch-up’ – and assuming an ongoing reform effort.Executive Summary executive summaryi ‘In 1991. “Our Berlin Wall fell…and it was like unleashing a caged tiger… We went from quiet self-confidence to outrageous ambition in a decade” [Tarun Das. with the economy expanding at an annualised rate of 9. the Republic of Korea.5 per cent to a much faster growth trajectory.
it must demonstrate benefits to all strata of society. this idea. development of the services sector occurs after developments in agriculture and manufacturing. construction. hoW can the services boom lead to sustainable groWth? For the reformist approach that has led to India’s recent growth to be politically sustainable in the medium to long term. knowledge-intensive services exports. But the main driver of growth in the economy since 1991 has been a knowledge-intensive sector. this would involve growth of dynamic services export sectors such as Information Technology–Information Technology Enabled Services (IT–ITES). In India’s case. based on the WTO definition of services which includes construction. Services have consistently grown at a faster pace than the economy as a whole since 1991. unlike virtually all other regions of the world. and consequently to job creation on the necessary scale. providing a major stimulus to domestic demand and hence catalysing reform and growth in other sectors – including infrastructure development. In terms of per capita income India remains a poor country. rural working class. How to resolve the two? Fieldwork in the course of this study suggested that. They now occupy some 60 per cent of India’s GDP. Productivity growth in India. Put simply. Though somewhat speculative. India’s recent growth has been led by the dynamism of its services sector – particularly high-end. which is elaborated in Chapter 1. particularly manufacturing. and the income that growth brings to the country. by contrast. nor that the profile of India’s economy will remain static over time. It is the consequent growth in these other sectors. The key imperative for Indian policy-makers is to improve the situation of a huge and growing. But to date. is of interest because it provides a plausible road map by which current developments might lead to the long-term projections.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Why services? This report focuses specifically on the services sector because of the central importance of services to India’s current economic expansion. and their sheer size within the economy means they will continue to have a critical role. it has been services that have led the way. P A G E iv . but relatively low skilled. This is not to say that developments in other sectors are unimportant. in the minds of many participants in the Indian economy. for example. while that of agriculture – still far and away the largest employer – has dwindled. there is a plausible route by which services-led growth could lead to broader-based development. Yet the services-dependent profile of its economy is much closer to that which has typically been associated with middle-income developing countries. has been strongest in services (IMF 2006). Manufacturing. This means creating vast numbers of appropriate jobs. when the reform effort was kicked off in earnest. In general. This is an unusual growth path. there are signs of an acceleration in the growth of India’s manufacturing sector. has maintained a stubbornly static share in the economy at around 20 per cent. which might be expected to provide the bulk of the required jobs over time. which is never likely to become a mass employer of low-skilled labour. Already. the reverse has occurred. Whereas the East Asian economies’ success has largely been built on the development of export-oriented manufacturing. manufacturing and retail.
financial services. private healthcare. PAGE v . the better performing services sub-sectors either have not been subject to significant amounts of regulation (notably IT–ITES) or have been deregulated and opened up to competition (most prominently. A modern economy demands both an efficient telecommunications infrastructure to facilitate rapid information exchange and communication between economic units. other services sectors also have a crucial role to play. Their expansion has in large part been based on external demand. Broadly speaking. which should in turn fuel increased domestic demand. Knowledge-based industries have been prominent among the fastest growing services. as employment grows.Executive Summary It also provides a framework for examination of India’s services sector as a whole which highlights the differing roles that different sub-sectors might play as the economy develops – and hence the differing types and timeframes for opportunities that are likely to arise for Australian services providers. educated workforce. High-end services such as IT–ITES have an important role to play in India’s overall development on two levels. It also requires increasing sophistication in areas such as transport and power infrastructure to prevent disruptions to production and enable goods to be moved efficiently around the country. to expansion of the IT sector. and biotechnology services. and in education and training to ensure that there is sufficient skilled labour to allow the economy to modernise. the roles of different sub-sectors Within an overall framework of services-led growth. creating requirements for new buildings and infrastructure. and has resulted in a significant increase in export earnings. and a financial sector which is able to provide sophisticated intermediation between capital providers and capital users so that resources are allocated efficiently within the economy. Increased inward investment flows stemming from a relaxation of restrictions on foreign investment and particular inducements such as Special Economic Zones (SEZs) have helped underpin the performance of some of the faster growing services sectors. The relative lack of regulation and modest capital requirements in these industries have enabled them to capitalise on the advantages of a low-cost. as well as burgeoning inflows of foreign direct investment. technological advances and widespread English-language capabilities. retail. and logistics – thereby improving productivity in those sectors and further enhancing growth prospects. As growth continues. but several other key services are also growing strongly. with most of the multinational ‘majors’ now represented in India. and will continue to lead. different services sub-sectors clearly have different roles to play. This success has led. including telecommunications. The rapid expansion of the export-oriented IT–ITES sector is much lauded. as well as the growth of an increasingly sophisticated and affluent consumer class. telecommunications and domestic air travel). These are examined in Chapter 2. consulting services. India’s world-class knowledge-based services are also increasingly assuming importance for the inputs they provide for other sectors of the Indian domestic economy – such as manufacturing.
Modernisation of airports is under way. Power shortages also remain a major constraint on growth – albeit one which the government is now seeking to address. Wipro. Already shopping malls are springing up all over India in the face of seemingly insatiable demand. less regulated by comparison with manufacturing. roads. economic activity in this area is mirroring familiar developments in the manufacturing sector. P A G E vi . Where they might do so is examined in Chapter 3. so have its imports. In relation to IT–ITES. including through the introduction of mechanisms designed to promote private and international investment in the sector. Australia has very real strengths in this area and is well placed to participate in emerging services production networks – particularly in high-end services such as Information and Communications Technology (ICT)-enabled research and analysis. Production is becoming more fragmented. opportunities for australian services providers The range and extent of changes that are foreseeable in the Indian economy as it continues to develop suggest that. substantial investment is required in these sectors to bring them to an acceptable standard. Significant changes have occurred in the financial sector. Australian services providers should be looking to a number of other sectors in considering how they might participate in India’s ongoing growth. But it is very much a two-way process. The first hypermarkets and department stores are starting to emerge – again bringing with them requirements for skills and approaches which to date have been little required in India. pressure for change can only be expected to increase as Indians increasingly travel overseas and experience international standards of service in these areas. Within another sector crucial to the health of the economy – transport infrastructure – the picture is mixed. India’s role in creating and leading a ‘tradability revolution’ in services merits strong attention from Australian business. The most commonly highlighted aspect of this phenomenon has been the trend towards business process outsourcing and ‘offshoring’ of services to India. reflecting a fundamental change in the way services are produced and delivered worldwide. providing jobs for locals in host markets – including Australia. such as Infosys. resulting in a rapid increase in services trade. And its major IT companies. Satyam and Tata Consulting Services (to name but a few). Specialised activities are taking place in diverse locations. although foreign investment in banking and insurance remains heavily constrained. While complete liberalisation of foreign investment rules in these areas is fraught with political difficulty and likely to be some way off. As India’s exports of business services have exploded. but it has been fraught with delays and is struggling to keep pace with the major expansion in air travel that is taking place in India. Essentially. are increasingly expanding overseas. As reform and growth continues in other areas. these sectors can also be expected to come under further pressure to deregulate and modernise. although most services have been. including modern distribution systems and integrated supply chains. as well as focusing on the obvious growth areas of IT–ITES. Some business services important to facilitating growth – such as legal and accountancy services – remain largely protected from foreign competition. Ports have been considerably opened up to competition. and to a greater extent.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Reform measures within these ‘enabling’ sub-sectors vary considerably. as does the retail sector. and remain. but while reform has begun in respect of railways.
While Australian direct investment in India’s services sector is presently at modest levels. in large part reflecting the strength of education exports – a direct spin-off from India’s rapid growth.Executive Summary While a key focus of the dozens of Indian IT companies operating in Australia is the provision of IT solutions to local companies. Indian companies have made substantial investments in Australia’s services sector. The bilateral commercial relationship has developed rapidly into one of vitality and energy. expanding bilateral economic ties The base of bilateral commercial activity on which Australian companies can build has grown rapidly. with more than 38 700 Indian student enrolments in Australian educational institutions for the 11 months to November 2006. At the official level. Australia and India concluded a Trade and Economic Framework (TEF) in March 2006. Relevant areas include infrastructure development and related consultancy services. Chapter 4 examines this activity. India ranks twelfth overall as a trading partner of Australia. Numerous visits to India by senior Australian Ministers – highlighted by that of Prime Minister Howard in March 2006 – underpin what is now a major trading relationship. P A G E vii . While India is home to a number of world class companies. including through the establishment of operations offshore and distance learning programs. biotechnology. most notably in IT. is that of education and training. It will be important for Australian companies to understand the export opportunities created by complementarities between Indian and Australian services providers in this area. which provides a clear structure for the further development of commercial relations. telecommunications. healthcare services. Despite high levels of publicity for the relocation of corporate functions to India by some major companies. financial services. information technology. there is ample scope for this relationship to continue to grow in the medium term – particularly as institutions take the opportunity to diversify their approaches to provision of education and training. Given the skills India’s development is likely to demand. principally at tertiary level. Australian companies also have significant expertise that could augment India’s capabilities or meet India’s needs. India has been Australia’s second-fastest growing services export market over the past five years. This number is still growing rapidly. As the trend to deliver services through international networks develops. sports and related infrastructure. cooperation and collaboration between Australian and Indian firms to service third markets could expand to the benefit of both countries. A major relationship already exists in this field. particularly in the context of New Delhi’s hosting of the 2010 Commonwealth Games. particularly in IT–ITES. film and television. retail and logistics. and legal and accountancy services. Perhaps the most striking example. mining services. it is set to increase with some recent investment decisions and conclusion of contracts. Total trade surpassed A$10 billion for the first time in 2005–06. tourism and travel-related services. a number of these companies are also using their Australian subsidiaries to secure or help take advantage of global market opportunities – leading to high-quality employment opportunities for Australians. however. the balance of bilateral services trade is firmly in Australia’s favour. with strong support from governments.
whose capacity to engender fellow-feeling should not be underestimated. as always. through migration and education. produced three possible scenarios for the future of the Indian economy. only one of which leads unequivocally to strong growth and broad-based development – and one of which leads equally unequivocally in the opposite direction (WEF 2005). It is clear that many other less optimistic scenarios are also possible. which represent a potential asset when it comes to exploiting trade and investment opportunities. achieved through low-profile. it also poses significant challenges. and barriers and burdens that exist both formally in the regulatory framework and informally in the way it is administered. the final chapter of this report. vocal and critical media have improved transparency for business. So is cricket. and foreign participation.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY india’s business environment A credible story can be told that would see the pattern of knowledge-intensive service-driven development which has been embarked upon by India feeding into the robust growth trajectory projected by Goldman Sachs and others. There are also significant people-to-people links. and has been. The key question will be the ability of successive governments to sustain the momentum of reform. However. of ongoing reform. Much can be. administrative measures. and the tenacity and resilience to overcome setbacks or delays. particularly in flagship areas such as labour policy. reduction in bureaucratic discretion over licences and permits. Key challenges include power and transport infrastructure shortcomings. Success demands significant investment of time and effort in understanding the business environment. If the necessary political support is to be achieved. There are some similarities in the legal systems of the two countries. though these should not be overstated. privatisation. The success of reform in generating growth to date appears to have engendered a critical mass of political opinion that is in favour. but feedback from businesses active in the Indian market continues to suggest that issues remain. Europe and China. Recent efforts to broaden the base of the business relationships by federal and state government-led business missions to India have helped raise Australia’s profile and improve Indian awareness of Australian capabilities and expertise in a number of areas. Chapter 5. in principle. English is widely spoken. Prerequisites for building a successful business in the Indian market include thorough research and preparation. relatively reasonably priced and friendly destination for their children’s education. seeks to identify relevant considerations for Australian companies considering a deeper involvement in India as a market for services exports. P A G E viii . That said. Indians perceive Australia as a safe. the jury will remain out for some time on whether the benign scenario of ongoing growth – and particularly increased employment and welfare across the Indian economy – will come to pass. While India presents as a potentially attractive market for many Australian businesses. despite facing fierce competition for India’s attention from larger players such as the United States. achieving major necessary reforms remains difficult. it is important that the benefits of economic growth are seen to be widely distributed. especially for smaller Australian companies. for example. and the ability to take a long-term view of the market. Increasing automation of transactions. careful selection of a business partner or customer. whether through trade or investment. and the activities of a free. is in the detail. But the devil. Work by the World Economic Forum in collaboration with the Confederation of Indian Industry. Australian companies enjoy a degree of benefit from favourable Indian perceptions of their country.
construction management and consulting services Education and training services Tourism and travel-related services Film and television Sports and related infrastructure Healthcare services Research Mining services Retail Logistics Professional services CHAPTER 4 THE BILATERAL ECONOmIC RELATIONSHIP Key points Overview of the relationship Trade in services Services investment A platform for future growth iii ix 1 1 2 4 7 12 14 15 15 17 28 35 40 45 49 49 51 52 53 54 56 59 61 62 62 63 64 64 65 65 67 67 68 70 77 84 P A G E ix . agriculture and mining CHAPTER 3 OPPORTUNITIES FOR AUSTRALIAN SERVICE PROVIDERS IN INDIA Key points Information technology Telecommunications Financial services Infrastructure.Table of Contents table of contentsi ExECUTIVE SUmmARY TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 SERVICES AND INDIA’S RISE Key points Introduction: an emerging giant The importance of services Drivers of services sector growth The way forward Implications CHAPTER 2 THE ROLE OF SERVICES IN DEVELOPmENT Key points The drivers The contributors The slower reformers Sectors vital to broad-based development Interrelationship of services with manufacturing.
INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY CHAPTER 5 INDIA’S BUSINESS ENVIRONmENT: ImPLICATIONS FOR AUSTRALIAN COmPANIES Key points An improving business environment Advantages for Australian companies Remaining hurdles Strategies for success 87 87 89 100 101 107 109 125 125 127 131 REFERENCES AUTHORS ECONOmIC ANALYTICAL UNIT ACKNOwLEDGmENTS ALSO BY THE ECONOmIC ANALYTICAL UNIT PAGE x .
in which India’s high-end services providers are playing a major role. – Rapidly increasing two-way trade in information technology and information technology enabled services (IT–ITES) and other high-end services sub-sectors has been a critical factor in India’s improved economic performance. • Services have been a major contributor to India’s strong recent GDP growth.Chapter 1 services and india’s risei Key points • Developments in India’s services sector potentially have worldwide significance. and – changes in patterns of services production worldwide. measured at market exchange rates. • If accompanied by further economic reforms. increased demand for goods and services in the Indian economy resulting from the success of high-end services has the potential to drive robust growth in the medium term. – Services have helped underpin India’s economic vibrancy through their linkages with other sectors of the economy. PAGE 1 . – Implementation of the reforms required to bring this growth about could engender changes in key services sectors that would open opportunities for participation by foreign companies. – the unusually large role services play in the economy overall by comparison with other countries at similar stages of development. which could be the third-largest in the world by a significant margin in 2050. given – the rapidly increasing importance of India’s economy.
citing India’s growing workforce and the scope for it to increase productivity dramatically through technological ‘catch-up’ with the West. Employing similar assumptions. Brazil and Mexico. and no major adverse shocks. far ahead of its previous sluggish performance. compared to 3.5 per cent.0 and 8. the analyses of Goldman Sachs et al would point to a significant re-alignment of the global economic order. PricewaterhouseCoopers forecast real average GDP growth of 5. and most commentators estimate that India should be able to sustain growth rates of between 7. McKinsey & Company) introduction: an emerging giant The first-time visitor to one of India’s major cities cannot but be struck by the energy.2 per cent per annum in India through to 2050. The Economist 2006a and ADB 2006). Goldman Sachs projects that by 2050 the Indian and Chinese economies will respectively be around 80 and 125 per cent of the size of the US economy. suggest India could be the world’s fastest growing major economy over the next 50 years.2 per cent during the third quarter of 2006. If realised. entrepreneurialism and optimism that abounds there.9 per cent in China. They suggest India’s economy could rival – at market exchange rates – the size of the largest European countries by 2020 and outstrip Japan by 2032 to become the world’s third-largest economy after the United States and China (Goldman Sachs 2003). IMF 2006. the optimism seems well-founded. as emerging economies.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY ‘[Information Technology (IT) and IT Enabled Services] can do for India what automotives did for Japan and oil for Saudi Arabia. resulting in reduced public sector participation in the economy.5 per cent in the near term (see for example. tapering off slightly after that (Goldman Sachs 2003). The Economist Intelligence Unit projects annual average growth in India’s real GDP of 5. If much of the international commentary is to be believed. In purchasing power parity terms. and significant deregulation. ongoing reform. India’s economic growth has averaged around six per cent. Principal. Clearly. Since those reforms. India is doing something right. A chorus of recent long-term projections.5 to 8.’ (Noshir Kaka. Goldman Sachs predicts annual real GDP growth of around six per cent through to 2040. and 4. India is already the world’s fourth-largest economy and will become the third-largest much sooner. PAGE 2 . GDP grew at 9. greater openness to international competition. and over the past three years growth has been of the order of 7. Measured at market exchange rates. outstripping even China and other emerging market economies. Assuming the maintenance of growth-supportive policy settings. come to account for a much larger share of global economic output. led by China and India. These projections build on an impressive growth record since the then Finance Minister (and now Prime Minister) Manmohan Singh initiated key economic reforms in June 1991.8 per cent in Indonesia (PricewaterhouseCoopers 2006).9 per cent through to 2030 (The Economist 2005b).
so that they are able to respond strategically when they do. will have important implications not just for India itself. The report concludes that successful pursuit of India’s current growth path could open a wide range of opportunities for Australian services providers. but the tasks – both practical and political – which confront it in maintaining the momentum of reform remain huge. This report has deliberately focused on the implications of India pursuing its current growth trajectory successfully. and the reform and change within India which would need to accompany it. this is by no means the only possibility. whether growth generated in what remains one relatively small sector of the economy will translate into reform and growth in other sectors. Both sustained growth. But China and the ASEAN countries rose to prominence through the rapid expansion of their export-oriented manufacturing. By contrast. In considering the potential for opportunities to arise in India. India’s growth path to date resembles those of other key developing economies in Asia. as numerous studies make clear. would create demand for new skills and capabilities within the Indian economy. The current leadership is likewise reformist in orientation. India has profited significantly from the reformist approach of its recent governments. fuelled by significant foreign investment. rapid growth in an export-oriented sector has been a key stimulus for growth in the economy as a whole. The extent to which India’s growth path can be sustained. and in particular whether it can adequately address India’s need to provide jobs for huge numbers of its unemployed and underemployed rural citizens. Australian companies need also to be fully cognisant of the hurdles that remain to be overcome. It is important that Australian companies are aware of the potential for these opportunities to arise. It describes the role that headline growth sectors such as IT–ITES and telecommunications would play in catalysing reform and growth in other areas of the services sector and the Indian economy more broadly if this path to development is successfully pursued. But.Servces and India’s Rise In one important respect. services – led by exports of business services from India’s burgeoning information technology and information technology enabled services (IT–ITES) sectors – have been the chief source of India’s recent economic success. That is. This report examines the contribution of India’s services sector to the unfolding story of India’s economic development. It is equally important that Australian companies remain aware of the caveats that surround this optimistic scenario. but also for the world economy. PAGE 3 . either through direct service provision or through education and training. Australian enterprises would be well placed to provide many of these capabilities.
Sources: United Nations Statistics Division 2006 for services to GDP data. Table 3 for pre-1999–2000 services to GDP data on India. Typically. financial services. IMF World Economic Outlook Database 2006 for 2004 per capita GDP data. This is consistent with the WTO General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). while industry’s share plateaus or declines. PAGE 4 . health related and social services. transport services and other services not included elsewhere. 1 In this report construction is included as part of the services sector. cultural and sporting services. The other major sectors are business services. RBI 2005b. tourism and travel related services. Pre 1999–2000 services to GDP data for India are 1993–94 price data.1). services’ share tends to grow more rapidly. Generally. 2004 services to GDP data for Thailand and Malaysia are not available. communication services. educational services. recreational. which includes construction and related engineering services as one of 12 major services sectors. distribution services. Indian CSO 2006 for 1999–2000 to 2004–05 services to GDP data on India. which have been melded to available 1999–2000 price data. service industries develop on a large scale after agriculture and manufacturing have reached a certain stage of development. initially centred on labour-intensive production.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY the importance of services The strength and importance of India’s services sector distinguish it from Asia’s other developing countries (Figure 1. The share of both industry and services in GDP tends to increase as per capita incomes rise and the economy progresses from low to lower-middle income status. 1 Figure 1.1 India’s ‘X’ factor: a dominant and growing services sector Services as a proportion of GDP (five year averages) and 2004 per capita GDP in selected Asian economies India’s services sector is larger and growing faster than that of economies with higher per capita GDP 70 60 Per cent of GDP 50 40 1985–89 1990–94 1995–99 2000–04 2004 per capita GDP 16000 14000 12000 10000 8000 Current USD 30 6000 20 10 0 Vietnam India Indonesia China Thailand Malaysia Republic of Korea 4000 2000 0 Notes: Services to GDP data are at constant 1990 prices in US dollars. As the economy moves to upper-middle income levels. as development proceeds. environmental services. agriculture’s share in national output contracts and a parallel expansion of industry takes place.
In 1970–71. RBI 2005b. while its growth is accelerating.2 Services sector gaining ground Sector shares in GDP (at factor cost and 1999–2000 prices).2). productivity grew most rapidly in services. By 2005–06. Table 3 for pre-1999–2000 data. compared with just 2.Servces and India’s Rise India’s manufacturing sector is biased towards capital-intensive production. the services sector grew at a trend rate of 7. It has remained largely static at around 20 per cent of the economy and. Indian CSO 2006 for 1999–2000 to 2004–05 data. 2 Throughout the report. 2 Figure 1.7 per cent (Figure 1. in per cent.1 per cent for industry and 6. 6. It contributed 70 per cent of overall GDP growth over the period. Over the period 1991–92 to 2005–06. In this respect. in contrast to the general pattern observed in other countries where productivity growth was stronger in manufacturing and agriculture (IMF 2006).9 per cent. The upward trend in services’ share of Indian GDP has accelerated since the major economic reforms initiated in 1991.6 per cent for agriculture. Between 1980–2004. it was 48 per cent. . India appears more typical of a middle-income developing economy than a low-income economy. which have been melded to available 1999–2000 price data. 1990–91 to 2005–06 100 80 Per cent of GDP 60 40 20 0 1990–91 2000–01 1993–94 1997–98 1999–00 1991–92 1992–93 1994–95 1995–96 1996–97 1998–99 2001–02 2003–04 2004–05 2002–03 2005–06 PAGE 5 Services Notes: Industry Agriculture Pre 1999–2000 data are 1993–94 price data.1 per cent for the economy overall. Sources: PIB 2006 for 2005–06 data. has not thus far benefited appreciably from strong growth in exports due to the trend to integrated international production systems (see Chapter 2). it stood at just 39 per cent. By 1990–91. Indian fiscal year data are for the April – March fiscal year. services’ share of GDP had risen to 60.
are vital to facilitating expansion of other sectors of the economy.6 per cent based on the earlier 1993–94 price data.1: measurement of services in the national accounts Services contributed 59.1). uniform across India’s services sector. transportation and transport infrastructure. much remains to be done. are compiled through indirect methods. given the fast-changing nature of some services sectors. While reform is proceeding in these areas.0 per cent. somewhat short of the eight per cent target set in the Plan.6) of manufacturing and services. And other sectors which potentially have a critical role to play in improving overall productivity have lagged far behind growth in the economy as a whole. box 1. PAGE 6 . as investment and rapid advancements in telecommunications infrastructure and information technology enable an increasing array of activities to be performed remotely. Under-reporting of incomes may also take place in some sectors.7 per cent of GDP in 2004–05 according to GDP data at 1999–2000 prices – compared with 57. Growth is not. Services may be even more important and growing somewhat faster than the official data would suggest (Box 1. using indicators to extrapolate benchmark GDP estimates in a base year (Indian CSO 2006). Certain services stand out in terms of their role in driving economic growth. GDP estimates for the ‘unorganised’ segments (as defined in Box 2. while total GDP grew at 7. This could in turn help ensure that development is more broadly based across both regions and socio-economic groups – and therefore sustainable. Their success has come largely through rapid expansion of exports tapping into burgeoning world-wide demand. Faced with relatively low levels of regulation.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Growth in services likewise exceeded overall growth in the economy over 2002–03 to 2005–06. however.1 per cent average growth. Deregulation and foreign investment in such facilitating services drive improved performance within those sectors and bring significant competitiveness benefits to the wider economy given their importance as inputs to other sectors. Building on India’s large pool of engineering talent and its rapidly expanding telecommunications sector. the first four years of the tenth Five Year Plan (2002–07). such as financial services. Weightings used to calculate 1999–2000 price estimates may not reflect activity weightings that would be more appropriate today. The sector recorded a robust 9. IT–ITES and other fast-growing high-end services such as telecommunications have now reached a size where they are significant contributors to GDP growth. Growth and improved efficiencies in other key areas. as well as for some segments of private organised services sectors. Moreover the official data do not capture all economic activity equally well. IT–ITES have in recent years been the key catalyst of growth.
investment and rapid technological advancements in telecommunications and information technology are driving reductions to the cost of digitising.6 billion. one should find “infrastructure camels” – those industries and firms that are thriving should be less than usually reliant on infrastructure.3 billion (RBI 2006a). transport infrastructure is scarce. Around 85 per cent of the growth in services exports in 2005–06 was attributable to growth in commercial services excluding transportation and travel (RBI 2006a). Specifically.Servces and India’s Rise drivers of services sector groWth ‘The aphorism “In a desert one should find camels not hippopotamuses” is a good guide to analyzing the pattern of economic growth.6). which contains more English-speakers than the United States and Britain combined (Chapter 5). and so less subject to investment-related regulatory hurdles (Indian Planning Commission 2002a). social and personal services) is more concentrated in the largely unregulated ‘unorganised’ sector (as defined in Box 2. Compared with the manufacturing sector. However some other important influences should be noted. consistent with the comment from the World Bank cited above. total services imports more than doubled to US$38. These factors are examined further below. say. deregulation. In an economic environment where. liberalisation of foreign investment and greater private sector participation since 1991.’ (World Bank 2006a) Strong growth in foreign demand. transmitting and processing information. Booming services trade India’s services trade has grown at a phenomenal rate in recent times reflecting strong growth in foreign demand. reflecting the two-way nature of trade opportunities generated by growth in the commercial services sector. not those reliant on water. Services tend to be less dependent on large-scale investments. The IT–ITES sector in particular has benefited from a supportive policy approach. gross product in services sectors (outside of community. In 2005–06 they were valued at US$60. Exports grew at a trend annual growth rate of 20 per cent over the ten years to 2004–05. Imports of commercial services excluding transportation and travel accounted for some 60 per cent of the total growth in services imports in 2005–06 (RBI 2006a). Technological developments have been the key enabler of the explosion in commercial services trade. particularly for IT–ITES. relatively low cost. has enabled India to capitalise on burgeoning export opportunities in high-end services. A large. then one should find animals adapted to a scarcity of water. up over 40 per cent on their 2004–05 value (RBI 2006a). Transport infrastructure shortcomings also tend to have a lesser bearing on most services sectors. If rain is scarce. increased industry outsourcing. and high income elasticity of demand for services have been among the key factors driving high growth in India’s services sector (Gordon and Gupta 2004). Services imports have demonstrated a similar pattern of strong growth. and well-educated workforce. Between 2003–04 and 2005–06. thereby enabling an ever increasing number of services to be undertaken remotely by specialist PAGE 7 .
as the ‘tradability revolution’ results in rapidly increasing trade in services. the dotcom bust of 2000. The customer potentially has access to a top international designer and a range of possible new hairstyle choices. Fundamental changes are occurring in the way service activities are undertaken and delivered worldwide. 3 3 Based on discussions in May 2006 with Professor S. All of a sudden. with its large cohort of engineering graduates and the widespread English language skills of its population. By ‘unbundling’ the hairdressing service in this way. there is a hairdressing shop where the appointment commences with the customer sitting while her head is photographed from many different angles. the hairdressing shop is able both to increase its efficiency and provide a better service. and in telecommunications have enabled packages of digitised information to be moved around the globe almost instantaneously. India. which left a global network of broadband on the market from failed telecommunications companies that was subsequently snapped up for a fraction of its cost. International Institute of Information Technology. maximising the value added by each. In Bangalore. But it is indicative of the entrepreneurialism being applied in India to exploiting its competitive advantage in IT Enabled Services. which requires the deliverer of the service (the hairdresser) to be physically located next to the recipient.2). This rather elaborate approach to hairdressing may never become widespread. Sadagopan. box 1. and the hairdresser and designer can focus on their respective specialised skills. But companies are re-examining their approach to service delivery as advances in information technology. PAGE 8 . The haircut. The designer produces and transmits back to the shop a range of suggested hairstyles. The digitised images are then processed so as to produce an accurate representation of the customer’s scalp. which is transmitted to a designer in a remote location. the haircut – or part of it – has become a tradable service. from which the customer can then choose. for example. economists have tended to think of services either as ‘tradable’ or ‘non-tradable’. India’s commercial services imports have experienced similar meteoric growth. has been a particular beneficiary of this services tradability revolution (Box 1.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY providers. In particular. has often been regarded as the archetypal ‘non-tradable’ service. the overall outcome has been a dramatic increase in India’s exports of commercial services excluding transportation and travel. But as the graph on the right demonstrates.2: rethinKing the haircut – india and the services tradability revolution Traditionally. Bangalore. drastically reduced the cost of broadband communications (Friedman 2005). As the graph on the left of the next page shows. Director. without hair.
4). . Foreign Investment and deregulation Liberalisation of foreign direct investment (FDI) regimes worldwide has enabled service providers to establish a commercial presence in host countries. which can be critical for the delivery of services (UNCTAD 2004). The stock of FDI in India’s services sector grew at a compound annual rate of 36 per cent between 1992–93 and 2001–02. compared with 20 per cent in other sectors (World Bank 2004). owing to the difficulties of measuring investment in the sector. Table 146 for pre 1999–2000 data. the telecommunications sector has also attracted significant inflows of FDI. Business and computer services and the finance and insurance sectors have been the main targets (Figure 1. Not surprisingly these are sectors that either have not been subject to significant amounts of regulation or have been deregulated and opened to competition since 1991. Reflecting the strong international demand for services in which India enjoys a comparative advantage.2 (continued) Booming two-way trade in commercial services India’s services trade (US$ billion) 70 45 40 35 Exports 60 50 Imports US$ billion 40 30 20 10 0 1996–97 2000–01 1995–96 1998–99 2001–02 2002–03 2003–04 1997–98 1999–00 2005–06 2004–05 US$ billion 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1996–97 1995–96 1998–99 2000–01 2001–02 2002–03 1997–98 1999–00 2003–04 2004–05 2005–06 PAGE 9 Commercial services excluding travel and transportation Total services Note: 2005–06 data are provisional. RBI 2005b. Close to one-half of total FDI inflows between 2002–03 and 2005–06 were directed to services (RBI 2005d.Servces and India’s Rise box 1. FDI in India’s services has grown strongly. According to data from the Indian Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP). 2006b). Commercial services excluding travel and transportation Total services Sources: RBI 2006a for 1999–2000 to 2005–06 data. 5 4 4 5 The official data may underestimate the level of foreign investment in services.
as firms appeared increasingly to look to services inputs to meet intensifying competition precipitated by the reforms (Banga and Goldar 2004). Table 1. The trade reforms of the 1990s were a significant factor behind manufacturing industries’ greater reliance on services inputs.3 Growing services FDI is concentrated in a few key sectors Industry breakdown of FDI inflows in Indian services. RBI 2006b. design and testing. up from just one per cent in the 1980s (Banga and Goldar 2004). 6 Increased private consumption of services High levels of domestic consumption are fuelling growth in both the services sector and the broader Indian economy (Das 2006). Japan (55 per cent) and China (42 per cent) 6 Gordon and Gupta (2004) find empirical evidence of industry’s increased resource to contract out services over the 1980s and early 1990s.71. Table 1.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Figure 1. 2002–03 to 2005–06 900 800 700 600 US$ million 500 400 300 200 100 0 2002–03 2003–04 2004–05 2005–06 Computer services Finance. Private consumption expenditure accounts for 64 per cent of India’s GDP – more than in Europe (58 per cent). Increased industry outsourcing of services Indian industry has increasingly sought to contract out an array of services previously produced in house (Gordon and Gupta 2004) . P A G E 10 . Services inputs contributed around 25 per cent of total output growth in India’s organised manufacturing sector in the 1990s. back-office functions and post-sales service.76. although continuing restrictions on foreign equity holdings in some sectors and other constraints and impediments to business have a restraining effect. insurance. Industry’s increased reliance on services inputs in turn appears to be having a marked effect on increasing manufacturing output. hotels and restaurants Other services Sources: RBI 2005d. real estate and business services Construction Transport Health and medical services Trade. such as software development. The fast growing Indian services market offers considerable potential for foreign investors.
the number of households able to afford an increasing range and quality of services is clearly growing rapidly. box 1. By 2009–10. India’s National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) estimates that in 2001–02 there were some 53 million households (comprising around 280 million people) with annual incomes of Rs90 000 (US$1900) or more. Growing affluence and a rapidly increasing middle class (Box 1. Services were prominent among the segments of private consumption expenditure that grew at annual rates of above 15 per cent over the decade to 2003 (Ernst & Young 2005a).3: an increasingly affluent middle class India has a large and growing consumer class.3) have helped power growth over more recent years. and education. Consumption expenditure on movies and theatres and vacations each increased by around 30 per cent in 2003 (KSA Technopak Consumer Outlook 2004. The segments recording strong growth included hotels and restaurants. Services’ share in private final consumption expenditure almost tripled to 29 per cent over the 50 years to 2000–01 (Hansda 2001). communication. P A G E 11 . cited in IBEF 2005c). India’s growing middle class Classification of households by income class (Rs ’000 pa) 250 Number of households (millions) 200 150 100 50 0 1995–96 Deprived (<90) 2001–02 Aspirers (90–200) 2005–06 * Strivers (200–1000) 2009–10 * Well-off (1000–10 000) * Projection Source: NCAER. There were almost 11 million households with incomes of Rs200 000–1million (US$4200–21 000). NCAER estimates the number of households with annual incomes of Rs90 000 or more will have increased to 108 million – double the number in 2001–02 and treble that in 1995–96 – while the number of households with incomes of Rs200 000–500 000 could exceed 28 million. Bearing in mind the relatively low cost of many goods and services in developing countries and rising per capita incomes. transport. medical care and health services.Servces and India’s Rise (The Economist 2006b).
Growth in services exports encourages savings and capital accumulation. This specialisation. First. Exporting is an efficient means of introducing new technologies and gaining exposure to leading-edge production and marketing techniques. educated elite. The rising incomes and expectations of those working in the boom industries helps fuel consumer demand. P A G E 12 . If sustained. and not just a relatively small. and more traditional services such as transport and construction. But the key question for India is whether the services-led growth that has. as well as manufacturing and agriculture. particularly given that manufacturing is widely considered to have a substantial multiplier effect on job creation in services. by increasing the supply potential of the economy. the growth of these high-end services should create pressure for expanded output from the industries required to facilitate ongoing expansion at the next level. the companies generating international revenue drive a rapid expansion of demand for production inputs and facilities (including physical infrastructure and services such as education and training). generates the foreign exchange needed to procure capital goods. export-led growth facilitates an expansion of aggregate demand (ADB 2005). mainly been driven by very rapid expansion of what remains a relatively small part of the economy – particularly in employment terms – can feed into broader economic development. while rising consumer demand is likely to drive growth in retail trade. sufficient to raise the living standards of all Indians. Second. and. both to India’s services exporters and to the broader economy (ADB 2005). education services. financial services. PricewaterhouseCoopers 2006). can provide greater opportunities for economies of scale. there are income multiplier effects. Perhaps most importantly in the context of India’s services-driven development model. The income generated by India’s knowledge-intensive services feeds into increased domestic demand in two ways (conceptualised in Figure 1. oil and other resources. and its capacity to increase productivity dramatically through technological ‘catch-up with the West from a lower base level than China and other large developing economies (Goldman Sachs 2003. Brazil’s or Russia’s).INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY the Way forWard Bullish forecasts for long-term economic growth in India vis-à-vis all other major economies are principally premised on projections of its labour force growing beyond 2050 (unlike China’s. such as telecommunications. hotels and restaurants and other tourism-related services.4). and therefore higher returns. raises India’s capacity to import. to date. to serve a global market. It is arguable that rapid expansion in knowledge-intensive services exports could continue to be a catalyst for India’s economic growth. Pressure for expanded output in those sectors would intensify further if India’s relatively capital-intensive manufacturing sector – which has begun to record growth rates in the vicinity of ten per cent – continues to perform strongly. India’s increasingly outward orientation is facilitating a more efficient allocation of resources according to the country’s comparative advantage in the production of knowledge-intensive services.
Moreover.Servces and India’s Rise Pressure for expanded output and rising consumer demand. Recent scenario work by the World Economic Forum and the Confederation of Indian Industry (WEF 2005) emphasises the risks for broader growth in the medium to longer term if reforms do not proceed. the National Association of Software and Service Companies (NASSCOM) – is an active and empowered advocate for ongoing reform in the Indian economy. At that point reform. Some of these processes are already evident. Figure 1. Knowledge-intensive services support innovation. Over time this should make growth in the Indian economy less dependent on external demand. infrastructure. and therefore less vulnerable to slowdown in industrial country markets. IT. manufacturing. If reform and modernisation do occur. financial services and telecommunication services are already vital inputs to the manufacturing sector. productivity growth and technological improvements in other sectors. in turn. Manufacturing’s competitiveness is being enhanced by the increasing tendency to contract out a range of services (see Chapter 2).4 How services could lead to broad-based development International demand for IT–ITES and other high-end services New products Export growth Investment in increased capacity Increased revenue Higher salaries in IT sector Demand for construction. Fast-growing services are also providing increasing business for other sectors. agriculture. and human resources Increased domestic demand for IT–ITES and other high-end services Higher personal consumption Productivity-enhancing reforms Pressure to improve delivery of infrastructure. implementing modern logistics systems or computerised manufacturing systems or outsourcing basic business processes. it is apparent that the IT–ITES sector – and in particular its principal representative organisation. investment and modernisation could occur. human resource development Pressure on retail. or constraints on the ongoing expansion of the fast-growing sectors might emerge. could create pressure for increased capabilities and productivity growth in the sectors outlined above. etc to increase output P A G E 13 . a further feedback to the IT–ITES sector could well develop as reforming sectors draw on India’s expertise in IT–ITES to make their own operations more productive – for example.
relative to overall productivity growth in the respective economies (UNCTAD 2005b). The robustness of productivity growth in India’s services sector through the 1990s of around 5. a fact of which Indian policy-makers are fully cognisant. with economic growth continuing to generate pressure for productivity improvements. P A G E 14 . 7 Productivity in the services sector is difficult to measure. point to the possibility of India’s services-led development being a viable alternative to the path followed by other rapidly developing Asian economies. • Australian companies could benefit from maintaining a strategic understanding of these developments when considering whether to venture into the Indian market. it will be important for other sectors to provide an environment in which the ongoing growth of high-end services can be maintained. financial services. transport and power infrastructure. grounds to expect opportunities to arise for foreign services providers. – There are. so that change in some of these is likely to be rapid. – A significant ongoing commitment to regulatory reform and market opening in these sectors – including reform of foreign investment regulations – will in turn be required to ensure that constraints on growth do not emerge. and strong and growing inter-sectoral linkages. professional services and education and training) that supply inputs for IT–ITES and other leading-edge services. telecommunications. technology-driven nature and scale of a growing range of Indian services. therefore. At the same time it is clear that manufacturing also has an important role to play in broadening the base of growth and absorbing India’s labour force (see Chapter 2). However the dynamics of the system mean there are likely to be strong positive pressures in favour of reform. 7 implications The above characterisation of the broad role services might play in the development of the Indian economy would give rise to a number of implications: • For India’s current development path to be sustainable. longer-term economic growth prospects could be placed at risk. – Such change will give rise to large-scale requirements for skills and capabilities that may not currently be available in sufficient quantities in India.6 per cent per annum was in some senses reminiscent of China’s experience in manufacturing over the 1984–93 period. – This will necessitate expansion in sectors (such as construction. the increasing sophistication. – If the reform effort falters.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY The services tradability revolution. • Reform to date in different services sub-sectors has been variable.
the services driving economic growth in India have either not been subject to significant amounts of regulation (notably IT–ITES) or have been deregulated and opened to competition (most prominently. – Retail and wholesale trade and housing and construction in particular have the potential to employ large numbers of less skilled workers. • Improvements in the delivery of education and healthcare services. • Services sector developments are facilitating modernisation in India’s relatively capital-intensive manufacturing industries and in agriculture. logistics. other services have a critical role to play. and legal and accountancy services. technological improvements in manufacturing.Chapter 2 the role of services in developmenti Key points • While high-end services are a key driver of economic growth. and services inputs should enable India to derive maximum benefit from mineral exploitation once an investment-friendly platform is established for the mining sector. including retail. particularly in rural areas. • Financial services and transport infrastructure can be expected to face further pressure to expand capabilities and improve productivity through reform if these sectors are to play their critical role in facilitating economic expansion. • Broadly speaking. P A G E 15 . telecommunications). including productivity growth in other services and in agriculture. • Growth in high-end services like IT–ITES has the potential to generate significant spin-offs. • Restrictive labour laws and a raft of other regulations provide a strong disincentive to small Indian companies growing above a certain size. and the emergence of a large consumer base with the discretionary spending power to spur demand and employment growth in key labour-intensive sectors. • The services sector has a major role to play in absorbing India’s rapidly growing labour force. and prevent modernisation and inhibit productivity growth in a number of sectors. are vital for sustainable growth.
High tech thus contributed no more than ‘smokestack’ lost… Where did all the jobs come from? Everywhere and nowhere. in which heavy regulation discourages small companies from growing above a certain size. Services sectors with high employment potential – including retail and wholesale trade.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY ‘Of the 40 million-plus jobs created since 1965 in the [US] economy. As noted in Chapter 1. in a dynamic and growing economy where entrepreneurialism is flourishing. Improvements in the delivery of public healthcare and education services. Innovation and Entrepreneurship) The description of the possible role of services in driving India’s economic growth in Chapter 1 highlights that services sub-sectors at different stages of deregulation and reform are likely to have differing roles to play in generating economic growth. IT–ITES and other high-end services are already having a significant positive impact on growth in the broader Indian economy. possibly leapfrogging similar industries in key competitor countries. This in turn would generate demand that could be a catalyst for growth in other more labour-intensive areas of the economy. Such reforms could significantly improve productivity in the economy. These relatively labour-intensive services are likely to have a crucial role to play if India is to absorb its rapidly growing labour force. Deregulation and improved efficiencies in financial services. Growth rates are also strongly and positively correlated with levels of FDI in services sub-sectors (World Bank 2004). It also has the potential to spur reform and productivity improvements in other key services sectors. Demand for manufactured products is also likely to increase. In general. Moreover high-end services can provide the technology to enable Indian manufacturing to move rapidly up the value chain. But as the above quote by Drucker highlights. high technology did not contribute more than 5 or 6 million. Other services sectors are critical to the health of the Indian economy. often in unexpected areas of the economy. particularly in rural areas. the sectors which have been subject to the greatest liberalisation have tended to experience higher employment growth than those which have only been P A G E 16 . transportation and transport infrastructure are driving improved performance within these sectors and also facilitating expansion in other areas of the economy. India’s more liberalised services have grown faster. hotels and restaurants.’ (Peter Drucker. across regions and socio-economic groups. will be critical to promoting more even – and politically sustainable – economic development. Developments in these key sectors can help ensure that development is more broadly based. While economic liberalisation can lead to adjustment costs. and housing and construction – will need to expand significantly in response to increased demand stemming from growing consumer affluence. Growth in these services has the potential to drive higher incomes among the growing middle class of consumers. significant numbers of jobs can emerge. as they increasingly draw on high-end services as inputs. For these sectors to meet the increased demand there is likely to be a need for reforms directed at easing the impact of the dual economy.
which are relatively lightly regulated or significantly deregulated. IT–ITES looks set to remain a key driver of economic development in India. • ’contributors’ such as financial services and transport infrastructure. such as legal and accountancy services. Despite facing some challenges.Role of Services in Development partially liberalised or remain closed. and inadequacies in infrastructure were less of a hindrance. New technology meant that at last India could reap the benefits of its long-term investments in education. both as a high-growth and employment-generating sector in its own right. Making Globalization Work IT–ITES – the star performer The rapid expansion of Information Technology–Information Technology Enabled Services (IT–ITES) has had a significant impact on the broader Indian economy. With the economy currently growing strongly. which remain relatively closed. by generating substantial export earnings and tax revenue. and modernisation and job creation in manufacturing. The efficient functioning of some sectors nonetheless demands oversight from an independent and effective regulator. noting some of the key areas where reform has already taken place. and precipitating productivity-enhancing technology diffusion to other industries and the public sector. and where further reform is planned. the Government is arguably in a good position to be taking some of the harder reform decisions. and through its linkages with other sectors. This chapter examines the role of the services sectors critical to the Indian economy’s ongoing expansion. and • ’sectors vital to broad-based development’ – education and healthcare. creating significant numbers of high-quality jobs. where policy makers need not be so concerned over the risk of displacement of large numbers of relatively poor and low-skilled workers (World Bank 2004).’ Joseph Stiglitz. • the ’slower reformers’ such as retail and legal and accounting services. P A G E 17 . The final section of the chapter considers the interrelationship between services sector developments. Continued liberalisation therefore appears to be both critical to future growth and potentially welfare-enhancing. particularly in those sectors which primarily employ skilled professionals. and whose growth has already had a significant impact on the economy’s strong performance. where reform has been happening but more remains to be done. agriculture and mining. the drivers ‘The advent of the internet proved to be the most important turning point. These sectors are categorised as follows: • the ‘drivers’ – high-end services such as IT–ITES and telecommunications. especially where service providers utilise and/or rely on public infrastructure – as is usually the case in telecommunications.
It has since benefited from rapid reductions in the cost of digitising. The ITES-BPO segment was initially dominated by call centres and the undertaking of ‘back-office’ functions. P A G E 18 . including India’s large pool of qualified professionals. IT–ITES’ expansion has been underpinned by a number of strengths. In addition to being far and away the largest exporter of ITES-business process outsourcing (ITES-BPO) services. diagnostic services. market research. IT services and software exports accounted for nearly two-thirds of total IT–ITES exports in 2004–05. combined with a supportive policy environment (Box 2. More recently there has been a shift towards the provision of higher value knowledge and analytic-based processes as capabilities have improved. its widespread use of English. education and training (for example.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY The dramatic growth in IT–ITES has been driven principally by fast-growing international demand for Indian IT services and software and by burgeoning business process outsourcing to India. software product development. tutorial services using Voice over Internet Protocol. telemedicine). and data analytics (PricewaterhouseCoopers 2005b). The Indian operations of multinational enterprises continue to dominate the ITES-BPO segment (NASSCOM 2005a). curriculum design). administration services and general accounting functions. The government’s light-handed approach to regulation in the sector. its rapidly increasing stable of world-class companies. engineering R&D. 1 1 Primarily data entry and processing. and is at the same time helping to re-define which services components are tradable. and cost advantage over other locations.1). India is fast gaining strength in legal services (for example.2) and have been growing rapidly. India’s IT industry took off in the late 1990s. has played a particularly important role in facilitating its growth. ITES-BPO exports accounted for nearly 30 per cent of the total in that year (Box 2. drafting contracts). medical services (for example. transmitting and processing information (Friedman 2005). as companies offshore service functions to affiliated Indian businesses (‘captive’ units) – which continue to dominate the segment – or outsource services to independent/third party BPO vendors (NASSCOM 2005a). India is a major exporter of IT services and software. legal research. India is emerging as a prominent player in a number of these segments. when the global IT industry was unable to meet the exponential growth in demand for IT services precipitated by Y2K compliance concerns.
Some states have also been more willing to modify labour laws as they apply to the IT sector. Import duties on software and personal computers were also lowered. STPs are special zones. developed an Information Technology Action Plan containing a large number of recommendations aimed at addressing the inadequacy of telecommunications and other infrastructure. • In 1998–99. Firms became eligible for concessional import duties on computers if they exported software. • The Software Technology Parks (STP) scheme was introduced in the early 1990s. provisioned with appropriate communication and physical infrastructure and designated for export-oriented activities. import of software in any form was permitted and the sector was opened to foreign investment. But policy measures introduced by the central government to bolster the position of the software sector arguably contributed significantly to India’s ability to exploit this opportunity. For example. The most famous STPs are located in Bangalore and Hyderabad. * see Saxenian (2000) for more detail on a number of these measures. Firms in STPs benefit from tax holidays up to 2010 and duty free equipment imports. By July 2004. State governments have also played a role in promoting the sector.1: the role of policy in promoting the softWare sector The Indian software industry took off largely in response to Y2K-driven demand for IT services. Andhra Pradesh’s efforts to attract technology investment and promote the use of IT in government agencies in the second half of the 1990s triggered competition from other states. P A G E 19 . • A National Task Force. FDI with 100 per cent foreign equity is permitted. the software sector was included amongst the list of ‘priority sectors’ to which the banks are subject to directed lending. and the regulatory impediments faced by the sector. akin to Export Processing Zones. • In 1997. These included*: • A 1984 Computer Policy recognised software as an ‘industry’.Role of Services in Development box 2. there were 40 parks set up under the scheme (WTO 2005). • In 1986. all import duties on software were eliminated and software firms were permitted to invest overseas. They have prospered and become a highlight of the ICT landscape in India. modelled after Silicon Valley in USA. established in 1998. making it eligible for an investment allowance and other incentives. The government accepted the plan’s recommendations. notably through enabling 24/7 working arrangements.
7 billion of gross value added in the unorganised sector (Indian CSO 2006).5 billion and are expected to reach US$36–38 billion in 2006–07. Revenues of the sector grew more than five-fold in the space of six years to reach an expected US$28. as it would appear to be based on sector revenues. excluding the hardware segment) increased by a further 30 per cent in 2005–06 to US$29. which tend to suggest a far higher level of exports than do counterpart import data.e. Total IT–ITES revenues (i. and an estimated 2. 5 4 3 2 3 4 5 Includes revenues derived by overseas subsidiaries of Indian IT companies. which bases its figures for the organised sector on NASSCOM revenue data and a value added ratio estimated from an analysis of annual reports of a few software companies. While IT services and software revenues have been contributing more to growth in total IT–ITES revenues.5 billion). with the top ten companies accounting for 60 per cent of total computer services exports in 2002–03 (RBI 2005c). as a share of GDP. India’s IT sector has enjoyed remarkable success. followed by ITES-BPO (US$5. ITES-BPO revenues increased ten-fold over the five years to 2004–05. the Computer and related activities sector’s gross value added in 1999–2000 was Rs172 billion (US$4. According to NASSCOM.0 billion).8 per cent in 2006–07 (NASSCOM 2006b. or 0. Conventional cross-border supply (Mode 1) accounted for almost 40 per cent of the US$6. which would place it ahead of the communications sector.8 per cent in 2005–06 (Indian Ministry of Finance 2006).3 per cent in 2004–05. Almost 50 per cent were derived from the supply of services by the overseas subsidiaries of Indian companies (Mode 3). comprising US$23.4 billion. In 2005–06.8 billion). the sector’s share of GDP grew from just 1. P A G E 20 . Computer services exports differ from total IT–ITES exports in that they exclude exports of companies engaged exclusively in business process outsourcing activities. as compared with the communication sector’s 1. while individuals temporarily abroad to supply a service (Mode 4) accounted for 13 per cent.1 per cent.7 billion) and hardware (US$6 billion).INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY box 2. not just conventional cross-border supply (Mode 1). 2 IT services and software is the largest segment (US$16. 2006c).96 per cent of GDP. This would appear to reflect the fact that the Indian data include revenues derived from all four modes of supply as identified by the WTO General Agreement on Trade in Services. most notably for the United States (see US Government Accountability Office 2005.2 per cent to 4.4 billion in IT–ITES. According to the Indian CSO. and WTO 2005). which is equivalent to 1. NASSCOM’s calculation seems inflated. India’s share in global IT software and services (including ITES-BPO) spending was 2. This includes an estimated Rs25. IT–ITES’ share of GDP is projected to increase to 4.4 per cent of GDP for that year. The discrepancy is apparent from a comprehensive survey of computer services companies for the year 2002–03 conducted by the RBI (RBI 2005c). ‘Software services’ (predominantly IT–ITES) exports have grown at a compound annual rate of around 35 per cent over the past six years. and US$0.2: the success of india’s it sector By any standard.5 billion in hardware.6 per cent share of GDP. Large companies dominate the export profile.2 billion in 2004–05 (NASSCOM 2005a).9 billion. This compares with organised IT–ITES sector (excluding hardware) revenues of Rs251 billion (US$5. not value added. There has been some contention as to the accuracy of Indian data. they were valued at US$23.
box 2.2 (continued)
The IT export boom IT–ITES export revenues
25 IT services and software exports 20 US$ billion ITES-BPO exports Hardware exports 15
The 2005–06 figure for IT services and software exports includes ITES-BPO (split of exports between IT services and software, and ITES-BPO was not available for 2005–06). NASSCOM 2005a and 2006b.
Despite being heavily export-oriented, the Indian IT sector is having a significant and growing impact on the local economy. Revenues from domestic business grew at a 19 per cent compound annual rate over the five years to 2004–05, with IT services and software accounting for roughly 40 per cent of revenues and hardware for 50 per cent. While most small Indian businesses cannot at this point afford IT services, IT is beginning to be used in a major way in manufacturing and in the automotive, banking and telecommunication sectors, enhancing the competitiveness of these industries. High-end services can also provide solutions to issues in other key services sectors, the development of which will be essential to ongoing economic growth. IT and online information provision and service delivery has been adopted rapidly by both the central and state governments. This is leading to streamlined and more efficient government service delivery and approvals processes, and also adding transparency to procedures and decision making. The growth in IT–ITES has also had a significant impact on the domestic economy as a result of technology diffusion. Relatively speaking, IT–ITES is not a major direct employer within the economy as a whole. In 2004–05, total direct employment was estimated at just over one million, comprising 697 000 professionals in the software segment – half of whom are involved in software exports with most of the remainder being in-house staff – and a further 348 000 in the ITES-BPO segment. Most direct employment is of skilled workers in larger cities such as Bangalore, Hyderabad and Delhi.
P A G E 21
INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR
The numbers directly employed are nonetheless increasing rapidly. ITES-BPO employment numbers almost doubled between 2002–03 and 2004–05. Total direct employment in IT–ITES is projected to increase to 1.3 million in 2005–06 – over a million more in the six years since 1999–2000 (NASSCOM 2006a, 2006b). TCS, Wipro and Infosys collectively are expected to hire some 50 000 engineering graduates in 2006–07 and the rest of the IT sector another 30 000. The ITES-BPO sector will probably increase by 120 000–130 000.
The IT industry also generates significant numbers of jobs in other industries through inter-sectoral linkages, especially in construction, but also in transport and retail. By one estimate, an additional 2½–3 million mainly low-skilled workers are employed indirectly by the IT industry.
Opportunities are emerging for IT sector employment in smaller cities and towns as the supply of skilled workers in the major IT centres comes under pressure. Furthermore, a number of IT–ITES activities do not require high skill levels and many can be undertaken remotely. For example, call centre and accounting-related services can be performed by people with at least some level of education from their homes or small shops/businesses as a source or supplementary source of income. The information technology and telecommunications revolution is showing some promise in assisting India’s rural development, in areas such as distance learning using the Internet; the use of IT to help agriculture at the grass-roots level; and telemedicine (see section on ‘Services and agriculture’ below). A number of the larger IT companies have established trusts and foundations or otherwise lent their support to community initiatives, including in rural areas. For example, Infosys gives one per cent of its profits to the ‘Infosys Foundation’, which is focused on helping the socially deprived in education and healthcare. In healthcare, for example, the Foundation helps government hospitals, while in education it assists libraries in villages and provides computers to government schools. The broader economy also benefits from growth in IT–ITES as a result of the tax revenues derived from the sector. The outlook for India’s IT–ITES sector remains buoyant. Almost all observers anticipate a continuing trend over coming years to increased trade in ITES-BPO services, whether by outsourcing to third parties or by captive units (UNCTAD 2004). To take one example, business process outsourcing of healthcare services to India has the potential to generate US$4.5 billion in revenues by 2008 (IBEF 2004). Nearly 80 per cent of executives from the world’s largest companies plan to locate corporate functions overseas over the coming three years (A.T. Kearney 2005). Global IT spending is forecast to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 7.9 per cent over the period 2004–08, with the ITES-BPO segment growing at over 11 per cent (NASSCOM 2005a). India’s IT–ITES exports are projected to grow at an annual average rate of over 25 per cent through to 2010, to reach US$60 billion (NASSCOM-McKinsey 2005). IT services and software exports are projected to grow
Based on discussions in May 2006 with Professor S. Sadagopan, Director, International Institute of Information Technology, Bangalore. Discussions in May 2006 with: Kiran Karnik, President, NASSCOM.
P A G E 22
at 25 per cent a year to reach US$35 billion, while ITES-BPO exports are projected to grow even more strongly – at 37 per cent – which would take their value to US$60 billion. IT–ITES could be contributing seven per cent of India’s GDP by then, and creating additional direct employment of 1.6 million over the five years to 2010. NASSCOM-McKinsey (2005) estimate it has the potential to provide over 6.5 million indirect jobs. Buoyant predictions for IT–ITES in India are conditional on the industry addressing some critical issues, notably the potential shortage of IT professionals. While the graduate talent pool for offshore IT and BPO is estimated at 1.8 million (or 28 per cent of the global total), on current trends there could be a shortfall of towards half a million suitably qualified workers by 2010 (NASSCOM-McKinsey 2005). India’s pool of young university graduates is estimated at 14 million, 1.5 times the size of China’s and almost twice that of the United States. 2.5 million graduates are added to the pool every year. However, despite the very high quality of the top Indian tertiary education institutions, only a relatively small percentage of graduates are considered suitable for employment in customer contact positions in multinationals, in large part because many have poor English or strong local accents (McKinsey 2005a). In response to impending labour shortages in some states, some IT companies are setting up or expanding their operations elsewhere. In particular, many are beginning to experience wage pressures and high turnover of engineering professionals. Demand for middle managers is particularly strong but there is a limited supply of people suitably qualified for these positions. McKinsey forecast that demand for young engineers could exceed supply as early as 2008, and even earlier in some regional centres. On the other hand, India has no looming shortage of people suitably qualified in areas outside of IT such as finance and accounting, call centres, and back-office administration (McKinsey 2005a). NASSCOM and a number of commentators (for example, Das 2006) highlight the need for action in the education system (and corporate training) to ensure that India produces enough quality English-speaking graduates. Reflecting these pressures, the major Indian providers are heavy investors in education and training. The increasingly acute shortage of suitably qualified workers for IT–ITES also affects other industries. India’s IT majors are recruiting engineers at the expense of manufacturing and infrastructure firms. Skills shortages are driving up wages for highly-skilled workers, and in turn beginning to erode the cost advantage that has been critical to the success of India’s IT–ITES. While labour costs remain a fraction of those in developed economies like the United States, wage increases are narrowing India’s cost advantage over other emerging economies (Accenture 2006).
Telecommunications – a dynamic enabler
Efficient telecommunications infrastructure generates significant spill-over effects in other sectors of an economy. Modern telecommunications networks facilitate efficient information exchange among economic units and rapid two-way communication, thereby lowering search and transaction costs, aiding the coordination of economic activity on a global scale, and enabling the optimal utilisation of available labour, technology, products and services around the world (Nandi 2002). India’s emergence
P A G E 23
3). increasing its share of GDP from 1. tele-density is still relatively low at around 11 phones per 100 people. Despite the recent rapid growth. The Broadband Policy announced in October 2004 had set a target of three million broadband subscribers by December 2005 and 20 million by 2010 (Indian Ministry of Finance 2005). P A G E 24 .6 million in 2005. Indian farmers can access modern telecommunications and IT to obtain more information about agricultural prices. a penetration rate of 4. Access to telecommunications and information technology in rural areas can facilitate the provision of basic services such as medical care.5 per cent. enable better access to financial services and create opportunities for distance learning. private sector operators had secured 79 per cent of the mobiles market. If for example. there were about 750 000 broadband subscribers (Indian Ministry of Finance 2006). Internet usage has increased nearly tenfold since 2000 to reach 50. the mobile subscriber base posted 85 per cent growth per annum. in large part driven by technological developments and the requirements of the IT sector.5 per cent. Over the past five years. Telecommunications networks also act as an electronic highway. Deregulation has helped spur rapid growth and enabled private telecommunications providers to play an increasingly important role. other markets and economic opportunities. By November 2005. there were 48 million fixed-line subscribers and 71 million mobile subscribers (Indian Investment Commission 2006a). Penetration in rural areas is significantly lower still. while in the fixed-line market they had captured 15 per cent (Indian Ministry of Finance 2006). a number of mobile operators have plans to tap into the rapid growth expected in rural areas. As at November 2005. However the take-up of broadband has been relatively slow. India’s telecommunications have undergone extensive deregulation and liberalisation (Box 2.9 per cent to 3. they are more likely to increase productivity and boost their livelihoods (see Box 2. Increased mobile and Internet access could make a strong contribution to addressing regional inequalities and ensuring more broadly based economic development if it reduces the telecommunications infrastructure divide between urban and rural areas.8). which is being spurred by the availability of cheap handsets and a wide array of tariff plans. Private companies achieved annual growth rates in their subscriber base of closer to 200 per cent (Indian Investment Commission 2006a). The mobile phone market has grown at extraordinary rates from an initially low base. By December 2005. The communications sector grew at an average annual rate of 24 per cent over the five years to 2004–05.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY and ongoing competitive advantage as a global provider of IT–ITES was (and will continue to be) dependent on the availability of efficient telecommunications infrastructure for electronically transferring and assessing information (Banerjee and Jha 2004). However. reducing asymmetries of access to market information and allowing rural businesses and citizens to participate directly in national and global economies.
was established to mobilise funding for services in remote and rural areas. Certain conditions apply to ensure the management of service providers remains in Indian hands. Its role included setting conditions attached to the licensing of private sector operators. an independent telecommunications regulatory authority was established. the government sold a strategic stake in VSNL – which at the time was the sole operator in the international long distance market – in favour of the Tata group. • The National Telecom Policy 1994 set a number of telecommunications penetration targets and opened basic telephone services to the private sector with the objective of bringing about world class telecommunication services and improving the competitiveness of the Indian economy. the Department of Telecommunications’ operational network was corporatised through the creation of a public company. • In 2005 the foreign equity limit in telecommunications was raised from 49 to 74 per cent subject to numerous restrictions. a range of value added services. information technology and media industries. which was previously undertaken by the incumbent Department of Telecommunications. involving a levy on all telecom operators. including in the area of licence fees (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India 1999). Concurrently. foreign carriers are not permitted to use overseas networks to link Indian cities nor to situate control centres outside of India. • In 1999 against the backdrop of revenues falling short of industry expectations and the convergence of the telecom. BSNL. Owing in large part to the Indian Government’s concerns over security. NTP 1999 also foreshadowed the opening of the national long distance segment from January 2000.3: groWth-facilitating deregulation of the telecommunications sector There have been a number of significant milestones in the deregulatory process: • In 1992. • In October 2000. international long distance services and Internet telephony were opened to competition. • In 1997. was opened to private sector competition. P A G E 25 .Role of Services in Development box 2. including cellular phone services and paging services. • In 2002 a Universal Service Obligation (USO) Fund mechanism. the New Telecom Policy was announced. • In April 2002. This introduced a number of reforms aimed at creating a more enabling environment.
2b Source: RBI 2006a. and look set to make an increasingly strong contribution to economic growth.64 billion. Between 2000–01 and 2004–05 exports of other commercial services (excluding software services) almost quadrupled in value to US$13.e. which comprises approximately 20 professional and other services (Figure 2. Other services 28% P A G E 26 . to almost rival software services exports (RBI 2006a). excluding transportation and travel) Insurance services 3% Communication services 11% Construction services 5% Software services 64% Financial services 3% Other 37% Management services 3% Other services 11% 2000–01 — US$10.1 Miscellaneous other commercial services – a strong growth area Breakdown of exports of ‘Other commercial services’ (i.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Other commercial services The dynamism in India’s IT–ITES and telecommunications sectors is widely recognised.8 billion.1b Insurance services 2% Software services 51% Communication services 5% Construction services 2% Financial services 4% Management services 8% Other 49% 2005–06 — US$46. In 2005–06 exports of these services increased by 64 per cent to US$22. Much of the growth in these exports stems from the ‘miscellaneous other commercial services’ sub-sector. Exports of other commercial services have also grown rapidly.1) Figure 2.
Medical tourism is a key area that has been targeted for expansion by the Indian Government. most visibly the Apollo Group.64 billion in 2005–06. a 393 per cent increase) and operational leasing services exports (US$393 million in 2005–06. • Research and development services exports: $US519 million in 2005–06. • News agency services exports: US$339 million in 2005–06. Some 150 000 foreigners went to India for treatment in 2004. with numbers increasing by 15 per cent a year. engineering and other technical services exports. a 135 per cent increase. which grew by 106 per cent to US$1. Film studios in Hollywood and elsewhere have also outsourced considerable work to India. an 81 per cent increase. comprising services and biopharmaceuticals. So-called ‘medical tourism’ has also been a growth sector. India is the largest producer of films in the world. • Maintenance of offices abroad exports. The sector. Significant numbers of qualified non-resident Indians are now returning to India to take advantage of emerging opportunities. which reached US$4. Biotechnology is assuming greater significance in the Indian economy. have been drawing in increasing numbers of patients from Western countries for a range of treatments and operations that can be carried out by highly skilled medical personnel far more cheaply than in their home countries and/or without the delays often experienced under their home country national health systems. is growing at annual rates in the order of 40 per cent. P A G E 27 . a 107 per cent increase on 2004–05. A number of technically advanced private Indian hospitals.Role of Services in Development Prominent exports within the miscellaneous other commercial services sub-sector (as detailed in RBI 2006a) include: • Architectural. a 98 per cent increase. Medical tourism export revenues are projected to reach US$2. • Trade related services exports: US$880 million in 2005–06. Other smaller but rapidly expanding growth areas include accounting and auditing services exports (US$138 million in 2005–06. 56 per cent of which derived from exports (IBEF 2005a). a 169 percent increase. • Legal services exports: US$390 million in 2005–06. aided by a well-qualified and low cost workforce. Revenues in 2003–04 were around US$700 million.3 billion by 2012 (Confederation of Indian Industry and McKinsey in Medical Tourism India 2006). a 227 per cent increase on the previous year. a 145 per cent increase). a 52 per cent increase. • Advertising / trade fair exports: US$435 million in 2005–06. • Merchanting services exports: US$504 million in 2005–06. Film exports have been rising as Indian films gain popularity overseas.49 billion in 2005–06.
Francois and Schuknecht 1999 and Mattoo. due to the sector’s shortcomings in mobilising savings and allocating capital (Farrell. Finance – work in progress The financial sector has a very important role to play in the modernisation of India’s economy. Rathindran and Subramanian 2001). Financial sector reforms and deregulation have triggered strong growth in the sector as financial intermediation has become increasingly important in the economy. Private sector mutual funds were also permitted from 1993. Indian stock markets have also come to greater prominence. and in roads. Measured in terms of the number of transactions. Beginning in the early 1990s. Banking The Indian banking system is changing rapidly. it is clear further reform would have significant dividends. India’s banking and insurance sectors have been significantly opened to private sector competition since 1993 and 2000 respectively. While such estimates are necessarily speculative to a degree. Several reforms have been introduced in the financial sector. addressing these shortcomings through an integrated reform program could raise India’s growth rate by close to three percentage points. it was characterised by poorlyperforming public sector banks employing outdated practices and technology. The sector therefore plays a vital role in the investment process. Indian borrowers pay more for capital and depositors receive a lower return than they do in comparable economies. Yet much remains to be done. Lund and Puri 2006). Their direct contribution to employment is also comparatively low.4) but foreign investment remains severely constrained. part of the overall economy. they remain a relatively small. which would. the National Stock Exchange is the third-largest stock exchange in the world after the NASDAQ and the NYSE. Banking and transport infrastructure services – which are critical to the health of the broader economy – will need to modernise further and become more productive if the growth currently being exhibited in higher-end services is to be replicated throughout the economy. the sector has been gradually liberalised (Box 2. It serves as a vehicle for channelling savings to individuals and businesses seeking to borrow funds. ports and air services – but there is scope for more. P A G E 28 .INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY the contributors While leading-edge services have been in the vanguard of India’s economic rejuvenation. According to one recent estimate published by McKinsey. increase per capita income by 2014 to more than US$1200 or 30 per cent higher than it would otherwise be (ibid). while the Bombay Stock Exchange moved into fifth place in 2003 (Indian Ministry of Finance 2006). There is strong empirical evidence of a positive relationship between liberalisation and growth in financial sectors (see for example. in turn. albeit growing. Traditionally. which is a major determinant of economic growth.
By September 2004. the Reserve Bank had granted operating approval to 25 new foreign banks or bank branches since issuing its 1993 guidelines. bringing the total number of foreign bank branches to 217 (USTR 2005). Significantly. others continue to perform poorly. While directed lending requirements have remained in place. • Interest rates were deregulated in stages beginning in the early 1990s.4 per cent in 1998 to 7.7 per cent by March 2005.2 per cent in 2004 (Reddy 2005). 8 Under the WTO Financial Services Agreement concluded in December 1997. the lending competences of the public sector banks are getting better. the public sector banks reduced their operating expenses as a share of total assets from 2. while the percentage of gross non-performing assets to gross advances fell from 14. Private sector banks had increased their share of total assets of all scheduled commercial banks to 24.2 per cent in 2003–04.4) may bring about some further improvements. compared to 20 per cent in China (Das 2006). • Banks have been permitted to invest a greater percentage of their assets outside of cash and government securities and given more freedom in their lending policies.9 per cent in 1996–97 to 2.8 per cent in 1996–97 to 7. including a tightening of prudential requirements. New guidelines issued in February 2005 provide greater managerial autonomy and operational flexibility to public sector banks. performing on a par with private and foreign banks. The liberalisation process resulted in the number of private sector scheduled commercial banks increasing to 61 in March 2005. However. including 31 foreign banks. with foreign banks having a 6. Their gross non-performing assets as a percentage of gross advances declined from 17. Bad loans account for less than two per cent of all loans. As a group.Role of Services in Development box 2. The Reserve Bank of India issued guidelines under which new private sector banks could be established. Some of the public sector banks have responded well to the new environment.4 per cent in 1991–92 to 1.6 per cent share (RBI 2005a). • Legislative amendments in 1994 enabled public sector banks to raise capital through public share issues.3 per cent at the end of 2002–03. although there remains considerable scope for improvement in the use of technology. • The greater freedoms afforded to the banks have been accompanied by an improvement in the overall regulatory framework. India committed to permitting 12 new foreign bank branches a year. P A G E 29 . and resulting greater competition within. the scope of lending deemed as meeting these requirements has been widened (Singh 2005). New guidelines issued in February 2005 (Box 2. Foreign banks were also permitted more liberal entry and have been able to take modest equity positions in existing private sector banks.8 per cent in 2003–04 (Chanda 2005). The return on assets of the banks rose from 0. the sector – together with tightened prudential requirements – has led to improved efficiencies in the banking system. 8 The liberalisation of.4: gradual liberalisation of the banKing sector • In January 1993.
be permitted up to a 74 per cent limit. foreign investment in any private sector bank will. through to March 2009. with only 42 per cent of rural households having bank accounts. in the second phase beginning in April 2009. 21 per cent having access to credit from a formal source and only one percent relying on a loan from a financial intermediary (IndiaMART 2006). If progress on consolidation is not achieved. India’s Reserve Bank has urged banks to adopt ‘no frills’ accounts with a view to encouraging greater availability and uptake of financial services by the rural sector and other parts of the population that have largely been excluded from the formal financial system. Improved access to banking products would greatly benefit rural businesses and households. Investment of up to 20 per cent is permitted in public sector banks. Foreign investment from all sources of up to 74 per cent will be considered in these banks. with the exception of banks that have been identified for restructuring.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY The efficiency of financial intermediation continues to be adversely affected by directed lending. notably agriculture and small-scale industries. The previous National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government was moving in early 2004 to automatically allow foreign equity in private banks from all sources of up to 74 per cent. Foreign banks were also directed not to acquire any fresh stakes in a private sector bank if such acquisition would take their holdings above five per cent. and help to raise living standards across the rural sector as a whole. Some mergers have been attempted but have not materialised because of union concerns over retrenchments and branch closures. foreign banks are allowed to establish a whollyowned subsidiary or convert their existing branches to wholly-owned subsidiaries. In the first phase. 9 Foreign investment policy remains a severe constraint. Banks have been advised to allow limited overdraft facilities in these accounts and provide a General purpose Credit Card (GCC) facility at their rural and semi-urban branches to allow holders to draw cash from their local branches (Thorat 2006). The Indian Government believes that some consolidation of the public sector banks needs to take place before opening up the sector to foreign competition. P A G E 30 . The current United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government released a ‘roadmap’ for the entry of foreign banks in February 2005 (RBI 2005e). and the individual shareholding limit removed. RBI guidelines of July 2004 remain in effect. but the election intervened. The penetration of financial services products in rural India is particularly low. 9 Foreign banks face a lesser directed lending obligation of 32 per cent. with public and domestic private banks required to extend 40 per cent of their credit to priority sectors. the scheduled opening up of the sector to foreign competition could well be delayed or even stalled. These limit the shareholding and control by a single entity or group of related entities in any private sector bank to ten per cent. But only limited amalgamations and consolidations have taken place to date. Subject to a review.
com 2006a). Insurance business transacted by Indian private insurance companies has increased rapidly. power and telecommunications connectivity.Role of Services in Development Some banks are now beginning to introduce innovative technology products that take account of the higher costs of delivering financial services to rural India. enabling firms to expand and take on the risks associated with pursuing new business opportunities. ICICI Bank has introduced ATMs with integrated power management systems suitable for use in rural areas. having operated as a state monopoly up until 1999 (Box 2. these initiatives remain modest given the magnitude of the rural service gap in banking. P A G E 31 . The bank has also been involved in the establishment of Internet kiosks in rural India. Rediff. like its banking system. Its Kisan Loan Card enables farmers to withdraw cash and take out cash or crop loans (ICICI Bank 2004). which can complement the ATMs to provide a powerful medium for farmers to enhance their business interests. which stem from typically low transaction sizes along with poor roads. The recent experience of ICICI and other Indian banks in partnering with community-based micro-finance institutions as intermediaries for micro lending has been encouraging (Thorat 2006. Insurance India’s insurance sector. has an important role to play in enhancing financial intermediation. insurers are playing a more prominent role in channelling financial resources to investment opportunities and facilitating companies’ access to capital.5). Some of the larger Indian banks with extensive rural branch networks such as ICICI Bank are well positioned to service the rural sector as they are able to defray their technology costs across a large customer base. For example. creating liquidity and mobilising savings in the economy. A well developed insurance market also promotes economic growth by fostering entrepreneurialism and innovation. As increasingly significant institutional investors in India. even though insurers continue to be subject to product price controls and prescriptive guidelines for funds investment (Mulford 2005). While arguably a step in the right direction. India’s insurance sector has changed significantly over the past few years.
By comparison. P A G E 32 .8 billion). India has made some progress in recent years in upgrading and modernising its transport infrastructure. total industry premium income grew by 16 per cent. first year (i. Health insurance has been the fastest growing segment of the non-life sector. The Finance Minister proposed in his July 2004 Budget Speech that the foreign equity limit be increased from 26 to 49 per cent.6 per cent over the corresponding period of 2005–06. 10 See www. subject to a 26 per cent foreign equity limit. much remains to be done. The market share of private insurers consequently rose from 19. 95 per cent up on that for the corresponding period of the previous year. but this change was stymied by political factors. including through Public Private Partnerships (PPPs).6 per cent over the first nine months of 2004–05 to 26.org/. 52 per cent up on that for the corresponding period in 2004–05. In the space of just six years. 10 By comparison. there are currently 14 private insurers plus the government-owned Life Insurance Corporation. Transport infrastructure – vital for growth A modern economy depends upon an efficiently functioning transportation network. and the life sector under the Life Insurance Corporation.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY box 2. But despite the Government’s recognition of deficiencies. the General Insurance Corporation became the national re-insurer and its subsidiaries were formally de-linked in March 2002. In November 2000. total new business income grew by over 50 per cent. The rate of infrastructure development is likely to lag behind demand and constrain economic growth for some years to come.irdaindia. • • Foreign investment was also permitted. • In August 2000. Premium income of the private insurers for the first nine months of 2005–06 was Rs169 billion (US$3. private insurers have secured a 27.2 billion). 1999 enabled competition from the private sector for the first time. In the life insurance sector. Previously the sector had operated as a state monopoly – the non-life sector under the General Insurance Corporation and its four subsidiaries plus the Export Credit Guarantee Corporation.8 per cent share in new business. Most of the private insurers have foreign equity partners. new business) premium income of the private insurers for the first nine months of 2005–06 was Rs231 billion (US$5.e. there are currently eight private insurers and six government-owned insurers. Infrastructure shortcomings are frequently cited as among the chief causes for the failure of India’s manufacturing sector to make greater headway as tariff barriers have come down. In the non-life insurance sector. the newly formed Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority invited applications for registration from private life and non-life insurers.5: reforms in the insurance sector • The passing of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act. According to the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA).
11 12 1999 prices See National Highways Authority of India. In Indian Railways’ 2006–07 budget for example. www. To be eligible for funding. as well as port connectivity (Indian Planning Commission 2002a). but was nearing completion at the time of publication. The Project was launched in 1999 at an estimated cost of US$12. the government launched a scheme in July 2005 to fund up to 20 per cent of infrastructure projects. Chennai and Kolkata. first-served basis. NHDP (Phase III). for projects in transport infrastructure and power. comprising the so-called ‘Golden Quadrilateral’ connecting Delhi. when the National Highways Act was amended. Complex passenger and freight pricing policies have also been simplified. the government has moved in recent years to open the sector to partnerships with private players. The Project involves the four/six-laning of 14 000 km of the existing road network. Roads The private sector has been permitted to participate in national highway projects since 1995. The top priority for the current Five Year Plan period is the completion of the National Highway Development Project (Phase I and II). freight rates for petroleum products were cut by eight per cent and the number of commodity groups reduced from 80 to 28 (having been lowered from 4000 to 80 in the previous budget) (The Hindu Business Line 2006a). The Golden Quadrilateral is running two years behind schedule. and the North-South and East-West corridors. with budgetary provisions for this purpose to be made on a year-to-year basis (Indian Department of Economic Affairs 2005). However. The government is still aiming to meet its original target of 2007 for the completion of the North-South and East-West corridors. Mumbai.com 2006b). projects should provide a service against payment of a predetermined tariff or user charge. in recognition of limited government finances and the constraints the generally poor state of infrastructure has imposed on economic growth. 12 11 Railways Recent improvements in service provision and financial performance on the part of Indian Railways after what the Government has characterised as years of financial trouble and neglect (Singh 2006). The load capacity (axle load) permitted for previously under-loaded rolling stock has been raised on select routes and wagon turnaround times have been improved across the network (Indian Institute of Management in Rediff. have fostered cautious optimism that India will be able to grapple with the task of rectifying massive under-investment in railways and modernising its ailing network.org/. Since the current UPA Government came to power. involving the upgrading and 4-laning of 10 000 km of selected high-density corridors of National Highways.Role of Services in Development Infrastructure has traditionally been the preserve of the public sector. Indian Railways has derived efficiency gains through better utilisation of its existing pool of resources. Many projects are arranged on a build-operate-transfer (BOT) basis. This ‘Viability Gap Funding’ is available on a first-come.5 billion (2005 prices). was launched in 2005 at an estimated cost of US$12. Against the backdrop of PPPs falling short of its own expectations. P A G E 33 . as well as other physical infrastructure in urban areas such as water supply and sewerage.3 billion. including foreign investors.nhai.
with the winners forming joint ventures with the Airports Authority of India. in large part because of cross-subsidisation of suburban and lower-class passenger fares (The Hindu Business Line 2006a). several new low-cost airlines have commenced operations in India since August 2003 to capitalise on increased demand for air travel from the P A G E 34 . Domestic air services were liberalised in 1994. with private sector participation. Mumbai.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Construction of a dedicated high axle-load freight corridor with computerised control on the western and eastern routes was proposed in the 2006–07 budget. Notwithstanding these developments. including foreigninvestor. rail freight continues to be hampered by excessive charges. In response to calls for PPPs to bridge the infrastructure and technology gaps. an enormous amount of investment will be required to modernise India’s rail network. Emulating the emergence of ‘no-frills’ carriers in the United States and Europe. In October 2006.4 million tons per annum – or over ten per cent of existing cargo throughput at major ports – and involving an investment of Rs26 billion (US$600 million) had been completed (Indian Department of Shipping 2005). Private carriers have since been permitted to operate scheduled services in India. Ports Major reforms have been introduced to the ports over recent years. which handle some 75 per cent of the country’s port traffic (Indian Planning Commission 2002a). As of 2005. Foreign companies were invited to form consortiums to bid for the restructuring and operating of the Delhi and Mumbai airports. Several state-owned ports have leased out terminals to private operators. Such infrastructure development should go some way to enabling India’s rail network to cope with anticipated growth in freight. Plans are afoot to corporatise India’s 12 major ports. Airports and air services Recognising that private sector involvement is required in order to ensure adequate funding for the modernisation of India’s major airports. 13 private-sector port projects with a capacity addition of around 47. with a view to upgrading them to international standards. However progress has been slow. and Kolkata – to private sector operators. Private-sector. The government has also moved to allow joint ventures between major ports and foreign ports and between major ports and minor ports (Ernst & Young 2005a). Significant investment has also been directed to ‘minor ports’ (a state responsibility) in some states. although railway container licences were privatised in April 2006. Rail has largely been the preserve of the public sector to date. subject to the fulfilment of certain criteria. Chennai. the Government decided to lease India’s four principal airports – in Delhi. In addition. particularly for container handling. despite some pricing reforms. Arrangements for new international airports at Bangalore and Hyderabad are also proceeding. work commenced on the Western corridor linking the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust and other ports in western India to industries in northern and central India (Singh 2006). participation in port development has increased markedly. Indian Railways have reportedly asked for clarification from the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion on foreign company involvement in the rail sector (Asia Times Online 2006).
However growth in these sectors and high-end services alone will not generate the 200 million new jobs needed to absorb existing unemployed and under-employed workers and the 160–170 million new workforce entrants expected by 2020 (Indian Planning Commission 2002b). particularly in relation to labour. the sector will have to play a major role in absorbing large numbers of low-skilled workers. which mainly comprises family businesses and other small employers (Box 2. social and personal services. Table 10. the vast majority of workers in these industries are in the relatively labour-intensive ‘unorganised’ sector.6). There is a high income elasticity of demand for services. Jha 2005). 13 Excluding community. Currently. Moreover. legal and accountancy services and housing and construction. The current UPA government still plans to divest equity in the airlines. but both sales fell through due to the withdrawal of the qualified bidders late during the final stages of the process.Role of Services in Development rapidly-expanding middle class. There are grounds to believe it is well-placed to do so. Economy-wide employment growth over the six years to 1999–2000 was virtually entirely due to job creation in the services sector 13 (Indian Ministry of Finance 2003. Today several private airlines compete to provide regular domestic air services. although the Government decided not to allow direct or indirect participation of foreign airlines. alongside the government-owned Indian Airlines. and therefore tend to be less competitive compared to those that have been liberalised. inhibits productivity growth and impedes job creation in retail and wholesale trade. Given its dominant contribution to domestic output.9). approximately 30 per cent of India’s 337 million-strong workforce was employed in services. This dual economy prevents modernisation. The number of domestic passengers is expected to grow from around 20 million a year in 2005 to 50 million a year in five years (The Economist 2006d). Services have been the main source of employment growth in the economy since the 1991 reforms. Yet these sectors. P A G E 35 . While small Indian companies in the unorganised sector benefit from being subject to minimal regulation. Sahara and Air Deccan. In 1999–2000. The privatisation of Indian Airlines and Air India was initiated a few years ago. Logistics also remains subject to significant hindrances. Some analysts question the capacity of services to absorb labour in a major way (for example. Prominent amongst the services sectors with high employment potential are retail and wholesale trade. The services sector’s share of employment is significantly less than its share in economy-wide GDP. they are discouraged from growing above a certain size by the heavy regulation. along with legal and accountancy services. remain highly protected. The Government has also allowed private airlines to fly on some international routes. the biggest private airlines are Jet Airways. the sloWer reformers Reforms in finance and transport infrastructure are building a platform for job creation and productivity improvements in the broader economy. The marked difference in the labour intensity of production between the unorganised and ‘organised’ sectors underscores the dualistic nature of the Indian economy. and housing and construction. logistics. The limit on FDI in domestic airlines has been raised to 49 per cent. Demand for services inputs by the manufacturing sector is also growing (see section on ‘Services and manufacturing’ below). to which they would become subject.
P A G E 36 . Over one-half of this employment was in trade. social and personal services are added in. While accounting for just 1.9 per cent of aggregate economy-wide employment in 1999–2000. services employed 64 million workers.6: employment and output in the ‘organised’ and ‘unorganised’ sectors India’s National Accounts Statistics divide the economy into ‘organised’ and ‘unorganised’ sectors. 14 14 Manufacturing establishments employing 10 or more workers on a regular basis using power plus those not using power and employing 20 or more workers. They accounted for just 11 per cent of employment in the private organised sector and 29 per cent of employment in the public sector in March 2003 (Indian Ministry of Finance 2006. hotels & restaurants. The unorganised sector comprises units whose activity is not regulated by law. Services (excluding community.3). these services contributed over 16 per cent of aggregate economy-wide net domestic product. However it contributed 41 per cent of aggregate net domestic product in the same year. Appendix Tables 3. representing 19 per cent of aggregate economy-wide employment (Indian Ministry of Finance 2003 and 2006). In 1999–2000. When community. The organised sector is a major force in the Indian economy. manufacturing units registered under the Factories Act 1948 and other private corporate sector entities. yet is not a major source of employment.1–3.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY box 2. but are a significant contributor to overall GDP. Services are far more prominent as employers in the unorganised sector. It includes private and limited companies and unincorporated enterprises. as well as enterprises run by co-operative societies and trusts. services’ net domestic product in the organised sector exceeded that in the unorganised sector. The organised sector employed 28 million – or a mere eight per cent – of India’s 337 million-strong workforce in 1999–2000. and/or those which do not maintain regular accounts. social & personal services) are not a major employer within the organised sector. The organised sector consists of the public sector.
Large-scale organised retailing has been held back by poor transport infrastructure.6 (continued) The organised sector is a major force in services Share of organised and unorganised gross product for selected services. In any event. The organised retail sector is growing at 18–20 per cent a year (The Economist 2006b). 1999–2000. Organised retailing accounts for only 2–3 per cent of the total and is concentrated in large cities. difficulties faced in acquiring tracts of land and rules and regulations at all levels of government. The retail industry is the largest provider of jobs after agriculture. a new shop needed on average 15 licences from 11 government bodies. India has the highest density of retail outlets in the world – more than 15 million compared to 900 000 in the United States (Mukherjee and Patel 2006). and is beginning to employ significant numbers of low-skilled P A G E 37 . Community. the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Act prevents farmers from selling produce directly to retailers (The Economist 2006b). Securing the licences took six months on average and cost up to 500 000 rupees (2003 study quoted in The Economist 2006b). hotels Transport. Table 24. In 2003. change is coming to the retail sector. accounting for six to seven per cent of employment and approximately ten per cent of GDP (The Economist 2006b). Some 40 shopping malls had been opened in India by the end of 2005 – up from fewer than half a dozen a year earlier – with 300 expected by 2007 (IMAGES-KSA Technopak 2005). for example. and is dominated by small. family-owned shops often surviving on unpaid labour. insurance. current prices 90 Share in gross product (per cent) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Construction Retail trade. Some retail chains are now appearing on the scene and large shopping centres are springing up. with an estimated 86 per cent occurring in the six biggest cities. storage and communications and restaurants Unorganised sector Organised sector Finance. social real estate and and personal services business services Source: Indian Planning Commission 2002c. In most states. Retail trade Retail trade occurs almost exclusively in the unorganised sector.Role of Services in Development box 2.
notably limitations on size of firm. Apart from benefiting the consumer through lower prices and improvements in the quality of perishable products. selling over 6000 consumer electronics and durables products (Tata Group 2006). allowing foreign investment would bring greater competition. Oil. as well as barriers to foreign entry. Handicaps faced by logistics providers have retarded the development of an efficient distribution system in India. More recently. Poor transportation infrastructure and the regulatory disincentives to small operators growing above a certain size have been key contributory factors to this situation. and increased opportunities for export of Indian products through foreign retailer outlets. P A G E 38 . subject to prior approval. Going on the experience of other developing countries. for example.2 billion in 1500–1800 supermarkets and hypermarkets and 60 supply centres over the next two years. best international practice. limited opening hours on interstate borders and numerous toll booths. with 100 stores to be established by March 2010. Foreign investment would also be likely to spur growth and create employment in labour-intensive industries such as food processing. petrochemicals and textiles giant. Both legal and accountancy services are subject to significant domestic regulation. play a vital role in supporting and facilitating business and encouraging foreign investment. The Economist (2006a) details a typical 2150 km journey between India’s two most populous cities. A number of global retailers are positioning themselves for an anticipated relaxation of foreign investment policy. Reliance Industries is. The Government moved to open up the sector in a very limited way in early 2006 by permitting FDI of up to 51 per cent in retail trade of ‘single brand’ products. and toll booths and interstate check-point procedures have also hindered the smooth flow of interstate traffic. The journey takes around 8 days at an average speed of 11 km per hour with around 32 hours spent waiting at toll booths and checkpoints. traffic jams. particularly legal and accounting services. Transport delays and inadequate cold storage mean that between 35 and 40 per cent of fruit and vegetables grown in India rots where it is harvested or in transit (The Economist 2006b).INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY workers. Tata Group announced the launch of a retail venture. Kolkata and Mumbai. organised retailing can benefit agricultural producers and manufacturers by reducing the need for intermediaries and introducing improved practices and technologies throughout the value chain. Food processing in India adds just seven per cent to the value of agricultural output compared to more than 40 per cent in China and 60 per cent in Thailand (Indian Ministry of Commerce and Industry cited in The Economist 2006b). who must negotiate restrictions on travel times for heavy vehicles. Logistics Modern retailing is underpinned by efficient distribution systems and integrated supply chains. Infiniti Retail Limited. Legal and accountancy services Professional services. ‘Multi-product’ single brands – such as supermarkets’ own branded goods – also appear to be allowed to invest under this regime (The Economist 2006b). which will provide employment for some 400 000 – 500 000 people (The Economist 2006b). and contributed to major losses of perishable goods during transportation. reported to be investing US$2. for freight carriers.
which would permit legal practice in India by citizens of a country where Indian legal qualifications are recognised. the sector has the potential to create employment opportunities for significant numbers of low-skilled workers. in reality India’s legal services market remains closed and foreign lawyers are not permitted to practice. India’s accountancy services sector is highly fragmented because firms are only allowed to operate as partnerships or as sole proprietorships (under self regulation). which precludes international law firms from establishing offices. in turn driving up transaction costs for other sectors. While the Advocates Act contains a reciprocity provision. If reforms precipitate large-scale construction. Foreign accounting firms can practice in India if their home country provides reciprocity to Indian firms. FDI is not permitted in the sector. Multi-jurisdictional legal advice is part of the essential infrastructure required to provide a sound base to encourage and increase foreign direct investment and international trade. Its more than 900 000 lawyers are regulated by the Bar Council of India. Internationally-based accounting firms are only permitted to operate as consultants. P A G E 39 . Foreign lawyers and law firms have no avenues to establish any commercial presence in India. There are fewer than 400 firms with 5 or more partners. Dwelling construction The construction services sector is highly fragmented. nor to provide advisory services on foreign law. Internationally recognised names may not be used. and no more than 20 professionals are permitted in any one firm (under the Partnership Act). Only graduates of an Indian university can qualify as accountants in India. Similarly. These barriers to foreign entry preclude exposure to competition from best-practice legal and accounting firms. which effectively prevents people from buying up large tracts of land to construct houses (World Bank 2004). which is constituted under the Advocates Act 1961. To date it has not recognised any foreign qualifications. foreign accountants may not be equity partners in an Indian accounting firm. unless they are comprised of the names of proprietors or partners or the name is already used in India.Role of Services in Development India has the world’s second-largest legal profession. However. Indian advocates are only permitted to enter into profit sharing arrangements with other Indian advocates. in part due to the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India regulates the profession.
Coefficients of variation in poverty rates across the states have increased since the mid-1990s and the regional variation in economic growth rates has remained high despite the reforms (Jha 2005). however. combined with supporting evidence from national accounts estimates of consumption. Improvements in the delivery of education and public healthcare services. healthcare and other public services (World Bank 2003 2006b. Changes to the NSS methodology in the 1999–2000 survey in particular called into question its comparability with previous estimates. Moreover. according to official estimates. The official poverty line is set with reference to minimum daily calorie requirements. are critical if more broadly based development is to ensue. Despite the continuing controversy. In the case of the services sector. P A G E 40 . either between the rural and urban areas or between states. particularly in rural areas. Das 2006). do suggest that India has experienced a continued fall in poverty since the 1991 reform push. and other surveys. expanded education and healthcare services will create high-quality employment opportunities. with the fruits of reform flowing through to all sections of society. from 36 per cent in 1993–94 to 26 per cent in 1999–2000 to 22 per cent in 2004–2005. 15 16 Economic reforms have not. The poor state of public finances (Box 2. Addressing deficiencies in the delivery of education and public healthcare services could also be important in ensuring India’s growth model remains politically sustainable. At the same time. particularly in rural areas. Official poverty estimates for India are based on regular surveys of consumer expenditure carried out by the National Sample Survey (NSS) Organisation. The proportion of people living below the poverty line has. 15 16 28. both for excluding broader measures of nutrition and due to methodological changes over time. data on wage rates. declined significantly. The Government recognises that the growth dividend of reform can provide it with more resources to address social issues and ensure at least a minimum level of services for all sections of the community. and improve the quality of governance so as to ensure better delivery of education. commentators suggest that many states need to consider reforms to simplify the business environment. growth has mainly been in urban areas – in particular in the larger cities – and has occurred in some states more than others. led to equal distribution of growth. If the states and the centre succeed in moving towards the elimination of their revenue deficits by 2009–10 – including through better expenditure management – this should place them in a better position to devote more resources to education and health. The official numbers have been the subject of intense debate. Thirlwell (2006) points out that the figures. adopt a more investor-friendly approach.7) has constrained the provision of education and healthcare services and inhibited infrastructure development.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY sectors vital to broad-based development The growth which has resulted from the economic reforms of the 1990s appears to have contributed to improvements in living standards.6 of the population was living below the poverty line in 1999–2000 if the data set is adjusted to ensure comparability with the 1993–94 estimates (World Bank 2003).
5 per cent.7: the state of india’s public finances Large revenue deficits at the centre and in the states over the years have resulted in underinvestment by India’s public sector in health. power and transport infrastructure. To ensure that the states get their finances in order. The state of Indian government finances reflects a high debt servicing burden.99 per cent of GDP in 2005–06. Central government tax receipts were expected to amount to just 10. The Government has sought to address the country’s public finances through the enactment of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act in August 2003. Capital expenditures have fallen from seven per cent of GDP in 1986–87 to an estimated two per cent for 2005–06. State government tax receipts have been relatively healthy. but remains vulnerable should rates pick-up again. the Government has made debt relief conditional on their enacting similar fiscal responsibility legislation (Indian Ministry of Finance 2005). . The central government has gradually wound back its overall fiscal deficit from its 1986–87 peak of 8. but at the expense of a sharp contraction in capital outlays. and deficiencies in the tax system and public expenditure management.Role of Services in Development box 2.48 per cent of GDP in 2005–06. Conversely. The date for the achievement of these targets has since slipped to 2009–10. Revenue and fiscal deficits of the centre and states 9 8 7 Per cent of GDP 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1994–95 1987–88 1988–89 1989–90 1990–91 1991–92 1992–93 1993–94 1995–96 1996–97 1997–98 1998–99 1999–00 2000–01 2001–02 2002–03 2003–04 2004–05 1986–87 2005–06 2006–07 P A G E 41 gross fiscal deficit – centre gross fiscal deficit – states revenue deficit – centre revenue deficit – states Source: RBI 2005b and 2006–07 Budget estimates. amounting to an estimated 8. the ‘revenue deficits’ (current revenues – current expenditures gap) of the states only became a significant problem from the late 1980s. The debt service burden has eased in recent years as interest rates have come down. education. Interest payments consume over one quarter of total central government expenditures. under which the central government’s revenue deficit was targeted for elimination by March 2008.
By 2004–05. many shortcomings still need to be addressed to lessen the constraints it imposes on the growth potential of the Indian economy.3 million in 1983–84 to 9. However. In the higher education sector.ugc. Improvements in enrolment rates are leading to major improvements in literacy rates – 65 per cent in 2001 and an anticipated 75 per cent by 2007. 17 In 2000–01. the sector is growing rapidly. the statistics do not take into account high drop-out rates (Khan and Roy 2003). The number of out-of-school children in the 6–14 year age group fell from 42 million at the beginning of the Tenth Five Year Plan period to 8.1 per cent and 3.2 million. The Government’s strategy to meet the fiscal targets focuses on increasing revenues by broadening the tax base and removing distortions in the tax regime.8 per cent of GDP respectively. together with complementary measures to improve expenditure outcomes.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY box 2.45 per cent of GDP.9 million students were enrolled in tertiary-level technical subjects (science.ac. but lower than the average across Asia and significantly lower than in OECD countries (Kapu and Mehta 2004).in. mathematics and computing) (UNCTAD 2005a). Source: RBI 2006c Education services While India has expanded its education system over recent years. P A G E 42 . The combined fiscal deficit (excluding losses of financial public sector enterprises) in 2005–06 amounted to 7. Further fiscal consolidation is under way. which is considerably higher than the average across developing countries. an enrolment rate of ten per cent is targeted for 2007. available at www.1 million in September 2004 – although the target of achieving universality of elementary education by 2003 has not been met. 1. there were 229 state/central universities and 95 ‘deemed universities’. Deemed universities are largely free of government regulations and more entrepreneurial than government-run universities. The UPA Government is also committed to ensuring the educational needs of disadvantaged groups are better addressed. Under the Plan. This will also experience some slippage. enrolments grew at around five per cent annually over the two decades to 2002–03. with the Government projecting in its 2006 Budget that the centre’s revenue deficit and fiscal deficit will fall in 2006–07 to 2. The gross enrolment rate in higher education (18–23 year age group) is around seven per cent. The two per cent ‘Education Cess’ levied on taxes since 2004 is greatly assisting the financing of much higher levels of basic education (Indian Planning Commission 2005). up from just 18 per cent in 1951. The Tenth Five Year Plan also set the objective of all children completing five years of schooling by 2007 and eight years by 2010. from 3. engineering. 18 up 17 18 University Grants Commission data.7 (continued) The revenue deficits and overall fiscal deficits of both the centre and the states have been tracking downwards in recent years. Notably also. The strong economy is also assisting in improving the tax take.
industry and government. The extremely capable students who are not accepted into the IITs and IIMs will often look for an education outside India (The Economist 2005a). have increasingly been taking their children out of government schools and placing them into private schools. Moreover. Concerned over the quality of schooling. While there have been significant increases in elementary school teacher numbers during the current Plan period. including from reputable foreign universities (Indian Planning Commission 2002b). Hammer.org. Although funded by government and the information technology industry. 19 The Indian government acknowledges the need for private sector investment in higher education. 16 per cent of Indian children from small villages are now enrolled in private primary schools. medicine and business schools. At one end of the spectrum. The number of colleges providing professional education with private management structures has grown rapidly since the early 1990s. while students may be enrolled in publicly-funded colleges and 19 www. regulation currently limits the scope for private providers.Role of Services in Development from 133 and 27 respectively in March 2002. Despite some improvements.iitbombay. A number of private universities have been set up by large industrialists and others. and on the whole the quality of university education has fallen (Indian Planning Commission 2002a). in 2005 only two per cent of those taking the rigorous admission tests were accepted into the IITs. While the private sector is playing an increasing role in the university sector. Getting into the best institutions is exceedingly difficult. those unable to get into the prestigious institutions will often look to overseas study if it is within their means. the education system still has many weaknesses. Kremer. Muralidharan and Rogers 2005). Such is the importance accorded to education. On the other end. In addition. primary school teacher-pupil ratios in 2002 were 1:42. Around one out of four teachers in government primary schools were absent during three spot checks. while one out of two teachers present were not actually teaching (Chaudhury. many colleges and universities do not deliver education to rigorous quality standards and many of India’s approximately 500 engineering colleges need to be upgraded (Indian Planning Commission 2002b). The number of colleges increased by almost one-third to 16 000 over the same period (Indian Planning Commission 2005). September 2005. much anecdotal evidence suggests parents. compared with around 1:20 for the upper-middle income reference level that India aspires to (Indian Planning Commission 2002b). Its revenues derive from student fees. For example. which typically charge US$1–3 a month (Das 2006). This compares with a ten per cent acceptance rate by Harvard. Another model is provided by the International Institute of Information Technology in Bangalore. Otherwise. The freedoms of these private colleges have however been curtailed as they are subject to the same raft of regulations as state colleges. the seven campuses of the Indian Institute of Technology (IITs) and the six campuses of the Indian Institute of Management (IIMs) are well resourced and internationally renowned. especially engineering. only a small fraction of the college-age population is able to be accommodated. P A G E 43 . India’s universities and technical colleges are also of variable quality. the government does not exercise control over it. ‘What’s New. even in slums and villages.
Healthcare services A clear duality has arisen in India’s healthcare systems. Foreign providers need to have an Indian partner and obtain approval to operate from the All-India Council for Technical Education (AICTE).1 per cent of total state government expenditures and 0. However.75 per cent of GDP (Indian Planning Commission 2005). which will regulate foreign university involvement in the sector (The Economic Times Online 2006). with their ability to set up ongoing operations dependent upon their performance in an initial trial period.3 beds per 1000 people (The Hindu Business Line 2005). Brazil and Thailand which have an average of 4. and in 2003–04 were just 4. means it will need to turn out increasing numbers of high quality graduates in these disciplines. which is very low compared with many other developing countries. The government is reportedly in the process of finalising legislation.5 hospital beds per 1000 people. Constraints foreign providers will face include the need to adopt fee structures laid down by the University Grants Commission. State allocations to health have been declining over the past decade. a number of private hospitals are now also exporting their services – in the form of a range of treatments and operations – to foreigners. Public spending on healthcare is increasingly constrained by public finances. that is without requiring government approval. While the betteroff in India can afford private care. With the encouragement of government.0 per cent of GDP by 2010 (Indian Ministry of Health & Family Welfare 2002). There are for example just 1. qualifications issued by these institutions are not recognised by the Indian Government. Industry will need in parallel to invest considerably more in research and development. they are increasingly turning to private sector providers of vocational training (Kapu and Mehta 2004). which compares poorly with countries such as China. Apart from efforts to ensure that all its institutions are up to an acceptable standard. Improvements measured in terms of public health indicators have been uneven both between urban and rural areas and among states. the majority of the population has to make do with a public health infrastructure that is under-equipped. India’s pool of qualified scientists and engineers is large by international standards. FDI in the education sector with up to 100 per cent equity is permitted under the ‘automatic route’. A range of controls also apply in technical education. primarily through independent practitioners and increasingly through well-equipped private hospitals. in addition to the strong commitment to training being demonstrated by the IT–ITES majors. there is also a need to define curricula that better reflect the needs of the labour market. based on the recommendations of the CNR Rao committee report. Public expenditure on healthcare presently amounts to just 1. Private healthcare now provides the bulk of the country’s healthcare services. under-financed and suffers from a shortage of doctors and nurses.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY universities. The number of private schools has also grown rapidly in recent years. The 2002 National Health Policy put forward the objective of increasing public expenditure on healthcare to 2. To P A G E 44 . They will also have to go through a two-phase approval process. However the rapidity of growth in knowledge-based industries such as information technology.0 per cent of GDP. consulting services and biotechnology.
Role of Services in Development achieve this. 20 interrelationship of services With manufacturing.in/ P A G E 45 . Services and manufacturing While the share of manufacturing in India’s GDP remained largely static throughout the 1990s at around 20 per cent. http://mohfw. it envisaged state sector health spending increasing to eight per cent of state budgets by 2010 with the share of central grants to constitute at least 25 per cent of total health spending. agriculture and mining Services sector developments are facilitating modernisation in India’s relatively capital-intensive manufacturing sector and in agriculture. The National Rural Guarantee Scheme. back-office tasks and post-sales service – are now being outsourced to world-leading Indian service 20 See Ministry of Health & Family Welfare website. launched by the Government in 2005. has undertaken to raise expenditure to at least 2–3 per cent of GDP over the five years to 2009 and introduce a national scheme for health insurance for poor families (National Advisory Council 2004). once an investment-friendly policy platform is established for the minerals sector. which itself can bring economic development to remote and underdeveloped regions. it has recently posted growth rates in the order of ten per cent. particularly in labour-intensive industries such as textiles. The first phase of the program will be focused on the country’s poorest and least developed districts. Moreover. is an ambitious program aimed at reducing rural poverty. The Report of the Committee on India Vision 2020 also pointed to the need to lift public expenditure on healthcare dramatically. lifting millions of rural Indians out of poverty.9 per cent to 2–3 per cent of GDP.nic. It forms an important part of the Government’s strategy to raise public spending on health from 0. which has been made possible by the services tradability revolution. and recommended that it be increased to the upper-middle income country reference level of 3. It is targeted at the rural unemployed and guarantees 100 days of work on infrastructure projects each year to one member from each of India’s 60 million rural households. mining services and technology should enable India to derive maximum benefits from exploration. Job creation in manufacturing. Meeting these targets will require a major mobilisation of financial and manpower resources. in its National Common Minimum Programme. The current UPA Government sees an urgent need to put substantially more resources into the public healthcare system and. The sector’s competitiveness is being enhanced by the tendency to contract out an increasing array of service functions. could play a key role in absorbing India’s growing labour force. The National Rural Guarantee Scheme and National Rural Health Mission are aimed at raising living standards and health standards in rural areas. Functions previously undertaken ‘in-house’ by manufacturers – such as software development. The National Rural Health Mission (2005–12) aims to tackle the poor health infrastructure in rural areas.4 per cent of GDP by 2020 (Indian Planning Commission 2002b). design and testing.
is making India more attractive to international investors. and could provide a means for rural Indians to move out of subsistence agriculture. forecasts that the textiles industry could increase its exports from the current level of US$17 billion to US$40 billion by 2010 and provide 12 million additional jobs. Goswami 2005. Kumar. The Confederation of Indian Textile Industry. high-skill manufacturing may not generate large numbers of jobs (see for example. The take-off of labour-intensive manufacturing in India is also impeded by a limited supply of skilled and managerial labour. Nokia and Motorola have recently established advanced plants. An industrial transformation towards advanced manufactures is now under way in India. The success of these facilities depends upon a variety of professional service inputs. improve the business environment (including complex labour regulations) (Kochhar. PC. increased services sector incomes provide a stimulus to consumer demand for manufactures. The global trend towards a ‘service approach’ to manufacturing production. Industries such as textiles have much potential. India may be able to exploit its competitive advantage in labour costs to significantly expand labour-intensive manufacturing but to do so would need to be able to address transport infrastructure bottlenecks. Das 2006). while chemicals (including pharmaceuticals) account for an additional 14 per cent (Thirlwell 2006). which is in high demand in export-oriented services sectors and therefore increasingly costly (Kochkar et al 2006). Indian manufacturing. Technology-intensive engineering goods. Concerns have been raised that India’s emerging strengths in high-tech. Many commentators (e. with an increasing emphasis on design and customisation. account for 21 per cent of India’s merchandise exports. for example. Companies such as ABB and Sigma Electric are already exploiting these capabilities (Financial Times 2006).INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY providers. and can therefore be expected to stimulate demand and employment growth in niche service sectors. for example. compared to US$110. A recent Confederation of Indian Industry–Boston Consulting Group report highlights the fact that the manufacturing sector provides a conduit for agricultural labour looking to enter more value-added industries and also has P A G E 46 .80 per month.g. India’s strengths in software and its engineering capabilities place it in a prime position to exploit this shift. A stronger manufacturing sector can in turn generate employment opportunities in services. In this way knowledge-intensive Indian services are supporting innovation in India’s manufacturing sector. In contrast India remains relatively unrepresented in many labour-intensive manufacturing sectors. Rajan. Nonetheless. whitegoods and telecommunications manufacturers such as Dell. at least in the formal sector. despite boasting healthy productivity growth and much lower wages than its competitors.80 in China (Thirlwell 2006). it would create employment opportunities for large numbers of low-skilled workers. as does the experience in a service-based approach to customers gained from its prominence as a business process outsourcing destination. In 2002 Indian workers in the manufacturing sector earned about US$23. Das 2006) have pointed to manufacturing’s low share of India’s GDP compared to that of other developing countries in Asia and the need for it to expand more rapidly to absorb a fast-growing labour force. tends to be biased towards capital-intensive production and predominantly requires skilled labour. Additionally. Subramanian and Tokatlidis 2006) and improve basic education in rural areas to equip potential workers with elementary literacy and other necessary skills.
agriculture. hotels and restaurants. and thereby increase that sector’s productivity. Yet only a small fraction of the area conducive to mineral deposits has been explored. Growth in organised retailing could also benefit farmers by reducing the need for intermediaries while the modernisation of logistics could reduce losses stemming from the spoiling of agricultural produce during transportation (see ‘The slower reformers’ above). Source: ITC website. e-Choupal services reach out to more than 3.9 per cent. The creation of large numbers of low-skilled jobs in services sectors like retail and wholesale trade. market prices and modern farm practices. copper.3 per cent of total output. zinc and diamonds (Federation of Indian Mineral Industries 2006). Services and mining India has large known reserves of bauxite. iron ore and coal and.8: the ‘e-choupal’ initiative – facilitating rural development The ‘e-Choupal’ initiative was launched in 2000 by ITC. one of India’s largest companies with a diversified presence in many products and sectors and a large exporter of agricultural products. Services and agriculture Production in the agriculture. The initiative aims to raise the competitiveness of India’s fragmented agricultural sector by empowering Indian farmers through the uptake of the Internet at the village level. lead. While progressive reforms beginning with the enactment P A G E 47 . Farmers are able to gain ready access to information in their local language on such things as the weather. forestry and fishing sector remains labour-intensive. given its geology. and housing and construction – as well as in labour-intensive manufacturing – could absorb surplus labour from agriculture. owing in part to prevailing policies. forestry and fishing grew at a trend rate of just 2.5 million farmers growing a range of crops in over 36 000 villages through nearly 6000 village ‘Internet kiosks’ across nine states.com.itcportal.6 per cent. Meanwhile.8). www. Over the post-reform period. notably in relation to IT and telecommunications. Its share of GDP has since declined steadily to 19. is being directed towards raising the competitiveness of India’s fragmented agricultural sector (Box 2. may also possess large deposits of other minerals such as gold. They are also able to make more informed decisions on the purchase of farm inputs and on the sale of their produce. The development means that farmers can look to collective purchases of inputs and sell their produce without the need to go through intermediaries and multiple handling. Today. high-end service provision. E-Choupal is aimed at a more efficient supply chain.Role of Services in Development a substantial multiplier effect in creating jobs in the services sector. Several global studies have estimated that every job created in manufacturing can lead to the creation of 2–3 jobs in services (IBEF 2006a). 1991–92 to 2005–06. The sector accounted for 57 per cent of employment in 1999–2000 but contributed only 25. box 2.
iron. P A G E 48 . software and systems. the introduction of 3-year. There is currently no guarantee that exploration leases will be converted to mining leases. In addition. often leading to small--scale operations and sub--optimal development of resources.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY of the 1993 National Mineral Policy have paved the way for private and foreign investor participation (Federation of Indian Mineral Industries 2006). investment in exploration and mine development has been inhibited by a number of factors. and cement producers access to coal and iron ore at extraction cost rather than market value (The Times of India 2006). Leading-edge expertise in mining services and technology is readily available from companies in countries such as Australia. and the removal of all qualitative and quantitative restrictions on iron ore exports. exploration and mining can be harnessed to contribute to economic development in India’s more remote and underdeveloped regions. Establishing a mining project in India requires multiple approvals from different layers of government (The Hindu Business Line 2006b). The application of advanced mining services and technology for exploration. A high-level committee under the chairmanship of former Deputy Director General of the WTO. the institution of an ‘open skies’ policy under which reconnaissance permits would be granted to more than one applicant for the same area. large scale private (including foreign) investment in the mining sector is likely to take place. As mineral deposits generally occur in remote areas with poor infrastructure (Indian Ministry of Mines 1993). published in June 2006. steel. 100 sq km ‘Large Area Prospecting Licenses’ within this area. safety. The Hoda Committee’s findings. are anticipated to form the basis of a new mining policy. captive mining policies grant power. environmental management. Professor Anwarul Hoda was established in September 2005 to recommend policy changes to attract more foreign and domestic investment in mineral exploration. communications and training should enable India to derive maximum benefits from mineral exploration. investment-friendly and internationally competitive policy regime with clearer and more transparent regulation. If India’s central and mineral-rich state governments can agree on a liberal. in addition to contributing to its overall prosperity. The Committee’s key recommendations include the establishment of a maximum 5000 square-kilometre area in which prospecting can take place.
P A G E 49 . in which Australian companies have significant expertise. include: – – – – – – – – – – – – – – information technology telecommunication services financial services infrastructure. and professional services. construction management and consulting services education and training tourism and travel-related services film and television sports and related infrastructure healthcare services research. including biotechnology mining services retail logistics. – Additional opportunities are likely to emerge over time as the momentum for reform fosters liberalisation and deregulation in protected sectors. • Key areas of current and emerging demand in India.Chapter 3 opportunities for australian service providers in indiai Key points • India’s services-driven development model is creating substantial openings for business.
infrastructure. A. highlighting the opportunities that could be expected to arise if India continues along its current growth trajectory. Education is already a major services export for Australia. the size of this task is enormous. But the pattern of growth posited in Chapter 1. on a huge scale. India will face a strong need to enlist the participation of external providers. Kearney 2005) because of its experienced. this is starting to occur. logistics. While these are important trends. Australia is itself an attractive international business process outsourcing destination (Greene 2006. largely induced by the expansion of the IT and other leadingedge services sectors. finance. There is no doubt that India’s current boom sectors offer opportunities for Australian participation. India’s economy is currently in a phase of significant growth. English-speaking and educated workforce and stable business environment (A. Whether in finding these capabilities or in building indigenous capacity.T.T. suggests that it is prudent for Australian services providers to look beyond the immediately obvious for longer-term possibilities. Kearney 2005). As disaggregation of services provision occurs through the development of international production networks. to the benefit of both countries. As noted in Chapters 1 and 2. Given the scale – and particularly the potential scale – of India’s economy. including in selling services to third country markets. This chapter examines some of those areas. the potential for major expansion in bilateral services trade is arguably in the sectors which are only now starting to take off in India. as well as the application of services to manufacturing. bilateral activity can be expected to intensify. and to differentiate between the different types of market opportunities that will arise depending on the current state of reform initiatives and growth in each sector. and this can only be expected to increase (see Chapter 4). agricultural production and distribution. P A G E 50 . But Australia also has significant expertise in many other areas where India will be seeking to augment its capabilities. To a significant extent. construction and transport. retail. for capabilities and skills which to date may not have been extensively required or available in India.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY ‘No big international company can be without an India strategy’ (The Economist 2006c) Opportunity knocks where change occurs. While this implies a certain degree of competition. it also suggests scope for collaboration taking into account each country’s particular strengths. Australian service providers are well positioned to capitalise on emerging market opportunities in India. as are professional services. broad-based economic development in India implies the ongoing reform and modernisation of a number of crucial facilitating sectors – including telecommunications. wherein the rapid development of one sector of the economy catalyses reform and expansion of others. and mining. Reform and modernisation imply the need. As the previous chapters highlight.
while an R&D and distribution agreement between the CSIRO and Infosys has paved the way for the commercialisation and export of leading-edge Australian intellectual property. This is of particular relevance to the financial services P A G E 51 . and creating export opportunities (see Chapter 4). and where Australia has established strengths. stimulating collaboration in research and development. IT–ITES exports are projected to grow at 25 per cent a year to reach US$60 billion by 2010 (NASSCOM-McKinsey 2005). The Australian operations of TCS. have generated significant employment and collaborative research opportunities in software engineering and telecommunications. One prospective area for such collaboration is knowledge process analytics – an area into which Indian companies are increasingly seeking to move. Minister Maran has said this projection may be too conservative (The Economic Times Online 2005). more and more opportunities for collaboration between Australian and Indian firms to take up joint development work and service third markets are likely to emerge. 26 first and second tier Indian IT companies had established a presence in Australia. implying that opportunities for Australian companies will come in the form of cooperation and collaboration. and about 17 per cent of GDP growth and 44 per cent of export growth over five years to 2010. In a similar vein. In many respects. As the trend to deliver services through international networks intensifies. a NASSCOM-McKinsey report in 2005 predicted that on the back of the strong growth in offshoring. these companies are using their Australian subsidiaries to secure or help take advantage of global market opportunities. in turn generating high-quality employment for Australians in engineering. Infosys and Birlasoft. has said that planned foreign investment in telecommunications and information technology is expected to double to US$22 billion in 2006 (The Economic Times Online 2005). Indian IT companies are becoming formidable multinationals in their own right. Intel Corporation and Cisco Systems – along with smaller Australian companies (see Chapter 4) are stepping up their presence in India. While ‘offshoring’ to affiliated Indian businesses (‘captive’ units) has been growing strongly. Dayanidhi Maran. Indian IT companies are world class. In addition to providing IT solutions to local businesses. As of October 2006. many multinationals are setting up development centres in India and also targeting the fast-growing domestic IT services market. The Information technology-information technology enabled services (IT–ITES) industry is projected to grow at an annual rate of over 25 per cent to US$148 billion by 2012 (Indian Investment Commission 2006a). Satyam. Many of the major global information technology manufacturers and service providers – including Microsoft. for example. They are building up global networks of facilities to service clients better in-country and thereby compete more effectively with the IBMs and Accentures of the world (NASSCOM 2005b). enabling each partner to specialise in its strengths and augment its capabilities in other areas. the country’s IT and business process outsourcing industry would account for seven per cent of India’s GDP by 2010. India’s Minister of Communications and Information Technology.Opportunities for Australian Services Providers in India information technology India’s information technology (IT) sector is attracting increasing attention from foreign investors. business management and consulting.
a leader in networking for the Internet. Hutchison Essar is a joint venture between the Essar Group and Hong Kong-based Hutchison Whampoa. With revenues of US$17.8 billion in 2004–05. network and Internet security consultancy and products. transportation. and in particular the mobile market. forcing them to invest in communications and other technology (The Mercury 2005). Information Technology and the Arts. Total FDI approvals in the sector up to September 2005 amounted to Rs416 billion (US$9. media and banking – areas where Australian companies have evident strengths. The telephone subscriber base is projected to grow at 30–40 per cent a year to reach 250 million by 2009–10 (Indian Investment Commission 2006a). there is scope for Australian business to become involved in education and health initiatives which can help raise living standards in India’s rural sector. Cisco Systems. Two other mobile phone operators also have foreign partners. Indian companies can look to developing the requisite capabilities themselves but often it will make sense for them to adapt offerings from overseas. and cost advantages over competing destinations. Vodafone secured a ten per cent stake in Bharti Tele-Ventures Ltd for approximately Rs67 billion (US$1. in part on the back of an assessment that deregulation is exposing local businesses to increased competition. Australian IT people are also recognised for their business orientation and problem solving strengths.5 billion). and joint research and development projects for emerging technologies and solutions around established technologies (Austrade 2006b). tele-health and remote monitoring. resulted in a memorandum of understanding (MOU) being signed to promote further cooperation in developing information and communications technology industries and strengthening business linkages (Coonan 2005b). The market. Senator Helen Coonan. insurance. including software products for industries such as health. P A G E 52 . A visit in October 2005 by a high-level industry delegation to India led by the Australian Minister for Communications. e-governance. sophisticated financial markets. India is now the fifth-largest telecommunications services market in the world. In October 2005. Invest Australia 2006). Singtel and investment house Warburg Pincus were already partners with Bharti. There may also be opportunities for Australian businesses to win market share in overseas markets by partnering with Indian outsourcing companies (ACS 2005. which can complement Indian technical expertise. which at the time was the largest ever single foreign investment in India (Bharti Enterprises 2005b). India also has application solutions gaps in mining. Australia can avail itself of its highly-skilled financial services workforce. finance and entertainment.6 billion) (Indian Ministry of Finance 2006). telecommunications Foreign investors are taking an increasing interest in India’s fast-growing telecommunications sector. consultancy and other services for India’s burgeoning ITES sector.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY sector. AT&T is a joint venture partner in IDEA Cellular. is expected to continue to grow at break-neck speed in coming years. Austrade has identified a range of opportunities for Australian companies in IT. is also reported to be ramping up its involvement in India. principally the mobile phone market. Given Australian capabilities in distance education.
5 cents) a minute. Citibank and HSBC – accounted for 64 per cent of the assets of all foreign banks in March 2005 (RBI 2005a). IBEF 2005b). particularly in relation to mobile phones. One projection is for total banking assets to double by 2010 to US$915 billion. which is expected in early 2007.Opportunities for Australian Services Providers in India While growing rapidly. is extremely competitive. the potential for large numbers of very small transactions. the opening of the sector since the early 1990s has enabled the generally more efficient foreign and privately-owned banks to secure an increasing share of the market – currently around 25 per cent.7 cents) and Rs2. representing a compound annual growth rate of 15 per cent (Indian Investment Commission 2006a). While public sector banks still dominate Indian banking. especially in long distance call rates (Indian Ministry of Finance 2006. reflecting buoyant conditions and the increasingly important role played by banking intermediation in a liberalising economy. is currently quite low by comparison with that in other developing countries. the opportunities that arise in the rural sector in particular may be difficult for foreign companies to access. Peak telecom tariffs have fallen dramatically over the past decade. became the first foreign telecom operator in India to secure national long distance and international long distance (NLD/ILD) licences.2 (US2. for example bank accounts. P A G E 53 . the Indian telecommunications market. HSBC. mobile carriers are now expanding their networks into untapped rural areas where more than two-thirds of the population lives (The Economic Times Online 2005). Rising incomes and cheaper services are one side of the equation. Domestic long distance rates presently vary between Rs1. financial services Banking The banking sector is expected to grow strongly in coming years. All three are expanding their presence in India (Sify 2005). Other international carriers remain interested in applying for NLD/ILD licences. a joint venture 74 per cent-owned by AT&T. Further dramatic falls are expected in the near term. involving. At the same time. credit cards. On the other side of the equation. The market potential in rural India is particularly significant (see Chapter 2). The penetration of financial products. and mortgages. An ILD enables foreign carriers to provide international connectivity to network facilities which they operate in other countries. following keen interest from numerous foreign carriers (Digital Media Asia 2006). India’s largest foreign bank. whose activities in India are focused on outsourcing operations. while mobile rates are around US2–3 cents a minute. AT&T Global Network Services India. aided by stiff competition in the marketplace.4 (US5. A number of guidelines that impede the provision of international voice and data telecommunications services were introduced in 2005 when the foreign equity limit in telecommunications was raised from 49 to 74 per cent (see Box 2.3). invested US$150 million in India through the first 11 months of 2005. Three foreign banks – Standard Chartered Bank. pending the outcome of an Indian Government review of the guidelines. as they do.
AXA Asia Pacific and Aon have each established joint ventures in the insurance sector (see Chapter 4). and aviation – are in need of massive upgrades and modernisation. rail. slated for March 2009. continued strong growth in the life. which is low compared with more mature markets. All major Australian banks are represented in India and are actively appraising market opportunities (see Chapter 4). Deutsche Bank is also restarting its retail banking operations in India. Prime Minister Singh indicated in October 2006 that the country needed investment in infrastructure to the tune of US$320 billion over the coming 5–10 years.and non-life sectors is widely expected in coming years. Aside from supplementing scarce government finances. All sectors – road. P A G E 54 . invested around US$120 million over the same period. which has been operating in the Indian market for 150 years. Independent research and advisory firm. 1 infrastructure. including some Australian banks. Insurance The opening of the life and non-life insurance sectors to foreign investment in 2000 spurred considerable activity by foreign investors. Given the importance of insurance availability to encouraging risk-taking business ventures. ICICI Prudential and Birla Sun Life have each generated more premiums on new business in India than in any other markets in Asia (IBEF 2006c). In transport as well as water. sewerage and tourism projects. Citigroup. foreign investment is bringing management. ports. and QBE Insurance is reported to be eyeing opportunities in India (Canberra Times 2005).6 per cent of GDP in 2003–04. are positioning themselves for the opening of the sector to greater foreign ownership. the government is enlisting private sector involvement in a major way through Public Private Partnerships. engineering and design skills. With India’s large population. whose activities are focused on retail and corporate banking. increasing discretionary incomes and a growing awareness of insurance products.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Standard Chartered. The bank reportedly plans to continue expanding its operations by opening 10–12 branches every year and focusing on the fast-growing retail segment (Sify 2005). is currently expanding its research and equity businesses. India’s imports of insurance services doubled to US722 million in 2004–05. Foreign banks have been prevented from holding a stake of more than five per cent in domestic private sector banks but a number of them. Life insurance premium income (first year plus renewal income) was running at around 2. construction management and consulting services India is according the highest priority to bringing its transport infrastructure to a standard which will support the rapid growth of the Indian economy. Financial Insights projects India’s life insurance sector will continue to expand at around 20 per cent a year over the medium term (Financial Insights 2005). 1 Most private insurance companies are joint ventures between Indian and foreign partners. demand for such services can only be expected to increase as India continues to grow.
100 per cent tax exemption in any consecutive ten years out of 20 after project commissioning. Private sector investment is being sought. Airservices Australia has already had some success (see Chapter 4). Chennai and Kolkata to private operators and building new international airports in Bangalore and Hyderabad with private sector participation (see Chapter 2). envisages investment of Rs558 billion (US$12. such as international standards compliance.Opportunities for Australian Services Providers in India Roads At least US$50–60 billion investment is required over the coming five years to improve road infrastructure (Indian Investment Commission 2006a). under build-operate-transfer (BOT) arrangements. Ports The National Maritime Development Programme.org. Yet India has limited skilled resources in a number of aviation services required by these and established airlines.nhai. P A G E 55 . has already begun assisting India’s aviation industry in this regard (see Chapter 4). announced in December 2005.1). including SMEC (Box 4. aviation security. in addition to leasing out India’s four major international airports at Delhi. compliance documentation. participation. These include up to 100 per cent foreign equity. who are streamlining cost structures. ground handling and safety systems development. have already secured contracts associated with the construction and upgrading of sections of the national highways network. and a number of other Australian companies are also interested in securing business in the air transport sector.7 billion) on ports sector projects through to 2011–12. Australia’s capabilities are recognised as world class in many of these areas. Altogether. over US$15 billion is expected to be invested in airport development over the coming five years (Indian Investment Commission 2006a). Private sector investment in constructing. Mumbai. fire services and navigational technologies. 2 See www. Several new. air traffic control. training. These projects are likely to generate flow-on opportunities in aviation transport services such as baggage handling. Aviation Compliance Solutions. and the right to retain tolls (Indian Department of Road Transport and Highways 2006). managing and operating berths and terminals is expected to account for two-thirds of overall investment in the Programme (Indian Press Information Bureau 2005a). including foreign investor. low-cost airlines have commenced operations in the past few years in response to rapidly growing demand from India’s burgeoning middle class (see Chapter 2). Several incentives are available to encourage private sector. Melbourne consultancy. A number of foreign players. subsidies of up to 40 per cent of project cost to make projects viable. to assist with the implementation of the National Highways Development Project. The aviation industry is consequently seeking outside assistance for a range of services. 2 Airports and air services The government is considering private investment in a further 25 city airports. manual design and management.
in many cases establishing their own learning institutions. with assets reverting to the port after the concession period. Development of other sectors will necessitate still further development of the indigenous skills base. and the Chennai Container Terminal. Up to 100 per cent foreign equity under the automatic route is permitted in projects involving construction and maintenance of ports and harbours. sewerage and environmental sanitation services to Bangalore.1). Box 3. Particular emphasis was placed on assisting the urban poor and other vulnerable groups. Despite this. municipalities have encouraged private participation in infrastructure environmental services. accessed May 2006 education and training services Human resource development. for example. mechanical and electrical engineering. Sinclair Knight Merz. the new deep water container port at Mundra. India’s major IT companies are investing very significantly in their own training efforts. at all levels. Environmental infrastructure and services India also recognises the need to improve its environmental infrastructure.1: sinclair Knight merz Australian engineering consulting firm. Since the 1990s. they have also taken over and are operating existing port facilities. and the relatively large number of graduates produced. Sinclair Knight Merz has also been engaged to carry out the civil. Assuming development proceeds according to plan.com. P&O Ports. the best of India’s educational institutions have incredibly competitive entry requirements and excellent tuition by world standards. The project aimed to improve local capacity for the delivery of water supply. was the managing contractor for the Bangalore Water Supply and Environmental Sanitation Master Plan Project. design and technology capabilities in environmental services. structural. As noted in Chapter 2. P A G E 56 . box 3.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Many multinationals and domestic players have been involved in new port development. in areas such as waste treatment and water purification. Ten-year tax holidays also apply. and foreign investment and joint ventures with foreign partners have been increasing (Sawhney and Chanda 2004. there is enough potential to keep both domestic and foreign providers busy for a very long time. skills shortages in the IT–ITES sector are still looming. and project management for the development of a large temple in the state of West Bengal. operates Mumbai’s new port. is arguably the largest challenge that confronts India on its path to development. Nhava Sheva.skmconsulting. but has only limited funding and management capacity. It is also yet to develop comprehensive R&D. Sourced from www. Private sector participation has generally been in the form of a build-operate-transfer (BOT) model.
With foreign degrees offered in India (in-country delivery) not recognised in India. Modi Group. the number of collaborative arrangements in school education has been increasing.com and www. Australia’s share of global demand is forecast to increase from three per cent in 2000 to eight per cent (one million students) in 2025. The Wharton School and the London Business School which have an association with the Indian School of Business. 56 per cent of which is expected to be for onshore 3 See www.2 million by 2025. notably business and hotel management programs. predominantly in the vocational area. destination for Indian tertiary students. offshore campuses and distance education) to grow from 1. et al. including the University of Southern Queensland and the University of South Australia. It seems increasingly likely that the major training opportunities will require foreign tertiary education and training providers to look at delivering their services on the ground in India.isb. www. whereby part of the program is undertaken in each country. P A G E 57 . No foreign universities have established campuses in India as yet.Opportunities for Australian Services Providers in India Australia has been a popular.edu. One forecast is for the demand for international higher education (encompassing overseas study. Study abroad is becoming more accessible with the increasing availability of credit. 3 A recent study found that at least 131 Indian higher education institutions have collaborative arrangements with foreign institutions. and as demand grows for labour in other sectors where potential salaries do not provide the incentive to justify the expense of travelling overseas to undertake a degree. the Western International University of the United States. The number of Indians studying in Australia has consequently grown rapidly in recent years (see Chapter 4). 2002). A handful of foreign institutions have been involved in establishing non-university higher education campuses in India.net 2006). although a number are positioning for entry. While most attention has been paid to the higher education sector. the demand for such courses would appear to reflect the enthusiasm among Indian students for foreign degrees (Boston College 2005). Overseas study Middle class interest in study abroad is growing.org. with China and India generating over half the global demand (Böhm. A number of foreign universities. There are estimated to be more than 200 schools in which foreign schools and Indian partners collaborate on program delivery (oneworld. both as competition heats up among Indian companies to recruit and provide in-house training to graduate engineers. particularly those wishing to undertake postgraduate engineering and business management degrees.8 million students in 2000 to 7.wiganindia. They include the UK-based Wigan & Leigh which has set up a number of business-oriented campuses across India. also provide distance education courses (see Chapter 4). Growth prospects are particularly strong.K. But potential exists for this pattern to change. which established the Modi Apollo International Institute in collaboration with the K.wiuindia. and rapidly growing. and the Kellogg School of Management. The majority of collaborations have involved ‘twinning’ arrangements. given the trend toward international student mobility.
white goods. there is a relative lack of formal training and skills are typically passed from father to son.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY higher education in Australia. While growing from a relatively small base. Australian education providers have also shown considerable interest in pursuing partnerships in vocational and technical education (VTE). There may therefore be opportunities for Australian educational institutions to get involved in joint ventures delivering education programs to Australian and international standards. healthcare. P A G E 58 . the number of Indian VTE students studying in Australia – principally hospitality and business courses – has increased by some 140 per cent over the past year. Australian educational institutions have been actively appraising the Indian market. but TAFE Global has concluded memoranda of understanding with two other Indian parties for the provision of vocational training services. The Bar Council of India. Australian educational institutions need to have something unique to offer before contemplating the establishment of campuses in India. Australia and Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) concluded a deed of understanding in 2004 for the introduction of a skills training strategy aimed at the Tata group. Some 800 000 students from India are projected to seek overseas study by 2025. Accreditation standards are also lacking in many fields. The increasing numbers of international students enrolled in Australian institutions is helping to facilitate the recognition of Australian qualifications overseas. has noted that while Australian institutions may not be able to take 80 000 Indian students [as projected by Böhm et al]. and English language in the workplace. IDP Education Australia’s India country director. ‘there is certainly room for another Monash in India or a Curtin in India’ (IDP Education Australia 2005b). There will be potential opportunities for Australian institutions to be involved in the establishment of campuses in India – once there is clarity in the regulatory approach governing the presence of foreign higher education providers. Cooperation is envisaged in automotive. for example. By 2025 offshore campuses and distance education programs are forecast to account for 44 per cent of the total global demand for Australian higher education (Böhm et al 2002). Henry Ledlie. the broader Indian workforce and internationally. Australian universities are exploring opportunities for twinning with Indian universities as well as the establishment of a direct market presence (Downer 2005). In the trades. now recognises undergraduate law degrees from a number of Australian universities. VTE courses can be provided more readily in India. The parties agreed to explore delivering four projects to transfer the know-how and training quality standards. The agreement has not yet translated into commercial contracts. while India has a large number of nursing colleges. However. TAFE Global. products and services of TAFE Global to the Indian training environment through TCS (TCS 2004). Commercial links Building on the many and varied educational linkages between Australia and India (see Chapter 4). In the case of nursing. many nurses have aspirations to work overseas. Compared with university education. with 80 000 wanting to study in Australia (IDP Education Australia 2005a).
The deregulation of the aviation market has led to a plethora of new airlines and air services. an estimated 25 million people. While margins may be tight. Looking ahead to 2025.2 million in 2004 (10.2 per cent. Tourism and Resources 2005). which has helped accommodate growth in the tourism market. with average annual growth in arrivals from India of 15.5 per cent compound annual growth). aspiring segments of the population. A limit of US$100 000 applies for persons travelling abroad for employment or emigration purposes. India’s share in world tourist arrivals is low – just 0. The World Tourism Organization forecast in 2002 that the number of outbound Indian travellers will reach 50 million by 2020 (Asia Times Online 2002). when visitor numbers are expected to top 290 000. These growth rates compare with World Tourism Organization forecasts of 4. The Indian domestic tourism sector is performing well below its potential. while foreign tourism boards and international airlines have also been actively undertaking promotional activities. International departures have grown from 2.5 per cent compound annual growth over 2001) (RBI 2002). credit cards and personal loans are increasingly popular.6 million in 2001 (8. This represents an annual compound growth rate of over 12 per cent on the 4.2 million in 1992 to 4. or 2.6 per cent through to 2015. in large part reflecting a poorly developed tourism infrastructure. the 11th fastest of all countries. notably the relaxation of foreign exchange transactions.Opportunities for Australian Services Providers in India tourism and travel-related services Indian outbound tourism is expected to grow very strongly in the coming years. P A G E 59 . Changing mindsets. and in fact the number of outbound tourists has been growing at rates not too far short of this over recent years. Currently the share is a little over one per cent (Department of Industry. especially among the larger travel agencies. In 2001.44 per cent in 2004 – although tourist numbers have recently been increasing quite rapidly (Indian Press Information Bureau 2005b). An increasing number of agents are starting to promote Australia as a destination (Tourism Australia 2005). Tourism and Resources 2005). In addition. Clearly. India is one of the fastest growing sources of tourists in the world. Competition is tough however. other factors have been facilitating the recent strong growth in Indian outbound tourism. particularly among the younger. Its travel and tourism economy gross product is expected to grow at an average annual inflation-adjusted rate of 6.9 per cent over the ten years to 2015.6 million tourist numbers recorded in 2001. visitor numbers from India are predicted to grow to around 550 000. which would make India Australia’s seventh-largest source of visitors with a share of 4. Apart from India’s growing middle class.1 per cent growth in worldwide international tourist arrival numbers through to 2020. Travel agencies and tour operators have proactively promoted foreign travel.5 per cent of the Indian population could afford international travel (Department of Industry. foreign players consider it worthwhile to invest in the Indian market given its anticipated future growth. have also stimulated interest in travel abroad. Under the Foreign Exchange Management Act 1999 (FEMA). to an estimated 6. people travelling abroad as tourists or as students are entitled to obtain foreign exchange from authorised dealers up to a limit of US$10 000 per person in any one calendar year (double the previous limit). Tourism Australia (2006) expects Australian providers to gain further market share in Indian outbound tourism over the coming decade.
More liberal code-sharing arrangements were agreed which will provide airlines greater flexibility in serving the market. Group General Manager Government and International Relations. In addition to the opportunities the growth of Indian tourism brings for Australian travel agencies and tour operators. Australian service providers have developed substantial expertise in the provision of tourism-related advice. Open freight arrangements with unlimited capacity and open routes were also agreed. In a bid to build a strong and viable presence in the market. Kolkata and Chennai. discussions with David Hawes. and offers connections from New Delhi. and Australian and Indian carriers had gained access to two additional ports in India and Australia respectively. FDI in travel-related services with up to 100 per cent equity is permitted automatically. Chennai and Ahmedabad.0 per cent. accessed December 2006) P A G E 60 . An estimated 100 000 hotel rooms will need to be added over the coming five years (Indian Investment Commission 2006a). The signing of an MOU in 2004 and a new Air Services Agreement in 2006 significantly increased the access of the two countries’ airlines to each other’s market.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Expenditure by international visitors on goods and services. Although traffic is growing strongly. both to service the Indian tourist market as well as to capture some of the growing business in Indian outbound tourism.au/regions/dyn/in/home. Bangalore. Melbourne. The new services coincided with the signing of an MOU and a new Air Services Agreement. Qantas. Mumbai. airport and other transport infrastructure. India will need to address a number of issues if such growth is to be realised. Qantas currently offers three non-stop flights per week from Mumbai to Sydney. Hyderabad. A number of foreign providers have entered the Indian travel-related services sector in recent years.com.qantas. and availability of high standard hotel accommodation. Qantas India website (http://www. access for the airlines of both countries increased from 2100 seats each way each week to 4500 seats between Australia’s four main gateway ports of Sydney. adjusted for inflation. so providing a platform for expansion of two-way trade and investment in the tourism sector (Box 3. is projected to grow at 9. Brisbane and Perth and four major ports in India: New Delhi. Qantas entered into a codeshare arrangement with Jet Airways in August 2006 to significantly increase the frequency of flights between multiple points in Australia and Mumbai and New Delhi via Singapore. the 6th highest across all countries (World Travel & Tourism Council 2005). Qantas resumed air services to India in September 2004 with three services a week to Mumbai. box 3. The introduction of multiple designation (‘open skies’) has allowed an unlimited number of airlines to operate between the two countries. planning and management services.2: qantas re-enters the indian marKet After a two-and-a-half year hiatus. In 2004. Sources: Anderson 2004. India is continuing to prove a difficult market for Qantas in the face of strong competition from hub carriers such as Singapore Airlines and Malaysian Airlines. Capacity had increased to 6500 seats per week by October 2006. including air seat capacity.2). which serve multiple cities in India and are able to offer connections with their Australian services at their hubs.
television serials and commercials. 1961. in the television and cable industry. Entertainment taxes varied between 14 and 167 per cent in 2002 (Mukherjee 2002). The film and television sectors are expected to grow at 18 and 24 per cent a year respectively. advancements in and better use of technology. It was largely under public ownership prior to the 1990s.Opportunities for Australian Services Providers in India film and television The audio-visual and related services sector has been reformed considerably.4 billion) and Rs427 billion (US$9. Ernst & Young 2004). 4 4 See Income Tax Act. These developments and liberalisation are spurring foreign investment (Austrade 2006c).taxmann. The international audience for Indian films is growing. The film. distribution and exhibition. partly spurred by the five year tax exemption on 50 per cent of profits from building. The cable industry forecasts the number of households with television to rise from 79 million in 2002 to 134 million in 2010. Indian film producers are focusing more on state-of-the-art technologies in cinematographic equipment. India’s entertainment industry is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 21 per cent to reach Rs617 billion (US$13. television and radio sectors are all open to foreign investment and a number of foreign investors have entered the market (IBEF 2006b). and reductions in entertainment tax in some states from their previous high levels (PricewaterhouseCoopers 2005a. Australia’s television service in the Asia Pacific region. up from just 35 million in 2002. owning and operating multiplex cinemas constructed between April 2002 and March 2005. up from Rs201 billion (US$4. Factors leading to buoyant growth include increasing numbers of pay TV homes and multiplexes. with the exception of film production. Modern multiplex and digital cinemas are also springing up everywhere. Section 80-IB (available at www. Demand for Australian film post-production services is also likely to grow.4 billion). P A G E 61 .6 billion) in 2010. and exhibition. This is encouraging producers to co-produce with overseas filmmakers and to include exotic locales in their films.net). post-production. evolving efficiencies in distribution. is available in India (see Chapter 4). The number of cable and satellite households is expected to reach 94 million by 2010.4 billion) in 2004 (PricewaterhouseCoopers 2005a). as is the interest of Indian film-goers in foreign films and influences. The government’s monopoly on the import of foreign films was removed in 1992 and a range of qualitative restrictions on film imports were removed in 2002 (Mukherjee 2002). Likewise. Australia remains a popular destination for Indian productions and awareness of Australia among Indian filmmakers is only likely to increase now that Australia Network. broadcasters are investing in the latest technology and additional services. industry corporatisation and consolidation. to reach Rs153 billion (US$3. making India one of the largest cable markets in the world (Zee Television 2003).
India will be seeking collaboration from countries with experience in hosting major games events. Many Australian companies have. By one estimate. particularly in the increasingly prominent private sector. The Victorian Government has since led a building. representing growth of 15 per cent a year (Indian Investment Commission 2006a). As more and more Indians adopt Western lifestyles. Increasing per capita incomes and a larger number of two-income families are spurring demand for health services among the middle. India has also signalled its wish to host the 2016 Olympic Games.and related-infrastructure forum took place in India in November 2005. architecture. built up particular strengths in contracting in the context of complex major sporting events. The Victorian and New South Wales governments in 2006 jointly established an Australian International Sporting Events Secretariat to promote the expertise developed by both states from hosting the Sydney Olympics and Melbourne Commonwealth Games (Brumby 2006). With a greater awareness of health issues and greater financial means. on the back of their involvement in the 2000 Sydney Olympics and 2006 Melbourne Commonwealth Games. engineering. as well as games operations and management and related services. Moreover. Changing demographics. with the Delhi Games being a major focus. Healthcare sector revenues are projected to increase from around US$30 billion in 2004–05 to US$60 billion by 2010. the incidence of diabetes and cardio-vascular diseases is increasing. infrastructure and related services mission to India. P A G E 62 .and higher-income groups. increasing disposable incomes and changing lifestyles are driving the burgeoning demand for healthcare. with 18 Australian companies participating. the Indian Healthcare Federation estimates that domestic investors will be in a position to meet only about one-half of the required investment in the sector over the next 8–10 years. the public healthcare system will be able to meet just one tenth of the demand for additional hospital beds over the coming three or four years. pointing to significant opportunities for foreign investors (IBEF 2004).3 per cent over the 1993–04 to 2001–02 period.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY sports and related infrastructure A number of Australian companies are positioning themselves to win business in connection with the Delhi 2010 Commonwealth Games. The share of health in private final consumption expenditure increased from 3. Australian companies have competencies in design. environmental management. The percentage of the working age population will also grow over the coming years. The Delhi Games will be India’s largest sporting event since the 1982 Asian Games. The percentage of the population 55 and above will increase to 12 per cent by 2010. healthcare services The healthcare services sector appears poised for buoyant growth. Indian consumers are increasingly seeking out preventive healthcare services.5 to 5. Health insurance cover is beginning to take off (IBEF 2004). An Australia–India Council-sponsored sports.
5 billion. Capabilities that are in particular demand include health insurance. has a large skills base and offers development and market potential across several biotechnology sectors. Prime Minister Howard announced a new A$25 million bilateral research and fellowships program and a new MOU on biotechnology was signed during his visit to India in March 2006. Australian biotechnology industry body. as demonstrated by Aus Health International and AWS Clinical Waste’s successes in the Indian market (see Chapter 4). P A G E 63 . India has made some significant investments in biotechnology. research There is strong scope for partnering and collaboration in numerous research fields. Australia was ranked 5th. An Indo–Australian Conference on Nanoscience and Nanotechnology was held in Bangalore in March 2006. and agricultural and industrial biotechnology could account for US$500 million. The new MOU will complement existing agreements between Australia and India in science and technology and education and training signed in 2003. For its part. Measured in terms of numbers of biotechnology companies. in October 2004 (AusBiotech 2004). with around 100 companies (Ernst & Young 2005b). Anticipating the Indian biotechnology market to reach half the size of the US biotechnology market within the space of 20 years. A number of hospitals and other healthcare operators have formed alliances with foreign companies with a view to tapping their capabilities and expertise in the provision of healthcare services. AusBiotech signed an MOU with India’s peak biotechnology industry body. the Indian Association of Biotechnology Led Enterprises (ABLE). Australian companies have capabilities in a range of healthcare service areas where India has a need for expertise. India’s biotechnology industry has the potential to generate US$5 billion in goods and services revenues by 2010. notably in biotechnology but also in areas such as nanotechnology and bioinformatics. up from US$700 million in 2003–04. There has also been a proposal to establish an Australia-India Nanotechnology Centre at the University of New South Wales (UNSW 2005). bio-services or outsourced research services could reach US$1 billion. Clinical development services revenues could exceed US$1.Opportunities for Australian Services Providers in India The number of private sector companies owning and managing hospitals has grown rapidly in recent years. India turns out nearly half a million graduates with degrees and diplomas in biotechnology. as well as training and consulting services. The MOU aims to strengthen ties and develop further biotechnology partnering and collaborative opportunities. India had the 11th largest biotechnology sector in the world in 2005. new hospital and diagnostic centre projects. Nanotechnology and bioinformatics are two areas at the interface of biotechnology and information technology where both countries have strengths. further enhancing scope for multi-disciplinary research and technology cooperation between the two countries. Each year. bio-informatics and the biological sciences (Indian Department of Biotechnology 2005). Australian industry has a track record in innovation. AusBiotech notes the complementarities that exist.
5 million additional jobs are likely to be created in retail by 2010. P A G E 64 . Opportunities exist to supply mining technology and services for exploration.24 billion in 2004–05. Over 60 per cent of the world’s mining software is written in Australia (Minerals Council 2005). software and systems. Australian project developers. Woolworths concluded a deal to provide Tata Group’s recently announced Infiniti retail venture with technical support and strategic sourcing facilities from its global network. Ludowici. the detail will reportedly be revisited if the Indian Government loosens restrictions on FDI in the retail sector (The Hindu Business Line 2006c). with additional investment of US$8–10 billion required in retail fit-outs and related equipment. For the present. safety. The growth in the organised retail sector could provide additional opportunities for Australian retailers if foreign investment laws are further relaxed. The Indian mining industry is becoming more aware of Australian capabilities in mining technology and other services areas. Organised retailing in India is growing particularly strongly and is projected to reach US$60–75 billion by 2011–12. India is looking for state-of-the-art technological and management expertise. cost reduction. retail Retail consultancy Technopak predicts that India’s retail sector will increase in size from US$300 billion in 2006 to US$427 billion by 2010 and US$637 billion by 2015. environmental management. Australian retailers have developed significant expertise in the modern retailing systems and practices that will be required by Indian companies scrambling to establish organised retailing ventures. but mining policy is currently under review. Australian mining service companies can be expected to follow the miners in a major way. While Woolworths has no equity stake in Infiniti.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY mining services Australian exports of mining technology services globally were expected to reach A$1. communications and training. Technopak (2006) estimates an additional 600–700 million square feet of retail space will be required by 2011. regulatory regimes are largely precluding foreign mining company investment in mine development in India. Mincorp and JK Tech already operating successfully in India (see Chapter 4). When the restraints on FDI are removed. Based on current projections of mall construction there will be a shortfall of 400–500 million square feet. which can improve productivity through good planning and design of mines. design and construction of this additional retail space. architectural firms and engineering consultancies – many of whom are already involved in India – are well placed to participate in the planning. The retail supply chain alone is expected to benefit from investments amounting to around US$22 billion (Technopak 2006). An estimated US$10–15 billion will be needed to make good this shortfall. with Xstrata. and optimisation of smelting and refining operations and by-product recoveries (Austrade 2006d). At least 2.
which would enable Australian lawyers to enter into voluntary forms of commercial association with Indian lawyers and law firms. including legal and accountancy services. The growth of the Indian economy has fostered demand for qualified and suitably experienced international lawyers and accountants to service the needs of foreign investors in India and Indian multinationals and Indian exporters of capital. While India’s legal and accounting professions are resistant to reform and market opening. P A G E 65 . better enable Indian companies to take advantage of international business opportunities. India’s fragmented logistics sector offers opportunities for more efficient Australian operators with sophisticated capabilities in supply chain management.Opportunities for Australian Services Providers in India logistics The rapid growth in organised retailing is rapidly changing the logistics landscape. Australia is also pushing for commitments on commercial presence to enable Australian accountants to establish offices in India and provide a full range of accountancy services. Linfox recently commenced operations in India and is working with potential customers to solve their supply chain issues (Linfox 2006). Its recent acquisition of a 60 per cent shareholding in Singapore’s SembCorp Logistics. and employ or be employed by Indian lawyers. Australia is seeking a commitment from India on legal services covering advisory services in foreign law. There is also demand in India for internationally qualified lawyers and accountants to support Indian companies acquiring assets abroad. there is growing acceptance within the Indian Government of the benefits of greater foreign participation. and expose Indian legal and accounting firms to international best practice. Gradual opening of these professional services markets in this way would encourage foreign investment. refrigerated containers and cold storage to enter the market. Toll Holdings aims to become the pre-eminent integrated logistics provider in the Asian region. professional services The Australian Government is working with Australian business to open opportunities in professional services in India. Any liberalisation is likely to be gradual. especially in the resource and information technology sectors. with its transportation and warehousing network stretching across 15 countries including India. goods and services. In WTO services trade negotiations. is a key element of its strategy (Toll Holdings 2006).
P A G E 66 .
play an important role in showcasing business opportunities in India. collaborative initiatives and export opportunities for Australian companies. – Australia currently runs a significant surplus in services trade with India. • India has been Australia’s second-fastest growing services export market over the past five years. • Dozens of Indian information technology companies have a significant and growing presence in Australia. which is generating employment. Australian companies are also taking advantage of emerging export opportunities in engineering. • The Trade and Economic Framework Agreement signed in march 2006 provides an important basis for the facilitation and future development of the bilateral trade and economic relationship. infrastructure design.Chapter 4 the bilateral economic relationshipi Key points • Australian business is beginning to capitalise on India’s economic emergence. the level of Australian direct investment in India is set to increase with some recent investment decisions and conclusion of contracts. – A number of state governments have also identified India as a strategic market. P A G E 67 . – Business associations and chambers of commerce. • While presently at modest levels. particularly in education. notably the Australia India Business Council (AIBC). – Growth in India’s services sector has fuelled a growth in demand by India for Australian services. healthcare and mining services. – India is now the second-largest source country for international student enrolments. – • Visitor numbers from India have grown rapidly over recent years.
Changes in Indian regulations governing gold imports have precipitated strong demand for Australian non-monetary gold. of US$160 million from Australia between August 1991 and April 2006 (Indian Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion 2006). Cumulative foreign direct investment inflows is a very rough proxy for the stock of investment. Increased coal sales have reflected increased demand for resources to fuel India’s fast-growing economy.4 billion. with exports growing at a trend rate of over 31 per cent over the past five years. Merchandise exports were valued at A$7. is growing rapidly. Exports increased by 36 per cent in 2005–06.8 billion. According to the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry. India is Australia’s fastest-growing major merchandise export market. The Indian data shows cumulative FDI inflows . Australia’s services exports to India were valued at A$1. it is clear that Australian companies have been actively pursuing investment opportunities. India has been Australia’s fastest-growing services export market after China. In 2005–06 India was Australia’s 11th largest overall trading partner – up from 18th in 2000–01.4 billion. with a number of investments in the services sector as well as manufacturing sector investments being undertaken by Bluescope Steel and Mayne Pharma. Total Australian exports to India exceeded A$8. with SMEC International (Box 4. India’s importance to Australia as a trade and economic partner has grown enormously over recent years. P A G E 68 .1). Australia is India’s eighth-largest overseas investor with over $1 billion approved for around 140 joint ventures.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY ‘Australian companies have undoubtedly discovered India. With a 23. The level of investment is set to increase. pushing India up into ninth place as a services export market for Australia.4 billion in 2005–06. as it does not take into account market valuation and exchange rate movements. making India Australia’s seventh-largest export market with 4.2 per cent trend growth rate over the past five years. excluding re-invested earnings. Together coal and gold accounted for 83 per cent of the total growth in exports over the 2000–01 to 2005–06 period and 72 per cent of total merchandise exports in 2005–06. ANZ Bank (technology operations in Bangalore) and Orica (explosives business) among the highest profile investors. As India’s economy adjusts to greater openness to trade in both industrial products and services. But it is highly likely that the growth is only just beginning’ (AFR 2006a) overvieW of the relationship Australian services providers looking to capitalise on the opportunities highlighted in Chapter 3 have an increasingly solid base of commercial activity upon which to build. According to Australian statistics. Estimates based on foreign investment approvals are substantially higher still. 1 1 Data from the ABS and Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion statistics on foreign direct investment are not directly comparable. In 2005–06. While estimates of Australian investment in India vary substantially depending on the methodology applied. though somewhat smaller. diversification of the bilateral commercial relationship can be expected.9 per cent of total exports. Total trade was worth A$10. for example. making India Australia’s 21st largest source of services imports. Imports of services from India were valued at A$348 million in 2005–06. Bilateral services trade. the stock of Australian FDI in India across all sectors was A$47 million at the end of 2005 (ABS 2005b). driven by increased jewellery production in India.
SMEC’s recent and current projects include: • a A$5 million contract for preparation of a Decision Support System to guide future water allocation and investment decisions across the Gangetic Plains of Uttar Pradesh. aimed at achieving sustainable improvement in the efficiency and effectiveness of transport infrastructure management in Kerala. This opens the way for the sale of electricity from the West Seti hydropower plant that SMEC International is proposing to develop in the Far Western Region of Nepal. • a A$3 million World Bank-funded consulting contract to prepare an institutional strengthening and reform roadmap for the massive Uttar Pradesh Irrigation Department (UPID) with close to 100 000 staff. SMEC.au and discussions with Pankaj Patel. including the irrigation system. SMEC is also drawing increasingly on its staff in India for projects elsewhere in Asia. The project involves the application of software to map and model water allocation generally. local technical skills and the social and political context.The Bilateral Economic Relationship box4.com. Rajasthan. policy and capability reforms to enable the Department to deal with emerging water sector management challenges in India’s most populous state and one of its poorest. • a contract with the Public Works Department of the state government of Karnataka for the provision of project management and construction supervision services in connection with a major upgrading program for 1000 km of state highways. SMEC India. • a contract with the Public Works Department of the state government of Kerala for capacitybuilding and modernisation initiatives. Over the past 15 years.and Asian Development Bank-funded stretches of road in Bihar.1: smec international The Australian consulting firm SMEC International has particular strengths in the application of IT to natural resource management. SMEC has built an appreciation of local needs and what would be an ‘appropriate solution’. P A G E 69 . it has undertaken a number of major infrastructure projects in India involving highways. including the World Bank. irrigation and water resource management. wetlands and socio-economic indicators. Orissa and Haryana. groundwater. and • an MOU with the Power Trading Corporation of India Limited. SMEC has also been actively involved as a supervising consultant for stretches of road being constructed and upgraded as part of the National Highways Development Project. the Indian government agency responsible for the co-ordination of the electricity market and the purchase of energy from private suppliers. Jharkhand. With many years experience in India and the countries of the region. taking account of the situation on the ground. crops. General Manager Environment & Planning.smec. It has ten project offices in India and over 600 staff in country under its 100 per cent owned local subsidiary. SMEC also places emphasis on capacity building by involving client personnel in their development work. The project aims to achieve structural. Source: www.
4 billion-plus services exports to India are dominated by education (described in the statistics as ‘education-related travel services’) which accounted for 70 per cent of total services exports in 2005–06. including portfolio and other investment.1). 2 trade in services Australia’s services exports to India Australia’s A$1. 2 Total Indian investment in Australia at the end of 2005.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Separate statistical data on the level of Indian direct investment in Australia are not available. It is concentrated in the IT (see sub-section on ‘Indian direct investment in Australia’ below) and resource sectors (construction of an ammonia plant by the Oswal Group for approximately A$630 million and copper mines acquired by Birla and Serlite in Queensland. Figure 4. Other personal and business travel amounted to A$181 million in 2005–06 while the remaining commercial services exports were valued at A$249 million (Figure 4. 2005–06 (A$ million) Government services. 4 Business. which would make Australia the ninth-most important destination for Indian FDI. P A G E 70 . was estimated by the ABS to be A$258 million (ABS 2005b). 71 Other commercial services. 189 Personal – education-related. Western Australia and Tasmania).1 Education the lion’s share of services exports Breakdown of exports of services to India. 110 Source: ABS 2006a. 56 Travel. 1166 Personal – other. Invest Australia estimates Indian investment in Australia to be worth around A$1 billion. 985 Transportation.
P A G E 71 . For the 11 months to November 2006. China and the Republic of Korea have been the major sources of growth in the higher education sector as well as in the vocational and technical education sector. up from eighth position in 2002. Australia is the second-most popular destination for Indians enrolled in higher education institutions overseas. ranking India third behind China and Malaysia.2 India: a large and growing source of students Australia’s top ten markets for international student enrolments for the 2005 calendar year. far outpacing the growth of other major markets. Note: Overseas students undertaking short English language courses not requiring a student visa are excluded from the statistics. Indian student enrolments almost doubled to around 28 000.The Bilateral Economic Relationship Education services Education exports in 2005–06 were valued at A$985 million. there were more than 38 700 Indian student enrolments in Australian educational institutions. Between 2003 and 2005. more than double their value in 2003–04 . after the United States. 3 Figure 4. India. and growth on previous year 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Hong Kong Malaysia Republic of Korea 40 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 United States Singapore Indonesia Thailand Japan China Other India Growth on 2004 (per cent) Enrolments 2005 calendar year Growth on previous year 35 Source: AEI 2006b.2). 3 Enrolments (’000s) The student fees component was estimated at A$230 million in 2004. India became the second-largest market (after China) for the export of education services in 2005 (Figure 4.
Rapid growth in education exports has been facilitated by the forging of institutional links between Australian education providers and their Indian counterparts. VTE student enrolments have increased rapidly. with student enrolments increasing from less than 100 in 2002 to around 1300 in 2005. Linkages are also being forged outside the higher education sector. services and transport. a leading Indian information technology company. The Australian School. but just 8. The majority of the remaining Indian students undertaking studies in Australian educational institutions are enrolled in vocational and technical education (VTE). Melbourne-based franchise company Kangaroo Kids recently opened seven new high schools in Mumbai in addition to its 35 pre-schools already operating in 12 cities across India (Austrade 2005). India is the top-ranked source of overseas postgraduate students in Australia. information technology and engineering. also recently opened in New Delhi (123India. Popular fields of higher education include business administration and management. A growing number of universities in the two countries have since been establishing their own agreements or memoranda of understanding in particular fields (Box 4. The University of Southern Queensland offers online MBA studies to students in India. to provide strategic direction for a partnership in the area of information technology services (The Hindu Business Line 2004).com 2005). An agreement was concluded in 1999 between the Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee and the Association of Indian Universities to cooperate in a number of areas.0 per cent of international student enrolments at all levels of education. A visit to India in February 2006 by Australia’s ‘Group of Eight’ universities was aimed at raising the profile of Australian education and research and building linkages. which offers students the opportunity to obtain the Western Australian Certificate of Education. 80 per cent of all Indians studying in Australia were enrolled in higher education institutions (AEI 2006a). communication studies. The University of South Australia similarly offers an online master’s degree in Information Technology (Techbizindia. Biotechnology.2). as well as the largest source of computing. Several Australian universities also provide courses online via distance education over the Internet. The University of Wollongong has an MOU with Wipro.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY In 2005. up from around 1400 in 2003 to around 3900 in 2005. The number of Indian students undertaking English language courses in Australia has also grown strongly. P A G E 72 . Indian students accounted for almost 14 per cent of all international student enrolments in Australian higher education in 2005. science and engineering students. and art and design are becoming increasingly popular.com 2004). A number of foreign institutions have established credit transfer / ‘twinning’ arrangements with Indian counterparts. mainly in hospitality.
The University of New South wales (UNSW) has entered a partnership with IIT Mumbai to develop collaborative research programs in computer science (Howard 2006a). Indian economic policy. the University of Melbourne. The University of melbourne has developed a variety of linkages with leading Indian academic institutions. the University of Sydney established five Visiting Research Fellowships. in collaboration with BHP Billiton. and another between the Queensland University of Technology and the Indian Institute of Information Technology in Bangalore. The University plans to open a liaison office in Bangalore in early 2007. and prevention and control of HIV/AIDS. The University of Queensland concluded a research collaboration agreement with Manipal Academy of Higher Education. An agreement between Southbank Institute of TAFE and the Institute of Hotel Management Bangalore. focused on collaboration in research. Bangalore focused on biotechnology and through research collaboration on topics such as grid technology research. monash University. It also negotiated a PhD student exchange program with Jawaharlal Nehru University in 2003 (University of Queensland 2004). 4 4 Based on correspondence in December 2006 with Professor Frank P Larkins. the Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineering at La Trobe University signed a twinning agreement with CMTES Informatics. Manufacturing and Medical Engineering also has an MOU with the Vellore Institute of Technology in the state of Tamil Nadu (Queensland Department of Premier and Cabinet 2004). a private provider of computer training courses in India. is establishing a joint institution for scientific research with the Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai (IIT Mumbai).2: examples of australian university linKages With indian counterparts In 2001. were signed during Premier Beattie’s 2004 visit to India (Queensland Department of Premier and Cabinet 2004).The Bilateral Economic Relationship box 4. In 2004. designed to establish and encourage research links with leading Indian researchers (University of Sydney 2004). in 2004. including through an MOU with the Indian Institute of Science. Queensland University of Technology’s School of Mechanical. P A G E 73 . to deliver the first part of its Master of Information Technology course in Hyderabad (La Trobe University 2002). UNSW has MOUs with Jawaharlal Nehru University and the University of Pune. The Queensland University of Technology also signed an MOU with the Madras Institute of Technology during Prime Minister Howard’s March 2006 visit to India (Howard 2006b). student and staff exchanges and education projects (DFAT 2005). Deputy Vice Chancellor (International). one of India’s top medical schools. It has established offices in New Delhi and Mumbai.
Strong growth in Indian visitor numbers looks set to continue. Australia and India agreed on an Action Plan to assist in fast-tracking tourism growth between the two countries.3 Rapid growth in visitor numbers from India Annual growth in short-term visitor arrivals from India and from all countries 30 25 20 Per cent 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 Source: ABS 2005a.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Tourism India was Australia’s 14th-largest inbound tourist market in 2005–06. Visiting friends and relatives. an increase of 54 per cent on the previous year . at 46 nights. Fran Bailey.0 per cent. Despite gaining market share in Indian outbound tourism over recent years. with 79 000 short-term visitor arrivals. During the ten months to October 2006 around 69 000 short-term visitors from India arrived in Australia.3). During a September 2005 visit to India by the Australian Minister for Small Business and Tourism. Annual growth in shortterm visitor arrivals from India outstripped the overall average from all countries over the decade and rebounded particularly strongly since the worldwide decline in tourism precipitated by September 11 (Figure 4. The long average stay. at a little over 1. a 25 per cent increase on the 53 000 that visited in the corresponding period of 2005 (ABS 2006b). P A G E 74 .2 per cent. Australia’s share remains low. out of 68 000 total visitors). reflects the fact that many Indians come to Australia to visit friends and relatives (13 000 in 2005. up 33 per cent on the 59 000 recorded in 2004–05 (ABS 2006b). Figure 4. Key elements of the Plan included research and training cooperation in ecotourism. including those studying in Australia. the sharing of expertise and the holding of a Tourism Business 5 5 Measured in terms of Total Inbound Economic Value (TIEV). The average annual growth in visitor numbers over the decade to December 2005 was 13. would also be a motivating factor for many of those stating they came to Australia for a holiday (27 000) (Tourism Australia 2006). India World 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Short-term visitors from India contributed A$280 million to the Australian economy in 2005.
to provide aviation compliance and safety services to the fast-growing Indian market (AFR 2006b). P A G E 75 . food tourism. Australian software company. Ambika Soni. and the economic value of Indian inbound tourism to increase by 890 per cent to A$2 billion by 2025. The increasing importance accorded to infrastructure development by the central and state governments alike is generating flow-on opportunities for Australian service providers. Other commercial services exports from Australia to India (including transportation) grew by 46 per cent between 2004–05 and 2005–06 from A$171 million to A$249 million. Other Commercial Services Australian companies are beginning to take advantage of emerging services export opportunities in India. This allows ‘Aussie Specialist’ agents in India to submit an electronic visa application (via the internet) for their clients. Tourism and Resources 2005).The Bilateral Economic Relationship Forum during the Melbourne Commonwealth Games in March 2006 (Bailey 2005). and have more than trebled since 2002–03 (ABS 2006a). which forecasts the number of annual visitors from India to reach 550 000 by 2025. outside of the education and tourism sectors.3 contains examples). The Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs introduced an electronic visa application facility for short stay visitor visas to the India market on 21 August 2006. Aviation Compliance Solutions reportedly secured contracts. Securities Markets Automated Research Training and Surveillance (SMARTS). thus reducing application delivery and processing times. agreed to pursue opportunities in ecotourism. supplied its stock market monitoring solution to the Indian national securities regulator. During the forum. which was launched in the fourth quarter of 2005 (Ford 2005). (Department of Industry. including with Air India. Minister Bailey and India’s Minister for Tourism and Culture. Ford Australia designed and engineered a new Fiesta specifically for the Indian market. Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) (Invest Australia 2005b). In the air transport sector for example. Numerous Australian engineering consultancies and infrastructure design companies are involved in the upgrading and modernisation of India’s transport infrastructure (Box 4. Australian design and software capabilities are also being recognised in India. enhancement of heritage sites and investment in infrastructure (Bailey 2006). Airservices Australia is providing safety management systems and air traffic management training at Delhi and Mumbai international airports for the Airports Authority of India (Airservices Australia 2005). The Australian Government has also moved to adopt a strategic approach to the sustainable growth of the Indian tourism market with the launching of an ‘Emerging Markets’ strategy.
From the State of Queensland alone. P A G E 76 . structural and environmental engineers and planners.3: examples of australian company involvement in india’s infrastructure sector Australian companies are actively participating in the modernisation of India’s infrastructure. ResMed. reflecting both the growing international audience for Indian films and a growing interest among Indian film-goers in foreign films and influences. Simplex Concrete Piles. performance improvement and technical supervision. valued at several million dollars. Burchill Partners of the Gold Coast. as well as strengthening management and implementation capacity. over 40 Indian films have been shot in 6 6 See www. companies that have won infrastructure-related business include: • Engineering consultancy Cullen Grummitt and Roe. • Union Switch and Signal Asia Pacific. In the past four years Australia has gained in popularity amongst Indian filmmakers as a film location. AWS Clinical Waste recently won a World Bank contract for the design and installation of clinical waste treatment plants in 22 district hospitals in West Bengal (Queensland Department of Premier and Cabinet 2004). Australian companies have been involved in projects aimed at strengthening India’s health system. which secured a number of projects in India associated with port sector development. who have been responsible for the planning and infrastructure design of the city at Amby Valley. Union Switch and Signal Asia Pacific has market responsibility in the Asia Pacific Region for the Ansaldo Signal NV group. It is doing the design work for the extension of a wharf in Mundra Port. Aus Health International secured a project focused on improving the institutional framework for policy development in the state health system. • Infrastructure design company Maunsell (part of the AECOM Group). The company was also involved in planning aspects for a 300-bed speciality hospital with corporate governance and contemporary management practice. Western India while its Indian partner. exports medical products to India that are used to treat sleep-disordered breathing and other respiratory disorders (ResMed 2006).com. The 2006 Australian Exporter of the Year. Kandla. which supplied design and safety systems for the Delhi metro system. Since 1998.ahi. is undertaking the construction work. which installed state-of-the-art safety control systems for India’s Southern Railway and South Eastern Railway.au.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY box 4. It has also designed port terminal facilities at Chennai. CGR established an office in Mumbai in 2005. • Civil. Source: Queensland Department of Premier and Cabinet 2004. Tuticorin and the Nhava Sheva Port and Jawaharlal Nehru Port in Mumbai. a residential project near Mumbai being constructed by Sahara India.
notably from Western Australia and Queensland. Mode 2 (consumption abroad) and Mode 4 (movement of natural persons) (excluding salaries and wages). released in September 2005. 7 ABS data on exports are collected to standards set out in the fifth edition of the IMF Balance of Payments Manual (BPM5) which incorporates Mode 1 (conventional cross-border supply). Salaam Namaste. construction. Xstrata’s Australian-based technology business has helped India’s Sterlite Industries to build an ISASMELT furnace. particularly in medical services (Box 4. personal non-education-related travel to India is by far Australia’s most significant services import from India (A$195 million in 2005–06). For example. perhaps owing to the fact that it includes revenues derived by the Australian subsidiaries of Indian companies (see Section on ‘Indian direct investment in Australia’ below). Queensland mining services firm JK Tech has recently supplied mineral processing technologies to Hindustan Zinc (Queensland Department of Premier and Cabinet 2004). RBI data on computer services exports incorporate Mode 3 transactions (trade by foreign affiliates). which is now operational. was the first Indian movie entirely shot in Australia (The Australian 2005a). Some smaller Australian companies.4 below). It was the highest-grossing Indian film overseas in 2005 and did well in the Indian urban market. have also established a foothold in areas such as mining software and mining systems development. Several Australian companies have established an on-the-ground presence in India to capitalise on emerging market opportunities. While short-term departures to India have not grown as fast as the number of visitors from India over the past decade. which are not recognised as exports under BPM5. India’s services exports to Australia According to official statistics. they have grown more rapidly in recent years – at a robust average of 37 per cent over the three years to 2005–06 (ABS 2006b.The Bilateral Economic Relationship Australia (Austrade 2006c). telecommunications.48 billion (A$164 million) for the 12 months to March 2003 (RBI 2005c). banking and insurance. Industry links arising from strong growth in exports of mineral products to India are helping to foster an awareness of Australian capabilities in the mining industry more broadly. Australian film post-production services have also been in demand. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) estimates imports of computer and information services and other business services from India to be worth A$75 million in 2005–06 (A$35 million in 2002–03). infrastructure. The RBI estimates computer services exports to Australia at Rs4. The Indian data on exports to Australia of computer services (excluding exports of companies engaged exclusively in business process outsourcing activities) is higher. It has also supplied Sterlite with its IsaProcess copper refining technology. 2005a. Australian mining software and technology services are much sought after by Indian industry. P A G E 77 . mining services. 7 services investment Australian direct investment in India The level of Australian investment in India’s services sector is set to increase with some recent investment decisions and conclusion of contracts. 2004b).
and most recently in India. Source: www. More broadly. IBA Health has nonetheless installed a power back-up. an P A G E 78 . in late 2005. The company also recognises the clustering advantages of operating an IT development centre from Bangalore’s Electronic City. administrative and departmental systems across the whole spectrum of health services. The operation requires managers from head office to be present on the ground so as to ensure their software is configurable and flexible enough for selling into other markets. In Australia. more than 180 private and public hospitals use IBA Health solutions for administration and business support. Clough is also currently undertaking work for the major G1-GS15 Deepwater Development located off the East Coast of India for India’s Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC). IBA Health chose to develop an in-house operation in India rather than outsource their IT needs because of the greater scope this afforded for managing the development work undertaken. The acquisition gave them a quick entry into the fast-growing Indian market and access to Medicom’s R&D capability. IBA Health’s main focus in the Indian market will be private hospitals. In gaining the necessary approvals to invest in India. IBA Health has operations in South East Asia. The scope of work includes the design. not just India. and consequently were making efforts to streamline procedures. the infrastructure in Bangalore’s Electronic City is relatively good.4: iba health IBA Health develops advanced information systems for clinicians and hospitals around the world. IBA Health’s experience has been that Australians – both corporates and individuals – are very welcome in India. South Africa and the Middle East. IBA Health’s intention is to consolidate all its development work in Bangalore and to develop the business there into a centre of excellence servicing its growing international business. Australian project development companies have begun to make significant investments in India. IBA Health. In addition.ibatech. Clough Limited announced in January 2005 the signing of a US$131 million (A$170 million) contract with BG Exploration and Production India Limited to develop three new platforms and associated pipelines in the shallow-water Panna oil field and the South Tapti gas field located north-west of Mumbai (Clough 2005). While Bangalore is beset with infrastructure difficulties. Visa applications were also processed without delay. IBA Health acquired the Bangalore-based Indian company. there are free trade zone-type benefits from operating in Electronic City and more administrative transparency compared with other parts of India. Chief Technology Officer. Asia. procurement and installation of a new onshore gas plant.com and discussions with Dr Brian Cohen. Medicom Solutions. Their software solutions link clinical. IBA Health found that that the Indian authorities recognised that the approvals process is an important issue for foreign investors. The private hospital sector is becoming increasingly important as incomes rise and as increased availability and affordability of insurance has increasingly made private healthcare more affordable.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY box 4.
Indian coal mining productivity should benefit from the management and technological expertise in mine operation and coal preparation of contract miners. P A G E 79 . In 2006. box 4. India for Reliance Ports & Terminals Limited.5: leighton’s increasing involvement in india 8 Leighton is one of Asia’s leading contractors and project developers. Roaring 40s. Thiess is reportedly planning to bid for another contract worth several billion dollars in early 2007 to supply coal to several major power stations in India. The Leighton Group is well positioned to meet growing demand for contract mining and associated mine infrastructure in India. Leighton won the contract to install new marine terminal facilities near Jamnagar. India’s strong economic growth is driving increased demand for energy. one of India’s largest conglomerates. which is being fuelled by strong domestic growth and accompanying requirements for power generation and steel production. It is also driving a need for improved infrastructure and at the same time is providing a greater capacity to fund infrastructure improvements. Leighton will be providing and installing communication systems along the railway line and in the locomotives using the line. It completed Nokia’s new mobile phone manufacturing plant near Chennai (Leighton 2005a). Also in joint venture. accessed April 2006.5). and sees significant scope for future growth.The Bilateral Economic Relationship additional shallow water wellhead platform. It has also won contracts to design and construct manufacturing centres for Motorola and . coal mining and industrial building projects. Leighton subsidiary Thiess currently has staff on the ground in Kolkata and Delhi and has recruited Indian graduates who are being trained in Indonesia and Australia to work in this emerging market.au. Leighton is part of a consortium that won a contract to modernise the signalling and telecommunications systems on the rail link between Ghaziabad and Kanpur.com. established offices in India to capitalise on consulting opportunities in the renewable energy sector (Hydro Tasmania 2006) Leighton is also investing in India with a view to ramping up its involvement in project development (Box 4. and a five-well sub-sea development involving trunklines and control system tied back to new and existing facilities . and discussions with Leighton. Leighton focused its attention initially on oil and gas infrastructure but also sees opportunities in transport infrastructure. 2005b.clough. Sources: The Australian 2006. 2006a and 2006b. Leighton 2005a. It has significantly ramped up its involvement in India over the past couple of years. Coal India is currently responsible for around 90 per cent of India’s annual coal production. 8 www. Hydro Tasmania Consulting and Australian renewable energy development business. Leighton has also looked for business opportunities with major multinationals operating in India. Although this bid was unsuccessful. Flextronics and Salcomp. which is part of Reliance Group. Thiess was the first foreign company to submit a major coal mining tender to work for Coal India’s subsidiary Eastern Coalfields Limited for their Rajmahal Open Cut Expansion Project in the state of Jharkhand.
The company was formed as a result of a merger between Perth-based Surpac Software International and Australian mining software company ECSI (Minex) in October 2002. Leighton subsidiary Thiess and the Surpac Minex Group are also pursuing opportunities (Box 4. and Sales and Support. it has three offices – in Bangalore. a Queensland company providing complete solutions for coal washeries. after successfully doing business in India for over 10 years.com. Orissa. opened an office in Bhubaneswar. See www. exploration and mineral resource modelling. engineering. signalled in May 1999. Surpac decided to establish its own office. While Telstra currently does not have a carrier licence in India. Sourced from www. which included the largest foreign bank branch network in the country. but retained its investment banking arm. in Mumbai. In 2001.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Reflecting the growing demand for mining services. Initially. ANZ Capital Private Limited. to simplify its international business and focus it on the Asia Pacific (ANZ 2000). Mincorp. Cambodia. It also has a significant information technology operation in Bangalore.5 and Box 4. It currently operates as a merchant bank. IT Support. geology. The ANZ Trade Centre in Bangalore now employs 1300 IT officers and provides a range of customised services aimed at forging and expanding trade and investment relationships between Australian and New Zealand companies and Indian businesses.6). which has an Internet service provider licence in India.com. box 4.6: surpac minex group The Surpac Minex Group produces leading-edge software for mine planning. which was established in 1988. as it has done in Indonesia. The ANZ’s preferred approach today is to enter partnerships with local banks. such as Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd (VSNL) and Bharti. It then moved to employ local agents.surpac. initially through its Grindlays businesses. ANZ has had a lengthy involvement in India. Ludowici opened an office in Chennai in 2006 to undertake design work for mining projects. Telstra has established direct supply arrangements with Indian carriers. so as to provide a one-stop shop for all telecommunications services for its corporate clients based in India (Telstra 2006). All major Australian banks are now represented in India. Mumbai and New Delhi – which manage supply of international telecommunications services to the Indian sites of its corporate clients. 10 9 9 10 The sale stemmed from ANZ’s intention. mining. Surpac serviced India remotely from Australia and the United Kingdom. in 2004. either directly or through third-party relationships. and today there are a number of divisions in the office including Research and Development. the Philippines and Vietnam.anztradecentre. although none currently has a branch licence. Reach. as well as sales to Indian customers of Telstra services outside India. ANZ disposed of its Grindlays operation to Standard Chartered in 2000 . Telstra is also a sales agent for its Hong Kong-headquartered joint venture operation. Quality assurance. P A G E 80 . The company’s presence in India has continued to grow.
It acquired ING’s Asian cash equities business in July 2004 giving it a footprint in 10 Asian countries. The focus of its Indian business is on stockbroking. P A G E 81 . 2005b). which is expected to invest approximately Rs5 billion (A$150 million) over the first three to four years of operations (Bharti Enterprises 2005a). The office will lead the Bank’s evaluation of opportunities in India (Commonwealth Bank 2005).7: macquarie banK Macquarie Bank established a securities business in Mumbai in July 2005. At the time of writing Westpac was reviewing its options for establishing a presence in India. which was part of the winning bid for the Mumbai airport redevelopment. It is reportedly keen to be involved in the privatisation of other airports in India (SMH 2006). Under the relationship. India remains an important market for AMP Capital Investors. box 4. it would henceforth be focused on asset management through AMP Capital Investors. AMP Sanmar. SCB supports Westpac customers in India and Westpac supports Indian customers in Australia. Macquarie Bank’s MacAir has a 28 per cent stake in Aeroporti di Roma.The Bilateral Economic Relationship The Commonwealth Bank received approval in June 2005 to establish a representative office in Bangalore. and also property. 11 In 2005. marking an expansion of Macquarie’s presence into all key Asian markets. Macquarie sees particular opportunities in India’s infrastructure sector.8). 11 Macquarie Bank has an exposure in Airports Company of South Africa. AXA Asia Pacific established a joint venture in the insurance sector (Box 4. which has a 20 per cent stake in the South African company (SMH 2004). telecommunications and media – all sectors in which it has competitive strengths. In Asia. AMP decided to sell its 26 per cent stake in its joint venture business. In the same year. to Reliance Life Insurance as part of a re-orientation towards its core wealth management businesses in Australia and New Zealand. It currently employs over 850 staff in Asia and has one of the largest equities sales and research teams dedicated to Asia (Macquarie Bank 2005). Westpac has a third-party relationship with Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) in India. investment advisory services and corporate finance. National Australia Bank received approval to open a representative office in Mumbai in August 2006. equity research. Macquarie Bank had teamed up with Aeroports de Paris to bid for the restructure and modernisation of the Mumbai and Delhi airports. with a presence that includes two infrastructure funds and other investments (AMP 2005a. but its bids were unsuccessful.
7 million and performance payments of A$15 million over five years. to establish a joint venture company to undertake life insurance business in India. and discussions with AXA Asia Pacific Holdings. It plans to roll out over 30 branches by the end of 2007. In November 2006. Tata Consultancy Services set up a Global Delivery Centre in Melbourne in 2002. which specialises in strategy conversion.8: axa asia pacific AXA Asia Pacific signed an agreement in August 2005 with Bharti Enterprises. TCS plans to develop its Financial Network Services business into a global centre of excellence for the banking industry (TCS 2006). TCS launched a credit risk model banking solution for the Indian market in association with JYI Risk Management Services of Melbourne in 2002 (TCS 2002). the maximum currently permitted under Indian regulations. while Bharti brings its strong local market knowledge. Other Australian companies are reported to be considering investment opportunities. 26 first and second-tier Indian information technology companies had established a significant presence in Australia to provide IT solutions to local businesses and secure global market opportunities. TCS acquired the business in October 2005 for US$26 million (TCS 2005a). reputation and presence. is intended to complement TCS’s global capabilities in consulting. TCS acquired Australian consultancy firm TCS Management (formerly Total Communications Solutions) for A$1. St George Bank. Indian direct investment in Australia As of October 2006. 12 See www. Australian franchises. which includes BHP. ANZ. Woolworths. The joint venture commenced operations on 22 August 2006 with the opening of its first office in Hyderabad.com P A G E 82 . agribusiness and infrastructure projects. New Zealand and the Asia Pacific. AXA Group 2005. 12 TCS also has a SAP Centre of Excellence in Melbourne (TCS 2005b). which the joint venture will be seeking to leverage. have also established operations in India.tcs. and in minerals prospecting and exploration. program alignment. It should enable TCS to improve services to its growing Australian client base. IT services and BPO.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY box 4. Alcoa and Rio Tinto (Business Standard 2006). which provides software solutions and consulting services to clients in Australia. The acquisition of TCSM. AXA Asia Pacific brings to the partnership its global life insurance and asset management expertise. AXA Asia Pacific acquired a 26 per cent equity stake in the joint venture. Gloria Jeans and Cookie Man. Sources: Bharti Enterprises 2006. notably in banking. portfolio balancing and navigation services. a business conglomerate with interests in telecom. Having initially partnered with Sydney-based Financial Network Services to deliver a banking platform to the Central Bank of India for the automation of bank branches (Financial Network Services 2005). Bharti Televentures has a retail presence in 4500 towns and over 20 million mobile customers.
situated at The Wharf at Woolloomooloo in Sydney. The Taj Hotels Resorts and Palaces. Satyam will also employ up to 20 of Victoria University’s graduating software engineers each year (Satyam 2005) and provide 20 University of Melbourne software engineering students with internships annually. 15 Gartner Research’s vice-president. 13 14 15 Based on correspondence in December 2006 with Professor Frank P Larkins. the students will be allocated to projects in Melbourne or in one of Satyam’s other 46 locations around the world. Dinesh. Satyam signed an MOU with the University of Melbourne in September 2006. The State Bank of India has a branch office in Sydney. Additional Indian investment in the banking and finance sectors can be expected as trade and investment linkages develop further. part of the Tata Group. also offers IT services worldwide from development centres in India and Australia. Infosys is forging partnerships with Australian technology developers (Invest Australia 2005a). in December 2005 for A$36 million (Taj Hotels 2005). 13 Birlasoft. Accordingly. The partnership will result in opportunities for Smart Internet’s growth through the leveraging of Infosys’ global network and knowledge base.com Discussions with K. has observed that Infosys’ long-term strategic intent is to use Australian resources for its global requirements (The Australian 2004).birlasoft. have also forged a cooperative working relationship in order to further enhance business-to-business links between Australian and Indian information and communications technology companies. Satyam has entered into an alliance with Victoria University which will enable up to ten VU students to undertake a software development internship with it each year. the University of Melbourne. and serves as a major technological development and software support centre for the company’s Asia Pacific operations (Satyam 2004). On successful completion of the training. Infosys is structured into globally integrated business units for different parts of its business. This will enable the CSIRO to market its Australian-developed intellectual property through Infosys’ strong global distribution network (Coonan 2005a). Indian companies are increasingly investing in Australia outside the information and communications technology sector. Deputy Vice Chancellor (International).The Bilateral Economic Relationship Satyam’s Melbourne operations house its largest global development centre outside India. The partnerships are in turn stimulating export opportunities for Australia. The collaboration involves the investment of $A800 000 in Australian research and development over four years (Infosys 2004). See www. the National Association of Software and Service Companies (NASSCOM). Partha Iyengar. The Australian Information Industry Association (AIIA) and its counterpart. which encompasses research and development cooperation for information engineering. as well as the commercialisation of CSIRO’s technology. For example. and thereby generate additional bilateral trade and investment opportunities. co-founder and Member of the Board of Infosys. The CSIRO recently signed a cooperation agreement with Infosys. acquired a 100-room hotel. part of the CK Birla 14 Group. P A G E 83 . Infosys entered the Australian market in 2004 with the acquisition of Melbourne company Expert Information Services for A$31 million (The Australian 2005b). it concluded an agreement with the Smart Internet Technology Cooperative Research Centre for joint efforts in research and development.
and Mumbai (within the Australian Consulate-General). during his March 2006 visit. For example. science and training services. trade and investment and. cooperative links between Australian and Indian businesses. Overarching coordination of the Australian Government presence in India is carried out by the High Commission in New Delhi. industry bodies and research institutions in specific services sectors. The stated aim of this initiative is to generate stronger links between Australian and Indian scientists and their research institutions. Australia Network. more broadly. management. For example. technology and medicine. information and communications technology. Customs and Biotechnology. sporting event infrastructure. The Agreement will provide an important basis for the facilitation and future development of the trade and economic relationship. which is being reflected in increased trade and investment linkages between the two countries. supported by the Australia India Business Council. and biotechnology. Prime Minister Howard announced a new A$25 million bilateral research and fellowships program during his visit to India in March 2006. has been broadcasting local Australian content into India since September 2005. and the number is growing rapidly. Australia Network is available in approximately five million homes in India. film and entertainment. tourism. The Australian Government has recently directed increasing attention to the Indian market. through promoting the respective strengths of the two economies. Specific services sectors identified for cooperation include infrastructure development and financing. strengthen the overall bilateral relationships to the benefit of both nations. Invest Australia has offices in New Delhi (within the Australian High Commission). Chennai and Hyderabad. the promotion and facilitation of joint ventures and partnerships. Australia’s television service in the Asia Pacific region. a bilateral Air Services Agreement. Austrade has offices in New Delhi (within the Australian High Commission). Kolkata. has been the push from the Australian and state governments. education. and will encourage closer strategic cooperation in many of the key economic sectors. generating increased awareness of Australia in the Indian market. and the Scientific Collaboration Fund. Links have also been fostered through memoranda of understanding. Prime Minister Howard witnessed the signing of Memoranda of Understanding on Defence Cooperation. Mumbai (within the Australian Consulate-General). and highlight within India the high quality of Australian education. reciprocal trade missions. P A G E 84 . Prime Minister Howard announced the establishment of a Consulate-General in Chennai during his March 2006 visit. Australian Government representatives from Austrade and Invest Australia are on the ground in India to assist Australian exporters capitalise on business opportunities and facilitate Indian investment in Australia. supported by the Consulate-General in Mumbai.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY a platform for future groWth A key factor in the heightened interest of Australian business in the Indian market. Bangalore. The Australian Government is also encouraging the development of productive. A Trade and Economic Framework Agreement was signed between Australia and India during Prime Minister Howard’s visit to India in March 2006.
P A G E 85 . while South Australia appointed a commercial representative in Chennai. Victoria has launched an ‘Opening Doors to Export’ plan which focuses on the promotion of exports in three emerging markets identified as key growth markets for Victorian exporters – North Asia. It maintains close links to the federal and state governments and showcases business opportunities in India to the Australian business community through an active program of events nationally. India and the Middle East – and has appointed a Special Trade Envoy to India (Business Victoria 2004). For example. Queensland has a Trade and Investment Office in Bangalore. Victoria recently opened a Business Office in Bangalore. There have been several state-government-led business missions to India over the past two or three years. The Australia India Business Council (AIBC) is a national bilateral chamber of commerce committed to building stronger business links between Australia and India for the benefit of both countries.The Bilateral Economic Relationship A number of state governments have also identified India as a strategic market. Business associations and chambers of commerce in both Australia and India play an important role in facilitating bilateral trade and investment. Western Australia has a Trade Office in Mumbai. most with a strong focus on services sectors. A number of Memoranda of Understanding have been signed during these visits.
P A G E 86 .
although such behaviour is being curtailed by increased competition.Chapter 5 india’s business environment: implications for australian companies Key points • India’s improved economic performance has been accompanied by a dramatic increase in its external trade and by its implementing of policies to attract foreign investment. P A G E 87 . they need to invest time and effort in understanding the business environment and its challenges. although these tend to act as less of a brake on services than on manufacturing. although there is scope for further liberalisation in these areas. hurdles in improving the business environment remain. – India’s rapidly increasing middle class and growing consumer affluence is already a draw-card for foreign investors and exporters. – Corruption remains a concern for business operating in India. • while India presents as a potentially attractive market for many Australian businesses. – Power and transport infrastructure shortcomings are a major concern. despite significant attention over recent years to addressing regulatory barriers and burdens. and it will be important for Australian companies wishing to exploit business opportunities in India to be aware of these. careful selection of a business partner or customer. – Prerequisites for building a successful business in the Indian market include detailed research and targeted preparation. once implemented they are likely to be durable given the need to build consensus among decision-makers in a democratic environment. – Many regulations remain onerous. • Nonetheless. • Australian companies can benefit from favourable perceptions of their country in India and significant people-to-people links in seeking to capitalise on business opportunities. improved accountability mechanisms and an increasingly activist media and NGO community. and a likely source of future opportunities for service providers. – The need for economic reform is now more broadly accepted in India and while further reforms may be gradual. the ability to take a long-term view and the capacity to ride out rough patches. deregulation and e-governance.
are growing strongly. Foreign exporters and investors recognise India’s emergence and want to do business with India. notably IT–ITES. Incomes per capita are increasing. Recent figures showing a rapid increase in manufacturing output suggests that such developments may indeed be starting to occur. and to take a long-term strategic view of their prospects. Chief among them are continuing power and transport infrastructure constraints. But some caveats are also required. their eyes will be focused on India for a long time to come. consumer tastes are changing and the aspirations of the younger population are rising. if they are to be successful. If growth in India’s knowledge-intensive services flows through into broader sustainable economic development. The rosy growth scenario sketched out in preceding chapters is by no means the only one. P A G E 88 . Optimism is a fine thing – and of itself is contributing to the sense of energy and success which is currently driving India forward. and to surprise pessimists positively. greater openness to international competition and significant deregulation. spurred by the reforms initiated by the then Finance Minister Manmohan Singh in 1991. significant amounts of regulation in many sectors. A study by the World Economic Forum and Confederation of Indian Industry (WEF 2005) presents three scenarios for India to 2025. While reforms to date have been impressive. India’s increasingly dynamic and competitive private sector now accounts for nearly 80 per cent of GDP (RBI 2005b). Both exports and imports.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY ‘India’s economy will continue to have the capacity to surprise optimists negatively. to accept that establishing a business presence will be time-consuming and possibly frustrating. The workforce is becoming increasingly skilled and the economy is being driven more and more by knowledge-based industries. India’s government remains of a reformist mindset. and the need to adapt to challenging business practices. The most pessimistic of these scenarios. particularly of services. which is premised on the government failing to instigate appropriate reforms and a difficult global environment.’ (Financial analyst) India is successfully managing its transition to a more open economy. But a recurring theme in the authors’ conversations with companies already operating successfully in India was the need for Australian entrants to the market to calibrate their expectations carefully. Australian companies wishing to exploit the opportunities India presents will do well to be aware of these. 1 1 2004–05 figures at factor cost. there remain some major hurdles in India’s business environment that will need to be overcome for sustainable growth to take place in the broader Indian economy. Australian businesses need to invest time and effort in understanding the business environment in India and its challenges. would see India slipping back towards the lower growth rates of earlier decades. Australian companies enjoy some advantages over others in capitalising on business opportunities in India. The reforms have resulted in reduced public sector participation in the economy. to be willing to do the hard yards required to adapt. But the task it faces is enormous.
an improving business environment Reform efforts and prospects
‘Because of its need to build a consensus for reform, in the longer term India’s rise may prove even more durable than that of China.’ (AFR 2005) The far-reaching economic reforms outlined in particular by the Indian Government’s July 1991 Statement on Industrial Policy aimed to foster a more vibrant economy, with far higher growth rates than those realised over the first three decades of India’s post-independence period. In addition to deregulation at the sectoral level (see Chapter 2), the reforms have included significant liberalisation of industrial policy, public sector enterprises, foreign exchange controls, interest rates, competition policy and taxation (Box 5.1), as well as tariffs and foreign investment (see section on ‘Increased openness to trade and foreign investment’ below). However commentators such as the World Bank continue to point to the need for further reforms if recent growth rates are to be sustained and the growth driven by knowledge-intensive services is to be replicated in other, more regulated areas of the economy. The need for ongoing reforms is now more broadly accepted in India. A strongly performing economy, increasing consumer affluence, a buoyant external sector and record foreign exchange holdings have given rise to confidence that policy makers will continue down the path of reform. The success enjoyed by reforming sectors has led to pressure for reforms to reap improved efficiencies in other industries they depend upon. Owing to the success of deregulation and liberalisation policies of the past decade-and-a-half, both central and state governments have come to recognise the need for a thriving private sector. For its part, the Planning Commission’s policies are now focused on facilitating private sector development. Following the devolution of many economic powers from the centre, state governments are now competing to attract foreign and domestic investment, which is in turn helping to drive improvements in policy, infrastructure and the overall business environment. Accordingly, by 2004–05, the public sector’s share of GDP was just 23.6 per cent. Further reinforcing the point, IT–ITES’s success is widely attributed to the government’s light-handed approach to regulation in that sector (see Chapter 2). The rapid growth of IT–ITES and other knowledge-based sectors shows clearly that Indian companies can thrive in the face of international competition.
Indian CSO 2006, Statement 18. Includes public services in quasi-government bodies. By comparison, the public sector share in Australia’s GDP was 22.0 per cent in the December quarter 2005.
P A G E 89
INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR
box 5.1: india’s maJor economic reforms since 1991
• Industrial policy was significantly liberalised in 1991 and reform has continued in the subsequent period. Compulsory industrial licensing for new undertakings or expansions was abolished in 1991 for all but 18 industries. The number of industries exclusively reserved for the public sector was reduced to eight. Today, six industries remain subject to compulsory licensing (mainly on account of environmental, safety and strategic grounds), while the only industries exclusively reserved for the public sector are atomic energy and railway transport. The number of manufacturing industries reserved for the small-scale sector has been reduced over time, but remains in excess of 50. • Some public sector enterprises have been partially privatised, although outcomes to date have been modest and privatisation remains controversial. Numerous public enterprises have been corporatised while others have been given greater managerial autonomy and operational flexibility. • Foreign exchange controls have been gradually relaxed since the early 1990s. A market-determined exchange rate system and full convertibility on the current account were in place by the early 1990s. Regulatory emphasis in relation to foreign exchange shifted significantly from control over use to management with the passing of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) in 1999. The rupee is today almost fully convertible on the capital account for non-residents. • An administered interest rates regime was progressively replaced by a system of marketdetermined interest rates during the 1990s. • The Competition Act 2002 replaced the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act 1969, which heavily circumscribed the operations of monopolies. The new Act aims to curb anti-competitive behaviour and abuse of dominant market positions; and regulates mergers and acquisitions. The Competition Commission of India, a new regulatory body with a scrutiny and enforcement role, has been established. Independent regulators have also been created in a number of sectors. • Taxation reform has focused on broadening the indirect tax base and removing distortions. A central services tax was introduced in 1994, and has been increased on two occasions to stand now at ten per cent. Additional services have been progressively brought into the tax net. Central excise duties on manufactured goods have been replaced by CENVAT, a 16 per cent tax on value added up to the manufacturing stage. A uniform state level VAT on goods, applying up to the retail stage, was introduced in April 2005, replacing state sales taxes. The standard tax rate is 12.5 per cent, although some goods attract a four or a one per cent tax. The tax replaced state-level sales taxes, entry taxes, purchase taxes and turnover taxes. The four per cent central sales tax levied on interstate sales of goods is also set to be phased out. In the 2006–07 Budget, the Finance Minister laid down a target date of April 2010 for the adoption of a national level goods and services tax, shared between the centre and the states. This will require a merging of CENVAT and state level VAT in some fashion.
P A G E 90
Only the pace of reforms is open to question. Economic reforms since the current United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government came to power in May 2004 have been more measured than under the previous National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government led by the Bharatiya Janata Party. During the election campaign, the Congress Party, the main party within the governing coalition, said it would pursue economic reforms with a ‘human face’. The ‘National Common Minimum Programme’, a pact agreed between the UPA government and the Communist and other parties it relies upon to maintain a majority in India’s lower house of parliament, reflects this stance (National Advisory Council 2004). In general, reforms are more likely to be held up by political opposition when they are dependent on legislative change rather than administrative decisions and notifications. Notwithstanding the progress being made by the Government in achieving reforms on the administrative front, some progress on flagship reforms such as labour laws and privatisation will be important to convince investors that the process is retaining momentum. Reforms in democratic India tend to be take place gradually because of the need to build consensus for reform among governing coalitions. In the longer term however, India’s democratic processes should underpin the durability of the reforms, provided reformers can point to improved performance and benefits for the majority of the Indian population.
Increased openness to trade and foreign investment
India’s improved economic performance has been accompanied by a dramatic increase in its outward orientation. Trade as a proportion of GDP has increased from 16 per cent in 1990–91 to 40 per cent in 2004–05. Average applied tariffs have declined significantly from prohibitive rates since the early 1990s (Box 5.2), although they still remain higher than in many developing countries.
box 5.2: indian tariffs
Prior to the 1990s reforms, most Indian imports were subject to licensing restrictions and high tariffs. India’s average tariff on non-agricultural products was reduced from 73 per cent in 1992–93 to 36 per cent in 1997–98 to 31 per cent in 2001–02. Maximum tariffs have been subject to cuts in more recent years. The tariff on most non-agricultural goods was lowered in January 2004 from 25 to 20 per cent; and the four per cent ‘Special Additional Duty’, which had been levied on virtually all imports since the 1998–99 budget, was abolished (although it was reinstated in 2006). The peak rate of customs duty on non-agricultural imports was further reduced in the 2006–07 Budget from 15 to 12.5 per cent. Lower input costs resulting from the tariff cuts have significantly enhanced the competitiveness of Indian industry.
Sourced from successive WTO Trade Policy Reviews of India.
P A G E 91
INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR
In addition to tariff reductions, which effectively act as an incentive to export by making production for domestic consumption relatively less attractive, the Indian Government has instituted a number of trade measures to encourage exports, with particular focus on the services sector (Box 5.3).
box 5.3: policy measures to support exports
• Numerous Special Economic Zones (SEZs) for both manufacturing and service provision have been established since April 2000, while eight Export Processing Zones have been converted into SEZs. The SEZs offer superior infrastructure facilities and tax concessions with a view to stimulating foreign investment and exports. • Under the ‘Star Export Houses’ scheme, both merchandise and services exports can apply for status as Star Export Houses and consequently be eligible for a number of privileges including fast-track clearance procedures for both exports and imports. Exporters are categorised according to the value of their exports. Star Export Houses achieving rapid growth in their exports are entitled to duty credits under the newly introduced Target Plus scheme. • The ‘Served from India’ scheme, a revamped version of the earlier duty free export credit scheme for services, involves duty credit entitlements for service providers depending on their level of foreign exchange earnings. • The Export Promotion Capital Goods scheme, accessible by all exporters including exporters of services, has been made more flexible. Under the scheme, the import of capital goods at a five per cent rate of duty is allowed, subject to fulfilling an obligation to export the equivalent of eight times the duty saved over a period of eight years. • ‘Export Oriented Units’ (EOUs) – units established anywhere which export all their production – have been extended benefits additional to duty free imports, including exemption from service tax. EOUs selling some of their output within the ‘domestic tariff area’ also enjoy some concessions, subject to certain conditions. Units in free trade zones, export processing zones, electronics hardware/software technology parks, and bio-tech parks enjoy similar privileges. • Duty exemption schemes are available, enabling the duty free import of inputs required for export production.
Source: Directorate General of Foreign Trade 2004
P A G E 92
Foreign direct investment (FDI) has an important role to play in India’s development. Both the central and state governments have assumed a more welcoming stance towards FDI, and this, as well as increasingly positive sentiment on the part of foreign investors, has resulted in healthier foreign investment inflows (Figure 5.1). The US$7.2 billion inflow in 2005–06 is in the vicinity of the US$8 billion a year inflow judged necessary to underpin the eight per cent GDP growth rate envisaged for the Tenth Five Year Plan period (Indian Planning Commission 2002d).
Figure 5.1 FDI picking up India’s direct investment inflows, 1991–92 to 2005–06 (US$ billion)
8 7 6 US$ billion 5 4 3 2 1 0 1991–92 1994–95 1996–97 1997–98 1992–93 1998–99 1999–00 2001–02 2004–05 1993–94 1995–96 2000–01 2002–03 2003–04 2005–06
P A G E 93
Total, including re-invested earnings and other capital Equity
FDI data have recently been brought into line with international statistical standards by incorporating reinvested earnings and intercompany debt transactions components. For the years prior to 2000–01, data are only available for the equity component.
Source: DIPP 2006.
In recent years, India has relaxed restrictions on FDI, with higher equity caps and investment approvals granted automatically (the ‘automatic route’) for most services sectors, although limits on foreign equity holdings continue to act as a restraint on investors’ operations (see Figure 5.2 and Table 5.1). India has also streamlined its procedures, set target timeframes and introduced greater transparency for the consideration of FDI proposals by the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB), the body charged with considering FDI in activities not covered by the automatic route (DIPP 2005a). A Foreign Investment Implementation Authority was established in 1999 to facilitate quick implementation of FDI approvals required by investors to get a project up and running. The Authority is assisted by ‘Fast-track Committees’ which include state government agencies concerned with the implementation of projects.
Significant differences can exist on such measures as cost and complexity of regulations and approvals processes. although some improvements are still possible on the enforcement front. FDI up to 51 per cent allowed under the Automatic route in 35 Priority sectors. pharmaceuticals.4). 100 per cent in some sectors. FDI policy liberalisation 1997 1991 Pre 1991 Source: DIPP 2005b Foreign investors and local players – most notably in areas such as information technology.2 Evolution of FDI policy in India The progressive liberalisation of FDI policy. state government incentives. Indian companies – particularly in areas such as software development and biotechnology – are themselves driving reform in this area pushing for greater protection of intellectual property rights to protect their own innovations. 1991–2005 2001–05 More sectors opened. the attitude of state government officials in facilitating business. Up to 74/51/50 per cent in 112 sectors under the Automatic Route. Equity caps raised in many other sectors. and film – also benefit from India’s legislative provisions for the protection of intellectual property (Box 5. 2000 Up to 100 per cent under Automatic Route in most sectors. Allowed selectively up to 40 per cent. Procedures simplified.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Notwithstanding these central Government policy initiatives. P A G E 94 . Increasingly. and the availability of trained manpower. except a small negative list. the investment climate in India tends to vary from state to state. Figure 5.
in three phases (Deloitte 2005). films and sound recordings. 1999 introduced a transitional facility in the fields of pharmaceuticals and agriculture chemicals and a system of exclusive marketing rights (previously only process patents were granted). foods and chemicals. The Trademarks Act 1999 served to provide better protection of trademarks for goods and services. The outcome has been three amendments to the Patents Act. which is based on a survey of executives from the world’s largest companies. The Copyright (Amendment) Act 1994 provided protection to all original literary. It included a number of substantive and procedural changes bringing Indian patent law more into line with international norms. and also brought satellite broadcasting. It undertook to meet its patent obligations by a January 2005 deadline.India’s Business Environment: Implications for Australian Companies box 5. Kearney’s 2005 FDI Confidence Index. The Patents (Amendment) Act. It also had a further five years to extend its product patent protection to areas of technology not already protected. beginning in January 1995. Changes introduced under the Patents (Amendment) Act 2002 included increasing the term of patents to 20 years from date of filing and extended patent protection to drugs. it had a transition period of five years to implement the Agreement.1 details the services sectors which are open to investment by foreign players.T. India acceded to the Paris Convention on Intellectual Property in 1998. While the investment environment still has shortcomings. India is a party to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. P A G E 95 .4: intellectual property rights India has implemented a number of major improvements in its intellectual property rights regime in order to meet its obligations under the 1994 WTO Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement. musical and artistic works. 1970. Table 5. dramatic. provided further reforms are initiated and infrastructure. cinematography. ranked India the secondmost attractive FDI destination in the world. A. up from third place in 2004. Kearney 2005). India’s attractiveness to foreign investors is expected to increase. logistics and regulatory barriers addressed (A.T. The Copyright (Amendment) Act 1999 effected changes to make the law fully compatible with the provisions of the TRIPS Agreement. As a developing country. computer software and digital technology under copyright protection.
V-Sat. 74%* Automatic approval up to 49% P A G E 96 . Cash and carry wholesale trading Transport Domestic airlines 100% Automatic 49% Automatic Direct or indirect participation of foreign airlines not permitted. Trading Retail trading activity Not permitted* *51% FDI permitted in single brand product retailing and in bulk imports with bonded warehouses subject to FIPB approval. building. Tax holidays for development or operation and maintenance of most infrastructure projects. national/international long distance. *The Indian Government has frozen the 74% level until the FDI rules are consistent with the licence guidelines. cellular. FDI not permitted in housing and real estate. and greenfield airport projects. 74% limit relates to foreign investment from all sources. resorts. hospitals. A resolution is expected in early 2007. educational institutions. global mobile personal communications services and other VAS. unified access services. Road and maritime transport services Railways Telecommunications Telecom services 100% Automatic Not permitted Includes basic. public mobile radio trunked services. including institutional investors. FIPB approval required for more than 74% equity in airport development. infrastructure and construction projects 100% Automatic Foreign equity limits Approval mechanism Comments Includes hotels. 100% FDI permitted in export sector trading and wholesale cash and carry under the automatic route. 1 Most sectors now open to FDI Current foreign direct investment guidelines for services sectors Sector Infrastructure Townships. ‘Viability Gap Funding’ available for Public Private Partnership (PPP) infrastructure projects.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Ta b l e 5 . Certain conditions apply to ensure management of service providers remains in Indian hands.
except those identified for restructuring. including institutional investors. advertising and films. Pollution control and management services. a license is required to operate. A 10% shareholding limit in private sector banks applies in the meantime. P A G E 97 . leasing and finance. stock broking. 74%* Automatic approval up to 5% *This ‘liberalisation’ occurred just prior to the 2004 elections and implementing guidelines are yet to be issued by the RBI. construction and related engineering services. investment advisory services. The incoming UPA government postponed the opening of the sector to 2009. Insurance 26% Automatic Non-bank financial companies 100% Automatic Includes merchant banking. Source: DIPP 2005a. asset management. including institutional investors. While approval is automatic. financial consultancy. architectural services.India’s Business Environment: Implications for Australian Companies Sector Finance and insurance Private banks Foreign equity limits Approval mechanism Comments 74% limit relates to foreign investment from all sources. R&D services. Selected other sectors Computer-related services. travel-related services Note: 100% Automatic More liberal arrangements apply for non-resident Indian investments. health-related and social services. 26% limit relates to foreign investment from all sources. and DIPP Press Notes. portfolio management services. venture capital. underwriting.
Increased FDI outflows have followed. hospital and audio visual services sectors. the Indian Government has relaxed restrictions on outward investment. in order to facilitate the temporary movement of Indian professionals in computer-related. including clear prescription 4 The WTO General Agreement on Trade in Services distinguishes between four modes of supply: By virtue of Mode 2: Consumption abroad. better access for foreign lawyers. 2006b). India is pushing for WTO commitments to facilitate the movement of contractual services suppliers and independent professionals. aiming at more liberal commitments in respect of cross-border supply (Mode 1) and of temporary entry by business people (Mode 4). India has made no commitments on mining and energy-related services. it has become much more ambitious in the services negotiations. and a more open regime on telecoms. a liberalising outcome to the WTO services negotiations would clearly be of benefit to India (Box 5. While Australia has acknowledged the improvements in sectoral coverage and depth of commitments in India’s revised offer. India has submitted requests to its trading partners in a number of services sectors. While it has adopted a generally conservative position on agricultural market access. including those related to FDI restrictions. Given both the significance of services exports to its economy and its increasing prominence as an overseas investor. 4 box 5. India’s rapidly growing knowledge-intensive services exports have encouraged the Government to play a more active role in multilateral. However its revised August 2005 offer covered just over half of the 160 sectors and subsectors in the WTO services classification list.7 billion.5 india’s increasingly active role in trade negotiations covering services In the Uruguay Round formally concluded in 1994. including higher education and environmental services in which it had not previously made commitments. India’s initial offer on services related only to sectors in which it had already made commitments under the Uruguay Round. but otherwise made very limited commitments on services. Similarly services delivered abroad through the commercial presence of an Indian enterprise are considered exports under Mode 3: Commercial presence. India committed to allowing foreign equity participation in a limited number of sectors. India is a key player in the current WTO Doha Round as a leading Member of the ‘G20’ (developing country agricultural exporters).5). led by India’s information technology companies which are increasingly adopting a global approach to service delivery (RBI 2005d. a number of Australia’s requests remain unmet. P A G E 98 .INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Recognising that a local presence is often necessary to facilitate the export of services abroad (Indian Department of Commerce 2002). energy and professional services. Similarly. both in terms of quality and sectoral coverage. FDI abroad in non-financial services sectors over the years 2002–03 to 2005–06 amounted to more than US$1. regional and bilateral trade negotiations on services and services-related outward investment. areas of key interest to Australia. services delivered in India to foreign visitors are counted as exports. limitations in insurance and banking. Access conditions for the cross-border supply of services are critical for exports of IT–ITES and other business services.
Under this agreement. initially in the areas of accounting and auditing. the EU. P A G E 99 . India agreed to allow three major Singapore banks to establish wholly-owned subsidiaries in its territory. Indian Ministry of Finance 2006). the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation member states (through the Framework Agreement on the South Asia Free Trade Area) and its Bay of Bengal partners (through the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sector Technical and Economic Cooperation). as well as its existing and prospective overseas investment interests in sectors such as ICT. although only limited further relaxation has occurred to date under the current National Congress-led UPA government (Indian Planning Commission 2002d). doctors. The Report of the Steering Group on FDI has advocated automatic approval for up to 100 per cent foreign equity for most sectors of the economy. intra-corporate transferees as well as professionals from a wide range of occupations. hospital services.India’s Business Environment: Implications for Australian Companies box 5. the Republic of Korea. licensing and technical standards. the Gulf Cooperation Council. it has typically finalised negotiations on goods prior to services and investment. Mutual recognition arrangements for education. Thailand. Given the potential of India’s conventional and medical tourism industries. with Singapore making a similar commitment in respect of three Indian banks. experience and licensing requirements are to be negotiated. Japan. service suppliers. It is also a strong proponent of developing broad disciplines on the domestic regulation of services covering qualification requirements and procedures. architecture. 5 5 Indian investments in Australia are detailed in Chapter 4. Despite the benefits which would accrue to India from liberalisation of services trade. it appears to be in its interests to push more actively for better Mode 2 (consumption abroad) and Mode 3 (commercial presence) access from its trading partners. Both countries agreed to ease visa restrictions governing the temporary entry of business visitors.5 (continued) of duration of stay and the removal of labour market and economic needs tests. India is pursuing trade agreements covering services and investment with ASEAN. and architectural services (Indian Department of Commerce 2002. dental and nursing. India is particularly interested in recognition of professional qualifications in sectors such as computer-related services. which was signed in June 2005. Both countries have undertaken to encourage close cooperation between their educational institutions and agreed to mutual recognition of degrees for university admission purposes. India made its first substantive commitments on services and investment in a Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement with Singapore.
6). That is. By 2015. A 1997 ‘India Today’ survey suggested that about one-third of the Indian population has the ability to carry on a conversation in English.au/newsradio/txt/s1363471. Indian consumers are now more readily able to access finance in order to purchase goods and services. providing a spur to consumer spending. There are also significant people-to-people links. despite having to compete fiercely for attention with larger players such as the United States. which represent a potential asset when it comes to exploiting trade and investment opportunities (Box 5. although similarities in the legal systems of the two countries should not be overstated. Around 47 per cent of India’s one billion plus population is under 20 years of age. Europe and China. Double-income families are becoming increasingly common as more and more women enter the workforce. Indians perceive Australia as a friendly. Australian service providers should be aware of these demographic changes and the opportunities that likely to emerge from them. The entrepreneurial spirit common to both countries is also a plus. Recent efforts to broaden the base of business relationships by federal and state government-led business missions to India have helped raise Australia’s profile and improve Indian awareness of Australian capabilities and expertise in a number of areas. advantages for australian companies Australian companies enjoy a degree of benefit from favourable perceptions of their country in India. With greater media exposure and a population increasingly travelling abroad. there are more English speakers in India than in the United States and Britain combined. English is widely spoken in business.net.htm. including almost 160 million in their teens. P A G E 100 . Other forms of consumer credit are also growing rapidly. Western trends.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Rising consumerism and a growing middle class India’s rapidly increasing middle class and growing consumer affluence are already a draw-card for foreign investors and exporters. The Indian consumer population is characterised by dynamic change and increasing confidence. the under-20 age group will grow to 55 per cent of the population (Business Standard 2005). through migration and education. 6 6 See www.abc. safe and reasonably-priced destination for their children’s education. Both countries have a particular affinity for cricket. particularly among the younger age group which tends to have higher aspirations. and the importance of its capacity to engender fellow-feeling should not be underestimated. By December 2004. the number of credit cards issued by banks and outstanding had grown to 43 million. tastes and brands are in growing demand. The Indian law of contract is based on the common law principles of contract. up from 27 million just one year earlier (Gopinath 2005).
available at www. Nevertheless. A number of Australian companies have been engaging non-resident Indians to manage or advise on their Indian interests (JSCFADT 1998). a significant number of Indian students who undertook higher education in Australia in fields of study with high labour market demand have opted for permanent migration. This skilled diaspora represents a potential asset for both countries when it comes to exploiting trade and investment opportunities in the fast growing and increasingly open Indian economy. the continued burden of excessive regulation and bureaucracy. which permits citizens of Indian origin from Australia and 15 other countries to hold dual citizenship. Some companies had experiences of customers not adhering to contracts. P A G E 101 . A number of the large consultancy and accountancy houses also publish information on the investment climate. there were around 95 000 people living in Australia who were born in India (DIMIA 2003). Indian-born immigrants have among the highest levels of educational training and qualifications of any group in Australia. and the pressures associated with growing inter. Moreover growth prospects can be constrained by the size and resources of 7 7 Investors in India can avail themselves of a wide range of investment advisory services. may also open further investment opportunities for non-resident Indians as citizens. a range of impediments to investment remain. An exceptionally high number of Indian-born immigrants hold postsecondary qualifications and many are employed in professional.com. Altogether. remaining hurdles ‘Significant constraints to the country’s growth potential. for example PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Destination India: A Brief Overview of Tax and Regulatory Framework. technical and other whitecollar occupations. including fiscal fragility. A survey of the Australian business community in India undertaken by the Australian High Commission in New Delhi in early 2005 revealed a number of concerns. infrastructure bottlenecks. In recent years.and intra-regional inequality. accounting for 13 per cent of visas granted in 2004–05 (DIMIA 2006).India’s Business Environment: Implications for Australian Companies box 5.6: capitalising on personal linKs – indians in australia In 2001. as well as business incentives and taxation treatment.pwc. India is Australia’s second-largest source of skilled migration. it can be difficult for companies to convince their shareholders of the value of a minority investment. Companies also noted differences between states in their receptiveness to foreign investment. Non-resident Indians have additional freedoms in some areas of FDI in India compared with other foreigners. there were over 156 000 people of Indian ancestry (ABS 2004). The passing of India’s Citizenship (Amendment) Bill 2003.’ (Thirlwell 2004) India’s investment climate has improved enormously over recent years. will all need to be overcome. shortcomings in the financial and agricultural sectors. Where FDI equity limits apply.
Business licences. notably mining. the Rs15 billion (US$340 million) provision in 2005–06 for Viability Gap Funding under the scheme is very modest given the infrastructure investment expenditures required. was cumbersome and lacked transparency. These include: entry barriers in several sectors. The National Common Minimum Programme attaches the highest priority to the development of physical infrastructure. But even in the information technology sector. however. particularly in emerging industries. The government’s finances are already stretched. Infrastructure development is happening but is not keeping pace with ever-shifting and ever-increasing requirements. Perhaps the greatest immediate impediment to business lies in power and transport infrastructure shortcomings.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY the Indian joint venture partner. A key finding arising from interviews of companies conducted on behalf of KPMG International in May 2005 was that India might fail to attract more foreign investment if it does not make more rapid improvements to its infrastructure (KPMG 2005). too. Efforts to reduce the fiscal deficits at both the centre and the states are. and divergence on investment policy between the central and state governments (Indian Investment Commission 2006b). Infrastructure The poor state of India’s infrastructure has acted as a major. Despite a significant allocation of resources to major infrastructure projects. inflexible labour laws. It contains an undertaking to enhance public investment in infrastructure and at the same time bolster private sector involvement through the Public Private Partnerships scheme. although more so in manufacturing than services. Power shortages and transport infrastructure bottlenecks have a bearing on most economic activity. many regulations remain onerous. bureaucratic delays and discretion. The regulatory framework in a number of industries. the state of infrastructure in India is seen as a major issue by multinationals locating functions there (McKinsey 2005a). To some extent. an uneven playing field in sectors dominated by public sector undertakings. However. the problems faced are a reflection of India’s economic success in recent years. and highlights a number impediments to investment. it will be a challenge to meet existing and future demand. if not the major. find it difficult to mobilise sizeable resources for development expenditure. The states. In addition. P A G E 102 . constraint to growth and is cause for some consternation amongst foreign investors. starting to meet with some success. and advocates the promotion of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) for key sectors. A recent report by the Indian Investment Commission points out that sustaining growth rates of over eight per cent a year would require a significant increase in investment levels in the economy. The report identified a series of recommendations aimed at establishing a more open. stable and consistent investment regime. while significant attention has been devoted to addressing regulatory barriers and burdens over recent years. could be difficult to obtain. which should provide scope to direct more public spending into infrastructure works.
India’s Business Environment: Implications for Australian Companies Contributing to the difficulties faced. In the current Plan period (2002–07). The road network remains inadequate. Generation capacity has grown rapidly. and over 60 per cent run their own generators (Accenture. resulting in continuing energy shortages and outages during peak periods. These ‘shell’ companies are then auctioned through competitive bidding to Indian and foreign investors. In the Ninth Five Year Plan period (1997–2002). the policy emphasises the need for Public Private Partnerships.10). Only 20 per cent of paved P A G E 103 . with the main criterion being the price at which power will be supplied. has acted to discourage private sector investment in power generation. An estimated Rs9000 billion (over US$200 billion at 2002–03 prices) needs to be invested to achieve this objective. The government’s Viability Gap Funding and the passing of the Electricity Act. Up to 40 per cent of electricity generated is believed to be lost in transmission (Fortune 2005). Transport infrastructure Capacity shortages on the main road and rail links are a major constraint to growth. Table 2. Electricity theft. rail track and rolling stock. below-cost pricing and the provision of free power to some rural areas has resulted in under-investment in the sector. The number of delayed public sector projects increased in 2003–04 and cost overruns were substantial (RBI 2005d. but look to significant extra capacity coming from the public sector. and consequently unreliable supply and high prices for paying customers. Recognising the immense funding required. the government’s expectations of generation capacity addition by the private sector are much reduced. stemming from tariffs insufficient to cover costs because of cross-subsidisation. The Government recently adopted a model for fast tracking mega-power projects. could lead to increased capacity down the track. The poor and deteriorating financial position of state electricity boards. despite some major investments in recent years. The average Indian business faces 17 power outages a month. While there have been major investments in port infrastructure in recent years. port operations are inefficient by international standards. 2003. but has failed to keep pace with demand. The 2005 National Electricity Policy establishes guidelines for accelerated development of the power sector and sets the objective of fully meeting the demand for power by 2012. 2006). many public infrastructure projects have not been completed in a timely manner. notably the ‘Golden Quadrilateral’ and the North-South and East-West corridors. and inadequate management and oversight (Indian Planning Commission 2002a). Projects are parked in ‘shell’ companies with all necessary clearances in place. barely half of the additional capacity planned was actually developed (Indian Planning Commission 2002a). But continuing power shortages can be expected for some time to come. Power sector The power sector is beset with problems. reflecting poor scheduling and prioritisation. Problems are compounded by inadequate maintenance of roads.
the government estimated that Rs1650 billion (US$34 billion) was required in order to address deficiencies in the national highway network (Ministry of Finance 2005). Nevertheless. In addition. and areas of the economy reserved for the public sector or subject to foreign investment restrictions. Labour productivity is low and there is overcharging on freight traffic in order to subsidise passenger transport (The Hindu Business Line 2006a). notably in industrial licensing. but enormous levels of investment in infrastructure and technological upgrading appear to be required for the sector to meet anticipated demand for freight traffic. P A G E 104 . This represents a huge challenge. 8 8 http://finmin.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY roads are thought to be in good condition. quantitative restrictions on imports. Complex administrative procedures remain in some areas. including the services sector. including through bringing ship turnaround times more into line with international standards (Ministry of Finance 2005). Significant reforms appear to be required if the sector is to take some of the load off roads. In 2002. The corporatisation of major ports is a pressing priority. and administrators continue to have wide discretionary powers. and an increasing reliance on Public Private Partnerships and foreign investment. some regulatory functions are performed at both the centre and state levels. With port capacity no longer acting as a constraint.in/foreign_investment/fii/.nic. continues to be heavily regulated and controlled. including through FDI. accessed February 2006. In 2006. Major investments in ports in recent years. price controls. should help raise efficiency levels. For example. including the foreign investment approvals process. it was ranked 116th by the World Bank in terms of an overall measure of ease of doing business. leading to duplication of effort and additional expense for the businesses affected. the government aims to improve productivity. Efficiency gains have been realised in railways in recent years. in a recent World Bank survey 61 per cent of firms reported that government regulations occupied ten per cent or more of senior management time (World Bank 2005). It has also moved to streamline administrative procedures and commit to timelines for administrative processing and decisions in some areas. some through Public Private Partnerships. are resulting in significant additions to capacity. Regulation India has taken major steps since 1991 in lessening regulation and economic controls. India ranks relatively poorly in terms of a number of indicators of the ease of doing business (Table 5. The government itself recognises that ‘business still has to deal with an inefficient and sometimes still slow-moving bureaucracy’. the economy. Increased private sector participation. even with funding from multilateral development agencies.2).
Moreover. political opposition has made it extremely unlikely that it will be able to push ahead in the short term. While the UPA Government has signalled the need to effect reforms in this area. In practice.India’s Business Environment: Implications for Australian Companies Ta b l e 5 . Firms become subject to a number of regulations depending on their size. although often at significant cost. while larger businesses may be subject to a raft of regulations. P A G E 105 . varying from state to state. it impacts on India’s overall economic performance and foreign investor perceptions of India. although the hiring of contract labour is also heavily regulated under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act for establishments employing 20 or more people. Some states have moved to rationalise and update their laws in this area. interpretation of the law is unclear. Andhra Pradesh has amended its law to facilitate the employment of workers to undertake temporary and non-core activities. China Thailand Vietnam Australia Procedures (number) 13 11 12 12 9 11 6 8 8 11 2 Duration (days) 48 71 151 22 30 48 6 48 33 50 2 Difficulty of hiring (index) 11 56 61 44 0 56 0 78 33 44 0 Difficulty of firing (index) 40 90 70 30 10 40 0 30 0 70 10 Procedures (number) 25 40 34 29 31 25 23 28 26 37 11 Time (days) 241 425 570 75 300 360 69 210 390 343 157 Source: World Bank 2006b. The difficulty experienced under the Industrial Disputes Act by firms with 100 workers or more in shedding labour is often cited by business as a factor inhibiting investment and was recognised as such in the Report of the Steering Group on FDI (Indian Planning Commission 2002d). it seems that many firms are able to find their way around this constraint. While the Industrial Disputes Act only covers the industrial sector and so has no direct bearing on services companies. Many large – and not so large – companies have turned more to contract labour in recent years. 2 Doing business in India measures of the ease of doing business in selected Asian economies Starting a business Ease of doing business (ranking) 91 116 115 27 21 113 2 35 20 99 5 Hiring and firing Enforcing contracts Country China India Indonesia Korea. For example. Rep of Malaysia Philippines Singapore Taiwan. Labour law and regulations are very complex. Small businesses in the unorganised sector tend to be less regulated.
In 2004. the Central Bureau of Investigation and the Enforcement Directorate. According to the World Bank (2006c). Progress in tackling corruption is evident in a number of areas. the CVC became an independent statutory body with the power to supervise the functioning of India’s two key investigating agencies. publishing on its website a list of public servants who have been found guilty of corrupt practices or are facing prosecution. The Karnataka Lok Ayukta in particular has been successful in using its power of office and media 9 9 India’s Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) score increased from 2. The CVC has since sought to limit the scope for corruption by encouraging public sector banks to computerise operations. However this may not simply reflect improved perceptions of India’s performance on corruption. despite marginal improvement since 2001 (Transparency International 2005). Previously an advisory body to the government of the day. yet considerable scope for improvement remains.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Business practices The Indian business environment can be challenging. the CVC was given authority to receive complaints from whistleblowers. Corruption and rent-seeking are increasingly being curtailed as regulations and controls are gradually reduced and more sectors opened to competition. Year-to-year changes in a country’s score on the CPI can also result from changing samples and methodologies (Lambsdorff 2005). banning post-tender negotiations with any party in procurement processes other than the lowest bidder and. and therefore limits the scope for corrupt practices. multiple. for example. In 2005. overlapping anti-corruption agencies and lengthy legal processes have made it difficult to secure convictions. A lack of legitimate funding sources for election campaigns has created incentives to extract rents from administrative functions to fund campaign expenses or repay contributors (World Bank 2006c). as measured by perception surveys (World Bank 2006c). and protect their identity (World Bank 2006c). The increased adoption of e-governance to simplify transactions and promote transparency in service delivery also appears to have curbed corruption by keeping transactions between business and decision-makers at arms’ length.9 in 2005. particularly for Australian companies seeking to enter sectors still subject to significant amounts of regulation. marginally behind China (78) but ahead of Vietnam (107). contributed significantly to reducing corruption levels.7 out of 10 in 2001 to 2. The computerisation of land records in Karnataka and Maharashtra. The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) – which is charged with tackling corruption among senior civil servants and state-owned enterprises – was given a stronger mandate in 1998 following a decision by an activist Supreme Court. Deregulation reduces the number of areas in which officials can exercise discretion. P A G E 106 . India was ranked 88th of 159 countries. particularly when accompanied by the political will and strong administrative leadership needed to counter resistance from officials. Corruption in India remains a pervasive concern. Accountability mechanisms of central and state governments have also been enhanced. although there has been some progress in curbing it. India continued to perform relatively poorly in Transparency International’s 2005 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). the Philippines (117) and Indonesia (137). State governments have deployed Lok Ayukta (ombudsmen) to address high-level political corruption.
Companies generally need to have substantial resources at their disposal in the start-up phase as success often requires a substantial initial investment of time and capital. economic development and the business environment. strategies for success There are some prerequisites for building a successful business in the Indian market. Broadly speaking. An increasingly active media and civil society have played a critical role in exposing several high profile corruption cases and galvanising political support for reforms that minimise rent-seeking opportunities (World Bank 2006c. While increased competition. such as thorough research and preparation. businesses contemplating the Indian market nonetheless need to be aware of their potential impact on their operations. Box 13 for examples). But approaches and ingredients for success in India are many and varied (see for example Austrade 2006a). In the event of a dispute. as in any overseas market. For many businesses entering the Indian market. there could be advantages in combining longer postings with a competent local as second in charge (McKinsey 2005b). and a more activist media and NGO community are likely to limit the scope for corruption and rentseeking in the future. Of 25 major joint ventures established by foreign multinationals from 1993 to 2003. it may be prudent to focus on just one region or city in India as there can be substantial differences between states in per capita incomes. deregulation and e-governance. Most foundered because the local partner was not in a position to invest sufficient resources to enlarge the business as quickly as the multinational had hoped. There is considerable merit in having full control of an operation where policy allows. compounded by the fact that foreign ventures cannot utilise in-house lawyers. there can be strong advantages in placing an Indian in charge of local operations. only three have remained in business (McKinsey 2005b). The prices of local competitors may mean that products that sell well in other markets will not sell in India. Consistent with the need to tailor products. P A G E 107 . joint venturers are also hamstrung to a degree by the time consuming nature of dispute resolution through the Indian legal system. improved accountability mechanisms. rather than just tailoring the strategy they have adopted in other markets. Moreover connecting transport infrastructure is often deficient. supply chains and distribution systems to local markets. the southern and western parts of India are wealthier and have been growing more strongly than others. careful selection of a business partner or customer and the ability to take a long-term view. If the preference is to have an expatriate in the position.India’s Business Environment: Implications for Australian Companies scrutiny to pressure corrupt officials and make corruption in service delivery a potent public issue (World Bank 2006c). Research by McKinsey (2005b) suggests that the most successful multinationals in India are those that have developed their strategy from the ground up.
INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Nevertheless. and uncomplicated related-party transactions (Todorchevski 2005). P A G E 108 . Parties entering into joint ventures should have congruent goals and similar ethics and values. Franchising and licensing is another option foreign companies may wish to consider for getting their brands into India. as with any moves into a new country with a different business culture. including the local knowledge and experience that the foreign partner can readily tap into. success for the newcomer may not be immediate and will depend largely on identifying and cementing the right business relationships from the start and being prepared to stay the course. Rapid growth and change in India’s services sector is creating substantial openings for Australian business. But. Australian services providers are well positioned to capitalise on emerging market opportunities in India. joint ventures can have their advantages.
Accenture 2006.ministers. available at www.adb.123India. P A G E 109 .T.com. Austrade 2005. 15 September 2004. 27 October 2004.gov. The Many Faces of Business Success in India.com/. AMP 2005a. available at www. March 2005. AMP Reviews Indian Joint Venture Life Insurance Business. accessed February 2006. accessed March 2006. Asian Development Outlook 2006.adb. available at www.com/. accessed March 2006. accessed February 2006. AMP Exits Joint Venture Operation in India.dotars.References referencesi 123India. accessed December 2005. Airservices Undertakes Air Traffic Safety Work in India. available at www. accessed April 2006.atimes.au. Media Release by the Hon John Anderson MP.anz. available at http://www. accessed November 2006. available at http://www.com.org. available at www. Maverick engineers Indian Railways turnaround.com. Australian School – Now in India.au. A. —— 2006. accessed October 2006. available at www.com. accessed March 2006. available at http://corp. Asian Development Bank (ADB) 2005.atkearney. Kearney 2005. Media Release 27 April 2000. —— 2005b.org. 2004. J. Asia Times Online 2002. gov. available at www. Kearney Study.com 2004.amp. Press Release.au/ publications.amp. accessed March 2006. available at www. Media Release 7 June 2005. media release 12 October 2004. Say Global Executives in New A. AusBiotech 2004.org.austrade. available at www. ANZ 2000. accessed February 2006. available at www.au. Media Release 2 August 2005.au. accessed March 2006. India’s School Children Taught by Kangaroo Kids.com. accessed August 2006.com. Indians Catch the Travel Bug. Significant Liberalisation for the Australia-India Airservices Agreement. Anderson. Asian Development Outlook 2005.atimes. —— 2006.ausbiotech. News Release 7 December 2005. Global FDI Recovery Clouded by Savings Glut Overhang.com. Media Release 10 October 2005.accenture.airservices. AusBiotech Strengthens International Outreach through Indian MOU. available at www. Airservices Australia 2005. Trademark. accessed August 2006. available at www.T. ANZ sells Grindlays to Standard Chartered. 28 November 2002. —— 2006a. 23 March 2006.austrade. Beyond the call centre – Mastering India’s growth dynamics.gov. accessed March 2006.
2001. Information Technology to India.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY —— 2006b. Joint Statement.austrade. Cat.0. International Investment Position. Cat. available at www. 3401.gov. No. —— 2006b. Cat.austrade. Year 2005 Market Indicator Data – Table F: Overseas Student Enrolments in Australia by Country and Major Sector. Asia’s Other Giant. International Trade In Goods and Services. MP. available at www.org. —— 2006b. Year 2005 Market Indicator Data – Table A: Student Enrolments in Australia from Top 10 Source Countries 2002 to 2005. —— 2006d.au. —— 2006b. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2004. available at www. accessed November 2006. News item 25 August 2005. Australia. available at http://minister.au.au.abs. 28 March 2006. Entertainment to India. 2004 and 2005. —— 2006c. accessed November 2006. Australia.austrade.com/en/news/.0. Media Release. Overseas Arrivals and Departures. —— 2006a. Indian tourism forum gives Australia inside running. No.industry.au. —— 2005b. 10 February 2006. (The) AXA Group 2005.0. No. Cat. available at http://aei.0. Australian Computer Society Policy Statement on Onshoring ICT Based Analytics. Australian Census Analytic Program: Australians’ Ancestries. accessed October 2006.gov. P A G E 110 . the Hon Fran Bailey. available at www.dest. available at www.au. —— 2006. Media Release. available at http://minister.abs. Australian Computer Society 2005. accessed February 2006. Dec 2005. 21 September 2005. India is where the business is. available at www.0. An Indian Joint-Venture for AXA Asia Pacific Holdings. available at www.axa. September 2006.gov. available at www.au. accessed November 2006. Overseas Arrivals and Departures. available at www. gov. accessed February 2006. 30 November 2005. 20 October 2006.abs.gov. Bailey 2005. available at http://aei.abs. 2005. 5352.abs.dest. accessed April 2006. Cat No. accessed November 2006.au. the Hon Fran Bailey. MP. accessed November 2006.gov.industry.gov. 2054. accessed March 2006.gov. accessed November 2005.gov. —— 2006a. No. Australia: Supplementary Country Statistics. accessed March 2006. November 2006 Consistent with September 2006 edition of 5368.au.au.gov.au.au. accessed March 2006.gov.au. Australian Education International (AEI) 2006a. accessed March 2006.0.au. —— 2005a. 3401. Australian Financial Review (AFR) 2005.gov.acs. 5368. Mining to India. Taking flight. available at www.
accessed March 2006. in International Higher Education. Fall 2005.icrier. pp. accessed November 2006. Working Paper No. and Rogers. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations. J.bharti. Goldar 2004. 91–116. N. available at www. Bharti Enterprises 2005a. Böhm.bc.vic. Bharti AXA Life Insurance Company Ltd. 75 Years of Development Research – An International Colloquium at Cornell University Organized by the Program for Comparative Economic Development. IDP Education Australia. 2005. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations. Muralidharan.vic. —— 2006. accessed March 2006.idp. media release 26 August 2005. accessed January 2006. Telecom reforms and state level economic development in India. Chaudhury. Business Victoria 2004. media release 28 October 2005.gov. 139.dpc. accessed January 2006. Canberra Times 2005. 2006. —— 2005b. Put Your Money Where You Shop. and B.bharti. K. Chanda. available at http://www.au. available at www. Opening Doors to Export. Working Paper No. New joint State body to promote games business opportunities. available at www. R. available at www. ‘Foreign universities in India: Market-Driven New Directions’. 2005. —— 2006. accessed October 2006. Global Student Mobility 2025: Forecasts of the Global Demand for International Higher Education. accessed March 2006. Winter 2006. S.org. available at http://www. available at www. Media Release. Number 41. cornell. Volume 20. Number 1. May 7–9 2004. Meares and Pearce 2002. Learning to Ride the Indian Elephant: Australia Should Look Beyond China. TCS buys Aussie consultancy firm. available at www. Kremer.com.com. Banga. com. New Delhi.. R.edu. accessed November 2006.arts.business.edu. New Delhi. accessed February 2006. Bharti Enterprises and AXA Asia Pacific Holdings Limited announce partnership for a life insurance joint venture in India. P A G E 111 . 9 November 2006. Brumby. 25 April 2005. Davis. and Jha S. accessed March 2006. BHARTI Announces Agreement with VODAFONE Marking the Entry of the World’s Largest Telecom Operator into India. the Hon John Brumby. R.businessstandard. Business Standard 2005. www. 2004. J. available at www.. Hammer.com. Trade in Financial Services: India’s Opportunities and Constraints.au. available at www.com/16aiecpapers/.gov.icrier. Media Briefing September 2002. Contribution of Services to Output Growth and Productivity in Indian Manufacturing: Pre and Post Reforms. 152. Journal of Economic Perspectives. commences operations.. M.bharti.References Banerjee. ‘Missing in Action: Teacher and Health Worker Absence in Developing Countries’. MP. 22 October 2005.org. accessed September 2005. Boston College 2005. News item 22 August 2006. 20 April 2005.
India Country Guide. available at www. 6 June 2005. in Foreign Affairs. December 2004 to January 2005 – Issue 33. available at www.commbank. accessed March 2006. Australia-India Focus. MP. in Beyond Borders: Global Biotechnology Report 2005. ‘Global Challenges.gov.com.com.au. AT&T becomes first foreign carrier to get new telecom licences in India.dcita.ey. Media Release. accessed March 2006.gov.com. Strengthening ICT Links with India. accessed March 2006.au/aic/.gov.ey. available at www. available at www. July/August 2006. accessed February 2006. —— 2005b. accessed March 2006. 2006. Coonan. People of Australia: Statistics from the 2001 Census. accessed February 2006. DC. P A G E 112 . Deloitte 2005. Media Release. available at www. National Tourism Emerging Markets Strategy: China and India. Senator the Hon Helen Coonan. Tourism and Resources 2005. www. 15 March 2004. —— 2005b.dfat. Senator the Hon Helen Coonan. 6 June 2005.au.ey. accessed February 2006.deloittecountryguides. —— 2006. Commonwealth Bank 2005.industry.clough. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) 2005. accessed March 2006. 24 October 2005. Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (DIMIA) 2003.dcita. Ernst & Young 2004. www. Press Release 31 January 2005. Washington. A.com. Department of Industry. Speech by the Hon Alexander Downer MP. http://www. Das. to the Australia-India Chamber of Commerce. available at www. accessed March 2006.foreignminister. Clough Signs A$170 Million BG India Contract – Looks To Growth In Indian Energy Sector Opportunities. www. accessed February 2006.au. H.gov. Global Solutions’. 2005.com. accessed April 2006.com.com. available at www. pdf. Australia India Council. 1 November 2005.au/statistics/ publications/popflows2004_5/.gov. accessed February 2006. 2005a. accessed February 2006. Council on Foreign Relations. 9 October 2006.gov. ‘The India Model’. Media Release. Digital Media Asia 2006.minister. Australia-India ICT Partnership Agreed.gov.immi. Downer.immi. The Commonwealth Bank of Australia Receives Approval for a Rep Office License in India.au.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Clough 2005. accessed November 2006. —— 2005a. G. available at www. MP.minister.au.au. www. Doing Business in India. Population Flows: Immigration Aspects 2004–05 Edition. available at www.digitalmediaasia. Press Release.au/research/publications/people_of_australia. FICCI-E&Y Entertainment Report Anticipates growth Opportunities for the Indian Entertainment Industry.
Financial Network Services 2005. Not Hubris.P. Bill Ford Celebrates Debut of Ford Fiesta in India. D.fns. Gupta 2004.S. Press Release 7 October 2005. 15 May 2006.S.com. in Far Eastern Economic Review. available at www. 2005. A New Manufacturing Mantra. Fortune 2005. Nos. Media Release. August 2006. accessed December 2006. Will Make India Great’. The McKinsey Quarterly. 168 No.com. 1999. 2005. J. India’s Financial System: More Market less Government. Farrar. L. available at www. Lund. in Reserve Bank of India Bulletin. and Puri. Office of Economics Working Paper.com. December 2005.au.References Farrell. P A G E 113 . ‘Sustainability of Services-led Growth: An Input Output Analysis of the Indian Economy’. J. L. Global Economics Paper No: 99. Indian Mining Industry. accessed November 2005.R Discussion Papers: 2144. Gopinath.financialinsights. accessed March 2006. S. Goldman Sachs 2003. available at www. Gordon. accessed November 2006. S. BANCS Roll-out Sets New Record: Central Bank of India Chooses FNS Solution. June 2005. and P.com. Economy?. S.fedmin. 22. Straus and Giroux. Federation of Indian Mineral Industries 2006. C. Financial Times 2006. Financial Insights Asia/Pacific Envisage Insurance Premium Expansions in Excess of 20% in China and India. available at www.in. 11.. Goswami.com. IMF Working Paper WP/04/171. The World Is Flat – A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. accessed January 2006. U.imf. Friedman. accessed February 2006. Financial Insights 2005. O. T. 1. 2 and 3.E. Trade in Financial Services: Procompetitive Effects and Growth Performance.rbi. available at www. Francois. Reserve Bank of India at the IBA-Banking Frontiers International Conference in Mumbai on 28 May 2005. Hansda. Fortune. available at www. Monsoon and Winter 2001.. 31 October 2006. and Schuknecht. 2001.org. Greene. ‘Humility. Understanding India’s Services Revolution. Summer. address by Deputy Governor. Growth in Services Outsourcing to India: Propellant or Drain on the U. Vol. available at http://media. Ford Motor Company 2005. International Trade Commission.org. 2005. India on the move. Vol.ford. 2006. accessed March 2006. Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050.gs. January 2006. 25 October 2005. Media Release 1 July 2005. 2006. W. in Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers. ‘Retail Banking – Opportunities and Challenges’. April 2005.
8 March 2006. —— 2005a. 6 March 2006. available at www.gov.ibef. IDP Education Australia 2005a. accessed June 2006.ibef. —— 2005b.com/investment_in_india/ banks. com. 2. a Report by Boston Consulting Group/Confederation of Indian Industry. accessed March 2006. available at www. —— 2006a. Media Release.au. a report by Crisil for IBEF. available at www. Healthcare. accessed March 2006.nic. available at www. J. 11 May 2005. ICICI Bank 2004. 2006a. Press Release. Media Release. IMAGES-KSA Technopak 2005. Indian CSO (Central Statistical Organisation) 2006.pm.au.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Howard.ibef. accessed May 2006. Call to Work the Indian Market. Vol. accessed February 2006.org. Hydro Tasmania Consulting and Roaring 40s to open India office.org.pm.idp. available at http://finance. Entertainment and Media. in India Now Magazine. India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF) 2004. www. Hydro Tasmania 2006.com. available at www. a report by PricewaterhouseCoopers for IBEF. available at www. Consumption.ibef. available at www.indiamart.edu. accessed March 2006.org. available at www. ‘Keeping the Smile on their Faces’.imagesretail.org.ibef.in.gov. Media Release by the Hon John Howard MP. It would be Tragic to Miss Out on India. Issue 5. accessed March 2006. available at www. accessed March 2006. Proxy Banking in India.au. available at www. The India Manufacturing Opportunity: India’s Emerging Global Challengers. —— 2006b. Bangalore: Retaining its Cutting Edge.html.hydro. accessed December 2006.mospi.au.au.ibef. 1 September 2004. accessed March 2006. ICICI Bank Launches Kisan Loan Card and Inaugurates Innovative Low Cost ATMs in Rural India. Media Release. IndiaMART 2006. accessed June 2006.icicibank. P A G E 114 .ibef. available at www. accessed March 2006. Calling One India: India’s Next Telecom Revolution.org. synopsis available at www.org. 12 May 2005. available at www.idp. www.edu. Visit to Mumbai. —— 2005b. New Series of National Account Statistics (Base Year 1999–2000). 7 March 2006. Address by the Hon John Howard MP to a business lunch hosted by the Indo-Australian Chamber of Commerce in Chennai. accessed June 2006. accessed March 2006. —— 2006c. International Retail Report 2005. accessed February 2006. accessed June 2006.org. —— 2005c. —— 2006b.com.
in/. accessed March 2006.gov.pdf. accessed December 2006. available at http:// indiabudget. PowerPoint Presentation by Dr Dua. Draft National Biotechnology Development Strategy. accessed February 2006.in. Indian Department of Shipping 2005. Indian Department of Economic Affairs 2005. accessed February 2006.in. accessed October 2005. Economic Survey 2004–2005.gov.nic. Economic Survey 2002–2003. accessed February 2006. http://mohfw. Fact Sheet on Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): From August 1991 to April 2006.nic. Foreign Direct investment in India. accessed February 2006. available at http://finmin.nic.100.245/exim/2000/. available at http://commerce. Ministry of Commerce & Industry. accessed February 2006.9.ppt.nic. available at http://dipp. Indian Ministry of Mines 1993. Investment Strategy for India: Investment Commission Report.in. available at http://morth.in/new_events_dipp/india_eco_summit2005. available at http://mines.nic. available at http://dipp. —— 2006b. —— 2006.in. Economic Survey 2005–2006. National Mineral Policy 1993. available at http://indiabudget.nic. Foreign Trade Policy 2004–2009. Ministry of Science and Technology. Secretary.nic. Medium Term Export Strategy 2002–2007. Annual Report 2004–05.in/. Indian Ministry of Finance 2003. Investing in India: Foreign Direct Investment Policy and Procedures. National Health Policy – 2002. New Delhi. Public Private Participation (PPP). Indian Department of Commerce 2002.investmentcommission. —— 2006.in/. available at http://finmin.nic.in. accessed November 2006.in. available at http://164. http://dbtindia. Invest India: Opportunities in the World’s Largest Democracy.in. accessed January 2006. accessed January 2006. in/np2002.nic. accessed February 2006. February 2006. accessed August 2006. Indian Investment Commission 2006a. available at http://indiabudget. —— 2005b.htm. available at http://shipping.in/biotechstrategy/BiotechStrategy. Indian Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP) 2005a. http://dipp.in.nic. Indian Department of Road Transport and Highways 2006.in/.nic.nic. P A G E 115 . 28 November 2005. Indian Directorate General of Foreign Trade 2004.References Indian Department of Biotechnology 2005. Indian Ministry of Health & Family Welfare 2002. —— 2005. Scheme for Support to Public Private Partnerships in Infrastructure. www.
Report of the Special Group on targeting Ten Million Employment Opportunities Per Year over the Tenth Plan Period.investaustralia. available at www.investaustralia.nic. accessed March 2006. —— 2005b.htm. D.infosys. Report of the Steering Group on Foreign Direct Investment. Invest Australia case study. “Atithi Devo Bhavah” is the Latest Mantra of Indian Tourism. 108. —— 2002d. Indian Press Information Bureau 2005a.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Indian Planning Commission 2002a. gov. Press Release 3 September 2005.au/house/committee/jfadt/reports. accessed August 2006.ap. accessed February 2006. available at http:// planningcommission. available at http://portal. Infosys Reaches out to Australia.com.com. Press Release 30 December 2005. 11 November 2004. accessed February 2006.in. Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs. available at http:// planningcommission. Australia’s Trade Relationship with India. available at www.gov. available at http://pib.au. Australia South Asia Research Centre. Report of the Committee on India Vision 2020. —— 2002b. 2003.in. —— 2006. Asian South Pacific Bureau of Adult Education (ASPBAE). P A G E 116 .au. accessed November 2005. Road Transport & Highways. —— 2005b. New Delhi. The Political Economy of Recent Economic Growth in India. available at www. accessed November 2006. L. Smart Internet Signs Infosys for Investment in Australian R&D. accessed January 2006.nic.imf. accessed November 2006. Canberra. M. Ministry of Shipping. Jha.unesco. and B.nic. 2005.au.in/efsep0503. available at www. Mid-Term Appraisal of the Tenth Five Year Plan (2002–2007). available at http://www. National Maritime Development Programme Formulated. Khan. New Delhi. Infosys 2004.nic. International Monetary Fund (IMF) 2006. Planning Commission. and Roy. Australia as a Hub for Analytics Offshoring. Defence and Trade (JSCFADT) 1998. Invest Australia 2005a. http://planningcommission.org. pdf. R. CID Working Paper No. Kapu. —— 2002c.axiss.in/aboutus/committee/tsk_sg10m.in. available at www. Indian Higher Education Reform: Half-Baked Socialism to Half-Baked Capitalism. Mehta 2004. 10th Five Year Plan (2002–2007). accessed December 2005.aph. Press Release.pdf. World Economic Outlook: Financial Systems and Economic Cycles. Education for all in India: Going up the down staircase?. September 2006. Securities and Exchange Board of India Gets SMARTS. —— 2005.org. accessed November 2006. available at http://pibhyd.gov.nic. Centre for International Development at Harvard University. accessed February 2006.
. available at www.linfox. available at www.com. Leighton 2005a.leighton. Linfox 2006. Media Release. I. The Methodology of the 2005 Corruption Perceptions Index.au. available at www.leightonasia.au. —— 2006b. Macquarie Bank 2005. —— 2005b. January 2005. 2001. Rathindran.com. accessed March 2006. Rajan. McKinsey Quarterly 2005 Special Edition: Fulfilling India’s Promise.com. 2005. in Leighton Asia News. available at www. KPMG 2005. The Right Passage to India. Transparency International and University of Passau. Macquarie Bank Announces Entry into Indian Market.” Policy Research Working Paper Series 2655.com.com. Jamnagar Export Refinery SPM and Pipelines.medical-tourism-india.com. available at www. 2006. Report by ICRIER and Ministry of Consumer Affairs. N. accessed December 2006.au..kpmg. Mukherjee. htm.au. in Leighton Asia News.com. January 2006. McKinsey 2005a.edu. ‘Another Major Manufacturer Signs up in India’. www. La Trobe Connections with India. J. P A G E 117 . accessed January 2006. Manufacturing in India. R. U. available at www. July 2005.latrobe. Minerals Council of Australia 2005.leighton. July 2006. accessed March 2006. The World Bank. IMF Working Paper WP/06/22. Solutions Asia Pacific. available at http://www.leighton.. La Trobe University 2002.com. Kumar. A. —— 2005b.macqaurie. India’s Pattern of Development: What Happened. What Follows?. accessed September 2006. FDI in Retail Sector: India. Measuring services trade liberalization and its impact on economic growth: an illustration. accessed March 2006. Lambsdorff. accessed January 2006. available at www. Ensuring India’s Offshoring Future. McKinsey Quarterly. accessed March 2006. http://www.imf.References Kochhar. A.minerals. Mattoo.transparency. —— 2006a. and Tokatlidis.org. Fact Sheet – The Australia China Minerals Trade. Government of India. ‘Expanding our Horizons into Oil and Gas’. Subramanian. accessed March 2006. and Patel. A. 2006. in Leighton Asia News. available at www. accessed February 2006. ‘Sub-continent Presents Exciting Opportunities’.org. available at www..au. R and Subramanian. accessed August 2006. accessed November 2006.org.au/india/links. K. February 2005. Medical Tourism India 2006. 28 July 2005. A.
com/in. December 2005.nasscom. Remarks by David C. 2005. 2002. accessed June 2006. The World in 2050: How Big will the Major Emerging Market Economies Get and How Can the OECD Compete?. in Reserve Bank of India Bulletin. 6–16 September 2004. available at www. available at www. Karachi on 18 May 2005. in Policy Analysis. National Advisory Council 2004. Issue No. http://nac. DC.6 Billion.org. —— 2006c.rbi. Washington.org. Y.pwc. ‘The Triumph of India’s Market Reforms: The Record of the 1980s and 1990s’.gov. PricewaterhouseCoopers 2005a.org.in/ncmp.nasscom. 48.net. available at www. available at http://southasia. Global Integration through Knowledge Process Outsourcing. accessed June 2006. www. accessed June 2006. The Indian Entertainment and Media Industry: Unravelling the Potential. —— 2005b. accessed March 2006. Reserve Bank of India at the Institute of Bankers of Pakistan.pwc. Foreign Direct Investment in Education Sector. October 2005.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Mulford. Nandi. P A G E 118 .qld. Queensland Department of Premier and Cabinet 2004. accessed March 2006.Fact Sheet. Oneworld. U.org. Mulford. accessed May 2006. Indian IT Software And Services Grow By 31. Panagariya. ‘Banking Sector Reforms in India : An Overview’. available at http://newdelhi. available at www.V. Looking Ahead at 2005–06. National Association of Software and Service Companies (NASSCOM) 2005a. Reddy. —— 2005b. Reddy. at the conference on ‘Building a Vibrant Insurance Market in India’. accessed February 2006. accessed February 2006. Extending India’s Leadership of the Global IT and BPO Industries.nic.V. OneWorld South Asia. —— 2006a.nasscom. 4 January 2006. —— 2006b. Y. available at www. 2005. D. on a Visit to Japan and India.org. accessed August 2006. Media Release.pwc. accessed November 2005 and June 2006. Knowledge Professionals.htm. —— 2006. Taj Mansingh Hotel.4% In FY 05–06 Posting An Aggregate Revenue Of USD 29. 2005. June 2005.net 2006. Premier and Minister for Trade. available at www. On-line Resource Center. Governor. available at www. Cato Institute. available at www. accessed May 2006.nasscom. speech by Dr. Seoul: International Telecommunications Society (ITS) 14th Biennial Conference Paper.org.in. Ambassador to India. 1 June 2006. A. NASSCOM Newsline.com. Role of Telecommunications in Developing Countries in the 21st century. Looking Back. National Common Minimum Programme. B. Report by Peter Beattie MP. available at www.thepremier.C. accessed February 2006.S.com/in. 7 November 2005.nasscom.gov. New Delhi October 6 2005.oneworld. accessed December 2005.usembassy. Indian IT Industry – Fact Sheet. NASSCOM-McKinsey 2005.au.
accessed March 2006.com.sims.References Rediff. org.rbi.com. Press Release.in. 2000. 28 February 2005. accessed December 2006. 1 September 2004.rbi. accessed February 2006.rbi. —— 2005e.org. and Chanda. Satyam Launches Its Largest Global Development Center Outside India at Melbourne.in. available at www. P A G E 119 .in. available at www. WTO Research Series No. Australia. accessed November 2006. Sawhney.icrier.rbi.rbi.satyam. accessed February 2006. 2004. Trade in Environmental Services: Opportunities and Constraints. available at www. accessed January 2006.in.edu/~anno/papers/ bangalore_svasia. Circular RBI/2004–05/377.satyam. available at www. 14 April 2006. in Reserve Bank of India Bulletin.org. Annual Report 2005–2006.com 2006a.rbi. available at http://resmed. Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy. available at http://www. available at www. available at www. ResMed named 2006 top exporter. Annual Report 2004–2005. accessed January 2006. available at www.org. Saxenian. —— 2006a.org. available at www. Lalu comes to IIM-A with new image. Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy. accessed November 2006.in. New Delhi. Statistical Tables Relating to Banks in India 2004–05. in. Why ICICI’s Rural Foray Thrived. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations. available at www. accessed November 2006. —— 2005. —— 2006b. May 2000. ResMed 2006. paper presented to Conference on Indian Economic Prospects: Advancing Policy Reform. Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform. Headline archives. accessed June 2006. R. November 2006. —— 2005d.org. available at www. Satyam 2004.in. ‘Computer Services Exports from India: 2002–03’. 3. Stanford.rbi. 4 December 2006. Roadmap for presence of Foreign Banks in India and Ownership and Governance in Private Sector Banks. A. accessed January 2006. in Reserve Bank of India Bulletin. Satyam Enters into Strategic Partnership to Invest in Victoria’s Human Capital. 13 September 2005. accessed November 2006. 30 August 2006.html.com. —— 2006b. Invisibles in India’s Balance of Payments. Press Release 1 June 2005. accessed February 2006. September 2005. accessed January 2006. 29 August 2005.berkeley.rbi. 18 September 2006.au.org. —— 2005c.in. —— 2005b. Press Release. 18 September 2006. Reserve Bank of India (RBI) 2005a.org. accessed December 2005. Bangalore: The Silicon Valley of Asia?. available at www. —— 2006c. A. 14 October 2005. org.
tajhotels. available at www. accessed March 2006.com.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Sify 2005.com 2005.in. 3 October 2006.com. available at www. M. The Taj Checks into Sydney – Another World Gateway City.tcs.tcs. 12 March 2004. TCS Expands Banking Sector Product Range Launches Credit Risk Model (Riskscan™and Enterprise Wide Risk Management (EWRM).com. —— 2005b. Defence and Trade inquiry into Australia’s Relationship with India as an Emerging World Power. 2006. 29 November 2005. accessed February 2006. Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) 2002. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India 1999.com. PM lays the foundation stone for the Western Rail Freight Corridor.trai. —— 2005a. 9 September 2006. —— 2005a. available at www.in. 29 December 2005. October 5. —— 2006. tata. Business story.techbizindia. Singh.com. Australia’s TAFE Global and TCS Jointly to Introduce Vocational Training Software.com. accessed October 2006. accessed February 2006. available at www. Tata Group 2006. 241. Foreign Banks on Expansion Spree in India. 3 August 2004.com. Macquarie Retains Big Plans for India. gov. accessed March 2006. Indians use Aussie Skills.com. Telstra 2006. available at www. accessed March 2006. available at http://pmindia. TCS Reiterates its Commitment to State of Victoria in Meeting with Premier Steve Bracks. Neville Roach Appointed Chairman of TCS-FNS in Australia. 14 December 2005. accessed February 2006. accessed October 2006. Online Education. 13 April 2005. 5 November 2004. C. Working Paper No. News Release 20 October 2005. Techbizindia. available at www. Media Release 18 September 2002. accessed January 2006. P A G E 120 . the Emerging e-wave.sify. New Telecom Policy 1999. submission to Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs. News Release 1 January 2006. Speech.gov. Press Release. News Release. Stanford Center for International Development. accessed August 2006. Financial Sector Reforms in India. Macquarie Keeps up with the Rush. available at http://www.nic. Stanford. Media release. —— 2006. The Australian 2004. Technopak 2006. 9 November 2005. Taj Hotels 2005. Tata Sons launches Infiniti retail. —— 2004.tcs. 2006. Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) 2004. aph. 2005. accessed March 2006.tcs. available at www. Impending Economic Impact of a Resurgent Indian Retail Sector. 3 January 2006. California.com.au/house/committee/jfadt/. www. Singh. www. accessed February 2006. Prime Minister’s Office. News Release. available at http://www. Bollywood Adds Spice to the Mix. The Australian.tcs. Presentation to Images Retail Forum. TCS Acquires Sydney-based FNS for US$26m.
India: Country outlook. —— 2006b. Thorat. available at www. —— 2006b. Oasis for Sahara. Encouraging signals. Tata retail arm ties up with Woolworths. Deputy Governor. 21 December 2005. Fast Passage for India from Cheap Resource to a Lucrative market. 12 April 2006. Financial inclusion and Millennium Development Goals. speech by Smt. 13 September 2005. 18 June 2006. —— . 24 January 2006. R. 26 August 2005.org. —— 2006d. 22 April 2005. Pune on 16 January 2006. Survey of Higher Education. Longueville Media. 3 June 2006.2006. U. —— 2005b. available at www. paper presented to The Institute of Chartered Accountants Doing Business in Global Markets conference. —— 2006c. More Foreign Investment in IT in ‘06. 23 October 2006.indiatimes. India Economy: Ten-year Growth Outlook. Sydney. 4 October 2006. Todorchevski. available at http:// economictimes.indiatimes. 15 March 2006. The Mercury 2005. available at http://economictimes. accessed August 2006. Not a Healthy Sign. Wipro Infotech Signs Pact with Australian Varsity.19 January 2006. Infosys Closing in on Big Bank Deal’. Roaring tiger or lumbering elephant? Assessing the performance. P A G E 121 .lowyinstitute. —— 2006. 17 November 2004. lowyinstitute.org. 20 October 2005. India: The Next Economic Giant. available at www. Now for the Hard Part: A Survey of Business in India. Panel rules out captive mines for steel makers. The Hindu Business Line 2004. Retailing in India – Coming to Market.References —— 2005b. Australia-India partnership — Natural complementarities. 2005. Economist Intelligence Unit: Country ViewsWire. —— 2005. —— 2006.org. 2006. The Economic Times Online 2005. A World of Opportunity. —— 2006a. The Economist 2005a. 17 November 2005. Foreign Varsities May Hit an Entry Wall Here. Economist Intelligence Unit: Country ViewsWire. accessed March 2006. Doing Business in Asia: Bluescope Steel. prospects and problems of India’s development model. Lowy Institute. accessed February 2006.rbi.com.com. accessed May 2006.in. 1 November 2006. M. The Times of India 2006. Usha Thorat. accessed June 2006. Double Bay 2004. 10 September 2005. 2004. Leighton puts a bet on Wynn casino job. Thirlwell. —— 2006a. 18 January 2006. —— 2006c. Lowy Institute Paper 01. Reserve Bank of India at the 4th Programs on Human Development and State Finances.
The World Bank.ustr.tourismaustralia. Toll’s Offer for Singapore’s SembCorp Logistics Now Open. accessed February 2006. —— 2004. Offshoring of Services: An Overview of the Issues. available in USTR Document Library.org. New York and Geneva.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Toll Holdings 2006. 9 July 2004.worldbank. available at www.htm.au. accessed February 2006. available at http://unstats. —— 2005b.com. Research Links with India. Trade and Development Report 2005: New Features of Global Interdependence. National Accounts Main Aggregates Database.usyd.Inclusive Growth and Service delivery: Building on India’s Success.toll. accessed November 2006. India: How Consumers Purchase Travel. UQ News Online.edu. World Bank 2003. accessed January 2006. Sustaining India’s Services Revolution: Access to Foreign Markets. worldbank. accessed February 2006. available at www.org.tourismaustralia. available at www. accessed March 2006. World Investment Report 2004: The Shift Towards Services. —— 2005a. —— 2006a. UNCTAD 2004. www. available at www.transparency.gov. University of New South Wales (UNSW) 2005. Biotech Boosts Indian Profile. accessed August 2006. Oxford University Press. accessed August 2006. United Nations. available from www. Corruption Perceptions Index. United Nations. available at www.au.items/d065pdf. Tourism Australia 2005. available at www. Reducing Poverty.doingbusiness. University of Sydney 2004. US Trade Representative (USTR) 2005. —— 2006. India: Visitor Profile. New York and Geneva. com. United Nations Statistics Division 2006. University of Queensland 2004.uq.unsw. accessed December 2005. South Asia Region.available at www. United Nations. available from www. accessed February 2006.un. News Release.in.au/news/. New Delhi. India: Sustaining Reform. Domestic Reform and International Negotiations.org.materials.org/unsd/default. News Item 12 August 2005. World Investment Report 2005: Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D. The World Bank. org. US Government Accountability Office 2005. —— 2005. Australia-India Nanotechnology Centre at UNSW. gao.edu. available at www.com. 10 November 2004. P A G E 122 . accessed November 2006. accessed September 2006. New York and Geneva. Media Release 21 March 2006.gov/new. India Development Policy Review. 2005 National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers. accessed February 2006. India. Doing Business in 2005: Removing Obstacles to Growth.au.edu. Transparency International 2005. available at www.
org. zeetelevision.weforum. Reforming Public Services in India: Drawing Lessons from Success. Geneva. Zee Television Limited 2003. 35041-IN. India: Travel & Tourism – Sowing the Seeds of Growth.org/2005tsa/pdf/India. 2005. —— 2006c.htm.org. accessed February 2006. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Sector Unit South Asia. Indian Cable and Satellite Industry: A White Paper.wttc. Report No. accessed August 2006. presented by the World Economic Forum and Confederation of Indian Industry.doingbusiness. World Economic Forum (WEF) 2005. World Trade Report. available at www. accessed January 2006. World Trade Organization (WTO) 2005.wto. accessed March 2006.com. available at www. The 2005 Travel & Tourism Economic Research. available at www.References —— 2006b.worldbank. accessed September 2006. available at www.pdf. World Travel & Tourism Council 2005. Doing Business in 2006: Creating Jobs. India and the World: Scenarios to 2025. www. accessed January 2006. P A G E 123 . org. available at www.org/ en/initiatives/index.
P A G E 124 .
Electronic copies of previous reports and information on how to purchase reports are on the Unit’s website. He spent the early part of his career with the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The Economic Analytical Unit has produced 43 major reports since its establishment in 1990. He holds a Bachelor of Commerce and a Bachelor of Arts from the University of New South Wales.gov.Economic Analytical Unit authorsi This report was co-authored by Robert Walters and Tim Stapleton under the guidance and direction of Richard Andrews. having previously been a policy officer in DFAT’s East Asia Branch.au Internet site: www. He was Counsellor at the Australian High Commission in London between 1990 and 1994. Robert Walters was a Director in the Economic Analytical Unit until mid-2006. Tim Stapleton joined the Economic Analytical Unit in mid-2006. Prior to this he worked in business development and financial management roles for a software development company and taught at the University of New South Wales. economic analytical uniti The Economic Analytical Unit is part of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and is responsible for publishing reports analysing major trade and economic issues of relevance to Australia. Contact details: Economic Analytical Unit Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade RG Casey Building John McEwen Crescent Barton ACT 0221 Australia Telephone: +61 2 6261 2237 Facsimile: +61 2 6261 3493 Email: economic. Executive Director of the Economic Analytical Unit in the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). Trade and Economic Analysis Branch. and North Asia Division. He has a Master of Economics from the Australian National University and a Bachelor of Economics (Honours) from the University of Tasmania.au/eau Executive Director Richard Andrews Directors Evanor Palac-McMiken Bruce Donald Joanne Frederiksen Christopher Lang David Morgan Deputy Directors Gita Nandan Angela Carey Research Analyst Tim Stapleton Office Manager Andrew Flowers P A G E 125 . He has written a number of trade-related analytical publications.dfat. Previously he directed sections in the DFAT’s Office of Trade Negotiations. He has published on trade policy in the Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies. Europe Branch.gov.analytical@dfat. Robert is now with the Commonwealth Grants Commission.
P A G E 126 .
Executive Officer. Investment Manager – India. Trade Commissioner. Business Development Manager. Services Trade and Negotiations Section. Legal Specialist and Roy Clogstoun. Director. Michael Moignard. Trade Development Division. Kristina Hickey. The Unit’s Office Manager. In New Delhi. Senior Manager. Jeff Riethmuller. Rohit Manchanda. Nathan Dal Bon. Assistant Secretary. Director. within the Department of Industry. Sue Begley. Luke Davies. Indigenous Graduate. Graduate Trainee. South East Asia. we thank Ajit Mangrulkar. Consular Officer. Ric Wells. Agriculture Counsellor. we thank Chaitanya Patil. South and West Asia Branch. International Operations. Business Development Manager. Investment Manager. and Hassan Noura. and Jarrod Mander. South Asia and the Pacific. and Ranjit Singh. International Economic and Finance Section. Also within Austrade. Trade and Economic Analysis Branch. India Desk Officer. Acting Post Manager. Justin Brown.Acknowledgments acKnoWledgmentsi Nicholas Coppel. First Secretary – Political. Second Secretary – Political/Economic and Jibby Thomas. Anthony Donnellan. Mahesh Rathod. Economic Analysis & Trade Policy. and Dong Zhang. Project Manager. Andrew Flowers provided administrative support. Nic Brown. within Treasury. former Executive Officer. Trade Analysis Section. Tony Burchill. Principal Economic Advisor. In Bangalore. India and South Asia Section. First Assistant Secretary. Director. within Invest Australia. Asia Policy Unit. Ron Wickes. Middle East and Africa Division. John Webb. we thank the High Commissioner. Trade Development Division. former Manager. was closely involved in oversighting the initial stages of preparation of the report. we thank. Director. Manager. Acting Assistant P A G E 127 . we would like to thank: Deputy Secretary David J Ritchie. John Fisher. Senior Analyst. South and West Asia. John Griffin. Education Counsellor. Other Australian Government agencies provided helpful information: within AusAID. Brendan Pearson. David Holly. Deborah Stokes. In Mumbai. Frank Bingham. Government Industry and Policy Group. Manager – Publications. Sandra Fox. Market Information and Analysis Section. Business Development Manager. and Joyce Pereira. International Liaison Unit. Australian Consulate-General. The Australian High Commission in New Delhi. Tony Urbanski. Manager – Client Services and John Weeden. John McCarthy. Pat Stortz. Megan Jones. Senior Investment Manager. Services and Intellectual Property Branch. Kerrie Burmeister. International Tourism and Bridgette Hargreave. Stephen Howes. and Rachel Small. Senior Trade Commissioner. Acting Director. Asia Economic Section. South Asia & Middle East. Within the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Tourism and Resources. Austrade. and Dr Chakriya Bowman. Deputy High Commissioner. Assistant Secretary. Assistant Secretary. Internet and International Broadcasting Section. the Austrade-managed Australian Consulate-General in Mumbai and Austrade’s office in Bangalore organised the Economic Analytical Unit visits to those cities and provided assistance in producing this report. First Assistant Secretary. Peter Howarth and Phillip Stonehouse. as former Executive Director of the EAU. Manager. former Directors. Steven Yates. Head China Free Trade Taskforce and Acting First Assistant Secretary. Edward Sulikowski. and David Ingham. and Sabina Jain.
Victorian Special Trade Envoy – India and Chairman Australia-India Council. Department of Industry & Resources. Director. Monash Asia Institute. Industry and Regional Development. and Devendra P A G E 128 . Manager Market Development for Middle East and India. General Manager Environment & Planning. Dash.INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Director. Network Technology & Projects. Director of Business Development (South Asia). Bangalore). within the Attorney-General’s Department. Trade Services. Kiran Karnik. and Raji Bhatia. Onshore Counsellor. Executive General Manager – Business Development. Prime Minister’s Advisory Council. International Economy. Within the NSW Department of State and Regional Development. Professor Marika Vicziany. we thank: G. In Delhi. In Queensland. Trade Services. Planning Commission. International Investment. India and Europe. Telstra. Geoff Coates. Dr Bhide. Director.K. Ministry of Commerce & Industry. Confederation of Indian Industry. SMEC. Professor Raghbendra Jha. P. Srivastava. Gavin Winbanks. Development Policy Division. Department of Innovation. International Legal Services Advisory Council. ANZ. Dr Pankaj Patel. Australian Computer Society. In addition. From Victoria. President. Post Olympics. Manager. Senior Manager. David Hawes. Director – India. Market Development Branch. Department of Trade and Economic Development. Corporate Director. Ashok Juneja. we thank Ashish Puri. Commonwealth Bank. we thank Gayle O’Brien. within the Department of Communications. we thank Donna-Marie Griffiths. Invest Victoria. International Financial Services. National Chairman. UNCTAD. Economist. Manager Export Development – Middle East and South Asia. Australian Information Industry Association. Office of International Business and Export. Fiona McAlister. we thank Darren Gribble. Macquarie Bank. Chief Executive Officer. General Manager ICT Development Branch. Head of Government and International Relations. Head of Strategy. Senior Manager. Sally Williams. Trade Manager. Trade Services. Dr Sharat Kumar. In Western Australia. Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies. University of Melbourne. IDP Education Australia Ltd. The National Centre for South Asian Studies. Anna Lavelle. we thank Ellen Lintjens. Edward Mandla. Bharti Tele-Ventures. Quentin StevensonPerks. Program Director. Dr Rangarajan. John Tucker. State Governments in Australia also provided helpful information and suggestions. Qantas. we thank Neville Roach AO. Head of Government and Regulatory Affairs and Monica Murray. Lowy Institute. Special Advisor. within Australian Education International. International Tourism Team. Information Technology and the Arts. NASSCOM. Director. Representative – India. Eric Winton. Manager Trade Services. Director International Relations. and Majundar. International Growth Specialists. Chairman. Senior Manager. Government and Regulatory Affairs. Vince Smith. Department of Premier & Cabinet (now with the Queensland Government Trade and Investment Office. Policy Advisor. Danny Kotlowitz. In South Australia. Dr Rashmi Banga. S P Joshi. past President. Executive Director. International Partnerships. George Di Scala. Westpac. Paul Mason. Senior Research Counsellor. and Henry Ledlie. International Market Development Division. and Mark Lobo. Senior Manager. Victoria Somlyay. Ausbiotech. Manager. Australian Business Ltd. Regulatory & Competition Legal Group. Lindsay Barton. Mark Thirlwell. Deputy Vice Chancellor (International). International Affairs. Australia South Asia Research Centre. Joint Secretary. Lawyer. Professor Frank P Larkins. Australia-India Business Council. Australian National University.
Economist. Hon Director. TATA Consultancy Services. Research Officer. Economist. Fellow. Pankaj Baliga. Assistant Adviser. Sarosh Irani. we thank: Dr Brian Cohen. K. Macquarie Securities (India) Pvt.. Ltd. FICCI. Adviser. Joint Managing Director. and Radhika Choudary. Chief Technology Officer. and Dr Ajit Ranade. Lakshmanan. Assistant Adviser. Global Markets – South Asia. In Mumbai. Consulting Editor. In Bangalore. Bangalore. Director and Country Head – India. Kalpana Morparia. TATA Consultancy Services. Murali Krishnan. Managing Director. Executive Director. Raghvan Srinivasan. Sadagopan. Association of Biotechnology Led Enterprises. Director. ICICI Bank. Dinesh. World Bank. Standard Chartered Bank. Rath. National Council of Applied Economic Research. Senior Fellow.OTSS India. State Government of Victoria. L. President – Group Finance. Ajay Sahai. Anjan Roy. Vice President. Sanjay Hansda. Dr Archana Mahale. P A G E 129 . R. and Dr Anand Kumar. Biocon Ltd. ANZ . D. Director General. Regional Head. Infosys. Director.Acknowledgments Kumar Pant. Business Standard. Group Chief Economist. and Raj Rajesh Kumar. Deputy Director. Wayne Lewis. and Dr Arpita Mukherjee. Commissioner to India. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations. Advisor. Ashish Narain. Pankaj Baliga. Prof S. we thank: Phil Michell. and Shuchita Mehta. Manfred Bertram. Bombay Chamber of Commerce & Industry. Director. Co-founder and Member of the Board. K. Sundeep Bhandari. Federation of Indian Export Organisations. Global Markets. International Institute of Information Technology. ANZ Capital Private Ltd. Additya Birla Management Corporation. Vice President. P. Patnaik. Department of Economic Analysis & Policy. Reserve Bank of India. Asia. IBAHealth.
P A G E 130 .
Kuwait. 139 pages South-South Trade: winning from Liberalisation Published June 2004 (ISBN 1-920959-07-6). 85 pages malaysia: An Economy Transformed Published February 2005 (ISBN 1 920959 25 4). Qatar. Botswana. 95 pages Australia and the United States: Trade and the multinationals in a New Era Published June 2005 (ISBN 1 920959 36 X). 42 pages Economic Aspects of Combating Terrorism in the Transport Sector Published May 2004 (ISBN 1 920959 00 9). and the United Arab Emirates Published September 2005 (ISBN 1 920959 46 7). Oman. 119 pages Papua New Guinea: The Road Ahead Published November 2004 (ISBN 1 920959 23 8). 103 pages Unlocking China’s Services Sector Published February 2006 (ISBN 1 920959 47 5). 113 pages Education without Borders: International Trade in Education Published September 2005 (ISBN 1 920959 51 3).EAU Publications also by the economic analytical uniti ASEAN: Building an Economic Community Published July 2006 (ISBN 1 920959 89 0). 52 pages African Renewal: Business Opportunities in South Africa. 135 pages China’s Industrial Rise: East Asia’s Challenge Published October 2003 (ISBN 0 9750627 4 3). 191 pages China Embraces the world market Published November 2002 (ISBN 0 642 50227 7). 75 pages Globalisation: Keeping the Gains Published May 2003 (ISBN 0 646 42270 7). Uganda. 69 pages More Than Oil: Economic Developments in Bahrain. 103 pages Connecting with Asia’s Tech Future: ICT Export Opportunities Published November 2002 (ISBN 0 642 50244 7). Mozambique and Kenya Published November 2003 (ISBN 0 646 42822 5). 172 pages Solomon Islands: Rebuilding an Island Economy Published July 2004 (ISBN 1 920959 08 4). 200 pages P A G E 131 .
272 pages Asia’s Infrastructure in the Crisis: Harnessing Private Enterprise Published December 1998 (ISBN 0 642 50149 1). Argentina and Chile Published August 2001 (ISBN 0 642 51879 3).INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR UNLOCKING OPPORTUNITY Changing Corporate Asia: what Business Needs to Know (2 parts) Published March 2002 (ISBN 0 642 48780 4/0 642 48781 2/0 642 48779 0). Burma. 205 pages Accessing middle East Growth: Business Opportunities in the Arabian Peninsula and Iran Published September 2000 (ISBN 0 642 47659 4). 512 pages China Embraces the Market: Achievements. 216 pages Asia’s Financial markets: Capitalising on Reform Published November 1999 (ISBN 0 642 56561 9). 380 pages A New Japan? Change in Asia’s megamarket Published June 1997 (ISBN 0 642 27131 3). 110 pages P A G E 132 . Mexico. Constraints and Opportunities Published April 1997 (ISBN 0 642 26952 1). 328 pages The New ASEANs . 87 and 230 pages India: New Economy. Old Economy Published December 2001 (ISBN 0 642 56583).Vietnam. 172 pages Investing in Latin American Growth: Unlocking Opportunities in Brazil. Cambodia and Laos Published June 1997 (ISBN 0642 27148 8). 376 pages Korea Rebuilds: From Crisis to Opportunity Published May 1999 (ISBN 0 642 47624 1). 158 pages Pacific Russia: Risks and Rewards Published April 1996 (ISBN 0 642 24521 5). 250 pages The Philippines: Beyond the Crisis Published May 1998 (ISBN 0 642 30521 8). 119 pages Iron and Steel in China and Australia Published November 1995 (ISBN 0 642 24404 9). 160 pages Transforming Thailand: Choices for the New millennium Published June 2000 (ISBN 0 642 70469 4). 448 pages Asia’s Global Powers: China-Japan Relations in the 21st Century Published April 1996 (ISBN 0 642 24525 8). 294 pages Indonesia: Facing the Challenge Published December 2000 (ISBN 0 642 70501 1).
150 pages Australia and North-East Asia in the 1990s: Accelerating Change Published February 1992 (ISBN 0 644 24376 7).gov. 260 pages ASEAN Free Trade Area: Trading Bloc or Building Block? Published April 1994 (ISBN 0 644 33325 1). 180 pages Changing Tack: Australian Investment in South-East Asia Published March 1994 (ISBN 0 644 33075 9). Hard copies of the reports can also be ordered through www.dfat. 110 pages Australia’s Business Challenge: South-East Asia in the 1990s Published December 1992 (ISBN 0 644 25852 7).EAU Publications Growth Triangles of South East Asia Published November 1995 (ISBN 0 642 23571 6).au/eau. 150 pages Korea to the Year 2000: Implications for Australia Published November 1992 (ISBN 0 644 27819 5). www. 380 pages Southern China in Transition Published December 1992 (ISBN 0 644 25814 4). only available online Overseas Chinese Business Networks in Asia Published August 1995 (ISBN 0 642 22960 0). 364 pages India’s Economy at the midnight Hour: Australia’s India Strategy Published April 1994 (ISBN 0 644 33328 6). full publication catalogues and details of briefing papers. 390 pages Expanding Horizons: Australia and Indonesia into the 21st Century Published June 1994 (ISBN 0 644 33514 9).gov. 136 pages. P A G E 133 .au/eau. 150 pages Grain in China Published December 1992 (ISBN 0 644 25813 6). 318 pages The EAU’s website. as well as executive summaries and tables of contents of earlier reports. 372 pages Subsistence to Supermarket: Food and Agricultural Transformation in South-East Asia Published August 1994 (ISBN 0 644 35093 8).dfat. provides access to recent reports.
au/eau DFAT . Entrepreneurial spirit was unleashed by wide-ranging liberalising reforms that commenced in 1991. Such developments would profoundly shift the world’s centre of economic gravity. what factors need to be taken into account along the way as Australian companies consider whether they should be seeking to participate directly in India’s growth? The report looks beyond headline services such as information technology and IT enabled services to examine emerging export and investment opportunities in education. led by the dynamism of its services sector – particularly high-end. mining. telecommunications. By 2050. logistics and professional services. healthcare. biotechnology. knowledge-intensive services exports.Optimism abounds in India. retail. The Indian economy has shifted to a much faster growth trajectory. And it highlights the successes of some of the Australian services providers behind Australia’s increasingly dynamic services trade relationship with India. sports and related infrastructure. Instead we ask: How might it happen? Is there a plausible path from today’s India to the projected giant economy of 2050? What opportunities might successful pursuit of that path generate for Australian services providers? And finally. construction management. film. financial services. This report does not seek either to substantiate or to disprove these rosy projections. it could be the third largest economy in the world by a significant margin. Studies by a number of prominent analytical organisations are now projecting that India could outperform all of the world’s major economies over the next fifty years.gov. INDIA’S SERVICES SECTOR: Unlocking Opportunity www. tourism. infrastructure.dfat.
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue listening from where you left off, or restart the preview.