1

C I V I L L A W R E V I E W E R – T O R T S A N D D A M A G E S MEMORY AID

A. ELEMENTS OF QUASI DELICT/TORTS

1. act or omission
2. damage or injury is caused to another
3. fault or negligence is present
4. there is no pre-existing contractual relations between the parties
5. causal connection between damage done and act/omission

B. DISTINGUISHED FROM OTHER SOURCES OF OBLIGATION:

CONTRACT QUASI DELICT DELICT
Vinculum Contract Negligent act/ omission Act/omission committed
Juris (culpa, imprudence) by means of dolo
(deliberate,
malicious, in bad
faith)

Proof Needed Preponderance of Preponderance of Proof beyond

evidence evidence reasonable doubt

Defense Exercise of Exercise of diligence of

available extraordinary good father of a
diligence (in family in the
contract of selection and
carriage), Force supervision of
Majeure employees

Pre-existing There is pre-existing No pre-existing contract No pre-existing contract

contract contract

Burden of Contractual party. Prove Victim. Prove the ff.: Prosecution. Accused
proof the ff.: 1. damage is presumed
1. existence of a 2. negligence innocent until the
contract 3. causal contrary is proved.
2. breach connection
between
negligence and
damage done

C. CIVIL LIABILITY IN QUASI-DELICT vs. DELICT

DIFFERENCE QUASI-DELICT DELICT
Liability of Employer Solidary Subsidiary

Reservation Civil aspect of the quasi-delict is Civil aspect is Impliedly instituted

Requirement impliedly instituted with criminal with criminal action
action, but under 2000 Crimpro
Rules it is independent and
separate

Effect of judgement Not a bar to recover civil damages Not a bar to recover civil damages
of acquittal in a EXCEPT when judgement
criminal case pronounces that the negligence
involving same from which damage arise is non-
act/omission existent

D. WHAT MUST BE PROVED

1. Negligence - In action for Quasi Delict, plaintiff must prove negligence of
defendant
Exception:
 2
C I V I L L A W R E V I E W E R – T O R T S A N D D A M A G E S MEMORY AID
a. In cases where negligence is presumed or imputed by law - this is only
rebuttable/presumption juris tantum
b. Principle of res ipsa loquitur (the thing speaks for itself) - grounded on the
difficulty in proving thru competent evidence, public policy considerations
2. Damage/injury

3. Causal connection between negligence and damage (to be actionable)

-Defendant’s negligence must be the proximate cause of the injury sustained by the
plaintiff to enable plaintiff to recover. Thus, if plaintiff’s own conduct is the cause of
the injury there can be no recovery.
*** If plaintiff's negligence is only contributory – he is considered partly
responsible only, may still recover from defendant but must be reduced by the
courts in proportion to his own negligence
Concept of proximate cause – the adequate and efficient cause which in the
natural order of events and under the particular circumstances surrounding the
case, would naturally produce the event

E. DEFENSES:
1. CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE - the theory here is that the plaintiff was
also negligent together with the defendant; to constitute a defense, proximate
cause of injury/damage must be the negligence of defendant
2. CONCURRENT NEGLIGENCE - the theory here is that both parties are
equally negligent; the courts will leave them as they are; there can be no
recovery
3. DOCTRINE OF LAST CLEAR CHANCE - even though a person’s own
acts may have placed him in a position of peril and an injury results, the injured is
entitled to recover if the defendant thru the exercise of reasonable care and
prudence might have avoided injurious consequences to the plaintiff.
*** This defense is available only in an action by the driver or owner of one
vehicle against the driver or owner of the other vehicle involved.
Elements:
a. plaintiff was in a position of danger by his own negligence
b. defendant knew of such position of the plaintiff
c. defendant had the least clear chance to avoid the accident by exercise of
ordinary care but failed to exercise such last clear chance and
d. accident occurred as proximate cause of such failure

Who may invoke: plaintiff

Inapplicable to:
1. joint tortfeasors
2. defendants concurrently negligent
3. as against 3rd persons

4. EMERGENCY RULE – a person is not expected to exercise the same

degree of care when he is compelled to act instinctively under a sudden peril
because a person confronted with a sudden emergency may be left with no time
for thought and must make a speedy decision upon impulse or instinct
• Applicable only to situations that are sudden and unexpected such as to
deprive actor of all opportunity for deliberation
• But action must still be judged by the standard of the ordinary prudent
man
• Absence of forseeability

5. DOCTRINE OF ASSUMPTION OF RISK – Volenti non fit injuria

• Intentional exposure to a known danger
• One who voluntarily assumed the risk of an injury from a known danger
cannot recover in an action for negligence or an injury is incurred
• Plaintiff’s acceptance of risk (by law/contract/nature of obligation) has
erased defendant’s duty so that his negligence is not a legal wrong
• Applies to all known danger
 3
C I V I L L A W R E V I E W E R – T O R T S A N D D A M A G E S MEMORY AID

6. DUE DILIGENCE – diligence required by law/contract/depends on

circumstances of persons, places, things

7. FORTUITOUS EVENT - no person shall be responsible for those events

which cannot be forseen, or which through forseen were inevitable
Exception: assumption of risk

8. DAMNUM ABSQUE INJURIA – a principle that involves damage without

injury, therefore no liability is incurred; there is no legal injury

9. LAW – specific provision of law

10. EXERCISE OF DILIGENCE OF GOOD FATHER OF FAMILY IN SELECTION

AND SUPERVISION OF EMPLOYEES

11. PRESCRIPTION
Injury to right of plaintiff/quasi delict - 4 years
Defamation - 1 year
*** When no specific provision, must be counted from the day they may be
brought

12. PROSCRIPTION AGAINST DOUBLE RECOVERY - Responsibility for

fault or negligence under quasi-delict is entirely separate and distinct from civil
action arising from the RPC but plaintiff cannot recover damages 2x for same act
or omission of the defendant

13. ACT OR OMISSION IS NOT THE PROXIMATE CAUSE OF THE DAMAGE

14. OTHER GROUNDS – MOTION TO DISMISS

a. lack of jurisdiction over person of defendant
b. lack of jurisdiction over subject matter
c. venue improperly laid
d. plaintiff has no legal capacity to sue
e. there is another action pending between same parties for same cause
f. cause of action is barred by prior judgement /statute of limitations
g. pleading asserting claim states no cause of action
h. claim set forth in pleading has been paid, waived, abandoned,
extinguished
i. claim is unenforceable under the provision of statute of fraud
j. condition precedent for filing claim has not been complied with

F. PERSONS LIABLE FOR QUASI DELICT

1. TORTFEASOR - Whoever by act or omission causes damage to another, there
being no fault or negligence is obliged to pay for the damage done (art 2176).
2. PERSONS VICARIOUSLY LIABLE – the obligation imposed in 2176 is demandable
not only for one’s own act or omission but also for those persons for whom one is
responsible (art 2180).
VICARIOUS LIABILITY – law on imputed negligence; a person who
himself is not guilty of negligence is made liable for conduct of another
Reason:
1. public policy – deeper pocket/capacity to pay
2. violation of duty on account of relationship – he is negligent
a) PARENTS - The father, and in case of his death or incapacity, the mother are
responsible for damage caused by:
i. minor children
ii. who live in their company
Note: Father and Mother shall jointly exercise parental authority over common
children. In case of disagreement, father's decision shall prevail (art 211).
 4
C I V I L L A W R E V I E W E R – T O R T S A N D D A M A G E S MEMORY AID
b) GUARDIANS - Guardians are liable for damages caused by the minor or
incapacitated persons who are
i. under their authority &
ii. live in their company
c) OWNERS & MANAGERS OF ESTABLISHMENT/ENTERPRISE - Owners &
managers of establishment or enterprise are responsible for damages caused by
their employees
i. in the service of the branches in which the latter are employed OR
ii. in occasion of their function

d) EMPLOYERS - Employers shall be liable for damages caused by their

employees & household helpers
i. acting w/in the scope of their assigned task
ii. even though the former are not engaged in any business or industry
(unlike in RPC – subsidiary liability of employer attaches in case of
insolvency of employer for as long as the employer is engaged in
business/industry)
Defenses available to employers:
i. exercise of due diligence ins election and supervision of employees
ii. act/omission was made outside working hours and in violation of
company's rules and regulations
e) STATE - The state is responsible when it acts through a special agent, but not
when the same is caused by an official to whom task done properly pertains in
which case art 2176 is applicable
f) SCHOOLS, ADMINISTRATOR, TEACHER - Teachers or heads of
establishments of arts & trades shall be liable for damages caused by their
i. pupils, students & apprentices
ii. as long as they remain in their custody
Note:
Family Code, art 218 - The school, its administration & teachers or the individual,
entity or institution engaged in child care shall have special parental authority &
responsibility over the minor child under their supervision, instruction or custody
(authority & responsibility shall apply to all authorized activities whether inside or
outside the premises or the school, entity or institution).

Family Code, art 219 - those given the authority & responsibility shall be solidarily
& principally liable for damages caused by act/omission of the unemancipated
minor; parents, judicial guardian or person exercising substitute parental
authority over said minor shall be subsidiarily liable.

Difference between Articles 218 & 2180

Art 218 Art 2180
School, admin, teachers engaged in child Teachers, head of establishment in Arts
care are made expressly liable and trades are made expressly liable

Liability of school, admin, teachers is No such express solidary nor subsidiary

solidary and parents are made subsidiary liability is stated
liable

Students involved must be minor Students involved not necessarily minor

Issues:
1. whether or not schools are liable? –
gen rule: schools are not liable as party defendants
exception:
a) FC 218 – schools are expressly made liable
b) St. Francis case ruling – school’s liability as employer
c) PSBA case ruling – school has liability based on contract
So that –
a) if culprit is a teacher, follow St. Francis ruling (sue school as
employer)
 5
C I V I L L A W R E V I E W E R – T O R T S A N D D A M A G E S MEMORY AID
b) if culprit is a stranger, follow PSBA ruling (sue school based on
contract)
c) if culprit is a student - apply 2180
2. does 2180 apply to school of arts & trades only?
No. applies to all including academic institution per weight of jurisprudence
based on obiter of Justice JBL Reyes in the Exconde case
3. basis of liability of teacher – principle of loco parentis (stand in
place of parents)
4. so long as they remain in their custody
• not literal anymore; before: boarding & living with teacher due to
peculiar characteristic of trade & arts school

• as long as they are in the protective, supervisory capacity of

teacher – special parental authority

3. PERSONS EXPRESSLY MADE LIABLE BY LAW (even without fault)

a. POSSESSOR OF AN ANIMAL OR WHOEVER MAKES USE OF THEM EVEN
IF THE ANIMAL IS LOST OR ESCAPED
Except:
1. Force majeure
2. Fault of the injured/damaged person
b. OWNER OF MOTOR VEHICLE - In motor vehicle mishap, the owner is solidarily
liable with the driver if:
1. he was in the vehicle, and
2. could have through due diligence prevented the misfortune
c. MANUFACTURERS & PROCESSORS OF FOODSTUFFS, DRINKS, TOILET
ARTICLES & SIMILAR GOODS
- they are liable for death and injuries caused by any noxious or harmful
substances used although no contractual relation exists between them and
the consumers
d. DEFENDANT IN POSSESSION OF DANGEROUS WEAPONS OR
SUBSTANCES, SUCH AS FIREARMS AND POISON
- there is prima facie presumption of negligence on the part of defendant if
death or injury results from such possession
Exception: The possession or use thereof is indispensable in his
occupation or business
e. PROVINCES, CITIES & MUNICIPALITIES
- shall be liable for damages for the death or injuries suffered by any person
by reason of the defective condition of roads, streets, bridges, public
buildings, and other public works under their control or supervision
f. PROPRIETOR OF BUILDING OR STRUCTURE
- responsible for the damages resulting from any of the ff.:
i. total or partial collapse of building or structure if due to lack of
necessary repairs
ii. explosion of machinery which has not been taken cared of
with due diligence, and the inflammation of explosive substances
which have not been kept in a safe and adequate place
iii. by excessive smoke, which may be harmful to persons or
property
iv. by falling of trees situated at or near highways or lanes, if
not caused by force majeure
v. by emanations from tubes, canals, sewers or deposits of
infectious matter, constructed without precautions suitable to the
place
g. ENGINEER, ARCHITECT OR CONTRACTOR
- if damage of building or structure is caused by defect in construction which
happens within 15 years from construction; action must be brought within 10
years from collapse
h. HEAD OF FAMILY THAT LIVES IN A BUILDING OR PART THEREOF
- liable for damages caused by things thrown or falling from the same
 6
C I V I L L A W R E V I E W E R – T O R T S A N D D A M A G E S MEMORY AID
G. SPECIAL TORTS
1. Art 19, 20, 21 (catch-all provision)
a. ABUSE OF RIGHTS (Art 19)
ELEMENTS:
i. There is a legal right or duty
ii. Which is exercised in bad faith
iii. For the sole intent of prejudicing or injuring another
b. GENERAL SANCTION (Art. 20)
- for all other provisions of law which do not especially provide their own
sanction
ELEMENTS:
i. In the exercise of his legal right or duty
ii. Willfully or negligently causes damage to another

c. CONTRA BONUS MORES (ART 21)

ELEMENTS:
i. There is an act which is legal
ii. But which is contrary to morals, good custom, public order or
public policy
iii. And it is done with intent to injure

2. UNJUST ENRICHMENT
- Arts. 22, 23, 2142 & 2143

3. OSTENTATIOUS DISPLAY OF WEALTH

- Art. 25; thoughtless extravagance for pleasure or display during a period of public want
or emergency

4. VIOLATION OF RIGHT OF PRIVACY AND FAMILY RELATIONS

Art 26 - every person shall respect the dignity, personality, privacy and peace of
mind of his neighbors and other persons.

The ff. acts though they may not constitute a criminal offense, shall produce a cause
of action for damages, prevention and other relief:
i. prying into the privacy of another's residence
iii. meddling with or disturbing the private life or family relations of
another
iii. intriguing to cause another to be alienated from his friends
iv. vexing or humiliating another on account of his religious beliefs,
lowly station in life. Place of birth, physical defect, or other
personal condition

5. DERELICTION OF OFFICIAL DUTY OF PUBLIC OFFICERS

- May be brought by any person suffering from material or moral loss because
a public servant refuses or neglects, without just cause to perform his official
duty (art 27).
REQUISITES:
a. defendant is a public officer charged with the performance of a duty in
favor of the plaintiff
b. he refused or neglected without just cause to perform such duty
(ministerial)
c. plaintiff sustained material or moral loss as consequence of such non-
performance
d. the amount of such damages, if material

5. UNFAIR COMPETITION
- Unfair competition in agricultural, commercial or industrial enterprises or in labor
through the use of force, intimidation, deceit. Machination or other unjust, oppressive or
highhanded method (Art 28)

7. MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
ELEMENTS;
 7
C I V I L L A W R E V I E W E R – T O R T S A N D D A M A G E S MEMORY AID
a. that the defendant was himself the prosecutor/ he instigated its
commencement
b. that it finally terminates in his acquittal
c. that in bringing it the prosecutor acted without probable cause, and
d. that he was actuated by legal malice, that is, by improper and sinister motive

8. VIOLATION OF RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES OF ANOTHER PERSON

9. NUISANCE
a. DEFINITION - any act, omission, establishment, condition of property, or
anything else which:
i. injures or endangers the health or safety to others, or
ii. annoys or offends the senses, or
iii. shocks, defies, or disregards decency or morality, or
iv. obstructs or interferes with the free passage of any public highway
or streets, or any body of water
v. hinders or impairs use of property

b. KINDS:

NUISANCE PER SE - denounced as nuisance by common law or by statute

NUISANCE PER ACCIDENS - those which are in their nature not nuisances, but
may become so by reason of their locality, surroundings, or the manner in which
they may be conducted, managed, etc.

PUBLIC - affects a community or neighborhood or any considerable number of

persons

REMEDIES AGAINST PUBLIC NUISANCES

1. Prosecution under the RPC or any local ordinance
2. Civil action
3. Abatement, without judicial proceeding

WHO MAY AVAIL OF REMEDIES

1. Public officers
2. Private persons - if nuisance is specially injurious to himself; the ff. steps
must be made:
i. demand be first made upon owner or possessor of the
property to abate the nuisance
ii. that such demand has been rejected
iii. that the abatement be approved by the district health
officer and executed with the assistance of local police
iv. that the value of destruction does not exceed P3,000

PRIVATE - one that is not included in the foregoing definition; affect an individual
or a limited number of individuals only

REMEDIES AGAINST PRIVATE NUISANCES

(1). Civil action
(2). Abatement, without judicial proceedings

WHO MAY AVAIL OF REMEDIES

(1). Public officers
(2). Private persons - if nuisance is specially injurious to himself; the ff.
steps must be made:
i. demand be first made upon owner or possessor of the property to
abate the nuisance
ii. that such demand has been rejected
iii. that the abatement be approved by the district health officer and
executed with the assistance of local police
iv. that the value of destruction does not exceed P3,000
 8
C I V I L L A W R E V I E W E R – T O R T S A N D D A M A G E S MEMORY AID

b. DOCTRINE OF ATTRACTIVE NUISANCE

- a class of cases within the general rule that one is liable for the injury resulting
to another from failure to exercise the degree of care commiserate with the
circumstances
• the attractiveness of the premises or of the dangerous
instrumentality to children of tender years is to be considered as an
implied invitation, which takes the children who accepted it out of the
category of a trespasser and puts them in the category of invitees,
towards whom the owner of the premises or instrumentality owes the
duty of ordinary care

H. DAMAGES
Kinds of Damages: (MENTAL)
MORAL
EXEMPLARY
NOMINAL
TEMPERATE
ACTUAL
LIQUIDATED

1. ACTUAL/COMPENSATORY
- adequate compensation for
a) the value of loss suffered
b) profits which obligee failed to obtain
Exception:
a. provided by law
b. by stipulation

WHAT MUST BE DONE TO COLLECT ACTUAL DAMAGES:

1.) Plead or allege the loss
GENERAL DAMAGE - natural, necessary and logical consequences of a
particular wrongful act which result in injury; need not be specifically
pleaded because the law itself implies or presumes that they resulted
from the wrongful act
SPECIAL DAMAGES - damages which are the natural, but not the
necessary and inevitable result of the wrongful act; need to be pleaded
2.) Pray for the relief that claim for loss be granted
3.) Prove the loss

WHEN LOSS NEED NOT BE PROVED:

1.) Liquidated damages previously agreed upon; liquidated damages take
the place of actual damages except when additional damages incurred
2.) If damages other than actual are sought
3.) Loss is presumed (ex: loss if a child or spouse)
4.) Forfeiture of bonds in favor of the government for the purpose of
promoting public interest or policy (ex: bond for temporary stay of alien)
 9
C I V I L L A W R E V I E W E R – T O R T S A N D D A M A G E S MEMORY AID
CONTRACTS & QUASI CONTRACTS
1. Damages in case of Good faith -
a. Natural and probable consequence of breach of obligation, and
b. Parties have forseen or could have reasonably forseen at time obligation was
constituted
2. Damages in case of bad faith
a. it is sufficient that damages may be reasonably attributed to the non-performance of
the obligation

CRIMES & QUASI-CRIMES

• defendant is liable for all damages that are natural and probable consequence of the
act/omission complained of
• not necessary that damages have been forseen or could have been reasonably forseen

a) VALUE OF LOSS SUFFERED - Destruction of things, fines or penalties,

medical & hospital bills, attorney's fees, interests, cost of litigation
Damages recoverable:
1. Medical & Hospital Bills
2. Loss or impairment of earning capacity (in case of physical disability)
3. Damages for death
a) Minimum amount: P50,000
b) Loss of earning capacity unless deceased had permanent physical
disability not caused by defendant so that deceased had no earning
capacity at time of death
c) Support, if deceased was obliged to give support (for period not more
than 5 years)
d) Moral damages

4. Attorney's fees
- as a general rule, attorney's fees (other than judicial costs) are not
recoverable, except:
a) stipulation between parties
b) when exemplary damages are awarded
c) when defendant's act/omission compelled plaintiff to litigate with 3rd
persons or incur expenses to protect his interest
d) malicious prosecution
e) clearly unfounded civil action or proceeding against plaintiff
f) defendant acted in gross & evident bad faith in refusing to satisfy
plaintiff's just & demandable claim
g) legal support actions
h) recovery of wages of household helpers, laborers & skilled workers
i) actions for indemnity under workmen's compensation and employer
liability laws
j) separate civil action to recover civil liability arising from crime
k) when double judicial costs are awarded
5. Judicial costs
6. interest
- discretionary on part of the court

b) UNREALIZED PROFITS - future earnings

WHEN IS DAMAGES MITIGATED:

1. Contributory negligence
2. In contracts. Quasi-contracts and quasi-delict -
a. plaintiff has contravened the terms of contract
b. plaintiff derived some benefit as result of contract
c. in case where exemplary damages are to be awarded, that the
defendant acted upon the advise of counsel
d. that the loss would have resulted in any event
e. that since the filing of the action, the defendant has done his best
to lessen the plaintiff's loss or injury
 10
C I V I L L A W R E V I E W E R – T O R T S A N D D A M A G E S MEMORY AID

2. MORAL DAMAGES - (PBMF-MWSS)

a. Physical suffering
b. Besmirched reputation
c. Mental anguish
d. Fright
e. Moral shock
f. Wounded feelings
g. Social humiliation
h. Serious anxiety
Notes:
• Sentimental value of real or personal property may be considered in
adjudicating moral damages
• The social and economic/financial standing of the offender and the
offended party should be taken into consideration in the computation of moral
damages
• Moral damages is awarded only to enable the injured party to obtain
means, diversions or amusements that will serve to alleviate the moral
suffering he has undergone, by reason of defendant's culpable action and not
intended to enrich a complainant at the expense of defendant

IN WHAT CASES MAY MORAL DAMAGES BE RECOVERED (enumeration

not exclusive):
a. Criminal offense resulting in physical injuries
b. Quasi-delicts causing physical injuries
c. Seduction, abduction, rape or other acts of lasciviousness
d. Adultery and concubinage
e. Illegal or arbitrary detention or arrest
f. Illegal search
g. Libel, slander or other form of defamation
h. Malicious prosecution
i. Acts mentioned in art 309 of the RPC relating to disrespect of the dead and
interference with funeral
j. Acts and actions referred to in arts 21, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34 and 35
k. The parents of the female seduced, abducted, raped, or abused
l. Spouse, descendants, ascendants and brother and sisters for acts mentioned
in art 309
m. Art 2220 - in cases of willful injury to property or breaches of contract where
defendant acted fraudulently or in bad faith

3. NOMINAL DAMAGES
- adjudicated in order that a right of the plaintiff, which has been violated or invaded by
the defendant, may be vindicated or recognized, and not for the purpose of indemnifying
the plaintiff for any loss suffered by him

ELEMENTS:
a. Plaintiff has a right
b. Right of plaintiff is violated
c. Purpose is not to identify but vindicate or recognize right violated

4. TEMPERATE OR MODERATE DAMAGES

- more than nominal but less than compensatory where some pecuniary loss has been
suffered but its amount can't be proved with certainty due to the nature of the case

REQUISITES:
a. Some pecuniary loss
b. Loss is incapable of pecuniary estimation
c. Must be reasonable

5. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
- those agreed upon by the parties to a contract, to be paid in case of breach thereof
 11
C I V I L L A W R E V I E W E R – T O R T S A N D D A M A G E S MEMORY AID
WHEN LIQUIDATED DAMAGES MAY BE EQUITABLY REDUCED:
a. iniquitous or unconscionable
b. partial or irregular performance

6. EXEMPLARY OR CORRECTIVE DAMAGE

- imposed by way example or correction for the public good, in addition to the moral,
temperate, liquidated to compensatory damages