## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

TEDDS 10.0 Asia Engineering Library

Page 1 of 44

TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library

Beam analysis ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Beam end connection design (BS5950:Part1:2000) ................................................................................................................... 4 Bolted cover plate splice connection (BS5950:Part1:2000) ........................................................................................................ 5 Boundary column fire design (SCI P313).................................................................................................................................... 5 Building wind load (BS6399:Part2:1997) .................................................................................................................................... 6 Cold formed sections (BS5950:Part5:1998)................................................................................................................................ 7 Column base plate design (BS5950:Part1:2000) ........................................................................................................................ 8 Column load chase down (BS6399:Part1:1996) ......................................................................................................................... 9 Column splice design (BS5950:Part1:2000) ............................................................................................................................... 9 Composite beam design (BS5950:Part3:1990)......................................................................................................................... 10 Compound section properties ................................................................................................................................................... 11 Concrete industrial ground floor slab (TR34) ............................................................................................................................ 11 Concrete specification (BS8500) .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Concrete sub-frame analysis (BS8110:Part1:1997).................................................................................................................. 12 Co-ordinate conversion calculation ........................................................................................................................................... 12 Crane gantry girder (BS5950:Part1:2000) ................................................................................................................................ 13 Dead load calculation................................................................................................................................................................ 13 Drain & sewer design................................................................................................................................................................ 14 Flitch beam analysis & design (BS5268:Part2:2002) ................................................................................................................ 14 Flitch beam design (BS5268:Part2:2002) ................................................................................................................................. 15 Floor vibration (SCI P076/AD256) ............................................................................................................................................ 15 Foundations near trees (NHBC Standards Chapter 4.2)........................................................................................................... 16 Gable framing analysis ............................................................................................................................................................. 16 General member safe load tables (BS5950:Part1:2000) .......................................................................................................... 17 Hipped end loading ................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Historical steelwork simple beam analysis & design ................................................................................................................. 18 Holding down bolts ................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Horizontal alignment (Part 1 TD9/93)........................................................................................................................................ 19 Masonry bearing calculation (BS5628:Part1:2005)................................................................................................................... 19 Masonry rectangular column design (BS5628:Part1:2005)....................................................................................................... 19 Masonry wall panel design (BS5628)........................................................................................................................................ 20 Notional load chase down......................................................................................................................................................... 21 Open channel flow calculation .................................................................................................................................................. 21 Pile cap design (BS8110:Part1:1997) ....................................................................................................................................... 22 Pile group analysis.................................................................................................................................................................... 22 RC beam analysis & design (BS8110:Part 1:1997) .................................................................................................................. 23 RC beam design (BS8110:Part1:1997)..................................................................................................................................... 23 RC beam torsion design (BS8110:Part2:1985)......................................................................................................................... 24 RC column design (BS8110:Part1:1997) .................................................................................................................................. 25 RC crack width calculation (BS8110:Part2:1985) ..................................................................................................................... 25 RC flat slab design (BS8110:Part1:1997) ................................................................................................................................. 26 RC pad footing design (BS8110:Part1:1997)............................................................................................................................ 26 RC pad footing horizontal capacity (BS8110:Part1:1997)......................................................................................................... 27 RC pad footing uplift design (BS8110:Part1:1997) ................................................................................................................... 27 RC raft foundation (BS8110-1:1997/CP65-1:1999) .................................................................................................................. 28 RC simple beam analysis & design (BS8110:Part1:1997) ........................................................................................................ 29 RC slab design (BS8110:Part1:1997) ....................................................................................................................................... 29 RC strip footing design (BS8110:Part1:1997) ........................................................................................................................... 30 RC thermal crack widths (BS8007:1987) .................................................................................................................................. 30 RC wall design (BS8110:Part1:1997) ....................................................................................................................................... 31 Retaining wall analysis & design (BS8002:1994)...................................................................................................................... 32 Rolling load analysis ................................................................................................................................................................. 32

Page 2 of 44

TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library Section properties calculator..................................................................................................................................................... 33 Simple beam analysis & design ................................................................................................................................................ 33 Simple column safe load tables (BS5950:Part1:2000).............................................................................................................. 34 Soakaway design (BRE digest 365) ......................................................................................................................................... 35 Steel angle design (BS5950-1:2000) ........................................................................................................................................ 35 Steel beam analysis & design (BS5950:Part1:2000) ................................................................................................................ 36 Steel beams in torsion (SCI-P-057) .......................................................................................................................................... 36 Steel member design (BS5950:Part1:2000) ............................................................................................................................. 37 Steel simple beam analysis & design (BS5950:Part1:2000) ..................................................................................................... 37 Steel simple beam with torsion analysis & design (SCI-P-057) ................................................................................................ 38 Surface wind load (BS6399:Part2:1997)................................................................................................................................... 38 Swale & filter strip design.......................................................................................................................................................... 38 Timber beam design (BS5268:Part2:2002)............................................................................................................................... 39 Timber connection design (BS5268:Part2:2002) ...................................................................................................................... 39 Timber joist design (BS5268:Part2:2002) ................................................................................................................................. 40 Timber member design (BS5268:Part2:2002) .......................................................................................................................... 40 Timber simple beam analysis & design (BS5268:Part2:2002) .................................................................................................. 41 Underpinning needle beam design (BS8110:Part1:1997)......................................................................................................... 41 Valley beam analysis & design ................................................................................................................................................. 42 Vertical alignment (Part 1 TD9/93)............................................................................................................................................ 42 Vibration of hospital floors (SCI P331) ...................................................................................................................................... 42 Wall load chase down (BS6399:Part1:1996) ............................................................................................................................ 43 Wind girder analysis & design................................................................................................................................................... 44

Page 3 of 44

TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library

BEAM ANALYSIS

• • These calculations analyse any beam arrangement up to 10 spans. The analysis is suitable for simple beams and continuous beams. The loading types available are point load, UDL, VDL, trapezoidal loading, partial UDL and point couple. The support conditions available are fixed, pinned or spring. There are 20 user-definable load combinations.

**BEAM END CONNECTION DESIGN (BS5950:PART1:2000)
**

• From Joints in Simple Construction Volume 1: Design Methods - 2nd Edition (The BCSA/SCI Green Book) and updated in June 2000 for BS5950-1:2000. NOTE - the BCSA/SCI Green Book is currently undergoing revision both for the BS5950-1:2000 amendment and to widen its scope. These calculations will be updated following its republication. The following connection types are handled:o angle cleats. beam to beam beam to beam to beam beam to column web beam to column flange beam to column web to beam o end plates beam to beam beam to beam to beam beam to column web beam to column flange beam to column web to beam o fin plates beam to beam beam to beam to beam beam to column web beam to column flange beam to column web to beam • • • • For a single connection, the calculations perform a check design in accordance with each of the checks as defined in the BCSA/SCI Green Book for the applied loads. The calculations also consider the forces due to structural integrity if required. As appropriate, user defined notches are considered in beam to beam connections The results can be output in full - details for every check, as detailed in the Green Book or in a summary format - one line per check.

•

Page 4 of 44

The validity of the portal frame geometry is checked. Plate to outside of top flange showing four rows of two bolts on each side of the joint Web plate showing three rows of bolts. symmetrical pitched portal frame in fire boundary condition under normal loading. shear and axial forces. These calculations analyse single or multi-span. one bolt per row on each side of the joint Plate to inside of top flange Steel beam section Plate to inside of bottom flange showing four rows of two bolts on each side of the joint Plate to outside of bottom flange BOUNDARY COLUMN FIRE DESIGN (SCI P313) • • • From SCI document ‘SCI P313 – Single Storey Steel Framed Buildings in Fire Boundary Conditions’.1) Page 5 of 44 .TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library BOLTED COVER PLATE SPLICE CONNECTION (BS5950:PART1:2000) • • From BS5950-1:2000 These calculations determine the capacity of a bolted splice connection between two identical sections subjected to bending. and formed using steel plates bolted to the flanges and web using high strength friction grip (HSFG) bolts.0 (SCI guide cl 5. using the ratio L/h > 1.

. The overall load on a building from wind on two opposing walls can be calculated. The pressures are calculated for all the appropriate wall and roof zones. Code of practice for wind loads. as defined in the code. BRE Digest 436 PLAN • • • PLAN B=L 0 deg D=L 90 deg ELEVATION H ELEVATION H D=W B=W Page 6 of 44 . One wind direction is considered for each run of the calculations. The lengths of the various wall zones are also calculated. 1.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library BUILDING WIND LOAD (BS6399:PART2:1997) • • • • Using either the standard or hybrid method. Including Amendment No. You can also enter the values of additional horizontal contributions from roof.1. Recommended Application of BS 6399-2. these calculations determine the dynamic pressure (qs) and the unfactored net surface pressure (p) on the walls and roof of a rectangular building with a flat or pitched roof. BS 6399: Part 2: 1997 . parapet and frictional drag loads so that the overall wind load on the building can be determined in accordance with code clause 2. SCI ED0001. Hence up to four runs would be required to determine the worst suction and pressure loads on any particular wall or roof surface from all wind directions.Loading for buildings: Part 2.6.3.

The user has the option to take account of the increase in yield strength arising from the cold forming of the section. For the case of welded end connection it is assumed that no bending moments arise due to eccentricity of the connection. the moments arising due to the eccentric bolted connection are calculated and considered in the design. The channels and top hat sections must have at least one axis of symmetry. If appropriate. For the bolted case. It is considered that this may be useful for the design of the top and bottom members of trusses or lattices where moments will occur if they are modelled as continuous members or where purlins are not located at node points. It covers the design of plain and lipped channels and ‘top hat’ type sections subjected to compression and tension loads plus plain angle sections subjected to tension only loading. it is assumed that the connection is made through the web for the channel and top hat sections and through the leg perpendicular to the x axis for the angle ie through the leg with dimension D (note that the inertia about the x axis may be less than that about the y axis unless the tension force is small (see last paragraph under ‘Limitations/Assumptions’) so effectively the connection can be made through either leg). is drawn to clause 3.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library COLD FORMED SECTIONS (BS5950:PART5:1998) • • This calculation is performed in accordance with BS5950-5:1998.4 of BS5950-5:1998 which states that the effects of cold forming should not be considered if the member is to undergo any form of heat treatment which may produce softening following forming. • • • Page 7 of 44 . Additional externally applied bending moments about the y axis may also be included. The user’s attention. however. The user can select to specify either a welded or bolted end connection.

This means that the required base plate size will always be sufficient to take the footprint of the column section. Equating the calculated effective area and the required bearing area yields a quadratic equation . The calculations incorporate the column section size when calculating the required base plate size. The required bearing area is calculated for the load applied in the column. The user can edit the automatically calculated values to specify the final size of base plate that they want to use.6 fcu. The calculations use the effective area method approach of BS 5950-1:2000 cl 4.2. where fcu is the characteristic cube strength of the concrete base or the bedding material.13. The maximum bearing strength of the base is taken as 0.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library COLUMN BASE PLATE DESIGN (BS5950:PART1:2000) • These calculations determine the minimum size of base plate required to transmit the forces in an axially loaded column into the foundations. The calculations determine the minimum thickness required for the base plate. • • • • • Dp T 2c + T D Bp Dp D B Bp 2c + T T 2c + D Dp D 2c + B B 2c + t 2c + T Bp Page 8 of 44 . The calculations use the specified base plate thickness to recalculate the value of c and determine the effective base plate area.the solution of this determines the minimum base plate size.

The default reduction factors can be overridden with values chosen by the user. The calculations always assume that the top ‘floor’ is a roof. internal external (no division plate) external (with division plate) non-bearing internal external • • For a single connection. Y1 Internal column Y1 / 2 Corner column X1 / 2 X1 Edge column COLUMN SPLICE DESIGN (BS5950:PART1:2000) • From Joints in Simple Construction Volume 1: Design Methods . as detailed in the Green Book or in a summary format . and that all floors below this do qualify.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library COLUMN LOAD CHASE DOWN (BS6399:PART1:1996) • • • • BS 6399: Part 1: 1996 . These calculations work out the factored axial loads on each stack of a multi-storey column due to dead and imposed loading. The following connection types are handled:bearing. edge and corner columns. the calculations perform a check design in accordance with each of the checks as defined in the BCSA/SCI Green Book for the applied loads.the BCSA/SCI Green Book is currently undergoing revision both for the BS5950-1:2000 amendment and to widen its scope. they are set by default to the values in Table 2 of the code.details for every check.Loading for buildings: Part 1. • Page 9 of 44 . Code of practice for dead and imposed loads. or the full imposed loads can be applied with no reduction.one line per check.2 of the code. Imposed loads can be reduced in accordance with clause 6. If the option to include reduction factors is selected. NOTE . The results can be output in full . The calculations cover internal.2nd Edition (The BCSA/SCI Green Book) and updated in June 2000 for BS5950-1:2000. not qualifying for reduction. These calculations will be updated following its republication.

Calculations are performed for the design of simply supported primary or secondary composite internal or edge beams with perpendicular or parallel decking. Code of practice for design of simple and composite beams. discontinuous or continuous decking options and with bars. Secondary beams can be loaded with a series of slab area loads. Checks include for both construction stage design checks. Primary beams can be loaded with up to 3 sets of point loads and a series of beam loads. BS 5950:Part 3:Section 3. and composite stage checks with additional deflection and natural frequency calculations.1:1990 . Code of practice for design . including lateral torsional buckling for parallel decks. mesh or no additional transverse reinforcement.com and find out more about Fastrak Composite Beam.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library COMPOSITE BEAM DESIGN (BS5950:PART3:1990) For industry leading specialised composite beam design software. Longitudinal shear can be resisted using no.Structural use of steelwork in building: Part 1.rolled and welded sections.Structural use of steelwork in building: Part 3. visit www.fastrak5950. A A b1 Primary Beam for design b 2 Primary Beam Secondary Beam for design b1 b 2 PLAN PLAN CROSS SECTION L CROSS SECTION L Page 10 of 44 . • • • • • • BS 5950-1:2000 .

The calculations check the design of an industrial concrete floor slab subjected to a series of point loads. a line load or a uniformly distributed load. maximum water/cement ratio. strength class. Each load case may consist of between one and four point loads. The calculation determines the exposure class or classes for the concrete element under consideration.Third Edition. allowable cements and combinations and allowable aggregates. line loads and uniformly distributed loads.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library COMPOUND SECTION PROPERTIES • These calculations determine the section properties of one of three possible combined section shapes. as applicable. The calculation covers reinforced. The calculations include the design of concrete slabs reinforced with either steel fibres or steel fabric placed to the bottom of the slab. normal or lightweight concrete with intended working life of at least 50 or 100 years. • Page 11 of 44 .A Guide to Design and Construction’ . ‘Concrete Industrial Ground Floors . The concrete may include air-entrainment or not. Wearing surface h d Reinforced concrete slab Steel fabric reinforcement Slip membrane Sub-base Subgrade CONCRETE SPECIFICATION (BS8500) • • • ‘Designed’ or ‘designated’ concrete specification to BS8500-1:2002. two I sections (at 90 degs). From the exposure class or classes the calculation determines.34. an RSC on an I section or a plate on an I section. unreinforced. minimum cement content. The calculations allow input of any number of load cases. the minimum concrete requirements including cover. CONCRETE INDUSTRIAL GROUND FLOOR SLAB (TR34) • • • • The calculations are based on Concrete Society Technical Report No.

using BS 8110: Part 1: 1997 cl.1. The moments generated in the supports are then used to determine the moments in the columns of the sub-frame. The calculations firstly determine the geometry of the three spans (including area and second moment of area). where the loads can be added in order to determine the design shear force and moment. The calculations use the sub-frame geometry and properties within the continuous beam analysis program. given the co-ordinates of a base station it will determine either: The coordinates of the target if the bearing angle from north and distance along the bearing are known. • Col B L B_upper Col C L C_upper SIMPLIFIED SUBFRAME BS 8110:Part 1:1997 cl 3. The size and stiffness of the columns are translated into vertical and rotational spring stiffnesses for the supports used in the continuous beam.1.2.3.N) Len gth L East Target (ETarget.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library CONCRETE SUB-FRAME ANALYSIS (BS8110:PART1:1997) • • These calculations consider a simplified sub-frame consisting only of a beam. These forces can then be optionally used in the RC beam design calculations. the stiffness of the end beams is modelled by applying a stiffness factor to the second moment of area (the fixity of the beam remote ends determine the stiffness of the beams on either side of the central beam).2. North Bearing Station (E. if any. the columns attached to the ends of the beam and the beams on either side. to design span 2 (the central beam).NTarget ) Page 12 of 44 . 3.2.2.3 Span 2 (h x b) Beam to be designed Span 1 (hl x bl ) Span 3 (h2 x b2) L L s1 L s2 L L s3 B_lower C_lower h xb B B CO-ORDINATE CONVERSION CALCULATION • • • h xb C C The calculation is based on the first principles of setting out co-ordinates. The bearing angle from north and distance along the bearing to the target if the coordinates of the target are known. The RC beam design calculations cover one moment check so whether the check is for sagging or hogging must be determined before the design calculations are run.

based on the number of wheels.12 from annex A of Eurocode 1: Actions on structures .1 to A. the web buckling and bearing capacity beneath the concentrated wheel load.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library CRANE GANTRY GIRDER (BS5950:PART1:2000) • • This calculation is performed in accordance with BS5950-1:2000.Densities. aw1 = = aw1 . the capacity of the weld connecting the plate or channel to the ‘I’ section and the vertical and horizontal deflections. • • • • Crab Crane Bridge Gantry Girder Safe Working Load. Wcrane Elevation on Crane Bridge Bogie wheel centres. The user can select to input the values of the ultimate vertical and horizontal shear forces and bending moments or. For the user specified girder. the calculation checks the vertical and horizontal shear capacity. number of wheels and class of crane in accordance with BS2573-1:1983. It covers the design of simply supported gantry girders comprising of either a plain ‘I’ section (UB or UC). For the latter option. crane and crab weight. alternatively. the calculation can be used to determine the maximum wheel loads from the basic crane data input by the user ie.Part 1-1: General actions . The calculation includes a datalist of typical material densities as well as a datalist based on Tables A. aw2 Wheel centres. Page 13 of 44 . the biaxial bending capacity. aw1 2 Wheel End Carriage DEAD LOAD CALCULATION • • • 4 Wheel End Carriage These calculations determine the unfactored dead loads of a series of composite constructions. minimum hook approach. span of crane bridge. safe working load. Wswl Crab weight. ah Span of crane bridge. imposed loads for buildings. In the case of the ‘I’ section with a capping channel the flanges of the channel are assumed to point downwards. If an ‘I’ section with a capping plate or channel is selected the calculation determines both the elastic and plastic section properties for the compound section. For the case where the calculation is used to determine the bending moments and shear forces it can accommodate one crane only on the simply supported span but covers the cases of the end carriage having two or four wheels.aw2 Bogie centres. L c Crane bridge weight. self-weight. The composite constructions are intended to represent the various floor. their spacing and the span of the gantry girder. Wcrab Minimum hook approach. wall and roof components of a building or structure. the calculation determines the wheel arrangement giving the maximum shear force and bending moment before proceeding to calculate them. an ‘I’ section with a capping plate or an ‘I’ section with a capping channel carrying a conventional overhead travelling crane ie not an underslung crane.

L h FLITCH BEAM ANALYSIS & DESIGN (BS5268:PART2:2002) • The elastic analysis and design of simple beams including:o o o o o o o • Steel beams Steel beams with torsion Concrete beams Timber beams Flitch beams Historical steelwork Other beams (BS5950-1:2000) (BS5950-1:2000 and SCI publication SCI-P-057) (BS8110-1:1997) (BS5268-2:2002) (BS5268-2:2002) (BCSA 11/84) (analysis only) The design may be run directly with no analysis should design shear forces and moments already be known. In this instance. no analysis results are returned to your document.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library DRAIN & SEWER DESIGN • These calculations allow the design of a surface water drain or foul sewer. +ve Sign Conventions loads P R P w P reaction a deflection δ x L b Page 14 of 44 .

shear and bearing stresses. and determine the bolting requirements. The calculations generate the section properties of the individual timber and steel elements as well as the composite section. The design is checked against applied bending. Calculates the natural frequency of a floor system using the deflection method. users enter a breadth and depth of section plus the number of members. These calculations check the design of a flitch beam consisting of one or more pieces of timber and one or more steel plates bolted together to form a vertically laminated beam which acts as one unit. The steel plate should be no deeper than the timber members. Timber • • • Steel Timber Steel Timber Steel The sizes of the timber and steel members are user defined. Checks the natural frequency of the floor system and the corresponding response factor. The flitch beam can be designed with either timber or steel elements to the outside of the member. Case 1 Lm Case 3 W L W L L Case 2 Lm Case 4 W1 W L l W W2 L L Page 15 of 44 . FLOOR VIBRATION (SCI P076/AD256) • • • From the Steel Construction Institute publication “Design Guide on the Vibration of Floors” P076. Further calculations check the deflection of the beam.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library FLITCH BEAM DESIGN (BS5268:PART2:2002) • • • From BS 5268-2:2002.

These calculations cover the overall structural analysis and member design checks for gable framing arrangements typically adopted for single-span portal-framed buildings. of the ISE/ICE 'Manual for the design of steelwork building structures' (Nov 1989 edition). one for each member.2) • • These calculations give guidance on meeting the technical requirements and recommendations of the NHBC with regard to foundation depth when building near trees. hedgerows or shrubs and trees. additional calculation runs should be made for that post. • • • Page 16 of 44 . After the structure has been analysed using the 'Analysis calcs' item. If restraint conditions or other factors indicate that another post may be critical. GABLE FRAMING ANALYSIS • • BS 5950-1: 2000 .7.Structural use of steelwork in buildings . particularly in shrinkable soils. buckling restraint conditions etc. April 2003 edition. one combination of simultaneous loads. hedgerows or shrubs which are scheduled to be planted.Part 1. corner posts. The parapet posts themselves are not analysed or designed. For each run of the analysis calculations.2. • One run of the analysis calculations covers one loading condition.e. Member design checks can be carried out for the following members:o • Gable posts. The structural concept for the gable frame bracing is as shown in section 9. Thus several runs of the calculations will be required to determine the critical load combination and wind direction for the design of each member. but any post can be chosen. where further choices can be made on steel grade. one particular intermediate gable post is chosen by the user and the member load effects are calculated for this particular gable post.Rolled and welded section. Hactual Zreq D • NHBC Standards . wall bracing and eaves strut/tie.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library FOUNDATIONS NEAR TREES (NHBC STANDARDS CHAPTER 4. multiple instances of the 'Member design calcs' item can be run in separate calc sections. Parapet posts are assumed to coincide with the gable posts and to be continuous cantilever projections of the gable posts.Chapter 4. to extract the appropriate member geometry and loading details from the analysis calcs and automatically feed these into the standard 'General member design' routine for each member. 10. Typically. gable rafters. The depth calculations take into account of the effects of soil desiccation caused by previous or existing trees. for which all the specified loads are applied. roof bracing. fig. section shape. A parapet with a horizontal top edge can be specified in the definition of the structure. hedgerows and shrubs. i. this will be the post directly below the apex. Code of practice for design .

It is assumed that the flat top portal gives no support to the hip raker. This introduces a small error local to the intersection of the flat top portal and the hip raker. These calculations cover the design of beam and column elements using safe load tables.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library GENERAL MEMBER SAFE LOAD TABLES (BS5950:PART1:2000) • • • From BS 5950-1:2000. HIPPED END LOADING • • These calculations determine the loading on the gable frame. Portal Frame S3 Portal Frame S2 Jack rafters Flat Top Portal Frame S1 Gable Frame = x2 x3 Hip raker 0 α x1 1 2 3 Crsg = Point loads Lspan/2 Page 17 of 44 . For both element types. Beams o • The types of design available are major axis bending and shear. All loads from the raker do pass to the flat top via the local jack rafters. tie check (angles only) and strut buckling checks (all elements). For details on the Simple column check please refer to the Notes for this item (either from within the calculation or in the Library Access System). flat top portal and first portal frame resulting from a hip extending over two frame centres. Columns o o o The types of design available are simple column check (UC only). the relevant input information is entered and then a suitable section can be selected from the relevant safe load/ultimate capacity table. using UB or UC sections or the ultimate UDL capacity for a fully restrained RSC or RSJ.

no analysis results are returned to your document. The calculations also check that the bolt tension capacity for the bolts selected is adequate to resist the tension force • L_proj (Clear projection of bolt above nut) t_was (Washer thickness) t_p (Base plate thickness) t_gr (Thickness of bedding) L_bolt (Overall length of bolts) Concrete Page 18 of 44 . +ve Sign Conventions loads P R P w P reaction a deflection δ x L b HOLDING DOWN BOLTS • • From 'Holding down systems for steel stanchions' BCSA/Constrado guide to holding down systems. These calculations determine the embedment depth of one of a pair of holding down bolts. In this instance. and using table 1 from the BCSA/Constrado guide.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library HISTORICAL STEELWORK SIMPLE BEAM ANALYSIS & DESIGN • The elastic analysis and design of simple beams including:o o o o o o o • Steel beams Steel beams with torsion Concrete beams Timber beams Flitch beams Historical steelwork Other beams (BS5950-1:2000) (BS5950-1:2000 and SCI publication SCI-P-057) (BS8110-1:1997) (BS5268-2:2002) (BS5268-2:2002) (BCSA 11/84) (analysis only) The design may be run directly with no analysis should design shear forces and moments already be known. calculate whether the effective conical surface area and concrete shear stress is sufficient to withstand the tension (pull-out) force applied.

the start and end point of the curve are calculated. If required the calculation will check the design bearing stress beneath the concrete spreader. • MASONRY BEARING CALCULATION (BS5628:PART1:2005) • From BS5628-1:2005 Beam Beam Spreader Masonry wall Masonry wall • These calculations check the design bearing stress at the bearing of a beam to determine the requirement for a concrete spreader or padstone. Optional calculations are: o o o o • The minimum stopping sight distance.4 × h below the beam bearing level. MASONRY RECTANGULAR COLUMN DESIGN (BS5628:PART1:2005) • The calculations check the design vertical load resistance of a single leaf masonry column to BS 5628: Part 1: 2005. • Page 19 of 44 . For phasing of the horizontal and vertical curves.Highway link design. which calculates the optimum chord length based on the criteria of the length of chord required to approximate the arc length of the curve. Horizontal curve .These calculations design a circular horizontal curve (no transitions). The chainage points are then calculated in relation to this reference point. a reference point on the horizontal curve must be given. This calculation can be phased with the horizontal curve design. Where applicable the appropriate default values are given. minutes and seconds into decimal format. The transition curve length. The calculation will finally check the design bearing stress at a depth of 0. The calculation uses a 'generic number of chords' method. A conversion of the input in degrees.These calculations design a vertical curve and provide the setting out information (reduced levels at the relevant chainage points). or the generic number of points. • Vertical curve . The minimum full overtaking sight distance. or a standard set of 7 points. The calculations also check that the column is within the slenderness limits given in cl 24. As well as either the 7 points.1.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT (PART 1 TD9/93) • • From Part 1 TD 9/93 . The chord length (or frequency of levels) should also coincide with the chord length used in the horizontal alignment calculations. They calculate the design vertical load resistance and compare this against the applied factored vertical load on the column. to enable the same setting out points to be used.

This calculation designs masonry wall panels and sub panels of single-leaf or cavity wall construction. conrete block. natural stone or random rubble masonry. The results reported in the calculation are based on the more favourable of the two arrangements. Walls may be designed using brick. arrangement A where the panels predominantly span vertically and arrangement B where the panels predominantly span horizontally. 1 2 4 1 2 4 3 3 Page 20 of 44 . Where the panel is only supported on three edges sub panel arrangements spanning toward the free edge are automatically ignored. either with or without bed joint reinforcement and with or without masonry piers. Depending on the aspect ratio of the panel and the external support conditions the calculation uses either yield line analysis or simple elastic analysis to determine the appropriate bending moment coefficient.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library MASONRY WALL PANEL DESIGN (BS5628) • • • • • In accordance with BS 5628 Code of practice for the use of masonry . the calculation automatically divides the panel into two sets of sub panels. subjected to horizontal and/or vertical loading. Wall panels may include up to three openings.Part 1: Structural use of unreinforced masonry and Part 2: Structural use of reinforced and prestressed masonry.

Notional horizontal loads are calculated at 1.0% of the factored dead load and at 0.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library NOTIONAL LOAD CHASE DOWN • • • These calculations work out the notional horizontal loads at the roof and each floor level of a multi-storey building. Page 21 of 44 .6 for imposed load. The floor area and perimeter wall lengths can be calculated for a range of building shapes.4 for dead load and 1. by selecting the user-defined shape option. The partial safety factors used are 1. or values for these parameters can be entered directly. Wb Lb Db Hb Lb Hb Lb Lb Lb OPEN CHANNEL FLOW CALCULATION • These calculations determine the discharge of an open channel which may consist of multiple sections.5% of the combined factored dead and imposed loads.

Express P1 in terms of rateX and rateY – eqn.866s P2 0.1 to solve P1. Substitute eqn. Substitute rateY back into eqn.4. Sum all the pile reactions in terms of P1. subject to vertical axial loading from a concentric or eccentric column 4 Pile Cap.3. Code of practice for design and construction. 9. rateY and P1 to solve remaining pile reactions.2 to solve rateY. Use rateX. Take moments about the origin in the x and y directions and divide the resultant moment values by the total load to get the coordinates of the centroid. expressing the results in terms of P1. three or four pile pile cap.3 to solve rateX. 4.288s w1 s w1 s x s L P3 b y ex Loaded width .2. These calculations offer the option to design a two.Structural use of concrete: Part 2.x. rateX and a rate of increase in the Y-direction. Calculates the centroid and total value of all applied loads.4 into eqn. 8.3 into eqn.1 and eqn. rateX and rate Y and equate them to the total load. rateY.x 3 case 2 ey case 1 3 ex 0. Take moments about the resultant load in both the X and Y direction.1 and express rateX in terms of rateY – eqn. 7. y x φ/5 4 P1 case 4 shear plane 4 P4 φ e b 2 L 1 PILE GROUP ANALYSIS • • • • • • • • • 1. Substitute rateY and rate X into eqn.3 and eqn. 3.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library PILE CAP DESIGN (BS8110:PART1:1997) • • BS 8110 Part 1: 1997 . 2.y. height h with eccentricity w2 e φ e 3 Pile Cap. Substitute eqn. Express all pile reactions in terms of the reaction of the first pile P1 plus a rate of increase in the X-direction. 5. height h s 2 P2 1 P3 case 3 shear plane e φ P1 Ldiag Loaded width . Page 22 of 44 . rate X and rateY – eqn. 6.

1 fcu) The calculations can include nominal or designed compression steel. reinforcement spacing and depth of cover. The calculation can be run in two modes. The calculation includes checks on the beam slenderness. (Design stress from uls loads less than 0. the first mode calculates the area of sagging.if req'd d' NA d Tension Steel . Rectangular rc beams not subject to significant axial load. identifying the appropriate design moments and loads to use in each instance and allowing different reinforcement to be specified as required. This calculation carries out the analysis and design of a reinforced concrete beam. bf hf h h h bf hf b Rectangular section • • b Flanged T section b Flanged L section Moment and shear force values are taken directly from the envelope results. Compression Steel As' . Code of practice for design and construction. hogging and shear reinforcement required in the beam. The second mode allows the user to prepare a full design calculation for the beam. and nominal or designed shear reinforcement.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library RC BEAM ANALYSIS & DESIGN (BS8110:PART 1:1997) • • • From BS8110 Structural use of concrete . outputting this data in a table. The full design mode allows the user to design the beam at any and every cross section they may choose.Structural use of concrete: Part 2.Part 1: Code of practice for design and construction.As b Page 23 of 44 . span/effective depth. • • RC BEAM DESIGN (BS8110:PART1:1997) • • • BS 8110 Part 1: 1997 . a flanged T or a flanged L cross section. The beam can feature a rectangular.

5 of BS8110-1:1997 or CP65:Part 1:1999) h D Area of steel at this level includes that required for bending and torsion c nom c nom L dia Page 24 of 44 .4. In all other respects.11. for a solid rectangular section subjected to a combination of direct shear force and torsional moment. The two codes of practice are very similar in their approach but use slightly different equations for calculating the shear strength of the beam vc.4 of CP65:Part 2:1996 (1999). • • • b Perimeter link only is considered in the design. Internal links not included in the design but may be required for spacing rules (see 3.05 whereas CP65 uses 1. BS8110 adopts a material partial safety factor for steel of 1. if any. The dimensions of the beam are user defined.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library RC BEAM TORSION DESIGN (BS8110:PART2:1985) • The calculation allows the design to be performed in accordance with either clause 2. The calculation checks the user input link properties for the applied shear force and torsional moment and also calculates the area of longitudinal torsion reinforcement required.4 of BS8110-2:1985 or clause 2.6 of BS8110-1:1997 or CP65:Part1:1999) is additional to that required for bending. users enter the breadth and depth of the section plus the concrete and reinforcement properties and both the direct shear force and torsional moment. Longitudinal torsion reinf't at max 300 ctrs (but see 3.2. It determines the quantity of torsional reinforcement (links and longitudinal bars) required.15. In addition. the two codes are identical. This link to be a closed torsion link.5.12.

b. Braced and unbraced columns can be defined under axial load with or without uni/bi-axial bending.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library RC COLUMN DESIGN (BS8110:PART1:1997) • • • • • • • BS 8110 Part 1: 1997 .3 of the code.A s S/2 Stresses / forces S φ εs ε1 Beam section Strain Key dimensions Page 25 of 44 .8. Cl.6 & Appendix B. symmetrically reinforced about the major axis. By selecting the relevant material factors. Columns are automatically classed as short or slender. d the depth to "tension" steel and is dependent upon axis of bending under consideration. Crack checks are performed to BS8110:Pt 2.x / 2 axis z c acr fs . Calculations are performed for the design of columns of solid rectangular section. More highly compressed faces Compression steel (Asc) Minor Axis Y h X h' X Major Axis Shear steel (Asv) "Tension" steel (Ast) Y b b' ch Rectangular Column Note for design D is the section depth. b x h d Neutral εc fc . For slender columns. Code of practice for design and construction. cb RC CRACK WIDTH CALCULATION (BS8110:PART2:1985) • • From BS8110:Part 2:1985 clause 3. additional deflection-induced moments are calculated in accordance with section 3. the calculations can also be compliant to BS 8110 Part 1: 1985. 3.8 & BS8007 Cl 2. Shear perpendicular to the major axis and crack width checks can be included if required.8 This calculation determines the design surface crack width to the tension face of a reinforced concrete section.Structural use of concrete: Part 2.

BS 8110 Part 1: 1997 .Structural use of concrete: Part 2. calculating the requirements for shear reinforcement at successive shear perimeters around each support. The calculations include the option to check the slab for punching shear at each of the supports. Once the calculation has determined the initial reinforcement design the user has the option of amending the reinforcement diameter and spacing at any point within the slab. Square pad footings for uplift. Code of practice for design and construction.5d b cy L by bcx Y = p 1 L 2d1 X L x1 L bx L c1 L c2 L 2d2 Rectangular Pad Base (all base in contact with soil) Page 26 of 44 . based on the specified default reinforcement diameter.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library RC FLAT SLAB DESIGN (BS8110:PART1:1997) • • • This calculation uses yield line theory to carry out an analysis of a reinforced concrete flat slab on a regular grid of concrete columns. shear and moment. The calculations determine the optimum requirements for top reinforcement over each support to satisfy bending criteria and bottom reinforcement for each span to satisfy bending and deflection criteria. Punching area M = V dx F ex Ds Db p 2 1. The slab is considered to be a one way continuous slab analysed and designed separately in both x and y directions. A ex 1 ey ly Span y l x1 Span x B lx l y1 • • 2 ly RC PAD FOOTING DESIGN (BS8110:PART1:1997) • • These calculations offer the option to design rectangular reinforced pad footings for axial.

If required holding down bolts are checked.13 & 6.Structural use of concrete: Part 2. anchors or the self-weight of the base to resist uplift. BS 5950: Part 1: 2000: Sections 4. Code of practice for design and construction.13 & 6. If required holding down bolts are checked. For the holding down bolt checks. For the holding down bolt checks. The uplift calculations permit tension piles. BS 5950: Part 1: 2000: Sections 4. BS 8110 Part 1: 1997 .TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library RC PAD FOOTING HORIZONTAL CAPACITY (BS8110:PART1:1997) • • • • • These calculations offer the option to check rectangular and square pad footings for uplift and for horizontal loading. BS 8110 Part 1: 1997 . The uplift calculations permit tension piles.Structural use of concrete: Part 2.6 and 'Holding down systems for steel stanchions' BCSA / Constrado 1980 Fup Vcv Vcu Lby (Uplift) Ds Db Lbx Note for a square pad footing the variable Lb is used on both axes Pad footing details Page 27 of 44 . Code of practice for design and construction.6 and 'Holding down systems for steel stanchions' BCSA / Constrado 1980 Fup Vcv Vcu Lby (Uplift) Ds Db Lbx Note for a square pad footing the variable Lb is used on both axes Pad footing details RC PAD FOOTING UPLIFT DESIGN (BS8110:PART1:1997) • • • • • These calculations offer the option to check rectangular and square pad footings for uplift and for horizontal loading. anchors or the self-weight of the base to resist uplift.

The calculated value is based on the number of sub-soil types present and their densities and ranges in value from 1. For the internal beams there is the option to have chamfered sides. The mesh may be located in both the top and bottom faces or in the top face only. The user has the option to input the basic diameter of the depression manually or to allow it to be determined by the calculation. It is considered that the calculation is appropriate to low-rise type structures founded on relatively poor ground. The design of the reinforced concrete elements of the raft can be performed in accordance with either BS8110-1:1997 or CP65-1:1999. this should not be included as part of the shear reinforcement. The beam elements must be reinforced in the top and bottom faces with loose bar reinforcement and in addition must have vertical shear reinforcement. It also determines the quantities of reinforcement required to support the loads whilst spanning over theoretical circular depressions in the sub-soil which are assumed to form beneath the raft. The raft may comprise of a plain uniform thickness slab or may have edge thickening beams and optional internal thickening beams. It should be noted that the calculated value is approximate only and the user should verify that the value obtained is appropriate to their particular situation. • • • • A sedgetop Asslabtop A sedgelink hedge hboot hhcorethick Asedgebtm hslab hhcoreslab aedge A sslabbtm bboot bedge Page 28 of 44 .TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library RC RAFT FOUNDATION (BS8110-1:1997/CP65-1:1999) • This calculation assesses the ability of elements of a raft to support various loading arrangements without exceeding the allowable bearing pressure. If inclined reinforcement is provided. There is the option for the edge beams to have a boot to the outer face and/or a chamfer to the inner face. for example in the chamfered face of a beam.5m. The slab element of the raft must be reinforced with square mesh.5m to 3.

TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library RC SIMPLE BEAM ANALYSIS & DESIGN (BS8110:PART1:1997) • The elastic analysis and design of simple beams including:o o o o o o o • Steel beams Steel beams with torsion Concrete beams Timber beams Flitch beams Historical steelwork Other beams (BS5950-1:2000) (BS5950-1:2000 and SCI publication SCI-P-057) (BS8110-1:1997) (BS5268-2:2002) (BS5268-2:2002) (BCSA 11/84) (analysis only) The design may be run directly with no analysis should design shear forces and moments already be known. no analysis results are returned to your document. punching shear. For details of what each check does. deflection and a cover check. In this instance. The calculations will check one way spanning or two-way spanning slabs and cater for simply supported or continuous support conditions. • h dx Asy N o m in a l 1 m w id th Asx S h o rte r S p a n dy h Asy N o m in a l 1 m w id th Asx Longer Span T w o -w a y s p a n n in g s la b (sim p le ) Page 29 of 44 . +ve Sign Conventions loads P R P w P reaction a deflection δ x L b RC SLAB DESIGN (BS8110:PART1:1997) • These calculations check solid slabs supported by beams or walls to BS 8110: Part 1: 1997 . The checks performed are. moment.5. shear. see the notes under ‘Results’ below. optionally.cl 3.

• tw tw ds hw ds dw cw hw bw Wall Reinforced Foundation Note:. This wall type is only relevant if a wall load chase down calculation has been run before this calculation. the calculations check that the spread of the load in the footing is >45 degrees and hence an unreinforced solution is adequate. The correct loads will be picked up automatically in this instance if the same wall type is selected.The variables with subscript 'w' will have an additional i. For reinforced footings the calculations calculate the shear and moment at the face of the wall and calculate the minimum reinforcement required for the base. this will result in accurate or slightly conservative results. The effective depth is calculated using the nominal cover and half the estimated bar diameter. Once the actual bars have been selected. cavity or party walls respectively Pult RC THERMAL CRACK WIDTHS (BS8007:1987) • • • This calculation is performed in accordance with BS8007:1987. party or cavity) is selected. then the cover check may fail and the calculations need to be re-run. the effective depth is assumed to stay the same and the cover is assumed to be dependant upon the bar size. suspended or ground bearing slab elements resulting from thermal shrinkage induced direct tension.c or p subscript representing internal. The effect of this is that if the bar diameter is greater than the initial estimated value. In reality if the placement of the bars is dependant upon the cover then the effect of a greater bar size than that estimated is that the effective depth may be overestimated and hence the calculations should be re-run anyway.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library RC STRIP FOOTING DESIGN (BS8110:PART1:1997) • • • • These calculations start from an applied load per metre run and an allowable bearing pressure. then the effective depth may be underestimated and hence be slightly conservative. For mass concrete foundations. and determine the minimum foundation width required to keep the net bearing pressure below the permissible bearing pressure.c or p subscript representing internal. If a smaller bar size is selected. As a result it is recommended that the initial estimate of bar size is the greatest size that might possibly be used. The calculations require that the wall type (internal. The reinforcement can be different in each face of the element and can be either loose bar or mesh but not a combination in a single element. cavity or party walls respectively bw Wall Mass Concrete Foundation Note:. The actual cover is calculated and compared against the allowable cover. It calculates the estimated maximum crack width in each surface zone of wall.The variables with subscript 'w' will have an additional i. Page 30 of 44 . The calculation also checks the users input reinforcement against the minimum requirements of BS8007:1987.

TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library RC WALL DESIGN (BS8110:PART1:1997) • • • • • • BS 8110 Part 1: 1997 . For slender walls.Structural use of concrete: Part 2. Walls are automatically classed as stocky or slender. Compression steel (Asc) h' h Horizontal steel (Ahor) Tension steel (Ast) 1000 mm Wall (assumed symmetric) Page 31 of 44 . the calculations can also be compliant to BS 8110 Part 1: 1985. Braced and unbraced walls in simply supported or monolithic construction can be defined under axial load with or without transverse shear and bending. additional deflection-induced moments are calculated in accordance with section 3. Crack checks are performed to BS8110:Pt 2. Crack width checks can be included if required.3 of the code. 3. By selecting the relevant material factors.6 & Appendix B.8. Code of practice for design and construction.8 & BS8007 Cl 2. Cl.

Load train comprising up to 10 point loads. and size and spacing of point loads are defined individually. W Surcharge β Moist retained material Water level h stem Wall Depth of excavation dcover t base d ds d exc Toe Base material Downstand t ds l toe t wall l base l heel Saturated retained material Heel h eff Virtual back of wall ROLLING LOAD ANALYSIS • • Rolling load analysis on a continuous steel beam with up to 10 spans. Length of each span. The calculations check the stability of a retaining wall which may feature a sloped or stepped back or face with or without a downstand. either propped or unpropped.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS & DESIGN (BS8002:1994) • • The calculations are in accordance with BS8002:1994 . against sliding and overturning. h water h wall Page 32 of 44 . and determines the maximum and minimum base pressures beneath the wall.Code of Practice for Earth Retaining Structures.

Canada. User defined sections can be created and saved for re-use at a later date. and the section is created automatically. Two examples are also provided that allow the input of variables to specify the shape created by the Section Properties Calculator. with or without holes. The second example allows the parameters of a standard rectangle. USA.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library SECTION PROPERTIES CALCULATOR • • • • The Section Properties Calculator calculates the section properties for a section constructed from rectangles. +ve Sign Conventions loads P R P w P reaction a deflection δ x L b Page 33 of 44 . The calculated section properties are returned to the TEDDS document as variables for use in further calculations. circle or triangle to be entered and the section is created automatically. Singapore and Australian sections. In this instance. • SIMPLE BEAM ANALYSIS & DESIGN • The elastic analysis and design of simple beams including:o o o o o o o • Steel beams Steel beams with torsion Concrete beams Timber beams Flitch beams Historical steelwork Other beams (BS5950-1:2000) (BS5950-1:2000 and SCI publication SCI-P-057) (BS8110-1:1997) (BS5268-2:2002) (BS5268-2:2002) (BCSA 11/84) (analysis only) The design may be run directly with no analysis should design shear forces and moments already be known. triangles and circles. Existing datalists can be used to import sections either as a starting point for new sections or to create combined sections (such as a channel on an I section). Japan. The first example allows the parameters of an I section to be entered. no analysis results are returned to your document. Datalists are available for the UK.

the entered loads and eccentricities of the incoming elements. and the minimum of the compressive resistances for major and minor axes . Using the calculated moment distribution factors (determined from the section’s properties). intermediate (columns above and below) and bottom (column above). the calculations determine the x and y axis moments for the column.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library SIMPLE COLUMN SAFE LOAD TABLES (BS5950:PART1:2000) • • From BS 5950-1:2000 cl 4.7.columns in simple construction. • • • • RA RD RC Labove RB L RA RD RC RB Lbelow Page 34 of 44 . For the easiest selection of a section use the search facility in the safe load tables to narrow down the range of sections that can be selected.top (column below). The moments and axial load can be used to determine the optimum section from the safe load tables. Initial sections are selected for each applicable level and used to determine the moment distribution factors. These calculations allow the design of a column in simple construction using the appropriate safe load tables.Pcx and Pcy.7 . The column can be based on one of three levels . The values used for the final check are the buckling resistance Mbs. The loads also include for up to 4 incoming beams at both top and bottom of the column section being designed (dependent upon which level is selected).

Effective length for compression capacity calculated in accordance with either clause 4.3.d STEEL ANGLE DESIGN (BS5950-1:2000) • • • • Design of single equal and unequal leg angles subjected to compression or tension and/or uni/bi-axial bending all to BS5950-1:2000. These calculations determine the M5 rainfalls using table 1 and then calculate the growth factor for table 2 and. Using these values the inflow for each duration is calculated along with the outflow (given the soil infiltration rate) The calculations can (optionally) determine the soil infiltration rate .8.10.2 (single angle struts) or using Table 22 end restraint factors.2. calculate the relevant rainfall for each rainfall duration. “Design and analysis of urban storm drainage – The Wallingford procedure”. 50 and 100 years using figures taken from “Volume 4 – The Modified Rational Method”.from trial pit size and the test results for the time taken for the water level to fall from 75% to 25% of the effective storage depth in the pit. F +ve x Mx +ve Fvy Fvx y My +ve y x b d Page 35 of 44 . The calculations also check that the soakaway discharges from full to half volume within 24 hours. These calculations determine the maximum storage required for each rainfall duration over a return period of between 5 and 100 years.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library SOAKAWAY DESIGN (BRE DIGEST 365) • • From BRE digest 365 .1 or as a general tension member in accordance with clause 4.6. In order to allow a range of return periods to be selected. table 2 has been extended to include Z2 growth factor values for 5. Section may be restrained or unrestrained against lateral torsional buckling when subjected to bending. published in 1981.7. Tension capacity is calculated either as a simple tension member in accordance with clause 4. The maximum value is compared with the calculated soakaway storage capacity to determine whether the soakaway is suitable. using this.1. 10.Soakaway designs for either rectangular or concentric ring soakaways. 20. The buckling resistance moment is calculated using the ‘basic method’ given in clause 4.6. of the DOE publication. Circular ring pit soakaway • • • • Incoming invert w d w Rectangular pit soakaway dia l w Pit is depth .3.

and combined effects including torsion. UC. Design for torsion. No intermediate lateral. VDL. two eccentric point loads. CHS. (Induced minor axis moments are covered. from the following: o o o o an eccentric uniformly distributed load. one eccentric point load. SHS. follows the guidance in the Steel Construction Institute's publication SCI-P-057 Design of Members Subject to Combined Bending and Torsion. partial UDL and point couple. The support conditions available are fixed. Page 36 of 44 . STEEL BEAMS IN TORSION (SCI-P-057) • • • • • • • • • BS 5950-1: 2000 . No axial loading or applied loading perpendicular to the minor axis. anywhere on the span. acting simultaneously with one pattern of eccentric loading. Full torsional restraint at both ends of beam.Rolled and welded section. Code of practice for design . Single span. the section may be may be free to warp or fully fixed against warping. pinned or spring. simply supported. trapezoidal loading. at quarter points.Structural use of steelwork in buildings . One load combination. The loading types available are point load. At each end. at third points. UDL. or three eccentric point loads. comprising any number and arrangement of concentric loads. The analysis is suitable for simple beams and continuous beams. UB.) Hot-rolled RHS. RSJ or Channel section. straight steel beam loaded normal to the major axis. torsional or warping restraint.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library STEEL BEAM ANALYSIS & DESIGN (BS5950:PART1:2000) • The elastic analysis and design of continuous beams including:o o • • Steel beams Concrete beams (BS5950-1:2000) (BS8110-1:1997) These calculations analyse any beam arrangement up to 10 spans.Part 1.

with or without bending (X and/or Y) RC.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (BS5950:PART1:2000) • • BS 5950-1:2000 . UC. The following section types and design loading are handled by the general member design:o o o o o o o o • UB.5 4.5 Effective length for lateral-torsional buckling (up to 4 segment lengths can be defined for LTB) in a single member 4. no analysis results are returned to your document.8 4.9 Resistance to lateral-torsional buckling Tension members Compression members Members with combined moment and axial force Members with biaxial moments STEEL SIMPLE BEAM ANALYSIS & DESIGN (BS5950:PART1:2000) • The elastic analysis and design of simple beams including:o o o o o o o • Steel beams Steel beams with torsion Concrete beams Timber beams Flitch beams Historical steelwork Other beams (BS5950-1:2000) (BS5950-1:2000 and SCI publication SCI-P-057) (BS8110-1:1997) (BS5268-2:2002) (BS5268-2:2002) (BCSA 11/84) (analysis only) The design may be run directly with no analysis should design shear forces and moments already be known.6 4.5 Section properties Classification of cross-sections Shear capacity Moment capacity 4. with or without bending (X and/or Y) SHS.6 4. In this instance.2. Code of practice for design – rolled and welded sections.Structural use of steelwork in building: Part 1.7 4. with or without bending (X and/or Y) CHS – axial (T/C).3.3. in accordance with the following sections of the code: o o o o o o o o o o 3. +ve Sign Conventions loads P R P w P reaction a deflection δ x L b Page 37 of 44 . with or without bending (X and/or Y) Tees – axial (T/C). RHS – axial (T/C). RC(P) – axial (T/C).3 4.4 3. RSJ – axial (T/C). with or without bending (X and/or Y) Angles – axial (T/C) Double angles – axial (T/C) Flats – axial (T/C) These calculations cover the numerical design checks required on individual members of a 'non-sway' structure.2.

Design Manual for England and Wales. • • Page 38 of 44 . +ve Sign Conventions loads P R P w P reaction a deflection δ x L b SURFACE WIND LOAD (BS6399:PART2:1997) • • • • Using the hybrid method. Including Amendment No.Design Manual for Scotland and Northern Ireland. BRE Digest 436 SWALE & FILTER STRIP DESIGN • Allows the design of swales and filter strips in accordance with the design guidance set out in the CIRIA publications Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems . no analysis results are returned to your document. from grass verge to shrub area. A filter strip is an area of vegetated land through which run off water is directed.Loading for buildings: Part 2. these calculations will determine the dynamic pressure (qs) and the unfactored net surface pressure (p) on a wall or roof surface. BS 6399: Part 2: 1997 .TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library STEEL SIMPLE BEAM WITH TORSION ANALYSIS & DESIGN (SCI-P-057) • The elastic analysis and design of simple beams including:o o o o o o o • Steel beams Steel beams with torsion Concrete beams Timber beams Flitch beams Historical steelwork Other beams (BS5950-1:2000) (BS5950-1:2000 and SCI publication SCI-P-057) (BS8110-1:1997) (BS5268-2:2002) (BS5268-2:2002) (BCSA 11/84) (analysis only) The design may be run directly with no analysis should design shear forces and moments already be known. They are particularly suitable for diffuse collection of water runoff from small residential or commercial developments. A swale is a linear grassed drainage feature in which surface water can be stored or conveyed. 1. Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems . surface water collector or disposal system. Code of practice for wind loads. Filter strips can take any natural vegetated form.they usually lie between a hardsurfaced area and a receiving stream.Soakaway Design. and BRE Digest 365 . In this instance. One wind direction is considered for each run of the calculations. Swales have a significant pollutant removal potential and can be designed to allow infiltration under appropriate conditions. paved areas and roads.

glulam and structural timber composite beams there is an option of setting the beam section on an incline as may be the case in the design of a purlin. screwed or toothed-plate. nailed. Nxb y x y Typical section with multiple members x h Nx b y x h x y θ Underside of beam notched at support Top of beam notched at support Inclined section with multiple members TIMBER CONNECTION DESIGN (BS5268:PART2:2002) • From BS5268-2:2002 Connected member Connected member Main member Main member • These calculations check the design of a simple bolted. The beam section is checked against applied bending. If required it is possible to define grade stresses and modulii for timber. structural timber composite or flitch beam. glulam and structural timber composite beams it is possible to define notches to either the top or bottom of the beam section at either one or both bearings. Further calculations check the beam deflection. Page 39 of 44 . glulam. glulam and timber composite materials. shear and bearing stresses. timber-to-timber or timberto-steel connection consisting of two members. For solid timber.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library TIMBER BEAM DESIGN (BS5268:PART2:2002) • • • • • • From BS5268-2:2002 These calculations check the design of a solid timber. For solid timber.

by entering a breadth and depth of section. The timber section can be user defined. clear span and both dead and imposed loads. The dimensions of the timber joists are user defined. Further calculations check the joist deflection. simply supported timber joist subjected to a uniformly distributed load and a point load. These calculations check a timber section to BS 5268-2:2002. The calculations allow the entry of a notch in the member.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library TIMBER JOIST DESIGN (BS5268:PART2:2002) • • • • • • • From BS5268-2:2002 These calculations check the design of a solid. users enter a breadth and depth of section plus the joist spacing. one where the joist is subjected to an imposed UDL and one where the joist is subjected to an imposed point load. The joist is checked under two separate load cases. The calculations generate the section properties of the individual joists. bending and deflection. shear and bearing stresses. either top or bottom and check the shear accordingly. Multiple floor joists 10 mm s <= 6 span Clear • Joist deflection is limited to the lesser of 0. For each load case the joist section is checked against applied bending. Also available is axial loading (either tension or compression) in which case both the axial load. or selected from a datalist of pre-defined timber sections. If required the user is able to define notches to either the top or bottom flanges at either bearing. Page 40 of 44 . The calculations check for shear. TIMBER MEMBER DESIGN (BS5268:PART2:2002) • • • • From BS 5268-2:2002.003 times the joist span or 14 mm. and the combined effects are checked.

foundation ground beam. width . For more details on the RC member design please read the appropriate notes for that calculation. In this instance. +ve Sign Conventions loads P R P w P reaction a deflection δ x L b UNDERPINNING NEEDLE BEAM DESIGN (BS8110:PART1:1997) • These calculations allow the entry of a needle (ground) beam geometry. wall exg. This information is used to set up the continuous beam analysis program.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library TIMBER SIMPLE BEAM ANALYSIS & DESIGN (BS5268:PART2:2002) • The elastic analysis and design of simple beams including:o o o o o o o • Steel beams Steel beams with torsion Concrete beams Timber beams Flitch beams Historical steelwork Other beams (BS5950-1:2000) (BS5950-1:2000 and SCI publication SCI-P-057) (BS8110-1:1997) (BS5268-2:2002) (BS5268-2:2002) (BCSA 11/84) (analysis only) The design may be run directly with no analysis should design shear forces and moments already be known. no analysis results are returned to your document. The analysis results are then used in the RC member design calculations to perform checks on the pre-defined element size and reinforcement details.b h eo et e mini piles s uplift Page 41 of 44 .

A conversion of the input in degrees. Calculates the natural frequency of a floor system using the deflection method. The chord length (or frequency of levels) should also coincide with the chord length used in the horizontal alignment calculations. The calculations also optionally allow the design of the valley and optionally calculate the stiffness of the beam (see Limitations/Assumptions below). • • • VERTICAL ALIGNMENT (PART 1 TD9/93) • • From Part 1 TD 9/93 . At the point of analysis the input data can be edited. Optional calculations are: o o o o • The minimum stopping sight distance. Secondary beam Primary beam Tie ny Ly Span of Ly slab Lx W = nx L x Secondary beam Page 42 of 44 . the start and end point of the curve are calculated. a reference point on the horizontal curve must be given. Where applicable the appropriate default values are given. This calculation can be phased with the horizontal curve design. For phasing of the horizontal and vertical curves.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library VALLEY BEAM ANALYSIS & DESIGN • These calculations calculate the forces on a valley beam from the basic geometry and loading. • Vertical curve . The transition curve length. minutes and seconds into decimal format. which calculates the optimum chord length based on the criteria of the length of chord required to approximate the arc length of the curve. The number of spans available are 1 to 5 which equates to 2 bays to 10 bays. The calculation uses a 'generic number of chords' method. The minimum full overtaking sight distance. to enable the same setting out points to be used. Horizontal curve . The calculations take the geometry and loads entered and set up the correct information in the continuous beam analysis program for analysis. or a standard set of 7 points.Highway link design. The chainage points are then calculated in relation to this reference point.These calculations design a circular horizontal curve (no transitions). Checks the natural frequency of the floor system and the corresponding response factor.These calculations design a vertical curve and provide the setting out information (reduced levels at the relevant chainage points). • VIBRATION OF HOSPITAL FLOORS (SCI P331) • • • From the Steel Construction Institute publication “Design Guide on the Vibration of Floors in Hospitals” P331. The design of the beam can be via the TEDDS general member design (recommended) or by linking the data provided manually to the S-Steel scratch pad. or the generic number of points. As well as either the 7 points.

under roof loading the total dead load is built up from Tiles. The dead loads are built up from the separate elements of each area. internal or cavity walls. based on the loading from the floors either side of the wall on each level and the self weight of the wall. such as the roof. again based on the loading from the floors above the wall on each level and the self weight of the wall. • • • • Roof 3rd floor h3 h2 2nd floor h1 1st floor h grnd Ground floor w Wall load chase down h below Page 43 of 44 .TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library WALL LOAD CHASE DOWN (BS6399:PART1:1996) • • From BS6399:part 1:1996. Each floor can be timber. all of which have default values but which can changed to suit.g. including sensible default values e. Battens. The total load includes the whole self weight of the wall on the level at which it is being considered. The walls types that can be considered are party. These calculations determine the factored and unfactored design loads on the foundations under the walls in consideration for a multi-storey building. in-situ or precast concrete.. The roof can be timber or steel and sloping or flat. Felt and Rafters etc. These calculations also calculate the factored wall design load at each level of the building.

depending upon what was chosen originally.TEDDS 10 – Asia Engineering Library WIND GIRDER ANALYSIS & DESIGN • • • These calculations calculate the design forces for a 3-6 bay wind girder. RHS or SHS. Optionally the calculations will design the elements using the safe load tables. or as a UDL across the whole girder. The user is presented with the forces in the member and can then select an appropriate section from CHS. The loading can be entered as point loads at each girder node position. Leeward boom RLH L Diagonals R RRH αL αR Windward boom Bay 1 Bay 2 Span Bay 3 PLH P12 P23 PRH Wind Wind Girder Sketch .concept applicable up-to 6 bays Page 44 of 44 .3 bays .

- Unit 15 ( DESIGN OF FOUNDATIONS )
- Detailing to BS 8110
- Design of Circular Concrete Columns
- SHS Design to BS 5950 Part 1
- Design Calculations
- Unit 6 ( DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CONTINUOUS BEAMS )
- Unit 10 ( TORSION )
- Unit 13 ( DESIGN OF SHORT BRACED COLUMNS )
- Base Plate Design - BS Code
- Reinforced Concrete Design to Bs8110
- Design of Beams to BS 8110
- Unit 7 ( DESIGN DETAILS OF BEAMS )
- concrete slab
- Design & Detail to BS 8110-1997
- BCA - Worked Examples Design of Concrete Building
- Concrete Beam and Slab Design Using Prokon
- bs8110
- Unit 9 ( DESIGN OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT )
- 6. Punching Shear Calculation
- Structural Design of Swimming Pools[1]
- Analysis and Design of Inclined Columns
- Unit 5 ( DESIGN OF FLANGED BEAM
- Holding Down Bolts
- Worked Example for Strip Foundation
- Prokon Tutorials
- Unit 8 ( SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE (SLS) )
- BS8110 structure use of concrete
- Reinforced Concrete Design - W.H. MOSLEY
- Design in Reinforced Concrete to BS 8110 1
- Worked Examples for Design of Concrete Buildings

Skip carousel

- Investigation of Web Perforation in Steel I-Beams
- Flexural Behaviour of Concrete Encased Cold Formed Steel Channel Section
- Investigation On Behavior of Cold Formed Steel in Beam Column Connections
- Study on Seismic Analysis of RCC and Steel-Concrete Composite Structure and Cost Comparison with different support conditions
- Prestressed Concrete Design of Flexural Member
- Design and Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Shells
- Weight Optimization of Composite Beams by Finite Element Method
- A Study on Strength and Behaviour of Exterior Beam-Column Joint by using SCC and SFRSCC
- Flexural Behaviour of Sifcon Fibres in Reinforced Concrete Beams
- Design of handling system for heavy rocket motor segments
- Mockingbird Pedestrian Bridge presentation
- Design & Analysis of High rise Building With & Without Floating Column Using Etabs
- The Mechanical Properties of WoodIncluding a Discussion of the Factors Affecting the MechanicalProperties, and Methods of Timber Testing by Record, Samuel J.
- Comparative study on RCC and Steel-Concrete Composite Building using Linear Static Analysis
- As 3572.8-2002 Plastics - Glass Filament Reinforced Plastics (GRP) - Methods of Test Determination of Long Te
- Experimental Study on Flexural Behaviour of Steel-Concrete Composite Beam using Epoxy Adhesive Bonding
- Structural Behaviour of Bubble Deck Slabs and Its Application
- Experimental behaviour on study of sandwich beams
- Design of Variable Stiffness and Variable Damping Vibration Absorber
- Comparative Study between Precast and Cast In-Situ Structure Under Combination of Dynamic Loads and Connections between Precast Elements
- Victor E. Baum v. Jones & Laughlin Supply Co., and Cabot Shops, Inc., 233 F.2d 865, 10th Cir. (1956)
- HB 48-1999 Steel Structures Design Handbook
- Finite Element Modeling of Push-Out Test for Embossed Steel Plate Connector
- As 5100.6-2004 Bridge Design Steel and Composite Construction
- tmp55E6.tmp
- tmp37BD.tmp
- Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United States, 275 U.S. 331 (1928)
- Scientific American Supplement, No. 601, July 9, 1887 by Various
- Childs Point Road Fire Report
- April 2013 MWD Power Point

Skip carousel

- As NZS 1301.431rp-2006 Methods of Test for Pulp and Paper Taber Bending Resistance of Paper and Paperboard
- tmp145D
- As NZS 4357.2-2006 Structural Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) Determination of Structural Properties - Test Met
- Structural Behaviour of Bubble Deck Slabs and Its Application
- Experimental behaviour on study of sandwich beams
- Stress Analysis of High Speed Single Helical Gear by Changing Design Parameter Using FEA Approach
- Design and Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Shells
- Weight Optimization of Composite Beams by Finite Element Method
- Design of handling system for heavy rocket motor segments
- As 5100.6-2004 Bridge Design Steel and Composite Construction
- The Mechanical Properties of WoodIncluding a Discussion of the Factors Affecting the MechanicalProperties, and Methods of Timber Testing by Record, Samuel J.
- As NZS 4063.1-2010 Characterization of Structural Timber Test Methods
- Design and Comparison of Steel Roof Truss with Tubular Section (using SP
- Chassis Frame Torsional Stiffness Analysis
- Dynamic Analysis of RCC Chimney- a review
- Design Tables for Simply Supported Beams with Rolled Steel I Sections
- tmpB4A0
- Design Guidelines for Strengthening of RC Structures Using FRP Materials - State of Art Review
- tmp705.tmp
- Seismic Behaviour of Honeycomb Structure with Conventional Structure by using STAAD Pro
- Structural Behaviour of Bubble Deck Slabs and its Application
- As 5100.5-2004 Bridge Design Concrete
- Design and Analysis of 50 Tonne Crane Hook for optimization
- Factors Affecting on Residual Stresses & Springback in Sheet Metal Bending
- Design Analysis of Crankshaft by Equivalent Beam Method
- Novel Technique of Sodium Silicate in Healing of Concrete
- Experimental Investigation of Precast Horizontal Wall Panel Connection using Reinforcement by Push Off Test
- Flexural Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Different Mineral Admixtures as Cement Replacements
- UT Dallas Syllabus for mech7v80.501.11s taught by Harun Khan (hrk102020)
- Retrofitting of RCC Beam in Flexure by External Cabling Method

Sign up to vote on this title

UsefulNot usefulClose Dialog## Are you sure?

This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?

Close Dialog## This title now requires a credit

Use one of your book credits to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.

Loading