This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Facilities Report 2010
Facilitles Condition Assessment Goals and Objectives
'Ide,ntify sys'tem level mechanical, "ng, electr ca ' and
architectural* expos, es to ide _tify the campus defe,rred maintenance exposure in concert, lith the, in:stlltuti,o:nailmlission.,
R view of building sy,stems to detelrmiine condUion and to define, the mag itude and cost ofe deferred mainte' ance need
Develo'pment ,of system level deferred mai tena_ iee observa,tion by categoriz,ation ,and exp cted Icapitall,co,st
Priioritizethe' de,ferred mainten.ance needs t,o, assist ln the de,ve!lopm.elnl of a phas'e-o'Ut strateglY 'that Icolns,lders, cost, c:onta:i:nme:nt opportunlities and programm'atic needs
Summ'ary offindi,ngs with a completese' of st'a,n;dard reports lorgan"z,ed in an easy tOI use format iorthe deveilopmlent, of future pl',anningffo,rts
A n A ...... A D'V Nole: The Archit'Bctural exposures examined focused on the building exterior 3 _ J"tn.""'",,v-u\n only. Building interiors were not surveyed for Architectura'i eXpOS'Ulies .
.. • ",(1; ...... IIDueA'UOH
Phase, Out St '
- -- -- --
• HID .... " .aU'CATIOH
! Assessment Overview lrnplernentation Inputs & Outputs
IOn Sil,e, As,sessmenti Wal1k .. Through
Di'a1logue with F,a,c,i "ty Operafo _5 Team
Interviews of Buildilng Qlc,cupants
'Off-Slt,e Engineeriing Analysis
Off ... S.:, e Observat on Cost,ing Effort
M,ajo,r Thelme',s, Identificat;io,n
Deaoll LO'sting of
Defe red ~ alntenanee Observat ens
Deferred Ma,ilntenance' Prloject List with
Cap lal Costs
- --- - - - - - -- --
I I!! I .... OH.'< .DuCA"~O"
- - - --
A. n A. AI if: A n V Note: The Pool Mechanical Room Building and the Stadium and its associated E
• ruvv't"VVU\. buildings were also included in this Facilities Condition Assessment.
1110'11.111 .OUC .. .,.,QH
Pr- ority Criteria
~ Prio:nty' 11. Currently Criticall
.~ Plri'o:riity' 2. P',otentiiiailly Critiical iiin a Vea,r
Priority 3a", Necess,ary but Not Ye,t Crlt'lcal- attention within 3 years
,§ Priority 3b" Nece:ssary but Not Yet C:ritiiic,al .. attention within 3 to 10 'years
~ IPriority 4. Recommended o
o Priority Undefiined- Does not meet current codes/standards - grandfa'lhered
-- - ---
• ""QH,." .oue .... TION
IDeferred Maintenanc,e: Critical maintenance that has been delayed and wiiU result in slignifica,nlt added costs, potential prolgraiml
curtailment or mterruptlon I and/or li.albility' lseue. -
IPlanned Maiint,enanc:e: Rlegular maintenance that is essential for the no rma II protection and preservs,tion of' the facllities' structural iintegrity!, functional utillt,Y', and/,or a,8sthetlic imp,act..
IMode,rnizatiion: IModifilcati'ons, or improvements dedicated to, raise the facillity, el,ectrical/mlechanicall systems and/or f'urnishings 'to currentliy accepted standards.
R,egul1at,ory C,ompli.ance: Change's tOI a faciillity to accommodate ,8 modlifiication in code requirements. These ,are typicaUy required
when major renovations occur. --
D1aily' Se'rviic:e: Routine maintenance that includes ,actiivlities such as milnor servlces and dailly fa,ciUly issues.
• HIIQHiII", .OUCA'IIQN
iINS,TIITUTI,ONAL STEWAR,DSIHIIIP CATEGORY
,Alcademic Program: Often corrsetlve work is needed to assure that educational programs can continue to be conducted at the same 'level of quality as has been the' case in the past,
Asslet :Plre.s'e;rv,a,tiion: These ,are projects which" when implemented, willi prevent or correct sit~'ations h~rein the 'facillily 9r system is ,det,eriorating and hence liS los'lng both Its educational and finaricial value.
,eo,s,t Containment: Gertainmainten_ance projects - parficularly in the area of enel'"QY conservation - offer Significant opportunity to' actuaUy save money since all too often a project deferr'ed results in the waste of fue,1 or other expensive resources.
U re n erfac :. Often maintenanoe which has been deferred results in an institutional appearance of "image, hloh aver Iy reflects on the ~ chool and iits goals. Projects ~hiich i:mprove the pUlbU,c interfaces o,f the instiiltulion need to be clearly identifi.ed.
Safety'lStatutory: Hi.ghest priority IS given to_ projects_w~ere correct.iv~ action is needed to assure the safety of the students faculty and staff. Similarly, certain projects must be undertaken to compliy wiith local, stat,e and 'federalll codes.
Stude~t Life,: Projects which are necessary to ensure that the environment in
h h tdlents live soc ahze and work IS both sale as well as I
• • •
- - ~ - -
.. HIOMliiilJIt .DUC",.T.OH
• HICH..,."" ,.ouc ... nON 10
,C3 101' 6 3:'1'-'9~
~ I._::_ _ 'I ,I I"
IDafe,l'JIed &, IPllann - dl lainlenance in~lud ,alii Prtoriity' 1,.2.; nd3al 'Obsel'VaUo,ns
C:a c lila II Renewal I'
I odernlzatl'on Includ' _ alii Priodty 3b & 4 ab eN81tions
IGr-ndfathel'od Inc Iud an ,'rlorib" IU IObervation '
• ARAJ\4AR1( *Grandf.a,thelred ;;; Does not meet current codes/standards 1"
HIGH'." .Due"" ION
Totals by Category Deferred Needs: $26,102,049
Capital Renewal & Modernization Needs: $4,708,151
Grandfathered Needs: $3,016,31
• MECIii\NICAl arEATIG
D EXTER'IOR St£ll
• ELECTRICAL COOU G
• HU:lH'.1'I .DUCATIOl'!
Observation Summary by Building System
Cost by Iinstiitutio,nall Mission
Stud.", Lolf_ Qvallty. $1U92.18oC .331%
. CAL. 15547 J'32 , ft
Total Need; $35 82'6 5119'
- - -- ---- - ----
AItAIWARK 1 ~
• ~,DH.ft IICUCATIO,.
- - ----
Obsel'Yabon SUlmmary by B'uillding Systeml IDeferrecdl Needs, Only
HUUrfO. WAI!511 • ft, \.JM c: . ~ . !tAl.., ,,1,7t" . n
StuMM Ufo Gwray. 'to,12:l.Q74 • 3IVJ.
Total Deferred INeed: $28,102,0'49
Build,lng GSF To'.al $ Oefe,rred $ Oefel'1red/GSF Total/GSF
Strother Cafeteria, 1.2,160~1 $1',460,191 $1,369','923 $112.66, $1:.20.,08
Tudor Han 32,280 $3,380.724 $3.089,284 $95.70 , $1;04.73
English Village 2,6,268 $3.242,573 $.,2t339,134 S89.05 $123..44
CO'Uingham I 67,448 $4.807.218 $4,348.,268 $64.47 $11.27
Norton Ubrary 34.776 $2.459.750 $.2.114.556 $60.81 $70.73
Church Hall 42.,000 $3,,1656,114 $.2.463.481 $58.65 $81.06,
Cavanaugh 48.,042 $2 .. '911.878 $2.590.174 $53,9'1 $60.6,1
1 Martin Performing Arts 3,1.389 $1.510.373 $1.413.354 $45.03 $48.12
I Guinn Audiltorium 5,1.,887 $2.758.23,2 $2.2911,16,54 $44.17 $53,.16
I Pass Buildingl 1,1641 $82.060 $711,02,0 $43.28 850.01
Alumni 5.629 $358,515 $219,233 .$38.95 i $63.69 -- - --
• "'CH •• ~ • e Col c.",,, ,0 ..
- - - -
Building GSF Total $ Deferred S Deferred/GSF TotallGSF
Married Student Housing 15.889 $999',797 $574,442 I $36.15 $62.92
W,ea.thersby Fine Arts 31.274 $983,B06 $897 .• 098 I $28.169 $31.46
Alexand:ria Han 43.152 $.2,,968,.3.291 $1,2,05 .• 788 $.27.'94 $68.7'9
Ba,seball 2,200. I 549,16'68 $47.149 $21.43 $22.58
H:O Westl\lValden 48,48.2 I 5818,021 5633,128 $13 .. 06 $16.87
Nursing Building 7,656 , $102.109 S,93,.341 $12.1.9 $13.34
Maintenance Building 17,1692 $249,141 $195,291 $11.04 514.08
Softball ",200 $11.146 I $9 .. 772 58.14 $9.29
Hixson Student Cant,er 47.,809 .$360,16311 1 $235.3>20 $4.92 $7.51
1 College Oliv,e Apartmenlls 113.,500 5104,490 $49.004 $3.63 $7.74
I Louisiana Athletic Club 64,449 $254,554 $180.751 $2.80 $3,.95
1 ----- - I
AIt4JW.ARK 1 E I
• H'OIH.1II: .DUC:A~'C""
-- - -- --- ---
• HIO' ........ DUlOAT.O" 17
Many buildings covered by fire alarm & fire protection systems
.. . -
ILo'uisliana ,AthletJ:c Club
Select buifdings covered by a fire protecnon systems
W,eathersby Fine ,Arts
.' - I
-- - -- - --- -
• 0.10 .... " ."UCATIOIPI '
New Church Hall
Key buUdings covered by a newer fire' alarm system
. - ..
Impressive new Louisiana Athletic Club building
Main electric service feeds, most 'of tlhe
Newer electronic controls on most equlpment
Cenfralized chilled water system,
Evidence of reguliar malntenan
IExtens:ive use of high efficiency ,(T-8's) light!ing
• ~'QHI':" .OuICA'TiiOH
Executive Summary IM,aJo,rThemes ,_ Architectural
rchltectural IRoofing Issues
W,a'telr lntruslon Roof Access
- - - - -
ARAJWAR1( 2C I
• "10"." .CUCATIOH
! MaJo,rTh,em,es· Architectural
Roofing Issues Exposure: Water lntrusien Examples:
Mull.iple patches throughout the 'Years are failingl
Multiple patches throughout" many areas sliU have active leaks
" ARAM4RK 21
MIO ... ",. .CH,oO"'fIO,"
M:aj',or Themes -Archltectural
Roofing Issues Exposure,: R,oD', Access Exampl! s:
All buildingls are Imis:sing reef access ..
Ptime examples are new buUdings such as CoHege Drive apartments where roof access was not included in the planninq of the bujilding.
College Drive Apartments
• ,""OH.A .CUCATIOI'I
Major Them,es- Arch itectu ra III
Exposure,: ,Old and outdated windows, in need of replacement IExamples:
Windows are ,original to building and have deteriorating wooden sashes and sills.
Window penetrations are exposed to external elements and water infillratjon
--- -- --- - ---- -
.... ,OtH'1It IIIDuCAT'ON
IE lectn ca I
Life ,Safety' lssues
Mli:ss,'ing E:gres:s Li,ghtilng & E,xit S,iian,sge ' E I
Obsollete Fir,e AI,ar,ml Panels
.. ,HIOi'l'UIi .oue,"I110'"
L 'Ife Safety - ssues
Exposure~ Lack of Egress ILighting & Exit Signs in some areas Examples:
Pass Academlc Resource Building
Lack of emergency egress lights and signs
Lack of emergency egress ,lights and si,gns
Mlarrj'ed Student Housing
Lack of emergency egr'ess lights and signs
.... 'O"c'"' .O'UCAT'ON
Life Sa,fet.y lssues
IEx!p:os,ure: ILa"ck of Fire Dete:ctlion Examples.:
Pass Academic Resouroe BuUding
IBuilding has no detectors
Buildin.g has no detectors
Bunding has no detectors
• HIDMIU •• DUCATIOH
Lit:e Safety' Iissues
Exposure' . lre Pa els are ag d and In need of u:pgrade Examples.
Aged corroded fir,s' pane'l
Cavanaugh Hall of Science
Aged fire panet
Aged fire panel
.. NIONII .. GOiOlCA'TION
---- - -- -- - - -
Primary --Iectric Service
'Expo,sure' any aged primary electric service panels in need ,of replacement Exa,mples:
Main distribution panel ag,ed and corroded
Main distribution panel ag;ed and corroded
Main distribution panel aged and corroded and without required access
• HIIO ... " .OUCATIOH
---- --- --
IExp,osure: 'Ollde:r secondary ,e'leetriie :s,e'rviic,es, within R'1tany butd,dingsi 'ExamIPI'I~es:
Sub-panel a,9,ed and willh no spares
Ag,ed fixtures and wiring
- - - -- --
111 HllalM'." ilDUC\ATUlN
ha leal ~~
Older HVAC Equlipment
Underqround ystelmS, Chilled _ ater
'V'AC I Chi led Water Contr'ols
.. Hila""' ..... OUC ... TIOH
Exposure: Older HVAC equiipm,enl Examples:
AHiU is old & in poor condinon, Dual duct system is old technology
Old AHU in poor condition
II "faN.R .OUCAT,OH
AHU in poor conditionl
HVAC.I C:lhiililed Walt,e'r Contlrols
EXIPOSllilr1e: Chilled 'water ,c,onlrio'ls oper,atiinlg limproperly EX3IDpl'es:
Cihiilled: waleI' bridge not slJp,pli),ling proper chilled wa~er t,emperature 10 building
Cavanaugh Halll of SC'ienoe'
Chilled waleI' bridg;e not supplying proper chilled w,ater temperature 10 ltluiilding
Two pumps runnilngl, poor chilled temperatures. ,8lnd ineffic,ienl in,effectuall'controls
• ' ... Ia .... '" .DUC .... 1110N
- ---- - ---
Major Themes ... MI,ech,anic,al
Exposu:re: Chined Water Iliines in need of inspec'lion Examples,:
Underground chiUed walter lines need to be inspected
UndeJl'g:round line to cooling to,wer st,a:ftingl to, rust at suri:ac,e pen,etra:lion
• poUCU-IiI." .DUle_,.ON
Underground Syste:ms Exposure: Ci:ty Water Examples.
Underground. ater lines
Main city water supply to HO West Conditio.n underground unknown
Married Student Housing
Underground waterlines have leaked & have been rerouted along outside of building
- - - -
• "'101'1'11" !lDU'CATlD,.
.. 1-110101." .DuCA'tION 35 I
- __ I
Fa,ciUt.y Condltlon Index" ts 181 ratiio used to measure 'the relative conditlon of a singlie builldiing or porttollo of buUdi!ln'gls. It. is calculated by dividing the Current Replacemlent Value (CR,V) by 'the ,e,xiis't1ing Cost: of Deferred IMaint'8'nance
- - - - -~ -
C,OST' OF D,E~ERREDI MAINTS:NAN'ICE
C,URR'cNT ,REPLACEMENT V~,lUE
NACUBO"s Fell is, an ett:eclive' mle,t.lri,c for r,anking the' condition of assets and usingl it for comparative analysis in a porttono,
• 'lIIa,~.n .OU'CATION
Suggested Condilion Ratios ranges based on NACUBO are as foUo,ws:
based' onl 2,0+' 'vear,s experience
.os to .110
-- - --- - ------ ----- ---
'"' KIOHIiIIII !OIOUCATION
LOUlI,SIIIANA COLLEGE F'ACII,LITY CIONDITION INIDIEX RATING"
Estilmat,ed CUflfient lRepl"acemlent Value (CRV) of Louisiana COlllleg:'e Buill!dings
Total lid enUfi edl Need
Deferred IMaintenance INeed (exc~udes Planned Maintenance, Moderniization & Prj,oriity 1110 '
$84.0 Milliion $35.81M1illllion
F'aciUty C'O'R'dition ,lndeK caiclula'tio,ftS are based: on De,felred ,Mainten,an,oe N,eed' 'O,nly*
COST OF' ,DEFICIENCIES $28, 1'O,2~,U49'
,FACILITV' CONDITION = IN'D,EX
CUR:R'ENT ,RePLACEMENT VJ!U.UE $84,014., 2510
------- ----- -
.ARAJ\.14JlK Not«: ~ P/ann,ed Maintenance, Mo,d,ernizaU~n & Prio'I'ity nr: observations 38
• HICHU .UUC"TID'N 8f.!3 exc/u,ded from th'e cost of deferred mamrenanc,e.
--- ------- ------- -- --
Building Nama DeferNd Current FCI
Maintenance $, Replacement Value
Louisiana CoUage Athletic C,lub $1180,751 $11,640,000 0.02
CoUege Drive Apartmen $49,004 $2(329,000 0.02
Hixson Student Center $235,430 $4,988.000 0.05
Softball $9,772 $184,000 0.05
HO WestJWald:en 56,33,128 55,306.,000 '0.12
Alox31ndria Hall $1.205,788 58.8'06,250 '0.14 -
• "'0"111"': IIII)ILJCATIOH
Maintenance Building Deferred Mainteoance Includes Central PI nt observations. Also the Current IReplacement Value
indudes the cooling lower CRV totals.
AR.AM4RK 4C :
• HIQH.R .OUC""IO"
The following CRV's were provided by the coillege but were not included in the, total Fel analysis:
Bu Idlng N'ame Defer1led Current Fel
Maintenance S Replacement Value
Football StadIum Not Surveyed _1,558,700 N/A.
Sidewalks Not Surveyed $'167,000 N'/A
Fence Not Survoyed $47,000 .."A.
Utility lines N'ot Survoy d $59.000 I KIA, I
Tennis 'Court I N'ot Surveyed S3J4,OOIJi I N'/A
Star,age, Bundlingl N'ot Surveyed $382',0001 N/A, ARAMARK 41
" HIIO"'liilf:f. .DUCATIQH
The' 10 II II! OW hlll gl IG,r,8iph de',pi,cts Ann,u'al Fundln,g' of$10Dtho,II'sand per ,'ealr over ,8 10 ye'sr,Il',eriod and iits, effe,ct en the FCI,ofthe eampus,
~ • All calculations are based on an inflafion rate of 3.0'Yolyear, a OM backlog 42
'" deterioration rate of 3.,O'YoIyear and a platU def,erioration ret« of 2.0%/year.
PlIIIC .... R .OUICA110IH
The 'followiing 'Gr,aph depicts ,Annual ,Funding of $500 Tho,usand per year over 8.10 year period and its effect on the FCI ofthecampus,
. ... - - -
-- - .., I"
... ..- ~ tilt
,. :'5": it .;
,f' or _- - 1 .......
- .... ~
~. -- -~\
... --.. __ --
- - -- - - - -- --
~ .. All calculations are based on an inflation rate of 3.0YoIyear, a DM b'acklog 4"
• deterioration rate of J.Oo/oIyear an,d a plant deterioration rate of 2.0'Yolyear. .....
Hla .... ~ .OUe ... TIOH
-- ... ......._..
The Jolllowing Grapl'h ds'picts A,nlnua',F'u,n'iC1in'g olf $1 Million Iperye,ar o,ver a 10 year pe,riod ,and its, eHeet on the Fei,D" thle campus,
. ~ '. All cetcutettons ere based ,o'n an jnflaUon ~ate of 3.0o/olyear, a OM ,bacJdog 4.:1
• deterior:ation rare of 3.0''UoIyea'r a'nd a p/~Hlr d,ererioration rate of 2.0~oIyear.
The' 'foUowiinlQ 'G!ralph depi"cts Annual Fu'n',rlJng ,of $1'.5 M,IIj;o,n per ye'ar' o,ver a 10 yea'r ped'od and iiits, eHec,t on the Fe:1 of 'the IcalmIPU's.
1 t I
_...., L~ --~ -.....-
'" -t. to «1' '" ~." it .
-~' . ~ . '
..... .' I~ .' •
- ~ -
101 .• 40
0 .• 30
----- - -- ---
~ • AlI,caicuiations are based ,Or1 an inflation rate of 3.0%lyear, a DM back/,og 4£;
• ,deteriora',fion rate of 3.0o/olyear ami a plant deterioration rate of 2.0%ly,ear. ....
The,follllo,wlingi IGlraph deplets An'nua'l Fu,nd'iDg of $'2 Million per 'y,e',alr o,v'er a 10 ,e'a'rpe'TIocl and lts ,effie'ct on the Fe:11 oi'the camlplUs.
AR.AJ\4A.RK . All calculations are based on an inflation rare of 3.D%lyear. a DM back/,og 46
.. dereri,orarion rate of J.Oo/oIyear and a planr deteriomtion rate of 2.09101year.
tHe,H." .'DuC ... TIICH.
The 'fo'liowlin,gl'Graph depii,cts, An'nu',a,' f=;fJ'Rding 0"'3 M'ill;o'n' pier year ever a 10 ye'a'r pe,r:i'od and its effelct on the' Fle:1 o,f t.lhe c3Imlpus,o,
AIt4J\4A.RK ~ All calculations are based on an inflation rare of 3JilYoIy,ear. a OM backlog 47
~ deterioration ('ate of 3.0o/olyear and a plant de,rerioration rate of 2.0YoIyear. I
'C'omlp,aris,on of Assumed IF'undiing ILe'vells
$O.1IM (O.1'~/o O'f CIRV)' $Qi.SIM (0.6Wo of CRV) $11,.OM (1.,2'0/0 of CRV), $11,.5MI (1.,8% of CRV)' $2.0MI (2.4% of CRV),
- - - - - - - --------
~ @ All calcu/af'ions are based on an inflation rate of 4. O'VoIyear, a OM bacJdog 48
• aetertoretion rate of 3.0'YJy,ear and a plan,r deterioration rate of 2.0'YJyear.
• HIQ".ft .DUCATION 49
A,ckn,owlle,d'gl,e our Startiln'Q Point:
• Alii institutions have deferred maintenance
• ,S,'carce resources focused on academlcs ,as it should Ibe
• Competing n,ee,ds of academic proqrarns and facilities
• Need to avoid disruptinq the institution's educational mission
I.' Exponential impact of delayinq deferred maintenance phase-out
.' ~UQMl!lfjJ ,!UHICAl'IOH
we -based 0
Operations Planning and Technical Inventory for the Management of Assets
,. Campen PhysIctJI PIIJIlIlnIotmBlIoo DB
• ~'f}fJfrJ('(ffd WI'
Inventoll)' • E sylJflSot1!ng,V~andPnilfnp • PMr p,.SOfI1mJoII ~~
Integrated system for facilities condlrlon p.haseout program
Combines essential facillfles
pi nnlng into one softwaro packago
• Maxim/us" cllWos (nformatlon to guide effecrlv9 decJsion-m king
• Genornt'es presen',f8t/on quality reports
• Declsion·maklng Quid
• User·frlendly Inler(. ce
• tllQHI!IJl .OUCATIION
Project Specific Strategy:
STRATEGY: Address Specific Campus Projects
R ESU L T: HHJhesl Prioflty ProJecls Addressed Campus Wide
High Priority Needs Per Buildinn--------,.
Building By Building Strategy:
STRATEGY: Toral BUlldmg Renovatlon- Address All Priorities RESULT: All t1f9l2.Priorily Needs Will NQt Be Addressed
.AU Prlorltles Addressed in Sel1ect Buildings
B IIdl F
- :~ •• !..:... : ! : III- :, '11111 : til. __ ! __
I ARAI\4ARK 5~
II! H.ClH.R .OUCI!ITIOH
'1. Cre,at,e a, representative St,e'ering Committee
2. S,et phase-out goals in ,alignmentwl lnsfituton's misslons l 'goalls
3, .. Reviiew overalll themes o,f coillected data 4. Develop apportionment strateqy I targets
1. By Oon:sliituency
2. By Iinstitutional Stewalrdship
3. By Priority
4. By Type (Sa.fety" Code, En.'ergy Saviingsli Comfort, Sustslinabilllity .. etc)
5. By Ilmpact on Fell
5" Develop annual phase-out plan based on avaUablefunds 6 .. Communlcate approach and focus
7 .. Report on spendiing vs. s,tr,a.tegy Itarg,ets 8 .. Mana'ge the data and repeat
I ~RK 53
I ~ HlltilHiiliAl liilDuICA:rtOIN
lnstitutlcnal !Mlli:ssi1o,nvs,,, Camp,us, C,o,nlstitu,e,'nc,i'es,
RE~1NVESTMENT STRATEG HOULD 'TO YOUR MlSSIO
'COAlS VIA INSTITUTIO 'S STRATEGIC PLAN",
.. HIGHII .. IIOUCLliTU:JN
- -- - - -- --- - - ---
.. HIO ... ,." .OUCATI,O,,"
L'OIU! is, lana College
Facllitles Conldi'tions, Assessment Slpe,cial R,eIPo,rt
• 101,1.101 •••• lliJa""'I.o1II
- - - - -
• 101,'.,Il0l •••• ua.""I .... '
I Cottinqharn HaU = Speclal Report : Roofinq Concerns
lP,hol,os below ~sh.oW' wa,l.e·r damage bc.dih at Ihel eomlee and at the llioof deoking whichl is evident at both recent roofing ,patches hlav,e occurred ,and where they have' yella occur.
IRoughly 115Wo ,ofth,e wooden root deckjng, llialft.ers,. sills ,and wai'll studs ar-e in need of either replacement ,O:1i major repalir .. A majority of affected! areas a,lie' within th.e oldest secUonSr ,of the attic alon91 the soumeast sec'li:on of thel building. Addlitiona'll repairs may be needed throughout adja,'cenl env,elope 'wallis
and ltihe,ir s'luds thslt can nol. be seen at thi.s llime.
I .~ -.
,Over.he years slate shingles have been replaced and specific arees have been Ir,e,paired but these repairs, are shari, telim and 'wil,hin 2 to 5 years will fail to keep' the fiool water tight. The' dormers in particula,r require a more lexte,nsive repair prog:ram tOI assure wai,er tightness.
Contlinued deterioration is occumilng throughout shingled areaslhat iha,ve not. been addressed. wood dec~king in particular has, not reoeived ,extensive repairs thus not givin,g localized slat,s repairs, U1e backup requiredror proper fastening.
I • IollaWIIII !!11"YIU".'1roI I
Cottinqham HiaUI - Special Report Roofing Concerns
Som.e areas or Ihe cornlce and fascIal are in extremel,), poor condition wi,lh many areas, of complete wood d,ecay allowing wa.te~lIanimals, and debns into, Ilhe attic as well as huge energy losses from air linfiltration. Most o'f lhe damage looks to be from glUluer probl~ems, :including ():YerRow IJI'Db'lems and g;ene.rallack of yearly inspections and maintenance.
This condition encompasses rougl1ly20~25% of the ea,ves lhro'Ugh.out the' buildin.QI. Comers, and! in,'lers,edions Iloo'k to hav,e the most damage.
I '. ~, _ 5
Cottlnqharn Hall - Special Report Roofing 'Concerns
The pnoto on the left shows some additional areas of dama.ge al'o,ng Ilhe buildings corni,ce while th'e photo on the right indicates the' ractlhat the delerio:ration goes all th:e way into the aUicwilh day:lighl. :showing to the ,exterior.
Roughly 15 I~ocations wer,e idenlifie,d throughout the buildingl wh,ere dayl'ig'ht was visible from Wlilthinlhe attic areas. These areas aile open to the e'lemen,ts and oo,ntinue to aocelerat,e deterioraUon of the Iroof framing and building ,enve~l~ope,.,
I Cottlnqham 'Hall - Specl a III Report
, 'Roofing Concerns
I _ _ _
Proposed Corrective Actio,ns:
locali~ed repairs, and patches have shorlerlife spans 'lhan 211 complete 'roofing system replacemenr. Total re,placement of lhe rooling mal.erial, all shingled areas, flashings, and terracona ridges need to be complelel~ replaced, Reoen'Uy com,plet,ed patches sholll'd C8irt'y 'th.e need fO.f this totall replaoem.ent for 5 years.
Howev,er, IlheJ'ieare s'liII sever,all aClill,e leaks a'nd a.reas that are ,open to the 'elements.
Lo,n,gl'Jierim C,orrective Actions
With advanced buildingl teohnologies" a new roofing produc'shouldl be used! rather than Jie;placing 'in kind. Itsholiidl be noted' !thal this cost is for a typIca'l roof membrane' rep'lacement and does not inc,I'udel ~he e,xtensive' r:epair work req:uiried ror this particu'lar case. An ,approximate shingle system replacement square footage of ,roughly 30,101010 SF
@ $4.,75 per SF. $,142,,:50'0
Immediate COIT,sctive A'ctio,ns
Cormer:s; Addi'tiona'i work must be done to' renovat,e, dormers '1.0 .r,epliC8,te a similar a rc:h il.ectu rail :realurie of 'the current liooting struclure. Dormer windows should be replaced witih ihea.vy duty louvered air vents and metal mesh, The walls and rloating matenal sunounding the sbucture of the dormers shou'ld be carefully re-constructed as pal1. of the roofingllrep:l!aoemen'l to ensure flashings and roofingl components properli,Y 'tie into the new roofingl syst'em. 26 dormers lhrougl'hout theenlirre roof @ r:Qug'hly $20()O per dormer.
Active leaks: roofing repairs shoulo Ibe done immediately for roughly SOO sf @ $60 per SF. $30,000
-- _ - -- ------ -
,. MI' ..... II!lloua • ., ....
_ - - __
Cottinqham Hall - Special Report Roofing Concerns
Immediate Corrective Actio s Cont.
Structural R'epairs: Of the, wooden decking. rafters. sills, and studs, roughly 15% are in need of repair and a replacement. The majority of affected areas are within the oldest sections of the aUic, which is along the southeast section of the buildingl. These areas have extensive rat and continue to be' open to the elements aUow,ing waiter, animals and debris 'to infiltll"at,e tlile ,aUic. These openings a'iso will anow potenUal high winds to pressunze the' aUic space to generate loads on the exis~ing structure that the wood 'rram.ed roof was not desig,ned to, witl1stand.
The northern areas of the building have more' contemporary structural features such as steel beams, and areas of decking that have been reptaced in the past. 10-15 years. The southwest section of the attic area has evidence of accelerated deterioration with small localized areas of rotting, decking. but not 1.0 the same extent as was found in the southeast section.
Corrective actions required for the southeast. attic w,ill! include the re-ibuilding of bearing points for the roof rafters as we'll as, other sl,ructurali members including ceiling and walll fr:amil1g. A more selective corrective' actions will be required for U,e southwest amc. lDecking repairs. will be needed to stop accel'erated detertoratron and prevent further damage to surrounding features.
Repairs and replacements of roughly 3750 SF @ $10 per SF ..
. ARA.MARK ~
., N;j'Uf •• , .'.UIU'P'.W
Cottlnqharn Hall - Special Report Roofinq Concerns
Immediate Corrective Actions Cont.
plaint Cornice, and 1irim: All cornice and trim areas surroundlnq the eaves need to be scraped, sanded, and Ire-painted with one coat of primer and two coats of high quam)' oil based paint. 11,350 Lineal' 'feel of eemee and trims @ $10 per ill:
Cornice Repair: Roughly 25% of these areas will need to' have wooden components replaced due to 'extensive rotor missing components,. In some cases these trim work components will need to be custom manufactured. 333 linear feet @ $30 per LF
Gutt,ers: All gutters will need 'tOI be inspected, cleaned. and repaired. All asscciated drains willalsol need 10 be cleaned and repaired '10 ensure' proper drainage and prevent further overfllow and d,aterioraltion. 1350 linear feet @ $115 per LF
.. HI"H •• 'I."!JlfJ,,,.oIIrw
- - - -
------ - -- --
Cottingham Hall - Special Report
--------------------- --- -
1Iw ,"~HIL Trw _"'?IHft'llfif
Due' to the amount of de~e~i:oraIUon within Ilh;e eav,e sections of cornice, trims. and fascia and addUiional1 assumed deterioratiion ofltte s'tructul",al 'framing at the inter-section of exterior walls and Ute Iraft,er bearing points" it is hi:ghly recommended that an ind'ependent structurat engineering study be condueied of 'the mot' at CotUngham Hall. iFrom ttis study" measures should be' recommenced 10 correct and enhance, the structural integrity iQf the roof. Some of these recommendations should address the affects 'of potentfal hurricane, strength winds on the' l!loofingl structure as it
currentl:y exists ,.
• NI UIl.'I'I ....
-- - -----------------
I Cottingham Hall - Special Report I Roofinq Concerns
For the structurall inlegr,ity o"f'the buHding and 'the iiinterior air quality for the buiUdillgl cccupants, il. is crucial these roolting corrections, repairs, and renovations be seriously considered.
'Complete' Shinglle' IR,eplaceme,:nlt. D'orm,er Renov,alio,ns
11,42,5010' 5;'0,000 310~1000 ,3,7,,5010 113,,500 1101.1001,0 201125'0
Acti,ve Lleak Repalirs S,tlroclur,all R.epaiiirs,
P'aint existingl trimis and comiice C:ornice IRe;p'aks
G,utter Repalirs and ins,:pect.ions
Indiivlidluallyaddedl, thes'e come to $3013,,750 ~ however a soft ICOSt of 3'0% and a 15OJo cont,ingency~or unknown conditions bring:s a total need of $440,438,. The structural ~study fo:r30,,'OOIO is not iincluded iin the, above costs andsholuld be, handled s'epalrate,ly and 'be undelrtak,en prior to, the structUiral reiP'aiir work listed above.
--- - - ---- -----
I ,,~ 11
Cottinqharn Hailll - Special Report Roofing Concerns
. • MI_" •••• UG'YI .... '
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?